DOCSLIB.ORG

Ohio History Lesson 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ohio History Lesson 1 http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish • Disappeared from Ohio with out leaving a trace Glacial Kame People • Group of the Archaic Indians • “Kame” means small mound of gravel left by retreating glaciers • Glacial Kame People buried their dead in these gravel mounds The Mound Builders Serpent Mound Effigy Mounds – work of art in the form of a living thing The Mound Builders • Lived in semi-permanent villages • Grew own food & saved it for winter • Sometimes called Woodland people • Built large mounds in many shapes –Forts for protection –Burial sites Artifacts Adena Mound Arrow Heads Pipe is over 2,000 years old Cone-Shaped Mounds – Burial Adena People • Lived by a river or stream - Cooking, drinking, washing, transportation • In winter, lived in caves • Made homes in villages • Planted and harvested crops -Sunflowers, goosefoot, swartweed • Made fine jewelry and objects Hopewell People Hopewell People Hopewell People • Hunted animals, gathered wild plants and raised crops • Lived next to a river or stream • Cremated their dead • Built Fort Ancient (huge complex of mounds) • Traded jewelry Fort Ancient Hopewell Built Fort Ancient •Built by the Hopewell-Entire City •Lived within walls 20 ft high – enclosed stone pavements and mounds Fort Ancient People • Part of a larger group called the Mississippians • Great hunters: deer, elk, fox, squirrel, wild turkey • Grew corn and bean (unlike others) • Jewelry, musical instruments, rattles, decorated pottery • Great traders Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleoindians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Answer Key • Answers will vary depending on the group selected • We can go back through the slides and review the groups, too ! .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Faunal Assemblages from Two Fort Ancient Villages
    Exploring Environmental and Cultural Influences on Subsistence: A Comparison of Faunal Assemblages from Two Fort Ancient Villages Honors Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors research distinction in Anthropology in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Melissa French The Ohio State University December 2013 Project Advisor: Professor Robert Cook, Department of Anthropology 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Ohio State University and Cincinnati Museum Center for allowing me to use their comparative collections to identify the faunal remains used in this study. I would also like to thank the Social and Behavioral Sciences research grant program and the Sidney Pressey Honors & Scholars grant program for providing funds for me to take part in the excavation at Guard in 2012. Thanks to Jackie Lipphardt for teaching me about the joys of faunal analysis. Thank you to Dr. Jeffery Cohen and Dr. Greg Anderson for serving as my committee members for my oral examination. And finally, I would also like to thank my advisor Dr. Robert Cook for allowing me to use the faunal remains from Guard and Taylor in my study as well as for challenging, educating and guiding me during this process. 2 Table of Contents Page List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………...4 List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..............5 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………............6 Introduction…................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1-2019 The Bioarchaeology of Instability: Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village Amber Elaine Osterholt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Repository Citation Osterholt, Amber Elaine, "The Bioarchaeology of Instability: Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village" (2019). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3656. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/15778514 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF INSTABILITY: VIOLENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS DURING THE LATE FORT ANCIENT (AD 1425 – 1635) OCCUPATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers
    The College of Wooster Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2020 Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers Kevin Andrew Rolph The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Recommended Citation Rolph, Kevin Andrew, "Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers" (2020). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 9005. This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The College of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2020 Kevin Andrew Rolph Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers By Kevin A. Rolph A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements of Independent Study In Archaeology at The College of Wooster Archaeology 451 Dr. Olivia Navarro- Farr March 23, 2020 Abstract The arrival of Europeans to the New World forever changed the social and economic landscapes of Native Peoples who occupied the continents. Colonial institutions profited off the land and those who occupied it. One institution that exemplified this was the Fur Trade. Throughout the North and Northeast colonies, European nations acquired furs from a variety of mammals to meet the trans-Atlantic demand. To maximize profits in the New World many European colonizers turned to Native peoples to aid in their economic endeavors. Native Americans employed trade routes and knowledge of the land to their advantage in the new economic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Perspective on the Volg (PDF)
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint A North American perspective on the Volgu Biface Cache from Upper Paleolithic France and its relationship to the “Solutrean Hypothesis” for Clovis origins J. David Kilby Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The “Solutrean hypothesis” for the origins of the North American Clovis Culture posits that early North American Volgu colonizers were direct descendants of European populations that migrated across the North Atlantic during the Clovis European Upper Paleolithic. The evidential basis for this model rests largely on proposed technological and Solutrean behavioral similarities shared by the North American Clovis archaeological culture and the French and Iberian Cache Solutrean archaeological culture. The caching of stone tools by both cultures is one of the specific behavioral correlates put forth by proponents in support of the hypothesis. While more than two dozen Clovis caches have been identified, Volgu is the only Solutrean cache identified at this time. Volgu consists of at least 15 exquisitely manufactured bifacial stone tools interpreted as an artifact cache or ritual deposit, and the artifacts themselves have long been considered exemplary of the most refined Solutrean bifacial technology. This paper reports the results of applying methods developed for the comparative analysis of the relatively more abundant caches of Clovis materials in North America to this apparently singular Solutrean cache. In addition to providing a window into Solutrean technology and perhaps into Upper Paleolithic ritual behavior, this comparison of Clovis and Solutrean assemblages serves to test one of the tangible archaeological implications of the “Solutrean hypoth- esis” by evaluating the technological and behavioral equivalence of Solutrean and Clovis artifact caching.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunwatch Indian Village/Archaeological Park)
    Select Bibliography for on 33My57 (SunWatch Indian Village/Archaeological Park) Allman, John C. 1968 The Incinerator Village Site. Ohio Archaeologist 18 (2): 50-55. Barber, Michael B. 1974 Fort Ancient Settlement Patterns. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio. Conard, Anthony R. 1984 Experimental Duplication of the Fort Ancient Shell Hoe. Ohio Archaeologist 34 (4): 18-19. 1985 A Preliminary Report on Incinerator Site (33My57) Stable Carbon Isotope Ratios Used in Dietary Reconstruction. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 1988 Analysis in Dietary Reconstruction. In A History of 17 Years of Excavation and Reconstruction: A Chronicle of 12th Century Human Values and the Built Environment, edited by J. Heilman, Malinda Lileas and Chris Turnbow, pp. 112- 156, vol. I, Dayton Museum of Natural History, Dayton, Ohio. 1988 The Shell Hoe. In A History of 17 Years of Excavation and Reconstruction: A Chronicle of 12th Century Human Values and the Built Environment, edited by J. Heilman, Malinda Lileas and Chris Turnbow, pp. 79-83, vol. I, Dayton Museum of Natural History, Dayton, Ohio. Conard, Anthony R. and Charlene M. Bohn 1988 Feather Cape Reconstruction. In A History of 17 Years of Excavation and Reconstruction: A Chronicle of 12th Century Human Values and the Built Environment, edited by J. Heilman, Malinda Lileas and Chris Turnbow, pp. 74- 78, vol. II, Dayton Museum of Natural History, Dayton, Ohio. Cook, Robert A. 2004 Upper Mississippian Village Structure and Formation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing. 2005 Reconstructing Perishable Architecture: Prospects and Limitations of a Fort Ancient Example.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpent Mound
    SERPENT MOUND Learning Objectives Lesson Overview Students will learn about the late prehistoric Students will Indians and their cultural practices by studying the Watch video on the Serpent Mound Fort Ancient Indian culture and the giant earthwork Examine images of Fort Ancient artifacts Create a “mock” cover and articles for Serpent Mound. National Geographic magazine Write an acrostic poem about the Serpent Mound Teacher Background a date of 1070 A.D. for its construction. Today, the site is on the National Register of Historic Places and The term Fort Ancient refers to a Native American has been nominated to become a UNESCO World culture that thrived between 1000-1650 A.D. in what Heritage Site. is now modern day southern Ohio and northern Kentucky. The culture was named after the site As with the Adena culture, mounds were often used “Fort Ancient,” a large settlement with extensive for burials. Though the Fort Ancient people were a mounded earthworks located in southwestern Ohio, moundbuilding culture, the mounds constructed by although these mounds are now believed to have the Fort Ancient did not serve a funerary function, been created by the Hopewell people. In fact, the nor was the Serpent Mound used for burials. Since Fort Ancient people were mound builders thought the Fort Ancient people left no written records, the to be descended from the Hopewell Culture. Today, function of the mound can never truly be confirmed. scholars believe the Fort Ancient Indians are the There are, however, several popular theories that likely ancestors of the Shawnee Indians. suggest that this colossal earthwork was used as a solar calender with different points along the curves The Fort Ancient people were Ohio’s first farmers of the serpent aligned to the seasonal solstices.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Illinois Archaeology
    Discover Illinois Archaeology ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Discover Illinois Archaeology Illinois’ rich cultural heritage began more collaborative effort by 18 archaeologists from than 12,000 years ago with the arrival of the across the state, with a major contribution by ancestors of today’s Native Americans. We learn Design Editor Kelvin Sampson. Along with sum- about them through investigations of the remains maries of each cultural period and highlights of they left behind, which range from monumental regional archaeological research, we include a earthworks with large river-valley settlements to short list of internet and print resources. A more a fragment of an ancient stone tool. After the extensive reading list can be found at the Illinois arrival of European explorers in the late 1600s, a Association for Advancement of Archaeology succession of diverse settlers added to our cul- web site www.museum.state.il.us/iaaa/DIA.pdf. tural heritage, leading to our modern urban com- We hope that by reading this summary of munities and the landscape we see today. Ar- Illinois archaeology, visiting a nearby archaeo- chaeological studies allow us to reconstruct past logical site or museum exhibit, and participating environments and ways of life, study the rela- in Illinois Archaeology Awareness Month pro- tionship between people of various cultures, and grams each September, you will become actively investigate how and why cultures rise and fall. engaged in Illinois’ diverse past and DISCOVER DISCOVER ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY, ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY. summarizing Illinois culture history, is truly a Alice Berkson Michael D. Wiant IIILLINOIS AAASSOCIATION FOR CONTENTS AAADVANCEMENT OF INTRODUCTION.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahokia Mounds – Largest Archaeological Site in North America
    Cahokia Mounds – Largest Archaeological Site in North America Preserving the remains of an ancient Native American city near Collinsville, Illinois, the Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site is across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri. Covering more than 2,000 acres, Cahokia is the most sophisticated prehistoric Native civilization north of Mexico. Best known for large, man-made earthen structures, the city of Cahokia was inhabited from about A.D. 700 to 1400. Built by ancient peoples known as the Mound Builders, Cahokia’s original population was thought to have been only about 1,000 until about the 11th century when it expanded to tens of thousands. At its peak from 1,100 to 1,200 A.D., the city covered nearly six square miles and boasted a population of as many as 100,000 people. Houses were arranged in rows around open plazas. Agricultural fields and a number of smaller villages surrounded and supplied the city. The Cahokians were known to have traded with other tribes as far away as Minnesota. The original name of the city is unknown and the inhabitants apparently never utilized writing skills. The name Cahokia is that of a unrelated tribe that was living in the area when the first French explorers arrived in the late 17th century. These ancient Indians built more than 120 earthen mounds in the city, 109 of which have been recorded and 68 of which are preserved within the site. Many others are thought to have been altered or destroyed by farming and construction. While some are no more than a gentle rise on the land, others reach 100 feet into the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Olde New Mexico
    Olde New Mexico Olde New Mexico By Robert D. Morritt Olde New Mexico, by Robert D. Morritt This book first published 2011 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2011 by Robert D. Morritt All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-2709-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-2709-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................... vii Preface........................................................................................................ ix Sources ....................................................................................................... xi The Clovis Culture ...................................................................................... 1 Timeline of New Mexico History................................................................ 5 Pueblo People.............................................................................................. 7 Coronado ................................................................................................... 11 Early El Paso ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]