217407123.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 Faculty Characteristics That Are Associated With the Retention of Doctoral Students. Bonnie Chaney Cooper Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cooper, Bonnie Chaney, "Faculty Characteristics That Are Associated With the Retention of Doctoral Students." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6239. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6239 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. FACULTY CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE RETENTION OF DOCTORAL STUDENTS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Vocational Education by Bonnie Chaney Cooper B.S., University o f Arkansas, 1964 M.S., Louisiana State University, 1986 August 1996 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 9706321 UMI Microform 9706321 Copyright 1996, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my husband, Jack, who propped me up when I was down, to my mother, Ellie, who taught me to persevere and to my nine year old daughter, Meagan, who had to make do without her mother. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all members of my doctoral committee who gave their time and support. Throughout my doctoral program, members of my doctoral committee have functioned not only as advisors but also as mentors in their specific areas. Three members of my committee served as my mentors before the dissertation ordeal began: Dr. Peggy Draughn, Dr. Joe Kotrlik, and Dr. Michael Burnett. Dr. Draughn was always that rock of support who gave encouragement, friendship, and compassion whenever needed. Dr. Kotrlik’s door was always open and he was willing to listen, advise, and suggest alternatives. Dr. Burnett was unselfish in giving his time being my research mentor. Dr. Vincent Kuetemeyer, my sagacious chair, served for seven years as my mentor, professionally and personally. Dr. Kuetemeyer was instrumental in helping funnel the literature and selecting a topic that I could sustain a passion for throughout the dissertation writing phase. His wisdom was especially useful in instrument development and packaging. At other times that wisdom was used like a battering ram to spur me on towards completion. He is responsible for helping keep the dissertation manageable. Two additional members of the Louisiana State University faculty deserve a special expression of appreciation. Dr. Betty Harrison served as friend and mentor for many years, and Professor Barbara Sims helped me draw closure to the process. Of course, I must thank Jo, Tonya, Glenda and Art. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION.............................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT................................................................................................................viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 Historical Perspective......................................................................... 5 Latest Emphasis in Doctoral Attrition Research ..................... 6 Design C lim ate.................................................................................... 7 Doctoral-Advisor Faculty ................................................................... 8 Statement of the Problem ................................................................... 8 Purpose and Objectives of the Study .................................................. 9 Objective 1 ............................................................................... 10 Objective 2 ...............................................................................10 Objective 3 ...............................................................................10 Objective 4 ...............................................................................11 Objective 5 ............................................................................... 11 Definitions ............................................................................................12 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ................................................16 History of the Doctorate .......................................................................16 The Dissertation ................................................................................... 17 Trends ................................................................................................ 19 The Hard Sciences .............................................................................. 20 The Doctoral G l u t .............................................................................. 21 Maximizing Doctoral Retention ..........................................................22 Variables Researched .......................................................................... 24 Selection Studies ...................................................................... 24 Program Studies...................................................................... 26 Key R esearch ....................................................................................... 27 In Search of an Attrition Model ..........................................................36 Faculty Performance ............................................................................ 40 Sum m ary ............................................................................................. 41 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................43 Introduction ......................................................................................... 43 Design of the Study .............................................................................43 Population .......................................................................................... 43 Instrumentation ................................................................................... 44 Data Collection ................................................................................... 46 Assumptions and Limitations .............................................................. 48 4 R ESU LTS..................................................................................................49 Population ........................................................................................... 49 Objective 1 Results............................................................................... 51 Doctoral Student Programs and Degree Completions ............ 52 Doctoral Program