DOCSLIB.ORG

Uranium-238 Which Inhibits Fission by Absorbing Neutrons Not Emitting Them

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uranium-238 Which Inhibits Fission by Absorbing Neutrons Not Emitting Them The Mushroom Farm By Joseph Cleveland Brown, III U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Fellow of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, (Retired Civil Works Project Engineer, (Retired) CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1: Einstein’s Legacy. Chapter 2: The Stars of Nuclear Physics. Chapter 3: Nuclear Energy Explained. Chapter 4: Our Race for the Bomb. Chapter 5: Our Bombs. Chapter 6: The Weapon Delivery Systems. Chapter 7: Our Nuclear Warheads. Chapter 8: Our Missiles. Chapter 9: Our Nuclear Powered Navy. Chapter 10: The Anatomy of a Nuclear Explosion. Chapter 11: U. S. Military Nuclear Safety record! Chapter 12: The Cuban Missile Crisis! Chapter 13: Our Testing. Chapter 14: Our Atomic Power Generation versus the World. Chapter 15: Our Planned Nuclear Waste Repository. Chapter 16: Our Cost so far. Chapter 17: How to prepare for the future. Glossary References and Sources Introduction OOPS! In 2007 I watched a one hour documentary on TV. I was shocked to learn that our government, Yes, You guessed it, the same government that looses all of our money in the Stock Market and Mortgage Market and puts space shuttles up, launches missiles that attack and kill other missiles and builds Nuclear Submarines so sophisticated that they are impossible to detect underwater has lost a Hydrogen Bomb close to a major American city and can’t find it! And as a middle manager in the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for over 30 years I was never officially informed of this fact! I had to learn of this disturbing event on TV! It was on The Discovery Channel one day and titled, “America’s Lost H- Bomb” and was indeed an eye opener. The title alone got my full attention as I was expecting a show about how we had lost a nuclear device somewhere in the deep oceans of the world. I was surprised to learn that there was a One Megaton Thermonuclear Bomb buried in the mud somewhere near Tybee Island Georgia right here in the good old U. S. of A.! I was further alarmed by the revelation brought out in the show that the weapon went missing in 1958 and has yet to be found. (I sincerely hope someone who wants to do the U. S. harm has not already found it)! The federal agencies looking for it know what it looks like, (12 feet long, weighing 7,600 pounds), they know at what altitude and airspeed the B-47 dropped it from, ( 7,200 feet and 200 knots) and they even know that it was serial number “47782” and had an explosive yield of One Megaton. I spent many years of my adult life and career in the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers an not once have I seen an official document mentioning this lost H-bomb! I can only conclude therefore that it was kept secret from the general public and some government agencies until recently. So, if I lived on Tybee Island Georgia I would move at least 500 miles away because there is a 1 Megaton Thermonuclear Bomb sitting in the mud offshore, in the vicinity of Wassaw Sound that may or may not be armed, and is exposed to the corrosive elements contained in the mud and surrounding sea water. The Government says it is safe but can we believe them? I would not stake my family’s life on the assurance of the government knowing their track record in promulgating misinformation. I have in my files a copy of the Official Air Force report dated 12APRIL2001 that says, “The Mark 15 bomb was produced in two versions; the Mod 0 and Mod 2. The Mod 2 version of this bomb type replaced the removable nuclear capsule of the Mod 0 with a non-removable nuclear capsule, thus making the Mod 2 version a self-contained fully functional nuclear bomb”. It goes on to say in the next paragraph, “Concern has been raised as to which version of the bomb was used”. The U. S. A. F. & Department of Energy both concluded that the bomb was a Mod 0, based on the following unsubstantiated investigative conclusions: • Maintenance records for this specific bomb indicate the only maintenance activity during which the Mod 0 to Mod 2 conversion might have been completed took place in July 1956. • Atomic Energy Commission production records indicate Mod 2 conversion kits were not ready until December 1957. • AEC production records indicate Mod 0 to Mod 2 conversions did not begin until March 1958. • As the accident occurred in February 1958, the evidence is inconclusive that the bomb involved was a Mod 0. • Testimony before congressional investigating committees in the aftermath of the “Tybee Incident” left more doubt about the weapon being armed or not and no conclusive evidence was offered as to which version of the bomb was lost! Chilling, isn’t it? Statements like, “conversion might have been completed,” or “the evidence is inconclusive that the bomb involved was a Mod 0!” I don’t know about you but might and inconclusive are not words I want to see in a report dealing with a lost 1 megaton thermonuclear bomb that is sitting in the mud off of a city that has over 300,000 inhabitants in its’ metro area. Savannah Georgia is a vital city in the Southeastern U. S. and is home to Fort Stewart, Hunter Army Bases not to mention Marine Corps Recruit Depot Paris Island just to the northeast . It occurs to me that maybe the U. S. government is and has been hoping this incident will go away and that the bomb will just deteriorate into the mud. With the shadow of nuclear annihilation perched on the doorstep of Tybee Island Georgia I sure hope the bomb that is there doesn’t just decide to go off some day (triggered by a random lightening strike) and give us all a dose of reality we are not ready for, or worse yet, some nefarious salvage firm recovers it and sells it to one of our enemies, foreign or domestic. In this age of uncertainty I fear the possibility of the Islamic Extremists and other types of domestic terrorists getting their hands on a suitcase sized nuke. (They exist and are very easy to use)! A suitcase sized nuke may not have enough power to level a large city but it could render Wall Street financial markets a fond memory if our government doesn’t destroy them first. I know in my heart that there are many groups of disaffected U. S. citizens who belong to radical left and right wing groups who would not hesitate to use a nuke to get their point across. I have studied these home grown groups in my years in the military intelligence training I have had and I attended a two week seminar once that was absolutely chilling. The topic was “Domestic Sects, Cults and Deviant Movements”. It was an two week course and I could not sleep well for quite a few weeks after attending it because I had learned just how many groups there are right here living among us that are enemies of the state for whatever misguided reasons they have. Not to mention the religious nut cases halfway around the world who live in a doomsday theology such as radical Islam. I decided right at that moment to write the definitive work on United States Nuclear History without sugar coating it so anyone could have a reference at their disposal to find the historical facts on Nuclear power generation, weapons, technology and the Government organizations that regulate Nuclear energy in this nation. Let me point out that I am no raving anti nuke person nor would anyone who knows me call me a liberal. I am a self described Conservative Libertarian and as patriotic as any American can be when it comes to the defense of my country. I adhere to the Theodore Roosevelt philosophy of, “Talk softly and carry a BIG stick”! That being said, I cannot explain why the United States has ten times more nuclear warheads and bombs than it has means to deliver them. The only plausible answer is like the old frontier scouts used to say “You can’t carry enough bullets in hostile Indian territory when you need them”! Nuclear weapons are not like your typical conventional ammunition. You don’t drop nuclear weapons every day on a city or military facility until you destroy it! It only takes one of sufficient size to do the trick! So, I ask myself. Why do we have so many nuclear bombs? Whatever the reason he has President George Bush will be remembered in history as the Commander in Chief who trimmed our Nuclear Arsenal to a manageable level by ordering the systematic dismantling and storage of thousands of obsolete nuclear weapons and the lethal components they are made from. (This fact is not widely published in the media for obvious reasons). The President thinks this is best for us and I agree that we must do this. We only have enough ships, submarines, aircraft and missiles to deliver 500 to 600 warheads at one time (in an all out combined forces effort of ship/submarine launched, silo launched and aircraft launched weapons). If Iran carries out their threats and does launch a nuke into Israel it will only take 2 medium sized weapons to destroy Israel but it will take 11 warheads to completely destroy Iran. The Israelis have an ample supply of nuclear warheads and delivery systems to accomplish this task.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE-OC Green Book
    SUBJECT AREA INDICATORS AND KEY WORD LIST FOR RESTRICTED DATA AND FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AUGUST 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Where It All Began .................................................................................................................................... 2 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RD/FRD and NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (NSI) ......................................... 3 ACCESS TO RD AND FRD ................................................................................................................................ 4 Non-DoD Organizations: ........................................................................................................................... 4 DoD Organizations: ................................................................................................................................... 4 RECOGNIZING RD and FRD ............................................................................................................................ 5 Current Documents ................................................................................................................................... 5 Historical Documents ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Nuclear Forensics: Analysis of Nuclear Material for Security
    THE NEW NUCLEAR FORENSICS Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes edited by vitaly fedchenko The New Nuclear Forensics Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Sven-Olof Petersson, Chairman (Sweden) Dr Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria) Jayantha Dhanapala (Sri Lanka) Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger (Germany) Professor Mary Kaldor (United Kingdom) The Director DIRECTOR Dr Ian Anthony (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 70 Solna, Sweden Telephone: +46 8 655 97 00 Fax: +46 8 655 97 33 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sipri.org The New Nuclear Forensics Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes EDITED BY VITALY FEDCHENKO OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2015 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © SIPRI 2015 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of SIPRI, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons FAQ (NWFAQ) Organization Back to Main Index
    Nuclear Weapons FAQ (NWFAQ) Organization Back to Main Index This is a complete listing of the decimally numbered headings of the Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions, which provides a comprehensive view of the organization and contents of the document. Index 1.0 Types of Nuclear Weapons 1.1 Terminology 1.2 U.S. Nuclear Test Names 1.3 Units of Measurement 1.4 Pure Fission Weapons 1.5 Combined Fission/Fusion Weapons 1.5.1 Boosted Fission Weapons 1.5.2 Staged Radiation Implosion Weapons 1.5.3 The Alarm Clock/Sloika (Layer Cake) Design 1.5.4 Neutron Bombs 1.6 Cobalt Bombs 2.0 Introduction to Nuclear Weapon Physics and Design 2.1 Fission Weapon Physics 2.1.1 The Nature Of The Fission Process 2.1.2 Criticality 2.1.3 Time Scale of the Fission Reaction 2.1.4 Basic Principles of Fission Weapon Design 2.1.4.1 Assembly Techniques - Achieving Supercriticality 2.1.4.1.1 Implosion Assembly 2.1.4.1.2 Gun Assembly 2.1.4.2 Initiating Fission 2.1.4.3 Preventing Disassembly and Increasing Efficiency 2.2 Fusion Weapon Physics 2.2.1 Candidate Fusion Reactions 2.2.2 Basic Principles of Fusion Weapon Design 2.2.2.1 Designs Using the Deuterium+Tritium Reaction 2.2.2.2 Designs Using Other Fuels 3.0 Matter, Energy, and Radiation Hydrodynamics 3.1 Thermodynamics and the Properties of Gases 3.1.1 Kinetic Theory of Gases 3.1.2 Heat, Entropy, and Adiabatic Compression 3.1.3 Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Equipartition 3.1.4 Relaxation 3.1.5 The Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Law 3.1.6 Specific Heats and the Thermodynamic Exponent 3.1.7 Properties of Blackbody
    [Show full text]
  • The Neutron Bomb
    المركز الوطني للمتميزين The National Centre for the Distinguished The Neutron Bomb Presented by: Sara Nasser Supervisor: Naseen Taiba 2015-2016 Abstract: A Neutron Bomb is a new type of neuclear weapons which is totally different from other types, and has irrational properties. 1 . Introduction Scientists have noticed the great use of radiation. So recently, it has been deployed in technology. As a result, it is wildly used in our life. Ordinary people worldwide understand the great perils of nuclear weapons, and lots of these weapons are classified in certain types. The newest and the most mysterious type is the Neutron Bomb. However, we still do not know how dangerous it is so far, but we can predict. This issue is going to be discussed deliberately in this seminar to clarify some features. The Neutron Bomb! Is it easy to be deployed in wars? How dangerous is it? If it is tremendously dangerous, how could it be in that level of danger? First of all, you have to know the Types of Radioactive Decay. Types of Radioactive Decay 1[1]There are six common types of radioactive decay: ퟒ 1: Alpha emission: (abbreviated α) emission of ퟐ푯풆 nucleus, or alpha particle, from an unstable nucleus. Control, L.o.C., et al., General Chemistry ninth edition ed. D.E.K. Heinle and A.E.A. Galvin. .1 1 2009, U.S.A.: Houghton Mifflin Company Boston New York Executive Publisher: George Hoffman 2 .Publisher: Charles Hartford 2: Beta emission: (abbreviated β-) emission of a high-speed electron from an unstable nucleus.
    [Show full text]
  • LLNL 65 Th Anniversary Book, 2017
    Scientific Editor Paul Chrzanowski Production Editor Arnie Heller Pamela MacGregor (first edition) Graphic Designer George Kitrinos Proofreader Caryn Meissner About the Cover Since its inception in 1952, the Laboratory has transformed from a deactivated U.S. Naval Air Station to a campus-like setting (top) with outstanding research facilities through U.S. government investments in our important missions and the efforts of generations of exceptional people dedicated to national service. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, About the Laboratory nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was founded in 1952 to enhance process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to the security of the United States by advancing nuclear weapons science and any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise technology and ensuring a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent. With does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States a talented and dedicated workforce and world-class research capabilities, the government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed Laboratory strengthens national security with a tradition of science and technology herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Red China's "Capitalist Bomb"
    CHINA STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 8 Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb”: Inside the Chinese Neutron Bomb Program by Jonathan Ray Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research and Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs. The military and civilian analysts and staff who com- prise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by perform- ing research and analysis, publication, conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the combatant commanders, to support the national strategic components of the aca- demic programs at NDU, and to provide outreach to other U.S. govern- mental agencies and to the broader national security community. Cover photo: Chinese hydrogen bomb test at Lop Nor Nuclear Test Range (Chinese government photo) Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb” Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb”: Inside the Chinese Neutron Bomb Program by Jonathan Ray Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies China Strategic Perspectives, No. 8 Series Editor: Phillip C. Saunders National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. January 2015 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
    The New encyclopaedia Britannica Volume 29 MACROPEDIA Knowledge in Depth FOUNDED 1768 15 TH EDITION Encyclopaedia Britannica. Inc. Robert P. Gwinn, Chairman, Board of Directors Peter B. Norton, President Philip W.Goetz, Editor in Chief Chicago Auckland/Geneva/London1 Madrid/ Manila/ Paris Rome/Seoul/Sydne y /Tokyo/Toronto 'Let knowledge grow from more to more and thus be human life cnnched.* The Encyclopedia Brirannica is published with the editorial advice of the faculties of the University of Chicago. Additional advice is given by committees of members drawn from the faculties of the Australian National University. the universities of British Columbia (Can.). Cambridge (Eng.), Copenhagen (Den. 1. Edinburgh (Scot. ). Florence (Italy). London ( Eng.). Marburg (W.Ger.). Oxford (Eng.), the Ruhr ( W.Ger.), Sussex ( Eng. ), Toronto (Can. 1, Victoria (Can.), and Waterloo (Can.): the Cornplutensian University of Madrid (Spain): the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (W.Ger. ); the New University of Lisbon (Port.): the School of Higher Studies in Social Sciences (Fr.1: Simon Fraser University (Can.): and the State University of Leiden (Neth.). First Edition Second Edition Third Edition Supplement Fourth Edition Fifth Edition Sixth Edition Supplement Seventh Edition Eighth Edition Ninth Edition Tenth Edition Eleventh Edition C 1911 B) Encyclopadia Bntannica. inc. Twelfth Edition C- 1922 By Encvclopzdia Bntannica. Inc. Thirteenth Edition S 1926 By Enc>clopiedia Bntannica. tnc. Fourteenth Edition c 1929, 1930. 1932. 1933. 1936. 1937. 1938. 1939. 1940, 1941. 1942, 1943. 1944, 1945. 1946, 1947. 1948. 1949. 1950. 1951. 1952. 1953, 1954, 1955. 1956. 195'. 1958. 1959. 1960. 1961. 1962. 1963. 1964, 1965. 1966. 1%'. 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • China and the Neutron Bomb (Stanford, CA: Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1988), 43
    CHINA STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 8 Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb”: Inside the Chinese Neutron Bomb Program by Jonathan Ray Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research and Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs. The military and civilian analysts and staff who com- prise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by perform- ing research and analysis, publication, conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the combatant commanders, to support the national strategic components of the aca- demic programs at NDU, and to provide outreach to other U.S. govern- mental agencies and to the broader national security community. Cover photo: Chinese hydrogen bomb test at Lop Nor Nuclear Test Range (Chinese government photo) Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb” Red China’s “Capitalist Bomb”: Inside the Chinese Neutron Bomb Program by Jonathan Ray Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies China Strategic Perspectives, No. 8 Series Editor: Phillip C. Saunders National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. January 2015 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Iran a Glossary of Terms
    Nuclear Iran A Glossary of Terms Simon Henderson and Olli Heinonen Policy Focus 121 | August 2012 HARVARD Kennedy School A COPUBLICATION WITH BELFER CENTER for Science and International Affairs Map: Nuclear installations in Iran. TURKMENISTAN TABRIZ Bonab Lashkar Abad TEHRAN MASHAD Karaj Marivan Parchin Fordow Arak QOM IRAQ Natanz AFGHANISTAN Isfahan Ardakan Saghand Darkhovin Yazd IRAN KUWAIT SHIRAZ Bushehr PAKISTAN Gchine BANDAR ABBAS BAHRAIN SAUDI ARABIA QATAR © 2012 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy UAE OMAN Map: Nuclear installations in Iran. Nuclear Iran A Glossary of Terms Simon Henderson and Olli Heinonen Policy Focus 121 | August 2012 HARVARD Kennedy School A COPUBLICATION WITH BELFER CENTER for Science and International Affairs n n n The authors extend special thanks to Mary Kalbach Horan and her editorial team at The Washington Institute. n n n All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2012 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Copublished in 2012 in the United States of America by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036; and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 79 JFK St., Cambridge, MA 02138. Cover photo: Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military Effectiveness and Collateral Effects
    Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military effectiveness and collateral effects Andre Gsponer Independent Scientific Research Institute Box 30, CH-1211 Geneva-12, Switzerland Version ISRI-05-03.17 February 2, 2008 Abstract The paper begins with a general introduction and update to Fourth Gen- eration Nuclear Weapons (FGNW), and then addresses some particularly important military aspects on which there has been only limited public discussion so far. These aspects concern the unique military character- istics of FGNWs which make them radically different from both nuclear weapons based on previous-generation nuclear-explosives and from conven- tional weapons based on chemical-explosives: yields in the 1 to 100 tons range, greatly enhanced coupling to targets, possibility to drive powerful shaped-charge jets and forged fragments, enhanced prompt radiation effects, reduced collateral damage and residual radioactivity, etc. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Second and third generation nuclear weapons arXiv:physics/0510071v5 [physics.soc-ph] 26 Feb 2006 2.1. Boosting 2.2. Two-stage thermonuclear weapons 2.3. Third generation nuclear weapons 2.4. The “Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator” debate 1 3. Fourth generation nuclear weapons 3.1. Inertial confinement fusion experiments and FGNW 3.2. Microexplosions and high energy-density 3.3. Petawatt-class lasers (superlasers) 3.4. Nuclear isomers 3.5. Antimatter 3.6. Micro/nano-technology and nuclear bullets 3.7. Pure antimatter bombs? 4. Target coupling 4.1. Initial energy from conventional or nuclear weapons 4.2. Initial work from conventional or nuclear weapons 4.3. Coupling to homogeneous and heterogeneous targets 4.4. FGNW coupling 5. Thermonuclear-driven jets and projectiles 5.1.
    [Show full text]