DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Archeological Survey Highlighted Sites by County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Archeological Survey Highlighted Sites by County OKLAHOMA ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTED SITES BY COUNTY Content created 1998-2002 by Oklahoma Archeological Survey Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS Adair County ................................................................................................................................... 4 Alfalfa County ................................................................................................................................ 6 Atoka County .................................................................................................................................. 9 Beaver County .............................................................................................................................. 11 Beckham County ........................................................................................................................... 12 Blaine County ............................................................................................................................... 14 Bryan County ................................................................................................................................ 16 Caddo County ............................................................................................................................... 19 Canadian County ........................................................................................................................... 21 Cherokee County .......................................................................................................................... 23 Choctaw County............................................................................................................................ 25 Cimarron County .......................................................................................................................... 28 Cleveland County.......................................................................................................................... 31 Coal County .................................................................................................................................. 33 Comanche County ......................................................................................................................... 35 Craig County ................................................................................................................................. 37 Custer County ............................................................................................................................... 40 Delaware County .......................................................................................................................... 42 Dewey County .............................................................................................................................. 45 Garfield County ............................................................................................................................ 48 Garvin County ............................................................................................................................... 50 Grady County ................................................................................................................................ 52 Grant County ................................................................................................................................. 54 Harper County ............................................................................................................................... 57 Haskell County.............................................................................................................................. 60 Hughes County.............................................................................................................................. 62 Jackson County ............................................................................................................................. 64 Jefferson County ........................................................................................................................... 66 Johnston County............................................................................................................................ 68 2 Kay County ................................................................................................................................... 70 Kiowa County ............................................................................................................................... 72 Latimer County ............................................................................................................................. 74 LeFlore County ............................................................................................................................. 76 Love County.................................................................................................................................. 78 Marshall County............................................................................................................................ 80 McClain County ............................................................................................................................ 84 McCurtain County ........................................................................................................................ 87 McIntosh County .......................................................................................................................... 89 Murray County .............................................................................................................................. 92 Nowata County ............................................................................................................................. 94 Oklahoma County ......................................................................................................................... 96 Osage County ................................................................................................................................ 98 Ottawa County ............................................................................................................................ 100 Payne County .............................................................................................................................. 103 Pontotoc County.......................................................................................................................... 105 Pottawatomie County .................................................................................................................. 106 Pushmataha County .................................................................................................................... 108 Roger Mills County..................................................................................................................... 111 Rogers County ............................................................................................................................ 113 Seminole County ......................................................................................................................... 116 Sequoyah County ........................................................................................................................ 118 Texas County .............................................................................................................................. 120 Tulsa County ............................................................................................................................... 122 Wagoner County ......................................................................................................................... 125 Washington County .................................................................................................................... 127 Washita County ........................................................................................................................... 128 Woods County ............................................................................................................................ 130 3 Adair County The Owl Cave Site Woodward Engraved pottery sherds from Owl Cave (photo courtesy Oklahoma Anthropological Society) Owl Cave, near Sallisaw Creek in Adair County, is a 70' x 20' cave which sheltered people for over a thousand years. The site came to the attention of archaeologists in 1963 when the cave's landowner discovered pothunters digging in the cave and disturbing human burials there. Current laws in the state of Oklahoma make this activity illegal, but at the time the only recourse was to run the diggers off the property. Salvage excavations at the site by Oklahoma Anthropological Society volunteers revealed fairly extensive disturbance by pothunters. Signs of centuries of human habitation had been left in 18" - 22" of soil. Recovered artifacts included projectile points which may date as early as the Archaic period and pottery which may relate to the Mississippian period (for a Flash presentation of the time periods in Oklahoma's prehistory, click here). Pottery sherds like those shown above all appear to have come from one vessel and show design elements like the apparent bird claw in the sherd in the upper right hand part of the photograph. Unfortunately, the pothunter's disturbance of the archaeological context resulted in the loss of most of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildlife Habitat in Oklahoma Territory and the Chickasaw Nation, Circa 1870
    W 2800.7 F293 no. T-17-P-1 6/04-12/07 c.1 FINAL PERFORMA1~CEREPORT OKL.AHOMA o "7JLDLIFE HABITAT IN OKLAHOMA TERRITORY AND THE CmCKASAW NATION, CIRCA 1870 . OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION June 1, 2004 through December 31,2007 Grant Tide: Wildlife Habitat in Oklahoma Territory and the Chickasaw Nation, circa 1870 Principal Investiga!or: Bruce Hoagland . '. Abstract: Habitat loss is the greatest threat facing wildlife species. This project created a land cover map of Oklahoma using General Land Office plats circa 1871. Such maps provide both a snapshot of past habitat conditions and a baseline for comparison with the modern distribution of wildlife habitat. General Land Office plats were acquired from the Archives Division of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries, georeferenced and digitized. Plat features were categorized as hydrology, transportation, land cover, or settlement. Each of these categories were further subdivided. For example, land cover consisted of natural (i.e., grassland, forests, etc.) and agricultural (cultivated lands, orchards, etc.). A total of 1,348 plats were digitized and joined into a comprehensive map. Grassland (6.2 million hectares) was the most extensive land cover type, followed by forest-woodland (2.6 million hectares). A sawmill, two lime kilns, a sandstone quarry, and several stores are examples of settlement features encountered. Land in cultivation was 7,600 hectares, and several named ranches were present. Future studies should include comparisons between the 1870s map and modern data sources such as the Gap Analysis map in order to quantify habitat change. Introduction: Habitat loss is the greatest threat facing wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas
    Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 3 2002 Contents Title and Author(s) Page Empty Quarter Archaeology — Donald J. Blakeslee and David T. Hughes 1 What Lies Beneath: Archeological Investigation of Two Deeply Buried Sites in the Whitewater River Basin — C. Tod Bevitt 5 Ongoing Investigations of the Plains Woodland in Central Kansas — Mark A. Latham 9 A High-Power Use-Wear Analysis of Stone Tools Recovered from 14DO417 — William E. Banks 14 Archaeological Investigation of the Scott Site House (14LV1082) Stranger Creek Valley, Northeastern Kansas, A Progress Report — Brad Logan 20 Kansas Archeology Training Program Field School, 2002 — Virginia A. Wulfkuhle 25 Spatial Variability in Central Plains Tradition Lodges — Donna C. Roper 27 Hit and Run: Preliminary Results of Phase III Test Excavations at 14HO308, a Stratified, Multicomponent, Late Prehistoric Site in Southwest Kansas — C. Tod Bevitt 35 Building a Regional Chronology for Southeast Kansas — H.C. Smith 39 Geoarchaeological Survey of Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge, Northwestern Kansas: Application of GIS Method — Brad Logan, William C. Johnson, and Joshua S. Campbell 44 An Update on the Museum of Anthropology — Mary J. Adair 50 Research Notes: Ceramic Sourcing Study Grant Received — Robert J. Hoard 51 Wallace County Research — Janice A. McLean 52 Another Pawnee Site in Kansas? — Donna C. Roper 53 1 2 Empty Quarter Archaeology Donald J. Blakeslee, Wichita State University David T. Hughes, Wichita State University covered most of the upper end. Furthermore, wind erosion has also created a zone around the When a small survey fails to reveal any lake in which it would be nearly impossible to archaeological sites, it is unusual for someone locate sites even if they were present.
    [Show full text]
  • OSU-Tulsa Library Michael Wallis Papers the Real Wild West Writings
    OSU-Tulsa Library Michael Wallis papers The Real Wild West Rev. July 2013 Writings 1:1 Typed draft book proposals, overviews and chapter summaries, prologue, introduction, chronologies, all in several versions. Letter from Wallis to Robert Weil (St. Martin’s Press) in reference to Wallis’s reasons for writing the book. 24 Feb 1990. 1:2 Version 1A: “The Making of the West: From Sagebrush to Silverscreen.” 19p. 1:3 Version 1B, 28p. 1:4 Version 1C, 75p. 1:5 Version 2A, 37p. 1:6 Version 2B, 56p. 1:7 Version 2C, marked as final draft, circa 12 Dec 1990. 56p. 1:8 Version 3A: “The Making of the West: From Sagebrush to Silverscreen. The Story of the Miller Brothers’ 101 Ranch Empire…” 55p. 1:9 Version 3B, 46p. 1:10 Version 4: “The Read Wild West. Saturday’s Heroes: From Sagebrush to Silverscreen.” 37p. 1:11 Version 5: “The Real Wild West: The Story of the 101 Ranch.” 8p. 1:12 Version 6A: “The Real Wild West: The Story of the Miller Brothers and the 101 Ranch.” 25p. 1:13 Version 6B, 4p. 1:14 Version 6C, 26p. 1:15 Typed draft list of sidebars and songs, 2p. Another list of proposed titles of sidebars and songs, 6p. 1:16 Introduction, a different version from the one used in Version 1 draft of text, 5p. 1:17 Version 1: “The Hundred and 101. The True Story of the Men and Women Who Created ‘The Real Wild West.’” Early typed draft text with handwritten revisions and notations. Includes title page, Dedication, Epigraph, with text and accompanying portraits and references.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imagined West
    CHAPTER 21 The Imagined West FOR more than a century the American West has been the most strongly imagined section of the United States. The West of Anglo American pioneers and Indians began reimagining itself before the conquest of the area was fully complete. In the late nineteenth century, Sitting Bull and Indians who would later fight at Wounded Knee toured Europe and the United States with Buffalo Bill in his Wild West shows. They etched vivid images of Indian fights and buffalo hunts into the imaginations of hundreds of thousands of people. The ceremonials of the Pueblos became tourist attractions even while the Bureau of Indian Affairs and missionaries struggled to abolish them. Stories about the West evolved into a particular genre, the Western, which first as novels and later as films became a defining element of American popular culture. By 1958, Westerns comprised about 11 percent of all works of fiction pubHshed in the United States, and Hollywood turned out a Western movie every week. In 1959 thirty prime-time television shows, induding eight of the ten most watched, were Westerns. Mid-twentieth-century Americans consumed such enormous quantities of imagined adventures set in the West that one might suspect the decline of the Western in the 1970s and 1980s resulted from nothing more than a severe case of cultural indigestion. This gluttonous consumption of fictions about the West is, however, only part of the story. Americans have also actively imagined their own Wests. A century of American children grew up imagining themselves to be cowboys and Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Line Volume Iii Caddo Indians: the Final Years
    BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS Jim Tiller Copyright © 2013 by Jim Tiller All rights reserved Bound versions of this book have been deposited at the following locations: Louisiana State University, Shreveport (Shreveport, Louisiana) Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Texas) Stephen F. Austin State University (Nacogdoches, Texas) Texas A&M University (College Station, Texas) Texas General Land Office (Archives and Records) (Austin, Texas) Texas State Library (Austin, Texas) University of North Texas (Denton, Texas) University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) To view a pdf of selected pages of this and other works by Jim Tiller, see: http://library.shsu.edu > Digital Collection > search for: Jim Tiller Electronic versions of Vol. I, II and III as well as a limited number of bound sets of the Before the Line series are available from: The Director, Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University, PO Box 2281 (1830 Bobby K. Marks Drive), Huntsville, Texas 77341 Phone: 936-294-1613 Design and production by Nancy T. Tiller The text typefaces are Adobe Caslon Pro and Myriad Pro ISBN 978-0-9633100-6-4 iv For the People of the Caddo Nation Also by Jim Tiller Our American Adventure: The History of a Pioneer East Texas Family, 1657-1967(2008) (with Albert Wayne Tiller) Named Best Family History Book by a Non-Professional Genealogist for 2008 by the Texas State Genealogical Society Before the Line Volume I An Annotated Atlas of International Boundaries and Republic of Texas Administrative Units Along the Sabine River-Caddo Lake Borderland, 1803-1841 (2010) Before the Line Volume II Letters From the Red River, 1809-1842 (2012) Jehiel Brooks and the Grappe Reservation: The Archival Record (working manuscript) vi CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES Michael D. Ciani The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ciani, Michael D., "THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4218. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4218 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES By Michael David Ciani B.A. Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2012 A.S. Historic Preservation, College of the Redwoods, Eureka, CA, 2006 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Anthropology Dr. Anna M. Prentiss Anthropology Dr. Christopher Servheen Forestry and Conservation Ciani, Michael, M.A., May 2014 Major Anthropology The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Combates Mas Fuertes De Este Ano En, Corea
    í P í READ EL T "EL TUCSONENSE" : El máa antlfn "ii Tha Southwesr and finest News- Con notlolaa hut d otitmb Vminuto; paper printed In Spanish, Is published y. artículos de tn lereA i m turna por Semi-Weekl- I unificación y iriaUd yaiftmeri- - EL TUCSONENSE Is delcated to an unity and friendships up-t- o data, with articles of interest. Ano XXXVI Númer0 134 Viernes, 13 de Junio de 1952 VL Números del nía 5c Atrasados Ule COMBATES MAS FUERTES DE ESTE ANO EN, COREA Mr. Harriman Tucson GENERAL QUE VIOLA UNA NINA Por Fortuna, en Los Nuestros PROGRAMA MAÑANA, DEL Logran Varías CANDIDATO En Agua Prieta, Victorias ! 'DIA DE LA BANDERA" EN TUCSON DEMOCRATA A Sonora, Huye Al 9 MILLONES DE GENTE DE A LAS 8 DE LOS ELKS SEOUL, PM, PRESIDENTE Lado Americano Corea, Viernes Junio 13 Toda esta semana, de día y de En prensa diaria de Nogales, noche, lia hab.do mas fuertes com-oat- es En Paseo Redondo se dan los detalles completos, HADLA en Corea que en cualesqui- el lúnes de esta semana, acerca HISPANA EN era otro periodo E.U.! similar de esta Del de quo el General Alberto Ortega año. Cerco Centro y Ortega, que venia actuando en Furiosos combates en el frente Agua Prieta, Sonora, como Jefe de central al suroeste de Kimsong, los Admisión Gratis Policía, 'huyó al lado americano LATINOS CON EISENHOWER, A 15 Millas De aliados con lanza-llam- arroja- tras de violar a un niña de menos ron a cientos de norcoreanos y catorce años Se Invita a Ud.
    [Show full text]
  • Besant Beginnings at the Fincastle Site: a Late Middle Prehistoric Comparative Study on the Northern Plains
    BESANT BEGINNINGS AT THE FINCASTLE SITE: A LATE MIDDLE PREHISTORIC COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE NORTHERN PLAINS CHRISTINE (CHRISSY) FOREMAN B.A., University of Lethbridge, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Geography University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Christine Foreman, 2010 Abstract The Fincastle Bison Kill Site (DlOx-5), located approximately 100 km east of Lethbridge, Alberta, has been radiocarbon dated to 2 500 BP. Excavations at the site yielded an extensive assemblage of lithics and faunal remains, and several unique features. The elongated point forms, along with the bone upright features, appeared similar to those found at Sonota sites within the Dakota region that dated between 1 950 BP and 1 350 BP. The relatively early date of the Fincastle Site prompted a re- investigation into the origins of the Besant Culture. The features, faunal and lithic assemblages from twenty-three Late Middle Prehistoric sites in Southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, Montana, Wyoming, and the Dakotas were analyzed and compared. The findings show that Fincastle represents an early component of the Besant Culture referred to as the Outlook Complex. This analysis also suggests a possible Middle Missouri origin of the Fincastle hunters, as well as the entire Besant Culture. iii Acknowledgments The last two years have been the most exhilarating and rewarding of my life. For this I have so many people to thank. First, I would like to thank my parents. They have been and continue to be extremely supportive of my academic and career choices, and they taught me to take pride in my work, follow my dreams and argue my opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Chesrow Complex (Older Than Clovis?) in Southeast Wisconsin Matthew Allen Neff Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2015 An assessment of the Chesrow complex (older than Clovis?) in southeast Wisconsin Matthew Allen Neff Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Neff, Matthew Allen, "An assessment of the Chesrow complex (older than Clovis?) in southeast Wisconsin" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 14534. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14534 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Assessment of the Chesrow Complex (Older Than Clovis?) in Southeast Wisconsin by Matthew Allen Neff A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: Anthropology Program of Study Committee: Matthew G. Hill Grant Arndt Alan D. Wanamaker, Jr. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2015 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FLINT HILLS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE March 26-27, 2004 PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS
    Twenty-Sixth Annual FLINT HILLS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE March 26-27, 2004 PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS Hosted by the St. Joseph Museum, St. Joseph, Missouri in cooperation with the Pony Express National Memorial and the St. Joseph Archaeological Society Cover Photography—A King Hill Excavation Scenes from a University of Nebraska excavation at the King Hill site, 23BN1, in southern St. Joseph, Missouri. Photography by Jim D. Feagins (summer of 1972). Note the museum display on the King Hill site at the Friday reception. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> King Hill, an Oneota Village in St. Joseph, Missouri The King Hill archaeological site is located on a high, loess-covered bluff overlooking the Missouri River valley in the southern part of the city of St. Joseph, Missouri. The King Hill village location contains cultural materials associated with the Fanning Phase (Henning 1998:391-393) a protohistoric/early historic Oneota occupation. This Oneota site is thought to probably represent an early Kansa (Kaw) Indian site (Henning 1970:146, 1993:258; Wedel 1959:17; Ruppert 1974:2). Based on the artifacts recovered, it is felt to have been occupied around A.D. 1700 or very shortly thereafter. The Oneota first appeared in the midwest about a thousand years ago. They inhabited an area that stretched from central Missouri to northern Wisconsin and from northeastern Kansas and eastern Nebraska to southwestern Michigan. They are thought to have developed into a number of historic tribes such as the Kansa, Ioway, Missouri, Omaha, Winnebago, Oto, and others, possibly the Osage. At King Hill, the Oneota women made globular-shaped, shell-tempered pottery, usually with high flaring-rims.
    [Show full text]
  • Washita Basin Project Oklahoma
    Washita Basin Project Oklahoma James M. Bailey, Ph.D. Bureau of Reclamation 2008 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. 1 Washita Basin Project ...................................................................................................... 2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................. 3 Prehistoric and Historic Setting .................................................................................. 4 Project Investigation and Authorization .................................................................. 11 Project Construction................................................................................................... 16 Uses of Project Water ................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 32 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 33 Index................................................................................................................................. 35 1 Washita Basin Project Located adjacent to America’s arid west/humid east division line known as the 100th meridian, western Oklahoma’s rolling uplands are susceptible to unpredictable weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • How Historical Myths Are Born ...And Why They Seldom
    A depiction of La Salle's Texas settlement from Carlos Castañeda's Our Catholic Heritage in Texas (volume l) bearing the misnomer "Fort Saint Louis." How Historical Myths Are Born . And Why They Seldom Die* BY DONALD E. CHIPMAN AND ROBERT S. WEDDLE* Introduction HEN CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS MADE HIS FIRST LANDFALL ON the fringe of North America, he believed he had reached the WEast Indies. He therefore called the strange people he met "Indians," a name that came to be applied to all American indigenes. In similar manner, inappropriate names—or names misapplied—have risen all across the Americas. When one of these historical errors arises, it takes on a life of its own, though not without a healthy boost from us historians. Historians, of course, come in all stripes, and so do the myths they espouse. Somedmes the most egregious of them may result from the purest intentions. But there is no denying that others are born of impure motives, of which the most prevalent perhaps is chauvinism—bending his- tory out of shape by falsely linking some major historic episode to one's native province. Mostly, however, such miscues arise from the urgency to provide answers—an explanation, a name, or an opinion—before the facts at hand justify it. For example, consider the various identities posited for the river shown on the famous "Pineda" map sketch (ca. 1519) as El Rio del Espíritu Santo. Was it the Mississippi as it has been long thought to be, or some other stream, perhaps as far east as Florida or as far west as Texas? Still * Donald E.
    [Show full text]