DOCSLIB.ORG

Montebello Bus Lines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montebello Bus Lines Transit Development Plan Update for FAST Final Report May 14, 2014 Fayetteville Area System of Transit (FAST) Transit Development Plan Update Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ ES-1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 ROUTE PROFILES ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Overall Findings ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Route Profiles ..................................................................................................... 2.4 Route 3 Southeast ........................................................................................ 2-5 Route 4 Downtown – DSS – VA Medical Center ........................................ 2-15 Route 5 Ramsey Street .............................................................................. 2-25 Route 6 University Estates – Cross Creek ................................................. 2-35 Route 7 Downtown – Cape Fear Valley Health System via Robeson/ Raeford ..................................................................................... 2-45 Route 8 Downtown – Cape Fear Valley Health System via Southern ........ 2-55 Route 9 University Estates – Cape Fear Valley North – Wal-Mart ............. 2-65 Route 12 Murchison Road .......................................................................... 2-75 Route 14 Downtown – FTCC – Cross Creek .............................................. 2-85 Route 15 Cape Fear Valley Health System – Cross Creek ........................ 2-96 Route 17 West Fayetteville ....................................................................... 2-106 Route 18 Cross Creek – 71st School Road ............................................... 2-117 Route 30 Downtown – PWC Shuttle ......................................................... 2-127 Chapter 3 PEER AND TREND ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 3-1 3.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 System Size, Cost, and Ridership ...................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Performance Measures ...................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 Service Spans and Headways ........................................................................... 3-8 3.4 FAST Trends, 2008-2012 ................................................................................. 3-11 Chapter 4 INTERCEPT SURVEY ....................................................................................... 4-1 4.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Survey Approach ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Survey Results ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Questions Applicable to Riders Only ...................................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Questions Applicable to Non-riders Only ................................................ 4-5 4.2.3 Questions Applicable to Riders and Non-riders ...................................... 4-5 4.3 Summary of Intercept Survey Results .............................................................. 4-10 Chapter 5 UNMET NEEDS ................................................................................................. 5-1 5.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Travel Needs: Residential Transit Orientation Index .......................................... 5-1 5.2 Findings from Intercept Survey .......................................................................... 5-3 5.3 New Service and Proposed New Developments ................................................ 5-3 5.4 Public Outreach .................................................................................................. 5-3 5.5 Operator Meetings .............................................................................................. 5-5 Dan Boyle & Associates, Inc. Page i Transit Development Plan Update Table of Contents 5.6 Summary of Unmet Needs ................................................................................. 5-5 Chapter 6 FUTURE GROWTH............................................................................................ 6-1 6.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Population Growth .............................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Employment Growth ........................................................................................... 6-3 Chapter 7 ANALYSIS OF FASTTRAC! ................................................................................ 7-1 7.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 FASTTRAC! Background and Existing Conditions .............................................. 7-1 7.1.1 Required ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Characteristics and Key Features .................................................................................. 7-1 7.1.2 ADA Application and Certification Functions .......................................... 7-4 7.1.3 Call Center .............................................................................................. 7-4 7.1.4 Drivers’ Observations ............................................................................. 7-5 7.1.5 Trip Scheduling and Dispatch Functions ................................................ 7-6 7.1.6 Website Information and Telephone Number ......................................... 7-7 7.2 FASTTRAC! Operating History and Performance ............................................... 7-8 7.2.1 Trips by Time of Day ............................................................................. 7-10 7.2.2 Trips Scheduled, No Show and Trip Cancellation Rates ...................... 7-11 7.2.3 Trip Types – Subscription, Advance and Same-Day ............................ 7-12 7.2.4 Vehicle Scheduling in Relation to Trip Demand ................................... 7-15 7.2.5 Trip Costs ............................................................................................. 7-16 7.3 Comparing FASTTRAC! Performance with Peer Systems – Demand Response Programs ............................................................................. 7-16 7.4 Service Area Characteristics and FASTTRAC! Demand Estimation ................. 7-18 7.4.1 Population Characteristics .................................................................... 7-18 7.4.2 Operating Environment Comments ...................................................... 7-20 7.4.3 Demand Estimation Methodology from TCRP Report 119 (Project B-28) -- Introduction to the Model ................................................... 7-21 7.4.4 ADA Ridership Estimations for Fayetteville and FASTTRAC! ............... 7-22 7.4.5 Demand Estimations Summarized in Terms of Vehicle Requirements 7-25 7.4.6 Estimating Costs ................................................................................... 7-28 7.5 Discussion of Review Findings ......................................................................... 7-28 7.5.1 ADA Compliance .................................................................................. 7-28 7.5.2 Trip Reservations and Scheduling ........................................................ 7-29 7.5.3 Rider Policies, Communication, and Education .................................... 7-29 7.5.4 Passenger Fares .................................................................................. 7-30 7.5.5 Operating Costs .................................................................................... 7-30 7.5.6 Demand Estimation and Vehicle Requirements ................................... 7-30 7.5.7 Demand Management Strategies ......................................................... 7-31 7.5.8 Cost Efficiency Strategies ..................................................................... 7-32 Chapter 8 SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 8-1 8.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Transit Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Short-Range Recommendations ........................................................................ 8-3 8.3 Mid-Range Recommendations ......................................................................... 8-15 8.4 Long-Range Recommendations ....................................................................... 8-21 8.5 Input at the Public Meetings ............................................................................. 8-23 8.6 Cost Estimates ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Optimization Plan September 2017
    Transit Optimization Plan September 2017 Prepared by: Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................6 Goals and Focus ........................................................................................................... 6 Study Process ............................................................................................................... 7 Report Contents ........................................................................................................... 8 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................................9 Market Assessment ...................................................................................................... 9 Population ..........................................................................................................................9 Employment .......................................................................................................................9 Development Patterns ........................................................................................................9 Regional Growth ............................................................................................................... 10 Growth in Senior Population ............................................................................................. 10 Transit’s Role in Mobility ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Up Mental Hygiene 330 N. Charles Street Baltimore, Mo
    UP MENTAL HYGIENE 330 N. CHARLES STREET BALTIMORE, MO. Governor of Maryland i'<r';|ir rir^ ir ''^ti|M‘»|i i"1'!11^ nyTr-'iCf^ • IrjjfrZj! \-XW jB^X \ ypgSIffl 1 rT^-i vr i7*st;:ss? ^TpS «iSi| s®? 'T? ^C1-, \l b S l/kfy, T nHfc,ij|/ r^ Jbt* .MAni, »■ **—>— 'a}' ' P^ f fi fw/ r t a'inL* Te*i««Ss5S£ The Mahyland State House, Built 1772 The Annapolis Convention or" 1786, forerunner of the Convention that framed the American Constitution, met in the old Senate Chamber. Three years earlier, in this same room, Washington resigned his commission as Commander-in-Chief of the Cont.nenta'. armies. Here also the Treaty of Peace with Great Britain -vas ratified in 1784. Maryland and Massachusetrf are the only twc states with Capitol buildings dating from before Revolution. The building pictured above is the third on this site. The first, bunt in 1617, was destroyed by fire, and the second, built .n 1704, was -.orn down to make room for the present stru jtnre. Government House Residence of the Governor of Maryland Rebuilt 1936 under the administration of Governor Harry W. Nice 'CO r\ .f <? / 7- 1 tJ -^ C^Cg J_ MARYLAND MANUAL 1938 /I Compendium of Legal, Historical and Statistical Information Relating to the S TATE OF MARYLAND /JT en 5,1., Compiled by E. RAY JONES Secretary of State. 20TH CENTURY PRINTING CO BALTIMORE, MD. INTRODUCTION In this copy of the Maryland Manual, for 1938, will be found much valuable information concerning the State of Maryland, including its Charter and Constitution, and the names of all State and County officials, and members and functions of the several commissions, boards and other governmental agencies which have been created.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing and Metro Board Schedule
    Administrative Item #1 04-30-09 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 100352 Yes No TITLE: Approval of Public Hearing Staff Report PURPOSE: To present the Staff Report on the Public Hearings for Proposed Service Adjustments and the General Manager`s Proposed FY2010 Budget, as described in Docket No. B09-3. DESCRIPTION: Six public hearings were conducted in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia during the week of April 13-17, 2009, to solicit public comment on the proposed service adjustments and the proposed FY2010 budget. Comments were received from 2,679 people and 159 people testified at the hearings. 2,520 people provided written testimony. A total of 2,675 people opposed some portion of the proposed Service Adjustments and the majority of them (54%) perceived a lack of equity in the proposal in regard to people who are transit-dependent. The attached Staff Report presents a summary of the public hearing testimony. FUNDING IMPACT: Acceptance of the Staff Report has no funding impact. The public comments will be used as input into the FY2010 budget development. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Staff Report on the Public Hearings as described in Docket No. B09-3. Page 1 of 120 Approval of Public Hearing Staff Report Presented to the Board of Directors Directors: April 30, 2009 1 Page 2 of 120 Purpose To present the Staff Report on the Public Hearings for Proposed Service Adjustments, as described in Docket No. B09-3 2 Page 3 of 120 Background (From
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Financial Analysis
    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY of WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009
    Transportation 2009 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Transportation 2009 Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY OF WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009 What is the Transportation Element? Community Vision for At the 1997 session, the General Assembly passed five Transportation pieces of legislation and budget initiatives known collectively as "Smart Growth." Maryland has adopted the principles of Smart Growth to be incorporated into the According to the 2008 Community Survey, Comprehensive Plan. Westminster drivers are concerned with the difficulties they encounter turning on and The following Smart Growth principle relates to the Transportation Element: off roads due to issues with visibility or merging. Some residents suggested that the Facilitate an adequate mix of transportation modes City should consider the addition of lanes, roundabouts, or left turn signals. A second To reduce traffic congestion throughout the City challenge with driving in Westminster is the To coordinate land use and transportation high volume of traffic. Residents describe traffic to be an issue on Route 140 during To create resiliency, and connectivity within the City commuting times in the early morning or road networks early evening because of the high number of To ensure connectivity between pedestrian, bike, commuters that leave Westminster everyday to work outside of Carroll County. transit, and road facilities From the timing to the synchronization, Revitalize existing neighborhoods into safe, residents listed challenges with traffic lights walkable, and livable communities throughout Westminster. In some cases, it is not the use of a traffic light, but rather the To mix land uses and build compactly, thus reducing lack of a traffic light that most concerned trips and make walking a more viable alternative residents.
    [Show full text]
  • May 18 2016 TC Presentation Revised
    Transportation Commission WORK SESSION May 18, 2016 2016 Transportation Long Range Plan Work Session Proposed Schedule April Overview / Guidance / Methodology for LRP update (Study Session) May Review draft of new LRP projects / Removed projects (Study Session) June Initial screening of projects July Finalize screening of projects (Draft LRP) Sept. Public Hearing Adoption of LRP by Transportation Commission 3 Removed Projects • #15-21 – S. Van Dorn Street Improvements • #15-23 – West End Commuter Hub 4 Projects moved to Developer Contingent List • #15-4 - Pedestrian / Bicycle connection from Potomac Yard to Four Mile Run Trail • #15-18 – Library Lane Extension • #15-22 – Elizabeth Lane Extension • #15-26 – New road to Four Mile Run Park 5 Consolidated Projects • #15-5 – Mt. Vernon at Russell Road New 01 • #15-6 – Mt. Vernon at Four Mile Road • #15-7 – Mt. Vernon at E/W Glebe Road New • #15-24 – Van Dorn at Braddock Road 02 • #15-25 – Beauregard at Braddock Road • #15-28 – Quaker at Seminary (Consolidate with New project #10) 6 Studies for Removal • #15-7 – Edsall from Van Dorn to S. Pickett • #15-8 – Commonwealth Ave / Reed Ave Signal Studies to be Consolidated • #15-3 – Feasibility of a pedestrian connection between the Braddock Metrorail station and the Northern gateway through Braddock Place development • #15-4 – Feasibility of a walking route along the road parallel to the Metrorail embankment to also include transit and bike New Study • #New 02 – Braddock Road Multimodal Connections (Removed from CIP) 7 2016 LRP New Projects • Two
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Train Station Master Plan Which Is a Product of the Lancaster County Planning Commission and Funded by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
    Lancaster Train Station Master Plan October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Current and On-Going Station Improvements ......................................................................... 1 Planning Horizons ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Physical Plant ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Maintenance .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Station Capital Improvements ............................................................................................................... 9 Available Non-Transportation Spaces ................................................................................................ 17 Station Artwork ................................................................................................................................... 19 Historic Preservation ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]