Yearbook 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yearbook 2000 Yearbook 2000 cargolux Association of European Airlines Association of European Airlines . Avenue Louise 350 B - 1050 Brussels Tel. +32 (0)2 639 89 89 Fax 639 89 99 E-mail [email protected] July 2000 Dear Reader of the AEA Yearbook, _____ This year sees a change in the ‘look’ negotiating – or should we say non- of the AEA Yearbook. I hope it negotiating – position, in the Air meets with your approval. Much of Traffic Control debate. No change the content follows the tried and in the way we do business, they tested format: a commentary on say, or safety will be compromised. last year, and a review of the main issues which the airlines address We – the airlines – have through their Association. You will commercialised in recent years, find, however, significant ‘added embracing competition, cutting back value’ in our Airline Profiles section. ruthlessly on costs and abandoning the lifebelt of State ownership. And Here, however, I would like to touch we have continued to improve our on a subject which is not extensively safety record. It is no accident, if covered in the Yearbook: Safety. you will pardon the pun, that the Or, to be more precise, what I might areas of the world with the best call the Politics of Safety. safety records are those where liberalisation is most advanced. In 1999, AEA brokered an agreement on what will become an Air Traffic Control keeps aircraft industry standard on Working Time, apart from each other. Other to ensure occupational health and professionals keep them in the air. safety for air crews. This rounded- No single sector of the industry has off a long dialogue which became a monopoly on safety; it is the very difficult at times because the priority of each and every one of us interests of some circles were often in this business wherever we work. hidden behind alleged safety concerns – and playing this ‘safety card’ proved quite effective: safety is simply not negotiable in aviation. Right now, we are seeing other interested circles using a similar K-H Neumeister Adria Airways, Aer Lingus, Air France, Air Malta, Alitalia, Austrian Airlines, Balkan, British Airways, British Midland, Cargolux, Croatia Airlines, CSA, Cyprus Airways, Finnair, Iberia, Icelandair, JAT, KLM, Lufthansa, Luxair, Malev, Olympic Airways, Sabena, SAS, Swissair, TAP Air Portugal, Turkish Airlines. CONTENTS SECTION I - AEA AIRLINES’ PERFORMANCE 1999 I-1 1999 At a Glance I-3 Traffic & Capacity - Overview I-4 Traffic & Capacity - Europe I-5 Traffic Trends - North Atlantic I-7 Traffic & Capacity - Asia I-9 Air Cargo I-10 Punctuality Performance - Overview I-11 Punctuality Performance - Airports I-12 Punctuality Performance - Air Traffic Control I-13 Alliances I-15 Fleet Development I-16 Operating Results I-17 SECTION II - TOPICS II-1 Airline Delays - The consumer deserves better! II-2 Congestion and Delay - What next? II-3 Air Traffic Control - The debate continues II-5 Aircraft Noise - The hushkit debate II-6 Aircraft Emissions - Combatting global warming II-7 Aviation Fuel Tax - A blunt weapon II-8 A Transatlantic Free-Trade Area for Aviation II-9 A Commitment to the Consumer II-10 SECTION III - SPOTLIGHT ON THE AEA III-1 AEA Highlights of 1999 III-3 Mission Statement III-5 Membership Criteria III-5 Structure of the AEA III-7 Airline Profiles & 1999 Review III-8 SECTION IV - KEY STATISTICS IV-1 Key Statistics - Total AEA IV-2 AEA Fast Facts IV-4 Key Statistics - By Carrier IV-5 What do we mean by…? IV-13 I - 1 AEA AIRLINES' TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND YIELD 1997 1998 1999 % change International Routes per Calendar Year 99/98 Passengers (000) 164,246 174,960 184,933 5.7 Passenger Kilometres (mill) 452,620 485,354 516,046 6.3 Seat Kilometres (mill) 625,566 674,027 723,216 7.3 Passenger Load Factor % 72.4 72.0 71.4 -0.6 pt Passenger Yield (current US cent/RPK) 10.2 9.9 9.1 -8.1 Average Nº of Seats per Aircraft 207.5 212.2 214.8 1.2 Average Stage Distance (Kms) 1,505 1,549 1,565 1.0 Freight Tonne-Kilometres (mill) 26,882 26,906 27,936 3.8 % Freight on Freighter Services 57.8 57.2 57.3 0.1 pt Freight Yield (current US cent/RFTK) 30.8 29.9 27.1 -9.4 AEA AIRLINES' OPERATING RESULT % change International Routes per Financial Year 1997 1998 1999 est. 99/98 Overall Load Factor % 68.9 68.6 67.9 -0.7 pt Break-even Load Factor % 65.2 64.0 67.2 3.2 pt Yield (current US cent/RTK) 76.9 73.7 68.5 -7.0 Unit Cost (current US cent/ATK) 49.4 47.2 46.4 -2.4 Operating Ratio before Interest 106.8 107.2 103.5 -3.7 pt Net Interest Rate % 2.3 2.6 2.5 -0.1 pt Operating Ratio after Interest 104.5 104.4 103.5 -0.9 pt Profit/Loss after Interest (current US$ mill) 2,333 2,276 619 TRAFFIC AND CAPACITY GROWTH IN 1999 20% 20% 10 10 0 20% -1.5 0 62.3 1.1 10 20% 77.0 20 % 20% 10 0 2.4 0 20% growth 99/98 10 10 67.2 2.1 R 10 A 76.4 P S 0 0 K 0 K -3.5 -1.5 73.1 73.3 + pt 99/98 - % load factor I - 2 1999 AT A GLANCE 1999 was a year when delays went off EUROPEAN DEPARTURE DELAYS the scale. 35% flights delayed more than 15 minutes For fuller details, including where and 30 why, turn to page I-11. 25 20 15 10 7 month moving average 5 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 Once again, the industry felt the shock of WORLD CRUDE OIL PRICES Source: EIA rocketing oil prices. 40 current US$ per barrel The impact on their fuel bills, and their 35 bottom line, is assessed on page I-18. 30 25 20 15 10 5 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 The AEA airlines in 1999 managed to OPERATING PROFIT/LOSS - Int'l routes break even, but not much more. 2.5 billion current US$ after interest 2.0 To relate ‘profit’ to ‘profitability’, there is a wealth of analysis on page I-17. 1.5 1.0 est. 0.5 0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 I - 3 TRAFFIC & CAPACITY - OVERVIEW 1999 saw a divergence in the growth 1999 load factors were generally down trends for the AEA airlines’ three main on the previous year’s level, although the operating regions, which had followed a Total International figure of 71.4% was similar pattern to each other for much of still within a percentage point of the all- the decade. time high, recorded in 1997. On Far East/Australasia, the increase of Substantial extra capacity was added on 2.6% was virtually unchanged from the North Atlantic routes, amounting to very low level recorded in 1998. Two 12.4% over the year. The result was and a half years on from the start of the that, despite the strong traffic growth, ‘Asian crisis’, there is still little sign of a load factors decreased slightly, from 77% revitalisation of the market. to 75.9%. In Europe, the growth rate tumbled to To the Far East, capacity was actually 1.7%, although this figure was influenced slightly reduced, by 0.2%, with the result by the circumstance that one airline that load factors were boosted by 2.1 (Finnair) re-classified its substantial points to 76.4%. leisure-market product from scheduled to charter. European load factors were depressed by the very low level of traffic growth, Discounting the effect of this change, the despite capacity being held at a modest underlying growth rate would have been plus 4.2%. about 3.8% - in any case, still the lowest annual figure since the 1991 Gulf War In the less heavily-travelled regions, shock. there was very strong traffic growth on North African (+24.6%) and Middle On the North Atlantic, in contrast, the Eastern (+14.0%) services, and on South growth rate for the year reached 10.8%. Atlantic routes, which grew 12.8%. This was the highest annual figure since Growth rates on the Mid Atlantic and to the 1992 recovery from the Gulf War the rest of Africa were more modest. slump. GROWTH RATES IN REVENUE PASSENGER KILOMETRES 20% growth in RPK's 15 North Atlantic 10 Europe 5 Far East 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 I - 4 TRAFFIC & CAPACITY - EUROPE The 1.7% increase in passenger- Traffic decreases were posted by Turkey kilometres on intra-European routes in (-7%), in the aftermath of the August 1999 translated into a growth in earthquake, and Norway (-1%). passenger numbers of 4.5%. In the larger markets, above-average 25% growth growth was recorded in Germany, Slovenia France, Netherlands and Spain, all of TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT which grew 7%, and Switzerland with a % GROWTH plus 6%. Italy and the UK had rather 1999 OVER 1998 lower growth, at plus 4%. 20 AEA scheduled international passengers These figures, of course, refer only to between 'AEA countries' AEA member airlines’ traffic. While traffic Average increase 4.5% figures for other segments of the industry are unavailable, capacity shares can be 15 determined from published schedule information.
Recommended publications
  • AGS Bilancio 2019 Xa
    AEROPORTO di GENOVA S.p.A. Sede Legale: Aeroporto “C. Colombo” – 16154 Genova Numero di iscrizione al Registro delle Imprese di Genova, C.F. e P.I.: 02701420107 Soggetto che esercita attività di direzione e coordinamento ex art. 2497 C.C.: Autorità di Sistema Portuale del Mar Ligure Occidentale AEROPORTO DI GENOVA S.P.A. al 31.12.2019 CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE Presidente Paolo Cesare Odone Consiglieri Lelio Fornabaio Fausto Palombelli Barbara Pozzolo Renato Redondi COLLEGIO SINDACALE Presidente Roberta De Felice Sindaci Effettivi Simona Brambilla Antonio Calzone Gian Alberto Mangiante Antonio Rosina DIREZIONE Direttore Generale Piero Righi SOCIETA’ DI REVISIONE EY S.p.A. 2 BILANCIO 2019 INDICE Lettera agli Azionisti pag. 4 Relazione sulla gestione pag. 6 Bilancio al 31 dicembre 2019 pag. 49 Nota integrativa pag. 55 Relazione del Collegio Sindacale pag. 97 Relazione della Società di Revisione pag. 100 3 AEROPORTO DI GENOVA S.P.A. LETTERA DEL PRESIDENTE Signori Azionisti, è con particolare piacere che sottopongo alla vostra attenzione il bilancio al 31.12.2019, che registra un utile netto dopo imposte di 382.863 euro. Il 2019 è stato, per l’Aeroporto di Genova, un anno di consolidamento e progettazione. Consolidamento perché dopo il 2018, anno in cui il “Cristoforo Colombo” è stato il primo scalo in Italia per crescita, nell’anno appena trascorso i passeggeri sono ulteriormente aumentati, superando per la prima volta nella nostra storia la soglia del milione e mezzo di passeggeri. L’incremento di traffico è stato superiore alla media nazionale e ancor più significativo se paragonato ai dati degli scali nazionali nella fascia compresa tra 1 e 3 milioni di passeggeri all’anno.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • The SAS Group Traffic Figures December 2012
    The SAS Group Traffic figures December 2012 SAS Group's December 2012 traffic figures SAS Group • SAS Group carried 1.8 million passengers in December, (scheduled) Dec 12 Change Nov-Dec 12 Change down 2.6%, reflecting different holiday pattern. • SAS Group’s capacity (ASK) was up by 3% and the Group’s ASK (Mill.) 2 630 3,0% 5 867 4,9% traffic (RPK) increased by 2.4%. RPK (Mill.) 1 828 2,4% 4 051 4,5% • The SAS Group’s load factor decreased by 0.5 p.u. to Passenger load factor 69,5% -0,5 p u 69,0% -0,3 p u 69.5%. No. of passengers (Mill.) 1,831 -2,6% 4,225 0,3% Group market trends, RASK and yield development Traffic growth continued to be positive during December, but did not fully match additional capacity. Intercontinental and certain European continued to grow well. Currency adjusted yield (Scandinavian Airlines) in November was down 0.1% versus previous year and RASK was up Summary of the December 2012 vs December 2011 0.3%. For December 2012 the yield (change vs last year) is airlines scheduled expected to be positive while the RASK will be slightly Change negative due to the different holiday pattern. Traffic Capacity Load of load The response to market campaigns is good and forward (RPK) (ASK) factor factor booking levels continue to be well above last year’s level. SAS Group 2,4% 3,0% 69,5% -0,5 p u Overall, the market demand continues to be good, but remains SAS 2,1% 2,8% 70,1% -0,5 p u unpredictable due to risk in the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Undisputed Leader in World Travel CONTENTS
    Report & Accounts 1996-97 ...the undisputed leader in world travel CONTENTS Highlights of the year 1 Chairman’s Statement 2 THE NEXT Chief Executive’s Statement 5 Board Members 8 The Board and Board Committees DECADEIN FEBRUARY 1997 and the Report of the Remuneration Committee 10 British Airways celebrated 10 years of privatisation, with a Directors’ Report 14 renewed commitment to stay at the forefront of the industry. Report of the Auditors on Corporate Governance matters 17 Progress during the last decade has been dazzling as the airline Operating and Financial established itself as one of the most profitable in the world. Review of the year 18 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 25 Report of the Auditors 25 Success has been built on a firm commitment to customer service, cost control and Group profit and loss account 26 the Company’s ability to change with the times and new demands. Balance sheets 27 As the year 2000 approaches, the nature of the industry and Group cash flow statement 28 competition has changed. The aim now is to create a new Statement of total recognised British Airways for the new millennium, to become the undisputed gains and losses 29 leader in world travel. Reconciliation of movements in shareholders’ funds 29 This involves setting a new direction for the Company with a Notes to the accounts 30 new Mission, Values and Goals; introducing new services and Principal investments 54 products; new ways of working; US GAAP information 55 new behaviours; a new approach to The launch of privatisation spelt a Five year summaries 58 service style and a brand new look.
    [Show full text]
  • September, 2008
    WWW.AIRCARGOWORLD.COM SEPTEMBER 2008 International Trends & Analysis INTERNATIONAL EDITION The World’s Top Cargo Airlines50 Cargo Security • India • Anti-Trust 2008 SUPPLY CHAIN INNOVATION AWARD FINALIST 6H>6 IDD J#H# EDGII"ID "9DDG# 96NN"9:;>C>I::# ,% A:HH I=6C6>G# As fuel prices send airfreight costs soaring, only OceanGuaranteed ® provides day-definite delivery from Asia to the U.S. that’s just as reliable, but at a fraction of the cost.With the combined resources and expertise of APL Logistics and Con-way Freight, OceanGuaranteed provides a unique single-source LCL/LTL solution with proven 99% on-time performance. In fact, your shipment is guaranteed to arrive on schedule, or we’ll pay 20% of the invoice.* Call 866-896-2005 or visit www.oceanguaranteed.com/22 for more information or to book a shipment today. *Conditions and restrictions apply. See website for full details. Service also available to Canada and Mexico. International Edition September 2008 CONTENTS Volume 11, Number 7 COLUMNS Top Cargo 12 North America Airlines With all the turmoil in Ohio, 22 The annual ranking of the growth at Toledo Express the world’s top 50 cargo air- Airport as a freight center is lines by traffic, with aircraft noteworthy orders and cargo revenue. 14 Pacific Yields on freighters may be down, but handling cargo in China remains a feast • JAL Slimmer 17 Europe Despite its bad timing of entering the market, Cargo 30 India B could be a survivor among India could become a plenty of airline failures key growth market for air 30 cargo, but overcapacity could spoil the party for freight operators.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eu) 2015/ 1014
    27.6.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that Union list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information and the verifications carried out by the Commission, the Union list should now be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Union list.
    [Show full text]
  • European Air Law Association 23Rd Annual Conference Palazzo Spada Piazza Capo Di Ferro 13, Rome
    European Air Law Association 23rd Annual Conference Palazzo Spada Piazza Capo di Ferro 13, Rome “Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights” Laura Pierallini Studio Legale Pierallini e Associati, Rome LUISS University of Rome, Rome Rome, 4th November 2011 Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini Air transport and insolvencies of air carriers: an introduction According to a Study carried out in 2011 by Steer Davies Gleave for the European Commission (entitled Impact assessment of passenger protection in the event of airline insolvency), between 2000 and 2010 there were 96 insolvencies of European airlines operating scheduled services. Of these insolvencies, some were of small airlines, but some were of larger scheduled airlines and caused significant issues for passengers (Air Madrid, SkyEurope and Sterling). Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini The Italian market This trend has significantly affected the Italian market, where over the last eight years, a number of domestic air carriers have experienced insolvencies: ¾Minerva Airlines ¾Gandalf Airlines ¾Alpi Eagles ¾Volare Airlines ¾Air Europe ¾Alitalia ¾Myair ¾Livingston An overall, since 2003 the Italian air transport market has witnessed one insolvency per year. Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini The Italian Air Transport sector and the Italian bankruptcy legal framework. ¾A remedy like Chapter 11 in force in the US legal system does not exist in Italy, where since 1979 special bankruptcy procedures (Amministrazione Straordinaria) have been introduced to face the insolvency of large enterprises (Law. No. 95/1979, s.c. Prodi Law, Legislative Decree No. 270/1999, s.c. Prodi-bis, Law Decree No. 347/2003 enacted into Law No.
    [Show full text]
  • Scandinavian Airlines Systems Annual Report 1958-59
    " — j7._____z. rzvZZZZ __*- r f annual report IN MEMORIAM Annual Report # for the f iscal Year October 1, 1958 — September 30, 1959 PER KAMPMANN SAS has suffered a great loss through the death, on April 7, 1959, of Mr. Per Kampmann, Board Chairman of the Danish parent company, Det Danske Luftfartselskab A/S, DDL. Early in life, Mr. Kampmann became one of the leaders of Danish civil aviation and made important contributions to the growth of DDL. His activities in civil aviation were marked by a Jinn belief in its fu­ ture. and by an exceptional ability to foresee the extent and nature of conditions likely to affect the future development of the industry. Even before the second world war, Mr. Kampmann was deeply inter­ ested in the idea of a closer co-operation between the airlines of (he Scandinavian countries. In spite of the difficulties imposed by war conditions, Mr. Kampmann, Board Chairman of DDL since 1940, continued liis planning for the /moling of commercial aviation re­ sources in Scandinavia. Consequently, at the end of the war, the ground was well prepared in Denmark for the realization of these /dans. In 1946, Mr. Kampmann became the first Chairman ofthe Board of Scandinavian Airlines System. For the rest of his life, lie continued to serve SAS as one of the three Board Chairmen. Per Kampmann is one of the great names in the history of Scandinavian SCA/V0JJVAVM/V A fAUWES SESEE/M civil aviation. SAS deeply feels the loss of a prominent leader and will DENMARK - NORWAY - SWEDEN remember him with gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Tendencje Rozwojowe Aliansów Strategicznych W Transporcie Lotniczym
    Transport lotniczy Tendencje rozwojowe aliansów strategicznych w transporcie lotniczym Iwona Anna Czarnecka Alianse lotnicze są formą współpracy linii lotniczych (często konkurujących ze sobą). Uczestnictwo w aliansie to określone korzyści, ale także liczne zagrożenia. A jednak wynikający z procesów liberalizacji proces łączenia się przewoźników w alianse wykazuje tendencję rozwojową. Na przestrzeni lat zmieniają się cele i zakres aliansów. Integracja staje się głębsza i przyjmuje formę fuzji i przejęć. Obserwujemy budowę struktury kapitałowej. Widoczne jest ograniczenie konkurencji na rynku lotniczym wynikające z konsolidacji przewoźników wokół największych i najmocniejszych linii lotniczych. Wprowadzenie połączeń. Taką strategię przyjęły m.in. linie: mi innych aliansów. Teoria gier zastosowana BA, Lufthansa, KLM. Strategia przystępowa- do analizy współpracy linii lotniczych przez Kryzys finansowy, który ogarnął świat nia do aliansów, skupionych wokół najwięk- T. Busacker’a i J. P. Clark’a pokazała okolicz- w 2008 roku wpłynął także na branżę lot- szych linii lotniczych, była wybierana przez ności sprzyjające dobrej współpracy w ra- niczą. Przewoźnicy ponieśli ogromne straty. coraz większą liczbę przewoźników, zwłasz- mach aliansu: Nowe warunki funkcjonowania wymuszo- cza tych średnich i małych, dla których sta- • umowa zawarta pomiędzy członkami ne przez kryzys pokazują, że należy dokonać nowiła szansę utrzymania się na rynku. powinna mieć długotrwały charakter, co rewizji naszego podejścia do aliansów lotni- Do podejmowania współpracy
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Explorer for Its Enable Airlines to Broaden Their Markets Are Served at the Right Real-Time Tracking, Reporting Analysis Capabilities to Include Key Times
    A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2009 Issue No. 1 2008 Issue No. 2 Taking your airline to new heights A Clear Vision A Conversation With … Sean Durfy, Chief Executive Officer, WestJet Airlines, Page 16. Special Section Survival Guide 38 8 Japan Airlines takes steps to improve 21 Delta Air Lines/Northwest Airlines merger 44 its environmental performance impacts regional carriers Airlines have three basic options to raise capital making contact Taking your airline to new heights 2009 Issue No. 1 To suggest a topic for a possible For more information about Editor in Chief future article, change your products and services featured in this Stephani Hawkins address or add someone to the issue of Ascend, please visit our Web site at www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Managing Editor mailing list, please send an B. Scott Hunt or contact one of the following e-mail message to the Ascend Sabre Airline Solutions regional Art Direction/Design staff at [email protected]. representatives: Charles Urich Contributors Khaled Al-Eisawi, Edward Bowman, Stan Boyer, Steve Clampett, Dennis Crosby, Jeanette Frick, Greg Gilchrist, Carla Jensen, Christine Kretschmar, Gordon Locke, Craig MacFarlane, Tim Maher, Kazuya Ohta, Dave Roberts, Tim Sutton, Jeremy Sykes, Fionna Wee. Asia/Pacific Latin America David Chambers Kamal Qatato Publisher Vice President Vice President George Lynch 3 Church Street, #15-02 Samsung Hub 3150 Sabre Drive 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Singapore 049483 SG www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Phone: +65 6511 3210 Phone: +1 682 605 5399 E-mail: [email protected] Awards Middle East and Africa Europe Maher Koubaa Alessandro Ciancimino Regional Head Vice President 77 Rue de la Boetie 2008 Awards for Publication Excellence, Via Appia Nuova 990 Paris, France 75008 International Association of Business 00178 Rome, Italy Communicators Bronze Quill and Silver Phone: +33 1 44 20 7657 Phone: +39 348 3708240 Quill, Hermes Creative Award, The E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Airline Alliances: Advantages for Major Airlines Being Aligned
    STRATEGIC AIRLINE ALLIANCES: ADVANTAGES FOR MAJOR AIRLINES BEING ALIGNED Jorge J. Villar Department of Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Javier Tafur Department of Industrial Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Guozhu Jia School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Beihang University), China Fernando Zobel 3, 3º C 16002 Cuenca Spain Telephone: (0086)13691243311, (0034)659928918 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Some factors including the deregulation in the U.S and the liberalization in Europe of the airline industry are essential to understanding why the number of partnership agreements between airlines has increased during the last 25 years. These events, coupled with the continuous economic downturn and the 9/11 catastrophe seem to be the perfect framework for the tendency to develop airline strategic alliances. However, it has been observed that this trend was not followed during the period 2005- 2008. The purpose of this paper is to analyze if a benefit was experienced by the major airlines who became a member of the current 3 big alliances compared to the major airlines that decided not to become a member or were not admitted into the alliances during 2005-2008. The methodology of this report includes an analysis of several airlines’ performance figures. These performance figures include the revenue passenger kilometers (RPKs), the passenger load factor (PLF) and also the market share (MS). The figures will be compared between the aligned airlines and others which have similar business models. The value of this paper is to reveal whether being aligned provides advantages to major airlines under a bearish airline market in a globalized environment.
    [Show full text]
  • RESUMEN DE PRENSA 31 De Octubre De 2016
    RESUMEN DE PRENSA 31 de octubre de 2016 EL DIFÍCIL DESPEGUE DE BINTER 31/10/2016 La expansión norteafricana de la aerolínea canaria tarda en dar beneficios palpables El País En el siglo primero antes de nuestra era, el general romano Quinto Sertorio viajó a las tierras de Hispania como comandante militar. Plutarco, en sus Vidas Paralelas, relató el encuentro del general con dos marineros que habían viajado por las islas atlánticas. Hablaban de tierras fértiles, con clima suave y la lluvia precisa para las cosechas. “Hay una creencia firme, incluso entre los bárbaros, que aquí están los Campos Elíseos y el hogar de los benditos que cantó Homero”. Hoy, el nombre de “islas afortunadas” o Macaronesia, que usaban los clásicos, se aplica a las islas Azores, Madeira, Canarias y Cabo Verde. Justo las islas que la aerolínea canaria Binter está en proceso de conquistar, a través de una malla aérea regional con base en el archipiélago español que facturó, en en el primer semestre de 2016, alrededor de 100 millones de euros. Además, aspira a hacerse con la fachada atlántica del noroeste africano. Binter fue la marca creada por Iberia en 1988 para operar los vuelos interinsulares en Baleares y Canarias, de los que hasta entonces se encargaba Aviaco. Cuando en los años noventa la antigua compañía de bandera empezó a vender activos para su proceso de privatización, las aerolíneas regionales fueron de las primeras en abandonar el grupo. Mientras que Binter Mediterráneo pasó a manos de Air Nostrum, en 2002 Binter Canarias fue a parar a manos de un consorcio de empresarios locales cuya figura más visible era Rodolfo Núñez, exconsejero de Obras Públicas del Gobierno regional y entonces presidente de CajaCanarias (hoy parte de CaixaBank), que ya había encabezado la compañía años atrás.
    [Show full text]