Annual Report 1956

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 1956 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO ANNUAL REPORT 1956 To the Member Banks of the Seventh Federal Reserve District: I am pleased to submit to you this Forty-second Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, covering the operations during the year 1956. In addi­ tion to the summary of Bank operations the Report includes a detailed review of the basic economic structures of two District cities— Indianapolis and Milwaukee. This is the third in a series of studies of the distinguishing characteristics of Seventh District “areas” to appear in the Annual Report. Clifford S. Young retired on February 28, after 35 years of devoted service to the Bank. He started here in 1921 as an Assistant Examiner, subsequently served as Assistant Federal Reserve Agent, as Secretary, as Vice President, and as President of the Bank from 1941 until his retirement. “Hap” Young’s knowledge of Midwest banks and bankers, together with his warm personal qualities, made countless friends and represented a most important asset for the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Federal Reserve System. December 31 saw the retirement of Assistant Vice President Mark A. Lies, a “charter employee” who had served the Bank since the day it opened for business in 1914 and in recent years was the capable manager of our bank building. Mr. Lies also left us with the respect and affection of a host of friends. Carl E. Allen, who had been a Class “C” Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board, succeeded Mr. Young as President of the Bank on October 1. J. Stuart Russell was then appointed Deputy Chairman of the Board, and Robert P. Briggs, Executive Vice President of Consumers Power Company, Jackson, Michigan, was appointed a Class “C” Director to succeed Mr. Allen in the latter capacity. J. Thomas Smith, President of the Detroit Harvester Company, was appointed Director of the Branch to fill a vacancy on the Board. C. V. Patterson, Executive Vice President of the Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan, was appointed Director of the Detroit Branch to succeed William M. Day, President, Michigan Bell Telephone Company. The past year set many records in the economic life of our country. As a result the volume of business handled by many departments of the Bank was larger than ever before. On behalf of our Directors, Officers and Staff, I extend our deep appreciation to you our stockholders for your understanding cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours, (L President carl E. allen took office as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on October 1, 1956. Prior to that time Mr. Allen had served as Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board of the Chi­ cago Bank and since 1950 had been President of Campbell, Wyant and Cannon Foundry Company of Muskegon, Michigan. A long career in commercial banking preceded his service as a Midwest industrialist. From 1926 to 1950, Mr. Allen was associated with the National City Bank of New York where he served as a Vice Presi­ dent from 1940 to 1950. When announcing selection of the new chief executive officer of the Bank, Bert R. Prall, Chairman of the Board, said, “In selecting Mr. Allen we have a man who can give the Federal Reserve Bank the kind of leadership this great area needs. The Chicago District is the largest in point of population, has more banks than any other District, and leads all others in many of the basic industries of our economy. He has a broad commercial banking experience, is an out­ standing industrialist, and being 51 years of age will give continuity to management.” Mr. Allen was born in Carbondale, Illinois, is a graduate of Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts, and of Dartmouth Col­ lege. He is married and has four children. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO Chairman and Federal Reserve Agent Deputy Chairman Bert R. Prall J. Stuart Russell Chicago, Illinois Farm Editor Des Moines Register and Tribune Des Moines, Iowa Robert P. Briggs Walter J. Cummings W illiam J. Grede Executive Vice President Chairman of the Board President Consumers Power Company Continental Illinois National Bank G rede Foundries, Inc. Jackson, Michigan and Trust Company of Chicago Milwaukee, Wisconsin Chicago, Illinois William A. Hanley Walter E. Hawkinson Vivian W. Johnson Director Vice President in Charge of Finance President Eli Lilly and Company and Secretary First National Bank Indianapolis, Indiana Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. C edar Falls, Iowa Milwaukee, Wisconsin Nugent R. Oberwortmann President The North Shore National Bank of Chicago Chicago, Illinois MEMBER OF FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Homer J. Livingston President The First National Bank of Chicago Chicago, Illinois MEMBERS OF INDUSTRIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE C. Harvey Bradley John W. Evers Walter Harnischfeger Chairman of the Advisory Board President President W. J. Holliday & Company Commonwealth Edison Company Harnischfeger Corporation Division of Jones and Laughlin Chicago, Illinois Milwaukee, Wisconsin Steel Corporation Indianapolis, Indiana Edward M. Kerwin James L. Palmer Senior Vice President President E. J. Brach and Sons Marshall Field & Company Chicago, Illinois Chicago, Illinois DETROIT BRANCH DIRECTORS Chairm an Ira A. Moore John A. Hannah Howard P. Parshall Chairman of the Board President President Peoples National Bank of Grand Rapids Michigan State University Bank of the Commonwealth Grand Rapids, Michigan - East Lansing, Michigan Detroit, Michigan C. V. Patterson Raymond T. Perring Ernest W. Potter Executive Vice President President President Upjohn Company The Detroit Bank and Trust Company Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank Kalamazoo, Michigan Detroit, Michigan Flint, M ichigan J. Thomas Smith President Detroit Harvester Company Detroit, Michigan FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO OFFICERS CARL E. ALLEN ERNEST C. HARRIS President First Vice President NEIL B. DAW ES, Vice President and Secretary GEORGE W. MITCHELL, Vice President WILFORD R. DIERCKS, Vice President HAROLD J. NEWMAN, Vice President ARTHUR M. GUSTAVSON, Vice President ARTHUR L. OLSON, Vice President PAUL C. HODGE, Vice President, RUSSEL A. SWANEY, Vice President General Counsel and Assistant Secretary WILLIAM W. TURNER, Vice President CLARENCE T. LAIBLY, Vice President LAURENCE H. JONES, Cashier ERNEST T. BAUGHMAN, ROBERT C. HOLLAND, Assistant Vice President Assistant Vice President PHIL C. CARROLL, Assistant Vice President BRUCE L. SMYTH, Assistant Vice President EDWARD A. HEATH, Assistant Vice President C. PAUL VAN ZANTE, and Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President HUGH J. HELMER, Assistant Vice President H. FRED W ILSO N , Assistant Vice President CARL E. BIERBAUER, Assistant Cashier WILLIAM O. HUME, Assistant Cashier E D W A R D D. BRISTOW , Assistant Cashier H ARRY S. SCHULTZ, Assistant Cashier LE ROY A. DAVIS, Assistant Cashier ELMER F. SHIREY, Assistant Cashier LE ROY W. DAWSON, Assistant Cashier ROBERT E. SORG, Assistant Cashier FRED H. G R IM M , Assistant Cashier JOSEPH J. SRP, JR., Assistant Cashier VICTOR A. HANSEN, Assistant Cashier GEORGE T. TUCKER, Assistant Cashier JOHN J. ENDRES, General Auditor CHARLES J. SCANLON, Chief Examiner FRED A. DONS, Assistant General Auditor LELAND M. ROSS, Assistant Chief Examiner WILLIAM C. GALLAGHER, Assistant Counsel DETROIT BRANCH RUSSEL A. SWANEY, Vice President PAUL F. CAREY, Assistant Cashier RICHARD W. BLOOMFIELD, ARTHUR J. WIEGANDT, Assistant Cashier Assistant Vice President GORDON W. LAMPHERE, HAROLD L. DIEHL, Cashier Assistant General Counsel FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO ANNUAL REPORT m i W JH 1 M i A | y ■ j ! •, Indianapolis Milwaukee big town, boom town old firms and new investment page 7 page 22 Big, thriving economies page 6 Activities in 1956 Assets and liabilities 41 Earnings and expenses 46 Operations: volume, personnel, membership 48 Big, thriving economies ne way to better understand the workings try. A city’s well-being, therefore, depends mainly of the dynamic and complex American economy is to on the external markets for the products in which examine differing regional and local economic con­ it specializes and on the effectiveness with which its ditions and trends. For nonfarm activities, the basic producers compete for these markets. For example, molecules in the economic fabric are metropolitan payrolls, employment, retail sales and bank deposits areas— cities and their environs. Thus the way to in most eastern Michigan cities are closely related study differences in molecular structure in the Mid­ to the sales of their principal “export” products— west is to appraise the economic specialization which motor vehicles and parts. differs considerably from one city to another and An appraisal of a city’s economic structure re­ imparts to each a distinctive set of economic char­ quires not only an examination of the present and acteristics. prospective demand for its exports, but also an What makes for prosperity, stability and growth analysis of investment in the community and how it in a metropolitan area? To some extent, a city’s way is financed— whether from the savings of local citi­ of making its living is a circular process. People zens and businesses, through local financial institu­ “take in each other’s washing”—that is, a fair pro­ tions, or in the national capital markets. For portion of the workers in every community earn their economic activities on current account— “exporting” keep by producing goods and services for each other. and serving local needs— while the main, are not the This kind of local specialization has existed in cities only things indicative of a city’s resources and pros­ for centuries.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In
    Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master's Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Christov Churchward, Jacob Herbers, Ben Picone, Drew Turro Client: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Capstone Instructor: Fred Rose Date of Oral Presentation: 5/6/2019 Approval Date of Final Paper: 1 Executive Summary State of the Market Medium-duty electric vehicles (MDEVs) are still in the early stages of adoption across the U.S. Cost- parity on the initial purchase price of these vehicles relative to their conventional counterparts is not expected until the mid-2020s. A lack of organizational experience operating and maintaining EVs and a dearth of charging infrastructure present challenges to the early deployment of all types of EVs. Furthermore, most test cases for MDEVs are in California, whose warmer climate makes it difficult to draw accurate operational comparisons to Minnesota. Despite this, manufacturers are entering the market and providing a greater variety of vehicle choices. The number of class three through six (5-13 tons) electric vehicles on the market increased by a factor of six from 2013 to 2018, going from four to 24. Utilities, recognizing customer demand for EVs, are developing specialized programs and electricity rates for their customers to keep the costs of EV charging low. Furthermore, MDEVs operate with half the fuel cost per mile versus a comparable diesel vehicle. For fleet owners able and willing to take on the
    [Show full text]
  • Consult the Reporting Issuer List
    AUTORITÉ DES MARCHÉS FINANCIERS Reporting Issuers List This list is updated at the date indicated below and takes into account all documents filed on the previous date. Defaults Various default codes are used on the list of reporting issuers. The codes appear under the heading “Defaults” and refer to the Default Nomenclature below. The AMF will make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the list. However, reporting issuers should promptly contact the AMF if they do not appear on the list of reporting issuers in Québec or if they are inadvertently identified as being in default. Last update : &[Date]2021-09-24 Default Nomenclature 1a. Failure to file the annual financial statements. 1b. Failure to file the interim financial report. Failure to file the annual or interim management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) or the annual or interim 1c. management report of fund performance (MRFP). 1d. Failure to file the Annual Information Form (AIF). Failure to file the certification of annual or interim filings required by Regulation 52-109 respecting Certification of 1e. Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (“Regulation 52-109”). 1f. Failure to file the required proxy materials or the required information circular. 1g. Failure to file the issuer profile supplement on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI). 1h. Failure to file the material change report. 1i. Failure to provide the written update after filing a confidential report of a material change. 1j. Failure to file the business acquisition report. Failure to file the annual oil and gas disclosure prescribed by Regulation 51-101 respecting Standards of Disclosure of 1k.
    [Show full text]
  • IC Bus Charging Fundamentals
    September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D-2 Item (Specify): 1(F)(4); 2(E)(4), 6(E)(2); 6(E)(4); 9(C)(1)
    BENEFICIARY ELIGIBLE MITIGATION ACTION CERTIFICATION Beneficiary Cherokee Nation Lead Agency Authorized to Act on Behalf of the Beneficiary: Office of the Secretary of Natural Resources (Any authorized person with delegation of such authority to direct the Trustee delivered to the Trustee pursuant to a Delegation of Authority and Certificate of Incumbency) Action Title: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Beneficiary’s Project ID: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Funding Request No. 4 (sequential) Request Type: ☐ Reimbursement X Advance (select one or ☐ Other (specify): Paymentmore) to be made to: X Beneficiary (select one or more) ☐ Other (specify): Funding Request & X Attached to this Certification Direction (Attachment A) ☐ To be Provided Separately SUMMARY Eligible Mitigation Action X Appendix D-2 item (specify): 1(f)(4); 2(e)(4), 6(e)(2); 6(e)(4); 9(c)(1) Action Type ☐ Item 10 - DERA Option (5.2.12) (specify and attach Detailed Description of Mitigation DERA Action Proposal): Item Including Community and Air Quality Benefits (5.2.2): Please see Exhibit 1 attached hereto Estimate of Anticipated NOx Reductions (5.2.3): Please see Exhibit 2 attached hereto Identification of Governmental Entity Responsible for Reviewing and Auditing Expenditures of Eligible Mitigation Action Funds to Ensure Compliance with Applicable Law (5.2.7.1): Cherokee Nation Financial Resources Describe how the Beneficiary will make documentation publicly available (5.2.7.2). Please see Exhibit 3 attached hereto Describe any cost share requirement to be placed on each NOx source proposed to be mitigated (5.2.8). Not applicable Describe how the Beneficiary complied with subparagraph 4.2.8, related to notice to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Activities: 1949-1950 Through 1958-1959
    ASAE QUAD CITY SECTION ACTIVITIES: 1949-1950 THROUGH 1958-1959 This listing of Section activities was excerpted from a longer listing most likely compiled by John Wilson in 1979-1980 as part of his research into the history of the Quad City Section. This longer listing ends with the April 29, 1979 Section meeting. 1949-1950 Chair: Robert H. Meier Vice-Chairs: Robert R. Roth C. J. Eveleth Secretary-Treasurer: Richard K. McConkey Nominating Committee: C. S. Morrison W. E. Knapp E. L. Hansen October 10, 1949 - Sky-Hi Room, LeClaire Hotel, Moline, Illinois. 1.) Elements of Welded Design - Leon C. Bibber, Welding Engineer, Research and Development Division, Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation. 2.) Low Alloy High Tensile Strength Steels - Clarence Attenburger, Chief Chemist, Alloy Division, Great Lakes Steel Corporation 3.) Farming in Iran - Main Speaker, Edwin L. Hansen, Hansen Brothers Agricultural Engineering Sales and Service, Hillsdale, Illinois. January 28, 1950 - Cafeteria, Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois. 1.) Peculiarities of Rubber Design - J. D. Berwick, Resident Field Engineer, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. 2.) Engineering Aspects of Packing as Applied to Hydraulics in Agricultural Implements - J. N. Smith, Manager, Hydraulics Division, E. F. Houghton & Company. 3.) Farm Machinery Safety - Main Speaker, Martin Ronning, Chief Engineer, Power and Machinery Division, Minneapolis-Moline Company. March 25, 1950 - Cafeteria, Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois. l.) Problems of the Self Propelled Combine - D. C. Heitshu , Chief Engineer, John Deere Harvester Works. 2.) Farm Structures Now and in the Future - R. R. McBeth, Head, Engineering Department, Louden Machinery Company. April 28, 1950 - First Annual Meeting of the Iowa-Illinois Section, Fort Armstrong Hotel, Rock Island, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report
    TRACKING THE ENERGY TRANSITION 2020 Taking the Wheel How Canada can cut carbon pollution and revitalize its auto sector December 2020 Contents 4 3 Our Car Conundrum 4 Troubling Trends Carbon Pollution is Up The Auto Sector is Down 8 The Electric Opportunity Cutting Carbon The Canadian Advantage 11 A Global Race to Electrify The Shift to EVs World-Leading Policies 14 Canadian Auto: The Next Generation 16 Endnotes 8 Taking the Wheel All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long as the source is cited How Canada can cut carbon pollution and revitalize its auto sector as “Clean Energy Canada.” Clean Energy Canada is a program at December 2020 | © 2020 Clean Energy Canada the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue at Simon Fraser University. ISBN: 978-1-989692-02-8 Cover photos: Shutterstock 2 CLEAN ENERGY CANADA Our Car Conundrum anada has a car conundrum. Our transportation delivering them to 4 emissions are up, and our auto manufacturing the Toronto Transit sector is down. And while these two challenges Commission. And might sound only tangentially related, they share a Canada’s auto parts common solution. manufacturers are C But let’s start with the problem. According to leading the charge the International Energy Agency, Canadians drive the most on a zero-emission polluting cars in the world.1 Literally, when it comes to concept car to tailpipe emissions, we take the global top spot. Over showcase what Canada’s supply chain can do.10 the past 20 years, carbon pollution from transportation has The opportunity also extends beyond building vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality
    Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Lion Electric Co Form 424B3 Filed 2021-06-14
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 424B3 Prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) Filing Date: 2021-06-14 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-21-190162 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Lion Electric Co Mailing Address Business Address 921, CHEMIN DE LA 921, CHEMIN DE LA CIK:1834974| IRS No.: 611869919 | State of Incorp.:A8 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 RIVIERE-DU-NORD RIVIERE-DU-NORD Type: 424B3 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-256633 | Film No.: 211015270 SAINT-JEROME A8 J7Y 5G2 SAINT-JEROME A8 J7Y 5G2 SIC: 3711 Motor vehicles & passenger car bodies (450) 432-5466 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) Registration No. 333-256633 PROSPECTUS 152,276,690 Common Shares This prospectus relates to the offer and sale from time to time by the selling securityholders or their permitted transferees (collectively, the selling securityholders) of up to 152,276,690 common shares in the capital of The Lion Electric Company. This prospectus also covers any additional securities that may become issuable by reason of share splits, share dividends or other similar transactions. The shares covered by this prospectus include (i) 132,867,990 common shares held, or issuable upon exercise of the Specified Customer Warrant (as defined herein), by certain selling securityholders that were securityholders of The Lion Electric Company, a corporation existing under the Business Corporations Act (Québec) (Lion), prior to the closing of the business combination (the Business Combination) between Lion, Lion Electric Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion, and Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and (ii) 19,408,700 common shares issued to certain securityholders in connection with the closing of a private placement offering at a price per share of $10.00, for gross proceeds of approximately $200,402,000, which closed concurrently with the Business Combination on May 6, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations For
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Vtrqtr1a Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles 10/01/2019 Vehicle Titles and Registrations Manufacturer Codes Alphabetically by Manufacturer Name
    VTRQTR1A NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 10/01/2019 VEHICLE TITLES AND REGISTRATIONS MANUFACTURER CODES ALPHABETICALLY BY MANUFACTURER NAME CODE MANUFACTURER CODE MANUFACTURER ACEW ACE WELDING TRAILER COMPANY BORC BORCO EQUIPMENT CO INC ACIF ACIER FABREX INC BOTT BOYD TANK TRAILERS ACRO ACRO TRAILER COMPANY BOYD BOYDSTUN METAL WORKS ACTN ACTION EQUIPMENT BRTI BRAE TRAILERS INC ACUR ACURA BREN BRENNER TANK INC AEPD ADVANCE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS BRMR BRI-MAR MANUFACTURING AMIN ADVANCE MIXER BROK BROOKFIELD TRAILER CORP AJAX AJAX MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC BUEL BUELL AJRI AJR INC BUGA BUGATTI ALAB ALABAMA TRAILER COMPANY BUIC BUICK ALFA ALFA ROMEO BUIL BUILT-RITE TRAILERS ALFB ALFAB INC BLKE BULK MFG ALLW ALLENTOWN BRAKE & WHEEL SERVICE LBOS BURKETT'S AUTORAMA INC ALTK ALLIED TANK TRUCK BCIB BUS & COACH INTL (BCI) ALLO ALLOY TRAILERS INC BUTL BUTLER ALMI ALMAC INDUSTRIES LIMITED BWSM BWS MANUFACTURING ALMT ALMONT BYDA BYD COACH AND BUS LLC ALTE ALTEC IND INC CEEZ C Z ENGINEERING ALUT ALUMATECH CSTW C/S TRAILER ALUM ALUMINUM BODY CORP CADI CADILLAC AMCE AMERICAN CARRIER EQUIPMENT CAGI CAGIVA AMCR AMERICAN CRUISER MOTOR HOME CANA CAN-AM AMGN AMERICAN GENERAL CAPT CAPACITY OF TEXAS AIH AMERICAN IRON HORSE CAT CATERPILLAR LAFR AMERICAN LA FRANCE CENT CENTENNIAL INDUSTRIES AMER AMERICAN MOTORS CNTR CENTREVILLE TAG AMRE AMERICAN REBEL CHAC CHALLENGE-COOK BROTHERS INC AMRT AMERICAN ROAD TRAILER CHAL CHAMBERLAIN TRAILERS AMEM AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURING INC CHMT CHAMPION TRAILERS AME AMERICAN TRAILERS INC CHCI CHANCE COACH TRANSIT BUS ANDS
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Electric Vehicle Roadmap
    PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC VEHICLE ROADMAP Prepared for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection February 2019 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC VEHICLE ROADMAP Technical support from: Meister Consultants Group | A Cadmus Company Yborra and Associates Volpe National Transportation Systems Center ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under the State Energy Program Award Number DE-EE0006994 through contract from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. SUPERVISION AND COORDINATION Mark Hand, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection LEAD AUTHORS Kelly Blynn, Meister Consultants Group, A Cadmus Company Erin Camp, Meister Consultants Group, A Cadmus Company CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Neil Veilleux, Meister Consultants Group, A Cadmus Company Ryan Cook, Meister Consultants Group, A Cadmus Company Philip Kreycik, Meister Consultants Group, A Cadmus Company Stephe Yborra, Yborra & Associates Coralie Cooper, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell Electric Buses an Attractive Value Proposition for Zero Emission Transit in Canada May 2020 Table of Contents
    Fuel Cell Electric Buses An attractive value proposition for zero emission transit in Canada May 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 6 Benefits of Zero-Emission Fuel Cell Buses . 7 Performance . 8 Reliability . 8 Resiliency . 8 Sustainability . 8 Scalability of Infrastructure . 8 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions . 9 Cold Weather Operation . .11 Fuel Cell Electric Bus . 13 Hydrogen Fuelling for Fuel Cell Bus Fleets . 15 Hydrogen Production . 15 Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure . 15 Fuel Cell Electric Bus Total Cost of Ownership . 15 Value to Canada . 17 Whistler: Lessons Learned . 20 Conclusion . 21 Affordable . 21 High Performing . 21 Zero-Emission . 21 The Other Electric Bus . 23 Document References . 24 Tables & Figures New Flyer’s Xcelsior CHARGE H2™ 18 metre articulated fuel cell electric bus . 4 Fuel cell electric bus in operation at Orange County Transportation Authority, California . 7 Canadian Industry Leaders . 18 Ballard Power Systems 2 Executive Summary There is no doubt that the future of public zero emission counterparts, battery electric buses. transportation is going to be zero emission and Canada is already a leader in the production of it will happen quickly. With the government’s hydrogen as an energy carrier, and has many mandate that all federally financed bus purchases competitive advantages (e.g. low carbon feedstocks) be zero emission beginning in 20231, cities and that will grow this sector as the world seeks low transit authorities are faced with a choice of what carbon intensity fuel options. On the technology technology to deploy. Transit operators can consider side, Canada is already home to world leading two zero emission electric bus solutions: fuel cell hydrogen and fuel cell companies that cover all electric buses (FCEBs) or battery electric buses elements of the supply chain— including hydrogen (BEBs).
    [Show full text]