DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Marksville Phases in the Lower Mississippi Valley: a Study of Culture Contact Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Marksville Phases in the Lower Mississippi Valley: a Study of Culture Contact Dynamics Archaeological Report No. 21 EARLY MARKSVILLE PHASES IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: A STUDY OF CULTURE CONTACT DYNAMICS EDWIN ALAN TOTH MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY In Cooperation with THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI SURVEY, HARVARD UNIVERSITY Jackson 1988 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 21 Patricia Kay Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director The Mississippi Department of Archives and History is in­ debted to the Lower Mississippi Survey, Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard Uni­ versity, both for permission to publish this work and for a grant to aid in its publication. LMS LOWER MISSISSIPPI SURVEY This publication is essentially unchanged from the original dissertation prepared by the author in 1977. The editor has adjusted punctuation, removed typographic errors. ex­ punged stylistic infelicities, and made the manuscript con­ form to series style. Typeset by Altamese Wash Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 88-620-839 ISBN: 0-938896-54-7 Copyright 1988 Mississippi Department of Archives and History CONTENTS Foreword by Samuel O. Brookes ix Author's Preface. 1977 xv Abstract xvii Introduction 3 Chapter I. Requisite Background Perspectives for a Marksville Synthesis 9 The Geographical Setting 9 History of Marksville Period Archaeology 13 Some Thoughts on Method and Theory 16 Chapter II. The Tchefuncte Base 19 Lake Cormorant Considerations 19 Tchefuncte Culture _ 21 Chapter III. The Hopewellian Intrusion 29 Conical Mounds 29 Ceramic Parallels 42 Hopewellian Status-Related Artifacts 50 Imported Copper Products 51 Local Duplication in Clay 56 Exotic Raw Materials _ 65 The Dynamics of Hopewellian Contact 70 Chapter N. Early Marksville Synthesis 74 La Plant Phase 74 La Plant 74 St. Johns 77 Other La Plant Phase Components 81 The La Plant Ceramic SeL 83 Turnage Phase 83 Helena Phase 83 Helena Crossing 85 Bowie 87 Burns and De Rossetts 88 Moore 88 Other Helena Components 88 The Helena Ceramic Set 89 Dorr Phase 89 Dorr and Oliver 91 iv Archaeological Report No. 21, 1988 Aderholt 93 Acree 93 Rochdale 96 Dickerson 99 Fant and Rudyard 105 Aust #2 107 Vaught 107 Allen #4 107 Brahan #2 109 Martin #1 112 Norflett 116 Boyd 118 Swan Lake 119 Eagle's Nest #1 120 Tackett 120 Norman 124 Yandle 129 Other Dorr Components 129 The Dorr Ceramic Set. 130 Twin Lakes Phase 132 Twin Lakes 132 White 134 Blue Lake 135 Denton 135 Beaver Dam Place 135 Other Twin Lakes Components 135 The Twin Lakes Ceramic Set.. 135 Kirk Phase 136 Kirk 138 Silver Lake 141 Shields 141 Joe Smith 142 Boles Lake 142 Armstrong 144 Gray 144 Other Kirk Components 144 The Kirk Ceramic Set 145 Anderson Landing Phase 145 Anderson Landing 148 Trammel 150 Mabin 150 Lake George 151 Spanish Fort 152 Erickson 152 Reaver Brown and Love 153 Bee Lake 153 Tchula Lake 153 laketown 153 Montgomery 155 Polk 156 Murphy 156 Contents v Palusha Creek 156 Beaked Bird 156 Phillipi 157 Other Anderson Landing Components 157 The Anderson Landing Ceramic Set... 159 Point Lake Phase 159 Point Lake 161 Mansford Plantation 166 Transylvania 173 Hill Bayou 173 Panther Lake 173 Lake Place 174 Canebrake 174 Kimbal. 175 Other Point Lake Components 175 The Point Lake Ceramic Set 176 Grand Gulf Phase 176 Grand Gulf 178 Catledge 181 Pumpkin Lake 181 Blueskin Creek 181 Foster 181 Sardine 181 Sun Oil 182 Other Grand Gulf Components 182 The Grand Gulf Ceramic Set.. 182 Marksville Phase 184 Marksville 184 McGuffee 189 Crooks 189 Coles Island 191 Wiley 193 Monda 193 Mayer Place 193 Saline Point 194 Other Marksville Components 195 The Marksville Ceramic Set 195 Smithfield Phase 196 Smithfield 196 Monks 203 Medora 207 Bayou Goula 209 Other Smithfield Components 209 The Smithfield Ceramic Set 209 Conclusion 211 Bibliography 215 Appendix I: Early Marksville Types and Varieties 223 vi Archaeological Report No. 21, 1988 Appendix II: Standard State Site Numbers for Sites Mentioned in the Text 235 LIST OF TABLES 1. Burial distribution in Marksville Mound 4 35 2. Distribution of status-related artifacts 52 3. Ceramic counts, La Plant site 76 4. Ceramic counts, St. Johns site 78 5. Ceramic counts, New Madrid County, Missouri 82 6. Ceramic counts, Acree site 94 7. Ceramic counts, Rochdale site 97 8. Ceramic counts, Dickerson site 100 9. Ceramic counts, Fant site 105 10. Ceramic counts, Allen #4 109 11. Ceramic counts, Brahan #2 110 12. Ceramic counts, Martin #1 113 13. Ceramics from excavated pits at Martin #1 115 14. Ceramic counts, Norflett 116 15. Ceramic counts, Swan Lake 119 16. Ceramic counts, Tackett 121 17. Ceramic counts, Denton 136 18. Ceramic counts, Kirk 139 19. Ceramic counts, Point Lake 162 20. Ceramic counts, Mansford surface collection 169 21. Ceramic counts, Mansford Test Pit #1 171 22. Ceramic counts, Kimbal 175 23. Typological refinements, early Marksville ceramics 185 24. Ceramic counts, Smithfield surface collections 201 25. Ceramic counts, Smithfield excavated units 204 26. Ceramic counts, Monks 207 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Physiographic map of the Lower Mississippi Valley 10 2. Tchefuncte site distribution 22 3. Conical mound distribution 32 4. Distribution of early Marksville ceramics 43 5. La Plant phase distribution 75 6. Helena phase distribution 84 7. Dorr phase distribution 90 8. Twin Lakes phase distribution 131 9. Kirk phase distribution 137 10. Anderson Landing phase distribution 146 11. Point Lake phase distribution 160 12. Grand Gulf phase distribution 177 13. Marksville phase distribution 183 14. Smithfield phase distribution 197 15. Smithfield site map 198 Contents vii 16. Profiles, Smithfield Test Pit 3 205 17. Profiles, Smithfield Test Pit 4 206 LIST OF PLATES I. Tchefuncte ceramics from Norman 24 II. Lower Valley conical mounds 30 III. Whole vessel comparisons 46 IV. Lower Valley platform pipes 58 V. Lower Valley ceramic figurines 62 VI. Greenstone celts 69 VII. St. Johns ceramics 79 VIII. Dorr and Oliver artifacts 92 IX. Acree artifacts 95 X. Rochdale artifacts 98 XI. Dickerson ceramics 102 XII. Dickerson artifacts 103 XIII. Fant and Rudyard artifacts 106 XIV. Aust #2 and Allen #4 artifacts 108 XV. Brahan #2 ceramics 111 XVI. Martin #1 ceramics 114 XVII. Norflett and Swan Lake artifacts 117 XVIII. Tackett ceramics 122 XIX. Tackett ceramics 123 XX. Norman ceramics 125 XXI. Norman ceramics 127 XXII. Ceramics from selected Twin Lakes sites 133 XXIII. Kirk ceramics 140 XXIV. Boles Lake and Armstrong ceramics 143 XXV. Trammel, Mabin and Lake George ceramics 149 XXVI. Bee Lake, Jaketown, Polk and Murphy ceramics 154 XXVII. Point Lake ceramics 163 XXVIII. Point Lake artifacts 165 XXIX. Mansford artifacts 167 XXX. Ceramics from selected Point Lake sites 172 XXXI. Ceramics from Grand Gulf and related sites 179 XXXII. Marksville artifacts 186 XXXIII. Excavated lithics, Marksville mounds 188 XXXIV. Excavated lithics, Marksville village area 190 XXXV. Marksville phase vessels 192 XXXVI. Smithfield ceramics 199 XXXVII. Smithfield artifacts 202 XXXVIII. Monks, Medora and Bayou Goula ceramics 208 Foreword The summer of 1972 was a very special Stu was not at Fatherland but Dotty time for me. I had been hired along with Byron Gibbens was and she gave us a tour of the site. Inmon by the Mississippi Department of Steve then drove us to the Fatherland lab and Archives and History to conduct an archaeolog­ we met Stu. The afternoon was spent discussing ical survey of Claiborne County, Mississippi. Dr. sites and listening to Stu's tales. I did find time McLemore and Elbert Hilliard seemed pleased to show them the sherds and they agreed with a with their new archaeologists--especially Byron. Marksville designation for all of them. Steve as he didn't wear a beard. Within the next two told me I needed to talk with Alan Toth, a weeks I had charged lobster to the state and had graduate student interested in Marksville. I fi­ gotten arrested for driving a commercial vehicle nally met Alan at the Memphis SEAC meeting on the Natchez Trace Parkway. My career at in 1973. Alan photographed the Grand Gulf MDAH was off to an inauspicious beginning--a vessels and we discussed type/ variety and paste portent of things to come. long into the night. At that time Alan and I Our first discovery in Claiborne County became friends and I started digging through was the raw face of the Grand Gulf mound. A MDAH collections in search of Marksville bulldozer had destroyed roughly two-thirds of sherds for Alan's dissertation. Over the next it. The remaining portion had huge holes dug three years Alan and I corresponded frequently, into it. and it was eroding. It was being visited sent sherds back and forth, and argued and daily by pot hunters, collectors, and curiosity discussed Marksville. seekers, all of whom dug or probed into the As I said, I looked through collections for mound in search of artifacts or "treasure." We sherds to send to Alan. Alan's dissertation was initiated steps to preserve the mound and to to be a synthesis of the Marksville period in the excavate it when our survey was finished. Lower Mississippi Valley. Phillips (1970) had After washing a small sample of sherds done a synthesis of the post Archaic cultures in from the site we drove to Natchez for a bus­ the region; Toth's report would refine and ex­ man's holiday. Stu Neitzel was digging at Fa­ pand the Marksville phases set up by Phillips. therland and Jeff Brain was working at the Ceramics formed the basis for the phases em­ Emerald mound. I wanted them to look at the ployed by both writers. Such an approach was Grand Gulf sherds and offer some ideas on a utilized for several reasons. Ceramic variation couple that had me baffled.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Office of the State Archaeologist Academic Activities
    Office The Year in Review OSA mission statement, academic activities, staff achievements, annual work plan accomplishments, and plans and prospects for of the State FY 2019. By the Numbers Archaeologist 30,094 An overview of FY 2019 through numbers and charts. Fiscal Year 2019 Student Success Eighteen undergraduate and one graduate students were Annual Report involved in various OSA archaeological and related research and repository activities over the course of the fiscal year. Research The OSA conducts a wide range of research activities to discover the archaeological and architectural history of Iowa and surrounding midcontinent over the last 13,000 years. Bioarchaeology In FY 2019 the OSA Bioarchaeology Program’s efforts have focused on fulfilling its responsibilities towards the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act as well as engaging in public education and outreach events. Strategic Initiatives The OSA provides resources and opportunities that encourage the understanding, appreciation, and stewardship of Iowa’s archaeological past. OSA Mission The Year in The position of State Archaeologist was established in 1959. Read the entire mission statement Review Advisory Committee Indian Advisory Council Academic Activities OSA staff instructed four UI classes during FY 2019 including CRM Archaeology and Human Osteology. OSA hosted eight Brown Bag lectures and a creative writing class for the UI English Department. Office and Staff Achievements During FY 2019, OSA staff were recognized for their outstanding professional presence and decades of service. We also welcomed three new hires to the OSA team! FY 2019 Annual Work Plan Accomplishments In FY 2019 the OSA continued energetically pursuing research, education and outreach, and service activities throughout Iowa, the surrounding region, and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 44 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 44 NO. 1 WINTER 1994 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incor­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 porated non-profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, BACK ISSUES Lancaster, OH 43130, (614) 653-6642 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 43130, (614)653-9477 Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse.$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's& 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614) 861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064, (614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gen­ 1994 Immediate Past Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Analysis of Marksville-Style Prehistoric Ceramics from Mississippi and Alabama
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2008 Elemental analysis of Marksville-style prehistoric ceramics from Mississippi and Alabama Keith A. Baca Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Baca, Keith A., "Elemental analysis of Marksville-style prehistoric ceramics from Mississippi and Alabama" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1858. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1858 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MARKSVILLE-STYLE PREHISTORIC CERAMICS FROM MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA By Keith Allen Baca A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology in the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Mississippi State, Mississippi May 3, 2008 ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MARKSVILLE-STYLE PREHISTORIC CERAMICS FROM MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA By Keith Allen Baca Approved: Janet Rafferty Evan Peacock Graduate Coordinator of Anthropology Associate Professor of Anthropology Professor of Anthropology (Director of Thesis) S. Homes Hogue Gary Myers Professor of Anthropology Interim Dean of College of Arts and Sciences Name: Keith Allen Baca Date of Degree: May 3, 2008 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Applied Anthropology Major Professor: Dr. Janet Rafferty Title of Study: ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MARKSVILLE-STYLE PREHISTORIC CERAMICS FROM MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA Pages in Study: 129 Candidate for Degree of Master of Arts Distinctive Marksville-style pottery is characteristic of the Middle Woodland period (200 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index
    Index A Bajloni’s calotte BAJ, 17, 19–20 Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution, 29 Balanica Acculturation, 164–165, 253 BH-1, 15, 24–29, 309 Acheulean, 80, 148, 172, 177, 201, 205, 306, 308, 310 hominin, 15–17, 29 large flake, 129, 132, 218 Mala, vi, 16, 24, 30, 139–140, 144–145, lithic artifacts, 80 148, 309–311 Lower, 308 Velika, 24, 36, 139–140, 144–145, 148 Middle, 308 Balıtepe, 214, 223–224 Admixture, vi, 29, 258 Balkan, v, 3, 139, 159, 171, 187, 218, 229, 274, 282, 303 Neanderthal, 51–64 and Anatolia, 308–310 Adriatic, 46, 154, 157, 162, 164–166 Central, vi, 3, 15–30, 139–150 Aegean, 29–30, 74–76, 116, 119, 121–122, 134–135, 148, 213, implications for earliest settlement of Europe, 220–221, 261, 283, 305, 316 187–210 Aizanoi, 221 Mountains, 69, 187 Akçeşme, 214, 223–224 and neighbouring regions, 229–261 Aktaş, 214, 217 Peninsula, 51, 70, 74, 119, 134, 150, 187, 201, 208 Alluvial plain, 125, 314 Southern, 3, 12, 47, 275 Alykes, 270, 272 Bañolas mandible, 28 Amărăști, 176–177, 181 Basalt, 201, 217–218, 220, 284 Anatolia (Asia Minor), 3, 79–80, 308–310 Basins, 51, 74, 99, 119, 139, 213, 281, 303 Central (Region), 128, 132, 134, 213, 217–218, 220, 223, 313 Anagni, 306 Eastern (Region), 217 Apennine, 310, 314 and hominin dispersals, 213–225 Beni Fouda, 307 North, 120 Čačak-Kraljevo, 140 Southeastern (Region), 215, 217, 220, 223 Carpathian, 51, 148 west, 119, 121 Denizli, 83 Anatomically modern human, 23, 36, 41, 44, 46, 55–56, 62, 70, 72, evolution on archaeological distributions, 313–317 76, 95, 111, 153, 165–166, 229 Grevena, 269, 272 Apidima, 4, 7–8, 11–12, 96, 310–311 Kalloni, 121–122 Apolakkia, 270–271 Megalopolis, 9, 12, 134–135, 298 Apollonia, 74, 270, 273, 276–277, 286–287 Mygdonia, 12, 273 Arago, 10, 25, 29, 56, 59, 87–90, 149, 312 Niš, 139, 146 Archaeological pattern, 303, 305 Pannonian, 15, 23, 319 Areopolis, 97 Thessalian, 310 Asprochaliko, 95, 148, 238–239, 253, 260 Venosa, 306 Assimilation model, 162 Belen Tepe, 221–222, 225 Atapuerca, 28, 276, 285, 287, 312, 318 Benkovski, 187, 205–209, 309 Sima de los Huesos, 27–29, 304, 306–307 BH-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Sequence at Avery Island. Sherwood Moneer Gagliano Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1967 Occupation Sequence at Avery Island. Sherwood Moneer Gagliano Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gagliano, Sherwood Moneer, "Occupation Sequence at Avery Island." (1967). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1248. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1248 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-8779 GAGLIANO, Sherwood Moneer, 1935- OCCUPATION SEQUENCE AT AVERY ISLAND. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1967 Anthropology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Sherwood Moneer Gagliano 1967 All Rights Reserved OCCUPATION SEQUENCE AT AVERY ISLAND A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Sherwood Moneer Gagliano B.S., Louisiana State University, 1959 M.A., Louisiana State University, 19&3 January, 1967 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 'The funds, labor, and other facilities which made this study possible were provided by Avery Island Inc, Many individuals contributed. Drs. James Morgan, and James Coleman, and Messrs. William Smith, Karl LaPleur, Rodney Adams, Stephen Murray, Roger Saucier, Richard Warren, and David Morgan aided in the boring program and excavations.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER LIST MASTER LIST by Alphabet
    Oklahoma Cemetery Directory MASTER LIST By Alphabet OHCE Genealogy Group Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Oklahoma Cemetery Directory Based on the original compilations of the 77 County Cemetery Indexes , an Oklahoma Centennial Project of Oklahoma Home and Community Education OHCE Oklahoma Cemetery Index es originally completed November 2005 2nd Edition of additions and corrections for publishing March 2008 by Oklahoma OHCE State organization Completion of name change to Oklahoma Cemetery Directory May 2009 by Oklahoma County OHCE Genealogy Group 1st Edition of Oklahoma Cemetery Directory 2010 2nd Edition of Oklahoma Cemetery Directory September 2018 Information may be copied from this book for personal use, but may not be copied for profit. ©2018 OHCE Genealogy Group Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Printed in the United States of America September 2018 Oklahoma Cemetery Directory – Master List - By Alphabet Cemetery Twp-Rng-Sec Latitude Longitude Comments County The latitude and longitude coordinates that are underlined are verified at Google Maps. The ones not underlined can’t be guaranteed . Coordinates written like this 352241N mean 35º22'41" North Coordinates written like this 0972241W mean 97º22'41" West A A L Stephens Memorial T2N-R19E-Sec29NE 343720N 0951925W aka Stephens Memorial Park; Pushmatah Park A. L. Stephen's Cem A. L. Stephen's Cemetery T2N-R19E-Sec29NE 343720N 0951925W aka A L Stephens Memorial Pushmatah Partk; NE of Clayton Aaron Cemetery T1N-R22W-Sec12NE 343446N 0992757W northwest of Olustee Jackson Aaron Pickens Cemetery T6S-R3E-Sec22
    [Show full text]