Written Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 19 December 2000 22/2000 WRITTEN DECLARATION for entry in the register pursuant to Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure by Toine MANDERS, Elly PLOOIJ-VAN GORSEL, Jan MULDER, Jules MAATEN and Marieke SANDERS-TEN HOLTE on a study to be carried out into the unintended disproportionately adverse side- effects on the economy of the directive on the conservation of wild birds, the habitats directive and the Natura 2000 directive Expiry date: 19.03.2001 DV\428418EN.doc PE 299.538 EN EN 22/2000 Declaration on a study to be carried out into the unintended disproportionately adverse side-effects on the economy of the Directive on the conservation of wild birds, the habitats directive and the Natura 2000 directive The European Parliament, A. whereas the European Union has a great diversity of wild animals and plants, B. whereas these special natural resources must be protected by Community legislation, C. whereas in the past measures have been adopted to protect these resources, D. whereas in various Member States the package of regulatory measures (including the wild birds directive, habitats directive and Natura 2000 directive) is having unintended adverse side-effects on various sectors of the economy, E. whereas in the vicinity of the protected areas which have been designated not only farming, tourism and such economic activities as the operation of ports are hampered but also alternative energy production, for example using wind turbines, F. whereas this may distort the principles of the internal market, G. whereas it is necessary to know more about these unintended adverse effects before the legislation in question is assessed, 1. Calls on the Commission: • without delay to study unintended side-effects on existing economic activity, such as agriculture and recreation, of Community legislation (inter alia the wild birds directive, habitats directive and Natura 2000 directive) for the protection of special natural resources; • if this study confirms that undesirable side-effects are occurring, to assess the legislation in question and if necessary adjust or amend it; 2. Instructs its President to forward this declaration to the Commission. PE 299.538 2/2 DV\428418EN.doc EN .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
[Show full text]
TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY in the NETHERLANDS Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology
TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology Marc C. Willemsen Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research Series Editors Patrick Fafard University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada Evelyne de Leeuw University of New South Wales Australia Liverpool, NSW, Australia Public health has increasingly cast the net wider. The field has moved on from a hygiene perspective and infectious and occupational disease base (where it was born in the 19th century) to a concern for unhealthy life- styles post-WWII, and more recently to the uneven distribution of health and its (re)sources. It is of course interesting that these ‘paradigms’ in many places around the world live right next to each other. Hygiene, life- styles, and health equity form the complex (indeed, wicked) policy agen- das for health and social/sustainable development. All of these, it is now recognized, are part of the ‘social determinants of health’. The broad new public health agenda, with its multitude of competing issues, professions, and perspectives requires a much more sophisticated understanding of government and the policy process. In effect, there is a growing recognition of the extent to which the public health community writ large needs to better understand government and move beyond what has traditionally been a certain naiveté about politics and the process of policy making. Public health scholars and practitioners have embraced this need to understand, and influence, how governments at all levels make policy choices and decisions. Political scientists and international relations scholars and practitioners are engaging in the growing public health agenda as it forms an interesting expanse of glocal policy development and implementation.
[Show full text]
De 26 Nederlanders in Het Europees Parlement 2
De 26 Nederlanders in het Europees Parlement 2 Verklaring symbolen Telefoonnummer Brussel Telefoonnummers in Nederland en andere lidstaten GSM GSM Brussel Informatie in deze brochure is bijgewerkt tot februari 2013 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 3 Inhoudsopgave Biografieën 4 Contactgegevens Europarlementariërs 17 Voorlichters 21 Parlementaire commissies 23 Hoe werkt het Europees Parlement? 25 Zetelverdeling 26 Bezoeken 27 Adressen 28 Vergaderdata 29 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 4 In dit boekje vindt u de namen en contactgegevens van de 26 Nederlandse leden van het Europees Parlement. De Europarlementariërs van het CDA maken deel uit CDA van de fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen- Democraten) (EVP) Wim van de Camp (delegatieleider) Geboren 27-07-1953 te Oss. Hogere Landbouwschool voor Tropische Landbouw en studie Rechten aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Juridisch beleidsmedewerker bij de VNG (1982-1986). Lid van de Tweede Kamer (1986 -2009). Lid van het EP sinds 2009. Lid van de Commissie burgerlijke vrijheden, justitie en binnenlandse zaken. Plv. lid van de Commissie interne markt en consumentenbescherming. Plv. lid van de Bijzondere Commissie georganiseerde misdaad, corruptie en witwassen. Plv. lid van de Subcommissie mensenrechten. Lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met de Volksrepubliek China. Plv. lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met Albanië, Bosnië-Herzegovina, Servië, Montenegro en Kosovo. Esther de Lange Geboren 19-02-1975 te Spaubeek. Studie Hogere Europese Beroepsopleiding en Internationale Betrekkingen. Projectmedewerker FEANTSA (Europese federatie van dak- en thuislozenorganisaties) (1997). Medewerker Europese zaken twee Duitse brancheverenigingen (1998-1999). Beleidsmedewerker Europarlementariër (1999-2007). Voorzitter werkveldcommissie Hogere Europese Beroepen Opleiding, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (sinds 2003).
[Show full text]
Law, Practice and Convention in the Constitution of the European Union
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Law, practice and convention in the constitution of the European Union Beukers, T. Publication date 2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beukers, T. (2011). Law, practice and convention in the constitution of the European Union. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Acknowledgments Writing this book was a most fascinating journey. It took me to many different places in Europe where I learned from insiders how Europe works. I enjoyed true hospitality in the beautiful English countryside, in the centre of modern Copenhagen and lively Madrid, in the classy Parioli and Monte Verde areas of charming Rome, in the overwhelming House of Lords, in Glasgow’s sophisticated Fantoosh bar, and closer to home, in The Hague.
[Show full text]
Europese Verkiezingen: 'Deze Keer Anders'
Clingendael Magazine voor Internationale Betrekkingen April Europese Verkiezingen: ‘deze keer anders’ Oekraïne: het begin van een Europese toekomst? 2014 NSA-affaire tast relatie Berlijn-Washington aan Vlamingen en Schotten op weg naar onafhankelijkheid? www.internationalespectator.nl Inhoud Redactioneel Over scheiden, stemmen en scannen 1 Actueel Euromajdan: het begin van een Europese toekomst voor Oekraïne? | Nienke de Deugd 2 De verkiezingen voor het Europees Parlement Artikelen Vijf jaar versterkt EP: Straatsburg maakt vandaag het verschil, maar Nederlands gewicht daar nabij nihil | Jan Werts 6 Welke toekomst voor (Nederland in ) Europa?: Verkiezingsprogramma’s doorgelicht | Marko Bos & Gera Arts 12 Column Luidt groeiende euroscepsis het einde van de Europese Unie in ? | Hans Vollaard 17 Artikelen De Europese verkiezingen 2014: ‘This time it’s different’ | Judith Hoevenaars, Adriaan Schout & Jan Marinus Wiersma 19 Winst of verlies: invloed eurosceptici in Brussel blijft miniem | Wouter Wolfs 24 Kloof tussen Europese parlementen praktisch overbrugbaar door persoonlijk contact | Mendeltje van Keulen 29 Artikelen Yes We Scan!: de NSA-affaire en de Duitse buitenlandse politiek | Thomas Gijswijt 33 Vlaanderen en Schotland op weg naar onafhankelijkheid | Mohamed El Khalfioui 37 Boekbesprekingen Harry S. Truman, president van Amerika in bewogen tijden | Sabrina Otterloo 43 Mondiale rechtvaardigheid | Hester Holtland 44 Nieuw Verschenen | Joris Kreutzer 46 Film The Monuments Men | Tim Masselink (op achtercover) II April 2014 Jaargang 68 nr.
[Show full text]
Debata Została Zamknięta
6.10.2005 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 247 E/31 Środa 12 styczeń 2005 8. Pomoc Unii Europejskiej ofiarom tsunami w Azji (ciąg dalszy debaty) Głos zabrali: Ryszard Czarnecki niezrzeszony, Hartmut Nassauer, Neena Gill, Emma Bonino, Carl Schlyter, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Mario Borghezio, Eoin Ryan, John Bowis, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Eva-Britt Svensson, Nils Lundgren, Inese Vaidere, Véronique Mathieu, Margrietus van den Berg, Angelika Beer, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Åsa Westlund, Sepp Kusstatscher, Maria Mar- tens, Glenys Kinnock, Gay Mitchell, Mauro Zani, Albert Jan Maat, Ana Maria Gomes, Thomas Mann, Wolf- gang Kreissl-Dörfler, Othmar Karas, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Anders Wijk- man, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Nicolas Schmit i Janez Potočnik. Propozycje rezolucji złożone na podstawie art. 103 ust. 2 Regulaminu na zakończenie debaty: — Martin Schulz, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Margrietus van den Berg, Glenys Kinnock, María Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco i Neena Gill w imieniu grupy PSE w sprawie tsunami w Azji (B6-0034/2005); — Brian Crowley i Cristiana Muscardini w imieniu grupy UEN w sprawie niedawnej katastrofy spowodo- wanej tsunami w Azji (B6-0059/2005); — Monica Frassoni i Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit w imieniu grupy Verts/ALE w sprawie tsunami (B6-0060/ 2005); — Nirj Deva, John Bowis, Jas Gawronski, Maria Martens, Mario Mantovani, Gay Mitchell, Hartmut Nassauer, Geoffrey Van Orden, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Anders Wijkman, Antonio Tajani, Manolis Mavrommatis i Michael Gahler w imieniu grupy PPE-DE w sprawie tsunami na Oceanie Indyj- skim (B6-0062/2005); — Graham Watson w imieniu grupy ALDE w sprawie katastrofy wywołanej tsunami, która dotknęła Azję Południowo-Wschodnią (B6-0063/2005); — Luisa Morgantini, Gabriele Zimmer, Miguel Portas, Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Ilda Figueiredo, Milo- slav Ransdorf i Dimitrios Papadimoulis w imieniu grupy GUE/NGL w sprawie pomocy europejskiej ofiarom tsunami w Azji (B6-0064/2005).
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0392/2000 7 December 2000 * REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation creating the Rapid Reaction Facility (COM(2000) 119 – C5-0272/2000 – 2000/0081(CNS)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: William Newton Dunn RR\427816EN.doc PE 285.651 EN EN Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members, except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission.) PE 285.651 2/32 RR\427816EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL.....................................................................................................5
[Show full text]
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
[Show full text]
The European Ombudsman
THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2004 EN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN _________________________ _______________________ P. NIKIFOROS DIAMANDOUROS Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES President European Parliament Rue Wiertz 1047 Brussels BELGIQUE Strasbourg, 8 March 2005 Mr President, In accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman's Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2004. Yours sincerely, P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS The European Ombudsman 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman – B.P. 403 – F-67001 STRASBOURG Cedex : +33 (0)3.88.17.23.13 – Fax : +33 (0)3.88.17.90.62 http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int – [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 7 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................... 15 2 COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES............................................................ 29 2.1 THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN'S WORK............................................ 31 2.2 THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN............................................ 31 2.2.1 Unauthorised complaints ..................................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Community institutions and bodies ....................................................................................
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 GGG Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PE/IX/PV/03-12 MINUTES of the meeting of 8 July 2003, 9 a.m. - 12.30 p.m and 3 p.m. - 6.30 p.m., and 9 July 2003, 9 a.m. - 12.30 p.m. BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.05 on Tuesday, 8 July 2003, with Caroline F. Jackson, chairman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 331.656 The draft agenda and the revised version circulated on 1 July was adopted with the following changes: * Item 9 on the agenda, Ms Laura González Álvarez' opinion on "Organic production of agricultural products" was postponed to Wednesday morning. 2. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 21 and 22 May 2003 PE 331.646 10 and 11 June 2003 PE 331.655 The minutes were approved. 3. Chairman's announcements: Recovery of cod stocks As the Fisheries Committee has drawn up a very tight timetable for this report, the exchange of views and vote will take place at the same time, during our September Committee meeting. The draft opinion of Ms Schörling has been circulated to the Members and a deadline for amendments has been fixed on 16 July at 6.00 p.m. PV\496005EN.doc PE 331.662 Or. EN EN EN New Common postitions received 4.1 Monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus) ***II T07902 -( COD020164 - A5-0022/03 ) ( COD020164 - C5-0292/03 ) Rapporteur: Encarnacion REDONDO JIMENEZ - Decision on timetable: Exchange of views: 8-9 September 2003 Deadline for amendments: 16 September 2003, noon Adoption in Committee: 7 October 2003 Plenary: October II 4.2 New sweeteners: sucralose and the salt of aspartame and acesulfame (amendment of Directive 94/35/EC) ***II T07900 -( COD02015 - A5-0049/03 ) ( COD020152 - C5-0299/03 ) Rapporteur: Anne FERREIRA - Decision on timetable: Exchange of views: 8-9 September 2003 Deadline for amendments: 23 September 2003, noon Adoption in Committee: 7 October 2003 Plenary: October II 5.
[Show full text]
Curriculum Vitae Jan Mulder Born: 3 October 1943 in Diever, The
Curriculum Vitae Jan Mulder Born: 3 October 1943 in Diever, The Netherlands 1970: MCs degree at Agricultural University in Wageningen, The Netherlands 1970-1975 Working first as an Associate Expert and later as Expert for the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations in Kenya. 1975-1976 Working as an official of the Ministry of Development Cooperation in the Netherlands 1976-1994 Working as an official of the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium. Responsible for developing and implementing Agricultural Development projects, especially Animal Production projects in Africa and Asia. 1994-2004 and 2010-2014 Member of the European Parliament. Elected on the list of the Dutch Liberal Party(VVD) and therefore initially a member of the Group of European Liberal Democrat and Reform party(ELDR), which transformed later in the Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe(ALDE). In his parliamentary activities; Chair of the Budget Control Committee.(2011-2012) Vice-Chair Temporary Committee on foot and mouth disease.(2002) Vice-Chair Committee on Budgets.(2004-2007) Vice-Chair Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and SAARC Quaestor 2007-2009 Member or substitute-member of the following committees. Budgets 1994-2010 and 2012-2014 Agriculture and Rural Development 1994-2009 Budgetary Control 1994-2009 and 2011-2014 Civil liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2010-2014 Fisheries. 2007-2009 Temporary committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit system.(1996-1997) Temporary committee on foot and mouth disease.(2002) Special committee on organized crime, corruption and money laundering.(2012-2013) Member or substitute-member of the following delegations.
[Show full text]
1033641.En Pe 537.999
Question for written answer E-006525/2014 to the Commission Rule 130 Jan Huitema (ALDE), Peter van Dalen (ECR) and Bas Belder (ECR) Subject: Cisgenesis The Commission stated, in answer to a question tabled by Jan Mulder (P-6606/2007, 9 January 2008), that a working group was being set up to determine whether new plant-breeding techniques and genetic modification techniques result in organisms which should be considered to fall under the definition of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC. In 2012, a panel for GMOs set up by the European Food Safety Agency (ESA) concluded that cisgenesis was just as safe as conventional plant-breeding and that if the genes used in the breeding process came exclusively from the target species, the product was not a GMO. The Commission then stated, in answer to a question tabled by Peter van Dalen (P-003194/2014, 18 March 2014), that the legal status of new plant-breeding techniques was currently being analysed to decide whether these new techniques should be considered as falling under the existing GMO legislation, and that EFSA’s conclusions did not impact on this. 1. Can the Commission explain why, since Mr Mulder tabled his question in 2008, the Commission has still not managed to decide whether or not new plant-breeding techniques such as cisgenesis fall under the definition of GMO in Directive 2001/18/EC? 2. Can the Commission indicate why it is analysing the legal status of new plant-breeding techniques without taking account of the conclusions of the EFSA panel? 3.
[Show full text]