DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Trails

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Trails REGIONAL TRAILS Three regional trail facilities were included in The following park packets follow the required and submit each to the Metropolitan Council the NSAMP planning process. The Luce Line Metropolitan Council format for regional trail for approval. Council approval is necessary prior Regional Trail, Shingle Creek Regional Trail master plans. The Luce Line is considered a to any expenditure of state or regional funds on (which includes the Creekview and Shingle Creek regional linking trail, while Shingle Creek and these regional trails. Park areas), and the Theodore Wirth Parkway Victory (Wirth) are destination regional trails, section of the Victory (Wirth) Memorial Parkway because they have wide corridors with significant Regional Trail do not have master plans and are natural resources. The Metropolitan Council inextricably intertwined with the neighborhood requires descriptions of community engagement, facilities in the NSAMP project area. The other which is included in this document in Chapter 2. regional parks and trails in the area (Theodore After adoption of the NSAMP document, MPRB Wirth Regional Park, Victory Memorial Parkway staff will separate each of these regional trail Regional Trail, North Mississippi Regional Park— master plan packets from this overall document, including the 49th Avenue Corridor, and Above add back in this document’s introductory the Falls Regional Park) already have adopted sections on process and community engagement, master plans. MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD 239 NORTH SERVICE AREA MASTER PLAN This page was intentionally left blank LOCATION AND HISTORY The trail travels through Bassett’s Creek Park until it reaches the end of Chestnut Avenue. It then LUCE LINE The Luce Line is an existing regional trail corridor moves onto the street again to follow Chestnut that connects the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and Cedar Lake Road to the entrance of Bryn westward through Theodore Wirth Regional Park Mawr Park, another Minneapolis neighborhood REGIONAL TRAIL and then farther west to other regional parks and park. The trail follows Cedar Lake Road in order trails in the Three Rivers Park District System. The to cross the same railroad tracks that pass under portion described in this master plan is operated the Glenwood Avenue bridge. The trail goes by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board through Bryn Mawr Park to a bike and pedestrian and travels from Theodore Wirth Parkway within overpass at the eastern end of the park. The Wirth Park to the Cedar Lake Trail. The trail is a overpass is necessary to cross a different railroad critical connecting link in north Minneapolis. Due track, and it includes helix ramps on both ends. to its intersection with the Cedar Lake Trail, it At the bottom of the easterly helix is the Cedar also provides connectivity to the Mississippi River Lake Trail, where the Luce Line ends. and therefore the Minneapolis Grand Rounds. The improvement of the Luce Line Regional Trail Currently, the trail exists entirely within other through existing MPRB properties was largely park properties, not within its own trail right-of- accomplished in 1996. The Minneapolis portion way or separate parcel definition. In addition, the of the trail currently lacks clear signage and trail takes a rather disjointed route from Wirth mapping and offers little in the way of other Park to Cedar Lake Trail, with several segments visitor comfort, such as benches, restrooms on-street. From the intersection of Three Rivers’s and drinking fountains. Though some of these Luce Line and Theodore Wirth Parkway, the amenities exist within the parks through which Minneapolis Luce Line travels southward on trails the Luce Line runs, they are not always closely paralleling Wirth Parkway within Wirth Regional associated with the trail. Park. It then turns east on trails paralleling Highway 55, also within Wirth Park. The Luce A key need for this trail has always been a more Line then passes under Highway 55, winds straight-forward routing without on-street through the eastern portion of Wirth Park, and segments. Recently, a railroad abandonment rises up to Glenwood Avenue. It then goes on- and a corridor offered for sale creates the street to cross railroad tracks on the Glenwood opportunity to set a similar but improved corridor LOCATION Avenue bridge, and then southerly along a street for the Luce Line. This master plan proposes to the northern edge of Bassett’s Creek Park, a that revised routing and provides associated neighborhood park in the Minneapolis system. acquisition and development activities and costs. MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD 241 NORTH SERVICE AREA MASTER PLAN 17TH LEGEND 17TH Park Boundaries CP RAIL SEGMENTS (see next page) Existing Trail • Theodore Wirth Park16TH segment Three Rivers 1 15TH 15TH FREMONT Proposed Trail EMERSON UPTON QUEEN OLIVER GIRARD THEODORE WIRTH IRVING RUSSELL VINCENT THOMAS •2 Fruen Mill segmentNEWTON Parcel Boundaries GOLF COURSE 14TH SHERIDAN 14TH •3 Bassets Creek Park segment PLYMOUTH •4 Eastern segment 7TH FARWELL •5 Van White Boulevard KNOX LOGAN JAMES 1 WASHBURN FARWELL 11TH OAK PARK HUMBOLDT OLIVER RUSSELL QUEEN SHERIDAN NEWTON CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS THOMAS OLSON MEMORIAL OLSON MEMORIAL M. MINTER TRUSTEE THEODORE WIRTH IRVING REGIONAL PARK PIONEER5TH INDUSTRIES INC 5TH RUSSELL QUEEN KNOX OLIVER LOGAN NEWTON MORGAN 4TH 167 JAMES LLC 4TH GLENWOOD RICHARD O HANOUSEK 2 INGLEWOOD 3RD SOO LNE RAILROAD 2ND VINCENT CEDAR LAKE JAMES ELOISE BUTLER CHESTNUT 3 CHESTNUT IRVING WILDFLOWER GARDEN 4 HAWTHORNE 5 PENN RUSSELL QUEEN UPTON THOMAS MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD NEWTON CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS MOUNT VIEW QUEEN BRYN MAWR PARK 394 HOV INTERSTATE 394 INTERSTATE 394 INTERSTATE 394 CEDAR LAKE PROPERTY OWNER MAP: LUCE LINE REGIONAL TRAIL MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD 242 NORTH SERVICE AREA MASTER PLAN BOUNDARY AND ACQUISITION currently has a collaborative relationship park dedication. The trail will run in this with private development entities in this newly acquired corridor. Properties acquired In order to create a more streamlined corridor area and is willing to work with them would become part of Luce Lune property, for the Luce Line, MPRB proposes to acquire, on the best routing for the trail. The rail not neighborhood park. in collaboration with partners, all or a portion corridor itself passes through the middle of of the abandoned CP Rail/Soo Line corridor 5• Van White Boulevard segment: At the end the development area, which may not be that runs through the Bassett’s Creek Valley. of the eastern creek segment, the proposed the best corridor for the trail. Nor may the There are in fact two different rail corridors trail follows existing very wide ped/bike trail need the entire railroad right-of-way that run through the valley: the CP Rail and facilities on the Van White Boulevard bridge width. Therefore, this master plan proposes the BNSF (which is active). The CP Rail is the as it crosses the Minneapolis impound acquisition of this segment in a collaborative line that most closely parallels the historic Luce lot and railroad tracks. The Luce Line effort with private development entities and Line and provides the greatest opportunity for will connect to the Cedar Lake Trail at its retention of a minimum 20-foot trail right- connecting the trail without on-road segments. intersection with Van White or as part of of-way or permanent easement at an exact The following describes the CP Rail corridor, the new southwest light rail station, when location to be determined. segment by segment, and notes opportunities implemented. This segment will run within for collaboration. Costs for acquisition are not 3• Bassett’s Creek Park segment: Between existing public right-of-way. included at this time, as an MPRB-ordered the Fruen Mill bridge and Cedar Lake Road, This master plan proposes to associate land area appraisal is still being reviewed and discussed the master plan proposes acquisition of with the Luce Line for the first time. Between with partners. the rail corridor as Luce Line property, not Glenwood and Van White, the trail would run in neighborhood park property. One key piece •1 Theodore Wirth Park segment: The CP Rail its own dedicated land area. North of Glenwood it of this acquisition will be the assurance of an corridor runs through the middle of Wirth would run through Wirth Regional Park, and on at-grade crossing of the BNSF railroad just Park from the western park boundary to Van White it would run in existing public right-of- east of Penn Avenue. Glenwood Avenue. This land is identified in way that would not change hands. the Master Plan for Theodore Wirth Park as 4• Eastern segment: After passing underneath an inholding in the park. This master plan the Cedar Lake Road bridge, the proposed DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT (AND COSTS) proposes acquisition of this segment as part trail leaves the rail corridor behind and The primary feature of the Luce Line Regional of Theodore Wirth Regional Park, with the begins to follow Bassett’s Creek. MPRB is Trail is the trail surface itself. A new 12-foot wide Luce Line Trail surface running through that currently working collaboratively with the multi-use trail will run from Wirth Parkway to larger Regional Park facility. City of Minneapolis and private developers the Cedar Lake Trail where it intersects with Van as the industrial land between cedar Lake •2 Fruen Mill segment: South of Glenwood White Boulevard. The new trail will run primarily Road and Van White Boulevard redevelops. Avenue is a commercial development site on in a corridor to be acquired from CP Rail and All parties’ intent is to preserve the corridor the old Fruen Mill site. This segment extends partly on industrial land currently redeveloping. of Bassett’s Creek as public green space. only from Glenwood Avenue to the first The total length of new trail is approximatley This green space corridor will be acquired by railroad bridge over Bassett’s Creek.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Plan Report (Final)
    MASTER PLAN FOR HIDDEN FALLS - CROSBY FARM REGIONAL PARK SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION ADOPTED JUNE 26, 2019 Adopted June 26, 2019 St. Paul Parks and Recreation Mission: To build a city that works for all of us, Saint Paul Parks and Recreation will facilitate the creation of active lifestyles, vibrant places and a vital environment. St. Paul Parks and Recreation Vision: Saint Paul Parks and Recreation will make Saint Paul a city that works for all of us by: Responding creatively to change. Innovating with every decision. Connecting the entire city. Hidden Falls / Crosby Farm Regional Park Master Plan | iii This page intentionally left blank iv | Hidden Falls / Crosby Farm Regional Park Master Plan CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 4. IMPLEMENTATION 33 Development Concept 33 1. PLANNING FRAMEWORK 3 Plan Approach 33 Park Overview 3 Project Ranking 33 Purpose of the Plan 3 Projects and Cost Estimates 33 Introduction 3 Project Priorities 35 Context Plan 4 1 - Park-Wide Recommendations 38 Guiding Principles 6 2 - Trails & Connectivity Recommendations 42 Vision Statement 6 3 - Hidden Falls North Recommendations 45 History and Culture 7 4 - South Hidden Falls Recommendations 51 5 - West Crosby Farm Recommendations 53 Related Projects and Agencies 9 6 - East Crosby Farm Recommendations 55 Demand Forecast 11 Stewardship Plan 57 Conflicts/Opportunities 58 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 13 Ordinances 59 Overview 13 Operations 60 Map 1: Existing Conditions 14 Map 2: Boundaries and Acquisitions 16 Operating Hours 60 Map 3: Floodway and Flood Fringe 20 Public Awareness 60 Natural Resources 23 2019 Crosby Farm Park NRMP 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Contact Organization Information
    Application 10350 - 2018 Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities 11025 - Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Regional Solicitation - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Status: Submitted Submitted Date: 07/13/2018 2:15 PM Primary Contact Paul Michael Sawyer Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name Title: Management Assistant Department: Saint Paul Parks and Recreation Email: [email protected] Address: 25 W 4th St 400 City Hall Annex Saint Paul Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip 651-266-6417 Phone:* Phone Ext. Fax: What Grant Programs are you most interested in? Parks Capital Improvement Program Grants Organization Information Name: ST PAUL, CITY OF Jurisdictional Agency (if different): Organization Type: City Organization Website: Address: Parks and Recreation 400 CITY HALL ANNEX 25 W 4TH ST ST PAUL Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip County: Ramsey 651-266-6400 Phone:* Ext. Fax: PeopleSoft Vendor Number 0000003222A15 Project Information Project Name Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Primary County where the Project is Located Ramsey Cities or Townships where the Project is Located: Saint Paul Jurisdictional Agency (If Different than the Applicant): This project proposes to reconstruct sections of the original segment that have reached the end of their usable life of the Sam Morgan Regional Trail along Shepard Rd in Saint Paul. The project will include removing the asphalt and base of the old trail; correcting any grades for drainage and Brief Project Description (Include location, road name/functional accessibility; constructing new base and asphalt; class, type of improvement, etc.) installing audible pedestrian signals and pedestrian ramps at intersections; landscaping; and installing lighting, signage, and user amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • References & Appendix
    References & Appendix 6. Daniel B. Shaw and Carolyn Carr (for Great River Document References Greening). 2002, Mississippi River Gorge (Lower Gorge): Ecological Inventory and Restoration Manage- 1. Aaron Brewer (for the Seward Neighborhood Group). ment Plan 1998, The Ecology and Geology of the Mississippi River Gorge 7. Metropolitan Council. 2015, Thrive MSP 2040: Regional Parks Policy Plan 2. Carolyn Carr and Cynthia Lane (for Friends of the Mississippi River). 2010, Riverside Park Natural Area: Ecological Inventory and Restoration Management Plan 8. Metropolitan Council. 2016, Annual Use Estimate for the Regional Park System for 2016 3. Close Landscape Architecture (for The Longfellow Community Council and MPRB). 1997, A Concept Plan 9. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2007, for the Mississippi River Gorge Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines 4. David C. Smith. 2018, Minneapolis’s Amazing River 10. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2015, Parks: West River Parkway Mississippi River Trail Bikeway U.S. Bicycle Route (USBR) 45 5. David C. Smith. 2018, Minneapolis’s Amazing River Parks: East River Parkway 11. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2016, Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) MISSISSIPPI GORGE REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN REFERENCES AND APPENDIX 8-1 12. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. 2007, 2007 – 28. City of Minneapolis. 2001, Southeast Minneapolis 2020 Comprehensive Plan Industrial (SEMI), Bridal Veil Refined Master Plan 13. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. 1982, Missis- 29. City of Minneapolis. 2007, Seward Longfellow Green- sippi River Master Plan way Area Land Use and Pre-Development Study 14. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. 2007, Mis- 30. City of Minneapolis. 2006, Mississippi River Critical sissippi River Gorge Slope Stabilization Inventory and Area Plan Analysis 31.
    [Show full text]
  • 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As Pa
    Web: swlrt.org Twitter: @SouthwestLRT Construction Hotline: 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As part of the normal flow of construction, some portions of the project corridor will remain quiet through the winter. However, active construction work continues in each city along the alignment, as crews focus on items that are critical to the overall project schedule or that can still easily be done in the winter. Please continue to expect crews and construction vehicles throughout the project route. Weekly Construction Photo: Beltline Boulevard Regional Trail Bridge in St. Louis Park Crews placed the bridge span for the Beltline Boulevard regional trail bridge over the freight rail tracks this past week. Watch a time-lapse video of crews setting the span. 1 | Page Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station. Moving east, the Prairie Center Drive LRT Bridge extends from the SouthWest Station area over Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive. Moving east, LRT will enter the Eden Prairie Town Center Station area. Current activities to expect in this area: • The right-turn lane on the eastbound Highway 212 ramp to Prairie Center Drive remains closed. • The SouthWest station area remains a busy construction site with ongoing piling and concrete work. 2 | Page • Concrete work and bridge walkway preparation will create roadway impacts on Prairie Center Drive during the week of February 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on the Southwest LRT
    #1 From: matt muyres < > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 9:38 AM To: swlrt <[email protected]> Subject: LRT Environmental Terrorism I hope you dont mind that we catalog, document and publish all environmental destruction, eminent domain and the widespread loss of open spaces left....? Ill give you the link soon... You guys are stuffing an aprt complex near the cedar lake regional trail...no room for it...UNLESS...you cut down trees....thats always the development mantra. Good luck, Matt Ms. Kelcie Campbell, Environmental Project Manager Metro Transit - Southwest LRT Project Office 6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 500 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Email: [email protected] #2 From: Richard Adair < > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 3:06 PM To: swlrt <[email protected]>; Ginis, Sophia <[email protected]> Subject: comments on SEA/Amended Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Comments on the SWLRT Supplemental Environmental Assessment/Amended Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation From: Richard Adair, Note: I am a resident of the Bryn Mawr neighborhood and a long-term observer of the SWLRT project who has attended most of the public meetings over the last 10 years. Most of my comments are directed to the portions of SWLRT near my neighborhood where I feel I have useful information to offer. Section 1.2. Purpose and Need Since the publication of the Final EIS, the following factors have increased the need for this project: a. Increased traffic congestion, especially severe during road construction and after even minor snowfalls. b. A growing residential population in downtown Minneapolis. c. Increasing racial disparities in the Twin Cities in income, home ownership, transit dependence, and incarceration.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations
    Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations 2000 - 2018 All Figures in Thousands Fund Key GO General Obligation bonding GO/UF 2/3 GO Bonds, 1/3 User Financing GF General Fund ERAP Environment and Natural Resources Appropriations Bonds REV Revenue Bonds UF User Financing MRSI Minnesota Rail Service Improvement RDA Regional Development Account AP Appropriations Bonds ALL All Funds (for totals) Source: Capital Investment bill language, and tracking Sheets 2000 - 2018 Notes: Figures are total borrowing or spending authorization, not necessarily actual spending. Amounts or portions of amounts may have been subsequently cancelled, or converted to other spending. Figures and totals do not include cancellations The total capital borrowing and spending authorization between 2000 and 2018 was about $12.7 Billion, with about $191 million in cancellations for a net authorization of about $12.5 billion before statutory four year cancellations. Figures and totals do not include capital spending in other bills Does not include Trunk Highway bonding or spending Grants to Political Subdivisions grouped by DEED Planning Region Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 1 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM University of Minnesota Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 1 Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) GO 9,000 35,000 40,000 30,000 35,000 25,000 56,000 25,000 50,000 42,500 20,600 45,000 413,100 2 System wide - Laboratory Renovation GO 3,333 6,667 10,000 3 System wide - Classroom
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota
    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance A 25-year long-range plan for Minnesota February 14, 2011 ©2011, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This information is available in a different format upon request of persons of all abilities. February 14, 2011 It is our pleasure to introduce the Parks and Trails Minnesotans will look back and say the Parks and Legacy Plan. Funding created by the Legacy Trails Legacy Amendment accomplished what they Amendment gives us a unique opportunity to hoped for—and more. improve and expand Minnesota’s parks and trails of state and regional significance. This allows us to The plan recognizes the world‑class network of look out 25 years to envision a future in which parks parks and trails Minnesota currently has in place. It and trails play a significant role in the lives of all proposes to build on this foundation, making user Minnesotans. experiences even better. It is based on four strategic directions that together ensure a great future for parks Our extensive 18-month public engagement effort and trails: allows us to confidently state that this is a parks and • Connect people and the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Mobility
    Chapter 6 Mobility: Getting Around Town Vision for the Mobility System Vision 3.0 included a recommendation on mobility to “Develop Future- focused Transit and Mobility.” A Strategic Priority was developed from the recommendation which states, “St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably” and includes the following: » Continuing to expand the network of sidewalks, trails and bike facilities. » Researching and implementing multiple and affordable mobility solutions for all. 6-205 | Mobility: Getting Around Town » Fostering smart growth and transit-oriented housing Mobility System Goals and Strategies development. 1. Plan, design, build, and operate » Increasing pedestrian safety through crosswalk the city’s mobility system in a improvements and increased park and trail lighting. way that prioritizes walking first, » Expanding the number of north-south and east-west transit options. followed by bicycling and transit use, and then motor vehicle use The city’s mobility system is made up of sidewalks, trails, and streets, which are there to provide safe and convenient Strategies A. Incorporate an approach that is based on travel for all. The right of way within the city is an important surrounding land use context when planning and component of the mobility system and must be used designing transportation projects. efficiently to provide the multimodal infrastructure needed to provide for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit service and B. Continue to explore and evaluate flexible and motor vehicles. innovative designs and seek guidance from Each mobility option is tied to the other: pedestrian established best practices, to achieve desired facilities are often connected to bicycle facilities; transit outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Development Committee Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 for the Metropolitan Council Meeting of January 24, 2018
    Business Item No. 2018-2 Community Development Committee Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of January 24, 2018 Subject: Robert Piram Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment, Saint Paul District(s), Member(s): District 13, Richard Kramer Policy/Legal Reference: MN Statute 473.313; Planning Strategy 1 2040 Regional Park Policy Plan Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael Peterka, Planner (651-602-1361) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Approve the Robert Piram Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment. 2. Require Saint Paul to submit estimated development costs related to the overpass of Barge Channel Road to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval prior to seeking grants for its development. 3. Require that prior to initiating development of the regional trail, preliminary plans must be sent to Scott Dentz, Interceptor Engineering Manager at Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, for review in order to assess the potential impacts to the regional interceptor system. Background Saint Paul has submitted a master plan amendment for the Robert Piram Regional Trail, formerly named the Harriet Island-South St. Paul Regional Trail. When complete, the regional trail will travel 3.4 miles and connect Lilydale-Harriet Island Regional Park in Saint Paul to the River to River Greenway and Mississippi River Regional Trails at Kaposia Landing in South St. Paul. The regional trail will complete an important gap in the system and make connections to existing and planned trails that lead to downtown Saint Paul and Hastings along the Mississippi River, and Burnsville along the Minnesota River. The current master plan for the regional trail was approved by the Metropolitan Council in April 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Summer Trail Use and User Surveys Conducted in 1996, 1997 and 1998
    STATE TRAIL USE Summary of Summer Trail Use and User Surveys Conducted in 1996, 1997 and 1998 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Trails and Waterways Division & Office of Management and Budget Services An electronic copy of this report can be found on the DNR’s World Wide Web home page: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/trails_and_waterways/ July 2000 2 State Trail Surveys in 1996, 1997 & 1998 CONTENTS Topic Page Executive Summary . 4 Introduction . 8 Methodology . 10 Trail use Market areas . 13 Intensity of use . 15 Trail activities . 28 Use of paved and unpaved trail segments . 35 Trail user experiences and characteristics How users first heard about the trail . 36 Appeal of the trail . 36 Trail ratings (including ratings of a variety of facilities and services) . 39 Priorities for trail improvements . 47 User conflicts and crowding . 49 Tourist expenditures and local economic impact . 50 Trip characteristics . 52 Demographic characteristics of trail users . 53 References . 55 Appendix A — Survey Use Estimates, Confidence Limits, Trail Descriptions and Maps . 56 Douglas Trail, Summer 1997 . 57 Gateway Trail, Summer 1997 . 59 Glacial Lakes Trail, Summer 1998 . 61 Heartland Trail, Summer 1998 . 63 Luce Line Trail, Summer 1998 . 65 Paul Bunyan Trail, Summer 1996 . 67 Paul Bunyan Trail segment near Lake Bemidji State Park, Summer 1998. 69 Root River Trail, Summer 1997 . 70 Sakatah Singing Hills Trail, Summer 1998 . 72 MN Department of Natural Resources 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION For the purpose of gaining a better understanding of summer state trail use, nine state trail surveys were conducted between 1996 and 1998 (see map). The nine surveys covered the main summer period from Memorial Day to Labor Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Blufflands State Trail Master Plan
    Mississippi Blufflands State Trail Master Plan Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails September 2016 Mississippi Blufflands State Trail Master Plan The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Parks and Trails Division would like to thank all who participated in this master planning process. Individuals and groups in local communities have been working for years to support this trail. Many DNR staff, city, county and state officials, trail committee members, and local citizens contributed their time and energy to the planning process. Project Team: • Craig Blommer, area supervisor • Andrew Grinstead, planning specialist, Conservation Corps Minnesota & Iowa • Kevin Hemmingsen, regional trails specialist • Caleb Jensen, manager, Frontenac State Park • Darin Newman, planner Copyright 2016 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources For more information on this management plan, please contact the DNR Parks and Trails Division at (651) 259-5600. This information can be made available in alternative formats such as large print, braille or audio tape by emailing [email protected] or by calling 651-259-5016. The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation or disability. Persons with disabilities may request reasonable modifications to access or participate in DNR programs and services by contacting the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected] or 651- 259-5488. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 2019-XXX MPOSC Luce Line RT Master Plan MPRB
    Business Item No. 2019-88 Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission Meeting date: May 2, 2019 For the Community Development Committee meeting of May 20, 2019 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of June 12, 2019 Subject: Luce Line Regional Trail Master Plan, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Review File No. 50120-1 MPOSC Districts, Members: District C, Margie Andreason and District D, Catherine Fleming Council Districts, Members: District 6, Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson and District 7, Robert Lilligren Policy/Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. § 473.313; 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan Planning Policy – Strategy 1 Staff Prepared/Presented: Colin Kelly, AICP, Planning Analyst (651-602-1361) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Approve the Luce Line Regional Trail Master Plan. 2. Require that the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, prior to initiating development of the regional trail, send preliminary plans to the Engineering Services Assistant Manager at the Metropolitan Council’s Environmental Services Division, for review in order to assess the potential impacts to the regional interceptor system. Background The Luce Line is an existing regional trail corridor that connects the Cedar Lake Regional Trail in Minneapolis through Theodore Wirth Regional Park and then farther west to other regional parks and trails in the Three Rivers Park District System. The portion described in the Luce Line Regional Trail Master Plan (Master Plan) is operated by Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB). The Master Plan is the result of nearly two years of community engagement as part of MPRB’s North Service Area Master Planning (NSAMP) effort, a project to create new vision plans for all neighborhood parks on the north side of Minneapolis as well as three regional trails.
    [Show full text]