3/27/2018 Soil Parent Material, Page 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3/27/2018 Soil Parent Material, Page 1 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR ___________________________________ CERTIFICATION TRAINING ___________________________________ Climate Organisms ___________________________________ SOIL PARENT Relief Time MATERIAL ___________________________________ The geologic sediments that the soils formed in ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By S.B. Mabee, PhD, PG, Massachusetts Geological Survey University of Massachusetts Amherst Presented by: New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Page 1, form 11 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Page 2, form 11 What is parent material? What landform? Read Topo map/read the landscape Understanding geology helps. Soil Parent Material, page 1 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Drumlin Landform ___________________________________ SU SH Summit SH ___________________________________ Shoulder BS Back slope Kame Landform ___________________________________ FS Glacial Till SH SU Foot slope ___________________________________ Sand & BS Gravel ___________________________________ TS FS Toe slope ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Soil Parent Material, page 2 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 The Parent Material ___________________________________ • Where do the deposits in which the soils have formed come from? ___________________________________ • These are the deposits that we live in ___________________________________ • Quick review of surficial geology of MA ___________________________________ • How did these deposits get here ___________________________________ • What types of landforms these surficial deposits are associated with and why ___________________________________ • How to recognize these landforms on topographic maps ___________________________________ • How are these deposits are represented on geologic maps • What are their characteristics and relevance to septic systems ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Parent materials governs minerals, color, permeability, infiltration New England soils do not form from weathering of bedrock ___________________________________ Types of ___________________________________ Glacial Till Deposits ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Outwash Plain ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Clay Topset Beds Sand & ___________________________________ Gravel Delta Wide variety, variable thick., wide range properties Soil Parent Material, page 3 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Most recent continental glaciation began 85,000 to 100,000 years ago ___________________________________ Wisconsin Glaciation (Laurentide Ice Sheet) ___________________________________ Max. extent ___________________________________ 22,000 to 28,000 years ago ___________________________________ About 1 mile thick over MA ___________________________________ Glaciation shaped ___________________________________ our landscape And dictate which soils ___________________________________ are suitable for septic systems and which are not ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Soil Parent Material, page 4 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ How do we know glaciers were here? ___________________________________ Modern analogs ___________________________________ Striations and Grooves ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ General South to Southeast Ice Flow ___________________________________ The Main Groups of Soil Parent Materials ___________________________________ • Glacial Till • Windblown (Loess) ___________________________________ • Shallow Bedrock • Organic Matter ___________________________________ • Glacial Outwash • Alluvial (Floodplain) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Lacustrine (Lakebed) • Coastal Deposits Deposits ___________________________________ • Fill Material • Marine Silts and Clays (Human Transported Material) Soil Parent Material, page 5 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 What Makes Our Landscape So Diverse? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ • Wide variety and complex environments that occur when the ice is retreating and actively melting ___________________________________ • Meltwater stream spew tons of sand and gravel with high permeability while glacial lakes accumulate thick deposits ___________________________________ of low permeability silts and clays The Bottom Line ___________________________________ • The advance and retreat of glaciers imparted significant ___________________________________ heterogeneity to our landscape that changes rapidly in both a lateral as well as vertical direction ___________________________________ • How did different glacial deposits form, how are they manifested in the landscape, how can they be identified on topographic maps and how do they affect soil properties ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Glacial Till ___________________________________ Dominantly unsorted and unstratified debris, ___________________________________ deposited directly by the glacier, and consisting ___________________________________ of a heterogeneous mixture of all the particle sizes – clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Two Types of Glacial Till ___________________________________ Lodgement or Basal Till ___________________________________ Compact, dense deposited at the base of an actively flowing (moving) glacier ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Ablation Till ___________________________________ Loose, sandier till deposited by the melting (wasting) glacier ___________________________________ Soil Parent Material, page 6 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ >50% sand, 25-35% silt, <17% (8%) Ubiquitous <10 ft thick to a max. of 230 feet ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Soil Parent Material, page 7 Soil Evaluator Course, Day 1, Presentation 5 - 3/27/2018 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Characteristics of Lodgement Till ___________________________________ • Heterogeneous mixture of all particles sizes – ___________________________________ clay to boulder size ___________________________________
Recommended publications
  • 1 Recognising Glacial Features. Examine the Illustrations of Glacial Landforms That Are Shown on This Page and on the Next Page
    1 Recognising glacial features. Examine the illustrations of glacial landforms that are shown on this C page and on the next page. In Column 1 of the grid provided write the names of the glacial D features that are labelled A–L. In Column 2 indicate whether B each feature is formed by glacial erosion of by glacial deposition. A In Column 3 indicate whether G each feature is more likely to be found in an upland or in a lowland area. E F 1 H K J 2 I 24 Chapter 6 L direction of boulder clay ice flow 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 A Arête Erosion Upland B Tarn (cirque with tarn) Erosion Upland C Pyramidal peak Erosion Upland D Cirque Erosion Upland E Ribbon lake Erosion Upland F Glaciated valley Erosion Upland G Hanging valley Erosion Upland H Lateral moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) I Frontal moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) J Medial moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) K Fjord Erosion Upland L Drumlin Deposition Lowland 2 In the boxes provided, match each letter in Column X with the number of its pair in Column Y. One pair has been completed for you. COLUMN X COLUMN Y A Corrie 1 Narrow ridge between two corries A 4 B Arête 2 Glaciated valley overhanging main valley B 1 C Fjord 3 Hollow on valley floor scooped out by ice C 5 D Hanging valley 4 Steep-sided hollow sometimes containing a lake D 2 E Ribbon lake 5 Glaciated valley drowned by rising sea levels E 3 25 New Complete Geography Skills Book 3 (a) Landform of glacial erosion Name one feature of glacial erosion and with the aid of a diagram explain how it was formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip F the PINNACLE HILLS and the MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A
    F-1 Trip F THE PINNACLE HILLS AND THE MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A. Sanders Department of Geosciences Monroe Community College INTRODUCTION The Pinnacle Hills, fortunately, were voluminously described with many excellent photographs by Fairchild, (1923). In 1973 the Range still stands as a conspicuous east-west ridge extending from the town of Brighton, at about Hillside Avenue, four miles to the Genesee River at the University of Rochester campus, referred to as Oak Hill. But, for over thirty years the Range was butchered for sand and gravel, which was both a crime and blessing from the geological point of view (plates I-VI). First, it destroyed the original land form shapes which were subsequently covered with man-made structures drawing the shade on its original beauty. Secondly, it allowed study of its structure by a man with a brilliantly analytical mind, Herman L. Fair­ child. It is an excellent example of morainal deposition at an ice front in a state of dynamic equilibrium, except for minor fluctuations. The Mendon Kame area on the other hand, represents the result of a block of stagnant ice, probably detached and draped over drumlins and drumloidal hills, melting away with tunnels, crevasses, and per­ foration deposits spilling or squirting their included debris over a more or less square area leaving topographically high kames and esker F-2 segments with many kettles and a large central area of impounded drainage. There appears to be several wave-cut levels at around the + 700 1 Lake Dana level, (Fairchild, 1923). The author in no way pretends to be a Pleistocene expert, but an attempt is made to give a few possible interpretations of the many diverse forms found in the Mendon Kames area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crag-And-Tail Features on the Amundsen Sea Continental Shelf, West Antarctica
    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on November 30, 2016 Crag-and-tail features on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, West Antarctica F. O. NITSCHE1*, R. D. LARTER2, K. GOHL3, A. G. C. GRAHAM4 & G. KUHN3 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 3Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) On parts of glaciated continental margins, especially the inner leads to its characteristic tapering and allows formation of the sec- shelves around Antarctica, grounded ice has removed pre-existing ondary features. Multiple, elongated ridges in the tail could be sedimentary cover, leaving subglacial bedforms on eroded sub- related to the unevenness of the top of the ‘crags’. Secondary, strates (Anderson et al. 2001; Wellner et al. 2001). While the smaller crag-and-tail features might reflect variations in the under- dominant subglacial bedforms often follow a distinct, relatively lying substrate or ice-flow dynamics. uniform pattern that can be related to overall trends in palaeo- While the length-to-width ratio of crag-and-tail features in this ice flow and substrate geology (Wellner et al. 2006), others are case is much lower than for drumlins or elongate lineations, the more randomly distributed and may reflect local substrate varia- boundary between feature classes is indistinct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics and Mass Budget of Aretic Glaciers
    DA NM ARKS OG GRØN L ANDS GEO L OG I SKE UNDERSØGELSE RAP P ORT 2013/3 The Dynamics and Mass Budget of Aretic Glaciers Abstracts, IASC Network of Aretic Glaciology, 9 - 12 January 2012, Zieleniec (Poland) A. P. Ahlstrøm, C. Tijm-Reijmer & M. Sharp (eds) • GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF D EN MARK AND GREENLAND DANISH MINISTAV OF CLIMATE, ENEAGY AND BUILDING ~ G E U S DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 201 3 / 3 The Dynamics and Mass Budget of Arctic Glaciers Abstracts, IASC Network of Arctic Glaciology, 9 - 12 January 2012, Zieleniec (Poland) A. P. Ahlstrøm, C. Tijm-Reijmer & M. Sharp (eds) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND BUILDING Indhold Preface 5 Programme 6 List of participants 11 Minutes from a special session on tidewater glaciers research in the Arctic 14 Abstracts 17 Seasonal and multi-year fluctuations of tidewater glaciers cliffson Southern Spitsbergen 18 Recent changes in elevation across the Devon Ice Cap, Canada 19 Estimation of iceberg to the Hansbukta (Southern Spitsbergen) based on time-lapse photos 20 Seasonal and interannual velocity variations of two outlet glaciers of Austfonna, Svalbard, inferred by continuous GPS measurements 21 Discharge from the Werenskiold Glacier catchment based upon measurements and surface ablation in summer 2011 22 The mass balance of Austfonna Ice Cap, 2004-2010 23 Overview on radon measurements in glacier meltwater 24 Permafrost distribution in coastal zone in Hornsund (Southern Spitsbergen) 25 Glacial environment of De Long Archipelago
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Processes and Landforms-Transport and Deposition
    Glacial Processes and Landforms—Transport and Deposition☆ John Menziesa and Martin Rossb, aDepartment of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada; bDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Introduction 2 2 Towards deposition—Sediment transport 4 3 Sediment deposition 5 3.1 Landforms/bedforms directly attributable to active/passive ice activity 6 3.1.1 Drumlins 6 3.1.2 Flutes moraines and mega scale glacial lineations (MSGLs) 8 3.1.3 Ribbed (Rogen) moraines 10 3.1.4 Marginal moraines 11 3.2 Landforms/bedforms indirectly attributable to active/passive ice activity 12 3.2.1 Esker systems and meltwater corridors 12 3.2.2 Kames and kame terraces 15 3.2.3 Outwash fans and deltas 15 3.2.4 Till deltas/tongues and grounding lines 15 Future perspectives 16 References 16 Glossary De Geer moraine Named after Swedish geologist G.J. De Geer (1858–1943), these moraines are low amplitude ridges that developed subaqueously by a combination of sediment deposition and squeezing and pushing of sediment along the grounding-line of a water-terminating ice margin. They typically occur as a series of closely-spaced ridges presumably recording annual retreat-push cycles under limited sediment supply. Equifinality A term used to convey the fact that many landforms or bedforms, although of different origins and with differing sediment contents, may end up looking remarkably similar in the final form. Equilibrium line It is the altitude on an ice mass that marks the point below which all previous year’s snow has melted.
    [Show full text]
  • Esker Habitat Characteristics and Traditional Land Use in the Slave Geological Province
    Re: Esker Habitat Characteristics and Traditional Land Use in the Slave Geological Province STUDY DIRECTOR RELEASE FORM The above publication is the result of a project conducted under the West Kitikmeot / Slave Study. I have reviewed the report and advise that it has fulfilled the requirements of the approved proposal and can be subjected to independent expert review and be considered for release to the public. Study Director Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date BOARD RELEASE FORM The Study Board is satisfied that this final report has been reviewed for scientific content and approves it for release to the public. Chair West Kitikmeot/Slave Society Date Box 2572, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2P9 Ph (867) 669-6235 Fax (867) 920-4346 e-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.wkss.nt.ca ESKER HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS and TRADITIONAL USE STUDY in the SLAVE GEOLOGICAL PROVINCE FINAL REPORT to the WEST KITIKMEOT / SLAVE STUDY Submitted by: Stephen Traynor Senior Land Specialist – Land Administration Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Yellowknife, NT August 2001 SUMMARY In May of 1996 approval was granted and funding awarded by the West Kitikmeot Slave Study Society (WKSS) for a project to initiate research and information dissemination on eskers in the Slave Geological Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers I: Intro, Geology and Mass Balance
    T. Perron – 12.001 – Glaciers 1 Glaciers I: Intro, Geology and Mass Balance I. Why study glaciers? • Role in freshwater budget o Fraction of earth’s water that is fresh (non-saline): 3% o Fraction of earth’s freshwater that is ice: ~2/3 o Fraction of earth’s surface covered by ice: ~8% • Climate records, climate effects & feedbacks: more in climate lecture • Postglacial rebound helps constrain mantle viscosity • Major driver of erosion, sediment transport, and landscape evolution • But how important have glaciers been over Earth’s history? o Over very long timescales, there seems to be a rhythm to glaciations . From geologic evidence: 950 Ma, 750, 650, 450, 350-250, 4-? . Proposed to reflect arrangement of continents (supercontinents promote accumulation of continental ice). But we don’t even have a very good record of this beyond a few hundred Myr, let alone precise climate records o We have better records for more recent intervals . Antarctic glaciation began 25 Ma, Greenland 20Ma, Alaska 7Ma. Major Northern hemisphere glaciations began ~4Myr. And this has been the typical climate state since! . Again, more in climate lecture. For now, suffice to say that glacial periods have dominated recent climate history. We’re in an interglacial, the first major one since ~125 ka. And our interglacial is an anomalously warm one. We must remind ourselves of this when examining landforms today. o What was North America like during glacial conditions? During LGM, we know there were . Extensive ice sheets [PPT] . Alpine glaciers in mountains beyond the ice margin . Large glacially-dammed lakes (Missoula, Bonneville) [PPT] .
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Coastal Processes and Geomorphology
    Notes on Coastal Processes and Geomorphology An incomplete assortment of digital notes. Handwritten notes and other materials are stored in the Harvard Forest Archives Brouillet MV Geomorphology The highly unstable geologic structure of the south side of the Vineyard enables it to erode at a much faster rate than that predicted by the Bruun rule (Table 17) From 1933 to 2003, trend analyses indicated that sea level was rising at 2.56 mm/yr in Woods Hole (Figure 57A). Similar analyses for Nantucket, from1965 to 2003, indicated a rate of 3.08 mm/year. the IPCC’s projection of 0.59 m by the year 2100, Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management and Thieler et al., (2001) indicated that, from 1851 to 1994A closer look at the individual study sites showed that the south side of Martha’s Vineyard had the highest linear rate of shoreline change per year (-1.71 m/yr) (Table 15), with 90% of the shoreline eroded and 2.6 km2 of land lost to the sea. Clearly, sea levels are rising and Martha’s Vineyard is eroding at a much faster rate on the south side of the island than at the other two study sites with predominantly northeastern and northwestern exposure. The northwest coast takes the brunt of winter winds and the northeastern side of the Vineyard has direct exposure to Northeasters, but both of these study sites appear to be on the low end of the coastal erosion spectrum for this island. In fact, the NE and NWareas are manifesting accretion in some spots. The culmination of these analyses led me to five key conclusions, namely that: 1) the three sites manifested different rates of erosion and accretion, from a loss of approximately 0.1 m/yr at the NE and NW sites to over 1.7 m/yr at the SS site; 2) the NE and NW sites fit the ratio predicted by Bruun for the rate of erosion vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Incision and Aggradation in Proglacial Rivers
    Incision and aggradation in proglacial rivers: Post-Little Ice Age long-profile adjustments of Southern Iceland outwash plains Erwan Roussel, Philip Marren, Etienne Cossart, Jean-Pierre Toumazet, Marie Chenet, Delphine Grancher, Vincent Jomelli To cite this version: Erwan Roussel, Philip Marren, Etienne Cossart, Jean-Pierre Toumazet, Marie Chenet, et al.. Incision and aggradation in proglacial rivers: Post-Little Ice Age long-profile adjustments of Southern Iceland outwash plains. Land Degradation and Development, Wiley, 2018, 10.1002/ldr.3127. hal-01897894 HAL Id: hal-01897894 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01897894 Submitted on 5 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Land Degradation & Development INCISION AND AGGRADATION IN PROGLACIAL RIVERS: POST-LITTLE ICE AGE LONG-PROFILE ADJUSTMENTS OF SOUTHERN ICELAND OUTWASH PLAINS Journal: Land Degradation & Development Manuscript ForID LDD-17-1101.R1 Peer Review Wiley - Manuscript type: Special Issue Article Date Submitted by the Author: 05-Jun-2018 Complete List of Authors: Roussel,
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Terms A
    Geographical Terms A abrasion Wearing of rock surfaces by agronomy Agric. economy, including friction, where abrasive material is theory and practice of animal hus­ transported by running water, ice, bandry, crop production and soil wind, waves, etc. management. abrasion platform Coastal rock plat­ aiguille Prominent needle-shaped form worn nearly smooth by abrasion. rock-peak, usually above snow-line and formed by frost action. absolute humidity Amount of water vapour per unit volume ofair. ait Small island in river or lake. abyssal Ocean deeps between 1,200 alfalfa Deep-rooted perennial plant, and 3,000 fathoms, where sunlight does largely used as fodder-crop since its not penetrate and there is no plant life. deep roots withstand drought. Pro­ duced mainly in U.S.A. and Argentina. accessibility Nearness or centrality of one function or place to other functions allocation-location problem Problem or places measured in terms ofdistance, of locating facilities, services, factories time, cost, etc. etc. in any area so that transport costs are minimized, thresholds are met and acre-foot Amount of water required total population is served. to cover I acre of land to depth of I ft. (43,560 cu. ft.). alluvial cone Form of alluvial fan, consisting of mass of thick coarse adiabatic Relating to chan~e occurr­ material. ing in temp. of a mass of gas, III ascend­ ing or descending air masses, without alluvial fan Mass of sand or gravel actual gain or loss ofheat from outside. deposited by stream where it leaves constricted course for main valley. afforestation Deliberate planting of trees where none ever grew or where alluvium Sand, silt and gravel laid none have grown recently.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Selected Drumlin Fields in North America
    MORPHOLOGY OF DRUMLINS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SELECTED 415 DRUMLIN FIELDS IN NORTH AMERICA Morphology of Drumlins: A Comparative Analysis of Selected Drumlin Fields in North America Amy Annen Faculty Sponsor: Dean Wilder, Department of Geography and Earth Science ABSTRACT Pleistocene glaciers revealed numerous types of land formations in their retreat northward during climatic warming. The postglacial landscape contains various features, such as moraines, flutes, and drumlin fields. Drumlin fields in southeast- ern Wisconsin and west central New York are compared in terms of drumlin morphology to ascertain regional differences between drumlin fields formed by dif- ferent lobes of the Wisconsinan Laurentide ice sheet. Topographic maps of the Wisconsin and New York study areas are used to measure physical characteristics of individual drumlins. Drumlins from the two glacial lobes differ significantly on the basis of length, width, and relief, but are similar in terms of nearest neighbor proximity and width/length ratios. Differences between the drumlin belts in Wisconsin and New York may result from natural variations in glacial conditions during formation, although the specific mechanisms remain elusive. INTRODUCTION Repeated advances and retreats of continental ice sheets characterized the late Pleistocene epoch (130,000 to 10,000 years BP.). The Pleistocene ice expansion during Wisconsin Glaciation occurred approximately 20,000 to 10,000 years BP. At about 17,000 to 18,000 years BP., the Laurentide ice sheet extended to its maximum position south of the Great Lakes, marked by a terminal moraine (Easterbrook, 1993, Benn and Evans, 1998). In the years following maximum advance, the ice sheet revealed numerous types of land formations in the retreat northward during climatic warming.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]