Members' Directory 2019-2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Members' Directory 2019-2020 Directory Sponsor MEMBERS’ DIRECTORY RenewableUK 2019-2020 Members’ Directory 2019-2020 Members’ Directory Micro Grid Renewables Generation Solar Electricity Trading Transmission Distribution Demand-Side Centralised Power Response Generation Smart Storage Cities Wind Smart Homes User Demand EVs 25 EUR million Sales in more than Established 6 manufacturing State of the art average annual investments facilities (last 3 years) 50 countries 1950 plants in 3 countries Who we are Tracing its industrial roots back to 1950, Cablel® Hellenic Cables has evolved into a leading European provider of reliable and competitive cable solutions. With 6 manufacturing plants across 3 countries, Cablel® Hellenic Cables covers a wide range of cable products and solutions, from Land and Submarine Power cables to Fiber Optics, Telecommunication cables and Magnet Wires. Cablel® Hellenic Cables offers a wide range of integrated solutions, including design, manufacturing, planning, project management and installation. In-house R&D and testing facilities guarantee continuous product development and innovation. As the world’s need for sustainable and reliable flow of energy and information continues to increase, we remain focused on our mission to provide top-quality products and services meeting the highest technical and sustainability standards set by our customers. HEAD OFFICE: 33, Amaroussiou - Halandriou Str., 151 25 Maroussi, Athens, GREECE Tel.: +30 210 6787 416, +30 210 6787 900, Fax: +30 210 6787 406 [email protected] www.cablel.com 09-13-2019_KX_CABLEL_168x240mm_FINAL.indd 1 13/09/2019 15:28 Contents Contents 4 Welcome from the Chief Executive 6 RenewableUK Senior Management Team and Board of Directors 10 Priorities for 2019/20 14 Membership 15 Membership Levels 16 The Value of Membership 18 Events 20 Project Intelligence 24 Members by Level 28 Member Profiles 97 Products & Services Guide While great care has been taken to ensure Contact information that the content of this directory is correct, neither RenewableUK nor the publisher of the directory accepts responsibility for any error, omission or claims made in the directory. The RenewableUK Members’ Directory 2019/2020 is printed on paper from a sustainably managed source. T: +44 (0)20 7901 3000 E: [email protected] | The RenewableUK Members’ Directory www.renewableuk.com | events.renewableuk.com 2019/2020 is produced and published on For further information, please contact Jeremy Sullivan, behalf of RenewableUK by: Head of Membership on +44 (0)20 7901 3016 or at [email protected]. Publishing Events Ltd 2nd Floor, Chapel House, 18 Hatton Place, No part of this directory may be reproduced in any form or by London EC1N 8RU, UK. T: +44 (0)20 7841 5960 any means without permission in writing from RenewableUK. [email protected] | www.publishingevents.com Directory Sponsor Sponsor members Marine Services www.renewableuk.com 3 Welcome from the Chief Executive Welcome from the Chief Executive Going into the new decade, the case for a renewables-led transition to a low carbon economy has never been stronger. Renewables are outcompeting fossil fuels economically, and there is a clear political consensus behind achieving net zero emissions. The challenge of the next decade is to build our future energy system faster and deliver solutions to new challenges. RenewableUK will be there to support our members in the next phase of the transition. The last 12 months have been momentous for the UK’s offshore wind sector. The signing of the Offshore Wind Sector Deal in March 2019 set new ambitions for 2030 – at least 30GW of capacity will provide over a third of our power needs and our industry will support over 27,000 jobs. Then, in September 2019, the results of the latest Contracts for Difference auction delivered a record 5.5GW of new capacity at record low prices. The spectacular growth of this industry means that offshore wind will be the backbone of our clean, modern energy system. While the onshore wind sector still faces significant market challenges and barriers to deployment, in the past year we’ve made the case more powerfully than ever that onshore wind is a vital technology for meeting our net zero emissions target and doing This Directory so in a way that makes the transition cheaper for consumers and businesses. We are continuing to work on behalf of the industry to secure support for new onshore wind showcases the “ developments and vital repowering in the next decade. success, capabilities The next phase of technology development will see innovative new technologies and variety of our like floating offshore wind, tidal stream and wave technologies follow the path of member companies” wind energy from the first arrays to mainstream deployment and we look forward to continuing our work with members on these exciting new opportunities. This Directory showcases the success, capabilities and variety of our member companies. From family-owned British firms to European and global companies, the businesses in our industry are providing jobs to tens of thousands of people, creating new opportunities and bringing local investment in towns and cities across the UK. I am, personally, very proud to be able to represent these companies and I wish you continued success in the year ahead. Hugh McNeal Chief Executive 4 www.renewableuk.com DEME Offshore is a leading provider of services and solutions for the offshore wind industry. We provide foundation, cable, turbine and substation installation, as well as maintenance and repair solutions. We design and deliver these solutions under Transport and Installation (T&I), Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Installation (EPCI) or Balance of Plant (BOP) contracts. We have the skills, technology and a high-tech fleet of vessels to perform in the most challenging marine environments. Always working closely with our customers, we understand what it takes to deliver a project cost-effectively, safely and on time. www.deme-group.com Meet the Board RenewableUK Senior Management Team and Board of Directors Senior Management Team Hugh McNeal Keith Moss Emma Pinchbeck Chief Executive Executive Director of Deputy Chief Executive Finance and Performance Maf Smith Deputy Chief Executive Board of Directors Stephen Bull Clare Foster Lindsay McQuade RenewableUK Chair, Partner & Head of Clean Chief Executive, SVP Wind & Low Carbon Energy, ScottishPower Renewables Development, Shepherd + Wedderburn Equinor Roisin Quinn Matthieu Hue Andy Reay RenewableUK Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Regional Manager, UK, Head of SO Strategy, EDF Renewables DEME Offshore National Grid Julian Brown Zoe Keeton Rachel Ruffle Vice President & UK Head of Energy Policy and CEO Northern Europe, Country Manager, Public Affairs, RES MHI Vestas Offshore Wind innogy Ian Bryan Clark MacFarlane Gareth Swales Managing Director, Group Managing Director, Wind Commercial Manager, Business Operations & Power Division, Fred. Olsen Renewables Managing Director, Siemens Gamesa Global Marine Renewable Energy Paul Cooley Rishi Madlani Benj Sykes Director of Generation, Sustainable Finance Lead, UK Country Manager, SSE Renewables Royal Bank of Scotland Ørsted Wind Power Martin Dronfield David Matthews Group Business Business Development, Development Director, GE Energy James Fisher Marine Services 6 www.renewableuk.com Commercial Feature Unparalleled Support for R&D in the Offshore Renewable Energy Sector Experimental Testing Many companies make use of the world leading facilities provided by the FloWave Ocean Energy Research Facility (www. flowavett.co.uk) at the University of Edinburgh. Clients including wave, tidal and floating offshore wind developers conducted large scale tests on their machines. Conditions found at the European Marine Energy Centre are faithfully recreated with precise mixtures of ocean swell and local wind driven seas. FloWave’s unique current generation capabilities subject tidal turbines Industrial Research the research project and work to combinations of waves, tidal Edinburgh leads the EPSRC and on a project driven by the needs currents and turbulence. The NERC funded Industrial CDT in and aspirations of the company. FloWave team provide fully Offshore Renewable Energy. This Graduates from the programme supported testing to ensure Centre was recently re-funded have significantly reduced the cost clients get the best experience. to train a further 50 Engineering of field cable array layouts, optimised Tests on Floating structures often Doctoral students, with the first installation logistics for large offshore make use of FloWave’s suite of Cohort starting in September 2019. wind farms, investigated HVDC over- and under- water motion IDCORE’s Research Engineers are transmission links, helped OEMs capture cameras, resolving based in their sponsor companies develop their technologies, and developed realistic sea conditions for motion to within 1mm. throughout the three years of test tanks based on measurements from EMEC. Further information can be found on our website www.idcore.ac.uk. Contact: ( 07971 537 670 * [email protected] www.eng.ed.ac.uk/research/ institutes/ies Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/company/ university-of-edinburgh-school-of- engineering www.renewableuk.com 7 Proud to support North East England’s Offshore Wind Cluster Developers Ports Supply Chain Innovation, Research & Academia Local Enterprise Partnership Energi Coast delivered by www.energicoast.co.uk Untitled-1 1 16/10/2019 13:25 Commercial Feature Energi Coast, North East
Recommended publications
  • Option 1 - Net Gain)
    Annex I4 Direct impacts arising from individual Marine Conservation Zones (MCZs) (Option 1 - Net Gain) 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This annex sets out the direct impacts of each of the Net Gain recommended Marine Conservation Zones (rMCZs) being proposed only for designation in Option 1 of the Impact Assessment. 1.1.2 Four sets of tables are provided for each rMCZ as follows: • Table 1 – sets out an ecological description of the site, and specifies what ecological features are to be protected by the rMCZ and their conservation objectives; • Table 2 – sets out the cost impacts of the rMCZ by sector. • Table 3 – lists the sectors that have activities currently occurring within or near to the rMCZ but for which no mitigation is required and therefore no cost impacts are anticipated. • Table 4 – sets out the contribution to the Ecological Network Guidance undertaken by the Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies (SNCBs) • Table 5 – sets out the beneficial impacts to ecosystem services of the rMCZ 2 Impact Assessment 2.1.1 The remainder of this document sets out the individual rMCZ and rMCZ Reference Area assessments. 1 rMCZ NG 1b, Orford Inshore Site area (km2): 71.95 • This site has been proposed for designation under Policy Option 1 only. Table 1. Conservation impacts rMCZ NG 1b, Orford Inshore 1a. Ecological description The site is of high importance as a nursery and spawning ground for fish species, including Dover sole, sprat, lemon sole and sand eel. Skate, ray, crustacean and dogfish are also present; recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ) NG 1b may be used by foraging sea bird species such as the red- throated diver.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (2216Kb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/150023 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications ‘AN ENDLESS VARIETY OF FORMS AND PROPORTIONS’: INDIAN INFLUENCE ON BRITISH GARDENS AND GARDEN BUILDINGS, c.1760-c.1865 Two Volumes: Volume I Text Diane Evelyn Trenchard James A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Department of History of Art September, 2019 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………. iv Abstract …………………………………………………………………………… vi Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………. viii . Glossary of Indian Terms ……………………………………………………....... ix List of Illustrations ……………………………………………………………... xvii Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….. 1 1. Chapter 1: Country Estates and the Politics of the Nabob ………................ 30 Case Study 1: The Indian and British Mansions and Experimental Gardens of Warren Hastings, Governor-General of Bengal …………………………………… 48 Case Study 2: Innovations and improvements established by Sir Hector Munro, Royal, Bengal, and Madras Armies, on the Novar Estate, Inverness, Scotland …… 74 Case Study 3: Sir William Paxton’s Garden Houses in Calcutta, and his Pleasure Garden at Middleton Hall, Llanarthne, South Wales ……………………………… 91 2. Chapter 2: The Indian Experience: Engagement with Indian Art and Religion ……………………………………………………………………….. 117 Case Study 4: A Fairy Palace in Devon: Redcliffe Towers built by Colonel Robert Smith, Bengal Engineers ……………………………………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan
    APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand Workshop on Grid Interconnection Issues for Renewable Energy 12 October, 2010 Tokyo, Japan RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Coverage Electricity Generation in New Zealand, The Electricity Market, Grid Connection Issues, Technical Solutions, Market Solutions, Problems Encountered Key Points. RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity in New Zealand 7 Major Generators, 1 Transmission Grid owner – the System Operator, 29 Distributors, 610 km HVDC link between North and South Islands, Installed Capacity 8,911 MW, System Generation Peak about 7,000 MW, Electricity Generated 42,000 GWh, Electricity Consumed, 2009, 38,875 GWh, Losses, 2009, 346 GWh, 8.9% Annual Demand growth of 2.4% since 1974 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Installed Electricity Capacity, 2009 (MW) Renew able Hydro 5,378 60.4% Generation Geothermal 627 7.0% Wind 496 5.6% Wood 18 0.2% Biogas 9 0.1% Total 6,528 73.3% Non-Renew able Gas 1,228 13.8% Generation Coal 1,000 11.2% Diesel 155 1.7% Total 2,383 26.7% Total Generation 8,91 1 100.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity Generation, 2009 (GWh) Renew able Hydro 23,962 57.0% Generation Geothermal 4,542 10.8% Wind 1,456 3.5% Wood 323 0.8% Biogas 195 0.5% Total 30,478 72.6% Non-Renew able Gas 8,385 20.0% Generation Coal 3,079 7.3% Oil 8 0.0% Waste Heat 58 0.1% Total 11,530 27.4% Total Generation 42,008 1 00.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity from Renewable Energy New Zealand has a high usage of Renewable Energy • Penetration 67% , • Market Share 64% Renewable Energy Penetration Profile is Changing, • Hydroelectricity 57% (decreasing but seasonal), • Geothermal 11% (increasing), • 3.5% Wind Power (increasing).
    [Show full text]
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Swindon Bus Station
    What is this document? We (primarily Lee) have looked at what the bus network might look like under option 24/7 in a pilot area, at the request of Philip Whitehead (meetings March and April 2016) The area selected was from (in the north) the Bath – Corsham – Chippenham – Calne – Royal Wootton Bassett corridor through to the Bath – Bradford-on-Avon – Trowbridge – Westbury – Warminster corridor to the West, covering all of West Wilts, services within that area out to Devizes. There is always considerable overlap across boundaries with public transport services, so you'll find significant services off the edge listed here, many of which are adjustments of ongoing supported services to continue to provide a logical, useful service. The suggestions here reduce the number of vehicle diagrams in the area from 59 to 52 – a saving of around 14%. The number of drivers required would be reduced somewhat less due to extension of some ENCTS time only services to cover journeys to and from work and in the evening and on Sundays and perhaps where appropriate a night bus. In general, very very few places / streets have lost their services, whilst areas such as the Pewsham Estate in Chippenham and Pickwick Road in Corsham see regular buses return, having been withdrawn under the current system. A number of new journey opportunities are provided too (some significant, some making use of much better bus / train connectivity) but there are cases where a change of vehicle will now be needed in place of a through service. Currently commercial services which thrive as “turn up and go” operations remain hardly changed – we are not proposing messing with what works – keeping the good.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy in Wales
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Energy in Wales Third Report of Session 2005–06 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes, Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2006 HC 876-I Published on Thursday 20 July 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales.) Current membership Dr Hywel Francis MP (Chairman) (Labour, Aberavon) Mr Stephen Crabb MP (Conservative, Preseli Pembrokeshire) David T. C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Mr David Jones MP (Conservative, Clwyd West) Mr Martyn Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Jessica Morden MP (Labour, Newport East) Hywel Williams MP (Plaid Cymru, Caernarfon) Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/welsh_affairs_committee.cfm. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA
    Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 June 30, 2020 Note: Numbers may not always add up due to rounding. % Invested For Each Plan Description Plan 3s DCP & JRA ACTIVIA PROPERTIES INC REIT 0.0137% 0.0137% AEON REIT INVESTMENT CORP REIT 0.0195% 0.0195% ALEXANDER + BALDWIN INC REIT 0.0118% 0.0118% ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUIT REIT USD.01 0.0585% 0.0585% ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GOVT STIF SSC FUND 64BA AGIS 587 0.0329% 0.0329% ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTAT REIT 0.0219% 0.0219% AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES REIT USD.01 0.0277% 0.0277% AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT A REIT USD.01 0.0396% 0.0396% AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0427% 0.0427% ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES IN REIT USD.01 0.0124% 0.0124% AROUNDTOWN SA COMMON STOCK EUR.01 0.0248% 0.0248% ASSURA PLC REIT GBP.1 0.0319% 0.0319% AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.0061% 0.0061% AZRIELI GROUP LTD COMMON STOCK ILS.1 0.0101% 0.0101% BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REIT USD.01 0.0102% 0.0102% BOSTON PROPERTIES INC REIT USD.01 0.0580% 0.0580% BRAZILIAN REAL 0.0000% 0.0000% BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC REIT USD.01 0.0418% 0.0418% CA IMMOBILIEN ANLAGEN AG COMMON STOCK 0.0191% 0.0191% CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0394% 0.0394% CANADIAN DOLLAR 0.0005% 0.0005% CAPITALAND COMMERCIAL TRUST REIT 0.0228% 0.0228% CIFI HOLDINGS GROUP CO LTD COMMON STOCK HKD.1 0.0105% 0.0105% CITY DEVELOPMENTS LTD COMMON STOCK 0.0129% 0.0129% CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD COMMON STOCK HKD1.0 0.0378% 0.0378% COMFORIA RESIDENTIAL REIT IN REIT 0.0328% 0.0328% COUSINS PROPERTIES INC REIT USD1.0 0.0403% 0.0403% CUBESMART REIT USD.01 0.0359% 0.0359% DAIWA OFFICE INVESTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Great Cheverell Conservation Area Statement Is Part of the Process
    86 High Street GREAT CHEVERELL CONSERVATION AREA STATEMENT October 2003 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Statement is to identify and record those special qualities of Great Cheverell that make up its architectural and historic character. This is important in providing a sound basis for the Local Plan policies and development decisions, as well as for the formulation of proposals for the preservation and enhancement of the character or appearance of the area. The Conservation Area was designated in 1989. This Statement includes a review of the Great Cheverell Conservation Area and is intended for all those with an interest in the village, or undertaking work on the buildings, landscape, roads or public spaces. It is also essential reading for anyone contemplating development within the area. By drawing attention to the distinctive features of Great Cheverell it is intended that its character will be protected and enhanced for the benefit of this and future generations. Rear of Manor House and St Peters parish church LOCATION Great Cheverell is 4.5 miles south of Devizes close to the centre of Wiltshire. It is situated on a secondary road joining the A360 (Devizes - Salisbury road) to the B3098 (Westbury - West Lavington route) east of Erlestoke. BRIEF DESCRIPTION The village lies on a northeast facing hillside with the parish church high on the northern edge. The junction of High Street with Church Road forms the centre of the village. Here a cluster of brick and slate historic buildings includes the village inn, a mansion, orchard and a barn. Large mature trees on a sloping green are significant in the approach to the church, to the grounds of the former rectory and to the manor house beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Cams Tide Mill, Fareham
    ISSN 0967-3474 Hampshire Industrial Archaeology Society Journal www.hias.org.uk from Downloaded No. 17 2009 www.hias.org.uk from DownloadedFront cover picture: Cams Tide Mill, Fareham. Painting of the Mill, circa 1800. Back cover pictures: UPPER; The Restoration of Winchester City Mill. Replacing wooden teeth in the great spur wheel. LOWER; Crossing borders – Fareham Chimney Pots. Detail of the banding on the top of a pot. 1 Hampshire Industrial Archaeology Society (formerly Southampton University Industrial Archaeology Group) Journal No. 17, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ Contents Editorial ………………………..……………………………………………………………..1 The Contributors and Acknowledgements……………………………………………………2 Cams Tide Mill, Fareham by Tony Yoward. …………………………………………………………………….3 The Restoration of Winchester City Mill by Bob Goodwin. …………………………………………………………………… 9 Southampton Docks at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century by Jeff Pain ….. ……………………………………………………………………. 15 Life on board H.M.S. Thunderer by Ian Sturton ….…………………………………………………….………………23 Crossing Borders - Fareham Chimney Pots by Alan H, J. Green .....................................................................................................29 Waste across time: impacts on the environment by Roger Hedge ………………………..……………………………………….........33 Editorialwww.hias.org.uk Welcome to Issue 17 of our Journal. Once again the Journal has articles on a variety of Hampshire subjects. We start with two articles on flour mills. Tony Yoward has researched Cams Tide Mill, Fareham, a mill which no longer exists, whilst Bob Goodwinfrom tells about the restoration of Winchester City Mill which, after seventy five years as a Youth Hostel, has been restored to working order by the National Trust, and has now produced flour for five years. Jeff Pain details the story of the development of Southampton as a port at the start of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonnes Per Year CO2 Saving†
    Wind power is an integral part of the UK Government’s climate change initiative; with the recognition that offshore wind power in particular has the potential to generate a significant amount of the energy needed by the UK itself in coming years. The London Array project forms part of a 7 gigawatt series of projects in the UK, which when complete will provide the energy equivalent to the needs of 7% of the UK¥. Supplying coatings to the London Array is the latest step in AkzoNobel’s experience in the offshore wind power market. Previous work includes supplying high performance coatings to some of the world’s most exciting offshore wind developments including wind farms Alpha Ventus, Greater Gabbard, Beatrice and also Ormonde, a 150MW installation in the Irish Sea. ¥ Source: bwea.co.uk/offshore/info * 470,000 homes powered by the output annually for phase 1 of the project * Based on an average annual household energy consumption of 4,478kWh and site specific data indicating a load factor of at least 39%. † Carbon calculators are based on 430g CO2/kWh and site specific data indicating a load factor of at least 39%. The facts on the size of the project speak for themselves… onshore 1 substation offshore substations 2 km² offshore With a capacity of up to 1000 megawatts (MW), the London Array Offshore 100 area Wind Farm in the outer Thames Estuary is expected to become the world’s wind turbines largest offshore wind farm when the construction of phase one of the project 175 km of offshore cabling is completed towards the end of 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy
    NEW ZEALAND Meridian Energy Performance evaluation Meridian Energy equity valuation Macquarie Research’s discounted cashflow-based equity valuation for Meridian Energy (MER) is $6,463m (nominal WACC 8.6%, asset beta 0.60, TGR 3.0%). We have assumed, in this estimate, that MER receives $750m for its Tekapo A and B assets. Forecast financial model Inside A detailed financial model with explicit forecasts out to 2030 has been completed and is summarised in this report. Performance evaluation 2 Financial model assumptions and commentary Valuation summary 5 We have assessed the sensitivity of our equity valuation to a range of inputs. Financial model assumptions and Broadly, the sensitivities are divided into four categories: generation commentary 7 assumptions, electricity demand, financial and price path. Financial statements summary 15 We highlight and discuss a number of key model input assumptions in the report: Financial flexibility and generation Wholesale electricity price path; development 18 Electricity demand and pricing; Sensitivities 19 The New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) supply contract; Alternative valuation methodologies 20 Relative disclosure 21 MER’s generation development pipeline. Alternative valuation methodology We have assessed a comparable company equity valuation for the company of $4,942m-$6,198m. This is based on the current earnings multiples of listed comparable generator/retailers globally. This valuation provides a cross-check of the equity valuation based on our primary methodology, discounted cashflow. This valuation range lies below our primary valuation due, in part, to the recent de-rating of global renewable energy multiples (absolutely and vis-a-vis conventional generators). Relative disclosure We have assessed the disclosure levels of MER’s financial reports and presentations over the last financial period against listed and non-listed companies operating in the electricity generation and energy retailing sector in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Framework for Improving Energy Justice in the UK
    Watching the Wind Blow By: A Theoretical Framework for Improving Energy Justice in the UK Rupert Cope Bournemouth University Faculty of Science and Technology the award for which the degree of Masters by Research (MRes) is submitted in partial fulfilment of its requirements Submitted September 2018 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. 1 | P a g e Abstract For over thirty years the Brundtland’s Commission’s definition has been widely accepted as the general definition of what sustainable development is. However, there is increasing academic discourse suggesting that aspects of the Brundtland’s definition are inadvertently limiting the potential of contemporary sustainability from the perspectives of both horizontal and vertical actors both nationally and internationally. Through a lack of a clear measuring tool of what effective sustainable development is under Brundtland’s definition, differing interpretations (either deliberately or subconsciously) can be made leading to competing interests between the environmental, economic and social pillars of the based on the interpreter’s subjective interests. Using an overarching definition of SD that overlooks or simplifies varying wants and needs of individuals and groups within a single society this can result in the production of unbalanced policy measures. These unbalanced policies then hamper significant advancement of sustainable technology implementation as they fail to adequately reflect these varied and competing needs. The UK is demonstrating such scenarios in which the skewed application of sustainable development is creating growing numbers of injustice.
    [Show full text]