DOCSLIB.ORG

Pentagon Transportation Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pentagon Transportation Management Plan Transportation Management Plan David B. Gleason, Flickr Creative Commons April 2, 2015 Prepared for: Washington Headquarters Services Prepared by: AECOM PENTAGON TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Purpose of the Study....................................................................................................................................................................1-4 1.3.1 TMP Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Transportation Management Plan .........................................................................................................................................1-7 1.4.1 Pentagon TMP Development Team ...............................................................................................................................1-7 1.4.2 DoD Technical Advisors ......................................................................................................................................................1-7 1.4.3 Coordinating Agencies .......................................................................................................................................................1-7 1.5 Plan Criteria and Guidelines ......................................................................................................................................................1-7 1.5.1 National Criteria ....................................................................................................................................................................1-7 1.5.2 Regional Guidelines, Policies, and Criteria ..................................................................................................................1-8 1.5.3 DoD Criteria ............................................................................................................................................................................1-8 1.6 Roadmap to the TMP ..................................................................................................................................................................1-8 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Existing Demand Management ...............................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Incentives ................................................................................................................................................................................2-2 2.1.2 Formal Ridesharing..............................................................................................................................................................2-2 2.1.3 Informal Ridesharing...........................................................................................................................................................2-3 2.1.4 Telecommuting and Compressed Work Schedules .................................................................................................2-5 2.2 Ongoing TDM Initiatives .............................................................................................................................................................2-5 2.2.1 WHS Transit Development Plan .....................................................................................................................................2-5 2.2.2 TIGER Grants ...........................................................................................................................................................................2-6 2.2.3 Education and Awareness .................................................................................................................................................2-6 2.2.4 WHS Collaboration Efforts ................................................................................................................................................2-7 2.3 Employee Travel Characteristics ..............................................................................................................................................2-8 2.3.1 Commute Distance ..............................................................................................................................................................2-8 2.3.2 Employee Arrival and Departure Times .......................................................................................................................2-8 2.3.3 Commuter Modes to Work ..............................................................................................................................................2-11 2.3.4 DoD Shuttles ........................................................................................................................................................................2-12 2.4 Transit Operations .......................................................................................................................................................................2-13 2.4.1 Transit Center Operational Summary .........................................................................................................................2-13 2.4.2 Transit Provider Overview ...............................................................................................................................................2-15 2.4.3 Tour Bus Operations ..........................................................................................................................................................2-16 i PENTAGON TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.4.4 Taxicab Operations ............................................................................................................................................................2-20 2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand and Infrastructure .......................................................................................................2-20 2.5.1 Existing Pedestrian Demands ........................................................................................................................................2-20 2.5.2 Sidewalks and Crosswalks ...............................................................................................................................................2-20 2.5.3 Bicycle/Multi-use Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................2-20 2.6 Parking Demand and Inventory .............................................................................................................................................2-27 2.7 Traffic Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................................................2-27 2.7.1 Average Daily Traffic Volume Data ...............................................................................................................................2-27 2.7.2 Intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMC) .......................................................................................................2-27 2.7.3 Vehicle Occupancy Counts .............................................................................................................................................2-27 2.7.4 Intersections and Ramps .................................................................................................................................................2-29 3. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................................3-1 3.1 Existing Pentagon Reservation Travel Demand Management .................................................................................3-1 3.2 Planned Projects ............................................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Pentagon Reservation Projects .......................................................................................................................................3-3 3.2.2 Regional Projects ..................................................................................................................................................................3-6 3.4 Travel Demand Management Strategies .............................................................................................................................3-9 3.5 Implementation Actions and Timeframes ............................................................................................................................3-9 3.6 Transit Operations .........................................................................................................................................................................3-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • __History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
    HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Up Mental Hygiene 330 N. Charles Street Baltimore, Mo
    UP MENTAL HYGIENE 330 N. CHARLES STREET BALTIMORE, MO. Governor of Maryland i'<r';|ir rir^ ir ''^ti|M‘»|i i"1'!11^ nyTr-'iCf^ • IrjjfrZj! \-XW jB^X \ ypgSIffl 1 rT^-i vr i7*st;:ss? ^TpS «iSi| s®? 'T? ^C1-, \l b S l/kfy, T nHfc,ij|/ r^ Jbt* .MAni, »■ **—>— 'a}' ' P^ f fi fw/ r t a'inL* Te*i««Ss5S£ The Mahyland State House, Built 1772 The Annapolis Convention or" 1786, forerunner of the Convention that framed the American Constitution, met in the old Senate Chamber. Three years earlier, in this same room, Washington resigned his commission as Commander-in-Chief of the Cont.nenta'. armies. Here also the Treaty of Peace with Great Britain -vas ratified in 1784. Maryland and Massachusetrf are the only twc states with Capitol buildings dating from before Revolution. The building pictured above is the third on this site. The first, bunt in 1617, was destroyed by fire, and the second, built .n 1704, was -.orn down to make room for the present stru jtnre. Government House Residence of the Governor of Maryland Rebuilt 1936 under the administration of Governor Harry W. Nice 'CO r\ .f <? / 7- 1 tJ -^ C^Cg J_ MARYLAND MANUAL 1938 /I Compendium of Legal, Historical and Statistical Information Relating to the S TATE OF MARYLAND /JT en 5,1., Compiled by E. RAY JONES Secretary of State. 20TH CENTURY PRINTING CO BALTIMORE, MD. INTRODUCTION In this copy of the Maryland Manual, for 1938, will be found much valuable information concerning the State of Maryland, including its Charter and Constitution, and the names of all State and County officials, and members and functions of the several commissions, boards and other governmental agencies which have been created.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Financial Analysis
    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY of WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009
    Transportation 2009 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Transportation 2009 Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY OF WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009 What is the Transportation Element? Community Vision for At the 1997 session, the General Assembly passed five Transportation pieces of legislation and budget initiatives known collectively as "Smart Growth." Maryland has adopted the principles of Smart Growth to be incorporated into the According to the 2008 Community Survey, Comprehensive Plan. Westminster drivers are concerned with the difficulties they encounter turning on and The following Smart Growth principle relates to the Transportation Element: off roads due to issues with visibility or merging. Some residents suggested that the Facilitate an adequate mix of transportation modes City should consider the addition of lanes, roundabouts, or left turn signals. A second To reduce traffic congestion throughout the City challenge with driving in Westminster is the To coordinate land use and transportation high volume of traffic. Residents describe traffic to be an issue on Route 140 during To create resiliency, and connectivity within the City commuting times in the early morning or road networks early evening because of the high number of To ensure connectivity between pedestrian, bike, commuters that leave Westminster everyday to work outside of Carroll County. transit, and road facilities From the timing to the synchronization, Revitalize existing neighborhoods into safe, residents listed challenges with traffic lights walkable, and livable communities throughout Westminster. In some cases, it is not the use of a traffic light, but rather the To mix land uses and build compactly, thus reducing lack of a traffic light that most concerned trips and make walking a more viable alternative residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • Park & Ride Commuter Lots
    Park &RideCommuterLots Serving I–270 and US 29 Corridors in Montgomery County A Handy Guide to Free Parking and An Easier Commute to Work Effective July 2002 Tired of fighting the traffic ? Want to make your commute to work easier and less stressful? Spending too much money parking your car downtown? Need a place to meet your carpool or vanpool? Free Park & Ride Commuter Lots may be the answer to your quest. Commuters may park their vehicles in most of Montgomery County’s Park & Ride Lots at no cost. There are a few lots, however, that may require a parking permit and fee. You can meet your carpools or vanpools, or take public transit from these lots. Park & Ride...Make it easier for yourself. Use this brochure as a guide to Park & Ride Commuter Lots along the I-270 and U.S. 29 Corridors, including selected Lots in neighbor- ing jurisdictions. For more information on bus routes serving these lots, contact the following service providers. Montgomery County Commuter Services Free personalized assistance to help commuters join a carpool or vanpool. Promotes alternative trans- portation benefits for employees. The Commuter Express Store, located at 8401 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, sells fare media, such as Metrobus/rail passes, tickets, and tokens, and Ride On bus passes and tickets. Pick up timetables and transportation information (301) 770-POOL (7665) www.rideonbus.com (click on Commuter Services) Ride On Bus (routes, schedules, fares) (240) 777-7433 (touchtone) (240) 777-5871 (rotary) (240) 777-5869 (TTY/TDD) www.rideonbus.com (passes and tokens sold online) Prince George’s County THE BUS (301) 324-BUSS (routes & schedules) 1-800-735-2258 (TDD) Department of Public Works and Transportation (301) 925-5656–Office of Transportation www.goprincegeorgescounty.com CONNECT-A-RIDE A fixed route community–based bus service in the mid–Baltimore/Washington suburban area.
    [Show full text]
  • Swanston St St Kilda Rd Fed Sq Works Brochure
    Tram service changes Alternative travel options We’re renewing tram tracks and overhead wires Route 1a, 58 and 67a trams between Stop 22 along Swanston Street, St Kilda Road and Southbank Toorak Rd/Dorcas St and Stop 7 RMIT University Boulevard. We’re also doing upgrade works for travelling along Kings Way, William Street and Stop 13 Flinders Street Station. La Trobe Street. Your journey may be affected during the works, so plan Trams along Bourke Street, Collins Street and Tram service ahead, consider alternative travel and allow extra time. Flinders Street to connect with diverting services. Sandringham, Cranbourne, Frankston, changes Route 1 trams run between South Melbourne Glen Waverley and Pakenham Line trains Beach and East Coburg diverting via Kings Way, 1 between the south eastern suburbs and City William Street and La Trobe Street between Loop stations. Stop 22 Dorcas St and Stop 7 RMIT University. Route 1 3 3a 5 6 16 Accessibility 64 67 72 Route 3 and 3a trams run a shortened service 3 between East Malvern and Stop 17 Grant St/ If you need assistance, speak to our customer 3a 2.30am Sunday June 27 to Police Memorial. service team or alert your driver. Accessible taxi services will be available at Route 5 trams run a shortened service between Stop 17 Grant St/Police Memorial: last tram Sunday July 11 5 Malvern and Stop 38 Orrong Rd, connecting with Route 64 trams to Grant Street. – 7am to 8pm on weekdays – 8am to 8pm on weekends Route 6 trams run in sections with no trams 6 between Stop 11 Collins St and Stop 17 Grant St/ Allow Police Memorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report
    HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES IN MARYLAND: 1631-1960: HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Prepared for: Maryland State Highway Administration Maryland State Department of Transportation 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: P.A.C. Spero & Company 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 412 Baltimore, Maryland 21204 and Louis Berger & Associates 1001 East Broad Street, Suite 220 Richmond, Virginia 23219 July 1995 Revised October 1995 Acknowledgements "Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report" has been prepared with the generous assistance of the Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration's Environmental Management Section and Bridge Development Division, and the historic and cultural resources staff of the Maryland Historical Trust. The preparers of this report would like to thank Cynthia Simpson, Rita Suffness, and Bruce Grey of the State Highway Administration Environmental Management Section, and Jim Gatley, Alonzo Corley, and Chris Barth of the State Highway Administration Bridge Development Division for their aid in providing access to key research materials. Thanks are also extended to Ron Andrews, Beth Hannold, Bill Pencek, Mary Louise de Sarran, and Barbara Shepard--all of the staff of the Maryland Historical Trust, and to the members of the Advisory Committee appointed to review this report. In addition we extend special appreciation to Rita Suffness, Architectural/Bridge Historian for the Maryland State Highway Administration, for providing us with numerous background materials, analyses, research papers, histories, and a draft historic bridge context report which she authored, for use in preparing this report. The final report was prepared by P.A.C. Spero & Company. Research, analysis, graphics preparation, and report writing were conducted by Paula Spero, Michael Reis, James DuSel, Kate Elliot, Laura Landefeld, and Deborah Scherkoske of P.A.C.
    [Show full text]