A Many-Storied Place

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Many-Storied Place A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (g) Non-contributing Features (h) Archeological Analysis 2 – Osotouy Unit Archeological Sites: Map from the Osotouy CLR 3 – Area Overview: Aerial photograph and unit boundaries from the Osotouy CLR 4 – Schematic of River Change: Maps from the Geologic Resources Inventory Report Bibliography 253 Index 279 List of Figures 1 – Location of Arkansas Post on Arkansas River 5 2 – Menard Mounds 13 3 – Stalking Buffalo, Arkansas, by George Catlin 18 4 – Buffalo Hunt under Wolf-skin Masks, by George Catlin 20 5 – Threshing rice on Grand Prairie near DeWitt, Ark. 31 6 – View of Post Bend 35 7 – Menard Mounds site map, 1881 41 8 – Edward Palmer, archeologist with the Mound Survey 43 9 – Ceramic from excavation at Menard Mounds in 1881 44 10 – Archeologist Clarence Moore 45 11 – Ford’s map of Menard Site, 1961 47 12 – De Soto at the Mississippi River 56 13 – De Soto’s burial in the Mississippi River 60 14 – “Teapot” form, Menard complex 70 15 – Henri de Tonty 75 16 – Tonty’s trading house in 1689 77 17 – Jean-Baptiste le Moyne de Bienville 84 18 – John Law 85 19 – Alexandre Chevelier de Clouet 98 20 – De Villiers’s 1779 map of Arkansas Post 103 21 – Map of Louisiana and British West Florida, 1763-1783 105 22 – Colbert’s raid on Fort Carlos III 107 23 – Carlos de Vilemont 112 24 – Calumet dancer 118 25 – Beaver pelts in trade 124 26 – Painted buffalo hide 131 27 – Osage: Tal-lee, Black Dog, Big Crow, by George Catlin 148 28 – Marie Felicite de Vaugine 154 29 – Thomas Nuttall 157 30 – Maid of Orleans steamboat 162 31 – Great raft on the Red River 163 32 – Louisiana Indians Walking along a Bayou, by Alfred Boisseau 177 33 – Scene on a cotton plantation 186 34 – The gunboat USS Baron de Kalb 193 35 – Survey map of approaches to Fort Hindman 194 36 – Brigadier General Thomas Churchill 195 37 – Major General John McClernand 196 vii List of Figures 38 – Major General William Tecumseh Sherman 199 39 – Battle of Arkansas Post mapped by historian Ed Bearss 201 40 – Union landing on White River 207 41 – Cotton worker’s cabin 213 42 – Caretaker’s house, 1963 218 43 – Congresswoman Catherine Dorris Norrell 223 44 – Interpretive sign, Old Townsite trail 227 45 – Little Post Bayou 228 46 – Fort Carlos III exhibit 230 47 – Paved footpaths, Old Townsite 231 viii Introduction Arkansas Post is a small place with a large history. It began in 1686 as a trading house situated next to the Quapaw village of Osotouy. Occupied by six men, four of whom soon left, this humble enterprise marked the beginning of colonial settlement in the lower Mississippi Valley. Begun anew in 1721-22 as both a military fort and a plantation of colonists, Arkansas Post became one of the linchpins of French dominion over the interior of North America through the next four decades of European colonization. After France ceded Louisiana to Spain in 1762, the fort and its associated settlement went on to serve for another four decades as an outpost on Spain’s frontier with Anglo America. In 1804, a U.S. flag was raised over the fort, and in 1819, Congress made the village of Arkansas Post the first capital of Arkansas Territory. As a river port in the early years of steamboat travel, Arkansas Post was on the Trail of Tears for Southeast Indian tribes who were forced to leave their homelands in the 1830s. In the second year of the American Civil War, Confederate forces turned the place into a stronghold to oppose a Federal advance up the Arkansas River. On January 10 and 11, 1863, a battle was fought there. Though the fort was destroyed in the battle and the old settlement nearly faded away afterwards, the place’s storied past was not forgotten. The site of the first territorial capital became a state park in 1929. Congress authorized Arkansas Post National Memorial in 1960, and the National Park Service (NPS) acquired the land base and established the unit in the National Park System four years later. The original area took in the old townsite of Arkansas’s territorial period together with a line of Confederate entrenchments built in 1862-1863. Almost no historic structures remained (archeological resources excepted). The historical significance of the site rested in its power of place, not in its historic resources, hence its designation as a national memorial rather than a national monument or national historic site. Development of the unit had barely gotten started when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers completed Lock and Dam No. 2 on the Arkansas River just two miles below Arkansas Post. The navigation pool behind the dam inundated lands in and around the national memorial and drastically changed the landscape. Of the national memorial’s 740 acres, just 305 acres remained as dry land. Bayous bordering the national memorial on the east and west were transformed from wetlands into broad, shallow bodies of water. The probable locations of the French and Spanish posts, as well as the site of the Confederates’ Fort Hindman, were submerged in the arm of the navigation pool known as Post Bend. All that remained was the high ground once occupied by the historic settlement. Whereas the fort and settlement once occupied a bend in the river, now the land has taken the form of a peninsula jutting into the navigation pool. There is so much expanse of water all around the Introduction place that a first-time visitor is hard-pressed to distinguish the Arkansas River channel from the rest of the navigation pool. Between the disorienting drowned landscape and the near absence of historic resources, Arkansas Post National Memorial presents a unique challenge for site-based interpretation of a historic site. Interpretation is not made easier by the fact that the place has so much history – nearly 200 years of history from the founding of Arkansas Post to the Civil War, plus a century and a half of history since. Over time, one aspect of the story or another has piqued more interest. When the state park was established, state and local supporters wanted in the first place to memorialize the site of Arkansas’s first territorial capital. As the NPS became interested in the site in the 1950s, the part of the Arkansas Post story that gave the place national significance was its early founding and nearly continuous occupation through the colonial era. After the national memorial was established, NPS historians argued that the Civil War battle deserved greater attention. In recent decades, American Indian history and perspectives have received more emphasis. In 1998, Congress authorized expansion of Arkansas Post National Memorial to include a second area, located six miles downstream from the existing area, which archeologists and historians had long suspected to be the site of the original French trading post and Quapaw village of Osotouy. Archeological investigations had long focused on the precontact Menard Mounds or Menard-Hodges site. When the investigations moved to an adjoining area called Wallace Bottom, the elusive archeological remains of Osotouy were likely discovered at last. Now Arkansas Post National Memorial consists of two units, the 389-acre Memorial Unit and the 360-acre Osotouy Unit, which features the precontact Menard Mound site, with the early contact period Wallace Bottom site being located just outside the unit on land owned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The NPS initiated the present study, a Historic Resource Study for Arkansas Post National Memorial, to assist the NPS with identifying, evaluating, and managing historic resources found within the park. Typically, a Historic Resource Study identifies historic resources such as buildings, cemeteries, roads, and other elements of what are collectively called the built environment, and then it seeks to integrate the story of the built environment with the political, social, Location Map 1. Arkansas Post National Memorial is in southeast and economic history of the area. Arkansas on the lower Arkansas River. 2 A Many-Storied Place: Historic Resource Study, Arkansas Post National Memorial Because very few historical resources exist within this park, the present study is primarily concerned with the place. The national memorial’s most important historic resource is the place, the geographic expression that was known through three centuries as Arkansas Post.
Recommended publications
  • Nus » Indiqué Sur La Pochette, Sont Dis- En Résumé, Je Vous Recommande For- Ponibles En Cliquant Ou Sélectionnant Tement Ce DVD
    BEATLES QUÉBEC MAGAZINE PAGE 9 nus » indiqué sur la pochette, sont dis- En résumé, je vous recommande for- ponibles en cliquant ou sélectionnant tement ce DVD. La qualité sonore et au menu, dans les « lobby cards » un visuelle de ce produit est sans égale, des personnages, soit sur John, Paul, compte tenue du produit qui date déjà George ou Ringo ou autre pour qu'ils de plus 42 ans. puissent virer au rouge. De là vous sélectionnez Play et le tour est joué: PROMOTION POUR vous avez les fameux spots de radio. Il LE FILM HELP! y en a 6 en tout répartis sur les 2 DVD. Ces hiddens in menus, appelés en Apple Records a conçu un mini site web pour le film. Vous retrouverez Page d’accueil du site Internet Scène coupée avec Wendy Richard language informatique « easter eggs », sont disponibles dans les deux formats DVD du film HELP!. toutes les informations pertinentes du film ainsi qu’une boutique de marchan- dises « Help! ». www.beatles.com/help UN DRAPEAU HELP! Avec la participation de Ringo Starr, eBay et Capitol Records (USA), un drapeau, mesurant 12 pieds par 18 pieds, à l’effigie du film HELP! , a été Scène coupée avec Wendy Richard offert en encan sur le site eBay. Les Beatles et Apple Records ne ces- Un ensemble d’items accompagnaient seront jamais de nous émerveiller. le fameux drapeau. Le gagnant de l’en- Même après toutes ces années, ils ont can s’est mérité un certificat d’authen- encore le don de nous fasciner. ticité signé par Ringo, un voyage de 5 jours/4 nuits à Londres, une visite au Studio Abbey Road, l’édition deluxe DVD du film Help! , un ensemble de 8 reproductions des « Lobby Cards » de 1965 du film Help! et un CD promo- tionnel (édition limitée).
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Gregory Oregon 0171N 12796.Pdf
    CHUNKEY, CAHOKIA, AND INDIGENOUS CONFLICT RESOLUTION by ANNE GREGORY A THESIS Presented to the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2020 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anne Gregory Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflict Resolution This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program by: Kirby Brown Chair Eric Girvan Member and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2020. ii © 2020 Anne Gregory This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Anne Gregory Master of Science Conflict and Dispute Resolution June 2020 Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflicts Resolution Chunkey, a traditional Native American sport, was a form of conflict resolution. The popular game was one of several played for millennia throughout Native North America. Indigenous communities played ball games not only for the important culture- making of sport and recreation, but also as an act of peace-building. The densely populated urban center of Cahokia, as well as its agricultural suburbs and distant trade partners, were dedicated to chunkey. Chunkey is associated with the milieu surrounding the Pax Cahokiana (1050 AD-1200 AD), an era of reduced armed conflict during the height of Mississippian civilization (1000-1500 AD). The relational framework utilized in archaeology, combined with dynamics of conflict resolution, provides a basis to explain chunkey’s cultural impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    SEGMENTED AND ASCENDANT CHIEFDOM POLITY AS VIEWED FROM THE DIVERS SITE BY GLEN ALOIS FREIMUTH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Emeritus R. Barry Lewis, Chair Professor Timothy R. Pauketat Adjunct Professor Thomas E. Emerson Associate Professor Mark W. Mehrer, Northern Illinois University ABSTRACT This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of political control exerted by the Mississippian Cahokia polity over small rural villages in the southern American Bottom. Currently two models, which I call the Segmented and Ascendant Chiefdoms, respectively, provide contrasting explanations of the nature and amount of Cahokia control over rural villages. I examine the fit of these models against archaeological data from the Divers and other regional sites. The analyses range over several main topics, including populations, labor requirements, nonlocal artifacts, provisioning, and rituals. I find that the archaeological patterns expressed at the Divers site best fit a Segmented Chiefdom model wherein political control is decentralized and rural villages retain a high degree of political autonomy. Cahokia, as the American Bottom’s main Mississippian town, has the largest population, physical size, elite status items, and monumental construction which I describe as material domination and political dominance. Political dominance requires manipulation of local leaders and their followers for political and social control and this manipulation was expressed through ritual materials and rituals performed at Cahokia and other mound towns. The Cahokia elite created new rituals and associated material expressions through collective action and attempted to gain control of existing commoner ritual performances and symbols but these and political autonomy largely remained with the commoners who occupied small villages like Divers.
    [Show full text]
  • French Louisiana in the Age of the Companies, 1712–1731
    CHAPTER FIVE FRENCH LOUISIANA IN THE AGE OF THE COMPANIES, 1712–1731 Cécile Vidal1 Founded in 1699, Louisiana was unable to benefit from the action of the two French ministers who did the most in the seventeenth century to foster the creation of companies for commerce and col- onization. Driven by the concern to increase the power of the State, Richelieu and especially Colbert, who had more success than his predecessor, had developed mercantilist policies that included the creation of companies on the English and Dutch model. Established in the same spirit as guilds, these companies were associations of merchants that received a monopoly from the king over trade between the metropolis and a specific region. They made it possible to raise the large amounts of capital necessary for large-scale maritime com- merce and overseas colonization. By associating, the merchants lim- ited their individual risk, while the monopoly guaranteed them a profit; they therefore agreed to finance costly enterprises that the royal treasury did not have the means to support. Companies thus served the interests of traders as well as the monarchy.2 In the New World, companies quickly became involved in the French colonization of Acadia, Canada, and the West Indies. By the end of the seventeenth century, however—the time of the founding of Louisiana—these various colonies had almost all passed under direct royal authority.3 In 1712, the same year that Louisiana’s com- mercial monopoly was entrusted to financier Antoine Crozat, the 1 This essay was translated from the original French by Leslie Choquette, Institut français, Assumption College.
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Archeology Journal, Volume 19. 2009
    CCaddoaddo AArcheologyrcheology JJournalournal Volume 19 2009 CADDO ARCHEOLOGY JOURNAL Department of Sociology P.O. Box 13047, SFA Station Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-3047 EDITORIAL BOARD TIMOTHY K. PERTTULA 10101 Woodhaven Dr. Austin, Texas 78753 e-mail: [email protected] GEORGE AVERY P.O. Box 13047, SFA Station Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-3047 e-mail: [email protected] LIAISON WITH THE CADDO NATION OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT CAST Tribal Historic Preservation Offi cer Caddo Nation of Oklahoma P.O. Box 487 Binger, OK 73009 e-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1522-0427 Printed in the United States of America at Morgan Printing in Austin, Texas 2009 Table of Contents The Caddo and the Caddo Conference 1 Pete Gregory An Account of the Birth and Growth of Caddo Archeology, as Seen by Review of 50 Caddo Conferences, 1946-2008 3 Hester A. Davis and E. Mott Davis CADDO ARCHEOLOGY JOURNAL ◆ iii The Caddo and the Caddo Conference* Pete Gregory There was one lone Caddo at the early Caddo Conference held at the University of Oklahoma campus—Mrs. Vynola Beaver Newkumet—then there was a long gap. In 1973, the Chairman of the Caddo Nation, Melford Wil- liams, was the banquet speaker for the Conference, which was held in Natchitoches, Louisiana. A panel, consisting of Thompson Williams, Vynola Newkumet, Phil Newkumet, and Pete Gregory, was also part of that conference. Subsequent to 1973, Caddo representatives have not only been invited, but have attended the majority of the conferences. Caddo Nation chairpeople who have attended include Melford Williams, Mary Pat Francis, Hank Shemayme, Hubert Halfmoon, Elmo Clark, Vernon Hunter, and La Rue Martin Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokees in Arkansas
    CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS A historical synopsis prepared for the Arkansas State Racing Commission. John Jolly - first elected Chief of the Western OPERATED BY: Cherokee in Arkansas in 1824. Image courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum LegendsArkansas.com For additional information on CNB’s cultural tourism program, go to VisitCherokeeNation.com THE CROSSING OF PATHS TIMELINE OF CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS Late 1780s: Some Cherokees began to spend winters hunting near the St. Francis, White, and Arkansas Rivers, an area then known as “Spanish Louisiana.” According to Spanish colonial records, Cherokees traded furs with the Spanish at the Arkansas Post. Late 1790s: A small group of Cherokees relocated to the New Madrid settlement. Early 1800s: Cherokees continued to immigrate to the Arkansas and White River valleys. 1805: John B. Treat opened a trading post at Spadra Bluff to serve the incoming Cherokees. 1808: The Osage ceded some of their hunting lands between the Arkansas and White Rivers in the Treaty of Fort Clark. This increased tension between the Osage and Cherokee. 1810: Tahlonteeskee and approximately 1,200 Cherokees arrived to this area. 1811-1812: The New Madrid earthquake destroyed villages along the St. Francis River. Cherokees living there were forced to move further west to join those living between AS HISTORICAL AND MODERN NEIGHBORS, CHEROKEE the Arkansas and White Rivers. Tahlonteeskee settled along Illinois Bayou, near NATION AND ARKANSAS SHARE A DEEP HISTORY AND present-day Russellville. The Arkansas Cherokee petitioned the U.S. government CONNECTION WITH ONE ANOTHER. for an Indian agent. 1813: William Lewis Lovely was appointed as agent and he set up his post on CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES RESPECTS AND WILL Illinois Bayou.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to State and Local Census Geography
    Guide to State and Local Census Geography Arkansas BASIC INFORMATION 2010 Census Population: 2,915,918 (32nd) Land Area: 52,035.5 square miles (27th) Density: 56.0 persons per square mile (34th) Capital: Little Rock Became a State: June 15, 1836 (25th) Bordering States: Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas Abbreviation: AR ANSI/FIPS Code: 05 HISTORY The United States acquired the area of Arkansas from France as part of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Arkansas Territory (spelled in the enabling act as Arkansaw) was organized from part of Missouri Territory on March 2, 1819, and included the greater part of Oklahoma, west to the 100th meridian. Arkansas Territory was reduced in area in 1824 and 1828 to generally assume the boundary of the present state. Arkansas was admitted to the Union on June 15, 1836, as the 25th state. Although the territory had not yet been established, census data are available for Arkansas beginning with the 1810 census (as part of Louisiana Territory). The 1810 and 1820 populations for Arkansas reflect the 1819 boundary of the territory, which included territory now in the state of Oklahoma. The population of the entire legally established Louisiana Territory (of which the area of Arkansas was a part) in 1810 was 20,845. Data for the legally established state of Arkansas are available beginning with the 1840 census. METROPOLITAN AND MICROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS AND RELATED STATISTICAL AREAS Arkansas has 8 metropolitan statistical areas, 14 micropolitan statistical areas, and 2 combined statistical areas. COUNTIES There are 75 counties in Arkansas. The governing body for each county consists of justices of the peace and a county judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2017 Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schieffler, George David, "Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2426. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2426 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by George David Schieffler The University of the South Bachelor of Arts in History, 2003 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in History, 2005 August 2017 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Daniel E. Sutherland Dissertation Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Elliott West Dr. Patrick G. Williams Committee Member Committee Member Abstract “Civil War in the Delta” describes how the American Civil War came to Helena, Arkansas, and its Phillips County environs, and how its people—black and white, male and female, rich and poor, free and enslaved, soldier and civilian—lived that conflict from the spring of 1861 to the summer of 1863, when Union soldiers repelled a Confederate assault on the town.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITA Charles P. West ADDRESS: Revised February 15
    CURRICULUM VITA Charles P. West ADDRESS: Revised February 15, 2017 Plant and Soil Sciences Box 42122 Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 USA E-mail: [email protected] PERSONAL: Born: 13 June 1952, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Citizenship: USA EDUCATION: Ph.D. in Crop Production/Physiology, 1981, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. M.S. in Agronomy, 1978, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota. B.S. in Agronomy, 1974, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Professor and Thornton Distinguished Chair, Forage Systems, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2012-present. Director, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Water Center, 2014-present. Assistant, Associate, and Full Professor, Forage Physiology, 75% research 25% teaching, Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1984-2012. Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, New Zealand, 1982-1984. Research on nitrogen fixation in white clover-ryegrass pastures. Predoctoral Research Associate, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 1978-1981. Research on nutrient cycling in pastures. Graduate Assistant, Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1977-1978. Research on pasture renovation. Agronomist, Peace Corps, Morocco, 1974-1976. Technical aid on development of irrigated forage management systems for dairy production. CURRENT RESEARCH AND OUTREACH PROJECTS: Analysis and upgrading of irrigation scheduling programs in the southern High Plains Use of alfalfa in improving forage quality of grazed Old World bluestem Assessment of insect deterrence by WW-BDahl Old World bluestem Modeling growth and water use of warm-season perennial grasses. Texas Coalition of Sustainable Integrated Systems (TeCSIS) http://www.orgs.ttu.edu/forageresearch/Index.html Texas Alliance for Water Conservations (TAWC) http://www.tawc.us TEACHING AND ADVISING EXPERIENCE (Texas Tech University): PSS 3321 – Forage and Pasture Crops.
    [Show full text]