World Heritage Nomination – Iucn Technical Evaluation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Early Break-Up of the Norwegian Channel Ice Stream During the Last Glacial Maximum
Quaternary Science Reviews 107 (2015) 231e242 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Early break-up of the Norwegian Channel Ice Stream during the Last Glacial Maximum * John Inge Svendsen a, , Jason P. Briner b, Jan Mangerud a, Nicolas E. Young c a Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Postbox 7803, N-5020 Bergen, Norway b Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA c Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA article info abstract Article history: We present 18 new cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages that constrain the breakup time of the Norwegian Received 11 June 2014 Channel Ice Stream (NCIS) and the initial retreat of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet from the Southwest coast Received in revised form of Norway following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Seven samples from glacially transported erratics 31 October 2014 on the island Utsira, located in the path of the NCIS about 400 km up-flow from the LGM ice front Accepted 3 November 2014 position, yielded an average 10Be age of 22.0 ± 2.0 ka. The distribution of the ages is skewed with the 4 Available online youngest all within the range 20.2e20.8 ka. We place most confidence on this cluster of ages to constrain the timing of ice sheet retreat as we suspect the 3 oldest ages have some inheritance from a previous ice Keywords: Norwegian Channel Ice Stream free period. Three additional ages from the adjacent island Karmøy provided an average age of ± 10 Scandinavian Ice Sheet 20.9 0.7 ka, further supporting the new timing of retreat for the NCIS. -
Ribbed Bedforms in Palaeo-Ice Streams Reveal Shear Margin
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-336 Preprint. Discussion started: 21 November 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Ribbed bedforms in palaeo-ice streams reveal shear margin positions, lobe shutdown and the interaction of meltwater drainage and ice velocity patterns Jean Vérité1, Édouard Ravier1, Olivier Bourgeois2, Stéphane Pochat2, Thomas Lelandais1, Régis 5 Mourgues1, Christopher D. Clark3, Paul Bessin1, David Peigné1, Nigel Atkinson4 1 Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, UMR 6112, CNRS, Le Mans Université, Avenue Olivier Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans CEDEX 9, France 2 Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, UMR 6112, CNRS, Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, BP 92208, 44322 Nantes CEDEX 3, France 10 3 Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 4 Alberta Geological Survey, 4th Floor Twin Atria Building, 4999-98 Ave. Edmonton, AB, T6B 2X3, Canada Correspondence to: Jean Vérité ([email protected]) Abstract. Conceptual ice stream landsystems derived from geomorphological and sedimentological observations provide 15 constraints on ice-meltwater-till-bedrock interactions on palaeo-ice stream beds. Within these landsystems, the spatial distribution and formation processes of ribbed bedforms remain unclear. We explore the conditions under which these bedforms develop and their spatial organisation with (i) an experimental model that reproduces the dynamics of ice streams and subglacial landsystems and (ii) an analysis of the distribution of ribbed bedforms on selected examples of paleo-ice stream beds of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. We find that a specific kind of ribbed bedforms can develop subglacially 20 from a flat bed beneath shear margins (i.e., lateral ribbed bedforms) and lobes (i.e., submarginal ribbed bedforms) of ice streams. -
Threats to the Kujataa UNESCO World Heritage Site
Threats to the Kujataa UNESCO World Heritage Site Niels Henrik Hooge, NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark’s Uranium Group 9th International NGO Forum on World Heritage | 24 February 2021 The site • One of three WHS in Greenland. • Inscribed on UNESCO’s world heritage list in 2017 under Criterion V in the WH Convention as “an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change”. • It comprises a sub-arctic farming landscape consisting of five components representing key elements of the Norse Greenlandic and modern Inuit farming cultures. They are both distinct and both pastoral farming cultures located on the climatic edges of viable agriculture, depending on a combination of farming, pastoralism and marine mammal hunting. • It is the earliest introduction of farming to the Arctic. • Source: UNESCO, Kujataa Greenland: Norse and Inuit Farming at the Edge of the Ice Cap (2017), https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1536/ Threats to the Kujataa UNESCO World Heritage Site 2 The site Source: UNESCO World Heritage Centre Threats to the Kujataa UNESCO World Heritage Site 3 The site Kujataa Greenland: Norse and Inuit Farming at the Edge of the Ice Cap. Photo: Kommune Kujalleq, Birger Lilja Kristoffersen Threats to the Kujataa UNESCO World Heritage Site 4 General concerns • Still less respect for environmental protection in Greenland • Greenland has some of the largest undiscovered oil and gas resources and some of the largest mineral resources in the world. -
Jakobshavn Isbræ,West Greenland: the 2002–2003 Collapse and Nomination for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Jakobshavn Isbræ,West Greenland: the 2002–2003 collapse and nomination for the UNESCO World Heritage List Anker Weidick, Naja Mikkelsen, Christoph Mayer and Steffen Podlech Jakobshavn Isbræ (also known as Sermeq Kujalleq or Ilulissat Isbræ) is situated at about 69°10′N and 50°00′W in West Nomination of ‘Ilulissat Icefjord’ and Greenland. This major outlet from the Inland Ice has an Sermeq Kujalleq extremely high rate of movement (nearly 1 m/hour) and thus The Eskimo ruins and archaeological sites in the region a high production of icebergs, which via the icefjord float around the modern Greenland township of Ilulissat include westwards through Disko Bugt to Davis Strait (Fig. 1). representatives of all the cultural phases since the first Eskimo Estimates of the iceberg production are in the range of 35 ± settlement of Greenland. The association with Greenland’s 10 km3 ice per year, more than 10% of the entire calf-ice pro- most productive glacier makes the ‘Ilulissat Icefjord’ area a duction of the Inland Ice (e.g. Bauer l968; Bindschadler strong candidate for inclusion in the UNESCO World 1984). The icefjord into which Sermeq Kujalleq calves is Heritage List. In December 2000 the Government of Kangia, best known in glaciological literature as Jakobshavn Greenland decided to nominate ‘Ilulissat Icefjord’, and the Isfjord. Spectacular changes of the glacier were observed dur- Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) was ing 2002 and 2003 at the same time as it was nominated for given the task of preparing the nomination document (Fig. 1; inclusion in the UNESCO World Heritage List under the Mikkelsen & Ingerslev 2003). -
Calving Processes and the Dynamics of Calving Glaciers ⁎ Douglas I
Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 143–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers ⁎ Douglas I. Benn a,b, , Charles R. Warren a, Ruth H. Mottram a a School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK b The University Centre in Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway Received 26 October 2006; accepted 13 February 2007 Available online 27 February 2007 Abstract Calving of icebergs is an important component of mass loss from the polar ice sheets and glaciers in many parts of the world. Calving rates can increase dramatically in response to increases in velocity and/or retreat of the glacier margin, with important implications for sea level change. Despite their importance, calving and related dynamic processes are poorly represented in the current generation of ice sheet models. This is largely because understanding the ‘calving problem’ involves several other long-standing problems in glaciology, combined with the difficulties and dangers of field data collection. In this paper, we systematically review different aspects of the calving problem, and outline a new framework for representing calving processes in ice sheet models. We define a hierarchy of calving processes, to distinguish those that exert a fundamental control on the position of the ice margin from more localised processes responsible for individual calving events. The first-order control on calving is the strain rate arising from spatial variations in velocity (particularly sliding speed), which determines the location and depth of surface crevasses. Superimposed on this first-order process are second-order processes that can further erode the ice margin. -
North America Name North America
Not at same scale Hawaii (U.S.) Name North America Name North America Greenland North America ARCTIC Sea Bering Bering Strait OCEAN Canada is on the continent Helpful Sea of North America. Hint Greenland Alaska Beaufort (Denmark) One U.S. state, Sea Two countries, the United States and Mexico, (U.S.) Baffin share the continent with Canada. North Hawaii, is not Bay part of North Gulf of America also includes Greenland, the countries Alaska America. %Nuuk of Central America, and many islands. Labrador Use the map to answer these questions about North America. Sea Hudson Canada Bay 1. In which direction is Mexico from the United States? R 2. Name three countries O C Mississippi Ottawa% K River that share a border with Mexico. Y M O U N T ATLANTIC A I 3. What country shares a border N Washington, D.C.% S OCEAN on the south with Canada? United States PACIFIC Rio of America Grande Bermuda (U.K.) 4. What U.S. state is on the northwest OCEAN part of North America? Bahamas Gulf of Mexico Cuba Dominican North America Mexico Republic 5. What oceans border the east Haiti Puerto Rico (U.S.) % National capital Mexico City Jamaica and west coasts of North America? % Mountain Belize Border Honduras 6. What ocean is north of this continent? Caribbean Sea Guatemala Nicaragua El Salvador N N 7. What is the capital of Canada? NW NE Costa Rica Area of detail WE WE Panama SOUTH AMERICA 8. What river forms part of the border Miles SW SE 0 200 400 600 S S between the U.S. -
A Review of Ice-Sheet Dynamics in the Pine Island Glacier Basin, West Antarctica: Hypotheses of Instability Vs
Pine Island Glacier Review 5 July 1999 N:\PIGars-13.wp6 A review of ice-sheet dynamics in the Pine Island Glacier basin, West Antarctica: hypotheses of instability vs. observations of change. David G. Vaughan, Hugh F. J. Corr, Andrew M. Smith, Adrian Jenkins British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council Charles R. Bentley, Mark D. Stenoien University of Wisconsin Stanley S. Jacobs Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Thomas B. Kellogg University of Maine Eric Rignot Jet Propulsion Laboratories, National Aeronautical and Space Administration Baerbel K. Lucchitta U.S. Geological Survey 1 Pine Island Glacier Review 5 July 1999 N:\PIGars-13.wp6 Abstract The Pine Island Glacier ice-drainage basin has often been cited as the part of the West Antarctic ice sheet most prone to substantial retreat on human time-scales. Here we review the literature and present new analyses showing that this ice-drainage basin is glaciologically unusual, in particular; due to high precipitation rates near the coast Pine Island Glacier basin has the second highest balance flux of any extant ice stream or glacier; tributary ice streams flow at intermediate velocities through the interior of the basin and have no clear onset regions; the tributaries coalesce to form Pine Island Glacier which has characteristics of outlet glaciers (e.g. high driving stress) and of ice streams (e.g. shear margins bordering slow-moving ice); the glacier flows across a complex grounding zone into an ice shelf coming into contact with warm Circumpolar Deep Water which fuels the highest basal melt-rates yet measured beneath an ice shelf; the ice front position may have retreated within the past few millennia but during the last few decades it appears to have shifted around a mean position. -
The Veterinary and Food Authority of Greenland
Aalisarnermut, Piniarnermut Nunalerinermullu Naalakkersuisoqarfik Departementet for Fiskeri, Fangst og Landbrug Uumasunik Nakorsaqarfik Inuussutissalerinermullu Oqartussaaffik (UNIO) Veterinær- og Fødevaremyndigheden i Grønland (VFMG) The Veterinary and Food Authority of Greenland (VFMG) under the Ministry of Fisheries, Hunting and Agriculture has issued the following guidelines for bringing dogs and/or cats into Greenland. The guidelines also cover travelling with these animals within Greenland. In order to protect the Greenlandic Sled Dog as a breed Act no. 18 of 30 October 1998 establishes a so called sled dog district. The territory is defined as follows: th ● North of Greenland on the West Coast from north of 66 northern degree of latitude, th ● The entire East Coast down to Kap Farvel, east of the 44 western degree of longitude. Within this district, only Greenlandic Sled Dogs may be kept and it is strictly prohibited to bring other dogs into these areas. This concerns both dogs travelling onboard cruise ships with tourists and local dogs travelling within Greenland. In accordance to Article 19, subsection 2 of Act no. 18 of 30th October 1998 by Greenland´s Home Rule regarding sled dogs, it is prohibited to introduce dogs of any race into the sled dog districts. The same Article states that it is prohibited to reintroduce Greenlandic Sled Dogs once they have left the sled dog district. Working dogs and service dogs for disabled people may be permitted admittance to the sled dog district, but only after receiving a permit from the Government of Greenland. Working dogs are solely defined as the dogs used by police or by the authorities in relation to border control. -
An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250
The Ohio Naturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University. Volume VIII. JANUARY. 1908. No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS. SCHEPFEL—An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250 AN ESKER GROUP SOUTH OF DAYTON, OHIO.1 EARL R. SCHEFFEL Contents. Introduction. General Discussion of Eskers. Preliminary Description of Region. Bearing on Archaeology. Topographic Relations. Theories of Origin. Detailed Description of Eskers. Kame Area to the West of Eskers. Studies. Proximity of Eskers. Altitude of These Deposits. Height of Eskers. Composition of Eskers. Reticulation. Rock Weathering. Knolls. Crest-Lines. Economic Importance. Area to the East. Conclusion and Summary. Introduction. This paper has for its object the discussion of an esker group2 south of Dayton, Ohio;3 which group constitutes a part of the first or outer moraine of the Miami Lobe of the Late Wisconsin ice where it forms the east bluff of the Great Miami River south of Dayton.4 1. Given before the Ohio Academy of Science, Nov. 30, 1907, at Oxford, O., repre- senting work performed under the direction of Professor Frank Carney as partial requirement for the Master's Degree. 2. F: G. Clapp, Jour, of Geol., Vol. XII, (1904), pp. 203-210. 3. The writer's attention was first called to the group the past year under the name "Morainic Ridges," by Professor W. B. Werthner, of Steele High School, located in the city mentioned. Professor Werthner stated that Professor August P. Foerste of the same school and himself had spent some time together in the study of this region, but that the field was still clear for inves- tigation and publication. -
Trip F the PINNACLE HILLS and the MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A
F-1 Trip F THE PINNACLE HILLS AND THE MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A. Sanders Department of Geosciences Monroe Community College INTRODUCTION The Pinnacle Hills, fortunately, were voluminously described with many excellent photographs by Fairchild, (1923). In 1973 the Range still stands as a conspicuous east-west ridge extending from the town of Brighton, at about Hillside Avenue, four miles to the Genesee River at the University of Rochester campus, referred to as Oak Hill. But, for over thirty years the Range was butchered for sand and gravel, which was both a crime and blessing from the geological point of view (plates I-VI). First, it destroyed the original land form shapes which were subsequently covered with man-made structures drawing the shade on its original beauty. Secondly, it allowed study of its structure by a man with a brilliantly analytical mind, Herman L. Fair child. It is an excellent example of morainal deposition at an ice front in a state of dynamic equilibrium, except for minor fluctuations. The Mendon Kame area on the other hand, represents the result of a block of stagnant ice, probably detached and draped over drumlins and drumloidal hills, melting away with tunnels, crevasses, and per foration deposits spilling or squirting their included debris over a more or less square area leaving topographically high kames and esker F-2 segments with many kettles and a large central area of impounded drainage. There appears to be several wave-cut levels at around the + 700 1 Lake Dana level, (Fairchild, 1923). The author in no way pretends to be a Pleistocene expert, but an attempt is made to give a few possible interpretations of the many diverse forms found in the Mendon Kames area. -
Ilulissat Icefjord
World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1149.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Ilulissat Icefjord DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: DENMARK CRITERIA: N (i) (iii) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (i): The Ilulissat Icefjord is an outstanding example of a stage in the Earth’s history: the last ice age of the Quaternary Period. The ice-stream is one of the fastest (19m per day) and most active in the world. Its annual calving of over 35 cu. km of ice accounts for 10% of the production of all Greenland calf ice, more than any other glacier outside Antarctica. The glacier has been the object of scientific attention for 250 years and, along with its relative ease of accessibility, has significantly added to the understanding of ice-cap glaciology, climate change and related geomorphic processes. Criterion (iii): The combination of a huge ice sheet and a fast moving glacial ice-stream calving into a fjord covered by icebergs is a phenomenon only seen in Greenland and Antarctica. Ilulissat offers both scientists and visitors easy access for close view of the calving glacier front as it cascades down from the ice sheet and into the ice-choked fjord. The wild and highly scenic combination of rock, ice and sea, along with the dramatic sounds produced by the moving ice, combine to present a memorable natural spectacle. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Located on the west coast of Greenland, 250-km north of the Arctic Circle, Greenland’s Ilulissat Icefjord (40,240-ha) is the sea mouth of Sermeq Kujalleq, one of the few glaciers through which the Greenland ice cap reaches the sea. -
Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental