TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY in the NETHERLANDS Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY in the NETHERLANDS Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology Marc C. Willemsen Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research Series Editors Patrick Fafard University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada Evelyne de Leeuw University of New South Wales Australia Liverpool, NSW, Australia Public health has increasingly cast the net wider. The field has moved on from a hygiene perspective and infectious and occupational disease base (where it was born in the 19th century) to a concern for unhealthy life- styles post-WWII, and more recently to the uneven distribution of health and its (re)sources. It is of course interesting that these ‘paradigms’ in many places around the world live right next to each other. Hygiene, life- styles, and health equity form the complex (indeed, wicked) policy agen- das for health and social/sustainable development. All of these, it is now recognized, are part of the ‘social determinants of health’. The broad new public health agenda, with its multitude of competing issues, professions, and perspectives requires a much more sophisticated understanding of government and the policy process. In effect, there is a growing recognition of the extent to which the public health community writ large needs to better understand government and move beyond what has traditionally been a certain naiveté about politics and the process of policy making. Public health scholars and practitioners have embraced this need to understand, and influence, how governments at all levels make policy choices and decisions. Political scientists and international relations scholars and practitioners are engaging in the growing public health agenda as it forms an interesting expanse of glocal policy development and implementation. Broader, more detailed, and more profound scholarship is required at the interface between health and political science. This series will thus be a powerful tool to build bridges between political science, international relations and public health. It will showcase the potential of rigorous polit- ical and international relations science for better understanding public health issues. It will also support the public health professional with a new theoretical and methodological toolbox. The series will include mono- graphs (both conventional and shorter Pivots) and collections that appeal to three audiences: scholars of public health, public health practitioners, and members of the political science community with an interest in public health policy and politics. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/15414 Marc C. Willemsen Tobacco Control Policy in the Netherlands Between Economy, Public Health, and Ideology Marc C. Willemsen Maastricht University Maastricht, The Netherlands Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research ISBN 978-3-319-72367-9 ISBN 978-3-319-72368-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72368-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018937408 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This book is an open access publication Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu- tional affiliations. Cover illustration: Esben Klinker Hansen | Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature. The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland For Jacqueline, Emma, and Julia PREFACE We doubt whether a man ever brings his faculties to bear with their whole force on a subject, until he writes upon it for the instruction or gratification of others. —William Ellery Channing, 1890 If one is lucky, at some point in one’s life, things fall into place. The pro- cess of writing this book and doing research for it was such an experience. For me, writing a book about Dutch tobacco control policy was the next logical step after more than a quarter of a century of research into tobacco control. I started my academic career developing and studying smoking cessation interventions. In the 1990s I became frustrated by the fact that regardless how much attention and counselling smokers who try to quit receive, the majority of quitters relapse within a year—most in the first month after treatment. Realising that even a combination of the best and most intensive treatment does not produce success rates much higher than 30%, I turned to more fundamental questions: what makes cigarettes so addictive, and what can be done to motivate whole populations to quit smoking? In 1998 I started to work for the Stichting Volksgezondheid en Roken (Dutch Smoking or Health Foundation) (STIVORO), the national expert centre on tobacco control. This gave me first-hand knowledge of tobacco control in practice, and I gradually learned about the political aspects of tobacco control. My appointment as Professor in Tobacco Control Research at the Department of Health Promotion at Maastricht University gave me the opportunity to cross the bridge from tobacco vii viii PREFACE control research to tobacco policy research. I familiarised myself with the public policy literature, contacted political scientists, and attended the fifth Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Conference of the Parties (FCTC COP) in 2012 in Seoul to witness tobacco control politics and advocacy in action at the global level. I discovered that tobacco policy is an important topic for public policy scientists, but that insights from ­political science have not even begun to be absorbed by the tobacco con- trol research community. I was thrilled when the opportunity arose for me to write a book about this. Most of the time the process of writing was a great pleasure, with many moments of excitement when I discovered new things and my understanding was deepened. The book has also turned into the first comprehensive historical account of tobacco control in the Netherlands, written for an international readership. Inspiration for this work came from two sources. One was a book by Clavier and De Leeuw (2013) which drew attention to the fact that the health promotion field lacks a theoretical understanding of the adoption and implementation of health policies. The other was a book that pre- sented an approach to the study of tobacco control policy that does justice to insights from public policy and political sciences while being accessible to those working outside the public policy field (Cairney, Studlar, & Mamudu, 2012). The first source made me realise that there is an under-­ recognised knowledge gap in the tobacco control field that needs to be filled, and the second presented me with a solution. There are so many public policy theories available that it can be quite overwhelming for a rela- tive layperson, so I was pleased to stumble on to the general analytical framework provided by Cairney and his colleagues. It allowed me to focus on the basis elements of the policymaking process and to apply a logical structure to this book. I felt confident enough to borrow insights from two theories that I found particularly interesting, the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). However, I call on political scientists and public policy scholars to join me in studying the case of Dutch tobacco control. There is much more to learn from the enormous amount of information and data on Dutch tobacco control pol- icy as I discovered, and it is available for further research. I am most grateful for a grant from STIVORO, which made it possible to afford the necessary research and to dedicate working time to write this book. As part of STIVORO’s science team, I had obtained first-hand knowledge of tobacco control and the workings of the broader tobacco control coalition in the Netherlands. In addition, from 2013 until 2017, PREFACE ix I worked for the Dutch Alliance for a smoke free society (ANR). These employments gave me relevant data and information—a clear advantage, given the complexity of the topic—but there was also the danger of bias. I distanced myself as much as possible from my own contribution to the processes I examined. I further reduced the risk of personal bias by having people critically comment on the work. I thank Paul Cairney, Pieter de Coninck, Sanne Heijndijk, Gera Nagelhout, Dewi Segaar, Fleur van Bladeren, Bas van den Putte, and Heide Weishaar for reading and giving feedback on draft versions of the book.
Recommended publications
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal-Testing Alternatives Valuesin
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/151524 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-27 and may be subject to change. lost in technication lost in technication Meggie Pijnappel Meggie Pijnappel lost in technication VOORKANT (WORDT APART AANGELEVERD) Why do so many research practices still use research animals, despite the societal wish to decrease the number of research Meggie Pijnappel animals, the existence of public policy that uncovering aims to stimulate the development of the alternative methods to animal experimen- latent tation and the sky-high potential of emerging technologies? In Lost in Tech- clash of societal nification - Uncovering the latent clash of societal values in Dutch public policy values in Dutch public on animal-testing alternatives, Meggie Pijnappel oers a critical reection on the technical promises of the established policy discourse on discourse coalition on animal-testing alternatives in the Netherlands. Her animal-testing alternatives research focuses on the intersection of policy, research funding and research practices in translating abstract societal values on health, safety and animal welfare Meggie Pijnappel into concrete research programmes. This research not only shows the diculties that the transition towards an animal-free research world entails, but it also provides a means to stimulate more sustainable policy change. LOST IN TECHNIFICATION Uncovering the latent clash of societal values in Dutch public policy discourse on animal-testing alternatives Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Declaration
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 19 December 2000 22/2000 WRITTEN DECLARATION for entry in the register pursuant to Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure by Toine MANDERS, Elly PLOOIJ-VAN GORSEL, Jan MULDER, Jules MAATEN and Marieke SANDERS-TEN HOLTE on a study to be carried out into the unintended disproportionately adverse side- effects on the economy of the directive on the conservation of wild birds, the habitats directive and the Natura 2000 directive Expiry date: 19.03.2001 DV\428418EN.doc PE 299.538 EN EN 22/2000 Declaration on a study to be carried out into the unintended disproportionately adverse side-effects on the economy of the Directive on the conservation of wild birds, the habitats directive and the Natura 2000 directive The European Parliament, A. whereas the European Union has a great diversity of wild animals and plants, B. whereas these special natural resources must be protected by Community legislation, C. whereas in the past measures have been adopted to protect these resources, D. whereas in various Member States the package of regulatory measures (including the wild birds directive, habitats directive and Natura 2000 directive) is having unintended adverse side-effects on various sectors of the economy, E. whereas in the vicinity of the protected areas which have been designated not only farming, tourism and such economic activities as the operation of ports are hampered but also alternative energy production, for example using wind turbines, F. whereas this may distort the principles of the internal market, G. whereas it is necessary to know more about these unintended adverse effects before the legislation in question is assessed, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • De 26 Nederlanders in Het Europees Parlement 2
    De 26 Nederlanders in het Europees Parlement 2 Verklaring symbolen Telefoonnummer Brussel Telefoonnummers in Nederland en andere lidstaten GSM GSM Brussel Informatie in deze brochure is bijgewerkt tot februari 2013 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 3 Inhoudsopgave Biografieën 4 Contactgegevens Europarlementariërs 17 Voorlichters 21 Parlementaire commissies 23 Hoe werkt het Europees Parlement? 25 Zetelverdeling 26 Bezoeken 27 Adressen 28 Vergaderdata 29 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 4 In dit boekje vindt u de namen en contactgegevens van de 26 Nederlandse leden van het Europees Parlement. De Europarlementariërs van het CDA maken deel uit CDA van de fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen- Democraten) (EVP) Wim van de Camp (delegatieleider) Geboren 27-07-1953 te Oss. Hogere Landbouwschool voor Tropische Landbouw en studie Rechten aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Juridisch beleidsmedewerker bij de VNG (1982-1986). Lid van de Tweede Kamer (1986 -2009). Lid van het EP sinds 2009. Lid van de Commissie burgerlijke vrijheden, justitie en binnenlandse zaken. Plv. lid van de Commissie interne markt en consumentenbescherming. Plv. lid van de Bijzondere Commissie georganiseerde misdaad, corruptie en witwassen. Plv. lid van de Subcommissie mensenrechten. Lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met de Volksrepubliek China. Plv. lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met Albanië, Bosnië-Herzegovina, Servië, Montenegro en Kosovo. Esther de Lange Geboren 19-02-1975 te Spaubeek. Studie Hogere Europese Beroepsopleiding en Internationale Betrekkingen. Projectmedewerker FEANTSA (Europese federatie van dak- en thuislozenorganisaties) (1997). Medewerker Europese zaken twee Duitse brancheverenigingen (1998-1999). Beleidsmedewerker Europarlementariër (1999-2007). Voorzitter werkveldcommissie Hogere Europese Beroepen Opleiding, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (sinds 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Law, Practice and Convention in the Constitution of the European Union
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Law, practice and convention in the constitution of the European Union Beukers, T. Publication date 2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beukers, T. (2011). Law, practice and convention in the constitution of the European Union. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Acknowledgments Writing this book was a most fascinating journey. It took me to many different places in Europe where I learned from insiders how Europe works. I enjoyed true hospitality in the beautiful English countryside, in the centre of modern Copenhagen and lively Madrid, in the classy Parioli and Monte Verde areas of charming Rome, in the overwhelming House of Lords, in Glasgow’s sophisticated Fantoosh bar, and closer to home, in The Hague.
    [Show full text]
  • Europese Verkiezingen: 'Deze Keer Anders'
    Clingendael Magazine voor Internationale Betrekkingen April Europese Verkiezingen: ‘deze keer anders’ Oekraïne: het begin van een Europese toekomst? 2014 NSA-affaire tast relatie Berlijn-Washington aan Vlamingen en Schotten op weg naar onafhankelijkheid? www.internationalespectator.nl Inhoud Redactioneel Over scheiden, stemmen en scannen 1 Actueel Euromajdan: het begin van een Europese toekomst voor Oekraïne? | Nienke de Deugd 2 De verkiezingen voor het Europees Parlement Artikelen Vijf jaar versterkt EP: Straatsburg maakt vandaag het verschil, maar Nederlands gewicht daar nabij nihil | Jan Werts 6 Welke toekomst voor (Nederland in ) Europa?: Verkiezingsprogramma’s doorgelicht | Marko Bos & Gera Arts 12 Column Luidt groeiende euroscepsis het einde van de Europese Unie in ? | Hans Vollaard 17 Artikelen De Europese verkiezingen 2014: ‘This time it’s different’ | Judith Hoevenaars, Adriaan Schout & Jan Marinus Wiersma 19 Winst of verlies: invloed eurosceptici in Brussel blijft miniem | Wouter Wolfs 24 Kloof tussen Europese parlementen praktisch overbrugbaar door persoonlijk contact | Mendeltje van Keulen 29 Artikelen Yes We Scan!: de NSA-affaire en de Duitse buitenlandse politiek | Thomas Gijswijt 33 Vlaanderen en Schotland op weg naar onafhankelijkheid | Mohamed El Khalfioui 37 Boekbesprekingen Harry S. Truman, president van Amerika in bewogen tijden | Sabrina Otterloo 43 Mondiale rechtvaardigheid | Hester Holtland 44 Nieuw Verschenen | Joris Kreutzer 46 Film The Monuments Men | Tim Masselink (op achtercover) II April 2014 Jaargang 68 nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Debata Została Zamknięta
    6.10.2005 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 247 E/31 Środa 12 styczeń 2005 8. Pomoc Unii Europejskiej ofiarom tsunami w Azji (ciąg dalszy debaty) Głos zabrali: Ryszard Czarnecki niezrzeszony, Hartmut Nassauer, Neena Gill, Emma Bonino, Carl Schlyter, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Mario Borghezio, Eoin Ryan, John Bowis, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Eva-Britt Svensson, Nils Lundgren, Inese Vaidere, Véronique Mathieu, Margrietus van den Berg, Angelika Beer, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Åsa Westlund, Sepp Kusstatscher, Maria Mar- tens, Glenys Kinnock, Gay Mitchell, Mauro Zani, Albert Jan Maat, Ana Maria Gomes, Thomas Mann, Wolf- gang Kreissl-Dörfler, Othmar Karas, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Anders Wijk- man, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Nicolas Schmit i Janez Potočnik. Propozycje rezolucji złożone na podstawie art. 103 ust. 2 Regulaminu na zakończenie debaty: — Martin Schulz, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Margrietus van den Berg, Glenys Kinnock, María Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco i Neena Gill w imieniu grupy PSE w sprawie tsunami w Azji (B6-0034/2005); — Brian Crowley i Cristiana Muscardini w imieniu grupy UEN w sprawie niedawnej katastrofy spowodo- wanej tsunami w Azji (B6-0059/2005); — Monica Frassoni i Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit w imieniu grupy Verts/ALE w sprawie tsunami (B6-0060/ 2005); — Nirj Deva, John Bowis, Jas Gawronski, Maria Martens, Mario Mantovani, Gay Mitchell, Hartmut Nassauer, Geoffrey Van Orden, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Anders Wijkman, Antonio Tajani, Manolis Mavrommatis i Michael Gahler w imieniu grupy PPE-DE w sprawie tsunami na Oceanie Indyj- skim (B6-0062/2005); — Graham Watson w imieniu grupy ALDE w sprawie katastrofy wywołanej tsunami, która dotknęła Azję Południowo-Wschodnią (B6-0063/2005); — Luisa Morgantini, Gabriele Zimmer, Miguel Portas, Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Ilda Figueiredo, Milo- slav Ransdorf i Dimitrios Papadimoulis w imieniu grupy GUE/NGL w sprawie pomocy europejskiej ofiarom tsunami w Azji (B6-0064/2005).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0392/2000 7 December 2000 * REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation creating the Rapid Reaction Facility (COM(2000) 119 – C5-0272/2000 – 2000/0081(CNS)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: William Newton Dunn RR\427816EN.doc PE 285.651 EN EN Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members, except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission.) PE 285.651 2/32 RR\427816EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL.....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Ombudsman
    THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2004 EN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN _________________________ _______________________ P. NIKIFOROS DIAMANDOUROS Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES President European Parliament Rue Wiertz 1047 Brussels BELGIQUE Strasbourg, 8 March 2005 Mr President, In accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman's Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2004. Yours sincerely, P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS The European Ombudsman 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman – B.P. 403 – F-67001 STRASBOURG Cedex : +33 (0)3.88.17.23.13 – Fax : +33 (0)3.88.17.90.62 http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int – [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 7 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................... 15 2 COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES............................................................ 29 2.1 THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN'S WORK............................................ 31 2.2 THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN............................................ 31 2.2.1 Unauthorised complaints ..................................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Community institutions and bodies ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 GGG Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PE/IX/PV/03-12 MINUTES of the meeting of 8 July 2003, 9 a.m. - 12.30 p.m and 3 p.m. - 6.30 p.m., and 9 July 2003, 9 a.m. - 12.30 p.m. BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.05 on Tuesday, 8 July 2003, with Caroline F. Jackson, chairman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 331.656 The draft agenda and the revised version circulated on 1 July was adopted with the following changes: * Item 9 on the agenda, Ms Laura González Álvarez' opinion on "Organic production of agricultural products" was postponed to Wednesday morning. 2. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 21 and 22 May 2003 PE 331.646 10 and 11 June 2003 PE 331.655 The minutes were approved. 3. Chairman's announcements: Recovery of cod stocks As the Fisheries Committee has drawn up a very tight timetable for this report, the exchange of views and vote will take place at the same time, during our September Committee meeting. The draft opinion of Ms Schörling has been circulated to the Members and a deadline for amendments has been fixed on 16 July at 6.00 p.m. PV\496005EN.doc PE 331.662 Or. EN EN EN New Common postitions received 4.1 Monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus) ***II T07902 -( COD020164 - A5-0022/03 ) ( COD020164 - C5-0292/03 ) Rapporteur: Encarnacion REDONDO JIMENEZ - Decision on timetable: Exchange of views: 8-9 September 2003 Deadline for amendments: 16 September 2003, noon Adoption in Committee: 7 October 2003 Plenary: October II 4.2 New sweeteners: sucralose and the salt of aspartame and acesulfame (amendment of Directive 94/35/EC) ***II T07900 -( COD02015 - A5-0049/03 ) ( COD020152 - C5-0299/03 ) Rapporteur: Anne FERREIRA - Decision on timetable: Exchange of views: 8-9 September 2003 Deadline for amendments: 23 September 2003, noon Adoption in Committee: 7 October 2003 Plenary: October II 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 27-Oktober-2010-Nadere-Motivering-Bezwaarschrift-Woz-Beschikkingen-D-D-4-Augustus
    Open brief, afgegeven met ontvangstbevestiging Gezien het grote corruptie gehalte van de WOZ-beschikkingen zal deze nadere motivering op ons bezwaarschrift d.d. 4 augustus 2010 met voorgaand ‘persbericht’ wereldkundig worden gemaakt. Van: A.M.L. van Rooij, ’t-Achterom 9, 5491 XD, Sint-Oedenrode; J.E.M. van Rooij van Nunen, ’t-Achterom 9a, 5491 XD, Sint-Oedenrode; J.M. van Rooij van der Heijden, ’t-Achterom 9a, 5491 XD, Sint-Oedenrode(inwnd); Aan: Burgemeester en wethouders van Sint-Oedenrode, t.a.v. de ‘anonieme’ heffingsambtenaar, Postbus 44, 5490 AA Sint Oedenrode. Sint-Oedenrode, 27 oktober 2010 Ons kenmerk: Gembel/040810/bz/wob Betreft: Nadere motivering bezwaarschrift d.d. 4 augustus 2010 van A.M.L. van Rooij tegen de aanslagen WOZ-beschikkingen over de jaren 2008, 2009 en 2010 aan A.M.L van Rooij, betreffende: - 2008, aanslagnummer: 313509, totaalbedrag € 1.825,84 bestaande uit RIO1(9): € 54,80; AFV1(9): € 65,04; OZB4(9a): € 1.157,00; OZB5(9a): € 549,00; (zie bijlage 1) - 2009, aanslagnummer: 313547, totaalbedrag € 1.864,48 bestaande uit RIO1(9): € 58,08; AFV1(9): € 70,40; OZB1(9): € 252,00; OZB4(9a): € 939,00; OZB5(9a): € 545,00; (zie bijlage 2) - 2010, aanslagnummer: 313688, totaalbedrag € 1.396,00 bestaande uit OZB1(9): € 254,00; OZB4(9a): € 1.142,00; (zie bijlage 3) Totaalbedrag € 5.068,32 Nadere motivering bezwaarschrift d.d. 4 augustus 2010 van J.E.M. van Rooij van Nunen tegen de aanslagen WOZ-beschikkingen over de jaren 2009 en 2010 aan J.E.M. van Rooij van Nunen: - 2009, aanslagnummer: 313669, totaalbedrag € 869,76 bestaande uit RIO2(9a): € 222,96; AFV1(9a): € 109,80; OZB5(9a): € 537,00; (zie bijlage 4) - 2010, aanslagnummer: 313540, totaalbedrag € 108,44 bestaande uit RIO2(9a): € 73,24; AFV(1)(9a): € 35,20; (zie bijlage 5) Totaalbedrag € 978,20 Nadere motivering bezwaarschrift d.d.
    [Show full text]