Title 5 Soil Evaluator Certification Training Soil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title 5 Soil Evaluator Certification Training Soil ___________________________________ TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR ___________________________________ CERTIFICATION TRAINING ___________________________________ Climate Organisms ___________________________________ SOIL PARENT Relief Time MATERIAL ___________________________________ The geologic sediments that the soils formed in ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By S.B. Mabee, PhD, PG, Massachusetts Geological Survey University of Massachusetts Amherst Presented by: New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Page 1, form 11 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Page 2, form 11 What is parent material? What landform? Read Topo map/read the landscape Understanding geology helps. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Drumlin Landform ___________________________________ SU SH Summit SH ___________________________________ Shoulder BS Back slope Kame Landform ___________________________________ SU FS Glacial Till SH Foot slope ___________________________________ Sand & BS Gravel ___________________________________ TS FS Toe slope ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ The Parent Material ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Where do the deposits in which the soils have formed come from? • What are their characteristics? ___________________________________ • These are the deposits that we live in ___________________________________ • Quick review of surficial geology of MA ___________________________________ • How deposits got here; how these deposits are typically represented on geologic maps ___________________________________ • What types of landforms these surficial deposits are associated ___________________________________ with and why • How to recognize these landforms on topographic maps and • Their characteristics and relevance to septic systems ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Parent materials govern minerals, color, permeability, infiltration New England soils do not form from weathering of bedrock ___________________________________ Types of ___________________________________ Glacial Till Deposits ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Outwash Plain ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Clay Topset Beds ___________________________________ Sand & Gravel Delta Wide variety, variable thick., wide range properties ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Most recent continental glaciation began 85,000 to 100,000 years ago ___________________________________ Wisconsin Glaciation (Laurentide Ice Sheet) ___________________________________ Max. extent ___________________________________ 22,000 to 28,000 years ago ___________________________________ About 1 mile thick over MA ___________________________________ Glaciation shaped ___________________________________ our landscape And dictate which soils ___________________________________ are suitable for septic systems and which are not ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ How do we know glaciers were here? ___________________________________ Modern analogs ___________________________________ Striations and Grooves ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ General South to Southeast Ice Flow ___________________________________ The Main Groups of Soil Parent Materials ___________________________________ • Glacial Till • Windblown (Loess) ___________________________________ • Shallow Bedrock • Organic Matter ___________________________________ • Glacial Outwash • Alluvial (Floodplain) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Lacustrine (Lakebed) • Coastal Deposits Deposits ___________________________________ • Fill Material • Marine Silts and Clays (Human Transported Material) What Makes Our Landscape So Diverse? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Wide variety and complex environments that occur when the ice is retreating and actively melting ___________________________________ • Meltwater stream spew tons of sand and gravel with high permeability while glacial lakes accumulate thick deposits ___________________________________ of low permeability silts and clays The Bottom Line ___________________________________ • The advance and retreat of glaciers imparted significant ___________________________________ heterogeneity to our landscape that changes rapidly in both a lateral as well as vertical direction ___________________________________ • How did different glacial deposits form, how are they manifested in the landscape, how can they be identified on topographic maps and how do they affect soil properties ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Glacial Till ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Dominantly unsorted and unstratified debris, deposited directly by the glacier, and consisting ___________________________________ of a heterogeneous mixture of all the particle sizes – clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Two Types of Glacial Till ___________________________________ Lodgement or Basal Till ___________________________________ Compact, dense deposited at the base of an actively flowing (moving) glacier ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Ablation Till ___________________________________ Loose, sandier till deposited by the melting ___________________________________ (wasting) glacier ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ >50% sand, 25-35% silt, <17% (8%) Ubiquitous <10 ft thick to a max. of 230 feet ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Characteristics of Lodgement Till ___________________________________ • Heterogeneous mixture of all particles sizes – ___________________________________ clay to boulder size ___________________________________ • Unsorted, not stratified ___________________________________ • Angular shaped rock fragments ___________________________________ • Firm and compact ___________________________________ • Clay content relatively high (5 – 25%) • Rock fragments are held firmly in place ___________________________________ Characteristics of Lodgement Till (con’t) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Typically occurs 2.5 to 3 feet below ground surface ___________________________________ • Locally referred to as “hardpan” ___________________________________ • Often has a perched water table during wet seasons and following periods of heavy precipitation ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________
Recommended publications
  • 1 Recognising Glacial Features. Examine the Illustrations of Glacial Landforms That Are Shown on This Page and on the Next Page
    1 Recognising glacial features. Examine the illustrations of glacial landforms that are shown on this C page and on the next page. In Column 1 of the grid provided write the names of the glacial D features that are labelled A–L. In Column 2 indicate whether B each feature is formed by glacial erosion of by glacial deposition. A In Column 3 indicate whether G each feature is more likely to be found in an upland or in a lowland area. E F 1 H K J 2 I 24 Chapter 6 L direction of boulder clay ice flow 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 A Arête Erosion Upland B Tarn (cirque with tarn) Erosion Upland C Pyramidal peak Erosion Upland D Cirque Erosion Upland E Ribbon lake Erosion Upland F Glaciated valley Erosion Upland G Hanging valley Erosion Upland H Lateral moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) I Frontal moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) J Medial moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) K Fjord Erosion Upland L Drumlin Deposition Lowland 2 In the boxes provided, match each letter in Column X with the number of its pair in Column Y. One pair has been completed for you. COLUMN X COLUMN Y A Corrie 1 Narrow ridge between two corries A 4 B Arête 2 Glaciated valley overhanging main valley B 1 C Fjord 3 Hollow on valley floor scooped out by ice C 5 D Hanging valley 4 Steep-sided hollow sometimes containing a lake D 2 E Ribbon lake 5 Glaciated valley drowned by rising sea levels E 3 25 New Complete Geography Skills Book 3 (a) Landform of glacial erosion Name one feature of glacial erosion and with the aid of a diagram explain how it was formed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250
    The Ohio Naturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University. Volume VIII. JANUARY. 1908. No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS. SCHEPFEL—An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250 AN ESKER GROUP SOUTH OF DAYTON, OHIO.1 EARL R. SCHEFFEL Contents. Introduction. General Discussion of Eskers. Preliminary Description of Region. Bearing on Archaeology. Topographic Relations. Theories of Origin. Detailed Description of Eskers. Kame Area to the West of Eskers. Studies. Proximity of Eskers. Altitude of These Deposits. Height of Eskers. Composition of Eskers. Reticulation. Rock Weathering. Knolls. Crest-Lines. Economic Importance. Area to the East. Conclusion and Summary. Introduction. This paper has for its object the discussion of an esker group2 south of Dayton, Ohio;3 which group constitutes a part of the first or outer moraine of the Miami Lobe of the Late Wisconsin ice where it forms the east bluff of the Great Miami River south of Dayton.4 1. Given before the Ohio Academy of Science, Nov. 30, 1907, at Oxford, O., repre- senting work performed under the direction of Professor Frank Carney as partial requirement for the Master's Degree. 2. F: G. Clapp, Jour, of Geol., Vol. XII, (1904), pp. 203-210. 3. The writer's attention was first called to the group the past year under the name "Morainic Ridges," by Professor W. B. Werthner, of Steele High School, located in the city mentioned. Professor Werthner stated that Professor August P. Foerste of the same school and himself had spent some time together in the study of this region, but that the field was still clear for inves- tigation and publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Coupeville and Part of the Port Townsend North 7.5
    WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-58 Geologic Map of the Coupeville and Part of the Port Townsend North R1W R1E 42¢30² 122°45¢ 40¢ 122°37¢30² 48°15¢ 48°15¢ Qgtv Qco Qb Qgoge Qco Qgdp 7.5-minute Quadrangles, Island County, Washington Qml 1 Qco schematic section Qgog Qgd 5 e Qcw from top to Qgav; Qgav Qgdme elev. 197 ft schematic section elev. 160 ft measured section Qgdp Qml Qgav Qgoge elev. 150 ft Qs <10 ft sand by Michael Polenz, Stephen L. Slaughter, and Gerald W. Thorsen ~10 ft below Qgav Qd active dune sand Qp Qs 110,124,182 6 to 12 ft 5 ft Qs sand Qgdm 18 ft sand and gravel Qgdm Qco silt and clay e Qgav 7 ft Qgdm diamict e Qb liquefaction features e Qgdme Qml Qc 15 ft silt 9 ft Qgd diamict Qcw o and small shears in Qd Qgoge Qgd 9 ft Qgt till 188 p 10 ft silt and clay silt and sand at ~100 ft June 2005 v Qgtv <75 ft Qgoge 11 ft Qgav sandy gravel Qcw Qp Qmw 177,178 gravel with ~30 ft mixed deposits—sand, Qmw silt boulders silt, and minor gravel Qgd Qp Qgomee? Qm Qgdmels? ~20 ft lahar runout (Table 2, samples 188 and 182*) GEOLOGIC SETTING AND DEVELOPMENT We suggest that this sediment source is partly documented by a high-energy outwash Deposits of the Fraser Glaciation (Pleistocene) alluvial facies reflect ancestral Skagit River provenance. Sparse, local Glacier REFERENCES CITED channel deposits— Qgomee Qcw Qgd 79 ft p clean sand with Qls Qb Qcw ~15 ft channel deposits—sand and minor gravel gravel unit (unit Qgoge), which locally grades up into Partridge Gravel, and which we Peak dacite and pumice pebbles, such as those found to the east of Long Point very sparse gravel Like most of the Puget Lowland, the map area is dominated by glacial sediment and lacks Armstrong, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip F the PINNACLE HILLS and the MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A
    F-1 Trip F THE PINNACLE HILLS AND THE MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A. Sanders Department of Geosciences Monroe Community College INTRODUCTION The Pinnacle Hills, fortunately, were voluminously described with many excellent photographs by Fairchild, (1923). In 1973 the Range still stands as a conspicuous east-west ridge extending from the town of Brighton, at about Hillside Avenue, four miles to the Genesee River at the University of Rochester campus, referred to as Oak Hill. But, for over thirty years the Range was butchered for sand and gravel, which was both a crime and blessing from the geological point of view (plates I-VI). First, it destroyed the original land form shapes which were subsequently covered with man-made structures drawing the shade on its original beauty. Secondly, it allowed study of its structure by a man with a brilliantly analytical mind, Herman L. Fair­ child. It is an excellent example of morainal deposition at an ice front in a state of dynamic equilibrium, except for minor fluctuations. The Mendon Kame area on the other hand, represents the result of a block of stagnant ice, probably detached and draped over drumlins and drumloidal hills, melting away with tunnels, crevasses, and per­ foration deposits spilling or squirting their included debris over a more or less square area leaving topographically high kames and esker F-2 segments with many kettles and a large central area of impounded drainage. There appears to be several wave-cut levels at around the + 700 1 Lake Dana level, (Fairchild, 1923). The author in no way pretends to be a Pleistocene expert, but an attempt is made to give a few possible interpretations of the many diverse forms found in the Mendon Kames area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crag-And-Tail Features on the Amundsen Sea Continental Shelf, West Antarctica
    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on November 30, 2016 Crag-and-tail features on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, West Antarctica F. O. NITSCHE1*, R. D. LARTER2, K. GOHL3, A. G. C. GRAHAM4 & G. KUHN3 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 3Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) On parts of glaciated continental margins, especially the inner leads to its characteristic tapering and allows formation of the sec- shelves around Antarctica, grounded ice has removed pre-existing ondary features. Multiple, elongated ridges in the tail could be sedimentary cover, leaving subglacial bedforms on eroded sub- related to the unevenness of the top of the ‘crags’. Secondary, strates (Anderson et al. 2001; Wellner et al. 2001). While the smaller crag-and-tail features might reflect variations in the under- dominant subglacial bedforms often follow a distinct, relatively lying substrate or ice-flow dynamics. uniform pattern that can be related to overall trends in palaeo- While the length-to-width ratio of crag-and-tail features in this ice flow and substrate geology (Wellner et al. 2006), others are case is much lower than for drumlins or elongate lineations, the more randomly distributed and may reflect local substrate varia- boundary between feature classes is indistinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Eemian Interglacial Deposits at Haćki Near Bielsk Podlaski: Implications for the Limit of the Last Glaciation in Northeastern Poland
    Geological Quarterly, 2002, 46 (1): 75-80 Eemian Interglacial deposits at Haćki near Bielsk Podlaski: implications for the limit of the last glaciation in northeastern Poland Stanisław BRUD and Mirosława KUPRYJANOWICZ Brud S. and Kupryjanowicz M. (2002) — Eemian Interglacial deposits at Haćki near Bielsk Podlaski: implications forthe limit of the last glaciation in northeastern Poland. Geol. Quart., 46 (1): 75-80. Warszawa. Pollen analysis was conducted on organic deposits on a kame ridge at Haćki in northeastern Poland. The deposits are referred to the Eemian Interglacial. Slope sediments only covered these Biogenic deposits. The glacigenic landforms therefore relate to the Wartanian Glaciation, and so this area has not been occupied By an ice sheet of the Vistulian Glaciation. Stanisław Brud, Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Oleandry 2A, PL-30-063 Kraków, Poland, e-mail: [email protected]; Mirosława Kupryjanowicz, Department o f Botany, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 20b, PL-15-950 Białystok, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] (received: November 3, 2000; accepted: February 26, 2001). Key words: NE Poland, Wartanian Glaciation, Eemian Interglacial, Vistulian, kames, pollen analysis. INTRODUCTION (Mojski, 1969) (Fig. 2). This deglaciation consisted of gradual reduction in ice sheet thickness, its dismembering into individ­ ual dead ice blocks, and their further melting. The most com­ mon landforms occurring north of Bielsk Podlaski are kames Numerous sites with biogenic deposits have Been found (Mojski and Nowicki, 1961). They rise from a few to aBout a during geological mapping of the Bielsk Podlaski sheet De­ dozen metres above melt-out depressions, marking an accumu­ tailed Geological Map of Poland, 1:50 000 scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Processes and Landforms-Transport and Deposition
    Glacial Processes and Landforms—Transport and Deposition☆ John Menziesa and Martin Rossb, aDepartment of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada; bDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Introduction 2 2 Towards deposition—Sediment transport 4 3 Sediment deposition 5 3.1 Landforms/bedforms directly attributable to active/passive ice activity 6 3.1.1 Drumlins 6 3.1.2 Flutes moraines and mega scale glacial lineations (MSGLs) 8 3.1.3 Ribbed (Rogen) moraines 10 3.1.4 Marginal moraines 11 3.2 Landforms/bedforms indirectly attributable to active/passive ice activity 12 3.2.1 Esker systems and meltwater corridors 12 3.2.2 Kames and kame terraces 15 3.2.3 Outwash fans and deltas 15 3.2.4 Till deltas/tongues and grounding lines 15 Future perspectives 16 References 16 Glossary De Geer moraine Named after Swedish geologist G.J. De Geer (1858–1943), these moraines are low amplitude ridges that developed subaqueously by a combination of sediment deposition and squeezing and pushing of sediment along the grounding-line of a water-terminating ice margin. They typically occur as a series of closely-spaced ridges presumably recording annual retreat-push cycles under limited sediment supply. Equifinality A term used to convey the fact that many landforms or bedforms, although of different origins and with differing sediment contents, may end up looking remarkably similar in the final form. Equilibrium line It is the altitude on an ice mass that marks the point below which all previous year’s snow has melted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geomorphic Classification System
    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain-Derived Versus Shelf-Based Glaciations on the Western Taymyr Peninsula, Siberia Christian Hjort1 & Svend Funder2
    Mountain-derived versus shelf-based glaciations on the western Taymyr Peninsula, Siberia Christian Hjort1 & Svend Funder2 1 Quaternary Sciences, Lund University, GeoCenter II, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden 2 Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark Keywords Abstract Siberian geology; glacial inception; glacial history. The early Russian researchers working in central Siberia seem to have preferred scenarios in which glaciations, in accordance with the classical gla- Correspondence ciological concept, originated in the mountains. However, during the last 30 C. Hjort, Quaternary Sciences, Lund years or so the interest in the glacial history of the region has concentrated on University, GeoCenter II, Sölvegatan 12, ice sheets spreading from the Kara Sea shelf. There, they could have originated SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: from ice caps formed on areas that, for eustatic reasons, became dry land [email protected] during global glacial maximum periods, or from grounded ice shelves. Such ice doi:10.1111/j.1751-8369.2008.00068.x sheets have been shown to repeatedly inundate much of the Taymyr Peninsula from the north-west. However, work on westernmost Taymyr has now also documented glaciations coming from inland. On at least two occasions, with the latest one dated to the Saale glaciation (marine isotope stage 6 [MIS 6]), warm-based, bedrock-sculpturing glaciers originating in the Byrranga Moun- tains, and in the hills west of the range, expanded westwards, and at least once did such glaciers, after moving 50–60 km or more over the present land areas, cross today’s Kara Sea coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers I: Intro, Geology and Mass Balance
    T. Perron – 12.001 – Glaciers 1 Glaciers I: Intro, Geology and Mass Balance I. Why study glaciers? • Role in freshwater budget o Fraction of earth’s water that is fresh (non-saline): 3% o Fraction of earth’s freshwater that is ice: ~2/3 o Fraction of earth’s surface covered by ice: ~8% • Climate records, climate effects & feedbacks: more in climate lecture • Postglacial rebound helps constrain mantle viscosity • Major driver of erosion, sediment transport, and landscape evolution • But how important have glaciers been over Earth’s history? o Over very long timescales, there seems to be a rhythm to glaciations . From geologic evidence: 950 Ma, 750, 650, 450, 350-250, 4-? . Proposed to reflect arrangement of continents (supercontinents promote accumulation of continental ice). But we don’t even have a very good record of this beyond a few hundred Myr, let alone precise climate records o We have better records for more recent intervals . Antarctic glaciation began 25 Ma, Greenland 20Ma, Alaska 7Ma. Major Northern hemisphere glaciations began ~4Myr. And this has been the typical climate state since! . Again, more in climate lecture. For now, suffice to say that glacial periods have dominated recent climate history. We’re in an interglacial, the first major one since ~125 ka. And our interglacial is an anomalously warm one. We must remind ourselves of this when examining landforms today. o What was North America like during glacial conditions? During LGM, we know there were . Extensive ice sheets [PPT] . Alpine glaciers in mountains beyond the ice margin . Large glacially-dammed lakes (Missoula, Bonneville) [PPT] .
    [Show full text]
  • The Ice Age in Pennsylvania 13
    Educational Series 6 PENNSYLVANIA AND THE ICE AGE An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer Recycled Paper 2200–BK–DCNR3061 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Tom Ridge, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES John C. Oliver, Secretary OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Richard G. Sprenkle, Deputy Secretary BUREAU OF TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Donald M. Hoskins, Director FRONT COVER: The wooly mammoth—a Pennsylvania resident during the Ice Age (modified from Thomas, D. J., and others, 1987, Pleistocene and Holocene geology of a dynamic coast, Annual Field Conference of Pennsyl- vania Geologists, 52nd, Erie, Pa., Guidebook, front cover). Educational Series 6 Pennsylvania and the Ice Age by W. D. Sevon and Gary M. Fleeger PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOURTH SERIES HARRISBURG 1999 When reproducing material from this book, please cite the source as follows: Sevon, W. D., and Fleeger, G. M., 1999, Pennsylvania and the Ice Age (2nd ed.): Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th ser., Educational Series 6, 30 p. Pennsylvania World Wide Web site: www.state.pa.us Department of Conservation and Natural Resources World Wide Web site: www.dcnr.state.pa.us Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey World Wide Web site: www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo Illustrations drafted by John G. Kuchinski First Edition, 1962 Fifth Printing, May 1978 Second Edition, May 1999 PENNSYLVANIA AND THE ICE AGE by W. D. Sevon and Gary M. Fleeger Have you heard the story of the Ice Age, a time when large sheets of moving ice (glaciers) blanketed the northern half of North America? Unbelievable though it may seem, half of our continent was once buried beneath thousands of feet of ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Terminology
    NRE 430 / EEB 489 D.R. Zak 2003 Lab 1 Glacial Terminology The last glacial advance in Michigan is known as the Wisconsin advance. The late Wisconsin period occurred between 25,000 and 10,000 years ago. Virtually all of Michigan's present surface landforms were shaped during this time. A. Glacial Materials Glacial Drift: material transported and deposited by glacial action. Note that most glacial features are recessional, i.e., they are formed by retreating ice. Materials deposited during glacial advance are usually overridden and destroyed or buried before the glacier has reached its maximum. Till: unstratified drift (e.g., material not organized into distinct layers), ice-transported, highly variable, may consist of any range of particles from clay to boulders. Ice-deposited material is indicated by random assemblage of particle sizes, such as clay, sand and cobbles mixed together. Ice-worked material is indicated by sharp-edged or irregular shaped pebbles and cobbles, formed by the coarse grinding action of the ice. Outwash: stratified drift (e.g., material organized into distinct horizontal layers or bands), water-transported, consists mainly of sand (fine to coarse) and gravel rounded in shape. Meltwater streams flowing away from glacier as it recedes carries particles that are sorted by size on deposition dependent upon the water flow velocity – larger particles are deposited in faster moving water. Water-deposited material is indicated by stratified layers of different sized sand particles and smooth rounded pebbles, consistent in size within each band. Water-worked material is indicated by smooth, rounded particles, formed by the fine grinding action of particles moved by water.
    [Show full text]