Final Draft Copy Updated 26 Aug 97
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hardware & Software Standards
Hardware & Software Standards Introduction This document identifies the current City of Chicago standards for its hardware and software environments, and is intended primarily for City department and vendor use. These standards do not mean that other software and hardware, which might have been previously listed as standard, may not be used or supported, but the following items should be purchased for any new initiative or growth/replacement needs. Any proposals for non-standard hardware or software purchases or questions/comments should be forwarded to the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) Enterprise Architecture Board for review, and will need to be approved via the Technology Purchase Review and Approval (TPRA) process. Standards denoted with an asterisk (*) are currently under review. Platform Standards Operating System (O/S) Hardware Platform Solaris 10 (Unix) (Oracle) Sun Microsystems RedHat Linux Enterprise Server 6.x, 7.x Dell RedHat Linux Enterprise Server 7.x (PCI Services) Dell VMWare VSphere 6.5U1 Dell Windows 2012 R2 & 2016 (Standard and Enterprise) Dell Windows 7, Windows 10 Dell, Panasonic Page 1 of 6 Last Revised January 2018 Hardware & Software Standards Enterprise Services Type Windows 2008 Server All other platforms Oracle Enterprise 11gR2, 12cR1; Postgres 9.x or 10.x (EnterpriseDB or Database N/A community) Print O/S n/a File O/S n/a Email Exchange 2016 / Office365 n/a Desktops, Laptops, & Tablets Type Model Standard Users Dell OptiPlex 5050 SFF, Dell OptiPlex 7450 All-In-One Mobile User Latitude 12 Rugged Extreme Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 Latitude 12 2 in 1 with case and Doc Latitude 5480 14" Laptop 6th gen proc High-End Workstation Dell Precision T5810 Laptop Accessories Docking- For the E-5470 units, Dell Business Dock - WD15 with 130W Adapter Monitor Dell 23 Monitor – P2317H Page 2 of 6 Last Revised January 2018 Hardware & Software Standards Printing and Scanning The Department of Fleet and Facility Management (2FM) oversees print services for the City of Chicago. -
Java Programming Language, Java SE 6
Java Programming Language, Java SE 6 Electronic Presentation SL-275-SE6 REV G.2 D61748GC11 Edition 1.1 Copyright © 2008, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Disclaimer This document contains proprietary information, is provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure, and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. You may copy and print this document solely for your own use in an Oracle training course. The document may not be modified or altered in any way. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, share, download, upload, copy, print, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, post, transmit, or distribute this document in whole or in part without the express authorization of Oracle. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. If you find any problems in the document, please report them in writing to: Oracle University, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, California 94065 USA. This document is not warranted to be error-free. Sun Microsystems, Inc. Disclaimer This training manual may include references to materials, offerings, or products that were previously offered by Sun Microsystems, Inc. Certain materials, offerings, services, or products may no longer be offered or provided. Oracle and its affiliates cannot be held responsible for any such references should they appear in the text provided. Restricted Rights Notice If this documentation is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone using the documentation on behalf of the U.S. Government, the following notice is applicable: U.S. -
Apple Lisa MRD (Marketing Requirements Document)
LISA MRD/PRD AMENDMENTS I. ADDITIONAL LISA MRDS Some areas covered in the MRD will adhere to the direction stated but will be subject to change until detailed, separate MRDs are prepared for each one. These areas, and the target completion date for each, are as follows: 1. USER INTERFACE May 31, 1980 2. SOFTWARE THEFT PROTECTION May 31, 1980 3. USER SET-UP AND CUSTOMIZING June 30, 1980 4. TERMINAL EMULATION June 30, 1980 5. VISICABINET June 30, 1980 6. WORD PROCESSOR June 30, 1980 7. GRAPHICS EDITOR June 30, 1980 8. PERSONAL APPLICATIONS June 30, 1980 9. MASS STORAGE PERIPHERALS June 30, 1980 10. PRINTERS June 30, 1980 11. NETWORKING AND ELECTRONIC MAIL July 31, 1980 12. DIAGNOSTICS/TESTING July 31, 1980 13. BUSINESS GRAPHICS July 31, 1980 14. INTRODUCTORY INTERACTIVE MANUAL August 31, 1980 15. 'OEM PRODUCTS (DEVELOPMENT TOOLS) August 31, 1980 II. HARDWARE ENGINEERING AMENDMENTS 1. Both Alps and Keyboard Co. (bucket) keyswitches will be pursued as potential options at introduction. Other keyboard technologies will be investigated in parallel but may not be available at introduction. If a better alternative does turn up, it could be made available within a few months of introduction, either as a standard keyboard or as an option. Although the keyboard layout is nearly final, it has not frozen since it is not yet on the critical path. One remaining potential variation is the possible removal of the cursor cluster from the layout. 2. Engineering is concerned that the current cost objectives may not be feasible. 3. Although there is no requirement to have the Problem Analysis Guide (PAG) stowed within LISA, Engineering will continue to pursue methods by which the PAG may be attached to the main unit. -
Epression Integrator'sguide
Mobile Multimedia Cabinet Axis1 Integrator’s Guide Registration Benefits At SMART, we’re always improving our customers’ experience by offering free software upgrades. In the past, we’ve made new features such as handwriting recognition, USB support and SMART Recorder available to all customers, new and old alike. Register your Expression 503 mobile multimedia cabinet to be notified of free upgrades like these in the future. We also want to give you the best technical support possible. Please help us by registering your Expression 503 cabinet and keeping this information available: Serial Number: Date of Purchase: Register online at: www.smarttech.com/registration FCC Warning This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a "Class B" digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception (this can be determined by turning the equipment off and on) the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: l Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. l Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. l Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. -
GOOGLE LLC V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GOOGLE LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT No. 18–956. Argued October 7, 2020—Decided April 5, 2021 Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. In 2005, Google acquired Android and sought to build a new software platform for mobile devices. To allow the millions of programmers familiar with the Java programming language to work with its new Android plat- form, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the Java SE pro- gram. The copied lines are part of a tool called an Application Pro- gramming Interface (API). An API allows programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks for use in their own programs. Over the course of protracted litigation, the lower courts have considered (1) whether Java SE’s owner could copyright the copied lines from the API, and (2) if so, whether Google’s copying constituted a permissible “fair use” of that material freeing Google from copyright liability. In the proceedings below, the Federal Circuit held that the copied lines are copyrightable. -
Sun Glassfish Enterprise Server V3 Preludetroubleshooting Guide
Sun GlassFish Enterprise Server v3 PreludeTroubleshooting Guide Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. Part No: 820–6823–10 November 2008 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. All rights reserved. Sun Microsystems, Inc. has intellectual property rights relating to technology embodied in the product that is described in this document. In particular, and without limitation, these intellectual property rights may include one or more U.S. patents or pending patent applications in the U.S. and in other countries. U.S. Government Rights – Commercial software. Government users are subject to the Sun Microsystems, Inc. standard license agreement and applicable provisions of the FAR and its supplements. This distribution may include materials developed by third parties. Parts of the product may be derived from Berkeley BSD systems, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, the Solaris logo, the Java Coffee Cup logo, docs.sun.com, Enterprise JavaBeans, EJB, GlassFish, J2EE, J2SE, Java Naming and Directory Interface, JavaBeans, Javadoc, JDBC, JDK, JavaScript, JavaServer, JavaServer Pages, JMX, JSP,JVM, MySQL, NetBeans, OpenSolaris, SunSolve, Sun GlassFish, Java, and Solaris are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. -
Instructions Dp10 Microscope Digital Camera System
INSTRUCTIONS DP10 MICROSCOPE DIGITAL CAMERA SYSTEM This instruction manual is for the Olympus DP10 Microscope Digital Camera System. To ensure the safety, obtain optimum performance and familiarize yourself fully with the use of this system, we recommend you study this manual thoroughly before operating the system. Retain this instruction manual in an easily accessible place near the work desk for future reference. A X 7 2 1 8 IMPORTANT Connecting this digital camera system to an Olympus UIS or LB series optical microscope allows you to easily photograph and record the magnified images observed through the microscope. Optimal optical performance may not be achieved if the DP10 microscope digital camera system is mounted on a non-Olympus video microscope system. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS 1. Use the provided AC adapter only. Using another AC adapter will prevent the camera system from operating at optimum levels and may cause it to malfunc- tion. 2. The cords and cables are not resistant to bending or twisting. Do not apply excessive force to them. 3. To prevent toppling of the microscope, keep the total height of the microscope below 1m when attachments are mounted. Safety and Operation Symbols The following symbols are found on the camera and hand switch. Study the meaning of the symbols, and always use the equipment in the safest possible manner. Symbol Explanation Before use, carefully read the instruction manual. Improper use could result in personal injury to the user and/or damage to the equipment. Indicates “ I ” (ON) or “ ” (OFF) of the main switch. Use the provided card or a commercially available 3.3 V SmartMedia. -
Steve Jobs – Who Blended Art with Technology
GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE Steve Jobs – Who Blended Art with Technology V Rajaraman Steve Jobs is well known as the creator of the famous Apple brand of computers and consumer products known for their user friendly interface and aesthetic design. In his short life he transformed a range of industries including personal comput- ing, publishing, animated movies, music distribution, mobile phones, and retailing. He was a charismatic inspirational leader of groups of engineers who designed the products he V Rajaraman is at the visualized. He was also a skilled negotiator and a genius in Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Several marketing. In this article, we present a brief overview of his generations of scientists life. and engineers in India have learnt computer 1. Introduction science using his lucidly written textbooks on Steve Jobs made several significant contributions which revolu- programming and tionized six industries, namely, personal computing, publishing, computer fundamentals. His current research animated movies, music distribution, mobile phones, and retail- interests are parallel ing digital products. In all these cases he was not the primary computing and history of inventor; rather he was a consummate entrepreneur and manager computing. who understood the potential of a technology, picked a team of talented engineers to create what he visualized, motivated them to perform well beyond what they thought they could do. He was an aesthete who instinctively blended art with technology. He hired the best industrial designers to design products which were not only easy to use but were also stunningly beautiful. He was a marketing genius who created demand for his products by leaking tit bits of information about their ‘revolutionary’ features, thereby building expectancy among prospective customers. -
Source Code for Apple's 1983 Lisa Computer to Be Made Public Next Year 31 December 2017, by Seung Lee, the Mercury News
Source code for Apple's 1983 Lisa computer to be made public next year 31 December 2017, by Seung Lee, The Mercury News The museum's software curator, Al Kossow, announced to a public mailing list that the source code for the Lisa computer has been recovered and is with Apple for review. Once Apple clears the code, the museum plans to release it to the public with a blog post explaining the code's historic significance. However, not every part of Lisa's source code will be available, Kossow said. "The only thing I saw that probably won't be able to be released is the American Heritage dictionary for the spell checker in LisaWrite (word processing application)," he said. The Lisa was the first computer with a graphical user interface aimed at businesses—hence its high cost. With a processor as fast as 5 MHz and 1 MB of RAM, the Lisa computer gave users the breakthrough technology of organizing files by Apple Lisa with a ProFile hard drive stacked on top of it. using a computer mouse. Credit: Stahlkocher/ GNU Free Documentation License Apple spent $150 million on the development of Lisa and advertised it as a game-changer, with actor Kevin Costner in the commercials. But Apple Before there was an iPhone, iMac or Macintosh, only sold 10,000 units of Lisa in 1983 and pivoted Apple had the Lisa computer. to create a smaller and much cheaper successor, the Macintosh, which was released the next year. The Lisa computer—which stands for Local Integrated Software Architecture but was also "The Lisa was doomed because it was basically a named after Steve Jobs' eldest daughter—was a prototype—an overpriced, underpowered cobbled- flop when it released in 1983 because of its together ramshackle Mac," author and tech astronomical price of $10,000 - $24,700 when journalist Leander Kahney told Wired in 2010. -
Technology Strategies and Standard Competition — Comparative Innovation Cases of Apple and Microsoft
Journal of High Technology Management Research 23 (2012) 90–102 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of High Technology Management Research Technology strategies and standard competition — Comparative innovation cases of Apple and Microsoft Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat ⁎ College of Innovation, Thammasat University, Bangkok 10200, Thailand article info abstract Available online 19 June 2012 This paper analyses the technology strategy and standard competition of the most outstanding innovation cases of Apple and Microsoft. The objective of the study is to understand innovators' Keywords: pursuit of strategies in securing the benefits from an innovation, based on the innovation life cycle Technology strategy model. The study develops a new methodological framework of platform for analysing the case Standard competition studies. It is argued that the ability to establish an industry standard and lock-in customers Apple enables an innovator to create a competitive advantage. The study offers important lessons in Microsoft strategic innovation management. Technology platform © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Competitive advantage 1. Introduction Competition to achieve competitive advantage often involves the ability to establish new standards for the interworking of products and services. The outstanding classic cases of standard battle are Sony Betamax and Matsushita VHS standards in the Videocassette Recorder (VCR) business, the standard competition among the powerful players of Visa Open Platform, MasterCard/ Mondex Multos, Proton World's Proton, Microsoft Windows for Smart Cards in the smart card industry and the recent standard competition between HD-DVD and Blu Ray in the Digital Versatile Disc player (DVD) business. This study endeavours to understand the use of technology strategies and competition to establish technology standards in the most outstanding innovative companies of Apple and Microsoft. -
The Macintosh Design Team, February 1984, BYTE Magazine
Left to right: Andy Hertzfeld, Chris Espinosa, Joanna Hoffman , Geo rge Crowe, Bill Atkinson, Jern) Manock . An Interview: The Macintosh Design Team The making of Macintosh On October 14, 1983, the design team for Apple Computer Inc .'s new Macintosh computer met with BYTE Managing Editor Phil Lemmons at the company's Cupertino, California, headquarters. In the dialogue that followed , Bill Atkinson, Steve Jobs, Andy Hertzfeld, Larry Kenyon, Joanna Hoffman, Burrell Smith, Dave Egner, Chris Espinosa, Steve Capps, Jerry Manock, Bruce Horn , and George Crowe discussed the evolution of their brainchild. BYTE: How did the Macintosh pro everyone can afford it. It's not very Quickdraw and have a mouse on it ject begin? many years ago that most of us in this in essence, build a really cheap im Jobs: What turns on Andy and room couldn't have afforded a $5000 plementation of Lisa's technology Burrell and Chris and Bill and Larry computer. We realized that we could that would use some of that software and everyone else here is building build a supercheap computer that technology. That's when the Macin something really inexpensive so that would run Bill Atkinson's amazing tosh as we know it was started. 58 February 1984 © BYrE Publications Inc. Hertzfeld: That was around January of 1981. Smith: We fooled around with some other ideas for computer design, but we realized that the 68000 was a chip that had a future and had . .. Jobs: Some decent software! Smith: And had some horsepower and enough growth potential so we could build a machine that would live and that Apple could rally around for years to come. -
Software Testing
Software testing PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:57:44 UTC Contents Articles Introduction 1 Software testing 1 Black-box testing 16 Black-box testing 16 Exploratory testing 17 San Francisco depot 19 Session-based testing 20 Scenario testing 22 Equivalence partitioning 22 Boundary-value analysis 24 All-pairs testing 25 Fuzz testing 26 Cause-effect graph 30 Model-based testing 31 Web testing 35 Installation testing 37 White-box testing 38 White-box testing 38 Code coverage 39 Modified Condition/Decision Coverage 44 Fault injection 45 Bebugging 50 Mutation testing 51 Testing of non functional software aspects 55 Non-functional testing 55 Software performance testing 56 Stress testing 62 Load testing 63 Volume testing 67 Scalability testing 67 Compatibility testing 68 Portability testing 69 Security testing 69 Attack patterns 71 Localization testing 75 Pseudolocalization 76 Recovery testing 77 Soak testing 78 Characterization test 78 Unit testing 80 Unit testing 80 Self-testing code 85 Test fixture 86 Method stub 88 Mock object 89 Lazy systematic unit testing 92 Test Anything Protocol 93 xUnit 96 List of unit testing frameworks 98 SUnit 129 JUnit 130 CppUnit 132 Test::More 133 NUnit 134 NUnitAsp 136 csUnit 138 HtmlUnit 140 Test automation 141 Test automation 141 Test bench 145 Test execution engine 146 Test stubs 148 Testware 149 Test automation framework 150 Data-driven testing 151 Modularity-driven testing 152 Keyword-driven testing