DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawthorn Heritage Gap Study - Decision to Adopt Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawthorn Heritage Gap Study - Decision to Adopt Amendment Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 7.4 Amendment C284 - Hawthorn Heritage Gap Study - Decision to Adopt Amendment Abstract The purpose of the officers’ report is to inform Council of the outcomes of the independent Planning Panel hearing for Amendment C284 to the Boroondara Planning Scheme and to seek a decision of Council to adopt Amendment C284 (Part 1). Amendment C284 (Part 1) proposes to implement the recommendations of the City of Boroondara Municipal Wide Heritage Gap Study: Volume 3 Hawthorn (the Study) prepared by Context Pty Ltd by: applying the Heritage Overlay to 13 individually significant heritage places and seven heritage precincts; and extending the existing Central Gardens Precinct (HO146), Glenferrie Hill Precinct (HO149), Leslie Street Precinct (HO164) and West Hawthorn Precinct (HO220) to include additional properties. Exhibition of Amendment C284 and the Study was undertaken from 7 February to 12 March 2019 in accordance with Section 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (the Act). Council received a total of 59 submissions during exhibition, including nine supporting submissions, 19 partially supporting submissions, 30 objections and one submission in objection which was later withdrawn. In addition, four late objecting submissions were received in May and June 2019. A Panel hearing was held on 14, 15, 19 and 21 August 2019 to consider the submissions received to Amendment C284. Fourteen of the submitters presented at the Panel Hearing. The Panel had regard to the exhibited Amendment and the post- exhibition changes recommended by Council as part of its submission. The Panel considered all submissions to the Amendment whether or not a submitter chose to present at the Panel hearing. On 4 October 2019 officers received the Panel’s report for Amendment C284. A summary of the Panel’s findings and officers’ responses were presented to the Urban Planning Special Committee (UPSC) on 3 August 2020. At this meeting, the UPSC endorsed the officer recommendation to split the amendment into two parts, Part 1 relating to the substantive amendment and Part 2 relating specifically to 36 Kooyongkoot Road, Hawthorn. The UPSC resolved to defer consideration of Amendment C284 (Part 2) due to legal proceedings being undertaken with respect to 36 Kooyongkoot Road, Hawthorn. Splitting the amendment will allow Council to consider the adoption of Amendment C294 (Part 1) without delay. The UPSC also resolved to accept the Panel recommendations in relation to Part 1 (as per the officers’ recommendation) and refer Amendment C284 (Part 1) to an Ordinary meeting of Council for adoption, which is the purpose of this report. The Panel generally supports Amendment C284 (Part 1) and the majority of recommendations made by Council through its submissions during the Panel hearing. City of Boroondara 311 Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 The Panel recommends Amendment C284 (Part 1) be adopted as exhibited subject to the following key changes: 1. Abandon applying the Heritage Overlay to: a) 19 and 23 Robinson Road, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) b) 141 and 147 Riversdale Road, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) c) 4, 6-10, 12, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 40 Lennox Street, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) d) 328, 330, 1/332, 2/332, 334, 336 and 340 Barkers Road, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) e) 1A and 2A Rae Street, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) f) 4 Marian Street, Hawthorn g) 1A-15 Malmsbury Street, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council) h) 823-825 Glenferrie Road, Hawthorn (as submitted by Council, correction of mapping error) A number of other recommendations are contained within the Panel report relating to recommended changes to the heritage citations or referencing within the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay at Clause 43.01 of the Boroondara Planning Scheme. Officers' recommendation That Council resolve to: 1. Adopt Amendment C284boro (Part 1) to the Boroondara Planning Scheme, as shown in Attachments 1 to 3, in accordance with Section 29(1) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 2. Submit Amendment C284boro (Part 1) to the Minister for Planning for approval in accordance with Section 31(1) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 3. Following the Minister’s approval of Amendment C284boro (Part 1), adopt a change to the Boroondara Schedule of Gradings Map to reflect the gradings attributed to properties. 4. Authorise the Director City Planning to undertake minor administrative changes to the amendment and associated planning controls that do not change the intent of the controls. City of Boroondara 312 Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 Responsible director: Shiran Wickramasinghe City Planning ___________________________________________________________________ 1. Purpose The purpose of this report is to: Inform Council of the outcomes of the independent Planning Panel hearing for Amendment C284 to the Boroondara Planning Scheme; and Seek Council’s adoption of Amendment C284 (Part 1), as shown at Attachments 1 to 3, including: o Attachment 1: Revised planning scheme ordinance o Attachment 2: Revised planning scheme maps o Attachment 3: Revised planning scheme incorporated documents 2. Policy implications and relevance to community plan and council plan Council Plan 2017-2021 and Boroondara Community Plan 2017-27 The identification and protection of identified heritage places is consistent with the strategic objectives and strategies set out in the Council Plan 2017-2021 and the Boroondara Community Plan 2017-2027. Specifically, the amendment is consistent with the objective to “protect the heritage and respect the character of the City to maintain amenity and liveability whilst recognising the need for appropriate, well-designed development for future generations” identified in the Council Plan and the Boroondara Community Plan under Theme 4 - Neighbourhood Character and Heritage. The amendment also assists in implementing the following strategies: Strategy 4.3 - Preserve the City’s history and protect heritage properties and precincts by undertaking a municipal-wide heritage review and introduce heritage overlays in the Boroondara Planning Scheme. Strategy 4.6 - Engage with owners and developers to achieve a balance between development and protection of neighbourhood character, heritage and amenity. The project will further assist Council in fulfilling its major initiative commitment to “protect the City’s heritage by continuing a municipal wide heritage assessment of all areas not currently subject to a Heritage Overlay in the Boroondara Planning Scheme”. Heritage Action Plan 2016 The Heritage Action Plan was adopted by Council on 2 May 2016 and establishes the framework to guide Council’s heritage work program as it relates to the identification, protection, management and promotion of Boroondara’s heritage assets. City of Boroondara 313 Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 The amendment is consistent with the following actions identified in the Heritage Action Plan 2016: “Ensure Heritage Citations and Statements of Significance clearly identify the significant elements of the heritage place as well as the non-significant / noncontributory elements where appropriate” “Complete and implement thematic studies of schools, churches and other community facilities and public places which were not assessed and protected through other area-based studies”. Boroondara Planning Scheme The amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Planning Policy Framework (PPF) and Local Planning Policy Framework (LPPF). In particular it addresses the following Clauses: Clause 15.03-1S - Heritage Conservation which seeks to ‘ensure the conservation of places of heritage significance’ by identifying, retaining and protecting places with identified heritage significance; Clause 21.04-5 - Built Environment and Heritage of the Municipal Strategic Statement which includes the objective ‘to identify and protect all individual places, objects and precincts of cultural, aboriginal, urban and landscape significance’; and Clause 22.03-2 - Heritage Policy which seeks to ‘preserve ‘significant’ heritage places, protecting all significant heritage fabric including elements that cannot be seen from the public realm’. Both the PPF and LPPF seek to ensure the Heritage Overlay is applied to protect places of heritage significance in the City of Boroondara. Plan Melbourne 2017-2050 The identification, assessment and protection of places of local heritage significance are supported by Outcome 4 of Plan Melbourne which seeks to ensure that “Melbourne is a distinctive and liveable city with quality design and amenity”. Direction 4.4 recognises the contribution heritage makes to Melbourne’ distinctiveness and liveability and advocates for the protection of Melbourne’s heritage places. In particular, Policy 4.4.1 recognises the need for “continuous identification and review of currently unprotected heritage sites and targeted assessments of heritage sites in areas identified as likely to be subject to substantial change”. The amendment is consistent with these Plan Melbourne directions and initiatives. Planning and Environment Act 1987 The amendment is consistent with the objectives of planning in Victoria, in particular the objective detailed in Section 4(1)(d) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, being: “To conserve and enhance those buildings, areas or other places which are of scientific, aesthetic, architectural or historical interest, or otherwise of special cultural value”. City of Boroondara 314 Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts 1890 and 1893
    VICTORIA. ANNO SEXAGESIMO PEIMO VICTOKLE BEGINS ####*####*#**#*######****^ No. 1491. An Act to amend the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts 1890 and 1893. [2Ath August, 1897.] T)E it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with -*-* the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled ana by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say):— 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Melbourne and Metropolitan short title ana con« Board of Works Act 1897, and shall be read as one with the Melbourne struction- and Metropolitan Board of Works Act 1890 (hereinafter called the N*08-1197'1351i Principal Act) and with the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Act 1893; and this Act and the said Acts may be cited together as the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts. (2) Sections three four five six and seven of this Act shall be deemed to be a portion of Part III* of the Principal Act. 2. The Act mentioned in the First Schedule to this Act to the Repeal. extent mentioned therein shall be and the same is hereby repealed. First schedule. Such repeal shall not be deemed to affect any notices given or things commenced or done by the Board pursuant to any of the repealed enactments before the commencement of this Act. 3. In DM 25 61 VICT.] Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works. [No. 1491. Interpretation. 3. In section seventy-six of the Principal Act for the definitions of the words " sewer" and u street" respectively there shall be substituted the following definitions, and such substitutions shall be deemed to take effect as from the commencement of the Principal Act:— " Sewer." "Sewer" shall mean and include any sewer or underground gutter or channel which is not a drain within the meaning of this Part of this Act and any drain or portion of a drain laid between a sewer and the boundary line of any allotment or curtilage.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawthorn Heritage Study
    HAWTHORN HERITAGE STUDY APRIL 1993 The Hawthorn Heritage Study was one of the three Special Strategy Plan Projects started during 1991. The Heritage Study was prepared by a team led by Meredith Gould, Conservation Architect, with substantial input from the Townscape and Heritage Topic Group as part of the Hawthorn Strategy Plan process. Some sections of the study were completed in draft form as early as late 1991; other sections have only reached completion now. This Study is the first ever comprehensive assessment of Hawthorn's urban and landscape heritage. Every bUilding in Hawthorn has been assessed for its heritage value. Significant trees, parks, landscapes and roadways have also been evaluated and recorded. The heritage areas proposed in the Study were endorsed by Hawthorn Council for the purpose of public consultation on 10 December 1991. Comments were sought by means of a map and explanatory material in a Strategy Plan booklet letterboxed throughout Hawthorn in March 1991. On 25 August 1992, Council resolved that a proposed Planning Scheme Amendment be drafted to include: Heritage protection for areas Protection of individual buildings of stand alone and contributory signiticance outside heritage areas. Voluntary registration of other individual places outside heritage areas, for the purpose of heritage protection. A degree of heritage control substantially reduced compared to normal Urban Conservation Areas. Council on 20 April 1993 resolved to publish the completed study; to notify property owners of buildings recommended for inclusion on the Historic Buildings Register, the National Estate Register and the Significant Tree Register; and to refer for further officer investigation the recommendations on signiticant street trees, kerbs/gutterslfootpaths/roadways, laneways, drains and creeks, Yarra River/Gardiners Creek, parks/reserves, and the establishment of an internal monitoring system.
    [Show full text]
  • KHS June 2020 Newsletter
    NEWSLETTER No. 131 JUNE 2020 Serving the community, families, schools, students, historians and the things you keep other researchers Heritage protection has been with us for so long now that it has evolved a history of its own. Post war architecture might be seen as one factor which inspired the first phase of the heritage protection movement in the 1950s and 1960s when Nineteenth century buildings and places seemed to be swept away by an uncaring tide of modernisation. Discussion of, and Contents agreement on, measures for its protection can be fraught with peril. In an article on the former Methodist Men’s Fellowship Hall (pages 8-9), the increased rigor and changes of emphasis that are occurring in THE THINGS YOU KEEP heritage research are noted. Additional archival material is available, 1 Progress to date on the draft Kew much of it now on-line in digitised searchable form. New themes such as Heritage Gap Study Indigenous History, Women’s History and LGBTI History have emerged. The historical time frame has expanded, the middle of last century now evokes a very different world from that of the pioneer settlers of Kew. SOCIETY NEWS 3 Lectures and Exhibitions during a The City of Boroondara Thematic Environmental History (Built Heritage period of enforced hibernation Pty Ltd, 2012) identified Post-Second World War places as representing the highest priority for further heritage study. Such places were amongst the most under-represented on the then current Heritage Overlay RANGEVIEW 4 A Mont Victor Road mansion – its schedule and, at the same time, under the most frequent threat of rise and fall as a house, as schools demolition or unsympathetic alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Citation
    NAME OF HERITAGE PLACE: Chesney Wolde Address: 57 Berkeley Street, Hawthorn Name: Chesney Wolde Survey Date: 25 August 2020 Place Type: Residential Architect: Not Known Grading: Significant Builder: Not Known Extent of Overlay: To title boundaries Construction Date: c1916 Historical Context The First Nations People, the Wurundjeri, have a connection to the land along the valleys of the Yarra River and Gardiners Creek.1 This connection extends back thousands of years, and continues today. The boundaries of Hawthorn are defined by Barkers Road and Burke Road to the north and east; and two watercourses, the Yarra River and its tributary, Gardiners Creek.2 Of 1 Gary Presland, First People. The Eastern Kulin of Melbourne, Port Phillip and Central Victoria, p 25. 2 The former City of Hawthorn 1 the watercourses, hills, valleys and plains within the Melbourne region, it is the Yarra River that is its defining feature, and one that serves as its artery. It was its abundant supply of freshwater that saw European settlement establish along the Yarra River in the nineteenth century. Today the metropolis still obtains much of its water from the Yarra and its tributaries in the nearby ranges. It was a short distance from the subject site, that in 1836-37 pastoralist John Gardiner (1798-1878) settled with his family, and Joseph Hawdon and John Hepburn. They drove cattle overland from Sydney to the property they established on Gardiners Creek,3 land now occupied by Scotch College. Improved transport links with the city, initially the completion of the railway from the city to Hawthorn in 1861, stimulated residential development.
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment C333boro
    AMENDMENT C333BORO System Note: The following ordinance will be modified in Clause:22 LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES, Sub-Clause:22.03 HERITAGE POLICY 22.03-7 Reference documents C333boro Assessment of Heritage Precincts in Kew (City of Boroondara, April 2013) Assessment of the Burwood Road Heritage Precinct, Hawthorn (City of Boroondara, August 2008, updated March 2012) Auburn Village Heritage Study (City of Boroondara, 2005) Balwyn Road Residential Precinct, Canterbury: Stage 2 Heritage Precinct Review (City of Boroondara, August 2006) Boroondara Heritage Property Database Boroondara Schedule of Gradings Map Camberwell Conservation Study (City of Camberwell, 1991) Camberwell Junction Heritage Review (City of Boroondara, 2008, updated 2013) Canterbury Hill Estate Precinct Citation (2014) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 1: Canterbury (Context Pty Ltd, 25 May 2017) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 2: Camberwell (Context Pty Ltd, 26 September 2017) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 7: Glen Iris (Context Pty Ltd, 15 October 2020) City of Kew Urban Conservation Study (City of Kew, 1988) Creswick Estate Precinct Heritage Citation (2016) Fairmount Park Estate Precinct Heritage Citation (2016) Grange Avenue Residential Precinct Citation (August 2014) Hawthorn Heritage Precincts Study (City of Boroondara, April 2012) Hawthorn Heritage Study (City of Hawthorn, 1993) Heritage Policy - Statements of Significance (City of Boroondara, August 2016, or as amended and adopted by Council from time to time) Kew and Hawthorn Further Investigations - Assessment of Specific Sites (February 2014) Kew Junction Commercial Heritage Study (September 2013) National Trust of Australia (Victoria) Technical Bulletin 8.1 Fences & Gates (1988) Review of B-graded Buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn (City of Boroondara, January 2007, updated June 2007 and November 2009) Volumes 1, 2 and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Our Club
    A Short History of our club. The Beginning In the early 1950’s, Australia was a vastly different place. Its population of a little over 12 million was almost exclusively of British descent. It had just emerged from almost six years of World War II during which hundreds of thousands of its men and women enlisted voluntarily for service in the armed forces. By 1949 Australia was emerging from wartime shortages and rationing. Oil exploration had not started. Mining was a very unsophisticated affair and the pick and shovel were the order of the day. Jet aircraft had not invaded the skies. High rise building was confined to St Patrick’s spire on Eastern Hill. We only just had our first Australian car. We had no freeways but the roads were not choked as few people had cars. Having children was normal; marrying beforehand was usual. Rotary had expanded from its beginnings in Chicago with clubs being formed in Canada, Ireland and England. Early in the second decade of the century we had a new organisation calling itself Rotary International. Two distinguished Canadians were appointed by RI in 1921 to undertake the task of establishing Rotary in Australia. Almost by accident, Melbourne was the site of that first club when Sydney passed up a prior opportunity. It is interesting to note that it took 16 years for Rotary to expand from Chicago to Melbourne (some 14,000km), it took another 32 years for it to expand a further 7km to Hawthorn. Between its formation in 1921 and the start of WWII, the Melbourne club ceded territory for only 3 other clubs to be formed, Essendon, Dandenong and Footscray.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Riversdale Road Hawthorn
    DUPLEX Prepared by: Context Pty Ltd Address: 70 Riversdale Road, Hawthorn Name: Duplex Survey Date: 18 May 2016 Place Type: Residential Architect: Grading: Individually Significant Builder: John Marriage Extent of Overlay: To title boundaries Construction Date: 1928-29 Historical Context The duplex at 70 Riversdale Road, Hawthorn is associated with the following themes in the City of Boroondara Thematic Environmental History (BTEH) 2012: 3.0 Connecting Victorians: 3.5 Travelling by tram 6.0 Building towns, cities and the Garden State: 6.3 Shaping the suburbs, 6.3.3 Creating middle class suburbs in the early twentieth century; 6.7 Making homes for Victorians, 6.7.5 Developing higher density living The following historical context comprises edited extracts from the BTEH 2012. The term ‘study area’ refers to the City of Boroondara: Travelling by tram The opening of the new Victoria Street Bridge in 1884, and the establishment of a cable tram terminus (on the Collingwood side of the river) in late 1885, prompted the Melbourne Tramway & Omnibus Company to propose a horse-drawn tram route through Kew. Commencing in 1887, this route ran between the gates of the Boroondara Cemetery and the new bridge, where commuters could cross the river and board the cable tram to the city. In January 1890, the same company established a second horse- drawn tram route through the study area – this time, extending from the Hawthorn Bridge (where there was another cable tram terminus on the western bank) along Burwood Road, Power Street, and Riversdale Road to Auburn Road, Upper Hawthorn. As Gwen McWilliam notes, this new tram route was to have a significant impact on the development of Riversdale Road as a local retail centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Places We Keep: the Heritage Studies of Victoria and Outcomes for Urban Planners
    The places we keep: the heritage studies of Victoria and outcomes for urban planners Robyn Joy Clinch Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture & Planning) June 2012 Faculty of Architecture, Building & Planning The University of Melbourne Abstract The incentive for this thesis that resulted from an investigation into the history of my heritage house, developed from my professional interest in the planning controls on heritage places. This was further motivated by my desire to reinvent my career as an urban planner and to use my professional experience in management, marketing and information technology. As a result, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between the development of the heritage studies of Victoria and the outcome of those documents on planning decisions made by urban planners. The methods used included a simulated experience that established a methodology for the thesis. In addition, interviews were conducted with experts in the field that provided a context for understanding the influencing factors of when, where, by whom, with what, why and how the studies were conducted. These interviews also contributed to the understanding of how the historical research had been undertaken and used to establish the significance of places and how this translated into outcomes for urban planners. Case studies in the form of Tribunal determinations have been used to illustrate key outcomes for urban planners. A large amount of information including that relating to the historical background of the studies plus a collection of indicative content from over 400 heritage studies was traversed.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Council Victoria
    Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 Name Residence Location 11 Majore Street, Hawthorn, City of Boroondara Hermes Number 198648 Heritage Overlay Number No Heritage Overlay 11 Majore Street (October 2017) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: • That the place NOT be included in the Victorian Heritage Register under s.37(1)(b) of the Heritage Act 2017. • The Heritage Council may wish to consider exercising its powers under s.49(1)(c) of the Heritage Act 2017 to refer the recommendation to the City of Boroondara for inclusion in the local Heritage Overlay. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director Recommendation Date: Friday 17 November 2017 This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act 2017. It has not been considered or endorsed by the Heritage Council of Victoria. Name:11 Majore Street, Hawthorn Hermes Number: 198648 Page | 1 EXTENT OF NOMINATION Date that the nomination was accepted by the Executive Director 1 February 2016 Written extent of nomination All of the place known as 11 Majore Street Hawthorn. Nomination extent diagram Nominated extent is indicated by green line Name:11 Majore Street, Hawthorn Hermes Number: 198648 Page | 2 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RESPONSE SUMMARY It is the view of the Executive Director that this place should not be included in the Victorian Heritage Register for the reasons outlined in this report. The information presented in this report and the attached documents demonstrates that 11 Majore Street, Hawthorn may be of potential local significance, rather than State level significance.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BOROONDARA Review of B-Graded Buildings in Kew
    CITY OF BOROONDARA Review of B-graded buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn Prepared for City of Boroondara January 2007 Revised June 2007 Revised November 2009 VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT & ADDENDA TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Main Report Project Team ii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope and Project Brief 1 1.2 Background 1 2.0 Methodology 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Existing Documentation 3 2.3 Existing Grading Systems 4 2.4 Site Inspections 6 2.5 Historical Research 7 2.6 Comparative Analysis 9 2.7 Assessment of Significance 9 3.0 Findings and Recommendations 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Recommendations for Individual Buildings 19 3.3 Kew Precincts Review 25 3.4 Recommendations for Further Work 28 3.5 Conclusions 28 4.0 Select Bibliography 30 4.1 Primary sources 30 4.2 Unpublished reports and theses 31 4.3 Secondary sources 31 4.4 Newspapers and journals 32 4.5 Websites, indexes and databases 32 Addendum 1 Consultation and Review of Citations, April-June 2007 Addendum 2 Consultation and Review of Citations, November 2007 Addendum 3 Amendment C64 and Final Recommendations VOLUME 2 Individual Building Data Sheets – Kew VOLUME 3 Individual Building Data Sheets – Camberwell and Hawthorn VOLUME 4 Individual Building Data Sheets for buildings not recommended for the Heritage Overlay LOVELL CHEN I Project Team This report was prepared by: Peter Lovell Kate Gray Michael Galimany Conrad Hamann Kate Paterson Katherine White II LOVELL CHEN 1.0 Introduction This report forms part of a Heritage Review of B graded buildings in Camberwell, Kew and Hawthorn undertaken in 2005-6 by Lovell Chen for the City of Boroondara.
    [Show full text]