Distribution Network Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution Network Review A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1 4.1 The ability of distribution systems to accept embedded generation ........................................ 4.1 4.2 N orthern Scotland - Scottish and Southern Energy ...................................................................4.4 4.3 Central and Southern Scotland - Scottish Power ...................................................................... 4.12 4.4 N orth East England - N orthern Electric...................................................................................... 4.16 4.5 N orth West England - N orweb ...........................................................................................................4.20 4.6 Merseyside and N orth Wales - Manweb ..........................................................................................4.24 4.7 Y orkshire and Humberside - Y orkshire Electricity.................................................................... 4.29 4.8 West Midlands - Midlands Electricity............................................................................................4.33 4.9 East Midlands - East Midlands Electricity................................................................................... 4.36 4.10 N orfolk and East Anglia - Eastern Electricity............................................................................4.40 4.11 Central London - London Electricity.............................................................................................4.43 4.12 South East England - SEEBOARD ..................................................................................................... 4.45 4.13 Southern England - Southern Electric...........................................................................................4.49 4.14 South Wales - SWALEC.........................................................................................................................4.51 4.15 South West England - SWEB...............................................................................................................4.55 5. TECHNICAL BENEFITS/DRAWBACKS ARISING FROM EMBEDDED GENERATION...........5.1 5.1 U tilisation of distribution network assets ...................................................................................... 5.1 5.2 Distribution System Losses and O verall System Efficiency ....................................................... 5.2 5.3 Security and quality of supply.............................................................................................................5.5 5.4 N eed for distribution reinforcement ................................................................................................. 5.7 5.5 Avoidance or deferment of distribution reinforcement ..............................................................5.8 5.6 System control , load balance and safety ........................................................................................5.8 5.7 Implications for NGC ............................................................................................................................... 5.9 6. POTENTIAL FOR UPTAKE OF EMBEDDED GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES........................6.1 6.1 The Projected N ear -term U ptake of Renewable Energy Projects in England , Scotland and Wales 6.1 6.2 The Projected N ear -term U ptake of Embedded Fossil -fuelled Projects in England Scotland and Wales ...........................................................................................................................................6.14 7. COMPARISON OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK CAPACITY WITH POTENTIAL UPTAKE ...7.1 8. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO OVERCOME OBSTACLES.................................................................. 8.1 8.1 Voltage regulation 8.1 Page iii 8.2 Thermal Loading .......................................................................................................................................8.3 8.3 FAULT LEVELS................................................................................................................................................ 8.4 8.4 OTHER ISSUES................................................................................................................................................ 8.5 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................. 9.1 9.1 Existing distribution systems.............................................................................................................. 9.1 9.2 E xisting levels of embedded generation ............................................................................................9.1 9.3 Potential benefits /drawbacks for the connection of embedded generation ......................... 9.2 9.4 Experience of PES Companies dealing with embedded generation .............................................9.4 9.5 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)................................9.4 9.6 Potential growth of embedded generation ...................................................................................... 9.5 9.7 Fossil Fuelled Projects ...........................................................................................................................9.6 9.8 Comparison of network capacity with Potential uptake of embedded generation ...............9.6 9.9 Potential Solutions to difficulties experienced with Embedded generation ......................... 9.7 9.10 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................9.9 Appendix A Scope of work Appendix B Assessment of capability of PES networks to accept new embedded generation Appendix C Questionnaire responses from Industry Stakeholders Page 1.1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report covers the work undertaken by PB Power, Merz and McLellan Division, on behalf of ETSU, as part of the United Kingdom’s Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) New and Renewable Energy Programme. The objective of the study is to review the distribution network in England, Wales and Scotland to examine its ability now and in the near future to accommodate more embedded generation, taking account of both renewable and conventional types of generation. For the basis of these studies we have considered generators with a registered capacity of less than 100 MW. The studies described in this report were performed in late 1998 and early 1999 and they involved soliciting the views of numerous organisations, including the 14 Public Electricity Supply companies, the Electricity Regulator (OFFER), key policy makers and industry stakeholders. As a background to the studies we have included a general description of the existing transmission and distribution systems in the United Kingdom. This description includes a brief history of how the networks were developed from discrete, isolated power systems with localised generators that served a number of specific consumers, to an interconnected network that enabled generation to supply demands in other parts of the country. As part of this background information we include a summary of the conditions stipulated in the Public Electricity Supply licences granted under the Electricity Act 1989 that are relevant to the developers of embedded generation schemes. We also include a summary of the agreements and consents that an embedded generator must obtain in order to connect to, and operate on, a distribution system. This background information is included in Section 3 of this report where we also include a brief description and commentary on the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements that are presently being performed by OFFER. In Section 4 we present the results of our discussions with the Public Electricity Supply companies together with some analysis based on these discussions. The aim of this analysis is to identify on a
Recommended publications
  • The Interconnector Pipeline a Key Link in Europe's Gas Network
    The Interconnector Pipeline A Key Link in Europe’s Gas Network Mark Futyan Oxford Institute of Energy Studies March 2006 Mark Futyan is a postgraduate student at Columbia Business School in New York. He previously worked for Interconnector (UK) Limited between 2001 and 2005. During this period, he was involved in a variety of engineering and commercial projects. For information or questions on this research, please contact: [email protected]. Copyright © 2006 Mark Futyan The contents of and views expressed in this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members, nor do they represent the views of Interconnector (UK) Limited. ISBN 1-901795-44-6 ii Preface The Interconnector pipeline has rarely been out of the news since it was first proposed in the early 1990s. It is probably not too much of an exaggeration to say that it has transformed short term trading in north west Europe, causing companies to enter into commercial behaviour that they had not previously considered possible or, in some cases, desirable. Equally interesting were predictions (before it was built) that the project was likely to be a waste of time, followed by periodic claims that: gas was flowing in the wrong direction; that larger or smaller volumes of gas should be flowing; and that shippers on one side or the other were responding inappropriately to price signals. For a gas research programme this made the Interconnector a particularly suitable research project which fits perfectly into our work on European gas issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland Bates Site, Blyth Local Development Order
    Northumberland Bates Site, Blyth Local Development Order February 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Bates Site 5 3 Statement of Reasons 9 4 The Local Development Order 14 5 LDO Conformity Process 25 6 Definitions 27 Appendices 1 (Schedule 1) LDO site boundary plan 29 2 Submission Form and Commencement Notice 31 3 Appendix 3 - Other consents 32 4 LDO Monitoring 34 Contact details 36 Local Development Order: Bates Site - ADOPTED 1. Introduction 1. Introduction Introduction 1.1 This document is a Local Development Order (hereinafter referred to as LDO) and has been produced by Northumberland County Council in partnership with Arch, the Northumberland Development Company.(1) 1.2 In developing the Order, site information has been collated; assessments have been undertaken; and advice has been sought from key consultees. Further information is available in the following documents, which should be read alongside this LDO. Local Development Order Guide – providing background and supplementary guidance Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion – this relates to legislative requirements and serves to demonstrate that the development permitted by the LDO does not have significant effects on the environment. Nature Conservation and Ecological Assessment – this comprises a number of assessments and relates to various legislative requirements, including in respect of protected habitats and species. Sustainability Appraisal Report – this reports on the testing of environmental, social and economic impacts of the LDO. 1.3 The draft LDO and associated documents identified above were subject to extensive consultation. The consultation was undertaken in accordance with the values of the Statement of Community Involvement(2) and exceeded statutory requirements(3).
    [Show full text]
  • High Voltage Direct Current Transmission – Proven Technology for Power Exchange
    www.siemens.com/energy/hvdc High Voltage Direct Current Transmission – Proven Technology for Power Exchange Answers for energy. 2 Contents Chapter Theme Page 1 Why High Voltage Direct Current? 4 2 Main Types of HVDC Schemes 6 3 Converter Theory 8 4 Principle Arrangement of an HVDC Transmission Project 11 5 Main Components 14 5.1 Thyristor Valves 14 5.2 Converter Transformer 18 5.3 Smoothing Reactor 20 5.4 Harmonic Filters 22 5.4.1 AC Harmonic Filter 22 5.4.2 DC Harmonic Filter 25 5.4.3 Active Harmonic Filter 26 5.5 Surge Arrester 28 5.6 DC Transmission Circuit 31 5.6.1 DC Transmission Line 31 5.6.2 DC Cable 32 5.6.3 High Speed DC Switches 34 5.6.4 Earth Electrode 36 5.7 Control & Protection 38 6 System Studies, Digital Models, Design Specifications 45 7 Project Management 46 3 1 Why High Voltage Direct Current? 1.1 Highlights from the High Voltage Direct In 1941, the first contract for a commercial HVDC Current (HVDC) History system was signed in Germany: 60 MW were to be supplied to the city of Berlin via an underground The transmission and distribution of electrical energy cable of 115 km length. The system with ±200 kV started with direct current. In 1882, a 50-km-long and 150 A was ready for energizing in 1945. It was 2-kV DC transmission line was built between Miesbach never put into operation. and Munich in Germany. At that time, conversion between reasonable consumer voltages and higher Since then, several large HVDC systems have been DC transmission voltages could only be realized by realized with mercury arc valves.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Site Condition Report
    APPLICATION SITE CONDITION REPORT Saltholme North Gas Fired Generating Facility Permit Application EPR/LP3300PZ/A001 JER1691 Application Site Condition Report V1 Final 9 September 2019 rpsgroup.com Quality Management Version Revision Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date 0 Draft Frances Bodman Jennifer Stringer Jennifer Stringer 16/08/2019 Statera Energy / 0 Client comments Frances Bodman - 27/09/2019 Jennifer Stringer 1 Final Frances Bodman Jennifer Stringer Jennifer Stringer 09/09/2019 Approval for issue Jennifer Stringer Technical Director [date] File Location O:\JER1691 - Statera EP GHG and EMS\5. Reports\1. Draft Report\Saltholme_North\Appendix G - ASCR\190909 R JER1691 FB Applicaiton Site Condition Report v1 final .docx © Copyright RPS Group Plc. All rights reserved. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by RPS Group Plc, any of its subsidiaries, or a related entity (collectively 'RPS'), no other party may use, make use of, or rely on the contents of this report. The report has been compiled using the resources agreed with the client and in accordance with the scope of work agreed with the client. No liability is accepted by RPS for any use of this report, other than the purpose for which it was prepared. The report does not account for any changes relating to the subject matter of the report, or any legislative or regulatory changes that have occurred since the report was produced and that may affect the report. RPS does not accept any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Findings Plains Eastern Clean Line
    United States Department of Energy Summary of Findings In re Application of Clean Line Energy Partners LLC Pursuant to Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 March 25, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FREQUENTLY USED ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................ iii I. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 a. Section 1222 of EPAct 2005......................................................................................................... 2 b. The Department’s 2010 Request for Proposals ............................................................................ 3 c. Clean Line’s Application .............................................................................................................. 4 d. Clean Line’s Regulatory Filings ................................................................................................... 5 e. DOE Review of Clean Line’s Application ................................................................................... 7 i. Environmental and Historic Property Review ....................................................................... 7 ii. Section 1222 Review.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Author: Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 Published by: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford (Surrey) GU2 7XH, United Kingdom http://www.surrey.ac.uk/CES Publication date: 2000 © Centre for Environmental Strategy, 2007 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not of the Centre for Environmental Strategy. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. This publication and its contents may be reproduced as long as the reference source is cited. ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Paper prepared as background to the Study Renewable Energy Sources March 1998 Dr Tim Jackson* and Dr Ragnar Löfstedt Centre for Environmental Strategy University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the thinking of the Royal Commission. Any queries about the paper should be directed to the author indicated * above. Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accurate transposition of the written reports onto the website, the Royal Commission cannot be held responsible for any accidental errors which might have been introduced during the transcription. Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Renewable Energy Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc
    Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2019 Registered No.: SC213460 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Contents Page No. Directors and Other Information 1 Strategic Report 2 Corporate Governance Statement 12 Directors' Report 15 Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Strategic Report, the Directors' Report and the Financial 16 statements Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc 17 Profit and Loss Account 21 Balance Sheet 22 Statement of Changes in Equity 23 Cash Flow Statement 24 Notes on the Financial statements 25 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors and Other Information Directors Gregor Alexander (Chairman) Steven Kennedy (Resigned 07/09/18) Stuart Hogarth David Gardner (Resigned 31/01/19) Colin Nicol Dale Cargill Alistair Borthwick (Appointed 07/09/18, Resigned 28/06/19) Robert McDonald (Appointed 31/01/19) Rachel McEwen Katherine Marshall David Rutherford (Non-Executive Director) Gary Steel (Non-Executive Director) Registered office Inveralmond House 200 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 3AQ Secretary Mark McLaughlin Auditor KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants 319 St Vincent Street Glasgow G2 5AS Registered number SC213460 1 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Strategic Report The Strategic Report sets out the main trends and factors underlying the development and performance of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc (the “Company”) during the year ended 31 March 2019, as well as those matters which are likely to affect its future development and performance. The business, its objectives and strategy The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SSE plc (the “Group”).
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom 840 United Kingdom United Kingdom
    UNITED KINGDOM 840 UNITED KINGDOM UNITED KINGDOM 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview United Kingdom (UK) is an abbreviated form of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The UK consists of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales and lies in north-western Europe, occupying the major portion of the British Isles. The country’s only land boundary is with the Republic of Ireland. The UK is separated from the coast of western Europe by the English Channel to the south and by the North Sea to the east. The northern and western shores are washed by the Atlantic Ocean. As a result of the relative warmth of the nearby seas, UK has a moderate climate, rarely marked by extremes of heat or cold. The mean annual temperature ranges between 11.1°C in the south and 8.9°C in the north-east. Seasonal temperatures vary between a mean of about 16.1°C during July, the hottest month of the year, and 4.4°C during January, the coldest month. Fogs, mists, and overcast skies are frequent, particularly in the Pennine and inland regions. Precipitation, heaviest during October, averages about 760 mm annually in most of the UK. During the Industrial Revolution the country became rapidly urbanized, and today more than 70% of the total population of 58.8 millions (1996) is concentrated in cities occupying 10% of the total land area. It has a mean population density of 243.2 persons per square km with an annual growth of 0.3% (1997). The population is highly urbanized, and the United Kingdom is the third most densely populated nation in Europe (after Netherlands and Belgium).
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Greater Manchester
    Exploring Greater Manchester a fieldwork guide Web edition edited by Paul Hindle Original printed edition (1998) edited by Ann Gardiner, Paul Hindle, John McKendrick and Chris Perkins Exploring Greater Manchester 5 5. Urban floodplains and slopes: the human impact on the environment in the built-up area Ian Douglas University of Manchester [email protected] A. The River Mersey STOP 1: Millgate Lane, Didsbury The urban development of Manchester has modified From East Didsbury station and the junction of the A34 runoff to rivers (see Figure 1), producing changes in and A5145, proceed south along Parrs Wood Road and into flood behaviour, which have required expensive remedial Millgate Lane, Stop at the bridge over the floodbasin inlet measures, particularly, the embankment of the Mersey from channel at Grid Reference (GR) 844896 (a car can be turned Stockport to Ashton weir near Urmston. In this embanked round at the playing fields car park further on). Looking reach, runoff from the urban areas includes natural channels, south from here the inlet channel from the banks of the storm drains and overflows from combined sewers. Mersey can be seen. At flood times the gates of the weir on Alternative temporary storages for floodwaters involve the Mersey embankment can be opened to release water into release of waters to floodplain areas as in the Didsbury flood the Didsbury flood basin that lies to the north. Here, and at basin and flood storage of water in Sale and Chorlton water other sites along the Mersey, evidence of multi-purpose use parks. This excursion examines the reach of the Mersey from of the floodplain, for recreation and wildlife conservation as Didsbury to Urmston.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering
    Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering BUSINESS IS 2 Building Offshore Wind in England Ministerial Foreword Offshore wind is a UK success story and the UK is open for business. The UK is the world leader in offshore wind. We have more offshore wind installed than anywhere else in the world. We are an island nation, blessed with strong winds and shallow seas – and this energy resource is on our doorstep. We are determined to move to cleaner electricity generation and offshore wind has an important role to play in our long term plan for a balanced, low carbon energy mix. I want the UK to secure the economic benefits of this new industry. Through our offshore wind industrial strategy, the Government is committed to working in partnership with business to build a competitive, innovative UK supply chain for offshore wind, delivering jobs and economic growth. Building a strong supply chain needs the commitment and expertise of local partners, working alongside central government to support businesses who want to invest here. The Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering (CORE) partnership offers an integrated and cooperative approach between Government and Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, to provide the best possible support to businesses choosing England as an investment location. The Rt Hon Matthew Hancock MP Minister of State for Business, Enterprise and Energy CORE brings together the relevant expertise from UK Central Government and the six major investment hubs in England to support business growth and showcase opportunities for foreign direct investment (FDI) for the offshore wind sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]