DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Note Package 39877

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Note Package 39877 Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 1739 HB Title: Death penalty, eliminating Estimated Cash Receipts Agency Name 2015-17 2017-19 2019-21 GF- State Total GF- State Total GF- State Total Office of Attorney General Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Total $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Expenditures Agency Name 2015-17 2017-19 2019-21 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Administrative Office of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. the Courts Office of Public Defense Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Office of Attorney Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. General Caseload Forecast .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Council Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Corrections Total 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 Local Gov. Courts * Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other ** (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) Local Gov. Total (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) Estimated Capital Budget Impact NONE Prepared by: Trisha Newport, OFM Phone: Date Published: (360) 902-0417 Final 2/19/2015 * See Office of the Administrator for the Courts judicial fiscal note ** See local government fiscal note FNPID: 39877 FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Judicial Impact Fiscal Note Bill Number: 1739 HB Title: Death penalty, eliminating Agency: 055-Admin Office of the Courts Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: Account FY 2016 FY 2017 2015-17 2017-19 2019-21 Counties Cities Total $ Estimated Expenditures from: Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. The revenue and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Responsibility for expenditures may be subject to the provisions of RCW 43.135.060. Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions: If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note X form Parts I-V. If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I). Capital budget impact, complete Part IV. Legislative Contact Edie Adams Phone: 360-786-7180 Date: 02/13/2015 Agency Preparation: Kitty Hjelm Phone: 360-704-5528 Date: 02/17/2015 Agency Approval: Ramsey Radwan Phone: 360-357-2406 Date: 02/17/2015 OFM Review: Cheri Keller Phone: 360-902-0563 Date: 02/17/2015 Request # 1739 HB-1 Form FN (Rev 1/00) 1 Bill # 1739 HB FNS061 Judicial Impact Fiscal Note Part II: Narrative Explanation II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact on the Courts This bill would eliminate the death penalty in favor of life incarceration. Section 1 would amend RCW 10.95.030 to: - require that a life sentence without possibility of parole must include a restitution order; - require that an offender sentenced to life without possibility of parole be required to work throughout the duration of his /her sentence to satisfy the restitution order; - require the death peanlty be removed as a possible sentence for aggravated first degree murder . Section 2 would repeal a number of sections of RCW 10.95 relating to court proceedings concerning a death sentence. II. B - Cash Receipts Impact None II. C - Expenditures This bill would require the death penalty be removed as a possible sentence for aggravated first degree murder . Eliminating the death penalty would result in cost savings for the superior courts for no longer trying death penalty cases and the supreme court for no longer hearing death penalty case reviews and appeals. According to a January 2015 Seattle University report on the "Analysis of the Economic Costs of Seeking the Death Penalty in Washington State", the average court, police/sheriff and miscellaneous costs associated with an aggravated first-degree murder case where the death penalty was sought was $528,779 compared to $65,075 when the death penalty was not sought. However, because these death penalty cases are before the supreme and superior courts over a period of years, each features different details and aggravating factors, and the cases are before different justices and judges there is not sufficient data to estimate the cost savings. The following are examples of the types of costs that would be saved: - Compared to other felony cases in superior court, more time is spent in death penalty cases on complex pre-trial motions, legal challenges and jury selection. A death penalty case lasts between 20 to 30 days longer than a typical felony case . - There would be savings in jury selection. Jury selection for death penalty trials is more complex with many more jurors summoned than in a typical jury trial. The process of selecting a jury is much more involved, with jurors having to provide additional written material and the court and attorneys reviewing these juror questionnaires. Jury selection can take as long as 30 days for a death sentence trial compared to other cases where jury selection takes a day or two. Should a jury find a defendant guilty of aggravated murder in the first degree then the same jury would convene for a “penalty phase.” In the penalty phase the jury decides whether the sentence should be death or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. This phase can last from a few days to longer than a week. - The supreme court would achieve savings by not hearing appeals of death penalty sentences . Statute provides for automatic review and appeal to the supreme court of all death penalty sentences. It requires the supreme court to review specific issues concerning whether sufficient evidence existed to justify the jury’s determination of insufficient mitigating circumstances; whether the sentence was a product of passion or prejudice; whether the sentence is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases considering both the crime and the defendant; and whether the defendant had an intellectual disability . - In the supreme court, additional procedures are required by supreme court rule. Two attorneys must be appointed to represent the defendant with one of these attorneys from the death penalty qualified list; every hearing must be transcribed and a proportionality analysis must be made; and the time for argument in death penalty cases is three times longer than in other cases . - If there is a supreme court decision that is adverse to the defendant, then within one year from that decision a Personal Restraint Petition (PRP) may be filed by the defendant in the supreme court that can raise issues not previously considered at the appellate or trial proceedings. These PRP proceedings also require that two attorneys be appointed, with at least one being an attorney qualified from the death penalty qualified list, the briefing to the court is increased, experts and investigators may be appointed and the hearing must be Request # 1739 HB-1 Form FN (Rev 1/00) 2 Bill # 1739 HB FNS061 Judicial Impact Fiscal Note transcribed. - The amount of additional time that a justice and staff assigned a death penalty case spends is considerably more than with other case assignments. It is estimated that currently the supreme court clerk spends 10 to 15% of his time on capital cases while another member of the clerk’s office staff spends 20% of their time. If this bill passed, judges and staff would redirect their time not spent on death penalty cases to other cases before the courts and to reducing caseload backlogs. Part III: Expenditure Detail Part IV: Capital Budget Impact Request # 1739 HB-1 Form FN (Rev 1/00) 3 Bill # 1739 HB FNS061 Judicial Impact Fiscal Note Individual State Agency Fiscal Note Bill Number: 1739 HB Title: Death penalty, eliminating Agency: 056-Office of Public Defense Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: NONE Estimated Expenditures from: Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. Estimated Capital Budget Impact: NONE The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates, and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II. Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions: If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note X form Parts I-V. If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I). Capital budget impact, complete Part IV. Requires new rule making, complete Part V. Legislative Contact: Edie Adams Phone: 360-786-7180 Date: 02/13/2015 Agency Preparation: Sophia Byrd McSherry Phone: 360-586-3164 Date: 02/17/2015 Agency Approval: Joanne Moore Phone: 360 956-2107 Date: 02/17/2015 OFM Review: Cheri Keller Phone: 360-902-0563 Date: 02/17/2015 FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note Request # 1739-1 Form FN (Rev 1/00) 1 Bill # 1739 HB Part II: Narrative Explanation II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or expenditure impact on the responding agency. HB 1739 would remove capital punishment from Washington statutes. Section 1 would amend RCW 10.95.030 to remove references to a special death penalty proceeding and would establish life imprisonment without parole as the penalty for aggravated first-degree murder.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sounding the Last Mile: Music and Capital Punishment in the United States Since 1976
    SOUNDING THE LAST MILE: MUSIC AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES SINCE 1976 BY MICHAEL SILETTI DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Musicology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Jeffrey Magee, Chair and Director of Research Professor Gayle Magee Professor Donna A. Buchanan Associate Professor Christina Bashford ABSTRACT Since the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed the legality of the death penalty in 1976, capital punishment has drastically waxed and waned in both implementation and popularity throughout much of the country. While studying opinion polls, quantitative data, and legislation can help make sense of this phenomenon, careful attention to the death penalty’s embeddedness in cultural, creative, and expressive discourses is needed to more fully understand its unique position in American history and social life. The first known scholarly study to do so, this dissertation examines how music and sound have responded to and helped shape shifting public attitudes toward capital punishment during this time. From a public square in Chicago to a prison in Georgia, many people have used their ears to understand, administer, and debate both actual and fictitious scenarios pertaining to the use of capital punishment in the United States. Across historical case studies, detailed analyses of depictions of the death penalty in popular music and in film, and acoustemological research centered on recordings of actual executions, this dissertation has two principal objectives. First, it aims to uncover what music and sound can teach us about the past, present, and future of the death penalty.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series Advisory Board ❦
    Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series Advisory Board ❦ Gary J. Simson, Chairman Cornell Law School Raj K. Bhala The George Washington University Law School John C. Coffee, Jr. Columbia University School of Law Randall Coyne University of Oklahoma Law Center John S. Dzienkowski University of Texas School of Law Paul Finkelman University of Tulsa College of Law Robert M. Jarvis Shepard Broad Law Center Nova Southeastern University Vincent R. Johnson St. Mary’s University School of Law Thomas G. Krattenmaker Director of Research Federal Communications Commission Michael A. Olivas University of Houston Law Center Michael P. Scharf New England School of Law Peter M. Shane Dean, University of Pittsburgh School of Law Emily L. Sherwin University of San Diego School of Law John F. Sutton, Jr. University of Texas School of Law David B. Wexler University of Arizona College of Law Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Second Edition Randall Coyne Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Lyn Entzeroth Law Clerk to Federal Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina Copyright © 2001 by Randall Coyne and Lyn Entzeroth All Rights Reserved. ISBN: 0-89089-726-3 LCCN: 2001092360 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America Summary Table of Contents Table of Contents ix Table of Cases xxiii Table of Prisoners xxix List of Web Addresses xxxiii Preface to the Second Edition xxxv Preface to First Edition xxxvii Acknowledgments xxxix Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma Community College 2006-07 Una Voce Student Essay Collection
    Welcome to the seventh edition of Una Voce! Inside are essays which represent some of the best writing by Tacoma Community College students during the 2006/2007 academic year. Over forty well-written essays were submitted to the editors of this publication. We, the editorial staff of Una Voce, had the difficult task of narrowing the selection to the final essays published here. The talented students of Tacoma Community College should be extremely proud of their writing ability, as this publication is only a narrow sample of their talent. We would like to thank the students who submitted their work for publication, and also the gifted instructors who mentored and encouraged them. This year’s publication is the most political issue of Una Voce ever compiled. TCC’s students are very aware of the controversies swirling around them, and they have smart things to say about it all. From local debates, such as “The Necessity of Wal-Mart” and “Relocating the RAP and Lincoln Work Release Houses,” to global issues, such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks (Belting), homelessness (Entus), the USA Patriot Act (Miller), oil drilling in the Arctic (Govan), and high-stakes testing in education (Tetrault), this year’s writers are particularly good at analyzing and writing about hot issues. We believe this high level of critical thinking says a great deal about TCC students’ intellect and their concern for serious issues. However, humorous essays are included, as well; a good laugh is always welcome, and you will find a few inside. Una Voce has always been a showcase for across-the-academic-curriculum essays, and this year’s edition continues that tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F. Utter Final PDF.Indd
    Robert F. Utter Research by John Hughes and Lori Larson Transcripti on by Lori Larson Interviews by John Hughes March 4, 2009 Hughes: Today The Legacy Project is with former Washington Supreme Court Justi ce Robert F. Utt er at his home on Cooper Point in Olympia. Justi ce Utt er served on the high court from Dec. 20, 1971, unti l his resignati on on April 24, 1995, to protest the death penalty. Besides his half-century career in the law and his internati onal acti vism for peace and justi ce, Justi ce Utt er has writt en widely about Justi ce Utt er on the Washington Supreme Court bench, 1972 his spiritual journey. Judge, I understand that Willi Unsoeld, the legendary mountain climber, was one of your heroes. Utt er: Willi was a neighbor. He always told me he had more sacred encounters in the mountains than in any church. And he said there were “only two illicit questi ons in philosophy – ‘What if?’ and ‘Why?’ He said they’re illicit because there’s no answer, and to dwell on them only leads to madness!” There have been two gurus in my life – Willi was one, and Jim Houston was the other. Houston is a remarkable man. He taught with C.S. Lewis at Oxford. Hughes: Speaking of heroes: C.S. Lewis. What a writer! Utt er: There is a beauti ful piece that Dr. Houston wrote — “Living in a Suff ering World.” It’s in the book called I Believe in the Creator. Hughes: It’s pronounced “whose-ton”? Utt er: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process 00 Coyne 4E Final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page Ii
    00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page i Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page ii Carolina Academic Press Law Advisory Board ❦ Gary J. Simson, Chairman Dean, Mercer University School of Law Raj Bhala University of Kansas School of Law Davison M. Douglas Dean, William and Mary Law School Paul Finkelman Albany Law School Robert M. Jarvis Shepard Broad Law Center Nova Southeastern University Vincent R. Johnson St. Mary’s University School of Law Peter Nicolas University of Washington School of Law Michael A. Olivas University of Houston Law Center Kenneth L. Port William Mitchell College of Law H. Jefferson Powell The George Washington University Law School Michael P. Scharf Case Western Reserve University School of Law Peter M. Shane Michael E. Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page iii Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process fourth edition Randall Coyne Frank Elkouri and Edna Asper Elkouri Professor of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Lyn Entzeroth Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Tulsa College of Law Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page iv Copyright © 2012 Randall Coyne, Lyn Entzeroth All Rights Reserved ISBN: 978-1-59460-895-7 LCCN: 2012937426 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page v Summary of Contents Table of Cases xxiii Table of Prisoners xxix List of Web Addresses xxxv Preface to the Fourth Edition xxxvii Preface to the Third Edition xxxix Preface to the Second Edition xli Preface to the First Edition xliii Acknowledgments xlv Chapter 1 • The Great Debate Over Capital Punishment 3 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 51 Number 2 Article 7 1-1-1997 Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause Kristina E. Beard Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Kristina E. Beard, Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, 51 U. Miami L. Rev. 445 (1997) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol51/iss2/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause I. INTRODUCTION ... ...................................................... 445 II. BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS CLAUSE AND THE DEATH PENALTY ..................................................... 449 III. USING THE CASES TO ARRIVE AT THE STANDARD ......................... 450 A. H istorical Inquiry ................................................ 450 B. Evolving Standards............................................... 452 C . D ignity ......................................................... 457 D . Sum m ary ....................................................... 459 IV. CURRENT METHODS UNDER THE STANDARD .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Note Package 31143
    Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 6283 SB Title: Death penalty elimination Estimated Cash Receipts Agency Name 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 GF- State Total GF- State Total GF- State Total Office of Attorney General Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion." Total $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Expenditures Agency Name 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Administrative Office Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. of the Courts Office of Public Fiscal note not available Defense Office of Attorney Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. General Caseload Forecast .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Council Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Corrections Total 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 Local Gov. Courts * Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. Local Gov. Other ** Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. Local Gov. Total Estimated Capital Budget Impact NONE Prepared by: Adam Aaseby, OFM Phone: Date Published: 360-902-0539 Final 1/27/2012 * See Office of the Administrator for the Courts judicial fiscal note ** See local government fiscal note FNPID 31143 : FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Judicial Impact Fiscal Note Bill Number: 6283 SB Title: Death penalty elimination Agency: 055-Admin Office of the Courts Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: Account FY 2012 FY 2013 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 Counties Cities Total $ Estimated Expenditures from: Non-zero but indeterminate cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Protest Bank of America Funding Fossil Fuels
    The New Hampshire Gazette, Friday, May 21, 2021 — Page 1 We Put the Vol. CCLXV, No. 18 The New Hampshire Gazette May 21, 2021 The Nation’s Oldest Newspaper™ • Editor: Steven Fowle • Founded 1756 by Daniel Fowle Free! PO Box 756, Portsmouth, NH 03802 • [email protected] • www.nhgazette.com in Free Press The Fortnightly Rant The Storm’s Not Coming—It’s Here ew Englanders are familiar lished that a person’s right to in- with the scene: video shows fluence elections should increase in Nrain falling sideways and random proportion to their net worth. objects flying through the air. Crash- Shelby County v. Holder, in 2013, ing waves beat furiously against the ruled that, since the Republican Par- shore. Finally the land crumbles. A ty had not been found guilty recent- house falls, beaten to smithereens, ly of criminally intimidating poor, and ceases to exist. non-white voters, the law that had Traditionally it’s been a hurricane been preventing them from doing so or a bad nor’easter, and the process could now be discarded. takes a few hours. Lately, it’s politics. Now that they have achieved such The end hasn’t come for America’s dominance, one might think that democracy yet, but things don’t look Republicans could relax a bit. Cer- particularly good. tainly life in these allegedly United Nobody builds on the edge of a States has been relatively and re- cliff, of course.* Things just creep up freshingly placid since Jack Dorsey on you: the Atlantic Ocean, the Re- threw a certain someone off Twit- publican Party….
    [Show full text]
  • IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992), 5 Cap
    Capital Defense Journal Volume 5 | Issue 1 Article 12 Fall 9-1-1992 IN RE BLODGETT 112 .S Ct. 674 (1992) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992), 5 Cap. Def. Dig. 22 (1992). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj/vol5/iss1/12 This Casenote, U.S. Supreme Ct. is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capital Defense Journal by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Page 22 - CapitalDefense Digest, Vol. 5, No. I IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992) United States Supreme Court FACTS HOLDING In 1982, a Washingtonjury convicted Charles Rodman Campbell of The Supreme Court denied the state's mandamus request.4 The multiple murders and sentenced him to death. Direct appeals, t a state Court held that the state should have asked the Court of Appeals to vacate habeas petition, and a federal habeas petition2 all failed to provide any or modify its 1991 order before proceeding to the United States Supreme relief to Campbell. After Campbell filed a second federal habeas petition Court with its request.5 However, the Court in Blodgett took a strong in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington position on stays of executions and "explicitly" held that "[ifn a capital in 1989, the district court held a hearing and issued a written opinion case the grant of a stay of execution directed to a State by a federal court denying a stay or other relief to the defendant.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Amber Text Converter
    ABC Amber Text Converter Unregistered, http://www.thebeatlesforever.com/processtext/ a fever in the heart [052-066-4.9] by ann rule. Author's Note. It has been said that there are no new stories under the sun. Even those dramas and tragedies that are true are only a reprise of something that has happened before. I suspect that is an accurate analysis. In this third volume of my true crime files, I note that I have either subconsciously or inadvertently chosen four cases that share a common theme: personal betrayal. Since I am a great believer in the premise that we do nothing accidentally, it must be the right time to contemplate homicides that occur because the victim or victims have been betrayed by someone they have come to trust. In most of the following cases, the victims have believed in their killers over a long time, in one case, the victims have put their faith too quickly in the wrong men. There is something especially heartbreaking about love and friendships betrayed. The thought that some of the victims in this book must have recognized that betrayal at the very last moments of their lives may be difficult to cope with. In the final two cases, the system trusted a criminal's rehabilitation and innocent people paid for this mistake. All serve to remind us that things are seldom what they seem. And to be wary. The title case in A Fever in the Heart occurred very early in my career as a true crime writer, so early, in fact, that I felt I had neither the courage nor the technical skill to undertake a book.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County Death Penalty Cases Under Current Law
    HeraldNet: Print Article Page 1 of 4 Everett, Washington Published: Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 5:37 p.m. Snohomish County death penalty cases under current law << Prev Next >> • Herald file photo / 1982 Charles Rodman Campbell was hanged in 1994. • Herald file Charles Ben Finch was sentenced to die in 1994. His sentence was later overturned. http://www.heraldnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20140211/NEWS01/140219808/Sn... 2/12/2014 HeraldNet: Print Article Page 2 of 4 • Herald file photo / April 25, 1997 Richard Mathew Clark leaves the courtroom after being sentenced to die. • Herald file photo Condemned murderer James Elledge hides his face by hanging his head as he is led through a Snohomish County Courthouse. Elledge died by lethal injection in 2001. • Herald file photo / 2003 http://www.heraldnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20140211/NEWS01/140219808/Sn... 2/12/2014 HeraldNet: Print Article Page 3 of 4 Barbara Opel appears in court on April 7, 2003. A jury opted for a life sentence rather than the death penalty for Opel. • Genna Martin / The Herald Byron Scherf stands with his lawyers after his death penalty sentencing is read by Judge George Appel in May 2013 in Snohomish County Superior Court. Herald Staff The cases of six convicted murderers show how the death penalty played out in Snohomish County since the state’s current capital punishment law was approved in 1981: • Charles Rodman Campbell was hanged in 1994 for the throat slashing murders of two women and a girl near Clearview in 1982. Campbell raped one of the women about a decade before the killings.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Wherever and Whenever'
    baylorlariat com SPORTS p. 5 Baylor men’s basketball was defeated by WVU with a final score of 66-64. BaylorLariat WE’RE THERE WHEN YOU CAN’T BE Wednesday | January 29, 2014 Body of bridge worker found after fall By Paula Ann Solis rived on scene at 8 p.m. and pronounced a manlift, which is a scaffold with a bucket workers on site rescued him when he sur- East Texas Medical Center EMS and Texas Staff Writer the person as dead at 8:17 p.m. The name or platform, when, for reasons unknown, faced. Providence Hospital medical staff is Parks and Wildlife responded to the call of the man has not been released because it went into the water with both men teth- currently treating him for hypothermia. for assistance. Divers found what may be the body of a positive identity could not be confirmed ered to it. It fell into an estimated 20 ft. of Swanton said he suffered no other known Texas Parks and Wildlife game wardens a missing construction worker Tuesday on scene. water. injuries. are using side sonar search methods to lo- evening in the Brazos River behind the Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton, the public in- The other man, whose identity has Authorities were alerted of the inci- cate the body, although Swanton said the McLane Stadium building site. formation officer for the Waco Police De- also not been released, was able to release dent shortly after 4 p.m. The Baylor -Po Justice of the Peace Kristi DeCluitt ar- partment, said two men were working on himself from the lift and construction lice Department, Waco Fire Department, SEE BRIDGE, page 6 In the ‘Wherever and whenever’ works Local developer to give housing opportunity to grad students By Jordan Corona Staff Writer A new idea in South Waco may give a special housing opportunity to Truett and social work graduate stu- dents.
    [Show full text]