DOCSLIB.ORG

A Geomorphic Classification System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Geomorphic Classification System A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals of the Geomorphology Working Group ............................................................................ 8 II. GEOMORPHIC CLASSIFICATION .......................................................................... 10 Geomorphic Process ................................................................................................................. 10 Landform ................................................................................................................................... 11 Morphometry............................................................................................................................. 12 Geomorphic Generation ........................................................................................................... 14 III. APPLICATION OF GEOMORPHIC CLASSIFICATION ....................................... 16 Application of the Classification at a Site................................................................................. 16 CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................ 17 CHARACTERISTIC ............................................................................................................ 17 Geomorphic Mapping and Map Units ...................................................................................... 17 Map Unit Concepts ............................................................................................................... 17 Application of the Classification for a Polygon .................................................................... 19 IV. USING THIS CLASSIFICATION FOR EXISTING MAPPING .................................. 21 V. LINK TO NATIONAL TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC HIERARCHIES .......... 23 VI. SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 26 VII. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 27 References Cited ....................................................................................................................... 27 References used for the classification but not cited .................................................................. 29 References by Geomorphic Process .......................................................................................... 31 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 35 Appendix A : Reference List of Existing Geomorphic and/or land Classification Systems ...... 35 A Geomorphic Classification System 2 Appendix B; A Hierarchical Classification of Geomorphic Processes and Landforms .......... 36 FLUVIAL ............................................................................................................................. 36 GLACIAL ............................................................................................................................. 39 PERIGLACIAL .................................................................................................................... 42 LACUSTRINE ...................................................................................................................... 43 TECTONIC ........................................................................................................................... 44 VOLCANIC .......................................................................................................................... 45 MASS WASTING ................................................................................................................ 46 COASTAL MARINE ........................................................................................................... 51 SOLUTION........................................................................................................................... 53 EOLIAN ................................................................................................................................ 54 Appendix C: Landscape Terms ................................................................................................. 55 Appendix D: Common landforms.............................................................................................. 56 Appendix E: Microfeatures ....................................................................................................... 57 Appendix F: Morphometry ........................................................................................................ 58 Appendix G: List of Reviewers .................................................................................................. 63 Appendix H: Codes for Geomorphic Processes and Landforms .............................................. 64 Used in this Geomorphic Classification ................................................................................... 64 Appendix I: Glossary of Geomorphic Processes and Landforms ............................................. 77 A ............................................................................................................................................ 77 B ............................................................................................................................................ 78 C ............................................................................................................................................ 83 D ............................................................................................................................................ 86 E ............................................................................................................................................ 90 F ............................................................................................................................................ 92 G ............................................................................................................................................ 96 H ............................................................................................................................................ 97 I ............................................................................................................................................. 98 K .......................................................................................................................................... 100 L .......................................................................................................................................... 101 M ......................................................................................................................................... 104 N .......................................................................................................................................... 106 O .......................................................................................................................................... 108 P .......................................................................................................................................... 109 R .......................................................................................................................................... 113 S .......................................................................................................................................... 117 T .......................................................................................................................................... 124 U U .......................................................................................................................................... 128 V .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basal Control of Supraglacial Meltwater Catchments on the Greenland Ice Sheet
    The Cryosphere, 12, 3383–3407, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3383-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Basal control of supraglacial meltwater catchments on the Greenland Ice Sheet Josh Crozier1, Leif Karlstrom1, and Kang Yang2,3 1University of Oregon Department of Earth Sciences, Eugene, Oregon, USA 2School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China 3Joint Center for Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, China Correspondence: Josh Crozier ([email protected]) Received: 5 April 2018 – Discussion started: 17 May 2018 Revised: 13 October 2018 – Accepted: 15 October 2018 – Published: 29 October 2018 Abstract. Ice surface topography controls the routing of sur- sliding regimes. Predicted changes to subglacial hydraulic face meltwater generated in the ablation zones of glaciers and flow pathways directly caused by changing ice surface to- ice sheets. Meltwater routing is a direct source of ice mass pography are subtle, but temporal changes in basal sliding or loss as well as a primary influence on subglacial hydrology ice thickness have potentially significant influences on IDC and basal sliding of the ice sheet. Although the processes spatial distribution. We suggest that changes to IDC size and that determine ice sheet topography at the largest scales are number density could affect subglacial hydrology primarily known, controls on the topographic features that influence by dispersing the englacial–subglacial input of surface melt- meltwater routing at supraglacial internally drained catch- water. ment (IDC) scales ( < 10s of km) are less well constrained. Here we examine the effects of two processes on ice sheet surface topography: transfer of bed topography to the surface of flowing ice and thermal–fluvial erosion by supraglacial 1 Introduction meltwater streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Enosburg Area, Vermont
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE ENOSBURG AREA, VERMONT By JOlIN G. DENNIS VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, State Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN No. 23 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 7 INTRODUCTION ...................... 7 Location ........................ 7 Geologic Setting .................... 9 Previous Work ..................... 10 Method of Study .................... 10 Acknowledgments .................... 10 Physiography ...................... 11 STRATIGRAPHY ...................... 12 Introduction ...................... 12 Pinnacle Formation ................... 14 Name and Distribution ................ 14 Graywacke ...................... 14 Underhill Facics ................... 16 Tibbit Hill Volcanics ................. 16 Age......................... 19 Underhill Formation ................... 19 Name and Distribution ................ 19 Fairfield Pond Member ................ 20 White Brook Member ................. 21 West Sutton Slate ................... 22 Bonsecours Facies ................... 23 Greenstones ..................... 24 Stratigraphic Relations of the Greenstones ........ 25 Cheshire Formation ................... 26 Name and Distribution ................ 26 Lithology ...................... 26 Age......................... 27 Bridgeman Hill Formation ................ 28 Name and Distribution ................ 28 Dunham Dolomite .................. 28 Rice Hill Member ................... 29 Oak Hill Slate (Parker Slate) .............. 29 Rugg Brook Dolomite (Scottsmore
    [Show full text]
  • The Science Behind Volcanoes
    The Science Behind Volcanoes A volcano is an opening, or rupture, in a planet's surface or crust, which allows hot magma, volcanic ash and gases to escape from the magma chamber below the surface. Volcanoes are generally found where tectonic plates are diverging or converging. A mid-oceanic ridge, for example the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, has examples of volcanoes caused by divergent tectonic plates pulling apart; the Pacific Ring of Fire has examples of volcanoes caused by convergent tectonic plates coming together. By contrast, volcanoes are usually not created where two tectonic plates slide past one another. Volcanoes can also form where there is stretching and thinning of the Earth's crust in the interiors of plates, e.g., in the East African Rift, the Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field and the Rio Grande Rift in North America. This type of volcanism falls under the umbrella of "Plate hypothesis" volcanism. Volcanism away from plate boundaries has also been explained as mantle plumes. These so- called "hotspots", for example Hawaii, are postulated to arise from upwelling diapirs with magma from the core–mantle boundary, 3,000 km deep in the Earth. Erupting volcanoes can pose many hazards, not only in the immediate vicinity of the eruption. Volcanic ash can be a threat to aircraft, in particular those with jet engines where ash particles can be melted by the high operating temperature. Large eruptions can affect temperature as ash and droplets of sulfuric acid obscure the sun and cool the Earth's lower atmosphere or troposphere; however, they also absorb heat radiated up from the Earth, thereby warming the stratosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strait of Anian and British Northwest America: Cook's Third Voyage in Perspective*
    The Strait of Anian and British Northwest America: Cook's Third Voyage in Perspective* JOHNNORRIS For local patriots of British Columbia, Captain Cook's third voyage is unsatisfactory. His stay at Nootka was so brief, his exploration of the coast so perfunctory, and his preoccupation with Alaska so much to be deplored. We are driven, in asking the reasons for these solecisms, to examine his instructions from the Admiralty for the third voyage. Alas, they hardly mention the coast of Northwest America between 45 ° and 65 ° North. Did their Lordships of the Admiralty slip up? Was Cook, that supreme professional who had had a hand in drawing up his own instructions, at less than his expert best? Did Palinurus nod at the helm? Cook's landing at Nootka was the result of his instructions "to put into the first convenient Port to recruit your Wood and Water and procure Refreshments . .Jîl But the prolongation of his stay to four weeks (29 March to 26 April 1778) was traceable to the bad fitting-out of his ships by the Navy Board, which resulted in the rotten foretop and mizzen masts of the Resolution having to be replaced after the strain of the spring gales of the North Pacific. Further, the avoidance of virtually all the rest of the British Columbia coast was in accordance with those instructions, since Cook was ordered to: ... proceed Northward along the Coast as far as the Latitude of 65 °, or farther, if you are not obstructed by Lands or Ice; taking care not to lose any time in exploring Rivers or Inlets, or upon any other account, until you get into the before-mentioned latitude of 65 °...
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier (And Ice Sheet) Mass Balance
    Glacier (and ice sheet) Mass Balance The long-term average position of the highest (late summer) firn line ! is termed the Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) Firn is old snow How an ice sheet works (roughly): Accumulation zone ablation zone ice land ocean • Net accumulation creates surface slope Why is the NH insolation important for global ice• sheetSurface advance slope causes (Milankovitch ice to flow towards theory)? edges • Accumulation (and mass flow) is balanced by ablation and/or calving Why focus on summertime? Ice sheets are very sensitive to Normal summertime temperatures! • Ice sheet has parabolic shape. • line represents melt zone • small warming increases melt zone (horizontal area) a lot because of shape! Slightly warmer Influence of shape Warmer climate freezing line Normal freezing line ground Furthermore temperature has a powerful influence on melting rate Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Summer Temperature main factor determining ice growth e.g., a warming will Expand ablation area, lengthen melt season, increase the melt rate, and increase proportion of precip falling as rain It may also bring more precip to the region Since ablation rate increases rapidly with increasing temperature – Summer melting controls ice sheet fate* – Orbital timescales - Summer insolation must control ice sheet growth *Not true for Antarctica in near term though, where it ʼs too cold to melt much at surface Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Rule of thumb is that 1C warming causes an additional 1m of melt (see slope of ablation curve at right)
    [Show full text]
  • Evaporation from Salty Lagoons (Case Study: Qattara Depression)
    The British University in Egypt BUE Scholar Civil Engineering Engineering Spring 4-2017 Evaporation from Salty Lagoons (Case Study: Qattara Depression) Mohamed Abdelhamid Eizeldin Dr. [email protected] Heba Abdelazim M.Sc Sherif Eldidy Prof. Cairo University Follow this and additional works at: https://buescholar.bue.edu.eg/civil_eng Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Eizeldin, Mohamed Abdelhamid Dr.; Abdelazim, Heba M.Sc; and Eldidy, Sherif Prof., "Evaporation from Salty Lagoons (Case Study: Qattara Depression)" (2017). Civil Engineering. 7. https://buescholar.bue.edu.eg/civil_eng/7 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering at BUE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Civil Engineering by an authorized administrator of BUE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Al-Azhar University Civil Engineering Research Magazine (CERM) Vol. (39) No. (2) April, 2017 Evaporation from Salty Lagoons (Case Study: Qattara Depression) Abdel Azeem, H.S1, El-Didy, S.M2, Eizeldin, M.A3, and Helmi, A.M4 ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻢ إﻋﺪاد اﻟﻌﺪﯾﺪ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺪراﺳﺎت - ﻓﻲ ﺑﺪاﯾﺔ اﻟﻘﺮن اﻟﻌﺸﺮﯾﻦ - ﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻞ ﻣﯿﺎه اﻟﺒﺤﺮ اﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼل ﻗﻨﺎة ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻞ ﻟﻤﻨﺨﻔﺾ اﻟﻘﻄﺎرة ﺑﮭﺪف ﺗﻮﻟﯿﺪ اﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ اﻟﻜﮭﺮﺑﺎﺋﯿﺔ وذﻟﻚ ﺑﺈﺳﺘﻐﻼل ﻓﺮق اﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﯿﺐ ﺑﯿﻦ اﻟﻤﻨﺨﻔﺾ واﻟﺒﺤﺮ اﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻂ ، وﺗﮭﺪف اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ اﻟﺤﺎﻟﯿﺔ إﻟﻰ :-أ) إﻧﺸﺎء ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت ھﯿﺪروﻟﻮﺟﯿﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺨﻔﺾ ب) ﺣﺴﺎب ﻣﻌﺪﻻت اﻟﺒﺨﺮ اﻟﻤﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﯿﺎه اﻟﻤﺎﻟﺤﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﻤﻌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺤﯿﺮة اﻟﻤﻨﺨﻔﺾ. وﻗﺪ ﺗﻢ إﻋﺪاد ﻣﻨﮭﺞ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪام اﻟﺒﺮاﻣﺞ اﻟﺤﺪﯾﺜﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻢ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﺪراﺳﺎت اﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺮوع ﺣﯿﻨﮭﺎ، وھﺬه اﻟﺒﺮاﻣﺞ ﻣﺜﻞ اﻟﻨﻤﺎذج اﻟﻌﺪدﯾﺔ اﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﺔ، ﻧﻈﺎم اﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت اﻟﻌﺪدﯾﺔ ( GIS) ، وﻧﻤﺎذج اﻹرﺗﻔﺎﻋﺎت اﻟﺮﻗﻤﯿﺔ (DEM).
    [Show full text]
  • "Erosion,' Surfaces Of" ' '" '"
    · . ,'.' . .' . ' :' ~ . DE L'INSTITUTNATIONAL ' /PQi[JRJl.'El'UDJiAC;RO,NU1VII,QlUE, DU CONGO BELGE , , (I. N. E.A: C.) "EROSION,' SURFACES OF" ' '" '""",,,U ,,"GENTRALAFRICANINTERIOR' ,HIGH PLATEAUS" 'T.OCICAL SURVEYS ,BY Robert V. RUHE Geomorphologist ECA ' INEAC Soil Mission Belgian Congo. , SERIE SCIENTIFIQUE N° 59 1954 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 11111' IIII II IIIJ '11 III If II I 78 0207537 9 EROSION SURF ACES OF CENTRAL AFRICAN INTERIOR HIGH PLATEAUS I PUBLICATIONS DE L'INSTITUT NATIONAL POUR L'ETUDE AGRONOMIQUE DU CONGO BELGE I I (1. N. E.A. C.) ! I EROSION SURFACES OF CENTRAL AFRICAN INTERIOR HIGH PLATEAUS BY Robert V. RUHE Gcomorphologist ECA ' INEAC Soil Mission Belgian Congo. Ij SERIE SCIENTIFIQUE N° 59 1954 CONTENTS Abstract 7 'Introduction 9 Previous work. 12 Geographic Distribution of Major Erosion Surfaces 12 Ages of the Major Erosion Surfaces 16 Tertiary Erosion Surfaces of the Ituri, Belgian Congo 18 Post-Tertiary Erosion Surfaces of the Ituri, Belgian Congo 26 Relations of the Erosion Surfaces of the Ituri Plateaus and the Congo Basin 33 Bibliography 37 ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. 1. Region of reconnaissance studies. 10 FIG. 2. Areas of detailed and semi-detailed studies. 11 FIG. 3. Classification of erosion surfaces by LEPERsONNE and DE HEINZELlN. 14 FIG. 4. Area-altitude distribution curves of erosion surfaces of Loluda Watershed. 27 FIG. 5. Interfluve summit profiles and adjacent longitudinal stream profiles in Loluda Watershed . 29 FIG. 6. Composite longitudinal stream profile in Loluda Watershed. 30 FIG. 7. Diagrammatic explanation of cutting of Quaternary surfaces- complex (Bunia-Irumu Plain) . 34 PLATES I Profiles of end-Tertiary erosion surface.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of Africa
    Major contributors to this publication include: The Association of American Geographers is a nonprofit scientific and educational society with a membership of over 10,500 individuals from more than 60 countries. AAG members are geographers and related professionals who work in the public, private, and academic sectors to advance the theory, methods, and practice of geography. This booklet is published by AAG as a special supplement to the African Geographical Review. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) was created in 1879 as a science agency charged with providing information and understanding to help resolve complex natural resource problems across the nation and around the world. The mission of the USGS is to provide relevant, impartial scientific information to 1) describe and understand the Earth, 2) minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters, 3) manage water, biological, energy, and mineral resources, and 4) enhance and protect our quality of life. NatureServe is an international conservation nonprofit dedicated to providing the sci- entific basis for effective conservation action. NatureServe’s network in the Americas includes more than 80 member institutions that collect and maintain a unique body of scientific knowledge about the species and ecosystems. The information products, data management tools, and biodiversity expertise that NatureServe’s scientists, technologists, and other professionals provide help meet local, national, and global conservation needs. The Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) was es- tablished in Nairobi, Kenya in 1975 to provide quality Geo-Information and allied Information Technology products and services in environmental and resource manage- ment for sustainable development in our member countries and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • U N C O R R Ec Ted Pr O
    SED 773 Dispatch: 1.2.06 Journal: SED CE: Hari Journal Name Manuscript No. B Author Received: No. of pages: 18 PE: Revathi Sedimentology (2006) 1–18 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00773.x Sedimentology and stratigraphy of a transgressive, muddy gravel beach: waterside beach, Bay of Fundy, Canada F SHAHIN E. DASHTGARD*, MURRAY K. GINGRAS* and KARL E. BUTLER *Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6E 2G3 (E-mail: [email protected]) O Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3 ABSTRACT O Sediments exposed at low tide on the transgressive, hypertidal (>6 m tidal range) Waterside Beach, New Brunswick, Canada permit the scrutinyR of sedimentary structures and textures that develop at water depths equivalent to the upper and lower shoreface. Waterside Beach sediments are grouped into eleven sedimentologically distinct deposits that represent threeP depositional environments: (1) sandy foreshore and shoreface; (2) tidal-creek braid-plain and delta; and, (3) wave-formed gravel and sand bars, and associated deposits. The sandy foreshore and shoreface depositional environment encompasses the backshore; moderately dipping beachface; and, a shallowlyD seaward-dipping terrace of sandy middle and lower intertidal, and muddy sub-tidal sediments. Intertidal sediments reworked and deposited by tidal creeks comprise the tidal-creek braid plain and delta. Wave-formedE sand and gravel bars and associated deposits include: sediment sourced from low-amplitude, unstable sand bars; gravel deposited from large (up to 5Æ5 m high, 800 m long), landward-migrating gravel bars; and, zones ofT mud deposition developed on the landward side of the gravel bars.
    [Show full text]
  • Taconic Physiography
    Bulletin No. 272 ' Series B, Descriptive Geology, 74 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 4 t TACONIC PHYSIOGRAPHY BY T. NELSON DALE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transinittal......................................._......--..... 7 Introduction..........I..................................................... 9 Literature...........:.......................... ........................... 9 Land form __._..___.._.___________..___._____......__..__...._..._--..-..... 18 Green Mountain Range ..................... .......................... 18 Taconic Range .............................'............:.............. 19 Transverse valleys._-_-_.-..._.-......-....___-..-___-_....--_.-.._-- 19 Longitudinal valleys ............................................. ^...... 20 Bensselaer Plateau .................................................... 20 Hudson-Champlain valley................ ..-,..-.-.--.----.-..-...... 21 The Taconic landscape..................................................... 21 The lakes............................................................ 22 Topographic types .............,.....:..............'.................... 23 Plateau type ...--....---....-.-.-.-.--....-...... --.---.-.-..-.--... 23 Taconic type ...-..........-........-----............--......----.-.-- 28 Hudson-Champlain type ......................"...............--....... 23 Rock material..........................'.......'..---..-.....-...-.--.-.-. 23 Harder rocks ....---...............-.-.....-.-...--.-.........
    [Show full text]
  • Hill and Upland Farming in the North of England
    M4te1.174; Fi tirgy:CDATION OF AGRICULTURAtcEcoNom ICS SEP • HILL AND UPLAND FARMING IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND S. ROBSON and D. C. JOHNSON Agricultural Enterprise Studies in England and Wales Economic Report No. 54 MAY 1977 — Price f1-50 UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS HILL AND UPLAND FARMING IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND. 1973/74 and 1974/75. A two year review_ of financial and other results for an identical sample of 53 farms in the Hills and Uplands of Northern England, with results 'relating to the main enterprises on the farms. - The review also includes a comparison of certain data for the years 1973/74 to 1975//6. AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE STUDIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES. University Departments of Agricultural Economics in England and Wales have for many years undertaken economic studies of crop and livestock enterprises, receiving financial and techr4cal support for this work from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. •The departments in different regions of the country conduct joint studies into those enterprises in which they have a particular interest. This community of interest is recognised by issuing enterprise reports prepared and published by individual departments in a common series entitled "Agricultural Enterprise Studies". Titles of recent publications in this series and the addresses of the Univprsity Departments are given at the end of this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. This report is based on financial and other data made available to the Agricultural Economics Department of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne by farmers who co-operated in the Farm Management Survey. The department takes this opportunity of thanking these _farmers for their willing co-operation and for providing the additional information required for the report.
    [Show full text]