The Impact of Ceramic Raw Materials on the Development of Hopewell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Ceramic Raw Materials on the Development of Hopewell The Impact of Ceramic Raw Materials on the Development of Hopewell and Preclassic Maya Pottery A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology of the College of Arts and Sciences by Dominique Sparks-Stokes May 2019 B.A. University of Cincinnati December 2017 Committee Chair: Kenneth Barnett Tankersley, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the role ceramic raw materials play in the technological development of pottery in two geographically separated regions, the Middle Woodland Hopewell in the Ohio River Valley and the Preclassic Maya in Lowland Belize. To this end, a suite of physical, mineralogical, and chemical analytical techniques including scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, and X-ray diffractometry is used to examine the ceramic raw material composition of pottery sherds from the Hopewell Twin Mounds Village site in southwestern Ohio and the Preclassic Maya Colha site in northeastern Belize. The Preclassic Maya pottery from the Colha site is technologically more advanced than Hopewell pottery from the Twin Mounds Village site in terms of hardness, porosity, and refractory properties such as thermal conductivity, resistance to thermal shock, and thermal decomposition. These ceramic properties result from the use of locally available volcanogenic clays at the Colha site. Comparable ceramic raw materials were unavailable to the Hopewell at the Twin Mounds Village site, which resulted in poorer quality pottery. ii iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Court Family Foundation and the Charles Phelps Taft Foundation supported this project. Dr. Fred Valdez, University of Texas, Austin provided pottery sherds from the Colha site in Belize, which was imperative to the completion of this work. Many thanks go to Department of Geology and Dr. Warren Huff for use of their instruments and assisting with X-ray Diffractometry analysis and Liquid separation. Gratitude goes to my loving friends and family for both mental and emotional support as I partook though this journey. The guidance and encouragement of Drs. Kenneth Barnett Tankersley and Sarah Jackson made this thesis possible. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………….……….….….ii Listing of Figures…………………………………………………….………...…...vii Listing of Tables………………………………………………………………….....ix Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2: Physical Properties of Pottery………………………...………………….7 Physical Properties of Clay…………………………………………………..7 Physical Properties of Pottery.……………………………………….….....10 Hardness………….…………………………………………….……....…..10 Strength……………………...…...…….………………..………….………11 Porosity…………. ……………………………………………….…….......12 Color……………………………...…….……………………….……...…..12 Firing Temperature………………………………………….……………...13 Texture…………….………………………………………….………....….14 Summary..………………………...…….………………….…………...…..15 Chapter 3: Archaeological Sites………….………………………………………...16 Colha……..…………………...…………………………….………………18 Twin Mounds……………………………………………….………………20 Summary…………….. ……..……………………………….……………..23 Chapter 4: Methods and Analyses..….…………………...……….…………...…...24 Pottery Sample………..…...……………………………….…………..…...25 Physical Properties….……..………………...………………………....…...25 Sample Preparation..………………………………………….…………….25 v Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS)…………………………...…….……………………………….…....29 Powder X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)....…………….……….…….....30 Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescent Spectrometry (ED-XRF)………......30 Summary…………………………...…….………………….………….…..31 Chapter 5: Results……….…………………………………..………...……….…...32 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)………………..…….……………...32 Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS)……………………..………...…...34 X-ray Diffractometry Analysis (XRD).……………….………….…...…....35 Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescent Spectrometry (ED-XRF).…………..38 Summary………….…………………………………………………....…...41 Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusion.………..…………………………….……..42 References Cited………………………………………………………..……….….45 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: The geographical locations of the Middle Woodland Hopewell Twin Mounds village and Preclassic Maya Colha site. Figure 2: The geologic setting of the Preclassic Maya Colha site relative to the source of volcanogenic clays (after Tankersley at al., 2011, 2016). Figure 3: The geologic setting of the Twin Mounds site relative to ceramic raw material source areas (after Dalby, 2007). Figure 4: Middle Woodland Hopewell pottery sherd sample from the Twin Mounds village site. Figure 5: Preclassic Maya pottery sherd sample from the Colha site. Figure 6: Photomicrographs of quartz, calcite, and clay minerals in sherds from the Colha site. Figure 7: Photomicrographs of quartz, calcite, and clay minerals in sherds from the Twin Mounds village site. Figure 8: SEM micrographs of temper raw materials from Hopewell pottery sherds from the Twin Mounds Village site. Figure 9: SEM micrographs of temper and paste raw materials from Preclassic Maya pottery sherds from the Colha site. Figure 10: XRD analysis of Hopewell pottery sherds from the Twin Mounds village site. Figure 11: XRD analysis of ceramic raw materials from the vicinity of the Twin Mounds village site. Figure 12: Mineralogical composition of clay minerals at the Twin Mounds Village site. vii Figure 13: XRD analysis of ceramic raw materials from the vicinity of the Colha site (after Tankersley et al., 2011, 2016). Figure 14: XRD analysis of Preclassic Maya pottery sherds from the vicinity of the Colha site. viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Radiocarbon dates obtained from the Colha and Twin Mounds Village sites. Table 2: Physical properties of Preclassic Maya and Middle Woodland Hopewell pottery sherds. Table 3: EDS analysis of Hopewell pottery sherds from the Twin Mounds village site. Table 4: EDS analysis of Preclassic Maya pottery sherds from the Colha site. Table 5: XRF analysis of major elements in Hopewell pottery sherds from Twin Mounds village site and Preclassic pottery sherds from the Colha site. Table 6: XRF analysis of pottery sherds from Twin Mounds village and Colha sites. ix Chapter 1: Introduction In 1959, Leslie White published a paradigm shifting anthropological theory in The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. Like its human biological counterpart, White believed that non-genetic culture also evolves. A primary aspect of his theory was the technological component of culture. He argued that technology was the driving force behind cultural evolution. White emphasized that the material, physical, and chemical aspects of technology provide humans with a means of survival and ultimately adaptation. White’s theory of cultural evolution drew upon the economic theoretical framework of Marxian economics. In particular, White focused on concept that the economic base determines the superstructure of society (i.e., political power structures, roles, state, etc.). In this perspective, the role of ceramic technology can be viewed as an important facet of a culture’s economic base, which in part determines the development of social superstructure. Ceramic raw material availability, quality, and their physical properties and chemical composition ultimately limit the level of the technological development of pottery. Consequently, the origin of pottery and its level of development vary in many parts of the world and at different points in times (Brown, 1989). Therefore, it is not surprising that the level of ceramic development corresponds to the level of a culture’s polity. That is, complex levels of ceramic technology are associated with more complex polities. Cross-culturally and pan-globally, the earliest pottery co-occurs with plant domestication and the need to store grain in insect-free containers. Food storage in ceramic containers was a crucial technological adaptation to increasing populations in environmentally or socially circumscribed regions. These subsistence and demographic changes are found in ceramic 1 technological innovations, class differences, and demands on labor (Goody, 1982:50153). Thus, understanding changes or differences in the development of ceramic technology are important indicators of changes in ancient subsistence economies (Barnett and Hoopes 1995; Mills, 1999; Arnold, 1999; Skibo and Blinman, 1999). With higher quality ceramic raw materials, greater technological developments could be made. In these situations, pottery played multiple and more complex roles in societies that went far beyond their subsistence functions. In complex polities, high-quality ceramic raw materials allowed pottery to enter exchange networks and became modes of social communications. Their new and differentiated roles in social communication were possible because of the physical and chemical properties of the ceramic raw materials (Stark, 1999). The accessibility and procurement of higher quality ceramic raw materials facilitated a shift from functional mundane pottery to elaborately decorated vessels in a structural hierarchy and status symbols in a complex polity, which communicates social strata, sacred values, and economically valued prestigious gifts (Stark, 1999). Anthropologically, the economics of ceramic production can be viewed as the cornerstone of the human livelihood in complex polities. In other words, understanding the modes of ceramic production is vital to our understanding of complex forms of social and political organization (Longacre, 1999). If the level
Recommended publications
  • The Function of a Middle Woodland Site in the Central Illinois Valley: a Ceramic Study of Ogden-Fettie
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 11-1-2013 The Function of a Middle Woodland Site in the Central Illinois Valley: A Ceramic Study of Ogden-Fettie Montana L. Martin Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Montana L., "The Function of a Middle Woodland Site in the Central Illinois Valley: A Ceramic Study of Ogden-Fettie" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 60. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/60 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FUNCTION OF A MIDDLE WOODLAND SITE IN THE CENTRAL ILLINOIS VALLEY: A CERAMIC STUDY OF OGDEN-FETTIE Fv196 Montana L. Martin 147 pages December 2013 Ogden-Fettie is a Middle Woodland Havana-Hopewell mound group in the Central Illinois Valley. Fv196 is the midden area near the largest mound. The function of Fv196 is in question, because it does not conform to the settlement and function models that have been applied to other sites. The ceramic collection from Fv196 was typed and categorized into categories based on perceived function, either habitation or ceremonial. The majority of the pottery belonged to the Havana series, which is traditionally considered habitation pottery; however, many of the Havana sherds are decorated indicating a ceremonial function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio
    " -.] + ** Mv U V • THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS OKSTACKS CENTRAL C is re- The person terial ibrary from sponsible foi • before the which it wa Latest Date oks are reasons Thoft, mutilation from i dismissal for dUclpllnary the University. 8400 TO RENEW CALL tANA-CHAMPAIGN UNIVERSITY OF :9 2001 13 200Z 8 2006 due date below 79521 L162 Mfc library OF THE wmm of Illinois <*» nB*n , »it*a faun OF HOPEWELL WORKS, ROSS COUNTY, OHIO 1 Field Museum of Natural History Publication 2 1 Anthropological Series Volume VI, No. 5 THE HOPEWELL MOUND GROUP OF OHIO By Warren K. Moorehead Curator of Museum of American Archaeology Phillips Academy, Andover, Mass. 48 Plates and 68 Text-Figures Berthold Laufer Curator of Anthropology Chicago 192: FA CONTENTS Page List of Illustrations 76 Preface 79 I. Work in the Hopewell»Mound Group 82 Relation of the Hopewell Group to Other Mound Groups 82 Detailed Description of the Hopewell Group 82 Clark's Work; North Fork of Paint Creek 83 Our Survey and Measurements ; Comments on Changes since 1845 86 Exploration of Mound No. 1 88 Exploration of Mound No. 17 90 Excavation of Mound No. 18 92 Excavation of Mound No. 19 94 Excavation of Mound No. 20 94 Excavation of Mound No. 21 95 Excavation of Mound No. 2 95 Excavation of Mound No. 24 96 Excavation of Mound No. 23 97 Excavation of Mound No. 3 and No. 9 101 Mound No. 5 102 Excavation of Mound No. 8 102 Mound No. 11 103 Excavation of Mound No. 25 103 II.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois
    LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY QF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 507 '• r CENTRAL CIRCULATION BOOKSTACKS The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its renewal or its return to the library from which it was borrowed on or before the Latest Date stamped below. You may be charged a minimum fee of $75.00 for each lost book. are reason* Thoft, imtfOaHM, and underlining of bck. dismissal from for dtelpltaary action and may result In TO RENEW CML TELEPHONE CENTER, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN APR 2003 MG 1 2 1997 AUG 2 4 2006 AUG 2 3 1999 AUG 13 1999 1ft 07 WO AU6 23 2000 9 10 .\ AUG 242000 Wh^^ie^i^ $$$ae, write new due date below previous due date. 1*162 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/archaeologicalsu10wint Howard D. Winters s AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OFTHE WABASH VALLEYin Illinois mmm* THE 3 1367 . \ Illinois State Museum STATE OF ILLINOIS Otto Kerner, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION John C. Watson, Director ILLINOIS STATE MUSEUM Milton D. Thompson, Museum Director REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS. No. 10 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE WABASH VALLEY IN ILLINOIS by Howard D. Winters Printed by Authority of the State of Illinois Springfield, Illinois 1967 BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS STATE MUSEUM Everett P. Coleman, M.D., Chairman Coleman Clinic, Canton Myers John C.Watson Albert Vice-President, Myers Bros. Director, Department of Springfield Registration and Education Sol Tax, Ph.D., Secretary William Sylvester White of Anthropology Professor Judge, Circuit Court Dean, University Extension Cook County, Chicago University of Chicago Leland Webber C.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Hopewell Meteorite Collecting : Context and Implicatiosn
    PREHISTORIC HOPEWELL METEORITE COLLECTING: CONTEXT AND IMPLICATIONS OLAF H. PRUFER Department of Humanities and Social Studies, Case Institute of Technology, Cleveland, Ohio INTRODUCTION This paper examines and evaluates the curious practice of meteorite collecting among the prehistoric Hopewell people of Eastern North America and, more specifically, of Ohio. The Hopewell culture complex, viewed in overall terms, covers a temporal range from approximately 400 B.C. to 400 A.D. It is not certain that this total range is applicable to the Ohio area, the center of Hopewell cultural intensity. There are indications that Ohio Hopewell began somewhat later and ended some- what earlier than other Hopewell manifestations (Prufer, 1961). The Hopewell complex represents one of the most highly-developed prehistoric cultures of Eastern North America. It is principally characterized by a tendency toward an extreme mortuary ceremonialism expressed in the construction of large and richly furnished burial mounds and earthworks. The entire ethos of Hopewell culture appears to have been directed toward this ceremonialism. Nearly all artistic efforts, special technological skills, and a far-flung trading network were devoted to providing goods to be ultimately deposited in burials. The dichotomy between the fabulous Hopewell burial mounds and their contents, and the unspectacular Hopewell village sites is sharply apparent, especially in Ohio and Illinois, where some of the great tumuli have yielded literally thousands of ceremonial objects. The production of such objects of high quality seems to have been the main interest of the Hopewellians. Part of this conspicuous collecting and mortuary disposal of wealth is a marked interest in exotic materials such as obsidian, from the Rockies or the Southwest, grizzly bear canine teeth from the Rockies, marine shells from Florida, native copper and silver from the Upper Great Lakes region, and mica from Virginia and the Carolinas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Havana Culture Late in the Archaic Period, Near the Confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers, Dramatic Cultural
    The Havana Culture Late in the Archaic Period, near the confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers, dramatic cultural changes occurred quickly. The area was occupied by the Prairie Lake people of the Red Ocher tradition, who lived in substantial villages on river bluffs above the floodplains. About 2,600 BP, pottery-making Marion groups from the north as well as Black Sand people from the south began settling the floodplains of the Illinois and Mississippi rivers. These immigrants had a profound influence on the local people, who soon abandoned their bluff based villages and Red Ochre cemetary burials. The intrusive immigrants lived in small hamlets on the floodplain. These hamlets have produced no evidence of their burials or mortuary activity, but they do contain the first pottery in Illinois. By 2,200 BP, the interaction of the Marion, Black Sand and Red Ocher cultures catalyzed rapid culture change and the beginning of the Havana culture. (Farnsworth 2009) Havana Hopewell By 2,100 BP, about 100 years after the Havana culture emerged, extensive mound building and Hopewellian mortuary ritual had begun. Eventually, the Havana built Hopewell mounds and ritual centers at ~ 9-12 mi. intervals in the floodplain along the river. Many ritual centers were associated with bluff-top villages with adjacent mounded cemeteries, suggesting some groups chose to continue some of the Red Ocher culture. (Farnsworth 2009; Griffin 1967) Ceramics The Havana developed a distinctive limestone temper ceramic technology and style. Their Fine Havana Zoned Stamped vessels are the first Hopewell pottery. Pots with distinctive decorations were later imported from Hopewell centers in Tennessee and Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Program
    Midwest Archaeological Conference November 4-6, 2015 - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Presentation Abstracts (Listed in Alphabetical order) [6] The Susceptibility of Wyandotte Chert to High Power Use-Wear Analysis ROBERT E. AHLRICHS (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) and KATHERINE STERNER-MILLER (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) During the Late Archaic to Early Woodland transition, caches of blue gray chert bifaces were deposited throughout the Midwest, often in association with burials. The types of analyses that can be conducted on these bifaces are restricted by NAGPRA. Specifically, cleaning of artifacts deemed necessary to conduct high power use-wear analysis is prohibited. An experiment testing three progressive levels of washing demonstrates that Wyandotte chert is fine-grained enough to display surface polishes from use even without intensive washing. The positive results of this experiment are then applied a sample of bifaces from the Riverside site in Michigan’s Upper Peninsu- la. [13] The Lichliter Site Project: A Model for Revealing Hidden Archaeological Collec- tions SARAH M. AISENBREY and WILLIAM E. KENNEDY (Dayton Society of Natural History) The DSNH is cataloging a large collection of archaeological artifacts from the Lichliter site, excavated in the 1960s, near Dayton, Ohio. The materials are from the Late Woodland, a poorly known time period in Ohio prehistory. Despite wide interest, no other professional had ever seen the artifacts, maps, or notes until the collection was returned in 2012. To accomplish deciphering and cataloging the site collection into a meaningful, cross-referenced database, the DSNH staff trained on QLC’s ArcheoLINK software. This project will serve as the first case study in applying ArcheoLINK as a collection management solution for archaeological research collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Woodland Ceramics of Northwestern Indiana and Western Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1981 Middle Woodland Ceramics of Northwestern Indiana and Western Michigan William L. Mangold Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Mangold, William L., "Middle Woodland Ceramics of Northwestern Indiana and Western Michigan" (1981). Master's Theses. 1757. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1757 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hi DOLE WOODLAND CERAMICS OF NORTHWESTERN INDIANA AND WESTERN MICHIGAN by W il1iam L. Mangold A Thesi s Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 1981 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. MIDDLE WOODLAND CERAMICS OF NORTHWESTERN INDIANA AND WESTERN MICHIGAN William L. Mangold, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1981 Much information regarding the Middle V/oodland occupation of northwestern Indiana and western Michigan has been recovered since the d efin itio n of the Goodall Focus by Quimby(19^1a). The object of this report is to undertake a detailed stylistic analysis of the ceramic assemblages from Middle Woodland sites, including the vessels used to establish the Goodall Focus, in order to elucidate Middle Woodland cultural relationships within this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopewell Newsletter- June 2010
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 6-2010 Hopewell Newsletter- June 2010 Erin C. Dempsey National Park Service, [email protected] Jennifer Pederson Weinberger National Park Service, [email protected] Kathy Brady National Park Service Amanda J. Landon Washington University in St. Louis, [email protected] Ann Bauermeister National Park Service, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark Dempsey, Erin C.; Pederson Weinberger, Jennifer; Brady, Kathy; Landon, Amanda J.; Bauermeister, Ann; and DeVore, Steven L., "Hopewell Newsletter- June 2010" (2010). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 74. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/74 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Erin C. Dempsey, Jennifer Pederson Weinberger, Kathy Brady, Amanda J. Landon, Ann Bauermeister, and Steven L. DeVore This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ natlpark/74 1. SMALL SCALE GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF EARTHEN WALL CONSTRUCTION AT THE HOPETON EARTHWORKS (33RO26) By Erin C. Dempsey Several geoarchaeological and geophysical investigations have been conducted at the Hopeton Earthworks (33RO26) and met with good success (Figure 1). As such, soil cores excavated in the summer of 2007 were studied using a two-pronged methodology of soil profile characterization and magnetic susceptibility testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas
    Number 4, 2003 Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 4 2003 Contents Title and Author(s) Page 14SD351, A Possible Keith Variant Burial - Robert J. Hoard, Michael Finnegan, Timothy Weston, and Randall Thies 1 Testing at the Vincent-Donovan Site, 2003 - Shannon R. Ryan, Kale M. Bruner, and Jack L. Hofman 9 Kansas Archaeological Field School Investigations at the Warne and Johns Creek Sites, Lovewell Reservoir, Jewell County, Kansas – Brad Logan and Lauren W. Ritterbush 11 Archeology of Site 14ML417 – Mark A.. Latham 16 Great Bend Archaeobotanical Remains – Mary J. Adair 22 Implications of the Ceramic Assemblage in the Whiteford Site (14SA1, the Indian Burial Pit) – Donna C. Roper 24 Archaeological Investigations at the Evans Locality, Stranger Creek Valley, Northeastern Kansas – Brad Logan 34 Kansas Archaeological Training Program Field School, 2003 – Virginia A. Wulfkuhle 44 The 2003 Odyssey/KATP Excavations at the Claussen Site (14WB322) – Chris Widga and Jack L. Hofman 45 14WB322 Upper Component – Donna C. Roper 48 The Survey – Martin Stein 50 Pitfalls in Typological Classification and Pattern Recognition Research: A Case Study Involving Two Paleoindian Projectile Point Isolates from Kansas - Janice McLean 51 1 Current Archaeology in Kansas 2 Number 4, 2003 14SD351, A Possible Keith Variant Burial Robert J. Hoard, Michael Finnegan, Timothy Weston, and Randall Thies Introduction In January 2003, a hunter found bone Excavation of the Burial eroding from a cut bank of a wash leading Hoard, Thies, Rowlison and Dan Kysar of directly to Museum Creek in Sheridan County. Palco, Kansas carried out excavation on The property is a walk-in hunting area, open Saturday, February 1, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Archeological Survey Highlighted Sites by County
    OKLAHOMA ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTED SITES BY COUNTY Content created 1998-2002 by Oklahoma Archeological Survey Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS Adair County ................................................................................................................................... 4 Alfalfa County ................................................................................................................................ 6 Atoka County .................................................................................................................................. 9 Beaver County .............................................................................................................................. 11 Beckham County ........................................................................................................................... 12 Blaine County ............................................................................................................................... 14 Bryan County ................................................................................................................................ 16 Caddo County ............................................................................................................................... 19 Canadian County ........................................................................................................................... 21 Cherokee County .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Exchange and Interaction at the Crystal River Site (8CI1), Florida Kassie Christine Kemp University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 10-29-2015 Pottery Exchange and Interaction at the Crystal River Site (8CI1), Florida Kassie Christine Kemp University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Indigenous Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kemp, Kassie Christine, "Pottery Exchange and Interaction at the Crystal River Site (8CI1), Florida" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5971 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pottery Exchange and Interaction at the Crystal River Site (8CI1), Florida by Kassie C. Kemp A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a concentration in Cultural Resource Management Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Ph.D. Brent R. Weisman, Ph.D. Robert H. Tykot, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 29, 2015 Keywords: ceramic analysis, INAA, gross paste analysis, vessel form and function, communities of practice, mound complex, Woodland Period, Florida archaeology Copyright © 2015, Kassie C. Kemp DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my professors, coworkers, family, and friends who supported me throughout my academic endeavors. A special thanks to my wolf pack for keeping me motivated throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 2 Ch. 2 Havana-Hopewellian Cultural Dynamics in West Michigan and Northwest Indiana
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond The University of Akron Press 2020 Vol. 2 Ch. 2 Havana-Hopewellian Cultural Dynamics in West Michigan and Northwest Indiana Jeff Chivis Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/encountering_hopewell Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Chivis, Jeff, "Vol. 2 Ch. 2 Havana-Hopewellian Cultural Dynamics in West Michigan and Northwest Indiana" (2020). Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond. 12. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/encountering_hopewell/12 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by The University of Akron Press at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Chapter 2 Havana-Hopewellian Cultural Dynamics in West Michigan and Northwest Indiana Jeff Chivis revious Hopewell research within west Michigan and northwest Indiana has revolved around several pertinent (and often contested) issues: the central mechanism responsible for the introduction of Havana-Hopewell Pinto the study region, the ambiguous cultural affiliations and importance of sites in the Kalamazoo and St. Joseph River Valleys in west Michigan, and the role of burial mounds in the potential integration of Hopewell-related peoples within the study region and beyond.
    [Show full text]