DOCSLIB.ORG

Worldwide Satellite Magazine January 2010 Satmagazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worldwide Satellite Magazine January 2010 Satmagazine Worldwide Satellite Magazine January 2010 SatMagazine In This Issue... Small Satellites — Small Package, Huge Potential Executive Interviews Sir Martin Sweeting, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. David McCourt, Satellite Holdings, LLC Forrester, Gottlieb, NSR, Radford Insights, Focus, Case Studies and more.... EDITORIAL + PRODUCTION Silvano Payne SatMagazine January 2010 Publisher + Writer — BEAM — Small Satellites Hartley Lesser The Editors............................................................................. Editorial Director 4 Pattie Lesser — BEAM — The SmallSat Market Editor By Phil Davies, SSTL. .............................................................14 Chris Forrester — NewsBEAMS — Associate Editor The Editors...........................................................................17 Michael Fleck Contributing Editor—Europe InSight — European Pay Radio Begins To Motor! Susan Sheppard by Chris Forrester ................................................................32 Contributing Editor—Asia Executive Spotlight Richard Dutchik Professor Sir Martin Sweeting, SSTL ......................................37 Contributing Editor InSight — The New Challenge At Sea Alan Gottlieb by Alan Gottlieb, Gottlieb International ......................................43 Contributing Editor Dan Makinster InSight — NSR Contributing Writer North America, The Waning Star...........................................48 Tony Radford InSight — Chronicles Of SATCOM Contributing Writer The Performance Appraisal by Tony Radford .......................52 Focus — Event SALES & MARKETING SatExpo Europe 2010 ..........................................................55 Jill Durfee Case Study Sales Director / Ass’t. Editor Breaking Down Barriers by Victor Barendse, Wired Ocean ....56 Focus — Taurus II DEVELOPMENT Rocketing Ahead by Baron Beneski, Orbital Sciences ............59 Simon Payne Development Manager Focus — Event — Bigger + Better Than Ever The 26th National Space Symposium ...................................61 Vol. 7 No. 8 Case Study — All Aboard! January 2010 THIS ISSUE’S AUTHORS The Kazakhstan Train Connection by SES WORLD SKIES .................67 Victor Barendse Executive Spotlight Baron Beneski David McCourt, Skyware Global ............................................69 Phil Davies Case Study — Surviving The Deadliest Catch Chris Forrester With SAILOR Onboard by Thrane & Thrane ..........................72 Alan Gottlieb Focus — Interorbital + TubeSat Hartley Lesser TubeSat Preps For Neptune 30 by Randa Relich Milliron .......75 Pattie Lesser Case Study — Matching The Pace Of Aerospace Randa Relich Milliron by Tim Nichols, Siemens PLM Software .................................81 Tim Nichols ADVERTISER INDEX Tony Radford Advantech .............................................................................. 45 Published monthly by AnaCom, Inc. ............................................................................ 7 Satnews Publishers AVL Technologies ................................................................... 57 800 Siesta Way Comtech EF Data .................................................................... 77 Sonoma, CA 95476 USA CPI .......................................................................................... 79 Phone: (707) 939-9306 Futron .................................................................................... 29 Fax: (707) 838-9235 GlobalLink .............................................................................. 85 © 2010 Satnews Publishers Gottlieb International Group ................................................... 47 We reserve the right to edit all submitted Intelsat General ........................................................................ 3 materials to meet our content guidelines MITEQ / MCL ............................................................................ 1 as well as for grammar and spelling NEWTEC CY .............................................................................. 5 consistency. Articles may be moved to NSR ........................................................................................ 49 an alternative issue to accommodate PacTel International ................................................................ 23 publication space requirements. Paradise Datacom ................................................................... 21 Submission of content does not constitute SatCom 2010 Africa ................................................................ 73 acceptance of said material by SatNews Sat Expo Europe 2010 .............................................................. 9 Publishers. Edited materials may, or SAT-GE ................................................................................... 83 may not, be returned to author and/or SMi (Oil & Gas SatCom) ........................................................... 19 company for review prior to publication. SSPI ........................................................................................ 53 The views expressed in our various Thuraya .................................................................................. 15 MASTHEAD CONTENTS publications do not necessarily reflect the Wavestream ............................................................................ 33 views or opinions of SatNews Publishers. BEAM: editors SatMagazine — January 2010 3 BEAM — editors ur wish to you is for a most joyous and fruitful ONew Year. Our industry, although far from immune to the economic doldrums affect- ing the global economies, has a resiliency we should all be most thankful for, and to that end, with the proper attitudes and earnest work, all should see a continuing recovery in 2010. SatNews Publishers is most thankful for your continued sup- port and if we can do anything to assist you with your endeav- ors as far as content is con- cerned, please contact us and let us know of your interests. Thank you! With today’s extremely cost sensitive market for SATCOM and MILSATCOM, it’s no wonder more focus and attention is being afforded to small satellites. Weight is the issue — heavy, multifunction satellites require launch vehicles of significant size to deliver them to their assigned orbits, and such is a most expensive proposition. Due to small satellite’s lower weights and smaller size, the cost to launch them is far less as, usually, multiple small satellites can be simultaneously propelled into orbit. Additionally, the piggy back method can also apply to small satellites, allowing them to ride along in launch vehicles as additional passengers for a large satellite payload. Another factor of significance for smaller satellites is their lower cost for their manufacture. Many Commercial and military/government interests continue times, a variety of smaller satellites can be to fuel additional developments, with the latter espe- built using mass production techniques. cially interested in smaller satellites due to their ability to become fully operational in a far shorter period of time There are, basically, four “types” of smaller than larger satellites, a most important condition for satellite: mini, micro, nano and pico. The warfighters. following four classifications are for the satellite’s “wet mass,” which includes the fuel for the spacecraft, from lightest to heaviest: 4 SatMagazine — January 2010 BEAM — editors • Between 0.1 and 1 kg (0.22 to 2.2 pounds) due to their ability to become fully operational in — picosatellite, which includes its sub-genre, a far shorter period of time than larger satellites, a CUBESAT, measuring 10x10x10 cm3 and a most important condition for warfighters. Smaller maximum mass of 1 kg) satellites can also be replaced in far shorter time and a full constellation (or a “swarm,” when • Between 1 and 10 kg (2.2 to 22 pounds) — applied to nanos and picos) can be deployed with nanosatellite advanced technologies while maintaining cost restrictive budgets. • Between 10 and 100 kg (22 to 220 pounds) — microsatellite Additionally, smaller satellites, once on orbit, present a unifying capability and can work • Between 100 to 500 kg (220 to 1,100 pounds) harmoniously together to produce objectives. — minisatellite Where, previously, ground control stations were needed to order the satellites into various Small satellites also require a great deal of formations, now such can be done automatically innovation, especially when it comes to the with the smaller satellite far more responsive, time- power driving the spacecraft for attitude control, wise, to alter an objective’s needs. propulsion, instrument use. Typical sources including butane, carbon dioxide (or a liquid Among the latest small satellite missions — that can be safely vaporized to deliver “push”), BeeSat, a pico satellite project of the Technical electric power (solar or battery), with any number University of Berlin. The main objective of of new and unique propulsion systems being BeeSat was to prove the viability during on orbit currently developed by a number of companies. verification of newly developed micro reaction Commercial and military/government interests wheels for pico satellite applications. continue to fuel additional developments, with the latter especially interested in smaller satellites BeeSat 6 SatMagazine — January 2010 BEAM ­­— editors Although there or clusters of are currently pico satellites several developers will result in of CUBESATs, completely new many of them applications at lack a precise very low cost. attitude control BeeSat will demo
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview
    Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview and Engagement Craig Owens Program Manager, SBIR Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Space Systems Company Portfolio Special Strategic & Missile Defense Civil Space Programs NASA Human Adv Programs Strategic Missiles Missile Defense Planetary Weather & Exploration Exploration Environment Military Space Mission Solutions Protected Narrowband Navigation Weather Early Space End-to-End Geospatial Comms Comms Warning Protection Mission Systems Technologies Commercial Space Advanced Technology Center Subsidiaries Remote Commercial Wind Energy Optics, RF Adv. Materials Space Sciences Sensing SATCOM Management & Photonics & Nano Systems & Instruments LM SBIR Team Mission 1. Collaborate with small businesses to get advanced technology to our customers 2. Build strategic, long term relationships with small businesses by leveraging Gov’t SBIR/STTR R&D funding 3. Understand what small business technologies are potentially coming to the market 4. Align discriminating small business technologies to LM programs and future opportunities to reduce cost and win new business 5. Complement our small business supply chain and support the Gov’t initiative to leverage small businesses © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LM SBIR Engagement • Strong engagement in the SBIR/STTR Program – Seeking technology maturation supporting program needs – 5-10 year outlook – TRL 6 needed for potential LM investment – Expect small businesses to be informed on LM • Benefits to LM – Innovation & Affordability – Strategic partnerships – Complements LM investments – Help drive innovation into next generation systems © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LMSSC Endorsement Process • LM SME’s assess all concepts • Leadership aware of engagements • Process allows for relationship building © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved 5 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs
    Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs Requirements in NASA Science Missions © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved Performance and Operational Measurement Requirements Emitted radiance Detect photons; Convert to e- Calibrate Data Science Data Quantized Photons Electrons Science Data Radiances § Orbit § Wavelength band § Detection § Science question § Signal photons § Integration time § Navigation analysis § Background scene § Quantum efficiency § Radiometric calibration § Field of View § Dark current § Resolution § Read noise § Solar intrusion Mission Requirements Performance Requirements • Duration • Environment • Electrical • Mechanical Iterate • Reliability • Operational • Thermal • Structural Evolve Requirements Constraints Resource Requirements • Spacecraft • Mass • Thermal interface • Power • Data rate • Launch vehicle • Size • Alignment Concept Design 2 Example Requirements Tree Implementing NASA Level 1s Institution/NASA Center Level 1 Reqts Program Level 2 Launch Environmental Mission Assurance Mission Reqts Doc Project Vehicle IRD Reqts Requirements (MAR) Flight System Level 3 Mission Ops & Element- Payload Spacecraft Flight to Ground Payload Reqts to SC ICDs Ground Developed, Requirements Doc ICD System Reqts Project Approved Payload/ Level 4 Spacecraft Ground Instrument Testbeds Element-Controlled Subsystems Subsystems Subsystems 3 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) v Objective: Characterize Mars’ atmospheric escape v PI: Dr. Bruce Jakosky, CU LASP v Implementing Institution: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center v Spacecraft and Mission Ops: Lockheed Martin v Instruments: UCB SSL, CU/LASP, NASA GSFC, CNES v Mars relay: Jet Propulsion Laboratory v Launched November 18th 2013 v MOI September 22nd 2014 v Currently in third mission extension Image Credit: NASA/B. Ingalls 5 Science Missions Across the Solar System 6 © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Monte Carlo Analysis for Collision Risk Assessment on VEGA Launcher
    ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES, Vol. 51, No. 1 – 2016 DOI: 10.1515/arsa-2016-0004 A MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS FOR COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT A Monte Carlo analysis for collision risk assessment on VEGA ON VEGAlauncher LAUNCHER payloads PAYLOADS and LARES AND LARES satellite SATELLITE G. Sindoni Sapienza Universit`a di Roma, Scuola di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] I. Ciufolini Universit`a del Salento, Dip. Ingegneria dell’Innovazione, Lecce, and Centro Fermi, Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] F. Battie ELV s.p.a. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This work has been developed in the framework of the LARES mission of the Italian Space Agency (ASI). The LARES satellite has been built to test, with high accuracy, the frame–dragging effect predicted by the theory of General Relativity, specifically the Lense–Thirring drag of its node. LARES was the main payload in the qualification flight of the European Space Agency launcher VEGA. A concern arose about the possibility of an impact between the eight secondary payloads among themselves, with LARES and with the last stage of the launcher (AVUM). An impact would have caused failure on the payloads and the production of debris in violation of the space debris mitigation measures established internationally. As an additional contribution, this study allowed the effect of the payload release on the final manoeuvers of the AVUM to be understood. Keywords: LARES, VEGA, launchers, space debris, collisions. 1. INTRODUCTION On February 13, 2012, the European Space Agency’s VEGA qualification flight inserted into orbit the LARES (LAser RElativity Satellite) satellite (Ciufolini et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Lifetime Predictions
    Orbital LIFETIME PREDICTIONS An ASSESSMENT OF model-based BALLISTIC COEFfiCIENT ESTIMATIONS AND ADJUSTMENT FOR TEMPORAL DRAG co- EFfiCIENT VARIATIONS M.R. HaneVEER MSc Thesis Aerospace Engineering Orbital lifetime predictions An assessment of model-based ballistic coecient estimations and adjustment for temporal drag coecient variations by M.R. Haneveer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday June 1, 2017 at 14:00 PM. Student number: 4077334 Project duration: September 1, 2016 – June 1, 2017 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. N. Doornbos, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. E. J. O. Schrama, TU Delft ir. K. J. Cowan MBA TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Summary Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experience low levels of drag due to the interaction with the outer layers of Earth’s atmosphere. The atmospheric drag reduces the velocity of the object, resulting in a gradual decrease in altitude. With each decayed kilometer the object enters denser portions of the atmosphere accelerating the orbit decay until eventually the object cannot sustain a stable orbit anymore and either crashes onto Earth’s surface or burns up in its atmosphere. The capability of predicting the time an object stays in orbit, whether that object is space junk or a satellite, allows for an estimate of its orbital lifetime - an estimate satellite op- erators work with to schedule science missions and commercial services, as well as use to prove compliance with international agreements stating no passively controlled object is to orbit in LEO longer than 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat Data Analysis Revision
    371-XXXXX Revision - CubeSat Data Analysis Revision - November 2015 Prepared by: GSFC/Code 371 National Aeronautics and Goddard Space Flight Center Space Administration Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 371-XXXXX Revision - Signature Page Prepared by: ___________________ _____ Mark Kaminskiy Date Reliability Engineer ARES Corporation Accepted by: _______________________ _____ Nasir Kashem Date Reliability Lead NASA/GSFC Code 371 1 371-XXXXX Revision - DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD REV DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE LEVEL APPROVED - Baseline Release 2 371-XXXXX Revision - Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Statement of Work 5 3 Database 5 4 Distributions by Satellite Classes, Users, Mass, and Volume 7 4.1 Distribution by satellite classes 7 4.2 Distribution by satellite users 8 4.3 CubeSat Distribution by mass 8 4.4 CubeSat Distribution by volume 8 5 Annual Number of CubeSats Launched 9 6 Reliability Data Analysis 10 6.1 Introducing “Time to Event” variable 10 6.2 Probability of a Successful Launch 10 6.3 Estimation of Probability of Mission Success after Successful Launch. Kaplan-Meier Nonparametric Estimate and Weibull Distribution. 10 6.3.1 Kaplan-Meier Estimate 10 6.3.2 Weibull Distribution Estimation 11 6.4 Estimation of Probability of mission success after successful launch as a function of time and satellite mass using Weibull Regression 13 6.4.1 Weibull Regression 13 6.4.2 Data used for estimation of the model parameters 13 6.4.3 Comparison of the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the Reliability function and the estimates based on the Weibull regression 16 7 Conclusion 17 8 Acknowledgement 18 9 References 18 10 Appendix 19 Table of Figures Figure 4-1 CubeSats distribution by mass ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review International Mobile Telecommunications Services, Including Wimax
    December 2007 - SPECIAL EDITION: THE TOP-10 SPACE BUSINESS STORIES OF 2007 - #1 - M&A Transactions Keep Pace #5 - 50th Anniversary of Sputnik Despite challenging credit markets, merger, As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the acquisition and investment activity kept pace in satellite that introduced the “space age”, 2007. Abertis & Caisse des Dépôts et approximately 1,000 satellites now orbit the consignations purchase 32% (€1.07B) and Earth and the space business has grown to 25.5% (€862.7M) stakes, respectively, in more than $100 billion in annual revenues. Eutelsat (Jan.). GE Capital sells back its 19.5% #6 - Satellite Manufacturers Remain Busy interest in SES Global for €588 million in cash 18 commercial satellite orders announced in and assets including stakes in AsiaSat, Star 2007. Ball Aerospace & Technologies: One and Orbcomm (Feb.). JSAT & SKY WorldView-2. EADS Astrium: YahSat 1A Perfect Communications merge (March). BC and 1B, Arabsat 5A, BADR-5 (the foregoing Partners to acquire Intelsat Ltd. for $16.4 billion, in cooperation with Thales Alenia Space) including debt (June). Carlyle Group to acquire and Alphasat 1-XL. Israel Aerospace ARINC (July). Apax Partners France Industries: Amos-4. Lockheed Martin purchases Telenor Satellite Services for $400 Commercial Space Systems: JCSAT-12. million (Sept.). Loral Space & Orbital Sciences Corporation: Optus-D3, Communications and PSP Canada conclude AMC-5R. Space Systems/Loral: Nimiq 5, C$3.25 billion acquisition of Telesat Canada ProtoStar I, Intelsat 14, SIRIUS FM-6, Abertis to acquire 28.4% stake in Hispasat EchoStar XIV, NSS-12. Thales Alenia (Nov.). CIP Canada Investment, indirectly Space: THOR 6, Palapa-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Systems
    Chapter 18 REST-OF-WORLD (ROW) SATELLITE SYSTEMS For the longest time, space exploration was an exclusive club comprised of only two members, the United States and the Former Soviet Union. That has now changed due to a number of factors, among the more dominant being economics, advanced and improved technologies and national imperatives. Today, the number of nations with space programs has risen to over 40 and will continue to grow as the costs of spacelift and technology continue to decrease. RUSSIAN SATELLITE SYSTEMS The satellite section of the Russian In the post-Soviet era, Russia contin- space program continues to be predomi- ues its efforts to improve both its military nantly government in character, with and commercial space capabilities. most satellites dedicated either to civil/ These enhancements encompass both military applications (such as communi- orbital assets and ground-based space cations and meteorology) or exclusive support facilities. Russia has done some military missions (such as reconnaissance restructuring of its operating principles and targeting). A large portion of the regarding space. While these efforts have Russian space program is kept running by attempted not to detract from space-based launch services, boosters and launch support to military missions, economic sites, paid for by foreign commercial issues and costs have lead to a lowering companies. of Russian space-based capabilities in The most obvious change in Russian both orbital assets and ground station space activity in recent years has been the capabilities. decrease in space launches and corre- The influence of Glasnost on Russia's sponding payloads. Many of these space programs has been significant, but launches are for foreign payloads, not public announcements regarding space Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download
    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelsat Satellites Supporting Approximately 50 Channels, Our Intelsatonesm Terrestrial Infrastructure and Other Production Capabilities; And
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-50262 INTELSAT S.A. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Luxembourg 98-0346003 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 4, rue Albert Borschette Luxembourg L-1246 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) +352 27-84-1600 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒* Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • The Space-Based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010)
    WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing For more information, please contact: System in 2010 (GOS-2010) World Meteorological Organization 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.wmo.int WMO Space Programme Office Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 85 19 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 84 74 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wmo.int/pages/prog/sat/ WMO-TD No. 1513 WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010) WMO/TD-No. 1513 2010 © World Meteorological Organization, 2010 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate these publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0)22 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +41 (0)22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] FOREWORD The launching of the world's first artificial satellite on 4 October 1957 ushered a new era of unprecedented scientific and technological achievements. And it was indeed a fortunate coincidence that the ninth session of the WMO Executive Committee – known today as the WMO Executive Council (EC) – was in progress precisely at this moment, for the EC members were very quick to realize that satellite technology held the promise to expand the volume of meteorological data and to fill the notable gaps where land-based observations were not readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Year in Review
    Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) January 1999 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION: 1998 YEAR IN REVIEW Cover Photo Credits (from left): International Launch Services (1998). Image is of the Atlas 2AS launch on June 18, 1998, from Cape Canaveral Air Station. It successfully orbited the Intelsat 805 communications satellite for Intelsat. Boeing Corporation (1998). Image is of the Delta 2 7920 launch on September 8, 1998, from Vandenberg Air Force Base. It successfully orbited five Iridium communications satellites for Iridium LLP. Lockheed Martin Corporation (1998). Image is of the Athena 2 awaiting its maiden launch on January 6, 1998, from Spaceport Florida. It successfully deployed the NASA Lunar Prospector. Orbital Sciences Corporation (1998). Image is of the Taurus 1 launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base on February 10, 1998. It successfully orbited the Geosat Follow-On 1 military remote sensing satellite for the Department of Defense, two Orbcomm satellites and the Celestis 2 funerary payload for Celestis Corporation. Orbital Sciences Corporation (1998). Image is of the Pegasus XL launch on December 5, 1998, from Vandenberg Air Force Base. It successfully orbited the Sub-millimeter Wave Astronomy Satellite for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. 1998 YEAR IN REVIEW INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION In 1998, U.S. launch service providers conducted In addition, 1998 saw continuing demand for 22 launches licensed by the Federal Aviation launches to deploy the world’s first low Earth Administration (FAA), an increase of 29 percent orbit (LEO) communication systems. In 1998, over the 17 launches conducted in 1997. Of there were 17 commercial launches to LEO, 14 these 22, 17 were for commercial or international of which were for the Iridium, Globalstar, and customers, resulting in a 47 percent share of the Orbcomm LEO communications constellations.
    [Show full text]