DOCSLIB.ORG

OES Annual Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OES Annual Report 2018 ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN ACTIVITIES AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 2018 ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 1 Published by: The Executive Committee of Ocean Energy Systems Edited by: Ana Brito e Melo and Henry Jeffrey Designed by: Formas do Possível - Creative Studio www.formasdopossivel.com COUNTRY REPORTS AUTHOR (S) Australia Republic of Korea Mark Hemer and Tracey Pitman (CSIRO) Jin-Hak Yi (Korea Institute of Ocean Science Stephanie Thornton (Australian Ocean Energy Group) and Technology) Belgium Mexico Vicky Stratigaki (Ghent University) Rodolfo Silva-Casarín (CEMIE Océano) Ludovic Mouffe (Federal Public Service Economy, Directorate-General Energy) Netherlands Jos Reijnders (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) Canada Ghanashyam Ranjitkar (CanmetENERGY-Ottawa, Natural New Zealand Resources Canada) Gareth Gretton (AWATEA and Wellington Institute Sue Molloy (Glas Ocean Engineering) of Technology) China Norway Peng Wei (National Ocean Technology Center) Daniel J. Willoch (NORWEA) Harald Rikheim (Research Council of Norway) Denmark Kim Nielsen (Ramboll) Portugal Ana Brito e Melo (WavEC Offshore Renewables) European Commission António Falcão (Instituto Superior Técnico) Davide Magagna (DG JRC) Matthijs Soede (DG RTD) Singapore Srikanth Narasimalu (Nanyang Technological France University) Yann-Hervé De Roeck (France Energies Marines) Spain Germany Yago Torre-Enciso (BiMEP) Jochen Bard and Fabian Thalemann Jose Luis Villate (TECNALIA) (Fraunhofer IEE) Sweden India Maria Olsson (Swedish Energy Agency) Purnima Jalihal (National Institute of Ocean Technology) UK Ireland Henry Jeffrey (Edinburgh University) Declan Meally and Patricia Comiskey (SEAI) USA Italy David Hume and Ann Dallman (U.S. Department of Energy) Luca Benedetti and Matteo Gianni (Gestore dei Servizi Energetici - GSE) Disclaimer: The Ocean Energy Systems (OES) Technology Collaboration Programme is part of a network of autonomous collaborative partnerships focused on a wide range of energy technologies known as Technology Collaboration Programmes or TCPs. The TCPs are organised under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA), but the TCPs are functionally and legally autonomous. Views, findings and publications of the OES TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries. CONTENTS CHAIRPERSON’S MESSAGE .......................................04 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................06 PERFORMANCE METRICS ON OCEAN ENERGY – INTERVIEW .......................... 43 01 OVERVIEW OF OES 05 Vision, Mission and Values ...............................................18 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES Membership ......................................................................21 ON OCEAN ENERGY Executive Committee ........................................................23 Australia ......................................................................... 48 Work Programme ..............................................................24 Belgium .......................................................................... 52 Canada ........................................................................... 58 China .............................................................................. 65 Denmark ......................................................................... 68 02 European Commission ................................................... 72 ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2018 France ............................................................................ 78 Germany ......................................................................... 82 Collection of Information and Dissemination ..................25 India ............................................................................... 85 Assessment of Environmental Effects and Monitoring Ireland ............................................................................ 87 Efforts................................................................................28 Italy ................................................................................ 93 Worldwide Web Gis Database for Ocean Energy .............31 Mexico ............................................................................ 98 Cost of Energy Assessment for Wave, Tidal and OTEC at an International Level ........................32 Netherlands ................................................................. 101 Wave Energy Converters Modelling New Zealand ................................................................ 104 Verification and Validation ...............................................33 Norway ......................................................................... 105 Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion ..................................35 Portugal........................................................................ 107 Performance Metrics International Republic of Korea ......................................................... 112 Framework for Ocean Energy ...........................................36 Singapore ..................................................................... 115 Tidal Energy Converters Modelling Verification and Validation ...............................................37 Spain ............................................................................ 119 Assessment of Jobs Creation on Ocean Energy ..............38 Sweden ......................................................................... 123 Ocean Energy in Insular Conditions ................................38 UK ................................................................................. 126 Open Water Testing ..........................................................39 USA .............................................................................. 134 03 06 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPENDICES ON OCEAN ENERGY - INTERVIEW ..............................40 Appendix 1- Membership Contacts ............................ 141 Appendix 2 - ExCo Meetings ....................................... 143 3 CHAIRPERSON’S MESSAGE MR. HENRY JEFFREY University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom OES Chairperson A warm welcome to the 2018 OES Annual Report and I trust that you will find it informative and useful. I must start this year’s Annual Report with the sad news of the passing of OES former chairman John Huckerby. John Huckerby was nominated the New Zealand’s representative to the OES Executive Committee by the New Zealand Government in 2008. John served as Chair of the OES over 4 years (2009 – 2012). During his mandate John submitted a new 5-year Strategic Plan to the IEA to secure a third 5-year mandate. John not only was responsible for producing a new 5-year Strategic Plan but it overhauled the OES ´brand´, by updating its name, its logo and, its website. John had a strong commitment to make OES “the authoritative voice on ocean energy”. During his chairmanship he introduced a high sense of rigor in the OES activities and always guided the Executive Committee meetings in a very diplomatic and motivational way. He spread the OES all over the world, engaging with other international organizations and conferences promoting ocean energy internationally and will be fondly remembered by many people around the world. For the content of this year’s report, I would like to thank all the member countries for their contributions. The country reports included here convey that 2018 has seen significant progress internationally for ocean energy. Several tidal projects achieved extensive operating hours with multi- GWhs of generation being clocked up globally. Wave energy technology has progressed with a number of large-scale laboratory and offshore tests having been successfully undertaken. Our 2018 feature article is an interview with Jonathan Hodges, Senior Innovation Engineer, of Wave Energy Scotland and Lauren Moraski of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Water Power Technologies Office. Together, they have been leading international collaboration on the development of Stage Gate Metrics for Ocean Energy that will provide a robust and common approach to managing innovation. A further featured article is on the successful ICOE 2018 conference hosted in Cherbourg, France by Amandine Volard, ICOE Conference Manager, including a message from the Linda Church Ciocci, Chair of the ICOE 2020 to be hosted in Washington D.C. Many key achievements for wave and tidal projects are discussed throughout this report with some of my personal highlights below. The US DoE announced funding of $25m to support 12 next-generation marine energy technologies as well as enabling projects. In the UK, Orbital Marine Power concluded testing of their 2MW turbine and successfully raised £7m from 2,300 individual investors for a next generation device. Wave Energy ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Scotland selected 2 devices to go forward to real- sea testing in 2020 with funding of £7.7m. In Europe there was further consolidation around three-bladed horizontal axis tidal turbines with vacant opportunities in France and beyond being actively pursued by other The country reports developers. In the southern hemisphere Australia is re-engaging with wave energy following the opening of included here convey that Albany test site, led by Carnegie Clean Energy. 2018 has seen significant At a policy level ocean energy progresses within a global energy market that is seeing significant change. The progress internationally for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Molene Archipelago
    bs_bs_bannerbs_bs_banner The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (2018) 47.1: 5–27 doi: 10.1111/1095-9270.12277 The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Molene` Archipelago, Iroise Sea, Brittany, Western France: a long-term tradition with early megalithic origins Henri Gandois UMR Trajectoires, Universite´ de Paris I Pantheon´ Sorbonne, Paris, France, research associate at the UMR CReAAH, Universite´ de Rennes 1, Rennes, France, [email protected] Pierre Stephan´ CNRS, UMR LETG, Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France. LTSER France, Zone Atelier ‘Brest-Iroise’, [email protected] David Cuisnier Ferme insulaire de Kemenez, ˆıle de Kemenez, Le Conquet, France, [email protected] Olivia Hulot DRASSM, Ministere` de la Culture et de la Communication, Marseille, France, [email protected] Axel Ehrhold IFREMER, Geosciences´ Marines, Centre, de Brest, BP70, CS10070, 29280 Plouzane,´ France, [email protected] Marine Paul CNRS, UMR LETG, Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France, [email protected] Nicolas Le Dantec CEREMA, UMR 6538 Geosciences´ Ocean,´ Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France Marcaurelio Franzetti CNRS, UMR 6538 Geosciences´ Ocean,´ Universite´ de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, 29280 Plouzane,´ France This reports on a project that combined evidence gleaned from aerial photographs, place-names, interviews, topography, LIDAR data, and sonar bathymetry to locate stone tidal fish weirs in the Molene` Archipelago. The results were verified by diver and pedestrian visual surveys. Models of Holocene sea-level change allowed a group of possibly Late Mesolithic–Early Neolithic weirs to be recognized, with a second group broadly dated to the later Neolithic–Early Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Marine Renewable Energies and the Preservation Of
    Development of marine renewable energies and the Renewable energies preservation of biodiversity - VOLUME 2 - Editors: Marion PEGUIN, under the coordination of Christophe LE VISAGE, coordinator of the contact group "Marine Renewable Energy", Guillemette ROLLAND, President of the Commission on Ecosystem Management, and Sébastien MONCORPS, director of the French Committee of IUCN. Acknowledgements: The French Committee of IUCN would particularly like to thank: the reviewers of this report: BARILLIER Agnès (EDF) - BAS Adeline (EDF EN) - BONADIO Jonathan (MEDDE- DGEC) - CARLIER Antoine (IFREMER) - DELENCRE Gildas (Energies Réunion) - GALIANO Mila (Ademe) - GUENARD Vincent (Ademe) - LEJART Morgane (FEM) - MARTINEZ Ludivine (Observatoire Pelagis) - MENARD Jean-Claude (ELV) - MICHEL Sylvain (AAMP) - de MONBRISON David (BRLi), the members of the "Sea and Coasts" working group of the IUCN French Committee, chaired by Ludovic FRERE ESCOFFIER (Nausicaa), the participants of the various steering committees: AMY Frédérique (DREAL HN) - ANDRE Yann (LPO) - ARANA-DE-MALEVILLE Olivia (FEE) - AUBRY Jérémy (Gondwana) - ARGENSON Alain (FNE) - BARBARY Cédric (GDF Suez) - BAS Adeline (Ifremer / EDF EN) - BEER-GABEL Josette (expert) - BELAN Pierre-Yves (CETMEF) - BONADIO Jonathan (MEDDE-DGEC) - BONNET Céline (Va- lorem) - BORDERON Séverine (GREDEG-CNRS) - BOUTTIER Jenny (BRLi) - CAILLET Antonin (Alstom Ocean Energy) - CANON Marina (EDPR) - CANTERI Thierry (PNM Iroise, AAMP) - CARRE Aurélien (UICN France) - CASTÉRAS Rémi (WPD Offshore) - CHATEL Jean (RTE) -
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Ocean Energy: 20 Projects + 5 Policy Initiatives
    SPOTLIGHT ON OCEAN ENERGY 20 PROJECTS + 5 POLICY INITIATIVES April 2018 Disclaimer: The OES, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of OES do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries INDEX 04 INTRODUCTION 08 SPOTLIGHT ON 20 OCEAN ENERGY PROJECTS AND 5 POLICY INITIATIVES 10 Korea: Sihwa Tidal Power Plant 11 China: LHD Tidal Current Energy Demonstration Project 12 Canada: Cape Sharp Tidal Project 13 France: SABELLA D10 Tidal Turbine 14 Italy: GEM “the Ocean’s Kite” 15 UK: Scotrenewables floating tidal system 16 UK: Shetland Tidal Array 17 Canada: Water Wall Turbine 18 Norway: Deep River Power Plant 19 Belgium: Laminaria Wave Energy Converter 20 Denmark: Resen Waves Smart Ocean Buoy 21 Ireland: Ocean Energy O35 Buoy 22 Portugal: Waveroller 23 Spain: Oceantec MARMOK A-5 Project 24 Sweden: Seabased Sotenäs Project 25 USA: Columbia Power Technologies Wave Energy Generator 26 India: Wave Power Navigational Buoy 27 Netherlands: Blue Energy Reverse Electrodialysis Project 28 Japan: Okinawa OTEC plant 29 Germany: StEnSea project Initiatives 30 UK: Wave Energy Scotland 30 USA: Wave Energy Prize 31 Mexico: CEMIE-Océano 32 Singapre: SEAcORE 32 European Commission: OCEANERA-NET INTRODUCTION 4 ABOUT OES The Technology Collaboration Programme on Ocean Energy Systems, known as OES is an intergovernmental collaboration between countries, which operates under a framework established by the International Energy Agency in Paris. OES was founded by three countries in 2001 and has grown to its present 25 members, which provide a broad international base of information, sharing experience and knowledge and further a diversified representation of interests: members are from governmental departments, utilities, universities and research organizations, energy agencies and industry associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents
    1 Numerical wave modeling in conditions with strong currents: 2 dissipation, refraction and relative wind. 1 Generated using version 3.0 of the official AMS LATEX template ∗ 3 Fabrice Ardhuin, Ifremer, Laboratoire d'Oc´eanographie Spatiale, Centre de Brest, 29200 Plouzan´e,France Aron Roland, Technological University of Darmstadt, Germany Franck Dumas and Anne-Claire Bennis, Ifremer, Laboratoire PHYSED, Centre de Brest, 29200 Plouzan´e,France Alexei Sentchev, Laboratoire d'Oc´eanologie et G´eosciences (CNRS-UMR8187), Universit´edu Littoral - C^ote d'Opale, Wimereux, France Philippe Forget, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, Sud Toulon-Var University, IRD, La Garde, France Judith Wolf, National Oceanographic Center, Liverpool, UK Franc¸oise Girard, Actimar SAS, Brest, France Pedro Osuna, CICESE, Ensenada, BC, Mexico Michel Benoit, Laboratoire Saint Venant, Chatou, France 2 4 ABSTRACT 5 Currents effects on waves have lead to many developments in numerical wave modeling over 6 the past two decades, from numerical choices to parameterizations. The performance of 7 numerical models in conditions with strong currents is reviewed here, and observed strong 8 effects of opposed currents and modulations of wave heights by tidal currents in several typ- 9 ical situations are interpreted. For current variations on small scales, the rapid steepening 10 of the waves enhances wave breaking. Using parameterizations with a dissipation rate pro- 11 portional to some measure of the wave steepness to the fourth power, the results are very 12 different, with none being fully satisfactory, pointing for the need for more measurements and 13 further refinements of parameterizations. For larger scale current variations, the observed 14 modifications of the sea state are mostly explained by refraction of waves over currents, 15 and relative wind effects, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/03/21 07:30 PM UTC 2102 JOURNAL of PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 42
    DECEMBER 2012 A R DHUIN ET AL. 2101 Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents: Dissipation, Refraction, and Relative Wind 1 # # FABRICE ARDHUIN,* ARON ROLAND, FRANCK DUMAS, ANNE-CLAIRE BENNIS, @ & 11 ALEXEI SENTCHEV, PHILIPPE FORGET, JUDITH WOLF,** FRANC¸ OISE GIRARD, ## @@ PEDRO OSUNA, AND MICHEL BENOIT * Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Oce´anographie Spatiale, Plouzane´, France 1 Technological University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany # Ifremer, Laboratoire PHYSED, Plouzane´, France @ Laboratoire d’Oce´anologie et Ge´osciences (CNRS-UMR8187), Universite´ du Littoral-Coˆte d’Opale, Wimereux, France & Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, CNRS, and Aix-Marseille University, and Sud Toulon-Var University, IRD, La Garde, France ** National Oceanographic Center, Liverpool, United Kingdom 11 Actimar SAS, Brest, France ## CICESE, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico @@ Laboratoire Saint Venant, Chatou, France (Manuscript received 28 November 2011, in final form 9 July 2012) ABSTRACT Currents effects on waves have led to many developments in numerical wave modeling over the past two decades, from numerical choices to parameterizations. The performance of numerical models in conditions with strong currents is reviewed here, and observed strong effects of opposed currents and modulations of wave heights by tidal currents in several typical situations are interpreted. For current variations on small scales, the rapid steepening of the waves enhances wave breaking. Using different parameterizations with a dissipation rate proportional to some measure of the wave steepness to the fourth power, the results are very different, none being fully satisfactory, which points to the need for more measurements and further re- finements of parameterizations. For larger-scale current variations, the observed modifications of the sea state are mostly explained by refraction of waves over currents and relative wind effects, that is, the wind speed relevant for wave generation is the speed in the frame of reference moving with the near-surface current.
    [Show full text]
  • Encouraging Harmonious Co-Existence of Marine Renewables Projects with Other Marine Uses & Interests
    Lessons and recommendations from the Celtic Seas Encouraging harmonious co-existence of marine renewables projects with other marine uses & interests Encouraging harmonious co-existence of marine renewables projects with other marine uses & interests – Lessons and recommendations from the Celtic Seas 1 20.06.16 Author: Geoff Nuttall Lessons and recommendations from the Celtic Seas Encouraging harmonious co-existence of marine renewables projects with other marine uses & interests CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE APPROACHES, TOOLS AND MECHANISMS TO MEET THE CHALLENGE OF CO-LOCATING RENEWABLES WITH OTHER MARINE USES AND INTERESTS 11 THE CHALLENGES OF MARINE RENEWABLES DEVELOPMENT AND CO-EXISTENCE WITH OTHER INTERESTS 13 SUMMARY OF EXISTING GUIDANCE AND OTHER USEFUL RESOURCES, CONTACTS AND INFORMATION 17 DETAILED CASE STUDIES Celtic Seas Partnership is an EC LIFE+ project with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community. It is a four-year project, running from January 2013 to December 2016. WWF-UK is the lead with partners the University of Liverpool, Eastern and Midland Regional Assembly, the Natural Environment Research Council and SeaWeb Europe. Project number: LIFE11/ENV/UK/392 2 3 20.06.16 Author: Geoff Nuttall Lessons and recommendations from the Celtic Seas Encouraging harmonious co-existence of marine renewables projects with other marine uses & interests INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In increasingly crowded waters, developing new marine renewable energy projects in ways which command the support of local communities and other users of the same or neighbouring sea space poses a major challenge for developers. Whilst the global need to reduce carbon emissions to protect our climate becomes ever more urgent, marine renewables developers continue to battle not only engineering challenges, but also significant opposition NORTH GREATER ATLANTIC NORTH from other stakeholders and lengthy OCEAN CELTIC SEA delays which threaten the viability of SEAS their projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents: Dissipation, Refraction, and Relative Wind
    DECEMBER 2012 A R DHUIN ET AL. 2101 Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents: Dissipation, Refraction, and Relative Wind 1 # # FABRICE ARDHUIN,* ARON ROLAND, FRANCK DUMAS, ANNE-CLAIRE BENNIS, @ & 11 ALEXEI SENTCHEV, PHILIPPE FORGET, JUDITH WOLF,** FRANC¸ OISE GIRARD, ## @@ PEDRO OSUNA, AND MICHEL BENOIT * Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Oce´anographie Spatiale, Plouzane´, France 1 Technological University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany # Ifremer, Laboratoire PHYSED, Plouzane´, France @ Laboratoire d’Oce´anologie et Ge´osciences (CNRS-UMR8187), Universite´ du Littoral-Coˆte d’Opale, Wimereux, France & Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, CNRS, and Aix-Marseille University, and Sud Toulon-Var University, IRD, La Garde, France ** National Oceanographic Center, Liverpool, United Kingdom 11 Actimar SAS, Brest, France ## CICESE, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico @@ Laboratoire Saint Venant, Chatou, France (Manuscript received 28 November 2011, in final form 9 July 2012) ABSTRACT Currents effects on waves have led to many developments in numerical wave modeling over the past two decades, from numerical choices to parameterizations. The performance of numerical models in conditions with strong currents is reviewed here, and observed strong effects of opposed currents and modulations of wave heights by tidal currents in several typical situations are interpreted. For current variations on small scales, the rapid steepening of the waves enhances wave breaking. Using different parameterizations with a dissipation rate proportional to some measure of the wave steepness to the fourth power, the results are very different, none being fully satisfactory, which points to the need for more measurements and further re- finements of parameterizations. For larger-scale current variations, the observed modifications of the sea state are mostly explained by refraction of waves over currents and relative wind effects, that is, the wind speed relevant for wave generation is the speed in the frame of reference moving with the near-surface current.
    [Show full text]
  • Article EWTEC2015 Mapping Tidal Energy Resources by HFR Ushant
    Proceedings of the 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference 6-11th Sept 2015, Nantes, France Mapping tidal energy resources by High Frequency Radar: Application to resource characterization around the Ushant Island (W. Brittany coast) Alexei Sentchev∗, Maxime Thiébaut∗ ∗Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences (CNRS UMR 8187), Université du Littoral - Côte d’Opale, 62930 Wimereux, France. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract—A methodology of assessing the hydrokinetic re- powerful tool and allowed a considerable gain of the quality sources and tidal flow potential at a near-shore site in the Iroise of velocity and available power estimation. Nowadays, 3D Sea is presented. More than a year-long surface current velocity models are routinely applied for tidal energy site assessment, time series recorded by high frequency radars (HFR) were used for site screening. We focused on the analysis of tidal current resource quantification, and studies of the impact of energy pattern around the Ushant Island which is a promising site of devices on the local circulation and environment. For example, tidal energy generation. Our results revealed current velocities numerical simulations by Regional Ocean Modeling System of 4 m/s northwest of the island and in the Fromveur Strait, (ROMS) allowed examining the tidal asymmetry in a promis- % % with 1 m/s value exceeded 60 and 70 of time respectively. ing site of Orkney Islands [3], or evaluating the wave influence The monitoring of surface currents allowed to discover an exceptionally high asymmetry between the flood and ebb flow on tidal stream energy resources [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport
    ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN ACTIVITIES AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 2018 ANNUAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY ACTIVITIES IN 2018 1 Published by: The Executive Committee of Ocean Energy Systems Edited by: Ana Brito e Melo and Henry Jeffrey Designed by: Formas do Possível - Creative Studio www.formasdopossivel.com COUNTRY REPORTS AUTHOR (S) Australia Republic of Korea Mark Hemer and Tracey Pitman (CSIRO) Jin-Hak Yi (Korea Institute of Ocean Science Stephanie Thornton (Australian Ocean Energy Group) and Technology) Belgium Mexico Vicky Stratigaki (Ghent University) Rodolfo Silva-Casarín (CEMIE Océano) Ludovic Mouffe (Federal Public Service Economy, Directorate-General Energy) Netherlands Jos Reijnders (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) Canada Ghanashyam Ranjitkar (CanmetENERGY-Ottawa, Natural New Zealand Resources Canada) Gareth Gretton (AWATEA and Wellington Institute Sue Molloy (Glas Ocean Engineering) of Technology) China Norway Peng Wei (National Ocean Technology Center) Daniel J. Willoch (NORWEA) Harald Rikheim (Research Council of Norway) Denmark Kim Nielsen (Ramboll) Portugal Ana Brito e Melo (WavEC Offshore Renewables) European Commission António Falcão (Instituto Superior Técnico) Davide Magagna (DG JRC) Matthijs Soede (DG RTD) Singapore Srikanth Narasimalu (Nanyang Technological France University) Yann-Hervé De Roeck (France Energies Marines) Spain Germany Yago Torre-Enciso (BiMEP) Jochen Bard and Fabian Thalemann Jose Luis Villate (TECNALIA)
    [Show full text]
  • The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Mol`Ene Archipelago, Iroise Sea
    The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Mol‘ene Archipelago, Iroise Sea, Brittany, Western France: a long-term tradition with early megalithic origins Henri Gandois, Pierre Stéphan, David Cuisnier, Olivia Hulot, Axel Ehrhold, Marine Paul, Nicolas Le Dantec, Marcaurelio Franzetti To cite this version: Henri Gandois, Pierre Stéphan, David Cuisnier, Olivia Hulot, Axel Ehrhold, et al.. The Stone Tidal Fish Weirs of the Mol‘ene Archipelago, Iroise Sea, Brittany, Western France: a long-term tradition with early megalithic origins. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Wiley, 2018, 47 (1), pp.5-27. 10.1111/1095-9270.12277. hal-01654772 HAL Id: hal-01654772 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01654772 Submitted on 4 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Author Query Form Journal IJNA Article ijna12277 Dear Author, During the copyediting of your manuscript the following queries arose. Please refer to the query reference callout numbers in the page proofs and respond to each by marking the necessary comments using the PDF annotation tools. Please remember illegible or unclear comments and corrections may delay publication. Many thanks for your assistance. Query No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Report T1.4: a Community Specific Assessment of Local Energy
    ICE REPORT T1.4: A COMMUNITY SPECIFIC ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL ENERGY 13/03/2018 1 Deliverable T1.4: A Community Specific Assessment of Local Energy Jon Hardwick, Siming Zheng, Helen C.M. Smith, Oscar Fitch-Roy, Jonathan Williams, Peter M. Connor, Senthilarasu Sundaram, Gregorio Iglesias. About ICE Supported by Interreg VA France (Channel) England, the Intelligent Community Energy (ICE) project aims to design and implement innovative smart energy solutions for isolated territories in the Channel area. Islands and isolated communities face unique energy challenges. Many islands have no connection to wider electricity distribution systems and are dependent on imported energy supplies, typically fossil fuel driven. The energy systems that isolated communities depend on tend to be less reliable, more expensive and have more associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than mainland grid systems. In response to these problems, the ICE project considers the entire energy cycle, from production to consumption, and integrates new and established technologies in order to deliver innovative energy system solutions. These solutions will be implemented and tested at our unique pilot demonstration sites (Ushant island and the University of East Anglia’s campus), to demonstrate their feasibility and to develop a general model for isolated smart energy systems elsewhere. The ICE consortium brings together researcher and business support organisations in France and the UK, and engagement with SMEs will support project rollout and promote European cooperation. 3 Executive summary This report builds on the output generated in ICE reports T1.1.1 and T1.1.2 to assess the current generation and demand characteristics for the two target sites: the island of Ushant off Northwest France and the University of East Anglia campus in Norfolk, England.
    [Show full text]