Annualreport

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annualreport ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN ACTIVITIES AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 2018 ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 1 Published by: The Executive Committee of Ocean Energy Systems Edited by: Ana Brito e Melo and Henry Jeffrey Designed by: Formas do Possível - Creative Studio www.formasdopossivel.com COUNTRY REPORTS AUTHOR (S) Australia Republic of Korea Mark Hemer and Tracey Pitman (CSIRO) Jin-Hak Yi (Korea Institute of Ocean Science Stephanie Thornton (Australian Ocean Energy Group) and Technology) Belgium Mexico Vicky Stratigaki (Ghent University) Rodolfo Silva-Casarín (CEMIE Océano) Ludovic Mouffe (Federal Public Service Economy, Directorate-General Energy) Netherlands Jos Reijnders (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) Canada Ghanashyam Ranjitkar (CanmetENERGY-Ottawa, Natural New Zealand Resources Canada) Gareth Gretton (AWATEA and Wellington Institute Sue Molloy (Glas Ocean Engineering) of Technology) China Norway Peng Wei (National Ocean Technology Center) Daniel J. Willoch (NORWEA) Harald Rikheim (Research Council of Norway) Denmark Kim Nielsen (Ramboll) Portugal Ana Brito e Melo (WavEC Offshore Renewables) European Commission António Falcão (Instituto Superior Técnico) Davide Magagna (DG JRC) Matthijs Soede (DG RTD) Singapore Srikanth Narasimalu (Nanyang Technological France University) Yann-Hervé De Roeck (France Energies Marines) Spain Germany Yago Torre-Enciso (BiMEP) Jochen Bard and Fabian Thalemann Jose Luis Villate (TECNALIA) (Fraunhofer IEE) Sweden India Maria Olsson (Swedish Energy Agency) Purnima Jalihal (National Institute of Ocean Technology) UK Ireland Henry Jeffrey (Edinburgh University) Declan Meally and Patricia Comiskey (SEAI) USA Italy David Hume and Ann Dallman (U.S. Department of Energy) Luca Benedetti and Matteo Gianni (Gestore dei Servizi Energetici - GSE) Disclaimer: The Ocean Energy Systems (OES) Technology Collaboration Programme is part of a network of autonomous collaborative partnerships focused on a wide range of energy technologies known as Technology Collaboration Programmes or TCPs. The TCPs are organised under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA), but the TCPs are functionally and legally autonomous. Views, findings and publications of the OES TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries. CONTENTS CHAIRPERSON’S MESSAGE .......................................04 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................06 PERFORMANCE METRICS ON OCEAN ENERGY – INTERVIEW .......................... 43 01 OVERVIEW OF OES 05 Vision, Mission and Values ...............................................18 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES Membership ......................................................................21 ON OCEAN ENERGY Executive Committee ........................................................23 Australia ......................................................................... 48 Work Programme ..............................................................24 Belgium .......................................................................... 52 Canada ........................................................................... 58 China .............................................................................. 65 Denmark ......................................................................... 68 02 European Commission ................................................... 72 ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2018 France ............................................................................ 78 Germany ......................................................................... 82 Collection of Information and Dissemination ..................25 India ............................................................................... 85 Assessment of Environmental Effects and Monitoring Ireland ............................................................................ 87 Efforts................................................................................28 Italy ................................................................................ 93 Worldwide Web Gis Database for Ocean Energy .............31 Mexico ............................................................................ 98 Cost of Energy Assessment for Wave, Tidal and OTEC at an International Level ........................32 Netherlands ................................................................. 101 Wave Energy Converters Modelling New Zealand ................................................................ 104 Verification and Validation ...............................................33 Norway ......................................................................... 105 Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion ..................................35 Portugal........................................................................ 107 Performance Metrics International Republic of Korea ......................................................... 112 Framework for Ocean Energy ...........................................36 Singapore ..................................................................... 115 Tidal Energy Converters Modelling Verification and Validation ...............................................37 Spain ............................................................................ 119 Assessment of Jobs Creation on Ocean Energy ..............38 Sweden ......................................................................... 123 Ocean Energy in Insular Conditions ................................38 UK ................................................................................. 126 Open Water Testing ..........................................................39 USA .............................................................................. 134 03 06 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPENDICES ON OCEAN ENERGY - INTERVIEW ..............................40 Appendix 1- Membership Contacts ............................ 141 Appendix 2 - ExCo Meetings ....................................... 143 3 CHAIRPERSON’S MESSAGE MR. HENRY JEFFREY University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom OES Chairperson A warm welcome to the 2018 OES Annual Report and I trust that you will find it informative and useful. I must start this year’s Annual Report with the sad news of the passing of OES former chairman John Huckerby. John Huckerby was nominated the New Zealand’s representative to the OES Executive Committee by the New Zealand Government in 2008. John served as Chair of the OES over 4 years (2009 – 2012). During his mandate John submitted a new 5-year Strategic Plan to the IEA to secure a third 5-year mandate. John not only was responsible for producing a new 5-year Strategic Plan but it overhauled the OES ´brand´, by updating its name, its logo and, its website. John had a strong commitment to make OES “the authoritative voice on ocean energy”. During his chairmanship he introduced a high sense of rigor in the OES activities and always guided the Executive Committee meetings in a very diplomatic and motivational way. He spread the OES all over the world, engaging with other international organizations and conferences promoting ocean energy internationally and will be fondly remembered by many people around the world. For the content of this year’s report, I would like to thank all the member countries for their contributions. The country reports included here convey that 2018 has seen significant progress internationally for ocean energy. Several tidal projects achieved extensive operating hours with multi- GWhs of generation being clocked up globally. Wave energy technology has progressed with a number of large-scale laboratory and offshore tests having been successfully undertaken. Our 2018 feature article is an interview with Jonathan Hodges, Senior Innovation Engineer, of Wave Energy Scotland and Lauren Moraski of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Water Power Technologies Office. Together, they have been leading international collaboration on the development of Stage Gate Metrics for Ocean Energy that will provide a robust and common approach to managing innovation. A further featured article is on the successful ICOE 2018 conference hosted in Cherbourg, France by Amandine Volard, ICOE Conference Manager, including a message from the Linda Church Ciocci, Chair of the ICOE 2020 to be hosted in Washington D.C. Many key achievements for wave and tidal projects are discussed throughout this report with some of my personal highlights below. The US DoE announced funding of $25m to support 12 next-generation marine energy technologies as well as enabling projects. In the UK, Orbital Marine Power concluded testing of their 2MW turbine and successfully raised £7m from 2,300 individual investors for a next generation device. Wave Energy ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Scotland selected 2 devices to go forward to real- sea testing in 2020 with funding of £7.7m. In Europe there was further consolidation around three-bladed horizontal axis tidal turbines with vacant opportunities in France and beyond being actively pursued by other The country reports developers. In the southern hemisphere Australia is re-engaging with wave energy following the opening of included here convey that Albany test site, led by Carnegie Clean Energy. 2018 has seen significant At a policy level ocean energy progresses within a global energy market that is seeing significant change. The progress internationally for
Recommended publications
  • Wave Hub Appendix N to the Environmental Statement
    South West of England Regional Development Agency Wave Hub Appendix N to the Environmental Statement June 2006 Report No: 2006R001 South West Wave Hub Hayle, Cornwall Archaeological assessment Historic Environment Service (Projects) Cornwall County Council A Report for Halcrow South West Wave Hub, Hayle, Cornwall Archaeological assessment Kevin Camidge Dip Arch, MIFA Charles Johns BA, MIFA Philip Rees, FGS, C.Geol Bryn Perry Tapper, BA April 2006 Report No: 2006R001 Historic Environment Service, Environment and Heritage, Cornwall County Council Kennall Building, Old County Hall, Station Road, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3AY tel (01872) 323603 fax (01872) 323811 E-mail [email protected] www.cornwall.gov.uk 3 Acknowledgements This study was commissioned by Halcrow and carried out by the projects team of the Historic Environment Service (formerly Cornwall Archaeological Unit), Environment and Heritage, Cornwall County Council in partnership with marine consultants Kevin Camidge and Phillip Rees. Help with the historical research was provided by the Cornish Studies Library, Redruth, Jonathan Holmes and Jeremy Rice of Penlee House Museum, Penzance; Angela Broome of the Royal Institution of Cornwall, Truro and Guy Hannaford of the United Kingdom Hydrographic Office, Taunton. The drawing of the medieval carved slate from Crane Godrevy (Fig 43) is reproduced courtesy of Charles Thomas. Within the Historic Environment Service, the Project Manager was Charles Johns, who also undertook the terrestrial assessment and walkover survey. Bryn Perry Tapper undertook the GIS mapping, computer generated models and illustrations. Marine consultants for the project were Kevin Camidge, who interpreted and reported on the marine geophysical survey results and Phillip Rees who provided valuable advice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Molene Archipelago
    bs_bs_bannerbs_bs_banner The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (2018) 47.1: 5–27 doi: 10.1111/1095-9270.12277 The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Molene` Archipelago, Iroise Sea, Brittany, Western France: a long-term tradition with early megalithic origins Henri Gandois UMR Trajectoires, Universite´ de Paris I Pantheon´ Sorbonne, Paris, France, research associate at the UMR CReAAH, Universite´ de Rennes 1, Rennes, France, [email protected] Pierre Stephan´ CNRS, UMR LETG, Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France. LTSER France, Zone Atelier ‘Brest-Iroise’, [email protected] David Cuisnier Ferme insulaire de Kemenez, ˆıle de Kemenez, Le Conquet, France, [email protected] Olivia Hulot DRASSM, Ministere` de la Culture et de la Communication, Marseille, France, [email protected] Axel Ehrhold IFREMER, Geosciences´ Marines, Centre, de Brest, BP70, CS10070, 29280 Plouzane,´ France, [email protected] Marine Paul CNRS, UMR LETG, Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France, [email protected] Nicolas Le Dantec CEREMA, UMR 6538 Geosciences´ Ocean,´ Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France Marcaurelio Franzetti CNRS, UMR 6538 Geosciences´ Ocean,´ Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France This reports on a project that combined evidence gleaned from aerial photographs, place-names, interviews, topography, LIDAR data, and sonar bathymetry to locate stone tidal fish weirs in the Molene` Archipelago. The results were verified by diver and pedestrian visual surveys. Models of Holocene sea-level change allowed a group of possibly Late Mesolithic–Early Neolithic weirs to be recognized, with a second group broadly dated to the later Neolithic–Early Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Progress Report: South West 2012 Annual Survey 3 Contents Foreword
    1 The south west now generates around 394 GWh of renewable electricity Renewable Energy from wind each year, which accounts for 28 per cent of renewable electricity in the south west, and 1.5 per cent of Progress Report: our electricity demand South West 2012 Annual Survey Renewable Energy Progress Report: South West 2012 Annual Survey 3 Contents Foreword Foreword 3 Last year global investment in renewable Renewable electricity 4 energy reached £165 billion – on par with Renewable heat 8 fossil fuel investment. The low-carbon Low-carbon economy 12 energy revolution is underway. R&D and technology development 14 This report uses the south west of England as a ‘test bed’ to 3. Some of our elected representatives are misreading the Regen SW’s advisory services 16 look in more detail at what is powering this revolution. It sets public mood: local opinion polls, as well as our experience out the excellent renewable energy resources, the progress we at community events, show a strong and consistent majority Case studies 17 are making in harnessing them and the lessons we can draw for supportive of all renewables, based on a common sense the national Renewable Energy Roadmap to increase the speed view that in an uncertain world we should make the most of Anaerobic digestion and sewage gas 18 of deployment and job creation. our local energy resources. The past year in the south west has seen record growth in 4. We need all renewables: small, medium and large: solar PV Biomass 20 renewable electricity from 218 MW to over 520 MW and has dominated this year’s figures in the south west, but consistent growth in renewable heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Integration of Low Carbon Energy and Biodiversity Policies
    Towards integration of low carbon energy and biodiversity policies An assessment of impacts of low carbon energy scenarios on biodiversity in the UK and abroad and an assessment of a framework for determining ILUC impacts based on UK bio-energy demand scenarios SUPPORTING DOCUMENT – LITERATURE REVIEW OF IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY Defra 29 March 2013 In collaboration with: Supporting document – Literature review on impacts on biodiversity Document information CLIENT Defra REPORT TITLE Supporting document – Literature review of impacts on biodiversity PROJECT NAME Towards integration of low carbon energy and biodiversity policies PROJECT CODE WC1012 PROJECT TEAM BIO Intelligence Service, IEEP, CEH PROJECT OFFICER Mr. Andy Williams, Defra Mrs. Helen Pontier, Defra DATE 29 March 2013 AUTHORS Mr. Shailendra Mudgal, Bio Intelligence Service Ms. Sandra Berman, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Adrian Tan, Bio Intelligence Service Ms. Sarah Lockwood, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Anne Turbé, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Graham Tucker, IEEP Mr. Andrew J. Mac Conville, IEEP Ms. Bettina Kretschmer, IEEP Dr. David Howard, CEH KEY CONTACTS Sébastien Soleille [email protected] Or Constance Von Briskorn [email protected] DISCLAIMER The project team does not accept any liability for any direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. This report contains the results of research by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of Defra. Photo credit: cover @ Per Ola Wiberg ©BIO Intelligence Service 2013 2 | Towards
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Marine Renewable Energies and the Preservation Of
    Development of marine renewable energies and the Renewable energies preservation of biodiversity - VOLUME 2 - Editors: Marion PEGUIN, under the coordination of Christophe LE VISAGE, coordinator of the contact group "Marine Renewable Energy", Guillemette ROLLAND, President of the Commission on Ecosystem Management, and Sébastien MONCORPS, director of the French Committee of IUCN. Acknowledgements: The French Committee of IUCN would particularly like to thank: the reviewers of this report: BARILLIER Agnès (EDF) - BAS Adeline (EDF EN) - BONADIO Jonathan (MEDDE- DGEC) - CARLIER Antoine (IFREMER) - DELENCRE Gildas (Energies Réunion) - GALIANO Mila (Ademe) - GUENARD Vincent (Ademe) - LEJART Morgane (FEM) - MARTINEZ Ludivine (Observatoire Pelagis) - MENARD Jean-Claude (ELV) - MICHEL Sylvain (AAMP) - de MONBRISON David (BRLi), the members of the "Sea and Coasts" working group of the IUCN French Committee, chaired by Ludovic FRERE ESCOFFIER (Nausicaa), the participants of the various steering committees: AMY Frédérique (DREAL HN) - ANDRE Yann (LPO) - ARANA-DE-MALEVILLE Olivia (FEE) - AUBRY Jérémy (Gondwana) - ARGENSON Alain (FNE) - BARBARY Cédric (GDF Suez) - BAS Adeline (Ifremer / EDF EN) - BEER-GABEL Josette (expert) - BELAN Pierre-Yves (CETMEF) - BONADIO Jonathan (MEDDE-DGEC) - BONNET Céline (Va- lorem) - BORDERON Séverine (GREDEG-CNRS) - BOUTTIER Jenny (BRLi) - CAILLET Antonin (Alstom Ocean Energy) - CANON Marina (EDPR) - CANTERI Thierry (PNM Iroise, AAMP) - CARRE Aurélien (UICN France) - CASTÉRAS Rémi (WPD Offshore) - CHATEL Jean (RTE) -
    [Show full text]
  • OES Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN ACTIVITIES AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 2018 ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 1 Published by: The Executive Committee of Ocean Energy Systems Edited by: Ana Brito e Melo and Henry Jeffrey Designed by: Formas do Possível - Creative Studio www.formasdopossivel.com COUNTRY REPORTS AUTHOR (S) Australia Republic of Korea Mark Hemer and Tracey Pitman (CSIRO) Jin-Hak Yi (Korea Institute of Ocean Science Stephanie Thornton (Australian Ocean Energy Group) and Technology) Belgium Mexico Vicky Stratigaki (Ghent University) Rodolfo Silva-Casarín (CEMIE Océano) Ludovic Mouffe (Federal Public Service Economy, Directorate-General Energy) Netherlands Jos Reijnders (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) Canada Ghanashyam Ranjitkar (CanmetENERGY-Ottawa, Natural New Zealand Resources Canada) Gareth Gretton (AWATEA and Wellington Institute Sue Molloy (Glas Ocean Engineering) of Technology) China Norway Peng Wei (National Ocean Technology Center) Daniel J. Willoch (NORWEA) Harald Rikheim (Research Council of Norway) Denmark Kim Nielsen (Ramboll) Portugal Ana Brito e Melo (WavEC Offshore Renewables) European Commission António Falcão (Instituto Superior Técnico) Davide Magagna (DG JRC) Matthijs Soede (DG RTD) Singapore Srikanth Narasimalu (Nanyang Technological France University) Yann-Hervé De Roeck (France Energies Marines) Spain Germany Yago Torre-Enciso (BiMEP) Jochen Bard and Fabian Thalemann Jose Luis Villate (TECNALIA)
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on Large Scale Wave Energy Conversion
    AN UPDATE ON LARGE SCALE WAVE ENERGY CONVERSION Rik van Hemmen, Fellow and Michael Raftery Member Martin Ottaway van Hemmen & Dolan, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] SNAME – SMC 2019 Technical Paper – Peer Reviewed Abstract Submission SNAME FACE: Engineers/Designers Topic: Design and Engineering, Sustainable Energy It is time for Wave Energy Conversion (WEC) to be part of the sustainable energy toolbox at a utility level. Solar and wind renewable power systems are now sustainable technologies which are economically competitive with existing fossil fuel and nuclear options. Even though there have been WEC development efforts as long as there have been industrial solar and wind efforts, WEC systems simply have never made it out of the experimental starting blocks. This paper examines prior efforts and examines why they have failed at a utility level and describes the design and engineering of emerging technologies that could make large scale wave energy conversion competitive with present state of the art large scale wind and solar projects. The SurfWEC concept is introduced as a game changing approach to achieve much lower Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) rates than are achievable with existing WEC approaches by enabling significant increases in kinetic energy input to various WEC designs. KEY WORDS: Renewable Energy; Marine Renewable IEC TC-114: IEC Technical Committee for Marine Energy; Wave Energy Converter; WEC; Marine Hydrokinetic; Energy Standards development and MHK; SurfWEC; Future Energy; Sustainable Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Wave Energy Technologies and the Necessary Power-Equipment
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27 (2013) 413–434 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Review of wave energy technologies and the necessary power-equipment Iraide López a,n, Jon Andreu a, Salvador Ceballos b, Iñigo Martínez de Alegría a, Iñigo Kortabarria a a Department of Electronics Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Spain b Tecnalia Research and Innovation, Derio 48160, Spain article info abstract Article history: The wave energy is having more and more interest and support as a promising renewable resource to Received 13 May 2013 replace part of the energy supply, although it is still immature compared to other renewable Received in revised form technologies. This work presents a complete analysis of the wave energy technology, starting with the 4 July 2013 characterisation of this global resource in which the most suitable places to be exploited are showed, and Accepted 5 July 2013 the classification of the different types of wave energy converters in according to several features. It is Available online 31 July 2013 also described in detail each of the stages that are part in the energy conversion, that is, from the capture Keywords: of the energy from the waves to the extraction of a proper electrical signal to be injected to the grid. Wave energy Likewise, existing offshore energy transmission alternatives and possible layouts are described. Wave power & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Wave energy converter Power electronics Power transmission Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 413 2. Global wave energy resource .
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Ocean Energy: 20 Projects + 5 Policy Initiatives
    SPOTLIGHT ON OCEAN ENERGY 20 PROJECTS + 5 POLICY INITIATIVES April 2018 Disclaimer: The OES, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of OES do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries INDEX 04 INTRODUCTION 08 SPOTLIGHT ON 20 OCEAN ENERGY PROJECTS AND 5 POLICY INITIATIVES 10 Korea: Sihwa Tidal Power Plant 11 China: LHD Tidal Current Energy Demonstration Project 12 Canada: Cape Sharp Tidal Project 13 France: SABELLA D10 Tidal Turbine 14 Italy: GEM “the Ocean’s Kite” 15 UK: Scotrenewables floating tidal system 16 UK: Shetland Tidal Array 17 Canada: Water Wall Turbine 18 Norway: Deep River Power Plant 19 Belgium: Laminaria Wave Energy Converter 20 Denmark: Resen Waves Smart Ocean Buoy 21 Ireland: Ocean Energy O35 Buoy 22 Portugal: Waveroller 23 Spain: Oceantec MARMOK A-5 Project 24 Sweden: Seabased Sotenäs Project 25 USA: Columbia Power Technologies Wave Energy Generator 26 India: Wave Power Navigational Buoy 27 Netherlands: Blue Energy Reverse Electrodialysis Project 28 Japan: Okinawa OTEC plant 29 Germany: StEnSea project Initiatives 30 UK: Wave Energy Scotland 30 USA: Wave Energy Prize 31 Mexico: CEMIE-Océano 32 Singapre: SEAcORE 32 European Commission: OCEANERA-NET INTRODUCTION 4 ABOUT OES The Technology Collaboration Programme on Ocean Energy Systems, known as OES is an intergovernmental collaboration between countries, which operates under a framework established by the International Energy Agency in Paris. OES was founded by three countries in 2001 and has grown to its present 25 members, which provide a broad international base of information, sharing experience and knowledge and further a diversified representation of interests: members are from governmental departments, utilities, universities and research organizations, energy agencies and industry associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Wave Energy in Coastal California
    Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor DEVELOPING WAVE ENERGY IN COASTAL CALIFORNIA: POTENTIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Prepared For: California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research Program REPORT PIER FINAL PROJECT and California Ocean Protection Council November 2008 CEC-500-2008-083 Prepared By: H. T. Harvey & Associates, Project Manager: Peter A. Nelson California Energy Commission Contract No. 500-07-036 California Ocean Protection Grant No: 07-107 Prepared For California Ocean Protection Council California Energy Commission Laura Engeman Melinda Dorin & Joe O’Hagan Contract Manager Contract Manager Christine Blackburn Linda Spiegel Deputy Program Manager Program Area Lead Energy-Related Environmental Research Neal Fishman Ocean Program Manager Mike Gravely Office Manager Drew Bohan Energy Systems Research Office Executive Policy Officer Martha Krebs, Ph.D. Sam Schuchat PIER Director Executive Officer; Council Secretary Thom Kelly, Ph.D. Deputy Director ENERGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Melissa Jones Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the able leadership and graceful persistence of Laura Engeman at the California Ocean Protection Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Hub Final Design Report 
    South West of England Regional Development Agency Wave Hub Development and Design Phase Final design report June 2006 South West of England Development Agency Wave Hub Development and Design Phase Final Design Report June 2006 Contents Amendment Record ! !" # "!$!" %& !"!" %& Halcrow Group Limited Ash House Falcon Road Sowton Exeter EX2 7LB Tel +44 (0)1392 444252 Fax +44 (0)1392 444301 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, South West of England Regional Development Agency, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2006 Executive Summary ' & ( ) * +, * ' - *. ' & * * */0 * P Q * . R 4 S ' - *6 /'-60 . ' & 7 8 4 . 4 ) . * 9 . 4 ' & 7 * R S . * : 8 : 8 * 8 . '-6 : .-) ) . * 8 * : 8 * . ) * ( . ;' ** .* <4= ##4=/ *"."4=0 '-6 . 4= & *8 : . + /+0 * ) ( .7 6 + /76+0 * * . * . 8 ( . ) 9 <! !.<4= : * '-6 *. ;' * !#?. ) . 8
    [Show full text]
  • BEIS Annual Report and Accounts 2019-20
    Annual report and accounts 2019-20 HC 709 Annual report and accounts 2019-20 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 6(4) of the Government Resource & Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 30 September 2020 HC 709 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 1 Victoria Street, London. SW1H 0ET Tel: 020 7215 5000 Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-2121-2 CCS0320287242 09/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Annual report and accounts 2019-20 1 Contents Foreword by the Secretary of State 2 The Certificate of the Comptroller and Report of the Permanent Secretary 3 Auditor General to the House of Commons 110 Performance report 5 The Report of the Comptroller and Overview 6 Auditor General to the House of Our purpose 6 Commons 114 What we set out to achieve 6 Financial Statements 115 Our highlights in 2019-20 8 Where we spent our money in 2019-20 10 Consolidated Statement of
    [Show full text]