DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relationship Between Centre and Periphery in the Ottoman Era Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Relationship Between Centre and Periphery in the Ottoman Era Of THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CENTRE AND PERIPHERY IN THE OTTOMAN ERA OF EXPERIMENTATION WITH AND ADAPTATION OF INSTITUTIONS FOR FISCAL DEMANDS: THE CASES OF KOZANI, SERFICE, AND VELVENDOS, CA.1690-CA.1820 by DIMITRIOS K. LAMPRAKIS A Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies School of History and Cultures University of Birmingham October 2017 I University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This dissertation is an attempt to describe and analyse the history of the relationship between the imperial centre and a minor peripheral area, but also the first step towards a more complete understanding of the history of the areas of Kozani, Serfice, and Velvendos during the 18th century, on the basis of both Ottoman and Greek primary sources, in an attempt to replace the old and, rather obsolete, nationalist narratives prevalent in the writings of the local amateur historians. Through the examination of the tax-farming system, on the one hand, and the timar system, on the other, in the areas under study, this dissertation addresses the developments that occurred at a local level in a period of Ottoman history marked by great changes and experimentation with new fiscal practices. It is also the aim of this dissertation to prove that the centre was represented locally by the local magnates and notables, who, by serving the interests of the absentee Istanbul-based élite, acted as representatives of the centre in their localities, and formed factions which vied for supremacy and served their respective interests at a local level. Thus, it supports the idea that the centre made the local notables, for as long as local notables made the centre in their given society and locality. ii To my mom and dad, always grateful for making this possible iii PREFACE This dissertation is the result of a long research and studying of a considerable number of primary and secondary sources, which allowed me to examine the history of a relatively unexplored area and, in accordance with the revisionist theories dominating the modern Ottomanist historiography, confront the traditional schemes of the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the tyrannical rule of the Ottomans over their subject populations. Now, after four long years my research is finally complete and I feel the need to express my gratitude to all those who assisted me on my arduous and lengthy course. My vision and ideas would have never been expressed and realised, had the Centre of Byzantine, Ottoman, and Modern Greek Studies of the University of Birmingham not offered me the opportunity to become part of its scholarly community. I also need to express my graditude to the University of Birmingham for the financial support which I was provided with for parts of my research at the Prime Minister’s Ottoman Archives in Istanbul. I am grateful to my two supervisors, Dr Rhoads Murphey and Dr Archibald Dunn, who assisted me from the very beginning of my course and encouraged me to express my ideas and thoughts. Moreover, I need to thank them both for their patience and their contribution to the amelioration of my research and academic skills, which I have experienced under their meticulous supervision. Dr Murphey helped me put my thoughts in due order and set, therefore, the foundations on which this dissertation was later structured and built, whilst Dr Dunn, by proposing and instructing me as to the combination of the information provided by the Ottoman and Greek documents, contributed to my final approach to the large number of sources at my disposal. His remarks and corrections were iv always of paramount importance and determined the final shape and form of this dissertation. I am also grateful to Dr Seyyed Muhammad Tagi Shariat-Panahi, whom I initially met as a tutor, but proved a true friend. By sharing with me his knowledge of the secrets of the science of the Ottoman diplomatics, he introduced me to the particularities of the Ottoman bureaucracy and documentation. His advice and adminitions helped me find my way and take the great decision of leaving Greece. Thus, I thank him for all of the time, which he devoted as a scholar and, above all, as a true friend. I would like also to thank Dr Georgios Liakopoulos for his lessons and discussions that we had together, long before I had taken the decision to leave Greece and move to Birmingham. As I came to realise, his experiences proved of invaluable help. My thanks go also to Dr Konstantinos Kambouridis, Dr Georgios Salakides, Dr Chariton Karanasios, Dr Georgios Tsotsos, and Dr Konstantinos Ntinas, who welcomed me into the community of the scholars who study the history of Western Macedonia and introduced me to the history and particularities of the Kozanite microcosm. All of them stood by me as true scholars, companions, and friends. I also am deeply indebted to the directory and staff of the Prime Minister’s Ottoman Archives in Istanbul, who always responded promptly to my demands and needs, whilst their interest in my project and assistance at a time when I lacked the necessary skills and experience for conducting research in the maze of the Ottoman Archives rendered my working in the archives a fruitful and pleasurable experience. The same feelings do I reserve for the staff of the Gennadeios Library of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, who always responded in the most positive manner and assisted me on my research and exploration of the plentiful collections preserved in the Gennadeios Library. v I also need to express my gratitude to my professors, Stephanos Papageorgiou and Alexandros Koutsis, who instilled at an early stage of my undergraduate studies into me the passion and love for the Ottoman Empire and history of Early Modern Greece and Middle East. I would like also to thank Dr Sophia Laiou and Professor John Alexander who assisted me at the earliest stages of this project, before I had made the great decision to move into the UK and the University of Birmingham. I am deeply grateful to both of them. I am also grateful to my friends, whose contribution is also necessary to be remembered. They were always eager at discussing my research and, through exchanging of opinions and lengthy discussions, each one of them contributed in every possible manner to the completion of this project. Yannis Tzortzis and Onur Usta are the best example of such good friends and scholars, for they never rejected my calls to discuss and analyse my ideas. Thus, I need to thank them both for all of the time and energy that they devoted, whenever I called for their assistance and counselling, sometimes even at the expense of their own research. I also thank for all their good advice and help Alex M. Feldman, Maria D. Petropoulou and Georgia Michael. Last, not least, and above all I need to express my deepest feelings of gratitude to my family. My parents and my brother always supported me and never hesitated to show their understanding of and theır patience and stamina to endure the vicissitudes characteristic of this lengthy and tiresome process. My parents proved a real treasure, not only because they allowed me to attempt to realise my dreams and vision, but also because they assisted me throughout this four-year-long period, which coincided with a period of an unprecedented financial and socio-economic crisis in Greece, a fact that further magnifies and intensifies their sacrifices and contribution. Therefore, I can only stand in awe before vi them and thank them for all the sacrifices that they have done, sometimes at the expense of their own welfare and quality of their life. Thus, for all their hopes, visions, love, endurance, and perseverance I dedicate wholeheartedly my dissertation to my mother, Maria, and my father, Kostas. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..ii PREFACE…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………iv TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………..viii ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….x NOTE ON TRANSLITERATION…………………………………………………………………………………………..xii NOTE ON DATE CONVERSION AND CALENDARS………………………………………………………………xv GLOSSARY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………xvi CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION……………………………..……………………………..……………………………...1 1.1. The Ottoman 18th century: A period of experimentation and modernisation………..4 1.2. The Thesis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 CHAPTER II: TAX-FARMING IN KOZANI, c.1750 – c.1820………………………………………………….17 2.1. Ottoman tax-farming methods and the Ottoman 18th century…………………………….17 2.2. Kozani during the 16th and 17th centuries…………………………………………………………….30 2.3. The tax-farm of Kozani during the 1750s……………………………………………………………….33 2.4. The tax-farm of Kozani during the 1760s……………………………………………....................44 2.5. The tax-farm of Kozani between 1770 and c.1795………………………………………………...62 2.6. The tax-farm of Kozani between c. 1795 and c.1820……………………………………………..83 2.7. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..90 CHAPTER III: COMMUNAL AFFAIRS AND BILATERAL FACTIONALISM IN KOZANI, c.1750 – c. 1820……………………………………………………………………………………………….....................................93 3.1. 18th-century Ottoman notables and magnates in modern bibliography………………95 3.2. The structure of the local communal administrative mechanism……………………….107 3.2.1. The role of the bishop of Servia and Kozani………………………………………………………….108 3.2.2. The role of the kocabaşı as the leader of the Kozanite community……………………….116 3.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire*
    STRUGGLE FOR EAST-EUROPEAN EMPIRE: 1400-1700 The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire* HALİL İNALCIK The empire of the Golden Horde, built by Batu, son of Djodji and the grand son of Genghis Khan, around 1240, was an empire which united the whole East-Europe under its domination. The Golden Horde empire comprised ali of the remnants of the earlier nomadic peoples of Turkic language in the steppe area which were then known under the common name of Tatar within this new political framework. The Golden Horde ruled directly över the Eurasian steppe from Khwarezm to the Danube and över the Russian principalities in the forest zone indirectly as tribute-paying states. Already in the second half of the 13th century the western part of the steppe from the Don river to the Danube tended to become a separate political entity under the powerful emir Noghay. In the second half of the 14th century rival branches of the Djodjid dynasty, each supported by a group of the dissident clans, started a long struggle for the Ulugh-Yurd, the core of the empire in the lower itil (Volga) river, and for the title of Ulugh Khan which meant the supreme ruler of the empire. Toktamish Khan restored, for a short period, the unity of the empire. When defeated by Tamerlane, his sons and dependent clans resumed the struggle for the Ulugh-Khan-ship in the westem steppe area. During ali this period, the Crimean peninsula, separated from the steppe by a narrow isthmus, became a refuge area for the defeated in the steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBANIAN SOLDIERS in the OTTOMAN ARMY DURING the GREEK REVOLT at 1821 Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Epoka University IBAC 2012 vol.2 ALBANIAN SOLDIERS IN THE OTTOMAN ARMY DURING THE GREEK REVOLT AT 1821 ∗∗ Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ Introduction Ottoman Army organization had started to deteriorate from the mid-17th century. Military failures made the social and economic problems worse. In this situation, alternative potentials in the empire appeared because of the increasing military needs of the central government and the provincial governors. By the way, general employment of the Albanian warriors who were famous with their courage and strength became possible.1 There were a lot of reasons for employing Albanian warriors with salary while there was Ottoman regular army corps, including janissaries and soldiers from the states. Governing problems, had existed in the states and land system after the defeat in Vienne at 1683, was one of these reasons. Also after the end of the conquering era, the castles and fortresses at the borderlines were built for defense and there were not a necessary number of soldiers in these buildings. This problem was tried to by employing the warriors with long- matchlock-guns from Bosnia, Herzegovina and Albania.2 During the time, the necessity of mercenary increased too much as seen in the example of the Ottoman army which established for pressing the Greek Revolt in 1821, was almost composed of the Albanian soldiers.3 There were historical reasons for choosing Albanian soldiers in the Balkans. A strong feudal-system had existed in the Albanian lands before the Ottoman rule. This social structure, which consisted of the local connections and obedience around the lords, continued by integrating, first, timar (fief) system after the Ottoman conquest in 1385 and then, devshirme system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Enlightenment and the Changing Cultural Status of Women
    SOPHIA DENISSI The Greek Enlightenment and the Changing Cultural Status of Women In 1856 Andreas Laskaratos, one of the most liberal authors of his time, writes: There is no doubt that we took a giant step in allowing our women learning. This step reveals that a revolution took place in the spirit; a revolution which has taken our minds away from the road of backwardness and has led them to the road of progress. Though this transmission has not received any attention yet, it constitutes one of these events that will leave its trace in the history of the human spirit.1 Laskaratos is quite correct in talking about a revolution since the decision to accept women's education at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries was indeed a revolutionary act if we consider the state of Greek women who had been living in absolute ignorance and seclusion that prevailed throughout the years of the Ottoman occupation. What caused this revolution? What made Greek men, or rather a progressive minority at first, still subjects of the Ottoman Empire concede the right to education and even to a public voice for women? The answer will be revealed to us by taking a close look at the first educated Greek women who managed to break the traditional silence imposed upon their sex by patriarchal culture and make their presence felt in the male world. We can distinguish two main groups among the first educated Greek women; those coming from the aristocratic circle of the Phanariots and those coming from the circle of progressive men of letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Pax Britannica and the Anti-Systemic Movement of Viceroy Mehmet Ali Pasha of Egypt
    PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY OKYANUS AKIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DECEMBER 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Çınar Özen (Ankara Uni., IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Okyanus Akın Signature: iii ABSTRACT PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT Akın, Okyanus M.S., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur December 2019, 234 pages The Pax Britannica, as a system, defined the political-economy of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • TANZIMAT in the PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) and LOCAL COUNCILS in the OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840S to 1860S)
    TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s) Dissertation zur Erlangung der Würde einer Doktorin der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Basel von ANNA VAKALIS aus Thessaloniki, Griechenland Basel, 2019 Buchbinderei Bommer GmbH, Basel Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch ANNA VAKALIS, ‘TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s)’ Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Basel, auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Maurus Reinkowski und Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yonca Köksal (Koç University, Istanbul). Basel, den 05/05/2017 Der Dekan Prof. Dr. Thomas Grob 2 ANNA VAKALIS, ‘TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s)’ TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..…….…….….7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………...………..………8-9 NOTES ON PLACES……………………………………………………….……..….10 INTRODUCTION -Rethinking the Tanzimat........................................................................................................11-19 -Ottoman Province(s) in the Balkans………………………………..…….………...19-25 -Agency in Ottoman Society................…..............................................................................25-35 CHAPTER 1: THE STATE SETTING THE STAGE: Local Councils
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • 200Th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021
    Special Edition: 200th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021 A publication of the Dean C. and Zoë S. Pappas Interdisciplinary March 2021 VOLUME 1 ISSUE NO. 3 Center for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies From the Director Dear Friends, On March 25, 1821, in the city of Kalamata in the southern Peloponnesos, the chieftains from the region of Mani convened the Messinian Senate of Kalamata to issue a revolutionary proclamation for “Liberty.” The commander Petrobey Mavromichalis then wrote the following appeal to the Americans: “Citizens of the United States of America!…Having formed the resolution to live or die for freedom, we are drawn toward you by a just sympathy; since it is in your land that Liberty has fixed her abode, and by you that she is prized as by our fathers.” He added, “It is for you, citizens of America, to crown this glory, in aiding us to purge Greece from the barbarians, who for four hundred years have polluted the soil.” The Greek revolutionaries understood themselves as part of a universal struggle for freedom. It is this universal struggle for freedom that the Pappas Center for Hellenic Studies and Stockton University raises up and celebrates on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the beginning of the Greek Revolution in 1821. The Pappas Center IN THIS ISSUE for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies have prepared this Special Edition of the Hellenic Voice for you to enjoy. In this Special Edition, we feature the Pappas Center exhibition, The Greek Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Music, Image, and Identity: Rebetiko and Greek National Identity
    Universiteit van Amsterdam Graduate School for Humanities Music, Image, and Identity: Rebetiko and Greek National Identity Alexia Kallergi Panopoulou Student number: 11655631 MA Thesis in European Studies, Identity and Integration track Name of supervisor: Dr. Krisztina Lajosi-Moore Name of second reader: Prof. dr. Joep Leerssen September 2018 2 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1 .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Theory and Methodology ........................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2. ........................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 The history of Rebetiko ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Kleftiko songs: Klephts and Armatoloi ............................................................................... 11 2.1.2 The Period of the Klephts Song .......................................................................................... 15 2.2 Rebetiko Songs...................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Rebetiko periods ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOCQUEVILLE in the OTTOMAN EMPIRE the OTTOMAN EMPIRE and ITS HERITAGE Politics, Society and Economy
    TOCQUEVILLE IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND ITS HERITAGE Politics, Society and Economy edited by Suraiya Faroqhi and Halil Inalcik Advisory Board Fikret Adanir • Idris Bostan • Amnon Cohen • Cornell Fleischer Barbara Flemming • Alexander de Groot • Klaus Kreiser Hans Georg Majer • Irène Mélikoff • Ahmet Yas¸ar Ocak Abdeljelil Temimi • Gilles Veinstein • Elizabeth Zachariadou VOLUME 28 TOCQUEVILLE IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE Rival Paths to the Modern State BY ARIEL SALZMANN BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2004 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available on http://catalog.loc.gov ISSN 1380-6076 ISBN 90 04 10887 4 © Copyright 2004 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, Rosewood Drive 222, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands SALZMAN_f1-v-xv 11/12/03 11:08 AM Page v v To my mother and father This page intentionally left blank SALZMAN_f1-v-xv 11/12/03 11:08 AM Page vii vii CONTENTS List of Illustrations ...................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................ xi List of Abbreviations .................................................................. xiii Note on Transliteration ............................................................ xv Introduction: Tocqueville’s Ghost .................................................. 1 In Search of an Archive ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Nature of the Turkish State Authority for Religious Affairs (ARA) and Turkish Islam in Europe Günter Seufert
    Working Paper SWP Working Papers are online publications within the purview of the respective Research Division. Unlike SWP Research Papers and SWP Comments they are not reviewed by the Institute. CENTRE FOR APPLIED TURKEY STUDIES (CATS) | WP NR. 02, JUNE 2020 The changing nature of the Turkish State Authority for Religious Affairs (ARA) and Turkish Islam in Europe Günter Seufert Contents Introduction 4 The umbrella organizations of the Turkish Authority for Religious Affairs in Europe 6 From "partner in integration" to "tool of a foreign power” 7 Definition of terms 9 Historical outline 11 The Authority for Religious Affairs as a product of Turkish secularization: the gradual exclusion of religious discourses and norms from administration and politics 11 The Authority for Religious Affairs as a bone of contention between secular and religious forces 14 Muslim policies beyond traditionalism and Islamism 17 The Authority for Religious Affairs between theological autonomy and political instrumentalization 21 The independence of the Diyanet as a step towards the rehabilitation and empowerment of the Islamic religion in society (and politics?) 21 The independence of the Diyanet as a step towards strengthening the civil character of religion and effectively dealing with worrying currents within national and international Islam 23 The intensified role of the Diyanet in the context of Turkish foreign policy 24 The Diyanet's attitude to subject areas 26 The comments of Diyanet on Fethullah Gülen 26 The Diyanet's Statement on the Ideology of the
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Reckonings
    COMMENTARY had a fixation with the event. They declared their dictatorship to be a “national-salvationist revolu- tion” (ethnosotirios epanastasis) that would com- plete the work of its predecessor. In 1971, the 150th anniversary of the uprising, more than 300 books were published on the subject – an astonishing number dwarfing that of any year before or since. The nation’s classrooms rang with the exhortation: “Long live the revolution of 25 March 1821! Long live the revolution of 21 April 1967!” It was ironic to watch an authoritarian military Junta heroizing a bunch of unruly and quarrelsome chieftains who had been united by few things stronger than their loathing for the idea of a regular army. But the pre- dictable result of turning 1821 into fascist kitsch was that by the time the colonels fell from power in 1974, everyone was fed up with the subject. This explains why, amid the truly remarkable resurgence in historical studies in Greece that took place with the restoration of democracy, the subject of its independence struggle was initially neglected. An exception was the scholarly journal Mnimon, which consistently published high-calibre research on the subject. Just three years ago, it published not one but two important volumes of essays on the Greek revolution. These signalled an end to the neglect of the recent past and showcased a younger generation of historians that was finding new rea- sons for returning to 1821. One of these volumes is a collective tribute to the late historian Despoina Themeli-Katifori, who had contributed to the journal from the start.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanlı İktisadi DÜZENİNDE İhtisab MÜESSESESİ VE MUHTESİBLİK ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME
    OSMANLı İKTİsADİ DÜZENİNDE İHTİsAB MÜESSESESİ VE MUHTESİBLİK ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME lbrahim ERDOGDU* Osmanlı Devleti'nin sosyo-ekonomik yapısı içerisinde önemli bir yeri olmasına rağmen görüldüğü kadanyla üzerinde nispeten az çalışılmış bir konu olan "İhtisab Müessesesi", bütün Müslüman devletlerde olduğu gibi Osmanlılar'da da özellikle dini emir ve ya- saklara nezaret ile ahlak ve an'anelerin kuşaklar arasında bo- zulmadan devamlılığını sağlamak; günlük hayatın yanı sıra özel- likle ticari faaliyetlerde devlet tarafından aktif bir sosyal kontrolün sağlaması bakımından, önemli bir kontrol mekanizmasıdır i . Bu müessesenin işleyiş tarzı ve Osmanlı idari-iktisadi S1S- temindeki öneminin anlaşılabilmesi, bazı temel esaslann tespiti ve *AÜDTCF Tarih Bölümü Araştırma Görevlisi ı. Konu hakkında, bu güne kadar ülkemizde akademik bir tez olarak yapılmış ça- lışmalardan en kapsamlı olanı için bkz. Kazıcı, Ziya, Osmanlılarda lhtisah Müessesesi. Is- tanbul, 1987; Bu konuda zengin bir arşiv kaynağına müracaatla kaleme alınmış diğer önemli bir eser için bkz. Ergin, Osman Nuri, Mecelle-i Umur-ı Belediyye, Ci, IstanbuL. i995. (Kitap, çeşitli tarihlerde yazılmış İhtisab kanıınıarı ile narh usulleri ve çeşitli ta- rihlerdeki narh numuneleri hakkında zengin bilgiler içermektedir); Ayrıca bkz. Barkan. Ö. Lütfi, "XV. Asrın Sonıında Bazı Büyük Şehirlerde Eşya ve Yiyecek Fiyatlarının Tesbit ve Teftişi Hususlarını Tanzim Eden Kanunlar", Tarih Vesikaları Dergisi, C i, S. i, İstanbuL. 1941; Mantran, Robert, "Hısba", The Encyclopedia OfIslam, C, III, New Edition, Leiden- London, 1970; Kavakçı, Yusuf Ziya, Hishe Teşkilatı, Ankara, 1975; Kütükoğlu, Mübahat, S., "Osmanlı İktisadi Yapısı", Osmanlı Devleti Tarihi (Ed: E. İhsanoğlu), İstanbul, 1999. s. 565-567; Levy, R., "Muhtesib", lA., C. VIII, s. 532; Inalcık. Halil, The Oltmnan Em- pire (1300-1600), London, 1973, s.
    [Show full text]