POETIC Techhiqces'ii the POETRY OP WILLIAM DUNBAR
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Poetic techniques in the poetry of William Dunbar Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Meyer, Charles August, 1941- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 04:50:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/317860 POETIC TECHHiqCES'II THE POETRY OP WILLIAM DUNBAR "by Charles August Meyer k Thesis Submitted, to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In- Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree- of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 5 Sf AfEEMEIT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Libraryo Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl edgment of source is made* Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Bean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter ests of scholarshipo In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: H V . 7 7 / m jo, J U S KEHRETH COHROY T T (J Bate Assistant Professor of Amglish TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT OOOOOOOOOOOOO0OOO0OOO-O INTRODUCTION ........ 1 ■PERSONAL POETRY = , © © © © © © © , © = , = » = = © 8 PETITIONS © © © © © © © © © © . © . © © © © © © . © 22 POEMS OF THE COURT AND OF THE TOWN .©..©», © © 34 RELIGIOUS POETRY © © ©© © © © © © © © © © . © © © © 51 POEMS OF WOMEN .©©©»,©©».©,»»»-«»» 6 ? ALLEGORIES ©©©©©©©©©©o©©©*©©©*©© 82 ADDRESSES ©©©©©o®©©©©©©©©©©©©©© 101 POEMS OF MORALITY © © © „ © ® © © » © © ® © © » © © 112 oooosoooooooo oooooooo 120 111 ABSfMG.$ William Dunbar is a poet of humor, of satire, of sadness, of fear, in short, of man and his existence» He writes poetry involving the entire gamut of human experi ence as he saw it through his own eyes0 Writing at the beginning of the sixteenth century, he is the last strong voice of a sparkling, dynamic age. His poetry is marked by its applicability today. Dunbar is not solely a poet of the past. His verse is representative of life as he experiences it. Because the . basic emotions of man have not changed, Dunbar, in many respects, is a current poet. There is no doubt that he is a medieval man. He is, however, a good example of the fact that the medieval period in literature is not solely one of convention and of tradition. It is made up of living men whose experiences and actions are recognizable today as being universal to man. Dunbar1s best work is not found in his conventional verse. Dream allegory and courtly love are not still part of literature as driving, dynamic forces. As an example, the poet's ability is clearly seen in "The Tretis of the Tua Mariit Wemen and the Wedo." It is not, however, in the poem's opening, and closing lines that this is apparent. When he leaves the traditional framework for description iv of the women and their ©pinions, the poem attains a stark ness and -vitality that removes it from a now-unexperienced convention to an area of real emotion, Dunbar, because of this, and because of his ability at handling language artistically, is a good poet. INTBODUCHOE Between the death of Ghaneer and the advent of Skelton, there is preeioms little of literary note in Englando Thomas Hoccleve8 s canon is slight and is narrow in its rangeo Lydgate is voluminous, "but "because he is so completely overshadowed "by Chaucer, his mentor, his work is known to students of the period primarily "by name rather than "by reput at i ©.a. Baugh,, in his discussion of Lydgate, concludes that he lived thirty years too long for the good of his literary reputation. The remainder of the names in this period are mentioned primarily out of curiosity: George Ashby, John Shirley, Eichard Sellyng, and John Halsham. They are amateurs and have scant influence upon the literature of the century in which they lived. Their poetry is a slight dabbling in literary exercise and has no lasting merit or impact. But to conclude that nothing of literary value is being written in English at this time is erroneous. While literature in England is surviving mainly through the influence of Chaucer's works, an entire vernacular litera ture is evolving north of the Tyne. Apart from the work of Burns in the eighteenth century, the fifteenth and early part of the sixteenth century is the golden age of Scottish literary productivity. Several names are called to mind: 1 Klag James I of Se©tlamd» Balf©mr> Hemrysom, ami. lomglas» . Bmt tMe demimamt name among them is William Bmnhar (14-6 ©?- 152©|). G©nTen.ieB.tly labelled as a Seettish Ghamoeriam* a Scottish Lydgatian, a Scottish Skelton, on a Scottish Tillon, he has been relegated to the minor ranks, a posi tion that certainly is not worthy of his virtuosity and talento Zor are the above labels a fair measure of his ability» Lydgate is also §. disciple of Ghameer; his work, however, lacks the driving force and baaamity that is characteristic of lumbar's poetry. Several points concerning lumbar and his poetry are immediately apparent to the reader =, His poetry can never be called "narrow. '* It has the diversity of his personality and as smeh cam never be completely pigeon holed as "conventional" or "traditional=" Is Shakespeare eomld rise to profound heights and sink into a morass of human misery, so can Immbar. He tackles the mysteries of humanity and of its individual with a gmst© unparalleled in Scotland before Burns. All is not misery and sadness; all is not joy and elation. It can never be said of lumbar that he took the wheat of human experience and left the chaff to lie, ignored® He loves life and living; he likes Han. $. F. Henderson has said; "It is when he touches on human life-— its follies and delights, its mischances. griefs$ mmeertaiaties and vamity--that he kindles inte true poetic warmth»" There are two types of diction within his poetry» He writes in ^anreate’1 diction in the formal pieces smeh as "The Thrissil and the Hois'’ and "The Goldyn Targe." Aureate diction is formalistic and is fall of hatinismsg conventional expressions, and traditional themes. John Speirs has called poems smeh as these "show piece" poems; they are artificial poetic exercises for the most part, and they do mot express Smmhar’s true poetic talent. It is in his poems written in collofmial Scots that he excel#*• Middle Scots is a descriptive, realistic language* It is ameh akin to English, hmt it has all the color of a separate tongme in its vocabmlary and s©mads. Bmmhar°s smbjeets eomld never have been treated in English with the same tone. His "Lallamd" dialect is a good medium for his eollogmial poetry. The richness and strength of Middle Scots is apparent in his realistic poems. Because the language and strmctmre are natural rather than constructed and artificial, the poetry takes on a realistic flair reminiscent of Bmrms three eemtmries later. Hmmor, 1. T. S. Henderson, Scottish Yernacmlar Idteratmre (Edinburgh, 191©), p» 1?8. 2. John Speirs, "A Survey of Medieval Terse," in Boris Ford, ed.. The Age of Ghameer (Baltimore, 1962), p. 58. sadness9 and sareasa never "go" in any mode other than the natural langmage ©f a people= A reader is impressed immediately fey the brevity of Imnhar’s poetry» His eanom is not large and his individual poems are not long® Some eighty-four p©ems comprise the hulk of his production^ The longest9 "The fretis of the fma Mariit Women and the Wed©," is femt 53© lines long© f© mistake this brevity for am inability at disomssimg in depth, however, is wrong» Shortness adds to the liveliness of his stanzas; the lack of superfluity'lets him get to the crux of the matter without any redundancy® He makes his point without being.l©mg-winded and boringo Certainly this is a mark of an accomplished professional as opposed to the amateur= fhat lumbar is to seme extent dependent upon Chaucer is evident, as will later be more fully demon strated <, He has also profited from the work done by Francois Villon, Skelton, and Lydgate» But to consider him as a disciple of any previous poet is not a fair representa tion. lumbar is simply too original in too much of his poetry to fee subservient to any other artist* What lumbar has done is to use the various examples of these men as inspiratory rather than dictatory models. He is never limited by the use of his contemporaries alone, however* He knows the earlier Middle English and later ©Id English poetry well enough to effectively write in unrhymed \ "5 alliterative meter; he smffieiemtly appreciates the teaal value and effeetiveaess ®£ alliteratiea t© make it integral thr©mgk©mt his eanon= Bmnhar is met remarkable in his traditieual^ e©avemtiomal$ medieval verse• It is within his mneoaven- tieaal that his p©etie ability and prefessiemal demeamer are especially evident« Eis subject material includes a headache that he has suffered, the physical ceaditieas ©f the Edinburgh streets, the g©bs. ©f tellers and shoemakers, and the way in which seme©me else has semrri1 ©msly rendered his verseo His emetica is ©pen; his honesty ©f presenta tion is plain; his laugh is leud; and his anger is strong» lumbar has complete confidence in his ability as a poet= His effects are rarely strained.