DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizen Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizen Report Citizen's Report District Six Tentative Work Program Fiscal Year 2021 - 2025 Miami-Dade County Prepared by FDOT - District 6 - 10/10/2019 Data Reading the Citizen’sCounty: Miami Dade Report ( 87 ) FDOT HIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE PROJECT MANAGER 251688.1 SR 836/I-395 FROM WE ST OF I-95 TO MACARTHUR C SWY BRIDGE PM: PERDOMO, MARIA City: MIAMI Work Mix: Bridge-Replace And Add Lanes Extra Description: SEE ALSO 6141902 & 6141919/ULTIMATE IMPROV. CONTRACT #E6J53 R/W EST=ALT. #E-2/PH32 IN 2011 FOR DESIGN BUILD PACKAGE 4B-02 = PROPERTY MGMT SERVICES/PH4302=BNIR IN 2011 FOR ADVANCE R/W PARCELS. 32-02=CAR CNT BDT36 32-03=GC STATE FUND SEE MORE NOTES Cont. Class: Design Build ON WP45 REGARDING PH 57 & FLAGGING. FHWA OVST (PODI). PROJECT IS P3 & LET W/429300-2, 423126-1 & 423126-2 Phase Fund Code FY 2021 FY 2022 5 Year Total Construction ACID $92,340 $92,340 CEI ACNP $513,000 $513,000 ACSU $3,872,138 $3,872,138 SA $18,468 $619,408 $637,876 Total For Project 251688.1 $4,495,946 $619,408 $5,115,354 TYPE OF WORK 414964.1 SR 9A/I-95 FROM S OF MIAMI GARDENSIdentifies DRIVE the TO major B ROWARD COUNTY LINE PM: WANG, BAOYING PROJECT COST PROJECTWork Mix: Pd&E/Emo Study categoryExtra Description: of work effort SEE 95 EXPRESS UNDER 4154561 PD & E STUDY TO SUPPORT MULTIMODAL EFFORTS REMINDER: REQUEST A PH 57 TO BE ADDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1MFunded IN THE SAME in the YR (ORTWP B4) PH 52 IS ALLOCATED PER H. HARTMANN ON 9/8/16. PHASECont. Class: Misc - No Letting on a particular item segment. BEING Phase Fund Code FY 2021 FY 2024 5 Year Total FUNDEDPDE ACNP $4,000,000 $4,000,000 P.E. ACFP $20,130,000 $20,130,000 DESCRIPTION SA $10,000 $10,000 ProvidesTotal theFor Project from 414964.1 and to $4,000,000 $20,140,000 $24,140,000 as well as the name of the road, bridge, transit operation,414964.7 airport,SR etc. 9A/I-95 FROM US-1 /SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO S OUTH OF NW 62ND STREET PM: WANG, BAOYING City: MIAMI Work Mix: Pd&E/Emo Study Extra Description: PD&E STUDY SWAT PROJECT MPO PRIORITY ID# 25/FY 21 MPO PRIORITY PROJECTS LISTING MPO RESOLUTION #17-14/LRTP PRIORITY #2 REFER TO 432639-6 FOR LIMIT SPLIT Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2022 FY 2024 5 Year Total PDE ACFP $6,700,000 $6,700,000 P.E. ACFP $10,340,000 $10,340,000 Total For Project 414964.7 $6,700,000 $10,340,000 $17,040,000 October. 10 2019 Page 2 of 151 County: Miami Dade ( 87 ) HIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE 251688.1 SR 836/I-395 FROM WE ST OF I-95 TO MACARTHUR C SWY BRIDGE PM: PERDOMO, MARIA City: MIAMI Work Mix: Bridge-Replace And Add Lanes Extra Description: SEE ALSO 6141902 & 6141919/ULTIMATE IMPROV. CONTRACT #E6J53 R/W EST=ALT. #E-2/PH32 IN 2011 FOR DESIGN BUILD PACKAGE 4B-02 = PROPERTY MGMT SERVICES/PH4302=BNIR IN 2011 FOR ADVANCE R/W PARCELS. 32-02=CAR CNT BDT36 32-03=GC STATE FUND SEE MORE NOTES Cont. Class: Design Build ON WP45 REGARDING PH 57 & FLAGGING. FHWA OVST (PODI). PROJECT IS P3 & LET W/429300-2, 423126-1 & 423126-2 Phase Fund Code FY 2021 FY 2022 5 Year Total Construction ACID $92,340 $92,340 CEI ACNP $513,000 $513,000 ACSU $3,872,138 $3,872,138 SA $18,468 $619,408 $637,876 Total For Project 251688.1 $4,495,946 $619,408 $5,115,354 414964.1 SR 9A/I-95 FROM S OF MIAMI GARDENS DRIVE TO B ROWARD COUNTY LINE PM: WANG, BAOYING Work Mix: Pd&E/Emo Study Extra Description: SEE 95 EXPRESS UNDER 4154561 PD & E STUDY TO SUPPORT MULTIMODAL EFFORTS REMINDER: REQUEST A PH 57 TO BE ADDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1M IN THE SAME YR (OR B4) PH 52 IS ALLOCATED PER H. HARTMANN ON 9/8/16. Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2021 FY 2024 5 Year Total PDE ACNP $4,000,000 $4,000,000 P.E. ACFP $20,130,000 $20,130,000 SA $10,000 $10,000 Total For Project 414964.1 $4,000,000 $20,140,000 $24,140,000 414964.7 SR 9A/I-95 FROM US-1 /SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO S OUTH OF NW 62ND STREET PM: WANG, BAOYING City: MIAMI Work Mix: Pd&E/Emo Study Extra Description: PD&E STUDY SWAT PROJECT MPO PRIORITY ID# 25/FY 21 MPO PRIORITY PROJECTS LISTING MPO RESOLUTION #17-14/LRTP PRIORITY #2 REFER TO 432639-6 FOR LIMIT SPLIT Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2022 FY 2024 5 Year Total PDE ACFP $6,700,000 $6,700,000 P.E. ACFP $10,340,000 $10,340,000 Total For Project 414964.7 $6,700,000 $10,340,000 $17,040,000 October. 10 2019 Page 2 of 151 HIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE 414964.8 SR 9A/I-95 FROM SOUT H OF NW 62ND STREET TO NO RTH OF NW 151 STREET PM: WANG, BAOYING City: MIAMI - NORTH MIAMI Work Mix: Pd&E/Emo Study Extra Description: PD&E STUDY MPO PRIORITY ID# 25/FY 21 MPO PRIORITY PROJECTS LISTING MPO RESOLUTION #17-14/LRTP PRIORITY #2 REFER TO 432639- 6 FOR LIMIT SPLIT Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2022 FY 2024 5 Year Total PDE ACFP $3,700,000 $3,700,000 P.E. ACFP $5,720,000 $5,720,000 Total For Project 414964.8 $3,700,000 $5,720,000 $9,420,000 415456.7 SR 9A/I-95 EXPRESS L ANES ITS OPERATIONS CONSU LTANT CONTRACT PM: MOTTA, ALEJANDRO City: MIAMI - NORTH MIAMI Work Mix: Technical Assistance Extra Description: Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2021 5 Year Total Capital Improvement/Operating TOBD $3,528,565 $3,528,565 Total For Project 415456.7 $3,528,565 $3,528,565 415456.9 SR 9A/I-95 EXPRESS F HP ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PM: RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER Work Mix: Other Its Extra Description: Cont. Class: Misc - No Letting Phase Fund Code FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 5 Year Total Capital Improvement/Operating TOBD $625,000 $380,000 $370,000 $1,375,000 Total For Project 415456.9 $625,000 $380,000 $370,000 $1,375,000 423126.2 SR 9A/I-95 SOUTHBOUN D RAMP TO WESTBOUND SR 83 6 PM: PERDOMO, MARIA City: MIAMI Work Mix: Interchange Improvement Extra Description: CNT# E6J53; P3 & LET W/251688-1, 423126-1 & 423126-2 FHWA OVERSIGHT (PODI). Cont. Class: Design Build Phase Fund Code FY 2021 5 Year Total CEI STED $2,220,004 $2,220,004 Total For Project 423126.2 $2,220,004 $2,220,004 October. 10 2019 Page 3 of 151 HIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE 423452.3 SR 9A/I-95 FROM N.W. 155TH STREET TO N.W. 170 TH STREET PM: SCHOT, KEVIN Work Mix: Landscaping Extra Description: THIS REQUEST IS FOR A NEW LANDSCAPE PROJECT WHOSE FUNDING HAS BEEN REQUESTED PREVIOUSLY BUT HAS NOT BEEN AVAILABLE. PROJECT LIMITS INCLUDE A MAJOR INTERCHANGE AT I-95, SR 826, SR-7, AND FL TPK. THIS MAJOR INTERSECTION IS ONE OF THREE IN THE I-95 CORRIDOR Cont. Class: District Let THAT, WHEN COMPLETED, WILL FINISH ALL SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPING ON I-95. G/W 428358-1;251684-6 Phase Fund Code FY 2023 5 Year Total P.E. DDR $500,000 $500,000 DIH $30,000 $30,000 Total For Project 423452.3 $530,000 $530,000 428358.5 SR 9A/I-95 FROM N. O F BISCAYNE CANAL TO SR 86 0/MIAMI GARDEN DR PM: GARGANTA, NATALIE Work Mix: Widen/Resurface Exist Lanes Extra Description: I-95 WIDENING TO PROVIDE AUXILARY LANES FROM BISCAYNE RIVER CANAL TO MIAMI GARDENS DRIVE MPO PRIORITY ID# 13/FY 21 MPO PRIORITY PROJECTS LISTING PHASE 32-01 = GEOTECH, 32-02 = INHOUSE SUPPORT AECOM ($300K) PHASE 32-03 = DRAINAGE AECOM ($150K) Cont. Class: Tallahassee Let CONTRACT C9J68 FHWA IDENTIFIED AS OVERSIGHT (PODI) 6/15/2018 FY19. Phase Fund Code FY 2021 5 Year Total P.E. DS $220,000 $220,000 Total For Project 428358.5 $220,000 $220,000 429047.1 SR 93/I-75 FROM NW 1 78 STREET TO NW 202 STREE T PM: SCHOT, KEVIN Work Mix: Landscaping Extra Description: STAND ALONE LANDSCAPING CONTRACT#: E6M81 (LEAD) LET W/4290472 NOTE: MEGA MALL INFLUENCE FOLLOW CST OF D6 FM 4326871 & D4 FM 4307637. FM 4217078 (D6 IMPACTS) PER LANDSCAPE GAMING MTG HELD 10/10/16 NOTE: BDI CONTRACT PER LEIGH,APPR. BY ANGELA MATIYOW Cont. Class: District Let 1-11-18 Phase Fund Code FY 2021 5 Year Total Construction DDR $1,115,380 $1,115,380 CEI DDR $136,126 $136,126 DIH $44,118 $44,118 DS $108,062 $108,062 Total For Project 429047.1 $1,403,686 $1,403,686 October. 10 2019 Page 4 of 151 HIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE 429047.2 SR 93/I-75 FROM NW 1 62 STREET TO NW 178 STREE T PM: SCHOT, KEVIN Work Mix: Landscaping Extra Description: NOTE: MEGA MALL INFLUENCE FOLLOW CST OF D6 FM 4326871 & D4 FM 4307637. FM 4217078 (D6 IMPACTS) PER LANDSCAPE GAMING MTG HELD 10/10/16 CNT# E6M81 LET W/4290471 (LEAD) Cont.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JULY 2016 Our Next Meeting Is Monday, July 18Th at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway Which Is the Golden Gate Community Center
    COLLIER FRUIT GROWERS NEWSLETTER JULY 2016 Our next meeting is Monday, July 18th at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway which is the Golden Gate Community Center. The topic is going to be " Unusual and Rare Fruit Trees that Adapt or May Adapt to Cultivation in Florida". There will not be an August meeting. See you in September Our speaker is Berto Silva, a native Brazilian who specializes in growing rare and unusual fruits. Berto was raised in northeast Brazil where he learned to enjoy several different types of fruits. In the last twenty years, he has experimented growing rare and unusual fruits from all over the world including some varieties native to the Amazon region. He has a spectacular jaboticaba arbor at his home in South Ft. Myers. He is an active member with the Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club and with the Caloosa Rare Fruit Exchange. Berto’s collection includes myrciarias, eugenias, pouterias, annonas, mangiferas, and campomanesias. The meeting starts at 7:30 pm at the Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway in Golden Gate City. The tasting table opens at 7:00 pm. BURDS’ NEST OF INFORMATION THIS and THAT FOR JULY MANGOS MANGOS MANGOS We suggest that you attend: The International Mango Festival is at Fairchild Tropical Botanical Garden on July 9 th &10 th from 9am -4pm. Saturday is the better day to go. The University of Florida Collier County Extension on Saturday July 16 th from 9am – 1pm presents “Alternatives to Citrus - Mango and Fruit Trees for you yard” with Steve from Fruit Scapes & the Burds.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2016 Newsletter
    July 2016 – Achachairu (Bolivian Mangosteen) Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club Newsletter Who we are and what we do: The Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club, Inc., is an educational not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to inform, educate and advise members and the public in the selection of tropical and subtropical fruiting plants and trees, to encourage their cultivation, and to provide a social forum where members can freely exchange plant material and information. The club cooperates with many organizations, and provides a basis for producing new cultivars. We function in any legal manner to further the above stated aims. Meetings: Regular membership meetings that include an educational program are held the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings begin with a tasting table at 6:45 PM followed by a program at 7:15 PM, at the First United Methodist Church, 27690 Shriver Avenue, Bonita Springs. The meetings are held in the "Fellowship Hall" meeting room. Workshops: Workshops (monthly discussions) are held on the fourth Tuesday of each month. This open format encourages discussion and sharing of fruits and information. Bring in your fruits, plants, seeds, leaves, insects, photos, recipes, etc. This is a great chance to get answers to specific questions, and there always seems to be a local expert on hand! The workshops begin at 7pm and are also held at the First United Methodist Church, 27690 Shriver Avenue, Bonita Springs, in the "Fellowship Hall" meeting room. Directions: From the intersection of Old 41 Road and Bonita Beach Road SE, proceed north to Dean Street. Turn right on Dean St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club 2017 Tree Sale Pre-Order Form
    BONITA SPRINGS TROPICAL FRUIT CLUB 2017 TREE SALE PRE-ORDER FORM Customer Name:____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone:_______________________ (OK to Text this number? Y/N) Email:____________________________________ NOTE: Tree Sale is Saturday, Feb. 25 at Riverside Park in Bonita Springs, from 9-1:00. Pre-orders must be picked up and paid for by noon that day or they may be sold. Submit pre-orders by Sunday, Feb. 12 to Kathy at [email protected] or 239-822-7151. You will receive order confirmation. Tree availability may change due to factors beyond our control. TREE* 1 gallon 3 gallon 7 gallon* Your Notes or Variety Selection (see back), if applicable TOTAL COST All Citrus $15 $30 $50 Atemoya $65 Avocado $35 $60 Banana $25 $40 Barbados Cherry $30 $50 Black Sapote $35 $60 Blackberry $25 Canistel $35 $60 Carambola $35 $60 Coconut $35 $60 Dragon Fruit $15 $35 Fig $35 $60 Guanabana See Soursop Grumichama $35 $60 Jaboticaba $35 $60 Jackfruit $35 $60 Jujube $35 $60 Longan $35 $60 Loquat $35 $60 Lychee $35 $60 Macadamia $35 $65 Mamey Sapote $40 $75 Mango $40 $65 Miracle Fruit $20 $40 Mulberry $35 $60 Circle: regular / dwarf Papaya $20 Passion Fruit $25 Peach or Plum $35 $60 Indicate which: Persimmon $35 $60 Pineapple $10 Raspberry $25 Sapodilla $40 $75 Soursop $35 $65 Sugar Apple $35 $65 Fruitilizer 50 lbs. $25 Fruitscapes’ special fertilizer blend for growing fruit. Perlite, large bag $20 A must-have for successful container growing. Book: Florida’s Best Fruiting Plants $22 The bible of tropical fruit for home growers in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Family an Acardiaceae
    CETHA VoL. l 330 1952 PoPENuE: CENTRAL AMEIUCAN Fnurr CuLTUHE 331 These lrees thrive in tllf' biglauds, Leing sufficiently hardy to stand the cold up to 3000 meters, perhaps evcn higher. They are not exacting as lo soil. They are easily ~~rown from sec•J,¡ and can alsu be propagated by shield huddine; as in the case of citrus. Attempts lo graft them on eitrus ro• )Í..,tnl'ks, however, h'' ve not l~ een successful at Escuda Agrícola Panamericana. These attempts were su~~ested by the fact that the two genera belon~ to thc same family. The culture of these trers is si rnple. They re:sist unfav­ orahle eonditions such as hard, rocky soil and long dry seasons. They are sometimes atlaekcd by scale insects. Little attention has .heen given their eultivation in Central America, where they are invariahly seen as dooryard trres or in a ludf-wild state. FAMILY AN ACARDIACEAE The im !)ortant family Anacardiaceae comprises about 6~ genera and sao species of trees and shrubs, sorne of which are tropical, while others are natives of the Temperate Zone. In addition to that delicious and universally popular fruit, the mango, the family includes the cashew or marañón; the jo­ cotes or Spanish plums~ the pistachio nut of the Med:terranean region; thc molle ( Schinus molle), a handsome ornamental tree~ ami some disa•ueea!Je memJ-.ers sunh as the noison oak or poison ivy of the United States and northern Central Ameri~a. Casimiroa edulis The genus Mangifera, to which thr mango belongs, is in· Courtesy Chicago Natural Hü;tory Museum digrnous in tropical southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Paper
    J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2019 Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 63-70, 2019 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Insect diversity visitors to gadung 21 variety of Mango flower on off Season and on Season Wiwin Windriyanti*1, Sri Karindah2, Liliek Sulistyowati2, Bambang Tri Rahardjo2 1Post Graduate Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia 2Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran Malang, Indonesia Article published on February 28, 2019 Key words: Diversity, Insect, Gadung 21 mango variety. Abstract Mango plantations (Mangifera indica Linn.) are generally flowering once a year. By technological innovation, the mango inflorescences period can be carried out over the flower season (Off Season). The purpose of this study is to examine the insect diversity of visitors to mango flowers in spring (on-season and off-season). Research was carried out in March-May and July - September 2017. The study was conducted in Rembang District, Pasuruan Regency, East Java with the topography of 60 meters above sea level with an average temperature of 26°C - 32°C and a minimum humidity of 80% - 88%. The insect diversity of visitors to mango flowers is observed by purposive sampling method, and periodic direct observation (scan sampling) is carried out. Data were analyzed with the help of the R statistic application version 3.4.1 and vegan package version 2.4-4. The results of the study were 17 species, 12 families, and 5 orders. The percentage of insects is dominated by 51% order Hymenoptera, 46% Diptera, Lepidoptera, Homoptera, and Hemiptera 1% each.
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Genetic Diversity Analysis and Pedigree Inferences for Florida Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 131(2):214–224. 2006. Mango Genetic Diversity Analysis and Pedigree Inferences for Florida Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers R.J. Schnell1, J.S. Brown, C.T. Olano, and A.W. Meerow National Germplasm Repository, USDA, ARS, SHRS, 13601 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL 33158 R.J. Campbell Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, 10901 Old Cutler Road, Coral Gables, FL 33156 D.N. Kuhn Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Mangifera indica, cultivar identifi cation, SSR markers, mango breeding, parentage analysis ABSTRACT. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm can be classifi ed by origin with the primary groups being cultivars selected from the centers of diversity for the species, India and Southeast Asia, and those selected in Florida and other tropical and subtropical locations. Accessions have also been classifi ed by horticultural type: cultivars that produce monoembryonic seed vs. cultivars that produce polyembryonic seed. In this study we used 25 microsatellite loci to estimate genetic diversity among 203 unique mangos (M. indica), two M. griffi thii Hook. f., and three M. odorata Griff. accessions maintained at the National Germplasm Repository and by Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden in Miami, Fla. The 25 microsatellite loci had an average of 6.96 alleles per locus and an average polymorphism information content (PIC) value of 0.552 for the M. indica population. The total propagation error in the collection (i.e., plants that had been incorrectly labeled or grafted) was estimated to be 6.13%. When compared by origin, the Florida cultivars were more closely related to Indian than to Southeast Asian cultivars.
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Growing in the Florida Home Landscape1 Jonathan H
    HS2 Mango Growing in the Florida Home Landscape1 Jonathan H. Crane, Jeff Wasielewski, Carlos F. Balerdi, and Ian Maguire2 Scientific Name: Mangifera indica L. include India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Mexico, Brazil, and the Philippines. Other important producers are Australia, Common Names: mango, mangga (Southeast Asia), South Africa, Ecuador, Peru, Israel, and Egypt. In the mamuang (Thai), manguier (French) United States, Florida, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii have small but locally important industries. Family: Anacardiaceae Relatives: cashew, spondias, pistachio Origin: Mangos originated in the Indo-Burma region and are indigenous to India and Southeast Asia. Distribution: Mangos are grown in tropical and subtropi- cal lowlands throughout the world. In Florida, mangos are grown commercially in Dade, Lee, and Palm Beach Counties and as dooryard trees in warm locations along the southeastern and southwestern coastal areas and along the southern shore of Lake Okeechobee. Figure 1. Selected mango cultivars. History: Mangos have been cultivated in India for more Credits: Ian Maguire, UF/IFAS than 4000 years. Beginning in the 16th century, mangos were gradually distributed around the world, reaching the Description Americas in the 18th century. The first recorded introduc- Tree tion into Florida was Cape Sable in 1833. Left unpruned many mango varieties become medium to large (30 to 100 ft; 9.1 to 30.5 m) trees. Trees are evergreen, Importance: Mangos are universally considered one of the with a symmetrical, rounded canopy ranging from low and finest fruits and are one of the most important fruit crops dense to upright and open. Tree vigor varies among variet- in tropical and subtropical areas of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • RED BANDED MANGO CATERPILLAR CONTINGENCY PLAN 2 Effective Chemicals
    MANGO INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN THREAT-SPECIFIC CONTINGENCY PLAN RED BANDED MANGO CATERPILLAR COMMON NAME: red banded mango caterpillar SCIENTIFIC NAME: Deanolis sublimbalis Snellen, 1899 ORDER: LEPIDOPTERA FAMILY: Pyralidae SUBFAMILY: Odontiinae SYNONYMS: mango fruit borer mango seed borer red banded borer Deanolis albizonalis (Hampson) Autocharis albizonalis (Hampson) Noorda albizonalis Hampson Prepared by Jane Royer, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland. March 2008. The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the threat. New information will be included as it comes to light, or when the document is reviewed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ 4 ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 4 Host Range .............................................................................................................. 5 Part of commodity affected ...................................................................................... 5 BIOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 5 Identification ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MANGO: Post Harvest Operations Page 2
    MANGO Post-harvest Operations - Post-harvest Compendium MANGO: Post-harvest Operations Organization: Instituto Tecnologico de Veracruz (ITVER)(http://www.itver.edu.mx) Authors: J. De La Cruz Medina, H.S. García ([email protected]) Edited by AGSI/FAO: Danilo Mejia,PhD (Technical), Beverly Lewis (Language & Style) Last reviewed: 05/06/2002 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Economic and social impact of mangoes ................................................................... 19 1.2 World trade ................................................................................................................ 21 1.3 Primary product ......................................................................................................... 23 1.4 Secondary and derived products ................................................................................ 27 1.5 Requirements for export and quality assurance ......................................................... 30 1.6 Consumer preferences ................................................................................................ 30 2. Post-Production Operations ............................................................................................. 33 2.1 Harvesting .................................................................................................................. 33 2.2 Packinghouse operations ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • See the Checklist
    P I C O B O N I T O R E A D E R R E N D E Z V O U S IN PARTNERSHIP WITH SPECIES CHECKLIST W E E K O N E SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS: DATE LOCATIONS VISITED WEATHER CONDITIONS / NOTES Day 1 Arrival Day 2 Pico Bonito Day 3 Rio Santiago Day 4 Lancetilla Day 5 Big Sit La Cieba Day 6 Cuero y Salado Day 7 Cayos Cochinos Day 8 - 1 - Pico Bonito & Bird Watcher's Digest Reader Rendezvous 2018 Common Name Scientific Name Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Total NOTES Tinamous Tinamidae Great Tinamou Tinamus major H Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui x x x Slaty-breasted Tinamou Crypturellus boucardi Guans Cracidae Plain Chachalaca Ortalis vetula H x x Crested Guan Penelope purpurascens Highland Guan Penelopina nigra Great Curassow Crax rubra Grebes Podicepidae Pied-billed Grebe Podylimbus podicepts Least Grebe Tachybaptus dominicus Pelicans Pelecanidae American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis x x x x Quail Odontophoridae Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge Dendrortyx leucophrys Spotted Wood-Quail Odontophorus guttatus Black-eared Wood-Quail Odontophorus melanotis Singing Quail Dactylortyx thoracicus Ocellated Quail Cyrtonyx ocellatus Tawny-faced Quail Rhynchortyx cinctus Spotted-bellied Bobwhite Colinus leucopogon Pelicans and Cormorants Phalacrocoracidae Neotropic Cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus x x x x Anhinga Anhingidae Anhinga Anhinga anhinga x - 2 - Frigate Birds Fregatidae Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Total NOTES Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens x x Herons
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Genetic Diversity Analysis and Pedigree Inferences for Florida Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers R.J
    J. Amu. Soc. I-tORT. SCI. 131(2):214-224. 2006. Mango Genetic Diversity Analysis and Pedigree Inferences for Florida Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers R.J. Schnell, J.S. Brown, C.T. Olano, and A.W. Meerow National Gerniplasm Repositor y, USDA, ARS, SHRS, 13601 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL 33158 R.J. Campbell Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, 1090/ Old Cutler Road, Coral Gables, FL 33156 D.N. Kuhn Department oJBiological Sciences, Florida International Universit y, Miami, FL 33199 ADDITIOSAI. INDEX WORDS. Maflgt/1.ra iJl(ll(fl. cultivar identification. SSR markers, mango breeding, parentage analysts ABS-r RAC T. Mango (Man gifera indica L.) germplasrn can he classified by origin with the primary groups being cultivars selected from the centers of diversit y for the species, India and Southeast Asia, and those selected in Florida and other tropical and subtropical locations. Accessions have also been classified by horticultural type: cultivars that produce monoembryonic seed vs. cultivars that produce polyembryonic seed. In this study we used 25 microsatellite loci to estimate genetic diversity among 203 unique mangos (M. indica), two M. grtjjillzii Hook. f., and three M. odorata Griff. accessions maintained at the National Germplasm Repository and by Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden in Miami, Fla. The 25 microsatellite loci had an average of 6.96 alleles per locus and an average polymorphism information content (PlC) value of 0.552 for the M, indica population. The total propagation error in the collection (i.e.. plants that had been incorrectly labeled or grafted) was estimated to be 6.13%. When compared by origin, the Florida cultivars were more closely related to Indian than to Southeast Asian cultivars.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoamerican Caribbean Reef Conservation Oo©18,WF-Konitrainlya H Ol Iefn O Aue W Eitrdtaeakonr 11-2001/5000 • Pri ® WWF Registered Trademark As the WWF - Known Owner
    24764_MesoAmer_Cover.qxd 06.10.02 5:00 PM Page 1 BY PHILIP A. KRAMER AND PATRICIA RICHARDS KRAMER EDITED BY MELANIE McFIELD Ecoregional Conservation Reef Ecoregional the Mesoamerican Caribbean Planning for Logo © 1986, Nature.Wide Fund for World internationally owner. WWF - known as the Trademark WWF Registered ® 11-2001/5000 • Pri nted on recycled paper inks.nted on recycled using soy-based Published May 2002 U.S.A. Straits of Florida CUBA Yucatan ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLANNING Channel MEXICO for the BELIZE BAY ISLANDS EA GUATEMALA Mesoamerican HONDURAS EL SALVADOR NICARAGUA Caribbean Reef ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLANNING for the Mesoamerican Caribbean Reef (MACR) BY PHILIP A. KRAMER AND PATRICIA RICHARDS KRAMER EDITED BY MELANIE MCFIELD Philip Kramer, Ph.D. and Melanie McField, Ph.D. Sylvia Marín Patricia Richards Kramer MACR Reef Scientist/Senior MACR Ecoregional Coordinator MGG, Rosenstiel School of Program Officer for Belize P.O. Box 629-2350 Marine and Atmospheric Science P.O. Box 512 San Francisco de Dos Ríos 4600 Rickenbacker Cswy. Belize City, Belize, Central America San Jose, Costa Rica Miami, FL 33149 Phone 501-2-37680 Phone 506-253-1529 Tel/Fax Phone 305-361-4664 Tel/Fax Tel/Fax 501-2-37681 506-234-7976 305-361-4632 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Acknowledgements his report is the result of a collaborative effort Conservation Society (WCS), Tom Allnutt (WWF), between World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Ocean Serge Andrefouet (USF), Alex Arrivillaga (USGS), TResearch and Education Foundation (ORE), and Bessy Aspra de Lupiac (DIGEPESCA), Robert Bonde The University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine (USGS), Ted Cheeseman (TNC), Pablo G.
    [Show full text]