DOCSLIB.ORG

The Union of Lublin in the Historical and Cultural Memory of Lithuania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Union of Lublin in the Historical and Cultural Memory of Lithuania The Union of Lublin in the historical and cultural memory of Lithuania Jūratė Kiaupienė (Lithuanian Institute of History) Today we have gathered here to commemorate the Union of Lublin, which has united to nations – the Kingdom of Poland the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In 1569 the Commonwealth of Two Nations was formed and it managed to survive in Europe for 226 years. After hearing the paper by the distinguished professor, I would like to begin from the place which the Union of Lublin occupies in the modern Lithuanian historical and cultural memory, which significantly different to that which is observed in Poland. There no streets or squares which bear the name of the Union of Lublin. There are not solemn commemorations of this date in the public life of the Republic of Lithuania. The Union of Lublin is not compared the Treaty of the European Union. On the other hand, the Union of Lublin is taught in schools as an important event in the history of Grand Duchy of Lithuania, but in this case the question of the Union is left for historians to interpret and research. Why did such differences between Lithuanian and Polish historical and cultural memory emerge? We should begin from a brief overview of history of Polish-Lithuanian Unions. Both Lithuanian and Polish states were formed during the Middle ages. In 1386 the first union between them was formed as a dynastic marriage, the grand duke of Lithuania was crowned as the King of Poland. From that point on for 186 years both Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was ruled by the members of a Lithuanian Gediminid/Jagiellonian dynasty. During the Fifteenth century there were attempts to change the shape of the dynastic union, but both Poland and Lithuania remained separate, with different dynamics of their internal development, as well as a different understanding of the concept of the Union. During this period there was more political strife between the partners of the Union than agreement. Such was the prehistory of the Union of Lublin. At the turn of the Sixteenth century, the shape of the Union inherited from the Medieval era, was no longer sufficient for the Early modern politics. There were attempts to renew the Polish-Lithuanian Union, by providing it with features that followed the zeitgeist of the era. But these attempts were unsuccessful, the attempts of renewing the union stalled. They stalled, because Polish and Lithuanian political nations throughout the first half of the Sixteenth century gave birth to new and different and competing visions for the future of relations between the states. 1 During the early Sixteenth Century Polish politicians attempted to create centralized Polish monarchy. They imagined that it will be a state which will include other territories in one way or the other related to the Polish kingdom as provinces, including the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. They even imagined a new name for Lithuania as the future province – New Poland. Political nation of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania imagined the renewed union as a union of two independent nations - a composite monarchy. This concept of the union had acceptance among the all strata of nobility of Lithuania. What is more, members of Lithuanian political elite, who had in their hands the main levers of state power and the support of the political nation, in 1526 reinvigorated the idea which was first encouraged during the early Fifteenth century by the Grand duke Vytautas (1392-1430), which was not embodied at that time. It was the idea of elevating Lithuania to the status of a Kingdom. Contemporary ruler of Poland and Lithuania Sigismund the Old rejected this request. Regardless of this decision by the ruler the notions of a separate statehood of Lithuania were further strengthened in the public political life. As it encountered the political culture of the Renaissance it strengthened its belief that the Grand Duchy must become a centralized state, ruled by a powerful monarch with a well-organized bureaucratic administration. Sixteenth century war with Muscovy for the control of the lands of Lithuanian Rus ‘, and the economic and political integration of these lands was a part of implementing this idea of centralized monarchy. On the other hand, Lithuanian political nation fully understood that good relations and mutual support between Polish and Lithuanian states ruled by a single ruler was essential. Therefore, Lithuania wanted a union, as a coexistence of two independent and equal political bodies – two states. During the mid-Sixteenth centuries, after further complications of political and military situation in the region, there were serious steps taken in order to renew and modernize the union. Polish and Lithuanian political nations were to decide regarding the bonds of two nations in the future and look for consensus. The preparations for the renewal of the union was complicated, and caused a lot of controversy. This work was to be finalized by members of the parliaments (Sejm’s) of two states, which gathered to Lublin in 1569 to a common Sejm. Polish and Lithuanian politicians brought political stances which were difficult to reconcile to Lublin. Before this Sejm Lithuanian senators, and representatives elected in powiats held a meeting and negotiated the political strategy and tactics which were to be used when discussing the issue of renewing the union with Poland in the common Sejm. What is more, the Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania received guarantees from the Grand duke Sigismund August, which were stated in the privilege issued on 21 of December, 1568. In it the ruler declared, 2 that in the Lublin Sejm no decisions related to the Lithuanian state could be taken against the will of its representatives or an act which would be sealed only with the seal of the Polish Crown. The ruler also promised not to take any decision regarding the union unilaterally, not to side only with Polish of Lithuanians, if the other side of the negotiations would not approve of the decision. Members of the Sejm from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania arrived to Lublin to negotiate the renewal of the Union with an oath of the Grand duke to forever protect the sovereignty of the Lithuanian state, as was legally formulated in the Lithuanian statute of 1566. Start of the negotiations at Lublin Sejm was difficult. Mikalojus Radvila the Red, the political leader of the Lithuanian delegation, explained that Lithuanian and Polish sejms are separated by “bars”, which hindered them to start fruitful work at the Sejm. In order to understand what “bars” were there in the mind of the Lithuanian politician can be seen by reading the diary of the Lublin Sejm in 1569. There we see that on one day Lithuanians failed to arrive to a meeting with Poles at a joint sitting, while the King promised that they will attend. While returning form the hall where the sessions were held at the castle of Lublin, Poles met Lithuanian members of Sejm and started speaking with them, inviting them, stating that the doors were open for them. As he answered to this proposal, Radvila said that he knows, that the doors to His Majesty‘s Polish lords are open, but that there are “bars’, that the Lithuanian representatives cannot pass, until they are lifted by His Majesty, the King. And during several occasions during the first months of the Lublin Sejm, representatives of Lithuanian Sejm repeatedly told the Poles, that they should not be angry and they should show timidity, as they explained that Lithuanians must firstly solve the most important issue with Sigismund August, as the Grand duke of Lithuania, which caused this crisis in the first place. They explained to Polish representatives, that firstly, Lithuanians must receive guarantees from the ruler, for its sovereignty, liberties and rights. They also reminded that the Polish Sejm must also recognize that the nations of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish Crown are equal “brothers”. Situation was complicated by the bishop of Krakow Filip Padniewski, who at a sitting of a Sejm on February 12, 1569 stated, that the ruler of Lithuania Jogaila, when in 1386 he was granted the Polish crown gifted his patrimony – the Grand Duchy of Lithuania to Poland, and annexed it to the Crown in order for two countries to become one country and a single political body. Lithuanian political nation could not agree with the Polish proposal for the Union which stated, that the future elected ruler should no longer be granted the title of the Grand duke of Lithuania, and that his title should remain the King of Poland; that granted rights and liberties should only be confirmed with a single seal – the one of the Polish Crown; that only Polish Sejm would remain and that the Statute of Lithuania (1566) should be revoked. These demands by Polish politicians, supported by 3 the ruler Sigismund August, was understood by Lithuanian representatives as a threat to destroy one of the aforementioned “brothers” - the nation and the state of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. As a response to this uncompromising stance of Lithuanian delegation, on 28 February, 1569, Sigismund August declared an ultimatum, that the members of both Sejms should gather in a single session and threatened, that should the session not take place, he will announce that two states in his domain will be joined, and he will single-handedly determine the form and contents of the new joint Polish-Lithuanian state. The political crisis deepened. In response to the threats of the ruler, on March 1, 1569, the Lithuanian delegation left Lublin. Polish historiography traditionally calls this act the “Lithuanian flight”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth As a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity*
    Chapter 8 The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity* Satoshi Koyama Introduction The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita) was one of the largest states in early modern Europe. In the second half of the sixteenth century, after the union of Lublin (1569), the Polish-Lithuanian state covered an area of 815,000 square kilometres. It attained its greatest extent (990,000 square kilometres) in the first half of the seventeenth century. On the European continent there were only two larger countries than Poland-Lithuania: the Grand Duchy of Moscow (c.5,400,000 square kilometres) and the European territories of the Ottoman Empire (840,000 square kilometres). Therefore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was the largest country in Latin-Christian Europe in the early modern period (Wyczański 1973: 17–8). In this paper I discuss the internal diversity of the Commonwealth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and consider how such a huge territorial complex was politically organised and integrated. * This paper is a part of the results of the research which is grant-aided by the ‘Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research’ program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science in 2005–2007. - 137 - SATOSHI KOYAMA 1. The Internal Diversity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Poland-Lithuania before the union of Lublin was a typical example of a composite monarchy in early modern Europe. ‘Composite state’ is the term used by H. G. Koenigsberger, who argued that most states in early modern Europe had been ‘composite states, including more than one country under the sovereignty of one ruler’ (Koenigsberger, 1978: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • The Archives of Poland and Where to Find Online Genealogy Records for Each - Sheet1
    The Archives of Poland and where to find Online Genealogy Records for each - Sheet1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Archives of Poland Territorial coverage Search theGenBaza ArchivesGenetekaJRI-PolandAGAD Przodek.plGesher Archeion.netGalicia LubgensGenealogyPoznan in the BaSIAProject ArchivesPomGenBaseSzpejankowskisPodlaskaUpper and Digital Szpejenkowski SilesianSilesian Library Genealogical Digital Library Society Central Archives of Historical Records All Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ National Digital Archive All Poland ✓ ✓ Central Archives of Modern Records All Poland ✓ ✓ Podlaskie (primarily), State Archive in Bialystok Masovia ✓ ✓ ✓ The Archives of Poland and where to find Online Genealogy Records for each - Sheet1 Branch in Lomza Podlaskie ✓ ✓ Kuyavian-Pomerania (primarily), Pomerania State Archive in Bydgoszcz and Greater Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Kuyavian-Pomerania (primarily), Greater Branch in Inowrocław Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Silesia (primarily), Świetokrzyskie, Łódz, National Archives in Częstochowa and Opole ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pomerania (primarily), State Archive in Elbląg with the Warmia-Masuria, Seat in Malbork Kuyavian-Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ State Archive in Gdansk Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Gdynia Branch Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ State Archive in Gorzow Lubusz (primarily), Wielkopolski Greater Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ Greater Poland (primarily), Łódz, State Archive in Kalisz Lower Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Silesia (primarily), State Archive in Katowice Lesser Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch in Bielsko-Biala Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch in Cieszyn Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • SR September 2013
    THE SARMATIAN REVIEW Vol. XXXIII, No. 3 __ _____________ __ September 2013 Cyprian Kamil Norwid (1821–1883) Poet and painter Naiads (1838), by C. K. Norwid. Public domain. September 2013 THE SARMATIAN REVIEW in the Poetry of Cyprian Kamil Norwid . 1771 The Sarmatian Review (ISSN 1059- 5872) is a triannual publication of the Polish Institute of Jan Twardowski, Carpe diem, tr. by Patrick Houston. The journal deals with Polish, Central, and Corness (poem). 1776 Eastern European affairs, and it explores their implications Karl A. Roider, Intermarium: The Land Between for the United States. We specialize in the translation of the Black and Baltic Seas, by Marek Jan documents. Sarmatian Review is indexed in the American Chodakiewicz (review) . 1776 Bibliography of Slavic and East European Studies, EBSCO, and P.A.I.S. International Database. From January 1998 on, Paweł Styrna, Politics, History and Collective files in PDF format are available at the Central and Eastern Memory in East Central Europe, ed. Zdzisław European Online Library (www.ceeol.com). Subscription Krasnodębski, Stefan Garsztecki, and Rüdiger price is $21.00 per year for individuals, $28.00 for Ritter (review) . 1777 institutions and libraries ($28.00 for individuals, $35.00 for libraries overseas, air mail). The views expressed by Bożena Karwowska, Out of the Nest: Polish authors of articles do not necessarily represent those of the Women Immigrants in Canada in the XX century, Editors or of the Polish Institute of Houston. Articles are by Maria Anna Jarochowska-de-Kosko subject to editing. Unsolicited manuscripts and other (review) . .1780 materials are not returned unless accompanied by a self- Ewa Thompson, Between the Brown and the addressed and stamped envelope.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIAŁYSTOK and KIELCE GHETTOS: a COMPARATIVE STUDY Sara Bender
    THE BIAŁYSTOK AND KIELCE GHETTOS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Sara Bender During the past two decades, scholars have written research reports and monographs about several Jewish communities in Poland that were destroyed in the Holocaust. Archivists in the United States and Israel conducted a massive campaign to gather testimony from Holocaust survivors and some of the major World War II and Holocaust testimonials have been computerized. An invaluable aid to those engaged in studying the history of the Polish Jews during the period of the German occupation, these tools have enabled scholars to conduct comparative studies of the ghettos—for example, of two ghettos in Poland (Białystok and Kielce) to which Holocaust historians had previously accorded scant attention. FROM SOVIET TO GERMAN OCCUPATION In accordance with the terms of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Treaty between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union, the Soviet Army entered eastern Poland on September 17, 1939, and, within a month, annexed this territory. One of the major cities annexed was Białystok (known for its textile industry), with a Jewish population of some 50,000. The remainder of Poland was divided into two parts: western and northern Poland, annexed by the Reich; and central Poland, which as of October 1939 became a single political administrative unit known as the Generalgouvernement; this unit was subdivided into four districts: Warsaw, Lublin, Kraków, and Radom. The city of Kielce, whose Jewish population in September 1939 numbered approximately 20,000, was located in the Radom district. The Soviets controlled Białystok for a little less than two years. On June 27, 1941, the Germans invaded Białystok and within a month imprisoned Jews in a ghetto.
    [Show full text]
  • Towns in Poland” Series
    holds the exclusive right to issue currency in the Republic of Poland. In addition to coins and notes for general circulation, TTownsowns inin PolandPoland the NBP issues collector coins and notes. Issuing collector items is an occasion to commemorate important historic figures and anniversaries, as well as to develop the interest of the public in Polish culture, science and tradition. Since 1996, the NBP has also been issuing occasional 2 złoty coins, In 2009, the NBP launched the issue struck in Nordic Gold, for general circulation. All coins and notes issued by the NBP of coins of the “Towns in Poland” series. are legal tender in Poland. The coin commemorating Warsaw Information on the issue schedule can be found at the www.nbp.pl/monety website. is the fifth one in the series. Collector coins issued by the NBP are sold exclusively at the Internet auctions held in the Kolekcjoner service at the following website: www.kolekcjoner.nbp.pl On 24 August 2010, the National Bank of Poland is putting into circulation a coin of the “Towns in Poland” series depicting Warsaw, with the face value of 2 złoty, struck in standard finish, in Nordic Gold. face value 2 zł • metal CuAl5Zn5Sn1 alloy •finish standard diameter 27.0 mm • weight 8.15 g • mintage (volume) 1,000,000 pcs Obverse: An image of the Eagle established as the State Emblem of the Republic of Poland. On the sides of the Eagle, the notation of the year of issue: 20-10. Below the Eagle, an inscription: ZŁ 2 ZŁ. In the rim, an inscription: RZECZPOSPOLITA POLSKA (Republic of Poland), preceded and followed by six pearls.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C.1500–1795
    The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, c.1500–1795 The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, c.1500–1795 Edited by Richard Butterwick Lecturer in Modern European History Queen’s University Belfast Northern Ireland Editorial matter, selection and Introduction © Richard Butterwick 2001 Chapter 10 © Richard Butterwick 2001 Chapters 1–9 © Palgrave Publishers Ltd 2001 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2001 978-0-333-77382-6 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2001 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St. Martin’s Press LLC Scholarly and Reference Division and Palgrave Publishers Ltd (formerly Macmillan Press Ltd). ISBN 978-1-349-41618-9 ISBN 978-0-333-99380-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780333993804 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg ✵ ✵ the Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg ✵
    The Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg ✵ ✵ The Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg ✵ TRH Grand Duke Henri and Grand Duchess Maria Teresa wave to the crowd from the balcony of the Grand Ducal Palace (7 October 2000) Historical introduction ✹07 Chapter One The House of Luxembourg-Nassau ✹17 - The origins of the national dynasty 18 - The sovereigns of the House of Luxembourg 20 - Grand Duke Adolphe 20 - Grand Duke William IV - Grand Duchess Marie-Adélaïde 21 - Grand Duchess Charlotte 22 - Grand Duke Jean 24 - Grand Duke Henri 28 Grand Duchess Maria Teresa 32 - Hereditary Grand Duke Guillaume 34 - Grand Duke Henri’s brothers and sisters 36 - HRH Grand Duke Henri’s accession to the throne on 7 October 2000 40 Chapter Two The monarchy today ✹49 - Prepared for reign 50 - The Grand Duke’s working day 54 - The Grand Duke’s visits abroad 62 - Visits by Heads of State to Luxembourg 74 - The public image of the Grand Ducal Family in Luxembourg 78 Chapter Three The constitutional monarchy ✹83 - The political situation of the Grand Duke 84 SUMMARY - The order of succession to the throne 92 Index - Index Accession to the Grand Ducal Throne 94 - The Lieutenancy 96 - The Regency 98 Chapter Four The symbols of the monarchy ✹101 - National Holiday – official celebration day of the Grand Duke’s birthday 102 - Coats of arms of the Grand Ducal House 104 - The anthem of the Grand Ducal House 106 Chapter Five The residences of the Grand Ducal Family ✹109 - The Grand Ducal Palace 110 - Berg Castle 116 - Fischbach Castle 118 Annexe - The Grand Duke’s visits abroad - Visits by Heads of State to Luxembourg HistoricalIntro introduction History Historical summary Around 963 1214 Siegfried acquires the rocky Ermesinde of Luxembourg outcrop of Lucilinburhuc marries Waleran of Limburg 1059-1086 1226- 1247 Conrad I, Count of Luxembourg Ermesinde, Countess of Luxembourg 8 1136 ✹ Death of Conrad II, last Count 1247-1281 Henry V of Luxembourg, of Luxembourg from the House known as Henry the Blond, of Ardenne.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Katarzyna Kosior (2017) "Becoming and Queen in Early Modern Europe: East and West", University of Southampton, Faculty of the Humanities, History Department, PhD Thesis, 257 pages. University of Southampton FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Becoming a Queen in Early Modern Europe East and West KATARZYNA KOSIOR Doctor of Philosophy in History 2017 ~ 2 ~ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Doctor of Philosophy BECOMING A QUEEN IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE: EAST AND WEST Katarzyna Kosior My thesis approaches sixteenth-century European queenship through an analysis of the ceremonies and rituals accompanying the marriages of Polish and French queens consort: betrothal, wedding, coronation and childbirth. The thesis explores the importance of these events for queens as both a personal and public experience, and questions the existence of distinctly Western and Eastern styles of queenship. A comparative study of ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ ceremony in the sixteenth century has never been attempted before and sixteenth- century Polish queens usually do not appear in any collective works about queenship, even those which claim to have a pan-European focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Twenty-Six
    Chapter Twenty-six Religion and Religiosity after the Crusades The First Crusade was a great turning-point for western Christendom. An obvious consequence of the First Crusade was that many Catholics became aware that their lot in this earthly life left much to be desired: in Orthodox Christendom and in the Dar al-Islam people were better off than they were in Catholic Europe. This recognition led to material and economic improvements in western Europe and to a new kind of education, which in turn was followed by humanism and the Renaissance. By 1500 western Europe was a very different place than it had been four hundred years earlier, and considerably closer to modernity. This secular improvement will be the subject of the next chapter, but in this chapter we must take a close look at the religious upheaval with which it began. Militancy against Muslims was paralleled at home by a heightened religiosity. Ordinary Christians, who had long assumed that they would reach Heaven by following the lead of the Church and its clerical hierarchy, began taking upon themselves the responsibility for their souls‟ salvation. Thousands of Christians enlisted in new and demanding monastic orders, and thousands more left the Catholic church to join communities of devout but renegade Christians. Another aspect of the Christians‟ new religiosity was violence against the small Jewish communities in their midst, which until then had enjoyed relative security. Judaism was also infused with a new religious enthusiasm, as the mystical texts known as the Kabbalah made their appearance and quickly took their place alongside the Tanakh and the Talmud.
    [Show full text]
  • From "Russian" to "Polish": Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925
    FROM “RUSSIAN” TO “POLISH”: Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925 Theodore R. Weeks Southern Illinois University at Carbondale The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17th Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Theodore R. Weeks Council Contract Number: 819-06g Date: June 4, 2004 Copyright Information Scholars retain the copyright on works they submit to NCEEER. However, NCEEER possesses the right to duplicate and disseminate such products, in written and electronic form, as follows: (a) for its internal use; (b) to the U.S. Government for its internal use or for dissemination to officials of foreign governments; and (c) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the U.S. government that grants the public access to documents held by the U.S. government. Additionally, NCEEER has a royalty-free license to distribute and disseminate papers submitted under the terms of its agreements to the general public, in furtherance of academic research, scholarship, and the advancement of general knowledge, on a non-profit basis. All papers distributed or disseminated shall bear notice of copyright. Neither NCEEER, nor the U.S. Government, nor any recipient of a Contract product may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Duchy of Lithuania As a Successor of Rome in the Early
    Open Political Science, 2018; 1: 170–181 Research Article Joanna Orzeł* From imagination to political reality? The Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a successor of Rome in the early modern historiography (15th–18th centuries)# https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0015 received December 17, 2018; accepted December 31, 2018. Abstract: At the beginning of the Renaissance Lithuanians understood that to join the civilization of Western Europe, it was necessary to have an appropriate (it means: very long) tradition. Like other countries, they had to create their own myth of origin. The most prestigious tradition was Greek-Roman antiquity, so the country’s origin story was invented, claiming its people descended directly from Rome. According to subsequent chronicles, the founder of the new state was Palemon (Publius Libon, initially Vilia). Using the theory of cultural memory of Jan and Aleida Assmann, the article presents how and why the Lithuanian myth of origin was transformed from 15th to the end of the 18th century. Particular attention was paid to the current needs of the state and the powerful noble families of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which also found their origins in the state myth. During the early modern period, the changes in the story were made (including the date of Palemon’s arrival in the Lithuanian lands). Nonetheless, the myth was not questioned for a long time. Even once it had already been established that it was no more than a fairy tale, the story was revived again, performing other functions in the 19th century. Keywords: cultural memory; foundation myth; mythical genealogy; Palemon; the Grand Duchy of Lithuania; Polish- Lithuanian historiography; Greco-Roman antiquity in early modern period.
    [Show full text]