DOCSLIB.ORG

Primary Contact Organization Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primary Contact Organization Information Application 04786 - 2016 Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities 05269 - CSAH 5/Stonebridge Trail Connection Regional Solicitation - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Status: Submitted Submitted Date: 07/15/2016 2:08 PM Primary Contact Sara Ashley Allen Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name Title: Planning Intern Department: Washington County Regional Railroad Authority Email: [email protected] Address: 11660 Myeron Rd North Stillwater Minnesota 55082 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip 320-237-1344 Phone:* Phone Ext. Fax: Regional Solicitation - Roadways Including Multimodal What Grant Programs are you most interested in? Elements Organization Information Name: WASHINGTON CTY Jurisdictional Agency (if different): Organization Type: Organization Website: Address: PUBLIC WORKS 11660 MYERON RD STILLWATER Minnesota 55082 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip County: Washington 651-430-4325 Phone:* Ext. Fax: PeopleSoft Vendor Number 0000028637A10 Project Information CSAH 5/Stonebridge Trail Connection to the Brown's Creek Project Name State Trail Primary County where the Project is Located Washington Jurisdictional Agency (If Different than the Applicant): The project will construct a paved multi-use trail section connecting the existing trail on the east side of County State Aid Highway 5/Stonebridge Trail in Stillwater to the Brown's Creek State Trail. This section would establish connectivity across an existing critical gap, linking some of the most popular bicycle routes in the state (Gateway State Trail, including Brown's Creek section) and County (CSAH 5) with west-central Stillwater. Brief Project Description (Limit 2,800 characters; approximately 400 words) The current multi-use trail on the east side of CSAH 5 terminates approximately 175 feet before the bridge over Brown's Creek. The project will feature a 0.10 mile long, 10 foot wide bituminous trail section with a retaining wall, passing down the slope to Brown's Creek State Trail. The project will also include 600 feet of realigned trail connecting to the existing CSAH 5 bridge over the Brown's Creek State Trail. Include location, road name/functional class, type of improvement, etc. CSAH 5/Stonebridge Trail at Brown's Creek State Trail, TIP Description Guidance (will be used in TIP if the project is construct multi-use trail connection to Brown?s Creek State selected for funding) Trail Project Length (Miles) 0.1 Project Funding Are you applying for funds from another source(s) to implement No this project? If yes, please identify the source(s) Federal Amount $1,426,800.00 Match Amount $365,700.00 Minimum of 20% of project total Project Total $1,792,500.00 Match Percentage 20.4% Minimum of 20% Compute the match percentage by dividing the match amount by the project total Source of Match Funds Local sources A minimum of 20% of the total project cost must come from non-federal sources; additional match funds over the 20% minimum can come from other federal sources Preferred Program Year Select one: 2020 For TDM projects, select 2018 or 2019. For Roadway, Transit, or Trail/Pedestrian projects, select 2020 or 2021. Additional Program Years: 2019 Select all years that are feasible if funding in an earlier year becomes available. Project Information County, City, or Lead Agency Washington County Zip Code where Majority of Work is Being Performed 55082 (Approximate) Begin Construction Date 05/01/2020 (Approximate) End Construction Date 10/30/2020 Name of Trail/Ped Facility: CSAH 5/Stonebridge Trail (i.e., CEDAR LAKE TRAIL) TERMINI:(Termini listed must be within 0.3 miles of any work) From: Southeast of the crossing of the Brown's Creek State Trail and (Intersection or Address) CSAH 5 To: Crossing of the Brown's Creek State Trail and CSAH 5 (Intersection or Address) DO NOT INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION; INCLUDE NAME OF ROADWAY IF MAJORITY OF FACILITY RUNS ADJACENT TO A SINGLE CORRIDOR Or At: Primary Types of Work Grade, agg base, bit surf, retaining wall, bike path Examples: GRADE, AGG BASE, BIT BASE, BIT SURF, SIDEWALK, SIGNALS, LIGHTING, GUARDRAIL, BIKE PATH, PED RAMPS, BRIDGE, PARK AND RIDE, ETC. BRIDGE/CULVERT PROJECTS (IF APPLICABLE) Old Bridge/Culvert No.: New Bridge/Culvert No.: Structure is Over/Under (Bridge or culvert name): Specific Roadway Elements CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ELEMENTS/COST Cost ESTIMATES Mobilization (approx. 5% of total cost) $80,000.00 Removals (approx. 5% of total cost) $7,500.00 Roadway (grading, borrow, etc.) $0.00 Roadway (aggregates and paving) $0.00 Subgrade Correction (muck) $0.00 Storm Sewer $0.00 Ponds $0.00 Concrete Items (curb & gutter, sidewalks, median barriers) $0.00 Traffic Control $0.00 Striping $0.00 Signing $0.00 Lighting $0.00 Turf - Erosion & Landscaping $15,000.00 Bridge $0.00 Retaining Walls $555,000.00 Noise Wall (do not include in cost effectiveness measure) $0.00 Traffic Signals $0.00 Wetland Mitigation $0.00 Other Natural and Cultural Resource Protection $0.00 RR Crossing $0.00 Roadway Contingencies $0.00 Other Roadway Elements $0.00 Totals $657,500.00 Specific Bicycle and Pedestrian Elements CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ELEMENTS/COST Cost ESTIMATES Path/Trail Construction $785,000.00 Sidewalk Construction $0.00 On-Street Bicycle Facility Construction $0.00 Right-of-Way $56,000.00 Pedestrian Curb Ramps (ADA) $0.00 Crossing Aids (e.g., Audible Pedestrian Signals, HAWK) $0.00 Pedestrian-scale Lighting $0.00 Streetscaping $0.00 Wayfinding $5,000.00 Bicycle and Pedestrian Contingencies $240,000.00 Other Bicycle and Pedestrian Elements $85,000.00 Totals $1,171,000.00 Specific Transit and TDM Elements CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ELEMENTS/COST Cost ESTIMATES Fixed Guideway Elements $0.00 Stations, Stops, and Terminals $0.00 Support Facilities $0.00 Transit Systems (e.g. communications, signals, controls, $0.00 fare collection, etc.) Vehicles $0.00 Contingencies $0.00 Right-of-Way $0.00 Other Transit and TDM Elements $0.00 Totals $0.00 Transit Operating Costs Number of Platform hours 0 Cost Per Platform hour (full loaded Cost) $0.00 Substotal $0.00 Other Costs - Administration, Overhead,etc. $0.00 Totals Total Cost $1,828,500.00 Construction Cost Total $1,828,500.00 Transit Operating Cost Total $0.00 Requirements - All Projects All Projects 1.The project must be consistent with the goals and policies in these adopted regional plans: Thrive MSP 2040 (2014), the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan (2015), and the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan (2015). Check the box to indicate that the project meets this requirement. Yes 2.The project must be consistent with the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. Reference the 2040 Transportation Plan objectives and strategies that relate to the project. Goal: Safety and Security; Objective A. Reduce crashes and improve safety and security for all modes...; Strategies B1 - ... incorporate safety and security... throughout processes; B6 - ...provide and improve facilities for safe walking and bicycling...; (pg. 2.7) Goal: Access to Destinations; Objectives A. Increase the availability for multimodal travel options..., D. - Increase ... the share of trips taken using transit, bicycling, and walking, E. - Improve multimodal travel options for people of all ages and abilities...; Strategies C1 - ... systems that are multimodal and provide connections between modes, C2 - ... provide a system of interconnected arterial roads, streets, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities..., C16 - ... provide for bicycle and pedestrian travel across or around physical barriers and/or improve continuity between List the goals, objectives, strategies, and associated pages: jurisdictions, C17 - ... provide... reliable, cost- effective and accessible transportation choices that provide and enhance access to ... social connections for pedestrians and people with disabilities; (pg. 2.8-2.10) Goal: Competitive Economy; Objective B. Invest in a multimodal transportation system; Strategies D3 - ... regional transit and bicycle systems that improve connections to jobs and opportunity, promote economic development, ...; (pg. 2.11) Goal: Healthy Environment; Objectives C. Increase the availability and attractiveness of transit, bicycling, and walking..., D. Provide a transportation system that promotes community cohesion and connectivity; Strategies E3 - ... implement a transportation system that considers the needs of all potential users..., E4 - ... protect, enhance and mitigate impacts on natural resources when planning, constructing, and operating, E5 - ... protect, enhance and mitigate impacts on the cultural and built environments...; (pg. 2.12-13) (Limit 2500 characters; approximately 750 words) 3.The project or the transportation problem/need that the project addresses must be in a local planning or programming document. Reference the name of the appropriate comprehensive plan, regional/statewide plan, capital improvement program, corridor study document [studies on trunk highway must be approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council], or other official plan or program of the applicant agency [includes Safe Routes to School Plans] that the project is included in and/or a transportation problem/need that the project addresses. The project completes a critical transportation gap between CSAH 5/Stonebridge Trail and the Brown's Creek State Trail. On page 15-16 of the 2012 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Brown's Creek State Trail Master Plan, the plan identifies the intersection of the Brown's Creek State Trail and CSAH 5/Stonebridge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Primary Contact Organization Information
    Application 10350 - 2018 Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities 11025 - Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Regional Solicitation - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Status: Submitted Submitted Date: 07/13/2018 2:15 PM Primary Contact Paul Michael Sawyer Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name Title: Management Assistant Department: Saint Paul Parks and Recreation Email: [email protected] Address: 25 W 4th St 400 City Hall Annex Saint Paul Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip 651-266-6417 Phone:* Phone Ext. Fax: What Grant Programs are you most interested in? Parks Capital Improvement Program Grants Organization Information Name: ST PAUL, CITY OF Jurisdictional Agency (if different): Organization Type: City Organization Website: Address: Parks and Recreation 400 CITY HALL ANNEX 25 W 4TH ST ST PAUL Minnesota 55102 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip County: Ramsey 651-266-6400 Phone:* Ext. Fax: PeopleSoft Vendor Number 0000003222A15 Project Information Project Name Sam Morgan Regional Trail Segment 1 Reconstruction Primary County where the Project is Located Ramsey Cities or Townships where the Project is Located: Saint Paul Jurisdictional Agency (If Different than the Applicant): This project proposes to reconstruct sections of the original segment that have reached the end of their usable life of the Sam Morgan Regional Trail along Shepard Rd in Saint Paul. The project will include removing the asphalt and base of the old trail; correcting any grades for drainage and Brief Project Description (Include location, road name/functional accessibility; constructing new base and asphalt; class, type of improvement, etc.) installing audible pedestrian signals and pedestrian ramps at intersections; landscaping; and installing lighting, signage, and user amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As Pa
    Web: swlrt.org Twitter: @SouthwestLRT Construction Hotline: 612-373-3933 Winter Construction Conditions Continue As part of the normal flow of construction, some portions of the project corridor will remain quiet through the winter. However, active construction work continues in each city along the alignment, as crews focus on items that are critical to the overall project schedule or that can still easily be done in the winter. Please continue to expect crews and construction vehicles throughout the project route. Weekly Construction Photo: Beltline Boulevard Regional Trail Bridge in St. Louis Park Crews placed the bridge span for the Beltline Boulevard regional trail bridge over the freight rail tracks this past week. Watch a time-lapse video of crews setting the span. 1 | Page Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station. Moving east, the Prairie Center Drive LRT Bridge extends from the SouthWest Station area over Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive. Moving east, LRT will enter the Eden Prairie Town Center Station area. Current activities to expect in this area: • The right-turn lane on the eastbound Highway 212 ramp to Prairie Center Drive remains closed. • The SouthWest station area remains a busy construction site with ongoing piling and concrete work. 2 | Page • Concrete work and bridge walkway preparation will create roadway impacts on Prairie Center Drive during the week of February 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations
    Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations 2000 - 2018 All Figures in Thousands Fund Key GO General Obligation bonding GO/UF 2/3 GO Bonds, 1/3 User Financing GF General Fund ERAP Environment and Natural Resources Appropriations Bonds REV Revenue Bonds UF User Financing MRSI Minnesota Rail Service Improvement RDA Regional Development Account AP Appropriations Bonds ALL All Funds (for totals) Source: Capital Investment bill language, and tracking Sheets 2000 - 2018 Notes: Figures are total borrowing or spending authorization, not necessarily actual spending. Amounts or portions of amounts may have been subsequently cancelled, or converted to other spending. Figures and totals do not include cancellations The total capital borrowing and spending authorization between 2000 and 2018 was about $12.7 Billion, with about $191 million in cancellations for a net authorization of about $12.5 billion before statutory four year cancellations. Figures and totals do not include capital spending in other bills Does not include Trunk Highway bonding or spending Grants to Political Subdivisions grouped by DEED Planning Region Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 1 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM University of Minnesota Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 1 Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) GO 9,000 35,000 40,000 30,000 35,000 25,000 56,000 25,000 50,000 42,500 20,600 45,000 413,100 2 System wide - Laboratory Renovation GO 3,333 6,667 10,000 3 System wide - Classroom
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota
    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance A 25-year long-range plan for Minnesota February 14, 2011 ©2011, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This information is available in a different format upon request of persons of all abilities. February 14, 2011 It is our pleasure to introduce the Parks and Trails Minnesotans will look back and say the Parks and Legacy Plan. Funding created by the Legacy Trails Legacy Amendment accomplished what they Amendment gives us a unique opportunity to hoped for—and more. improve and expand Minnesota’s parks and trails of state and regional significance. This allows us to The plan recognizes the world‑class network of look out 25 years to envision a future in which parks parks and trails Minnesota currently has in place. It and trails play a significant role in the lives of all proposes to build on this foundation, making user Minnesotans. experiences even better. It is based on four strategic directions that together ensure a great future for parks Our extensive 18-month public engagement effort and trails: allows us to confidently state that this is a parks and • Connect people and the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Mobility
    Chapter 6 Mobility: Getting Around Town Vision for the Mobility System Vision 3.0 included a recommendation on mobility to “Develop Future- focused Transit and Mobility.” A Strategic Priority was developed from the recommendation which states, “St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably” and includes the following: » Continuing to expand the network of sidewalks, trails and bike facilities. » Researching and implementing multiple and affordable mobility solutions for all. 6-205 | Mobility: Getting Around Town » Fostering smart growth and transit-oriented housing Mobility System Goals and Strategies development. 1. Plan, design, build, and operate » Increasing pedestrian safety through crosswalk the city’s mobility system in a improvements and increased park and trail lighting. way that prioritizes walking first, » Expanding the number of north-south and east-west transit options. followed by bicycling and transit use, and then motor vehicle use The city’s mobility system is made up of sidewalks, trails, and streets, which are there to provide safe and convenient Strategies A. Incorporate an approach that is based on travel for all. The right of way within the city is an important surrounding land use context when planning and component of the mobility system and must be used designing transportation projects. efficiently to provide the multimodal infrastructure needed to provide for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit service and B. Continue to explore and evaluate flexible and motor vehicles. innovative designs and seek guidance from Each mobility option is tied to the other: pedestrian established best practices, to achieve desired facilities are often connected to bicycle facilities; transit outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • SWLRT Civil Construction Update
    2021 Construction and Going Forward As announced on Thursday, over the course of the 2020 construction season, the project staff and our contractor, Lunda-McCrossan Joint Venture encountered unforeseen obstacles in the Minneapolis portion of the alignment which will take longer to overcome. These obstacles include the construction of the corridor protection wall along the BNSF fright rail line and a secant wall to complete LRT tunnel construction in a portion of the Kenilworth corridor due to poor soil conditions. These are no small changes and require thoughtful and deliberate engineering, design plans and construction methods. While these types of setbacks are not uncommon on projects of this scale, we are also disappointed by this development. We strongly believe the long-term benefits of this project to the region and state outweigh the short-term challenges we face. While this means we most likely won’t be meeting our opening day projection of 2023, we know that 2021 will be a robust construction year. To see an overview of 2021 construction activities in Minneapolis, view the recording of the January 14 Minneapolis Town Hall. We will be sharing 2021 overviews of construction activities in the corridor cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and St. Louis Park in the coming weeks. Weekly Construction Photo: SouthWest Station in Eden Prairie 1 | Page Looking east towards SouthWest Station construction crews install piles that will support the bus loop/roadway. Due to poor soils conditions, project elements including track, stations, roadway and utilities are supported by piles. Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 2 | Page SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Trails
    REGIONAL TRAILS Three regional trail facilities were included in The following park packets follow the required and submit each to the Metropolitan Council the NSAMP planning process. The Luce Line Metropolitan Council format for regional trail for approval. Council approval is necessary prior Regional Trail, Shingle Creek Regional Trail master plans. The Luce Line is considered a to any expenditure of state or regional funds on (which includes the Creekview and Shingle Creek regional linking trail, while Shingle Creek and these regional trails. Park areas), and the Theodore Wirth Parkway Victory (Wirth) are destination regional trails, section of the Victory (Wirth) Memorial Parkway because they have wide corridors with significant Regional Trail do not have master plans and are natural resources. The Metropolitan Council inextricably intertwined with the neighborhood requires descriptions of community engagement, facilities in the NSAMP project area. The other which is included in this document in Chapter 2. regional parks and trails in the area (Theodore After adoption of the NSAMP document, MPRB Wirth Regional Park, Victory Memorial Parkway staff will separate each of these regional trail Regional Trail, North Mississippi Regional Park— master plan packets from this overall document, including the 49th Avenue Corridor, and Above add back in this document’s introductory the Falls Regional Park) already have adopted sections on process and community engagement, master plans. MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD 239 NORTH SERVICE AREA MASTER PLAN This page was intentionally left blank LOCATION AND HISTORY The trail travels through Bassett’s Creek Park until it reaches the end of Chestnut Avenue. It then LUCE LINE The Luce Line is an existing regional trail corridor moves onto the street again to follow Chestnut that connects the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and Cedar Lake Road to the entrance of Bryn westward through Theodore Wirth Regional Park Mawr Park, another Minneapolis neighborhood REGIONAL TRAIL and then farther west to other regional parks and park.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Trails Information
    Bike Trails Information Many bike trails are undergoing detours, closures, construction, and, may be subject to occasional flooding. For bike trail information please see below. Hennepin County Newest Interactive bike map—allows you to view bike friendly trails, on road lanes and bike friendly streets. Construction and detours are also shown: http://hennepin.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=89b4fc93062f4db2a7fe6840ffe04ba5 Kenilworth and Cedar Lake Trails Hennepin County from Minneapolis detours*: https://metrocouncil.org/Transportation/Projects/Light-Rail-Projects/Southwest-LRT/Construction/Detour- Maps.aspx *Cedar Lake and Kenilworth Trail Closures: (Update June 21st from the SWLRT website) The Cedar Lake Trail and Kenilworth Trail are closed for two to three years (see detour maps) Since the closures were put in place in May, adjustments have been made to detour signage in St. Louis Park and Minneapolis based on trail users feedback. Cedar Lake Trail: Closed through Hopkins and St. Louis Park until Fall 2021. The portion of the Cedar Lake Trail that closed starts just east of the North Cedar Lake Trail connection in Hopkins to France Avenue in St. Louis Park. At this time, automobiles, bikes and pedestrians will continue to cross at Jackson Street, Blake Road, Louisiana Avenue, Wooddale Avenue, TH-100 and Beltline Blvd. Cedar Lake Trail will remain open between France Avenue in St. Louis Park and Kenilworth Trail/Midtown Greenway intersection in Minneapolis. The Midtown Greenway will remain open. Kenilworth Trail: Closed in Minneapolis until Summer 2022 The portion of the Kenilworth Trail that closed is at the intersection with the Midtown Greenway and extends northeast to just south of W 21st St.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Document 4.Indd
    MASTER PLAN October 2012 Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Acknowledgments The contributions and support of the following individuals and organizations were instrumental in the creation of this plan, and are gratefully acknowledged: Metropolitan Airports Commission: Pat Mosites Riverfront Corporation: Gregory Page US Army Corps of Engineers City of St. Paul Public Works Bruce Elder Sewer Engineer Mike Klassen Transportation Planner Emily Erickson Sustainable Transportation Planner Dakota County Planning Department John Mertens Kurt Chatfi eld City of South St. Paul Christopher Esser Parks and Recreation Director John Sachi City Engineer National Park Service Susan Overson Great River Passage Community Task Force City of Saint Paul Parks and Recreation Staff: Don Varney Ellen Stewart Anne Gardner David Ronzani Prepared by: St. Paul Department of Parks and Recreation Design & Construction Division October, 2012 Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail Master Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Introduction 4 Background 6 1. Property Ownership and Acquisition Costs 8 2. Stewardship Plan 10 3. Demand Forecast 11 4. Development Concept 13 5. Confl icts 25 6. Public Services 34 7. Operations 35 8. Citizen Participation 36 9. Public Awareness 36 10. Accessibility 37 11. Natural Resources 37 Appendix 39 Trail Project Context Map / Existing Trails A1 Trail Alignment Map / Adjacent Land Cover A2 Trail Alignment / Wetland Resources A3 Public Participation Process A4-A6 Letters of Support A7-A10 Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail Master Plan Introduction The Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail (HISSP) will be a public transportation and recreational trail corridor that will connect Harriet Island and Lilydale Regional Park and their trails to the south portion of the City and beyond to the City of South St.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Supplemental Draft EIS Comments
    Attachment 3: Master Responses to Comments Received on the Supplemental Draft EIS OUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Master Responses to Comments Received on the Supplemental Draft EIS MR Topic Master Response Original Comment IDa Number 1 Invalid NEPA/MEPA The Southwest Transitway Scoping Process did not initially include the analysis of freight rail 1, 42, 47, 66, 74, Scoping Process changes (either relocation of freight rail to the MN&S Spur or co-location of freight rail and light rail 83, 112, 131, 133, because original in the Kenilworth Corridor), because at that time potential freight rail modifications were not 205 scoping report did not considered part of the Project. Prior to 2011, freight rail relocation out of the Kenilworth Corridor include freight rail co- was the subject of separate action being undertaken by Hennepin County and MnDOT. location The Project’s Scoping Process began with a notice published on August 23, 2008, and publication of a notice of intent in the EQB Monitor on September 8, 2008, and the Federal Register in September 23, 2008. The Scoping comment period ended on November 7, 2008. The Project conducted three formal public hearings and one agency meeting where written comments were received and where verbal comments were recorded. A Scoping Booklet was published that explained the EIS process (including the Scoping Process, how to comment, which agencies were involved, and how to stay involved after the Scoping Process). Exhibits at the scoping meetings explained the Scoping Process in more detail, the alternatives that were under consideration, and the upcoming EIS process.
    [Show full text]
  • CLPA Summer-12:CLPA Spring 05
    UPDATE Summer 2012 Engagement Edition Volume 24, No. 1 Southwest LRT Will Impact the Park and Trails he Southwest Light Rail Transit (Southwest LRT) will directly affect T Cedar Lake Park and three major trails — Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Kenilworth Trail, and the Midtown Greenway. It is imperative that we closely monitor the design and devel- opment of the SWLRT. When appropriate, we need to voice our concerns and share our ideas to protect and, if possible, enhance Cedar Lake Park and the three trails. The Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County have joined forces on the Southwest LRT project and convened a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) to provide input on the planning stages of the Southwest LRT. CLPA has attained a seat on the CAC. At the May As the Southwest LRT rolls closer, stakeholders and volunteers are engaged in efforts to 10, 2012 meeting, Met Council and Hennepin mitigate its impact. County staff provided important updates on the status of the project. Here is a brief report on those updates. approval to enter Preliminary 2013. However, we keep getting assured that The bonding bill that was just Engineering (PE). During this phase 30% of the Kenilworth Trail will remain in the passed by the state legislature did the engineering will be done. It is projected Kenilworth Corridor. not include the $25 million requested that this will be accomplished sometime in The current SWLRT design projections for the SWLRT. Mark Fuhrman, Director for 2013, with the final design phase to be com- have a fly-over bridge at Cedar Lake Rail New Starts, said he was disappointed but pleted in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Parks, Reserves and River Trails While Visiting Or Using Those Facilities
    Typo 47 Lake 28 Bethel Fish St. Francis Lake Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 24 Minard Lake 24 65 Martin 26 Lake Linwood Twp Rum River Trail 24 Island Tamarack Lake George Lake Lake Ford VIKING Martin-Island- BLVD REGIONAL River Linwood Lakes Lake Brook George Linwood 5 Rum 22 Lake A Nowthen Deer 22 9 Lake Pickerel 47 55 Oak Grove East Lake Twin Boot Lake Devil Lake 22 Creek East Bethel Lake 17 parks 22 Little Coon Cedar Lake 22 SYSTEM AVE CENTRAL Coon Lake Carlos Avery WMA 8 Bone ROUND LAKE BLVD 18 18 Lake Rum River Forest 2 Central Lake Columbus 35 Lake Netta Mud 1 Lake Goose ANOKA Lake 95 Ramsey Rum Ham Lake Howard Lake Ham 97 5 Andover Lake 19 97 Round Clear Scandia Lake Forest Lake 3 B 47 65 Lake Central Anoka 17 169 7 Fish County Trail Lake William O’Brien R 10 k iv e State Park e 23 15 r e 61 ssi 9 r Mi ssip pi C Central Anoka Bunker Hardwood River Crooked Sand e County Trail Lake c Big Lake i Creek Trail Lake Crow Crossways R Marine 101 Rum River Lake Lake Bunker AVE LEXINGTON 144 Anoka Trail MANNING TRAIL 18 Hills 94 Diamond Randeau Horseshoe 4 Lake R Lake Lake Big Marine i v e r 242 14 Coon 4 Crowley Elm Creek 116 Rice Creek 14 Marine on St. Croix Lake Rogers Creek Oneka Mud Coon Rapids Lake Sylvan Dayton Mississippi Chain of Lakes Peltier Lake Lake Lake 121 River Trail Crow-Hassan French 169 Coon Creek Blaine George Hugo Turtle Lake 1 Trail Watch Lake Hayden EAST RIVER ROAD Lake 95 Lochness May Twp 7 Hassan Twp Lake 12 Marshan Henry 81 Champlin 35W Lake Lemans 10 AVE CENTRAL Centerville Square Lake C Lake Lake Lake 8 East Anoka
    [Show full text]