DOCSLIB.ORG

Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.2 Archaic Period ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 GENERAL THEORETICAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................ 19 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 44 3.1 POINT COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION...................................................................................................... 44 3.1.1 Clovis/Gainey (11,500-10,900 B.P.) .................................................................................................... 47 3.1.2 Thebes (10,000-9,000 B.P.) ................................................................................................................. 50 3.1.3 MacCorkle (9,000-8,500 B.P.) ............................................................................................................. 52 3.1.4 LeCroy (8,500-7,800 B.P.) ................................................................................................................... 54 3.1.5 Brewerton Corner Notched (5,000 – 4,000 B.P.) ................................................................................ 55 3.1.6 Data Organization ............................................................................................................................... 56 3.2 ACCURACY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................... 64 3.2.1 Interpolation Methods.......................................................................................................................... 65 3.2.2 Dataset description .............................................................................................................................. 68 3.2.3 Execution of interpolation assessment, building a new accuracy dataset ........................................... 69 iii 3.2.4 More Detailed Evaluation of the Interpolation Assessment................................................................. 71 3.3 TRADITIONAL AND “IMPRESSIONISTIC” METHODS ......................................................................................... 75 3.3.1 Graphical display of non-directional distance data ............................................................................ 75 3.3.2 Mapped display of non-directional distance data ................................................................................ 76 3.4 GEOSPATIAL METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 79 3.4.1 Non-Local Raw Materials Maps .......................................................................................................... 79 3.4.2 Interpolation ........................................................................................................................................ 80 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 83 4.1 GENERAL RAW MATERIAL COMPOSITION ...................................................................................................... 83 4.2 FALL-OFF CURVES AND CONCENTRIC CIRCLE MAPS ..................................................................................... 87 4.3 INTERPOLATION SURFACES ............................................................................................................................ 94 4.3.1 Early Paleoindian Interpolation Results.............................................................................................. 94 4.3.2 Thebes Interpolation Results.............................................................................................................. 100 4.3.3 MacCorkle Interpolation Results ....................................................................................................... 105 4.3.4 LeCroy Interpolation Results ............................................................................................................. 110 4.3.5 Brewerton Interpolation Results ........................................................................................................ 115 4.4 COMPARISON OF FALL-OFF RESULTS AND INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTED (DIFFERENCE MAPS) RESULTS. 120 4.4.1 Clovis/Gainey Difference Map Results .............................................................................................. 120 4.4.2 Thebes Difference Map Results ......................................................................................................... 122 4.4.3 MacCorkle Difference Map Results ................................................................................................... 124 4.4.4 LeCroy Difference Map Results ......................................................................................................... 126 4.4.5 Brewerton Difference Map Results .................................................................................................... 128 4.5 NON-LOCAL RAW MATERIAL MAPS ............................................................................................................ 130 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION............................................................................................. 137 5.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS ........................................................................................................... 138 5.2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO MOBILITY STUDIES ...................................................................................................... 140 5.2.1 Clovis and Gainey: Early Paleoindian (11,050 – 10,800 BP) ........................................................... 140 iv 5.2.2 Thebes: Earliest Early Archaic (10,000-8,000 BP) ........................................................................... 142 5.2.3 MacCorkle: Later Early Archaic (9,500-8,000 BP) .......................................................................... 144 5.2.4 LeCroy: Latest Early Archaic (8,500-7,800BP) ................................................................................ 146 5.2.5 Brewerton: Early Late Archaic (5,000-4,000 BP) ............................................................................. 147 5.3 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ............................................................................................................. 149 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 153 v LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.1 STUDY AREA. ............................................................................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 1.2 TERRAIN MAP OF OHIO .............................................................................................................................. 12 FIGURE 1.3 PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS OF OHIO ............................................................................................................ 13 FIGURE 1.4 OHIO FLINT OUTCROPS FROM MULLETT 2009. .......................................................................................... 14 FIGURE 1.5 DISTRIBUTION OF THE UPPER MERCER LIMESTONE FORMATION FROM CARLSON 1994. ........................... 16 FIGURE 1.6 EXAMPLES OF UPPER MERCER CHERT. .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Level Preservice Teachers Experience a Natural History Arts
    Middle Level Interdisciplinary Natural History Unit Weber & Rule Page 15 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Journal of STEM Arts, Crafts, and Constructions Middle Level Preservice Volume 2, Number 2, Pages 15-44. Teachers Experience a Natural History Arts-Integrated Interdisciplinary Thematic Unit Carolyn A. Weber and Audrey C. Rule University of Northern Iowa The Journal’s Website: Abstract http://scholarworks.uni.edu/journal-stem-arts/ Curricular demands and best practices for middle school require interdisciplinary units. Arts integration can provide motivation and a new pathway to learning. This unit focused on inquiry into the natural history of artifacts and rocks recovered from the exposed Key Words subsoil of an area near Cedar Falls, Iowa that had been bulldozed Thematic curriculum, middle school, arts integration, glaciation, as part of subdivision development. The described unit involved stone artifacts, agates, iron formation. preservice teachers in exploration of all subject areas (language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) with arts-integrated projects (agate watercolor painting, stone tool graphing, acrylic Introduction polymer clay agate keyring making, and stone tool drawings). The content area activities for social studies included identification and lifestyle interpretation of stone tools found intermixed with rocks and Teachers are asked to teach so many topics and sand in the subsoil of the site. Science content activities included
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 44 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 44 NO. 1 WINTER 1994 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incor­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 porated non-profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, BACK ISSUES Lancaster, OH 43130, (614) 653-6642 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 43130, (614)653-9477 Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse.$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's& 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614) 861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064, (614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gen­ 1994 Immediate Past Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2Nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S
    Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Newsletter Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S. Navy Story Number: NNS130716-29) The Navy discovered a significant prehistoric artifact 90 miles west of San Diego on San Clemente Island (SCI) located mid-island at a newly discovered archeological site. A boat effigy made of submarine volcano lava was spotted at the surface of the site during an archeology survey. The boat effigy represents a type of boat used by the California Indians who occupied the California Channels and adjacent southern California mainland at the time of the Spanish "discovery" in the AD 1500s. Dr. Andy Yatsko, Senior Archaeologist and Region Southwest Archaeologist for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest in San Diego, who has over 40 years experience in prehistoric and historic archaeology finds the boat effigy to be an uncommon find. "Boat effigies like the one found are exceedingly rare in the archaeological record, with this being my first one recovered during my 30 year tenure with SCI," said Dr. Yatsko [image courtesy U.S. Navy]. "Finding artifacts on the surface of archaeological sites at the island is not unusual, but a rare one like this is always exciting to come across." The effigy was created from submarine volcano lava. This lava differs from the lava that flows on the mainland because the vesicles are smaller, making it more brittle and more difficult to handle. “The vesicle volcanic material used is hard and brittle but somehow they were able to craft a fine little carving out of it to represent an important part of their culture," said Yatsko.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier History of Coshocton
    Frontier History of Coshocton By Scott E. Butler, Ph. D. Frontier History of Coshocton First printing 2020 Library of Congress Control Number: 2020915741 Copyright 2020 Scott E. Butler Copyright of photographs, maps and illustrations remains with persons or institutions credited. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-578-75019-4 Printed by Carlisle Printing Sugarcreek, Ohio Cover art is a digital photo of an oil-on-canvas painting by the author’s father, Dr. John G. Butler, a veterinarian in Coshocton for many years. He enjoyed painting animals. Manufactured in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Open Your Eyes and Ears and Clear Your Mind and Listen to What I Have to Say – Adapted from customary opening words of northeast Native American conferences among tribes and nations and with white people in the 18th Century. Dedicated to the people of Coshocton, that present and future generations may know the truth about the grand history of their place in the world. Contents Page # Preface i Acknowledgements ii Illustrations iii Maps iv Terminology v Sources vi Chapter Page # 1. Introduction & the Pre-European Era 1 2. Mary Harris 21 3. Early Habitation of Ohio after 1701 40 4. The Conflict Begins 56 5. The War Years in Ohio 66 6. Recovery in Coshoctonia 78 7. Delaware Survival in Coshoctonia 107 8. Delaware Revival in Coshoctonia 118 9. Conversions and Conflicts 133 10. Coshoctonia on January 1, 1775 168 11. Resolution and Revolution 178 12. Lichtenau & New Leaders 197 13. Peace and War 209 14. Alliance and Breakdown 234 15. Fort Laurens 253 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee
    From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Miller, Darcy Shane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 09:33:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/320030 From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee by Darcy Shane Miller __________________________ Copyright © Darcy Shane Miller 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Darcy Shane Miller, titled From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Vance T. Holliday _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Steven L. Kuhn _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Mary C. Stiner _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) David G. Anderson Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 38 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 38 NO. 1 WINTER 1988 »*n Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio TERM Back Issues EXPIRES O AS. OFFICERS 1988 President Martha Potter Otto, Ohio Historical Society, Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Columbus, OH 4321 1 -Tel. 614/297-2641; Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $ 5 00 Home 614/846-7640 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 4.00 Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N Converse $10.00 1988 Vice-President Donald A Casto, 138 Ann Ct.. Lancaster. The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse . $15.00 OH 43130-Tel. 614/653-9477 Back issues—black and white —each $ 4 00 1988 Exec. Sec. Michael W Schoenfeld, 5683 Blacklick-Eastern Back issues—four full color plates—each $ 4.00 Rd. N.W., Pickerington, OH 43147 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 1988 Treasurer Stephen J Parker, 1859 Frank Dr. Lancaster. are generally out of print but copies are available from time to time Write to business office for prices and availability. OH 43130-Tel 614 653-6642 1988 Recording Sec Barbara Motts, 7050 Refugee Rd., Canal ASO Chapters Winchester, OH 431 10-Tel 614/837-4862; Black Swamp Bus 614/898-4116 President: Kevin Boos, 510 Wilder Ave , Huron, OH 44839 1988 Imnied. Past Pres. Don Gehlbach, 3435 Sciotangy Dr.. Meeting place: Huntington Bank, Bowling Green, last Tuesday Columbus, OH 43221 -Tel. 614/459-0808; of each month Bus 614/888-3572 Cuyahoga Valley 1990 Editor Robert N Converse, 199 Converse Dr, Plain City, President: Beverly Imhoff, 87 N 4th St Rittman.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Evidence of Systemic Inflammation from Osteological Markers in the Indian Knoll Population of Ohio County, Kentucky
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Detecting evidence of systemic inflammation from osteological markers in the Indian Knoll population of Ohio county, Kentucky. Krysta Wilham University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Wilham, Krysta, "Detecting evidence of systemic inflammation from osteological markers in the Indian Knoll population of Ohio county, Kentucky." (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2587. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2587 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETECTING EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION FROM OSTEOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE INDIAN KNOLL POPULATION OF OHIO COUNTY, KENTUCKY By Krysta Wilham B.A., Northern Kentucky University, 2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology Department of Anthropology University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2016 Copyright 2016 by Krysta N. Wilham All rights reserved DETECTING EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION FROM OSTEOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE INDIAN KNOLL POPULATION OF OHIO COUNTY, KENTUCKY By Krysta N.
    [Show full text]