DOCSLIB.ORG

The Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Control Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Control Program THTHEE ALAMEDA CCOUNTYOUNTY MOSQMOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT CONTROL PROGRAM September 2011 Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District 23187 Connecticut Street Hayward, California 94545-1605 THE ALAMEDA COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT CONTROL PROGRAM Key Staff John Rusmisel - District Manager Bruce Kirkpatrick - Entomologist Erika Castillo - Environmental Specialist Patrick Turney - Field Supervisor Phone: 510-783-7744 Fax: 510-783-3903 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission and Vision Statement ......................................................................................................................................... 5 General Information about the District........................................................................................................................... 6 Location of the District ....................................................................................................................... 7 District Powers.................................................................................................................................... 7 The Value of an Organized Mosquito Control District ....................................................................... 8 District Goals and Services ................................................................................................................. 9 Service Calls ....................................................................................................................................... 10 District Finances ................................................................................................................................. 10 District Organization .......................................................................................................................... 10 District Personnel Organization .......................................................................................................... 11 Education and Training ....................................................................................................................... 14 Field Organization .............................................................................................................................. 15 District Facilities and Equipment ....................................................................................................... 16 District Office ...................................................................................................................... 16 District Facilities ................................................................................................................. 16 District Equipment .............................................................................................................. 16 Regulation, Cooperation and Participation ......................................................................................... 17 Federal Agencies ................................................................................................................. 17 State Agencies ..................................................................................................................... 17 Regional Agencies ............................................................................................................... 17 Local Agencies .................................................................................................................... 18 Special Agencies.................................................................................................................. 18 Participation......................................................................................................................... 18 Memberships ....................................................................................................................... 18 District Public Information Program .................................................................................................. 19 Public Contact ..................................................................................................................... 19 Media Contact ..................................................................................................................... 19 Public Information Publications .......................................................................................... 19 District Web Site.................................................................................................................. 20 Introduction to the District Mosquito Control Program .................................................................................................. 21 Program Orientation ............................................................................................................ 21 Definitions of Source Types ................................................................................................ 21 Mosquitoes targeted in the District Program ....................................................................... 22 Mosquitoes of Alameda County .......................................................................................... 23 Mosquito Species by Source Distribution ........................................................................... 24 Alameda County MAD’s Most Important Mosquitoes ....................................................... 25 Mosquito-Borne Diseases .................................................................................................................. 27 Encephalitis ......................................................................................................................... 27 Dog Heartworm ................................................................................................................... 28 Malaria................................................................................................................................. 28 Mosquito Surveillance ....................................................................................................................... 29 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 29 Mosquito Surveillance Methodologies ................................................................................ 29 Larval Mosquito Surveillance.............................................................................................. 29 Adult Mosquito Surveillance............................................................................................... 29 Virus Surveillance.................................................................................................................29 Transportation and Access for Monitoring and Control .................................................................... 30 Foot ..................................................................................................................................... 30 General Use Vehicles .......................................................................................................... 30 District ATV’s ..................................................................................................................... 31 Argo .................................................................................................................................... 31 Polaris ................................................................................................................................. 31 District Boat ............................................................................................................ 32 Aerial ...................................................................................................................... 32 Access Selection Criteria ........................................................................................ 33 Control of Mosquitoes .................................................................................................................................................... 34 Physical Control and Source Reduction .......................................................................................... .. 34 Description of Activities ...................................................................................................... 34 Mosquito Producing Habitats Considered for Source Reduction ....................................... 34 Freshwater Lakes, Ponds, and Retention Areas ...................................................... 34 Salt Marshes ............................................................................................................ 34 Temporary Standing Water ..................................................................................... 34 Wastewater Treatment Facilities ............................................................................. 35 Septic Systems ........................................................................................ 35 Municipal Treatment Facilities ............................................................... 35 Spray-Irrigation Systems ........................................................................ 35 Stormwater and Wastewater mamagement Systems .............................. 35 Containers ............................................................................................................... 36 Source Reduction in Freshwater Habitats ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mosquito Species Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks With
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mosquito species identifcation using convolutional neural networks with a multitiered ensemble model for novel species detection Adam Goodwin1,2*, Sanket Padmanabhan1,2, Sanchit Hira2,3, Margaret Glancey1,2, Monet Slinowsky2, Rakhil Immidisetti2,3, Laura Scavo2, Jewell Brey2, Bala Murali Manoghar Sai Sudhakar1, Tristan Ford1,2, Collyn Heier2, Yvonne‑Marie Linton4,5,6, David B. Pecor4,5,6, Laura Caicedo‑Quiroga4,5,6 & Soumyadipta Acharya2* With over 3500 mosquito species described, accurate species identifcation of the few implicated in disease transmission is critical to mosquito borne disease mitigation. Yet this task is hindered by limited global taxonomic expertise and specimen damage consistent across common capture methods. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are promising with limited sets of species, but image database requirements restrict practical implementation. Using an image database of 2696 specimens from 67 mosquito species, we address the practical open‑set problem with a detection algorithm for novel species. Closed‑set classifcation of 16 known species achieved 97.04 ± 0.87% accuracy independently, and 89.07 ± 5.58% when cascaded with novelty detection. Closed‑set classifcation of 39 species produces a macro F1‑score of 86.07 ± 1.81%. This demonstrates an accurate, scalable, and practical computer vision solution to identify wild‑caught mosquitoes for implementation in biosurveillance and targeted vector control programs, without the need for extensive image database development for each new target region. Mosquitoes are one of the deadliest animals in the world, infecting between 250–500 million people every year with a wide range of fatal or debilitating diseases, including malaria, dengue, chikungunya, Zika and West Nile Virus1.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Disease Surveillance
    VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2020 SAVE WATER. NOT MOSQUITOES. DON’T CREATE MOSQUITO HABITAT BY ACCIDENT. Over watering lawns and plants is a large contributor to mosquito breeding. Help fight the bite by: • Fixing leaky faucets and broken sprinklers. • Only apply as much waster as your plants and soil need. Visit SCCVector.org for more information. IN THIS ISSUE MANAGER'S MESSAGE 2 SERVICES AVAILABLE 3 OPERATIONS DATA 4 - 6 WEST NILE 7 - 8 SURVEILLANCE PUBLIC SURVICE 9 REQUESTS VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CONSUMER & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PAGE 2 | OPERATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE REPORT MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGER Warm weather is here and that means vectors such as ticks are more active. May was Lyme Disease Awareness Month, and the County of Santa Clara Vector Control District celebrated by participating and advertising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Lyme Disease Awareness Month Lunch and Learn Series. The weekly series offered interactive presentations on tick surveillance, tick collection, tick bite prevention, and other activities. The District reminds the public to practice preventative measures to avoid coming into contact with ticks. Use insect repellent approved by the Environmental Protection Agency, avoid areas with high grass, and check gear, pets, and children for ticks during and after being in tick habitat. Warm months also mean other vectors such as mosquitoes are more active as well. The District is hard at work monitoring for diseases, such as West Nile virus and Nayer Zahiri eliminating mosquito breeding in areas like marshes, neglected pools, curbs, catch basins, and ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Alaska
    LIBRAR Y ■JRD FEBE- Î961 THE U. s. DtPÁ¡<,,>^iMl OF AGidCÜLl-yí MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U < The purpose of this handbook is to present information on the biology, distribu- tion, identification, and control of the species of mosquitoes known to occur in Alaska. Much of this information has been published in short papers in various journals and is not readily available to those who need a comprehensive treatise on this subject ; some of the material has not been published before. The information l)r()UKlit together here will serve as a guide for individuals and communities that have an interest and responsibility in mosquito problems in Alaska. In addition, the military services will have considerable use for this publication at their various installations in Alaska. CuUseta alaskaensis, one of the large "snow mosquitoes" that overwinter as adults and emerge from hiber- nation while much of the winter snow is on the ground. In some localities this species is suJBBciently abundant to cause serious annoy- ance. THE MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA By C. M. GJULLIN, R. I. SAILER, ALAN STONE, and B. V. TRAVIS Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1961 For «ale by the Superintendent of Document«. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 45 cent» Contents Page Page History of mosquito abundance Biology—Continued and control 1 Oviposition 25 Mosquito literature 3 Hibernation 25 Economic losses 4 Surveys of the mosquito problem. 25 Mosquito-control organizations 5 Mosquito surveys 25 Life history 5 Engineering surveys 29 Eggs_".
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Disease Surveillance Report
    Page 1 Santa Clara County Vector Control District Operations and Surveillance Report August 2018 District Mission Table of Contents page To detect and minimize vector-borne diseases, to abate mosquitoes, and to assist the public in resolving problems with rodents, wildlife, and insects that can cause disease, discomfort, or injury to humans in the County. Manager’s Message 1 Services Provided Operations Report: Curbs and Catch Basins 2 Detection of the presence/prevalence of vector-borne diseases, such as plague, West Nile virus, rabies, and Lyme disease, through ongoing surveillance and testing Routine inspections and treatment, as necessary, of Operations Report: known mosquito and rodent sources Neglected Pools 3 Response to customer initiated service requests for iden- and Mosquitofish tification, advice, and/or control measures for mosqui- toes, rodents, wildlife, and miscellaneous invertebrates (ticks, yellowjackets, cockroaches, bees, fleas, flies, etc.) Continuing Education at Free educational presentations for schools, homeowner Vector Control associations, private businesses, civic groups, and other 4 West Nile Virus interested organizations Surveillance Free informational material on all vectors and vector- borne diseases Carbon Dioxide Baited Traps 5 Manager’s Message West Nile Virus Update Mosquitofish is the common name for Gambusia affinis and is a small fish related to common guppies. They are called Public Service Requests mosquitofish because mosquito larvae are their primary diet Invasive Cockroach 6 and they can eat 100 to 500 mosquito larvae per day. Vector Detected in County Control District delivers free limited numbers of mosquitofish for residents’ pools or ponds. To request mosquitofish, please call or visit our website. Outreach Programs - 7 (408) 918-4770 West Nile Virus Treatments sccvector.org Page 2 Operations Report: Curbs and Catch Basins The District employs seasonal staff to check and treat mosquitoes in flooded street stormwater catch basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection Dynamics and Immune Response in a Newly Described Mbio.Asm.Org Drosophila-Trypanosomatid Association on September 15, 2015 - Published by Phineas T
    Downloaded from RESEARCH ARTICLE crossmark Infection Dynamics and Immune Response in a Newly Described mbio.asm.org Drosophila-Trypanosomatid Association on September 15, 2015 - Published by Phineas T. Hamilton,a Jan Votýpka,b,c Anna Dostálová,d Vyacheslav Yurchenko,c,e Nathan H. Bird,a Julius Lukeš,c,f,g Bruno Lemaitre,d Steve J. Perlmana,g Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canadaa; Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republicb; Biology Center, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Budweis, Czech Republicc; Global Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerlandd; Life Science Research Center, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republice; Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Budweis, Czech Republicf; Integrated Microbial Biodiversity Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canadag ABSTRACT Trypanosomatid parasites are significant causes of human disease and are ubiquitous in insects. Despite the impor- tance of Drosophila melanogaster as a model of infection and immunity and a long awareness that trypanosomatid infection is common in the genus, no trypanosomatid parasites naturally infecting Drosophila have been characterized. Here, we establish a new model of trypanosomatid infection in Drosophila—Jaenimonas drosophilae, gen. et sp. nov. As far as we are aware, this is the first Drosophila-parasitic trypanosomatid to be cultured and characterized. Through experimental infections, we find that Drosophila falleni, the natural host, is highly susceptible to infection, leading to a substantial decrease in host fecundity. J. droso- mbio.asm.org philae has a broad host range, readily infecting a number of Drosophila species, including D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomopathogenic Fungusmetarhizium Anisopliae For
    VWJS 1'J Ernst-Jan Scholte The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhiziumanisopliae for mosquito control Impact on the adult stage of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae and filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus Proefschrift terverkrijgin g vand egraa dva ndocto r opgeza gva n derecto r magnificus vanWageninge n Universiteit, Prof.Dr .Ir .L .Speelma n inhe topenbaa rt e verdedigen opdinsda g 30novembe r200 4 desnamiddag st ehal ftwe ei nd eAul a Scholte,Ernst-Ja n(2004 ) Theentomopathogeni cfungu sMetarhizium anisopliaefo r mosquitocontro l Impact onth e adult stage ofth eAfrica n malaria vectorAnopheles gambiae and filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus Thesis Wageningen University -withreferences - with summary inDutc h ISBN:90-8504-118- X fs/l0x£u Stellingen 1. Ondanks aanvankelijke scepsis kan deinsect-pathogen e schimmel Metarhizium anisopliaeworde n ingezet bij bestrijding van malaria muggen (dit proefschrift). 2. De ontdekking vanBacillus thuringiensis israelensis in 1976heef t het onderzoek naar, en ontwikkeling van, entomopathogeneschimmel s voorbestrijdin g van muggen sterk afgeremd (ditproefschrift) . 3. Biologische bestrijding van plagen isveilige r voor devolksgezondhei d dan chemische bestrijding (FrancisG . Howarthi nAnn. Rev. Entomol. 1991, 36: 485-509). 4. In etymologische zin kunnen muggen ook worden opgevat als amfibieen. 5. Het feit dat sommigeAfrikane n zich grappend afvragen of blanken welbene n hebben geeft aan dat de meesteblanke n zich tijdens eenbezoe k aan Afrika teweini g uithu n autobegeve n omzic honde r deplaatselijk e bevolking temengen . 6. Het isbiza r dat het land met het grootste wapenarsenaal, een land dat in de afgelopen 100jaa r bij 15oorloge n betrokken is geweest zonder dathe t land zelf ooitwer d binnengevallen, zich opwerpt alsbeschermenge l van dewereldvred e en democratie.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Virus Transmission & Evolution in Mixed Communities
    MODELING VIRUS TRANSMISSION & EVOLUTION IN MIXED COMMUNITIES MODELING VIRUS TRANSMISSION & EVOLUTION IN MIXED COMMUNITIES By MORGAN P. KAIN, B.S.,M.S. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Morgan P. Kain, April 2019 PhD Thesis — Morgan P. Kain McMaster University — Biology McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2019) Hamilton, Ontario (Biol- ogy) TITLE: Modeling virus transmission & evolution in mixed communities AUTHOR: Morgan P. Kain, B.S. (University of Pittsburgh), M.S. (East Carolina University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Benjamin M. Bolker NUMBER OF PAGES: ix, Main Text 134, Appendix 227. ii PhD Thesis — Morgan P. Kain McMaster University — Biology Lay Abstract In their work in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Anderson and May demonstrated that pathogen induced host harm and pathogen transmission ability are intimately linked. This work clearly showed that pathogens maximize their reproductive potential by causing some harm their hosts, contrary to the established belief that pathogens shouldn’t harm their hosts at all. I extend this work to study pathogen evolution and transmission in heterogeneous host populations, using two model host-pathogen systems: birds infected with West Nile virus, and European rabbits infected with the myxoma virus, as well as a general model for the evolution of poorly adapted pathogens in small host populations. I show that pathogen transmission in heterogeneous host populations can be estimated using citizen science data, that pathogen transmission is lower in heterogeneous populations, and that pathogens invading naive host populations may experience short-term evolution to higher-than-optimal virulence, increasing infection burden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California
    The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California Vector Control Technician Certification Training Manual Category B 1/10 Instructions This study guide is meant to replace the manual The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California. • You can navigate through the guide at your own pace and in any order. • Click on the purple home button to return to the main menu. • Click on the gray return button to go to the chapter menu of the current slide. • Click on the button if you want to access the glossary. Important terms are highlighted in red and appear in the glossary. The link to the glossary can be found at the beginning of each chapter. 2/10 Main Menu Chapter 1: Biology of Mosquitoes Chapter 2: Ecology of Mosquitoes Chapter 3: Public Health Importance of Mosquitoes Chapter 4: Classification and Identification of Mosquitoes Chapter 5: Principles of Mosquito Control Chapter 6: Chemical Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 7: Physical Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 8: Biological Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 9: Mosquito Control in California Chapter 10: Surveillance for Mosquitoes and Mosquito-borne Diseases Chapter 11: Public Relations in Mosquito Control Appendix 1: Glossary 2 :Conversions of Units and Formulas used with Insecticides 3 :Additional Information 3/10 Introduction • Arthropods are a huge group of invertebrate animals (animals without backbones) that include insects, arachnids (ticks, mites, and spiders), crustaceans (crabs, lobsters, and shrimp) and others. • There are millions of species of arthropods, all sharing characteristics of a hard exoskeleton and jointed legs. • Many arthropods are pests of one kind or another, especially on agricultural crops and farm animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Xylella Fastidiosa
    EPPO Datasheet: Xylella fastidiosa Last updated: 2020-05-12 IDENTITY Preferred name: Xylella fastidiosa Authority: Wells, Raju, Hung, Weisburg, Parl & Beemer Taxonomic position: Bacteria: Proteobacteria: Gammaproteobacteria: Lysobacterales: Lysobacteraceae Other scientific names: Grapevine Pierce's disease agent, Xylella fastidiosa subsp. piercei Common names: Anaheim disease, California vine disease, Pierce's disease of grapevine, citrus variegated chlorosis, dwarf disease of alfalfa (US), dwarf disease of lucerne (GB), leaf scorch of American sycamore, leaf scorch of almond, leaf scorch of coffee, leaf scorch of more photos... elm, leaf scorch of maple, leaf scorch of mulberry, leaf scorch of oleander, olive quick decline syndrome, peach phony disease, plum leaf scald view more common names online... EPPO Categorization: A2 list view more categorizations online... EU Categorization: Emergency measures, A2 Quarantine pest (Annex II B) EPPO Code: XYLEFA Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature X. fastidiosa is a genetically diverse species that has been associated with a wide range of plant diseases (see common names above). Subspecies: six different subspecies of X. fastidiosa have been proposed, namely: - X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa - X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex - X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca - X. fastidiosa subsp. sandyi - X. fastidiosa subsp. tashke - X. fastidiosa subsp. morus However, of these subspecies only two, fastidiosa and multiplex, are currently officially considered as valid names by the International Society of Plant Pathology Committee on the Taxonomy of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria (ISPP- CTPPB) (Bull et al., 2012). A pathovar subdivision within X. fastidiosa has also been proposed (Hendson et al., 2001). Sequence types (STs): Multilocus sequence typing (Maiden et al., 1998) is a genetic typing methodology that is widely used to characterise X.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Protection Product Risk Assessment for Aquatic Ecosystems
    Plant protection product risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems Evaluation of effects in natural communities Alessio Ippolito Plant protection product risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems Evaluation of effects in natural communities The research presented in this thesis was carried out at the department of Environmental and Landscape Sciences (DISAT), Università di Milano- Bicocca, Milano, Italy. Cover image : observed by far, the figure is the outline of a stonefly (Agnetina capitata ), however, by a closer look, it is also a long string of values, representing the codification of the organism traits. The same happens with ecology and ecotoxicology: a holistic, comprehensive view is needed to understand what is the meaning and the overall relevance of any process, but a reductionist approach is often appropriate to get a mechanistic understanding. The challenge proposed by this thesis is to achieve a correct balance between holism and reductionism, finding the right distance to see both the stonefly and the string. UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA Facoltà di Scienza Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Dottorato di ricerca in Scienze Ambientali XXIV ciclo Plant protection product risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems Evaluation of effects in natural communities TUTOR: Prof. Marco Vighi DOTTORANDO: Dott. Alessio Ippolito Anno Accademico 2011/2012 A Dino CONTENTS 1 General introduction ............................................................................... 11 1.1 Ecological Risk Assessment for chemicals ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of California. Biv
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 1, NO. 2 THE MOSQUITOES OF CALIFORNIA BY S. B. FREEBORN and R. M. BOHART (Division of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1951 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. 0. Essig, S. B. Freeborn, E. G. Linsley, R. L. Usinger Volume 1, No. 2, pp. 25-78, plates 2-8 Submitted by Editors, November 28, 1950 Issued June 8, 1951 Price 50 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFS67 IN THE UNITBD STAThS OF AMERICA THE MOSQUITOES OF CALIFORNIA Ihe first general publication on the mos- calts might be aptcalts, terrttans or boharti. In quitoes of California was by Quayle (1906). In the the case of the Culex piptens -quinque,+asciatus same year Dyar and Knab, dismayed by the confused complex, our distribution records are based pri- jumbling of genera and species in lheobald’ s writ- marily on material of which we have examined male ings, proposed an independent classification based genitalia. Furthermore, the county records of com- on larval characters and the thesis that well-de- mon species, such as C. tarsalis and C. incidens, fined differences apparent in the larvae should note only token occurrences and arc repeated with- be reflected in the adults. lhey illustrated their in a countyonly when there are sigificant ecolog- hypothesis by the German proverb that “Wer A sagt ical variations in the county, such as elevation muss auch B sagen. ” lheir contribution brought or a distinction between coastal and inland dis- order out of confusion and their later monograph tribution.
    [Show full text]