Memory Politics: the Use of the Holodomor As a Political And

CEU eTD Collection

The Use of the Holodomor as aPolitical andNationalistic Tool Ukrainein

Inpartialthe fulfillmentrequirements theoffordegree of Advisor:

NationalismStudiesProgram Central European UniversityEuropeanCentral Memory Politics: Budapest, HungaryBudapest,

Maste Jennifer BorykJennifer ProfessorMaria Kovacs Submitted to Submitted 201 r ofArtsr By

CEU eTD Collection ofacceptanceofHolodomorhinderedpolicies. Viktor Yushchenko‘s thedivergentv discusses byUkraine‘sgenocide population, wellinas as the identity,this identity. of cornerstone thesisservesof theofThis analysis asconstructionthe an usedefiningHolodomor and the as

Thethesis constructed in thediaspora,constructed in

Ukrainian addresses thestepsbyaddressestakenViktorYushchenko U in iews of historyof andiewsUkraine culturein

nationalidentity,the and victimof a creation byseeking Abstract

ternational community.thesisalso The

the recognition ofrecognitiontheasthe Holodomor

and howtheseand differences

narrativethroughthis kraine topromote CEU eTD Collection Bibliography Conclusion ChapterFour: ChapterThree: theof Holodomor………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... ChapterTwo: The Ukrainian Diaspora ChapterOne: Introduction 3.2 Ancient 3.2 Ties: The Kyiv Rus Debate………………… 2.3 UnitedThe Nations Convention theon Preve 2.2 UkrainianThe Diaspora’s Holodomor Narrative 2.1 CreationThe of a Diaspora I National Memory 1.2 Creation 1.1 Collective a of Narrative Tr The 3.1 3.1 4.3 Digging Up the Ghost theof Past: Stali 4.2 Top Down Nationalism: The Release Sovietof Documents andUkrainian the Institute of 4.1 Politicizing theHolodomor: Legislation Under Viktor Yushchenko 3.1.4 The 3.1.3 Ukrainization…………… 3.1.2 The 3.1.1 The Soviet and 3.2.3 The Kyiv Rus: 3.2.2 The Kyiv Rus: The 3.2.1 The Kyiv Rus: Russophileand Trauma Narratives: Genocideas Culture, Culture as Identity

History as Politics inUkraine ials of Nation Building

......

...... Eastern Slavic School Ukrainophile School The National Identity Formula The Long Histo

...... riography and Political Parties of Ukraine asan IndependentState Eastern SlavicSchool Shadow of the Holodomor RussophileSchool Ukrainophile School

...... ………………………… ...... dentity …………………… ………………………

...... Table Table Contentsof

......

Soviet School ......

...... s

: Navigating:

...... n’s Tri ………………………………………………………………………………38

…………………………………………………………………………….39 and their Cla ……………………

...... n ...... al……………………………………………………………………..60 ………………………………………………..…………………….

tion and Punishment Genocideof and the Case ...... s

and the

...... the Middle……………… ...... im of Separateness…………………………. 43

“Slavic Brotherhood………………………

………… ......

...... ………………………………………….41 ......

...... ………………………… ......

...... …. …. 45 . . 42 28

43 69 64 57 5 4 37 36 3 24 19 18 15 11 1

1 7 3 0 3 1

CEU eTD Collection January 2011). Ukraine Home Page debrispile of before him grows skyward. storm This we what call is progress.‖ close them. storm This irresistibly propels him into the future whichto his back is turned, blowing from paradise; it has got caught hisin wings such with violence that the angel can no longer The angel would like to stay, awake t he sees a single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage uponwreckage hurls and in front of his feet. pictures the angel history. of His face is turned toward the past. Where weperceive achain of events, fixedly contemplating. His eyes are staring, mouth his open,is his wings are spread. This Angelus Novus shows an angel looking though as heis about to move away from something heis November ev the stability. bu Ukrainians a defeat his historicalnationalcreating astarted memory with hiselectio Inthebe.to wantof UkraineYushchenko‘s case thisViktor andprocess administration,of processweThrough this define towho seek seizeduponmorewithotherssome arevigor than weisprogress.‖ironically,call ―what past the towards ofNovusthe forcetimetotransforming strugglesAngeluskeepitsto who bodyturned ent as genocide as ent ilding processwouldpropelilding the county 2 1 hisIn He urgedHe Ukrainians

2 Viktor Yushchenko ―President Yushchenko‘s Speech Dedicated to Holodomor,‖the Walter Benjamin

Yushchenkobelieved in2010 early , but also a questionalsobutamoral responsibility.of , 2008, Victor Yushchenko spokeunveilingof2008,theVictoratvictims Yushchenkothe memorial a toof

distinctive

IXontheThesisPhilosophyHistoryof ,

whileviolently changehim dragsBenjamin,storm,Thiswrites forward. ,

, whichheconsidered a http://www.wumag.kiev.ua/index2.php?param=pgs20074/14

identity throughidentityhistoricalnarrative, claiming nationthatthis He He ‘s IX‘s Thesis on Philosophythe history of states: ―A paintingKlee named usedinterpretationof an

to come to terms withto totermspast its come throught recognizing

he dead, he dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But astorm is citizenr 1

Introduction Eventsremembered are exactlynotthey happened; as

vitalpartof Ukrainian y forward toprogressforwarderaofnational an and weweare,wherehave from, come the Holodomorwasthe onlynotpressing a issue for 1

whilesomeareconsigne , WalterBenjamincompares the ever

Ukrainianhistory

as president,as

national he acceptance ofhethis acceptance

that

identity. Onidentity.

an d to oblivion.to d

sought (accessed 11 dendedwith and what wewhat and

is is how one

while the to giveto 26

CEU eTD Collection became areas experienced long periods Russian of and Soviet Rule. Ukrainians and Cossacks these in regions famine 1932 in Romania. Western Ukraine, where majoritythe Ukrainian of peasants resided, did experiencenot Volhynia were part Poland,of Trans Hungarian Empire before World War I. Between World War I Vinnytisia and Zhytomyr.Galicia Bukovina The center is defined as Cherkassy, Chernihiv, Kheemlnytsky, Kyiv, Kirovograd, Poltava, Sumy, Kharkiv, Luhansk andZaporizhzhia. The south definedis Crimea, as Kherson, Myk Trans Western Ukraine StudiesAsia http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/index.php?id=148&listid=78961 November 19,2008,‖ genocide.not but diversityofthethe accounts forcountry has th underfaltered Ukrainian citizens understandtohow,thisinis essentialHolodomor attempt memory,createthis to many nationbuildingandmemory oftenconstructions,are complexof layers. consisting multipleIt buildingexperimentnationUkraine,in often of dismissingpolicies.critics hisCollective Nevertheless,Yushchenkopushedtheforremembrancethe Holodomor of parthis as unifytothepopulationofattempt replaythroughoutdifferentinpresidentwould term his ascities allUkraineoverof parthis as liescannotpeople, p consolidate onlypastasour toadministration‘smemory. thisstated, efforts create He HolodomortheKharkiv,oneinmostofthe affected taken severaltakenstepsto - Carpathian Region and Volhynia. Eastern Ukraine is defined Dnepropetrovsk, as Donetsk,

4 3 Ukr culturally andlinguistically

Ivan Katchanovski, ―The Politics of Soviet andNazi Genocide Orangein Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, ―Speech given unveiling at the of Holodomor Memorial in Kharkiv,‖

aine 62, no. 6 (August 2010): 975. - 33 andwere un not ‘shistories

is is defined the as areas Galicia, of Ivano the truth will helpusthe truthand consolidate will e Yushchenkoadministration.Thepresident,e current Yanuchovych

cameintonarrativethiswith conflict Ukrainian Radio Webpage,

reverseYushchenko‘s

and thepeoples

der Soviet rule until 1939.In the east and south Ukraine, of these stating instatingspeechgiven athe to eople. Wegivehavetoupthehistorical fear.‖ assimilated to the Russian population. - Carpathia belonged Czechoslovakia to and Bukovina waspartof thecountry

‘s population,‘s and Carptho

of behind thebehind 2

Ukraine

policies - -

areas Ukraine wereUkraine ruled Frankovsk, Lviv, andTernopol, Bukovina, (accessed 3 October 2010). build the future. Thebuildtruthuniteswise thefuture. and view and , are

and whythisand memo throughpromoting formation “ and World War II, Galicia and

of the famines Wegettotothe aretruthof know

sordid and oftensordidandconflicting. s theHolodomortragedyas as European

ViktorYanuchovych a Holodomornarrativea by the Austro ,

as parthisasof U nion an identity thatidentityan rybuilding olaiv andOdessa.

Thisscene

Parliament - “Europe , - .

CEU eTD Collection http://www.ukrainebusiness.com.ua/news/1432.html thismemorynationbuildingthat andcreated directly i recognitionpromotetoHolodomorthe andof the a NationalistMovementUkrainian thatincluded controversial fig Ukraine administrationYushchenko‘s endeavorednationestablishbuildingto a policybasedon policiesratherbelongedhis administration‘stoof realm symbolic the identitypolitics. theUkrareforming election.ViktorYushchenkonew wonthe second platform election runoff onof the SupremeUkrainianCourtdeclar RevolutionOrange ofdissatisfactionUkrainianpoliticians,international organizations withinmassprotestagainstfirstthesystem electoral corruption independence. since runoff betweenpresidential electionViktorYushchen OrangeRevolution, popular2004.The emergingvoterdiscontent againstfraudfrom the in The Trials of differencesthehistoricalwithin country. unifyingcreatingUkrainiannational abecausenarrative political, of the cultural bewilltheresearchYushchenko role, administration‘sand Yushchenko‘s that (March nternationalcommunity. theHolodomor - 6 5 developingprospectsUkraine‘sasociety for functionaldemocratic seemed brightin April April 2005): 35

as directofsoleasdescendentthe and medieval ―Viktor Ya Adrian Karatnycky, ―Ukraine‘s Orange Revolution,‖

policiesthattosought consider the Nation Building nukovych‘s Speech to PACE April 27 2010

inianespeciallytackling state,However, andmuch crime corruption. of protests was―collective atragedyof thepeopleSoviet

- 52. Manyofpolicies these wer

, serve

ing theingoutcome d as a catalystd as a

for change.forinevitablyThis

(accessed 3 October 2010). ofruntheofffirst to be invalid, calling a for Hol s

genocideUkrainein e divisive within Ukrainedivisivewithine affected the politicsaffected the koViktorYanukovych,the andwas odomor KyivstateRus For ,‖ breakdown Ukrainian Business

eign Affairs genocide. ures such as StepansuchuresBandera, as , , ‖

5 and voter and

thus rejectingthus ,

to reinterpretto oft

Theoffocusthis

84 no.2 and

andof climate the his

resulted in the inresulted

to theto processof , . Theschisms. ,

illustrated byillustrated ,

and 6 the

The CEU eTD Collection against those who have initially imposed them.‖ have used them, disguise to themselves so as pervertto them, invert meaning,their andredirect them ― Interviews howtheconstructionunderstand nationalof aidentity throughgovernmentrelates to policies theUkr where orderinbettertoUkraineYushchenkohas administration understandwhere from come and administration. government, whichsi new has thebuildHolodomorremembranceand aaddress collective havebeen may undonebythe definetoitselfinternallyininternationalstrugglesand the Yushchenko‘stoarena, work why tobut failed, YanukovychTymoshenko.andViktor Yulia receiving2010, percentfiveonly thedeemedpopulationlegitimateof tried onthebasisof followers that collective identity.‖ whenespeciallythere are tensionsother either withbygroupsleaders or efforts tomobilize demarcatedgroupclearlynotis given by simplytradit pastsperceived conflictother,ofverybeing witheach―the a of sense member coherent a and groupsthatmay amongidentity have not homogenous historical a past, especially iftheir In country. The success of history belongs those who to are capable of seizing these rules, to replace those who

Ukrainian tonational establishbyusing anarrative only principlessegment certain thata specific 8 7 thisonmethodinadopteditThe centers First,relevant thesis is twoideas. to Yushchenko

Michel Foucault Craig Calhoun, , (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 197 Nationalism, seize ainian

citizens did notdidcitizens ―fal Itis important, however, todiscussthis ofconstruction memory duringthe certainrules

declined

state Nationalism , Craig CalhounspeakstheCraigdifficulty about of cr Language Counter may headmay theinfuture. to consider

delinedofthemuchnation building agenda setbythe previous , 8

as MichelasFoucault it, explainsques of the ballotsof the thein , (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997), 32. l in line‖inlpolicies.supporttothese . Viktor

cultural and regiandcultural - Memory and Practice: Selected Essays and Yushchenko was readilyvotedYushchenkoofwas out

Although 7). 4

primaryhis electionagainsttworivals, ion Yushchenko‘s adminiYushchenko‘s , onal differencesonalthein

but raisedbut certainincontext tionsremain still While UkraineWhile eatingnationala stration tried,stration

country, and

officein

— on CEU eTD Collection History Politics of Commemoration Hungary in Romania Slovakia,‖ and 19, no.2 (April 1996): 411 Rogerssee Brubaker, ―Nationalizing State the Studies Press, 2002), 204 groupparticularbecausetheir of social This conceptstructures. often laws,nationalpolitics, andcelebrations economy. principles politicalrights,wellsocialshared andallegiancespolitical as ascertainsocial to and nationali nationalism, genocide theirtraumaticpastwith through Yushchenko‘shewith administrationUkraine‘s asurged diverse toterms citizenryto come manipul are constructedpoliciesby arestate institutions throughthe national integration.‖national HarasynivnationBohdanb defines government understandtopoliciesimportant suchdeliberately how are historyofaitthe territory(Ukraine)and ,

orEth class cleavages. 44, no 10 9 Rogers

sm Bohdan Harasymiw

. For further discussion regarding the construction memory of and eastern in central Europe ,

Civic nationalism reflectsnationalismCivic

and isand

ate ‘s or while civic nationalismseen isa more as .4 (October 2002): 700

use of nationuseof building.his In work d,evolving onethatcultivates Brubakerthatcontendspost

linkedliberalism,todemocracy

Workingconcept, thisonewithin delvemust how further intothese - 05. - 437 andRogers Brubaker and

to suitprocessThisspecificpurposes.to continued escalated and

, Post , Post Communist Ukraine nicnationalism,ornationalismbased upontheelevationof a

dismisses cultural

a crossa culturalbasedupon blending th Holodomor - 744. uildingasof ―thepoliciespromotedesignatedto sum

a top downtopd a

thatstrifethatmay smulti which a

characteristics, promotescharacteristics,identitynational based a in the New Oldand Europe,‖ - Sovietdevelopcountries ethni

remembranceof andthis acceptance account as 5 -

ethnic composition. Second,composition.ethnicit equally is state , Post isseminationofprinciples regarding

and creationstableandof ainfrastructure and , (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Margit

- agrees uponthroughagreesunifieduse of the ― Communist Ukraine Communist westernized employed throughemployed the

Feischmidt be presentbe Comparative Studies Societyin and ,

and howtheseand constructions ‖

mode , ―1848 1994: in The , Ethnic andRacial Studies causedbyethnic, e notion ofe equally notion l , politicalscientist, c rather thancivicrather c . 10

Civic ,

CEU eTD Collection morals, customs, history and the legitimate for claims ethnic of groups with national aspirations. elaborated on ethnic nationalism. He discusses the use common of territory, descent, langua ―nationalist goals‖ based on distinctiveness their as a culture. The Marxist Otto BauerVon further identity essential is distinin Herder believed that culture wastied to the language, history and traditions of a group. This cultural strugglesw Internal ancreates atmosphere buildingprocess.maynation state The tosimplistic choose narration developa thewithHolodomor, astimes, more complex arecontroversial and disagreementsthese center aroundthe interpretation ofhistories theoverdisagreements principles chosencontemporary in politics politicalfulfill needs. inevi ofdevelopment nationalism. civic pluralism postinconcepts miredisdisagreementsbuildingin between groups.Overlapping identities and competing others thereonlyparadigms, as people are particular thator events thegroup.of ofnationalism th on tably usedoftothetablygoal justifying fulfill stateofthe existencea e prominente to fulfilltonati a 11 narrativesVictimization difficultto are nationaloftenasof accept story partaand whetheritbuildinginnationalism,History,employedethnic iscivic or whetherisitorAnysomewhat civicethnic,nationalism, consistsofartificial

Johann GottfriedJohann Herder defined the theory ethnic of nationalism the of late 18 primarily

tenemploysthe construction - Sovietmay Ukraine

group‘s language,group‘sreligion

ithinmulti a based onbased

onalidentity

This refashioningThisofideas ofdistrustrifts furthersociety,in and guishing groups from one another. Each group is free pursue to region

- ethnic . In . al and linguistical and

have Ukraine‘smulti society

caused thestat caused

of an identity groundedidentityof anthe in ,

a ndterritorialhistory. 6

lead tolead ,

based differences, - ethnic

the clashing oftheclashinghistorical narratives on a e‘s weakness,thus e‘s creating ethnic

contentious ratherthan creating accord. society, deemedare .

and further hinderingandthe further

and society,andespecially if ,

11 and

, the

Thistypeof and is manipulatedisandto

can past process ofnationprocess

as bet as continuous historycontinuous

further damagefurther a ,

sheds

or both, ter suitedthan ,

which th

century.

lighton ge,

CEU eTD Collection Editions scientifiques Internationales, 2007). StudiesAsia wh alongthemselves territorialandlines. linguistic nationalof aversions how proces thisinto thehistoryterritoryunderstand of the that provide divergent takestandaontheto firmissue. sensitivityextremeand antagoni thatYushchenko‘sclaimUkraine, communityinternationala as tentativeitsandacceptance genocide.T as concurrence.However,generalnotis this the Holodomorcasenarrativeof the Ukraine, in supposednarrativesbeNationalto simplistic, are or most all whereas of thecitizenryin is thesewhen wantidentifytowiththatnot narrativepaints a less than aofflatteringpicture victimization, withty this arise moralspresentthe toandoutsideworld recognitioninternationaltheeventgenocide. of their as norms,symbols use They cultural ofto cultivatesenseunders as bestform the commemorationand efforts. o ,

Ukrainianscholarship a in westerninUkraine 13 12 s

a goodofmultipleathesean example

See Stephen Shulman, ―The Contours of Civic and Ethnic Identification Ukraine,‖in political and socialpoliticalandsituation

identities are 56, no.1 (Jan 2004):39. ulationproduce to Collective Traumas: M sofnationbuilding duringt pe of pe

identityUkraine.in narrative; ,

supposed to lionizetostruggleovercomingsupposedand the of grea is considerednational a that combatedoccupation hero Soviet and 12 ndpoliticalparties valid tanding oftandingtraumatic amay eventand furtherfor call

Theoftraumause tool asnationnecessarilybuilding ais not

a collectivenarrative.a typeWith thisofnarrative, groupstry sm onbehalfofRussia sm however, as evident inHolodomorhowever, as the evident Furthermore,this

emories Warof andConflict 20 in

the claim ofgenocideclaim s Holodomorrecognizedgenocide beprovoked as

that center

N encompasses presentencompassesUkraine, day his narrativehisnotmay bydeveloping identity this he arratives,norms social d conflictingHolodomortomemory. claims Yushchenko 7

is crucial, Anisof the legacyStepan example Bandera,

on territoriallinguisticon anddivides narrative

either , and many o many , and

as they havethey as

administration . Intheofparticular. case clashedinternally.

be acceptedbythe th ,

Century Europe and historiesand often align ther statestherwere . 13

shaped their owntheir shaped example,

Severalissuesmay , an assessment ofassessmentan and to delvetoand

Ukraine‘s citizens maycitizens t odds.t , (Brussels: Europe reluctant , To

CEU eTD Collection (Budapest: CEU Press, 2008). disproportionate the perpetratedregime.bygenocide Stalin‗s theasinternationalrecognizingworkingwellto convince ofcommunityHolodomor as the Bandera‗s UkrainiannationaladiasporaThisidentity. of role significant hadpromoting in a Stepan administration.Yushchenko‘s oftheofconstruction UkrainianHolodomordiscussion identityu the and schoolsreferenceinthesetoof the thr that all rejectsthebothUkrainophile,school Russophile theisand Empire (Ruspeople Slavic hist other thatmigratedUkrainians and westwardcre birthright connectionbetweenthe Slavicpeoples wh Eastern and (9 differencesthe and Marples David Nazicollaboratortraitor.aand i anfought for th - diaspora 13 th , 14 provesUkrainianbealsotodiasporatheinThe a discussionof factor the emergence

and laterand theinSovie centuries) hascenturies) ledpoliticalto also and

oriographyschools contend . While someconsiderthe While . David Marples, principle component ee groupsdevelopedside byee side promotionUkrainian asnat a , believeth ndependentUkraine.I

hasfocusedextensively

languagepoliciesthatdogivenot sian, Belarusian among

eir policieseirnationalisticpromotes Ukrainian a including agenda, Heroes and Villains: Creating National History in Contemporary Ukraine,

his legacy his

t Union. The connection betweenUnion.Thetheconnection threegroups naturalt is

There has beenTherehasinto extensivescholarship ofanSlavicbrotherhood ―Eastern , KyivstateRus

and Ukrainian).andT ofinheritancetheKyiv Rus neasternandUkraine, Bandera southernperceived is as

thatthewasKyivRusof the cradlethreeEastern all in

ionalhero onthedivergentviewsof this controversial figure Ukraine Opponents the to ated theatedGalicia ,

and thereforeshareand

8 schola

. , 14

and , theKyiv, Rus

will bewilloutlined laterstarting aspoint a for Russian

The genesis storyofgenesistheThe KyivRus rlydebatetheincountry his legacyhis thein continuedRussian Soviet School Soviet ich

groupthe is - workUkrainianof nationalists and

VolynianStates (1199 thestatusoflanguagea state a history.a passeddownto ethnic - ethnic Ukrainianas link,ethnic ,‖ someclaim.,‖ s claims ― just nder Viktornder Bandera‘ Thedifferingviews ‖ ,

heir tothis and ; specifically ;

Yet believes - 1349), 1349), s legacy. ,

another

CEU eTD Collection a asintersectingidentitieswell that narratives. identitytheUkrainianco and underidentitynational bringi nationalism, an whileassert,defineintendingmany to whichoccur 2010, Holocaust a hi namelycountry‘sinhabitants,Russianspeakers,the other moreonfocusedintently using t KuchmaLeonidandinitiated both ofnationalcreation memory Ukraine.EarlierUkrainian prewithin notthis the intentis ofthesisto thatViktor claimwas the for solelyresponsible Yushchenko buildingprojectnation ongenocideHolodomoras centering the country the o promoteUkrainiano identity a bout howstoriesbouttheseshouldthe intonation fit building project. Holodomor story of themultistoryof ng the varioustogetherundernarrative.groups the one ng The of casesSpecific , The collectivegroupsthewithinmodern Ukrainian territoryhave also .

conclus the Theofpointthelast focal

Law( d an

Ukrainian red shortlyred before -

ion williononfocuswhypolicies thesenotdid tran 2006 ethnic state ethnic "us versus them" m "us Yushchenko ) Viktor ,

and laterattemptstoofdenialthe criminalizedthe InstituteofNational Memory,t and mplexitiesoftheseuse surrounding differentthe identifying

. , includingHolodomorremembrance, policies thatwerepolicies Yus

giverisetoofmultitude historical anarratives

programscreatingnationalaimed atanarrative Ukraine in . hchenko‘s

Yushchenko Itislook criticaltothese at differentof components

Ukraine chapter willchapterthespecificYushchenko‘s concern case of entalityrelationsstrained

9 , harden, projects

seen asUkrainians favoringethnic against lost the electionprimarylost ed identities ed for discussionfor

rather thanthe focusingsharedon heStalinJosefTrial inof

ofthe in Ukrainein

sidents . slatebuildingin this Theuseof ethnic . Yushchenko,how . includethe Ukrainian peasantry. ItUkrainianpeasantry. LeonidKravchuk . Thesepolicies, . ,

rather than Holodomor ,

and ideas creation ofcreation separate,as ever,

and

CEU eTD Collection Construction of National Identity, sharedtraumanarrative.aof as chaThe partasnarrativeof the creation of this an group, toothersindividual seeksthat findshare theseunites common characteristics thata them into c defining ofpartourthemnature. asessential These identitiesidentity. literallynotourimprinted into are genes,however ofdothink we nationalthe whichworld, cultureintoborn we the one areprinciple of are sources of cultural define themselvesinternallywellto as as exte historylegitimizesofspecific group‘s a existence use ofOnethe mostindividuals. aspectsthein important group‘saculture,expresses history language, culture istheandin essential media.politicaland institutions, the nationalmanifestedcollective.belongingisThisto a

of historicalofgroups rallyingtoas eventspointide a express for their . Theofmolding. nat a 16 15 discusswillThis chapter the stronglyisidentitytoNationalindividual‘sperception tied an ofor him herself as pter willpter alsoserveindiscusstothe problemsbasedon creatingidentity anlegacy a

doften,expresses whoonlynotthey Ruth Wodak, Rudolf De Cill Stuart Hall,Stuart haracteristicwhoof Chapter One:

Modernity and its Futures construction ionalcharacterdown‖ involvesapolicies ―topcreationthat of

a personais

(Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press, 2009), 29.

of a societyofathatshares values,the same histories, and ‖ 15 ia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart, eds., forging 16 The

Nationalidentity,oftenistimes, shapedby the stat

identity This in referenceintoparticular a group orientation National Identity ― of collective memory and the useofandof collective memorythe a trauma . (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), 291. essentialnature , 10 rnally.AsStuart

are and territorialandthelikeness legacy throughof as it isitinasused forming

but also whotheybut also and throughtheir and formation and perpetuatedand bysocialpractices, ‖

of theindividualof often isa Hallremarks,

ofidentitynationalthe ais Formula

history,groupsareable are notare

a ntification state‘s ―oneness

The Discursive ―

In the modernIn the

. The useThe . . The . e, ‖

CEU eTD Collection University Press, 198 Crossmedia GmbH & Co. KG,2009), 80. Memory,‖ factbook/geos/up.html stepsbethatmustcertaintaken c to exception.not an thattogroup.belong legitimization outsiders.to present remindersofconstant traditionThis is thisincommemorationprocess the is―inventionof tradition thepertainspresentationcommemorationof to a politicalandto cultural need iseventhistoricalboundstaynotto stagnant;instead, it is continuouslychanging according Belarusian,Polish,Tartar, CrimeanBulgarian,Hungarian Jewish, Romanian. and withremaining the Russians, percentof 5 consisting makeup intoSovietthe incorporationUnion1922 in occupiedandPolish,overtaken Habsburg by the con 1.1 sequences. Creation of Collectivea Narrative 19 18 17 part times,theindividualmayOften giveofup theirwhole memory to the As historicalCollectivenarrative nationbuildingand political, have social

ofthe78percent consistsof country 17percentUkrainianand ethnic ethnic

Eri Mitchell Ash, ―Historical Scholarship: Politics of the Publi CIA Factbook, World ―Ukrai Justice andJustice Memory, with c Hobsbawm and Terrance Ranger, of thesocialof group basedo Throughoutitshistory,theterritory beenUkraine has of continuously

developed historymemory,andtheofconstruction narrative national aon base a Collectivememorycreationa is process. W 3).

Thissocialpositioning ensures

(accessed 28 Group memoryGroupcreation is in essentialnation building,Ukraine is a and

the origins oforiginsgroupthisthe through as set ofthroughasritualsset commemoration and s

. Ruth Wodak andGertraud Auer Borea, eds. (Vienna: Manz

Anofpartthe essentialprocessnation building November 2010 reatethis memory ne,‖

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the nits connec . Accordingthethe2001ethnic to census, The Invention Traditionof

11 ,

and creates a positioningand a creates the for

). ,

unifiedbynarrativestate the

and Russianempires and certain ethnic tionthewithpast. . As Maurice HalbwachsAsMauriceasserts, ―there .

continuity groupsidentifying asthemselves , ‖ as Eric‖suggests. asHobsbawm ith all processes,ithdenotesthis all c Past and (Semi) Private , (Cambridge: Cambridge , ,

and insenseand a prioritsto

sthatserveas . The first . ,

and cultural group and - , world 17

as toas

the to - 19

CEU eTD Collection Current Problems Ukrainian of Historiography,‖ 16. The Politics National of Identity, National Identity, Memory glories andoftrauma, the Ukrainianpeople. ofacreation collective narrative marginalization ― history becomeindependentto ansought Soviet relaytothesethecommunicationwithpast. ideas partAcollectivefundamentalof memory. this the collectiveaisuse memory societyofof natiofaexperiences shareaThesewhich common experience.of experiencesintocommon agroupthe overlap existing pre groupsare consciousness astheir well culture. narrativespersonal thesadapt and ofsenserediscovery memorytimepassesis a asof is theto andforindividual essential create stateless nation stateless

, s 24 23 22 21 20 memorybelievedhistoryHalbwachs and continuouslyforpeopleevolvegroup of a C 21

tates, thetates, ―rediscoverybeganthewithreferendumprocess‖1991 in and thefulfillmentandofreferendum thisbe a would fi (Chicago: University Chicago of Press, 1992). cultural patterns, linguisticpatterns,culturaldiscourses

hoice of grouporientationofhoice is uponthe contingentgroup‘s system,heritage, value and

Serhil M. Plokhy, History ―The of a ―Non Maurice Halbwachs, John R.Gillis, ―Memory Identity: and HistoryThe of a Relationship,‖ David Lowenthal, ―Identity, Heritage and History,‖ For Further discussion on collective memory to refer Maurice Halbwachs, Thisofpointreference cultural valuesculturaland agendastheirof andor historical ―place,‖ sense . - structuredbecausemethese B ,

,‖ John R. and trauma.and y positioning the group, memory becomesgroup,ypositioningmemorythe

achievinglegitimateasrecognition a on.beorderrecreated Historygroupcan tofulfill byin a use of the

Gillis, Gillis, ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 50. 24 On Collective Memory

ed. R.John Gillis, ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994) Alongthisofwiththecreationstate came the the needfor ,

offerstheoutsider theinto lookdynamics a of t and to discovertoand thepa e narrativeseintoto largera fit collective narrative.‖ state . Ukraine moriesbythis are asserted collective which

Slavic Review 12 ,

and setsocialandpractices.

hadbeendeprivedofof ―state‖ mostits a for Historical‖ Nation: Notes on the Nature and 23 .

ForUkrainia strectifytothatsoughtdiscrepancies, country Commemorations: ThePolitics of

54, no. 3(Autumn 1995): 711. nalin chapterl a political.

after yearsafterstruggle, of ns,with as many former Memorybycreation 22

Commemorations: ,

onghistory as as Ukrainiansas On Collective

hegroup 20

has

as a , CEU eTD Collection http://www.economist.com/node/482463(accessed Ukraine. anthem the of 1862 by national anthem‘s lyrics were slightly modified after independence 1991.in The poem was written in Republic The national flag (blue and yellow) was of (accessed 04 May 2011). thediaspora.Theexpectationin waswouldaccomplishsame this theobjectiveonce newly a ofgen act beto intendedHolodomorremembrancewas independence. believedversion diaspora theirof thetoUkrainianflagofstate.ideals new express theseof the statues Ukrainianstateof1991ininceptionthe goalachievingisof throughthis commemorations. public presentthe past andis practicescommemorativeintegrated into are everyday culture. seekinginpast.thisselectiveout negotiatednorms are the throughinconstruction for search whenespeciallythere istransitionoppress an a from needs.culturalpolitical, andThe statethisresponsible is creating for memory framework, relatedbeits institutions,mustdestroyedor m

thatglorified 28 27 26 25 accountwellof aOn orderfornewIn a collective memorybetoold implemented, the memory

Pavlo Chubynsky . The

―Ukraine‘s Bitter D ―Ukrainian Symbols Ruth Wodak al., et HobsbawmEric and Terranc ocide. Thi ocide. Ukrainian People's Republic flag was officially restored 1992in fo 28

Oneof theessentialpiecesof thecollective identity the createdin diaspora s createda

the Soviet Union the Soviet supposed

, a prominent, ethnographer from Kyiv. song The was The Discursive Construction of National Identity. iaspora,‖ (18 January 2001) , - ‖ established Ukrainianestablisheddiasporapopulation, Ukrainiansthein

Dompalov Travelling sense ofsensenationalism, identity, ethnic and homogeneity cultural

to createto 25

historytransferwould easilytheto newafter state

Afterthepronouncementof narrative what the these is, e Ranger, , the rewriting, the o ficially adopted 1918in during the

and later reinstated as the national throughtherenamingofstreets and

a continuumsocietyathe for The Invention Tradition.of seeking out recognitionseekingout 13 odified,tothe fulfill country

03 March 2011).

llowing Ukrainian independence , http://www.dompavlov.com/ iveregimetoopen an society. The Economist, f therestatingnationalf anthem,the and This processThisstarted the with a usable pastusable ahighly and are 27

Thisbetweenthe connection .

of the

Theeffectiveway most

Ukrainian People's anthem post in

first the national 's curre

Holodomor as Holodomor tearingdownof symbols.htm, . UkrainThe ,

nt social,nt along withalong Cultural - Soviet e

an CEU eTD Collection January 2011). Ukraine understandtoattempting oridentity, itsidentities withininterruption ― asserted ofeventthedefiningHolodomor is thecenter at ofof thestruggle disturbance representusedtodisruptiontheYushchenkoHolodomor a Ukrainianin history. injusticesthathistoricalthroughout history. occurred their diaspora. stateonewasUkrainian importanttheof objectivesmost of nation abuilding the forproject Ukrainianofthe undersufferingpeople rule. this the of Furthermore, an creation independent historyUkrainianaid to intotalitarian exposing nationalism.Thecivicdiasporaworked to elevateto event thiscentralwithinstation a ofthe creationimpeded nationalism. civicTherenot aUkrainian was freeto statethis create need(orethnicity the what tomeantitbe definetous Ukrainian), the ―backbone‖ executed Ukrainewasindependent established. Ukrainianofwaylife 30 29

Home Page Theofth creation thattheHolodomorwasby occupyregimethatto caused sought a eradi and

policies Ibid. Viktor Yushchenko, ―President Yushchenko‘s Speech Dedicated to Holodomor,‖the

ceased ofthe

that would leadthethattoofwould eradicationthepeasantry,group viewed a the as

Ukrainiandiaspora‘snation.notionnationalismSincethe of arose from , develop the citizenry‘s http://www.wumag.kiev.ua/index2.php?param=pgs20074/14

, ‖

and symbolizes the destructionsymbolizesthe andofthe Ukrainian nation. is historical processwayhistoricalis a isthat amay societywork through ment

ofUkrainedemocr as a history was anewhistorywas challengethe for Josef Stalinof accusedpurposefully was planning an 14 policiesSovietofthe Union, the and

, as thecase, asturned atic andatic freebelievedHe country. t Similarthetodiaspora, theUkrainianHepeople. out toout be. e ofethnice aligning

state that wasthat

(accessed 11

29 30

This President This catethe d he CEU eTD Collection df http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/201/articles/89NoraLieuxIntroRepr groupUkraine. inusingnarrative Bystandards,cultural establishedgroup retain a sense can a existing thattheariseinofmemorynation building development processes. commemorationhistoryandpoliticalgain. forPierreNoradiscusses thepoliticsinevitable of legitimacy narrative‘s pacefervent solacethosetothatweregivesof part the collective tragedy. theinpublic‘spressureputsclaimmind,onthose held responsible, be that could a and thistragedythatis ofimportantpart anThis group‘s narrative. a historical thekeeps transfer alsostrivesmemoryt tragicof amemory event willensuretoits alivenot uphistory's inPost endoubliette. Itisforums.importantand an of partgroupsseeking memorialization any keep for the to thatremovedisgenerationthe e from postortransfer, orderinunderstandtomemoryoutsiders represented howtheisduring certain era. aThis group,bothimportantvictimsofis the memory the for of tofindrepresentations fittinghard helpto preserve generations. themfor future blocks group'sTraumaticofpast events aoften national arecomplicateduse as to building narrative 1.2

(accessed 11April 2011). wirkungsgeschitchte

Trauma NarrativesTrauma that create 32 31 Viktor cultural norms,cultural(mostly constructed thewithinUkrainiandiaspora), to establish a

Pierre Pascale R.Bos, ―Adopted Memory,‖

duringpresidencyhis Yushchenko

Nora - memory,passing facilitatesonof athe survivor‘s toexperience another

difficulties , Between Memory andHistory: Les Leuix de Memoire,

obringreconciliationthe eventand to acknowledgementbythe public

and accused the YushchenkoandofHolodomorthe accusedusing administration , or theposition, or andthatthe functionplaysthetraumainto collective

contin : ofhowto

Genocide Culture,as Culture as Identity ued the processofthe ued creating a . Groups withinGroupsUkraine questioned. the Holodomor ventitselfthroughrecognition, public commemoration,

expresstheseinevents I a context. cultural Diaspora Diaspora and Memory, 15

their descendants,their presentto and to 31

trauma narrativetrauma no.13 (2006):100 32

Thismemorytheused

This creation at a moreat a esentations.p - 01. t ist also

- lso CEU eTD Collection Slovakia." Memory,‖ f storiesareNational supposedto Jie group. celebrate a duringYushchenko‘sadministrationUkraine because manyitnegative consideredhistory. a populationthe convincingofthe event‘simportance. Theconnectionthis atkey all. usableto creating collective past laythe success in of thepastmaythat actuallywith conflict into come this ortheremay memory, no be pastofwillconstruction ainto automatically every fit citizen‘smemory. groups processofarestillandthe in post intrue do ofpast,parttheorevent isrecenttoo too away theeventsoccurrence, far or fromtheevent ittothisappropriatenot findvarious commemoratefor trauma reasons. The ofproximity the thethusprocessepisode, o oftenbackfire, project especially ifthereviewpointsofare severalhistoricalthe same narrative,nationalcreatingthesebut a collective inthat arenation memoriesusedbuilding a needs. packages andselects historical materialsthatarepolitical relevantcurrent for and cultural societyalookimportantto forthe at legitimacyhistoricalofthroughwhether anarrative, itinvolvesor trauman romaan ―heroic‖to ― es not fit intonotnationales this fitnarrative some for This thecountry. be within especially may 33 in a 35 34 33 ofth use The theseSometimes constructsmisrepresented donot are andorindividualswith agree

This wasThisimportant to establishUkr for

Brubaker et al, Ibid. Mitchell Ash, ―Historical Scholarship: Politics of the Public Past and (Semi) Private Justice andJustice Memory,

- certainItdangerousissociety. forthenarrative‘sarchitects that the toassume SovietsuchUkraine,that countries,haverecentlyasonly been independent made

e Holodomorasofepart athis central fueled narrativecontroversy within

innocent victiminnocentnarrative "1848 "1848 1998:in The Politics Commemoration of Hungary,in Romania, and f integrationf may actuallydisintegration.tolead

discoveringidentitiestheir 86.

actual

eventmayithaveoccurred; as instead, 16 aine in thepost aine in ‖

in theofin collective creationmemory in 35 -

HyunsignificantnotesLima shift as a statas a - Soviettorespects erain e.

Onemust assume 34 ot.

Societies maySocieties

Itbecomesless

society CEU eTD Collection StudiesAsia Assmann Sebastian and Conrad, eds., (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) Global Accountability policies.andabusesrights advocatingUkrainiansbehind fortheCurtainIronby the Soviethuman exposing Union‘s theinternationalth in community campaignorganized historynationalist nationalism.‖ ―crude ledthetodevelopmentofhistories, Ukrainiancleavagessociety within the torise andof a Yushchenkoadministration‘softhe lacknegotiating, or acknowledginggroups‘other historicaldemonsown thatwouldtheirpaintthem the perpetrators.Some as cr the ofgenocidebyacknowledgement international the documents through community such as identities,thetheirpost especiallyin notionThisdecades.recentof hasvictimhood prevalent morebecome as nations construct United Nations DeclarationUnitedNationsof Rights, Human 37 36 nextdiscusses chapterTheoftherole Jie Stephen Shulman, ―The Contours of Civic and Ethnic Identification Ukraine,‖in - 56, no.1 (January 2004) Hyun Lim,‖ Victimhood Nationalism Contested in Memories: National Mourning and

and implementationand of , , 37

‖ the

Memory in a Global Age: Discourses, Practice

diaspora

: populationwasrecognition togainof able the

39. concentrated - Soviet space.

Holodomor thethediasporaincreation 17

on this victimthisnarrative on or because a state may not wantbecausenotstate atoormay face 36

This mayThisby be caused

identity. Throughidentity. highly executinga s, andTrajectories ,

138. ,

of a Ukrainianof a as wellasas

the iticsthat felt Holodomor , Aleida Europe -

CEU eTD Collection Cosmopolitanism Pastin and Present, Cosmopolitanism Pastin and Present policiesactions andpromotion aimedinternationalrecognitio at and historyto legitimizethe group ofdepartmentscreationmajorin universities throughworkinternationalrecognitionintellectual andgroup.often ofThis the the includes throughidentity language,cu policiesincludeNationalistic the formation territorial claim nation nation Ukrainian narrativecreated abasedthe ‗heroictragicbut on struggle‘ and byofcausedtraumaticlosshomeland,strong a a re ethnic a consciousness, identity ethnic history. primarilynarrativebasedonthe struggleswhich the group throughouthas endured their servesasserttheidentity tocore thecreationto cultivatenationof a withinhistorictheir reside ofterritories.One thegoals of t main a sensesolidarityaof otherinmembers withethnic - state bystateseriesof tragic a thethatin eventsresulted expu 41 40 39 38 Diaspora Diasporas Diasporas

Ibid., 9. Susanne Lachenicht and Kirsten Vic Satzewich, Susanne Lachenicht a ,

thatl becausetheUnion‘sSoviettakeover of soften .

are Some int

are definedare or―movementas aofthat peopleor migration national share a eaveestablished an ancestral Diasporamovements homeland.are often

defined asreligious, ethnic,

chooses strategies The Ukrainian Diaspora Chapter 2: hediasporath asserted lture,historical and narrative. nd Kirsten Heinsohn,

as distinctiveothers. fromas

group identity, and in thisingroupandcreation,produceidentity, may also a , (Chicago: University Chicago of Press, 2009), 8. -

state 8.

The

Heinsohn,

and

41 ,

Ukrainian and preservation and , that are nationalistic,that are anidentity. ethnic

18 and the study and the , (London: Routledge, 2002), 15.

Diaspora Identities: Exile, Nationalism and Diaspora Identities: Exile, Nationalism and or cul at they were deprivedtheyofwereat their societies . turalcommunitiesthatdotonot

This recognitionThistoextend may Diasp 40

oftheliterature, language C

, for nationalforindependence osmopolitanforged is identity

of a distinctiveofa na

.‖ lsiontheir from This elevationofethnic hesenations exiled 39 ora as wellasas cosmopolitan.

The UkrainiandiasporaThe n ofthehistoricaln

turnmovement,

― tional

―rightful‖ historic‖ 38

m , and

ay ofthe

CEU eTD Collection Page othermanygroup and elites Russianoverlords.or Estonian wasidentitybyEstonianEstonians created theinlate argues. ornavelsit.heties,not is astermsnavelThis the in essential crea GellnerErnestbelievesnation in experience sometimessymbolic,link,a with specificterritory. a identity. factors modernist identity. 2.1 power.Sovietthe workprom todiaspora‘s include groupsassertingofseveralgenocide claimsagainstk their thepastinjusticesgroup‘s from clude language and historiclanguagecludeand territory The Creation of

http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/gellner/Warwick.html used

43 thatle 43 42 identityimportantNationalis formation discussterms toin ofthe the Armenianthe

Antho ErnestGellner Anthony Smith, nation He usesHethe the caseEstonians of ―The Warwick Debates: Ernest Gellner andAnthony Smith,‖

construction , to establishtothis

which adgroup to nySmithmore a asserts

creating the

is only understoodonlyisprecedingbyusing ethni

TherewasseparateEstonian a literature,language s in Eastin s diaspora‘s . Gellner and AnthonyS and Ethno ote theHolocaust ote a Diasporaa

asserting

identity. The Ukrainianidentity,Theidentity. similarthat to theEstonian of

―other.‖Estoniansdid -

ssometimesdo andtimes other symbolism andNationalism, - Central EuropeCentralbeyond, andbase is . This . believes

workpromotto its serv rightofselforder determinationinnationalto a form ,

Identity mith argue whether ashistoricalwellthewith asmythsnation. associated primordia

that a groupthatbecoming anation a , es

and as to rectifytothepast

19 annation exampleofhavingnot a navel. a the

e genocide bytheeTurks genocide in 1915 list

Ukrainian not identifynotwith their German,

42 view. nineteenth

Nation‘s

(accessed December(accessed 14,2010).

(New York: Routledge, 2009), 31. in

a Membersof

nationa is long

diaspora‘s donot c ties c injustice

members sharemembers

century, baseduponthecentury, - tion oftiona nation ago Ernes dupontheofnotionthe . Binding. elements

have . Examples ofExamplesthis

, as is theiswith, as case t Gellnert Resource prim

ethnies , claimof

isbasedupon certain

and folk culture thatand folk culture creation of diasporacreation of these primordialthese ordial orordial

usuallyhave a

, genocideby collective

the Gellner

Swedish,

of Jewish

s ,

CEU eTD Collection homeland.the onlynot Holodomor remembrance, but also by embracing Ukrainian the l Yushchenko‘s administration, have used events and traditions to create historical a memory through addition to the na nations have purposefully constructed traditions that may seem beancient, to but rather are a recent how memory constructed is through rituals and symbols. Both authors contend modernthat in times, and howspecific events shape the national consciousness a how nations construct their identity through the process remembering of andforgetting (omitting), Ander Anderson‘s also important this in revival. Ukrainian nation became important an national symbol for U century. Poets such as Taras Shevchenko that glorified peasantry the the as foundation of the consciousness through promotion Ukrainian of literature and language the in latter half of 19the histo collective thediasporaunitetotheHolodomor, ableUkrainianpopulation was differingofbecause perceptionson certainselected bythemselves, spite inofrealistic more standards reinterpreted continuity,inshow although fact there viewnationalismconstructionistof an is attempt linkpast to withpresent the the orderinto theofconstructionpurposefulmemoryof andnational anarrative. politicaldemandsand there. throughswept immigrants set Tsarists control. Ukrainianswere other. son‘s book, considered of one worksthe first kind of its in nationalism seeks studies, to look at 45 44 outsideo Ukrainians HobsbawmBenedictEricBoth and greatAndersongo into

For a moreFor a in depth discussion about the construction nationalof memory, Benedict Like Estonians, the elites in west the Ukraineof sought to establish natio a Imagined Communities ,

orsimply manipulated tledthe U in western rical backgroundricaldefinedUkrainians that tional narrative to fulfill a need. In Ukrainian the case, both diasporathe and Viktor 44

Atinthe timelatewhen,nineteenth the century,manyUkrainian geographical,political

Ukraine and UkrainianUkraine andnationalism made tiedthetothelandsubjects andPolish, of Habsburg, or mostly

nited f Ukrainehavef formeda

S and Eric Hobsbawm‘s tates ,

tonationalisticideal a fulfill based as communitiesare

may benomaywithpast all. connection theEvents are at and Canada,aandnation comprehensivebuilding process ,

and socialandconstellation 20

different

The Invention of Tradition nd narrative. Hobsbawm‘s book studies krainians. Language education and was

in the

nationthose from diaspora it 45 s detailindiscussions their

anguage, culture and ties to s first linguistic,first cultural

. overseas Andersonbelieves this Byonthe focusing

as a cohesiveasnational a

nal around a

are often cited. in Ukraine .

CEU eTD Collection farmers. there were better economic opportunities i Oleskiw, who was highly of critical the treatments of Ukrainia later influenced moveto primarily to United the States and Canada by work the of Dr. Joseph opportunities and theto United States Canada and work to mainly in industry and mining. They were notbut necessary part of a quest to fulfill agreater group identity. within society, kept but cultural traditions, such creationthe of the Ukrainian identity abroad. populationThis had a tendency assimilate to quicker opportunity. Most of the population that left seekto economic opportunity was not as strongly tied to political oppression, well as immigration, as based up the idea of seeking economi better Ukrainian population is not purely oneor the other; but rather a combination diaspora, of based upon well elementsas of adiaspora their lives. There are elements of a classical migration from home the territory to AmericaNorth as many solace found in creating anew national identity would that continue playto apowerful role in created an identity that was as not prominent within the country origin. of Fo assimilate into the new host country. In instances, other the immigrant population strengthened, or came the to newcount the factors contributing to the immigration, and where the immigrant population settled once they ofareas east century manyparallels ofactgenocidean under theregimepeople Soviet culture the nineteenthlatethatrevivalswere century nationallargely basedonliteraturelanguageandof bindingmost identityThe ofsymbolism,nationalismtransference identity. innation‘simportant any deliberateprocessis Thein formation. always forgingcol a whetherwasthisgroup, identifyingnot. theiror factor 49 48 47 46 Thiswave firstof. mostly consistedmigrants.labor farmers and immigrationUkrainianNorthSouth toandAmerica

Gellnercomments,

The experiences of immigrants are varied, depending onthe time period of the immigration, Ernest Gellner, Vic Satzewich, In Ukrainians 1890s, the

in Europein ern similar movementsbygr

and centr and ,

servedbondingthata force in as essential was creat ry. Sometimes this experience includes severing with ties the home country to

. In . The Warwick Debates. The Ukrainian Diaspora the al Europe thatEuropetraditionallyal are

of theUkrainiannationof

within the Ukrainian population. However, the resettling of the ― diaspora‘s diasporagroupscan given effectivelyassertthemselves,their

and moreand

immigrated to Brazil and Argentina for n Unitedthe States for industrial workers Canada and for

, vision,sufferingof thecollectivethe Ukrainian

oups in easternsoutherninandofEurope the oups as wellas shared asof constructiona experience.

specifically,the as 21

religious affiliations , 23.

outsideofUkra

46 considered homelandsconsideredof Ukrainians

ns in Brazil andArgentina and believed This groupThisdefining momentis

48 promotion ofpromotionthe

beganroughly1880. in

and symbolism that is familiar ine

happened yearshappenedthe after

mostly agricultural r Ukrainianr immigrants, ing 49

Immigrants this Holodomor identity. c nineteenth lective It left ‖

CEU eTD Collection the language. based upon pieces of Ukrainian history, literature figures, collective suffering and a standard and independent Ukrainian homeland, the elites started effectively to build amosaic political affiliation diasporaoftenthe succum Ukrainiannationthe the for Ukrainiancommunitylivingabroad. Holodomor collectivesuffering,aincludingmost recentthe theunderregime. eventsSoviet To them,the Ukrainiana to formidentity basedupontheir language,ties, culturaland theof remembrance inUnitedUkrainians the States opportunity refugeespolitical attempti conflict intolastingandthe theearly coincidesbeginning 1950s,again, worlda with ending ofand ofmigrants, laborbutconsistedofpolitical refugees. also Thethirdwave, starting1940in incorporationthe subsequentandUkraine ofthe intoUnion.TheseimmigrantSoviet withFirstofWorldthe theend the 1930s, coincides UkrainianWar War, Independence of min mostlyagriculturalinsettled Austria spreads This area ing and steelandingproduction - 52 51 50 suchvaryingWithsocial educational, theyearsIn followingthearrivalsecond, of thefirst,third and , Hungarian EmpireHungarian RussianEmpire. throughthe

and thestartandof the waveColdThis incl War. also

With the emigration of many U Ibid., 27. Ibid., 25. . remembrancesignifiedofthe creation collectiveofdefines an memory eventthat

from theofregionGalicia Bukovinathe in west andpartthat of the was

and eventerrit and

ng to escape theregimengto escapeSoviet bed to infightingtobedprimarybetween groups,basedupon religion, . Thewave,secondstarting. 1920 aboutlasting and the into

areas to areas

, Can , orialdivisionsthatUkrainian fractured ada, a ada,

establish smallestablish farms krainian intellectuals and nationalists whocalled for a free ndArgentinasmallergroups in and ,

22 and evencultu and

50 ,

as wellas udeddisplacedmany persons and , The first waveTheof first immigrants

orworkedin industries ral backgrounds,ralUkrainians 52 as thoseas

waves,some ‘sideasof a seeking - like identity Braz

economic il

suchas , ization of

s, again, setout in ,

CEU eTD Collection Soviet Union. human trafficking, well as promotingas inquiries into humanthe rights abuses in Ukraine during the congress‘ w advantage of it to force peasants to accept policies collectivizationof they strongly opposed. The majority did conclude that Soviet authorities, without actively wanting the famine, most likely took famine Ukraine, in orderin ensureto the success The commission majority was unable affirmto existence the of a preconceived plan organize to a 1984, The was very vocal about creating acommission to inquire about Holodomorthe as an ofact g mixed more words Russian create to a hybrid language, referred asto depending onwhere the person was from originally. Some dialects intermixed Polish while others Orthodox groups that came from south the and eastern territories. Dialects of Ukrainian also differed, groups, while neither the Ukrainian Cath Orthodox. UkrainianThe Catholic groups were suspicious of the Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox Orthodox, while those who came from Russian the Empire could be either Russian Ukrainian or western territories Galicia of Bukovina, and Ukrainians wereeither Uk was difficult to lend itself to social cohesion. Religion often created suspicion in groups. In the establishment however, did not always see eye eye, to even though they we Ukrainian independence movement suffered or under Soviet policies. The different movements part of an urban intellectual classt society than the farmers and laborers of the first wave. These individuals were better educated and Union againstSoviet Ukrainians. ethnic the int petitioning democratic political through economic, thediaspora1991, communit suffering regime,UkrainiansSoviet livingof Ukrainecreatedoutside uponbasedthisidentity an someinstances,divergent.in were quiet tocommonforcedground findwithin grouppolitics, socialwhose a cultureandbackgrounds, culture collective identity. , 54 53 ofThrough collective experiencethis ― an

orrel

, Intellectually, the second and thirdwaves of Ukrainians were part of different segments of

International Commission Inquiry of Into the 1932 World Congress of Free Ukrainians (now Ukrainian World Congress), established 1967, in and also advocatedUkrainiansandbehindthe itAfterIron for Curtain. independencein ork now focuses onpromote social services, education, cultural and international affairs, society

of an independent Ukraine. This different experience of what it meant beUkrainianto igion to pullinsteadtoigionUkrainianintellectuals from; ernational community to declarecommunitytoernational thegenocideHolodomoranbytheof act 53 . This ranged. advocacysupportingremembrance from Holodomor to

Therenowas common territory, collective experience, language,

and y continued to betoycontinuedanof importantpart theUkraine rebuilding of

hat had fled Ukraine because of they wereaffiliated with the

socialpromotedactionUkraine‘s thatestabli olics Ukrainian nor Orthodox groups trusted the Russian 54

T ounderstand the casegenocide forasse of Stalin‘s policy. However, the commission 23

injustice‖doneoutsidebyan Stalin‘s force, re afterre the same of goal the – 33 Famine Ukraine in outsideof Ukraine surzhik rainian Catholic Ukrainian or .

shmentas a was established. werenow enocide. In rtedby CEU eTD Collection collect targetto the Kulaks (wealthy peasants) that he considered dangerous capitalists bent ondestroying the classto identity than to ethnicity. While workers were promoted to positions of status, Stalin worked labor, the largest class in the cities, where Russians domina renaissance in literature and the arts Ukraine.in Communists gave privileged a position manualto were responsible for 14million deaths within the territory the of ―Bloodlands.‖ that both the policies Adolf of Hitler and Josef Stalin and the signing of the Molotov somewhatis controversial because it rewrites the historiography of Secondthe World War. He ass crimes perpetrated by both regimes. His discussion begins Ukraine in with the Holodomor. His book 2010). number. numberthe at 10million. The Yushchenko administration also used 7 to 10 million their as guiding However, many Canadian Ukrainian organizations, such as the Commission on Ukrainianthe Sorrows theput number of dead at around 2million Ukraine. in In Conquest‘s Robert book, 2 million 14to million. Scholars have long debated the accuracy of 1937the Soviet census that would policysoughtreverseThis alsotrend to theof Russificationthatplace took theunderRussian promotingwellaseducation, asplacesto ethnic elites ofthepowerstructure.within Soviet collectivizationsystem. korenizatsiya UkraineSSR within theUkrainianSocialistincluding Repu Soviet 1928,inwhichimplementedcalledrapid theindustrialization Soviet for of the Union, movetoUSSRto collect Holodomor. 2.2 his Ukrainiandiaspora the Snyder‘s book looks at the area caug toric The

ivization and modernization Ukraine. of 57 56 55 Betwe Holodomor backgroundofal the , he puts th

Under guidancethe of Timothy Snyder, The number of causalities caused by Holodom the Ukrainian 55 , or a processofor anativization , aimedtothe at forcingthemacceptnew to

en 1929en1933, andsevenestimated an Josef StalinJosef various instrumented e death toll at around 14million. The United States Congress in their report, ,

and elsewhere inSovietand elsewherethe Union ,

Diaspora’s a That process also included programsprocessalsoincludedThat encouraging literacy and ivefarmsfulfillthetoso and nd laterYushchenko thend discussionofbrief administration,the a Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler andStalin

Famine

Mykola Skrypnyk ht betweenht Stalin andHitler as partof his discussion of the , published 1988,in determined 8million people died.

Holodomor Narrative ,

seenbynationalists diaspora 24 blic. ‘s Soviet leadership‘s encouraged national a

policiespeasantsforceto throughoutthe 56

millionUkrainiansdiedthein

Star - ted. ted. The typical worker was more attached calledNewEconomicPlan, , or (massor starvation, disease) ranges from

werethe targetof a t ing1925, inUkrainianpeasants Ucrainica Institute

, (New York: Basic Books, ,

is necessary.is

in C in Harvest of policy - Ribbentrop PactRibbentrop anada have put

known as

Soviet

The erts 57

CEU eTD Collection Historical Culture Stalin. The committee, however, did not rescind the award. were calls for the revocation the of prize by Ukrainian the diaspora others and that suffered under Duranty, on otherthe hand, won later aPulitzer diaspora for his reporting on the famine and his attempt get to the international community involved. for int ―R New York Times outlets were reluctant runto his reports Soviet Union in a story for the Polish because they werenot under So that contained majoritythe the of Ukrainian peasantry anddid not experience famine 1932 in Nationalism andanti Europe reports regardingdenied situation theUkraine. in ifthereportedstorywasstory, at all. s Holodomor remaintoSoviet authorities diseaseridden invillages with without contact outside world. the SSR Russianpopulations,Ukrainian and policySovietofstoresgrainthe confiscating planned frommeetto farmers the quotas, rebel.Togetherwithto other f ofcollectivizationprocess nativization and continued againstwill, their thefarmerscontinued grainstores letting rot,planttorefusing fields,slaughtering andlivestock. even As the nativizationresistedfarmers collectivizationby and res culture.literature and Em ussians Hungryussians not but Starving, p

ire. For a briefForaofire. periodtime, starved, die starved, ernational intervention on fell deaf ears. Jones ha

agents were attempting create to a―famine scare.‖ - 60 59 58 ofthe UkrainiandiasporahavepushedMembers investigationsinto forthe peasants,majorityofThe however, defiedthe Sovietof collectivization. attemptsThe Asia Studies

Johan Dietsch,Johan Joseph Stalin Ivan Katchanovski, ―The Politics of Soviet andNazi Genocides Orangein Ukraine,‖ ince th , denying existence the of a famine in Sovietthe Union, with the headline of dofcontagious diseases , (Lund: Lund University, 2006), 122.

- 62, no. 6(August 2010), 973 Soviet values evolved specifically areas the in of Gali e first reportse firstsurfaced

and Making Sense of Suffering: Vyacheslav Molotov Manchester Guardian viet rule and were not affected by collectivization policies

actors, such1931drought,rapidactors, the industrialization, as and ‖

disputing Jones‘ accounts. these policiestheserevivalsawUkrainian the of language, mostly in theinmostlyand regions eastern southernof on th 59

WhenSovietquestioned,the governmentvehemently , e famine

liketyphustyphoidbyforced or and were fever, . 58

Prize in 1932for his reporting on USSR.the There

Westernwerereporttheslowto journalists 25 -

denied the existence of the famine alleged and 997.

. Walter Duranty famously ran story a in 60 and the Holocaust andHolodomor Ukrainianin

s been

Gareth Jones

toring to sabotage,toringtoincluded which

New EveningYork Post elevated to

Jones stood byJones his story

reported on conditions in the a

cia. The area of Galicia hero by Ukrainian the . Many news , Ukraine

. but his pleas

- 33 The

CEU eTD Collection criticized western journalists governments and that refused to intervene onbehalf of the Ukrainian that the famine Ukrainein was anact of genocide of the Ukrainian nation by the Soviet Union. He are independent of aUN resolution that states the Holodomor wa byact Stalin‘s regime: United States, Argentina, Chile, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Spain. These Paraguay, Peru, The Vatican, andPoland. Six countries have recognized Holodomor the crimi as Australia, Canada, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador, Georgia, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, diaspora groups thein United States Canada. and book, in byhistorians analyzedsourcesscholars interviewedof available andthewitnessesbeenevent, has asdone diaspor governments,the includingUni theHolodomorofrecognition policiesnot andconditions denytotheattempt existence of thefaminesin of scholars falsifyingevidence,doctoring photos thewithofhorrorsin attunetheThe Holocaust. Unionrepeatedly Soviet many accused ― coinedtheHolodomor, in HarvardAndrews,specificallySainttoas and studyhistoryUkrainian includedThistheHolodomor. establishmentof several profilehigh centers atcol themeanshadall theyat disposal. their community international pushedrecognitiondays,forcommemoration of genocide theHolodomor as by the forgottenbytheinternationalbe community.Ukrainiansliving havesetupabroad mor” Harvest ofHarvest

meaning deathmeaningor extermination a populations.a 63 62 61 theearlytheinIn 197 thatperiod,Since

F Robert Conquest‘s book was awidely read study The term Holodomor was first used describeto the Ukrainian Famine by several Ukraine i f t e e n terestedthe inpersonalof survivors. Holocaust experience Conquest‘s Robert

countries h Sorrow

62 As more information wasinformationdivulgedmore about policies,Stalin‘sAs more , s

the and remindedtheand 63 197 ave recognized Holodomor the genocide. as They as are follows: ,

, published1989,inwasthe, significant first until 1983.Pressurebyuntildiasporagroupsled theUkrainianto diasporah 0s,beganin scholarshipAmerica academic Northtackle tothe

0s as atcriminal leastasby atheact Stalinist regime ted States,ted Canada,Brazil, and 61 , brings two words togetherbringstwowords ― , , in anin attemptlegitimize to ,

as workedsystematicallyassothat thisnot event would m

ofofthethe―oppression‖regimeSoviet 26 USSR

, and , statingwasby it caused environmental , concocting

on Holodomor.the Conquest concluded s a criminals a act theof Stalin r

which holod” first thepolicyeventterror as a

contain largeUkrainiancontain -

hand accounts inhand accountsan and culture meaningandhunger

scholarly work toworkscholarly

byseveral leges, suchleges, . Thet .

egime. with erm nal nal

CEU eTD Collection made.‖ spokesmen have never given afully accurate adequateor account, significant progress has been madehas substantial progress in dealing the with Famine. Although Ukrainianthe Famine. Recently, scholarship bothin the West and, to a lesser extent, the Soviet Union members t of Sovietthe government November in 1933, immediately the after famine. During the Famine certain might have ameliorated the situation. Instead, the Administration extended diplomatic recognition to government hadample and timely information about and those around him genocide committed against Ukrainians in 1932 made prevent to the starving from travelling areas where to wasfood more available. Joseph Stalin paralleledare only the in ethnically Ukrainian Kuban region of Norththe Ca whole, the invasiveness of Stalin's interventions bothof Fall the of 1932 and January 1933in Ukraine place during the 1932 national self intensify grain the seizures (and therefore the famine) in Ukraine and to eliminate modestsuch situation and maximized the loss of life. Pavel further his control over the Communist Party Ukraine of mandated and actions which worsened the January 1933,Stalin used the ‗laxity‘ of the Ukrainian authorities seizingin lived in fear of punishment. knew Stalin that people were starving death to in Ukraine by late 1932. In extraction of agricultural prod intensifyto grain seizures further. The Ukrainian Famine of 1932 used the resulting ‗procurements crisis‘ Ukrainein as an excuse to tighten his control in Ukraine and severe measures to extract the maximum grain of quantity from peasants. the In authorities Ukrainein meet to grainthe procurements quota forced them introduce to increasingly reversed course an Ukrainian SSR that excessive grain procurements had led to localized outbreaks of famine, Moscow maketo of series a concessions to the peasantry. Inmid response a to drought false. The famine was not, isas often alleged, related to drought. In 1931 allegations by Soviet authorities. The victims the of Ukrainian Famine numbered in millions.the Official Soviet Territory starved death to in aman ―There is nodoubt that large numbers of inhabitants of findings: testimony and heard staff research, Commissionthe on Ukrainethe Famine makes the following gath The purpose of Unitedthe CommissionStates on the Ukrainian Famine was studyto famine the by http://www.faminegenocide.com/resources/findings.html applause bymembers of the Ukrainian diaspora. scholarship anddebate on the status of the famine as genocide thein West. His book was greeted with peasants during the Famine Ukrainian by applauded peasantry theHolodomor consider ering all available information about the famine, analyzing causes its and consequences. Based on 64

. Ukrainianvictims‘left some. werehistoriansbut famine accounts skeptical,

Famine Genocide Ukraine:in of "kulak sabotage," uponwhich all ‗difficulties‘ were blamed during the Famine, are - assertion as Ukrainians had hitherto been allowed by USSR. the While famine also took he American press corps cooperated with the Soviet government to deny existence the of

others,E.Mace,Jamessuch as d took an increasingly hard line toward the peasantry. The inability Soviet of famine. His scholarship into the subject sparked the start of more thorough . 64 - - induced grain shortage outside Ukraine was t 193

Mostmemoirstheseimportantdescriptions ofdetailed addtheto 3 agricultural year thein Volga and Basin the North Caucasus Territory as a genocide bytheUnionSovietgenocide against uce uce from the population.rural Officials in charge of grain seizures also - made famine 1932 in

1932

- Postyshev 1933

theofthe head 27

the famine but failed to take any which steps

the Ukrainianthe SSR and the Caucasus North - 1932, following complaints by officials in the -

1933, caused by1933, caused the seizure of the 1932 crop

(accessed 10(accessed May 2011). had a dualhad a mandate from to Moscow: - US Commission onUS Commissionthe 1933 was caused by maximum the o send aid to the areas affected and

, official Soviet historians and

specifically - 1933. The American - 1932, the official1932, the Soviet

grain strengthento ucasus. Attempts were the fall of fall the 1932 Stalin ,

theUkrainia

CEU eTD Collection 2011). Genocide http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml populationbasedcivilian on murder,of extermination, formdeportation enslavement, col througha werebetohumanity held fortheir accountable actions,levelfromindividual extending an happening alreadywas the inlargerinternational those responsible arena; fo ofthe foundation freedom,inpeace justice and the world.‖ inhere theofoutlined basic fundamental acceptance human―Whereasrights, recognition of the ofthesubsectionlarger a cleans ethnic atrocities committedbytheNaziregimeduringthe Second War World andPunishmenttheofCrimesPreventionGenocide of Unite The Genocide and the 2.3 theofCrimesGenocide.ofPunishment genocideunder abuild case for famine.Theofduringpurposethe these studieswere helptoUkrainians withindiaspora the ex isting scholarshiprevealingistingon thetheHolodomor, livingdismalUkraine in conditions The United Nations Convention on the Prevention and the Punishment of

nt dignityntthe equalofinalienablerights and andof members the of human all family is 66 65 Holodomor The ,” Human Rights Website

―United Nations Convention onthe Prevention and Punishment of the Crimes of ―United Nations Declaration onHuman Rights,‖ dNationsofficiallydefinedgenocide intheunder 1948 ing and genocide whichingoccurredgenocide in and the lective levellective

Case of the wasprojecta controversial . Theinternational. defined communitygenocideaggravatedas an UnitedonNationsHuman(UNDHR)DeclarationRights

their

the UnitedNationsthe Convention onthePreventi . http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html

political,racial,religious background. or Holodomor

(accessed 18 March 2011).

given thegiven twentieth

United Nations Website. (UNPPCG) ,

ndothercommitted actsagainst a 65

This documentThiswhat codified historyoftheterm ―genocide.‖ century.Thiswas convention Conventiononthe

as a response to theresponseto a as ,

and otherandofacts

(accessed 10 March 66 r crimesr against

Such framework onand ,

which

CEU eTD Collection History,‖of Sovietthe Union. directed at the varied ways maystates in use their interpretations of amatteras of courtesy moral or responsibility. Criticism international against customary is law they must be not binding international law. alsoStates must view it as obligatory to follow the customary and law, mayStates to choose follow certain policies under a ―sense‖ of legal obligation, it doesbut make it dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Interna timehasmanyinpassed,muchinstances ofbecauseprovesealedarchives, inaccurate conflicting accounts, statistics,or becaus pasthumanaboutrights abuses. peasant Ukrainian bytheStalinistregimeattempt destroyto theViktortoUkrainiananddiaspora,administration,According Yushchenko‘s therewas an haveUkraine, into come conflic groups incidenthistoricalshouldtheunder auspicesof fall the Genocide community,internationaleventhewithdeclaration and itself. withinth communities ofbasis groupsthathad manyfor beenvictimsoppression of Januaryin1951.Byforceg defining beengiventhehasstatus international of customarylaw ,

69 68 67 The such as thesuchUkrainian asdiaspora later,Yushchenko‘s andgovernment Viktor in UNPPCG

International governments have recognized Russianthe Federation as successorthe state of ―International Customary Law,‖

Antoon De Baets. ―The Impact the of Universal Declaration of Human Rights on Study the outlinestheresponsibilities

History and Theory UnitedNations lieve that they free are depart to from whenever it they choose, or observe to it only

ry.Theallowsvictims conventionfortheir assert to right for the truth for . Thesehaveoften. claims come historicalwith conflictnarratives into of

e countrysuchmade,wellperceptionse claimswhere asof are the the as Convention on the PreventionConventiononthe andPunishment the ofof Crimes

48 69 t with thewithtSovietsuccessoritsstate Unionandof Russia.

( February(

Sinceremotehistorical difficult injusticesare moreto enocide, theNationsenocide, established United the framework tional+Law oftheinternationalcommunitywhen ifa deciding Legal Dictionary Online

groupsreachingrectify aretoout these at leastat

2009): 36 29

(accessed 18 March 2011). a part ofparttheUkrainiana nation, the

and annihilation and

UNDHR

since thedeclarationsince into came

, issues. issues. http://legal . Claimsbyindividualmade.

to maketoclaims onthe

injusticesas e tooe 68

CEU eTD Collection Convention of 1948,‖ The http://www.holodomoreducation.org/index.php/id/159 (Accessed mixture of Moldavians, Belarusians, Hungarians, and 80%in of the victims were Ukrainian, Russian, 5% 2% Jewish, 1% Polish, and the remaining 12% a Oblast, Chernehiv Oblast, Dniperpystrovsk Oblast, Kharkiv Oblast, andDonetsk Oblast. According to The most affected regions in Ukraine SSR were as follows: Vinnitsya Oblast, Kyiv Oblast, Samizdat Register II mainof the one cases including raged, ofcollectivization.policiesThroughout the Unionperiod,duringSovietthis several famines group wholegroup;the destroysufficientthat is it the was chargebasedThetheUnionwasSoviet against uponthe bel affectedareas reserve populations,whilenot.theirwasStalinuse notdid 3) Ukrainethe significantpopulationexperienceratesof declineprovided weregrain andalso to with feed Belarus Moldova, UkraineSovietof experienced famine ofTheevidence.pieces servearenainternationalas the toactclosureforgroup.victim Thesenationofofbuildingshamepart a process. ―events UNPPCG

targeted . ‖ , 73 72 71 70 The 73

It ortakeother any measures

―Holodomor, Sergei Maksudov, "Losses Suffered by Population the theof USSR 1918 Ibid., 41.

Roman Serbyn, should beshouldunderstood

leadingHolodomorregarding argumentsgenociderevolve as the several around ,

, ―the Conventiondoes, limitnottheof genocideto notion an to intention and thusandbe can classified genocide,the per asUN Convention.According to with grain,with

onesincentralAsia Siberia, and additionUkraine. Kazakhstan,into isThis

, ed.R. Medvedev (London and theRussianregionsand immediatelyUkraine thetodidnorthof not

against “Ukrainica Research Institute

keypointsfollows: areA as 1)

Ukrainian Quarterly ―The Ukrainian Famine of 1932 as in theFarincasesEastasof Moldova Siberia, Russia,and Belarus.

declaring the Holodomorgenocidedeclaringbecausethe it affectedarray an

thatUkrainethenotSSRonlywasaffected area by Stalin‘s

to supply Ukrainianssupplywithto food 71 . 2)regionsOtherSoviet. of the Unionsuch as

– 50 thedesireeliminate toofconcernpartthe onlya New York 1981). 30 ,

no. 2

Germans. ,

(Summer 2006): 184. - ll regions withinregionsllwhat 1933 as Genocide1933 as in the Light theof UN ,‖ and recognition and,‖

ief thatief 02 April 2011).

, Soviet

theUkrainian whilesupplyingother

Union‘s

in thein – was 1958", The

peasantry the bordersthe grain

Oddessa

CEU eTD Collection Romania Slovakia,‖ and 724 Terror,‖55. UkrainewithinYushchenkonarrative the under administration chapter questiontomanyprompting Yushchenko administr identitybindingofassertion a Ukrainian They memoiredeleuix throughinternationalHolodomor recognition wastonosystematicthere programeradicate the the bewilldiscussedwhich in Yanuchovych,Russiangovernment,otherwellbyViktor the as politicians as aca and population thecollectivizationpolicies of eradicatepopulation, tobutseek onparticular ratherpopulation anythat went the against Unionqualify maySoviet demociderat as notthetotherefore limitedUkraini c Union,severalSovietadditionalscholars throughoutthewas famines that it arguethe withinSovietpeople the ofUnion ollectivizationpolicies Holodomor

sought tosought creat 76 75 74 Ukrainiandiaspo The serveidentifytothethefactorsadministration‘s thatprohibited creatio

Rogers Brubaker et al., ―1848 in 1998: T Ibid. Klas

du s

withintheUSSR ringtheUnion.Soviet -

Goran Karlsson, ―Motives, Mechanisms Memories and Soviet of Communist

agree thattheagreeoccurred famines inUSSRduring1932 the

76 — e the idea ofideae the a

a placeamemory symbolic for a collect where ation‘s claimthistoation‘s legacy. aimedallpeasantry,of atregardless their background, ethnic -

a 726.

later chapte ViktorYushchenko‘s ra‘s endeavor , ,

rather regime, thus makingregime,thus it and thenandlater aof genocide, claimset up a framework the for

and an peasantry. It ispeasantry.anIt Ukrainiannationoutsideofthe Theoftheuse

than a specificthana group.

didpopulation.targetanot specific r . All ofAllpartiesthese . thatdisagreethewith that claim herthangenocidebecause

to commemorateto ,

31 wasattemptat anthe communitybuildto a he Politics of Commemoration Hungary,in

Ukrainian This created Holodomor nationbuildingtechniques

suggested thatthesuggestedpoli an event that 75

peasantry

Thisthe ismainused argument and bringand attention to the

bythediaspora, first as an

though a reviewathough of the tensionsin Ukraine

traditionalofhomeland iveheritagerepresentedis annihilated

Stalin‘s policiesStalin‘snotdid

overgroup. another - 1933, but believebut 1933, 74 cies within thewithincies

With theWith . The following .

n ofthisn entire ,

demics,

. CEU eTD Collection cleavagesUkraine in schoolsofpoliticalparties,historicaldifferingand thought .

and

thelinguisticand cultural CEU eTD Collection History 8no.2(September 142. 2010), 36. Comparison, Dealing a with Traumatic Past Ukraine from Perspective the Sociology of Development of andModernization,‖ 2003. to creating a initwhile m fact, theircreationownaofnational identity Soviethistoriography expel the formerSoviet countriesfromof the Union, allowing thus for strongregion thestrongoflackaofnationalismwithin civic thecountry discussionaboutopenthenarrative‘s construction. wherehandedsocietiesmonologue,rather narrative,dialogue, arethan aa thereis where an developmen whileclashattemptingoftennat a to construct groupsapartandtensions.pushes social creates in ideologies, entrenched Ideologiescategories.socialmaintain can Theofuse arguments

Chapter Three: 79 78 77 scholarsbedevelopment intoproblematic. can dependentwayspoliticalobviousdirection, the upon selection but of cadrestheir and dangerousmix…Becauseoftheparticularlysuchworkin instates historiansis in Preciselycommemoration.historythesesothe becauseof lands are c theparticipationlimiting formercommunists)prosecution,documentation of and bythecontrolledstateandsome with mixture of lustration (government policies of European easternMost havesome countries central formhi of oftenplay Ideologies a critical role theincreation, identification, obscuring or of

Timothy Snyder, ― Aleida Assmann Kutuev Pavlo, ―Development of IdeologyIdeology and Development: of Contemporary

t Ruth Wodak andAuer Borea, eds. (Vienna: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co. KG,2009), usable collective al orlinguisticties in al

is influencedpoliticalisbycurrent objectives. construction This ay on ay

traditionallyassociatedpost with ly servelyto createdifficulties , ―From Collective Violence to a Common Four Models Future: for

politica Politics Historyof in Eastern Europe,

,” Justice and Memory: Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An International Historiography

nationalnarrative as as Independentan State lsocial andposturing,

the country

Academicsmayitsee as ,

orhistoricalunderminednarratives 33 ionalnarrative.Ultimately,

instead 77 and and Politic

laythesuccessofconvincingin the

Differingpoliticalhistorical andopinions 78

regardingidentity and memory.

Some ofSomethese tensionsbe may 79 AsTimothySnyder. comments,

- can Soviet historiographySoviet ,

servea catalyst as that further which propagateswhichofthe creation al Parties ‖ Journal of Modern European

― rehabilitating therehabilitatingpast storical agency,funded

of Ukraineof a narrative‘s maybecome omplex,thisa is . T .

hese designedto

the resultthe

The keyThe

‖ a

CEU eTD Collection (May thereas are always degrees politicalof affiliation that may more beless or extreme. Ukraine. There are obvious degrees of which a memorialpolitics.Ukrainian historiographyschools, ofdiscussion the The survived show legitimacy, ―In AndersonBenedict this story‖―genesis thentheineventsdiasporaandlater independenc This world, academic especiallyit when diverse pastitstobyusingdirection ful beyond, T group. the uniteagroup asto pastofwillconstruction ainto automatically everyItdifficult fitiscitizen‘smemory. a for oftheimportancepopulation of this construction processconstruction -

June 2001):June 39. is a continuumof a civilization 81 80 The school evident inwayevident the Ukrainianmemorythat , despite challenges,occupation, setbacks,and that mayhaveoccurreditsin history. and

Benedict Anderson, ―Western Nationalism andEastern Nationalism,‖ Academics have labeled and categorized four groups of historiography post in

past hasinfluencedpast thecommemorationof several controversial figuresand

hedeepdifferenceshistoricalin e as spillintopolitical the arena. sofhisto

thelineofofficialthediscourse, of the state state commentsonnationalist‘suse of an

. KyivStateRus KyivstateRus

ry.

servesa as when there are deep theredividesarehinderwhen historical that . Inhis. article 80

Thesesc

fill this historicalthisfill and narrative are ,

launching relates and serveand , theirdevelopment, story , because , hools havebeenhoolsof subject has ,

― WesternEastern Nationalism and

. It risky isnation a. for courted Political g Political

cademics may to prescribe each of the school‘s ideals, to Ukraine‘sto memorytimesoftendifficult tooare lookto

pointdiscussionoflaterthe forHolodomor in 34 toofidentity createan

ofthedisputedclaims byseveral

olderPastthe debate took roup

in indepenin shapethe indiaspora historynational and construction

ancient in t in s

seek to influencetoseekthecountry‘s he academic the better.‖the

past discussion the within tothatthe assume

dent Ukraine.Ukraine‘sdent influencedbythese

as way to showwayasto a groupa world throughoutworld New Left Review theofconsensus 81 Nationalism A

, thathas

ncient past ncient and sinceand its - Soviet , ‖ . s

CEU eTD Collection institutions. Only 8percent theof population claimed to have confidence in nationaltheir Ukrainians expressed their dissatisfaction and an outright lack confidenc of 8.7 percent supported the president in 2002.In aGallup Poll conducted in September 2007, surveyed trusted p members the of middle class were surveyed about trust andpolitics. Only 15.9 percent of those In 2002,two years before the Orange Revolution, those Ukrainians who identified themselves as January 2,2010). http://www.gallup.com/poll/103687/Few ―Few Ukrainians Confident National in Institutions,‖ Centre National Security and Defense, 200 February 2004. Ukraine,‖ (September 2010), 152. History Easternin Europe haveUkraine their for weaknessofthe tospeak Ukrai country,the as Ukraineinaccounts politicaltoalso correlate preferences post at looks theeffectsofHrystak creation socialand cleavagesin media through dissimilitudeinThe - Soviet s Soviet ,

where commemoratio 84 83 82 ofthis Some tension oneisseparately, fairly theinteraction fromofarises viewsdifferent of thepast, eac historyof dominatesversionUkraine.throughoutallThis the territories of pluralism preservationthe historyfostersofthepluralisminpublicsphere ensures that no and presenceUkraine,the In severalregional different of centers th with AndriyPortnov

school of

See Liudmilla Shanghhina, Andr Second Annual Stasiuk Yarislav Hrystak, ―Onthe Relevance and Irrelevance Natof

regionalnationalismbased political uponethnic, tates iy Portnov, ―Post Soviet Ukraine Dealing with its Controversial Past,‖

seenwith curriculum,nationalultimately and commemorationceremonies, thein

olitical parties. The statistics regarding government of trust officials found that only

thatisprimary on based . 83 school

national Thesehistoriographiescontrasting

Ukraine. comments , Timothy Snyder, ed. the construction ofconstructionKyivthe Holodomor narratives. andRus mayThis s ofpoliticalthought,s parties denotes n

- nationalism

- and questsrecognitionforandof nian politicalnian distrust actorsthe thatthe and of citizens Cambridge Lecture, University of Cambridge, England, governmentgeneral.in sided.

Ukraine’s Middle Class as aPublic Actor,

a , 82 -

and Ukrainians lack oflacka

8). 8).

in Ukraine,in ethn referencesdiffering concerning Journal of Modern European History 35 ic and regionaldifference.ic and T stable

- Confident Gallup Poll Online

government 84 and found it to betoandit found a ,

Polarizinghistoricalthough and historicalandremembrance echoed generate - National , certain narrativecertain

and linguisti and ionalism Contemporary in

, in Ukraine in - politicalwithin wrangling hofwhich, taken I nstitutions.aspx,(accessed e government their in c lines.Yaroslavc

(Kyiv: Razumkov unique casewithinunique historical eir own versionofown eir hese two factorshese s

and le Politics of

8 no.2 a dpoliticalto

the

20 t

also

CEU eTD Collection elections actually dropped to 8percent from 16percent between 2006 and 2007. widespread corruption. In addition, the percent government, while staggering a 83 percent expressed the belief that their government contained betoelevatedusedpolitical for sothatsimplified theybe canbytheunderstood common citizen narrativesthesebyof politicalparties. narratives Along theway,these thefromtransfer mirrorthesometimes rememb theKyivstoryRusofthegenesisin next and,politics chapter, the of Holodomor History3.1 Politicsas inUkraine thus marginalizinhistory, wasUkrainiansexclusivehistorythatof Tsarist and narratives Soviet omitted andof This Ukraine. nationbuilding.Itviewedto is serving as nationali theoverothersUkrainophilenarrativeof theseveralhas causedstumbling this in path blocks because itself narrativ celebratingthanthe multi School weakentonationbuildingthisserves process. Extr s These fourThese e, which thecountry e, accounts for rance.Itimportantlookistothepolitical at parties that m

it lacksdefiningit astanceon commemorationnarrative. historical andElevation narrative ay servetonationalist‘sayviewpoints exert these exacerbatedifferences

elite academic worldacademicelite school

historiography , constructed in thein, constructed during WestUnion,Soviet the s of historiographysof towhen areat importantlookdiscussing the g the indigenouspopulationUkraine.Russianingthe - ethnic population of Ukraine.Theofofpopulationthe weakness ethnicEastern Slav intention . While theseWhile schoolonthere center fours a academia, is

to thattoofthe popular

s ‘s multiple identimultiple ‘s .

age of those who had confidence in honesty the their of

s emes oftheRussophile emes t goals,ofthet firstdiaspora, ties

involved realm ,

hasshortofe fallen

and certain principlesand certain thro

and theirthatandplatforms ugh thedissimilationugh are

strived

and altered an Ukrainophile and lat and

to buildto a stablishing

, d

rather

er ,

CEU eTD Collection Terror,‖ May 2011). Parties,‖ National Identification Ukraine,‖ in Papers Building, History Writing and Competition over Legacythe the of Kyiv Ukraine, Rus in and History WritingUkr in thecollapseofAfterthe Union, the Soviet Stalin Josef theneedtofulfill create successfulState.Soviet a nostalgia,terms nosupportbyyoungerorlittle Ukrainians Partyi Communist governUkrainian Ukraine a Russia Belarusians.Ukrainians and ofbrotherhood,‖―Slavic aidea servingRussiawith protectortheovertwoaslessergroups of naturalminglingalso aof the UnionpromotedtheRussianlanguage Soviet dom as turnawayunnatural from Ukrainians. Russia 3.1.1

33 no.1 (March 2005): 29 as theleas 89 88 87 86 85 SovietphileThe The 58. ‘sCommunistparty Kyiv Post, ndBelarus

Klas Political―Poll: Forces of Tigipko, Yatseniuk, Co Taras Kuzio, ―National Identity andHistory Writing in Ukraine,‖ 408. Taras Kuzio andStephen Shulman For an in

85 ,

are rationalizedinnameareprogressive the of developmentof thepeople.Soviet Soviet and

- TheSovietphile Goran Karlsson, ―M ading eastern Slavicadingnation, eastern believing citingpolices ment, -

12 May 2010, depth discussiondepth on Ukrainian historiography, Taras see Kuzio, ―National Identity solder from ,

and a return to theandreturntosystemof a in USSR. communismfound the

promotestheSovietphile view School aine,‖ Belarus,Russia Russophile School , whileverynotin successful elections , 86

differentgroupsUkrainewith ethnicSSR This school This School of the Sovietof the Unionnecessary order werein and justified - Nationalities Papers

58, andStephen Shulman ―The Contours Civic of and came tocame prominence citizens in citizens http://www.kyivpost.com/news/politics/detail/66496/ (accessed otives, Mechanisms Memories and Soviet of Communist Europe

believe - Asia Studies ,

promoteseventualreunification an Ukraine with of thesouthofeastUkraine and 88 and Ukraineand ideologicalofbasethe

Supporters sthatUnionwasSoviet dissolving the 37

34 no.4, (September 2006): 407 s

Manypolicies,thoseincludingunder during the Soviet Union Sovietduringthe 56, no.1 (January 2004): 35

inant withinSovietthe space.inant T there is notisnational athere to exclusiveness . Most ofMostthe support for . mmunist Party in Top April5 of Rating of in a cultural and politicalainand cultural union.

tend toSoviettendat look the Unionin S ,

ovietSchool or powerful inorpowerful the , ,

whichpromotedthe and

. I . theparty - t prioritizedt 56.

- was 427: ―Nation427:

Nationalities 87 Ethnic

an herewas severely

has to The

16 CEU eTD Collection creating acontinuous history the Ukrainian for nation that dated back to the 9 Rus on Ukrainian culture, history, literature and a ten volume work entitled, Central and Easter Ukrai 2003, created anthetoRussophile alternative and Prevalent Ukrainianthe and 3.1.2 similarities languageUkrainian from language.Ukrainian thanUkrainian language statesindependent are a groups ethnicbetweenseparate Russians,Belarusians becausesharedof natural their bonds,histories,language ethnic Belar Empire,theimpedingRussian Union,oflaterthusSovietstudyUkrainians and USSRbo foldedthe withrelationship independentstate.‖anhistoryfor H marginalized. , one of usians http://www.kyivpo The 93 92 91 90 The thetoSimilarSoviet

Mykhailo Hrushevsky aUkrainian was nationalist and historian who wrote multiple works Anna Fournier, ―Mapping Identities: Russian Resistance Linguistic to Ukrainianization in Taras Kuzio, ‗National Identities and History Writing Ukraine,‖in 408. Taras Kuzio, ―Medieval History Impacts Contemporary Attitudes,‖ in Ukrainianindepartments research and theinUnited centersStates and Canada, it the the first works puts that the heirs to the Kyiv .

92 Ukrainophile School UkrainophileSchool as separateas groups.The

istorian RussiaBelarus and diasp th UkrainethBelarus‘shistories and Someschoolthisin

ne,‖ st.com/news/opinion/op_ed/detail/13683/(accessed typical ora. Taras Kuzioout,pointsTaras ,

further corruption and Europe

phile Itisaligned

more cosmopolitan thanmoreruralthe more cosmopolitan―cor and . 91

emerged out of the nineteenthofoutemergedthe Russophiles tendbelieveRussophiles tothatRussianis―higher‖ a S - 90

Asia Studies chool

s .

chool TheRussophile and , withMykhailoHrusshevsky. thehistorian

believe the

believesthreetheofuniononly the is countries ,

Soviet School Soviet and possibleand Russophile School 38

54, no. 3(May 2002):418.

theschoolSovietphileis that - Rus princedom the as Galician ,

Russification into thatintoofhistorythethe larger of and Ukrainians and destruction s Soviet School Soviet ‘

historical viewpoint. Thehistoricalviewpoint. , centurynationalist movement

strivesnaturalpromotetoa and religion.andThereare no The History of the Ukrainian

polic ,

, becauseof the 15 April 2011).

th and Kyiv Post

s‘ century.

―not a useable―not a ies

prominence duringprominence the

preserve rupted‖ three , 6February -

Volnya State, 93 ,

the - CEU eTD Collection http://www.tryukraine.com/society/ukrainization.shtml Parties,‖ Decided_in_May_printer.shtml http:/ 25 April 2008, ofUkraine much commemorationand efforts. languageUkrainian 3.1.3 stillintact is wranglingpoliticaland ideologicalwithin splitsthe coali blocTimoshenko‘s speakingpopulation.Russian promotingofaccusedan Ukrainianization aggressivepolicy sought blocwaspopular mostwesternThis central inUkraine, andincludingKyiv. They nationalistpoliticalUkrainian parties, includingthe Con and UkrainethepartyOurwhichby promotedbloc, andUkraine‘s relatio buil nation historyseparateUkrainianRussia‘s, asUkrainian fromthushistory a making priorityas nationalist and anti Sc Ukrainophile

/www.ocnus.net/artman2/publish/Analyses_12/The_Future_of_the_Orange_Coalition_Will_Be_ membership in membership Ukrainianization 97 96 95 94 isUkrainization a YushchenkDuringViktor Kyiv Post.

―Ukrainianization: Issues and Arguments,‖ Political―Poll: forces of Tigipko, Yatseniuk, Communist Party 5 in Top Aprilof Rating of Taras Kuzio, ―The Future theof Orange Coalition will beDecided in May,‖ Ivan Katchanovski, ―The Politics of Soviet andNazi Genocide Orangein dingtool. ,

and enjoysandthewest supportfrom most of centerthe country. and hool

SSR

to establishtothe Russian.The and

the European Union and NATO.Unionandthe European

is viewedbyistheSoviet,

overlong the

culture inculture policypromoting of and

(accessed 14 May 2011).

AftertheOrange Revolution,Ukraine Our

Sincethe UkrainophileSchool o‘s variousof areassociety, includingeducation, government OrangeCoalition eras administration

ofRussiandomination,Soviet and Russian 39 Russophile, and

Ukraine

language

(accessed facilitatingdevelothe , theideology, . Thebloc latercollapsed.

The blocTheof consistedmajo

promotesspecific aof agenda gress ofgressUkrainian Nationalists. tion2008.in

was favored in publicinlifefavoredacrosswas 02 April 2011). EasternSlavicSchool of the schoolwas the of to marginalizeto the 95 nship with thewithnship West

pmentof the Timoshenko‘s unitedwith

Ukrainianization

Ukraine,‖683 96 because ofbecause

Ocnus

rity were

endorsed s as

, Yulia

often

bloc 94 -

84.

CEU eTD Collection oneonlypromote identifythemselvesUkrainian.thewho However,pushof as M ispartand aregions, of theeveryday printed andpress media culture, the major in cities. populationsmajoritypredominantofthe in urban southern, and eastern, evensomecentral believetheybecause i nationalistic. theinThose betoviewe tendRussians as―European‖themselves morethanRussians, loving, open freedom and minded, while society. and ofexternalizingSovietRussian and culture connected culture tonorms.extendedand cultural political artifi ofaccusedoppressingwere thisviewspromotes agenda policies endorse any people speakpeopleanymother Russianas tonguetheir onan everyday includingthose basis, promoteUkrainianhistory ethnic ciall

100 99 98 strovegivetovoice aethnic to

Partseparatethis Ukraini Ethnic

y placed in a dominantposition,yplacedainthus creating a ―Ukrainization: Issues Anna Fournier, 417.

Anna Fournier. 419. Communism and Soviet powerwithSovietCommunismand Russians 99 Russophile School

EthnicRussians Ukraineinmay Ukrainians

Ukrainian as the soleUkrainianlanguageasof the the country. indigenous

nthe das

thatoftheviews adopt the specialbondbetween the

Ukrainian and culture language Russia's historicalRussia'sinfluenceon U

languageoftheco

and Arguments.‖ backwards,close

may an andan Russianidentitiespromote stereotypeswithin also

viewUkrainiansamoral,selfishsomewhat and as .

Ukrainian 98

Theassertion

and historyand 40

- refusegotowith along

untry minded, to ―

reclaim groups — Ukrainophile SchoolUkrainophile

from Ukraine serves to distinguishtoUkraine serves from Ukrainian.

oftheUkrainian insideoutside andUkraine of hierarchybasedonlanguagethat an ti . T . . ‖ 100 - Ukrainianization

democratic krainenegatively.Russians their pasttheir he

Russian is theRussianislanguageof the The

Russian

UkrainophileSchool

. In. doi Ukrainizationpolicies ,

language language and

may

― seeks to ngso foreign

view

and was ,

t hey . . ‖ This

that CEU eTD Collection Parties, Kyiv hybridonelaboratesthis union SlavicSchool Eastern YaroslavHrytsakas―Creoles,‖group terms thata them,be is determined to can theinto fall loyalties Ukrainians speaking donotparticular haveamembers loyaltyto Russia regionalmutual cooperation. brother‖Russia‘s ―elder role homethe territoryasview multito languages thebecausethiscountryofofhistorical legacy, believeThey Ukraine. thattheRussian Ukrain and shareRussiansand Kyiv.in PetroTolochko,InstituteofdirectorofArcheologyNa is the the at somewhatframework is forscholars. problematic 3.1.4 The 103 102 101 RegionPartyofThethe advocates of creation centr The

The regardingUkrainian

. TheytheUkraine asnaturalbuffersee. Europe Russia between and ―Poll: Political―Poll: forces of Tigipko, Yatseniuk, Communist Party 5 in Top Aprilof Rating of Anna Fournier, 416. Taras Kuzio, ―Medieval History Impacts Contemporary Attitudes,‖

Post. Eastern EasternSlavicSchool ist schoolisist the

similaroverlappinghistories and ,

and indigenoustoterritoryandUkraine, thehowever, of

and possiblyandsupporttothe Slavic School .

102

While most popularmosttheWhilesouth of the inandc east ―special‖

EasternSlavicSchool ple andidentities fluid ethnic

negotiatesmiddlegroundbyUkrainiathe that asserting

relations 41 thus both thus

hip

101 Party of Regions.HrytsakPartyof further ian languagesnationalbothian languages are 103

with Russiawith are an

The historian closely tiedhistorianthistocloselyTheschool withinterritorymodern the ofday

and themselvesRussian consider strongwithnaturalasties Russia ally in . This school‘sThisoflackdefinable.

shouldrecognizedo be as

and rejectand tionalof AcademyScience othermatter. Kyiv Post.

external politicalexternal any notion ofnotionany , ountry,

and many and

fficial The ns CEU eTD Collection Ukraine. under gr politicalpartiespowerful ofbecauseitsin academia ―multiple SlavEastern and studytoprecursorasimportant athe to Holodomordebate,especially with to reference the Belarusians civilization. School Ukrainians theconcerning 3.2 ofresidentsand regi Ukrainian party presi Current oup to Ukrainianhistoryto become oup onalist onalist Ancient Ties: The propose apropose languagelaw thatwouldinclude state Russianas language a Viktor

105 104 mostlyWhile centeredon academicdebate, an claims Ukraine‘s independence,Sinceeach soforth.and to seeksit UkraineclaimstoThus democraticto adhere values remainsbut ―Creoles‖The holdstheidea fast thatall Eas

, Taras Kuzio, ―Medieval History Impacts Contemporary Ukraine,‖ History in Yar

ideology and are a separatearegroupRussians a ethnicfrom and ,

Thelegacyofthe Kyiveithershowscontinuitywith Rus Russians orsplitsthese t dentViktor Yushchenko‘sadministrat oslav Hrytsak, ―ancient‖theof origins establishing

urban areas UkrainophileSchool enter . Most ofMosttheirsupport comes from . 104

are responsiare

theEuropeanUnionbut tiesRussia,with maintains soon close and Yanukovych in Ukrainein Kyiv RusKyiv Debate On the Relevance and Irrelevance Nationalismof inContemporary

hree Ukraine a in the east andthe eastin south

groups ble for the prevailingble forthe

importantwhendiscussingHolodomor remembrance . T . allegian tern S tern sa

s.the While hails from hese academicdebates and Kyiv Rus StateKyiv Rus ion. ,

dependingwhichgroup‘spreon isnarrative federation. Theyoftenfederation.aretied thetocreation of lavic groupswerelavic

ofgroups thesehist claimsdifferent a ces 42

,‖ the Party,‖ofone Regionsmost theisof the

. theRegions.SupportersPartyof 105 EasternSlavicSchool

. The . middleaged ambivalence Belarusians UkrainophileSchool

―born‖ out―born‖ of byofgroupsthese each are allegiances

Ukrainians in Ukrainianin politics. , whilethe , highly

may not benotpopularmay

theKyiv Rus

along

made byeachmade

and authoritarian;

and Russophile

Kyiv Post. believes orical orical

side ofthe retir sented. claim ees, ees,

CEU eTD Collection Kyiv Ukraine,‖ Rus in 40. hiswith troops accepted the allegiance of the Bohdan Khmelnitsky thanRussian.century emphas state Rus The groups. 3.2.2 naturalwasmendedEmpirebroken continuum and a groups. bondbetween the throughout this collapseAfter appearonly asandthegroupcollapseof after athe School Russophile ofPeryaslav1694inTreaty nation theEmpireRussianandMoscow, oftransfer the EasternSlavicbrotherhood.Aftein an nation Brotherhood” 3.2.1 . This naturalThis i . did not desirenotdidindependentstate, anunitedratherbut anation with B and Russia The The 108 107 106 The RussophileForthe and ize

as a separatea asidentityEasternSlavic othergroups. fromLinguis Council of Pereyalslav was ameeting between the representative of the Ibid. Taras Kuzio, ―Nation Building, History Writing and Competition over the Legacy the of ,

the territoryeasternthe andof centra Ukrainianissimilarthetolanguage more spoke UkrainophileSchool school Kyiv Rus:Kyiv Russophile and Kyiv Rus:Kyiv

culture of culture

emphasize

t also proposes that Ukrainians that also proposes bettertheto haslegacy claim the of , the leader, the of heEasternSlavic nclusivenessofhistorywas thissetmotion intoby

108

Theyalsonotionchallenge theof Moscowthe―cradle‖ as of the all threeSlavicgroupsall Ukrainophile School 106 s

Soviet School Soviet thatUkrainians areregionalbr thatreunitedgroups the thesewithRussian crown.

Cossack Hetmanate innotdoes contrast, seeethnic conn an were

peoplewerebrokenunnaturally r ther Kyiv collapseof the S Rus

tasked intasked preserving and Tsardom Russia of Soviet School l Europe.l s,Kyi the 43 —

Belarusian, Russian, and Ukrainian toBelarusian, Russian,and Ukrainian

and and Claimthe of . During council the Kyiv Rus stateKyiv Rus

The v Rus‘ legacyshowsthat UkrainianvRus‘

integrationintoRussian the .

nKyivinto up s anches of theanchesRussianpeopleof and the “Slavic guidingthe in thein tate, there wastate,a there Bohdan Khmelnitsky and

the signing of t ofthe signing Separateness ection withinectionthe tically, they tically, fourteenth scattered thethirteenth

Russian Tsar members ofmembersthis

107 century.

The Kyiv elarus elarus he

and

CEU eTD Collection incorporated into the 1340. In 14 the G A founded state in 1199 by accessed http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages%5CG%5CA%5CGalicia6VolhyniaPrincipalityof.htm( ofhistory tides byhistoricalwere,circumstance, themercy at andvictims Soviet Union.Russophile Ukrainian victimizationnathe people‘sUkrainian serfdomreinstated bringthem Poland, the closertoOrth consequencestreaty‘s ofPereyaslavTreaty century. Galician a sees thetherefore Slavicpeople,Eastern alicia alicia and Volhynia under his rule. The

continuance with thewithcontinuance 111 110 109

110 - 05 May 2011). Volynianstate

―Galician Ibid. peasantry

Taras Kuzio andStephan Shulman. AccordingUkrainophileto historiograp Russians aswhile perpetrators; legitimate th

. century, the territory was taken

, -

Lithuanian histori Volynian State,‖Volynian and was viewedand was rrative

isbowtoto forcesaggressive an Russian e

between thegroupsnotbetweenwas sough

servedcuttowithUkrainiansofftheir from ties Roman Catholic arguing

, which was independentwasuntilRussia, which the from late heirtheto Roman Mstyslavych cal territory under theterritoryundercal of the controlTsar This typeThisofgivesnarrative historical alegacy to Ukrainians as

that Kyiv Rus stateKyiv Rus -

Ruthenian state, until was it taken over by 16 the

that Kyivthat twoolderalmosttimesisthan Moscow is promotedisin Kyiv Rus stateKyiv Rus Encyclopedia of Ukraine,

as justificationbytheRussianEmpirebringing as the odox Church, marginalizedodox Church,the Ukrainianlanguage, Romanovych dynasty

and Christianity Ukrainianswe , the , the over by Lithuanian the kingdom,and later, was

Ukrainophilehistoriography ofaggressive theRussian

prince . 109 hy, thisreunificationhy, tha

of of Volhynia from 1170, who united t, addition,the

but ratherbut forcedthem.The upon

repeacefula agrariansociety, ruled the state until its demise in

notMoscowin mpire .

111 UkrainophileSchool ,

and laterand the This h This s

and . Theethnic. , eighteenth th t begantwith the

but inbut the

century the e arkensback ,

changing and .

they

to CEU eTD Collection History Easternin Europe remarks, factor defining competingThese conte looktochancethedifferinga at construction the desire providinginimportant narrativea historicalthe to territory presentday of They Ukraine. thethreegroupsofrecognition seeks separation caused state Ukrainians 3.2.3

Kyivtie Rus .

mporary Starting in theinStarting a historythatrecognizesabirthplaceof thethe KyivinKyiv Rus

recognitionRussianpeople‘sof theinfluence cultural The 112 sidesofborders.eastern its betweendifferencesessentialUkraine neighbors its theboth and westernand on oftheexistencefactof andseveral public competition visions pastmarksof the the ofdialogue betweenlack them,regional the ofasymmetries andmem sometimesanddifferent narratives of opposite, Despitehistoricalmemory. the evident presentin Thus, KyivThe Rus The

Andriy Portnov, ―Post ,

EasternSlavicSchool and Russians,and

Kyiv Rus:Kyiv in Ukrainian . Ukraine Thesefactorsextend s .

deviationsin culture historical

thirteenth

legend serveslegend as an - . , 155. day Ukraine, onedayUkraine, canfind, admire,orthe fearcoexistence of

Although the focus ofthisthe focus Although debateistiedto more academia, nation buildingnation The wereallculturallylinguisticallyand influenced by the school

Eastern Slavic School ‘ overlappingheritage‘ century,t - Soviet UkraineSoviet Dealing with its Controversial Past,‖

historical

remainsthe middlegrou 112 sbased areregionalism heavilyidentityon ethnic andas a

to theto , language

he and theviewpointsandofdiffering groups Ukraine in appropriate exampleofappropriatehistorical memory schools

political three 45

, gro

and tradition and ,

and how the Kyivhow theand Rus landscape ups naturally dri naturally ups . They believeThey all. threegroupsare : Navigating the nd in thein nd ,

and history in Ukrainehistoryinand

in Ukraine.in . T he EasternSlavSchool he

debate. fted apart.T fted ,

but also legacy AndriyPortnov Belarusians ory, thevery Middle wishes Politics of Kyiv Rus his playsinto

it offersit through

for thefor ,

. CEU eTD Collection toUkrainianhistory.claim‖ regardinglanguageissuesand nation thetostatusnationalincludingHolodomor narrative, of tragicsuch using a eventdefinea to playofSeveralintoquestioningViktor factors Yushchenko‘s the administration elevatingthe asnarrative intoquestioncalled Thelife.complicationscultural of historicaldivergentof narratives the construction U inprocess constru School Slavic stateofacreation While both thebothSovietWhile and , cting this nationalctingthisnarrative thenextIn chapter, and

the nationalisticthe undert krainewill takestage. center influenced , becauseof, its ―multiple allegiances facet of facet narrative,the the claim ofthetheclaim Ukrainian legislation

Russophile SchoolRussophile theHolodomornarrative

culture.It is

UkrainophileSchool identity , commemoration . ones oftheones

Holodomoras by several groups,byseveral

Ukraini

challengedbygroupsasserting―historical their 46 s project.

have

phile dominationofthisphile national , ‖ has nothasin beenas‖ successful an act ofactgenocidean

, and howitandthein evolved nationbuilding

been as well as politicalwell asas dominatesthis Historyservesas a foundation for severally

na tionallyinternationally. and

marginalized process.The ,

and the use of thisuseandof the UkrainophileSchool , academic, in the Eastern

and

CEU eTD Collection planting techniques for the deaths of between 20 and 43 million people. 1958 government blamed the famine onnatural condition such as drought conditions, for the famines of collectivization po the famine caused by Chairman ―Great Mao‘s Leap Forward‖ campaign. As with Stalin‘s http://www.un Yushchenko,‖ narra remembrancesofUkrainian their famin regimeSovietduringthe subsequentlycreatewould policiesthatmarginalized the Russian populationUkraine. in influencegovernment‘s They thecountry.alsoweary within were nationalistic hisbetogenuine.words take They the accusedof presidenttheusingHolodomort humiliateof anynationsto or states.‖ ornations,statesother heritage of ―Revivalisour not against aimed don‘tanyone.Wewant thema uniting wouldrecognitioninternalrectifyingindisparateUkrainian aidhistoryof the the accept - tivetheinUkrainiandiaspora how it and 1961. Scholarship outside Chinaof however, blames policies the to col 114 113 Thisemotionalized.of discoursevictimizationhas succeededin of thecreation the narrativenewinfluenced ofAmericathe Ukraine, highlyis whichpoliticized and theatmosphereColdTheofthe a Wardiscourse and Yushchenko‘sinclaimViktor lay studiesconductedwestern historians bymostly presidency,Duringhis ―Attempts to recognize Holodomor genocide as not aimed other against states Felix Wemheur‘s article compares the remembrance of Ukrainian the famine with that of Holodomorof asthe genocide Ukrainianpeople

agenda thatagendatheties tostrengthen soughtshake the and with West Russian off ian. ChapterFour: Ukraine Information Agency sone He country. also claimedthat thesearch truthwas against for notaimed net licies, Mao sought createto commune farms. Atfirst, as with the Soviet Union, the /eng/news/news

. IndetailFelix. article Wemheur‘s

iktor YushchenkosettooutUkrainianiktor convince to citizens The Long Shadow of the - 222599.html 113 e

, 20 November 2007, ThoseUkraine,withininwell as as Russia s , he discussesthehecreation of , theHolodomor 47

later influencedindependentUkrai an (accessed 18December 2010).

. Yushchenkobelieved. thatthis ing the historiesofChinesethe ing boutgenocidethesis the North in Holodomor

thatclaims thePresident‘s lectivize farms new and

citizenry –

opush a , did notdid , ne, 114

and , CEU eTD Collection Post Russian andEurasian History Ukrainian andChinese Famines State under Socialism the Cold after War,‖ bestexamplesofthe of complexitiesnationbuilding theinformer Union.Soviet rifts scapegoats community, questioningbythebothcriticism andwell international citizenry, country‘sas as the wellasinternational,national as issueswithin th Georgia,theBalticincluding States,Thesevictim led Ukraine. narrativesseveral to and have hasThisled history. genocide alsoeruption of toan narratives are ofdeconstruction thecollafter ignoranceStalin‘sofof his policies. collectivization thediscussedfaminewastheinthen,terms of rationalized tragedy and a casualty as evenoradmittancethat ana famineraged theinUnion Soviet villages creationundergroundof― the an famine, UkraineinduringperiodThoseSoviet not didthe theofhorrors aboutthe ―forget‖

regulartopic -

created bythisnationcreated building reality,process. In thesituationthein one of country is 1989 EasternEurope,‖ 118 117 116 115 Evgenywars‖,stresses,―History characterize Finkle landscape theofnationbuilding survivedduring thatmemory‖ theSovietinfamiliesvillages. the and era narrativewasnationalittaketobecauseable up the com instead; theykeptinstead;their accounts affected

Felix Wemheuer, ―Regime Changes of Memory: Creating Official the History the of Ibid. Evgeny Finkle,‖ In Search Lostof Genocide: Historical Policy andInternational Politics in Ibid., 37. . As discussed in previousinAsdiscussedch specificallythe Sovietofapsethe Unionin eastern in andEurope central

sdiscussed

by the famine. There wasbythefamine.Therenoofficial narrative i

thepast,Soviet

Global Society

when post when 10, no. 1 (Winter 2009): 57. Russiangovernment

personal memory thereclaimingthestolenthepast, ofsearchand for ―truth - Sovietseekto countriesthein fill ―bl

apters, Ukraine hasbeenotapters,Ukraine 24, no. 1(January 2010):52.

and memorieand 48

ese countries,eseareimmunetonot and

thatclaimRussiansunjustly targeted are as , ‖ 116 which

sof the event,hid

survivedtheinregions and , ,

118 untilth municative ―underground n the Sovietnthe Unionof

Finkleinasserts, countries

nimmune thetointernal Krit many e 1980e den ika, Explorationika, in

through countries. ank spots‖ofank . Even. 115

, 117

The ‖ CEU eTD Collection Holodomor.the TheresolutionStalin blamedSovietpeople. the government andorganizing for executing and deUkraine, history collectivenarrativeto establish a tha ―WeUkrainmadepresidency, wellastheinternallyto as onthatstate.‖ discourse the assesses thei byinternationaltragedies orga legitimacyofgivethetheseto claim regimes the c SovietNazi andcommittedtheirin crimescountries. Yushch ofinstitutesremembrancecreation in countries case,of course.unique pastcomplexand toattemptedthe elevateas Holodomor diaspora ommemoration days throughoutommemorationdaysremember formertocountries communist the victims international rperpetratorsthough trials, . In2003,the . 121 120 119 independenceneedUkraine‘sa broughtdefinetowhatabout enko administration, in Ukraine.inenko administration, The―starving ident , even whenthese, even ofbids genocidegounrecognized by theinternational community, ,

and shapedtheand Yushchenko Ibid. Evgeny Finkle, 56. On the Saturdaythird November of each year in Ukraine, citizens remember victims the of . claring the Holodomor wasdeliberateclaringtheaofHolodomor act genocideUkrainian against the 119

By creating such remembrancecreatingBy suchbasedonvictimhood, template this toseeks community continuingregional,ethnic,linguistic anddifferences. VerkhovnaRada

Several 121

international community.As

ity,‖severaltermedit, asRussian formedfirst journalists in

still

e, nowneedwee,Ukrainians.‖ to Hiswords reflect make need a nizations and states,nizations and perhaps and

examples legislation must addressthemustgeno t would define those who residewouldtdefinethosewho states as victims,states as

administration

passedresolutionindependencesinceof thefirst the a defininganegating while narrative, Ukraine‘s

These institutions in theinpost ,

and 49 reparations.

such - ‘s Soviet and communistincludethe space Governmentsestablished

to seek globalrecognitionto seek of their

nationbuilding agenda cidethus claims,creating a ―global Poland and Georgia,Polandand under and the Leniod seekoutfind tothe ―truth‖about 120

AsEvgeny furtherFinkle ,

Kuchmastatedduring his to seek l seekto

thecountry in Ukraine under oneunder Ukraine in

egal actionegal against Ukraine is notisUkraine a .

The identityThe

w as

CEU eTD Collection (accessed 2010, 11 2011). Ukraine Home Page remembers November 2008, 2011). http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/en/publish/article%3Fart_id=72980&cat_id=32589 (accessed thatwereinterpretcontrol chosen memory this to ofSovietwhilesuch release otherarchives, Timothy asSnyder groupsinethnicthe multiplenot accountfor Some thecountry. academics the applauded hechargedPoliticianswas insensitivethetoof historythe theallUkrainian people of did and 2008establishedasHolodomor the―Yearof RemembranceUkraine.‖ in theHolocaustcommemorationwith inspeeches given duringtermpresidenthis as and Holodomorgenocide.recognize the Yushchenko as con EuropeanasUnion,United thewellsuchNations, asnations, other as includingIsrael, lobbyingundertakenintenseeffortbyhave histo administration internationalorganizations, remembrance,campaign for ―Ukraine deathsmilliontheinUnion,stopped butSovietshortof calling thefamine genocide. passeddeclaration aRussia, of defining thefamine nationalatrag as theHolodomorofrecognition genocidethe in asstates, Nations. including Twenty United six president Kuchma,theunder UkrainianForeign Ministry begana international campaignfor thatwouldleadpolicies the to exterminationofthe Ukrainian peasantry. http

127 126 125 124 123 122 Yushchenko‘smethodswereViktor questioned internallyboth ext and theeleWith

://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/feb/03/ukraines 02 April 2011).

- Israel does not recognize the Holodomor genocide. as ― Timothy Snyder, ―Ukraine‘s past on Trial,‖ Viktor Yushchenko, ―President Yushchenko‘s Speech Dedicated to Holodomor,‖the Felix Wemheur, 48. The Holodomor was law passed 28October 2006. world.html Honoring the Victims the of Holodomor 1932 http://action , ction ofction http://www.wumag.ki

(accessed 02De

- ukraine ViktorYushchenko2004,inthepresident

- report.blogspot.com/2008/11/aur917 cember 2010). remembers, therecognremembers,World ev.ua/index2.php?param=pgs20074/14 50

127 The New York Review of Books

- Stillotherepisodes his in 1933,‖ tinuously paralleledtinuouslythe Holodomor Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Website,

A ction Ukraine Report - , questionedthe , past - on izes. edy that caused 710tothat causededy - nov

- launchedthepublic trial/ 122 126 ‖ - 22 124

The same yeasame The

- (accessed January

ukraine

It was It ernally. , 33 February methodsof , (22

- an 123

10 May 125

r, to CEU eTD Collection (accessed 02February 2011). http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp Ukrainian loaded. nationalludeto seemsto people.‖Ukrainian nation,‖Ukrainianwhile the the wordingof cleavag population.Russian policies illegalden was to coalitionhis majority thein thepoliticalpartiespolarizedpopulation and Ukraine.inYushchenko‘s administration 4.1 thewithaprovoke fight country. nationalisticpoliciesYushchenko‘sandonseveral him accusedoccasions of trying to neighborUkraine‘sTh Russia.to theeast, Ukrainianguidanceofthe the Security Servicebrought(SBU), which about criticismfrom viewwasAddingofStalin,nationalisticof Josef theHolodomor.trial thefire under fuel Law leddebatestoadministration political onthe Theoflevel.thecreation Holodomor Denial

(2006) Politicizing the 129 resolutionwascontroversialThis several forreasons. Yushchenko‘spu Viktor es withinUkraine territoriales alongethnic andlines. as a purelyanationalistic asmove

Peter Finn, ―Aftermath of the Soviet Famine,‖ courtedcontroversy n furtheranddividedthe bill yHolodomor thegenocidein as Ukraine. . 129

Thebillrejected original and stated, TheRegionsbelievedthat Partythisofwould declaration create

T Holodomor heterm

Verkhovna Rada

passed resolutionpassedstated

sh to haveshtoHolodomordeclaredgenocide thestrongly nation

- dyn/content/article/2008/04/26/AR2008042602039.html : Legislation under Viktor , determinedmarginalizetoUkraine's, ethnically

as opposed toas e Russianehighly governmentwasof critical only ,

51 pressedwithforward legislationthat stated it

ethnic Ukrainiansethnicvictims, as leavingethnic , ―A , Washington Post people

―A n act ofngenocide act the against ation becauseationofsomewhat its 128 Severalpoliticalpartiesthese saw ngenocideof act against the

is politicallyis and ethnically

Opponentschallengedthe

, 27 April 2008, Yushchenko

and CEU eTD Collection November 2006. believedhistory, betweenUkrainiansethnicwedge andStanislavKulchitsky,ofRussians. ethnicprofessor a weremembersabstainingleery ofbit theusingwords a genocide, fearing it genocideHolodomoras Ukrainiansthe against not ―tragedytheandpeople.‖ SovietThe a of absta ofthe members compatriotsconsideredthatsacrificed themselves nation the―Ukrainian for definitionofgenocidethe bythe resolutionalsorecognitioninternationalThe cited theof thefaminebyseveral countries and however hintedlegislation also thattherewouldbelawan additionalto criminalizedenial, this statingmuch further, wentpublic denialwasofthat theillegal.Holodomor The whatresolutionh endorsed onnotratherbutnaturalphenomenon, the famine a policies.Stalin‘sofAlthough type this statinggovernment,thatthe policiesdeliberately killedmillions bystarvation, blaming thus narrative. bill canbethe evaluatedan asattemptexclude to them this from collective historical Ukraine,in the famine ethnicity nationalismexclusive the asRussians ined from voting on thevotinginedmeasure. fromobjectedTheyon of theto phrasingthe that described bill 131 130 resolutio The 1ofthe resolutionArticle usedterminology t

, that

and

Ibid. ―Yushchenko Signs Holodomor Bill into Law,‖

clausewas omitted

to dominatetothepublicsphere. Although Russians wer ethnic also

― VerkhovnaRada outgroup the legislationthe contained n‘s passingnotn‘seasily, come did

seeks

and throughouttheSovietand Union, ,‖ ad already beenalreadyad passed administration,2Article during Kuchma‘s

tooneother, elevategroup the throughoverreligionculture, and possiblyand

, mostlyhailing, the from UNDHR

becauseofthe controversy an surroundingsuch action.

. Furthermore,thevictimsthewere. of famine could be interpretedcouldbeas the correct phrasingthe correct wastheto and appropriate 52

hat criminalizedofthe actionshatthe Soviet

however. ViktorYanukovychhowever. 200 and Russia andCIS Presidential Bulletin

the use oftheuse

Russianspeaking south andeast

the perpetrators.the This

nation

in thedraftofin first

. would drive awould ‖ 131

original e victims invictimse

use ofuse

, 29 130 ,

or ,

CEU eTD Collection http://www.day.kiev.ua/290619? politiciansacademics, becausebelieved theypolicies theoutrage from came media,obviouswereespecially those who Yushchenko‘s criticalof prestigeUkraine‘s thepromoteinworld.‖ oflawsuchdemocraticthepassagewith a would―complyEuropean standards further and wereoffensesdeemedprosecutorialThe bytheYushchenko SBU. addedthatthe further theproceedrecommendedit to Ukraine.CodesT ofProcedural Holodomor genocide Rada legislationwhoabstainedthe others and alo country.‖ MaybehadUkrainegreater initcountries. a Ukrainemore is as effect, agricultural believed,him,withotherpolices, along many byhunger.‖ Ukraine.inItdifferentwas industrialization not or modernization; was it cold situationUkraine inHolodomor.historic involvingHethe c . This did notdidThis . 135 134 133 132 suchdenial.containing people,thegenocide againstJewishandpreparing for disseminationofandmat UkraineingenocideHolodomor asthe HolocaustUkrainian againstpeoplethe as and sentencetwoupyears,custodialforpublic tothe of fordenialthe of the fact imposepenalty100300thetotimewould untaxed a of minimum incom UkrainianPeopletheHolocaustandthe genocide asJewishagainst apeoplethe ofpublicdenialtheTheof 1932 Holodomor In , 133

2007,Yushchenkopresidentlaw pushedat for Peter Finn Ibid. ―Holodomor andHolocaust Denial beto Criminal Offense,‖ Ibid. and furthered his pursuit ofpursuithisfurtheredinternationaland recognition.

132

and th Therewasobvious anbetweenofidentity lack athose commonwho voted for

WhileViktorYanuchovych thatagreedSovietthefaminewasof thecause

e HolocausteUkraine,in faze , ―The Aftermath the of Soviet Famine,‖

and even ordi and even Yushchenko, however;Yushchenko,

idsource=179841&mainlang=eng 134 this wasthis an attack on VerkhovnaRada heEnforcementLaw LegislativeSupport Committee

narycitizen‘sopinionswere endangered.wordingThe 135 and totheandtoamendment add theCriminaland ngand ethnic territoriallines thein

This spaThis

53 ―Itonthe happenedterritoriesof many as hetosoughtas createthis basedon narrative

for considefor - theirrighttospeech free 1933 in Ukraineingenocidea 1933 asagainst rked outragerkedonseveral The levels. o criminalize thedenialo criminalize of the Washington Post. ommented,was―Themechanism rati

(accessed 5February 2011). on. The proposedon.Thestated,law

Dehn (Day),

. Journalists,.

- 03 April 32007, blooded killingblooded Verkhovna e level, orlevel,e a erials erials

CEU eTD Collection 2008, hepoliticizingdiscussesthenarrative2008, the of by Yushchenko: famine presentedwasbyPyotrpolices, Romanovan in articlein bytheinarchivesSBU the truth.‖―search Oneof viewth for collectivization,byanynecessary. means heinminority.isbut the presidency,PartyduringYushchenko‘sbelieved therewas deliberate ―not anystarvation,‖ ratherSome,than genocide. democide PetrosuchSymoneko,headof asthe Communist wascaused thatfamine by totalitarian believenottheHolodomormaywas an ―exclusive‖Ukrainianratherbutevent, large ascale seemsgroundedmore law‖ in becausetoHolocaustreferenceof the theabsurdof H claims liabledenycriminallyto Holocaust. there Whilebeneed the a maysuch forlaws exist toin was it as speech.freeDenyingneed for Holodomorthe wasthreat asa genocide tosecurity national thewithtotal compatibilityUkrainianConstitution,whereasnational security the superseded Volodymr aMoisyk, wasnot defined.denial‖ The clearly attack onliberties was civil somewhat by rationalized legislation thebroadwithin bewasto enoughinterpreted several ways http://en.rian.ru/analy 136 ofthedeplorable aspect discussion. humansuffering,sincere politicking outrightuneducated andhostilitythe is most albeitradicalunsophisticated,bellicoseUkrainian This nationalism. mixtureof discussionofHolodomorinvolvesthe time onHolodomorlaw I withthe andagree many I aspects.However when agree cannot havedeservesreadvictimsI speeches every respect. the Yushchenko ofPresident and the1932 Doubtless, T thedenial furthercomparesHe laws Holocaust inEuropean countries,is ten it where he passing of thispassingoflawreasonshe alsobehindSoviet openingthe contradictsupof simplethat as

Pyotr Romanov, ―Ukraine Blames Russia for the Holodomor,‖

Ukrain .

sis/20081222/119103228.html (accessed Stalin‘s plansStalin‘swereto ―break‖resistance thatpopulationsshowedto - 1933 Holodomoristerribletragedy;1933 a and ian

the Supreme CourtSupreme judge.believedtheHelegislation in be to Yush policiesofThesebeliefs Stalin.lineinwith are more chenko‘s administrationattempt

136 54

- servingpolitical consideratio Rianovosti olocaust revisionists,olocaust th e famine,eof andYushchenko‘s

5 March 2011). . Written in Decemberin. Written Rianovosti

, theitsmemoryof

a tothat silencethose s

―Holodomor ―Holodomor

, 22 December

n and is

―denial — CEU eTD Collection 2010). December 2009, (accessed November 2008, waswouldgenocidehave famine andtimeunder possible faced jail the newspaper Ukrainian becannotrecognized genocide.Holodomor as wereimplemented the famine thebygovernment;UkrainianswithinSoviet therefore the gavenationalisticandviewwere aof false history,well as as favor ethnic U questioningYushchenko‘sarticle motivesHolodomorinpolicies.Hethatthe policies argued s on theSovietwholeconcernedof Union.‖ ItbyMoscow.Kremlin's atthe finger causedpolicies was theway backthen, it and was famine neo criticize thetovictimstribute of Medvedev Presi Russian - everal occasionsworkplaceeveralhisKyivat at the

Nazismtheincountry falsifyingand history.‖

140 139 138 137 Yushchenko‘s alsoinitiatives, criticizedOthers arguingthepoliciesSovietthat during hasunitedthatUkraine withcountrycenturies. been for a while testpatriotismtooutandHolodomor loyaltyand to certain achievepoliticalgoals, usedlikeitbetopersecution, during the totalitarian citingthe use era, further of the It just d

5 March 2011).

theadministrationpolicies framing for that―favorUkrainians…reviving ethnic ―Ukrainian Political Analyst Under Fire for Views on 1930s Famine,‖ Dimitry Cydakov, ―Russia Condemns Ukraine for Distorting History,‖ Ibid. Ibid.

further stated further

meantmotivate toItsnationalists.negative usedaspectwas weapon aspointto a dentMedvedevcommented, sohappensdisagree thatthosewithwho will the underlawfall criminal

t the same timethethe sametcountryseparatetrying accusing of Russia, itselfto from a http://rt.com/news/holodomor h ttp://english.pravda.ru/world/ussr/14

RodnePriazovye thefamine.

that lawswouldneverthat be abl

137

One politicalOne anal , questioned theadministration‘squestioned assertion , that the 138

Pir - famine o 55 z 140 henk

- Sergeyan edit Shvedko, based CIS institution after he wroteinstitution CISbased hean after - -

pirozhenko 11 He commented o

- ehistoricalprovide to justice, claimed 2008/106702 ystUkraine,inViktorPirozhenko - ukraine

hewasbytheSBUharassed

- , ―This perception of, ―Thisthe perception russia_ukraine_holodomor

(accessed 05December proposed orthe foreastern Russian Time, Pravda, krainians. amendment

14. orpay 139

CEU eTD Collection January 2010, http://rt.com/news/ukraine Verkhovna Radafor avote. bepersonanof athoughts illegal cannotregardless act of how much certainwould forces hiscivilposition voiced thatagainoncedemocraticviewpoints confirms state, ina and decisioncourt‘safterthe dismissal, ―Thefact thethatthe Shvedkonotdidbelieved violate bythelaw Shvedko onopinion. expressinghis commented theof oflaw.‖ violation Ukrainianpeople2Articlequalifyingthe and Holodomor betoofdenialgenocidethe and a 1ofthe 1932 Article Holodomormemoryvictims.‖ofthe was―criminal[ly]Ukrainians negligent,‖because itnational ―humiliated dignityinsulted and reasoneKovalenko DonetskdistrictUkraine head,Vasily Kovalenko, branch stancehiso for th undersued creating furt He statesdefense:hisinShvedko thecodeofto criminalUkraine fact her claimed 144 143 142 141 The facts.historic solelydirectedU against negligencecriminalof theleadership.country‘sI don‘t that What isit with agreewas fullyagreeI that famine manyofpartstheUnion rockedwas it and Soviet by caused rifts ―Ukraine Puts Jour

The legislation criminalizing ―Holodomor andHolocaust denial‖ did makenot it to the Ibid. Holodomor―First Denial Trail in Ukraine Hist of Holodomornotunlawful,of denial that

Donetskthatheard courttherefused arguments Theygrantprivateto lawsuit. the in Ukrainianinsocietypoliticsand along territorial andethnic lines.Shve http://www.ukrainebusiness.com.ua/news/725.html e controversialeHolodomor(2006Law

144

dthatarticlequestioning Shvedko‘s Yushchenko‘spoliciesofcreating national this Holodomornarrative were

Shvedko - 142

1933Holodomorlaw thattherecognizes to famine

- journalist

nalist on Trialfor Viewpoint‖

pointedhisinoutdefense thatArticle2designates thatdenial , which , krainians. Ibaseinternational thinkingkrainians. this on law and - famine 143

criminalizing Hestated further - trial . (accessed December 05 2010). 56

it wasitgenocide. ) byUkrainianbusinessmanOur) and ory Slated,‖ Holocau

Russian Times

the exclusivity of thethe exclusivityf of , ―My demands, ―Myare backed upby court sidedthecourtwithwho journalist

(accessed 28 April 2011). st

and Ukrainian Business News

Holodomor , 21 January 2010,

n thefamine. begenocide against

amine toamine

denial

dko was dko . 141 , 12

CEU eTD Collection 2010). 5 May 2008, Repression,‖ http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/sergei http://www.khpg.org/en/index.php?id=1263315208 Human Rights Protection Group 2011). Rianovosti thosewhoquestiondidtheopeningbut feared it anotherby ploythe was to administration theinternationaltoOppositionin community. ofwas the theopening documents very little, documents,thisthe detailingpoliciesdocumentstheunderregimeSoviet S the Ukrainian 4.2 defeata for maywhile itboundarieshavetestedwasoutcome,thevictor thelaw, ofa waslitmus thistestPerhaps a all involvedhow forpartiesseetoeffectiveThethiswas. law thein politicallines along against speech inbecauseconsideration thefirst works placethelaw restrictto indi an decisionbyTheynotedthe court.the thatthealsonot should havebeen lawsuitbroughtto that.‖ want

oviet era Top Down Nationalism: The Release of Soviet Documents and

and is especisand 147 ―Holodomor Defamation Case Squashed Ukraine,‖ in 146 145 2009,JanuarySBUofIn thedeclassified 800,000of aboutpagesof documents Shvedko eation oflaweationthisthat hindered ―Journalist Taken to Court on Article over Holodomor,‖ ―Legal Precedent Ukraine:in Journalist allowed to do James Marson, ―Ukraine: Opening Secret of Archives Shines Light on Famine, 11 March 2010 145 Yushchenko‘s http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2009/0505/p06s04 Christi Institute of National Memory

(1917 Severalhuman organirights

showsthepolarizingthat effectthe an Science Monitor ially journalists. dangerousfor . wouldrenewthe fightgainto the Holodomor of recognition g as - Furthermore

1989) , http://en.rian.ru/exsoviet/20100311/158159509.html

policies. includingpersonal , 12 January 2010, , it questionsofitthe Yushchenko themotives, administration

therightsto express ofjournaliststheiropinions. - shvedko/ zations in Ukraineinzations 57 testimonies,

( a 146 c

(accessed 03 May 2011). c e

Holodomor . Thelawsuitbroughtby s 147 s e d

Yushchenkohoped thatbyreleasing

Index onCensorship, 0

3 trials, a ubt Holodomorubt Genocide,‖ as

M - , Huma wogn.html

and internationally and a y

narrative h 2 0 ndother government n Rights Ukraine,in Kharkiv 1 1 ) . vidual‘soffreedom

(accessed y j for

(accessed 05 March ad onUkraine ad Kovalenko 19 March 2010, ournalistsand

, 20 December

the the applauded enocide from from CEU eTD Collection and to fulfill: theto legislative power in The Institute of National Remembrance was created to address whichissues are considered essential secution_of_Crimes_agai.html http://www.ipn.gov provided for such a transfer specialthe archive under the Institute for National Memory. was A law draft written that would have ―The archives of Sovietthe secret service were never removed from Ukrainian their heirs (SBU) to benotheaded would by independent an Holodomor.Unlikesimilarinstitutesthe in eastern centraltheEurope, andinstitute Ukrainian Yukhnovskyy ofheadedNational byoneInstitute Memory was V of happened. SBUthethe toplannedfrom Holodomor believed somerelease, theydocumentswouldomitthat may speakingUkraine.populationinSinceRussian the inwhat was SBUofdocuments charge to one conveya 2. 1. 3. 2. 1.

150 forgotten. belief that no unlawful deeds of the state against its citizens can beprotected by secrecy or people in the t The need to compensate for damages which were suffered by the repressed and harmed The duty to prosecute crimes against peace, humanity andwar crimes; dignity; Citizens' to fight efforts f Patriotic traditions of fighting occupants, against Nazism andCommunism; post The losses which were suffered by Polish the Nation as result a of the World War II andthe 149 148 Polishafterof theModeledNational Institute Remembrance,

148 The Polish Institute of National Remembrance Website, Andriy Portnov, ―Post ―Ukrainian Scholar to head National Remembrance Institute,‖ -

war period;

positi

, sidednationalisthistorywould and further create

150

on and sought toandtheUkraine,regimein studyspecificSovietwith sought emphasis on .pl/portal/en/1/2/Institute_of_National_Remembrance__Commission_for_the_Pro . imes when human were rights violated by state. the This is the expression of

Control ofControlofthecatalogue documen

Poland, primarily preserve to memory the of:

but wasbut it never even debated Parliament.‖ in

(accessed 17 May 2011). Ukrainian

or an independent Polish State, defense in of freedom andhuman -

Soviet UkraineSoviet Dealing with it InstituteMemory,Nationalthis forbut never authority,suchwithas thecaseratherbut in Poland, 58

iktor Yushchenko‘s allies, IhoriktorYushchenko‘s allies, ts was supposedwasbetotstransferred s Controversial Past,‖ 154.

not supportnotYushchenko‘s

tensionwith Russiathe and

BBC Monitor 149

the Ukrainianthe

ing, Kyiv.

CEU eTD Collection 11 2011). Ukraine Home Page million dollar mistake. passage leading to memorial.‖the stylized ca ―Located thein November 2010). Project,‖ term, independent from the government Poland. of Stalin‘sJosef trialin2010 the early ―resurrectionThis continuedofUkrainian memory‖ woulddramatictaketurnwith another quest:hisbehind Holodomoroneorderinmovetoasunitedthe Ukraine. whereYushchenkopleadedwith2008, nation to again theUkrainian with ―come terms‖to institute‘s the design.for however of because leaders International databases,electronicspace and attestingthetoUkrainiantragedypeople.‖ the of complexhistorical includ aofincluded CandleMemory Monument Ukrainiangovernment.bythe While the complex hadthe complexWhileyet be tothemonumentbuilt, d was 155 154 153 152 151 totalitarianismofher symbols from dressUkraine.inmustneatWelivingUkraine ain condition shirt remove the and work honest and bewill resurrectionofIt our m a , and themonumentand , was completedin Unian

ndle Pirozhenko calls huge a Holodomor monument erected in centerthe of Kiev amulti Ibid. Svitlana Korenovska and Morgan Williams, ―Candle Memory:of Ambitious Holodomor The Institute of National Remembrance in Poland headedis by apresident for a five year Viktor Yushchenk

theofvaluethe research institute thatanwould allow.reversehappened The -

like structure with a flame ontop. There are also two angels on both sides of the

Park Eternal of Glory 11 Oct

, http://www.wumag.kiev.ua/index2.php?param=pgs20074/14

urged theurgedbuildgovernmentto the institute monumentfirst, then the ober 2008,

-- ing a largemuseum,researchaing scholars, for center library archiveand only suchonlyhelpworkbring can order anationaldecent justand

o, ―President Yushchenko‘s Speech Dedicated to Holodomor,‖the 151

http://www.unian.net/eng/news/news

This projectThispart waslargerofproject aremembrance that

with with .

the Alley of Heroes, monumentthe is emory, purificationemory, liesandbe fromIt filth.ispure to . 152 body.

59 Theinstitutepromotedwasas a

2008.Thereyetbehadtoblueprints created

155

154

Inspeech,hishehis stated reasons edicated on22edicated November - 283587.html an artistically

(accessed January

(accessed 10(accessed

―world class 153

- , CEU eTD Collection 2011). 2010, April 2011). National News Agency of Ukraine Ukraine. (Communist Pa Communist Party) Chubar Vlas (Chairman the of Ukrainian Co Lazar Kaganovich (General Secretary), Vyacheslav Molotov (Chairman of Councilsthe of People‘s http://umoloda.kiev.ua/number/1574/222/55413/ a was blam to wascaused famine byoftheactionsthe state Stalin‘s and collectivization thatpolicies were presidentialupcoming election. thatYushchenkoadding genocideSovietof againstUkrainian people the in 1930sis absolutely groundless,‖ outrageoverexpressedproceedings thestatingDuma, genocide. intendedwas legalhopesinguiltythe arenathataverdictwould legitimize the thatthe Holodomor claim takebytoHolodomorhismovethe administrationpolitical ofoutthe realm itput into and January2010 in of StanislavKaganovich,Lazar Kosior,Vlas Chubar, underof thegenocide condition 4.3 mmissars) (Deputy Prime Minister). Stanislav Kosior (General Secretary the of Ukrainian Digging up th http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/feb/0/ukraines

deliberate 159 156 trial infuriatedThetheRus YushchenkoadministrationThedeclare pushto its continued th e for thee throughout for famine UnionSoviet1932 the from 158 157

Yaroslav Myzichenko, ― Ibid. Timothy Snyder, ―Ukraine‘s Past on Trial,‖ New ―SBU Brought Criminal Case on the Fact Committing of Genocide Ukraine,‖in

rty Ukraine) were instrumental carryingin the out collectivization

genocide. ,

where they werewherethey guilty. found

e Ghosts theof Past: Stalin’s T 158 was trying to pick a fight with Russiawithpick tryingawas order in fightto to votes the for court

, 159 http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/order/?id=177790 Ykraina Moloda,

sia The RussiangovernmentThe UNDHR ngovernment

(accessed 01 May 2011). and triedStalin,andJosef 60

22 May 2010 157 . Boris Gryzol,Speaker. Borisof the Russia‘s

MendelKhatayevych

Yushchenko‘schoice ,

― Sovnarkom

York Review of Books The rial hasadmitted

idea of Holodomorofthe ideaidea and , - past -

33, but hasbutdenied 33, it always - ), Mendel ), Khatayevych on Vyacheslav

- trial/ e Holodomore

thatmass the 156

(accessed 1 March

oftrial awas a policies of Stalin in

, 03February

inKyiv a court (accessed 15 Molotov, The CEU eTD Collection December 2010,http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/order/?id=177372 (accessed 22April 2011) and isolated were called black boards. This created mass starvation thesein areas. Toward endthe of 1932, the villages and regions Ukrainein that were cut off from outsideworld the http://www.presiden http://en.rian.ru/world/20091223/157329277.html (accessed 12April 2011). hedocuments, arg France ofgrainseizuresother food and boards ―black unites.Descriptio militaryspecial army Stalinagainstevidence others, andaccordingthe Nalyvaychenko,presence toincludedof thetoProsecutorGeneral‘ evidence almosthad its completed the investigationwould intobeHolodomor,andturning itsover historical justice. Stephan Romaniv,believedUWC,thatthis wereUWCpresent the help topreparetheevidence trial. forThe executive of secretary byBolshevikcreated the mass regimeandofdeath cause citizens.‖ bringtoevidenceonthecriminalenough acase fact theopeningWithofNalyvaychenko thearchives, now ―Ukrainehas stressed, collected Congressthe Worldfromof Ukrainians (UWC)discusstothe trial of themen. future six 2009,thetheSBU‘shead,springValentynofIn Nalyvayche , as wellofrestriction as, asfreeof a the movementpeasantry. 164 163 162 161 160 Ukrainereceivedinvestigation, ofevidencescommitting absolute crimes against itsJanuaryand commitment1933fromtill June of1933… In the thecourse thetopreparationrelated genocideourin committingt for personalsignaturehisthere, and personalsecret andinstructions, everything and verdictmaterialThethe of andStalin.withguilty mentionedHissurnameis begins trialbeganwithopeningPreparation the of for the archivesSBU the2009.bythe in

―Ukraine Says Holodomor Genocide Case Almost Solved, Ibid. ―SBU Brought Criminal Case on the Fact Committing of Genocide Ukraine.‖in ―SBU Blames Sta Viktor Yushchenko, ―Holodomor,‖ , ‖

163 161

ued, heldStalin‘s signature: ued, plan t.gov.ua/en/news/8296.html

By DecemberByof2009,Yushchenkoreported thetothepress SBU that

nedat blockades aimedcertain Ukraine, indetailed areas plansof lin lin for Genocide of Ukrainians,‖

thatwassentItaly,to subsequently Egypt sofficeshortly thereafter trial. for nsoflocalities within ofUkraine totarget,the use The Wall Street Journal wasmove atowards progressive establishing

(accessed 10 May 2011). 61

ofwasthe famine,whichartificially National News Agency of Ukraine nko, met withnko, met representatives ‖ Rian , 27November 2007. erritory and theitselferritorycrimeand 164 160

Alottheseof

, 22 December 2010, 162

Representatives from

Someof the ,

Greece and

, 24

CEU eTD Collection Ykraina Moloda. http://rt.com/politics/holodomor Ykraina Moloda, October 2009, 2011). Ukraine UNDHR strictlywasdecision political legalofnot a and weredefendants Ukrainebuild tochance democratic and onfair principles", thisverdictpraised ―symbolic.‖ as allthoseontrialfoundguiltygeno of secretinmet wasevidenceverdictpresentedthe the took a deliberators,TheSBUofconsistingpresidency. a a officer, the men.case against Italy,States,theKazakhstan,Moldova,United Germany, bolsterAustriaPolandto the and onpetitions otherinUkrainians during countriesthe famine,theinvestigatorsSBU havesubmitted organizat Nalyvaychenko,thedocumentsAccordingsent to were also international courts and

171 170 169 168 167 166 165 kickedtrialinduring offtheThe lastbreathsof January 2010, Yushchenko‘s wellpapers,otheras933 mass burial as places of victims. genocide Soviet3,685 classifieddocuments,includingJosephwith Stalin's signature, many and bytheUSSRofficials.topGenocidehumanity in1932 in Ukraine , 30

as a guidelineas a ions.

―Yushchenko Brings Stalin Court to over Genocide,‖ Yaroslav Myzichenko, ― ―Ukraine provides PACE Holodomor with Proofs,‖ National News Agency Ukraine, of 23 ―SBU Disclose to Criminal Case on Genocide 1932 Ibid. Ibid. Yaroslav Myzichenko, ―

December 2009, retaining

and discussedandtheir reached findingsaftertheironly theyverdict.The men http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/order/?id=172608 166

alldead,thepasscourtnoton couldbutsentence a them, noted thatthis TheSBUstated directorthatorder alsoin to proofsgenocide collect of of

167 legalassistance

for their verdicttheirfor

http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/order/?id=177790 -

famine The Kiev Court Appeals of Named Organizers the Holodomor. of The Kiev Court Appeals of Named Organizers the Hol of 169 -

cide against cide stalin "This decisionrestores the"This historical truth givesa and from . They . -

ukraine,(accessed law enforcementofagenciesBelaruRussia,

62 mere further dimension

the UkrainianViktorpeople.Yushchenkothe

two and a half hourstwotoandhalf a deliberate.

justified the trial becausejustifiedthe trialunder -

. (accessed 08 April 2011). 1933,‖ 171

Russian Times, 1 hefurtheradded. prosecutor and a judge.

March 2011). Thecourtthe also cited National News Agency of

(accessed 08April

14 January 2010, 33 is pr 33is 165 170

Sincethe oved byoved

After all odomor. 168 s,

They

CEU eTD Collection mineralizedalmostchargethesuchimpact of trial. a Ukraine,initkeeping Byputtingcommunity. and the SBU,inheritor KGB inof the the Thishavehelpsuggested.bolstertoSnyder maygenocide claims of theintheinternational tribunalinternationallooktotheratherevidencethan at the keeping ―trial‖ localized, a bybutJanuarywasitnumbers,Aa point.betteroption have moot 2010 may beentoan ask generalelectthe Yushchenko elections.presidential hadcomein primary infifth the and bytheregime.TheSovietuseddaystacticsverdict out before of came four the firstround participatedresearch,andratherin joint governmentsotherSovietUkraine and formercooperated throughresourcessharing archival dispel.‖to meantwas deliberateverdictthisto believedthis and―summon[ tactic rightshuman violations.of UNDHR 173 172 SnyderTimothyhowever,Yushchenko‘s criticizedHistorian use of a troika‖ ―modern ,

thereis Ibid. Ibid.

ion.

nolimittimeonwhen

PerhapstheYushchenkothoughttrialwouldbolstersagging his poll 173

Snyderstudythathistoricalsuggestedwould betterbe served if 172

thansuchconductingtrialsthathearkened back to chargesbroughtbe canindividuals against accused 63

ed] the spiritthatit theofed] Stalinism hadqualifiednot s for CEU eTD Collection wastheir aidhowever,met withmixtureof a acceptance scoff.Nationalists welcomed and deserv to accounttheirhave forcomplex ownandpasts. controversial painttopictureablevictimblackwere white aof and perpetrator, and underSoviet thepeople‖ re c Holodomor. rootsofhistoricalthe identity classifiedHolodomor as Holodomor thediasporabyboth and Holodomor Y diaspora narrows thesis politicians Ukraine,Ukrainianswithininternationaland organizations consistsofaHolodomor reateidentity anthe for Ukrainian exiled ushchenko‘s administrationushchenko‘s ed, a placeatheUkrainiantableed, atinthe outsideofUkraine Ukrainians constructed my The

With theindependenceofdiasporaWith Ukraine, the expected,perhaps thought and they wassetto employedUkrainians apart fromthrough Russianslanguage, culture, ‘sbuildingof the ,

all ofwhichall sought genocideUkrainianthe against narrative The UkrainianThe diaspora

thestudy riad of riad . The thesisThe . KyivstateRus actors involvedin actors of theof genocide bytheinternationalgenocide community complex cast. Itincludescast.complex Ukrainian diaspora, theRussians ethnic Viktor

narrative gime ,

whichthisidentity endorsed construction ofconstruction to influence theconstructionof . By creating. ByUkrainiansnarrative,such a the in diaspora Yushchenko alsolookedat a swellas sought tosought externaliz , and ultimately,, and throughtheofnarrativethe Conclusion

thedebateover Ukrainian s

by peasantry , exploring the case, exploringfor,the

64 on several

nationbuildingprocess.To theirsurp advancing the studyadvancing the of Holodomormemory theofpromotionthe

thenarrativevictim an .

e Soviethistory,Russophilee and examplesof

in anin attempt to national a create states and

Ukrainian .

This exclusivenational identitytheand bythe focusing Holodomor and ag and

, s , President thesufferingof―their and ultimately, didultimately,and not cholars, dfought

stateidentity ainst deemingtheainst

Vik and

as genocideas

to havetothe tor rise, . Th . and is CEU eTD Collection The Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 2003), 75. Genocide: Cases, Comparisons and Contemporary Debates,” (Hanover: University New of England Press, 1999), 241. Memoryof Cultural Recall thein Present Ukraine,narrativethisIn was furthercomplicated schoolsofhistory,political bydiffering baseduponidentificationtraumaticnarrative ais difficult atask undertaketo for group. any thereflectsgroup‘ regime wasStalin‘s crucialofpart athis memoryprocess. building ―evil.‖ groupsthemselvespresenthistory, canasothers ―righteous,‖maywhile be perceivedas byshowingnever standsandvictimizationcurrentMemory alone, aof throughouttheir newthisto createin Variousnarrative.nationalpolicies Viktorunderleadership were Yushchenko‘s implemented independenceshiftUkraine‘sa historical broughtinaboutmemory therewrite to and need a issue, struggleshowUkrai thisover andhighlighted, January2001, fromthedated diasporatrials of the relationship Ukrainewiththeir and are wasthistothought an attempt marginalize themgroup as a up picked ofview their

175 176 175 174 returns,ofpastsum notbutThea facts,basedon constructthe as narrative a that anti ofrestthebycountry,nostalgicThethe Union, moreSoviet iscontrast, less and for allalmost are fiercely anti decidedthatthewereNazisthere th westernUkraine, swallowedfromby1939.theinSomeonly Soviet people Union realproblemaThe isdifferent completely of diaspora viewhistory.Most activists are

Th ―Ukraine‘s Diaspora Blues,‖ Klas the victimthe narrativeas Er - Russian e restorationethe andthatof commemorationUkrainians under suffering endured nst Alphen,Van ―Symptoms Discursively: of Experience, Memory andTrauma,‖ Ukrainian - Goran Karlsson, ―Moti s preferencesandvalues. contemporarys nationalTheof a creation — ternal narrativeternalthat the adopted diaspora‘saccountasblueprint. its

despiteartiStalin‘s

history

that carried on an idthat carriedonan if itwasif - communist. Guerrillawarfareon until communist. the carried 1950s. ves, Mechanisms Memories and Soviet of Communist Terror,‖ The Economist. , Mieke Bal, Jonathan Crewe, and LeoSpitzer, eds., ficial famine, whichficialkilledmillionsin famine, the 1930s. theirown. e lesseroffought two evilsalongside andthem; 65 nianidentityan is

entity throughtheUnionSovietentity they and

EthnicR

Steven L.B. Jensen, ed.,(Copenhagen: . In articlefrom an. ussi

evolvingpresentand ever ans in Ukraine,however,ans in 176

T he Economisthe Acts 174

CEU eTD Collection million. ―the cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime‖ and estimates the death declara Nations still nothas recognized Holodomor the as genocide; however, the General Assembly passed a genocide; but it condemned actions the Stalin of and the Soviet government. As of 2011, UnitedThe tragedy collectivizationpolicies during1932 was‗targeted‖stillpopulation isupdebate, a for considering thatparttheconcludeof terror was Stalin‘spolicies, famine administration t Furthermore, belittleto the―searchfor truth debatescholarlymeaningfulresearch andsidedintoOneversions of theissue.seemed events res Memory denial Holocaust ofspeechwas freedomfor and easily too justified by struggledinstilltoinhas governmentsince its independence. It slap constitutedthein aface Holodomorlegislationmakedenial toillegal wentdemocratic againstprinciples that Ukraine though wascausebound tothat schisms ethniccreate andRus ethnic betorecognizedHolodomor genocide? as account. asgenocideHolodomor Yushchenko‘srejected policies andthatto sought ethnic,affiliations, linguistic,territorial and whichprone not allegiances,wereacceptto the ources, however,theources, legislationsupported by Yushchenko tion that provides some language important regarding famine. the It attributes the famine to . 177 Yushchenko

Theoftheopeningarchives and of thecreation

TheofquestionremainswhyViktordid pushsodiligen Yushchenko broughthope and excitement toscholarsintonewlydelveto eagerthe available

In December 2010, Councilthe E of

heofdirectionhadtheresearch bybeenestablished already the Yushchenko long before the releasebeforelongthe Soviet ofthe documents

lawsinstatesEuropean other

deniedsuchanyintention

‖ and ‖

Ukrainian - 33 . T . 177 here must behere must urope stopped short of describing Holodomor the as

66 Holodomorlegislationusedstrong language

. Furthermore,. theattempted . unity

that Yushc that paralleling Holodomorparalleling denial and theUkrainianI recognition but tobutdegreetheUkrainian a that

siansgroup,outan as

the destructivenessofthe Stalin‘s all but negatesbutall thecreation . Thereis. enoughto research henko enc

ofother affectedbythis nstitute ouraged - toll at toll seven to ten squash passage ofpassage tly for the for tly

of National . this even of CEU eTD Collection Disenchantment,‖ of citizensstoryafor nationalistic thisrationalbethroughshoulddonebut discussion throughnotopen poorly and constructed withinthe communitiesinevitable isschism ofhistory allthis segmentsIf represented,notare groupswithinall onbu be theUSSRespecially thewithSovietviews,asRussophileis and westdemonizingwasthe Union Soviet Soviethistoriographycombat createdtowas and era Russophile where inan that acceptingthought the didn‘tand Isgoingpassively resist? thatreallyhow you‘recreate to a atetheirpeople children? Totell howyou were about destroyed sat youthere and just remembered.Butbe toitneeds make to your centralsymbol?To national tell how about they―Whydididentity:Holodomor? the I choose was tragedy,itit agree ab was Georgiyhistorian, Kasianov,questionedofYushchenko‘sthe use Holodomorin creating an it wassupposedreconciliationprocess to create thewithhistoricpastand injustices instead, but theanto forefront alreadyissueled contentiousto within further cleavages Ukraine.

created more questionsthancreatedmoreanswersmore and separation than understanding.Ukrainian 178 theissens It is There Yushchenkodid Viktor ildingnational anarrative historical thatuses thelanguagedistinct of culture the and

Keith Gessen,Keith ―The Orange and Blue:the After ― hot

also The New York Times Magazine Ukraine headedness e ofbeinge grouppast aofawith parta common that c

much more to Ukrainianmuchmore toiden

a defuncta state state , as wellasgiving recognition as, due the totragedy the Holodomor. of

Holodomor to claimtoas . ‖

notHolodomorthe constructbutnarrative, efforts his bring to .

their as genocideas wentstepstooUkrainophile a few far.

and viceandversa outdatednoand longer history.Memory,history, .

Thesehistoryblankof spotsbe shouldfilled in, , March 1,2010. 67

as seen in thisinseencas as titythantheHolodomor

the Revolution,the aPolitics of . This UkrainophileThisof viewhistory,

is workistheinpresent, e,

and nationalismand are all citizenry?‖ the potentialthe a for reatesa national . Theshould focus. ad…andit 178

O This thers CEU eTD Collection Sociology, Nash ed.Kate and Alan Scott (Malden, Ma: Blackwell Publishing, 2 2001), unitethemasthanone. Yushchenko‘screationofthe Holodomor pol identity. whopeopledrawgroupon sameofaresources thesetof when articulating ofsense their actualtaskthe at behindpoliticsthethe po administration‘s UkrainedoRussianshaveUkrainians andshared in aoverlappingidentity andhistory, and Yushchenko whichwiththepopulationsthe majoritytermsof agree fateofThe everynation bindsociety ato psychethatthisshapepowerful forces collectivegroup. of Theseato cancome forces 179 179

Alan Finlayson, ―Imagined Communities‖ in The Blackwell Companion Political to

Thisattemp

did notdiddefininga createnarrative thefor Ukrainian citizenry. , but theybut , tearscan alsoin create collectivefabric this of the countrywell. as

hand

—

t totunitedby a create commonof sense community through identity a - thatofnationbuilding. building project is dubious untildubiousprojectisbuilding

licies seemedlicies take tostage centermarginalized and iciestodivide seemedfurther Ukraine 68

―A comm―A s.

This nationThisbuilding under project thereareclearstraightforwardand unity‖,asAlannotes Finlayson Although 81.

rather g ether ether , ―is CEU eTD Collection ErnestAnthonyGellner,and Smith Gerald.Dirks, Johan.Dietsch, Antoon.Impact Baets,UniversalDeclarationDe ―TheofHuman the ofRights ontheStudy Craig.Calhoun, Craig.Calhoun, RogersBrubaker,and RogersBrubaker,―Nationalizing theStatethe in NewEurope.‖ Oldand Mieke,Crewe,JonathanBal, Leo andSpitzer eds. AleidaSebastian andAssmann,Conrad, eds. Myroslava.Antonovych, that ______Benedict. Anderson, Bos, PascaleBos, R.―AdoptedMemory,‖

Matters?”New9Left(May Review http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/gellner/Warwick.html Mon Historical York:Routledge, 2007.New ( no.4 Romania,Hungary, and Slovakia.‖ Studi Present Practices, ContempinSeminar Ukraine.Holodomor)(thein Amsterdam: CenterPolitics. Studies,Asian1992.for Nationalism. 2010). of Histo treal: McGilltreal: “Western Nationalismand“WesternEastern Is Nationalism: es 19no.2(April1996):411 es Long DistanceLong WorldCapitalismof Nationalism:andtheRise Identity October 2002): 700 October2002):

Canada’sPolicy:IndifferenceorOpportunism? Refugee . Hanover: University1999.Hanover:NewEngland Press,of. MakingofSenseandHolodomor inSuffering: Holocaust Ukrainian NationsHistoryCulture,the Matter:Cosmopolitan Dream and National ry.‖ andTrajectories Culture.

HistoryandTheory London: Verso, 1983.London:Verso, Imagined Communities:ImaginedReflections on Margit

- ism Legal AccountabilityforCrime1932 Legalof the Queens UniversityPress,1977.Queens

Lund:LundUniversity,2006. oraryStudiesUkrainian(23 . Minneapolis:University. Minnesota,1997.of

Feischmidt - 744. . London:PalgraveMacmillan,. 2010. ,

―The Warwick Debates‖,―The Warwick PresentedDanyliwtheAnnualFourthResearch at

Diaspora andDiasporaMemory, Bibliography -

June 2001):3 June - 48(February 2009): 20 48(February2009): , ―1848 in 1994: The1994:in, ―1848Politics of Commemoration in 437.

Comparative Studies in SocietyinComparative Studies andHistory

MemoryaAge:Discourses, inGlobal

ActsMemor of - 41

- 25 October2008).25

theandSpreadOriginsof

no.13(2006):97 Ernest GellnerErnest ResourcePage,

(accessedDecember14, -

42. Therea Difference y: Cultural Recall Culturaltheiny:

- 1933Famine Great

Ethnic andRacialEthnic

- 104. .

CEU eTD Collection ―Ukraine‘sKaratnycky,Adrian.OrangeRevolution.‖ StevenL.B. Jensen, ed. Wsevolod,Isajw, YarislavRelevance Hrystak, On theIrrelevanceof andNationa KasperNils,Lippert Holtug, Hobsb Harasymiw MauriceHalbwachs, Stuart.Hall, JohnR.,Gillis, ed. Fritz RussianAnna.Fournier,Identities: ―Mapping Resistanceto Michel.Foucault, KateAlan andScott,Nash, eds. Evgeny.Search Finkle, Genocide:Lost ―In of Historical PolPolicy International and Keith.OrangetheAfterGessen, Blue:and ―The the Revolution,Politics a of , Verna. , awm, EricTerrenceand awm, Ranger. (March TheDanishCopenhagen: Center forHolocaustGenocide 2003. andStudies, 2004. Ottawa, Agenda. Ukraine, 1983.UniversityPress, Press,2002. Studies Russia. CornellUniversityIthaca: 1977. Press, Ma:Malden, Blackwell2001. Publishing, Post Disenchantment.‖ What hasbeenLearned, What ResearchAgenda. DevisingUniversityOttawa:a of England, MulticulturalismainWorldMigrationof Princeton:PrincetonUniversity 1994. Press, CentralEasterUkraine.‖and , - 1989 Eastern Europe.‖ Eastern 1989 Bohdan. Mod State

Budapest:CEUPress,2007. April 2005):35 April Forthe WorkshopUnderstandingtheTransformation of Ukraine:Assessing Second AnnualSecond Stasiuk ernity andItsFuturesernity 20February2004. and Civil SocietyandTowardCivilaS Ukraine: in - LanguageCounter

Building: A Comparative StudyLithuania,Ukraine,Building:AofBelarusComparativeand Commemorations: ThePolCommemorations: OnMemory Collective

PostUkraine Communist Genocide: Cases,Genocide:Comparisons

TheNewYorkTimesMagazine

- Rasmussen and SuneRasmussenLaeggaard, andeds. -

52. TheBlackwellPoliticaltoCompanion Sociology

Global SocietyGlobal

- Europe Memory andPractMemory . Cambridge:PolityPress,. 1993. The Invention of Tradition.TheofInvention - Cambridge Lecture, Univ Lecture,Cambridge

. Chicago: Universityof1992.. Chicago: Chicago Press, -

itics ofiticsIdentity. National Asia StudiesAsia . (Edmonton:CanadianofInstituteUkrainian .

. NewPalgraveMacmill. York:

24no.1(January2010):52

Foreign AffairsForeign

ice:SelectedEssays andInterviews andDebate Contemporary , March1,2010.,

54,no.2002):3(May ystematicSociologicalResearch LinguisticUkrainianizationin lism inlism Contemporary ersity ofCambridge,ersity Cambridge:Cambridge Nationalism and Nationalism

Vol.No.2 84

- 70. an, 2009.an, .

415

iticsin

433.

CEU eTD Collection SerhilM.―The‗NonPlokhy,a History of Kutuev.―DevelopmentPavlo, of IdeologyIdeologyDeve andof Nora Conny,JohnTroy,Mithander, MariaHolmgren Sundholm, eds RachelMay,AndrewK. andMilton, eds. James.OpeningSecretMarson, ―Ukraine:of ArchivesShines R.DavidBandera:Maples, ―StepanTheof ResurrectionUkr a SergeiMaksudov,by "LossesSufferedPopulation theof theUSSR 1918 JamesE. Mace, SusanneLachenicht, andHeinsohn, Kirsten eds. ______Taras.―NationBuilding,Kuzio,HistoryWriting, Competition andtheoverLegacy of the IvanKatchanovski, ―ThePoliticsGenocide ofOraninSoviet Nazi and GeorgiyPhilippKasianov, Ther,eds.and , Pierre (Autumn 1995):709 (Autumn Current 3_21/01_kutuyev_pv.pdf Modernization.‖(2003). epresentations.pdf http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/201/articles/89NoraLieuxIntroR 2007.Publishing, Memories 2005. Books, Dem 07April2011).(accessed http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2009/0505/p06s04 Europe RegisterII Samizdat College,Lawrenceville: Rider1988. andPastPresent.inCosmopolitanism 2009.UniversityPress, Ukraine ChristianScienceMonitor (September2006):407 Kyiv Europe andRecent ―National Identity―National HistoryUkraine.‖andin Writing . BetweenandHistory:. MemoryLes Leuix ocratic Rus.‖ Nationalities33Papersno. 1(MarchRus.‖ 29 2005): - - Asia StudiesAsia Problems of UkrainianProblemsof Historiography.‖ Asia StudiesAsia from the Perspective the from EffortsofFindings theCommission and of WarofandConflict 20 in Transitions in Eastern Europe andLatinEasternTransitionsinEuropeAmerica UkrainianHistoriography

(accessed11April201 . London:RoutledgePress1981..

582006):no.4555 (June 716. 626(August20 no.

- http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/NaUKMA/Soc/200 427.

(accessed04May2011).

, 05May2008,,

of SociologyDevelopmentof andof - (Un) Civil Societies:(Un)andRights Civil Human A La A Historical‘Nation:Noteson the Nature th

CenturyEurope 71 . Budapest:European Central Chicago: UniversityChicago:Press,Chicago2009. of boratoryTransnationalHistory:ofUkraine

DiasporaIdentities:and Exile, Nationalism 10):973 1).

566. de Memoire.de SlavicRevie onUkrainianFamine the -

997.

- wogn.html . Brussels: Peter LangPeterBrussels: .

LightonFamine,Repression.‖ ainian NationalainianHero.‖

Nationalities34Papersno.4 . Collective Traumas:Collective . lopment: Contemporary - 58. w . NewYo .

ge Ukraine.‖

54no.3

–

1958." 1958."

rk: Lexington

The and . .

CEU eTD Collection Viktor.―SpeechApril27Yanukovych,PACE2010.‖to RuthAuerandWodak, Borea, eds. Ruth,Cillia,RudolfDeWodak, Martin ReisiglLiebhart.Karin and Felixof ChangesWemheuer, ―RegimeMemory:Official History the Creating the of Hagen,UkraineMark.HaveVon ―DoesHistory?‖ a Timothy,―PoliticsSnyder,HistoryEastern ed. of in Europe.‖ ______Timothy.Snyder, ______Stephen.ofCivic Shulman, Ethnic andIdentification ―TheContours Ukraine.‖in Gabriel.Sheffer, Liudmilla,Shanghhina, Shafir Roman Serbyn, Vic.Satzewich, Peter―Rodgers,or Compliance W.Contradiction? Teaching‗Hi Smith,Anthony. , Gershon,ed. , http://www.ukrainebusiness.com.ua/news/1432.html An Construction 658 History (accessed http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/feb/0/ukra Europe 2003.Press, Security2008.Defense,National and Minnesota ofConvention 503 2007):(May Explorationin Ukrainian 2010. A

ViewBorderlands.‖Ukraine‘s Eastern from InternationalComparison. - 673.

―Ukraine‘s Past onTrial‖, ―Ukraine‘s Past3 FebruaryNew 2010, TheofEthnicNations Origins

8no.2(September2010).141 Asia Stu Asia ―TheUkrainianFamineof 1932 TheUkrainian

Diaspora Politics:DiasporaAbroadAtHome 17April2011).

Bloodlands:BetweenandStalinEurope Hitler Ethno Press,1998. and ChineseandFaminesStateunder Socialism after War.‖the Cold

TheDebates:A CitizenshipReader of NationalofIdentity.

1948.‖ RussianandHistoryEurasian dies Ukraine’s Middle Class as aPublicMiddleActorClassUkraine’s as - - symbolism andNationalismsymbolism 519.

56,2004):35(Jan no.1 The Ukrainian QuarterlyTheUkrainian

Diaspora

Justice and Memory: ConfrontingJusticeandMemory:Traumatic Pasts. Vienna:CrossmediaManzGmbH &KG,Co. 2009. . London: Routledge, 2002.London: Routledge, .

Edinburgh:Edinburg2009.Press, University . Oxford:Press,Blackwell. 1986. -

163. 72

- 1933theGenocideUN intheof asLight

- 56.

SlavicReview . NewYork:Routledge,2009.. . Cambridge:.

10no.1(Winter2009):31

Europe 50no.2(Summer2006):181 . Minneapolis:. University of Ukrainian Business Ukrainian

(accessed3October2010). JournalModernofEuropean

- YorkReviewof Books Asia StudiesAsia ines story‘Ukraine.thein‗New‘ . NewYork. . K .

Cambridge UniversityCambridge 54no.3(Aut TheDiscursive -

past yiv: Razumkov CentreRazumkovyiv: - on

59no. 3 - : Basic Books,: Basic trial/ - umn 1995):umn 59.

- Kritika,

194. ,

CEU eTD Collection ―Ukraine.‖ NationsDeclaration ―United on HumanRight Institute NationalofPolish RemembranceWebsite, TakenCourtonovertoArticle―Journalist Holodomor.‖ Customary―InternationalLaw.‖ ― DefamationCaseUkraine.‖ inSquashed―Holodomor Geno Famine ______Viktor.Yushchenko, ―Holodomor.‖ ―Resolution no.789 ―Resolution NationsonPrevention ―United Convention the PunishmentCrimes andofofGenocide the ―Holodomor.‖ Honoring the Victims of the Holodomor 1932 VictimsofHonoringthethe Holodomor http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/en/publish/article%3Fart_id=72980&cat_id=32589 world 10March(accessed2011). http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml Commission_for_the http://www.ipn.gov.pl/portal/en/1/2/Institute_of_Nat 03May(accessed2011). Website. Group remembers http://action http://www.holodomoreducation.org/index.php/id/159 http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/sergei http://www.faminegenocide.com/resources/findings.html November2008.‖19 11January(accessed2011). Page Home http://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/8296.html (accessed HumanWebsiteRights (accessed02April2011). http://legal http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/index.php?id=148&listid=78961 CIAWorldWebsiteFactbook ―Speech given at unvegiven―Speechat ―Preside - cide inUkraine:1932

factbook/geos/up.html UkrainicaResearchInstituteWebsite

10May2011). - - , world.html - dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/International+Law ukraine http://www.wumag.kiev.ua/index2.php?param=pgs20074/14 - nt Yushchenko‘sntSpeechDedicated to Holodomor.‖ the IV.‖ http://www.khpg.org/en/index.php?id=1263315208 Verkhovna - _Prosecution_of_Crimes_agai.html report.blogspot.com/2008/11/aur917 UkrainianRadio Website.

. (accessed12March2011). http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html

LegalDictionary Online

ilingHolodomorMemorialof the Kharkiv.‖in

- 1933 Website.1933 TheWallStreet Journal

RadaofWebsite. Ukraine (accessed2010).28November . https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the 73 s.‖ - 1933.‖

United NationsWebsite.United

- . shvedko/ IndexonCensorship Action Ukraine Report WebsiteActionReportUkraine

(accessed2011).10May Kharkiv HumanProtectionRightsKharkiv .

(accessed18March2011).

ional_Remembrance__ . 27November2007,.

(accessed10March 2011). (accessed03May 2011).

(accessed17May2011). (accessed18March2011). (accessed 3October2010). (accessed - nov

- 22

ukraine

Website.

Ukraine

. -

.”

CEU eTD Collection Moloda)(Ykraina YoungUkraine PostWashington TimeRussian Internat Russian PresidentialCIS andBulletinRussia InformationRussian Agency Guardian The Independent(Ukraine InformationUnianAgency) EuropeFreeRadio AgencyNewsofNationalUkraine Pravda KyivPost Kommersant (Dehn) Day OnlineNewsBBC

ional NewsionalAgency (Rianovosti

)