DOCSLIB.ORG

The Interconnector Pipeline a Key Link in Europe's Gas Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Interconnector Pipeline a Key Link in Europe's Gas Network The Interconnector Pipeline A Key Link in Europe’s Gas Network Mark Futyan Oxford Institute of Energy Studies March 2006 Mark Futyan is a postgraduate student at Columbia Business School in New York. He previously worked for Interconnector (UK) Limited between 2001 and 2005. During this period, he was involved in a variety of engineering and commercial projects. For information or questions on this research, please contact: [email protected]. Copyright © 2006 Mark Futyan The contents of and views expressed in this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members, nor do they represent the views of Interconnector (UK) Limited. ISBN 1-901795-44-6 ii Preface The Interconnector pipeline has rarely been out of the news since it was first proposed in the early 1990s. It is probably not too much of an exaggeration to say that it has transformed short term trading in north west Europe, causing companies to enter into commercial behaviour that they had not previously considered possible or, in some cases, desirable. Equally interesting were predictions (before it was built) that the project was likely to be a waste of time, followed by periodic claims that: gas was flowing in the wrong direction; that larger or smaller volumes of gas should be flowing; and that shippers on one side or the other were responding inappropriately to price signals. For a gas research programme this made the Interconnector a particularly suitable research project which fits perfectly into our work on European gas issues. This is the first publicly available document to provide a detailed account of the Interconnector pipeline supported by primary source materials. I am very grateful to Mark Futyan for taking on such a challenging project and seeing it through from the other side of the Atlantic alongside his MBA. Jonathan Stern March 2006 iii CONTENTS GLOSSARY......................................................................................................................................... VI ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................2 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................3 1.1 INTERCONNECTOR OVERVIEW .................................................................................................3 1.2 FACILITIES ...............................................................................................................................3 1.3 A TEN-YEAR HISTORY .............................................................................................................4 2 PROJECT HISTORY ...................................................................................................................5 2.1 EARLY CONCEPTS....................................................................................................................5 2.2 THE STUDY GROUP..................................................................................................................5 3 KEY STAKEHOLDERS...............................................................................................................7 3.1 LANDFALL PARTNERS..............................................................................................................7 3.2 UK GOVERNMENT ...................................................................................................................7 3.3 SHAREHOLDERS.....................................................................................................................10 3.4 SHIPPERS ...............................................................................................................................15 3.5 MARKET EXPECTATIONS .......................................................................................................17 4 CREATING THE INTERCONNECTOR.................................................................................18 4.1 FINANCING ............................................................................................................................18 4.2 ALLIANCE STRUCTURE ..........................................................................................................20 4.3 TECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CHALLENGES...............................................21 4.4 INTER-GOVERNMENTAL TREATY...........................................................................................22 5 BUSINESS RULES......................................................................................................................23 5.1 FLOW DIRECTION ..................................................................................................................23 5.2 NOMINATIONS .......................................................................................................................25 5.3 CAPACITY AND INVENTORY TRADING ...................................................................................25 5.4 VARIABLE INVENTORY ..........................................................................................................28 5.5 DIRECT ACCESS CONNECTION ...............................................................................................28 5.6 A COMPLEX SYSTEM .............................................................................................................29 6 FLOW AND PRICE TRENDS...................................................................................................30 6.1 ARBITRAGE............................................................................................................................30 6.2 PIPELINE FLOWS ....................................................................................................................31 6.3 PRICE EVOLUTION .................................................................................................................33 6.4 DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN TRADING HUBS......................................................................35 7 FLOW CONSTRAINTS AND OUTAGES ...............................................................................36 7.1 PLANNED OUTAGES ...............................................................................................................36 7.2 UNPLANNED OUTAGES ..........................................................................................................36 7.3 FLOW DIRECTION CHANGES ..................................................................................................39 7.4 CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS.......................................................................................................40 8 REVERSE FLOW ENHANCEMENT ......................................................................................41 8.1 DEVELOPMENT PHASES .........................................................................................................41 8.2 CAPACITY SALES ...................................................................................................................41 8.3 MOTIVATION OF CAPACITY HOLDERS ...................................................................................42 8.4 COMPETING IMPORT PROJECTS..............................................................................................43 8.5 ELECTRICITY MARKET EXPOSURE.........................................................................................44 iv 9 SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................45 9.1 FROM CONCEPT TO REALITY .................................................................................................45 9.2 IMPACT OF THE INTERCONNECTOR.........................................................................................45 9.3 PROJECT EVALUATION...........................................................................................................45 9.4 EVOLUTION & THE FUTURE ...................................................................................................46 10 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................47 10.1 INTERVIEWS...........................................................................................................................47 10.2 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES.....................................................................................................47 10.3 FURTHER INFORMATION ........................................................................................................47 v GLOSSARY ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION bcm/y Billion normal cubic metres per annum CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine DTI Department of Trade and Industry (UK) EASEE European Association for the Streamlining of Energy Exchange EIB European Investment Bank EU European Union Fluxys Belgian natural gas network operator Forward Flow Flow from the UK to Belgium ISIS Interconnector Shippers Information System IUK Interconnector (UK) Limited LNG Liquefied Natural Gas NBP National Balancing Point (NTS notional trading point) NGT National Grid Transco (NTS operator) NTS National Transmission System (UK natural gas network, operated by NGT) Ofgem Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Regulator) PLUTO Pipeline
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Voltage Direct Current Transmission – Proven Technology for Power Exchange
    www.siemens.com/energy/hvdc High Voltage Direct Current Transmission – Proven Technology for Power Exchange Answers for energy. 2 Contents Chapter Theme Page 1 Why High Voltage Direct Current? 4 2 Main Types of HVDC Schemes 6 3 Converter Theory 8 4 Principle Arrangement of an HVDC Transmission Project 11 5 Main Components 14 5.1 Thyristor Valves 14 5.2 Converter Transformer 18 5.3 Smoothing Reactor 20 5.4 Harmonic Filters 22 5.4.1 AC Harmonic Filter 22 5.4.2 DC Harmonic Filter 25 5.4.3 Active Harmonic Filter 26 5.5 Surge Arrester 28 5.6 DC Transmission Circuit 31 5.6.1 DC Transmission Line 31 5.6.2 DC Cable 32 5.6.3 High Speed DC Switches 34 5.6.4 Earth Electrode 36 5.7 Control & Protection 38 6 System Studies, Digital Models, Design Specifications 45 7 Project Management 46 3 1 Why High Voltage Direct Current? 1.1 Highlights from the High Voltage Direct In 1941, the first contract for a commercial HVDC Current (HVDC) History system was signed in Germany: 60 MW were to be supplied to the city of Berlin via an underground The transmission and distribution of electrical energy cable of 115 km length. The system with ±200 kV started with direct current. In 1882, a 50-km-long and 150 A was ready for energizing in 1945. It was 2-kV DC transmission line was built between Miesbach never put into operation. and Munich in Germany. At that time, conversion between reasonable consumer voltages and higher Since then, several large HVDC systems have been DC transmission voltages could only be realized by realized with mercury arc valves.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008
    2008 Corporate responsibility report Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Contents 3 Chief Executive’s introduction 4 Assurance and scope 5 Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement 6 2008 Highlights 7 Business overview 8 Our approach 14 CR Committee and Governance 17 Business principles 22 Key Performance Indicators 25 Key impact areas 26 Climate change and the environment 44 Customer service 56 Securing future energy supplies 64 Health and safety 72 Employees 83 Supply chain 87 Local impact 92 Our stakeholders 94 Customers 97 Investors 99 Employees 101 Suppliers and business partners 103 Governments and regulators 105 Communities 107 NGOs and consumer organisations 109 Media 110 Trade unions 111 Appendix – Memberships 2 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Chief Executive’s introduction Introduction from Sam Laidlaw 2008 was my first full year as a member of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Throughout the year, the Committee challenged our current performance and debated areas of future activity across a range of critical business issues. Through this continual process of improvement, I have confidence that we are making good progress in developing the necessary structures and processes, allied to a management commitment that will build a sustainable and environmentally aware business for the future. In this report, you can read about our initiatives and performance over the year, as well as our forward- looking plans for 2009 and beyond. As our CR programmes mature, there is an increasing amount of available information to present to our internal and external audiences. As in previous years, we have chosen to use the online environment to report.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies
    The UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Final Report A report to the DTI Renewable Energy Development & Deployment Team June 2003 Imperial College London Centre for Energy Policy and Technology & E4tech Consulting ii Executive summary Background and approach This report considers how innovation systems in the UK work for a range of new and renewable energy technologies. It uses a broad definition of 'innovation' - to include all the stages and activities required to exploit new ideas, develop new and improved products, and deliver them to end users. The study assesses the diversity of influences that affect innovation, and the extent to which they support or inhibit the development and commercialisation of innovative new technologies in the UK. The innovation process for six new and renewable energy sectors is analysed: • Wind (onshore and offshore) • Marine (wave and tidal stream) • Solar PV • Biomass • Hydrogen from renewables • District and micro-CHP In order to understand innovation better, the report takes a systems approach, and a generic model of the innovation system is developed and used to explore each case. The systems approach has its origins in the international literature on innovation. The organising principles are twofold: • The stages of innovation. Innovation proceeds through a series of stages, from basic R&D to commercialisation – but these are interlinked, and there is no necessity for all innovations to go through each and every stage. The stages are defined as follows: Basic and applied R&D includes both ‘blue skies’ science and engineering/application focused research respectively; Demonstration from prototypes to the point where full scale working devices are installed in small numbers; Pre-commercial captures the move from the first few multiples of units to much larger scale installation for the first time; Supported commercial is the stage where technologies are rolled out in large numbers, given generic support measures; Commercial technologies can compete unsupported within the broad regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnectors
    Connecting for a smarter future How interconnectors are making energy better for consumers Benefiting customers today Stronger links for and tomorrow a smarter future Interconnectors are making energy more secure, affordable Interconnectors are transmission cables that allow and sustainable for consumers across Great Britain (GB) electricity to flow freely between markets. They are at and Europe. And they are set to deliver much more. the heart of the transition to a smarter energy system. Tomorrow’s energy will be cleaner, more flexible and more responsive to the individual needs of consumers. To efficiently deliver the energy system of tomorrow, European countries are working together to maximise the potential of technologies £3 billion investment like battery storage, wind and solar power. Interconnectors Since 2014, over £3 billion has been invested in 4.4 GW of new enable smarter energy systems to react quickly to changes interconnector capacity, which will more than double the existing in supply and demand, ensuring renewable energy flows capacity between GB and continental Europe by the early 2020s. from where it is being generated in large quantities, to where it is needed most. Consumers benefit from interconnectors because they open the door to cheaper energy sources and Power for 11 million homes help GB build a smarter energy system. 4.4 GW of capacity provides access to enough electricity to power National Grid recognises 11 million homes. While the future relationship between GB and the EU the challenges that remains unclear, we are confident that we will continue Brexit poses. However, to trade electricity across interconnectors. It is in the best interests of all consumers for GB to keep working closely we remain confident 9.5 GW more that trade in electricity There is potential to increase the benefits to consumers through a with the EU to build an energy system that makes the best further 9.5 GW of interconnectors that will help deliver a smarter, more use of all our energy resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Benefits of Energy Storage and Electricity Interconnections in Future British Power Systems
    This is a repository copy of Technical benefits of energy storage and electricity interconnections in future British power systems. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82657/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Edmunds, RK, Cockerill, TT, Foxon, TJ et al. (2 more authors) (2014) Technical benefits of energy storage and electricity interconnections in future British power systems. Energy, 70. 577 - 587. ISSN 0360-5442 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.041 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Title: Technical Benefits of Energy Storage and Electricity Interconnections in Future GB Power Systems Authors: R.K. Edmundsa, T.T. Cockerillb, T.J. Foxonc, D.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Network Review
    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Background
    Appendix 2.2: Industry background Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of major market participants ....................................................................... 1 The Six Large Energy Firms ....................................................................................... 3 Gas producers other than Centrica .......................................................................... 35 Mid-tier independent generator company profiles .................................................... 35 The mid-tier energy suppliers ................................................................................... 40 Introduction 1. This appendix contains information about the following participants in the energy market in Great Britain (GB): (a) The Six Large Energy Firms – Centrica, EDF Energy, E.ON, RWE, Scottish Power (Iberdrola), and SSE. (b) The mid-tier electricity generators – Drax, ENGIE (formerly GDF Suez), Intergen and ESB International. (c) The mid-tier energy suppliers – Co-operative (Co-op) Energy, First Utility, Ovo Energy and Utility Warehouse. Evolution of major market participants 2. Below is a chart showing the development of retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms: A2.2-1 Figure 1: Development of the UK retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms Pre-liberalisation Liberalisation 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Difference Investing in the Communities Where We Live and Work Making a Difference: Investing in the Communities Where We Live and Work
    Making a difference Investing in the communities where we live and work Making a difference: Investing in the communities where we live and work As Britain’s leading supplier of energy and related services, it’s essential we act responsibly in everything we do. Our commitment to doing what’s right in the communities we serve is at the heart of our business. With our resources and nearly 30,000 people, we’re uniquely placed to help tackle some of the challenges that face the 11 million homes we supply with energy and services. For example, almost a third of privately rented homes do not meet the Government’s Decent Homes Standard. Over 4 million UK households are in fuel poverty. And at the same time, the UK is short on the skills needed to power the homes of the future. Many organisations across the country are doing a fantastic job in addressing some of these challenges. This brochure outlines the ways in which we aim to make a difference, through collaborating with some of these expert partners. A helping hand We want to help people who need extra support to keep their homes warm and working. In 2015, we invested £8.5 million in energy grants through the British Gas Energy Trust to help people living in fuel poverty. In 2016 we’re continuing to build on our successful partnership with Shelter. In their 50th anniversary year, we are working together to help shape new standards for homes in the 21st century. Building Britain’s skills The UK is facing a real skills shortage, and youth unemployment remains a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Response Status in EU Member States
    Demand Response status in EU Member States Paolo Bertoldi Paolo Zancanella Benigna Boza-Kiss 2016 EUR 27998 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Contact information Paolo Bertoldi Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749. Ispra 21027. Italy. Email: [email protected] Tel.: +390332 78 9299 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC101191 EUR 27998 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-59818-0 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2790/962868 Print ISBN 978-92-79-59817-3 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2790/354290 © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. How to cite: Bertoldi P, Zancanella P, Boza-Kiss B.; Demand Response Status in EU Member States; EUR 27998 EN; doi:10.2790/962868 All images © European Union 2016 except those used on the front page which were taken from the following website www.flickr.com Abstract: This report reviews the current status of European Member States’ regulation supporting Demand Response and Aggregation in the wholesale, balancing and ancillary electricity markets, as stipulated in Article 15 of the Energy Efficiency Directive. Demand Response is able to increase the system’s adequacy and to substantially reduce the need for investment in peaking generation by shifting consumption away from times of high demand.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Island Transmission System Performance Report 2019
    All-Island Transmission System Performance Report 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Key Data ...................................................................................................................... 8 3. All-Island System Data ........................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Overview of the All-Island Electricity System ................................................................ 9 3.2 Total System Production .............................................................................................. 9 3.3 System Records ......................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Generation Capacity ................................................................................................... 10 3.5 Generation Availability ................................................................................................ 11 3.6 Generation Forced Outage Rate ................................................................................ 12 3.7 Generation Scheduled Outage Rate ........................................................................... 13 4. EirGrid Transmission System Performance ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Gas Industry in the UK: Providing Pictures
    spective from the gas monopoly years to the fully the evolution of the Gas liberated market today through three lenses of Industry in the uk policy frameworks. It poses the challenges and outlook for the future given the infrastructure and By Calliope Webber price linkages that are currently in play. The rise of the United Kingdom’s gas market and ● The monopoly years: launching British Gas its regional integration within the north-western Originally, gas used in the UK was synthetic gas European gas market over the course of more manufactured from coal (or “town”) gas, and the than a century is a gas market integration success market was run primarily by county councils and story. It is characterised by important energy policy small private firms. After World War II that changes and changing market circumstances both changed with the Gas Act of 1948, which in Europe generally as well as at an intra- nationalised the UK gas industry. When it came regional level. into effect in May 1949, over 1,000 privately The objective of this paper is to use the GMI owned and municipal gas companies were model as a framework to describe the evolution of merged into 12 area Gas Boards – geographically the UK gas market. It provides a descriptive retro- organised and collectively known as British Gas. The world’s first commercial LNG delivery was made from Algeria to the UK by the Methane Princess with the shipment arriving at Canvey Island on October 12, 1964. 198 t h e e V o l u t I on of the G A s Industry I n t h e u k This was the beginning of the publicly owned, Similarly, the electricity supply monopoly was vertically integrated monopoly for the downstream run by the Central Electricity Generating Board supply of gas in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautilus Interconnector Briefing Pack
    Nautilus Interconnector Briefing Pack July 2019 Introduction Connecting for a cleaner future Nautilus Interconnector is a proposed second Interconnector between Great Interconnectors are making energy more secure, affordable and sustainable Britain and Belgium, including cabling works and a converter station situated in for consumers. East Suffolk. These projects have helped to lower electricity prices, increase the security of supply and stabilise energy in the Great Britain transmission network. When built, it will create a new 1.4 gigawatts (GW) high voltage direct current (HVDC) electricity link between the transmission systems of Great Britain and Belgium. Interconnectors are the perfect tool to help decarbonise our energy system. So far this year it is estimated that almost 65% of electricity coming into Britain through National Grid’s Interconnectors comes from zero carbon sources. It is expected that This will carry enough electricity to supply around 1.4 million homes. this figure will reach 90% by 2030. Who we are They also help to strengthen security of supply, by providing access to a much larger and more diverse mix of generation. Proposals for Nautilus Interconnector (Nautilus) are being developed by National Grid Interconnector Holdings (NGIH) and joint venture partner Elia. NGIH is a wholly owned subsidiary of National Grid Group and is legally separate from National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (NGET). Elia is Belgium’s transmission system operator, operating the high voltage electricity network in Belgium1. It also Reducing our reliance on energy from Providing access to affordable energy is a key player in the energy market and the interconnected electricity system. fossil fuels for consumers NGET is responsible for ensuring electricity is transported safely and efficiently from where it is produced; reaching homes The transition to a low-carbon energy system is necessary to Interconnectors make the market more economically and businesses safely, reliably and efficiently.
    [Show full text]