DOCSLIB.ORG

BELMONT COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2013-2018 Page 95

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BELMONT COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2013-2018 Page 95 CHAPTER 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY 2013-2018 This section of the Plan provides the “blueprint” for Belmont County and participating municipalities to become less vulnerable to natural and technological hazards. It is based on the general consensus of the Belmont County Mitigation Planning Committee along with the findings of the Local Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability assessment. This section consists of the following subsections: • INTRODUCTION • GOALS AND OBJECTIVES UPDATE SUMMARY • COMMUNITY VALUES, HISTORIC AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS • FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGY • SEVERE SUMMER STORMS MITIGATION STRATEGY • SEVERE WINTER STORMS MITIGATION STRATEGY • LANDSLIDE MITIGATION STRATEGY • TORNADO MITIGATION STRATEGY • TEMPERATURE EXTREMES MITIGATION STRATEGY • DAM FAILURE MITIGATION STRATEGY • MINE SUBSIDENCE MITIGATION STRATEGY • ALL-HAZARDS MITIGATION STRATEGY INTRODUCTION ____ _________ __ The intent of the Mitigation Strategy is to provide Belmont County and participating municipalities with the goals that will serve as the guiding principles for future mitigation policy and project administration, along with a list of proposed actions deemed necessary to meet those goals and reduce the impact of natural hazards. It is designed to be comprehensive and strategic in nature. The development of the strategy included a thorough review of natural hazards and identified policies and projects intended to not only reduce the future impacts of hazards, but also to help Belmont County and participating municipalities achieve compatible economic, environmental and social goals. The development of this section is also intended to be strategic, in that all policies and projects are linked to establish priorities assigned to specific departments or individuals responsible for their implementation and assigned target completion deadlines. Funding sources are identified that can be used to assist in project implementation. • Mitigation goals are general guidelines that explain what the County wants to achieve. Goals are usually expressed as broad policy statements representing desired long-term results. BELMONT COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2013-2018 Page 95 CHAPTER 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY 2013-2018 • Mitigation objectives describe strategies or implementation steps to attain the identified goals. Objectives are more specific statements than goals; the described steps are usually measurable and can have a defined completion date. • Mitigation Actions provide more detailed descriptions of specific work tasks to help the County and its municipalities achieve prescribed goals and objectives. Based on participation from the Belmont County Mitigation Planning Committee, the mitigation strategy was modified and updated. Objectives were clarified to better document roles and responsibilities. Completed actions were noted and deleted. New actions have been added to address particular hazards facing Belmont County and the consensus achieved in how to address those actions. The last step in updating the Mitigation Strategy is the creation of jurisdictionally specific Mitigation Action Plans (MAPs). The MAPs represent the key outcome of the mitigation planning process. MAPs include a prioritized list of proposed hazard mitigation actions (policies and projects) for Belmont County and its municipalities, including accompanying information such as those agencies or individuals assigned responsibility for their implementation, potential funding sources, estimated target date for completion, and a current status. The MAPs provide those individuals or agencies responsible for implementing mitigation actions with a clear roadmap that also serves as an important tool for monitoring progress over time. The collection of actions listed in each jurisdictions MAP also serves as an easily understood synopsis of activities for local decision makers. In preparing their own Mitigation Action Plan, each jurisdiction considered their overall hazard risk and capability to mitigate identified hazards, in addition to meeting the adopted countywide mitigation goals. Prioritizing mitigation actions for each jurisdiction was completed using FEMA’s STAPLEE methodology. The STAPLEE approach allows for a careful review of the feasibility of mitigation actions by using seven criteria. The criteria are described below: • S - Social • T - Technical • A - Administrative • P - Political • L - Legal • E - Economic • E - Environmental FEMA mitigation planning requirements indicate that any prioritization system used shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost-benefit review of the proposed projects. To do this in an efficient manner that is consistent with FEMA’s guidance on using cost-benefit review in mitigation planning, the STAPLEE method was adapted to include a higher weighting for two elements of the economic feasibility factor – Benefits of Action and Costs of Action. BELMONT COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2013-2018 Page 96 CHAPTER 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY 2013-2018 This method incorporates concepts similar to those described in Method C of FEMA 386-5: Using Benefit Cost Review in Mitigation Planning (FEMA, 2007). For the individual action plans, a STAPLEE score was calculated based on the number of favorable considerations that can be found on the STAPLEE document. Up to 23 considerations can be used to prioritize each action using this evaluation methodology. In order to ensure that a broad range of mitigation actions were considered, the Belmont County Mitigation Planning Committee analyzed a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions for each hazard after it had completed the risk assessment. This helped to ensure that there was sufficient span and creativity in the mitigation actions considered. There are six categories of mitigation actions which Belmont County considered in developing its mitigation action plan. Those categories include: • Prevention: Government administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples include planning, zoning, building codes, subdivision regulations, hazard specific regulations (such as floodplain regulations), capital improvement programs, and open-space preservation and stormwater regulations. • Property Protection: Actions that involve modifying or removing existing buildings or infrastructure to protect them from a hazard. Examples include the acquisition, elevation and relocation of structures, structural retrofits, flood-proofing, storm shutters, and shatter resistant glass. This category also includes insurance. • Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about potential risks from hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include hazard mapping, outreach projects, library materials dissemination, real estate disclosures, the creation of hazard information centers, and school age / adult education programs. • Natural Resource Protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, forest and vegetation management, wetlands restoration or preservation, slope stabilization, and historic property and archeological site preservation. • Structural Project Implementation: Mitigation projects intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by using structures to modify the environment. Structures include stormwater controls (culverts); dams, dikes, and levees; and safe rooms. • Emergency Services: Actions that typically are not considered mitigation techniques but reduce the impacts of a hazard event on people and property. These actions are often taken prior to, BELMONT COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2013-2018 Page 97 CHAPTER 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY 2013-2018 during, or in response to an emergency or disaster. Examples include warning systems, evacuation planning and management, emergency response training and exercises, and emergency flood protection procedures. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES UPDATE SUMMARY ((2007-2012)__ ____ _________ __ The Mitigation Planning Committee reviewed the current plan, identified new information that needed to be included in the Plan update and incorporated it as required by state and federal guidelines. The planning committee was also tasked with collecting all accurate data from plan participants and provided outreach to the public and business stakeholders to ensure that everyone’s information is included in this Plan update. The following table is an update summary to the goals and objectives from the 2007 Belmont County Hazard Mitigation Plan conducted by the Belmont County Mitigation Planning Team on November 15, 2012. Table 3-1: 2007-2012 Goals and Objectives Update Goal Objective Defer Change Delete Note Reduce the potential for Reduce the probability of damage as a result of significant flood damage dam failures in Belmont as a result of dam failure X County Protect Belmont Increase public New goal and County’s agricultural awareness as to the objective will be re- assets from the negative agricultural effects of worded effects of a drought drought, as well as the X ramifications to the public water supply Develop methods for the This objective is an procurement of an action emergency water supply X Reduce the potential Educate the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1995
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. Box 37127 ·washington, D.C. 20013-7127 I~ REPLY REFER TO: The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to inform you that the following properties have been entered in the National Register of Historic Places. For further information call 202/343-9542. JAN 6 1995 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/26/94 THROUGH 12/30/94'· KEY: State, County, Property Name, Address/Boundary, City, Vicinity, Reference Number NHL Status, Action, Date, Multiple Name ARIZONA, YAVAPAI COUNTY, Fleury's Addition Historic District, Roughly, Western and Gurley from Willow to Grove, and Willow, Garden and Grove, from Western to Gurley, Prescott vicinity, 94001488, NOMINATION, 12/27/94 (Prescott MRA) CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Lanterman House, 4420 Encinas Dr., La Canada Flintridge, 94001504, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, MONTEREY COUNTY, Pacific Biological Laboratories, 800 Cannery Row, Monterey, 94001498, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY,. Huntington Beach Elementary School Gymnasium and Plunge, 1600 Palm Ave., Huntington Beach, 94001499, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Smiley Park Historic District, Roughly bounded by Brookside Ave., Cajon St., Cypress Ave. ami Buena Vista St., Redlands, 94001487, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, SAN MATEO COUNTY, Brittan, Nathanial. Party House, 125 Dale Ave., San Carlos, 94001500, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, SONOMA COUNTY, Rosenburg's Department Store, 700 Fourth St., Santa Rosa, 94001497, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 CALIFORNIA, STANISLAUS COUNTY, Hotel Covell, 1023 J St., Modesto, 94001501, NOMINATION, 12/29/94 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE EQUIVALENT, Carnegie Institution of Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), As Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E
    The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), as Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E. Martens Two of the pictures I took during an early visit to the he Common Field site occurs near the bluffs in the site are shown in Figure 1. The first shows Mound A, the TMississippi River floodplain 3 km south of St. Gen- largest of the six then-existing mounds. The nose of my evieve and approximately 90 km south of St. Louis. It is brand-new 1980 Volkswagen parked on the farm road is a large Mississippian-period site that once had as many as in the lower right corner of the picture. The second photo eight mounds (Bushnell 1914:666). It was long considered shows the outline of a burned house structure typical of to be an unoccupied civic-ceremonial center because very many evident across the site. Although it has been noted few surface artifacts were found. This all changed due that many people visited the site shortly after the flood, I to a flood in December 1979, when the Mississippi River did not meet anyone during several visits in 1980 and 1981. swept across the Common Field site. The resulting erosion I subsequently learned that Dr. Michael O’Brien led removed up to 40 cm of topsoil, exposing: a group of University of Missouri (MU) personnel in a [a] tremendous quantity of archaeological material limited survey and fieldwork activity in the spring of 1980. including ceramic plates, pots and other vessels, articu- The first phase entailed aerial photography (black-and- lated human burials, well defined structural remains white and false-color infrared) of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Hclassification
    Form No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC Athens Historic, District AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER Athens-Boonesboro Pike —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Athens —.VICINITY OF 06 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Kentucky 021 Fayette 067 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE .^DISTRICT _PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) 3LPRIVATE J&JNOCCUPIED X-COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH J^WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL X-PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS -XYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY E-OTHER: Vacant OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Ton t- -in n at- -inn STREET& NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC ___Favette County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER Main. CITY,TOWN STATE Lexington Kentucky REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS Tl'TLE DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE CONDITION CHECK ONE JLEXCELLENT .^DETERIORATED (Parker HOUSe-)-UNALTERED ^.ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD _RUINS ^ALTERED AMOVED DATElate 1800 T s. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED (Rose's Store) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The small community of Athens is located in the southeastern portion of Fayette County, ten miles southeast of Lexington and 6ne-quarter mile from the Interstate 75 interchange with Athens-Boonesboro Road. It lies in the midst of cultivated agricultural lands with several residences, primarily farm related, dotting the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Region X CEDS Update
    2020 Update Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Region X Bel-O-Mar Regional Council Wheeling, West Virginia Submitted to: U.S. Economic Development Administration Philadelphia, PA Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................................1 B. Council Organization ...........................................................................................................2 C. Jurisdiction and Boundaries .................................................................................................2 D. General Description of the Area ..........................................................................................5 1. History............................................................................................................................5 2. Geographic Location and Proximity to Markets ............................................................6 3. Natural Features .............................................................................................................7 II. Summary Background – The Economic Development Conditions of the Region .....................8 A. Population and Labor Force Characteristics ........................................................................8 1. Population ......................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape Historic Name
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being nominated, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape historic name other name/site number Wonderland of Rocks; Rhyolite Park; The Pinnacles; Say Yahdesut “Point of Rocks” 2. Location street & number: Chiricahua National Monument (CHIR) 12856 E. Rhyolite Canyon Road _____not for publication city/town: Willcox___________________________________________________________ _X_ vicinity state: Arizona_____ code: AZ __________ county: Cochise_________ code: 003_____ zip code: 85643___ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ¨ nomination ¨ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places an meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ¨ meets ¨ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Northern Border Remote
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF NORTHERN BORDER REMOTE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM PROJECT SWANTON SECTOR PHASE I U.S. BORDER PATROL U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C. February 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to construct, operate, and maintain relocatable and permanent Remote Video Surveillance Systems (RVSS) towers, and the colocation of equipment on existing equipment and buildings to provide long-term, permanent surveillance in the USBP Swanton Sector. With the RVSS, CBP can maintain surveillance over large areas, contributing to agent safety, and increasing operational effectiveness as they detect, identify, and classify incursions/illegal entry and resolve the incursions with the appropriate level of response. Purpose and Need There are currently areas along the U.S./Canada border in the Swanton Sector Area of Responsibility where cross-border violators smuggle goods across the border along remote trails and roads. CBP proposes to improve the USBP’s efficiency of detection, identification, and apprehension of cross-border violators through the installation of RVSSs. The systems enable U.S. Border Patrol’s (USBP) agents to survey rural and remote areas and identify and classify illegal entries without committing numerous agents in vehicles to perform the same functions. The increasing frequency and nature of illegal cross-border activities, as well as the geographic area over which these activities occur, create a need for a technology-based surveillance capability that can effectively collect, process, and distribute information. Proposed Action and Alternatives Considered CBP proposes to construct, operate, and maintain relocatable and permanent RVSS towers, and the colocation of equipment on a commercial cell tower to provide long-term, permanent surveillance in the USBP Swanton Sector.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Survey of Newton County: Enhancement of a Data Deficient Region Grant # 18-14-FFY-03
    An Archaeological Survey of Newton County: Enhancement of a Data Deficient Region Grant # 18-14-FFY-03 By: Jamie M. Leeuwrik, Christine Thompson, Shelbi Long, Kevin C. Nolan, and Erin Steinwachs Principal Investigators: Christine Thompson and Kevin C. Nolan Reports of Investigation 88 Volume 1 May 2015 Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0439 Phone: 765-285-5328 Fax: 765-285-2163 Web Address: http://www.bsu.edu/aal i An Archaeological Survey of Newton County: Enhancement of a Data Deficient Region Grant # 18-14-FFY-03 By: Jamie M. Leeuwrik, Christine Thompson, Kevin C. Nolan, Shelbi Long, and Erin Steinwachs Christine Thompson and Kevin C. Nolan Principal Investigators ________________________________ Reports of Investigation 88 Volume 1 May 2015 Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0439 Phone: 765-285-5328 Fax: 765-285-2163 Web Address: http://www.bsu.edu/aal i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL ASSISTANCE This project has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service’s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. The project received federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana. However, the contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist 59 2
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST / BACK ISSUES OF OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST Term 1956 thru 1967 out of print Expires A.S.O. OFFICERS 1968 - 2007 $ 2.00 2010 President Michael Van Steen, 5303 Wildman Road, Cedarville, 1951 thru 1955 REPRINTS - sets only $20.00 OH 45314 (937) 766-5411. 2000 thru 2002 $ 5.00 Vice President George Colvin, 220 Darbymoor Drive, Plain 2003 $ 6.00 City, OH 43064 (614) 879-9825. 2008 $ 4.00 Immediate Past President Rocky Falleti, 5904 South Ave., Postage for one $2.00, add $0.75 for every additional magazine ordered. Youngstown, OH 44512 (330) 788-1598. The Archaeology of Ohio, by Robert N. Converse regular $60.00 Author's Edition $75.00 Executive Secretary Dennis Link, 1214 Nelson Dr, Chillicothe, Postage, Add $ 5.00 OH 45601 (513)404-6425. Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are generally out Treasurer Chris Rummel, 6197 Shelba Drive, Galloway, OH of print but copies are available from time to time. Write to business office for 43119(614)558-3512 prices and availability. Recording Secretary Cindy Sperry, 15515 Nixon Rd., Mt. ASO CHAPTERS Vernon, OH 43050 (740) 507-2685. Aboriginal Explorers Club Webmaster Steven Carpenter, 529 Gray St., Plain City, OH. President: Mark Cline, 1377 Parshall St., Wellsville, OH 43968 (330) 532-1157 43064(614)873-5159. Beau Fleuve Chapter Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, OH President: Richard Sojka, 11253 Broadway, Alden, NY 14004 (716) 681-2229 43064(614)873-5471. Blue Jacket Chapter President: Ken Sowards, 9201 Hilgefort Rd., Fort Laramie, OH 45845 (937) 295-3764 TRUSTEES Chippewa Valley Chapter Carl Harruff, Box 81, Sparta, OH 43350 (419) 352-4804.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeol Volume 29 Spring 1979
    'tut' ^•T & ARCHAEOL VOLUME 29 SPRING 1979 I ,(; N m' The Archaeological Society of Ohio Officers—terms expire 1980 Robert Harter, 1961 Buttermilk Hill, Delaware, Ohio Jeff Carskadden, 2686 Carol Drive, Zanesville, Ohio President—Steve Fuller, Associate Editor, Martha P. Otto, 4767 Hudson Dr., Stow, Ohio Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio Vice President—Frank Otto, 1503 Hempwood Dr., Columbus, Ohio All articles, reviews and comments on the Ohio Archae­ Executive Secretary—Jan Sorgenfrei, ologist should be sent to the Editor Memberships, re­ Pandora, Ohio quests for back issues, changes of address, and other Treasurer—Mike Kish, matter should be sent to the business office. 39 Parkview Ave., Westerville, Ohio PLEASE NOTIFY BUSINESS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY Recording Secretary—Robert Sturm, 3256 E. Cleveland Ave., Grove City, Ohio OF ADDRESS CHANGES. BY POSTAL REGULATIONS Editor—Robert N. Converse, SOCIETY MAIL CANNOT BE FORWARDED. 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, Ohio Editorial Office Trustees 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, Ohio 43064 Term expires Ernest Good, 3402 Civic Place, Business Office Grove City, Ohio 1980 Summers Redick, 35 West River Glen Drive, William C. Haney, 96 Buckhorn St., Worthington, Ohio 43085 Ironton, Ohio 1980 Alva McGraw, Rt. #11, Membership and Dues Chillicothe, Ohio 1980 Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are Charles H. Stout, 91 Redbank Dr., payable on the first of January as follows: Regular mem­ Fairborn, Ohio 1980 bership $8.50; Husband and wife (one copy of publication) Dana Baker, W. Taylor St., $9.50; Contributing $25.00. Funds are used for publish­ Mt. Victory, Ohio 1982 ing the Ohio Archaeologist. The Archaeological Society Steve Balazs, 401 Mulberry St., of Ohio is an incorporated non-profit organization and Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Thermal Alteration in Lithic Reduction Strategies at the Leftwich Site in Middle Tennessee Audrey L
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 3-1986 The Role of Thermal Alteration in Lithic Reduction Strategies at the Leftwich Site in Middle Tennessee Audrey L. Grubb University of Tennessee, Knoxville Recommended Citation Grubb, Audrey L., "The Role of Thermal Alteration in Lithic Reduction Strategies at the Leftwich Site in Middle Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1986. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4120 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Audrey L. Grubb entitled "The Role of Thermal Alteration in Lithic Reduction Strategies at the Leftwich Site in Middle Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Walter E. Klippel, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: R.L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Audre¥ L. G;rubb entitled "The Role of Thermal Alteration in Lith1c Reduction Strategies at the Leftwich Site in Middle Tennessee." I have examined the final copy of this· thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthrop ology.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Survey of Hamilton County, Indiana Grant # 18-12-41921-4
    Distributional Analysis of Archaeological Remains in the Upper White River Basin: An Archaeological Survey of Hamilton County, Indiana Grant # 18-12-41921-4 By: Matthew R. Swihart and Kevin C. Nolan Compiled and Edited by Kevin C. Nolan Principal Investigators: Kevin C. Nolan and Mark A. Hill Reports of Investigation 82 Volume 1 June 2013 Applied Archaeology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0435 Phone: 765-285-5328 Fax: 765-285-2163 Web Address: http://www.bsu.edu/aal 1 Distributional Analysis of Archaeological Remains in the Upper White River Basin: An Archaeological Survey of Hamilton County, Indiana Grant # 18-12-41921-4 By: Matthew R. Swihart and Kevin C. Nolan With Contributions by: John P. McCarthy, Amber J. Yuellig, Alex Barton, and Clayton Ziegler Compiled and Edited by Kevin C. Nolan Kevin C. Nolan and Mark A. Hill Principal Investigators ________________________________ Reports of Investigation 82 Volume 1 June 2013 Applied Archaeology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0435 Phone: 765-285-5328 Fax: 765-285-2163 Web Address: http://www.bsu.edu/aal i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL ASSISSTANCE This project has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service’s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. The project received federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana. However, the contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]