The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C.1500–1795

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C.1500–1795 The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, c.1500–1795 The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, c.1500–1795 Edited by Richard Butterwick Lecturer in Modern European History Queen’s University Belfast Northern Ireland Editorial matter, selection and Introduction © Richard Butterwick 2001 Chapter 10 © Richard Butterwick 2001 Chapters 1–9 © Palgrave Publishers Ltd 2001 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2001 978-0-333-77382-6 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2001 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St. Martin’s Press LLC Scholarly and Reference Division and Palgrave Publishers Ltd (formerly Macmillan Press Ltd). ISBN 978-1-349-41618-9 ISBN 978-0-333-99380-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780333993804 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Polish-Lithuanian monarchy in European context : c[a]. 1500–1795 / [edited by] Richard Butterwick. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Poland—Politics and government. 2. Monarchy—Poland. 3. Poland—Politics and government—1763–1796. I. Butterwick, Richard. DK4179.2 .P65 2001 943.8’02—dc21 00–054533 10987654321 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Contents Preface vii Notes on the Contributors ix Pronunciation Guide xiii Maps The Jagiellonian territories, c. 1500 xv The Polish±Lithuanian Commonwealth after the Union of Lublin xvi The Polish±Lithuanian Commonwealth in the seventeenth centuryxvii The partitions of Poland±Lithuania xviii Gazetteer xix Introduction Richard Butterwick 1 1 The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchyin International Context R. J. W. Evans 25 2 The Development of Monarchies in Western Europe, c. 1500±1800 Ian Green 39 3 The Formation of the Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in the Sixteenth Century Almut Bues 58 4 The Grand Duchyand the Grand Dukes of Lithuania in the Sixteenth Century: Reflections on the Lithuanian Political Nation and the Union of Lublin JuÅrateÇ KiaupieneÇ 82 5 Nobles, Burghers and the Monarchyin Poland-Lithuania: the Case of Royal Prussia, 1454±1772/93 Karin Friedrich 93 6 Polish Views on European Monarchies Anna GrzesÂkowiak-Krwawicz 116 vi Contents 7 The Szlachta and the Monarchy: Reflections on the Struggle inter maiestatem ac libertatem Jerzy Lukowski 132 8 Obsequious Disrespect: the Problem of Royal Power in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth under the Vasas, 1587±1668 Robert I. Frost 150 9 The Functioning of the Monarchyduring the Reigns of the Electors of Saxony, 1697±1763 Mariusz Markiewicz 172 10 The Enlightened Monarchyof Stanisøaw August Poniatowski (1764±1795) Richard Butterwick 193 Chronology of Polish-Lithuanian Monarchs 219 Genealogical Table 221 AGuide to Further Reading 222 Glossary 229 Index 233 Preface The articles collected in this volume have grown out of the papers presented to the II Wiles Colloquium, held at the Queen's University of Belfast on 24±26 September 1999. The contributors and participants would like to express their deep gratitude to the Wiles Trust, and, in particular, to paytribute to the late Mrs Janet Boydfor making possible such an illuminating and enjoyable occasion. Thanks are also due to the Queen's Universityof Belfast, and especiallyto the academic and secre- tarial staff of the School of Modern Historyfor their help in staging the colloquium. The discussions benefited from the insights of Dr David Hayton, Professor Peter Jupp, Dr Richard Middleton, Dr Ian Packer and Dr Michael Rowe. The difficulties inherent in rendering terminology, personal and place names connected with the multilingual Polish-Lithuanian Common- wealth are extreme, particularlyin a collective work covering three centuries. National sensitivities are still raw in the region, but the aims here are to avoid anachronism while maximizing accessibility. The con- tributors have all been consulted, and it is hoped that the volume will be a step towards an emerging consensus, but the final decisions are the editor's. In rendering terminology, where there is an established English form, such as `palatine', it has been used, but `Sejm' is preferred to `Diet' or `Parliament', and `sejmik' to `dietine'. However, the Royal Prussian Landtag has been accorded the dignityof `diet' rather than that of the `general sejmik' which some Polish nobles wished to impose on it. Wherever possible, Polish terms such as Sejm and starosta have been anglicized. The glossarygives brief explanations of the keyinstitutions and offices. The names of rulers and the members of ruling families have been anglicized where there is a recognized form, so we have Casimir rather than Kazimierz or Kazimieras, Sigismund rather than Zygmunt or ZÏygi- mantas. On the other hand Stanisla(u)s and Ladisla(u)s are not accepted as English forms, so theyremain Stanisøaw and Wøadysøaw(except in the case of the eldest son of Casimir IV, who was Vladislav II of Bohemia and UlaÂszlo II of Hungary). August becomes Augustus, with the exception, for the sake of euphony, of Stanisøaw August. The names of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania before 1432, none of which have an English equiva- lent, are given in Lithuanian. Otherwise, personal names have been left vii viii Preface in the original language ± generallyPolish or German. Persons from the eastern territories of the Commonwealth present particular dilemmas ± during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the elites adopted Pol- ish, at different times in different places, in preference to Lithuanian and Ruthenian. The Polish language probablyencountered most resist- ance in the Ukraine. The names of Lithuanian nobles in the sixteenth centuryare given in Polish, but the Ukrainian Khmelnytskyisused instead of the Polish Chmielnicki to give the name of the leader of the 1648 Cossack revolt. Names of towns and cities are given in the nearest modern equivalent of the language of their dominant population; thus Danzig (German) rather than Gdan sk (Polish); LwoÂw (Polish) rather than Lviv (Ukrain- ian). However, what is appropriate for the sixteenth centuryis not always so for the eighteenth. The capital of the Grand Duchy of Lithu- ania is rendered as Vilnius (Lithuanian) in the sixteenth centuryand as Wilno (Polish) in the seventeenth and eighteenth. Fortunately, there are no other cases of having to give the same place in different forms. In cases of possible confusion, and where a source gives a different version, alternative forms are given in parentheses. Where familiar English forms exist, theyare used: Warsaw, Cracow and perhaps more controversially Kiev and Brest. The names of provinces and regions are anglicized wherever possible: thus Great Poland, rather than Wielkopolska; Volhy- nia, rather than Woøyn or Volyn; Ruthenia is used for the Palatinate of RusÂ, but Rus refers to the lands once forming part of Kievan Rus and so claimed bythe Grand Dukes of Muscovyas `Tsars of all Rus'. The Gazetteer gives alternative versions. Needless to say, no verdict is intended on the justice or injustice of current frontiers. The work of editing and introducing the volume would have been far more daunting were it not for the supportive advice and comments of myfellow contributors and mycolleagues at Queen's ± I would like to single out David Hayton and Peter Jupp. I also extend my thanks to the Staff and editors at Palgrave for their helpfulness. Richard Butterwick Belfast, May2000 Notes on the Contributors Almut Bues is DeputyDirector of the German Historical Institute in Warsaw. She is the editor of Eine schwierige Erbschaft. Die Verhandlungen nach dem Tode Herzog Jakobs von Kurland 1682/83 (Wiesbaden, 1995), co- editor of Die Testamente Herzog Albrechts von Preu en aus den sechziger Jahren des 16. Jahrhunderts (Wiesbaden, 1999) and author of Historia Niemiec XVI±XVIII wieku [Historyof Germanyfrom the 16th to the 18th Centuries] (Warsaw, 1998). Her research includes Austro-Polish relations and the Commonwealth's fiefs ± Courland and Ducal Prussia. Richard Butterwick is Lecturer in Modern European Historyat the Queen's Universityof Belfast. He is the author of Poland's Last King and English Culture: Stanisøaw August Poniatowski, 1732±1798 (Oxford, 1998) and articles on eighteenth-centuryPoland-Lithuania. He is currently working on studies of the Polish Revolution and the Catholic Church, 1788±1792, and the Enlightenment in Poland and Lithuania, c. 1730± 1830. Robert J. W. Evans is Regius Professor of Modern Historyat the Uni- versityof Oxford and Fellow of Oriel College. His publications include Rudolf II and his World: a Study in Intellectual History 1576±1612 (1st edn, Oxford, 1973), and The Making of the Habsburg Monarchy 1550±1700: An Interpretation (1st edn, Oxford, 1979). His current research interests cover the historyof the Habsburg lands from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries, especiallyHungaryin the eighteenth and nine- teenth centuries. Karin Friedrich is Lecturer in Historyat the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UniversityCollege London. She is the author of The Other Prussia: Royal Prussia, Poland and Liberty, 1569±1772 (Cambridge, 2000), and other studies. Her research includes Polish and Prussian urban history, issues of early modern national identities and the Enlight- enment.
Recommended publications
  • Enlightenment in Poland
    Enlightenment in Poland Enlightenment in Poland Lesson plan (English) Lesson plan (Polish) Bibliografia: M. Piotrowska-Marchewa, Nędzarze i filantropi. Problem ubóstwa w polskiej opinii publicznej 1815-1863, Toruń 2004. Enlightenment in Poland Naonal Theatre on the Krasiński Square in Warsaw Source: Zygmunt Vogel, 1791, domena publiczna. Link to lesson You will learn to characterize the characteristic features of the Enlightenment in Poland; to exchange the leading creators of the Polish Enlightenment; to recognize the examples of the Classicism period art, including your own region Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu The most significant Enlightenment impulses reached Poland from France. Another Enlightenment source of inspiration were the patterns derived from Germany. Both, August II and his son August III, were known for their love of art. Thanks to their investments, Dresden turned into a model baroque city, and Zwinger into an example of a palace building, admired by people in Europe. In Warsaw a number of investments were carried out - from the famous Saxon Axis to the Royal Castle reconstruction. In Grodno a new castle was built and the Sejm sessions were held there. However, Polish culture owns the most to the patronage of the last king - Stanisław August. In cooperation with the art advisory: Marcello Bacciarelli and Fryderyk Moszyński, Stanisław August implemented a number of initiatives in the field of urban planning, architecture, sculpture and painting. Wonderful palaces, gardens, residential towns reconstructions and art collecting became the responsibility of the largest magnate families. The main magnate families began to build magnificent residences. The most famous are: Radziwiłł Palaces in Nieśwież and Nieborów, Branicki Palace in Bialystok, Lubomirski Palace in Łańcut, Czartoryski Palace in Puławy, Sieniawa and Korc, and Potocki Palace in Tulczyn.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports
    Flash Report 01/2017 Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and country reports EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Flash Report 01/2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Flash Report 01/2017 Country Labour Law Experts Austria Martin Risak Daniela Kroemer Belgium Wilfried Rauws Bulgaria Krassimira Sredkova Croatia Ivana Grgurev Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Czech Republic Nataša Randlová Denmark Natalie Videbaek Munkholm Estonia Gaabriel Tavits Finland Matleena Engblom France Francis Kessler Germany Bernd Waas Greece Costas Papadimitriou Hungary Gyorgy Kiss Ireland Anthony Kerr Italy Edoardo Ales Latvia Kristine Dupate Lithuania Tomas Davulis Luxemburg Jean-Luc Putz Malta Lorna Mifsud Cachia Netherlands Barend Barentsen Poland Leszek Mitrus Portugal José João Abrantes Rita Canas da Silva Romania Raluca Dimitriu Slovakia Robert Schronk Slovenia Polonca Končar Spain Joaquín García-Murcia Iván Antonio Rodríguez Cardo Sweden Andreas Inghammar United Kingdom Catherine Barnard Iceland Inga Björg Hjaltadóttir Liechtenstein Wolfgang Portmann Norway Helga Aune Lill Egeland Flash Report 01/2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth As a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity*
    Chapter 8 The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity* Satoshi Koyama Introduction The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita) was one of the largest states in early modern Europe. In the second half of the sixteenth century, after the union of Lublin (1569), the Polish-Lithuanian state covered an area of 815,000 square kilometres. It attained its greatest extent (990,000 square kilometres) in the first half of the seventeenth century. On the European continent there were only two larger countries than Poland-Lithuania: the Grand Duchy of Moscow (c.5,400,000 square kilometres) and the European territories of the Ottoman Empire (840,000 square kilometres). Therefore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was the largest country in Latin-Christian Europe in the early modern period (Wyczański 1973: 17–8). In this paper I discuss the internal diversity of the Commonwealth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and consider how such a huge territorial complex was politically organised and integrated. * This paper is a part of the results of the research which is grant-aided by the ‘Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research’ program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science in 2005–2007. - 137 - SATOSHI KOYAMA 1. The Internal Diversity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Poland-Lithuania before the union of Lublin was a typical example of a composite monarchy in early modern Europe. ‘Composite state’ is the term used by H. G. Koenigsberger, who argued that most states in early modern Europe had been ‘composite states, including more than one country under the sovereignty of one ruler’ (Koenigsberger, 1978: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • The Archives of Poland and Where to Find Online Genealogy Records for Each - Sheet1
    The Archives of Poland and where to find Online Genealogy Records for each - Sheet1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Archives of Poland Territorial coverage Search theGenBaza ArchivesGenetekaJRI-PolandAGAD Przodek.plGesher Archeion.netGalicia LubgensGenealogyPoznan in the BaSIAProject ArchivesPomGenBaseSzpejankowskisPodlaskaUpper and Digital Szpejenkowski SilesianSilesian Library Genealogical Digital Library Society Central Archives of Historical Records All Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ National Digital Archive All Poland ✓ ✓ Central Archives of Modern Records All Poland ✓ ✓ Podlaskie (primarily), State Archive in Bialystok Masovia ✓ ✓ ✓ The Archives of Poland and where to find Online Genealogy Records for each - Sheet1 Branch in Lomza Podlaskie ✓ ✓ Kuyavian-Pomerania (primarily), Pomerania State Archive in Bydgoszcz and Greater Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Kuyavian-Pomerania (primarily), Greater Branch in Inowrocław Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Silesia (primarily), Świetokrzyskie, Łódz, National Archives in Częstochowa and Opole ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pomerania (primarily), State Archive in Elbląg with the Warmia-Masuria, Seat in Malbork Kuyavian-Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ State Archive in Gdansk Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Gdynia Branch Pomerania ✓ ✓ ✓ State Archive in Gorzow Lubusz (primarily), Wielkopolski Greater Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ Greater Poland (primarily), Łódz, State Archive in Kalisz Lower Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Silesia (primarily), State Archive in Katowice Lesser Poland ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch in Bielsko-Biala Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch in Cieszyn Silesia ✓ ✓ ✓ Branch
    [Show full text]
  • The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy Sean Krummerich University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, and the European History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Krummerich, Sean, "Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nationalitätenrecht: The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy by Sean Krummerich A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor, Graydon A. Tunstall, Ph.D. Kees Botterbloem, Ph.D. Giovanna Benadusi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 6, 2012 Keywords – Austria, Hungary, Serb, Croat, Slovene Copyright © 2012, Sean Krummerich Dedication For all that they have done to inspire me to new heights, I dedicate this work to my wife Amanda, and my son, John Michael. Acknowledgments This study would not have been possible without the guidance and support of a number of people. My thanks go to Graydon Tunstall and Kees Boterbloem, for their assistance in locating sources, and for their helpful feedback which served to strengthen this paper immensely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consensus of Sandomierz: an Early Attempt to Create a Unified Protestant Church in 16Th Century Poland and Lithuania
    CTQ 73 (2009): 317–346 The Consensus of Sandomierz : An Early Attempt to Create a Unified Protestant Church in 16 th Century Poland and Lithuania Darius Petkunas In early April 1570, representatives of the Reformed, Lutheran, and Bohemian Brethren Churches in Poland and Lithuania met in the city of Sandomierz for an extraordinary general synod. The purpose was to formulate a common confession which would symbolize the united faith and practice of the three churches to the crown and the parliament. The result was the formulation and acceptance of the Consensus of Sandomierz (Latin: Consensus Sendomiriensis) .1 The signing of the Consensus of Sandomierz has been regarded as a watershed event, unique not only in the history of the Polish and Lithuanian Churches, but in the Reformation era. It was here that, for the first time, representatives of three separate Protestant confessions with diverse theological and liturgical traditions stated that the chief obstacles in the way of church union had been overcome. They were now essentially united in faith, making intercommunion possible. Future efforts would make the realization of this unity evident to all. Never before had Lutherans been willing to concede so much in order to enter a consensus, even though there was no agreement on the essential sacramental issues. In the 1520s, Lutherans had even refused to enter into a military alliance with Zwinglian and other Reformed princes and territories to create a common defense in the face of what seemed to be an inevitable attack from Roman Catholic military forces. At Marburg in 1529, Luther and Ulrich Zwingli were unable to come to an agreement concerning the nature of Christ’s presence in the Sacrament of the Altar thereby dooming any possibility of a common Protestant front against the Roman Catholic Church.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020
    Annex no. 1 to Resolution no. 458/XXII/12 Of the Sejmik of Pomorskie Voivodeship of 24th September 2012 on adoption of Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 GDAŃSK 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OUTPUT SITUATION ………………………………………………………… 6 II. SCENARIOS AND VISION OF DEVELOPMENT ………………………… 18 THE PRINCIPLES OF STRATEGY AND ROLE OF THE SELF- III. 24 GOVERNMENT OF THE VOIVODESHIP ………..………………………… IV. CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES …………………………………………… 28 V. IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM ………………………………………………… 65 3 4 The shape of the Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 is determined by 8 assumptions: 1. The strategy is a tool for creating development targeting available financial and regulatory instruments. 2. The strategy covers only those issues on which the Self-Government of Pomorskie Voivodeship and its partners in the region have a real impact. 3. The strategy does not include purely local issues unless there is a close relationship between the local needs and potentials of the region and regional interest, or when the local deficits significantly restrict the development opportunities. 4. The strategy does not focus on issues of a routine character, belonging to the realm of the current operation and performing the duties and responsibilities of legal entities operating in the region. 5. The strategy is selective and focused on defining the objectives and courses of action reflecting the strategic choices made. 6. The strategy sets targets amenable to verification and establishment of commitments to specific actions and effects. 7. The strategy outlines the criteria for identifying projects forming part of its implementation. 8. The strategy takes into account the specific conditions for development of different parts of the voivodeship, indicating that not all development challenges are the same everywhere in their nature and seriousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria As a 'Baroque Nation'. Institutional and Media Constructions
    Austria as a ‘Baroque Nation’. Institutional and media constructions Andreas Nierhaus Paris, 1900 When Alfred Picard, General Commissioner of the World Exhibition in Paris 1900, declared that the national pavilions of the ‘Rue des Nations’ along the river Seine should be erected in each country’s ‘style notoire’, the idea of characterizing a ‘nation’ through the use of a specific historical architectural or artistic style had become a monumental global axiom. Italy was represented by a paraphrase of St. Mark’s Cathedral in Venice, Spain chose the look of the Renaissance Alcazar, the United States selected a triumphant beaux-arts architecture, Germany moved into a castle-like building – in the style of the "German Renaissance", of course – and the United Kingdom built a Tudor country house. However, there were considerable doubts about the seriousness and soundness of such a masquerade: ‘Anyone wanting to study national styles at the Quai d' Orsay would fail to come to any appreciable results – just as the archaeologist who wants to collect material for costume design in a mask wardrobe [would equally fail]. Apart from few exceptions, what we find is prettily arranged festive theatrical decoration (...).’1 Whereas the defenders of modernism must have regarded this juxtaposition of styles as symbolic of an eclecticism that had become almost meaningless, both the organizers and the general public seemed very comfortable with the resulting historical spectacle. It was no coincidence that the Austrian Pavilion was given the form of a Baroque castle. (Fig. 1) Its architect Ludwig Baumann assembled meaningful quotes from the buildings of Johann Bernhard and Joseph Emanuel Fischer von Erlach, Lucas von Hildebrandt and Jean Nicolas Jadot in order to combine them into a new neo-Baroque whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Sejmiki Szlachty Sieradzkiej W Szadku W Latach 1668–1695. Zestawienie
    BIULETYN SZADKOWSKI Tom 14 2014 Micha KOBIERECKI * SEJMIKI SZLACHTY SIERADZKIEJ W SZADKU W LATACH 16681695 ZESTAWIE IE CHRO OLOGICZ E Prezentowane w artykule zestawienie sejmikw wojewdztwa sieradzkiego posiada wspln cech jest ni miejsce obrad, czyli Szadek, stolica powiatu. badanym okresie w mie!cie odbywa"y si sejmiki poselskie 1, relacyjne 2 czy deputackie 3 oraz te, ktre by"y prolongowane 4. Przedstawione zestawienie zosta"o oparte na analizie ksig grodzkich z Sieradza, Tek Pawi(skiego i Tek Pstroko(- skiego 5. przypadku pierwszego z przedstawionych +rde" korzystano ze zbioru relacji, gdzie umieszczano lauda , bd+ uniwersa"y sejmikowe, protestacje czy akty konfederacji. .atomiast w Tekach Pstroko(skiego znalaz"y si oryginalne wypisy z ksig grodzkich sieradzkich i piotrkowskich, jak i /0/-wieczne odpisy wymienionych wy1ej aktw. Podobna sytuacja mia"a miejsce w przypadku Tek Pawi(skiego, gdzie znajduj si odpisy dokonane w okresie zaborw 2. * 3icha" 4obierecki, dr, adiunkt, 5niwersytet 6dzki, ydzia" 7ilozo8czno-9istoryczny, 4atedra 9istorii .owo1ytnej, 90-219 6d+, ul. 4ami(skiego 22a. 1 Sejmik poselski zjazd szlachty z danego terytorium (ziemia, powiat, wojewdztwo) zwo"any przez monarch, na ktrym wybierano pos"w na sejm walny i opracowywano dla nich instrukcj. 2 Sejmik relacyjny, na ktry zje1d1a"a szlachta, aby dowiedzie> si od swoich pos"w o decy- zjach, jakie podjto na zako(czonym sejmie. 3 Sejmik deputacki zjazd lokalnej szlachty, na ktrym wybierano deputatw, swoich sdziw do Trybuna"w 4oronnego lub Litewskiego. 4 Sejmik prolongowany zjazd, na ktrym szlachcie nie uda"o si podj> wsplnej decyzji i ustalono jedynie zwo"anie kolejnego sejmiku w wyznaczonym terminie, dla ponownego rozpatrze- nia spornych kwestii.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Title: Introduction to Polish History and Culture*
    Course Lecturer Hours ECTS Semester Introduction to Polish History and Culture (till 1795) prof. Robert Bubczyk 30 4 winter Introduction to Polish Modern and Contemporary History and Culture prof. Robert Bubczyk 30 4 summer Polish Modern and Contemporary History in Film prof. Robert Bubczyk 30 4 summer Course title: Introduction to Polish History and Culture* Course code: PHC/2017/2018 Number of didactic hours: 30 (15 sessions, 90 mins each) Course duration: 1st semester; classes on Thursdays, from 14:40 to 16:10, starting from 5th October 2017**. Note: it is possible to change this timetable following the arrangement with the participants in the first meeting Venue: classroom no. 226, 2nd floor (important: the ‘old’ building with a clock on the wall of the Faculty of the Humanities) ECTS credits: 4 Course description The aims of the course are the following: To provide the participants with the knowledge of major aspects of the history of Poland down through the centuries To offer students an opportunity of better understanding the challenging process of creating and sustaining a civil society and liberal democracy in post-Communist Poland To foster a creative comparison between Poland and the participants’ own country To compare the Polish political, social and cultural arrangements with other EU member states The classes have been devised to be conducted in a interactive lecture format, consisting of lectures and possible follow-up discussions on the respective subjects which cover the history of Polish society and civilization from the origins of the nation and state until the collapse of the Polish state at the end of the 18th century.* Since Lublin and the Lublin region are historic areas with lots of historical monuments and artefacts (a number of them dating from the Middle Ages), students’ individual excursions to such sights are highly recommended, which should facilitate a deeper insight into the history of Polish society and culture of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]