DOCSLIB.ORG

40 Appendix T10 Circulation Element Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX T10 City of Oceanside General Plan Circulation Element Appendices OCEANSIDE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT City of Oceanside, California APPENDICES September 2012 Appendix A Bicycle Master Plan Circulation Element CityCity ofof OceansideOceanside BicBicyycclele MasterMaster PlanPlan 2008 Prepared by KTU+A • Planning + Landscape Architecture In association with IBI Group • Transportation Planning for the City of Oceanside, California City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary Caltrans BTA Compliance Introduction 1.1 Project Scope 1-1 1.2 Field Work 1-1 1.3 Bikeway Facility Types 1-1 1.3.1 Class 1 Bike Paths 1-1 1.3.2 Class 2 Bike Lanes 1-2 1 1.3.3 Class 3 Bike Routes 1-4 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Land Use 2-1 2.2 Planned Land Use 2-1 2 2.3 Bike Commuting 2-1 2.4 Age Density: Under 16 Years Old 2-1 2.5 Employment Density 2-1 2.6 Population Density 2-2 2.7 Activity centers 2-2 2.8 Traffic Volumes 2-2 2.9 Safety and security 2-3 2.10 Existing bicycle facilities and major street segments 2-18 2.10.1 Downs Street 2-18 2.10.2 California Street 2-18 2.10.3 Morse Street 2-18 2.10.4 Fire Mountain Drive 2-18 2.10.5 Foussat Road 2-18 2.10.6 North River Road 2-18 2.10.7 Pacific Street 2-19 2.10.8 Sleeping Indian Road 2-19 TOC-1 2.10.9 The Strand 2-19 2.10.10 Oceanside Boulevard 2-19 2.10.11 Rancho Del Oro Drive 2-20 2.10.12 Melrose Drive 2-20 2.10.13 North Santa Fe Avenue 2-20 2.10.14 Mission Avenue 2-20 2.10.15 Mesa Drive 2-20 2.10.16 Barnard Drive 2-21 2.10.17 College Boulevard 2-21 2.10.18 Lake Boulevard 2-21 2.10.19 El Camino Real 2-21 2.10.20 Douglas Drive 2-22 2.10.21 Coast Highway 2-22 2.10.22 Vista Way 2-22 2.10.23 Vandergrift Boulevard 2-22 2.11 San Luis Rey River Tra il 2-23 2.11.1 Access #1: Neptune Way 2-23 2.11.2 Access #2: Benet Road 2-23 2.11.3 Access #3: Foussat Road 2-23 2.11.4 Access #4: Douglas Boulevard 2-23 2.11.5 Access #5: Cypress Road Bridge 2-23 2.11.6 Access #5: College Boulevard 2-23 2.12 Access to transit sites and inter-modal transfer points 2-24 2.13 Gaps in existing regional bikeway facilities 2-27 2.14 Existing bikeway hazards 2-27 2.14.1 Highway Crossing Hazards 2-27 2.14.2 Highway Crossing Opportunities 2-27 2.15 Bicycle facility configurations at intersections 2-28 2.16 Maintenance of bikeway facilities 2-28 Survey of Existing Bike Maps, Trails and Regional Plans 3.1 Carlsbad Bikeway Master Plan (2001) 3-1 3.2 City of Carlsbad: Current Conditions 3-2 3.3 City of Vista’s Non-motorized Transportation 3 Facilities Master Plan (2002) 3-3 3.4 San Diego County Bicycle Master Plan (2003) 3-4 TOC-2 City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan 3.5 SANDAG Mobility 2030: A Transportation Plan for the San Diego Region (2003) 3-4 3.6 San Diego Region Bike Map (2007) - SANDAG 3-6 3.7 NCTD Short Range Transportation Plan 3-7 3.8 City of Oceanside General Plan: Recreational Trails Element (2002) 3-7 3.9 City of Oceanside General Plan: Circulation Element (2002) 3-9 3.10 San Luis Rey River Trail: Opportunities and Constraints (2005) 3-10 3.11 Survey of Planned Local Bikeways 3-11 Recommendations 4.1 Recommended Bikeway Facilities 4-1 4.1.1 Class 1 Facilities 4-1 4.1.2 Class 2 Facilities 4-1 4.1.3 Class 3 Facilities 4-1 4.1.4 Recommended Projects in Caltrans Right-of-Way 4-2 4.2 Recommended Projects 4-2 4 4.2.1 Class 1 Bike Paths 4-2 4.2.2 Class 2 Bike Lanes 4-3 4.2.3 Class 3 Bike Routes 4-4 4.3 Additional Recommended Improvements 4-10 4.3.1 Bicycle facilities configurations at intersections 4-10 4.4 Mountain Bike and Trail Opportunities 4-11 4.5 The Five Es of a Bicycle Friendly Community 4-11 4.5.1 Engineering 4-11 4.5.2 Education 4-13 4.5.3 Encouragement 4-14 4.5.4 Enforcement 4-14 4.5.5 Evaluation and Planning 4-14 4.6 Additional Recommendations 4-15 4.6.1 Canyon Drive and Oceanside Boulevard 4-15 4.6.2 Melrose Drive and North Santa Fe Road 4-15 TOC-3 Prioritized Routes and Bikeway Funding 5.1 Facility Priority Criteria and Implementation 5-1 5.2 Typical Construction Costs 5-3 5.2.1 Class 1 Bike Path Facilities 5-3 5.2.2 Class 2 Bike Lane Facilities 5-4 5 5.2.3 Class 3 Bike Route Facilities 5-4 5.2.4 Bikeway Bridge Improvements 5-4 5.3 Top Priority Projects 5-5 5.4 Second Priority Projects 5-8 5.5 Bikeway Funding Sources 5-12 5.5.1 Federal Sources 5-12 5.5.2 State Sources 5-15 5.5.3 Other State Bicycle Project Funding Sources 5-16 5.5.4 Local Sources 5-16 5.5.5 Most Likely Sources 5-17 5.6 Bikeway Planning 5-18 5.6.1 Local Emphasis 5-18 5.6.2 Master Plan Process 5-18 5.6.3 “Institutionalizing” Bicycle Planning 5-18 Design Guidelines 6.1 Bikeway Planning 6-1 6.1.1 Local Emphasis 6-1 6.1.2 Master Plan Process 6-1 6.1.3 “Institutionalizing” Bicycle Planning 6-1 6.1.4 Primary Planning Considerations 6-2 6.1.5 Integration with Other City Plans and Programs 6-2 6.1.6 Education and Encouragement 6-2 6.1.7 Regulating Land Use and Community Design to 6 Benefit Cycling 6-3 6.1.8 Bicycle Parking Facilities 6-4 6.1.9 Locating Bicycle Facilities on Roadways 6-9 6.1.10 Integrating Bicycle Facilities into the Roadway Planning Process 6-9 6.2 General Physical Guidelines 6-11 6.2.1 Pavement Width 6-11 6.2.2 Sight Distance 6-13 6.2.3 Truck Traffic 6-13 6.2.4 Steep Grades 6-13 6.2.5 Unavoidable Obstacles 6-13 6.2.6 Pavement Design 6-14 TOC-4 City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan 6.2.7 Raised Roadway Markers 6-14 6.2.8 Utilities 6-14 6.2.9 Drainage Facilities 6-14 6.2.10 Combination Curb and Gutter 6-15 6.2.11 Bridges 6-15 6.2.12 Traffic Control Devices 6-16 6.2.13 Intersections and Driveways 6-18 6.2.14 Roadside Obstacles 6-19 6.2.15 Railroad Crossings 6-19 6.2.16 TSM Type Improvements 6-19 6.2.17 Marginal Improvements and Retrofitting Existing Roadways 6-19 6.2.18 Access Control 6-20 6.2.19 Bikeway Reconstruction after Construction 6-20 6.2.20 Maintenance Priorities 6-21 6.2.21 Intermodal Planning and Facilities 6-21 6.2.22 Traffic Calming 6-21 6.3 Class 1 Multi-Use Path Guidelines 6-23 6.3.1 Class 1 Planning Issues Shared-Use of Multiple Use Paths 6-23 6.4 Design of Class 1 Facilities (Paths Primarily Used by Bicycles) 6-25 6.4.1 Width and Clearance 6-25 6.4.2 Horizontal Separation from Roadways 6-25 6.4.3 Design Speed 6-26 6.4.4 Horizontal Alignment and Superelevation 6-26 6.4.5 Grade 6-26 6.4.6 Switchbacks 6-27 6.4.7 Sight Distances 6-27 6.4.8 Intersections 6-27 6.4.9 Signing and Marking 6-28 6.4.10 Pavement Structure 6-28 6.4.11 Structures 6-29 6.4.12 Drainage 6-30 6.4.13 Lighting 6-30 6.4.14 Barriers to Motor Vehicle Traffic 6-30 6.5 Unpaved Multi-Use Facilities 6-30 6.6 Class 2 Facilities 6-31 6.6.1 Lane Widths 6-31 6.6.2 Intersections 6-33 6.6.3 Signing and Striping Requirements 6-33 6.6.4 Miscellaneous Bikeway Criteria 6-34 6.7 Class 3 Facilities 6-35 6.7.1 Roadway Engineering 6-35 TOC-5 Appendix A: Caltrans Highway Design Manual - Chapter 1000 - Bikeway Planning and Design AA-1 Appendix B: Public Input AB-1 Workshop #1 Summary AB-1 Workshop #2 Summary AB-16 Appendix C: Guidelines for Selecting Safe Routes to School AC-1 Appendix D: California Bicycle Laws and Safety AD-1 VC 231 - Bicycle Defined AD-1 VC 21200 - Bicycle Use AD-1 VC 21201 - Equipment Requirements AD-1 VC 21202 - Duty of Bicycle Operator: Operation On Roadway AD-2 VC 21203 - Hitching Rides AD-2 VC 21204 - Riding On Bicycle AD-2 VC 21205 - Carrying Articles AD-2 VC 21208 - Permitted Movements from Bicycle Lanes AD-2 VC 21210 - Parking AD-2 VC 21211 - Obstruction of Bikeways AD-3 VC 21212 - Youth Helmets AD-3 VC 21650.1 - Bicycles on Roadways AD-3 VC 21960 - Bicycling on Freeways AD-3 VC 22111 - Hand Signals AD-3 VC 23330 - Toll Crossing AD-3 VC 27400 - Headsets and Earplugs AD-3 VC 39002 - License Requirement AD-3 VC 23111 - 23112 AD-4 Appendix E: Priority Scoring Sheets AE-1 TOC-6 City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan FIGURES Figure 1.1 Bikeway Facility Types 1-1 Figure 1.2 Typical Class 2 Bike Lane Sections 1-3 Figure 2.1 Existing Land Use 2-4 Figure 2.2 Planned Land Use 2-5 Figure 2.3 Bicycle Commuting 2-6 Figure 2.4 Age Density Under 16 Years old 2-7 Figure 2.5 2000 Employment Density 2-8 Figure 2.6 2030 Employment Density 2-9 Figure 2.7 2000 Population Density 2-10 Figure 2.8 2030 Population Density 2-11 Figure 2.9 Activity Centers 2-12 Figure 2.10 ADTs 2-13 Figure 2.11 Bicycle Collisions (2004-July 2007) 2-14 Figure 2.12 Speed Limits 2-15 Figure 2.13 Street Classifications 2-16 Figure 2.14 Bus Stop Boarding and Alightings 2-17 Figure 2.15 Existing Bicycle Facilities 2-25 Figure 2.16 Coaster and Sprinter Alignments 2-26 Figure 3.1 Planned Bicycle Facilities 3-13 Figure 4.1 Class 1 Bike Path Recommended Projects 4-6 Figure 4.2 Class 2 Bike Lane Recommended Projects 4-7 Figure 4.3 Class 3 Bike Route Recommended Projects 4-8 Figure 4.4 Recommended Projects on Caltrans Rights-of-Way 4-9 Figure 4.5 Mountain Bike and Bike Park Opportunities 4-12 Figure 4.6 Canyon Drive and Oceanside Boulevard 4-16 Figure 4.7 Melrose Drive and North Santa Fe Road 4-17 Figure 5-1 Typical Construction Costs 5-3 Figure 5-2 Top Priority Projects 5-7 Figure 5-3 Second Priority Projects 5-11 Figure 5-4 Bikeway Facility Funding Summary 5-20 TOC-7 TOC-8 City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan Executive Summary Project Scope This study is a comprehensive update of the 1995 City of Oceanside General Plan Circulation Element and Recreational Trails Element.
Recommended publications
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda

    Meeting Notice and Agenda

    MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP The SPRINTER Smart Growth Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. City of San Marcos, Valley of Discovery Room 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 Staff Contacts: Susan Baldwin and Christine Eary (619) 699-1943; (619) 699-6928 [email protected]; [email protected] AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR • I-PLACE3S SKETCH MODELING TOOL • SPRINTER SERVICE PLAN AND BUS COORDINATION SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP Wednesday, April 11, 2007 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS +2. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP MEETING APPROVE SUMMARY The Working Group should review and approve the January 31, 2007, Meeting Summary. REPORTS (3 through 6) 3. DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR (WG members) DISCUSS Working Group (WG) members will have the opportunity to share comments and questions regarding the station area sites visited during the SPRINTER tour on March 14. Working Group members are asked to comment on site constraints common among the station areas, and strategies being implemented to address those constraints.
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q4-FY17[Icon]

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q4-FY17[Icon]

    ATTACHMENT 4A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period April 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017 (Q4 of FY17) Page 1 of 59 Contents BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 8 RIDERSHIP ................................................................................................................... 12 ROUTE PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 25 CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ............................................................................................. 41 FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 58 Page 2 of 59 BACKGROUND NCTD produces this Quarterly Performance Report to provide information regarding the performance of its operations. The data contained in this report for Fiscal Year 2017 is unaudited and subject to change. In December 2015, NCTD awarded a new contract to Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA, Inc. (Bombardier) for combined SPRINTER and COASTER operations and maintenance. Revenue operations by Bombardier commenced with an early start in mid-June 2016, three weeks before the beginning of FY2017, July 1, 2016. The Bombardier contract with NCTD included a more robust capital project
  • Title Vi Triennial Program Update for Metropolitan Transit District and North County Transit District

    Title Vi Triennial Program Update for Metropolitan Transit District and North County Transit District

    TITLE VI TRIENNIAL PROGRAM UPDATE FOR METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT AND NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT AUGUST 2012 401 B Street, Suite 800 • San Diego, CA 92101-4231 • (619) 699-1900 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I General Requirements and Guidelines..................................................................... 1 1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 2 2. Required Components of the Program Update ................................................ 2 3. General Requirements ........................................................................................ 2 Chapter II Program-Specific Requirements and Guidelines for Recipients Serving Large Urbanized Areas ........................................................ 13 1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 14 2. Program-Specific Requirements ......................................................................... 14 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within Low-Income Areas ............................................ 46 Table 2-2 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within Minority Areas ................................................... 46 Table 2-3 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within LIM Areas ........................................................... 46 Table 2-4 NCTD Inventory of Transit Stops within Low-Income Areas ........................................... 47 Table 2-5 NCTD Inventory of
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q1-FY19[Icon]

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q1-FY19[Icon]

    ATTACHMENT 4A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period July 1, 2018 – September 30, 2018 (Q1 of FY19) Page 1 of 46 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................ 6 Ridership ....................................................................................................................... 14 Farebox Recovery ......................................................................................................... 21 On-Time Performance ................................................................................................... 22 NCTD Customer Feedback ........................................................................................... 23 Paratransit and Fixed-Route Wheelchair Usage ............................................................ 32 Fare Collection System ................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A: BREEZE Descriptions and Service Statistics ............................................ 37 Appendix B: BREEZE Composite Rankings by Day Type ............................................. 40 Appendix C: October Service Change Ridership Trends .............................................. 44 Appendix D: COASTER & SPRINTER Quarterly Performance ..................................... 46 Page 2 of 46 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NCTD produces the
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region

    Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region

    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
  • BREEZE Accidents by Category

    BREEZE Accidents by Category

    ATTACHMENT 4A April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 Safety and Security Division Quarterly Report For the Period April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 (Q4 of FY 2018) April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 Contents FY 2018 Annual Safety and Security Summary .......................................... 3 Safety and Security Performance Metrics ................................................... 5 Preventable Accidents ................................................................................ 6 Non-Preventable Accidents ........................................................................ 7 Rail Accidents ............................................................................................. 8 BREEZE Accidents by Category ............................................................... 10 San Diego Subdivision Overview .............................................................. 12 Escondido Subdivision Overview .............................................................. 15 Part 1 Crimes ............................................................................................ 18 Law Enforcement Activities April – June 2018 .......................................... 19 Assaults .................................................................................................... 20 Fare Validation .......................................................................................... 21 Page 2 of 21 April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 FY2018 Annual Safety and Security Summary For FY2018, NCTD had no preventable accidents on COASTER or SPRINTER, and

  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q2-FY18[Icon]

    ATTACHMENT 7A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017 (Q2 of FY18) Page 1 of 47 Contents BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 8 ROUTE PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 30 NCTD CUSTOMER FEEDBACK .................................................................................. 37 FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 46 Page 2 of 47 BACKGROUND NCTD produces this Quarterly Performance Report to provide information regarding the performance of its operations. The data contained in this report for Fiscal Year 2018 is unaudited and subject to change. Final and audited financial and performance results will be provided as part of NCTD’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Page 3 of 47 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ridership Performance NCTD’s ridership performance is consistent with the nation-wide trends of decreased transit ridership, which can partly be attributed to the growing popularity of transportation network companies (TNCs), like Uber and Lyft, low unemployment, and increased automobile sales. Internal factors, like on-time performance, reliability,
  • RESOLUTION ST-98 Rail Transit and Crossing Branch November 6, 2008 Rail Transit Safety Section

    RESOLUTION ST-98 Rail Transit and Crossing Branch November 6, 2008 Rail Transit Safety Section

    CPSD/RWC/RTSS/JEB/vdl Mailed 11/7/08 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Consumer Protection and Safety Division RESOLUTION ST-98 Rail Transit and Crossing Branch November 6, 2008 Rail Transit Safety Section R E S O L U T I O N RESOLUTION GRANTING NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT A VARIANCE TO GENERAL ORDER 143-B MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS ON HIGH LEVEL STATION PLATFORM “WING RAILINGS” AND ORDERING SPECIAL SAFETY PROCEDURES AT SPRINTER STATIONS WITH RETRACTABLE GANGWAYS SUMMARY This resolution grants North County Transit District’s (NCTD’s) request for a variance to General Order (GO) 143-B, Section No. 9.06 c (1) Side Clearance requirements on NCTD’s Sprinter Line high level station platforms. The resolution also imposes special safety procedures on NCTD’s Sprinter Line’s high level station platforms with retractable gangways. These special safety procedures are necessary to ensure safe operations on NCTD’s right-of-way shared by both freight railroad trains operated by the BNSF Railway (BNSF) and light rail transit vehicles as permitted by the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) and Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) “temporal separation” provisions.1 1 See the October 3, 2006 letter from Grady C. Cothen, Jr., Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program Development, Federal Railroad Administration, to Mr. Edward Fishman, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Nicholson, Graham, LLP, Washington, DC; and “Joint Statement of Agency Policy Concerning Shared Use of the 360113 - 1 - CPSD/RWC/RTSS/JEB/vdl Resolution ST-98 November 6, 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION NCTD constructed a rail fixed-guideway system known as the “Sprinter” carrying passengers between the cities of Oceanside and Escondido on the existing 22-mile Escondido Branch Line, an active freight railroad line, with a new loop extension in San Marcos.
  • North County Transit District Storm Water Management Plan July 2019

    North County Transit District Storm Water Management Plan July 2019

    North County Transit District Storm Water Management Plan July 2019 Prepared For: 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 NCTD Overview ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Program Management ................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.1 Program Management Element .............................................................................................. 10 1.3 Regulatory Background ............................................................................................................... 11 1.4 NPDES Permit Program ............................................................................................................... 11 1.4.1 MS4 Permit Phase I Program .................................................................................................. 11 1.4.2 MS4 Permit Phase II Program ................................................................................................. 12 1.4.3 Industrial General Permit ........................................................................................................ 12 1.4.4 Construction General Permit .................................................................................................. 13 1.5 Non-NPDES Permits ...................................................................................................................
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 (Q2 of FY19) Page 1 of 39 Contents PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY ......................................................................... 3 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 5 YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE ................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ................................................... 10 APPENDIX B: BREEZE ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ........ 11 APPENDIX C: COASTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STANDARDS ...... 20 APPENDIX D: SPRINTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STATISTICS ....... 24 APPENDIX E: LIFT SERVICE DESCRIPTION AND STATISTICS ............................... 28 APPENDIX F: FLEX ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS .............. 33 APPENDIX G: AMTRAK AND METROLINK ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ................................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX I: FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM ............................................................... 38 Page 2 of 39 PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY The Quarterly Transit Operations Performance Report provides an overview of NCTD performance trends by mode as they relate to budgeted goals for both year to date (through December 31, 2018) and in the current quarter for the fiscal year. NCTD performance goals are set either as contractual requirements or established
  • North County Transit District’S Zero-Emissions Bus Rollout Plan for Submission to the California Air Resources Board

    North County Transit District’S Zero-Emissions Bus Rollout Plan for Submission to the California Air Resources Board

    Agenda Item # 5 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 20-04 APPROVING THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT’S ZERO-EMISSIONS BUS ROLLOUT PLAN FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD Time Sensitive: ☒ Consent: ☒ STAFF Adopt Resolution No. 20-04 approving North County Transit District’s (NCTD) RECOMMENDATION: Zero-Emissions Bus Rollout Plan for submission to the California Air Resources Board (CARB). BACKGROUND The Innovative Clean Transit (ICT) regulation became effective October 1, 2019 INFORMATION: and requires all public transit agencies to gradually transition their bus fleets to zero-emission technologies. The ICT regulation applies to all transit agencies that own, operate, or lease buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds. It covers standard, articulated, over-the-road, double decker, and cutaway buses. The ICT regulation requires a percentage of new bus purchases to be zero-emission buses (ZEBs). The ZEB percentage increases gradually with time. The ZEB purchase requirements begin in 2023 for large transit agencies. Starting 2029, 100 percent of all transit agencies’ new bus purchases must be ZEBs, with a goal of complete transition to ZEBs (all buses in each transit agency’s fleet to be ZEBs) by 2040. The ICT regulation requires each transit agency to submit a Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan (Rollout Plan) before ZEB purchase requirements take effect. The Rollout Plan will be a living document and is meant to guide the implementation of zero-emission bus fleets and help NCTD work through many of the potential challenges and explore solutions. The plan includes estimated timelines based on best available information for future bus purchases, infrastructure upgrades, and workforce training.

  • Pacific Ocean Carlsbad Oceanside Vista

    94 302 M-F ! VA 318 L-V E l ! Clinic • • Oceanside Transit Center C Olive Ave ! SÁ SA a El Corazon m !Ä 101, 302, 313, 318, i n ! 323 • • o DO Walmart Oceansi Ä de B r SPRINTER, FLEX 392, lvd R College Blvd. 315 ! SU ! a D VISTA ! n c 325 d ! l h Station FLEX 395, COASTER, Ä a o ! r Rancho Del D e El Camino d Way Ä Ä The e ! ! v r ta Ä ! ! Amtrak, Metrolink, l m is ! !Ä l V ! Oro Station D Ä MiraCosta E ! B ! Wave O Station r Ä • • • Destinations/Destinos e Boomers !Ä ! Oceanside aVistavíaWay Oceanside toVistaviaWay e ! Scripps RTA 202, Greyhound r College g 309 o d ! !Ä e ! ! The ShoppesatCarlsbad Plaza CaminoReal MiraCosta College l n l !Ä !Ä !Ä u Urgent ! ! ! !Ä o !Ä !Ä Ä! h ! ! ! C Courthouse Social T ! Care !Ä !Ä !Ä Crouch St OCEANSIDE !Ä !Ä ! !Ä Security !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä ! Station The Shoppes/ Ofce !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä ! ! Ä Ä Ä ! Ä ! !Ä ! !Ä Ä ! !Ä ! ! !Ä Regal Cinemas Target !!Ä !Ä ! Vista Transit Center Vista W !Ä ! !Ä ay !Ä Tri-City !Ä !Ä Walmart !Ä ! !Ä !Ä !Ä 303, 305, 306, 318, ! !Ä ! Hospital ! Ä d C ! !Ä Blv !Ä Vons ! e ! oa ! Lak 332, 334, SPRINTER Ä ! s y Ä !Ä ! Coast Hwy t a !! !Ä !Ä !Ä H W !Ä w ta !Ä Ä Station s ! ! !Ä Rady Children’s 332 !Ä y i ! ! !Ä V !Ä Urgent Care !Ä M Walmart !Ä PACIFIC ! o Carlsbad n !Ä ro Plaza Camino Village e College Monthly Pass available at OCEAN St Real Station the Student Account’s Ofce at M el r • • • • 309, 315, MiraCosta College’s Oceanside os Legend/Leyenda e Vista CommunityClinic SPRINTERStation Coast Hwy.