DOCSLIB.ORG

Elizabethy^ SECUND^ Reginyc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elizabethy^ SECUND^ Reginyc 19 7 0 83 VICTORIA. ANNO UNDEVICESIMO ELIZABETHy^ SECUND^ REGINyC No. 7957. An Act relating to certain Lands in the Cities of Richmond and Hawthorn and for other purposes. [1th April, 1970.] HEREAS certain land in the City of Richmond was by Order Preamble. W in Council of the 13th day of October, 1873 permanently g^^J™"' reserved as a site for public park and recreation designated ""jl?"- Richmond Park and by Crown grant dated the 19th day of ?4.ii.i873. November, 1886 granted to, the Board of Land and Works and vof'*i902 the Mayor Councillors and Citizens of the City of Richmond : fo°'326. ' And whereas it is provided by the Richmond {South-Eastern NO. 7519. Freeway) Lands Act 1967 that on completion by the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works of works in connexion with the diversion of the Yarra River in the locality north-west of Heyington railway station in the city of Prahran and the extension of the metropoUtan main highway known as the South-Eastern Freeway through the said land and certain other land and upon the registration in the Office of Titles of a transfer and surrender to Her Majesty of certain land the said Order in Council and Crown grant shall be deemed to relate also to that land and to certain other lands : And whereas— (a) sections of the Yarra Boulevard have been constructed and maintained by the Public Works Department and are now to be maintained by the Country Roads Board ; {b) portion 84 1970. Richmond and Hawthorn Lands. No. 7957 (b) portion of the land to which the said Order in Council and Crown grant relate has been used for the construction of the section of the Yarra Boulevard which runs from the MacRobertson Bridge easterly northerly westerly and northerly to Bridge-road in the city of Richmond ; (c) in consequence of the construction of the extension to the said highway and diversion of the Yarra River it is necessary that part of the said section of the Yarra Boulevard be re-constructed in a new position between the said highway and the right bank of the Yarra River in its diverted course ; and (d) it is expedient that a strip of land containing not more than 21 acres, being the land on which the said section of the Yarra Boulevard is constructed or is to be re-constructed in a new position as aforesaid but not including the land occupied in its old position by the part to be re-constructed, be excised from the land to which the said Order in Council and Crown grant relate or are to be deemed to relate and become a public road : And whereas the area and position of the boundaries of the strip of land required for the Yarra Boulevard cannot be exactly determined until the works in connexion with the diversion of the Yarra River and the extension of the said highway have been completed : And whereas by reason of the construction of the extension to the said highway and the taking of lands for that purpose, the schools known as St. Kevin's College and Scotch College have been adversely affected in their sporting facilities and it is expedient to make provision whereby the loss they have suffered may be mitigated : And whereas it is expedient that an area of not more than 3 roods and 10 perches between the Yarra Boulevard and the Yarra River being the area approximately indicated by hatching ^1"1A..,. °" ^^^ Pl^" '" the First Schedule be excised from the land to which Schedule. the said Order in Council relates in order that it may be leased as hereinafter provided : And whereas the said St. Kevin's College is conducted by a community whose property is held by trustees who are a body corporate incorporated under the Act of the Parliament of New South Wales known as the Roman Catholic Church Communities' Lands Act 1942 under the name of the " Trustees of the Christian Brothers " : And 1970. Richmond and Hawthorn Lands. No. 7957 85 And whereas the land indicated by hatching on the plan in the Second Schedule is by virtue of the provisions of the Richmond |~^^^ High School Land Act 1967 permanently reserved for the purposes n^ 750*3. of a State High School and in order to provide a site for a boathouse for the use of the said high school it is expedient that an area of not more than 2 roods and 35 perches between the land reserved by virtue of the said Act and the Yarra River being the area indicated by cross-hatching on the plan in the Second Schedule be excised from the land to which the said Order in Council relates and be added to the land reserved by virtue of the said Act : And whereas— (a) the land delineated and shown hatched on the plan in the Third Schedule is part of a road in the city of Third Hawthorn known as Morrison-street ; schedule. (b) the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works is registered as the proprietor of an estate in fee simple in the land comprised in certificate of title entered in the register book of the Office of Titles volume 8740 folium 170 being part of Crown portion 11 in the Parish of Boroondara ; (c) the land delineated and shown cross-hatched on the plan in the Third Schedule is part of the land comprised in the said certificate of title ; (d) it is expedient that the said portion of the said road be closed and that the land comprised therein be granted to The Presbyterian Church of Victoria Trusts Corporation and the said land shown cross-hatched on the said plan should be a public highway : And whereas the said Scotch College is conducted on land abutting Morrison-street in the city of Hawthorn held in fee simple by The Presbyterian Church of Victoria Trusts Corporation, a body corporate incorporated under the Presbyterian Trusts Act 1890 : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say) :— 1. This Act may be cited as the Richmond and Hawthorn Lands shon utie. Act 1970. 2. In 86 1970. Richmond and Hawthorn Lands. No. 7957 Interpretation. 2. In this Act unless inconsistent with the context or subject-matter— "Reserved " Reserved land" means the land reserved by the land." hereinbefore recited Order in Council of the 13th day of October, 1873 and comprised in Crown grant entered in the register book of the OflSce of Titles volume 1902 folium 326 and includes the land to which the said Order in Council and Crown grant are by virtue of the provisions of the Richmond {South-Eastern Freeway) Lands Act 1967 to be deemed to relate. Excision of 3. (1) Upon submission to the Minister of Lands of a plan land to be surveyed from or plans of survey signed by the Surveyor-General showing the reservation and Crown grant strip of the reserved land on the right bank of the Yarra River of Richmond Park. between the MacRobertson Bridge and Bridge-road which is required for the Yarra Boulevard and containing not more than 21 acres, the Minister may recommend to the Governor in Council that the said land be excised from the reservation. (2) Upon receiving such a recommendation the Governor in Council may by proclamation published in the Government Gazette revoke the hereinbefore recited Order in Council of the 13th day of October, 1873 and Crown grant dated the 19th day of November, 1886 so far as they relate or are to be deemed to relate to the land shown in the plan or plans of survey. Excised land deemed to be (3) On the day on which a proclamation revoking the said proclaimed as Order in Council as provided in sub-section (2) is published in a road. the Government Gazette every other Order in Council or proclamation so far as it reserves or affects or purports to reserve or affect the land shown in the plan or plans of survey shall also be revoked and the said land— (a) shall notwithstanding anything in any Act become and be unalienated land of the Crown freed and discharged from all trusts encumbrances reservations limitations and restrictions whatsoever and from every estate or interest therein ; and (6) shall be deemed to be proclaimed as a road under the provisions of section 25 of the Land Act 1958. Power to 4. (1) Upon submission to the Minister of Lands of a plan sSl^yS'from'* of survcy signcd by the Surveyor-General of not more than 3 oSra'SSnt'rf roods and 10 perches of the reserved land corresponding as nearly Richmond Park, ^g practicable with the land indicated by hatching on tiie plan in the First Schedule and upon being satisfied that the land described in the plan of survey does so correspond the Minister may reconmiend to the Governor in Council that the land shown in the plan of survey be excised from the reservation. (2) Upon 1970. Richmond and Hawthorn Lands. No. 7957 87 (2) Upon receiving a recommendation pursuant to sub-section (1) the Governor in Council may by proclamation published in the Government Gazette revoke the said Order in Council of the 13th day of October, 1873 and Crown grant dated the 19th day of November, 1886 so far as they relate to the land shown in the plan of survey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts 1890 and 1893
    VICTORIA. ANNO SEXAGESIMO PEIMO VICTOKLE BEGINS ####*####*#**#*######****^ No. 1491. An Act to amend the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts 1890 and 1893. [2Ath August, 1897.] T)E it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with -*-* the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled ana by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say):— 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Melbourne and Metropolitan short title ana con« Board of Works Act 1897, and shall be read as one with the Melbourne struction- and Metropolitan Board of Works Act 1890 (hereinafter called the N*08-1197'1351i Principal Act) and with the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Act 1893; and this Act and the said Acts may be cited together as the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Acts. (2) Sections three four five six and seven of this Act shall be deemed to be a portion of Part III* of the Principal Act. 2. The Act mentioned in the First Schedule to this Act to the Repeal. extent mentioned therein shall be and the same is hereby repealed. First schedule. Such repeal shall not be deemed to affect any notices given or things commenced or done by the Board pursuant to any of the repealed enactments before the commencement of this Act. 3. In DM 25 61 VICT.] Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works. [No. 1491. Interpretation. 3. In section seventy-six of the Principal Act for the definitions of the words " sewer" and u street" respectively there shall be substituted the following definitions, and such substitutions shall be deemed to take effect as from the commencement of the Principal Act:— " Sewer." "Sewer" shall mean and include any sewer or underground gutter or channel which is not a drain within the meaning of this Part of this Act and any drain or portion of a drain laid between a sewer and the boundary line of any allotment or curtilage.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawthorn Heritage Study
    HAWTHORN HERITAGE STUDY APRIL 1993 The Hawthorn Heritage Study was one of the three Special Strategy Plan Projects started during 1991. The Heritage Study was prepared by a team led by Meredith Gould, Conservation Architect, with substantial input from the Townscape and Heritage Topic Group as part of the Hawthorn Strategy Plan process. Some sections of the study were completed in draft form as early as late 1991; other sections have only reached completion now. This Study is the first ever comprehensive assessment of Hawthorn's urban and landscape heritage. Every bUilding in Hawthorn has been assessed for its heritage value. Significant trees, parks, landscapes and roadways have also been evaluated and recorded. The heritage areas proposed in the Study were endorsed by Hawthorn Council for the purpose of public consultation on 10 December 1991. Comments were sought by means of a map and explanatory material in a Strategy Plan booklet letterboxed throughout Hawthorn in March 1991. On 25 August 1992, Council resolved that a proposed Planning Scheme Amendment be drafted to include: Heritage protection for areas Protection of individual buildings of stand alone and contributory signiticance outside heritage areas. Voluntary registration of other individual places outside heritage areas, for the purpose of heritage protection. A degree of heritage control substantially reduced compared to normal Urban Conservation Areas. Council on 20 April 1993 resolved to publish the completed study; to notify property owners of buildings recommended for inclusion on the Historic Buildings Register, the National Estate Register and the Significant Tree Register; and to refer for further officer investigation the recommendations on signiticant street trees, kerbs/gutterslfootpaths/roadways, laneways, drains and creeks, Yarra River/Gardiners Creek, parks/reserves, and the establishment of an internal monitoring system.
    [Show full text]
  • KHS June 2020 Newsletter
    NEWSLETTER No. 131 JUNE 2020 Serving the community, families, schools, students, historians and the things you keep other researchers Heritage protection has been with us for so long now that it has evolved a history of its own. Post war architecture might be seen as one factor which inspired the first phase of the heritage protection movement in the 1950s and 1960s when Nineteenth century buildings and places seemed to be swept away by an uncaring tide of modernisation. Discussion of, and Contents agreement on, measures for its protection can be fraught with peril. In an article on the former Methodist Men’s Fellowship Hall (pages 8-9), the increased rigor and changes of emphasis that are occurring in THE THINGS YOU KEEP heritage research are noted. Additional archival material is available, 1 Progress to date on the draft Kew much of it now on-line in digitised searchable form. New themes such as Heritage Gap Study Indigenous History, Women’s History and LGBTI History have emerged. The historical time frame has expanded, the middle of last century now evokes a very different world from that of the pioneer settlers of Kew. SOCIETY NEWS 3 Lectures and Exhibitions during a The City of Boroondara Thematic Environmental History (Built Heritage period of enforced hibernation Pty Ltd, 2012) identified Post-Second World War places as representing the highest priority for further heritage study. Such places were amongst the most under-represented on the then current Heritage Overlay RANGEVIEW 4 A Mont Victor Road mansion – its schedule and, at the same time, under the most frequent threat of rise and fall as a house, as schools demolition or unsympathetic alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Citation
    NAME OF HERITAGE PLACE: Chesney Wolde Address: 57 Berkeley Street, Hawthorn Name: Chesney Wolde Survey Date: 25 August 2020 Place Type: Residential Architect: Not Known Grading: Significant Builder: Not Known Extent of Overlay: To title boundaries Construction Date: c1916 Historical Context The First Nations People, the Wurundjeri, have a connection to the land along the valleys of the Yarra River and Gardiners Creek.1 This connection extends back thousands of years, and continues today. The boundaries of Hawthorn are defined by Barkers Road and Burke Road to the north and east; and two watercourses, the Yarra River and its tributary, Gardiners Creek.2 Of 1 Gary Presland, First People. The Eastern Kulin of Melbourne, Port Phillip and Central Victoria, p 25. 2 The former City of Hawthorn 1 the watercourses, hills, valleys and plains within the Melbourne region, it is the Yarra River that is its defining feature, and one that serves as its artery. It was its abundant supply of freshwater that saw European settlement establish along the Yarra River in the nineteenth century. Today the metropolis still obtains much of its water from the Yarra and its tributaries in the nearby ranges. It was a short distance from the subject site, that in 1836-37 pastoralist John Gardiner (1798-1878) settled with his family, and Joseph Hawdon and John Hepburn. They drove cattle overland from Sydney to the property they established on Gardiners Creek,3 land now occupied by Scotch College. Improved transport links with the city, initially the completion of the railway from the city to Hawthorn in 1861, stimulated residential development.
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment C333boro
    AMENDMENT C333BORO System Note: The following ordinance will be modified in Clause:22 LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES, Sub-Clause:22.03 HERITAGE POLICY 22.03-7 Reference documents C333boro Assessment of Heritage Precincts in Kew (City of Boroondara, April 2013) Assessment of the Burwood Road Heritage Precinct, Hawthorn (City of Boroondara, August 2008, updated March 2012) Auburn Village Heritage Study (City of Boroondara, 2005) Balwyn Road Residential Precinct, Canterbury: Stage 2 Heritage Precinct Review (City of Boroondara, August 2006) Boroondara Heritage Property Database Boroondara Schedule of Gradings Map Camberwell Conservation Study (City of Camberwell, 1991) Camberwell Junction Heritage Review (City of Boroondara, 2008, updated 2013) Canterbury Hill Estate Precinct Citation (2014) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 1: Canterbury (Context Pty Ltd, 25 May 2017) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 2: Camberwell (Context Pty Ltd, 26 September 2017) City Of Boroondara Municipal-Wide Heritage Gap Study Volume 7: Glen Iris (Context Pty Ltd, 15 October 2020) City of Kew Urban Conservation Study (City of Kew, 1988) Creswick Estate Precinct Heritage Citation (2016) Fairmount Park Estate Precinct Heritage Citation (2016) Grange Avenue Residential Precinct Citation (August 2014) Hawthorn Heritage Precincts Study (City of Boroondara, April 2012) Hawthorn Heritage Study (City of Hawthorn, 1993) Heritage Policy - Statements of Significance (City of Boroondara, August 2016, or as amended and adopted by Council from time to time) Kew and Hawthorn Further Investigations - Assessment of Specific Sites (February 2014) Kew Junction Commercial Heritage Study (September 2013) National Trust of Australia (Victoria) Technical Bulletin 8.1 Fences & Gates (1988) Review of B-graded Buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn (City of Boroondara, January 2007, updated June 2007 and November 2009) Volumes 1, 2 and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Our Club
    A Short History of our club. The Beginning In the early 1950’s, Australia was a vastly different place. Its population of a little over 12 million was almost exclusively of British descent. It had just emerged from almost six years of World War II during which hundreds of thousands of its men and women enlisted voluntarily for service in the armed forces. By 1949 Australia was emerging from wartime shortages and rationing. Oil exploration had not started. Mining was a very unsophisticated affair and the pick and shovel were the order of the day. Jet aircraft had not invaded the skies. High rise building was confined to St Patrick’s spire on Eastern Hill. We only just had our first Australian car. We had no freeways but the roads were not choked as few people had cars. Having children was normal; marrying beforehand was usual. Rotary had expanded from its beginnings in Chicago with clubs being formed in Canada, Ireland and England. Early in the second decade of the century we had a new organisation calling itself Rotary International. Two distinguished Canadians were appointed by RI in 1921 to undertake the task of establishing Rotary in Australia. Almost by accident, Melbourne was the site of that first club when Sydney passed up a prior opportunity. It is interesting to note that it took 16 years for Rotary to expand from Chicago to Melbourne (some 14,000km), it took another 32 years for it to expand a further 7km to Hawthorn. Between its formation in 1921 and the start of WWII, the Melbourne club ceded territory for only 3 other clubs to be formed, Essendon, Dandenong and Footscray.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Riversdale Road Hawthorn
    DUPLEX Prepared by: Context Pty Ltd Address: 70 Riversdale Road, Hawthorn Name: Duplex Survey Date: 18 May 2016 Place Type: Residential Architect: Grading: Individually Significant Builder: John Marriage Extent of Overlay: To title boundaries Construction Date: 1928-29 Historical Context The duplex at 70 Riversdale Road, Hawthorn is associated with the following themes in the City of Boroondara Thematic Environmental History (BTEH) 2012: 3.0 Connecting Victorians: 3.5 Travelling by tram 6.0 Building towns, cities and the Garden State: 6.3 Shaping the suburbs, 6.3.3 Creating middle class suburbs in the early twentieth century; 6.7 Making homes for Victorians, 6.7.5 Developing higher density living The following historical context comprises edited extracts from the BTEH 2012. The term ‘study area’ refers to the City of Boroondara: Travelling by tram The opening of the new Victoria Street Bridge in 1884, and the establishment of a cable tram terminus (on the Collingwood side of the river) in late 1885, prompted the Melbourne Tramway & Omnibus Company to propose a horse-drawn tram route through Kew. Commencing in 1887, this route ran between the gates of the Boroondara Cemetery and the new bridge, where commuters could cross the river and board the cable tram to the city. In January 1890, the same company established a second horse- drawn tram route through the study area – this time, extending from the Hawthorn Bridge (where there was another cable tram terminus on the western bank) along Burwood Road, Power Street, and Riversdale Road to Auburn Road, Upper Hawthorn. As Gwen McWilliam notes, this new tram route was to have a significant impact on the development of Riversdale Road as a local retail centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Places We Keep: the Heritage Studies of Victoria and Outcomes for Urban Planners
    The places we keep: the heritage studies of Victoria and outcomes for urban planners Robyn Joy Clinch Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture & Planning) June 2012 Faculty of Architecture, Building & Planning The University of Melbourne Abstract The incentive for this thesis that resulted from an investigation into the history of my heritage house, developed from my professional interest in the planning controls on heritage places. This was further motivated by my desire to reinvent my career as an urban planner and to use my professional experience in management, marketing and information technology. As a result, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between the development of the heritage studies of Victoria and the outcome of those documents on planning decisions made by urban planners. The methods used included a simulated experience that established a methodology for the thesis. In addition, interviews were conducted with experts in the field that provided a context for understanding the influencing factors of when, where, by whom, with what, why and how the studies were conducted. These interviews also contributed to the understanding of how the historical research had been undertaken and used to establish the significance of places and how this translated into outcomes for urban planners. Case studies in the form of Tribunal determinations have been used to illustrate key outcomes for urban planners. A large amount of information including that relating to the historical background of the studies plus a collection of indicative content from over 400 heritage studies was traversed.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Council Victoria
    Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 Name Residence Location 11 Majore Street, Hawthorn, City of Boroondara Hermes Number 198648 Heritage Overlay Number No Heritage Overlay 11 Majore Street (October 2017) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: • That the place NOT be included in the Victorian Heritage Register under s.37(1)(b) of the Heritage Act 2017. • The Heritage Council may wish to consider exercising its powers under s.49(1)(c) of the Heritage Act 2017 to refer the recommendation to the City of Boroondara for inclusion in the local Heritage Overlay. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director Recommendation Date: Friday 17 November 2017 This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act 2017. It has not been considered or endorsed by the Heritage Council of Victoria. Name:11 Majore Street, Hawthorn Hermes Number: 198648 Page | 1 EXTENT OF NOMINATION Date that the nomination was accepted by the Executive Director 1 February 2016 Written extent of nomination All of the place known as 11 Majore Street Hawthorn. Nomination extent diagram Nominated extent is indicated by green line Name:11 Majore Street, Hawthorn Hermes Number: 198648 Page | 2 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RESPONSE SUMMARY It is the view of the Executive Director that this place should not be included in the Victorian Heritage Register for the reasons outlined in this report. The information presented in this report and the attached documents demonstrates that 11 Majore Street, Hawthorn may be of potential local significance, rather than State level significance.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BOROONDARA Review of B-Graded Buildings in Kew
    CITY OF BOROONDARA Review of B-graded buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn Prepared for City of Boroondara January 2007 Revised June 2007 Revised November 2009 VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT & ADDENDA TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Main Report Project Team ii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope and Project Brief 1 1.2 Background 1 2.0 Methodology 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Existing Documentation 3 2.3 Existing Grading Systems 4 2.4 Site Inspections 6 2.5 Historical Research 7 2.6 Comparative Analysis 9 2.7 Assessment of Significance 9 3.0 Findings and Recommendations 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Recommendations for Individual Buildings 19 3.3 Kew Precincts Review 25 3.4 Recommendations for Further Work 28 3.5 Conclusions 28 4.0 Select Bibliography 30 4.1 Primary sources 30 4.2 Unpublished reports and theses 31 4.3 Secondary sources 31 4.4 Newspapers and journals 32 4.5 Websites, indexes and databases 32 Addendum 1 Consultation and Review of Citations, April-June 2007 Addendum 2 Consultation and Review of Citations, November 2007 Addendum 3 Amendment C64 and Final Recommendations VOLUME 2 Individual Building Data Sheets – Kew VOLUME 3 Individual Building Data Sheets – Camberwell and Hawthorn VOLUME 4 Individual Building Data Sheets for buildings not recommended for the Heritage Overlay LOVELL CHEN I Project Team This report was prepared by: Peter Lovell Kate Gray Michael Galimany Conrad Hamann Kate Paterson Katherine White II LOVELL CHEN 1.0 Introduction This report forms part of a Heritage Review of B graded buildings in Camberwell, Kew and Hawthorn undertaken in 2005-6 by Lovell Chen for the City of Boroondara.
    [Show full text]