DOCSLIB.ORG

Ulkomaiset Lentokentät / International Airports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ulkomaiset Lentokentät / International Airports Ismo Porna ISMONDIA 1960–2012 Ulkomaiset lentokentät / International Airports 1. London Gatwick Airport Great Britain 1963 / 7 2. Prague Ruzyne International Airport Czechoslovakia 1969 / 4 Prague Vaclav Havel Airport Czech Republic 1993 / 4 3. Copenhagen Airport Kastrup Denmark 1969 / 64 4. Warsaw Chopin Airport Poland 1969 / 4 5. John Paul II Int. Airport Kraków-Balice Poland 1969 / 2 6. Oslo Airport Fornebu Norway 1969 / 19 7. Gothenburg Landvetter Airport Sweden 1969 /19 8. Malmö-Sturup Airport Sweden 1969 / 3 9. Stockholm Arlanda Airport Sweden 1969 / 72 10. London Heathrow Airport Great Britain 1969 / 44 11. Berlin Schönefeld Airport German Democratic Republic 1972 / 10 12. Budapest Ferihegy International Airport Hungary 1972 / 14 Budapest Lizt Ferenc International Airport 13. Venice Marco Polo Airport Italy 1973 / 3 14. Trieste Ronchi Dei Legionari Airport Italy 1973 / 1 Trieste Friuli Venezia Giulia Airport 15. Frankfurt am Main Airport Germany 1976 / 69 16. Nürnberg Airport Germany 1976 / 2 17. Rhodes International Airport ”Diagoras” Greece 1977 / 2 18. Brussels Airport Belgium 1977 /30 19. Paris Orly Airport France 1977 / 15 20. Strasbourg International Airport France 1977 / 30 21. Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport France 1977 /73 22. Reykjavik-Keflavik International Airport Iceland 1977 / 2 23. Lyon Satonas Airport France 1978 / 4 Lyon Exopéry Airport 24. Athens Int. Airport “Eleftherios Venizelos” Greece 1978 / 6 25. Vienna International Airport Austria 1978 / 15 26. Eindhoven Airport The Netherlands 1979 / 1 27. Hamburg Airport Germany 1979 / 2 28. Constanza Airport Romania 1979 / 2 29. Lisbon Portela Airport Portugal 1979 / 7 30. Fransisco de Sá Carneiro Airport - Porto Portugal 1979 / 2 31. Madrid-Bajaras Airport Spain 1979 / 7 32. Amsterdam Airport Schiphol The Netherlands 1980 / 28 33. Dublin Airport Ireland 1980 / 10 34. Manchester Airport Great Britain 1980 / 5 35. Zurich Airport Kloten Switzerland 1980 / 15 36. Geneva International Airport Switzerland 1980 / 7 37. Luxembourg Findel International Airport Luxembourg 1981 / 2 38. Milan Malpensa Airport ”City of Milan” Italy 1981 / 4 39. New York John F. Kennedy Int. Airport USA 1982 / 5 Fifth terminal by Eliel Saarinen 40. Newark Liberty International Airport USA 1982 / 6 41. Benito Juarez Int. Airport- Mexico City Mexico 1982 / 5 42. Ixtapa-Zihuatanejo International Airport Mexico 1982 / 2 43. Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int. Airport USA 1982 / 2 44. Miami International Airport USA 1982 / 8 45. Sangster International Airport – Montego Bay Jamaica 1982 / 2 46. Kingston/Norman Rogers Airport Jamaica 1982 / 1 47. Toussain Louverture Int. Airport Port au Prince Haiti 1982 / 2 48. Las Américas Int. Airport - Santo Domingo Dominican Republic 1982 / 2 49. Luis Muñoz Marin Int. Airport - San Juan USA – Puerto Rico 1982 / 2 50. Grantley Adams Int. Airport - Bridgetown Barbados 1982 / 4 51. Piarco International Airport – Port of Spain Trinidad and Tobago 1982 / 4 52. Lille Airport France 1982 / 1 53. Istanbul Atatürk Airport Turkey 1982 / 9 54. Houari Boumeniene Airport – Algiers Algeria 1983 / 4 55. Diori Hamani International Airport – Niamey Niger 1983 / 4 56. Nouakchott International Airport Mauritania 1983 / 1 57. Lépold Sédar Senghor Int. Airport - Dakar Senegal 1983 / 3 58. Banjul International Airport The Gambia 1983 / 1 59. Roberts International Airport Roberts Field Liberia 1983 / 1 Robertsville 60. Port Bouet Airport – Abidjan Ivory Coast 1983 / 3 61. Kotoka International Airport – Accra Ghana 1983 / 2 62. Gnassingbé Eyadéma - Lomé-Tokoin International Airport Togo 1983 / 2 63. Nice Côte d’Azur Airport France 1983 / 4 64. Fiumicino - Leonardo da Vinci International Airport – Rome Italy 1983 / 6 65. Bari Karol Woijtyla Airport Italy 1983 / 2 66. Varna Aksakovo Airport Bulgaria 1984 / 2 67. Monastir Habib Bouirguiba International Airport Tunisia 1985 / 2 68. Tunis-Carthage Airport Tunisia 1985 / 2 69. Malta ”Luga” International Airport – Valletta Malta 1985 / 2 70. Verona Villafranca Airport Italy 1985 / 2 71. Cork Airport Ireland 1985 / 2 72. Sheremetyevo Airport – Moscow USSR / Russian Federation 1985 / 13 73. Quatro de Fevereiro Int. Airport – Luanda Angola 1985 / 2 74. Maya-Maya Airport – Brazzaville Congo Republic 1985 / 3 75. Douala International Airport Cameroon 1985 / 4 76. Libreville International Airport Gabon 1985 / 2 77. Tripoli International Airport Libya 1985 / 3 78. Odessa International Airport USSR 1985 / 1 79. Paphos International Airport Cyprus 1986 / 2 80. Barcelona El Prat Airport Spain 1987 / 13 81. Umeå Airport Sweden 1987 / 1 82. Rinas International Airport – Tirana Albania 1988 / 2 Tirana Int. Airport Nënë Tereza (2001) 83. Ängelholm-Helsingborg Airport Sweden 1988 / 2 84. Sundsvall-Härnösand Airport Sweden 1988 / 1 85. King Hussein International Airport – Agaba Jordan 1989 / 1 86. Queen Alia International Airport – Amman Jordan 1989 / 2 87. Tallinn Airport USSR / Estonia 1990 / 3 88. LaGuardia Airport – New York USA 1990 / 2 89. Montréal-Pierre Elliot Trudeau International Airport Canada 1990 / 2 90. Aalborg Airport Denmark 1991 / 1 91. Suvarnabhumi Airport – Bangkok Thailand 1993 / 23 92. Noi Bài International Airport – Hanoi Vietnam 1993 / 11 93. Wattay International Airport – Vientiane Laos 1993 / 2 94. Phnom Pehn International Airport Cambodia 1993 / 2 95. Greater Rochester International Airport USA 1993 / 2 96. M. R. Stefánik Airport – Bratislava Slovakia 1993 / 2 97. Cat Bi International Airport – Hai Phong Vietnam 1994 / 1 98. Tan Son Nhát International Airport Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) Vietnam 1994 /2 99. Singapore Changi Airport Singapore 1994 / 6 100. Kuala Lumpur International Airport Malaysia 1994 / 2 101. Vilnius Airport Lithuania 1994 / 2 102. Minsk National Airport Belarus 1994 / 2 103. Kyiv (Zuliany) International Airport Ukraine 1994 / 2 104. Darwin International Airport Australia 1994 / 1 105. Cairns Airport Australia 1994 / 2 106. Jacksons Int. Airport – Port Moresby Papua New Guinea 1994 / 6 107. Goroka Airport Papua New Guinea 1994 / 2 108. Kagi Airport Papua New Guinea 1994 /2 109. Sydney Airport Australia 1994 / 4 110. Melbourne (Tullamarine) Airport Australia 1994 / 3 111. Ljubljana Joze Pucnik Airport Slovenia 1994 / 4 112. Yangon International Airport Myanmar 1994 / 2 113. Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport Serbia and Montenegro 1996 / 2 114. Kansai International Airport – Osaka Japan 1996 / 13 115. Fukuoka Airport Japan 1996 / 4 116. Incheon International Airport – Seoul South Korea 1996 / 2 117. New Chitose Airport – Sapporo Japan 1996 / 8 118. Matsumoto Airport – Nagano Japan 1996 / 2 119. Narita International Airport – Tokyo Japan 1996 / 3 120. Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport – Plaine Magniem Mauritius 1997 / 2 121. Seychelles International Airport Pointe Larue Mahe/Victoria Seychelles 1997 / b2 122. Kai Tak Airport / Hong Kong Int. Airport Great Britain 1997 / 2 123. Taiwan Taoyuan Int. Airport - Taipei Taiwan 1997 / 2 124. Beijing Capital International Airport China 1997 / 6 125. OR Tambo Int. Airport – Johannesburg South Africa 1997 / 19 126. Hosea Kutako Int. Airport – Windhoek Namibia 1997 / 14 127. Moshoeshoe International Airport – Maseru Lesotho 1997 / 2 128. Maputo International Airport Mozambique 1997 / 2 129. Ninoy Aquino Int. Airport – Manila Philippines 1997 / 4 130. Osaka-Itami International Airport Japan 1997 /1 131. Bamako Senou International Airport Mali 1997 / 2 132. Ouagadougou International Airport Burkina Faso 1997 / 4 133. Indira Gandhi Int. Airport – Delhi India 1998 / 4 134. Triphuvan Int. Airport – Kathmandu Nepal 1998 / 4 135. Dubai International Airport United Arab Emirates 1998 / 8 136. Windhoek – Eros Airport Namibia 1998 / 2 137. Mokati Lodge Airport Namibia 1998 / 2 138. Katima Mulilo Airport Namibia 1998 / 2 139. Victoria Falls Airport Zimbabwe 1998 / 2 140. Livingstone Airport Zambia 1998 / 2 141. Brunei Int. Airport – Bandar Seri Begawan Brunei 1998 / 2 142. Jinnah International Airport – Karachi Pakistan 1998 / 2 143. Munich Airport Germany 1998 / 11 144. Bucharest Henri Coanda Int. Airport Otopeni Airport Romania 1998 / 1 145. Bucharest Baneasa Henri Vlaicu International Airport Romania 1998 / 1 146. Chisinau International Airport Moldova 1998 / 2 147. Zagreb Pleso Airport Croatia 1998 / 1 148. Sarajevo International Airport Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998 / 2 149. Matsapha Airport – Manzini Swaziland 1999 / 2 150. Chileka International Airport – Blantyre Malawi 1999 / 2 151. Lilongwe International Airport Malawi 1999 / 2 152. Birmingham Airport Great Britain 1999 / 2 153. Murtala International Airport – Lagos Nigeria 1999 / 2 154. Bologna Guglielmo Marconi Airport Italy 2000 / 2 155. Cairo International Airport Egypt 2000 / 6 156. Addis Ababa Bole International Airport Ethiopia 2000 / 10 157. Djibouti Ambouli International Airport Djibouti 2000 / 2 158. Jomo Kenyatta Int. Airport – Nairobi Kenya 2000 / 3 159. Copernicu Airport Wrocklaw Poland 2000 / 2 160. Marseille Provence Airport France 2000 / 1 161. Florence Airport Peretola Italy 2000 / 1 162. Glasgow International Airport Great Britain / Scotland 2000 / 2 163. São Paulo/Guarulhos - Governador André Franco Montoro International Airport Brazil 2001 / 5 164. Rio de Janeiro/Galeão– Antonio Carlos Jobim International Airport Brazil 2001 / 3 165. Silvio Pettirossi Int. Airport – Asuncion Paraguay 2001 / 2 166. Capitan Corbeta CA Curbelo International Airport – Punta del Este Uruguay 2001 / 1 167. Carrasco/General Cesáreo L. Berisso International Airport – Montevideo Uruguay 2001 / 2 168. Jorge Newberry Airfield
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Immigration Situation Overview
    COVID-19 Pandemic – Immigration Situation Overview This is a summary of the confirmed immigration restrictions and/or concessions that global jurisdictions are currently imposing in an effort to contain the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). It includes: (1) the operational status of government authorities; (2) travel restrictions; (3) entry, quarantine, and health requirements; and (4) government concessions. Where a jurisdiction is not listed, Fragomen cannot reliably confirm it is currently imposing restrictions or concessions of this type. The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is a rapidly changing event; this summary is for reference only. It does not attempt to cover other developments that may be relevant to travelers, such as airline route cancellations, the closing of consular posts, or national travel advisories. For the latest on global confirmed coronavirus disease cases, review the World Health Organization’s latest situation report here. Individuals considering travel should consult their country’s consular posts and seek case-specific advice from their travel and /or immigration providers. Employers whose staff have moved to remote work arrangements may need to complete additional labor law requirements, such as employment contract amendment. User Tip: country names act as bookmarks in this document – open your bookmarks pane to navigate the document. Last updated at 6/1/2020 11:11:00 AM ET Table of Contents Afghanistan Congo (DR) Hong Kong (SAR) Moldova Slovakia Albania Congo (Republic) Hungary Mongolia Slovenia Algeria
    [Show full text]
  • Ai2009-1 Aircraft Serious Incident Investigation Report
    AI2009-1 AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. J A 8 9 0 4 JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. J A 8 0 2 0 January 23, 2009 Japan Transport Safety Board The investigation for this report was conducted by Japan Transport Safety Board, JTSB, about the aircraft serious incident of JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL , B747-400D registration JA8904 and JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL, MD-90-30 registration JA8020 in accordance with Japan Transport Safety Board Establishment Law and Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation for the purpose of determining causes of the aircraft serious incident and contributing to the prevention of accidents/incidents and not for the purpose of blaming responsibility of the serious incident. This English version of this report has been published and translated by JTSB to make its reading easier for English speaking people who are not familiar with Japanese. Although efforts are made to translate as accurately as possible, only the Japanese version is authentic. If there is any difference in the meaning of the texts between the Japanese and English versions, the text in the Japanese version prevails. Norihiro Goto, Chairman, Japan Transport Safety Board AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. BOEING 747-400D JA8904 2. JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. DOUGLAS MD-90-30 JA8020 AT ABOUT 10:33 JST FEBRUARY 16, 2008 ON THE RUNWAY 01R OF NEW CHITOSE AIRPORT December 10, 2008 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board (Aircraft Sub-committee) Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Yukio Kusuki Member Shinsuke Endo Member Noboru Toyooka Member Yuki Shuto Member Akiko Matsuo - 1 - 1 PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION 1.1 Summary of the Serious Incident The event covered by this report falls under the category of “an aborted take-off on an engaged runway” as stipulated in Clause 1, Article 166-4 of the Civil Aeronautics Regulations of Japan, and is classified as an Aircraft Serious Incident.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Book Igc 2015 (Pdf)
    34th International Gemmological Conference IGC August 2015 Vilnius, Lithuania 34th IGC 2015 – Vilnius, Lithuania Introduction 34th International Gemmological Conference IGC August, 2015 Vilnius, Lithuania Dear Participants, We are really honored for the first time to host IGC Conference here, in Lithuania – “Lonely Planet“ Best in Travel destination for 2015. Thank you for taking this great opportunity to come to Europe’s Northern Baroque pearl – capital Vilnius and our Amber land, Lithuania. Many of you are coming from afar to share great ideas and experiences, all in the single love to gemmology. Since I joined IGC, I have been impressed by high level of intelligence and the pool of knowledge of great IGC community that was built almost 90-ty years ago and still continuing to grow. From Greenland to Japan, from France, Germany to India, Sri Lanka to Australia, from Tanzania, Switzerland to Vietnam, USA, Canada and many more – the community’s in-depth research and awareness in science of gemmology shines through. I am truly delighted that our worldwide dialogue and exchange in gemmological research will be held with the highest-level standard here, at Vilnius University, one of the oldest Alma Mater in Europe, developing its deep scientific traditions for over 430 hundred years. I wish all of you an inspiring conference and great discoveries and emotions visiting our charming Vilnius and beautiful Lithuania – the country where World Amber Road starts. Dr. Arūnas Kleišmantas Chairman of 34th IGC 2015 2 34th IGC 2015 – Vilnius, Lithuania Introduction Organising Committee for the 34th IGC Conference Organisers Dr. Arūnas Kleišmantas, Chairman of 34th IGC’2015, Vilnius – IGC programme development Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Travel Guide
    Travel 1. Arriving by airplane Minsk National Airport (MSQ) There are several Airlines that operate at Minsk National Airport, such as Belavia, Aeroflot, Airbaltic and Lufthansa. The airport is about 50 km from Minsk. An alternative low-budget connection to Minsk is to fly to Vilnius International Airport (VNO) and take the train from Vilnius to Minsk. Several low-cost airlines operate at Vilnius International Airport. The Vilnius International airport is about 200 km from Minsk and train are frequently operating between Minsk and Vilnius (see information below). Important! If you will choose this option you need to have a valid visa or a valid passport allowing to stay visa-free in Belarus. Information about visa process is in General information. Transport from the airport (MSQ) to the Minsk Central station (Minsk Tsentralnyi) Minsk Tsentralnyi is a bus stop near Minsk Central Train station (Babrujskaja 6). By bus: BUS № 300Э You can buy a ticket via the ticket machine at the airport, at the bus station by credit card, from a ticket agent at the bus stop or from bus driver by cash (BYN only). You can exchange money at the airport. The bus stop is located in front of Gate 5-6 (arrival hall). Journey time: 1 hour. Bus timetable: From National Airport Minsk (MSQ) to Minsk Central (Minsk Tsentralnyi) 4:50, 6:25, 7:20, 8:00, 9:00, 9:40, 10:20, 11:20, 12:00, 12:40, 13:20, 14:20, 15:00, 15:40, 16:20, 17:00, 17:40, 18:20, 19:00, 20:00, 20:40, 21:20, 22:05, 23:00, 00:05, 1:45, 3:15 By taxi: You can pay by credit card and order taxi online.
    [Show full text]
  • "Airports" (PDF)
    Specialist services for the airport life cycle Let's talk aeronautics Specialist services for the airport life cycle AERTEC provides specialist Aviation consultancy and design services to a wealth of Aviation- sector clients, including airport operators, construction firms, service providers, airlines, government agencies, investors, and financial aeronautics institutions. Our company also provides consultancy services and solutions development for Airport Technological Systems. Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport Spain Let's talk Let's M A D We create value for Aviation clients Consultancy through integrated Conception services and independent specialist advice Operations Development Operational Planning assessment & Design Airport Technology #Airports Our Services Feasibility studies Airport solutions for landside/airside and analysis Studies and plans ¬ Policy and sector studies ¬ Airport masterplanning ¬ Air transport market studies ¬ Feasibility studies ¬ Traffic forecasting ¬ Airport planning studies ¬ Business advisory ¬ Aeronautical safety studies ¬ Transaction support ¬ Design of flight procedures and Consultancy and due diligence airspace compatibility studies ¬ Obstacle limitation surface studies ¬ Operational safety studies ¬ Capacity studies: airside and landside Brussels South Charleroi Airport Planning & Design ¬ Aircraft flow simulations (AirTop/Simmod/AeroTURN) C R L Belgium ¬ Passenger flow simulations (AirTop/CAST) ¬ Aircraft noise contour studies (AEDT) ¬ Airport planning application Airfields ¬ Preliminary plans,
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto G
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Brussels, 25.08.2016 C(2016) 5375 final Subject: State aid SA.40197 (2016/N) – Lithuania Investment in infrastructure at Vilnius airport Sir, 1 PROCEDURE (1) On 31 December 2015, the Lithuanian authorities notified a measure concerning the modernisation of the Vilnius Airport's infrastructure (hereinafter “the measure”) after pre-notification contacts. (2) Between January and April 2016 several formal and informal contacts and information exchanges have taken place. The reply of the Lithuanian authorities to the Commission services' requests for information was received on 2 June 2016 and an update was received on 21 July 2016. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE 2.1 The beneficiary Vilnius airport/Lietuvos Oro Uostai (3) Since 1 July 2014, the operation of the three Lithuanian airports Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga has been entrusted to the State-owned company Lietuvos Oro Uostai (LUO) ("Lithuanian Airports") under the control of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The airport management company ensures account separation for the different airports. Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto g. 2 LT-01511 Vilnius LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKA Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 (4) LOU is the direct beneficiary of the notified measure. (5) The three airports complement each other in destinations covered, airlines present and passenger groups served. Vilnius airport is the main capital gateway for business and tourist travel from and to the country, Kaunas airport is focused on facilitating travel at low cost of Lithuanian nationals working/living abroad and Palanga airport provides access to the Scandinavian region using premium Scandinavian airlines for tourists and for business to and around the port city of Klaipeda.
    [Show full text]
  • Aichi Prefecture
    Coordinates: 35°10′48.68″N 136°54′48.63″E Aichi Prefecture 愛 知 県 Aichi Prefecture ( Aichi-ken) is a prefecture of Aichi Prefecture Japan located in the Chūbu region.[1] The region of Aichi is 愛知県 also known as the Tōkai region. The capital is Nagoya. It is the focus of the Chūkyō metropolitan area.[2] Prefecture Japanese transcription(s) • Japanese 愛知県 Contents • Rōmaji Aichi-ken History Etymology Geography Cities Towns and villages Flag Symbol Mergers Economy International relations Sister Autonomous Administrative division Demographics Population by age (2001) Transport Rail People movers and tramways Road Airports Ports Education Universities Senior high schools Coordinates: 35°10′48.68″N Sports 136°54′48.63″E Baseball Soccer Country Japan Basketball Region Chūbu (Tōkai) Volleyball Island Honshu Rugby Futsal Capital Nagoya Football Government Tourism • Governor Hideaki Ōmura (since Festival and events February 2011) Notes Area References • Total 5,153.81 km2 External links (1,989.90 sq mi) Area rank 28th Population (May 1, 2016) History • Total 7,498,485 • Rank 4th • Density 1,454.94/km2 Originally, the region was divided into the two provinces of (3,768.3/sq mi) Owari and Mikawa.[3] After the Meiji Restoration, Owari and ISO 3166 JP-23 Mikawa were united into a single entity. In 187 1, after the code abolition of the han system, Owari, with the exception of Districts 7 the Chita Peninsula, was established as Nagoya Prefecture, Municipalities 54 while Mikawa combined with the Chita Peninsula and Flower Kakitsubata formed Nukata Prefecture. Nagoya Prefecture was renamed (Iris laevigata) to Aichi Prefecture in April 187 2, and was united with Tree Hananoki Nukata Prefecture on November 27 of the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 10.10 Session
    Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 Draft agenda 10.00 - 10.10 Opening speech. International review: airlines and airports on the way to recovery Kurt Hofmann, journalist, aviation expert, Air Transport World 10.10 Session 1. AIR FIELD IN NEW REALITY Moderators: Alexey Sinitsky, Research and Development Director, Infomost Consulting 10.10 - 10.30 Airport of the future: new world, new trends Pierre Charbonneau, Director, Passenger at International Air Transport Association* 10.35 - 10.55 Air traffic restart roadmap TBC, NACO 10.55 - 11.55 Cases. On the way to recovery Herbert M.Keffel, Practice Leader and Management Consultant, Munich Airport International Radek Zabransky, Director Aviation & Strategic Marketing, Bratislava Milan Rastislav Stefanik Airport* Marius Gelzinis, CEO, Lithuanian Airports Aboudy Nasser, CCO, London Stansted Airport Liene Freivalde, Director Aviation Services and Business Development, Riga International Airport 11.55 - 12.20 Coffee break 12.20 - 12.40 Cases. Russian airport experience: growth area of route networks and passenger flows TBC, Domodedovo* Evgeny Ilyin, Commercial Director, Pulkovo Airport * 12.45 - 13.30 Dialogue with experts. The airport in the new reality Opening speech: Support of the state in international practice Speaker TBC Key topics: State participation: what airports expected in Russia and international overview Airports’ sources of income: adaptation to the new reality. Ways to restore non-aviation revenues Air Cargo Development: a long-term trend or short-term reaction?
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Effects of Air Transport Liberalisation on the Domestic Market in Japan
    Chikage Miyoshi Analysis Of The Effects Of Air Transport Liberalisation On The Domestic Market In Japan COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis Academic year 2006-2007 Chikage Miyoshi Analysis of the effects of air transport liberalisation on the domestic market in Japan Supervisor: Dr. G. Williams May 2007 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Cranfield University 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the different experiences in the Japanese domestic air transport market compared to those of the intra-EU market as a result of liberalisation along with the Slot allocations from 1997 to 2005 at Haneda (Tokyo international) airport and to identify the constraints for air transport liberalisation in Japan. The main contribution of this study is the identification of the structure of deregulated air transport market during the process of liberalisation using qualitative and quantitative techniques and the provision of an analytical approach to explain the constraints for liberalisation. Moreover, this research is considered original because the results of air transport liberalisation in Japan are verified and confirmed by Structural Equation Modelling, demonstrating the importance of each factor which affects the market. The Tokyo domestic routes were investigated as a major market in Japan in order to analyse the effects of liberalisation of air transport. The Tokyo routes market has seven prominent characteristics as follows: (1) high volume of demand, (2) influence of slots, (3) different features of each market category, (4) relatively low load factors, (5) significant market seasonality, (6) competition with high speed rail, and (7) high fares in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Chart Rjaf / Matsumoto Matsumoto
    MATSUMOTO Civil Aviation Bureau,Japan Aviation Civil Japan AIP RJAF /MATSUMOTO MATSUMOTO AIRPORT ABN TRUE NORTH RADIO APRON FLOOD LIGHTS 6 7 8 45 334.7m 9 3 10 SOUTH APRON NORTH APRON 11 12 3 RUNWAY THRESHOLD 12 (EFF:7 APR 2011) APR (EFF:7 PAPI Angle 3.0 10/3/11 ° IDENTIFICATION LIGHTS MEHT 18.5m (61ft) N - T S - T CIRCLING GUIDANCE LIGHTS WDI WDI 2 1 6 1 5 2 4 3 4 5 6 18 36 6 1 5 2 4 3 3 4 2 5 1 6 OVERRUN LIGHTS ARP 361000N PAPI Angle 3.0 ° 1375522E MEHT 18.5m (61ft) 438.1m RUNWAY SIMPLE REMARKS : ALIGNMENT INDICATOR APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM APPROACH LIGHT BEACONS RUNWAY GROOVING 2000m x 45m RUNWAY STRENGTH 45 / F / B / X / T WIDTH & STRENGTH OF TAXIWAY S - T 23m 45 / F / B / X / T 18 36 N - T 9m AUW 5700kg DIMENSION & STRENGTH OF APRON SOUTH 90m x 135m 58 / R / B / X / T 480m 420m 300m 300m 300m NORTH 117m x 62m AUW 5700kg LONGITUDINAL PROFILE OF RUNWAY RWY18 RWY36 2170ft 2182ft 2132ft 2143ft (661.7m) (665.2m) (649.95m) (653.2m) RJAF-AD2-24.1 0.65% 0.85% 0.70% AD CHART 0m 500m 1500m 2000m RJAF-AD2-24.2 AIP Japan MATSUMOTO STANDARD DEPARTURE CHART-INSTRUMENT RJAF / MATSUMOTO SID MATSUMOTO REVERSAL ONE DEPARTURE RWY 18 : Climb RWY HDG to 2700FT, turn left HDG321˚ to intercept and proceed via MBE R006 to 5.0DME, turn right direct to MBE VOR/DME. Cross MBE R006/5.0DME at or above 6000FT, cross MBE VOR/DME at or above 10000FT.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Aircraft Accident and Serious Incident Investigations
    Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations 1 Aircraft accidents and serious incidents to be investigated <Aircraft accidents to be investigated> ◎Paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft accident) The term "Aircraft Accident" as used in this Act shall mean the accident listed in each of the items in paragraph 1 of Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. ◎Paragraph 1, Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Obligation to report) 1 Crash, collision or fire of aircraft; 2 Injury or death of any person, or destruction of any object caused by aircraft; 3 Death (except those specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) or disappearance of any person on board the aircraft; 4 Contact with other aircraft; and 5 Other accidents relating to aircraft specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. ◎Article 165-3 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Accidents related to aircraft prescribed in the Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under item 5 of the paragraph1 of the Article 76 of the Act) The cases (excluding cases where the repair of a subject aircraft does not correspond to the major repair work) where navigating aircraft is damaged (except the sole damage of engine, cowling, engine accessory, propeller, wing tip, antenna, tire, brake or fairing). <Aircraft serious incidents to be investigated> ◎Item 2, Paragraph 2, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft serious incident) A situation where a pilot in command of an aircraft during flight recognized a risk of collision or contact with any other aircraft, or any other situations prescribed by the Ordinances of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under Article 76-2 of the Civil Aeronautics Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Envies D'ailleurs
    IN ][ OUT MAGAZINE DE L'AÉROPORT DE LILLE LILFÉVRIER-MARS-AVRIL 2017 ENVIES D’AILLEURS L’Algarve, Faro, Venise, Brest Guide des vols & séjours Vluchten- en reisgids www.lille.aeroport.fr Une adresse intime en bord de mer... Plage de Pinarello 20144 Sainte Lucie de Porto-Vecchio - Corse Tél : 04.95.71.44.39 - [email protected] www.lepinarello.com 04 News Édito LIL, Éco, Tourisme, Culture 8 Rencontre Chers passagers, Alexandre Bloch L’année 2016 s’est achevée sur de bonnes nouvelles pour votre 20 aéroport régional : l’aéroport de Lille a enregistré en 2016, un trafic Art de vivre & Culture record de 1.781.490 passagers, soit une progression de plus de Musée du Louvre-Lens : Quand la 15 %, grâce aussi au soutien des grandes compagnies aériennes culture redessine un bassin minier européennes et d'acteurs majeurs du tourisme. D’autre part, easyJet ouvrira prochainement 3 nouvelles lignes : Naples, Venise et Faro. 25 De son côté, Volotea confirme un programme renforcé sur la Corse et Envies D’ailleurs ouvrira bientôt Montpellier. Le groupe TUI France vous emmène quant L’Algarve, Faro, Venise, Brest à lui à Araxos, Kalamata, Split, Cagliari, en plus d'Athènes et du Cap- Vert, portant à 30 le total des destinations Vacances. Sans oublier 45 Tendance Flykiss qui a ouvert récemment Brest et Clermont Ferrand. Au total, 55 destinations vous sont proposées au départ de Lille cette année. 46 Guide des vols Autant de bonnes raisons de regarder 2017, avec envie et optimisme, & des voyages et de vous inviter à voyager, partir à la découverte d'autres horizons et Plannings des vols 2017 d'aller à la rencontre des autres.
    [Show full text]