DOCSLIB.ORG

FARA Second Semi-Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FARA Second Semi-Annual Report U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2018 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................2 ALGERIA..........................................................3 ANGOLA...........................................................4 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................5 ARGENTINA........................................................6 ARMENIA..........................................................7 ARUBA............................................................8 AUSTRALIA........................................................9 AUSTRIA..........................................................11 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................12 BAHAMAS..........................................................14 BAHRAIN..........................................................15 BANGLADESH.......................................................17 BARBADOS.........................................................19 BELGIUM..........................................................20 BERMUDA..........................................................21 BOLIVIA..........................................................22 BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA.............................................23 BRAZIL...........................................................25 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS...........................................26 BULGARIA.........................................................27 BURUNDI..........................................................28 CAMBODIA.........................................................29 CAMEROON.........................................................30 CANADA...........................................................32 CAYMAN ISLANDS...................................................37 CHILE............................................................39 CHINA............................................................40 COLOMBIA.........................................................48 CONGO, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE................................49 CONGO, REPUBLIC OF THE...........................................50 COSTA RICA.......................................................57 COTE D'IVOIRE (IVORY COAST)......................................58 CROATIA..........................................................59 CYPRUS...........................................................60 CZECHIA..........................................................61 DENMARK..........................................................62 DJIBOUTI.........................................................63 DOMINICA.........................................................64 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC...............................................65 ECUADOR..........................................................66 EGYPT............................................................67 EL SALVADOR......................................................68 ENGLAND..........................................................69 EQUATORIAL GUINEA................................................70 ESTONIA..........................................................71 ETHIOPIA.........................................................72 FIJI.............................................................74 FRANCE...........................................................75 GABON............................................................76 GEORGIA..........................................................77 GERMANY..........................................................78 GHANA............................................................81 GIBRALTAR........................................................82 GREAT BRITAIN....................................................83 GREECE...........................................................85 GUATEMALA........................................................86 HAITI............................................................87 HONDURAS.........................................................88 HONG KONG........................................................89 HUNGARY..........................................................91 ICELAND..........................................................94 INDIA............................................................95 INTERNATIONAL....................................................96 IRAN.............................................................98 IRAQ.............................................................99 IRELAND..........................................................105 ISRAEL...........................................................107 ITALY............................................................110 JAMAICA..........................................................113 JAPAN............................................................114 JORDAN...........................................................132 KAZAKHSTAN.......................................................134 KENYA............................................................135 KOREA, SOUTH.....................................................137 KOSOVA...........................................................146 LAOS.............................................................148 LEBANON..........................................................149 LIBERIA..........................................................150 LIBYA............................................................151 LUXEMBOURG.......................................................153 MACAU............................................................154 MALAWI...........................................................155 MALAYSIA.........................................................156 MALDIVES.........................................................159 MALI.............................................................160 MARSHALL ISLANDS.................................................161 MAURITANIA.......................................................165 MEXICO...........................................................166 MICRONESIA.......................................................171 MOLDOVA..........................................................172 MONACO...........................................................174 MOROCCO..........................................................175 NAGORNO KARABAKH.................................................178 NEPAL............................................................179 NETHERLANDS......................................................180 NEW ZEALAND......................................................181 NICARAGUA........................................................182 NIGER............................................................183 NIGERIA..........................................................184 NORTHERN IRELAND.................................................186 NORWAY...........................................................187 PAKISTAN.........................................................188 PALESTINE........................................................190 PANAMA...........................................................191 PAPUA NEW GUINEA.................................................192 PERU.............................................................193 PHILIPPINES......................................................194 POLAND...........................................................196 QATAR............................................................199 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN..........................................210 ROMANIA..........................................................211 RUSSIA...........................................................212 RWANDA...........................................................215 SAHARAWI ARAB DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC................................216 SAINT LUCIA......................................................217 SAMOA............................................................218 SAUDI ARABIA.....................................................219 SCOTLAND.........................................................231 SERBIA...........................................................232 SINGAPORE........................................................233 SOMALI DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.......................................235 SOUTH AFRICA.....................................................237 SPAIN............................................................238 ST. BARTHELEMY...................................................239 ST. MARTIN.......................................................240 SURINAME.........................................................242 SWEDEN...........................................................243 SWITZERLAND......................................................244 SYRIA............................................................245 TAIWAN...........................................................247 TANZANIA.........................................................252
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan
    October 2000 Vol. 12, No. 6 (C) REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan I. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................2 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................3 To the Government of Pakistan..............................................................................................................................3 To the International Community ............................................................................................................................5 III. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................5 Musharraf‘s Stated Objectives ...............................................................................................................................6 IV. CONSOLIDATION OF MILITARY RULE .......................................................................................................8 Curbs on Judicial Independence.............................................................................................................................8 The Army‘s Role in Governance..........................................................................................................................10 Denial of Freedoms of Assembly and Association ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Agency Family Tree
    2017 GLOBAL AGENCY FAMILY TREE TOP 10 WPP OMNICOM Publicis Groupe INTERPUBLIC Dentsu HAVAS HAKUHODO DY MDC Partners CHEIL BlueFocus (Revenue US 17,067M) (Revenue US 15,417M) (Revenue US 10,252M) (Revenue US 7,847M) (Revenue US 7,126M) (Revenue US 2,536M) (Revenue US 2,282M) (Revenue US 1,370M) (Revenue US 874M) (Revenue US 827M) OGILVY GROUP WPP DIGITAL BBDO WORLDWIDE PUBLICIS COMMUNICATIONS MEDIABRANDS DENTSU INC. DENTSU AEGIS NETWORK HAVAS CREATIVE GROUP HAKUHODO HAKUHODO MDC PARTNERS CHEIL WORLDWIDE DIGITAL Ogilvy & Mather ACCELERATION BBDO Worldwide Publicis Worldwide Ansible Dentsu Inc. Other Agencies Havas Worldwide Hakuhodo Hakuhodo 6degrees Cheil Worldwide BlueDigital OgilvyOne Worldwide BLUE STATE DIGITAL Proximity Worldwide Publicis BPN DENTSU AEGIS NETWORK Columbus Arnold Worldwide ADSTAFF-HAKUHODO Delphys Hakuhodo International 72andSunny Barbarian Group Phluency Ogilvy CommonHealth Worldwide Cognifide Interone Publicis 133 Cadreon Dentsu Branded Agencies Copernicus Havas Health Ashton Consulting Hakuhodo Consulting Asia Pacific Sundae Beattie McGuinness Bungay Madhouse Ogilvy Government Relations F.BIZ Organic Publicis Activ Identity Dentsu Coxinall BETC Backs Group Grebstad Hicks Communications Allison + Partners McKinney Domob Ogilvy Public Relations HOGARTH WORLDWIDE Wednesday Agency Publicis Africa Group Initiative DentsuBos Inc. Crimson Room FullSIX Brains Work Associates Taiwan Hakuhodo Anomaly Cheil Pengtai Blueplus H&O POSSIBLE DDB WORLDWIDE Publicis Conseil IPG Media LAB Dentsu-Smart LLC deepblue HAVAS MEDIA GROUP
    [Show full text]
  • American Evangelicalism and the Uyghur Crisis: a Call to Interfaith Advocacy
    Blay| 1 American Evangelicalism and the Uyghur Crisis: A Call to Interfaith Advocacy Joshua Blay Northwest University International Community Development Program Author’s Notes Aspects of this paper were written for the following classes: Practicum IV, Practicum V, Fieldwork, Leadership, Social and Environmental Justice, and Peacemaking. Disclaimer: All names of Uyghurs within this thesis have been alerted to protect their identities. Blay| 2 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. THE UYGHUR CRISIS .................................................................................................................................. 5 A. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE UYGHUR PEOPLE ............................................................................................................. 6 i. Why Commit Cultural Genocide? .................................................................................................................... 7 ii. My Research and the Uyghur Crisis .............................................................................................................. 9 III. LOVE GOD AND LOVE NEIGHBOR ....................................................................................................... 11 A. LOVING GOD AND NEIGHBOR THROUGH RESOURCES, PRIVILEGE, AND POWER ...................................................... 14 i. Resources .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in the Defense Sector: Identifying Key Risks to U.S
    Corruption in the Defense Sector: Identifying Key Risks to U.S. Counterterrorism Aid Colby Goodman and Christina Arabia October 2018 About Center for International Policy The Center for International Policy promotes cooperation, transparency, and accountability in U.S.global relations. Through research and advocacy, our programs address the most urgent threats to our planet: war, corruption, inequality, and climate change. CIP’s scholars, journal- ists, activists and former government ofcials provide a unique mixture of access to high-level ofcials, issue-area expertise, media savvy and strategic vision. We work to inform the public and decision makers in the United States and in international organizations on policies to make the world more just, peaceful, and sustainable. About Foriegn Influence Transparency Inititative While investigations into Russian infuence in the 2016 election regularly garner front-page head- lines, there is a half-billion-dollar foreign infuence industry working to shape U.S. foreign policy every single day that remains largely unknown to the public. The Foreign Infuence Transparency Initiative is working to change that anonymity through transparency promotion, investigative research, and public education. Acknowledgments This report would not have been possible without the hard work and support of a number of people. First and foremost, Hannah Poteete, who tirelessly coded nearly all of the data mentioned here. Her attention to detail and dedication to the task were extraordinary. The report also could not have been completed without the exemplary work of Avery Beam, Thomas Low, and George Savas who assisted with writing, data analysis, fact-checking, formatting, and editing. Salih Booker and William Hartung of the Center for International Policy consistently supported this project, all the way from idea inception through editing and completion of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joyce Foundation Betraying Donor Intent in the Windy City
    Stopping Juvenile Detention: The Joyce Foundation Betraying donor intent in the Windy City By Jonathan Hanen Summary : The Joyce Foundation’s en- dowment came from David Joyce, a lum- ber magnate who believed in the American system of free enterprise. Today the foun- dation that lives off his wealth is a hotbed of trendy, left-wing thinking and grant- making. It funds efforts to hurt the lumber industry, turn schools into union-controlled sources of Democratic Party patronage, block Americans’ gun rights, and constrict economic freedoms. Barack Obama sat on its board from 1994 to 2002, and directed the foundation’s money to causes Joyce al- most certainly would not have favored. he Joyce Foundation, based in Chicago, Illinois, was founded in T1948 by Beatrice Joyce Kean, the Leftist Ellen Alberding runs the Joyce Foundation. sole heir to the Joyce family fortune. The Joyces of Clinton, Iowa, originally made by the end of his life he was “a stockholder gave him the ownership of several plants.” their money in the lumber industry. The in twelve different sawmill plants located Joyce was “prominent in public enterprises patriarch who created the Joyce fortune was in all sections of the country, one within and contributed large amounts to various the great nineteenth-century entrepreneur eighteen miles of Lake Superior at the North religious institutions and was a subscriber David Joyce (died 1904). Of “old New and another within eighty miles of the Gulf to society and educational work.” England Puritan stock,” he was “strong, of Mexico in the South, while still another bold and resourceful.” “He was one of the was on Puget Sound.” “Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Lobbyists 2016: Hired Guns
    Top Lobbyists 2016: Hired Guns By The Hill staff - 10/26/16 06:00 AM EDT Lobbying runs deep in Washington. Every day, thousands of law firms, associations and advocacy groups seek to exert influence over policymaking away from the glare of presidential and congressional politics. In such a crowded field, a select few have shown an ability to get things done — and it’s those movers and shakers who are among The Hill’s Top Lobbyists. From the “hired guns” who populate K Street, to the lobbyists who derive strength from grassroots organizing, to the trade associations harnessing industry might, to the professionals representing America’s biggest companies, influence comes in many forms. Many of the people on The Hill’s list are not formally registered to lobby. We use the term broadly here to encompass Washington’s influence arena and those who do battle within it. Josh Ackil and Matt Tanielian, Franklin Square Group From Apple to Uber, the hottest names in the tech world trust this bipartisan firm with their advocacy efforts. Andy Barbour, Smith-Free Group Barbour, a former Clinton administration official, is among the top Democrats on K Street when it comes to financial issues. Haley Barbour, Lanny Griffith, Ed Rogers and Loren Monroe, BGR Group This GOP-run powerhouse has made strategic Democratic hires in recent years, giving it more range when representing its stacked client roster. Doyle Bartlett, Eris Group The firm is well established in the financial services landscape, counting everyone from angel investors to hedge funds to payday lenders as clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, As Amended
    OMB No. 1124-0004; Expires May 31,2020 U.S. Department o r jfifiCeived By NSD/FARA Washington, dc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended INSTRUCTIONS. A registrant must furnish as an Exhibit B copies of each written agreement and the terms and conditions of each oral agreement with his foreign principal, including all modifications of such agreements, or, where no contract exists, a full statement of all the circumstances by reason of which the registrant is acting as an agent of a foreign principal. Compliance is accomplished by filing an electronic Exhibit B form at https://www.fara.gov. Privacy Act Statement. The filing of this document is required for the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 611 etseq., for the purposes of registration under the Act and public disclosure. Provision of the information requested is mandatory, and failure to provide the information is subject to the penalty and enforcement provisions established in Section 8 of the Act. Every registration statement, short form registration statement, supplemental statement, exhibit, amendment, copy of informational materials or other document or information filed with the Attorney General under this Act is. a public record open to public examination, inspection and copying during the posted business hours of the Registration Unit in Washington, DC. Statements are also available online at the Registration Unit’s webpage: https://www.fara.gov. One copy of every such document, other than informational materials, is automatically provided to the Secretary of State pursuant to’Section 6(b) of the Act, and copies of any and all documents are routinely made available to other agencies, departments and Congress pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Foreign Policy with a View to Ascertaining Its Alignments with the Dream of Our Founding Fathers, Ideological Mooring and the Genesis of Pakistan
    PAKISTAN’S FOREIGN POLICY An Ideological Appraisal Prof. Fateh ur Rehman* Abstract As a rule, foreign policy of a state, is an extension or a reflection of its internal policy. Since Pakistan emerged as an Islamic State, its internal policy was deemed to be committed to the establishment of a just socio-moral order in this country (in consonance with the socio teachings of Islam). By implication, its foreign policy should likewise have been reflective of the same ideological commitment. It means that Pakistan should have only one overriding objective: Establishment of a just socio-moral order in Pakistan, and a just socio-moral order around the globe. It means that Pakistan should have been a party to those who are striving for justice and be opposed to those who are spreading corruption and exploitation at the international level. In this brief article, we will try to analyse as to how far we have been faithful to our ideological moorings. And if we have deviated, which indeed we did, then what steps should be taken to rectify this departure. Fifth anniversary of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001 is over but the culprits responsible of 9/11catastrophe are still shrouded in mystery. The terrorist attack on symbols of American military and economic power triggered a transformation of world politics and accentuated dramatic change into the course of international affairs. Its ripples are strong, violent and are reaching far and wide. No corner or country of the world could escape from its far reaching consequences. However, events unfolded so far reveal that apart from Iraq and Afghanistan (& may be the U.S.), Pakistan is the only country that has been turned upside down because of the post 9/11 changed scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Pack Bretagne
    2021 PRESS PACK BRETAGNE brittanytourism.com | CONTENTS Editorial p. 03 Slow down Take your foot off the pedal p. 04 Live Experience the here and now p. 12 Meet Immerse yourself in local culture p. 18 Share Together. That’s all ! p. 24 Practical information p. 29 EDITORIAL Bon voyage 2020 has been an unsettling and air and the wide open spaces. Embracing with the unexpected. A concentration of challenging year and we know that many the sea. Enjoying time with loved ones. the essential, and that’s why we love it! It of you have had to postpone your trip to Trying something new. Giving meaning to invites you to slow down, to enjoy life, to Brittany. These unusual times have been our daily lives. Meeting passionate locals. meet and to share: it delivers its promise a true emotional rollercoaster. They Sharing moments and laughs. Creating of uniqueness. So set sail, go for it, relax have also sharpened our awareness and memories for the years to come. and enjoy it as it comes. Let the eyes do redesigned our desires. We’re holding on to Let’s go for an outing to the Breton the talking and design your next holiday our loved ones, and the positive thoughts peninsula. A close, reassuring destination using these pages. of a brighter future. We appreciate even just across the Channel that we think we We wish you a wonderful trip. more the simple good things in life and know, but one that takes us far away, on the importance of seizing the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • NEOM: $500Bn Smart City
    NEOM: $500Bn Smart City Key Facts “NEOM will be Key Saudi Vision 2030 Project constructed from the 26,500 sqkm of space straddling Saudi ground-up, on greenfield to be invested by the Public Investment Arabia, Jordan and Egypt making NEOM the $500 billion first private zone to span three countries sites, allowing it a Fund, apart from private and global investors unique opportunity to be First phase to be completed by 2025 EGYPT JORDAN S.ARABIA distinguished from all other places that have Special zone with autonomous judicial system & been developed and economic framework Situated in an area rich in wind and solar energy constructed over 468 km of pristine resources coastline and hundreds of years and Aspirations for NEOM spectacular beaches A new local tourist we will use this NEOM’s contribution to the Kingdom’s GDP is set NEOM destination for opportunity to build a to reach at least $100 billion by 2030 Saudi citizens new way of life with Highest GDP per capita in the world 70% of the world’s excellent economic population lives 8 Free highest-speed internet prospects.” Around 10% of hours flight away the world’s trade Net zero carbon footprint His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin flows through the Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown Prince, Red Sea 10 degrees cooler Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the A destination topping the 'world’s most than rest of GCC livable cities index' Public Investment Fund. Key pillars of NEOM economy: $70Bn opportunity Energy & Water Mobility Biotech Food Advanced Media Entertainment Technology Living Powered by Connected with Hub for Cutting-edge Manufacturing Hub for production Centre of sports, Artificial Modern renewable energy 100% green next-generation technologies such Home to innovations houses and studios performance and intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Glover Park Group Date: March 6, 2008 Re: Food and Fuel Campaign RFP
    MEMORANDUM To: Scott Faber, Grocery Manufacturers Association From: Glover Park Group Date: March 6, 2008 Re: Food and Fuel Campaign RFP Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal for services. The unintended consequences of America’s current corn-based ethanol policy are crying out for increased focus and attention. Already, independent-minded grassroots organizations, news media leaders and policy makers are recognizing the looming threat to the food security of Americans and vulnerable populations worldwide. In this environment, a federal agency-level or legislative solution to the economically, environmentally and socially untenable ethanol policies now in place is feasible. A range of options exist to help alleviate the problem. Examples include an EPA waiver, legislation eliminating or updating of the biofuels mandate, ending the ethanol import tariff and possibly shifting revenue from the blender tax credit to hunger abatement programs. At the same time, state governments looking to take action on climate change in the absence of clear federal leadership (or under the sway of corn ethanol interests) may soon establish undesirable policies, while other states may be reachable on reforming existing policies. We therefore have a window – albeit brief – to intervene and change funding priorities before the impacts become too great. Our opportunity and task is to galvanize grassroots, media and policy voices into a unified campaign that will impact decision makers at the state and federal level and deliver constructive shifts in policy. The Glover Park Group is an agency that was designed to help build and manage these kinds of high-intensity campaigns. We have deep experience bringing together diverse groups to organize around issues of common interest; effectively coordinating efforts among those groups; and then translating that organizational energy into effective communications blitzes that force policy makers to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Teach Uyghur Project Educational Outreach Document
    TEACH UYGHUR PROJECT EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH DOCUMENT UYGHUR AMERICAN ASSOCIATION / NOVEMBER 2020 Who are the Uyghurs? The Uyghurs are a Turkic, majority Muslim ethnic group indigenous to Central Asia. The Uyghur homeland is known to Uyghurs as East Turkistan, but is officially known and internationally recognized as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China. Due to the occupation of their homeland by the Qing Dynasty of China and the colonization of East Turkistan initiated by the Chinese Communist Party, many Uyghurs have fled abroad. There are several hundred thousand Uyghurs living in the independent Central Asian states of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, as well as a large diaspora in Turkey and in Europe. There are and estimated 8,000 to 10,000 Uyghurs in the United States. The Uyghur people are currently being subjected to a campaign of mass incarceration, mass surveillance, forced labor, population control, and genocide, perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). About the Uyghur American Association (UAA) Established in 1998, the Uyghur American Association (UAA) is a non-partisan organization with the chief goals of promoting and preserving Uyghur culture, and supporting the right of Uyghur people to use peaceful, democratic means to determine their own political futures. Based in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area, the UAA serves as the primary hub for the Uyghur diaspora community in the United States. About the "Teach Uyghur Project" Education is a powerful tool for facilitating change. The goal of this project is to encourage teachers to teach about Uyghurs, and to persuade schools, and eventually state legislatures, to incorporate Uyghurs into primary and secondary school curriculum.
    [Show full text]