DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert F. Utter Final PDF.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Robert F. Utter Research by John Hughes and Lori Larson Transcripti on by Lori Larson Interviews by John Hughes March 4, 2009 Hughes: Today The Legacy Project is with former Washington Supreme Court Justi ce Robert F. Utt er at his home on Cooper Point in Olympia. Justi ce Utt er served on the high court from Dec. 20, 1971, unti l his resignati on on April 24, 1995, to protest the death penalty. Besides his half-century career in the law and his internati onal acti vism for peace and justi ce, Justi ce Utt er has writt en widely about Justi ce Utt er on the Washington Supreme Court bench, 1972 his spiritual journey. Judge, I understand that Willi Unsoeld, the legendary mountain climber, was one of your heroes. Utt er: Willi was a neighbor. He always told me he had more sacred encounters in the mountains than in any church. And he said there were “only two illicit questi ons in philosophy – ‘What if?’ and ‘Why?’ He said they’re illicit because there’s no answer, and to dwell on them only leads to madness!” There have been two gurus in my life – Willi was one, and Jim Houston was the other. Houston is a remarkable man. He taught with C.S. Lewis at Oxford. Hughes: Speaking of heroes: C.S. Lewis. What a writer! Utt er: There is a beauti ful piece that Dr. Houston wrote — “Living in a Suff ering World.” It’s in the book called I Believe in the Creator. Hughes: It’s pronounced “whose-ton”? Utt er: Yes. He has a doctorate in geography from Oxford and because he taught with C.S. Lewis and others of that group, he developed a strong interest in theology. He was one of 2 the founders of Regent College up in Vancouver, B.C. It is now part of the University of Briti sh Columbia. Jim Houston wrote the only thing that ever made sense to me on human suff ering. And as a person who tries to fi nd spiritual answers, the only reason it makes sense is that the only answer is that there is no answer. Essenti ally he says it’s for God to know … and that “to live in a meaningful world” you need to have the right atti tude, rather than just go James Houston the Oxford don looking for simple answers. “Relati ng to God is more profound whose theological writi ng so impressed Justi ce Utt er. than knowing about God,” he emphasized. I just love all the things that I’ve seen in Houston’s book. Hughes: How to make sense of suff ering? Sounds like Houston is putti ng a twist on Camus, who wrote about making the fundamental choice to live. And someone once suggested that “Suicide is a permanent soluti on to a temporary problem.” Utt er: Exactly. And then this is something I wrote for the Washington Bar. It sti ll prett y much expresses my feelings on the resiliency of the human spirit and the need for a rule of law. Hughes: You and your friend (former justi ce) Charles Z. Smith have had some absolute parallel tracks evolving from the Bapti st Church and the rule of law and internati onal understanding, haven’t you? Utt er: Yes. I’ve been so fortunate, John, I just really have … As a kid who never thought that these things, these opportuniti es, would be present in his life. Hughes: Where did you meet James Houston? Utt er: Well, that’s kind of a long story. He lives in Vancouver. But he was very acti ve with a group called the Fellowship Foundati on that I got involved with back in the 1960s. It was a group that got ( Watergate conspirator) Chuck Colson turned around. It started actually in Sea tt le when Abram Vereide, who was a spiritual adviser to Gov. Arthur Langlie, put together a program. Hughes: Well, you and I ought to stop here and get started at the beginning of your eventf ul life. For the record, I too grew up in the First Bapti st Church. 3 Utt er: Yes! Hughes: But my mother didn’t get mad when I fell in love with a Catholic girl, with predictable results. I want you to know that from what I’ve read about your spiritual life, I think you would make a wonderful Jesuit. I could talk to Father Steve Sundborg at Seatt le U and Father Spitzer at Gonzaga and we could get you converted overnight! Utt er: (Laughs) Hughes: A lot of people don’t understand that there are Bapti sts and then there are Bapti sts. Utt er: We’re from the liberal branch of the Bapti st faith. I say we have no sawdust on our fl oors. But people so readily stereotype it. Hughes: I hate stereotyping. Utt er: I do too. It’s a substi tute for thinking, is what it is. Hughes: That’s a wonderful way of putti ng it. … Well, you were chief justi ce of the Washington Supreme Court from 1979-1981, and overall you served on the court for 23 years and fi ve months. Does that make you one of the longest serving judges in the history of the Washington Supreme Court? Utt er: I think I was the second-longest serving. I was the youngest chief justi ce at that ti me. Hughes: How old were you? Utt er: I was 49. Hughes: And how about to just be on the court? Utt er: I was 41. I think there was one other judge in state history – at that ti me, at least – who came on the Supreme Court younger. He was in his thirti es. Hughes: Some wag once observed, “If I’d known I was going to live this long I would have taken bett er care of myself.” And then Bett e Davis chimed in with the immortal line that “Getti ng old is not for sissies.” You’ve got some maladies, but you look great, and what are you – almost 80? Utt er: Prett y close. 79 this June. Hughes: So, no real regrets? 4 Utt er: Just that I haven’t got another 79 years to go. That’s a very deep regret. I’ve tried to live not being afraid of things. And my ocean sailing is what really got me started there. I was deathly afraid the fi rst ti me I raced to Hawaii, just of what I’d fi nd out there and the responsibiliti es I’d have as captain. And once that was over my life was never the same. Hughes: What year was that? Utt er: It was 1976. I’d been on the court for fi ve years. Hughes: So that was your fi rst ocean voyage on a sailboat? Utt er: Of that length. The year before that we sailed to Cobb Seamount, a dormant volcano off the mouth of the Columbia River. It’s under water so it was a crazy race. You had to fi nd it by celesti al navigati on and prove you were there by a photograph of your depth fi nder. Hughes: Tell us how you got interested in sailing. Did you grow up sailing as a boy? Utt er: I think I have to believe in reincarnati on because somewhere back there I held some sailors before I ever knew them. My parents both came from Boise, Idaho. Hughes: (Jokingly) There’s a lot of sailing there in Boise! Utt er: The romance of the sea was not in my geneti c code from them. Dear people, but we went through some very impoverished ti mes during the Depression. I sat in a home in West Seatt le that overlooked the sea, the Sound, up on a high bluff . Watching these boats sailing out there, something in it really reached something deep inside me. So I always said, “Well, when I can, I’ll get a sailboat.” And a friend of mine in high school lived on the beach and had a small sailboat. On occasions he would invite me to go with him, which was a great delight. We’d sail this litt le boat over to Blake Island. Hughes: How big was that? –the boat that is. Utt er: Oh, gosh, it couldn’t have been over 15 feet. Like (the nursery rhyme of) Wynken, Blynken, and Nod sailing out seaward. But that started it. And Bett y always says, “When I agreed to marry you I knew we were going to get a sailboat soon.” Hughes: Was Bett y a reluctant sailor? Utt er: She had never sailed at all. I think it had to be out of pure love and aff ecti on. We bought a sailboat before we bought a house. 5 Hughes: What was it about that fi rst race to Hawaii that meant so much to you in terms of confi dence as a sailor and something you learned about life in general? Utt er: It was something I always had an inborn anxiety about. I guess “anxiety” is the best word, because you have a lot of Justi ce Utt er smoking a pipe at the ti ller of Tondelayo. responsibility as a captain on a race with crew safety and preparati on. You only read about storms at sea. You never read of the beauty of the experience. So I had a deep, deep inborn concern about what I’d fi nd out there and my ability to deal with it.
Recommended publications
  • Edition 15F Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet

    Edition 15F Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet

    STATE OF WASHINGTON Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary VOTERS’’PAMPHLET VOTERS PAMPHLET August 19, 2008 Primary Washington’s New Top 2 Primary Washington has a new primary. You do not have Each candidate for partisan offi ce may state a political to pick a party. In each race, you may vote for any party that he or she prefers. A candidate’s preference one of the candidates listed. Th e two candidates does not imply that the candidate is nominated or who receive the most votes in the August Primary endorsed by the party, or that the party approves will advance to the November General Election. of or associates with that candidate. Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary. PUBLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND KING COUNTY ELECTIONS EDITION 15F Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet It’s your choice … it’s your voice. Dear King County voter: Congratulations on exercising your privilege and responsibility A lot has changed since the last presidential election in 2004. to take part in Washington’s elections − never more important Since then, King County Elections has worked tirelessly to than in this watershed 2008 election year. Our new Top 2 implement more than 300 reforms and recommendations Primary on August 19 will give you maximum choice, allowing resulting from outside audits, election experts, and the you the independence and freedom to “vote for the person, innovative work of elections staff. With these changes and not the party.” 19 successful elections behind us, King County is ready and energized for the August 19 primary.
  • Sounding the Last Mile: Music and Capital Punishment in the United States Since 1976

    Sounding the Last Mile: Music and Capital Punishment in the United States Since 1976

    SOUNDING THE LAST MILE: MUSIC AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES SINCE 1976 BY MICHAEL SILETTI DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Musicology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Jeffrey Magee, Chair and Director of Research Professor Gayle Magee Professor Donna A. Buchanan Associate Professor Christina Bashford ABSTRACT Since the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed the legality of the death penalty in 1976, capital punishment has drastically waxed and waned in both implementation and popularity throughout much of the country. While studying opinion polls, quantitative data, and legislation can help make sense of this phenomenon, careful attention to the death penalty’s embeddedness in cultural, creative, and expressive discourses is needed to more fully understand its unique position in American history and social life. The first known scholarly study to do so, this dissertation examines how music and sound have responded to and helped shape shifting public attitudes toward capital punishment during this time. From a public square in Chicago to a prison in Georgia, many people have used their ears to understand, administer, and debate both actual and fictitious scenarios pertaining to the use of capital punishment in the United States. Across historical case studies, detailed analyses of depictions of the death penalty in popular music and in film, and acoustemological research centered on recordings of actual executions, this dissertation has two principal objectives. First, it aims to uncover what music and sound can teach us about the past, present, and future of the death penalty.
  • Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series Advisory Board ❦

    Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series Advisory Board ❦

    Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series Advisory Board ❦ Gary J. Simson, Chairman Cornell Law School Raj K. Bhala The George Washington University Law School John C. Coffee, Jr. Columbia University School of Law Randall Coyne University of Oklahoma Law Center John S. Dzienkowski University of Texas School of Law Paul Finkelman University of Tulsa College of Law Robert M. Jarvis Shepard Broad Law Center Nova Southeastern University Vincent R. Johnson St. Mary’s University School of Law Thomas G. Krattenmaker Director of Research Federal Communications Commission Michael A. Olivas University of Houston Law Center Michael P. Scharf New England School of Law Peter M. Shane Dean, University of Pittsburgh School of Law Emily L. Sherwin University of San Diego School of Law John F. Sutton, Jr. University of Texas School of Law David B. Wexler University of Arizona College of Law Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process Second Edition Randall Coyne Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Lyn Entzeroth Law Clerk to Federal Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina Copyright © 2001 by Randall Coyne and Lyn Entzeroth All Rights Reserved. ISBN: 0-89089-726-3 LCCN: 2001092360 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America Summary Table of Contents Table of Contents ix Table of Cases xxiii Table of Prisoners xxix List of Web Addresses xxxiii Preface to the Second Edition xxxv Preface to First Edition xxxvii Acknowledgments xxxix Chapter 1.
  • Tacoma Community College 2006-07 Una Voce Student Essay Collection

    Tacoma Community College 2006-07 Una Voce Student Essay Collection

    Welcome to the seventh edition of Una Voce! Inside are essays which represent some of the best writing by Tacoma Community College students during the 2006/2007 academic year. Over forty well-written essays were submitted to the editors of this publication. We, the editorial staff of Una Voce, had the difficult task of narrowing the selection to the final essays published here. The talented students of Tacoma Community College should be extremely proud of their writing ability, as this publication is only a narrow sample of their talent. We would like to thank the students who submitted their work for publication, and also the gifted instructors who mentored and encouraged them. This year’s publication is the most political issue of Una Voce ever compiled. TCC’s students are very aware of the controversies swirling around them, and they have smart things to say about it all. From local debates, such as “The Necessity of Wal-Mart” and “Relocating the RAP and Lincoln Work Release Houses,” to global issues, such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks (Belting), homelessness (Entus), the USA Patriot Act (Miller), oil drilling in the Arctic (Govan), and high-stakes testing in education (Tetrault), this year’s writers are particularly good at analyzing and writing about hot issues. We believe this high level of critical thinking says a great deal about TCC students’ intellect and their concern for serious issues. However, humorous essays are included, as well; a good laugh is always welcome, and you will find a few inside. Una Voce has always been a showcase for across-the-academic-curriculum essays, and this year’s edition continues that tradition.
  • Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process 00 Coyne 4E Final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page Ii

    Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process 00 Coyne 4E Final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page Ii

    00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page i Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page ii Carolina Academic Press Law Advisory Board ❦ Gary J. Simson, Chairman Dean, Mercer University School of Law Raj Bhala University of Kansas School of Law Davison M. Douglas Dean, William and Mary Law School Paul Finkelman Albany Law School Robert M. Jarvis Shepard Broad Law Center Nova Southeastern University Vincent R. Johnson St. Mary’s University School of Law Peter Nicolas University of Washington School of Law Michael A. Olivas University of Houston Law Center Kenneth L. Port William Mitchell College of Law H. Jefferson Powell The George Washington University Law School Michael P. Scharf Case Western Reserve University School of Law Peter M. Shane Michael E. Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page iii Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process fourth edition Randall Coyne Frank Elkouri and Edna Asper Elkouri Professor of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Lyn Entzeroth Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Tulsa College of Law Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page iv Copyright © 2012 Randall Coyne, Lyn Entzeroth All Rights Reserved ISBN: 978-1-59460-895-7 LCCN: 2012937426 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America 00 coyne 4e final 6/6/12 2:50 PM Page v Summary of Contents Table of Cases xxiii Table of Prisoners xxix List of Web Addresses xxxv Preface to the Fourth Edition xxxvii Preface to the Third Edition xxxix Preface to the Second Edition xli Preface to the First Edition xliii Acknowledgments xlv Chapter 1 • The Great Debate Over Capital Punishment 3 A.
  • Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause

    Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause

    University of Miami Law Review Volume 51 Number 2 Article 7 1-1-1997 Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause Kristina E. Beard Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Kristina E. Beard, Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, 51 U. Miami L. Rev. 445 (1997) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol51/iss2/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS Five Under the Eighth: Methodology Review and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause I. INTRODUCTION ... ...................................................... 445 II. BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS CLAUSE AND THE DEATH PENALTY ..................................................... 449 III. USING THE CASES TO ARRIVE AT THE STANDARD ......................... 450 A. H istorical Inquiry ................................................ 450 B. Evolving Standards............................................... 452 C . D ignity ......................................................... 457 D . Sum m ary ....................................................... 459 IV. CURRENT METHODS UNDER THE STANDARD .............................
  • 60Th Anniversary Issue

    60Th Anniversary Issue

    King County Bar Association NON PROFIT ORG. 1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700 U.S. POSTAGE PAID Seattle, WA 98101 KENT, WA PERMIT NO 71 BBARAR BBULLETINULLETIN THE Volume 36 • Issue 1 • $2.00 Reality Issue September 2017 KCBA Celebrates Combating Alternative Facts 60 Years of the in Reproductive Health Care Bar Bulletin By Gene Barton Age catches up to all of us. We By Priya Walia us with the medical knowledge to turn press care clinics, and their information were well into production of the Health care — what is quality aches and pains into treatments and appears to be medically based. CPCs August issue of the Bar Bulletin health care, who gets it, who should therapies. What happens, then, when advertise their services using persuasive when we realized that it was our pay for it — is a topic of much discus- we cannot trust our providers for med- phrases such as “evidence based medi- 60th anniversary issue. So, we have sion, especially with the advent of the ically accurate information? cal care,” “all options pregnancy coun- decided to throw ourselves a belated Affordable Care Act. To some, health Since the 1970s, free so-called “clin- seling,” “high quality medical care,” and birthday party and you’re all invited. care should be a fundamental human ics” called crisis pregnancy centers “accurate confidential services” to lure It was August 1957 when the right for all, while others see aspects (“CPCs”), or sometimes limited ser- clients into their offices. then-Seattle Bar Association sent of health care — especially pertaining vice pregnancy centers (“LSPCs”), have The funders of and volunteers at out the first issue of the Bar Bulletin to women — as a wedge political issue.
  • Primary Election

    Primary Election

    SAMPLE BALLOT SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 — PRIMARY ELECTION Candidate Party Key: United States Representative, State Senator, 26th Legislative District No. 9 District DEM = DEMOCRAT ! Ron Taber (REP) ! Beth Wilson (DEM) ! Keith Peterson (REP) ! Bob Oke (REP) REP = REPUBLICAN ! Randy Bell (REP) ! RFM = REFORM ! Adam Smith (DEM) State Representative, 26th Legislative Dist., Position No. 1 IND = INDEPENDENT State Representative, 2nd ! Lois McMahan (REP) Legislative Dist., Position 1 ! A. Donald Nelson (REP) SW = SOCIALIST WORKERS ! Roger Bush (REP) ! Patricia Lantz (DEM) ! Larry Nelson (DEM) NP = NON PARTISAN State Representative, 26th Partisan Positions State Representative, 2nd Legislative Dist., Position No. 2 Legislative Dist., Position 2 ! Jim Shea (DEM) United States Senator ! Pat Roberts-Dempsey (DEM) ! Tom Huff (REP) ! Warren E. Hanson (REP) ! Tom Campbell (REP) ! Patty Murray (DEM) ! Joel A. Derefield (DEM) State Representative, 27th ! Jean Sensel (DEM) ! Thor Amundson (DEM) Legislative Dist., Position No. 1 ! James Sherwood Stokes (DEM) ! John Smith (REP) ! Mike The Mover (RFM) ! Ruth Fisher (DEM) ! Robert Tilden Medley (DEM) State Representative, 20th ! Eugene P. Weltzer (IND) ! Harvey Vernier (DEM) Legislative Dist., Position No. 1 ! Linda Smith (REP) State Representative, 27th ! Richard DeBolt (REP) ! Nan Bailey (SW) Legislative Dist., Position No. 2 ! Chris Bayley (REP) ! Tom Beattie (DEM) ! Steve Thompson (RFM) ! Debbie Regala (DEM) ! John Marshall (REP) State Representative, 20th ! Jack Claussen (DEM) ! Charlie R. Jackson (RFM) Legislative Dist., Position No. 2 State Representative, 28th United States Representative, ! Gary Alexander (REP) ! Robert Strong (DEM) Legislative Dist., Position No. 1 District No. 6 ! Georganne “Gigi” Talcott (REP) ! Norm Dicks (DEM) State Representative, 25th ! T. Clinton Lowry (DEM) ! Bob Lawrence (REP) ! Don R.
  • Fiscal Note Package 31143

    Fiscal Note Package 31143

    Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 6283 SB Title: Death penalty elimination Estimated Cash Receipts Agency Name 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 GF- State Total GF- State Total GF- State Total Office of Attorney General Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion." Total $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Expenditures Agency Name 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Administrative Office Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. of the Courts Office of Public Fiscal note not available Defense Office of Attorney Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. General Caseload Forecast .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Council Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Corrections Total 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 0.0 $0 $0 Local Gov. Courts * Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. Local Gov. Other ** Non-zero but indeterminate cost. Please see discussion. Local Gov. Total Estimated Capital Budget Impact NONE Prepared by: Adam Aaseby, OFM Phone: Date Published: 360-902-0539 Final 1/27/2012 * See Office of the Administrator for the Courts judicial fiscal note ** See local government fiscal note FNPID 31143 : FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Judicial Impact Fiscal Note Bill Number: 6283 SB Title: Death penalty elimination Agency: 055-Admin Office of the Courts Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: Account FY 2012 FY 2013 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 Counties Cities Total $ Estimated Expenditures from: Non-zero but indeterminate cost.
  • Youth Protest Bank of America Funding Fossil Fuels

    Youth Protest Bank of America Funding Fossil Fuels

    The New Hampshire Gazette, Friday, May 21, 2021 — Page 1 We Put the Vol. CCLXV, No. 18 The New Hampshire Gazette May 21, 2021 The Nation’s Oldest Newspaper™ • Editor: Steven Fowle • Founded 1756 by Daniel Fowle Free! PO Box 756, Portsmouth, NH 03802 • [email protected] • www.nhgazette.com in Free Press The Fortnightly Rant The Storm’s Not Coming—It’s Here ew Englanders are familiar lished that a person’s right to in- with the scene: video shows fluence elections should increase in Nrain falling sideways and random proportion to their net worth. objects flying through the air. Crash- Shelby County v. Holder, in 2013, ing waves beat furiously against the ruled that, since the Republican Par- shore. Finally the land crumbles. A ty had not been found guilty recent- house falls, beaten to smithereens, ly of criminally intimidating poor, and ceases to exist. non-white voters, the law that had Traditionally it’s been a hurricane been preventing them from doing so or a bad nor’easter, and the process could now be discarded. takes a few hours. Lately, it’s politics. Now that they have achieved such The end hasn’t come for America’s dominance, one might think that democracy yet, but things don’t look Republicans could relax a bit. Cer- particularly good. tainly life in these allegedly United Nobody builds on the edge of a States has been relatively and re- cliff, of course.* Things just creep up freshingly placid since Jack Dorsey on you: the Atlantic Ocean, the Re- threw a certain someone off Twit- publican Party….
  • IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992), 5 Cap

    IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992), 5 Cap

    Capital Defense Journal Volume 5 | Issue 1 Article 12 Fall 9-1-1992 IN RE BLODGETT 112 .S Ct. 674 (1992) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992), 5 Cap. Def. Dig. 22 (1992). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj/vol5/iss1/12 This Casenote, U.S. Supreme Ct. is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capital Defense Journal by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Page 22 - CapitalDefense Digest, Vol. 5, No. I IN RE BLODGETT 112 S. Ct. 674 (1992) United States Supreme Court FACTS HOLDING In 1982, a Washingtonjury convicted Charles Rodman Campbell of The Supreme Court denied the state's mandamus request.4 The multiple murders and sentenced him to death. Direct appeals, t a state Court held that the state should have asked the Court of Appeals to vacate habeas petition, and a federal habeas petition2 all failed to provide any or modify its 1991 order before proceeding to the United States Supreme relief to Campbell. After Campbell filed a second federal habeas petition Court with its request.5 However, the Court in Blodgett took a strong in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington position on stays of executions and "explicitly" held that "[ifn a capital in 1989, the district court held a hearing and issued a written opinion case the grant of a stay of execution directed to a State by a federal court denying a stay or other relief to the defendant.
  • ABC Amber Text Converter

    ABC Amber Text Converter

    ABC Amber Text Converter Unregistered, http://www.thebeatlesforever.com/processtext/ a fever in the heart [052-066-4.9] by ann rule. Author's Note. It has been said that there are no new stories under the sun. Even those dramas and tragedies that are true are only a reprise of something that has happened before. I suspect that is an accurate analysis. In this third volume of my true crime files, I note that I have either subconsciously or inadvertently chosen four cases that share a common theme: personal betrayal. Since I am a great believer in the premise that we do nothing accidentally, it must be the right time to contemplate homicides that occur because the victim or victims have been betrayed by someone they have come to trust. In most of the following cases, the victims have believed in their killers over a long time, in one case, the victims have put their faith too quickly in the wrong men. There is something especially heartbreaking about love and friendships betrayed. The thought that some of the victims in this book must have recognized that betrayal at the very last moments of their lives may be difficult to cope with. In the final two cases, the system trusted a criminal's rehabilitation and innocent people paid for this mistake. All serve to remind us that things are seldom what they seem. And to be wary. The title case in A Fever in the Heart occurred very early in my career as a true crime writer, so early, in fact, that I felt I had neither the courage nor the technical skill to undertake a book.