DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008 2008 Corporate responsibility report Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Contents 3 Chief Executive’s introduction 4 Assurance and scope 5 Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement 6 2008 Highlights 7 Business overview 8 Our approach 14 CR Committee and Governance 17 Business principles 22 Key Performance Indicators 25 Key impact areas 26 Climate change and the environment 44 Customer service 56 Securing future energy supplies 64 Health and safety 72 Employees 83 Supply chain 87 Local impact 92 Our stakeholders 94 Customers 97 Investors 99 Employees 101 Suppliers and business partners 103 Governments and regulators 105 Communities 107 NGOs and consumer organisations 109 Media 110 Trade unions 111 Appendix – Memberships 2 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Chief Executive’s introduction Introduction from Sam Laidlaw 2008 was my first full year as a member of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Throughout the year, the Committee challenged our current performance and debated areas of future activity across a range of critical business issues. Through this continual process of improvement, I have confidence that we are making good progress in developing the necessary structures and processes, allied to a management commitment that will build a sustainable and environmentally aware business for the future. In this report, you can read about our initiatives and performance over the year, as well as our forward- looking plans for 2009 and beyond. As our CR programmes mature, there is an increasing amount of available information to present to our internal and external audiences. As in previous years, we have chosen to use the online environment to report. Through Welcome to Centrica’s corporate responsibility report our website we believe we can disclose the most for 2008. information in the easiest to use format, leaving users to choose the level of detail appropriate to their interests. It has been a very challenging year with changing economic circumstances and extraordinary turbulence I hope you find the report useful and encourage you to in the commodity markets. As a result there has been an provide any feedback that you may have so that we can increased focus on many corporate responsibility (CR) continue to improve both our performance and how we issues and, in particular, how companies continue to communicate it. manage these issues in and embed them into everyday business performance during times of recession where cost efficiencies are very much a global priority. In a year of sharply rising fuel prices the areas of highest impact for Centrica were our support programmes for our most vulnerable customers and our long term efforts to ensure security of energy supply. We also continued to take a Sam Laidlaw lead role in our generating power through low emission Chief Executive technologies, minimising climate change as we move towards a low-carbon future. 3 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Assurance and scope Scope Independent assurance This report covers our corporate responsibility (CR) Centrica has commissioned Corporate Citizenship to performance from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008. provide it with external assurance and commentary on It updates our last CR report, which was published in its 2008 Corporate responsibility report. The 2008 report May 2008. For the sixth consecutive year, our report is is embedded within the ‘Responsibility’ section of the externally assured by Corporate Citizenship. Centrica.com website. 2008 performance is denoted by the ‘2008 Reporting’ badge. The scope of the report covers our global operations. Our main operations are in the UK and North America and, as a result, the content of this report focuses on these activities. However, we also provide detail on our operations in Nigeria and our outsourced activities in India; and we have increased reporting on Belgian energy company SPE, in which we acquired a 51% stake. In Centrica’s management has prepared the report and is future reports, as our international businesses continue responsible for its contents. Our objectives were to review to evolve and grow, we will report our activity and and advise on aspects of content and presentation, to performance accordingly. conduct selected checks to underlying corporate records, and to provide this statement for which we have sole Where appropriate, we have reported the activities of responsibility. our individual business units but we have chosen not to produce separate reports for each of these. Further details Corporate Citizenship is a specialist management of their corporate responsibility activities can be found on consultancy advising corporations that seek to improve each of the business unit websites. their economic, social and environmental performance around the world. We use external guidelines and frameworks to inform our reporting where relevant. Although we do not explicitly Corporate Citizenship base our report on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) www.corporate-citizenship.com guidelines, we have included a GRI index to show which 1 May 2009 elements of the guidelines we cover and to enable comparison with other companies’ reports. We have Centrica 2008 Assurance also indexed the report against our Group strategy, our An excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s assurance Group business principles and the principles of the United statement is included in this report. For the full statement, Nations Global Compact, to which we are a signatory. please visit www.centrica.com/cr08/assurance We encourage you to contact us with your views through our feedback tool. We will publish our next corporate responsibility report in May 2010. 4 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Assurance and scope Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement Opinion and conclusions Comparability of data In our opinion the Centrica Corporate Responsibility Report The Exposure Draft of Guidance for the Use of AA1000 AS 2008 reflects the principles of AA1000 (2008), namely (2008) cites comparability, also a GRI principle as a test inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness. The specified of information quality, as a positive attribute of a report. In sustainability performance information is reliable and particular, the guidance notes that comparability includes: accurate. The level of assurance is that defined by AA1000 year-on-year comparability, comparability with industry peers, as moderate. and comparability with appropriate benchmarks. Centrica engages with key stakeholder groups, gives Centrica has developed a style of reporting that is built upon a balanced consideration to their views and issues, assesses broad base of performance data. The quantity which are material, and responds by altering practice and of data disclosed has grown. Centrica as a norm gives innovating as appropriate. a five-year range of data showing changing performance over time. Currently Centrica includes relatively few comparisons Commentary with peers or external benchmarks and should, we believe, Our work was considerably assisted by the thorough, consider including comprehensive benchmarking of a limited deep and ordered way in which the Centrica Corporate number of key performance indicators in future reporting. Responsibility Committee engages with the corporate responsibility agenda. Within the work of the Committee, Process for deciding what issues to include in the report the regular presentation by businesses of their responsibility The section Our approach provides a succinct explanation engagement, agenda and response was a notable feature, of how Centrica judges what are its material corporate providing significant evidence of the application of relevant responsibility issues. policies and targets within the businesses. Some leading reporters include a brief section explaining how In our opinion future reports could be strengthened by further and why they decided on what information to include in the addressing the five aspects that we identify below. report and where other relevant information may be found. Inclusion of such a section in future report would further Climate change strengthen the materiality and responsiveness of Centrica’s As a member of the Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index, reporting. Centrica has an independently acknowledged claim to leadership in this field. In our judgement the current report Review of report and underlying documentation against meets current expectations of stakeholders with regard to the scale of business activities climate change. However, Centrica should note that this We considered whether the contents of the report fully area needs to be held under review. A shift upwards in the reflected the balance of Centrica’s different businesses and generally reported assumptions about the likely extent of geographies. We concluded that the report was appropriately climate change is evident, and 2009 will be marked by the balanced. However, the review raised two issues. Centrica Copenhagen Climate Conference. has made progress on management information and key performance indicators. Whilst good progress has been made In particular, future coverage should show the extent to over the last 12 months in Direct Energy, Centrica’s North which Centrica’s policies and programmes seek to maintain American business that accounts for roughly one-quarter of a leadership position by addressing the latest public
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Interconnector Pipeline a Key Link in Europe's Gas Network
    The Interconnector Pipeline A Key Link in Europe’s Gas Network Mark Futyan Oxford Institute of Energy Studies March 2006 Mark Futyan is a postgraduate student at Columbia Business School in New York. He previously worked for Interconnector (UK) Limited between 2001 and 2005. During this period, he was involved in a variety of engineering and commercial projects. For information or questions on this research, please contact: [email protected]. Copyright © 2006 Mark Futyan The contents of and views expressed in this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members, nor do they represent the views of Interconnector (UK) Limited. ISBN 1-901795-44-6 ii Preface The Interconnector pipeline has rarely been out of the news since it was first proposed in the early 1990s. It is probably not too much of an exaggeration to say that it has transformed short term trading in north west Europe, causing companies to enter into commercial behaviour that they had not previously considered possible or, in some cases, desirable. Equally interesting were predictions (before it was built) that the project was likely to be a waste of time, followed by periodic claims that: gas was flowing in the wrong direction; that larger or smaller volumes of gas should be flowing; and that shippers on one side or the other were responding inappropriately to price signals. For a gas research programme this made the Interconnector a particularly suitable research project which fits perfectly into our work on European gas issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Option 1 - Net Gain)
    Annex I4 Direct impacts arising from individual Marine Conservation Zones (MCZs) (Option 1 - Net Gain) 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This annex sets out the direct impacts of each of the Net Gain recommended Marine Conservation Zones (rMCZs) being proposed only for designation in Option 1 of the Impact Assessment. 1.1.2 Four sets of tables are provided for each rMCZ as follows: • Table 1 – sets out an ecological description of the site, and specifies what ecological features are to be protected by the rMCZ and their conservation objectives; • Table 2 – sets out the cost impacts of the rMCZ by sector. • Table 3 – lists the sectors that have activities currently occurring within or near to the rMCZ but for which no mitigation is required and therefore no cost impacts are anticipated. • Table 4 – sets out the contribution to the Ecological Network Guidance undertaken by the Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies (SNCBs) • Table 5 – sets out the beneficial impacts to ecosystem services of the rMCZ 2 Impact Assessment 2.1.1 The remainder of this document sets out the individual rMCZ and rMCZ Reference Area assessments. 1 rMCZ NG 1b, Orford Inshore Site area (km2): 71.95 • This site has been proposed for designation under Policy Option 1 only. Table 1. Conservation impacts rMCZ NG 1b, Orford Inshore 1a. Ecological description The site is of high importance as a nursery and spawning ground for fish species, including Dover sole, sprat, lemon sole and sand eel. Skate, ray, crustacean and dogfish are also present; recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ) NG 1b may be used by foraging sea bird species such as the red- throated diver.
    [Show full text]
  • 5810 GA Low Carbon Report
    housing a low carbon society an ODPM leadership agenda on climate change “green alliance... Housing a Low Carbon Society An ODPM leadership agenda on climate change by Joanna Collins Published by Green Alliance, May 2006, £15 Artwork and print by Upstream – www.upstream.coop Printed on Revive Silk – 75 per cent post-consumer waste. ISBN 0 9549757 8 2 © Copyright Green Alliance 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. This book is sold subject to condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it was published and without a similar condition including the condition being imposed on subsequent purchaser. Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0RE tel: 020 7233 7433 fax: 020 7233 9033 email: [email protected] website: www.green-alliance.org.uk Green Alliance is a registered charity number 1045395 Company Limited by guarantee, registered number 3037633 Green Alliance Green Alliance is one of the UK’s foremost environmental groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Behavioural Energy Use Advice
    City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Home Energy Conservation Act Further Report 2012-2013 Initial Report to Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change 1 Contents Page: 1 HECA summary 3 2 Introduction to HECA 3 3 Wakefield’s geography and deprivation 4 4 Wakefield’s housing stock 4 5 Wakefield’s build types 5 6 Wakefield’s socio-economic background 5 7 Fuel poverty and excess winter deaths in the Wakefield district 6 8 Wakefield Affordable Warmth Strategy 2007-2010 7 9 Greener Homes, Healthier Homes: An Action Plan for Affordable 9 Warmth 2011-2016 10 Wakefield Affordable Warmth Action Plan 2013-2014 10 11 Supporting evidence: domestic gas and electricity consumption data 11 12 HECA achievements to date for the Wakefield district 12 13 HECA planned activity for the Wakefield district 2013-2014 14 2 1. HECA summary On the 26 July 2012 the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change issued new guidance to English Energy Conservation Authorities (ECAs) setting out their obligations pursuant to the Home Energy Conservation Act (HECA) 19951. The City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council (WMDC) is an ECA. This document represents WMDC’s submitted initial Home Energy Conservation Act (HECA) report to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change for March 2013. 2. Introduction The guidance sets out requirements for ECAs to report on the energy conservation measures it considers practicable, cost-effective and likely to result in significant improvement in the energy efficiency of residential accommodation in their areas. The significant improvements can result from measures which take advantage of financial assistance from central Government initiatives such as Green Deal, Energy Company Obligation (ECO) and the Renewable Heat Incentive and which have been developed using area based/street by street roll out involving local communities and partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • Citywide Climate Change Strategy & Action Plan 2010
    Citywide Climate Change Strategy & Action Plan 2010 - 2020 Delivering Newcastle’s Sustainable Community Strategy Foreword We realise the need for a citywide climate change strategy, one that provides a comprehensive response to the threats and opportunities that we face. We also recognise the urgent need to secure a low carbon future and prepare for a changing climate. I’m proud to say the strategy goes much further than before. It raises our ambitions and sets out how we plan to deliver against national and European commitments. At the heart of the strategy is our Sustainable Energy Action Plan that sets out a scenario to reduce our carbon emissions, and makes us confident enough to commit to our Newcastle Climate Change Declaration, adopted by the full Council in March 2010. The strategy also contains plans to adapt to the impacts of a changing climate. These will help us to seize the opportunities that a low carbon future presents, and to protect our heritage and citizens into a sustainable future. We all have a part to play, from our day-to-day actions and efforts to live in a low carbon future, to the development, delivery and uptake of physical measures to minimise our impact on the environment. This presents significant economic opportunities for our City. However, we cannot do this without understanding and preparing to live with the inevitable risks of a changing climate. Although the strategy lays the foundations for these actions, achieving our goals will not be easy. In this time of austerity we need to be bold in our choices and strong in our convictions, so that we make the decisions necessary for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2006 Annual Report and Accounts 2006
    Centrica plc Annual Report and Accounts 2006 Annual Report and Accounts 2006 report Securing our customers’ energy needs Our vision is to become a leading integrated energy company in selected markets in order to maximise value to shareholders. In 2006 we focused on securing energy to meet our customers’ future needs. Our strategy Our strategy is to create a distinctive business model that delivers sustained profitability through the commodity cycle. We will achieve this by focusing on the following clear priorities: Transform British Gas Sharpen up the organisation and reduce costs Reduce risk by adding new sources of gas and power Build on our multiple growth platforms Our main activities Our upstream business Our downstream business We source energy internationally We supply energy to homes We find and produce gas predominantly in the UK We are Britain’s largest gas and electricity retailer, and have acquired licence blocks in Norway and supplying 49% of the residential gas market and 22% north and west Africa. We trade energy in the UK, of residential electricity. We are a growing North America and Europe and secure contracts force in North America, serving customers in five to bring gas to the UK. Canadian provinces and 15 US states. We generate energy We supply energy to businesses We generate electricity through our gas-fired power In Britain, we are a major supplier of gas and stations in the UK and US and through a growing electricity to the commercial sector. We also have portfolio of wind assets and purchasing agreements. customers in Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 STA Cover 2007
    15-28 STA Listings 2007 21/2/07 2:37 PM Page 15 THE SOURCE TESTING ASSOCIATION THE STA MEMBERSHIP 3M UK Aerosol Industrial Station Road, Coleshill ALcontrol On-Site Services Ian Clarkson Research Group Birmingham B46 1JY Trevor Worrall 3M Centre, Cain Road, Bracknell Cristina Gutiérrez-Cañas T: 0800 917 1313 Templeborough House, Mill Close Berkshire RG12 8HT Maria Diaz de Haro 68 F: 01675 467022 Rotherham, South Yorkshire T: 01344 857801 Bajo Pab 3-4-5, Portugalete [email protected] S60 1BZ [email protected] Bizakaia 48920, Spain www.uk.airliquide.com T: 01709 841028 www.mmm.com T: (+34) 944 723597 F: 01709 841079 F: (+34) 944 723604 Air Monitors [email protected] A-Plus Consulting [email protected] James Mills www.alcontrol.co.uk Graham Clarke www.aerosolirg.com Unit 2, The Hawthorns 35 Holmesdale Road, Dronfield Pillows Green Road, Staunton Derbyshire S18 2FA AES Gloucestershire GL19 3NY T: 01246 410256 Mark Elliott T: 01452 849111 [email protected] Northumberland Dock Road F: 01452 849112 Wallsend, Tyne & Wear NE28 0QD [email protected] T: 0191 2968500 www.airmonitors.co.uk Anchem Laboratories F: 0191 2968560 Gethyn Jones [email protected] Air Products Unit 5a, Darcy Business Park www.aes-labs.co.uk Dr Gary Yates Darcy Way, Llandarcy, Neath 2 Millennium Gate, Westmere Drive SA10 6EJ ABB AES Kilroot Power Crewe, Cheshire CW1 6AP T: 01792 323223 John Kelly Stephen Fleming T: 01270 614227 F: 01792 323236 Hortonwood 37, Telford, Shropshire Larne Road, Carrickfergus F: 01932 258622 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Framework for Improving Energy Justice in the UK
    Watching the Wind Blow By: A Theoretical Framework for Improving Energy Justice in the UK Rupert Cope Bournemouth University Faculty of Science and Technology the award for which the degree of Masters by Research (MRes) is submitted in partial fulfilment of its requirements Submitted September 2018 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. 1 | P a g e Abstract For over thirty years the Brundtland’s Commission’s definition has been widely accepted as the general definition of what sustainable development is. However, there is increasing academic discourse suggesting that aspects of the Brundtland’s definition are inadvertently limiting the potential of contemporary sustainability from the perspectives of both horizontal and vertical actors both nationally and internationally. Through a lack of a clear measuring tool of what effective sustainable development is under Brundtland’s definition, differing interpretations (either deliberately or subconsciously) can be made leading to competing interests between the environmental, economic and social pillars of the based on the interpreter’s subjective interests. Using an overarching definition of SD that overlooks or simplifies varying wants and needs of individuals and groups within a single society this can result in the production of unbalanced policy measures. These unbalanced policies then hamper significant advancement of sustainable technology implementation as they fail to adequately reflect these varied and competing needs. The UK is demonstrating such scenarios in which the skewed application of sustainable development is creating growing numbers of injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2017
    DIGEST OF UNITED KINGDOM ENERGY STATISTICS 2017 July 2017 This document is available in large print, audio and braille on request. Please email [email protected] with the version you require. Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to BEIS, at the address given in paragraph XXVIII of the Introduction. The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice This is a National Statistics publication The United Kingdom Statistics Authority has designated these statistics as National Statistics, in accordance with the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 and signifying compliance with the UK Statistics Authority: Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Designation can be broadly interpreted to mean that the statistics: ñ meet identified user needs ONCEñ are well explained and STATISTICSreadily accessible HAVE ñ are produced according to sound methods, and BEENñ are managed impartially DESIGNATEDand objectively in the public interest AS Once statistics have been designated as National Statistics it is a statutory NATIONALrequirement that the Code of Practice S TATISTICSshall continue to be observed IT IS © A Crown copyright 2017 STATUTORY You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT FINAL REPORT Cambridge Economic Policy Associates
    SCOPING TOWARDS POTENTIAL HARMONISATION OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION TARIFF STRUCTURES AGENCY FOR COOPERATION OF ENERGY REGULATORS (ACER) JUNE 2015 DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Cambridge Economic Policy Associates Ltd CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. The European electricity market ............................................................................... 1 1.2. Tariff structure harmonisation .................................................................................. 2 1.3. Scope of study ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. Study methodology .................................................................................................... 3 1.5. Report structure ......................................................................................................... 4 2. Context of study ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1. The Internal Electricity Market .................................................................................. 6 2.2. Objectives for transmission tariffs ........................................................................... 10 3. Transmission tariff structures in Europe today ......................................................... 12 3.1. What are transmission tariffs? ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pitfalls and Perils: a Community Guide to Developing a Renewable
    Pitfalls and Perils: A Community Guide to Developing a Renewable Energy Project for the first time. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Outline of the Projects a. Kielder b. Bellingham c. Heatherslaw d. Gairshields e. Stonehaugh 4. Discussion of Sticking points 5. Generic Conclusions – lessons learned for each party and roadmap for project development. 6. Question and Answers 7. List of further support Introduction So, you want to develop a community renewable energy project… Background The inspiration for the production of this brochure came largely from the process of developing the promotional brochure for the fourteen projects supported by the Northumberland Strategic Partnership Renewable Energy Capital Grant Scheme, which was made available in 2007-08 to support a number of demonstration schemes. In talking to the recipients of the grant, many of the people involved in developing projects heaved a big sigh and proclaimed that they were glad If only I had….. that they’d got there in the end but “if only I had ….” or “if I was to do it again I’d make sure…..”. Many of these experiences came from community groups or small businesses who had faced interacting with not only the renewable energy sector, but the whole process of contracting large works for the first time with little more than home renovation experience to go on. If I was to do it It became apparent that much of the real value of again I would…. supporting such projects was not only the resulting demonstration of the technology but also the opportunity to capture this learning process that individuals and groups have been through to reach a successful project.
    [Show full text]