DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H. Hawley Jr. (Richard Howard) Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION By RICHARD H. HAWLEY, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Political Science Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2011 Richard H. Hawley, Jr. defended this dissertation on August 26, 2011. The members of the supervisory committee were: Heemin Kim Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dale Smith Committee Member Charles Barrilleaux Committee Member Lee Metcalf Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my father, Richard H. Hawley, Sr. and To my mother, Catherine S. Hawley (in loving memory) iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who made this dissertation possible, and I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all of them. Above all, I thank my committee chair, Dr. Heemin Kim, for his understanding, patience, guidance, and comments. Next, I extend my appreciation to Dr. Dale Smith, a committee member and department chair, for his encouragement to me throughout all of my years as a doctoral student at the Florida State University. I am grateful for the support and feedback of my other committee members, namely Dr. Charles Barrilleaux, Dr. Lee Metcalf, and Dr. Jonathan Grant, the last of whom is my outside committee member from the department of history. Finally, I want to thank former committee members for their support, encouragement, and helpful comments, in particular Dr. Will H. Moore and Dr. Paul Hensel, the second of whom inspired me to approach ethnic conflict in the post-Soviet space from the territorial perspective. Thanks must also be extended to other university personnel who made the successful completion of this dissertation attainable. In particular, I want to thank Dr. Sara Tirulamasetty, M.D. for her encouragement and support, and for helping me to gain the structure I needed to reach this important milestone in my life. I also extend my gratitude to Dr. John Bailey, M.D., who helped me to stay on track, especially with the coursework. I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to Bea Awonyi, PhD., the Director of the Student Disability Resource Center at the Florida State University, and to Darren MacFarlane, MSW, the campus-wide social worker. Without them, I probably would have had a much harder time completing this dissertation. I also want to thank Mary Schneider and Jerry Fisher, the two departmental academic coordinators whom I have had the pleasure of befriending, and who offered me encouragement, gave me direction, and who made sure I did everything I was supposed to do to obtain my doctorate. I also want to extend my appreciation to the Graduate School at Florida State University, for making sure that my dissertation meets university guidelines, and for making the publication of this project possible. I thank the personnel at the Co-Cathedral of Saint Thomas More for their encouragement and guidance throughout all of my years as a doctoral student at the Florida State University. In particular, I owe my gratitude to Monsignor Mike Tugwell, Deacon Santiago Molina, Louis, and to the priests I have encountered in Tallahassee over the years. I also want to thank Brothers iv Jude Lasota, Sam Gunn, and Jason Zink for their friendship and help. I am grateful to have met Beth Dees, who assisted me in navigating this thing called life, and who helped to make the completion of this project possible. There were friends who I met down here in Tallahassee who gave me encouragement, guidance, and assistance over the years. In particular, I want to thank Kristian Bredemeyer, Jonathan Korsah, Bonny Bhatacharjee, PhD., Chad Tilford, Steve Mozier, Sean Kozlowski, and J.P. Gower for their friendship. You made my stay in Tallahassee welcoming and pleasant. Finally, I want to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my family, in particular to my father, Richard, and to my late mother, Catherine. I have dedicated this dissertation to you both, for you brought me into the world, raised me, and supported my doctoral dream. My stepmother, Judy, came into the lives of my father and me, and made the pain over losing my mother less intense. I also want to extend my gratitude to my sisters, Margaret and Joan, and to the men in their lives, Robert and Scott, for being there for them. In addition, I owe a tremendous debt to my late grandparents, and to my aunts, uncles, and cousins. You all encouraged me to pursue my dream, and to bring it to a successful conclusion. The scientific enterprise is built on the work of others, and all scientists are a team who work to advance the frontiers of knowledge. In particular, I want to extend my appreciation to the works of those who preceded me, and whom I have cited. Any errors of fact and interpretation in this dissertation are mine, and mine alone. Because of the aforesaid individuals, this work was completed, and it is my hope that it makes a contribution, however modest, to the scientific enterprise. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... xi 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 2. TERRITORIALITY IN ITS LITERATURE CONTEXT .......................................................... 9 3. THEORY OF TERRITORIALITY ...................................................................................... 27 3.1 Facilitating Conditions of Territoriality ......................................................................... 29 3.2 Research Design: Methods and Cases ............................................................................. 39 3.3 Conclusion and Summary ................................................................................................ 46 4. RUSSIAN AND SOVIET NATIONALITIES POLICIES....................................................... 48 5. NAGORNO-KARABAKH ..................................................................................................... 87 5.1 Historical Background ...................................................................................................... 90 5.2 Evaluation of Territoriality with the Nagorno-Karabakh Case ................................. 103 6. MOLDOVA ........................................................................................................................... 119 6.1 Historical Background .................................................................................................... 122 6.2 Evaluation of Territoriality with the Moldova Case .................................................... 133 7. CHECHNYA ......................................................................................................................... 146 7.1 Historical Background .................................................................................................... 147 7.2 Evaluation of Territoriality with the Chechnya Case .................................................. 154 8. NON-EVENT 1: TATARSTAN........................................................................................... 166 8.1 Historical Background .................................................................................................... 168 8.2 Evaluation of Territoriality with the Tatarstan Case .................................................. 188 9. NON-EVENT 2: CRIMEA................................................................................................... 197 9.1 Historical Background .................................................................................................... 198 9.2 Evaluation of Territoriality with the Crimea Case ...................................................... 223 vi 10. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 244 10.1 Causes of Ethnic Conflict ............................................................................................. 247 10.2 Non-Events ..................................................................................................................... 250 10.3 Concluding Remarks .................................................................................................... 252 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 259 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................................................................................................... 296 vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ANM Armenian National Movement ARC Autonomous Republic of Crimea ASSR Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic AzPF Azerbaijani Popular Front CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CMMC Central Muslim Military Collegium CPD Congress of Peoples’ Deputies CPM Communist Party of Moldova CPRF Communist Party of the Russian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Baku 2015 European Games – Men Athlete Profiles 1 49KG
    Baku 2015 European Games – Men Athlete Profiles 49KG – ARTYOM ALEKSANYAN – ARMENIA (ARM) Date Of Birth : 24/06/1996 Place Of Birth : Martuni Height : 159cm Coach : Fedya Aleksanyan Club : YSSCOR Residence : Ararat Stance : Orthodox Number of training hours : 20 in a week Number of bouts : 54 Began boxing : 2006 2015 – Liventsev Memorial Tournament (Minsk, BLR) 7th place – 49KG Lost to Abdulla Kuchkarov (UZB) 3:0 in the quarter-final 2015 – Armenian National Championships 2nd place – 49KG Lost to Artur Hovhannisyan (ARM) 2:1 in the final; Won against Harutyun Harutyunyan (ARM) 3:0 in the semi-final 2014 – Kutaisi International Youth Tournament (Kutaisi, GEO) 1st place – 49KG 2014 – Armenian Youth National Championships 3rd place – 49KG Lost to Artyom Hovhannisyan (ARM) 2:1 in the semi-final 49KG – SALMAN ALIZADA – AZERBAIJAN (AZE) Date Of Birth : 01/12/1993 Place Of Birth : Baku Height : 163cm Coach : Nazim Guseynov Club : Gilan Residence : Baku Hobbies : Travelling; Photography Began boxing : 2004 2015 – Great Silk Way Tournament (Baku, AZE) 6th place – 49KG Lost to Tinko Banabakov (BUL) 2:1 in the quarter-final 2015 – Bocskai Memorial Tournament (Debrecen, HUN) 2nd place – 52KG Lost to Masud Yusifzada (AZE) 2:0 in the final; Won against Nurlan Askhar (MGL) 2:1 in the semi-final; Won against Kuanysh Sabyr (KAZ) 3:0 in the quarter-final 2014 – World Cup of Petroleum Countries (Beloyarskiy, RUS) 1st place – 49KG Won against Abdulla Kuchkarov (UZB) 3:0 in the final; Won against Turat Osmonov (KGZ) 2:0 in the semi-final; Won against Andrei
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Armenian Nobility: Five Armenian Families of the Ottoman Empire
    J. Soc. for Armenian Stud. 3 (1987) Printed in the United States of America 93 Robert H. Hewsen IN SEARCH OF ARMENIAN NOBILITY: FIVE ARMENIAN FAMILIES OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE The importance of the nobility in Armenia before the loss of its independence cannot be overestimated, but the history of this nobility was characterized by a steady decline in the number of families of which it was composed. From about fifty in the fourth century A.D., the number of Armenian princely houses steadily dwindled to some forty-two in the fifth century, to thirty-five in the sixth, and to twenty in the eighth.1 Ultimately, only seven Armenian noble families are known for certain to have survived the fall of the last Armenian monarchy in 1375.2 Of these, five continued to exist in Georgia3 while three others, the House of Artsruni, the House of Siwni, and the House of Orbelian, survived on Armenian soil, the first until the Turkish occupation of Van; the remaining two under Persian and, later Russian rule.4 For all this, however, there are not lacking some Armenian fam- ilies of the Ottoman Empire who claim descent from the princely houses of the Armenia of old, and some of these families have played a conspicuous role in modern Armenian history. The basic problem in dealing with their claims lies in proving their legitimacy on grounds other than those of the family's own traditions, which valid though they may possibly be, by their very nature cannot always be verified. In the egalitarian world of Islam, and especially in the Ottoman Em- pire (which, unlike Russia, recognized no hereditary nobility beyond the imperial house itself), the lack of official recognition of nobiliary descent leaves us with very little support for nobiliary claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaming Russia First, Foreign Affairs, November 2000
    Blaming Russia First Stephen F. Cohen, Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia, Norton. Chrystia Freeland, Sale of the Century: Russia’s Wild Ride From Communism to Capitalism, Crown Business. Paul Klebnikov, Godfather of the Kremlin: Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia, Harcourt. Pity the unpopular Russians! In July, Mexico elects its first president from outside the country’s ruling party, and The Economist magazine labels it a “real democracy”. Russia elects a president from the political opposition in 1991, then holds no fewer than five competitive, generally free national elections in the following years. The Economist labels it a “phoney democracy”. Colombia has a problem with organized crime, and Washington gives its government $1.3 billion to help fight the drug lords. Russia has a problem with organized crime, and American politicians lecture Moscow sternly not to expect any more aid until it cleans up its act. An American bank is accused of laundering money for Russian organized crime figures, and a leading senator accuses the Russian government of being “the world’s most virulent kleptocracy”. An undercover Customs Service operation finds several Mexican banks laundering drug money in the US, and Washington apologizes to the Mexicans for conducting undercover operations on their territory. When the Asian crisis scares foreign investors away from the Russian market and the ruble collapses, commentators declare this proof of the failure of liberal economic reform in Russia. When the Asian crisis scares investors away from the Brazilian market and the real collapses, commentators declare this a bump in the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/04/2021 08:59:36AM Via Free Access
    Chapter 12 Aristocrats, Mercenaries, Clergymen and Refugees: Deliberate and Forced Mobility of Armenians in the Early Medieval Mediterranean (6th to 11th Century a.d.) Johannes Preiser-Kapeller 1 Introduction Armenian mobility in the early Middle Ages has found some attention in the scholarly community. This is especially true for the migration of individuals and groups towards the Byzantine Empire. A considerable amount of this re- search has focused on the carriers and histories of individual aristocrats or noble families of Armenian origin. The obviously significant share of these in the Byzantine elite has even led to formulations such as Byzantium being a “Greco-Armenian Empire”.1 While, as expected, evidence for the elite stratum is relatively dense, larger scale migration of members of the lower aristocracy (“azat”, within the ranking system of Armenian nobility, see below) or non- aristocrats (“anazat”) can also be traced with regard to the overall movement of groups within the entire Byzantine sphere. In contrast to the nobility, however, the life stories and strategies of individuals of these backgrounds very rarely can be reconstructed based on our evidence. In all cases, the actual signifi- cance of an “Armenian” identity for individuals and groups identified as “Ar- menian” by contemporary sources or modern day scholarship (on the basis of 1 Charanis, “Armenians in the Byzantine Empire”, passim; Charanis, “Transfer of population”; Toumanoff, “Caucasia and Byzantium”, pp. 131–133; Ditten, Ethnische Verschiebungen, pp. 124–127, 134–135; Haldon, “Late Roman Senatorial Elite”, pp. 213–215; Whitby, “Recruitment”, pp. 87–90, 99–101, 106–110; Isaac, “Army in the Late Roman East”, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia's Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 64 Number 1 Internationalism and Sovereignty Article 3 (Fall 2019) 4-23-2020 Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine. Igor Gretskiy [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Igor Gretskiy, Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine., 64 St. Louis U. L.J. (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol64/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW LUKYANOV DOCTRINE: CONCEPTUAL ORIGINS OF RUSSIA’S HYBRID FOREIGN POLICY—THE CASE OF UKRAINE. IGOR GRETSKIY* Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Kremlin’s assertiveness and unpredictability on the international arena has always provoked enormous attention to its foreign policy tools and tactics. Although there was no shortage of publications on topics related to different aspects of Moscow’s foreign policy varying from non-proliferation of nuclear weapons to soft power diplomacy, Russian studies as a discipline found itself deadlocked within the limited number of old dichotomies, (e.g., West/non-West, authoritarianism/democracy, Europe/non-Europe), initially proposed to understand the logic of Russia’s domestic and foreign policy transformations.1 Furthermore, as the decision- making process in Moscow was getting further from being transparent due to the increasingly centralized character of its political system, the emergence of new theoretical frameworks with greater explanatory power was an even more difficult task.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Guernsey Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Guernsey: Appendices. Author: Dr Charles David Guernsey Biological Records Centre, States of Guernsey Environment Department & La Societe Guernesiaise. More information available at: www.biologicalrecordscentre.gov.gg This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Guernsey chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to Guernsey is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5743 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 Commissioned by the States of Guernsey Environment Department for the Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prepared by Dr C T David Guernsey Biological Records Centre August 2010 1 Contents Appendix 1: Bailiwick of Guernsey – Location and Introduction ............................. 3 Location, Area, Number of Islands, Population 3 Topography 4 Main economic sectors 4 Constitutional Position 4 Appendix 2: Multilateral Environmental Agreements. ............................................... 5 Appendix 3: National Legislation ................................................................................ 8 Planning 8 Ancient Monuments 8 Coast and beaches 8 Land 8 Fauna 8 Flora 9 Trees 9 Import/export 9 Marine environment 9 Waste 9 Water 9 Appendix 4: National Strategies ................................................................................ 11 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatar Question: a Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism*
    The Crimean Tatar Question: A Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism* Andrew Wilson Abstract: This article discusses the ongoing debates about Crimean Tatar identity, and the ways in which the Crimean Tatar question has been crucial to processes of reshaping Ukrainian identity during and after the Euromaidan. The Crimean Tatar question, it is argued, is a key test in the struggle between civic and ethnic nationalism in the new Ukraine. The article also looks at the manner in which the proponents of different versions of “Eurasianism”—Russian, Volga Tatar, and Crimean Tatar—have approached the Crimean Tatar question, and how this affects the attitudes of all these ethnic groups to the Russian annexation of Crimea. Key words: Crimean Tatars, Euromaidan, Eurasianism, national identity, nationalism—civic and ethnic Introduction In the period either side of the Russian annexation of Crimea, the Crimean Tatar issue has become a lodestone for redefining the national identities of all the parties involved. The mainstream Crimean Tatar movement has been characterized by steadfast opposition first to the Yanukovych regime in Ukraine and then to Russian rule. This position has strengthened its longstanding ideology of indigenousness and special rights, but it has also * The author is extremely grateful to Ridvan Bari Urcosta for his invaluable help with research for this article, to Bob Deen and Zahid Movlazada at the OSCE HCNM, to Professor Paul Robert Magocsi, and to the anonymous reviewers who made useful comments and criticisms. 1 2 ANDREW WILSON belatedly cemented its alliance with Ukrainian nationalism. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s would‐be new supra‐ethnic civic identity draws heavily on the Crimean Tatar contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • First Division Clubs in Europe 2014/15
    CONTENTS | TABLE DES MATIÈRES | INHALTSVERZEICHNIS UEFA CLUB COMPETITIONS Calendar – 2014/15 UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE 3 Calendar – 2014/15 UEFA EUROPA LEAGUE 4 UEFA MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS Albania | Albanie | Albanien 5 Andorra | Andorre | Andorra 7 Armenia | Arménie | Armenien 9 Austria | Autriche | Österreich 11 Azerbaijan | Azerbaïdjan | Aserbaidschan 13 Belarus | Belarus | Belarus 15 Belgium | Belgique | Belgien 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina | Bosnie-Herzégovine | Bosnien-Herzegowina 19 Bulgaria | Bulgarie | Bulgarien 21 Croatia | Croatie | Kroatien 23 Cyprus | Chypre | Zypern 25 Czech Republic | République tchèque | Tschechische Republik 27 Denmark | Danemark | Dänemark 29 England | Angleterre | England 31 Estonia | Estonie | Estland 33 Faroe Islands | Îles Féroé | Färöer-Inseln 35 Finland | Finlande | Finnland 37 France | France | Frankreich 39 Georgia | Géorgie | Georgien 41 Germany | Allemagne | Deutschland 43 Gibraltar / Gibraltar / Gibraltar 45 Greece | Grèce | Griechenland 47 Hungary | Hongrie | Ungarn 49 Iceland | Islande | Island 51 Israel | Israël | Israel 53 Italy | Italie | Italien 55 Kazakhstan | Kazakhstan | Kasachstan 57 Latvia | Lettonie | Lettland 59 Liechtenstein | Liechtenstein | Liechtenstein 61 Lithuania | Lituanie | Litauen 63 Luxembourg | Luxembourg | Luxemburg 65 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | ARY de Macédoine | EJR Mazedonien 67 Malta | Malte | Malta 69 Moldova | Moldavie | Moldawien 71 Montenegro | Monténégro | Montenegro 73 Netherlands | Pays-Bas | Niederlande 75 Northern Ireland | Irlande du Nord | Nordirland
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus Globalization
    Volume 6 Issue 4 2012 1 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Conflicts in the Caucasus: History, Present, and Prospects for Resolution Special Issue Volume 6 Issue 4 2012 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 2 Volume 6 Issue 4 2012 FOUNDEDTHE CAUCASUS AND& GLOBALIZATION PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS Registration number: M-770 Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press® Sweden Registration number: 556699-5964 Registration number of the journal: 1218 Editorial Council Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council (Baku) ISMAILOV Tel/fax: (994 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Kenan Executive Secretary (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Azer represents the journal in Russia (Moscow) SAFAROV Tel: (7 495) 937 77 27 E-mail: [email protected] Nodar represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi) KHADURI Tel: (995 32) 99 59 67 E-mail: [email protected] Ayca represents the journal in Turkey (Ankara) ERGUN Tel: (+90 312) 210 59 96 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Nazim Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) MUZAFFARLI Tel: (994 – 12) 510 32 52 E-mail: [email protected] (IMANOV) Vladimer Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Georgia) PAPAVA Tel: (995 – 32) 24 35 55 E-mail: [email protected] Akif Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) ABDULLAEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 6 IssueMembers 4 2012 of Editorial Board: 3 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Zaza D.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chechen War: Motivator for Military Reform?
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Information Warfare in the Second (1999-Present) Chechen War: Motivator for Military Reform? by Timothy L. Thomas, Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS., 2002. This article was previously published in Russian Military Reform 1992-2002 Published by Frank Cass Publishers, 2003 Chapter 11, Page 209-233 During the past ten years, the Russian military has attentively studied the subject of information war (IW). The main catalyst for this interest was the successful use of IW by coalition forces during Operation Desert Storm. Russian military theorists watched coalition planes bomb Iraqi targets in real time with precision and understood that warfare had entered a new phase, one dominated by information-based equipment and resources. Two further motivators were the poor use of IW by the Russian armed forces during the first Russian-Chechen war (1994-1996), which contributed to the loss of Russian morale, and the successful use of IW by NATO during the conflict over Kosovo. The success of the coalition forces in both Desert Storm and Kosovo indicated that military reform would be bankrupt if the technical aspect of reform did not include information-based technologies. These technologies must be imbedded into new military equipment, from sensors and radars to jet fighters and cruise missiles. However, Russia was also concerned about the impact of information technologies on the brain and consequently morale.
    [Show full text]