Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices 41421

In June 2006, the Department also II; Rubian; Ruby; Ruchi; RVR; S A; S & EFFECTIVE DATE: July 21, 2006. received information indicating that one S Sabri; Safa; Sagar Foods; Sagar FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John of the companies named in the Notice Grandhi; Sagar Samrat; Sagrvihar; Sai; Holman or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD of Initiation is now doing business Salet; Samrat; Sanchita; Sandhya; Operations, Office 5, Import under a different name. This company Santhi; Sarveshwari; Satya; Satyam; Administration, U.S. Department of is Surya Marine Exports/Suryamitra Sawant; S B Agro; S Chanchala; Sea Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Exim Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, in order to Rose; Sealand; Seaperl; Selvam; Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; determine whether this company is Sheimar; Sharon; Shimpo; Shipper telephone: (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482– subject to this proceeding, the Exporter National Steel; Shivaganga; 1690, respectively. Department must make a successor-in- Shroff; Siddiq; Silver; Sita; S K; Skyfish; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: interest finding with respect to it. We SLS; Sonia; Sourab; Sprint; Sree; intend to make such a finding no later Sreevas; Sri Satya; Sri Sidhi; Sri Background than the preliminary results in this case. Venkata; SSFLtd; S S; Star Agro; Star On May 29, 2002, the Department Partial Rescission of Review Fish; Sterling; Surya; Supreme; Swarna; published the final results of TBR; Teekay; The Canning; Theva; Tim As noted above, the petitioner and administrative review of the Tim; Tony; Tri Marine; Trinity Exports; antidumping duty order on stainless certain respondents withdrew their Tri-Tee; Ulka; Upasana; Usha; Varnita; requests for an administrative review for steel wire rods from India for the period Veraval; Vijayalaxmi; Vinner; V Marine; December 1, 1999, through November the following companies within the V.S; Waterbase I; Waterbase II; time limits set forth in 19 CFR 30, 2000. See Stainless Steel Wire Rods Wellcome I; Wellcome II; Winner; from India; Final Results of 351.213(d)(1): Abad; Accelerated I; Wisdom; and Z A. Therefore, because Accelerated II; Adani; Aditya; Agri Antidumping Duty Administration no other interested party requested a Review, 67 FR 37391 (May 29, 2002) Marine; AL Mustafa; Alapatt; Alfuzz; review for these companies, in Allana; AMI; All Seas; Alsa; Ameena; (Final Results). In the underlying accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), administrative review the Department Ananda I; Ananda II; Andaman; we are rescinding this review with Anjaneya; Anjani; Apex; Aqua; Arsha; collapsed Viraj Forgings Limited (VFL), respect to these companies. Viraj Impoexpo Limited (VIL), and Viraj A.S Marine; ASF; Ashwini; Asvini I; Additionally, as noted above, we are Asvini II; Asvini III; Asvrm; Aswin; Alloys Limited (VAL). See Final Results rescinding the review of ‘‘Devi Marine and accompanying Issues and Decision Atta; Avanti; Baby Marine Sarass; Bell; Food Exports Ltd.’’, ‘‘Kader Exports’’, Bengal; Bharat; Bhavani; Bhisti; Bijaya; Memorandum at Comment 1 and ‘‘Magnum Estate Private’’, Bilal; Bluefin; Bluepark; Blue Water; Collapsing Memorandum of the Viraj ‘‘Manufacturer Falcon Marine Exports’’, BMR; Brilliant; Britto; Capital; Capithan; Group, Limited, dated December 31, and ‘‘Navyauga Exports’’. Castlecrock; Central Calcutta; Cham I; 2001 (Collapsing Memo). Carpenter This notice is published in Cham II; Cham III; Chand; Chemmeens; Technology Corporation (the Petitioner) accordance with section 751 of the Choice I; Choice II; Corlim; C P contested the collapsing of these Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 Aquaculture; Danda; Dariapur; companies. CFR 351.213(d)(4). Deepmala; Devi I; Devi II; Devi III; On August 16, 2004, the CIT issued a Dhanamjaya; Diamond; Digha; Dorothy; Dated: July 17, 2006. decision remanding one aspect of the Edhayam; El-Te; Esmorio; Excel; Stephen J. Claeys, Final Results, the collapsing of three of Exporter Coreline Exports; Fernando; Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import the Viraj companies. The CIT ordered Firoz; Five Star I; Five Star II; Forstar; Administration. the Department, ‘‘in the absence of any Freeze; Frigerio; Frontline; G A; Gadre; [FR Doc. 06–6380 Filed 7–20–06; 8:45 am] agency showing herein that dispels this Galaxy; Gausia; Gayathri; Geo Aquatic; BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M logic based upon substantial evidence Geo Seafoods; G.K S; Goan Bounty; on the record,’’ to calculate and impose Gold; Golden; Gopal Seafoods; individual antidumping–duty margins Grandtrust; Gtc; GVR I; GVR II; Hanjar; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE upon VFL and VIL in the manner of the Hanswati; HIC ABF; Hiravata; Hiravati I; approach taken by the agency, and Hiravati II; HMG; Honest; I Ahamed; International Trade Administration affirmed by the CIT, in Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 162 F. Supp. 2d 656 India; Indian I; Indian II; Indo Aquatics; A–533–808 Interfish; International Freezefish; (CIT 2001). On February 22, 2005, the Interseas; Jagadeesh; Jaya Lakshmi I; Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India: Department filed the final results of its Jaya Satya; Jaya Lakshmi II; Jinny Notice of Court Decision Not in remand redetermination with the CIT. Marine; J R K; Kaushalya; Kay Kay; Harmony Due to the fact that only VFL and VIL Keshodwala; Key; King Fish; KNR; made sales to the United States during Koluthara; Konkan; K.R.M.; K.V Marine; AGENCY: Import Administration, the period of review, we did not include Lakshmi; Lansea; Laxmi; Lewis Natural; International Trade Administration, VAL’s sales or cost data in our revised L.G Seafoods; Libran; Lourde; Malabar; Department of Commerce. margin analyses for VFL and VIL. On Malnad; Mamta; Marina; Marine; SUMMARY: On July 7, 2006, the United July 7, 2006, the CIT affirmed the Markoorlose; Meenaxi; Miki; M K; States Court of International Trade (CIT) Department’s final results of M.R.H.; Msngr; Mumbai; Naga affirmed the Department of Commerce’s redetermination pursuant to remand. Hanuman; Naik I; Naik II; Nas; National; (the Department’s) redetermination on The changes to our calculations with N.C; Nekkanti; New Royal; Noble; remand of the final results of the respect to VFL and VIL resulted in a Noorani; Omsons; Overseas; Padmaja; antidumping duty administrative review weighted–average margin of 1.29 Partytime; Philips; Pijikay; Pisces; on stainless steel wire rods from India. percent for VFL and a weighted–average Premier I; Premier II; Pronto; Rahul I; See Carpenter Technology, Corp. v. margin of 3.77 percent for VIL for the Rahul II; Raj; Ramalmgeswara; United States and Viraj Group, Slip Op. period of review. Accordingly, absent an Rameshwar; Raunaq; Ravi; Raysons; 06–102 (CIT July 7, 2006). The appeal, or, if appealed, upon a Razban; RBT; Reddy & Reddy; Regent; Department is now issuing this notice of ‘‘conclusive’’ decision by the Court of Relish; Riviera; R K; Rohi; Royal I; Royal court decision not in harmony. Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:59 Jul 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM 21JYN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1 41422 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices

which is consistent with the CIT’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following products, by way of example, decision, we will amend our final Stephen Bailey, Office 7, AD/CVD are outside and/or specifically excluded results of these reviews to reflect the Operations, Import Administration, from the scope of this order:- Single recalculation of margins for VFL and International Trade Administration, reduced electrolytically chromium VIL. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th coated steel with a thickness 0.238 mm Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., (85 pound base box) (10%) or 0.251 mm Suspension of Liquidation Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) (90 pound base box) (10%) or 0.255 mm The CAFC has held that the 482–0193. (10%) with 770 mm (minimum width) Department must publish notice of a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (1.588 mm) by 900 mm (maximum decision of the CIT or the CAFC which length if sheared) sheet size or 30.6875 is not in harmony with the Department’s Background inches (minimum width) (1/16 inch) determination. See Timken Company v. On July 1, 2005, the Department and 35.4 inches (maximum length if United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (CAFC initiated and the ITC instituted a sunset sheared) sheet size; with type MR or 1990). Publication of this notice fulfills review of the antidumping duty order higher (per ASTM) A623 steel that obligation. The CAFC also held on tin mill products from Japan chemistry; batch annealed at T2 1/2 that, in such a case, the Department pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff anneal temper, with a yield strength of must suspend liquidation until there is Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See 31 to 42 kpsi (214 to 290 Mpa); with a a ‘‘conclusive’’ decision in the action. Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) tensile strength of 43 to 58 kpsi (296 to Id. Therefore, the Department must Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). As 400 Mpa); with a chrome coating suspend liquidation pending the a result of its review, the Department restricted to 32 to 150 mg/square meter; expiration of the period to appeal the found that revocation of the with a chrome oxide coating restricted CIT’s July 7, 2006, decision affirming antidumping duty order would be likely to 6 to 25 mg/m with a modified 7B the Department’s remand results or to lead to continuation or recurrence of ground roll finish or blasted roll finish; pending a final decision of the CAFC if dumping and notified the ITC of the with roughness average (Ra) 0.10 to 0.35 that decision is appealed. magnitude of the margins likely to micrometers, measured with a stylus The Department will not order the prevail were the order to be revoked. instrument with a stylus radius of 2 to lifting of the suspension of liquidation See Certain Tin Mill Products from 5 microns, a trace length of 5.6 mm, and on entries of stainless steel wire rods Japan; Final Results of the Expedited a cut–off of 0.8 mm, and the during the review period before a court Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty measurement traces shall be made decision in this lawsuit becomes final Order, 70 FR 67448 (November 7, 2005). perpendicular to the rolling direction; and conclusive. On June 13, 2006, the ITC determined, with an oil level of 0.17 to 0.37 grams/ We are issuing and publishing this pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, base box as type BSO, or 2.5 to 5.5 mg/ notice in accordance with section that revocation of the antidumping duty square meter as type DOS, or 3.5 to 6.5 516A(c)(1) of the Act. order on tin mill products from Japan mg/square meter as type ATBC; with would be likely to lead to continuation electrical conductivity of static probe Dated: July 17, 2006. or recurrence of material injury to an voltage drop of 0.46 volts drop Joseph A. Spetrini, industry in the United States within a maximum, and with electrical Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import reasonably foreseeable time. See Tin- conductivity degradation to 0.70 volts Administration. and Chromium–Coated Steel Sheet drop maximum after stoving (heating to [FR Doc. E6–11626 Filed 7–20–06; 8:45 am] From Japan, 71 FR 37944 (July 3, 2006), 400 degrees F for 100 minutes followed BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S and ITC Publication 3860 (June 2006), by a cool to room temperature). entitled Tin- and Chromium–Coated - Single reduced electrolytically Steel Sheet From Japan: Investigation chromium- or tin–coated steel in DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE No. 731–TA–860 (Review). the gauges of 0.0040 inch nominal, 0.0045 inch nominal, 0.0050 inch Scope of the Order International Trade Administration nominal, 0.0061 inch nominal (55 [A–588–854] The scope of this order includes tin pound base box weight), 0.0066 mill flat–rolled products that are coated inch nominal (60 pound base box Certain Tin Mill Products from Japan: or plated with tin, chromium or weight), and 0.0072 inch nominal Continuation of Antidumping Duty chromium oxides. Flat–rolled steel (65 pound base box weight), Order products coated with tin are known as regardless of width, temper, finish, tin plate. Flat–rolled steel products coating or other properties. AGENCY: Import Administration, coated with chromium or chromium - Single reduced electrolytically International Trade Administration, oxides are known as tin–free steel or chromium coated steel in the gauge Department of Commerce. electrolytic chromium–coated steel. The of 0.024 inch, with widths of 27.0 SUMMARY: As a result of the scope includes all the noted tin mill inches or 31.5 inches, and with T– determinations by the Department of products regardless of thickness, width, 1 temper properties. Commerce (the Department) and the form (in coils or cut sheets), coating - Single reduced electrolytically International Trade Commission (ITC) type (electrolytic or otherwise), edge chromium coated steel, with a that revocation of the antidumping duty (trimmed, untrimmed or further chemical composition of 0.005% order on certain tin mill products from processed, such as scroll cut), coating max carbon, 0.030% max silicon, Japan would be likely to lead to thickness, surface finish, temper, 0.25% max manganese, 0.025% continuation or recurrence of dumping coating metal (tin, chromium, max phosphorous, 0.025% max and of material injury to an industry in chromium oxide), reduction (single–or sulfur, 0.070% max aluminum, and the United States within a reasonably double–reduced), and whether or not the balance iron, with a metallic foreseeable time, the Department is coated with a plastic material. All chromium layer of 70–130 mg/ publishing notice of the continuation of products that meet the written physical square meter, with a chromium this antidumping duty order. description are within the scope of this oxide layer of 5–30 mg/square EFFECTIVE DATE: July 21, 2006. order unless specifically excluded. The meter, with a tensile strength of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:59 Jul 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM 21JYN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1