DOCSLIB.ORG

Westernization Index 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Westernization Index 2020 STRATEGEAST WESTERNIZATION INDEX 2020 ABOUT STRATEGEAST StrategEast is a strategic center whose goal is to reinforce the values of rule of law and private property protection in Eurasian and Baltic countries through the transition from natural resources-based to knowledge- driven economy. Our work is focused on the 14 countries, which proclaimed or restored their independence after the collapse of the USSR: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. StrategEast is a registered 501(c)3 organization based in the United States. LEARN MORE AT OUR WEBSITE: www.StrategEast.org THIS REPORT Serdar Aitakov Parviz Mullojonov (Mullojanov) WAS WRITTEN BY: Ilvija Bruge Boris Navasardian Alyona Getmanchuk Dr. Adil Nurmakov Gubad Ibadoghlu Sergiy Solodkyy Tamerlan Ibraimov Agniete Pocyte Alisher Ilkhamov Maili Vilson Leonid Litra Andrei Yahorau Salome Minesashvili © 2020 StrategEast. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-578-63441-8 StrategEast Westernization Index 2020 is available on our website: www.StrategEast.org StrategEast Concept: Michael Sheitelman 1900 K Street, NW Project Coordinator: Lidia Shavlo Suite 100 Editor: Courtney Dobson Washington, D. C. 20006 Design: Vitaly Tchirkov Page Proof: Mark Kanarsky [email protected] www.StrategEast.org 4 STRATEGEAST WESTERNIZATION INDEX | About STRATEGEAST TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6 Index Methodology 8 Scores 14 Cross-Country Analysis 16 Westernization Index of Post-Soviet States 42 Armenia 43 Azerbaijan 51 Belarus 57 Estonia 64 Georgia 69 Kazakhstan 75 Kyrgyzstan 83 Latvia 89 Lithuania 95 Moldova 101 Tajikistan 108 Turkmenistan 114 Ukraine 121 Uzbekistan 128 Bibliography 135 Authors’ Biographies 176 STRATEGEAST WESTERNIZATION INDEX 5 INTRODUCTION 2018, when the Index was launched, many post-So- viet countries experienced backsets. By highlighting this, the Index draws much-need attention not only to the region’s transition itself. It also reminds us of the challenges that remain for European integration and for efforts to build a Eu- ro-Atlantic order of peace. Sure: the European Union and NATO integrated many Eastern European states, thereby contributing to peace, democracy, and pros- perity in the post-Soviet region. Yet, many countries are still struggling to find their place in the European Photo by MSC/Michael Kuhlmann order and the Western world. In this regard, the Index is also a forceful remind- Dear Reader, er of the West’s responsibility for the future of the The publication of the 2020 Westernization In- region and its ongoing transformation — and of dex, which documents the state of transition of 14 the fact that if the West fails to act, other powers post-Soviet countries towards Western political and will not hesitate to jump in. By deciding not to open economic standards, comes at a very timely mo- accession talks with North Macedonia and Albania, ment. The Index is released just a few months after the EU has certainly not lived up to its responsibility. we celebrated a truly remarkable anniversary — re- But the greatest stumbling block to regional markable for the post-Soviet region covered in the transformation and to efforts to build a durable Eu- Index, and for Europe as a whole: Thirty years ago, ropean security order is posed by the dismal state on November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall came down — of Western relations with a country that is absent and with it vanished the dividing line that had sepa- from the Index: Russia. It is a pity that the vision of a rated both Germany and Europe for several decades. ‘Common European Home,’ as expressed by former This moment, many believed, would be the start- Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, never material- ing point of a comprehensive transformation pro- ized — a home to all including Russia. What began cess. A process that would see post-Soviet countries, in 1989 in Germany still remains incomplete. The including Russia, embrace Western standards of de- objective of “a Europe whole, free and at peace” as mocracy, rule of law, and human rights protection. A formulated by US Presidents George H.W. Bush and process that would eventually give rise to a pan-Euro- Bill Clinton has still not come to fruition. pean security architecture, a durable order of peace. In documenting the state of transition of the And in fact, the 2020 Westernization Index doc- post-Soviet region, the Westernization Index is a force- uments that much has been achieved in the past ful reminder of the aspirations that came alive in 1989. 30 years: Many post-Soviet countries have moved In reading the results, we should be reminded of the towards more democratic and market-oriented in- pan-European project that we embarked on almost 30 stitutions. But the report also demonstrates that years ago — and of the merit of continuing this journey. much remains to be done: From ensuring individual freedoms and independent courts to protecting hu- Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger, man rights — the process of transition that started Chairman of the Munich 30 years ago is far from completed. And there is Security Conferencee nothing automatic about this process. In fact, since 6 STRATEGEAST WESTERNIZATION INDEX | Introduction financial and analytical) began viewing this space as a single region, applying their models and solutions, which were previously applied only to one particular country or group of countries, to the entire region, thus significantly increasing the effectiveness of coop- eration these Western institutes have with the region. The new edition of this Index, released two years after our first attempt to measure the degree of the region’s Westernization, retains its unique features: • it is still the only report to analyze the 14 coun- tries of the PSNR region as a whole; Photo by Alexander Kozachenko • it measures each country’s wholesale integration into the Western world across many sectors; While presenting the second edition of the West- • it is prepared for the West by experts from the ernization Index for post-Soviet states, I would like to region. remind the reader about the story of its inception. However, the present edition of our Index also We at StrategEast conceived this Index as a product has a fundamentally different quality: it now reveals for internal use, as a measuring instrument allow- not only a static but also a dynamic picture of West- ing us to apply our efforts in the most efficient way ernization in the PSNR region. The second edition when analyzing the Westernization of 14 countries shows trends in political, economic, and legal West- which gained or restored independence after the ernization, and by extension, the effectiveness of ef- breakup of the Soviet Union. And also, to find the forts by Western institutions operating in the region. points for application of our efforts and measure The Westernization Index dynamics indicate where their result. But two years ago, after we saw the find- we have been able to succeed, where even great- ings produced by experts who worked on preparing er efforts must be applied, and where we perhaps the Westernization Index, we decided to make this even chose the wrong way. Index a public product—and this decision has paid Nevertheless, being one of the first to see the off. During the intervening two years, StrategEast findings of the 2020 Westernization Index, I can as- has released a large number of reports, analytical sure you that overall, we—Western institutes work- articles, and policy papers, but the Westernization ing with post-Soviet states—have chosen the right Index remains our standard-bearing product—the way. The Westernization dynamics revealed by the only product presenting at a glance, the entire pic- present edition of our Index indicates that this region ture of what is going on in the region we analyze. not only has a common past but also a common fu- During the past two years, the Index became a ture, and whether this region—as a whole—moves useful tool for a large number of public institutes, in the “right” direction: toward traditional Western both in the Post-Soviet, Not-Russian (PSNR) region it- values, such as transparency, the rule of law, and self, and in the West, where it is used by internation- private property protection. al financial institutes working with post-Soviet states and where Western think-tanks and analysts can base Sincerely, Anatoly Motkin their findings on its data and conclusions. Thanks to Founder and President, the advent of the Index, which considers 14 post-So- StrategEast viet countries as a single space, many institutes (both STRATEGEAST WESTERNIZATION INDEX | Introduction 7 INDEX METHODOLOGY HOW THE SCORE IS DETERMINED Westernization is a process of social change whereby societies adopt Western patterns of political development, legal functioning, economic relations, cultural discourse, and lifestyle. The Westerniza- tion Index is a tool aimed at measuring the level to which the post-So- viet countries and societies, except the Russian Federation, have adopt- ed, accepted, or were permeated by the Western culture in all the key areas for each country. The Index is based on a series of elements and benchmarks that helped us to assess the adoption and implementa- tion of the Western model by looking at five key areas: 1. Political Westernization. 2. Economic Westernization. 3. Legal Westernization. 4. Language and cultural Westernization. 5. Westernization of lifestyle. We limited the Index to the five areas we believe are most critical to examine, although we accept that we could have expanded this to include even more areas for even more robust analysis. Each area (which has multiple sub areas) is weighted differently within the In- dex to capture the relative importance of each sector to the overall Western transition. The weight of each of the first three areas is 25%, the fourth 15%, and the fifth 10%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • © Copyright by Ann Littmann Rappoport 1978 SOVIET POLICIES TOWARD ITS UNION REPUBLICS: A
    790820A RAPPOPORT t ANN LITTMANN SOVIET POLICIES TDWARD ITS JNION REPUBLICS A COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF "NATIONAL INTEGRATION". THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, PH.D., 1978 University, Microfilm s International .TOO N / I I U HOAD. ANN AHIJOH. Ml 4H1<K> © Copyright by Ann Littmann Rappoport 1978 SOVIET POLICIES TOWARD ITS UNION REPUBLICS: A COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF "NATIONAL INTEGRATION" DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ann Littmann Rappoport ***** The Ohio State University 1978 Reading Committee: Approved By Philip D. Stewart, Ph.D. R. William Liddle, Ph.D. Loren K. Waldman, Ph.D. M) Adviser \ Department of Political Science Dedicated to the most special Family with all my love. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A lengthy appendix might be in order to adequately acknowledge those persons who provided valuable assistance to this dissertation. Many of their names do indeed appear throughout the footnotes and bibliography of this study. Certain others are acknowledged for the inspira­ tion they provided me through their dedicated teaching. My sincere appreciation goes to my thesis and Major Adviser, Prof. Philip D. Stewart, who supported and somehow tactfully guided this undertaking. I also thank Prof. R. William Liddle and Prof. Loren K. Waldman, for their incisive comments, especially at the time of this study's "debut" presentation. Professor Waldman1s suggestion to investigate the Lieberson Diversity Measure as a means for approaching my compositional problem, made a great independent contribution toward this study while also serving to provide my Entropy Index with additional credibility. In preparing and typing this manuscript, the work of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • China's False Allegations of the Use of Biological Weapons by the United
    W O R K I N G P A P E R # 7 8 China’s False Allegations of the Use of Biological Weapons by the United States during the Korean War By Milton Leitenberg, March 2016 THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES Christian F. Ostermann, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry. The project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to accelerate the process of integrating new sources, materials and perspectives from the former “Communist bloc” with the historiography of the Cold War which has been written over the past few decades largely by Western scholars reliant on Western archival sources. It also seeks to transcend barriers of language, geography, and regional specialization to create new links among scholars interested in Cold War history. Among the activities undertaken by the project to promote this aim are a periodic BULLETIN to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertaining to Cold War history; a fellowship program for young historians from the former Communist bloc to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in the United States; international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars; and publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationality Issue in Proletkult Activities in Ukraine
    GLOKALde April 2016, ISSN 2148-7278, Volume: 2 Number: 2, Article 4 GLOKALde is official e-journal of UDEEEWANA NATIONALITY ISSUE IN PROLETKULT ACTIVITIES IN UKRAINE Associate Professor Oksana O. GOMENIUK Ph.D. (Pedagogics), Pavlo TYchyna Uman State Pedagogical UniversitY, UKRAINE ABSTRACT The article highlights the social and political conditions under which the proletarian educational organizations of the 1920s functioned in the context of nationalitY issue, namelY the study of political frameworks determining the status of the Ukrainian language and culture in Ukraine. The nationalitY issue became crucial in Proletkult activities – a proletarian cultural, educational and literary organization in the structure of People's Commissariat, the aim of which was a broad and comprehensive development of the proletarian culture created by the working class. Unlike Russia, Proletkult’s organizations in Ukraine were not significantlY spread and ceased to exist due to the fact that the national language and culture were not taken into account and the contact with the peasants and indigenous people of non-proletarian origin was limited. KeYwords: Proletkult, worker, culture, language, policY, organization. FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM IN GENERAL AND ITS CONNECTION WITH IMPORTANT SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL TASKS ContemporarY social transformations require detailed, critical reinterpreting the experiences of previous generations. In his work “Lectures” Hegel wrote that experience and history taught that peoples and governments had never learnt from history and did not act in accordance with the lessons that historY could give. The objective study of Russian-Ukrainian relations require special attention that will help to clarify the reasons for misunderstandings in historical context, to consider them in establishing intercommunication and ensuring peace in the geopolitical space.
    [Show full text]
  • Lgbti+ in the Region of Central Asia: Repressions, Discrimination, Exclusion
    WITH THE PARTICIPATION: Кyrgyz Indigo, Human & art, Kok.Team, Uzbekistan LGBTIQ IG «Equality», IG OAT Kurtuluş WITH THE SUPPORT: IG Safe Space, Trans*Coalition in the Post-Soviet Space LGBTI+ IN THE REGION OF CENTRAL ASIA: REPRESSIONS, DISCRIMINATION, EXCLUSION Footage from a documentary «Deafening silence» ADC Memorial thanks Human Right defenders, activists, initiative groups, LGBTI+ individuals who, despite the risks, shared their experience and told their stories. Without your participation, this publication would not be possible. LGBTI+ IN THE REGION OF CENTRAL ASIA: REPRESSIONS, DISCRIMINATION, EXCLUSION Human rights report ADC Memorial with the participation: Кyrgyz Indigo, Human & Art, Kok.Team, Uzbekistan LGBTIQ IG «Equality», IG OAT Kurtuluş and with the support: IG Safe Spac, Trans*Coalition in the Post-Soviet Space. May 2020. adcmemorial.org CONTENTS PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF LGBTI+ PEOPLE IN CENTRAL ASIA ................... 4 THE SITUATION OF INDIVIDUAL GROUPS OF LGBTI+ PEOPLE.............................. 8 The Problems of Lesbian and Bisexual Women ............................................... 8 Problems Faced by Transgender People ........................................................10 Problems Related to Gender Transition ..........................................................11 Stigmatization of LGBTI+ People Living with HIV ............................................14 A Tragic Anachronism: The Criminalization of Consensual Same-Sex Relationships Between Men in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan ...........................16
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Sovietization?
    What is Sovietization? It is not easy to define the term “Sovietization,” because the actual implementa- tion of the process varied from country to country. In addition, over time the content of this term underwent slight changes. If we examine only one country, such as Latvia or Estonia, we risk overlooking the larger context.1 Thus this dis- cussion of “Sovietization” starts by looking at the history of the term. The word “soviet” (совет) means “council” in Russian and was used in the Russian Empire as a politically neutral term, as in Council of Ministers (sovet ministrov). In the context of the February Revolution in 1917, across the empire workers’ and soldiers’ councils were established, often elected, and played a role in the revolution. They turned into a parallel power structure vis-à-vis the institutions of the provisional government, especially because the remnants of the old administration began to dissolve and lacked legitimacy in the eyes of the population. In most workers’ and soldiers’ councils, it was not the Bolsheviks who dominated but other socialist parties such as the Mensheviks and the Social Revolutionaries. The “trick” used by Lenin and the Bolsheviks during their coup d’état, also known as the October Revolution, was to seize power in the name of the workers’ and soldiers’ soviets under the slogan “all power to the soviets.” The long-term goal of the coup d’état, the establishment of a one-party dictator- ship headed by Lenin, was hidden. Workers’ and soldiers’ councils played a cer- tain role locally in developments, especially in the unfolding civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Propoganda in Azerbaijani Children's Literature In
    ISSN 2411-9598 (Print) European Journal of January-April 2018 ISSN 2411-4103 (Online) Language and Literature Studies Volume 4 Issue 1 Communist Propoganda in Azerbaijani Children’s Literature in the Soviet Union Zhala Babashova KASTRATİ Kastamonu University Faculty of Science and Letters, Contemporary Turkish Dialects and Literatures Abstract After the national republic had fallen in Azerbaijan in 1920 and the nation taken in the USSR, people’s view of the world was reshaped. Foreseeing that the sustainability of the Soviet order depends on educating children, the Communist Party rapidly started to improve the children’s literature. Furthermore, the Soviet ideology began to be transferred to the children in Azerbaijan via magazines and newspapers. Improved under the control of the Soviet Union, Azerbaijani children’s literature maintained the goal of raising Soviet minded people thanks to the topics and heroes in the literature. Three stages were considered so that Azerbaijani children could be raised with communist mentality. These stages are: Oktyabryat (age 7-9), Pioner (age 10), Komsomol (age 14). Oktyabryat was the first title given on the way to the Communism. The Soviet government made use of the power of the press, magazines and newspapers in order to carve socialism ideology into people’s minds. With the purpose of raising children with the Soviet mentality, the children’s magazine called Pioner (1927-1990) began publishing in Baku, in 1927. The magazine was issued 11 times a year. 80 percent of the essays, stories and poems were served for the Communist propaganda. These praised the Soviet era, told stories about Lenin’s success in school and included poems about the Soviet ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Stalin and the Holodomor
    Reflections on Stalin and the Holodomor Françoise Thom Paris-Sorbonne University (Paris IV) Abstract: The mechanisms and the chronology of the great crimes committed by totalitarian regimes are now well documented. While they may explain the mechanics of these events, they do not always explain why they transpired. The implementation of Stalin’s policy of collectivization and de-kulakization relied on dissimulation. Moreover, the pace of collectivization was justified by external threats, initially from Great Britain and Poland, and later extending to Japan. This made possible the branding of any political adversary as a traitor. As long as Stalin faced organized political opposition, he was unable to launch any maximal policies. After the defeat of Trotsky in December 1927 he was able to create crisis situations that ultimately furthered his own power. The offensive he unleashed against the peasants became a means of reinforcing his increasing dictatorship. The collectivization campaign employed the rational argument that the backward countryside needs to modernize production. Its ultimate aim, however, was the crushing of an independent peasantry. There are enlightening comparisons that can be made between collectivization in China and the USSR, which are explored in this essay. The resistance to collectivization was particularly strong amongst Ukrainians. Stalin, who had long regarded the national question as inseparable from the peasant question, deliberately chose mass starvation to break resistance to his will. The history of these events was for a long time shrouded in great secrecy until it began being discussed by Western scholars, becoming a matter of considerable debate between the “totalitarian” and “revisionist” schools of Soviet historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Ukrainization, 1923-1932
    3 Linguistic Ukrainization, 1923-1932 On October 10, 1920, Stalin published an artide in Pravda that for the first time authoritatively announced the Soviet policy of korenizatsiia: "It is nec- essary that all Soviet organs in the borderlands-the courts, the administration, the economic organs, organs oflocal power (as well as Party organs)-be com- posed to the greatest possible degree of people who know the customs, habits and language of the local population. »1 Korenizatsiia, as definitively formulated at party congresses in March 1921 and April 1923, consisted of two major tasks: the creation of national elites (Affirmative Action) and the promotion oflocal nationallanguages to a dominant position in the non-Russian territories (lin- guistic korenizatsiia). Linguistic korenizatsiia would prove much more difficult to achieve. Between April 1923 and December 1932, central party and soviet organs issued dozens of resolutions urging the immediate implementation of linguistic korenizatsiia. Local republican and oblast authorities issued hundreds, if not thousands, of similar decrees. Nevertheless, linguistic korenizatsiia failed almost everywhere. Why? 1 initially assumed that central authorities must have been sending mixed signals, publidy trumpeting the need for irnmediate korenizatsiia while privately letting it be known that this public rhetoric was largely for show. 1 was wrong. Not only did the soft-line soviet bureaucracies in charge of nationalities policy, such as TsIK's Soviet of Nationalities and VTsIK's Nationalities Depart- ment, vigilantly monitor the implementation of korenizatsiia, hard-line organs attached to the party's Central Committee were equally vigilant. The Orgburo 11. Stalin, "Politika sovetskoi vlasti po natsional'nomu voprosu v RDssü" (1920), in Marksizm i natsional'no-kolonial'nyi Tlopros (Moscow, 1934): 62.
    [Show full text]
  • Santraukos Final
    VILNIUS UNIVERSITY Jovita Pranevi čiūt÷ FACTORS OF NATIONAL IDENTITY FORMATION IN CIS AREA: BELARUS AND UKRAINE CASE STUDY Summary of doctoral dissertation Social science, political science (02S) Vilnius, 2009 0 The dissertation was prepared at Vilnius University, Institute of International Relations and Political Science, 2004 – 2008. Academic supervisor: prof. habil. dr. Evaldas Nekrašas (Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) Council of Defence Chairman: Prof. dr. Raimundas Lopata (Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) Members: Prof. dr. Alvydas Jokubaitis (Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) Prof. dr. Gediminas Vitkus (Lithuanian Military Academy, Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) Assoc. dr. Vladas Sirutavi čius (Lithuanian Institute of History, humanities, history – 05 H) Assoc. dr. Tomas Janeli ūnas (Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) Opponents: Prof. dr. Algis Krupavi čius (Kaunas University of Technology, social science, political science – 02 S) Assoc. dr. Dovil ÷ Jakni ūnait ÷ (Vilnius University, social science, political science – 02 S) The public defence of the dissertation will be held at 3 p.m. on the 19th June, 2009 at the Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University. Address: Vokie čių g. 10, LT- 01130, Vilnius, Lithuania The summary of the doctoral dissertation was sent out on the 19th May, 2009. Dissertation is available at Vilnius University Library. 1 VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS Jovita Pranevi čiūt÷ NACIONALIN öS TAPATYB öS FORMAVIMOSI VEIKSNIAI NVS ERDV öJE: BALTARUSIJOS IR UKRAINOS ATVEJ Ų ANALIZ ö Daktaro disertacijos santrauka Socialiniai mokslai, politikos mokslai (02 S) Vilnius, 2009 2 Disertacija rengta 2004 – 2008 metais Vilniaus universitete Mokslinis vadovas: prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy 1991-2004
    THE FORMATION OF KYRGYZ FOREIGN POLICY 1991-2004 A Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of The FletCher SChool of Law and DiplomaCy, Tufts University By THOMAS J. C. WOOD In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 Professor Andrew Hess (Chair) Professor John Curtis Perry Professor Sung-Yoon Lee ii Thomas J.C. Wood [email protected] Education 2005: Ph.D. Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Dissertation Formation of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy 1992-2004 Supervisor, Professor Andrew Hess. 1993: M.A.L.D. Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University 1989: B.A. in History and Politics, University of Exeter, England. Experience 08/2014-present: Associate Professor, Political Science, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC. 09/2008-07/2014: Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC. 09/2006-05/2008: Visiting Assistant Professor, Political Science, Trinity College, Hartford, CT. 02/2005 – 04/2006: Program Officer, Kyrgyzstan, International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) Washington DC 11/2000 – 06/2004: Director of Faculty Recruitment and University Relations, Civic Education Project, Washington DC. 01/1998-11/2000: Chair of Department, Program in International Relations, American University – Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. 08/1997-11/2000: Civic Education Project Visiting Faculty Fellow, American University- Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Languages Languages: Turkish (advanced), Kyrgyz (intermediate), Russian (basic), French (intermediate). iii ABSTRACT The Evolution of Kyrgyz Foreign PoliCy This empirical study, based on extensive field research, interviews with key actors, and use of Kyrgyz and Russian sources, examines the formation of a distinct foreign policy in a small Central Asian state, Kyrgyzstan, following her independence from the Soviet Union in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukraine Crisis in the Northeast-Asian Comparative Perspective (Report Under the Taiwan Fellowship-2019 for Scholars)
    Dr. Igor PILIAIEV (Kyiv, Ukraine) The Ukraine Crisis in the Northeast-Asian Comparative Perspective (Report under the Taiwan Fellowship-2019 for Scholars) There is no East, and there is no West. There is no end to the sky. There is no East, and there is no West, Father has two sons. There is no East, and there is no West, There are sunrise and sunset, There is a big word — EARTH! Olzhaz Suleymenov1 From “The Sunny Nights” collection (1962)2 INTRODUCTION In one of his latest appearances in media in the early 2017 one of America's main foreign policy strategists, Zbigniew Brzezinski, pointed out with much anxiety that "strategic insecurity is now a fact of life on a scale heretofore not experienced by the now increasingly vulnerable humanity"3. Structural shocks in the geopolitical, institutional, socio-cultural and security architectonics of the Eastern European and post-Soviet space which have occurred with epicenter in Ukraine, have sharply delimited and polarized the regional transformation and integration processes. The extreme aggravation of the Ukraine- Russia relations as a result of Euromaidan’s victory in Kyiv, followed by Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the hybrid armed conflict in Donbas4, has exposed deep 1 Olzhaz Suleymenov is National Writer of Kazakhstan, Permanent Representative of Kazakhstan to UNESCO in 2002-2018. 2 English translation made by Igor Piliaiev from the Russian original. 3 Brzezinski, Z. How To Address Strategic Insecurity In A Turbulent Age. HuffPost. January 3, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/us-china-russia- relations_us_586955dbe4b0de3a08f8e3e0?section=us_world (Last accessed: 10.10.2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H. Hawley Jr. (Richard Howard) Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION By RICHARD H. HAWLEY, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Political Science Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2011 Richard H. Hawley, Jr. defended this dissertation on August 26, 2011. The members of the supervisory committee were: Heemin Kim Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dale Smith Committee Member Charles Barrilleaux Committee Member Lee Metcalf Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my father, Richard H. Hawley, Sr. and To my mother, Catherine S. Hawley (in loving memory) iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who made this dissertation possible, and I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all of them. Above all, I thank my committee chair, Dr. Heemin Kim, for his understanding, patience, guidance, and comments. Next, I extend my appreciation to Dr. Dale Smith, a committee member and department chair, for his encouragement to me throughout all of my years as a doctoral student at the Florida State University. I am grateful for the support and feedback of my other committee members, namely Dr.
    [Show full text]