Notes and References

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes and References Notes and References 1 Deficiences in Preparation: August 1914 I. For the principles of British strategy and military operations see C. Barnett, Britain and Her Army, 1509-1970: A Military, Political and Social Survey (London, 1970) and D. French, The British Way in Warfare, 1688-2000 (London, 1990). 2. See P.M. Kennedy, The Rise ofthe Anglo-German Antagonism. 1860-1914 (London, 1980). 3. G. Monger, The End of Isolation: .British Foreign Policy, 1900-1907 (London, 1963); K.M. Wilson, 'The Dissimulation of the Balance of Power' and 'The Invention of Germany', in The Policy ofthe Entente: Essays on the Determinants ofBritish Foreign Policy, 1904-1914 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 59-84 and 100-20; P.M. Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London, 1988), pp. 182-256 passim. 4. Barnett,op. cit., p. 298; J.E. Helmreich, Belgium and Europe: A Study in Small Power Diplomacy (The Hague , 1976), pp. 146-53; D.H. Thomas, The GuaranteeofBelgian Independence and Neutrality in European Diplomacy, 1830s-1930s (Kingston, Rhode Island, 1983), pp. 273-304. 5. E.M. Spiers, Haldane: an Army Reformer (Edinburgh, 1980). 6. For the strategic geography of Belgium see Thomas, op. cit., pp. 3-6. For German and French strategy in relation to Belgium see G. Ritter, The Schlieffen Plan: Critique ofa Myth (London, 1958); and S.R. Williamson, The Politics of Grand Strategy: Britain and France Prepare for War, 1904-1914 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969), pp. 210-13. 7. 'Report of the Sub-Committee on the Military Requirements of the Empire (Europe)' (24 July 1909), Cabinet Office: Committee of Imperial Defence Ad-hoc Sub-Committees of Enquiry; Proceedings and Memoranda, Public Record Office (PRO), Kew, London, (CAB 16): CAB 16/5. 8. For the history of British strategic planning see J. Gooch, The Plans of War, c.1900-16 (London, 1974); M. Howard, The Continental Commitment (London, 1972); J. McDermott, 'The Revolution in British Military Planning from the Boer War to the Moroccan Crisis', in P.M. Kennedy (ed.), The War Plans ofthe Great Powers, 1880-1914 (London, 1979), pp. 99-117; N. d'Ornbrain, War Machinery and High Policy: Defence Administration in Peacetime Britain, 1902-14 (Oxford, 1973); N.W. Summerton, 'The Development of British Military Planning for a War Against Germany, 1904-14' (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 2 vols, 1970); J.E. Tyler, The British Army and the Continent, 1904-14 (London, 1938); Williamson, op. cit. 9. The deficiencies of British military preparations are analysed in more detail in W.J. Philpott, 'British Military Strategy on the Western Front: Independence or Alliance, 1904-1918' (unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1991), pp. 5-77. 166 Notes and References 167 10. lbid., pp. 11-6S passim. 11. W.J . Philpott, 'The Strategic Ideas of Sir John French', The Journal of Strategic Studies, XII (1989), pp. 4S8-78; K.M. Wilson, 'The War Office, Churchill and the Belgian Option: August to December 1911', Bulletin of the Institute ofHistorical Research, L (1977), pp. 218-28; Esher journal (4 Oct. 1911), Viscount Esher papers, Churchill College, Cambridge, ESHR 2/12. 12. Williamson, The Politics of Grand Strategy, pp. 168-9; Summerton, 'The Development of British Military Planning', ii 366-430; 'The Military Aspects of the Continental Problem', memorandum by the General Staff (IS Aug. 1911), Cabinet Office: Committee of Imperial Defence Miscellaneous Memoranda, PRO (CAB 4): CAB 4/3/130B . 13. Wilson awaits an adequate biography. Maj.-Gen. Sir C.E. Callwell, Field­ Marshal Sir Henry Wilson : His Life and Diaries (2 vols, London, 1927) and B. Collier, Brasshat: A Biography ofField-Marshal Henry Wilson (London, 1961) both rely uncritically on Wilson's private diaries, while B. Ash, The Lost Dictator: Field-Marshal Sir Henry Wilson (London, 1968) argues spu­ riously that Wilson was above politics. 14. Committee of Imperial Defence, 'Minutes of the 114th meeting' (23 Aug. 1911), Cabinet Office: Committee of Imperial Defence Minutes, PRO (CAB 2): CAB 212; D'Ombrain, War Machinery and High Policy, pp. 100-7; Callwell, op. cit., i 86-IS6 passim. IS. Asquith to the King (IS Nov. 1911), Earl of Oxford and Asquith papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford, file 6; D'Ombrain, op. cit., pp. 106-7. 16. Wilson diary (31 Aug. 1911 passim), Wilson to Nicholson (31 Aug. 1911) and 'Appreciation of the Political and Military Situation in Europe', by Wilson (20 Sept. 1911), Field-Marshal Sir Henry Wilson Papers, Imperial War Museum, London (73/1) , HHW 2170/12 and 3/6/6; Wilson to Churchill (29 Aug . 1911), in Wilson, 'The War Office, Churchill and the Belgian Option' , p. 219. 17. 'Records of a Strategic Wargame, 1905' , War Office: Reports and Miscellaneous Papers, PRO (WO 33): WO 33/364; Williamson, The Politics ofGrand Strategy, p. 47. 18. 'The Military Aspects of the Continental Problem', memorandum by the General Staff (1S Aug. 1911), CAB 4/3/130B; Committee of Imperial Defence, 'minutes of the I 14th meeting' (23 Aug. 1911), CAB 212; Wilson diary (23 Aug.-13 Sept. 1911 passim); Callwell, Sir Henry Wilson, i 86-lS6 passim. 19. Esher journal (6 Sept. 1911), in M.V. and O. Brett (eds), Journals and Letters of Reginald. Viscount Esher (4 vols, London , 1934-38), iii S8; Williamson,op. cit., p. 188. 20. 'Notes of Conferences held at Whitehall Gardens' (19 Dec. 1905 and 6, 12 and 19 Jan. 1906), CAB 2/1; 'The Assistance to be Given by Great Britain to France if She is Attacked by Germany', note by French (S Jan. 1909), CAB 16/S; Philpott, 'The Strategic Ideas of French', passim . 21. Lt.-Col. Barnardiston to Grierson (14 Feb., 30 and 31 Mar. 1906), in G.P. Gooch and H. Temperley (eds), British Documents on the Origins of the War, /898-/9/4, vol. 3: The Testing of the Entente , /904--6 (London, 1928), pp. 190-2 and 197-9; Sir G.T.M. Bridges, Alarms and Excursions 168 Notes and References (London, 1938), p. 62; Helmreich, Belgium and Europe, pp. 162-3; Summerton, 'The Development of British Military Planning' , i 131 and 137-41 and ii 512-5; Philpott, 'British Military Strategy', pp. 28-9 and 63-4. 22. Minutes of the first meeting of the 'Sub-committee on the Military Requirements of the Empire (Europe)' (3 Dec. 1908), CAB 16/5. 23. 'Secretary's Notes of a War Council Held at 10 Downing Street, 5 August 1914' , Cabinet Office: Cabinet Papers, 1915-16, PRO (CAB 42): CAB 42/1/2; Wilson, The Policy ofthe Entente, pp. 129-33. 24. WilIiamson, The Politics ofGrand Strategy , pp. 312-6. 25. /bid., pp. 64-81 . 26. /bid., pp. 178-81. 27. Wilson, the Policy ofthe Entente, pp. 122-4. 28. WilIiamson,op. cit., p. 222. 29. Committee of Imperial Defence, 'Minutes of the 114th meeting' (23 Aug. 1911), CAB 2/2. 30. Williamson, op. cit., p. 316. 31. 'Notes of Conferences held at Whitehall Gardens' (19 Dec. 1905 and 6, 12 and 19 Jan. 1906), CAB 2/1; C. a C. Repington, The First World War (2 vols, London, 1920), i 6-12; Philpott, 'The Strategic Ideas of French' , pp.462-3. 32. Asquith to Venetia Stanley (I and 2 Aug. 1914), in M. and E. Brock (eds), H.H. Asquith: Letters to Venetia Stanley , pp. 139-40 and 145-7; Asquith to the King (28 July and 2 Aug. 1914), Asquith papers, file 7; W.S. Churchill, The World Crisis, /9/J-/8 (6 vols, London, 1923-31), i 201-2. 33. Asquith to the King (30 July 1914), Asquith papers, file 7. 34. Wilson, The Policy ofthe Entente, pp. 135-47 . 35. Asquith to Venetia Stanley (2 Aug. 1914), Brock, op. cit., pp. 145-7 ; H.H. Asquith, Earl of Oxford and Asquith, The Genesis of the War (London, 1923), p. 209. 36. Viscount Grey of Fallodon, Twenty-Five Years, /892-/9/6 (2 vols, London, 1925), i 319. 37. For the political and strategical background to Britain's entry into the war see Wilson, op. cit., pp. 135-47 and M. Brock, 'Britain Enters the War', in R.J.W. Evans and H. Pogge von Strandmann (eds), The Coming ofthe First World War (Oxford, 1988), pp. 145-78. 38. C. Hazlehurst, Politicians at War, July /9/4 to May /9/5: A Prologue to the Triumph ofLloyd George (London, 1971), pp. 113-14. 39. Asquith to Venetia Stanley (2 Aug. 1914), Brock op. cit., pp. 145-7. 40. King Albert 1 to the entente governments (4 Aug. 1914), in M.-R. Thielemans and E. Vandewoude (eds), Le Roi Albert au Travers de ses Lettres Inedites, /882-/9/6 (Brussels, 1982), p. 507. 41. R.A. Prete, 'French Strategic Planning and the Deployment of the BEF in France in 1914', Canadian Journal of History, XXIV (1989), pp. 42-62: p.53. 42. 'Secretary's Notes of a War Council' (5 Aug. 1914), CAB 42/1/2. 43. Asquith to Venetia Stanley (6 Aug. 1914), Brock, op. cit. , pp. 158-9. Notes and References 169 44. 'Report on the Opening of the War' by Committee of Imperial Defence Historical Section (I Nov. 19I4), Cabinet Office: Miscellaneous Records, PRO (CAB I): CAB 1/10/30, p. 8. 45. See for example, Wilson diary (17 and 25 Nov. 1912). 46. Ibid. (5 Aug. 1914). 47. 'Secretary' s Notes of a War Council' (5 Aug. 1914),CAB 42/112. 48. Philpott, 'British Military Strategy' , pp. 39-42 and 58-62. 49. 'Secretary's Notes of a War Council' (5 Aug. 1914),CAB 42/112. 50. Hamilton to French (13 Aug.
Recommended publications
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing Marshal Ferdinand Foch
    Command in a Coalition War 91 Command in a Coalition War: Reassessing Marshal Ferdinand Foch Elizabeth Greenhalgh* Marshal Ferdinand Foch is remembered, inaccurately, as the unthinking apostle of the offensive, one of the makers of the discredited strategy of the “offensive à outrance” that was responsible for so many French deaths in 1914 and 1915. His acceptance of the German signature on the armistice document presented on behalf of the Entente Allies in 1918 has been overshadowed by postwar conflicts over the peace treaty and then over France’s interwar defense policies. This paper argues that with the archival resources at our disposal it is time to examine what Foch actually did in the years be- tween his prewar professorship at the Ecole Supérieure de Guerre and the postwar disputes at Versailles. I The prewar stereotype of the military leader was influenced by military and diplomat- ic developments on the island of Corsica during the eighteenth century that resulted in the Genoese selling the sovereignty of the island in 1768 to France. This meant that Carlo Buonaparte’s son would be a Frenchman and not Italian, thus altering the face of Europe. The achievements of France’s greatest of “great captains” thus became a benchmark for future French military leaders. A French family from the southwest corner of France near the Pyrenees saw service with Napoleon Bonaparte, and in 1832 one member of that family, named Napoleon Foch for the general, consul and empe- ror, married Mlle Sophie Dupré, the daughter of an Austerlitz veteran. Their second surviving son was named Ferdinand.
    [Show full text]
  • General Sir William Birdwood and the AIF,L914-1918
    A study in the limitations of command: General Sir William Birdwood and the A.I.F.,l914-1918 Prepared and submitted by JOHN DERMOT MILLAR for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales 31 January 1993 I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of advanced learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. John Dermot Millar 31 January 1993 ABSTRACT Military command is the single most important factor in the conduct of warfare. To understand war and military success and failure, historians need to explore command structures and the relationships between commanders. In World War I, a new level of higher command had emerged: the corps commander. Between 1914 and 1918, the role of corps commanders and the demands placed upon them constantly changed as experience brought illumination and insight. Yet the men who occupied these positions were sometimes unable to cope with the changing circumstances and the many significant limitations which were imposed upon them. Of the World War I corps commanders, William Bird wood was one of the longest serving. From the time of his appointment in December 1914 until May 1918, Bird wood acquired an experience of corps command which was perhaps more diverse than his contemporaries during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Front the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Westernthe Front
    Ed 2 June 2015 2 June Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Western Front The Western Creative Media Design ADR003970 Edition 2 June 2015 The Somme Battlefield: Newfoundland Memorial Park at Beaumont Hamel Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The Somme Battlefield: Lochnagar Crater. It was blown at 0728 hours on 1 July 1916. Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front 2nd Edition June 2015 ii | THE WESTERN FRONT OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR ISBN: 978-1-874346-45-6 First published in August 2014 by Creative Media Design, Army Headquarters, Andover. Printed by Earle & Ludlow through Williams Lea Ltd, Norwich. Revised and expanded second edition published in June 2015. Text Copyright © Mungo Melvin, Editor, and the Authors listed in the List of Contributors, 2014 & 2015. Sketch Maps Crown Copyright © UK MOD, 2014 & 2015. Images Copyright © Imperial War Museum (IWM), National Army Museum (NAM), Mike St. Maur Sheil/Fields of Battle 14-18, Barbara Taylor and others so captioned. No part of this publication, except for short quotations, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the permission of the Editor and SO1 Commemoration, Army Headquarters, IDL 26, Blenheim Building, Marlborough Lines, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 8HJ. The First World War sketch maps have been produced by the Defence Geographic Centre (DGC), Joint Force Intelligence Group (JFIG), Ministry of Defence, Elmwood Avenue, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 7AH. United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917
    ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Timeline C
    6.2.1 World War I Timeline c June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia are killed by Serbian nationalists. July 26, 1914 Austria declares war on Serbia. Russia, an ally of Serbia, prepares to enter the war. July 29, 1914 Austria invades Serbia. August 1, 1914 Germany declares war on Russia. August 3, 1914 Germany declares war on France. August 4, 1914 German army invades neutral Belgium on its way to attack France. Great Britain declares war on Germany. As a colony of Britain, Canada is now at war. Prime Minister Robert Borden calls for a supreme national effort to support Britain, and offers assistance. Canadians rush to enlist in the military. August 6, 1914 Austria declares war on Russia. August 12, 1914 France and Britain declare war on Austria. October 1, 1914 The first Canadian troops leave to be trained in Britain. October – November 1914 First Battle of Ypres, France. Germany fails to reach the English Channel. 1914 – 1917 The two huge armies are deadlocked along a 600-mile front of Deadlock and growing trenches in Belgium and France. For four years, there is little change. death tolls Attack after attack fails to cross enemy lines, and the toll in human lives grows rapidly. Both sides seek help from other allies. By 1917, every continent and all the oceans of the world are involved in this war. February 1915 The first Canadian soldiers land in France to fight alongside British troops. April - May 1915 The Second Battle of Ypres. Germans use poison gas and break a hole through the long line of Allied trenches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps in World War I: from Inception To
    THE PORTUGUESE EXPEDITIONARY CORPS IN WORLD WAR I: FROM INCEPTION TO COMBAT DESTRUCTION, 1914-1918 Jesse Pyles, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major Professor Robert Citino, Committee Member Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Pyles, Jesse, The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps in World War I: From Inception to Destruction, 1914-1918. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 130 pp., references, 86. The Portuguese Expeditionary Force fought in the trenches of northern France from April 1917 to April 1918. On 9 April 1918 the sledgehammer blow of Operation Georgette fell upon the exhausted Portuguese troops. British accounts of the Portuguese Corps’ participation in combat on the Western Front are terse. Many are dismissive. In fact, Portuguese units experienced heavy combat and successfully held their ground against all attacks. Regarding Georgette, the standard British narrative holds that most of the Portuguese soldiers threw their weapons aside and ran. The account is incontrovertibly false. Most of the Portuguese combat troops held their ground against the German assault. This thesis details the history of the Portuguese Expeditionary Force. Copyright 2012 by Jesse Pyles ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The love of my life, my wife Izabella, encouraged me to pursue graduate education in history. This thesis would not have been possible without her support. Professor Geoffrey Wawro directed my thesis. He provided helpful feedback regarding content and structure. Professor Robert Citino offered equal measures of instruction and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 11, 1916
    The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 11, 1916 Table of Contents OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES .......................................................................................5 PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTH TO THIRTY-NINTH MEETINGS .............................................................................................7 PAPERS EXTRACTS FROM LETTERS OF THE REVEREND JOSEPH WILLARD, PRESIDENT OF HARVARD COLLEGE, AND OF SOME OF HIS CHILDREN, 1794-1830 . ..........................................................11 ​ By his Grand-daughter, SUSANNA WILLARD EXCERPTS FROM THE DIARY OF TIMOTHY FULLER, JR., AN UNDERGRADUATE IN HARVARD COLLEGE, 1798- 1801 ..............................................................................................................33 ​ By his Grand-daughter, EDITH DAVENPORT FULLER BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF MRS. RICHARD HENRY DANA ....................................................................................................................53 ​ By MRS. MARY ISABELLA GOZZALDI EARLY CAMBRIDGE DIARIES…....................................................................................57 ​ By MRS. HARRIETTE M. FORBES ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TREASURER ........................................................................84 NECROLOGY ..............................................................................................................86 MEMBERSHIP .............................................................................................................89 OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    . INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6"X 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing theUMI World’s Information since 1938 300 North Z eeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8820321 Operational art and the German command system in World War I Meyer, Bradley John, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1088 by Meyer, Bradley John. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 OPERATIONAL ART AND THE GERMAN COMMAND SYSTEM IN WORLD WAR I DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Bradley J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87577-6 - The Cambridge History of War: War and the Modern World: Volume IV Edited by Roger Chickering, Dennis Showalter and Hans van de Ven Index More information Index A. Q. Khan network 485 importance of power in 569, 579 Acheson, Dean 498, 554, 557 and Spanish Civil War 330 Adan, Avraham 507, 508 see also Afghanistan; Iraq; RMA; Royal Air Aden, insurgency in 539 Force British withdrawal from 539 Akiyoshi Yamada, General 106 and Marxist People’s Republic with Al Qaeda, September 11 terror attacks 582 Yemen 539 see also Afghanistan Adenauer, Konrad 545 Algeria, French colonial rule in 526 Afghanistan military aspects of 529–30 insurgency in 586 Algerian War and US army reform 587 ALN attacks, and French response 527 Operation Anaconda 583–84 casualty numbers in 539–40 lack of collaboration between US and de Gaulle’soffensive 528 allies 584 formation of OAS 529 terrorist sanctuary 582 and FLN 526–27 US support for Northern Alliance 582–83 criticism of France 528 US airstrikes 583 French attempts to remove activists 528 Africa negotiations with 528 civil wars in and use of military and victory 529 technology 581 and idea of postwar European peace division of former German colonies 560–61 287–88 use of French conscripts 527 military organization of colonies in 138–39 Ali, Mehmet 11 age of mass 165 Alsace-Lorraine, and France’s Plan XV 62 agricultural crises, and war 9 Amazons of Dahomey 91 agricultural economies, challenges to 268 Ambrosio, General Vittorio 364 agriculture, advances in, and American Civil
    [Show full text]