DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations 2000 - 2018 All Figures in Thousands Fund Key GO General Obligation bonding GO/UF 2/3 GO Bonds, 1/3 User Financing GF General Fund ERAP Environment and Natural Resources Appropriations Bonds REV Revenue Bonds UF User Financing MRSI Minnesota Rail Service Improvement RDA Regional Development Account AP Appropriations Bonds ALL All Funds (for totals) Source: Capital Investment bill language, and tracking Sheets 2000 - 2018 Notes: Figures are total borrowing or spending authorization, not necessarily actual spending. Amounts or portions of amounts may have been subsequently cancelled, or converted to other spending. Figures and totals do not include cancellations The total capital borrowing and spending authorization between 2000 and 2018 was about $12.7 Billion, with about $191 million in cancellations for a net authorization of about $12.5 billion before statutory four year cancellations. Figures and totals do not include capital spending in other bills Does not include Trunk Highway bonding or spending Grants to Political Subdivisions grouped by DEED Planning Region Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 1 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM University of Minnesota Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 1 Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) GO 9,000 35,000 40,000 30,000 35,000 25,000 56,000 25,000 50,000 42,500 20,600 45,000 413,100 2 System wide - Laboratory Renovation GO 3,333 6,667 10,000 3 System wide - Classroom Improvements GO/UF 2,000 2,000 4 Crookston - Dowell Hall and Owen Hall GO 3,200 3,200 5 Crookston - Wellness Center GO 10,000 10,000 6 Crookston - Replace Bede Hall GO/UF 7,701 7,701 7 Crookston - Kiehie Building GO/UF 6,500 6,500 8 Duluth - Glensheen Asset Preservation GO 4,000 4,000 9 Duluth - Chemical Sciences and Advanced Materials Building GO 1,500 28,267 29,767 10 Duluth - Labovitz school of business GO 15,333 15,333 11 Duluth - Life Science Building GO 10,100 10,100 12 Duluth - Recreational Sports Addition GO 8,700 8,700 13 Duluth - Laboratory Science Building GO/UF 25,500 25,500 14 Duluth - Music Performance Center GO/UF 6,100 6,100 15 Morris - Humanities Building and Blakely Hall GO 3,200 3,200 16 Morris ROC wind energy to hydrogen to anhydrous ammonia pilot project GO 2,500 2,500 17 Morris - Community services building renovation GO 5,000 5,000 18 Morris - District Heating GO 4,000 4,000 19 Morris - Football Stadium GO 1,800 1,800 20 Morris - Social Science Building GO/UF 8,600 8,600 21 Morris - Science and Math Building Renovation GO/UF 8,000 8,000 22 Twin Cities - Pillsbury Hall Capital Renewal GO 24,000 24,000 23 Twin Cities - Health Sciences Education Facility GO 66,667 66,667 24 Twin Cities - Plant Growth Research Facility GO 4,400 4,400 25 Twin Cities - Veterinary Isolation Facility Replacement GO 18,000 18,000 26 Twin Cities - Tate Laboratory Renovation GO 56,700 56,700 27 Twin Cities - Research Laboratory Improvement Fund GO 8,667 8,667 28 Twin Cities - Combined Heat and Power Plant GO 10,000 10,000 29 Twin Cities - Physics and Nanotechnology GO 4,000 51,333 55,333 30 Twin Cites - Central Corridor Transit Way Laboratory Mitigations GO 12,500 12,500 31 Twin Cities - Folwell Hall GO 23,000 23,000 32 Twin Cities - Science Teaching Student Services Building GO 48,333 48,333 33 Twin Cities - National Solar Rating and Certification Laboratory GO 2,150 2,150 34 Twin Cities - Carlson School of Management GO 26,600 26,600 35 Twin Cities - Medical Biosciences phase I and utility upgrade GO 40,000 40,000 36 Twin Cities - Civil Engineering Addition - Voss Kovach Hall GO 10,000 10,000 37 Twin Cities - Kolthoff Hall GO 17,400 17,400 38 Twin Cities - Education Sciences GO 14,500 14,500 39 Twin Cities - Academic Health Center GO 11,600 11,600 40 Twin Cities - Jones Hall Renovation GO/UF 8,000 8,000 41 Twin Cities - Translational Research Facility GO/UF 24,700 24,700 42 Twin Cities - Teaching Technology Center - Predesign and Design GO/UF 3,000 3,000 43 Twin Cities - Veterinary Diagnostic Lab GO/UF 1,500 1,500 44 Twin Cities - Nicholson Hall GO/UF 24,000 24,000 45 Twin Cities - Plant Growth Research Facility GO/UF 5,963 17,700 23,663 46 Twin Cities - Molecular Cellular Biology Building GO/UF 35,000 35,000 47 Twin Cities - Art Building GO 18,500 18,500 48 Twin Cities - Plant Genomics Building GO 10,000 10,000 Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 2 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM University of Minnesota Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 49 Research and Outreach Centers (including 2005 Agriculture Grants) GO 3,919 3,500 7,419 50 Research and Outreach Centers GO/UF 1,150 2,508 3,658 51 North Central Research and Outreach Center Grand Rapids GO 283 283 52 Cedar Creek Natural History Area, East Bethel GO 500 500 53 Cloquet Forestry classroom addition GO 500 500 54 Itasca Facilities Improvements GO 4,060 4,060 55 Willmar Poultry Testing Laboratory GO 8,529 8,529 56 Willmar Poultry Testing Lab GO 300 300 57 WCROC Solar Thermal & Photo Voltaic Systems GO 350 350 58 Mayo Clinic Biotechnology Research Facility GO 21,726 21,726 59 Mayo Clinic Biotechnology Research Facility GO/UF 400 400 Subtotal University of Minnesota - System wide ALL 10,150 - 37,000 2,908 65,928 31,300 - 41,833 25,350 62,667 25,000 54,060 - 42,500 8,529 20,600 45,000 472,825 Subtotal University of Minnesota - Crookston ALL 6,500 - 7,701 - - - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - 3,200 27,401 Subtotal University of Minnesota - Duluth ALL 6,100 - 25,500 - 18,800 15,333 - - - - - - - 1,500 - 28,267 4,000 99,500 Subtotal University of Minnesota - Twin Cities ALL 69,463 - 41,700 37,200 43,500 66,600 - 58,333 2,150 27,000 63,833 10,000 - 65,367 18,000 71,067 24,000 598,213 Subtotal University of Minnesota - Morris ALL 8,000 - - 8,600 5,800 2,500 - 5,000 - - - - - - - - 3,200 33,100 Total University of Minnesota ALL 100,213 - 111,901 48,708 134,028 115,733 - 105,166 27,500 89,667 88,833 64,060 - 119,367 26,529 119,934 79,400 1,231,039 MnSCU / Minnesota State Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 60 Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) GO 30,000 60,000 41,500 40,000 55,000 40,000 52,000 30,000 20,000 42,500 25,000 45,000 481,000 61 Lake Superior College & Northwest CTC Dental Clinics GO 775 775 62 System wide Classroom Initiative and Demolition GO/UF 10,000 6,900 1,660 3,883 22,443 63 Science labs system wide GO/UF 1,900 6,668 5,140 5,775 19,483 64 Property Acquisition system wide GO/UF 300 3,400 3,700 65 Northland CTC - Thief River Falls & East Grand Forks GO/UF 5,000 2,156 300 7,800 300 5,864 826 22,246 66 Northwest TC - Bemidji GO/UF 5,000 - 5,000 67 Minnesota State CTC - Moorhead, Detroit Lakes, Wadena, & Fergus Falls GO/UF 6,258 1,160 14,665 2,500 820 25,403 68 Minnesota State University Moorhead GO/UF 1,600 18,955 10,977 9,980 13,500 5,448 14,901 6,544 628 82,533 69 Minnesota State University Moorhead - Parking Expansion GF 3,600 3,600 70 Minnesota State University Bemidji GO/UF 2,000 1,000 10,863 700 8,900 3,303 13,790 22,512 63,068 71 Alexandria TCC - Alexandria GO/UF 500 9,150 400 10,500 200 20,750 72 Central Lakes College - Staples & Brainerd GO/UF 5,953 4,234 10,187 73 NHED - International Falls, Ely, Virginia, Eveleth, Hibbing, Grand Rapids GO/UF 3,600 5,496 300 5,477 3,000 4,549 3,344 11,223 36,989 74 Lake Superior College - Duluth GO/UF 700 11,243 420 12,098 5,266 29,727 75 Fond du Lac Tribal CC - Cloquet GO/UF 635 12,390 1,157 14,182 76 Fond du Lac Tribal CC - Cloquet GO 4,500 4,500 77 St. Cloud TCC - St. Cloud GO/UF 7,992 700 15,056 200 5,421 4,000 33,369 78 St. Cloud State University GO/UF 3,894 30,000 10,000 4,050 18,500 15,700 42,334 865 18,572 143,915 79 Ridgewater College - Willmar, Hutchinson GO/UF 2,880 3,500 13,851 20,231 80 Minnesota West CTC - Canby, Granite Falls, Pipestone, Worthington, JacksonGO/UF 6,300 450 4,606 3,267 978 15,601 81 Southwest Minnesota State University - Marshall GO/UF 800 9,200 9,200 3,000 25,818 48,018 82 Southwest Minnesota State University - Marshall GO 11,000 11,000 83 South Central College - North Mankato & Faribault GO/UF 300 5,157 400 13,315 9,600 28,772 84 Riverland CC - Owatonna, Albert Lea, Austin GO/UF 5,540 3,500 10,122 19,162 85 Rochester CTC - Rochester GO/UF 5,900 12,759 200 8,746 1,000 22,853 51,458 86 Minnesota State College Southeast - Red Wing & Winona GO/UF 580 3,802 4,855 1,700 10,937 Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 3 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM MnSCU / Minnesota State Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 87 Minnesota State University Mankato GO/UF 6,907 8,400 2,560 32,900 25,500 2,065 6,478 84,810 88 Minnesota State University Winona GO/UF 1,600 11,118 11,586 5,902 25,306 55,512 89 Minnesota State University Winona GO 8,400 8,400 90 Anoka TC - Anoka GO/UF 12,500 2,114 14,614 91 Anoka - Ramsey CC - Coon Rapids & Cambridge (1) GO/UF 10,483 3,800 5,357 980 569 21,189 92 North Hennepin TC - Brooklyn Park GO/UF 11,000 350 900 14,782 26,292 53,324 93 Hennepin TC - Brooklyn Park & Eden Prairie GO/UF 2,000 2,400 10,566 14,966 94 Normandale CC - Bloomington GO/UF 11,400 9,900 5,125 7,000 1,000 21,984 12,636 69,045 95 Dakota County TC - Rosemount GO/UF 500 7,387 200 7,230 7,733 23,050 96 Inver Hills CC - Inver Grove Heights GO/UF 500 6,045 700 13,200 698 21,143 97 Century College - White Bear Lake GO/UF 2,500 5,888 19,900 7,900 5,000 2,020 6,362 49,570 98 Minneapolis CTC - Minneapolis GO/UF 11,700 9,000 900 18,874 400 13,389 3,600 57,863 99 St.
Recommended publications
  • Primary Contact Organization Information

    Primary Contact Organization Information

    Application 10350 - 2018 Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities 11025 - Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Regional Solicitation - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Status: Submitted Submitted Date: 07/13/2018 2:15 PM Primary Contact Paul Michael Sawyer Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name Title: Management Assistant Department: Saint Paul Parks and Recreation Email: [email protected] Address: 25 W 4th St 400 City Hall Annex Saint Paul Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip 651-266-6417 Phone:* Phone Ext. Fax: What Grant Programs are you most interested in? Parks Capital Improvement Program Grants Organization Information Name: ST PAUL, CITY OF Jurisdictional Agency (if different): Organization Type: City Organization Website: Address: Parks and Recreation 400 CITY HALL ANNEX 25 W 4TH ST ST PAUL Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip County: Ramsey 651-266-6400 Phone:* Ext. Fax: PeopleSoft Vendor Number 0000003222A15 Project Information Project Name Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Primary County where the Project is Located Ramsey Cities or Townships where the Project is Located: Saint Paul Jurisdictional Agency (If Different than the Applicant): This project proposes to reconstruct sections of the original segment that have reached the end of their usable life of the Sam Morgan Regional Trail along Shepard Rd in Saint Paul. The project will include removing the asphalt and base of the old trail; correcting any grades for drainage and Brief Project Description (Include location, road name/functional accessibility; constructing new base and asphalt; class, type of improvement, etc.) installing audible pedestrian signals and pedestrian ramps at intersections; landscaping; and installing lighting, signage, and user amenities.
  • Northfield City Council Agenda

    Northfield City Council Agenda

    SPECIAL CLOSED & REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2013 6:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS SPECIAL CLOSED MEETING – 6:30 pm CALL TO ORDER ____Graham ____DeLong ____Ludescher ____Nakasian ____Peterson White ____ Pownell ____Zweifel 1. Motion to Close Meeting Pursuant to 13D.05 Subd. 3 to Develop or Consider Offers or Counteroffers for the Purchase of Real or Personal Property Located at 219 Water Street ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 pm CALL TO ORDER ____Graham ____DeLong ____Ludescher ____Nakasian ____Peterson White ____ Pownell ____Zweifel APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES PRESENTATIONS • Award from Minnesota National Association of Housing & Redevelopment Officials REPORTS FROM THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS CONSENT AGENDA Public Comments: Persons commenting on consent agenda items only may use this opportunity to speak. Speakers must identify themselves by providing their name and address and completing a comment card. Comments are limited to two (2) minutes. Agenda items below are approved by one motion unless a Council member requests separate action. All items approved by majority vote unless noted. 1. Motion – Review of City Disbursements 2. Ordinance No. 952 – Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Northfield Land Development Code (LDC) to Remove the Classification of “Discontinued” from the Neighborhood General 1 (N1-B) Zoning District 3. Ordinance No. 953 – Second Reading of Ordinance to Change the Zoning Classification of Outlot C of the Valley View Third Addition from Neighborhood General 2 (N2-B) to the Neighborhood General 1 (N1-B) Zoning District 4. Resolution 2013-118 – Approve Parking Regulations on Sheldahl Road North of Fremouw Avenue 5. Resolution 2013-106 – Approve Armstrong Road Parking Regulations 6.
  • 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As Pa

    612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As Pa

    Web: swlrt.org Twitter: @SouthwestLRT Construction Hotline: 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As part of the normal flow of construction, some portions of the project corridor will remain quiet through the winter. However, active construction work continues in each city along the alignment, as crews focus on items that are critical to the overall project schedule or that can still easily be done in the winter. Please continue to expect crews and construction vehicles throughout the project route. Weekly Construction Photo: Beltline Boulevard Regional Trail Bridge in St. Louis Park Crews placed the bridge span for the Beltline Boulevard regional trail bridge over the freight rail tracks this past week. Watch a time-lapse video of crews setting the span. 1 | Page Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station. Moving east, the Prairie Center Drive LRT Bridge extends from the SouthWest Station area over Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive. Moving east, LRT will enter the Eden Prairie Town Center Station area. Current activities to expect in this area: • The right-turn lane on the eastbound Highway 212 ramp to Prairie Center Drive remains closed. • The SouthWest station area remains a busy construction site with ongoing piling and concrete work. 2 | Page • Concrete work and bridge walkway preparation will create roadway impacts on Prairie Center Drive during the week of February 1.
  • Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota

    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota

    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance A 25-year long-range plan for Minnesota February 14, 2011 ©2011, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This information is available in a different format upon request of persons of all abilities. February 14, 2011 It is our pleasure to introduce the Parks and Trails Minnesotans will look back and say the Parks and Legacy Plan. Funding created by the Legacy Trails Legacy Amendment accomplished what they Amendment gives us a unique opportunity to hoped for—and more. improve and expand Minnesota’s parks and trails of state and regional significance. This allows us to The plan recognizes the world‑class network of look out 25 years to envision a future in which parks parks and trails Minnesota currently has in place. It and trails play a significant role in the lives of all proposes to build on this foundation, making user Minnesotans. experiences even better. It is based on four strategic directions that together ensure a great future for parks Our extensive 18-month public engagement effort and trails: allows us to confidently state that this is a parks and • Connect people and the outdoors.
  • Chapter 6: Mobility

    Chapter 6: Mobility

    Chapter 6 Mobility: Getting Around Town Vision for the Mobility System Vision 3.0 included a recommendation on mobility to “Develop Future- focused Transit and Mobility.” A Strategic Priority was developed from the recommendation which states, “St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably” and includes the following: » Continuing to expand the network of sidewalks, trails and bike facilities. » Researching and implementing multiple and affordable mobility solutions for all. 6-205 | Mobility: Getting Around Town » Fostering smart growth and transit-oriented housing Mobility System Goals and Strategies development. 1. Plan, design, build, and operate » Increasing pedestrian safety through crosswalk the city’s mobility system in a improvements and increased park and trail lighting. way that prioritizes walking first, » Expanding the number of north-south and east-west transit options. followed by bicycling and transit use, and then motor vehicle use The city’s mobility system is made up of sidewalks, trails, and streets, which are there to provide safe and convenient Strategies A. Incorporate an approach that is based on travel for all. The right of way within the city is an important surrounding land use context when planning and component of the mobility system and must be used designing transportation projects. efficiently to provide the multimodal infrastructure needed to provide for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit service and B. Continue to explore and evaluate flexible and motor vehicles. innovative designs and seek guidance from Each mobility option is tied to the other: pedestrian established best practices, to achieve desired facilities are often connected to bicycle facilities; transit outcomes.
  • Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study

    Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study

    Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study In Minnesota, paved state trails serve about 1.2 million visitors each summer. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administered a trail intercept survey to 1,561 visitors throughout the summer of 2019 to better understand visitor satisfaction, how they used state trails, their opinions on investment and funding, and their demographics. Below are key takeaways from the survey. Root River State Trail Visitor satisfaction Given that providing high-quality experiences is a cornerstone of the DNR’s efforts to attract new and current visitors to state trails, how satisfied are people with Minnesota state trails? Overall, trail users were highly satisfied with their experiences. The majority were also satisfied with specific aspects of the trails, such as how well they were maintained and the availability of amenities, such as toilet facilities. Of those trail visitors who were not completely satisfied, the most common suggestion was the need to improve trail surface conditions, such as fixing potholes and cracks. Blank Blank Blank blank More than 90% of visitors reported The most commonly suggested being completely satisfied or very improvement was that trail surface satisfied with their overall experience. + conditions needed improving (e.g., potholes, cracks). More than 90% of visitors indicated More than 80% of visitors reported that different aspects of state trails, that the availability of trail amenities including trail maintenance, trail was at least acceptable; 36% reported surface, and amenities were at least that drinking water availability was acceptable. poor or very poor. "DNR trails are a great resource for Minnesotans.
  • State of the Trails Final Report February 2017

    State of the Trails Final Report February 2017

    STATE OF THE TRAILS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2017 ParksCounCil of & Minn TrailsESoTA CONTENTS 3 Key Findings 4 Project Overview STATE OF THE TRAILS 6 Experiental Ratngs 7 Trail Roughness Index 8 DNR Investment Groups 10 Overview of State Trail Pavement Conditons 13 Segment-by-Segment Ratngs 13 Alex Laveau State Trail 29 Harmony Preston State Trail 14 Blazing Star State Trail 31 Heartland State Trail 15 Brown’s Creek State Trail 34 Luce Line State Trail 16 Casey Jones State Trail 36 Mill Towns State Trail 17 Central Lakes State Trail 36 Preston-Forestville State Trail 20 Cuyuna Lakes State Trail 37 Minnesota Valley State Trail 21 Douglas State Trail 38 Paul Bunyan State Trail 22 Gateway State Trail 44 Root River State Trail 23 Gitchi-Gami State Trail 47 Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail 24 Glacial Lakes State Trail 49 Shootng Star State Trail 27 Goodhue Pioneer State Trail 51 Willard Munger State Trail 28 Great River Ridge State Trail RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Consistent State Trail Rehabilitaton 57 Create a State Trail Capital Improvement Plan METHODOLOGY 59 How to Understand Our Ratngs 61 Important Caveats 63 Acknowledgments Vector artwork on cover designed by Freepik 2 www.parksandtrails.org KEY FINDINGS STATE TRAIL CONDITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: • Minnesota State Trails are currently in good • Lawmakers and the DNR should commit to conditon. Our inventory found 79% of state rehabilitatng an average of 20 state trail miles trail miles are in either excellent or good per year, which is the level needed to maintain conditon. Minnesota State Trails long term. • Only 26 miles of Minnesota State Trails are • Lawmakers should commit to funding state currently in poor conditon, and 90 miles are in trail rehabilitaton through consistent state fair conditon.
  • SWLRT Civil Construction Update

    SWLRT Civil Construction Update

    2021 Construction and Going Forward As announced on Thursday, over the course of the 2020 construction season, the project staff and our contractor, Lunda-McCrossan Joint Venture encountered unforeseen obstacles in the Minneapolis portion of the alignment which will take longer to overcome. These obstacles include the construction of the corridor protection wall along the BNSF fright rail line and a secant wall to complete LRT tunnel construction in a portion of the Kenilworth corridor due to poor soil conditions. These are no small changes and require thoughtful and deliberate engineering, design plans and construction methods. While these types of setbacks are not uncommon on projects of this scale, we are also disappointed by this development. We strongly believe the long-term benefits of this project to the region and state outweigh the short-term challenges we face. While this means we most likely won’t be meeting our opening day projection of 2023, we know that 2021 will be a robust construction year. To see an overview of 2021 construction activities in Minneapolis, view the recording of the January 14 Minneapolis Town Hall. We will be sharing 2021 overviews of construction activities in the corridor cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and St. Louis Park in the coming weeks. Weekly Construction Photo: SouthWest Station in Eden Prairie 1 | Page Looking east towards SouthWest Station construction crews install piles that will support the bus loop/roadway. Due to poor soils conditions, project elements including track, stations, roadway and utilities are supported by piles. Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 2 | Page SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station.
  • Parks and Recreation VISION STATEMENT: We Enhance, Promote, and Maintain Outstanding Outdoor Trail, Park and Recreational Facilities

    Parks and Recreation VISION STATEMENT: We Enhance, Promote, and Maintain Outstanding Outdoor Trail, Park and Recreational Facilities

    CHAPTER 7 PARKS AND RECREATION VISION STATEMENT: We enhance, promote, and maintain outstanding outdoor trail, park and recreational facilities. 127 RED WING 2040 COMMUNITY PLAN O verview Some History Levee Park was the first major project undertaken, In Red Wing we have a deep attachment to our city’s in 1904. In an agreement between the city and Parks, trails, and natural areas are defining Milwaukee Road, the railroad agreed to construct elements of a community’s quality of life. Our city’s past and a progressive attitude toward its future. This perspective is certainly true about our city’s a new depot and donated $20,550 to the city to unique natural setting heightens the importance begin improvement of the levee area. The classically of preserving natural resources, promoting park system. Much of what is now the backbone of the Red Wing park system was an outgrowth of the designed park was completed between 1905 recreation, and strengthening connections to and 1906. Around this time, John Rich Park, Red Red Wing’s scenic amenities. As discussed in the “City Beautiful” movement of the early 20th century. Spawned by the Chicago Columbian Exposition of Wing’s gateway park area, was also completed Green Infrastructure chapter, the 2040 Community at the entrance to downtown. John Rich was a Plan views parks and open spaces as essential 1893, City Beautiful affected architecture, landscape architecture, and urban planning for the following founding member of the Red Wing Civic League components of the city’s green infrastructure. This and personally financed the development of network of greenspace provides immeasurable two decades.
  • Regional Trails

    Regional Trails

    REGIONAL TRAILS Three regional trail facilities were included in The following park packets follow the required and submit each to the Metropolitan Council the NSAMP planning process. The Luce Line Metropolitan Council format for regional trail for approval. Council approval is necessary prior Regional Trail, Shingle Creek Regional Trail master plans. The Luce Line is considered a to any expenditure of state or regional funds on (which includes the Creekview and Shingle Creek regional linking trail, while Shingle Creek and these regional trails. Park areas), and the Theodore Wirth Parkway Victory (Wirth) are destination regional trails, section of the Victory (Wirth) Memorial Parkway because they have wide corridors with significant Regional Trail do not have master plans and are natural resources. The Metropolitan Council inextricably intertwined with the neighborhood requires descriptions of community engagement, facilities in the NSAMP project area. The other which is included in this document in Chapter 2. regional parks and trails in the area (Theodore After adoption of the NSAMP document, MPRB Wirth Regional Park, Victory Memorial Parkway staff will separate each of these regional trail Regional Trail, North Mississippi Regional Park— master plan packets from this overall document, including the 49th Avenue Corridor, and Above add back in this document’s introductory the Falls Regional Park) already have adopted sections on process and community engagement, master plans. MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD 239 NORTH SERVICE AREA MASTER PLAN This page was intentionally left blank LOCATION AND HISTORY The trail travels through Bassett’s Creek Park until it reaches the end of Chestnut Avenue. It then LUCE LINE The Luce Line is an existing regional trail corridor moves onto the street again to follow Chestnut that connects the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and Cedar Lake Road to the entrance of Bryn westward through Theodore Wirth Regional Park Mawr Park, another Minneapolis neighborhood REGIONAL TRAIL and then farther west to other regional parks and park.
  • Byllesby Park Master Plan

    Byllesby Park Master Plan

    Byllesby Park MASTER PLAN Approved December 7, 2017 A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS G oodhue County Board of Commissioners » Barney Nesseth » Brad Anderson » Paul Drotos » Ron Allen » Jason Majerus G oodhue County Parks, Trails, and Recreation Advisory Board » Brad Anderson, Commissioner » Ron Allen, Commissioner » Mike Melstad, 1st District Rep » Vince Cockriel, 2nd District Rep » Mairi Doerr, 3rd District Rep » Andru Peters, 4th District Rep » Janie Farrar, 5th District Rep » Scott Roepke, Cannon Valley Trail Rep » Roxanne Bartsh, Goodhue Pioneer Trail Rep » Ken Burns » Dave Maroney Project Management Team » Greg Isakson, Public Works Director / County Engineer » Jennifer Ziemer, Administrative / Accounting Assistant Ct onsultan » HKGi ii Goodhue County Byllesby Park Master Plan CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Regional Significance 3 Past Planning and Related Planning Efforts 4 Planning Process 5 Public Input / Participation 5 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions 10 Park Context 12 Existing Park Conditions 14 Issues and Opportunities 18 Key Considerations 20 Chapter 3: Vision, Trends, + Public Values 22 Vision Statement 22 Local and Regional Demographics 23 Trends 24 Public Values 25 GMRPTC Criteria Statements 26 Chapter 4: Development Master Plan 28 Park Development Concept 28 Winter Recreation 35 Park Facilities, Amenities, & Signage 35 Lake Byllesby Regional Park Connection 36 Ecological and Land Resources Plan 37 Programming Plan 37 Motorized Boating (MnDNR Guidelines) 37 Chapter 5: Implementation + Management 38 Phasing and Priorities 39 Acquisition 42 Park Ordinances 42 Research Plan 42 Park Operations and Management 42 Budget and Funding 45 Contents iii iv Goodhue County Byllesby Park Master Plan CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION OvERVIEW & PROJECT PURPOSE Byllesby Park is located in the northwest corner of Goodhue County in Minnesota, near the City of Cannon Falls.
  • Minnesota Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileages As of July 1, 1996

    Minnesota Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileages As of July 1, 1996

    96056 Minnesota Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileages as of July 1, 1996 (pursuant to Minnesota Statute 85.017) This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Trails & Waterways Unit, Recreation Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 52, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4052 l....._ ________________ Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 85.017 To: Distribution List Date: November 20, 1996 From: Dan Collins, Supervisor Phone: (612) 296-6048 Recreation Services Trail Recreation Section Trails and Waterways Unit DNR Building - 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4052 Subject: 1996 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileage Enclosed you will find the latest edition of the Minnesota Registry ofPublic Recreational Trail Mileage, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.017. This is the only comprehensive listing of the state's 20,000 miles of public off-road trails. Although the Registry includes bicycle, cross-country ski, hike, horse, all-terrain vehicle and snowmobile trails, only the all-terrain vehicle, cross-country ski and snowmobile trails are systematically updated annually. It reflects, in part, the July 1, 1996 information contained within the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) recreational facility computer files. These files contain a great variety of information on trails shown in this Registry. The current report format does not have room to include all-terrain vehicle (ATV) trail information within the regular report.