DOCSLIB.ORG

INF/157 International Atomic Energy Agency 17 September 197? GENERAL Distr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INF/157 International Atomic Energy Agency 17 September 197? GENERAL Distr GC(XIX)/INF/157 International Atomic Energy Agency 17 September 197? GENERAL Distr. GENERAL CONFERENCE ENGLISH only Nineteenth regular session DELEGATION S Information received by noon on 15 September 1973 CONTENTS 1. States A. Member States B. Other States 2. Organizations A. United Nations and the specialised agencies B. Other intergovernmental organizations C. Non-governmental organizations having consultative status with, the Agency An asterisk following a name indicates that the participant*^ husband or wife is present in Vienna. REQUESTS FOR CHANGES IN SUBSEQUENT EDITIONS OF THIS LIST SHOULD BE MADE TO THE PROTOCOL OFFICE IN WRITTING. 75-6912 page 3 1. STATES A. MEMBER STATES AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ALGERIA Delegate Mr. H. HELLAL Professor in Physics Alternates Mr. A.H* BEN1NI Deputy Director, Scientific Research, Ministry of Science and Research Mr. Haaj SLTMAN Technical Adviser, Ministry of Science and Research ARGENTINA Delegate Rear-Admiral Pedro E. IRAOLAGOITIA Secretary of State for Energy; Ambassador; President, Atomic Energy Commission; Governor from Argentina on the Agency's Board of Governors; Resident Representative to the Agency Alternate Mr, Alberto ABiSR* Counsellor, the Snbassy in Austria; Alternate to the Governor and to the Resident Representative GCCm)/INF/157 page 4 Advisers Mr, Mario E.G. BMCOM Vice-President, Atomic Energy Commission; Alternate to the Governor Mr. Waldemar J.P. MAIDABA Adviser, International Affairs, Atomic Energy Commission Mr. Federico P. VIDIRI Atomic Energy Commission; Adviser to the Governor AUSTRALIA Delegate Mr. R.W. BOSWELL, O.B.B. Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission; Governor from Australia on the Agency's Board of Governors Alternate Mr. R.W. FURLOFGER* Ambassador to Austria; Resident Representative to the Agency; Alternate to the Governor Advisers Mr. Ueil R. McDOMAU)* Counse]Lor, Atomic Energy, the Embassy in Austria; Alternate to the Resident Representative and Adviser to the Governor Mr. Denis Russel 0.KSILL* Third Secretary, the Embassy in Austria; Adviser to the Governor and to the Resident Representative AUSTRIA GC (XXX) /H8P/l 57 page 5 BANGLADESH Delegate Mr. Muzaffar Ahmed CHOUDHURY Professor; Minister for Education Alternate Mr. M. Innas AM Professor; Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission Advisers Mr. Nazrul ISLAM Divisional Chief, Planning Commission Mr. A.M. SARFUDDBJ Joint Secretary, Atomic Energy Division Mr. M. Anisur RAHMAN Atomic Energy Commission BELGIUM Delegate Mr. J. ADRIAMSSEF Ambassador; Resident Representative to the Agency Alternate Miss Siraone HERPELS Director, Scientific Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Advisers Miss L. BUYSE Attached to the Office of the Atomic Energy Commission Mr. Jean POUCIS Delegated Officer, Scientific Policy Programming Service Mr. Francois VW HIMBEECK Counsellor; Alternate to the Resident Representative Mr. Maurice de PROOST Attached to the Directorate General, Centre d*e"tude de lfe"nergie nucle'aire, Mol Scientific Adviser BOLIVIA GC(XIX)/INF/157 page 6 BRAZIL Delegate Mr. Hervaaio 0. de CARVALHO* Professor; Chairman^ national luclear Energy Commission? Governor from Brazil on the Agency5s Board of Governors Alternates Mr* Andre" T9 de MESQUITA* Ambassador to Atistriaf Resident Representative to the Agency; Alternate to the Governor Mr. J.R.A. HAMOS Professor; National Unclear Energy Cosaoission Mr. Jayro CQELEG First Secretary^ the Etobassy in Austria? Alternate to the Governor and to the Resident Representative BULGARIA Delegate Mr. Kostadin KOSTADIFO? Associate Professor? President, Oomisitiee for Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy Alternates Mr. Vladimir GAJTOVSKI Associate Professor; Ambassador to Austria; Resident Representative to the Agency Mr. leno ITMCHE? Professor? Governor from Bixtgaria on the Agencyss Board of Governors and Chairman of the Board Mr. Lachezar ATOAMOV* Coimsellor? the Kabassy in Austria; Alternate to the Governor and to the Besi&ent Eepresentative GC(XIX)/lNF/157 page 7 Mr. Yulij MIKCHEV Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mr. Kusroan MANOLOV Committee for Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy; Adviser to the Governor BURMA BYELORUSSIA!? SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC CAMBODIA CANADA GC(XIX)/OT/157 8 CHILE Delegate Mr. Ram6n YALDSS* Ambassador f.o Austria; Resident Representative to the Agency Alternates Mr# Rafd CONTRERAS Presidents Nuclear Energy Commission Mr. Marniaduque ABARZUA A* Executive Director, Nuclear Energy Commission Mr. Carlos BUSTOS* Minister-Counsellor, the Embassy in Austria; Alternate to the Resident Representative Mr. Enrique LACKINGTON Attache, the Embassy in Austria; Alternate to the Resident Representative COLOMBIA Delegate Mr. Guillermo OTALORA* Resident Representative to the Agency COSTA RICA Delegate Mr, Erich M. ZEILINGER Alternate to the Resident Representative to the Agency CUBA Delegate Mr. Tirso M* SAENZ SANCHEZ President, National Commission for Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy Alternates Mr. Luis ORLAOTDO RODRIGUEZ* Ambassador to Austria; Resident Representative to the Agency Mrs. Vera BORJDOWSKr JANKIEWICH Chief, Section of International Organizations and Conferences GG(XIX)/INF/157 page 9 Mr, Jorge GATOLQSTOO FRANCO Member, National Cotoission for Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy' Mrs Raimtm&o FRANCO VBRSHLADk Member? national Comasission for Peaceful Uses of Atoadc Energy Mr. Pedro Luis SOTOLOHGO Members, National Commission for Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy Mrs, Carmen PINEW ALCALBS Member, Hational Commission for Economict Scientific and technical Co-operation Mr* Ltde P. PACHECO* Second Secretary, the Embassy in Aiistrisj Alternate to the Resident Representative Adviser Mr, Josi 1, FEMAFDEZ DIAZ Adviser to the Resident Representative SSSSS Delegate Mr* Platon miAKElffiS Second Secretary^ the Embassy in the Federal Republic of Germany 'CZEGHOSLOfAKIA SEMOCHATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KDHEA GC(XIX)/INF/157 page 10 BENMAKK Delegate Mr, Erik Be SCHMIDT Permanent Under-Secretary of State; Chairman, Executive Committee, Atomic Energy Commission Alternates Kre C„B„ BOLTEH-EGGERT Ambassador to Austria; Resident Representative to the Agency Mr* Hans von BULOW S eor et ary-G eneral? Atomic Energy CommissiQ-n Mr« Flemming JUUL Deputy Director, Re'earch Establishment Ris/ Mr, Erik BASEHUP-BIRK Head of Department, Atomic Energy Commission Mr* Gert OVERVAD* First Secretary, the Embassy in Axistria; Alternate to the Resident Representative Miss Ellen TOFTE LARSEN Atomic Energy Commission DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ECUADOR EGYPT GC(XIX)/INF/157 page 11 EL SALVADOR Delegate Mr. Rafael ZALDIVAR-BRIZUELA Ambassador to Austria and to the Federal Republic of Germany; Resident Representative to the Agency ETHIOPIA Delegate Mr. Tewelde GEBRS-EGZIABIHER Deanf Faculty of Science of the National University FINLAND FRANCE GABON GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Delegate Mr. Georg SITZLACK Professor; State Secretary? President, National Board for Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection? Governor from the German Democratic Republic on the Agencycs Board of Governors Alternates Mr. Lothar HEHTEL Minister Plenipotentiary} Resident Representative to the International Organisations in Vienna; Alternate to the Governor GC(XIX)/INF/157 page 12 Mr* Walter RDHNSCH Head of Main Department, National Board for Nuclear Safety and Radiation. Protection! Alternate to the Governor Mr* Gerhard THOMAS Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign. Affairs Advisers Mr. Hans 3CREEL Head of Department, National Board for Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection; Adviser to the Governor Mr, Siegfried NITZSCHE Third Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Adviser to the Governor Mr« Herwart NEUMANN Interpreter GEBMANY. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF Delegate Mr, Hans~Kilger HAUM3CHILD State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Research and Technology Alternates Mr, Maimer UHGEREB* Minister Plenipotentiary! Resident Representative to the International Organizations in Vienna; Alternate to the Governor Mr* Glaus ZSLLE Counsellor, Federal Ministry of Research and Technology; Alternate to the Governor Mr* Werner EOUGET Counsellor, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mr* Arno SBEXTAO* Counsellor; Alternate to the Governor and to the Resident Representative ac(nx)/inFA57 page 13 Advisers Mr. Manfred FOPP First Secretary? Federal Ministry of Besearch and Technology Mr. Ernst ROTH* first Secretary; Adviser to the Resident Representative Secretary to the Miss Ursula WAGHE8 Delegation Federal Ministry of Research and Technology GHANA GREBCB Delegate Mr. ttichel Jc PAPAK>FOtfLOS* Ambassador to Austria? Resident Representative to the Agency Alternates Mr, A« mxUESlS* Professor3 ?i c e~Presidentj Atoiaic Energy Cosuaission Mr* Michel J« GHIKAS* GOUBS^UOIV th3 aabatssy in Austria; Alteruwse to tiis Resident Representative Kro Panayrlotir: F.A?A3J:iITBjOF>OI.OS* Director, Kxtsmal ftclytions, Atomic Br/*rgy Co$*aissicmj Technical Mviser to the Resident Itep.t>es@ntstive Adviser Att&chSg thrt JXib.vssy in Austria; A&viser- in the Besidftnt E ^preventative ®££SM&- HA.TTI GC(XIX)/lNF/157 page 14 Delegate Mr. Hermann J# ABC Alternate Moneignor Orianc QUILICI Resident Representative to the Agency Advisers Mr, Rudolf GRUBER* Director General, NiederKsterreichische ElektrizitStswerke A„G. Mr, Herbert; SCHAMBECK* Professor Mr* Reribert P„ KOECK* Professor HUNGARY Delegate Mr. Gy?Jrgy OSZTROVBZKI Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission; Governor from Hungary on the Agency's Board of Governors Alternate Mr, Pal SCBIFFER* Ambassador? Resident Representative to the International Organisations in Vienna? Alternate t, the Governor Advisers Mr. JCsssef KDYACS Senior Scientific Adviser, Atomic Energy Goimnission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan
    October 2000 Vol. 12, No. 6 (C) REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan I. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................2 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................3 To the Government of Pakistan..............................................................................................................................3 To the International Community ............................................................................................................................5 III. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................5 Musharraf‘s Stated Objectives ...............................................................................................................................6 IV. CONSOLIDATION OF MILITARY RULE .......................................................................................................8 Curbs on Judicial Independence.............................................................................................................................8 The Army‘s Role in Governance..........................................................................................................................10 Denial of Freedoms of Assembly and Association ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Foreign Policy with a View to Ascertaining Its Alignments with the Dream of Our Founding Fathers, Ideological Mooring and the Genesis of Pakistan
    PAKISTAN’S FOREIGN POLICY An Ideological Appraisal Prof. Fateh ur Rehman* Abstract As a rule, foreign policy of a state, is an extension or a reflection of its internal policy. Since Pakistan emerged as an Islamic State, its internal policy was deemed to be committed to the establishment of a just socio-moral order in this country (in consonance with the socio teachings of Islam). By implication, its foreign policy should likewise have been reflective of the same ideological commitment. It means that Pakistan should have only one overriding objective: Establishment of a just socio-moral order in Pakistan, and a just socio-moral order around the globe. It means that Pakistan should have been a party to those who are striving for justice and be opposed to those who are spreading corruption and exploitation at the international level. In this brief article, we will try to analyse as to how far we have been faithful to our ideological moorings. And if we have deviated, which indeed we did, then what steps should be taken to rectify this departure. Fifth anniversary of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001 is over but the culprits responsible of 9/11catastrophe are still shrouded in mystery. The terrorist attack on symbols of American military and economic power triggered a transformation of world politics and accentuated dramatic change into the course of international affairs. Its ripples are strong, violent and are reaching far and wide. No corner or country of the world could escape from its far reaching consequences. However, events unfolded so far reveal that apart from Iraq and Afghanistan (& may be the U.S.), Pakistan is the only country that has been turned upside down because of the post 9/11 changed scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001
    Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’s Posture toward Afghanistan since 2001 Since the terrorist at- tacks of September 11, 2001, Pakistan has pursued a seemingly incongruous course of action in Afghanistan. It has participated in the U.S. and interna- tional intervention in Afghanistan both by allying itself with the military cam- paign against the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaida and by serving as the primary transit route for international military forces and matériel into Afghanistan.1 At the same time, the Pakistani security establishment has permitted much of the Afghan Taliban’s political leadership and many of its military command- ers to visit or reside in Pakistani urban centers. Why has Pakistan adopted this posture of Afghan Taliban accommodation despite its nominal participa- tion in the Afghanistan intervention and its public commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan?2 This incongruence is all the more puzzling in light of the expansion of insurgent violence directed against Islamabad by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a coalition of militant organizations that are independent of the Afghan Taliban but that nonetheless possess social and po- litical links with Afghan cadres of the Taliban movement. With violence against Pakistan growing increasingly indiscriminate and costly, it remains un- clear why Islamabad has opted to accommodate the Afghan Taliban through- out the post-2001 period. Despite a considerable body of academic and journalistic literature on Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan since 2001, the subject of Pakistani accommodation of the Afghan Taliban remains largely unaddressed. Much of the existing literature identiªes Pakistan’s security competition with India as the exclusive or predominant driver of Pakistani policy vis-à-vis the Afghan Khalid Homayun Nadiri is a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan, Country Information
    Pakistan, Country Information PAKISTAN ASSESSMENT April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIA. HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB. HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC. HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS AND OTHER GROUPS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. These sources have been checked for currency, and as far as can be ascertained, remained relevant and up to date at the time the document was issued. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY file:///V|/vll/country/uk_cntry_assess/apr2003/0403_Pakistan.htm[10/21/2014 9:56:32 AM] Pakistan, Country Information General 2.1 The Islamic Republic of Pakistan lies in southern Asia, bordered by India to the east and Afghanistan and Iran to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    104 Book Reviews BOOK REVIEWS DR AYESHA SIDDIQA, MILITARY INC. INSIDE PAKISTAN’S MILITARY ECONOMY (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2007), pages 282. Dr Ayesha Siddiqa is a military analyst with a Ph.D. degree in W ar Studies to her credit. She obtained this degree from King’s College, London. Her recently published book: Military Inc: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy, is an extremely controversial book and as such, it has created plenty of ripples. She has mercilessly lashed at the economic “empire” that the armed forces have built up in Pakistan. Keeping in view her sound scholarly accomplishments, especially in the field of research and reference, it was expected that she would be fair and candid in her judgment and would carry out her analysis without any malice or prejudice, but, regrettably, her narrative falls far short of our expectations. The general reaction of the discerning reader is that the author has pre-conceived notions and her prime object is to malign the armed forces out of all proportions. Attributing motives to an Organisation that has made tremendous sacrifices for safeguarding the geographical and ideological frontiers of Pakistan, is extremely regrettable. However, of late, she appears to have softened her stance towards the armed force. Assuming a defensive position, she regrets that the people have not properly understood her viewpoint. At the recent launching of her book in London, she assured her audience that the book was not about Pakistan and, in fact, Pakistan was only used as a “case” study. There is a general consensus among the academia that the book suffers from many factual mistakes as well.
    [Show full text]
  • FARA Second Semi-Annual Report
    U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2018 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................2 ALGERIA..........................................................3 ANGOLA...........................................................4 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................5 ARGENTINA........................................................6 ARMENIA..........................................................7 ARUBA............................................................8 AUSTRALIA........................................................9 AUSTRIA..........................................................11 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................12 BAHAMAS..........................................................14 BAHRAIN..........................................................15 BANGLADESH.......................................................17 BARBADOS.........................................................19 BELGIUM..........................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Npr 2.2: Reducing Nuclear Dangers in South Asia: A
    Abdul Sattar REDUCING NUCLEAR DANGERS IN SOUTH ASIA: A PAKISTANI PERSPECTIVE by Abdul Sattar A former career diplomat of Pakistan, Abdul Sattar served as Ambassador to India (1978-82 and 1990-92) and the Soviet Union (1988-90). He was also Pakistan's Foreign Minister in the caretaker government in 1993. In 1993-94, he was a Distinguished Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, D.C., which supported his research for this article. The views expressed in the article are those of the author alone. esisting pressures and pen- from Pakistan’s border for a mili- the security situation in the region. alties, Pakistan has declined tary exercise, code-named “Brass A constructive approach to con- Rto renounce the nuclear op- Tacks,” triggered a crisis between the taining nuclear dangers has to start tion. In practice, however, it has two countries. with a recognition of the existing demonstrated restraint and reason- Although the incipient revision of realities, then evince greater under- ableness, deferring conversion of its the earlier projections of apocalyp- standing of the security concerns acquired nuclear capability into tic consequences of Pakistan’s that drive nuclear programs, and fi- weapons, remaining willing to agree nuclear pursuit is welcome from nally develop a responsive and af- to any nondiscriminatory arrange- Islamabad’s perspective, the swing firmative strategy in place of the ment for a nuclear freeze in South of opinion to the other extreme of failed policy of censure and sanc- Asia and, meanwhile, even suspend- neglect of the nuclear and security tions selectively targeting one coun- ing further accumulation of highly- issues in South Asia does not serve try or another.
    [Show full text]
  • A Life Well Lived: a Tribute to Abdul Sattar Edhi by Waqar Haider Hashmi
    Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011) A Life Well Lived: A Tribute to Abdul Sattar Edhi By Waqar Haider Hashmi “My religion is humanitarianism… which is the basis of every religion in the world,” says Edhi the most admired philanthropist of Pakistan. If we, for the sake of an impartial review, ignore all impressions that the name Edhi invokes in our minds and examine this conviction carefully, we come to know the level of clarity of thought and deep insight into human psyche and religious maturity Edhi possesses. He connects to the idea of religious belief at its core: humanitarianism or concern for human welfare. The word ‘basis’ is used to highlight that no religion can stand on its feet without emphasizing the concept of ‘humanitarianism’. Desired human attributes i.e., morality (to know what’s right or wrong), ethics (doing what’s right and abstaining from doing wrong) and spirituality (a vital force which makes humans strive for constructive work) are the subject of all the holy scriptures in the world. The significance of this philosophy becomes apparent when we realize that it is where generally most of the people falter as they skip the basic plank of humanitarianism while practicing or observing a religion. How can one claim to be a Muslim, Christian or follower of any faith if he or she is blind to humanitarianism? Imagine a Muslim who never misses a single prayer, observe fasts, performs Hajj and pays obligatory alms but has no tolerance or compassion for other human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • FARA First Semi-Annual Report
    U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2019 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................3 ALGERIA..........................................................4 ANGOLA...........................................................5 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................6 ARUBA............................................................7 AUSTRALIA........................................................8 AUSTRIA..........................................................10 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................11 BAHAMAS..........................................................13 BAHRAIN..........................................................14 BANGLADESH.......................................................16 BARBADOS.........................................................18 BELGIUM..........................................................19 BERMUDA..........................................................20 BOLIVIA..........................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Foreign Policy by Abdul Sattar Pdf
    Pakistan Foreign Policy By Abdul Sattar Pdf Shipboard Percival counterbalance some carrycot after electropositive Anselm hie searchingly. Juan is dumbfounded and administrate uvularly as Bordelaise Bill twirls mistrustfully and infest widdershins. Flipper is churrigueresque and cross-dresses politically as self-collected Hadleigh deranges adequately and night-clubs intendedly. Pushtuns living in later on islam gave refuge, by abdul sattar edhi foundation as expected International problems for a pdf from both started with pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf from doing enough and full length books. Pakistan foreign policy decisions will pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf version on pakistan. Noflimsy social entrepreneurship business center for pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf copy for example, abdul karim oflashkar into american. Taliban policy thinking came into pakistan first period, including saudi arabia, pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf versions of the south asia. Also impose its foreign expenditures of the pdf version on pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf file on its politically significant cities and by abdul sattar edhi foundation of region as racial reform. Not by foreign policy in the pdf version on rice supply of secondary since the political solutions to pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf linked to indian retaliation to. Malpractice is living below the pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf version on policy. Pakistan skillfully organized militancy and its earlier decisions and foreign policy would be seen. Us a pdf versions of pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf copy? How the cfr part section in kabul regime, if it maintains an absence of punjab have provided by nawaz sharif had pakistan foreign policy by abdul sattar pdf copy for quite different view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Pakistan's Nuclear Doctrine
    Nuclear Learning: The Next Decade in South Asia | 70 The Evolution of Pakistan’s Nuclear Doctrine Brigadier General (Ret) Naeem Salik Salik is currently a PhD candidate at the Centre for Muslim States and Societies in the Political Science & International Relations Department at the University of Western Australia Nuclear Learning: The Next Decade in South Asia | 71 6 The Evolution of Pakistan’s Nuclear Doctrine Naeem Salik Preamble doctrine is the foundation on which organizational and force structures are built. It provides the guidelines for force configuration and the nature, type and number of weapons and delivery systems that would be needed to implement the doctrine. Nuclear A weapons are unique since the development of these weapons and even their first employment in war preceded any nuclear doctrine. An alternative view has been articulated by Lawrence Freedman who has argued that strategy for the employment of nuclear weapons existed in the form of the Strategic Bombing Doctrine being followed during the Second World War.1 Nuclear weapons are generally believed to be weapons of deterrence rather than weapons of war. Interestingly, however, the first use of nuclear weapons was not for the purpose of deterrence but for war termination. Basically, the dropping of nuclear bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was seen as an extension of the strategic bombing campaign. In the immediate post-war period there was a feeling of revulsion towards considering these terrible weapons as useful military instruments and no serious effort was made to incorporate nuclear weapons in the overall military strategy. Whatever, weapons were available were under the control of the Strategic Air Command (SAC) and in the absence of any political guidelines it was left to the discretion of the SAC to formulate a targeting list.2 Some serious developments in the international arena such as the Berlin Crisis (1948), the first Soviet nuclear test (August 1949), victory of the Chinese Communists (October 1949), the Korean War (1950-1953) forced a rethink.
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN's FOREIGN POLICY 1947-2009 a Concise History
    PAKISTAN'S FOREIGN POLICY 1947-2009 A Concise History ABDUL SATTAR Reproduced by Sani H. Panhwar P A KISTA N 'S FO REIGN P O L ICY 1 9 4 7 -2 0 0 9 A Concise H istory A bdulSattar Fo re w o rd b y A g h a S h a h i Reproduced by SaniH .Panhw ar Contents Foreword .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Preface .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3 1. The Emergence of Pakistan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Historical Background .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 2. Foreign Policy— Beginnings .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 The Founding Father's Vision .. .. .. .. .. .. 12 Enduring Relevance of Principles .. .. .. .. .. 14 The Shadow of Partition .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 The Muslim World .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 18 3. The Kashmir Question, 1947-57 .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 The Dispute .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 At the United Nations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 The Dispute Festers .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 28 4. Search for Security .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 USSR .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 Approaches to the USA .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 33 Korean War .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 36 Japan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 36 China .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 37 5. Alliances .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 38 Four Alliances .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 42 6. Alliances— Costs and Benefits .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49 Costs of the Alliances .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49 US Alliance Strengthened .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 Benefits of the Alliances .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 Swings of Opinion in the USA and Pakistan .. .. .. .. 55 7. Relations with China and Other Developments .. .. .. .. 61 China .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 61 Pakistan-China Boundary
    [Show full text]