Budget Index Budget and Management, Department Of

BUDGET INDEX

BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF BUDGET ANALYSIS OFFICE OF CAPITAL BUDGETING

EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL: BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS - CAPITAL APPROPRIATION EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - GOVERNOR OFFICE OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING OFFICE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES EXECUTIVE DEFT-BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES SECRETARY OF STATE HISTORIC ST. MARY'S CITY COMMISSION OFFICE FOR SMART GROWTH INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF AGING COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING MILITARY DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MD INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STATE ARCHIVES MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

FINANCIAL AND REVENUE ADMINISTRATION: COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND: OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION BUREAU OF REVENUE ESTIMATES REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION COMPLIANCE DIVISION FIELD ENFORCEMENT DIVISION ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX DIVISION MOTOR FUEL TAX DIVISION CENTRAL PAYROLL BUREAU INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION STATE TREASURER: OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER INSURANCE PROTECTION BOND SALE EXPENSES STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION STATE LOTTERY AGENCY PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS REGISTERS OF WILLS

I — 793 BUDGET INDEX (continued) GENERAL SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 546,565 OFFICE OF FACILITIES SECURITY 550,566 OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 553,566 OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND LOGISTICS 558,568 OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE 561,570 OFFICE OF FACILITIES PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 563,570

JUDICIAL AND LEGAL REVIEW: JUDICIARY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR MARYLAND TAX COURT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE'S COUNSEL SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

LEGISLATIVE: GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLANDJDEPT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 51 1

NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY FORESTRY SERVICE WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE CAPITAL GRANTS & LOAN ADMINISTRATION LICENSING AND REGISTRATION SERVICE NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE RESOURCE PLANNING ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL AREAS COMMISSION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST WATERSHED SERVICES FISHERIES SERVICE

PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE 10

RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION: MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS INJURED WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND

TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF: SECRETARY'S OFFICE DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION STATE MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

I — 794 BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION

Department of Budget and Management Office of the Secretary Office of Personnel Services and Benefits Office of Information Technology Office of Budget Analysis Office of Capital Budgeting Major Information Technology Development Project Fund

DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

MISSION

The Department of Budget and Management helps the Governor, State agencies, and their employees provide effective, efficient and fiscally sound government to the citizens of Maryland. We support agency efforts to achieve results by helping them obtain the fiscal, capital, personnel, and information technology resources needed to provide services to Maryland citizens. We are dedicated to providing advice and assistance with professionalism, state of the art technology, modern management techniques, and teamwork. VISION

We will advance the interests of the citizens of Maryland in a State government that is well regarded, responsive, and contributes to environmentally sound communities whose residents are well-educated, healthy, safe, and gainfully employed. Our success depends on our employees. The recognition we give to individual effort and teamwork will make our agency a very desired place to work. Our advice and assistance will be actively sought. We will emphasize getting the job done with utmost professionalism. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Allocated resources contribute to achievement of outcome goals by State agencies.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Index of 30 outcome-related performance measures reported by state agencies and other sources 104

Goal 2. Executive branch agencies have a high quality workforce that reflects the diversity of the State.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of employees evaluated using the Performance Planning and Evaluation Program (PEP) 73.6% 61.0% 85% 85% Outcomes: Percent of individuals appointed to vacant positions under OPSB's classification system for the ASR classifications who took up-to-date examinations NlA(1) 90% 90% 90%

FY 2001 ASR Classifications: (6) Core Clerical Fiscal Clerical Professional Fiscal Data Processing Operations Professional Social Workers

Percent of State employees receiving open enrollment training provided by EDTI and completing a course evaluation who rate the course as good or better (4)% (4)% 85% 85% Retention rate 92.29% 91.54% 92% 94% Percent of the protected categories in the Maryland State government that reflect the proportional composition in the Maryland Civilian Labor Force 53% %(5) 53% 53%

Note: (1) The FY 02 ASR was limited to a new job series for addictions counselors. All examination development activities for this job series are decentralized to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH). (2) This data is reported for January 1, 2002 through June 30,2002. (3) No formal examination is used for Professional Social Workers. These are "hard to recruit" classifications, and all applicants who meet the specific professional licensure requirements are certified to the Eligible List as Best Qualified. (4) New measure in FY 2004. (5) Fiscal year data not available until January when Division's Annual Report is due. (6) New ASR classifications for Fiscal Year2005 include: juvenile services counselors and direct care staff; assistant public defenders and related attorneys; assessors; public health lab scientists and related chemists; administrative law judges; financial examiners; and entry level classifications requiring a college degree.

I — 461 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

Goal 3. State government maximizes the benefit and value from investments in the information technology supporting State business processes. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of new major IT development projects executed by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch that are successful. * 66.7% 80% 80% Percent of new major IT development projects implemented by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch that are compliant with the State's IT Security Policy and Standards. * * 80% 80% The number of substantial disruptions experienced during regular Business hours to critical State business processes due to the unavailability of infrastructure directly maintained by the Telecommunications Division

Note: * New measure for which data is not available.

I — 462 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 531.30 472.30 472.30 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 27.10 19.40 20.90 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 30.972. 753 31.217. 515 89.279. 147 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1.164.041 733.274 830. 566 Operating Expenses ...... 28.255.335 33.208. 961 37.151. 499 Original General Fund Appropriation...... 38.167. 417 33.524. 827 TransferReduction ...... -3.387. 698 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 38.167. 417 30.137. 129 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 9.326. 042 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 28.841. 375 30.137. 129 89.194. 076 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 13.726. 029 15.146. 388 15.772. 027 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 17.824.725 19.876.233 22.295. 109 Total Expenditure ...... 60.392. 129 65.159. 750 127.261.212

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 153.00 165.00 165.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation...... TransferEeduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 463 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Secretary of the Department of Budget and Management, under the direction of the Governor, is responsible for the overall review, analysis and final preparation of the State Budget for Chief Executive approval and submission to the General Assembly. The Office of the Secretary coordinates the functions of the various departmental divisions and formulates policies and guidelines to promote efficient budgetary, fiscal, personnel and information technology management within State government. The Office provides legal counsel and representation and coordinates legislative activities for the Department.

This program directs the Department in the attainment of the mission, vision, goals, objectives, and performance measures for the Department as a whole.

I — 464 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A01.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (Continued)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the Statewide Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator administers and enforces the State Equal Employment Opportunity Program under the authority of the Secretary of the Department of Budget and Management established by Annotated Code of Maryland State Personnel and Pensions Article 8 5-202. The Office reviews appealed discrimination complaints, investigates Whistleblower complaints, monitors agencies' fair practices and equal employment opportunity (EEO) programs and policies, provides training and technical assistance to managers and supervisors, ensures compliance with Federal, State and local laws prohibiting discrimination, evaluates State agencies' EEO efforts, and reports annually to the Governor.

MISSION

The mission of the Office of the Statewide Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator is to ensure a fair and equitable personnel system, in which:

State employees are able to pursue their careers without discrimination or harassment;

Job applicants have an equal opportunity to compete for State employment; and

Individuals requesting services from the State are provided those services without discrimination.

VISION

A State personnel system based on fairness and equity, free of discrimination and harassment.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Executive Branch and independent agencies should have a workforce that reflects the diversity of the State. Objective 1.1 Annually, 55 percent of the protected groups in the State's workforce will reflect their proportional composition in Maryland's Civilian Labor Force.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of protected groups in the State's workforce that reflect their proportional composition in Maryland's Civilian Labor Force 53% * 53% 53%

Goal 2. EEO complaints are resolved with the agency and/or with the Office of the Statewide Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. Objective 2.1 Annually, at least 74 percent of EEO complaints will be resolved with the agency and/or with the Office of the Statewide Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of EEO complaints resolved with the agency and/or with the Office of the Statewide Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator 73% * 74% 74%

Note: * Fiscal year data not available until January when Division's Annual Report is due.

I — 465 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10901 Transfer from Employees and Retirees' Health Insur- ance Non-Budgeted Accounts ...... F10905 Assessments for Telecommunications Expenses ...... Total ......

I — 466 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A01.02 DIVISION OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Finance and Administration is responsible for the: accounting, budgeting, payroll, purchasing and related functions for the Department. It manages the automated budget system, provides support to Departmental staff and State agencies that use the system, and is responsible for printing the State Budget and Fiscal Digest. In addition, the Division maintains a master position control file for all authorized State positions to enable position, classification, and salary level for the annual State Budget.

MISSION

The mission of the Division of Finance and Administration is to provide high quality, efficient and timely financial, purchasing, payroll and administrative support for the goals and objectives of the Divisions in the Department of Budget and Management. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Manage database to support the preparation, analysis and printing of the State Budget. Objective 1.1 Annually provide budget, personnel and fund data files and software to financial agencies and their employees who use the State Budget System (HOBO) for the preparation of their budget request.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Input: Number of agencies that received files & software 45 45 45 45 Number of individual users who received files & software 345 297 297 297

Objective 1.2 Annually transfer to the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) budget, personnel and non-general fund source records from the HOBO database that contain the three years of data used to create the Governor's allowance. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Output: Number of budget records transferred 123,598 121,452 122,000 122,000 Number of personnel records transferred 94,183 86,597 86,000 86,000 Number of non-General Fund source records transferred 5,324 4,127 4,100 4,100

Objective 1.3 The State Budget Books will be published and delivered by the third Wednesday in January each year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Output: Delivered on schedule Yes Yes Yes Yes

I — 467 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A01.02 DIVISION OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 468 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.03 CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Central Collection Unit is the unit of State government responsible for the collection of all-delinquent debts, claims and accounts of the State other than taxes, child support, unemployment insurance contributions and overpayments. Typical debts are student tuition and fees, restitution for damage to State property, reimbursement for institutional care, local health department fees, workers' compensation premiums, Home Improvement Commission awards, and State grant overpayments.

MISSION

The mission of the Central Collection Unit is to collect all delinquent debts, claims and accounts of the State other than taxes in the quickest and most cost effective manner while employing the highest professional standards.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Maximize returns on debt collection. Objective 1.1 The unit will increase or maintain its net profit (gross collections - operating expenses) compared to the three year average of net profit for the first three of the last four completed fiscal years.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Net profit increased or maintained (YJN) Yes Yes Yes Yes Net profit $1,091,835 $2,8 17,869 $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Objective 1.2 The unit will collect some or all of the debt from at least 40 percent of debt referrals received by the unit over the last four fiscal years. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of debt referrals collected upon 40% 36% 33.4 % 3 1%

Note: The Fiscal 2003 percentage of debt referrals collected was 4% less than Fiscal 2002. This decline was due to a significant increase in the number of accounts assigned to CCU during Fiscal 2003. During Fiscal 2003, the number of accounts assigned to CCU increased by 209,166 or 49.8%, while the number of accounts collected increased by 59,287 or 35.5%. Falling short of the 40% goal is forecast to continue during Fiscal 2004 and 2005. The variance is due to the projected continuing growth in the volume of new accounts assigned to CCU significantly outpacing the projection for the number of collected accounts.

Objective 1.3 The unit will collect at least 33 percent of the total debt from debt referrals received by the unit over the last four fiscal years.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of total dollar value of debt collected 38% 30.4% 32% 33.6%

Note: The Fiscal 2003 percentage of total dollars of debt collected was 7.6% less than Fiscal 2002. The decline was a result of a large increase in the dollar value of new accounts assigned to CCU ($380 million or 55% increase) that outpaced the increase in the dollar value of accounts collected ($67 million or 29.2% increase).

I — 469 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.03 CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: F10301 Collection Fees ......

I — 470 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A01.04 DIVISION OF POLICY ANALYSIS - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Policy Analysis consists of the following programs: Policy Analysis, Procurement, and Fleet and Travel Management. These programs provide the following functions: analysis of policy, program, and management issues of strategic concern to State agencies, the Governor, and the Legislature; centralized review, and approval or rejection of procurements for services and information technology submitted by Executive State agencies; procurement of services and information technology for statewide use; and internal support for all DBM procurements; and policy and procedural direction and contract management services that ensure effective and efficient statewide fleet operations and travel management services.

MISSION

The Division of Policy Analysis develops solutions and provides technical assistance on policy, program, and management issues that are of concern to the Department of Budget and Management, other State agencies, the Governor, and the Legislature. By providing these services, we help DBM and other State agencies provide cost effective services and products that meet the needs of their customers and stakeholders.

We use sound management techniques and teamwork to provide analytical services, advice, and assistance. We value open communication and cooperative relationships among our staff and with our customers. We respect the strengths of our staff, capitalize on their talents, and invest in their growth.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide high quality solutions to policy, program, and management issues affecting State agencies. Objective 1.1 Ninety percent (90%) of projects completed during each fiscal year are rated as meeting or exceeding quality standards in providing solutions to the issues. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of projects rated as meeting or exceeding quality standards in providing solutions to issues 100% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 2. Maximize the benefit and value from procurements of services supporting performance of State agency functions. Objective 2.1 Beginning in fiscal year 2005 at least 60% of initial submissions, and 80% of second submissions of agency solicitations that must be reviewed by the Procurement Unit meet or exceed the standards of a well-prepared solicitation. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of reviewed initial submissions of agency solicitations that meet standards for a well prepared solicitation. * **30% 40% 60% Percent of reviewed second submissions of agency solicitations that meet standards for a well prepared solicitation * **66% 75% 80%

Note: *Data not available prior to FY 2003 **The FY 2003 actual reflects 6 months of data because the Procurement Data Base (PDB) was not operational until January 2003.

I — 471 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.04 DIVISION OF POLICY ANALYSIS - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (Continued)

Goal 3. State agencies use fleet vehicles efficiently. Objective 3.1 Each year at least 90% of the State vehicles that must be driven a minimum number of official miles per year will meet or exceed the official mileage standard set by the Fleet Administration Unit staff for that year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Percent of State vehicles that must be driven a minimum number of official miles per year that meet or exceed the official mileage standard 91% 93.7% 90% 90%

I — 472 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA01.04 DIVISION OF POLICY ANALYSIS-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: F10303 Open Society Institute ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10902 Tuition Fees ......

I — 473 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Personnel Services and Benefits provides policy direction for the human resources system established by the State Personnel and Pensions Article. The Executive Director manages the Office of Personnel Services and Benefits within the Department of Budget and Management and administers State personnel policies and health benefit programs. The Divisions of Employee Medical Services, Management and Personnel Services, and Labor Relations provide direct support to the Executive Director on pertinent issues.

MISSION

The Office of Personnel Services and Benefits (OPSB) promotes the recruitment, development, and retention of a competent, motivated workforce for Maryland State Government which strives for excellence through efficient, effective services that are responsive to the needs of the State's citizens. We provide a variety of programs including: salary administration and classification, employee development and training, recruitment and examination, employee relations, employee benefits, and medical services. OPSB shares responsibility with State agencies for the administration of personnel functions through policy development, guidance, and interpretation.

We are a team that serves our customers with the same regard that we treat our fellow team members. We are committed to acting with responsibility, integrity, fairness, and sensitivity. VISION

We will manage a high performance governmental personnel system that delivers timely, accurate, and reliable services in response to our customers. We will emphasize acquiring new skills that enhance our capability to effectively manage our operations and solve problems. To do so, we will use modern personnel techniques and state-of-the-art information systems.

We will strive to make Maryland government a first-class employer who attracts and retains the best and the brightest. Our expertise and our reputation for excellence will make us highly influential in shaping public policy affecting the personnel system.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Retain employees in the State Personnel Management System who perform work tasks at an efficient, effective, and productive level. Objective 1.1 Annually, maintain or improve the retention rate of permanent employees in the State Personnel Management System and certain MDOT agencies who are in grades 1-26.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Retention rate 92.29% 91.54% 92% 94%

Goal 2. Management of the Employee Medical Services Division promotes the productivity of State employees. Objective 2.1 During fiscal year 2005, reduce by 3 percent the number of days lost at work by State employees referred to the State Medical Director due to medical absences, compared to the number of days lost during the prior fiscal year. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent reduction in the number of days lost at work by State employees referred to the State Medical Director due to medical absences. ^ 22% 15% 15%

Note: * During fiscal year 2002, baseline data was collected on this objective to determine the number of days lost at work. The number of days authorized by the State Medical Director compared to the number of days authorized by private physicians in fiscal year 2002 was 86 percent. In order to avoid duplication, objectives from prior years can be found in the individual division's plans. In addition, the Division of Medical Services and the Division of Labor Relations have been consolidated into Executive Direction.

I — 474 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 169.50 142.00 142.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 6.20 5.90 5.90 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 9.114. 933 8.750. 057 66.791. 823 Technical and Special Fees ...... 126.023 268. 159 213.063 Operating Expenses ...... 3.112. 534 2.773. 360 2.882.423 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 10.105. 896 8.807. 996 TransferReduction ...... -163. 444 -1.284. 637 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 9.942. 452 7.523.359 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 1.813. 119 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 8.129. 333 7.523. 359 65.478. 555 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 4.224. 157 4.268. 217 4.408. 754 Total Expenditure ...... 12.353.490 11.791.576 69.887. 309

FlOA02.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10901 Transfer from Employees and Retirees' Health Insur- ance Non-Budgeted Accounts ......

I — 475 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.02 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Employee Benefits administers health care related benefit programs for: State employees and retirees, satellite agencies, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) continuation of coverage of participants, and contractual employees. This program also administers the flexible benefits program for State employees. The State's share of the estimated fiscal year cost of the health benefits programs is appropriated in the various agency budgets.

MISSION

The Employee Benefits Division (EBD) provides coverage for State employees, retirees, and their dependents to protect them from financial loss and to provide for health care expenses. This coverage includes: the administration of medical benefits, other health related insurance programs, flexible spending accounts, and life insurance. Our program provides many options for multiple types of benefits that meet the unique needs of a diverse workforce. Our efforts make a major contribution toward the recruitment and retention of productive State employees serving State citizens.

We emphasize education, training, and information about the available benefits coverage. To do so, we work with other State agencies through continuing education and training of Agency Benefits Coordinators and Human Resource Directors. We also educate and assist the State workforce in receiving and understanding their benefits. These services are provided through multiple means of communication, including: training sessions, benefits booklets, Web-site information, and benefit fairs.

The Employee Benefits Division strives to administer benefit program laws and regulations in a manner that is sensitive, responsible, knowledgeable, and timely.

VISION

We will administer a benefits program that provides a variety of choices and options for the unique needs of our customers, the employees and retirees of the State of Maryland. We will utilize state-of-the-art technology systems to administer the benefits program in a timely and accurate manner. We will emphasize continuous training and education of our staff, our customers, and the agency staff with whom we work to constantly expand our knowledge and improve our skills.

We will strive to work cooperatively with our fellow State agencies through continuing education, training and communication. We will strive to make a significant contribution to the recruitment and retention of the State workforce by providing a benefits program that is responsive to their needs.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Services provided by our health plan vendors meet quality standards of performance. Objective 1.1 Annually, 100 percent of health plan vendors will receive a "satisfactory" rating by at least 85 percent of all plan survey respondents in their overall plan satisfaction.

CY 2001 CY 2002 CY 2003 CY 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of health plan vendors who received a "satisfactory" rating by at least 85 percent of all plan survey respondents 73% 82%* 90%* 100%

Note: * Calendar year 2003 estimated based on an estimate that 10 out of 11 plans will receive a "satisfactory" rating by at least 85 percent of all plan survey responses.

I — 476 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.02 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS (Continued)

Objective 1.2 Each calendar year at least 85 percent or more of health plan vendors will meet 80 percent of contractual Performance Standards criteria as defined in the State's contract.

CY 2001 CY 2002 CY 2003 CY 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of health plan vendors who meet 80 percent of the contractual Performance Standards on an annual basis, as reported in the Quarterly Performance Standard Report submitted by each vendor 83% 91% 91%* 91%*

Note: * Estimate based on calendar year 2002 results for all plans.

Goal 2. Enroll State participants in their benefit programs accurately and on time. Objective 2.1 Each calendar year accurately process at least 90 percent of all enrollment applications.

CY 2001 CY 2002 CY 2003 CY 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of enrollment applications processed accurately 97 % 98% 97.5%* 98%

Note: * Estimate based on first six months of calendar year 2003. Final results available in March 2004.

I — 477 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.02 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10901 Transfer from Employees and Retirees' Health Insur- ance Non-Budgeted Accounts ......

I — 478 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.04 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS- OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Employee Relations provides guidance, advice, and assistance on interpreting State personnel laws impacting employee/employer relations. It also manages the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) which provides confidential and professional assessment and referral services for State employees experiencing personal problems that may be affecting their work performance. The EAP focuses on the early identification, evaluation, and referral for treatment and/or counseling of employees experiencing social, health, and behavioral problems. In addition, the Division investigates employee complaints, mediates disputes involving grievances or disciplinary action appeals, and administers the Employee Leave Bank. The Division also reviews and processes various personnel transactions submitted by State agencies.

MISSION

The Employee Relations Division provides services that deal with work disputes, employees' personal problems, and salary transactions, all of which affect the employment relationship of workers in Maryland State government.

Our services include: conducting settlement conferences, investigating employee disputes, administering the Employee Assistance and Leave Bank Programs, and reviewing and processing salary transactions. We also provide technical assistance to State employees in these service areas. Our purpose is to promote the efficient functioning of State government so that its performance meets the high expectations of the citizens of Maryland.

VISION

In dealing with employment relationship issues, the Employee Relations Division acts with equity and fairness. We will establish ourselves as a knowledgeable and reliable source of information and services that State employees prefer to use in resolving employment matters.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide effective mediation services for third step grievances and disciplinary action appeals. Objective 1.1 Annually, the Division will achieve a resolution rate of at least 32 percent for third-step grievance mediations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of resolved third-step grievance mediations. 3 1% 32% 32% 32%

Objective 1.2 Annually, at least 80 percent of settlement conference participants will rate the third-step grievance mediation as useful. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual* Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of settlement conference participants who rate the third-step grievance mediation as useful 80% 76% 82% 82%

Note: * Data available for April 23 - June 30, 2001. Objective 1.3 Annually, the Division will achieve a resolution rate of at least 57 percent for disciplinary action appeal mediations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of disciplinary action appeal mediation cases in which resolution is reached.

I — 479 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.04 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS- OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS (Continued)

Objective 1.4 Annually, at least 80 percent of settlement conference participants will rate disciplinary action appeal mediation as useful. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of settlement conference participants who rate the disciplinary action appeal mediation as useful 86% 87% 88% 88%

Goal 2. The Leave Bank protects employees who will be able to return to work from an earnings disruption resulting from a short- term (less than 16 months) health crisis. Objective 2.1 Annually, at least 35 percent of eligible State employees will be active Leave Bank members.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Percent of eligible State employees who are active Leave Bank members 34% 36.7% 35% 35%

Goal 3. The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) helps employees referred by management resolve personal matters adversely affecting their job performance. Objective 3.1 Annually, at least 50 percent of EAP participants will judge the EAP services as having significantly helped with the problem for which the referral was made. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of EAP participants who judge the EAP services as having significantly helped with the problem for which the referral was made 64% 61% 64% 64%

Objective 3.2 Annually, at least 50 percent of employees referred to EAP by their supervisors will improve their post- referral work performance as assessed by their supervisors. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of employees referred to EAP who improved post-referral work performance as assessed by their supervisors 41% 44% 50% 50 %

I — 480 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.04 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10901 Transfer from Employees and Retirees' Health Insur- ance Non-Budgeted Accounts ......

I — 481 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.05 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Employee Development and Training coordinates in-service and out-service training conducted by State agencies through the Employee Development and Training Institute (EDTI) and Information Technology Training (ITT) program. The Division focuses on providing open enrollment and specialized training in the areas of communications, effective leadership, administrative development, human resource issues and the Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) process. Wellness programs are also implemented through the Division to help employees lead healthier and more productive lifestyles.

MISSION

The Employee Development and Training Institute empowers State employees and agencies to build, improve, and sustain an efficient, effective, and productive workforce in the State of Maryland.

We do this by providing training and consulting services in the areas of: information technology; health promotion and wellness; workforce development; continuous quality improvement; and employee identification and recognition.

VISION

A State in which all State employees are provided with high quality, cost effective employee development training and consulting services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Employees in the State Personnel Management System will have the abilities required to perform work tasks at an efficient, effective, and productive level. Objective 1.1 Annually, at least 85 percent of employees will be evaluated using the Performance Planning and Evaluation Program (PEP) as reported by the agency.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of employees evaluated using the Performance Planning and Evaluation Program (PEP) 73.6% 61.0% 85% 85%

Objective 1.2 Annually, at least 85 percent of the employees attending EDTI open-enrollment courses and completing a course evaluation will evaluate the overall course rating as good or better.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of State employees receiving open-enrollment training provided by EDTI and completing a course evaluation who rate the course as good or better * * * * 85% 85%

Note: * PEP data submitted as of July, 2003. ** New measure in FY 2004.

I — 482 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.05 DIVISION OF EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionKteduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10902 Tuition Fees ...... F10903 State Employee Conference Fees ...... Total ......

I — 483 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.06 DIVISION OF SALARY ADMINISTRATION AND POSITION CLASSIFICATION - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Salary Administration and Classification develops and maintains the State's position classification plan and provides for the development and operation of the State's salary and wage program.

MISSION

In order to support the recruitment and retention of a competent, motivated workforce that meets the needs of Maryland's citizens for quality public services, the Division of Salary Administration and Position Classification develops and maintains uniform and competitive classification and compensation systems and assists agencies with system administration. We provide a variety of services which include: maintenance of the classification plan, publication of new and revised class specifications, development of classification standards and guidelines, recommendations for changes to the salary plan, development of salary guidelines and procedures, and technical training of agency staff with responsibilities for classification and compensation activities. We continue to provide leadership, and expert advice and guidance to State personnel officers and managers in developing solutions to classification and compensation issues and problems.

We are a team that believes in accurate, open, honest and continuing communication with our customers and among ourselves. In our actions, we emphasize responsibility, integrity, fairness and sensitivity.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Agency requests for reclassification actions meet the needs of the agency and are completed in a timely fashion. Objective 1.1 Annually, at least 90 percent of reclassification actions will be completed within 45 days from the date requests are logged-in. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of actions completed within 45 days. 93.6% 95.3 % 95 % 95%

Goal 2. State agencies administer delegated classification and compensation functions under the State Personnel Management System consistent with OPSB guidelines. Objective 2.1 Reduce the number of agency exceptions in delegated classification and compensation functions by 2 percent during fiscal year 2004 (compared with fiscal year 2003). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent reduction in the number of agency exceptions in delegated classification functions 37% 60% 2% 2%

Goal 3. The salary system promotes recruitment and retention of a qualified State workforce. Objective 3.1 During each fiscal year, no more than 10 percent of the appointments to new and/or salary-adjusted classifications implemented as a result of the ASR will be above the mid-point of the salary scale. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of appointments to new and/or salary adjusted classifications implemented as a result of the ASR that are above the mid-point of the salary scale 9.9% * lo%**

Note: * No new classifications were implemented in the fiscal year 2003 ASR and fiscal year 2004 ASR. ** Funding is allowed for Fiscal Year2005 to increase salaries for classifications covering juvenile services counselors and direct care staff; assistant public defenders and related attorneys; assessors; public health lab scientists and related chemists; administrative law judges; financial examiners; and entry level classifications requiring a college degree.

I — 484 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.06 DIVISION OF SALARY ADMINISTRATION AND CLASSIFICATION-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

I — 485 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.07 DIVISION OF RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATION - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Recruitment and Examination evaluates applications, analyzes jobs, and creates appropriate testing instruments to provide a ranking system for placement of candidates on eligible lists; conducts tests at various sites throughout the State; and provides consultation, training, and technical assistance to agencies conducting selection processes for unique classifications.

MISSION

The Recruitment and Examination Division assists Maryland's State agencies by developing, or empowering them to establish interested pools of the best-qualified applicants for filling skilled and professional services vacancies. This accomplished by providing a variety of services for recruitment, examination, and selection. We share with State agencies our expert knowledge of recruitment and selection processes, understanding of legal and technical standards regarding recruitment and employee selection, and recent renovations and best practices in personnel selection. We add value by helping to staff Maryland State agencies so that they more effectively achieve missions, vision and goals that meet the needs and concerns of Maryland citizens.

The Recruitment and Examination Division supports the merit principles of open competition and communication, equal access, fairness, and customer service and compliance with relevant employment laws. We foster continuous improvement of selection methods and technology to deliver high quality services in a timely and cost effective manner.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Recruit candidates for the Skilled and Professional service with the capabilities to satisfactorily perform the essential work functions for positions used by State Agencies. Objective 1.1 Annually, at least 90 percent of individuals appointed to vacant positions under OPSB's classification system included in the Annual Salary Review (ASR) will have taken up-to-date examinations that reflect the work competencies currently required of these positions. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of individuals appointed to vacant positions under OPSB's classifications system for the ASR classifications who took up-to-date examinations. NIA* 90% 90% 90%

Fiscal year 2001 ASR Classifications: Core Clerical Fiscal Clerical Professional Fiscal Data Processing Operations Professional Social Workers

Note: * The fiscal year 2002 ASR was limited to a new job series for addictions counselors. All examination development activities for this job series are decentralized to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH). ** These data are reported for January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002. ***No formal examination is used for Professional Social Workers. These are "hard to recruit" classifications, and all applicants who meet the specific professional licensure requirements are certified to the Eligible List as Best Qualified. ****New ASR classifications for FY 2005 include: juvenile services counselors and direct care staff; assistant public defenders and related attorneys; assessors; public health lab scientists and related chemists; administrative law judges; financial examiners; and entry level classifications requiring a college degree.

I — 486 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.07 DIVISION OF RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATION - OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS (Continued)

Goal 2. State Agencies administer recruitment and examination activities under the State Personnel Management System consistent with OPSB guidelines. Objective 2.1 Annually, agencies perform a complete verification of minimum qualifications for at least 85 percent of skilled and professional appointments sampled. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of appointments sampled for which agencies performed a complete verification of minimum qualifications 86% N/A* 85% 85%

Note: * The audit for the fiscal year 2003 period from 7/1/02 through 12/31/02 is currently underway. All audits are completed at least six months after the specified timeframe to ensure the probationary period (at least six months in duration) has been fulfilled.

I — 487 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA02.07 DIVISION OF RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATION-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 488 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.08 STATEWIDE EXPENSES-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Program Description: This program contains statewide expenses that are later distributed to state agencies. The expenses may include cost of living adjustments, annual salary reviews, pay for performance reimbursements, state law enforcement officers death benefits, etc.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 489 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.10 STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Labor Relations Board is responsible for administering and enforcing the State's collective bargaining laws. The Board also establishes guidelines for creating new bargaining units; supervises the conduct of and resolves disputes regarding elections of the exclusive representatives; and investigates and takes appropriate action in response to complaints of unfair labor practices and lockouts.

I — 490 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A02.10 STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD-OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: R65GOO Higher Education Labor Relations Board ......

I — 491 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.01 STATE CHIEF OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Information Technology (OIT) administers major information technology funding and provides policy direction for information technology throughout the Executive Branch of State government. The OIT Executive Direction manages the Information Technology Investment Management, Contracts & Project Management, Security & Architecture, Application Systems Management, and Telecommunications divisions of the OIT, and the Department's Major Information Technology Development program. The State Chief Information Officer makes budgetary and priority recommendations to the Secretary and Governor; and plans the effective, comprehensive, and coordinated use of information technology (IT) to achieve State objectives.

The Office also administers the Major Information Technology Development Project Fund, which is a non-lapsing fund that enables State agencies to be more effective in their use of information technology. The Fund is used for two main purposes: (1) to fund State major IT development projects, and (2) to fund educationally related State information technology projects, application service provider initiatives, or other information technology projects such as pilots and prototypes.

MISSION

The Office of Information Technology provides technical leadership and guidance to all State agencies, consistent with the direction of the political process and fiscal responsibilities of a large public sector enterprise.

VISION

The Office of Information Technology will apply best business practice principles to evolve information technology systems, projects and contracts in order to assist all State agencies in improving constituent services and operational efficiencies.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The State Chief of Information Technology directs attainment of the goals, objectives and measures for all programs in the Office of Information Technology. The State Chief of Information Technology's key goals, objectives and measures are below.

Goal 1. Ensure successful information technology development projects in State agencies. Objective 1.1 Beginning in fiscal year 2003, all new, major IT development projects executed by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch are successful.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of new major IT development projects executed by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch that are successful. * 66.7% 80% 80%

Objective 1.2 Beginning in fiscal year 2004, all new, major IT development projects implemented by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch are compliant with the State's IT Security Policy and Standards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of new major IT development projects implemented by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch that are compliant with the State's IT Security Policy and Standards. * * 80% 80%

Note: *New measure for which data is not available.

I — 492 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.01 STATE CHIEF OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Continued)

Goal 3. Ensure statewide information technology infrastructure and core business systems managed by the Department are efficient and effective. Objective 3.1 Annually, infrastructure directly operated and maintained by the Telecommunications Division which support critical State business processes will experience no substantial disruptions during regular business hours.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: The number of substantial disruptions experienced during regular business hours to critical State business processes due to the unavailability of infrastructure directly maintained by the Telecommunications Division

I — 493 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 161.00 123.50 123.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 7 no 5.00 5.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferIReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

FlOA04.01 STATE CHIEF OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Reimbursable Fund Income: D38101 State Board of Elections ...... F10A04 DBM-Office of Information Technology ...... Total ......

I — 494 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.02 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT - DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Information Technology Investment Management (ITIM) manages the State's information technology investment portfolio from each project's inception through disposition, by providing oversight of major IT initiatives and by developing and promulgating statewide policy, standards and guidance for information technology.

MISSION

The IT Investment Management Division (ITIM) maximizes the benefit of information technology investments through a comprehensive program of selection, control, evaluation, project oversight and financial management. The ITIM Division partners with State Agency Chief Information Officers, IT project managers and other units of the Department of Budget & Management to help ensure the success of major IT projects.

VISION

Through the Division of IT Investment Management the State of Maryland will select major IT investments that are sound and accomplish business objectives successfully.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 2. Establish direction for the productive use of information technology by State agencies. Objective 2.1 During fiscal year 2004, develop a statewide Information Technology Master Plan (ITMP) for review and approval by Executive Branch management.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: The State IT Master Plan (ITMP) is developed by June 30, 2004 for review and approval by Executive Branch management (Yes/No). Yes

Note: * New measures for which data is not available

I — 495 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A04.02 DIVISION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

I — 496 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.03 APPLICATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT - DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Application Systems Management (ASM) Division designs, develops, implements, maintains, and operates a fully integrated statewide Financial Management Information System consisting of: accounting, budgeting, financial management, personnel, timekeeping, position control, purchasing, and fixed asset functions. This system will provide current, complete, and consistent information to assist policy makers, program executives, and financial managers in decision-making and accurate assessment of the financial position and results of operation of their respective agencies. In addition, ASM's Web Systems Unit oversees the management of MARYLAND.GOV, including maintenance and operations of the site and architecture, content management and administration, and customer service. This unit also participates in various aspects of design, development, integration and maintenance of DBM's web sites, various statewide web applications and systems. Examples of statewide web applications include the Central Collection Unit's CU Connect, Statewide Telephone Directory, Cellular Inventory, Professional Fiscal Class (PFC), IT Advisory Council (ITAC), and the IT Purchase Request (ITPR).

MISSION

The Application Systems Management (ASM) Division assists Maryland's policy makers, program, and financial managers by facilitating access to information to improve management, financial, and human resource decision-making. The systems maintained by ASM help Maryland agencies process administrative transactions in a timely and efficient manner in order to meet their business needs, statutory, and other requirements. Through the Portal, ASM benefits citizens, employees, businesses and visitors to the State by providing centralized access to information and services available via the web and efficiencies in the day-to-day business of State Government. To accomplish this mission ASM develops, implements, maintains, and operates automated management information systems and web technology to support statewide objectives and administrative processes.

VISION

ASM is committed to providing systems that meet the needs of the users, who are partners in determining system design and business requirements. The division strives to ensure that appropriate decision-makers have ready access to current, complete, and consistent information. ASM's systems promote the acquisition of accurate information. ASM is devoted to ready availability, open communication, and "user friendly" operations to provide services with professionalism and technical competence.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Establish direction for the productive use of information technology by State agencies. Objective 1.1 Beginning in FY2004, Maryland Portal utilization increases by at least 5% over the previous year for each of the next five years.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: The percent of change from the previous year's utilization of the Maryland Portal based on monthly average of unique visitors. ()yo*** 43% 10% 15%

Note: ***Baseline results were annualized from 6 months of data.

I — 497 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.03 APPLICATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT - DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Continued)

Goal 2. Ensure statewide information technology infrastructure and core business systems managed by the Department are efficient and effective Objective 2.1 Annually. there are two or fewer occurrences of substantial disruptions, due to technical issues, which occur during standard operating hours that affect ASM's automated management information systems which support critical statewide administrative processes.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of substantial disruptions, due to technical issues, occurring during standard operating hours affecting ASM's automated management information systems which support critical statewide administrative processes 1 0 0 0 Outcome: Percent of time ASM systems are available during standard operating hours 100% 100% 100% 100%

Objective 2.2 Beginning in fiscal year 2003, at least 65 percent of respondents to the annual ASM MFR survey of systems users "strongly agree" or "agree" or "acceptable" in rating the reliability and accuracy, ease of use and effectiveness of ASM systems.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of respondents to the ASM MFR survey who rate the availability and accuracy of ASM systems as "strongly agree" or "agree" or "acceptable" * 82% 82% 82%

Note: *New measure for which data is not available.

I — 498 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.03 DIVISION OF APPLICATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: Genera! Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10901 Transfer from Employees and Retirees' Health Insur- ance Non-Budgeted Accounts ...... F10906 Training Fees ...... Total ......

I — 499 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A04.04 DIVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division of Telecommunications is responsible for the State's telecommunications resources including voice, radio, video, and data services. The Division, in consultation with the Governor's Advisory Board for Telecommunication Relay, also administers the Telecommunications Access for Maryland program that provides cost-effective, unrestricted 24 hours a day, 365 days a year telecommunication relay service for Maryland's hearing and speech impaired citizens.

The Division also provides local area network support for the Department.

MISSION

The Division of Telecommunications promotes the use of efficient and effective communications solutions to improve government business processes, expand and simplify citizen access to services, and enhance the dissemination of appropriate information among and within government agencies, educational institutions and the citizenry.

VISION

The Telecommunications Division will provide a stable foundation for equitable and appropriate access to information, unconstrained by geography, supporting Maryland's government agencies, educational institutions and the citizenry.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure successful information technology development projects in State agencies. Objective 1.1 Annually, the Telecommunications Division will complete 80 percent or more of routine agency requests for service within 3 business days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: The annual percent of routine requests for service completed within 3 business days 91% 89% 90% 90%

Objective 1.2 Annually, ninety percent of calls coming into the dual party telephone relay service will adhere to the "Call Quality Standard" as established by the Federal Communications Commission.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: The annual percent of calls coming into the dual party telephone relay service that adhere to the "Call Quality Standard" established by Federal Communications Commission 86% 94% 90% 90%

Goal 2. Establish direction for the productive use of information technology by State agencies. Objective 2.1 Beginning in fiscal year 2005, ensure utilization of networkMaryland by all State agencies requesting transport or internet services through DBM OIT Telecom unless alternative connectivity is approved by State CIO.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of all State agency requests for transport or internet services through DBM OIT Telecom that were fulfilled by networkMaryland * 39% 60% 80%

Note: *New measure for which data is not available.

I — 500 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.04 DIVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Continued)

Goal 3. Ensure statewide information technology infrastructure and core business systems managed by the Department are efficient and effective. Objective 3.1 Annually, infrastructure directly operated and maintained by the Telecommunications Division that support critical State business processes will experience no substantial disruptions during regular business hours.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of substantial disruptions experienced during regular business hours to critical State business processes due to the unavailability of infrastructure directly maintained by the Telecommunications Division 0 0 0 0

I — 501 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.04 DIVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: F10306 Public Telephone Utilities ...... F10308 PBX User Fees ...... F10309 Network Maryland User Fees ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10905 Assessments for Telecommunications Expenses ....

I — 502 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.05 DIVISION OF CONTRACTS & PROJECT MANAGEMENT - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The program is responsible for supporting the DBM OIT in its purview of Information Technology (IT) projects and procurements. Services involve advising the DBM Procurement Unit, the Board of Public Works, and other executive branch agencies to ensure that IT procurement instruments such as Request For Proposals (RFPs), contracts, and Task Order Request For Proposals (TORFPs) meet optimal technical/contractual criteria.

MISSION

The Contracts & Project Management Division (CPMD) assists the executive branch agencies by providing advice about the quality of IT procurement solicitations and contracts with vendors. We mentor and train State agencies to improve their capacity to craft clear concise contracts. We manage statewide contracts for technical services and for computer products.

VISION

High quality IT procurement instruments provide the basis for IT solutions that effectively meet the business needs of the State.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure successful information technology development projects in State agencies. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, 75 percent of new IT contracts received by CPMD and have BPW approval will meet at least 85 percent of the criteria for a well documented and approved contract.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of new IT contracts evaluated by CPMD and approved by the BPW that meet at least 85 percent of the criteria for a well documented and approved contract * * 60% 75%

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2005,SO percent of new contracts that are a result of TORFPs and have CPMD approval will meet at least 90 percent of the criteria for a well documented and approved contract.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: The number of contracts as a result of TORFPs awarded by CPMD * * 22 22 Quality: Percent of TORFPs approved by CPMD that meet at least 90 percent of the criteria for a well documented and approved contract * * 20% 80%

Note: *New measure for which data is not available.

I — 503 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.05 DIVISION OF CONTRACTS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: F10A04 DBM-Office of Information Technology ......

I — 504 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

F10A04.07 DIVISION OF SECURITY AND ARCHITECTURE - OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Security and Architecture Division is responsible for developing, implementing and maintaining a statewide program for information technology security and enterprise architecture. Key stakeholders for this program are the Secretary, the Legislature, the Governor, agency business unit managers, and agency Chief Information Officers within the Executive and Constitutional agencies.

MISSION

The Security and Architecture Division provides the blueprint for effective and secure use of the State's information technology resources. The division provides a common framework and guidance to support the needs of the citizens with secure, consistent, interoperable, cost effective, and technically sound computer systems. The Security and Architecture Division partners with agency Chief Information Officers, IT Investment Management personnel, as well as State, local, federal, and private technology organizations to establish and maintain strong security and architectural design principles, innovative and cost effective strategies, policies and standards, guidance and education for information technology products and services statewide.

VISION

The Security and Architecture Division will be a leader in creating an integrated framework for State information technology resources, and how they can be applied most efficiently and securely to meet the business needs of the State.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure successful information technology development projects in State agencies. Objective 1.1 Beginning in fiscal year 2004, all new, major IT development projects implemented by non-exempt units of the Executive Branch are compliant with the State's IT Security Policy and Standards.

Goal 2. Establish direction for the productive use of information technology by State agencies. Objective 2.1 Develop and publish IT infrastructure standards by fiscal year 2006, and maintain the infrastructure standards thereafter.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: IT infrastructure standards are developed and published by July 1,2005 (YesINo) Yes

Note: *New measure for which data is not available.

I — 505 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA04.07 DIVISION OF SECURITY AND ARCHITECTURE-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Reimbursable Fund Income: MOOA01 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene ......

I — 506 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGMENT

FlOA05.01 OFFICE OF BUDGET ANALYSIS

MISSION

To allocate state resources in ways that provide the most benefits at the least cost to the citizens of the State.

The Office of Budget Analysis achieves this purpose by analyzing State programs, their expenditures, revenues, and performance; by recommending funding allocations to the Secretary of Budget and Management, State agencies, and the Governor; and by preparing a complete, balanced, and economical budget for the operations of State government in accord with both legal requirements and the Governor's priorities. The Governor presents this budget for the consideration of the General Assembly.

VISION

The Office of Budget Analysis (OBA) envisions a Maryland State budget process in which people trust the State budget process, knowing that it is fair, open, and professional and recognize OBA as the best source for answers, advice, assistance, and leadership regarding fiscal issues.

OBA envisions a State government that contributes to environmentally sound communities whose people are well-educated, healthy, safe, and gainfully employed.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND STRATEGIES

Goal 1. To improve State agencies' ability to achieve their strategic outcome goals. Objective 1.1 State agencies improve their performance annually as measured by an index of performance measures reported by state agencies and other sources. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Index of 30 outcome-related performance measures reported by state agencies and other sources 101 102 103 104

I — 507 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF BUDGET ANALYSIS

F10A05.01 BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORMULATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 508 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

FlOA06.01 CAPITAL BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORMULATION - OFFICE OF CAPITAL BUDGETING

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Capital Budgeting (OCB): develops the annual Capital Budget; prepares the five-year Capital Improvement Program; reviews all separate Bond Bills that are proposed to be undertaken with State funds; and strengthens master planning in other State agencies. MISSION

The Office of Capital Budgeting assists in the planning of facilities, that meet the needs of Maryland's citizens. We accomplish this mission by providing analytical, advisory, and technical services to the Governor, Department Secretary, State agencies, local governments and private organizations in the development of the annual capital budget and five-year capital improvement program. VISION

The State's capital investments enhance the ability of public and private organizations to provide their services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Completed capital projects meet the agency functional space needs identified in the facility programs given final approval by OCB. Objective 1.1 *Beginning with projects completed during fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004 and during each subsequent three fiscal year period, 90% of completed capital projects will meet agency functional space needs identified in the facility programs given final approval by OCB.

1998199 2000101 2002/03104 2005106107 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of completed capital projects that meet agency functional space needs identified in the facility programs given final approval by OCB 75% 87.5% 90% 90%

Note: *The surveys conducted during FY 01 and 03 covered 2-year periods (FY 98 and 99, and FY 00 and 01). Due to the low number of facilities that met the survey criteria for a 2-year interval, the survey will now be conducted every three years to ensure a sufficient number of projects that meet the survey criteria of being newly constructed or renovated, State-owned facilities occupied for one year, and costing over $5,000,000. The next survey will be conducted during FY 06 and will cover facilities completed during FY 02,03 and 04 that meet the survey criteria.

Goal 2. State-owned capital projects included in the capital budget are consistent with the principles of sound capital budget planning. Objective 2.1 Annually, 90% of State-owned capital projects included in the capital budget will be consistent with agency facilities master plans. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Actual Estimated Quality: Percent of State-owned capital projects consistent with agency facilities master plans 86% 85% 78% 90%

I — 509 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF CAPITAL BUDGETING

FlOA06.01 CAPITAL BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORMULATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 510 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

F50A01.01 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

Program Description: This program identifies a nonlapsing fund administered by the Office of Information Technology's State Chief Information Officer. The Fund was established on June 1, 2002, replacing the Information Technology Investment Fund. The Fund is used for two main purposes: (1) to fund State Major Information Technology Development Projects, and (2) to fund educationally related State Information Tech- nology projects, application service provider initiatives, or other Information Technology projects such as pilots and prototypes. The program is linked to the Managing for Results Goal 1, Objective 1, its measures and strategies in the Office of Information Technology, State CIO, and all Managing for Results goals, objectives, measures and strategies in the Office of Information Technology Information Technology Investment Management Division.

FISCAL YEAR 2004

Major Information Technology Development Project Fund Balance June 30, 2003 ...... 2004 Estimated Revenues ......

Adjustment to Revenue:

Transfer from Information Technology Investment Fund ...... Subtotal Revenues ......

Subtotal Available for Projects ......

2004 Estimated Revenue Transfers for Approved Projects:

2003 Carryover Obligations (see detail) ...... 2004 2004 Approved Transfers (see detail) ...... Subtotal Transfers ......

2004 Estimated Ending Balance ......

FISCAL YEAR 2005

2005 Estimated Beginning Balance ...... 2005 Estimated Revenues (see detail) ...... 2005 General Fund Allowance ...... Subtotal Available for Projects ......

2005 Transfers for FY 2004 Committments (see detail) ...... 2005 Estimated Transfers for Requested Projects (see detail) ......

2005 Estimated Ending Balance ......

I — 511 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

F50A01.01 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

2004 2005 Estimated Estimated

Projected Revenues-Special Funds Sale. Lease. or Exchange of Communication Sites or Communi- cation Frequencies ...... Commissions, Rebates, Refunds. Rate Reductions or Telecommu- nication Bypass ...... Payphone Commissions ...... Gifts, Contributions and Grants: Investment Interest ...... Total Special Fund Revenues ...... 3,453. 500 255, 000

FY 2004-Revenue Transfers for Approved Projects

2003 ITIF Commitments DHMH HIPAA Medicaid ...... DHMH HIPAA Non Medicaid ...... DHR Chessie - Lease Payments ...... Comptrollers Tax System (E-File) ...... DPSCS - NCIC 2000 Switch ......

2004 ApprovedIPending Projects Comptrollers Tax System (E-File) ...... DPSCS .NCIC 2000 Switch ...... DHMH - HIPAA Medicaid ...... DHMH - HIPAA Non Medicaid ...... DHMH - HIPAA HMIS ...... DHMH E-SAMIS ...... DHR - CHESSIE ...... MSP - Race-based Traffic Stops ...... Total ......

FY 2005-Requested Projects DHMH .Medicaid ...... DPSCS - Infrastructure Stabilization ...... DPSCS - Network LiveScan ...... DPSCS - NCIC 2000 ...... DHR - CHESSIE ...... DGS - Photo ID System ...... MSP - Race-based Traffic Stops ...... Total 2005 Estimated Revenue Transfers for Requested Projects ..

I — 512 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

F50A01.01 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Communication ...... Travel ...... 15.000 Contractual Services ...... 3.577. 100 Supplies and Materials ...... 500. 000 Equipment-Replacement ...... 100.000 Equipment-Additional ...... 1.985.485 Total Operating Expenses ...... 6,177.585 Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF302 Major Information Technology Development Project Fund ......

I — 513 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------flOaOl Office of the Secretary f10a0101 Executive Direction secy dept budget mgmt dep sec dept budget mgmt div dir ofc atty general prgm mgr senior iv administrator vii asst attorney general vi administrator v administrator iii administrator i budget analyst ii operating exec assoc iii exec assoc ii management assoc ---- TOTAL flOaOIOI* 17.00 f10a0102 Division of Finance and Administration prgm mgr senior ii 1.OO administrator vii 1.OO admin prog mgr ii 1.OO fiscal services administrator i 1.OO accountant, lead specialized 1.OO accountant ii 1.00 admin officer iii 1 .OO accountant i 1.00 accountant trainee 1.OO fiscal accounts technician i 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk manager 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk supervise .OO admin aide 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk ii 1.OO ------TOTAL fIOa0102* 13.00 647,432 12.00 624,241 12.00 634,685 f10a0103 Central Collection Unit asst attorney general viii 1.OO prgm mgr senior i 1.00 asst attorney general vi 2.00 prgm mgr ii 2.00 fiscal services administrator i 1 .OO dp functional analyst supervise 1.OO fiscal services administrator i 1.OO staff atty ii attorney genral 1.OO accountant supervisor i 1.OO

I — 514 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------f10a0103 Central Collection Unit computer network spec ii 55,027 staff atty i attorney general 42,898 administrator i 96,846 accountant ii 117,603 BPW2 admin officer iii 46,419 financial compliance auditor ii 44,670 admin officer ii 131,688 admin officer i 41,906 admin officer i 38,820 collection agent iv 42,307 collection agent iv 116,393 admin spec iii 38,513 admin spec iii 38,145 collection agent iii 413,172 admin spec ii 36,778 admin spec ii 62,055 collection agent ii 159,768 admin spec i 104,972 BPW4 collection agent i 303,258 BPW5 dp programmer 33,055 fiscal accounts technician supv 34,322 paralegal ii 83,708 BPWI paralegal ii 29,844 fiscal accounts technician ii 36,084 fiscal accounts technician ii 95,421 management assoc 41,504 admin aide 101,838 BPWI fiscal accounts clerk, lead 30,465 office secy iii 34,135 fiscal accounts clerk ii 284,959 BPW3 office secy i 46,192 BPWI office secy i 27,810 BPWI office services clerk 110,255 fiscal accounts clerk i 45,446 office clerk ii 47,515 office clerk i 176,924

f10a0104 Division of Policy Analysis prgm mgr senior ii 1 .OO 79,407 1 .OO 79,407 prgm mgr senior i 2.00 165,178 1 .OO 80,312 admin prog mgr iv 1.00 83,975 1 .OO 75,148 administrator v 1 .OO 68,415 1 .OO 68,415 administrator iv

I — 515 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

f10a0104 Division of Policy Analysis prgm analyst supv bdgt mgmt procurement analyst supv bdgt prgm analyst sr bdgt mgmt procurement analyst iii bdgt prg analyst iii bdgt & mgt prgm analyst iii bdgt mgmt procurement analyst ii bdgt m administrator i procurement analyst i bdgt mg admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer i admin spec ii admin aide - - - - - TOTAL fIOa0104* TOTAL f10a01 ** f10a02 Office of Personnel Services and Benefits f10a0201 Executive Direction exec vi i 1 .OO 121,301 prgm mgr senior iii 1 .OO 83,730 prgm mgr senior i 3.00 223,774 administrator vii 1 .OO 51,003 administrator v .OO 0 personnel administrator iv 1 .OO 1,655 personnel administrator ii 2.00 58,696 personnel administrator i 2.00 102,450 administrator i 1 .OO 23,332 registered nurse 1 .OO 48,441 admin officer ii 1 .OO 34,314 admin officer ii 1 .OO 41,044 admin spec iii 2.00 55,830 personnel associate ii 1 .OO 35,740 exec assoc i 1 .OO 44,314 obs-executive associate i 1 .OO 42,648 management associate .00 0 admin aide 1 .OO 35,740 office secy iii 1 .OO 28,271 ------TOTAL fIOa0201* 22.00 1,032,283 fIOa0202 Division of Employee Benefits prgm mgr senior iii 1 .OO 95,901 1 .OO 95,401 1 .OO 97,280 prgm mgr iv 2.00 146,041 2.00 146,041 2.00 148,906

I — 516 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------f10a0202 Division of Employee Benefits prgm mgr 1 administrator iii administrator iii corn hlth educator v financial compliance auditor pr personnel administrator ii accountant supervisor i personnel administrator i comm hlth educator iii financial compliance auditor, I admin officer iii admin officer iii financial compliance auditor ii personnel officer ii accountant i admin officer ii admin officer i admin officer i admin spec iii admin spec ii admin spec i fiscal accounts technician ii personnel associate ii personnel clerk office secy ii data entry operator ii office clerk ii office clerk i office clerk assistant

TOTAL fIOa0202* f10a0204 Division of Employee Relations prgm mgr senior i 1.00 prgm mgr 111 1.OO personnel analyst supv budget 1.00 personnel analyst adv/lead budg 1.00 administrator i 3.00 personnel analyst budget mgmt 4.00 admin officer ii 2.00 admin spec iii 1 .OO dp production control spec ii 1.OO personnel associate iii 4.00 personnel associate i 1.OO admin aide 3.00

I — 517 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------f10a0204 Division of Employee Relations services specialist 1.00 0 .OO 0 .OO 0 data entry operator ii 2.00 42,011 2.00 43,350 2.00 44, 162 ------TOTAL f10a0204* 26.00 1,053,999 24.00 1,055,483 24.00 1,071,434 f10a0205 Division of Employee Development and Training prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO 80,812 prgm mgr iii 1 .OO 70,322 prgm mgr i 1 .OO 65,282 personnel administrator i 1 .OO 55,027 administrator i 1 .OO 25,669 emp training spec iii 1 .OO 35,638 admin spec iii 1 .OO 38,880 office secy ii 1 .OO 27,020 ------TOTAL f10a0205* 8.00 398,650 f10a0206 Division of Salary Administration and Classification prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO 80,562 1 .OO 80,312 1 .OO 81,890 personnel administrator iv 2.00 134,950 2.00 134,200 2.00 135,516 personnel analyst supv budget 5.00 229,278 4.00 235,132 4.00 239,154 personnel analyst adv/lead budg 4.00 216,401 4.00 215,900 4.00 219,056 personnel analyst budget & mgmt 2.00 129,559 4.00 201,407 4.00 204,351 personnel officer ii 2.00 101,322 2.00 89,493 2.00 90,768 personnel officer i 2.00 87,338 1 .OO 43,472 1 .OO 44,314 personnel specialist iii 2.00 19,537 -00 0 .00 0 admin spec iii 1 .OO 37,923 1 .OO 37,423 1.00 38,145 office secy ii 2.00 43,211 1.00 31,992 1.00 32,298 ------TOTAL f10a0206* 23.00 1,080,081 20.00 1,069,331 20.00 1,085,492 f10a0207 Division of Recruitment and Examination prgm mgr senior 1 1.00 administrator iv 1 .OO personnel administrator ii 1 .OO personnel analyst supv budget & 6.00 personnel analyst adv/lead budg 2.00 personnel analyst budget & mgmt 12.00 admin officer ii 1.00 personnel officer i 1 .OO admin spec iii 1.00 personnel associate iii 1 .OO personnel technician iii .00 personnel associate ii 3.00 personnel technician ii 4.00

I — 518 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------f10a0207 Division of Recruitment and Examination personnel associate i 5.00 128,050 management associate 1 .OO 25,526 office secy ii .50 11,563 ------TOTAL f10a0207* 40.50 1,570,790 f10a0210 State Labor Relations Board asst attorney general vii 1.00 80,312 prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO 20,981 admin officer iii 1 .OO 0 admin officer i 1 .OO 0 ------TOTAL f10a0210* 4.00 101,293 3.00 TOTAL f10a02 ** 169.50 6,925,204 142.00 f10a04 Office of Information Technology f10a0401 State Chief of Information Technology chf information technology 1 .OO prgm mgr senior iv 2.00 administrator vi 1 .OO dp programmer analyst manager 1 .OO administrator i 1.00 data base spec i 1.00 exec assoc i 1 .OO admin aide 2.00

f10a0402 Division of Informaton Technology Investment Mgmt prgm mgr senior 11 1 .OO 0 dp asst director iii 2.00 127,239 prgm mgr iii 1 .OO 61,992 administrator v 1 .OO 68,415 administrator v 2.00 133,733 dp programmer analyst manager 1 .OO 31,195 administrator iii 1 .OO 27,063 prgm analyst sr bdgt mgmt 1 .OO 68,415 dp staff spec 1 .OO 0 administrator i .OO 0 admin officer iii 1 .OO 43,945 admin officer i 1 .OO 43,587 program analyst 2.00 0 ------TOTAL f10a0402* 15.00 605,584

I — 519 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

f10a0403 Division of Application Systems Management prgm mgr senior ii dp asst director iii dp asst director ii obs-data proc director ii data base spec manager dp asst director i dp programmer analyst manager dp technical support spec manag data base spec supervisor dp programmer analyst superviso dp programmer analyst superviso dp technical support spec super dp functional analyst superviso dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp quality assurance spec dp technical support spec ii dp functional analyst lead dp programmer analyst ii dp staff spec webmaster ii data base spec i dp functional analyst ii dp programmer analyst i dp functional analyst i dp programmer analyst trainee admin spec iii admin spec ii management associate admin aide

TOTAL fIOa0403* f10a0404 Division of Telecommunications asst dir state enterprise netwo 1.OO prgm mgr senior 11 1.OO dp asst director iv -00 dp asst director iii 2.00 administrator vi 1.OO dp asst director ii 1.OO prgm mgr i i i 2.00 administrator v 1.OO dp asst director i 1.OO dp programmer analyst manager 1.OO administrator iv 2.00 administrator iv 2.00

I — 520 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

f10a0404 Division of Telecomunications administrator iii 1 .OO administrator iii 1 .OO computer network spec mgr 1.00 prgm analyst sr bdgt mgmt .OO computer network spec supr 1 .OO dp programmer analyst supervise .OO computer network spec lead 2.00 dp quality assurance spec .OO administrator ii 1 .OO computer network spec ii 3.00 administrator i 1 .OO administrator i 3.00 computer network spec i 3.00 computer network spec i 1 .OO data base spec i 1.00 procurement analyst i bdgt & mg 1 .OO accountant ii 1 .OO admin officer iii 1 .OO computer network spec trainee 1 .OO admin officer i 3.00 admin spec iii 2.00 admin spec i 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk supervise 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk, lead 1 .OO office secy iii -50 fiscal accounts clerk ii 1.00 office services clerk .50 ------TOTAL f10a0404* 48.00 f10a0405 Division of Contracts and Project Management prgm mgr senior ii 1 .OO 79,407 -00 0 .OO 0 dp asst director iii 1 .OO 77,388 1 .OO 86,118 1 .OO 86,l 18 administrator vi 1 .OO 62,892 1 .OO 73,107 1 .OO 73,825 dp asst director ii 1 .OO 44,894 1 .OO 60,244 1 .OO 62,598 prgm mgr iii 1 .OO 0 .OO 0 .OO 0 administrator v 1 .OO 64,044 1.00 64,548 1 .OO 65,811 administrator v 2.00 65,720 2.00 120,923 2.00 124,226 dp programmer analyst manager 1 .OO 60,010 .OO 0 -00 0 administrator iii 3.00 0 .OO 0 .OO 0 asst dir contract off tele/lics 1 .OO 0 .OO 0 -00 0 ------TOTAL f10a0405* 13.00 454,355 6.00 404,940 6.00 412,578

I — 521 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

f10a0407 Division of Security and Architecture prgm mgr senior 11 1 .OO dp asst director iv 1 .OO dp asst director iii 1 .OO dp programmer analyst manager 1 .OO administrator lii 1 .OO dp programmer analyst ii 1 .OO systems engineer 1 .OO management associate 1 .OO ------TOTAL fIOa0407* 8.00 TOTAL f10a04 ** 161 .OO

f10a05 Office of Budget Analysis f10a0501 Budget Analysis and Formulation exec vii 1 .OO prgm mgr senior 11 2.00 prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO administrator vii 2.00 administrator iii .80 supv budget examiner 4.00 budget analyst iv operating 2.00 budget analyst iv operating 3.00 budget analyst iii operating 1 .OO budget analyst iii operating 2.00 budget analyst ii operating 3.00 budget analyst ii operating 2.00 dp functional analyst i 1 .OO budget analyst i operating .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO budget analyst trainee 1 .OO exec assoc i 1 .OO management associate .OO office secy iii 1 .OO

TOTAL fIOa0501* TOTAL f10a05 **

f10a06 Office of Capital Budgeting f10a0601 Capital Budget Analysis and Formulation exec vii 1 .OO 111,008 prgm mgr senior iii 1 .OO 86,538 supv budget examiner 3.00 225,429 budget analyst lead,capital pro 6.00 371,169 computer network spec supr 1 .OO 54,85 1 budget analyst iii, capital pro 2.00 116,441

I — 522 PERSONNEL DETAIL Budgetary and Personnel Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol . -. f10a06 Office of Capital Budgeting f10a0601 Capital Budget Analysis and Formulation computer network spec ii 1 .OO budget analyst ii,capital progr 1.OO computer info services spec i .OO obs-executive associate i 1.OO admin aide 1.OO office secy ii 1 .OO ------TOTAL f10a0601* 19.00 TOTAL f10a06 ** 19.00

I — 523

EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL

Board of Public Works Board of Public Works—Capital Appropriation Executive Department—Governor Office of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Office for Individuals with Disabilities Maryland Energy Administration Office for Children, Youth and Families Executive Department—Boards, Commissions and Offices Secretary of State Historic St. Mary’s City Commission Office for Smart Growth Interagency Committee for Public School Construction Maryland Department of Aging Commission on Human Relations Maryland Stadium Authority Maryland Food Center Authority State Board of Elections Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals Department of Planning Military Department Operations and Maintenance Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems Department of Veterans’ Affairs State Archives Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund Maryland Insurance Administration Canal Place Preservation and Development Authority Office of Administrative Hearings

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

MISSION

In order to protect and enhance the State's fiscal integrity, the Board of Public Works ensures that significant State expenditures are: necessary and appropriate, fiscally responsible, fair, and lawful. In reviewing and approving capital projects, procurement contracts, and the acquisition, use and transfer of State assets (including tidal wetlands), the Board assures: Maryland citizens, legislators, government contractors, bond-rating houses, and Federal funding partners that executive decisions are made responsibly and responsively. VISION

A State in which Maryland citizens are confident that government actions concerning the stewardship of State assets and the expenditure of General, Special, Federal, and General Obligation Bond funds are taken in a prudent, open and fiscally responsible manner. KEY GOALS

Goal 1. Ensure that the State's procurements are fairly conducted and are appropriate,

Goal 2. Protect the State's credit, and borrow and expend money prudently.

Goal 3. Ensure the judicious use of the State Public School Construction Program capital budget.

Goal 4. Ensure the judicious use of General Obligation Bond Funds.

Goal 5. Preserve and manage the State's wetlands.

Goal 6. Ensure that property transactions to which the State is a party are fair and appropriate.

I — 161 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

SUMMARY OF BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 9.00 9.00 9.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 641, 819 653,560 668,411 Technical and Special Fees ...... 19,232 16,300 19,500 Operating Expenses ...... 6,143,008 9,669,301 5,350,423 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 5,576,050 6,000,18 1 TransferReduction ...... -861, 000 -2,189, 764 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 4. 7 15.050 3.810. 417 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 35,991 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 4,679,059 3,810,417 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 2,125,000 6,528,744 Total Expenditure ...... 6,804,059 10,339,161

I — 162 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.01 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides administrative support to the Board of Public Works by scheduling Board meetings, preparing agendas and related materials, and maintaining Board minutes and records. Staff also: researches and advises Board members on a variety of subjects; reviews all procurements; investigates fraud, waste and abuse complaints; instructs agencies on best procurement practices; and facilitates interagency communication on procurement matters. See Sections 10-205, 12-102 State Finance and Procurement Article. MISSION

Provide administrative support to the Board of Public Works to ensure that Board actions are efficiently and wisely taken, and are accessible to the citizens of Maryland, and that Board policies are effectively communicated to and implemented by State agencies. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Enable the Board of Public Works to take efficient and wise actions by providing services that meet the standards expected by the Board, State agencies, and the public. Objective 1.1 Respond to members' requests for research and advice in a manner satisfactory to the members. Objective 1.2 Respond to research requests from government units and members of the public in a manner satisfactory to 95% of customers in 2005. Objective 1.3 In fiscal year 2005, conduct biweekly Board Meetings.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of satisfied inquirers * * 95% 95% Inputs: BPW meetings 22 24 23 23 BPW agenda items 205 1 1898 1950 1850

I — 163 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.01 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 164 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.02 CONTINGENT FUND

Program Description: Article 111, Section 32 of the State Constitution establishes a contingent fund that the Board of Public Works may allocate to supplement agencies' annual appropriations which may be insufficient for salaries and operating expenses during the fiscal year.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 236,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 236,000 Total Expenditure ...... 236,000

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 750,000 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... -514,000 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 236,000

I — 165 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.05 WETLANDS ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Any person seeking to dredge in or to place fill on State tidal wetlands must first secure a license from the Board of Public Works. The Wetlands Administration conducts public hearings, prepares written recommendations and issues licenses after approval by the Board. This program also coordinates State Wetlands licensing program with other government agencies, landowners and the general public. See Section 16-202 of the Environment Article.

MISSION

Preserve and manage the State's tidal wetlands for the benefit of citizens, now and in the future, by balancing the various ecological, economic, developmental, recreational, and aesthetic values of tidal wetlands activities.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide efficient recommendations to the Board of Public Works on applications for wetlands licenses and promptly issue licenses as approved by the Board. Objective 1.1 In fiscal year 2005 meet the Board's processing time of 30 days for wetlands licenses for at least 90% of the cases heard. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: License applications submitted to BPW 17 1 150 175 175 Outputs: Wetlands licenses approved 171 141 175 175 Quality: Average day to process a license (BPW) 24.5 22 30 30 Percent licenses processed (BPW) within 30 days 66% 90% 90% 90%

Goal 2. Provide administratively and environmentally sound recommendations to the Board of Public Works on applications for wetlands licenses. Objective 2.1 Strive to achieve the Board's concurrence on 95% of wetlands license recommendations presented in fiscal year 2005. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percentage of recommendations upheld 100% 100% 95 % 95 %

Objective 2.2 In cooperation with the Maryland Department of Environment, create at least 10 additional acres of vegetated tidal wetlands in fiscal year 2005 through the regulatory permitting process.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Acreage of tidal wetlands planted 7.22 6.73 10 10

I — 166 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.05 WETLANDS ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 167 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.10 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS TO PRIVATE NON-PROFIT GROUPS

Program Description: This program provides annual grants to private non-profit groups and sponsors that have statewide implication and merit State support

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators Maryland State Firemen's Association-Administrative ...... Maryland State Firemen's Association-Widows and Orphans Fund ...... Maryland State Firemen's Association-Emergency- Assistance Trust Account ...... Maryland State Firemen's Association-Low Interest Revolving Loan Account ...... Council of State Governments ...... Maryland Wing Civil Air Patrol ...... Historic Annapolis Foundation ...... Maryland Historical Trust ...... MD Agriculture Education and Rural Development Assistance Program ...... Regional Air Service Development Program ...... Connect Maryland (UMB Wellmobile Program) ...... Maryland-Israeli Visiting Fellowship Program (AIDSIHIV) ...... Total ...... * Transferred to Maryland Department of Agriculture in FY 2004. FY 2003 actual expenditures moved for comparison purposes.

Grant for TEDCO now located under T50T01.01

Grant for Connect Maryland now located in the Maryland Higher Education Commission budget.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: DO5301 Fire Truck Loan Fund ...... DO5303 Maryland Emergency Medical System Operations Fund ...... Total ......

I — 168 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.11 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Program Description: This program provides grants to local governments,

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators Baltimore City State's Attorney ......

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 1,000,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 1,000,000 Total Expenditure ...... 1,000,000

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1,000,000 Total Expenditure ...... 1,000,000

Special Fund Income: SWF307 Dedicated Purpose Fund ...... 1,000,000

I — 169 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

D05E01.15 PAYMENTS OF JUDGEMENTS AGAINST THE STATE

Program Description: This program contains funds appropriated to pay settlements or judgments against the State or any State personnel pursuant to Title 12, Subtitle 4 of the State Government Article.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure .,,.,,.,.,,.,.,,.~......

Net General Fund Expenditure ..,,,..~ ......

I — 170 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS-CAPTIAL APPROPRIATION

SUMMARY OF BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS-CAPTIAL APPROPRIATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Operating Expenses ...... 35,174,000 2.400.000 2.800.000 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 6,500,000 TransferReduction ...... -2,681,500 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

D06E02.01 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Program- Description: The Capital Appropriation provides operating funds for capital projects. Expenditures of these funds will be made in accordance with State Finance and Procurement Article Section 7-305.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators General Fund Allocation: Allegany County Fair-Multi-purpose Building (Allegany) ...... Allegany County Public Works Capital Equipment (Allegany) .... Allegany County Roads-Satellite Garage (Allegany) ...... Allegany Highlands Trail (Allegany) ...... Atlantic General Hospital (Worcester) ...... Baltimore City Circuit Court ...... Baltimore City Revitalization Projects (Baltimore City) ...... Bowie Regional Arts Visions Association (BRAVA) ...... Chesapeake Village Park (Baltimore) ...... Chelsea School (Montgomery)...... Colmar Community Center (Prince George's) ...... Doctors Community Hospital (Prince George's) ...... East Baltimore Biotechnology-Aquisition and Demolition ...... Foundation School (Prince George's) ...... Gateway Arts District (Prince George's) ...... Great Blacks in Wax Museum (Baltimore City) ...... Howard County Head Start Center (Howard) ...... Frederick Douglass-Isaac Myers Maritime Park (Baltimore City) Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health ...... Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Research Building ...... Kensington Community Center (Montgomery)...... Lane Kirkland Center for Labor and Economic Advancement- Meany Ctr (MC) ...... Link-Ages (Montgomery) ...... Liz Lerman Dance Exchange (Montgomery) ...... Montgomery County Family Services (Montgomery) ...... Maryland Hall for the Creative Arts (Anne Arundel) ...... MHEC-Community College Grant Program ...... MHEC-Cecil Community College-Elkton Center (Cecil) ...... MICUA-Private Higher Education Facilities ......

I — 171 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS-CAPTIAL APPROPRIATION

D06E02.01 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators National Federation for the Blind ...... National Trolley Museum (Montgomery) ...... Parole Plaza Improvements (Anne Arundel) ...... Patterson Park Community Development Corporation ...... Park Heights Golf Range and Family Sports Complex ...... Pyramid Atlantic-State for Electronic Media, Art and Applied Art ...... Rehabilitation Opportunities (Montgomery) ...... Ripken Stadium and Youth Baseball Academy ...... Rockville Science, Cultural and Business Resource Center (Montgomery) ...... Public School Construction Program-Solar Energy Pilot Program (Statewide) ...... Strathdale Manor Demolition (Baltimore City) ...... Suitland Manor Revitalization (Prince George's) ...... Takoma Park Community Learning Center (Montgomery) ...... TEDCO-Technology Development Investment Fund ...... Westernport Landfill Cap (Allegany) ...... Wheaton Multi-Purpose Youth Center (Montgomery) ...... YMCA of Central Maryland (Howard) ...... Accessibility Modifications for Individuals with Disabilities (Statewide) ...... Mosquito Laboratory-Department of Agriculture (Prince George's) ...... Annapolis Government Complex Security ...... Bowie State University-Science Building ...... USM-Bowie State University-Site Improvement (Prince George's) ...... CEES Aquaculture and Ecology Lab-HPEL ...... Coppin State College-Dining Facilities (Baltimore) ...... Coppin State College-Luthem Hospital AcquisitionDemolition .. CSC-Miles Connor Building Renovation ...... DHMH-Clifton T . Perkins Hospital-Rehabilitation Services Wing (Howard) ...... DHMH-Springfield Hospital Center-Electrical Distribution System (Carroll) ...... DJJ-Eastern Shore Detention Center (Wicomico) ...... DJJ-Western Maryland Dentention Center (Washington)...... DSP-Princess Anne Barracks and Garage/Communications Building (Somerset) ...... Eastern Shore Higher Education ...... FSU-Gunter Hall ...... FSU-New Compton Science Center ...... USM Headquarters-Hagerstown Educational Center ...... High Speed Data Network (Network.MD) ...... Legislative Facilities (Anne Arundel) ...... USM-Maryland Fire and Rescue Institute-Sonthem Maryland Reg Training Ctr ...... Morgan State University-Northwood Property Aquisition ...... MSU-Science Research Building with Greenhouse ...... Public Safety Communications ...... Southern Maryland Higher Ed Classroom Building #2 ...... CSC-Telecommunications Upgrade ...... St . Mary's College of Maryland-Calvert Hall Hazard Remedi- ation (St . Mary's) ...... St . Mary's-New Academic Building ...... St . Mary's-New Student Services Building ...... St . Mary's College-Somerset Hall Expansion ...... DSP-State Police Crime Laboratory (Baltimore) ...... Towson University-7800 York Road ...... Towson University-Fine Arts Building ...... Towson University-Regional Sports Complex ......

I — 172 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS-CAPTIAL APPROPRIATION

D06E02.01 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators University of Baltimore-Charles Hall ...... UMBI-CARB I1 Building ...... University of Maryland ChemistryIPhysics Building ...... University of Maryland Dental School ...... University of Maryland Health Sciences Facility ...... University of Maryland Baltimore County-ITtEngineering Facility ...... University of Maryland Baltimore County-New Public Policy Institute ...... UMCP-Chemistry Teaching Building ...... UMCP-MFRI-New Headquarters ...... UMES-Food Science and Technology Center (Somerset)...... UMES-Physical PlantICentral Receiving Building ...... UMES-Social Science and Health Education Bldg ...... University of Maryland Eastern Shore-Waters and Somerset Halls ...... USM-University of Baltimore-Law School and Thurgood Marshall Law Library ...... USM-Shady Grove Educational Center 111 (Mongomery) ...... USM-Salisbury State University-New Science Building ...... Total ......

*Amounts as amended by Senate Bill 323, the Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act of 2002

I — 173 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS-CAPTIAL APPROPRIATION

D06E02.01 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 14 Land and Structures...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF307 Dedicated Purpose Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 16.007 State and Local Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program ......

D06E02.02 PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Program Description: The Capital Appropriation provides operating funds for capital projects for Public School Construction. Expenditures of these funds will be made in accordance with State Finance and Procurement Article Section 7-305.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: DO6301 Ravens School Construction Payment ......

Federal Fund Income: 84.352 School Renovation, IDEA, and Technology Grants Program ......

I — 174 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - GOVERNOR

DlOA01.01 GENERAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND CONTROL

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The executive power of the State is vested in the Governor, who, as Chief Executive, exercises supervision over the agencies of the Executive Branch. Annually, he presents his work program and financial requirements for the ensuing year to the Legislature in the annual budget and reports to the Legislature upon the condition of the State. There is also a Lieutenant Governor, whose duties are delegated by the Governor. MISSION

To provide executive oversight, guidance and coordination to the various State agencies and to provide the public with information about the Governor's policies, his goals and core functions, and the functions of State government generally. Core values and guiding principals include uncompromising attention to a broad range of citizen services and a commitment to moving the State forward through the use of technology.

VISION

A State with efficient and effective government that provides excellent services to its citizens.

KEY GOALS

Goal 1. Fiscal Responsibility

Goal 2. Education

Goal 3. Health and the Environment

Goal 4. Public Safety and Safer Neighborhoods

Goal 5. Commerce

I — 175 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT-GOVERNOR

DlOA01.01 GENERAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND CONTROL

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF307 Dedicated Purpose Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance

I — 176 OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

DllA04.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (ODHH) advocates for and promotes the general welfare of individuals in Maryland who are deaf or hard of hearing. Under the authorizing statute, Chapter 537 of the Acts of the 2001 General Assembly, the specific responsibilities of the office include the following services for deaf and hard of hearing individuals: (1) providing, advocating and coordinating the adoption of public policies, regulations and programs; (2) improving access to communication and to existing services and programs; (3) providing direct services as appropriate; (4) increasing public awareness of the needs and issues affecting deaf and hard of hearing individuals; (5) working with State and local agencies to ensure access to safety and emergency services, including the acquisition and distribution of visual smoke detectors; (6) developing a referral service; (7) serving as an information clearinghouse on the needs and issues affecting deaf and hard of hearing individuals; (8) working to increase access to educational, health and social opportunities; (9) working with private organizations, the federal government and other units of State government to promote economic development; (10) working to eliminate underemployment and unemployment; (1 1) providing a network through which services provided by State and federal programs can be channeled; and (12) promoting compliance with State, local and federal laws and policies protecting and serving deaf and hard of hearing individuals.

VISION

All Maryland citizens who are deaf or hard of hearing will have equal and full access to resources, services and opportunities for participation in all aspects of community life through the provision of appropriate accommodations.

MISSION

The Office of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing exists to provide expertise related to deaf and hard of hearing issues to Maryland citizens and to facilitate their ability to access resources and services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To help facilitate the appropriate delivery of state, local and other public services to deaf and hard of hearing individuals. Objective 1.1 Work with state and local agencies to ensure access for deaf and hard of hearing individuals to safety and emergency services, including the acquisition and distribution of visual smoke detectors, as well as to increase awareness of emergency preparedness for individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing.

2004 2005 Performance Measures Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of plans developed 1 3 Number of trainings 2 6 Number of applications for visual smoke detectors received 16 17

Goal 2. Improve access to information and to existing services and programs for deaf and hard of hearing individuals. Objective 2.1 Increase awareness of ODHH activities and maintain communication with the community through regular meetings and workshops and the use of group e-mails, flyers and publications.

2004 2005 Performance Measures Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of meetings and workshops 8 10 Number of participants 120 240 Number of contacts 1,100 1,300

Since this is a new office, data for it's performance measures are not available for periods prior to FY2004.

I — 177 OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

D11A04.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION (Continued)

Objective 2.2 Encourage state, county and local governments to include deaf and hard of hearing individuals on their advisory and policy-making boards, commissions and committees.

2004 2005 Performance Measures Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of advisory and policy-making entities with 5 10 deaf and hard of hearing representatives

Note: * New measure for which data is not available.

I — 178 OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

D11A04.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 179 OFFICE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

D12A02.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Governor's Office for Individuals with Disabilities (OID) provides information on programs and services for Maryland citizens with disabilities, identifies and works to fill gaps in services, coordinates and supports public and private agencies serving individuals with disabilities, monitors and encourages State government compliance with laws and policies that affect persons with disabilities, and recommends capital projects to improve access at State-owned facilities.

VISION

The Governor's Office for Individuals with Disabilities envisions Maryland as a state where all citizens have full access to the resources, services and opportunities for participation in all aspects of community life through the provision of appropriate information, referral, assistance, accommodations and supports.

MISSION

The Governor's Office for Individuals with Disabilities exists to provide disability-related expertise and support to Maryland citizens; to facilitate their ability to access resources, information and services; and to provide informationlexpertise regarding law and State compliance issues. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To raise awareness of information and resources available to individuals with disabilities. Objective 1.1 To provide advocacy via training, presentations and direct intervention and representation on task forces, committees and related groups.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of people at training 4,635 2,531 3,185 3,185 Number trained by Technical Assistance Program 2,200 97 8 1,245 1,245 Number of Youth Leadership Forum attendees 26 27 27 30 Number of Governor's Committee on Employing People with Disabilities annual conference attendees Number of State Americans with Disabilities Act training attendees Other trainings

Objective 1.3 To increase by at least 10% the number of businesses and individuals participating in the Disability Access Card Program.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of businesses participating 105 156 132 200 Number of individuals participating 427 503 575 65 0

I — 180 OFFICE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

D12A02.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. To identify and remove barriers that negatively impact the quality of life for people with disabilities. Objective 2.1 To improve the quality of physical access on an annual basis at state facilities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of projects in design stage (initiation stage) 6 10 7 7 Number of projects in construction stage 25 18 25 25 Number of projects completed 24 14 30 30 Outcomes: Number of state facilities with increased access 64 30 40 40

Note: Some projects are multiyear

Objective 2.3 To increase independence for people with disabilities through loans for the acquisition of assistive technology.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Amount of loan program funding $1,148,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Output: Number of loans awarded 102 151 155 160 Outcomes: Number of loans defaulted on 2 3 6 10 Number of persons with increased independence because they have fully repaid their loan

Objective 2.4 To identify and increase funding for State programs serving people with disabilities in Maryland.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of grant proposals submitted 7 7 8 8 Outputs: Number of grant proposals funded 6 7 7 7 Amount of funding acquired (some are multiyear grants)

Goal 3. To create a climate in which meaningful employment opportunities exist for people with disabilities. Objective 3.1 To increase by 25% on an annual basis the number of employers who are members of the state or regional Business Leadership Networks (BLN), which are networks of employers interested in hiring individuals with disabilities. The State BLN and regional BLN's are staffed by the Governor's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Members of BLN 145 175 250 300 Number of regional BLN's 5 6 7 7

I — 181 OFFICE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

D12A02.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl2304 Assistive Technology Guaranteed Loan Fund Interest ......

Federal Fund Income: 84.224 Assistive Technology ...... 93.630 Developmental Disabilities Basic Support and Advocacy Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: MOOF02 DHMH-Community Health Administration ...... 53. 650 NOOC01 DHR-Community Services Administration ...... 70.000 ROOA01 State Department of Education-Headquarters ...... -5. 000 12.000 Total ...... 65. 000 65. 650

I — 182 MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 183 MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

D13A13.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Energy Administration (MEA) manages the State's Energy Performance Contracting Program and the State Agency Loan Program, which help reduce energy consumption in State facilities and operations. MEA also manages programs that encourage the use of renewable energy resources and promote energy efficiency in the industrial, commercial and residential sectors. MEA's alternative fuel vehicles programs work to develop the infrastructure to support alternative fuel vehicles while encouraging the use of alternative fuel vehicles in the public and private sectors. MEA advises the Governor's Office on energy policy and managing energy disruptions and emergencies.

MISSION

The mission of the Maryland Energy Administration is to develop resources and policies that will maximize energy conservation through increased efficiency and use of renewable resources, thereby promoting economic development, protecting Maryland energy supplies and improving the environment.

VISION

Our vision is a State in which all sectors, State and local government, business, industry, and citizens maximize energy efficiency and the use of renewable resources, thereby reducing costs, increasing profitability, and minimizing environmental impacts. Reliable and affordable energy is important for maximum productivity, efficient operation of government, and enhanced quality of life, such as home, workplace, and school building comfort, and travel opportunity, while maintaining the quality of our air and water-especially of the Chesapeake Bay.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Increase energy efficiency and reduce the cost of State government. Objective 1.1 The State shall reduce energy consumption in State facilities by 10% by 2005 and 15% by June 30, 2010 relative to 2000 baseline. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total value of energy improvements financed through energy performance contracts ($ millions) $37.5 $56.7 $58.2 $65.2 Outputs: Number of energy projects and phase one awards for energy performance contracts initiated 3 5 5 6 MEA funding loaned to State agencies for energy projects $1,000,000 $935,910 $900,000 $1,500,000 Outcomes: Annual energy savings from all completed energy performance contracts and loans (million British Thermal Units or BTUs) 357,900 609,000 611,000 685,000 Estimated total energy savings in State facilities compared to a 2000 baseline (million BTUs) 300,000 * * * Annual savings from State energy performance contracts ($ millions) $5.4 $6.8 $6.8 $7.4 Reduction in energy use relative to 2000 baseline (%) 4% * * * Reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions (combined tons) 855 1,487 1,492 1,686

I — 184 MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

D13A13.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. To fulfill our role as a federally funded State Energy Office providing resources and assistance to individuals, businesses, local governments and non-profit organizations for the use of renewable energy, clean energy technologies, and energy efficiency. Objective 2.1 To save or displace 450,000 million BTUs of fossil fuel energy annually in local government, schools and the residential, commercial and industrial sectors by June 30, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of renewable energy projects completed (including solar, wind & biomass projects in all sectors -additive) 49 56 70 82 Outcomes: Annual energy savings from energy projects completed since FY 2000, excluding State facilities (million BTUs) 126,178 233,438 383,000 490,000 Reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions (combined tons) 301 558 915 1,168

Goal 3. Support the use of alternative fuels and the development of advanced transportation technologies. Objective 3.1 By 2005, have 11,000 alternative fuel vehicles (AFV) and energy efficient vehicles in use Statewide.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: New AFV purchases by public and private organizations * 286 438 300 New AFV refueling stations installed 3 2 5 4 New hybrid-electric vehicles purchased in the State * * 1,000 1,200 Outcomes: Number of AFVs registered in the State 5,930 6,216 6,68 1 7,013 Number of hybrid-electric vehicles registered in the State * 2,109 3,109 4,309

Note: * Data not available.

I — 185 MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

D13A13.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl3301 Community Energy Loan Program (CELP) ...... Dl3302 Energy Overcharge Restitution Trust Fund (EORTF) ...... Dl3303 Environmental Trust Funds ...... Dl3304 State Agency Loan Program (SALP) ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: AA.D13 Coalition of Northeast Governors ...... 81.041 State Energy Conservation ...... 81.084 Minority Honors Training and Industrial Assist- ance Program ...... 81.090 State Heating Oil and Propane Program ...... 8 1.117 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Infor- mation Dissemination, Outreach. Training and Technical Analysis/Asistance ...... 81.119 State Energy Program Special Projects ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: KOOA01 Department of Natural Resources ......

I — 186 MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

D13A13.02 COMMUNITY ENERGY LOAN PROGRAM-CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Program Description: The Community Energy Loan Program (CELP) is a self-sustaining program which provides financial assistance in the form of loans to schools, local governments, and non-profit organizations. Loans made through these programs are for the purpose of making energy conservation improvements.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... 1,000,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 1,000,000 Total Expenditure ...... 1,000,000

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1,000,000

Special Fund Income: Dl3301 Community Energy Loan Program (CELP) ...... 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000

D13A13.03 STATE AGENCY LOAN PROGRAM-CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Program Description: The State Agency Program Loan Program (SALP) is a self-sustaining program which provides financial assistance in the form of loans to state agencies. Loans made through these programs are for the purpose of making energy conservation improvements.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... 965.910 Total Operating Expenses ...... 965,910 Total Expenditure ...... 965,910

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 965,910

Special Fund Income: Dl3304 State Agency Loan Program (SALP) ......

I — 187 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN. YOUTH AND FAMILIES

D14A14.01 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office for Children, Youth and Families (OCYF) serves as the Governor's advocate for the health, safety, education and well-being of all Maryland's children and youth. OCYF supports the development of policies and programs that will result in safe, stable and self-sufficient families, through a comprehensive, coordinated, and interagency effort, in partnership with families and communities. Under the direction of the Special Secretary for Children, Youth and Families, OCYF plays several roles, including partner, catalyst, facilitator and collaborator, in promoting child-centered, family focused and culturally-competent services. OCYF encourages the development of prevention and early intervention services in the community while also addressing the needs of Maryland's most vulnerable children and families.

MISSION

Like many states, Maryland delivers services for children and families across numerous state and local agencies. The Governor's Office for Children, Youth and Families supports the Special Secretary in leading the Subcabinet to coordinate policy development and the delivery of services for Maryland's children and families. This approach ensures a seamless, interagency service system addressing the individualized needs of each child and family, emphasizing prevention, early intervention and community- based services.

VISION Maryland's children and families will thrive in their homes and communities.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Promote and support local jurisdictions in their efforts to meet the needs of their communities Objective 1. Improve delivery of technical assistance to Local Management Boards Objective 2. Improve communication and access between LMB's and OCYF Objective 3: Review current monitoring methods and make changes where necessary

Goal 2. Provide support to interagency initiatives, councils and commissions Objective 1. Home VisitingEIealthy Families: Merge the oversight of these previously separate initiatives. Objective 2. Governor's Council on Adolescent Pregnancy: Reduce incidence of teen pregnancy Objective 3. Maryland School-Based Health Center Policy Advisory Council: Continue to develop this initiative Objective 4. State Commission on Infant Mortality Prevention: Increase the percentage of babies born healthy. Objective 5. Children's Trust Fund: Provide funding for innovative child abuse prevention programs Objective 6. State Council on Child Abuse and Neglect: Review the extent to which state and local agencies effectively discharge their child protection responsibilities. Objective 7. State Coordinating Council for Children: Review and monitor children leaving the State for services due to special needs. Objective 8. Convene and chair the Governor's Council on Custody Relinquishment.

Goal 3. Implement a mechanism for locating and maximizing available resources from all sources (including federal moneys and private third party reimbursement) to be used for innovative, interagency funding of initiatives and programs for children, youth and families Objective 1. Review availability of funds under Title IV E Objective 2. Review availability of Medicare reimbursement Objective 3. Designate a staff position within OCYF to be responsible for research of available funding sources to support programs for children, youth and families

Goal 4. Work with members of the Subcabinet to provide training and services where gaps currently exist in the continuum of care to children and families Objective 1. Address reporting and investigation of child abuse in institutional setting Objective 2. Support families with intensive-needs children in functioning better in their communities

I — 188 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN. YOUTH AND FAMILIES

D14A14.01 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES

Objective 3 Strengthen investigation of non-institutional child abuse by communicating more effectively with young children Objective 4 Assist DJS in correcting issues at juvenile facilities that have emerged over past years

Goal 5. Develop and standardize resources and data collection across agencies Objective 1 Continue development of Subcabinet for Children, Youth and Families Information System (SCYFIS). Objective 2 Explore the use of SCYFIS across agencies for standardized and cross-agency case management. Objective 3. Improve use of collected data to better target service delivery.

Additional goals, objectives, and performance measures pertinent to the work of the Office and to Maryland's Results for Child Well-Being can be found in Program ROOA04.01, Maryland Subcabinet for Children, Youth, and Families in the Maryland State Department of Education.

I — 189 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN. YOUTH AND FAMILIES

D14A14.01 OFFICE FOR CHILDREN. YOUTH AND FAMILIES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl4301 Conference Fees .Child Abuse ...... Dl4302 Conference Fees .GCAP ...... Dl4303 Anne E . Casey Foundation ...... Dl4306 Children's Trust Fund ...... Dl4308 Campaign for Our Children (CFOC) Royalty Pre- miums ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ...... 93.600 Head Start ...... 93.643 Children's Justice Grants to States ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ...... MOOF02 DHMH-Community Health Administration ...... NOOBOO DHR-Social Services Administration ...... ROOA02 Aid to Education ...... ROOA04 Subcabinet Fund ...... VOOD01 Department of Juvenile Services ...... Total ......

I — 190 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.01 SURVEY COMMISSIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Survey Commission program provides funds for special commissions appointed to investigate and make recommendations concerning problems affecting the administration and welfare of the State, as well as other on-going non- departmental programs. The following commissions were active during the most recently completed fiscal year.

Survey Commission Authorization Fiscal Year 2003 Expenditures

Commission on State Debt Chap. 43, Acts of 1978 Executive Department TechnologyIAffiliated Initiatives Judicial Nominating Commission Executive Order 01.01.1999.08 Southern Regional Education Board Chap. 282, Acts of 1949 State Publications Depository Joint Resolution

TOTAL $81,910

I — 191 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 79.00 81 .00 81.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 21.90 19.40 16.50 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 4.468.384 4.477. 27 1 5.400. 994 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1.922. 357 1.392.509 1.3683 13. Operating Expenses ...... 53.853.837 41.865. 720 39.494.435 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 10.798.015 10.318. 131 Transfer/Reduction ...... -698. 598 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 10.798. 015 9.619. 533 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 742. 503 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 10.055.512 9.619.533 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1.829. 684 2.035. 727 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 47.042. 126 35.564. 738 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 1. 3 17.256 515. 502 Total Expenditure ...... 60.244. 578 47.735. 500

D15A05.01 SURVEY COMMISSIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 192 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.03 OFFICE OF MINORITY AFFAIRS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Governor's Office of Minority Affairs (OMA) promotes and coordinates the plans, programs, and operations of State government that promote or otherwise affect the establishment, preservation, and strengthening of minority business enterprises as well as evaluates the impact of public issues and government-sponsored programs on minority communities, and advises the Governor on methods for providing positive impact and greater benefits to minority communities.

MISSION

To facilitate Maryland's Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) activities through the coordination and promotion of government programs aimed at strengthening and preserving minority business firms. The Governor's Office of Minority Affairs is responsible for providing the managerial and organizational framework for units of State government to plan and carry out projects that are intended to overcome the special problems of minority business enterprise initiatives. This office also encourages the private sector and local municipalities to aggressively pursue minority businesses. In addition, the Governor's Office of Minority Affairs advises the Governor on key issues affecting minority citizens including employment, education, health and other such matters.

VISION

To achieve a marketplace where minority-owned firms will not be subject to discrimination and where these businesses will get a fair share of private and public contracts.

I — 193 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.03 OFFICE OF MINORITY AFFAIRS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 194 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.05 OFFICE OF SERVICE AND VOLUNTEERISM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Executive Order 01.01.1998.08 established the Governor's Office on Service and Volunteerism (GOSV) by merging the Governor's Office on Volunteerism and the Governor's Commission on Service. The merger consolidated the coordination of service and volunteer efforts on the State level, including connecting volunteers across the State with the State's national service initiatives through a unified State plan and public recognition of citizen service. The GOSV, along with the Governor's Commission on Service and Volunteerism, administers two major federal grants (AmeriCorps, and Learn and Serve America, for community-based organizations) and supports new or expanded volunteer centers across Maryland. The Office provides low or no-cost training and technical assistance to the volunteer service field and serves as a clearinghouse for information, research, best practices, analyses of legislation, policies, plans and programs related to engaging citizens in strengthening communities by meeting pressing unmet local needs.

MISSION

The mission of the GOSV is to create, promote and support service and volunteer efforts that engage Marylanders in strengthening communities by meeting unmet local needs. The office staffs the Governor's Commission on Service and Volunteerism, which serves as an advisory body to the Governor and Lieutenant Governor on volunteer service and is responsible for ensuring the oversight of and a fair and open process for the distribution of Federal funds to address State priorities.

VISION

All Marylanders are committed to a life-long ethic of volunteer service and give back to their communities.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Create volunteer service opportunities to address unmet needs and enhance the quality of life in Maryland. Objective 1.1 Continue to develop a network of sustainable volunteer centers to serve communities across Maryland. Objective 1.2 Deploy available funding to engage volunteers and national service participants to address State and local priorities in the areas of child and family well-being, safe and caring communities, environmental protection, quality education, emergency preparedness and homeland security. Objective 1.3 Support volunteer generation to meet the needs of government, non-profit and faith-based organizations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Dollars granted to community based organizations AmeriCorps Learn & Serve Volunteer Centers Youth Leadership Disability Total Dollars granted to child-serving agencies by the GOSV Input: Ratio of dollars leveraged State Federal Ratio Quality: Maryland's national ranking in dollars awarded in competitive AmeriCorps grants per capita #5 of51 Top 10of51 Top 1Oof 51

I — 195 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.05 OFFICE OF SERVICE AND VOLUNTEERISM (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of AmeriCorps members and service hours, and volunteers generated by AmeriCorps programs Members 487 46 1 424 424 Hours 489,000 473,095 500,000 500,000 Volunteers generated 20,000 13,725 7,000 7,000 Number of Volunteer Centers in Maryland performing all 4 of the core competences of Volunteer Centers as outlined by the Points of Light Foundation 8 12 14 14

Goal 2. Promote volunteer service as a strategy to address unmet needs in Maryland. Objective 2.1 Increase the number of Marylanders recognized for their volunteer service efforts by 10% annually. Objective 2.2 Invite 100,000 Marylanders per year to volunteer in their communities through targeted marketing efforts.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Ratio of private match funding generated Match generated $6,392,903 $5,550,665 $2,582,962 $2,699,593 Ratio: Grant dollars to Match dollars 1:1.07 1:1.08 1:l.l 1:1.21 Outcome: Marylanders recognized for volunteer efforts (awards, certificates, State Fair passes, citations) 135,000 190,000 240,000 240,000

Goal 3. Support organizations to develop and operate high quality volunteer service programs. Objective 3.1 At least 75% of surveyed organizations trained per year will identify an increase in their capacity to effectively manage volunteers in their operations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of people trained by GOSV 1,000 2,944 2,500 2,000 Outcome: Percentage of individuals surveyed reporting increased skills as a result of training

I — 196 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.05 OFFICE OF SERVICE AND VOLUNTEERISM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl5303 Site Matching Funds ......

Federal Fund Income: 94.003 State Commissions ...... 94.004 Learn and Serve America-School and Commu- nity Based Programs ...... 94.006 AmeriCorps ...... 94.007 Planning and Program Development Grants ...... 94.009 Training and Technical Assistance ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 197 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.06 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Title 15 of the State Government Article establishes the State Ethics Commission. The Commission administers the Maryland Public Ethics Law, which primarily includes disclosure and standards of conduct programs covering officials, employees and regulated lobbyists. It renders advisory opinions concerning the law's application, investigates complaints, receives and reviews financial disclosure statements and lobbyist registration and activity reports. The Commission assists and monitors the activity of local governments in implementing local public ethics laws by setting minimum standards for local laws and approving the content of those laws. The Commission also provides information to the general public and training and education to those covered by the law's requirements. MISSION

To carry out legislative mandates and policy in support of the public interest in having Maryland's government and its lobbyists conform to established standards of ethical conduct and disclosure.

VISION

A State in which government decisions, operations, and services are carried out consistent with high ethical standards.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Support public trust in its officials and employees and help assure the public that impartiality and independent judgment of officials is maintained, using public disclosure, training and related information. Objective 1.1 Ensure that officials' and lobbyists' statutory disclosure filing requirements are met by accurately identifying those required to file, distributing forms, reviewing forms and conducting follow-up activities resulting in timely and complete filing of forms. Make these forms accessible for public inspection consistent with statutory requirements. Increase the number of financial disclosure forms given detailed review and continue to maintain 100% detailed desk review of lobbyist filings.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Financial disclosure forms filed 10,888 11,634 1 1,750 12,000 Time of appointment exemption forms filed 145 299 235 250 Output: Financial disclosure forms reviewed 432 1,000 2,000 2,500 Lobbyist registrations filed and reviewed 2,282 2,303 2,500 2,600 Lobbyist activity reports filed and reviewed 3,924 4,333 4,700 4,850

Objective 1.2 Develop and distribute information through the Internet or other means to explain Ethics Law requirements to officials, employees, regulated lobbyists and others impacted by the Public Ethics Law. Maintain current publications and Internet services and increase employees' training programs. Provide two hours of mandated ethics training to all new public officials within six months of their entering State service. Provide mandated initial and continuing training to regulated lobbyists.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Officials receiving mandatory training 559 575 500 5 25 Lobbyists receiving mandatory training 350 370 350 375

I — 198 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.06 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION (Continued)

Goal 2. To prevent the conduct of State business from being subject to improper influence and avoid, to the extent reasonably possible, the appearance of improper influence through fair but rigorous application of the Public Ethics Law. Objective 2.1 Provide accurate and timely advice to those subject to the requirements of the Ethics Law. Provide all advice within the 60-day statutory period, unless waived by the requestor.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Formal advisory opinions issued 4 2 2 2 Input: Commission informal ethics advice issued 150 274 275 260

Objective 2.2 Maintain a system to issue complaints and process complaints and other investigative or enforcement activities consistent with the requirements of the Public Ethics Law. Complete all complaint matters within 12 months of initiation. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Formal legal complaints 7 18 20 22 Output: Number of complaints completed 7 12 18 2 1 Amount of late fees, fines or settlements paid $5,250 $2,250 $6,500 $4,550

I — 199 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.06 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl5301 Lobbyist Registration Fees ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D10A01 Executive Department-Governor ......

I — 200 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.07 HEALTH CLAIMS ARBITRATION OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Health Claims Arbitration Office provides a system of mandatory arbitration filings for all medical malpractice claims in excess of $25,000. Pursuant to Title 3, Subtitle 2A and Section 5-109 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article and Section 482A of Article 48A, the powers and duties of the Health Claims Arbitration Office are: (1) the selection of arbitration panels from a list of qualified persons prepared by the Director; (2) the elimination of a specific dollar amount in pleadings; (3) the determination of liability and the awarding of damages and costs for each claim filed; (4) the opportunity for an appeal of a panel decision to the Courts; (5) the review of attorney fees when requested; (6) the provision that insurers may settle claims without restriction and repay certain costs of claimants; (7) the opportunity to waive the arbitration process and proceed at the Circuit Court level; (8) the opportunity to have a case heard by a Neutral Case Evaluator for those medical malpractice cases pending in the Circuit Courts; and (9) the reporting of all claims against physicians to the Board of Physician Quality Assurance, the Maryland State Medical Society, and upon request, to health care facilities and the general public.

MISSION

To offer an expedient alternative resolution process for medical malpractice claims. To serve as the State's only accurate and accessible information source for health care facilities and the general public regarding medical malpractice complaints against physicians and other health care providers.

VISION

To further decrease the number of medical malpractice cases requiring trial at the Circuit and U.S. District Court Systems.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To alleviate the Circuit and U.S. District Courts caseloads by lowering the number of cases waiving the arbitration process. Objective 1.1 Follow cases closely, closing as many as possible by promptly ruling on Motions to Dismiss or Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution or arbitration.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of cases pending at HCAO 678 625 603 65 3 Outputs: Cases closed at HCAO by panel 15 6 15 15 Outcome: Total cases closed at HCAO 165 123 140 140

Goal 2. To make accurate information regarding medical malpractice claims more readily available to health care institutions and the general public. Objective 2.1 Decrease the time required to fulfill requests for copies of medical malpractice claims.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of copies of claims requested by health care facilities 1,033 903 1,500 1,500 Outputs: Number of copies of claims forwarded to requesting health care facilities 1,304 858 1,400 1,400 Efficiency: Average time in days required to fulfill request 7.79 3.03 3.0 2.5

I — 201 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.07 HEALTH CLAIMS ARBITRATION OFFICE (Continued)

Objective 2.2 Maintain or decrease the time required to fulfill written requests for information regarding medical malpractice claims against a physician.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of written requests for information from health care facilities 6,348 6,305 6,500 6,500 Outputs: Number of responses forwarded to requesting health care facilities 6,348 6,305 6,500 6,500 Efficiency: Average time in days required to fulfill written requests 14 14 13 13 Inputs: Number of telephone calls from public requesting information regarding physician medical malpractice record 2,369 2,201 2,500 2,500 Efficiency: Number of telephone calls responded to per day 9.44 8.91 9.96 9.96

Goal 3. To create a resolution process whereby all parties have the opportunity to resolve medical malpractice claims, rather than proceeding with lengthy litigation. Objective 3.1 Continue to promote the value of Neutral Case Evaluation to all Circuit Court Judges and malpractice attorneys. Objective 3.2 Provide Neutral Case Evaluation for 1% of those medical malpractice cases that waived the arbitration process in FY 2002 and FY 2003 and are currently pending before the Circuit Courts.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Cases waiving arbitration 537 554 5 60 560 Outputs: Cases going through the Neutral Case Evaluation process Outcome: Number of cases closed at HCAO through Neutral Case Evaluation

I — 202 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.07 HEALTH CLAIMS ARBITRATION OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl5302 Filing Fees ...... 48. 676 83. 087 85.797

I — 203 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.09 STATE COMMISSION ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Commission on Uniform State Laws, authorized by Title 9, Subtitle 2 of the State Government Article, was created in 1896 to recommend measures to the General Assembly to promote uniform laws within the States. Working with their fellow members of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Maryland's Commissioners have recommended and the General Assembly has approved uniform or model legislation governing at least 86 subject areas, including the Commercial Code, probate, child custody, anatomical gifts, administrative procedures and consumer credit.

MISSION

The mission of the State Commission on Uniform State Laws is to represent Maryland in the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, to participate in the drafting of recommended uniform state legislation, and to promote the adoption of uniform laws within the States. VISION

The State Commission on Uniform State Laws envisions Maryland as a State whose laws do not unnecessarily conflict with those of its neighbors.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: New Uniform and Model Acts Enacted in Maryland 0 1 2 2

I — 204 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.09 STATE COMMISSION ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 205 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.16 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Executive Order 01.01.1995.18 established the Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention by merging the Governor's Drug and Alcohol Abuse Commission and the Governor's Office of Justice Administration. The Office of Crime Control and Prevention administers numerous Federal and State grant programs and serves as a clearinghouse for information, research, analysis and other materials necessary for formulating crime control and prevention policy. Additionally, the Office assists in the development of legislation, policies, plans, programs and budgets relating to the reduction and prevention of crime, violence, delinquency and substance abuse; the coordination of activities among relevant state and local agencies; the improvement of the administration of justice; and other public safety issues.

MISSION

The mission of the Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention is to provide leadership and support efforts to make Maryland's communities safer by ensuring the collaboration of relevant agencies to ensure the coordination of State policy and grant funds to support victims and to control, reduce and prevent crime.

VISION

A Maryland that is maximally effective at preventing future victims.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Advise and assist in the development and implementation of the comprehensive and collaborative State crime control prevention strategy. Objective 1.1 By December 1, 2005, revise and update the Comprehensive Crime Control and Prevention Strategy for Maryland. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of crime control and prevention strategy updates issued 0 0 1 1

Objective 1.2 By September 1, 2004, GOCCP will complete an assessment of currently funded grants to ensure that they continue to support the comprehensive crime control & prevention strategy.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of assessments of currently funded grants 0 0 1 1

Goal 2. Identify and implement best practices in the administration of grant funds. Objective 2.1 By June 30, 2005, 85% of grant applications will be submitted electronically.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of grant applications electronically submitted * 172 235 400 Quality: Percent of grant applications submitted electronically * 37% 50% 85%

Note: * New measure for which data are not available.

I — 206 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.16 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION

Local Law Enforcement Grants General Funds 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Baltimore City Foot Patrol ...... Prince Georges' County Drug Grant ...... Baltimore City Community Policing ...... Body Armor for Local Law Enforcement ...... Baltimore City Violent Crime Control Grant ...... Prince George's County Violent Crime Grant ...... STOP Gun Violence Grant ...... Criminal Justice Coordinating Council ...... Gun Trafficking Unit-OAG ...... Family Violence Council-OCYF ...... GOCCP-Grant Administration ...... Total ......

Fiscal Years 2003 and 2004 Local Law Enforcement Grants are in the Department of State Police-Program WOOA01.07. Special Funds for the School Bus Safety Grants remain in the Department of State Police .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 207 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.16 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION

Special Fund Income: Dl5304 Victims of Crime ...... Dl5311 Victim and Witness Protection and Relocation Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants ...... Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention- Allocation to States ...... Title V-Delinquency Prevention Program ...... Part E-State Challenge Activities ...... Byme Formula Grant Program ...... Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth in Sen- tencing Incentive Grants ...... Violence Against Women Formula Grants ...... Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies ...... Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program ...... Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners ...... Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program ...... Police Corps ...... Combating Underage Drinking ...... Safe and Drug-Free Schools-State Grants ...... Consolidated Knowledge Development and Appli- cation Program ...... Family Violence Prevention and ServicesIGrants for Battered Women's Shelters Discretionary Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: WOOA01 Maryland State Police ......

I — 208 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.17 VOLUNTEER MARYLAND

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Volunteer Maryland (VM) is a State-based AmeriCorps program. Funded through a combination of Federal funds via the Governor's Office on Service and Volunteerism, private contributions and State General Funds, the program places trained volunteer coordinators in non-profit agencies, schools and other governmental agencies for one-year national service assignments. During the service year, the volunteer coordinators, with the support of Volunteer Maryland staff, build or enhance volunteer management systems and recruit volunteers to serve Maryland citizens and the environment. Since 1992, 381 Volunteer Maryland AmeriCorps members have recruited 50,516 volunteers to serve over 1,000,000 hours to communities in need around the State. The dollar value of this volunteer service is approximately $16,4 16,000 (as measured by a national wage equivalency scale). In addition, the program has mobilized over 50,000 students in local communities. Volunteer Maryland is a unique volunteer-generator program model; baseline measurements were set in the program's demonstration period (1992-1995). Volunteer Maryland meets or exceeds all best practices related to volunteer program development and national service programming, as demonstrated by partnerships with the Federal Corporation for National and Community Service and the Maryland Governor's Office on Service and Volunteerism.

MISSION

Volunteer Maryland meets critical needs in the areas of education, human needs, public safety and the environment. Each year, program participants engage citizens in tutoring, mentoring, environmental restoration and preservation, neighborhood crime control, and more. The results of their efforts are multiplied in communities across the State, with better-educated children and adults, safer communities and cleaner environments. The placement sites for AmeriCorps members vary from year to year, and, therefore, the annual outcomes vary as reflected in the program goals and objectives. However, annual program results show the scope of the AmeriCorps members' service and volunteer activities.

Examples of these volunteer activities include health education, Meals-On-Wheels to senior citizens and persons with AIDS, low-cost housing construction and maintenance, free legal services, drug/alcohol awareness and counseling, emergency shelters for the homeless and victims of domestic abuse, friendly visitors for adults with emotional and physical disabilities, food collection and distribution, and immigrant job counseling and language skill training.

In addition, Volunteer Maryland has educated youth, bringing on 2,000 volunteers to serve over 7,000 young people in Maryland. Examples of the volunteer services include tutoring in a variety of subjects for K-12 students, teaching economics with Junior Achievement, mentoring youth with Big BrothersBig Sisters, providing adult literacy tutoring, and service-learning activities at schools and colleges. At public safety sites, Volunteer Maryland has mobilized over 1,000 volunteers to patrol neighborhoods, design safe communities and educate the public on safety issues. Together these members and volunteers reached more than 17,000 community members. Volunteer Maryland participants have also contributed significantly to environmental and wildlife education and preservation efforts around the State. In all, they have mobilized more than 10,000 volunteers to create and maintain 25 miles of nature trails, educate more than 60,000 people on environmental and wildlife preservation, monitor the water quality of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed in Maryland, clean up 100 miles of streams, plant 6,000 trees, build environmentally friendly playgrounds, remove 30 tons of trash, plant marsh grass, preserve 160 acres of grasslands, care for 700 orphaned or injured animals, plant 14 community gardens, and more. The scope of these services makes it impossible to count the number of citizens who have benefited (or will benefit in the future) from the efforts of these volunteers and AmeriCorps members.

VISION

Volunteer Maryland envisions a State in which all critical human and environmental needs are met; all citizens have the opportunity to participate in high quality and meaningful volunteer service to solve community problems; and nonprofit and government agencies value and effectively engage volunteer resources.

I — 209 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.17 VOLUNTEER MARYLAND (Continued)

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Serve citizens and communities in need, in the areas of human welfare, public safety, education and the environment. Objective 1.1 In 2005, 85 percent of Service Sites will meet their specific, measurable community impact objectives by the end of the partnership year. (Since VM works with different sites and communities each year, the specific results vary from year to year.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of Service Sites reporting achievement of goals to meet critical community needs 95 % 93% 85% 85%

Objective 1.2 In 2005, VM will meet the educational, safety, health needs of at least 4,000 community members as a result of volunteer service. (Again, since the placement sites vary from year to year, the specific needs will vary depending on the communities served in 2005.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of clients served 99,181 378,897 3,700 4,000

Goal 2. Involve Maryland citizens of all ages and backgrounds in positive community action, during the service year and beyond. Objective 2.1 In 2005, VM will mobilize at least 4,000 citizens across the State.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of volunteers and students 42,736 8,484 3,700 4,000 Hours contributed to State 92,733 75,676 55,500 84,000 Dollar value of volunteer hours and in-kind generated for State $1.4M $1.4M $832,500 $1.4M

Objective 2.2 In 2005, 85 percent of former VM Coordinators will continue to be involved in positive community and volunteer activities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of past coordinators reporting continued civic involvement

Goal 3. Expand capacity of public sectors (government and nonprofit) to deliver critical services. Objective 3.1 In 2005, 85 percent of Service Sites will report an increased organizational capacity to manage volunteers or student participants as a result of partnering with VM.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of Service Sites reporting increased organizational capacity to manage volunteer activities 89% 95 % 85% 85%

Objective 3.2 In 2005, 85 percent of former Service Sites will report that they have sustained or improved their organizational capacity to manage volunteers since the end of the Volunteer Maryland partnership,

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of past Service Sites reporting sustained or improved organizational capacity to manage volunteer activities after VM service year 78% 100% 85% 85%

I — 210 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.17 VOLUNTEER MARYLAND

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Contractual Positions ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl5303 Site Matching Funds ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 211 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.20 STATE COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING POLICY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Established under Chapter 648 of the Acts of 1999 (House Bill 602), the State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy ("the Commission") is the successor to the Maryland Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy and is created as a permanent body under Criminal Procedure Article, $6-201 through $6-213, The Commission was created to oversee criminal sentencing policy in Maryland. The Commission consists of 19 members, including members of the: judiciary, representatives of the criminal justice system, members of the State Senate and House of Delegates, and members of the general public.

The Commission assumes primary responsibility for the Maryland voluntary sentencing guidelines (for Circuit Courts) by: distributing and collecting sentencing guidelines worksheets, compiling sentencing guidelines worksheets, and maintaining the sentencing guidelines database. The Commission conducts training and orientation for: trial court judges, attorneys, probation officers and other interested parties as may be required. In addition, the Commission: monitors judicial compliance with the guidelines, studies the factors driving judicial departures from the guidelines, and adopts changes to the sentencing guidelines, if necessary.

In addition to overseeing the application of the sentencing guidelines, the Commission is expected to integrate corrections options programs into the sentencing guidelines system and to establish guidelines to identify appropriate candidates for participation in corrections options programs. The Commission will use a correctional population simulation model to provide estimates of the impact of proposed legislation or policy changes on State and local correctional resources. The work of the Commission is documented in an annual report to the General Assembly delivered before or on December 1 of each year.

MISSION

The State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy serves the citizens of Maryland by promoting fair and proportional criminal sentences without unwarranted disparity for all offenders with similar criminal histories committing similar offenses within a voluntary guidelines system providing judges options of probation, prison, or corrections options. It also serves Maryland citizens by assisting understanding of actual times to be served by offenders and by protecting public safety through prioritization of incarceration of violent and career offenders.

VISION

Achievement of the Commission's mission would result in a state with low crime rates; sentences considered just by offenders and victims, well understood by the public, and consistent with the state's voluntary guidelines; and individual and community knowledge and empowerment concerning crime and its effects on them.

In establishing the Commission, the General Assembly stated its intent that: unwarranted sentencing disparities should be reduced; truth-in-sentencing policies should be promoted; prison capacity and usage should give priority to the incarceration of violent and career offenders; meaningful judicial sentencing discretion should be preserved; and sentencing judges should be able to impose the most appropriate criminal penalties for offenders.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Minimal disparity in sentences of similar offenders sentenced for similar offenses. Objective 1.1 The Commission will seek to improve rates of voluntary compliance with current guidelines.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Reports with statistical measures of differences in 1 1 1 1 sentence outcomes by disposition and length explained by "warranted" and "unwarranted" factors.

I — 212 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.20 STATE COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING POLICY

Goal 2. Improved rates of judicial compliance with the state's voluntary sentencing guidelines. Objective 2.1 Aggressive outreach and careful re-evaluation of criteria to improve compliance numbers.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Reports on compliance issued. 1 1 1 1 Reports with statistics on rates of compliance by 1 1 1 1 circuit, general offense type, and selected special variables.

Goal 3. Increased proportions of inmates considered violent or career in state prisons. Objective 3.1 Support for adoption and implementation of corrections options programs to supplement its current structured sentencing system.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Reports with statistics on proportions of inmates by general offense type (person, property, drug). 1 1 1 1

I — 213 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.20 STATE COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING POLICY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 214 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.21 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council is active within the Baltimore City criminal justice system in identifying, planning, and coordinating solutions to issues facing the Baltimore City criminal justice system. The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council is viewed as a vital entity for ensuring participation of all stakeholders operating in and affected by the Baltimore City criminal justice system. The Council assists the Judiciary and the member agencies in the planning and delivery of quality services. Although the Council is not a statutorily created entity and has no authority to mandate member participation or specific activities, it is expected that the Council's recommendations will ensure that all participants in the criminal justice community have the opportunity to communicate specific needs and interests. The Council is also the facilitator for integrating computer networks within the criminal justice system.

The Memorandum of Understanding executed by the criminal justice partners during August 2001 defines membership on the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. It currently includes regular representation from the Baltimore City Mayor's Office, Circuit Court for Baltimore City, District Court for Baltimore City, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Office of the State's Attorney, Office of the Public Defender, Baltimore City Council, Baltimore City Police Department, Division of Pretrial Detention and Services, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit and District Courts for Baltimore City, Baltimore City Sheriff's Office, Private Defense Bar, Office of the Attorney General and the Governor's Office. The Council meetings are open to the public and are also regularly attended by members of the Legislature and their staff as well as by many private and public agencies and groups interested in the criminal justice system.

MISSION

The members of the Baltimore City Criminal Justice Coordinating Council and their respective agencies work cooperatively to enhance public safety and reduce crime in Baltimore City, to advance the fair and timely disposition of cases, and to ensure justice for those accused of crimes and the victims of crimes.

To accomplish our Mission, we vigorously address policy questions, systemic problems, and other issues affecting public safety and the administration of criminal justice in Baltimore City. We facilitate the initiation, coordination, implementation, and evaluation of effective practices and procedures among ourselves and with other members of the criminal justice community. We promote and encourage inter-agency decision-making and communication and the sharing of timely and accurate criminal justice information

KEY GOALS

Goal 1. Improve public safety and reduce crime in Baltimore City and Maryland.

Goal 2. Provide justice for those accused and those convicted of crimes.

Goal 3. Provide justice for victims of crimes

Goal 4. Ensure timely and early disposition of criminal cases.

Goal 5. Promote the wise allocation of resources and ensure adequate system capacity.

Goal 6. Increase public confidence in the criminal justice system in Baltimore City.

Goal 7. Promote the use of shared information through integrated technology.

I — 215 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.21 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 216 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT - BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.22 GOVERNOR'S GRANTS OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Governor's Grants Office is responsible for: assisting State agencies in both locating grant opportunities and collaborating with other agencies, as appropriate, on applying for grants; offering a statewide database of grant opportunities; providing grant writing workshops to teach agency staff how to write grant proposals; and assisting agencies with the preparation and monitoring of grant applications. The Office has as its primary objective the generation of additional revenue for the State through establishing a central tracking location for all available grants and working with the agencies to apply for these grants.

I — 217 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT .BOARDS. COMMISSIONS AND OFFICES

D15A05.22 GOVERNOR'S GRANTS OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 218 SECRETARY OF STATE

D16A06.01 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Under the Maryland Constitution and State statutes, the Office of the Secretary of State is charged with a variety of responsibilities. Among the many duties, the Secretary attests to the Governor's signature on all public papers and documents; certifies documents for international transactions; registers trademarks, service marks and insignia; administers the Notary Public laws; processes the extradition of prisoners; commissions Special Police and Railroad Police; registers charitable organizations, professional fundraisers and solicitors, and educates the public concerning charitable organizations and solicitations; and represents the State of Maryland and the Executive Department in intergovernmental and international affairs. In addition, the Office of the Secretary of State includes the Division of State Documents, which publishes all State administrative regulations in the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) and the Maryland Register and publishes State, county, and municipal procurement information in the Maryland Contract Weekly.

MISSION

To provide the citizens of Maryland with information, services, and assistance relating to the constitutional, statutory, and regulatory functions assigned to the Office of the Secretary of State. To promote Maryland's expanding role in international affairs by representing the Executive Department and the State of Maryland in diplomatic and related duties. To foster communication and cooperation across State, county, and municipal borders through the coordination of intergovernmental activities.

VISION

We will exemplify the characteristics of dedicated public servants in our efforts to assist Maryland citizens by placing an increased emphasis on quality customer service and improve State relations both nationally and internationally.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Simplify agency preparation and filing of documents for publication in the Maryland Register. Objective 1.1 100% of documents published in the Maryland Register will be filed electronically by Fiscal Year 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Documents published in the Maryland Register 1,942 1,77 1 1,900 1,900 Outcome: Documents published in the Maryland Register that were filed electronically 0 0 0 600

Goal 2. Strengthen and enhance Maryland's role and influence in international affairs. Objective 2.1 Coordinate the activities of State government entities involved in international relations (Executive Order 01 .01.2001.20, establishing the Governor's Subcabinet for International Affairs).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: International meetings, contacts and transactions handled by the Office of the Secretary of State 5,653 6,870 7,000 7.000

Goal 3. Obtain accurate financial information from charitable organizations required to register with the Office of the Secretary of State. Objective 3.1 Ensure compliance with the requirements of the Maryland Solicitations Act by reviewing the financial information submitted by charitable organizations identified as having inconsistencies or potential problems.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Registered charitable organizations 5,515 5,639 5,700 5,750 Organizations required to submit financial statements 4,042 4,460 4,560 4,660 Output: Financial statements reviewed 94 84 90 90

I — 219 SECRETARY OF STATE

D16A06.01 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE (Continued)

Goal 4. Utilize technology to increase citizen access to information. Objective 4.1 Comply with the E-Government Initiative (50165180 plan).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Constituent-used data accessible online 72% 79% 79% 79%

Goal 5. Help Maryland residents make informed decisions when contributing to a charitable organization. Objective 5.1 In conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission and other charity regulators, provide information to Maryland residents about wise charitable giving.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Requests for information about charities' registration status with the Office of the Secretary of State 8,838 11,740 12,000 12,000

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: MD Register subscriptions 75 1 679 650 600 COMAR partial subscriptions by title 10,918 9,950 9,500 9,200 Outputs: Notary Public Commissions processed 23,005 24,049 24,500 25,000 Documents certified 24,808 28,841 33,300 38,400 MD Register pages printed 2,356 2,152 2,300 2,300 COMAR pages printed 10,432 9,677 10,000 10,000

I — 220 SECRETARY OF STATE

D16A06.01 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl6301 Sales of Publications. Binders and Data ......

I — 221 HISTORIC ST. MARY'S CITY COMMISSION

D17B01.51 ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Historic St. Mary's City is an outdoor history and archaeology museum that preserves, researches, and interprets the site of Maryland's first capital. Chapter 583, Acts of 1997, established the Historic St. Mary's City Commission as an independent unit of State government reporting to the Office of the Governor. MISSION

The mission of the Historic St. Mary's City Commission is to preserve and protect the archaeological and historical record of Maryland's first colonial capital, and to appropriately develop and use this historic and scenic site for the education, enjoyment, and general benefit of the public. VISION

Through the work of the Historic St. Mary's City Commission, all citizens of Maryland will understand how Historic St. Mary's City played a vital role in developing core principles of American democracy such as liberty of conscience, separation of church and state, representative government, and economic opportunity; and they will support the preservation and development of Historic St. Mary's City as a National Historic Landmark.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Preservation and Research. Assure that the archaeological sites and collections, scenic views, and rural character of Maryland's most important historic site are safeguarded by preservation and research practices consistent with its status as a National Historic Landmark District (NHLD). Fully apply all appropriate historical, archaeological, and scientific resources to document the land features, structures, political and economic activities, and lives of individuals associated with the National Historic Landmark District where Maryland's first capital was situated.

Objective 1.1 By Fiscal Year 2007, treat in excess of 8,500 objects in our archaeological collection for conservation (cataloged, detailed treatment, documented, located in climate controlled, secure, fire-suppressed space and available for interpretation and analysis). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of objects treated for conservation (by year) 800 2000 n/a n/a

Objective 1.2 By Fiscal Year 2007, provide basic conservation treatment (arrest deterioration from the environment, and package for long-term storage in secure, conditioned spaces) for 100% of artifacts in the collection.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of artifacts having basic conservation treatment 30% 45 % 60% 75%

Objective 1.3 As part of the Maryland Heritage Project (MHP) and continued site development, conduct archaeology and analyze preliminary results for eight major archaeological sites at St. Mary's City by Fiscal Year 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of major archaeology sites under active investigation (total sites investigated during the year1 new sites started) 613 611 512 210 Total pages of archaeologicallhistorical reports produced (per yr) 600 500 500 600

I — 222 HISTORIC ST. MARY'S CITY COMMISSION

D17B01.51 ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. Site Development. Enable visitors to understand the 17th century layout and function of Historic St. Mary's City through accurate reconstruction of original features, roads, and important colonial structures through development of facilities, landscape, and interpretive sites. Objective 2.1 Complete all of the currently approved interpretive Historic St. Mary's City site development projects on schedule and within approved budgets. 2004 2005 2006 2007 Performance Measures Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Output: Number of major capital projects completed 1 1 2 0 Quality: Percent interpretation programs implemented NIA 100% 100% 100%

Goal 3. Education and Interpretation. Engage large and diverse audiences of every age level, giving special attention to the school children of Maryland (especially those in underserved communities), through interpretive and educational programs that bring to life the history of St. Mary's City and its relevance to our current society. Objective 3.1 Increase the general public, tour group, and school visitation numbers.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: General Public Attendance 8,446 8,244 9,480 10,428 Percent increase from previous year -15% -2% 15% 10% Adult Tour Group Attendance 1,625 797 1050 1260 Percent increase from previous year -30% -51% 30% 20% Children served on-site 28,645 22,219 27,000 29,260 Percent increase from previous year +4% -22% 21% 10%

Goal 4. Governance and Management. Assure that Historic St. Mary's City is recognized for sound planning and fiduciary oversight and strong base of public and private support. Objective 4.1 With proactive assistance of the HSMC Foundation, as much as 40 percent of Historic St. Mary's City's operating budget will come from earned special funds and non-state grants by Fiscal Year 2007.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Net Museum Shop Profits $10,000 $15,550 $18,000 $22,000 Quality: Earned Special Funds (Percent of Operating Budget) 18% 17% 21% 22% Private and Public Grants and Gifts (non-state) $264,000 $469,584 $350,000 370,000 Special Funds and Grants and Gifts as a percent of Operating Budget 27 % 35% 35% 37%

I — 223 HISTORIC ST. MARY'S CITY COMMISSION

D17B01.51 ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Dl7301 Historic St . Mary's City Revenue ......

Federal Fund Income: 45.164 Promotion of the Humanities-Public Programs ....

I — 224 OFFICE FOR SMART GROWTH

D20A15.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Program Description: The Office for Smart Growth (OSG) was established on July 1, 2001 ($9-1401, State Government Article) to help local governments, developers, citizen groups, and others expedite projects consistent with Smart Growth and to provide a one-stop resource for persons seeking to learn about Maryland's Smart Growth Programs. On October 8, 2003 Governor Ehrlich signed Executive Order 01.01.2003.33, Maryland's Priority Places Strategy, which gave the Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) the lead role in developing and executing State planning policy for development, economic growth, community revitalization, and resource conservation. In order to gain a better coordination of efforts, increased efficiencies and a stronger and more focused staff commitment to Smart Growth activities and implementation, staff and budgetary resources for this office have been transferred to the budget of the Maryland Department of Planning

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 225 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

D25E03.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Public School Construction Program reviews and analyzes requests for State funds for capital improvement projects for public school buildings from each local education agency with the approval of the local government. The funded projects enable students and teachers to learn and teach in safe and educationally supportive learning environments. Local matching funds are required for projects such as: renovations, additions, new school systemic renovations, wiring schools for technology, high school science facility renovations and pre-kindergarten additions.

MISSION

The Public School Construction Program provides leadership and resources to local education agencies in the development of school facilities so that all Maryland public school students, teachers, administrators and staff have safe and educationally supportive environments in which to teach and learn. We support State goals of neighborhood conservation, the protection of the environment, and the preservation of natural resources as we assist in the development of school facilities.

VISION

A State in which all public school facilities enable students and educators to learn and teach in safe environments designed, constructed, and maintained to meet the requirements of educational programs and services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The Public School Construction Program will promote physical learning environments that support the educational goals of the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) and local education agencies (LEA). Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005 90% of all high school science labs will be designed and constructed to support MSDE science curriculum. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Funding for science lab projects ($000) $2,586 $595 $5,433 $3,394 Number of labs identified for potential projects 206 186 185 125 Outputs: Number science labs approved for renovationlnew construction 20 1 60 15 Outcomes: Percent (%) increase in the number of science labs 4% 2% 11.6% 2.9% that can support the MSDE curriculum

Goal 2. The Public School Construction Program promotes safe physical environments in which to teach and learn. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2005 the number of schools identified by local education agencies as in good or better physical condition will increase by 22% over FY 2004. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of schools 1,334 1,511 1,343 1,343 Number of schools rated good or better 988 1,136 817 1,000 Number of schools rated less than good as measured by LEA standards 346 375 526 343 Outputs: Number of approved projects in these identified schools 107 52 43 50 Outcomes: Percent increase in the number of schools identified by LEAS as in good or better physical condition * 15% -20% 22%

Note: Change in total number of schools is due to removal of closed schools and administrative buildings.

I — 226 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

D25E03.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 3. The Public School Construction Program will support State goals for community redevelopment, environmental protection, and preservation of the State's natural resources. Objective 3.1 Each fiscal year a minimum of 75% of the projects approved will be located in Priority Funding Areas.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent approved projects in PFA's 80% 73% 81 % 75 %

Goal 4. The Public School Construction Program will ensure the judicious use of State funds for school construction projects. Objective 4.1 By July 1,2005 50% of audited local education agency financial project records will be in compliance with PSCP regulations. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent in procedural compliance of PSCP regulations by LEAS 4% 25% 25% 50%

2002 2003 2004 2005 Other Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of capital project requests 622 293 27 8 250 Number of Aging School Program (ASP) requests 168 235 200 200 Capital budget appropriation (millions) $287 $157 $117 $100 ASP appropriation (millions) $10 $10 $10 $10 Outputs: Number of capital projects approved 484 157 129 60 Number of ASP projects approved 168 175 175 175 Number of contracts approved 8 18 515 550 550

Notes: *New measures for which historical data is not available. FY 2004 data in bold italics is actual data.

I — 227 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

SUMMARY OF INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 17.00 17.00 17.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

D25E03.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: ROOA01 State Department of Education-Headquarters ......

I — 228 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

D25E03.02 AGING SCHOOLS PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Aging School Program was established in 1997 to provide funds (without local matching funds) for capital improvements, repairs, and maintenance projects at existing public school buildings. The Aging School Program provides state funds that are distributed to all school systems in the State of Maryland to address the needs of their aging school buildings.

This program shares the same mission, vision, goals, objectives, performance measureslperformance indicator as program D25E03.01 General Administration of the Interagency Committee for Public School Construction.

I — 229 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

D25E03.02 AGING SCHOOLS PROGRAM

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators Aging Schools Program:

Allegany ...... Anne Arundel ...... Baltimore City ...... Baltimore ...... Calvert ...... Caroline ...... Carroll ...... Cecil ...... Charles ...... Dorchester ...... Frederick ...... Garrett ...... Har ford ...... Howard ...... Kent ...... Montgomery ...... Prince George's ...... Queen Anne's ...... St . Mary's ...... Somerset ...... Talbot ...... Washington ...... Wicomico ...... Worcester ...... Total ......

TIMS Accelerated Wiring Program:

Master Equipment Lease Purchase Debt Service...... Grand Total ......

Source of Funding: General Funds-Aging Schools ...... General Funds-TIMS ...... Subtotal-General Funds ...... Special Funds-TIMS ...... G.O. Bonds-Aging Schools ...... Total ......

I — 230 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION

D25E03.02 AGING SCHOOLS PROGRAM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF305 Cigarette Restitution Fund ......

I — 231 DEPARTMENT OF AGING

D26A07.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Department of Aging has responsibilities for administering community-based long-term-care programs and services for the elderly, evaluating service needs of the elderly, and determining the extent to which public and private programs meet the needs of the elderly. With input from the local Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs), seniors, and caregivers, the Department establishes priorities for meeting the needs of the elderly, and advocates for the frailest and most vulnerable seniors who have no one to speak for them.

MISSION

The Maryland Aging Network, made up of the Maryland Department of Aging in partnership with the Area Agencies on Aging, provides leadership and advocacy for senior Marylanders and their families through information, education, programs, and services which promote and enhance choice, independence and dignity.

VISION

We envision Maryland as a State where all people are able to age with choice, independence and dignity.

KEY GOALS OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

To ensure that older citizens served by the Aging Network are treated with dignity and respect, the Maryland Department of Aging, through leadership, advocacy, and community partnerships, has developed the following goals for Fiscal Year 2005.

Goal 1. To enable seniors who are served by the Aging Network to be maintained in the most appropriate and safest living arrangements within the community for as long as possible. Objective 1.1 To continue services through June 30, 2005 at an outcome percentage no lower than 18.72 percent to current seniors served by MDoA assisted living and in-home service programs.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of clients enrolled in Medicaid Home And Community Based Waiver for Older Adults Number of seniors in senior apartments supported by Congregate Housing Services programs Number of seniors in private homes receiving in-home services through the Senior Care program Number of seniors in Assisted living group homes receiving services subsidized by the Department Outcomes: Percent of Maryland's over 50 in need of community-based support services receiving services financed by the Department *

* The estimate of percentage of older adults with disabilities is based on a study performed by the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) Center for Health Program Development and Management for the Department in August 2001. The Center used a variety of methodologies to estimate the population in need. The Department used one of the more conservative of these methodologies, providing an estimate of the population over 50 in need in Fiscal Year 2004 of 43,967. (We used age 50 since age eligibility for the Medicaid Waiver for Older Adults begins at age 50). The percentages of people served are derived by dividing the total number of people served by Department programs by the UMBC projection.

I — 232 DEPARTMENT OF AGING

D26A07.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. To ensure that vulnerable seniors served by the Aging Network are treated with dignity and, to the extent possible with available resources, protected against abuse, exploitation, and consumer fraud. Objective 2.1 To maintain advocacy activities for residents of long-term-care facilities through June 30, 2005 at the Fiscal Year 2003 level or higher.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of complaints received by Ombudsmen. Number of abuse complaints received by Ombudsmen

Objective 2.2 To maintain through June 30, 2005 public guardianship activities protecting the rights of legally incompetent adults over the age of 65 at Fiscal Year 2003 actual levels.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of clients for whom MDoA and AAAs serve as public guardians

Goal 3. To provide seniors and caregivers served by the Aging Network expanded choices in services, vendors, and activities. Objective 3.1 To increase the number of qualified vendors providing services for clients of the Home and Cornmunity- based Waiver in all 24 jurisdictions by 20 percent over Fiscal Year 2003 levels by June 30, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of enrolled Medicaid Providers 1,185 2,532 3,052 3,052 Number of jurisdictions with at least one vendor for each Medicaid Waiver Service

Goal 4. To enhance the quality and quantity of nutrition, health education, physical fitness and socialization activities offered by the Aging Network. Objective 4.1 To increase participation by 10 percent in 16 senior centers in economically distressed jurisdictions over Fiscal Year 2003 levels by June 30, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of seniors utilizing programs in targeted senior centers

Objective 4.2 To maintain home-delivered meals services at Fiscal Year 2003 levels through June, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of home- delivered meals served. 1,395,032 1,397,840 1,397,840 1,397,840

I — 233 DEPARTMENT OF AGING

D26A07.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 5. To promote the well being of seniors by providing a broad range of employment opportunities. Objective 5.1 By June 30, 2005, to increase unsubsidized job placement rate for individuals participating in the Senior Employment Program by one percent over Fiscal Year 2003 levels.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of senior employment participants placed in jobs. Total number of senior employment program participants trained.

I — 234 DEPARTMENT OF AGING

D26A07.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D26301 Registration Fees-Continuing Care Program

Federal Fund Income: 10.550 Food Donation ...... 16.579 Byme Formula Grant Program ...... 17.235 Senior Community Service Employment Program .. 93.042 State Grants for Long Term Care Ombudsman Services ...... 93.043 Special Programs for the Aging-Title 111, Part D Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services ...... 93.044 Special Programs for the Aging-Title 111, Part B Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers ...... 93.045 Special Programs for the Aging-Title 111, Part C Nutrition Services ...... 93.048 Special Programs for the Aging-Title IV Discre- tionary Projects ...... 93.052 Nation Family Caregiver Support ...... 93.239 Policy Research and Evaluation Grants ...... 93.576 Refugee and Entrant Assistance-Discretionary Grants ...... 93.778 Medical Assistance Program ...... 93.779 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Research. Demonstrations and Evalu- ations ...... Total ......

I — 235 DEPARTMENT OF AGING

D26A07.02 SENIOR CENTERS OPERATING FUND

Progran Description: The Senior Citizen Activities Center Operating Fund provides additional funds to economically distressed areas for senior citizen activities centers.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 500,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 236 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS

D27L00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Commission resolves allegations of discrimination by conciliation, mediation, investigation and litigation in the areas of employment, housing and public accommodations, based on race, color, creed, ancestry, religion, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, genetic information and physical or mental disability. In addition, the Commission, through its educational and outreach efforts, improves community relations and fosters a better understanding of the law, thus reducing the potential number of complaints generated.

Efforts in fair employment practices and fair housing are supplemented by work sharing arrangements and contracts with the US. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Commission engages in cooperative efforts with Federal, State, Local and private agencies having comparable interests and or legal authority.

MISSION

The mission of the Commission on Human Relations is to ensure equal opportunity and promote better human relations for all who work in, live in, or visit Maryland.

VISION

Our vision is a State free of any traces of unlawful discrimination.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Improve equal opportunity in Maryland through the use of effective, creative and efficient case processing activities and reduce, eliminate or resolve instances of unlawful discrimination. Objective 1.1 By FY 2005 increase to at least 35%, the percentage of complaints electing mediation through the use of the MCHR Mediation Program in order to promote prompt resolution of disputes in an alternative, non-investigative, non-adversarial manner. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Complaints received for processing 1013 1074 1070 1055 Outputs: Percentage of eligible cases where parties elect to mediate 13% 30% 35% 40% 1 Outcome: Percentage of mediated complaints resolved 42% 51% 55% 55%

Objective 1.2 By FY 2005, reduce the average time to process complaints so that it is lower than the Federal processing time standard, in order to provide prompt, thorough investigations and resolutions of allegations of discrimination.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Employment complaints closed 66 1 708 650 640 Housing complaints closed 116 145 125 125 Public Accommodations cases closed 103 157 100 100

Resolutions from the Mediation Program are one segment of the total number of cases settled at MCHR through Pre-Determination Settlements, Conciliation Agreements and withdrawals with benefits and settlements from the Office of the General Counsel.

I — 237 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS

D27L00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Average number of days to process a case Employment 2 Housing Public Accommodations3

Average Age of Pending Cases Employment Housing Public Accommodation

National average in days of pending cases Employment Housing

Percentage of pending cases meeting or exceeding federal standards (Open 270 days or less for each category) Employment Housing

4 Objective 1.3 By the end of FY 2005, complete four systemic investigations of disparate treatment or disparate impact cases5 per year in order to reduce, eliminate or resolve patterns of discrimination having the most significant impact on protected groups in Maryland.

Systemic Performance Measures 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Completed Systemic investigations6 3 37 4 4

Average time in processing complaints (Federal Standard) - 270 days

(No national data on public accommodations complaints)

As used here, "systemic investigation" refers to an investigation in which all related complaints and allegations against the same respondent are consolidated. Multiple complaints filed by individuals or organizations may be combined in one systemic investigation. Such investigations are complex and involve extensive interviews of numerous witnesses, review of thousands of documents, data entry, and advanced statistical analysis. A team of three persons work an average of 3,000 hours to complete one systemic investigation, not counting conciliation (relief) or litigation. This may take one to two years.

"Systemic disparate treatment" cases, often called "pattern or practice" cases, typically involve employment or housing practices that are intentionally discriminatory, have class-wide impact (affect a large number of persons), and are amenable to statistical analysis.

Completing a systemic investigation does not always mean the end of a case. During FY 2003, the Unit completed 27 Statements of Charges relating to an investigation completed in FY 2001, was heavily involved in the conciliation phase of a major mortgage lending case with hundreds of potential victims, and conducted compliance reviews of employers with settlement agreements. The Unit also neared the completion of a statewide investigation of alleged racial bias in a state agency's licensing process.

1 Involved pattern or practice investigations of two financial institutions accused of mortgage lending discrimination, and a large employer in the security industry alleged to have discriminated against black employees in a reduction-in-force.

I — 238 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS

D27L00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Objective 1.4 By the end of FY 2005, complete one study or survey of systemic discrimination within a major industry (e.g., real estate, financial services, retail goods) in a representative urban, suburban, or rural community per year in order to identify and understand patterns of discrimination having the most significant impact on protected groups in Maryland.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Systemic Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Completed studies of discrimination in major industry 1 0 1 1

Economic Indicators of Equal Opportunity in Maryland

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Economic Outcome 1: Annual share of Maryland labor 8 market held by underrepresented minorities & females Females 48.49% 48.58% 48.58% 48.58% Officials & Managers 34.91% 35.15% 35.39% 35.63% Craft Workers 11.11% 11.31% 11.51% 11.71% Operatives 23.37% 23.37% 23.37% 23.37% Laborers 29.47% 30.00% 30.53% 31.06%

African-Americans Officials & Managers Professionals Craft Workers

Hispanic/Latino Officials & Managers Professionals Technicians Craft Workers Operatives

Source: EEO-1 Reports for 1996 through 2001, Maryland employers, in Job Patterns For Minorities and Women in Private Industry (U.S.EEOC). EEO-1 data first become available about 18 months after the end of the reporting year.

"A major indication of the impact of equal employment opportunity legislation, regulation, and enforcement is the number and percentage of employed minorities and women." U.S. EEOC, Indicators of Equal Employment Opportunity-Status and Trends (Nov. 2001), p. 5.

I — 239 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS

D27L00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Economic Outcome 2: Annual share of Maryland home lending market held by underserved minorities African-Americans Loan Applications Loan Originations Loan Dollars Originated Hispanic/Latino Loan Applications Loan Originations Loan Dollars Originated

Source: Data on Conventional Home Purchase Loans reported under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), 1996-2002. Automated HMDA data first become available 8-9 months after the end of reporting year.

I — 240 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS

D27L00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: 14.401 Fair Housing Assistance Program-State and Local .. 30.002 Employment Discrimination-State and Local Fair Employment Practices Agency Contracts ..... Total ......

I — 241 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 83.50 83.50 83.50 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 4,727,876 5,261,636 5,262,297 Technical and Special Fees ...... 775,599 811,384 822,015 Operating Expenses ...... 97,828,921 109,348,356 70,472,736 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 10,461,079 10,498,275 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 527,504 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 9,933,575 10,498,275 13,428,270 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 2 1,949,000 22,000,000 22,000,000 Non-Budgeted Funds ...... 71,449,821 82,923,101 41,128,778 Total Expenditure ...... 103,332,396 115,421,376 76,557,048

D28A03.02 MARYLAND STADIUM FACILITIES FUND

Program Description: Section 7-312 of the State Finance and Procurement Article establishes the Maryland Stadium Facilities Fund as a special, non-lapsing fund that consists of monies that may be appropriated, transferred, credited or paid to it from any source relating to Camden Yards. Monies credited to the Maryland Stadium Facilities Fund may be used, in accordance with approved comprehensive financing plans, to pay rent to the Maryland Stadium Authority; to make grants or loans, not exceeding $1 million in any fiscal year, to the Authority for its corporate purposes; to finance capital construction in lieu of issuing bonds; or to financially support, through equity investment, loan guarantee or otherwise, full or partial private financing of any element of the Camden Yards facilities.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D28301 Transfer from Lottery Revenue ......

I — 242 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.41 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Administer funds earmarked for project construction andlor to support private investment for projects such as Ripken Stadium, Comcast Center at the University of Maryland College Park, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Towson University Sports Complex, Montgomery County Conference Center, Hippodrome Performing Arts Center, Camden Station, Memorial Stadium demolition and Veterans Memorial.

MISSION

To provide our expertise to the officials of the State and the subdivisions throughout Maryland for design, finance and construction of state-of-the-art, high quality sports facilities, convention and conference centers and artslentertainment venues on time and on budget. VISION

To utilize our unique abilities and expertise to design, finance and build facilities which are of high quality, operationally efficient and produce economic benefits and civic pride to the citizens.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Design and build facilities that are completed with available funds. Objective 1.1 Develop responsible project budgets. 2.2 Monitor the process using construction management techniques.

Goal 2. Complete projects within the established time frame. Objective 2.1 Design an aggressive but achievable project schedule.

Goal 3. Complete projects within the established time frame. Objective 3.1 Design an aggressive but achievable project schedule. 3.2 Attain user satisfaction on all projects undertaken by the Maryland Stadium Authority.

Goal 4. To create a formula to be used to determine an amount the Authority should be reimbursed for construction projects Objective 4.1 To recover all expenses that the Authority incurs on each construction project

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total Projects Completed 3 2 1 2 Projects Completed on Schedule 3 2 1 2 Projects Completed on Budget 3 2 1 2 Management Fees Collected $190,000 $120,000 $195,000 $95,000

I — 243 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.41 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28701 Maryland Stadium Authority Facilities Fund ......

D28A03.42 CAPITAL PROGRAMSBASEBALLEOOTBALL PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION COST

Program Description: The Capital Programs provide funds for construction at Camden Yards and other construction projects to suppofi private investment. including renovations of Camden Station and the Northern and Southern Warehouse .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 3,436,201 13 Fixed Charges ...... 10,139,853 251,481 251,481 14 Land and Structures ...... 70,589 11,470,600 2,470,600 Total Operating Expenses ...... 13,646,643 11.722. 08 1 2,722,081 Total Expenditure ...... 13,646,643 11,722.081 2,722,081

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28701 Maryland Stadium Authority Facilities Fund ...... 13.646. 643 11.722.08 1 2.722. 081

I — 244 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.44 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Facilities Management program oversees operations (including security, cleaning and maintenance) at the Camden Yards Sports Complex, which includes Oriole Park at Camden Yards (OPACY), Ravens Stadium, The Warehouse at Camden Yards and surrounding grounds and parking lots.

MISSION

The mission of the Maryland Stadium Authority is to manage in a safe and cost effective manner the facilities at Camden Yards to ensure customer satisfaction while maximizing the economic return.

VISION

To operate the Camden Yards Complex in a manner that will place it in the top 25 percent of sports facilities in the Nation, make the Warehouse at Camden Yards one of the most desirable Class B rental facilities in the metropolitan area and attain recognition as a top location for catered events.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Maximize the satisfaction of visitors to the facilities managed by the Maryland Stadium Authority. Objective 1.1 Achieve a 95 percent satisfaction rating by tenants of the Warehouse at Camden Yards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Percent tenant satisfaction with Warehouse environment 95 % 95 % 95 % 95% Percent warehouse occupancy 100% 95 % 95 % 100% Warehouse rental income ($millions) $3.0 $3.1 $3.25 $3.5 Average rental per square foot $18.42 $19.38 $20.3 I $21.88

Goal 2. Maximize revenues derived from the facilities managed by the Maryland Stadium Authority to reduce dependence on State lottery funds. Objective 2.1 Increase the number of non-professional games held in the seating bowls of the Camden Yards Site. 2.2 Increase the number of catered events held in the facilities at Camden Yards. 2.3 Evaluate lease renewals to maximize full rental rates. 2.4 Evaluate event-related costs to minimize expenses wherever possible.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Percent of fan satisfaction at OPACY and Ravens Stadiums 95 % 97% 97% 100% Number of Seating Bowl Events 3 6 I 2 Amount generated from Seating Bowl Events ($thousands) $37.5 $250 $250 $250 Number of catered events at OPACY, The Warehouse and Ravens Stadium 230 240 230 230 Amount generated from catered events ($thousands) $515 $468 $440 $440

Goal 3. Ensure cost efficient maintenance and operational systems. Objective 3.1 Monitor maintenance schedules for all equipment and systems to maximize efficiency. 3.2 Competitively bid all service related contracts to obtain the most cost efficient pricing.

I — 245 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.44 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28701 Maryland Stadium Authority Facilities Fund ......

I — 246 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.48 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT - ORIOLE PARK

PROGRAM DISCRIPTION

This program manages the Capital improvements Account established under the Orioles Lease.

I — 247 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.48 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT-ORIOLE PARK

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28701 Maryland Stadium Authority Facilities Fund

D28A03.55 BALTIMORE CONVENTION CENTER

Program Description: The State Contributes funding towards debt service, operating costs, and a maintenance reserve for the Baltimore City Convention Center.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 248 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.58 OCEAN CITY CONVENTION CENTER

Program Description: House Bill 1370 authorizes the Maryland Stadium Authority to issue $17,340,000 in Lease Revenue Bonds and contribute the net bond proceeds to the Ocean City Convention Center Expansion Project on an equal basis (i.e. 50150) with Ocean City. The estimated total construction cost of the Ocean City Convention Center Expansion Project is $31,750,000, of which $1 million is being funded by a FY 1994 Statelocean City grant. Starting in FY 1998 the Maryland Stadium Authority and the Town of Ocean City will each contribute $50,000 to a capital improvements fund. The State contributes funding towards debt service, operating costs and a maintenance reserve for the Ocean City Convention Center.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 249 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.59 MONTGOMERY COUNTY CONFERENCE CENTER

Program Description: Non-budgeted funds reflect the expenditure of bond proceeds towards construction of the Mongomery County Conference Center . General funds reflect state contributions toward debt service and operating costs .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 70 .70 70 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Non-Budgeted Funds ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28759 Montgomery Conference Center ......

I — 250 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY

D28A03.60 HIPPODROME PERFORMING ARTS CENTER

Program Description: Senate Bill 125, provided funds to the Maryland Stadium Authority to implement the renovation and construction of the Hippodrome Performing Arts Center which includes the Hippodrome Theater and adjacent properties. The Authority is permitted to enter into contracts, engage consultants, make recommendations, and take other actions related to this purpose. The Stadium Authority shall work in conjunction with the Baltimore Center for Performing Arts in developing this project.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Non-Budgeted Funds ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28760 Hippodrome Performing Art Center ...... 27,822,640 21,916,405 1,890,186

D28A03.61 MEMORIAL STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT-CAPITALAPPROPRIATION

Program Description: Senate Bill 125, 23.01.03.61 provides funds to the Maryland Stadium Authority to provide design and pre-demolition funds (e.g. hazardous abatement) for demolition of Memorial Stadium and for the preparation of the site for redevelopment.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 737,976 Total Operating Expenses ...... 737,976 Total Expenditure ...... 737,976

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D28761 Memorial Stadium ...... 737,976

I — 251 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 28.00 29.00 29.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 1,630,889 1,538,231 1,551,194 Technical and Special Fees ...... 51,862 50,7 17 50,887 Operating Expenses ...... 1,191,130 1,306,847 1,332,488 Non-Budgeted Funds ...... 2,873, 881 2,895,795 2,934,569

I — 252 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

D30N00.41 ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Food Center Authority (MFCA) is a non-budgeted enterprise agency that is involved in numerous aspects of the agricultural and food related industries. Primary experience and expertise is in the development of high-quality, lower cost facilities and support services for the agricultural and food related businesses seeking the most up-to-date technologically advanced working environment.

MISSION

The MFCA enhances and provides economic growth opportunities for Maryland's agricultural, seafood, and food related industries.

VISION

An organization that will empower its employees, allowing effective contribution of their knowledge and skills, resulting in high quality services and facilities in furtherance of the mission, in exchange for continued personal growth and fulfillment through continuing education, broad industry involvement, and work diversification.

KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

MFCA Board of Directors and management supports attainment of the goals and objectives for all programs of the MFCA.

Goal 1. Safe, quality, sanitary and efficient facilities with full service support at a reasonable price. Objective 1.1 Constant observation and comparison with providers elsewhere in the industry. Objective 1.2 MFCA offers maintenance service; on-site entrance control security guards; and roving security guards who patrol the grounds during evenings, nights, and early mornings. Objective 1.3 Conduct surveys to determine the best possible facilities and support services the MFCA can offer tothe agricultural and food related industries.

Goal 2. Maintain open communication with MFCA customers while maintaining a current understanding of changes affecting the agricultural and food related industries in order to ensure the highest level of current customer satisfaction, as well as attracting new business to the State of Maryland. Objective 2.1 Hold MFCA Board Meetings held approximately four times per year. Objective 2.2 Hold Tenant Advisory Board Meetings held quarterly. Objective 2.3 Open line of communication between the tenants and MFCA via 24 hour, 7 days a week security guard service.

I — 253 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

D30N00.042 MARYLAND WHOLESALE PRODUCE MARKET

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Wholesale Produce Market opened in 1976 and operates as an integral component of the Maryland Food Center complex. The Produce Market consists of two buildings with approximately 330,000 square feet of space. The 101 individual units in the buildings continue to be leased by privately-owned firms engaged in the wholesale distribution of fresh produce. Many of the companies are second and third generations of the same family-owned business. The produce dealers own and operate highly-specialized companies and lease their offices, storage and dock facilities from the Maryland Food Center Authority (MFCA). Receivinglshipping terminals, handling, storage, refrigeration and processing functions for produce are centralized in a single location. These units have had to broaden their business, several companies include value added services, that necessitate changes in their facility design.

MISSION

MFCA develops, owns, operates, improves, and maintains a full service wholesale produce market in the State of Maryland that provides economical and sanitary facilities for product distribution.

VISION

A market environment that will provide the State of Maryland with the most modern, safe, sanitary and efficient wholesale produce market on the East Coast.

KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

For MFCA management to continuously improve the operational efficiency and security while providing a higher level of sanitation at the Produce Market facilities.

Goal 1. To examine development and distribution needs of Maryland's produce industry, and the most effective use of the MFCA's development and management resources to meet those needs. Objective 1.1 Conduct surveys to determine the best possible facilities and support services the MFCA can offer the produce industry. Objective 1.2 Hold Tenant Advisory Board Meetings held quarterly. Objective 1.3 Participate in national and international associations, taking lead roles to stay abreast of global changes and trends.

I — 254 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D30701 Interest Income ...... 20. 259 21. 272 22. 336 D30702 Rental Income ...... 1.008, 153 1,068,658 1.107. 920 Total ...... 1,028,412 1.089.930 1,130,256

D30N00.42 -MARYLAND WHOLESALE PRODUCE MARKET

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D30702 Rental Income ...... D30704 Entrance Fees ...... Total ......

I — 255 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

D30N00.046 ROCK HALL SEAFOOD PROCESSING PLANT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Rock hall Seafood Processing Plant in Kent County is no longer operating. Fiscal Year 2003 and 2004 data is presented for informational purposes.

I — 256 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

D30N00.047 MARYLAND WHOLESALE SEAFOOD MARKET

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Wholesale Seafood Market operates in a similar method to the Maryland Wholesale Produce Market, consolidating all of the specialized storage, refrigeration, shippinglreceiving and processing functions into one main facility expressly designed for the industry. The 36 individual units in the buildings continue to be leased by privately-owned firms engaged in the wholesale distribution of fresh seafood. These businesses, too, are often owned by the second and third generation of families. Due to the changes in health, sanitation and safety regulations, particularly in the seafood industry, seafood businesses have been affected in increasing regulations regarding food safety and handling, such examples include Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point and the United States Department of Commerce Certification Program. The predicted future trends regarding food safety and handling in the seafood industry indicate stronger concerns for food sanitation including the elimination of potentially harmful microbiological bacteria associated with cold product being distributed across a warm environment.

MISSION

The Maryland Food Center Authority develops, owns, operates, improves, and maintains a full service wholesale seafood market in the State of Maryland that provides economical and sanitary facilities for product distribution.

VISION

A market environment that will provide the State of Maryland with the most modern, safe, sanitary and efficient wholesale seafood market on the East Coast.

I — 257 MARYLAND FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

D30N00.46 -ROCKHALL SEAFOOD PROCESSING PLANT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D30702 Rental Income ...... 6,798 15.465

D30N00.47 -MARYLAND WHOLESALE SEAFOOD MARKET

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D30702 Rental Income ...... D30704 Entrance Fees ...... Total ......

I — 258 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

SUMMARY OF STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 29.50 29.50 29.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 4.00 4.00 9.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferIReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 259 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

D38101.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Board of Elections (SBE) supervises elections conducted by the 24 local election board offices in Maryland. SEE monitors compliance with Maryland and Federal election laws; assists citizens to exercise their voting rights; and provides access to candidacy for all those seeking elective office.

MISSION

The State Board of Election's mission is to administer the process of holding democratic elections in a manner that inspires public confidence and trust.

VISION

The State Board of Elections envisions an election management system in which:

1.) All persons served by the election system are treated fairly and equitably; 2.) All qualified persons may register and vote and those who are not qualified do not vote; 3.) Those who administer elections are well-trained, they serve both those who vote and those who seek votes, and they put the public interest ahead of partisan interests; 4.) Full information on elections is provided to the public, including disclosure of campaign finance information; 5.) Citizen convenience is emphasized in all aspects of the election process; and 6.) Security and integrity are maintained in the casting of ballots, canvass of votes, and reporting of election results.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Utilize technology to help improve the local boards' abilities to efficiently and accurately maintain voter registration rolls. Objective 1.1 Provide for the electronic exchange of duplicate voter registration reports between the State Board of Elections and 100 percent of the local election boards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of local election boards receiving electronic duplicate registration reports from SBE 24 24 24 24

Objective 1.2 Ensure that the data on deceased persons received at SEE from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) is transmitted electronically to 100 percent of the local election boards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of local election boards receiving successful electronic transfer of DHMH data on deceased persons from SEE* 24 24 24 24

*FY02 and FY03 were completed retroactively

Goal 2. Monitor compliance with Federal and State election law mandates. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2007 monitor all 24 local boards of elections for compliance with Federal and State election laws. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of local election boards monitored 24 24 24 24 Number of local election boards receiving an on-site audit 2 4 8 8

I — 260 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

D38101.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 3. Provide timely public access to election results and other election related data. Objective 3.1 Post unofficial election results on the SEE web site within 3 hours of receipt from the local election boards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Percentage of local election boards whose election results are posted timely N/A 100% 100% 100%

Goal 4. Promote compliance with Maryland campaign finance laws. Objective 4.1 Upon receipt of campaign finance reports, review 100 percent of the reports and provide the candidates, campaign chairpersons, and treasurers information on the corrections, deficiencies, and adjustments necessary. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of campaign reports reviewed 100% 100% 100% 100% Number of corrections, deficiencies, and adjustments necessary 452 847 800 700

I — 261 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

D38101.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 262 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

D38101.02 HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA), passed in October 2002, imposed new election requirements on states and called for the upgrade of voting machines. In compliance with HAVA, the State Board of Elections (SBE) will use this program to appropriately account for expenditures related to improving election administration in the State. In partnership with the 24 local election board offices in Maryland, the Board will develop and review the HAVA State Plan, implement a statewide voting system and improve election administration in the State.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Monitor compliance with Federal and State election law mandates. Objective 1.1 Implement the priorities identified in the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) State Plan by the end of fiscal year 2006. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Develop and maintain a HAVA State Plan NIA 1 1 1 Quality: Number of local election boards receiving weekly electronic confirmation of data verification from the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) NIA NIA 100% 100% Percent of election officials and election judges receiving sensitivity training N/ A NIA 100% 100% Percent of provisional ballot application outcomes posted to the web site within 24 hours of receipt from the local election boards NIA NIA 100% 100% Number of local election boards using the statewide voter registration system NIA NIA NIA 2 Number of actions coordinated by SEE to improve accessibility to polling places for voters with disabilities on election day NIA NIA 100 50

Goal 2. Acquire and certify a statewide uniform voting system. Objective 2.1 Complete the implementation of the statewide uniform voting system by July 1, 2006, as mandated by State law. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of local election boards implementing a new voting system. 4 0 19 1

Note: NIA - Not applicable

I — 263 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

D38101.02 HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Contractual Positions ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D38301 Local Election Reform Payments ......

Federal Fund Income: 39.01 1 Election Reform Payments ......

I — 264 MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

D39S00.01 CONTRACT APPEALS RESOLUTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Title 15, Subtitle 2, of the State Finance and Procurement Article established the Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals and vested it with jurisdiction to hear and resolve all disputes relating to the formation of a procurement contract and the determination of the successful bidder or offer or and all disputes arising under or relating to a contract which has been entered into by the State including but not limited to those concerning the performance, breach, modification, and termination of a contract.

MISSION

It is the mission of the Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals to adjudicate disputes concerning the formation of State contracts, except for the procurement of architectural and engineering services, and adjudicate disputes relating to contracts that have been entered into by the State.

VISION

Stakeholders will view the services provided by this Board as the most efficient, timely and creditable method to resolve contract formation and contract execution disputes.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To resolve bid protest and contract claims before this Board in the least time possible consistent with established legal requirements. This is an established continuing goal. Objective 1.1 Publish bid protest opinions within three months or less after receipt of the Agency Report.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number new appeals filed 3 1 25 21 23 Number from prior year 2 10 7 (Actual) 7 Outputs: Number of appeals requiring a written decision 15 11 18 19 Number appeals carried forward 10 7 7 8 Quality: Percent decisions issued in 3 months* 80% 91% 88% 84% Number opinions appealed this period 2 2 2 2 Number opinions affirmed by Courts this period 2 1 Number opinions reversed by Courts this period 0 0

Objective 1.2 Publish contract claim opinions within six months or less of the close of the record.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Disputes filed this period 28 37 30 30 Carried over prior period 47 45 (Actual) 40 Outputs: Number of cases resolved prior to hearing 26 27 27 Number of opinions issued 6 8 7 Number of opinions issued in 6 months or less** 6 8 7 Number carried forward 45 40 3 8 Quality: Percent decisions issued in 6 months 100% 100% 100% Number opinions appealed this period 3 Number opinions affirmed by Courts this period 3 Number opinions reversed by Courts this period 2

Note: *As of date filed. **As of the date all briefs have been filed when the record is normally closed

I — 265 MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

D39S00.01 CONTRACT APPEALS RESOLUTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 266 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

MISSION

Provide information and services that improve the ability of State & Local government, and community, development and environmental organizations to support desirable growth in Maryland. Promote growth in Maryland that fosters vibrant, livable communities, preserves and protects the environment, and makes efficient use of State resources.

Present and future policy makers have the creative and informational tools necessary to make decisions relative to Maryland's people and land. KEY GOALS

Goal 1. To preserve our valuable State natural resources including forest and farmland.

Goal 2. Support and enhance the vitality of communities and neighborhoods, which have existing or planned infrastructure.

Goal 3. Increase the return on infrastructure investments by encouraging new residential and employment growth in Priority Funding Areas.

Goal 4. Provide web enabled information and services to the public over the Internet.

I — 267 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Administration program provides administrative services to fulfill financial, personnel, procurement, and information technology needs for the Department of Planning. The program also provides planning and technical assistance for the Interagency Committee for Public School Construction. In this capacity, the Department looks to ensure adherence to the principles of comprehensive planning, development management, land use, capital budgeting, policy analysis and Smart Growth for annual and five-year programs of elementary and secondary school capital improvements funded or to be funded by the State for each county and Baltimore City.

MISSION

To assure funding for public school construction projects complies with Smart Growth principles and practices.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Support and enhance the vitality of communities and neighborhoods, which have existing or planned public school infrastructure. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2004, ninety five percent of approved new school sites will be located within priority funding areas. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of approved new school sites 8 4 10 10 Output: Percentage of approved new school sites located within priority funding areas 75% 50% 80% 80%

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2003 ninety percent of approved construction projects will be improvements to existing schools.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of approved public school projects 487 319 295 295 Output: Percentage of approved improvements to existing public schools

I — 268 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 129.00 120.00 124.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 10.00 8.00 2.50 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 8.138.047 7.376.851 8.279.643 Technical and Special Fees ...... 244.205 241.928 71.325 Operating Expenses ...... 1.349.990 1.016.037 778.872 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 8.740.915 7.819.889 TransferReduction ...... -166.495 414.439 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 8.574.420 7.405.450 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 565.234 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 8.009.186 7.405.450 7.792.791 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 170.329 225.000 326.490 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 202.207 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 1.350.520 1.004.366 1.010.559 Total Expenditure ...... 9.732.242 8.634.816 9.129.840

D40W01.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 134.903 04 Travel ...... 6.SO0 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 18.220 08 Contractual Senices ...... 130.229 09 Supplies and Materials ...... SO.587 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 7.SO0 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D40901 Goods and Services to Various State Agencies ......

I — 269 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.02 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance fulfills the State's need for intergovernmental coordination pursuant to the Federal Intergovernmental Cooperation Act. The State Clearinghouse serves as the single point of contact for Federal and State agencies seeking the views of State, regional and local elected officials on: (1) applications for Federal and State assistance, (2) Federal and State development projects, (3) certain planning activities such as power plant transmission lines applications, municipal annexations, easements or right-of-ways across State real property, transfer or disposal of State excess real property, substantial changes in the use of State real property, environmental assessment forms and environmental effects reports, applications by State agencies for Federal instructional contracts, instructional grants, research contracts, or research grants, and (4) other actions requiring intergovernmental coordination. The Clearinghouse program maintains the Catalog of State Assistance, prepares a weekly report detailing or listing Federal and State actions and maintains an inventory of State-owned real property.

MISSION

To serve as intergovernmental coordinator and a resource for: (I) master and sector plans proposed and developed in the state and (2) direct development and financial assistance activities proposed throughout the State.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To manage efficiently the Maryland Intergovernmental Review and Coordination, (MIRC) process to ensure increased consistency of plans and proposed development projects with federal, State and local plans, programs, objectives, Smart Growth policies and permitting requirements. Objective 1.1 By June 2004, one hundred percent of state funding opportunities and development projects reviewed throughout the State will be consistent with Smart Growth policies and practices.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of MIRC projects received and reviewed 1,267 1,380 1,280 1,300 Percentage of projects consistent with Smart Growth 99% 99.9% 100% 100%

Goal 2. To collect and provide useful, accurate, and easily accessible information on Federal, State and private sector funding sources and land use development plans. Objective 2.1 By June 2004, to maintain and update on the Internet a Catalog of State Assistance Programs (Red Book) and MdGrants - an informative Internet database on private, federal and State grants, loans, and other financial and technical assistance. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of visits to Red Book pages annually 6,000 6,822 7,200 7,500 Number of visits to Maryland Grants pages annually 3,600 9,553 10,000 10,000

I — 270 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.02 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 271 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.03 PLANNING DATA SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Planning Data Services Division collects, analyzes and publishes socioeconomic, cultural, geographic, parcel and land use data - current, past and projected; identifies and evaluates development issues in support of Smart Growth; prepares reports and studies on specific topics in support of the Executive Branch and as requested by the General Assembly; and maintains computerized property maps reflecting accurate and up-to-date property maps with linkages to parcels and a variety of other data sets.

MISSION

Develop, compile and maintain socioeconomic, demographic, cultural, geographic, land use and property data on Maryland in support of the Governor's Smart Growth, neighborhood revitalization and land preservation initiatives as well as other government, private sector and general public interests; prepare and maintain intelligent map and data products that integrate with other digital base maps and data to provide intelligent decision support tools in support of the Administration's interest in growth management, economic development, environmental and natural resource protection. VISION

A state which provides it leaders, people and businesses with intelligent information technology decision support tools and complete, comprehensive and accurate data and analyses to facilitate sound and effective decision making in support of Smart Growth and economic development for Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide timely data and intelligent tools to implement the Department's key goals; preserving our valuable natural resources, enhancing the vitality of existing communities and concentrating new growth in Priority Funding Areas. Objective 1.1 During fiscal year 2004, update one and develop one new application that use spatial data decision support tools to facilitate effective Smart Growth programs for State and local government.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of parcel records processed and included on each MdProperty View Edition update (thousands) 2,085 2,104 2,124 2,144 Number of basemaps updated (not including property maps) 4 8 72 72 72 Output: Number of applications developed using spatial data tools to facilitate Smart Growth and planning applications 2 2 1 1

Objective 1.2 During fiscal year 2004, update the Smart Growth Benchmarking tool for providing measurements to annually evaluate Smart Growth's effectiveness. CY2000 CY2001 CY2002 CY2003 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of statewide residential single family parcels (20 acres or less in size) developed inside priority funding areas* 72.0% 7 1.9% 72.5% 73.0% Percent of statewide acreage associated with residential single family parcels (20 acres or less in size) occurring inside priority funding areas* 23.1% 24.3% 24.8% 25.3%

* Note: Calendar Year (CY) measures (based on MdPropertyView 2002 Edition)

I — 272 DEPARTMENT OF' PLANNING

D40W01.03 PLANNING DATA SERVICES (Continued)

Objective 1.3 Prepare Annual School Enrollment Projections Report, 2003 - 2012 in support of State capital spending decisions so that one-year projections are within 2% of statewide enrollment consistent with Smart Growth.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of school enrollment reports distributed to LEAS, General Assembly and MDP library 55 55 5 5 55 Qua1ity:One year projections are within two percent of statewide actual enrollment Meet Meet Meet Meet Five year projections are within five percent of LEA projections for purposes of State and Local school planning Meet Meet Meet Meet

Goal 2. Increase the amount of information and services on the web. Objective 2.1 During fiscal year 2004 update the web site for accessing 2000 Census maps and socio-economic profiles based on 2000 Census sample data, with the goal of providing 80 percent of information and services on the web.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of Census 2000 profiles available via the web not including address look-up profiles 16,506 58,185 loo** SO** Outcome: Percent of information requests provided via the web versus paper 90% 93% 93% 93%

**Note: Profiles based on Census 2000 Summary File 4 and the American Community Survey may be prepared depending on release schedule for data.

Goal 3. Publish Census data in support of State and local planning and redistricting efforts. Objective 3.1 During fiscal year 2004, provide the technical assistance for legislative and congressional redistricting, including access to maps and profiles for the new districts.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of election results profiled 0 0 9,979 NIA (2004 Estimated figures are for Election Year 2002) Number of Congressional and Legislative District Boundary maps prepared 301 1,324 500 200 Number of Congressional and Legislative District Profiles prepared 5 665 NA NA

I — 273 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.03 PLANNING DATA SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 274 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.04 LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Local Planning Assistance program: provides professional technical services to improve the planning and management capacity of local governments; helps local planning officials develop long-term comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations; and prepares project, topic, and site-specific analyses and research on development issues and smart growth techniques.

MISSION

To provide county and municipal governments with professional planning assistance and timely advice that promotes Smart Growth and resource conservation. VISION

Maryland's local comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, infrastructure programs, sewer and water plans, and transportation plans incorporate Smart Growth and resource conservation principles; local development decisions support Smart Growth and resource conservation principles; and State agencies support local Smart Growth and resource conservation projects through regulatory innovation and flexibility.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To preserve our valuable State natural resources, including forest and farmland. Objective 1.1 In each succeeding year, there will be 3 new infill and mixed use projects within Priority Funding Areas that utilize Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) design assistance, streetscape assistance, or professional planning expertise. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of new Assistance Projects and Publications 3 3 4 5

Objective 1.2 By 2004,45 percent of local governments will incorporate one or more Smart Growth or resource conservation principles into their comprehensive plans and ordinances.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of comprehensive plans and ordinances written for local governments 10 8 8 8 Number of local plans analyzed and commented on * 25 20 20 Outcomes: Number of jurisdictions that adopt the Infill and Mixed use Model & Guidelines (or similar techniques) * 1 8 8 Number of local governments updating their comprehensive plans or ordinances in a given year that include one or more improved Smart Growth or resource conservation principles. 8 10 12 12

Goal 2. Support and enhance the vitality of communities and neighborhoods, which have existing or planned infrastructure. Objective 2.1 Maintain an institutional framework through which MDP can exercise its authority to support the goals of Smart Growth by participating in land use decisions of extraordinary circumstance.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of cases of State interest considered 10 15 15 15 Number of interventions (administrative and legal) undertaken 3 2 2 2

Notes: * New measures for which data is not available

I — 275 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.04 LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: 23.01 1 Appalachian State Research. Technical Assistance. and Demonstration Projects ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D40901 Goods and Services to Various State Agencies ...... KOOA10 DNR-Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission ...... SOOA20 Department of Housing and Community Development . Total ......

I — 276 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.05 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The comprehensive Planning Program develops and promotes policies supporting: sustainable communities, neighborhood conservation, land preservation, natural resource protection, and growth and development in Maryland. The program also provides technical support staff for: the Patuxent River Commission, The Upper Western Shore Tributary Team, the State Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Commission, The Rural Legacy Board, the Maryland Agricultural Certification Program, and represents the agency on a variety of Boards and Commissions.

MISSION

Achieve trends in development patterns and resource land consumption that are consistent with Smart Growth principles and related State, federal and local resource conservation objectives.

VISION

New growth and development are concentrated in cities and towns, rural and natural resource lands are preserved and protected, communities thrive, and transportation supports Smart Growth objectives.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Preserve our valuable natural resources including forest and farmland. Objective 1.1 By 2010, permanently preserve from development, 20% of the land area in Maryland.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of new dwellings built outside of Priority funding areas (PFAs) (Note: # - 1998-1999 , ## - 2000 - 2001) Improved parcels outside of PFAs in proportion to total population Percent of Maryland that is protected ** Number of improved parcels outside PFAs ***(#-2000 - 2001) Acres of improved parcels outside PFAs ***(#-2000 - 2001) Number of improved parcels inside PFAs ***(#-2000 - 2001) Acres of improved parcels inside PFAs ***(#-2000 - 2001)

(Note: ### - represents a baseline ratio of parcels per person in 2000, based on Census 2000 population numbers) (Note: #### - actually an estimate, because based on the 10 year Census 2000 population numbers) Note: ** - Protected lands defined as Federal Lands (excluding military), State and County Owned Parks, State Easements, Local Easements, and private Easements Note: *** - Improved parcels defined as any parcel with an improvement value greater than $10,000

Objective 1.2 To increase our assistance to local governments. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of analyses where technical assistance was completed related to Smart Growth Issues, including rural preservation analyses, new household capacity studies, and other analyses

I — 277 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.05 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING (Continued)

Objective 1.2 By 2003, work with DNR and MDA to ensure that the majority of State land preservation funds are spent in jurisdictions directing growth and new development to existing communities and neighborhoods.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of new acres of agricultural land 2,266,187 2,264,100 2,262,100 2,260,100 Number of acres of agricultural land preserved through MALPF and Rural Legacy 24,637 21,853 18,000 17,000 Number of new acres of agricultural, natural and environmental resource easements 49,700* 53,129* 50,000 50,000

Note: 2002 actual is from 2000 Land UseILand Cover. 2003 actual is from estimate *Note: This includes Greenprint acquisitions

Goal 2. Support and enhance the vitality of existing communities and neighborhoods where infrastructure is already in place or planned. Objective 2.1 By 2002, publish data and analysis on land use change, patterns, and projections by county for the entire State, to assess the extent to which anticipated development will occur inside or outside of Priority Funding Areas. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Population inside PFAs 4,288,463# 4,290,000 4,300,000 4,310,000 Percent of housing units occupied in PFAs 92.28%# 92.4% 92.6% 92.8%

#Note: Baseline number from Census 2000, completed every ten years.

Objective 2.2 By 2002, make available to State and local government and the legislature an inventory of the available capacity for new households in existing communities and neighborhoods with sewer service.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Capacity for new households in existing communities and neighborhoods with sewer service 355,299(#) 3 14,556 3 10,000 305,000

#Note: Difference between 2002 actual and 2003 actual is a result of updated data and corrected information such as zoning, sewer and protected lands. We are continuing to update 2000 data.

Goal 3. Increase the return on infrastructure investments by concentrating new residential and employment growth in Priority Funding Areas. Objective 3.1 By 2002, make available to State and local government and the legislature an inventory of the available capacity for new households in Priority Funding areas.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Capacity for new households in existing communities and neighborhoods 726,994 561,819# 550,000 540,000

#Note: Difference between 2002 actual and 2003 actual is a result of updated data and corrected information such as zoning, sewer and protected lands. We are continuing to update 2000 data.

I — 278 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.05 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 25.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D40901 Goods and Services to Various State Agencies ...... JOOA01 Department of Transportation ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... LOOA 11 Department of Agriculture ...... Total ......

I — 279 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.06 PARCEL MAPPING

This program shares the mission, vision, key goals, objectives, and performance measures of program D40W01.03 Planning Data Services

I — 280 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

D40W01.06 PARCEL MAPPING

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D40300 Fees Collected from Goods and Services ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D40901 Goods and Services to Various State Agencies ......

I — 281 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides the overall statewide direction, development, and maintenance of the Maryland National Guard as well as authority for operating the Maryland Emergency Management Agency.

MISSION

The Military Department has three missions:

Our State mission is to provide highly trained personnel, equipment, and facilities capable of protecting life and property and preserving, peace, order, and public safety.

Our Federal mission is to be prepared to defend the nation and its vital national security interest.

Our Community mission is to add value to the communities by providing highly trained and skilled citizen-soldiers and citizen-airmen whose military skills and discipline accrue to the benefit of employers and civic organizations.

VISION

The Military Department comprises quality people, equipment, facilities and systems to enhance our partnerships with communities, and local, State, and federal governments.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To ensure that the readiness of the Military Department, through preparedness, is capable of responding to State, federal, and community requirements. Objective 1.1 To demonstrate the Military Department's capability to respond to these requirements through successful completion of exercises and actual occurrences.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Successful completion of readiness program requirements 100% 100% 100% 100%

I — 282 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

SUMMARY OF MILITARY DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 343 .00 33 1. 00 334.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 54.50 44.50 44.50 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 283 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.01 ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Administrative Headquarters program provides overall direction for the Military Department, including agency headquarters, financial management, personnel, procurement, recruitment and retention, public outreach and education, records management, and administration of all facilities used by the State's military forces.

MISSION

To manage fiscal and administrative requirements in order to enhance readiness for the Military Department to support State, federal, and community needs.

VISION

Administrative Headquarters seeks to support the Military Department as the most effective military and emergency management organization.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To provide resources and services to the Military Department. Objective 1.1 The Military Department to attain 95% authorized strength

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of Guardsmen 9,335 8,638 9,335 9,335 Quality: Percent of authorized strength 90% 88% 93% 95%

I — 284 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.01 ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D50301 Armory Rentals ......

Federal Fund Income: 12.401 National Guard Military Operations and Mainte- nance Projects ...... 83.552 Emergency Management Performance Grants ...... Total ......

I — 285 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.02 AIR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program operates and maintains the Warfield Air National Guard Base at Martin State Airport. This reservation is used by the Maryland Air National Guard, which is represented by the 175' Wing. Federal shops for repair of Maryland Air National Guard aircraft are also located here. These facilities support the operations, training and readiness for over 1,888 Maryland Air National Guard members who perform humanitarian and national security missions (federally underwritten) and response for State and local support requests, to include responses to man-made and natural disasters.

MISSION

To provide the base support for the Maryland Air National Guard (MDANG). This includes operations, custodial support, repair and maintenance of the MDANG's airbase facility at Warfield Air National Guard Base, Martin State Airport.

VISION

This vision of the Maryland Air National Guard, supported by state-of-the-art facilities, is to be the premier unit equipped with leading edge technology and poised in readiness to meet tomorrow's challenges.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. All facilities and real property support the operational and training needs of the Maryland Air National Guard to support ongoing Maryland Air National Guard operations and respond to State and local emergencies. Objective 1.1 To maintain 95% or better, facilities in a fully functional status in compliance with National Guard Bureau requirements. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of facilities 4 8 48 4 8 4 8 Quality: Percent of facilities in fully functional status 92% 94% 95 % 98%

Goal 2. All operations and maintenance of facilities performed in a safe manner that promotes the health and welfare of the workforce. Objective 2.1 To provide a safe workplace for the workforce and members of the Maryland Air National Guard by reducing lost work hours as a result of accidents by 50%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of accidents 7 7 3 1 Outcome: Number of lost work hours 170 0 10 0

I — 286 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.02 AIR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: 12.401 National Guard Military Operations and Mainte- nance Projects ......

I — 287 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.03 ARMY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program operates and maintains 40 armories in 19 counties and Baltimore City. These armories are used by the Maryland Army National Guard, represented by units of the historic 29Infantry Division (Light), the Troop Command (Non- divisional units) and the State Area Readiness Command (headquarters). Support facilities include the United States Property and Fiscal office located in Havre de Grace, an army air field at Aberdeen Proving Ground, various vehicle, equipment and aircraft maintenance facilities, and four training sites to include its major facility, Camp Fretterd, in Reisterstown. These facilities, comprised of over 300 buildings and 4,000 acres of land, staffed with over 200 Military Department employees, support the operations, training and readiness for over 6,400 Maryland Army National Guard members who perform humanitarian and national security missions (federally underwritten) and response for State and local support request, to include responses to man-made and natural disasters.

MISSION

To provide the facility support for the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG). This includes operations, custodial support, repair and maintenance of the MDARNG's facilities located throughout the State of Maryland.

VISION

The vision of the Maryland Army National Guard, supported by the state-of-the-art facilities, is to be the premier unit equipped with leading edge technology and poised in readiness to meet tomorrow's challenges.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. All facilities and real property support the operational and training needs of the Maryland Army National Guard to support ongoing Maryland Army National Guard operations and respond to State and local emergencies. Objective 1.1 To maintain 95% or better, facilities in a fully functional status in compliance with National Guard Bureau requirements. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of facilities 42 42 43 43 Quality: Percent of facilities in fully functional status 58% 61% 62 % 66%

Objective 1.2 To provide a safe workplace for the workforce and members of the Maryland Army National Guard by reducing lost work hours as a result of accidents by 50%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of accidents 2 8 1 1 Outcome: Number of lost work hours 60 3,050 10 10

Goal 2. The reduction in overall consumption of energy by 15% and water by 10% over the next 9 years at all facilities without degrading quality of life and operational readiness for the Maryland Army National Guard. Objective 2.1 To reduce energy consumption. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Percent reduction in BTU's consumed 3% 5% 6% 8%

Objective 2.2 To reduce water consumption in line with the Governor's declaration over a 2000 baseline.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Percent reduction in water consumed. 3% 4% 7% 9%

I — 288 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.03 ARMY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... SuppliesA A and Materials 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D50301 Armory Rentals ......

Federal Fund Income: 12.401 National Guard Military Operations and Mainte- nance Projects ......

I — 289 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.04 CAPITAL APPROPRIATION - DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

PROGRAM DISCRIPTION

The Capital Appropriation program provides operating funds for capital projects for improvements to Military Department facilities.

I — 290 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.04 CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 10,248 14 Land and Structures...... 2,440,966 Total Operating Expenses ...... 2,451,214 Total Expenditure ...... 2,451,214

Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 2,451,214

Federal Fund Income: 12.400 Military Construction, National Guard ......

I — 291 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.05 STATE OPERATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Operations program provides overall direction for the Military Department relating to our community missions to include: youth programs, veterans' burial honor detail, and distributive training technology (DTT) and telework centers. This program seeks partnerships with employers and educational institutions to recruit and retain quality personnel. The Military Department views this organization as one that values teamwork, provides a role model for youths and shows proper burial recognition to veterans who served their country. MISSION

To enhance the communities by providing highly trained and skilled citizen-soldiers and citizen-airmen whose military skills and discipline accrue to the benefit of our youth, employers, civic organizations, and citizens of Maryland.

VISION

State Operations is intent on establishing and maintaining community partnerships that strengthen the organization and provides benefits to our citizens now and in the future.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. At risk youth (Military Youth Challenge (MYC) graduates) to become productive citizens. Objective 1.1 Increase the percentage of MYC graduates who continue their schooling, get a job, or enter the military from 75% to 91%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of students 200 200 200 200 Output: Percent of MYC graduates who continue working 88% 89% 90% 92%

Objective 1.2 Increase the percentage of MYC graduates who achieve their General Education Degree (GED) diploma from 69% to 75%. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of MYC graduates with GED diploma 71% 72% 73% 75%

Objective 1.3 Increase the percentage of MYC graduates in their Post Residential Phase that have active Mentor relationships beyond six months from 20% to 70%. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percent of MYC graduates with active mentor relationships 61% 63% 69 % 70%

Objective 1.4 Increase the average number of MYC graduates per class from 80 to 100. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of students per class 100 100 100 100 Output: Average number of MYC graduates 87 93 100 100

I — 292 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.05 STATE OPERATIONS (Continued)

Goal 2. Operate the Veterans Burial Detail Program to provide honors with dignity for deceased veterans and their families in Maryland. Objective 3.1 Provide at least 2,000 services per year with no complaints.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of services performed 2,536 2,958 3,000 3,300 Percent of services performed without complaint 100% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 3. Operate the DTTtTelework Program to provide at least 14 sites located in key strategic geographic areas. Objective 4.1 To provide alternative work sites for teleworking, emergency management response and training.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of Users 15,959 18,555 20,000 22,000 Number of Usage ours' 90,5 19 96,724 105,000 112,000

' The DTTP sites are set up to cover several programs: video conferencing, video class, video training, computer classes, tele-work, etc. Usage Hours are increasing due to an increase in open sites, a drastic increase in state agency and college use, and operational changes resulting in more accurate reporting procedures and more flexible staff coverage of events.

I — 293 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.05 STATE OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D50302 About Face Program ......

Federal Fund Income: 12.401 National Guard Military Operations and Mainte- nance Projects ...... 16.007 State and Local Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 294 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.06 MARYLAND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides the overall statewide direction, development, implementation and coordination of mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery activities with local jurisdictions, State departmentslagencies, federal departmentslagencies, private and volunteer organizations.

Mitigation: Taking sustained actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. Preparedness: Building the emergency management profession to prepare effectively for, mitigate against, respond to and recover from likely or potential Maryland hazards by planning, training, and exercising. Response: Conducting emergency operations to save lives and property by positioning emergency equipment and supplies, evacuating potential victims, providing food, water, shelter, and medical care to those in need, and restoring critical public services. Recovery: Rebuilding communities so individuals, businesses, and governments can function on their own, return to normal life, and protect against future hazards.

MISSION

To lead, coordinate, and support the State of Maryland in a comprehensive, all-hazard emergency management system of mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery and homeland defense for the purpose of reducing the loss of life and property and protecting our institutions and environment.

VISION

To be the national model for state emergency management organizations. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Readiness. Develop and maintain the capability to effectively perform the 13 Emergency Management Functions (EMFs) as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the Capability Assessment for Readiness (CAR) to prepare for, mitigate against, respond to, and recover from disasters.

Note: The 13 Emergency Management Functions (EMFs) are 1) Laws and Authorities, 2) Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, 3) Hazard Mitigation, 4) Resource Management, 5) Planning, 6) Direction, Control, and Coordination, 7) Communications and Warning, 8) Operations and Procedures, 9) Logistics and Facilities, 10) Training, Exercises, Evaluations, and Corrective Actions, 11) Crisis Communications, 12) Public Education, 13) Finance and Administration. The 13 EMFs are rated on a scale of one to five, five being the highest possible score. The assessment is based upon State government capabilities which include the readiness of our State department and agency partners. The year 2000 ratings serve as the baseline.

Objective 1.1 To reach an 80% rating (average of 4 on a 5 point scale) or better on the Capability Assessment for Readiness (CAR) by 2003 and sustain the rating in the future.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: CAR composite score' 80% 86% 80% 80%

' Scores based on a scale of 1-5, 5 being highest possible score. Average composite score of each 13 EMF is divided by 5 and percentages are developed based on that score. Baseline for year one (2000) is 3.57 (71%), 3.74 (75%) for 2001, 3.97 (79%) for 2002.

I — 295 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.06 MARYLAND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (Continued)

Goal 2. Performance. Demonstrate the state's capability to respond to emergencies through evaluated exercises, incorporating lessons learned into improvements. Objective 2.1 To maintain a rating of "success" in 90% of evaluated areas on an annual basis.

Note: Ratings are based upon objectives for annually evaluated exercises for the chemical stockpile at Aberdeen Proving Ground and the Calvert Cliffs and Peach Bottom nuclear power plants whose emergency preparedness zones include local jurisdictions in Maryland. The ratings are indicators of probable performance in an actual emergency.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Evaluated exercise rating 100% 98% 90% 90%

The Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP), Calvert Cliffs, and Peach Bottom are the exercises by which MEMA is federally evaluated. Each exercise has its own objectives by which MEMA is assessed.

I — 296 MILITARY DEPARTMENT

D50H01.06 MARYLAND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 55.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 268. 486 04 Travel ...... 119.856 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... SO. 854 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 3. 077 08 Contractual Services ...... 565. 733 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 77.609 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 465. 210 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 296. 487 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 26.652. 459 13 Fixed Charges ...... 22. 819 Total Operating Expenses ...... 28.522. 590 Total Expenditure ...... 30.464. 358

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 1.887.526 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... 153.065 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: State and Local Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program ...... Urban Areas Security Initiative ...... Interagency Hazardous Materials Public Sector Training and Planning Grants ...... Hazardous Materials Assistance Program ...... Community Assistance Program-State Support Services Element (CAP-SSSE) ...... Flood Mitigation Assistance ...... Crisis Counseling ...... Individual and Family Grants ...... Public Assistance Grants ...... Hazard Mitigation Grant Program ...... Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program ...... Emergency Management Performance Grants ...... Pre-Disaster Mitigation ...... Federal Assistance to Individuals and Households -Other Needs ...... State and Local All Hazards Emergency Oper- ations Planning ...... Citizen Corps ...... Community Emergency Response Teams ...... Total ......

I — 297 MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS

D53T00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS) oversees and coordinates all components of the statewide EMS system (including planning, operations, evaluation, and research), provides leadership and medical direction, conducts, approves and/or supports EMS educational programs, operates and maintains a statewide communications system, designates trauma and specialty centers, licenses and regulates commercial ambulance services, and participates in EMS-related public education and prevention programs.

MIEMSS provides the executive support for the EMS Board in reviewing and approving the budgets for agencies receiving funds from the EMS Operations Fund, developing and promulgating regulations and protocols, proposing EMS system legislation, licensinglcertifying and disciplining EMS providers, and conducting other EMS Board business. MIEMSS also provides the administrative and staff support for the Statewide EMS Advisory Council and five EMS regional councils.

MISSION

Consistent with Maryland law and guided by the EMS Plan, to provide the resources (communications, infrastructure, grants, and training), leadership, (vision, expertise, and coordination), and oversight (medical, regulatory, and administrative) necessary for Maryland's statewide emergency medical services (EMS) system to function optimally and to provide effective care to patients by reducing preventable deaths, disability, and discomfort.

VISION

To be a state EMS system acknowledged as a leader for providing the highest quality patient care and sought out to help other EMS systems attain the same level of quality care.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide high quality medical care to individuals receiving emergency medical services. Objective 1.1 Maryland will maintain its trauma patient care performance above the national norm at a 95% or higher statistical level of confidence.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: 295% statistical level of confidence that Maryland performs above the national norm: Yes Yes Yes Yes

Objective 1.2 By 2005, maintain an overall inpatient complication rate of 10% or less for Maryland trauma centers

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Statewide trauma center complication rate: 11.9 *12.3 11.0 10.0

Objective 1.3 Achieve 20% witnessed sudden cardiac arrest resuscitation upon ER arrival in 70% of jurisdictions by 2003.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent jurisdictions achieving 20% witnessed Resuscitation**

Notes: *2003 data review revealed an overall increase of 0.4% in trauma center complications **Uponfurther review of final verified data, the indicator definition of "Witnessed" was redefined as "Witnessed and having a cardiac rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia ". This definition better corresponds with the established objective and strategies.

I — 298 MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS

MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS

D53T00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D53301 Maryland Emergency Medical System Operations Fund ...... D53302 Commercial Ambulance Licensing/Inspection Fees . D53303 Miscellaneous Service Charges ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.127 Emergency Medical Services for Children ...... 93.259 Rural Access to Emergency Devices Grant ...... 93.952 Improving EMSITrauma Care in Rural Areas ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ...... MOOF01 DHMH-Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services ... Total ......

I — 299 MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS

? r-3 r- r' "

- c^ " -Â¥ vr'

0 5 ,. r'

- - a-fi

-s

- -

\c 8 fi 2 (^ -5 CT- m \c

- -

^c 8 u-0 fl IT-.

- - 8 -4 0" [^ 0 s If. 2

M 2 2 dc 2 - 5 s a" Â¥ a: 3 -^ a- n a 2 Oi 2 c, i/i ec ti - m

I — 300 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Department of Veterans Affairs provides administrative services to veterans and their dependents, manages five veterans cemeteries, maintains four veterans war memorials, and operates and manages the Charlotte Hall Veterans Home.

MISSION

The Maryland Department of Veterans Affairs delivers services and programs to assist veterans, their families and survivors in obtaining federal, state and local benefits provided by law in recognition of their service to state and country.

VISION

The Department is as an advocate of veterans' issues and will dedicate itself to the preservation and enhancement of benefits, rights, and entitlements to ensure that veterans and their families live productive and successful lives.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Promote awareness of services and benefits available to veterans, their dependents, and survivors. Objective 1.1 Maintain the number of client contacts at fiscal 2003 levels in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Maryland veteran population 495,177 484,323 473,716 463,228 Outputs: Number of client contacts 69,720 68,830 68,830 68,830 Number of new power-of-attorney assignments 98 1 898 850 850

Goal 2. Assure maintenance of burial areas, surrounding lawn areas, buildings, and roads that fulfills the expectations of family members and members of the veterans community. Objective 2.1 Reduce grounds maintenance complaints filed by family members by 10% in fiscal year 2005 while increasing the number of complaints resolved within 30 days to 97%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of burial sites 51,107 54,189 57,437 60,937 Outcomes: Number of complaints received 180 213 150 135 Quality: Percent of complaints to burial site ratio 004% 004% 003% 003% Percent of complaints resolved within 30 days 95 % 95% 96% 97%

I — 301 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.01 SERVICE PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Veterans Service Program provides information, guidance, and assistance to veterans, their dependents, and survivors in applying for and obtaining federal, state and local benefits and entitlements granted by law.

MISSION

The Veterans Service Program aids veterans, their dependents, and survivors in the preparation, development, and resolution of claims for: service-connected disability compensation, pension, death benefits, educational assistance, home loans, medical care, and other benefits available from federal, state and local organizations.

VISION

We envision a State that improves the economic well being of its veterans and their families by providing quality benefits information and counseling.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 2. Provide effective benefits counseling and claim development services to veterans and their dependents. Objective 2.1 Prepare and submit 100% of claims within the month of receipt in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of client contacts 69,720 68,830 68,830 68,830 Outputs: Number of claims filed 3,586 3,219 3,200 3,200 Quality: Percentage of claims filed within month of receipt 100% 100% 100% 100%

Objective 2.2 Maintain the proportion of benefit awards during fiscal year 2004.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of decisions on initial claims 875 894 914 925 Number of decisions on appeal issues heard 154 130 130 130 Quality: Percent of benefit awards on initial claims 69% 62% 69% 69% Percent of benefits denials on initial claims 31% 38% 31% 31% Percent of benefit awards on appeal issues heard 26% 49% 49% 49% Percent of benefit denials on appeal issues heard 10% 32% 10% 10% Outcome: Monetary value of new claims benefits awarded during fiscal year ($)

I — 302 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.01 SERVICE PROGRAM (Continued)

Objective 2.3 Maintain customer service satisfaction at 96% during fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of customer satisfaction surveys solicited 1,278 670 730 730 Quality: Percentage of customers rating service excellent or good 96% 97% 96% 96% Percentage of customers rating service fair or poor 4% 3% 4% 4%

Note: * New measures for which data is not available.

I — 303 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 70.00 65.00 65.00

Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... I .92 1.92 1.92 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferBeduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

D55P00.01 SERVICE PROGRAM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

I — 304 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.02 CEMETERY PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Veterans Cemetery Program operates and maintains five veterans cemeteries to provide interment for eligible Maryland veterans and their dependents. MISSION

The Veterans Cemetery Program offers a final resting place for Maryland veterans and their eligible dependents. We will assist veterans and their families in establishing burial eligibility both prior to and at the time of need, provide professional and dignified burial services, and perform perpetual care of burial areas, the surrounding grounds, buildings and roads.

VISION

Veterans Cemetery Personnel will ensure that service and perpetual care that is customer focused. Our cemeteries will be operated and maintained in such a manner that veterans and their families will be proud to bury their loved ones in a State Veterans Cemetery.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide interment services that are responsive to the needs of eligible veterans and their family members. Objective 1.1 During fiscal year 2005, provide burial services for 100% of those eligible and their dependents that desire to be buried in a Maryland Veterans Cemetery. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Interment services provided 3,201 3,082 3,300 3,500 Outcomes: Percent of those eligible and desiring that are interred 100% 100% 100% 100%

Objective 1.2 Increase by 1% per year the percent of those eligible to be buried in a veterans' cemetery who are interred in a veterans' cemetery. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Estimated death population eligible for interment 14,706 14,995 15,251 15,467 Outputs: Interment services provided 3,201 3,082 3,300 3,500 Outcomes: Percentage of those eligible that are interred 21% 21% 21% 22%

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of burial sites 51,107 54,137 57,437 60,937 Outcomes: Number of complaints received 180 213 150 135 Quality: Percent change in number of complaints -44.1% +13.3% -29.6% -15% Percent of complaints resolved within 30 days 95 % 95 % 96% 97 %

I — 305 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.02 CEMETERY PROGRAM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D55303 Contract Payments ......

Federal Fund Income: 64.101 Burial Expenses Allowance for Veterans ......

I — 306 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.03 MEMORIALS AND MONUMENTS PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program operates, secures, and maintains three veterans' memorials and monuments.

MISSION

The Memorials and Monuments Program will assure quality maintenance of the memorials honoring Maryland veterans who served in the U.S. Armed Forces during World War 11, Korean Conflict, and Vietnam Era.

VISION

The superior appearance of our veterans' memorials will place Maryland at the forefront of honoring the military history and contributions of its men and women who served and sacrificed for their state and nation.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goall. Assure that the maintenance of grounds and structures preserves the reverent symbolism of the Maryland Veterans' Memorials. Objective 1.1 During fiscal year 2004, all organizations using the Memorials for ceremonial functions will rate the appearance and use of the Memorials as acceptable or better than acceptable.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of ceremonies conducted 4 6 6 6 Number of satisfaction surveys returned 0 0 6 6 Outcomes: Percent rated as acceptable or better than acceptable NIA NIA 100% 100%

Note: NIA = Not applicable

I — 307 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.03 MEMORIALS AND MONUMENTS PROGRAM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 308 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.05 VETERANS HOME PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Veterans Home Program is charged with exercising general supervision over and proscribing rules for the government and management of the Home, making all necessary bylaws and regulations governing the admission, maintenance discharge of the residents, monitoring of the Contractor providing the health care management in the Home, and all things necessary to successfully carry into effect these purposes.

MISSION

The Charlotte Hall Veterans Home provides an Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing care facility for Maryland veterans who are unable to take care of themselves due to disability, advancing age, or have requirements for nursing home care. The Home provides the support and services required for shelter, sustenance, social support, and medical care with the intent to improve resident quality of life and when practical, return the resident to the community. VISION

Provide the highest quality long-term care to Maryland veterans.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Promote the functional independence of each resident. Objective 1.1 Maintain the residents' ability to perform their daily living requirements at or below the State average during each fiscal year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Resident population 27 3 27 1 345 370 Outcomes: Percentage of incidence of cognitive impairment Prevalence of bladder or bowel incontinence Prevalence of bedfast residents Incidence of decline in late loss of Assisted Daily Living skills Incidence of decline in Range of Motion Quality: State Average: Percentage of incidence of cognitive impairment Prevalence of bladder or bowel incontinence Prevalence of bedfast residents Incidence of decline in late loss of Assisted Daily Living skills Incidence of decline in Range of Motion

Goal 2. Provide a safe living environment. Objective 2.1 Maintain the danger to residents from accidents and preventable medical conditions at or below the State average during each fiscal year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Resident population 273 27 1 345 370 Outcomes: Incidence of new fractures Prevalence of falls Prevalence of urinary tract infections Prevalence of pressure ulcers (bed sores)

I — 309 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.05 VETERANS HOME PROGRAM (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: State Average: Incidence of new fractures Prevalence of falls Prevalence of urinary tract infections Prevalence of pressure ulcers (bed sores)

Goal 3. Maintain or improve the resident's quality of life. Objective 3.1 Provide an environment in which indicators of resident quality of life is at or below the State average each fiscal year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Resident population 273 27 1 345 370 Outcomes: Prevalence of daily physical restraints 6.0% 2.3% 5.0% 5.0% Prevalence of symptoms of depression 11.6% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% Prevalence of antipsychotic drug use 22.8% 12.6% 19.0% 19.0% Prevalence of behavioral symptoms affecting others 12.6% 17.7% 17.5% 17.0% Quality: State Average: Prevalence of daily physical restraints Prevalence of symptoms of depression Prevalence of antipsychotic drug use Prevalence of behavioral symptoms affecting others

Goal 4. Increase the resident population. Objective 4.1 In FY2005 increase average occupancy to 120 residents for Assisted Living and to 230 residents for Comprehensive Care

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total available beds: Assisted Living Care Comprehensive Care Outputs: Average daily residents: Assisted Living Care Comprehensive Care Percent occupancy - Assisted Living Care Percent occupancy - Comprehensive Care

I — 310 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.05 VETERANS HOME PROGRAM

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D55304 Gifts and Requests ...... D55306 Dedicated Purpose Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 64.014 Veterans State Domiciliary Care ...... 64.015 Veterans State Nursing Home Care ...... Total ......

I — 311 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.06 CAPITAL APPROPRIATION - VERARANS HOME PROGRAM

PROGRAM DISCRIPTION

This program provides capital funding for the Veterans Home program.

I — 312 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

D55P00.06 CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

03 Communication ...... 3,440 08 Contractual Services ...... 1,911 14 Land and Structures...... 267,818 Total Operating Expenses ...... 273,169 Total Expenditure ...... 273,169

Federal Fund Expenditure...... 273,169

Federal Fund Income: 64.005 Grants to States for ~onstruction of State Home Facilities ......

I — 313 STATE ARCHIVES

MISSION

The State Archives is the central depository for Maryland government records, and certain designated private records of permanent value. Holdings date from 1634 to the present. They include colonial and State executive, legislative and judicial records; county probate, land and court records; municipal records; and publications and reports of State, county and municipal government. Special collections preserve records of religious bodies (particularly as they relate to the recording of births, deaths, and marriages), fine and decorative arts, business and organizational records, maps, newspapers, photographs, and private papers, including oral histories. Our central mission is to appraise, acquire, describe, preserve and make electronically available the permanent records of the past, while providing reliable current information about Maryland State, county and municipal government. Materials are made accessible through a secure and (where appropriate) web-enabled environment, continually compiled and updated for the benefit and use of Maryland citizens and public officials.

VISION

A state that preserves government records (as well as certain designated private records) and provides access to them in a convenient, cost-effective manner and in a web-enabled environment.

KEY GOALS

Goal 1. Identify, appraise, acquire, describe, preserve and make accessible records deemed to have permanent historical, administrative, fiscal, legal or educational value. Where appropriate, make these materials electronically available.

Goal 2. Describe the agencies, budgets, functions, historical evolution, organizational structure, origin, personnel, reports (mandated) and other aspects of State, county and municipal government in an e-Government environment.

Goal 3. Facilitate a broad and better understanding of the archival record through educational programs and published historical works searchable at the Archives of Maryland Online website (http:l/a0n101.net).

Goal 4. Manage, conserve, and exhibit State-owned fine arts collections; preserve State-owned public records.

I — 314 STATE ARCHIVES

SUMMARY OF STATE ARCHIVES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 44.50 44.50 44.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 42.15 37.65 42.97 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 315 STATE ARCHIVES

D60A10.01 ARCHIVES - STATE ARCHIVES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State Archives identifies, appraises, acquires, describes, preserves, and makes permanent records accessible within a secure environment. The State Archives articulates the origin, functions, structure, personnel, and other aspects of Maryland State, county and municipal government and encourages the study of Maryland history and government.

MISSION

Our central mission is to acquire, describe, preserve and make electronically available in a secure and dynamic environment the permanent records of the past, while providing reliable information to the public for a better understanding of Maryland government and history.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFRMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Identify, appraise, acquire, describe, preserve, and make accessible records deemed to have permanent historical, administrative, fiscal, legal or educational value. Where appropriate, make these materials electronically available. Objective 1.1 By Fiscal Year 2005 assess in a comprehensive way at least 67% of the statewide records inventory still in agency custody; and put in place the physical storage capacity required to take on the records identified; and devise strategy for effective execution of future inventory efforts.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Records pending transfer to Archives (cubic feet) 161,113 164,913 168,713 172,600 Outputs: Records in custody (cubic feet) 23 1.035 239,254 254,254 269,254 Outcome: Shelving capacity added (cubic feet) 12,432 33,936 5,480 73,584 Quality: Reduction of backlog of permanent State records (annualized) 4% 4% 4% 4% Efficiency: Percent records shelved to records in custody 93% 100% 99% 100%

Objective 1.2 Through Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005, assess requirements for the permanent storage of electronic records that are legally mandated to be transferred to or backed up by the Archives and provide the information technology infrastructure to accomplish this goal.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Electronic record storage capacity (gigabytes) 800 4,300 3 1,000 58,000 Outputs: Electronic data online (gigabytes) 463 1,082 24,054 43,857 Website files online (images, htmls, etc.) 4,157,738 9,537,983 37,136,180 63,039,401 Efficiency: Ratio of electronic data online to storage capacity 58% 25 % 78% 76%

Objective 1.3 In Fiscal Year 2005, improve access to records through the expansion of web-based delivery of reference services by 12%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Patron inquiries (web-based) 53,422,258 60,840,966 76,027,617 95,794,797 Outputs: Records circulated (in person) 118,499 81,938 80,000 75,000 Records circulated (digital) 8,855,297 10,378,072 15,200,000 26,400,000 Outcome: Digital record delivery (% increase) 87% 17% 46% 74% In-person visit in hours (average length) 3.88 3.63 3.33 3.00

I — 316 STATE ARCHIVES

D60A10.01 ARCHIVES - STATE ARCHIVES (Continued)

Goal 2. Facilitate a broad and better understanding of the archival record through educational programs and published historical works. Objective 2.1 In Fiscal Year 2005, add value to the understanding of the archival record by locating, identifying, and interpreting records, and making the results accessible through electronically published historical compilations and analyses.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of completed complex research inquiries 300 310 3 20 340

Objective 2.2 In Fiscal Year 2005, support the legally mandated goals of the Commission to Coordinate the Study, Commemoration, and Impact of Slavery's History and Legacy in Maryland by conducting research and publishing the results electronically.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Slavery Commission mandated projects completed 2 6 7 7

I — 317 STATE ARCHIVES

D60A10.01 ARCHIVES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D60344 Consolidated Publications Account ......

Federal Fund Income: AA.D60 National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Grant ...... 84.345 Underground Railroad Educational and Cultural Programs ...... Total ......

I — 318 STATE ARCHIVES

D60A10.02 ARTISTIC PROPERTY - STATE ARCHIVES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Commission on Artistic Property is the official custodian of the State's art collections. Artistic Property, Preservation, Outreach, and Exhibits is responsible, through the Commission on Artistic Property, for the care and management of all State-owned art objects that comprise the Annapolis Complex Art Collection and the Peabody Art Collection, as well as the preservation of State- owned public records. This program creates exhibitions of State-owned art collections and other archival materials, and provides research on the State House and Government House and support for the State House Trust and Government House Trust.

MISSION

To manage the State-owned art collections through their proper appraisal, storage, conservation, and research. To interpret and exhibit State-owned artwork through display in public buildings and other places accessible to the public. To provide support for activities of the State House Trust and Government House Trust and research on the State House and Government House. To preserve, through conservation, proper storage, and preservation scanning, the State's written public record.

VISION

A state that promotes an appreciation of the visual and decorative arts through the exhibition and interpretation of its artistic property and an appreciation and understanding of its most historic buildings.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Properly manage State-owned art collections. Objective 1.1 Inventory, appraise, and insure 100% of State-owned art collections on an annual basis.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Annapolis Collection Fine arts objects (per 2001 condition survey) 857 914 930 945 Insured value of collection (in millions) $7.894 $8.091 $8.283 $8.490 Peabody Collection Fine arts objects (per 2001 condition survey) 368 368 368 368 Insured value of collection (in millions) $19.8 $20.3 $20.8 $21.3 Outputs: Percentage of capitalized fine arts objects inventoried 100% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 2. Preserve State-owned art collections, and State-owned public records. Objective 2.1 By the close of Fiscal Year 2009, conserve 100% of State-owned art objects from the Annapolis Collection and the Peabody Collection classified as being in poor condition (per 2001 condition survey) in order to preserve the State's investment in the collections and increase the number of works available for exhibition.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Annapolis Collection Fine arts objects in poor condition 186 189 193 200 Peabody Collection Fine arts objects and works on paper in poor condition 149 149 149 149 Outputs: Annapolis Collection Objects conserved 2 12 0 0 Peabody Collection Fine arts objects and works on paper conserved 2 3 0 0

I — 319 STATE ARCHIVES

D60A10.02 ARTISTIC PROPERTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D60344 Consolidated Publications Account ......

I — 320 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

MISSION

To help protect Maryland citizens from economic loss resulting from automobile accidents.

VISION

MAIF values all its customers, both internal and external, and will demonstrate this commitment with its excellent service.

KEY GOALS

Goal 1. To offer insurance to all eligible Maryland citizens who are unable to obtain insurance in the private market.

Goal 2. To handle claims for MAIF policyholders and claimants in a fair, expeditious and professional manner.

Goal 3. To provide efficient services to minimize the subsidy from the insured motorists of Maryland.

I — 321 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

D70J00.42 INSURED DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The statutory purpose of the Insured Program is to provide automobile insurance policies to those eligible Maryland residents unable to obtain insurance in the private market. Net premium income and investment income from policies are available for the payment of claims and Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (MAIF) administrative expenses. MAIF receives no State General Fund appropriations, and the debts or obligations of MAIF are not deemed in any manner to be a debt of the State or a pledge of its credit.

MISSION

To help protect Maryland citizens from economic loss resulting from automobile accidents and control, in part, the cost of compulsory insurance for Marylanders by providing insurance coverage to qualified Maryland licensed drivers who are unable to obtain automobile insurance in the private market.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES (All Data Reflect Calendar Years)

Goal 1. To offer automobile insurance to all eligible Maryland citizens who are unable to obtain insurance in the private market. Objective 1.1 To process new business and rewrite applications in an average of 8 days for calendar year 2004.

2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of Manual Applications Received 121,238 97,036 77,400 79,500 Number of Internet Applications Received 13,655 69,100 92,000 94,500 Total 134,893 166,136 169,400 174,000 Output: Number of Applications Processed 137,094 169,409 169,400 174,000 Quality: Average number of days to process 19.6 8.6 8.0 8.0

Objective 1.2 To process endorsements in an average of 6 days for calendar year 2004.

2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of manual endorsements processed 109,959 159,944 174,000 180,000 Number of Internet endorsements processed 0 39,543 55,000 70,000 Total 109,959 199,487 229,000 250,000 Quality: Average number of days to process 7.0 5.4 5.5 5.5

Goal 2. To handle claims for MAIF policyholders and claimants in a fair, expeditious and professional manner. Objective 2.1 MAIF will maintain a closure ratio at or above 100%.

2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of claims available 44,059 58,771 55,780 64,600 Output: Number of claims closed 40,694 55,443 53,900 64,600 Efficiency: Closure Ratio 92.4% 94.3% 97% 100%

Objective 2.2 To manage MAIF expenses so the ratio of paid Direct Defense and Cost Containment Expense to Direct Losses Paid will be 5% or below. 2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Direct Losses paid $96,836,258 $130,740,238 $146,800,000 $150,800,000 Outcome: Direct Defense and Cost Containment expense paid $3,502,797 $3,330,700 $3,400,000 $3,500,000 Efficiency: Ratio 3.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.3%

I — 322 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

D70J00.42 INSURED DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 3. To provide efficient services to minimize the subsidy from the insured motorists of Maryland. Objective 3.1 To meet the estimated 2004 productivity goals. The Claims goal is based on the number of claims suffixes received per claims' employee. The Underwriting and Other goals are stated in number of policies received per Underwriting or Other employee.

2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Claim Employees 186 266.0 282.5 280.5 Underwriting Employees 67 70.5 69.0 69.0 Other Employees 155 167.5 171.0 172.0 Efficiency: Claims 44 8 424 360 360 Underwriting 2,367 2,440 2,430 2,500 Other 905 1,040 1,000 1,000

I — 323 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

2003 2004 2005 Estimated Estimated Estimated Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 538.00 537.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 2.00 2.00 . Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 29,835, 367 30,033,494 Technical and Special Fees ...... 11.484,666 12,596.542 Operating Expenses ...... 7,584, 925 6,932,717 Non-Budgeted Funds ...... 48.904, 958 49.562, 753

D70J00.42 INSURED DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Estimated Estimated Estimated

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D70742 Net Premium and Income Accruing Therefrom ......

I — 324 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

D70J00.47 UNINSURED DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The purpose of the Uninsured Program is to administer and pay claims when no other insurance recovery is available. Only Maryland residents involved in Maryland accidents with uninsured or unidentifiable motorists, or hit and run incidents are eligible to collect from the Uninsured Program. Payments issued by the Uninsured program may be recovered from the uninsured at fault party in any manner provided by the law. Sources of income to operate the Uninsured Program are investment income, uninsured motorists fines and collections on notes and judgments.

MISSION

To help protect Maryland citizens from economic loss resulting from automobile accidents where the responsible party is either uninsured or can not be found.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES (All Data Reflect Calendar Years)

Goal 1. To handle claims for the Uninsured Division of MAIF in a fair, expeditious and professional manner. Objective 1.1 Maintain a closure ratio at or above 100%. 2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of claims available 909 1,040 1,020 1,020 Outputs: Number of claims closed 1,019 963 1,020 1,020 Efficiency: Closure Ratio 112% 93% 100% 100%

Goal 2. To continue to recover money in those cases where the Uninsured Division paid a claim on behalf of the responsible party in an automobile accident. Objective 2.1 To maintain consistent yearly collections. 2001 2002 2003 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Average number of Recovery Specialists 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.0 Outcome: Total Collections (in millions) $1.6 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5

I — 325 MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

D70J00.47 UNINSURED DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Estimated Estimated Estimated

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: D70747 Uninsured Motorist Fines. Investment Income and Col- lections on Notes and Judgements ......

I — 326 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 280 00 294 00 294.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 327 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

SUMMARY OF INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 274.00 288.00 288.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 4.40 8.60 12.10 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 15.592, 155 16,709.628 17,495,751 Technical and Special Fees ...... 320,767 564,362 752,796 Operating Expenses ...... 6,484. 803 6.088. 574 3,777,948 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 22,397,725 23,362,564 22,026,495

REVENUE COLLECTIONS

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Revenue($): Premium Taxes ...... 191,204,876 Retaliatory Taxes ...... 1,783,315 Fines and Costs ...... 3,774,431 Company Licensing Fees ...... 1,388,858 Agenmroker Licensing Fees ...... 5,425, 301 Rate and Form Filing Fees ...... 2,700,086 FinanciaWMarket Conduct Examination Fees ...... 2,794,466 Miscellaneous Fees ...... 67.841 Insurance Fraud Prevention Fee ...... 1,716,650 Interest Income ...... 1,228,649 Health Regulatory Fund ...... 1,776,367 Insurance Regulatory Fund ...... 9,137,719 222,998,559

Premium and Retaliatory Taxes ...... 192,988,191 Fines and Costs ...... 3,774,43 1 All Other Revenues ...... 26,235,937 Total General and Special Fund Revenue ...... 222,998,559

I — 328 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS - INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Insurance Administration develops policies, procedures and regulations as well as implements laws that affect Maryland's insurance industry. The agency performs rate and form reviews, financial audits, licensing examinations, market conduct examinations, and fraud investigations and prosecutions. It also resolves consumer complaints, as well as issues agent, broker and company licenses. MISSION

To protect the public from illegal conduct by insurers by actively and fairly enforcing the insurance laws of the State of Maryland. VISION

A State with competitive, stable, and viable insurance markets in which insurance consumers are treated fairly.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES Goal 1. Ensuring that the terms and conditions of insurance contracts are reasonable and meet the requirements of Maryland law. Objective 1.1 During fiscal year 2005, review for compliance with insurance statutes and regulations, 100 percent of Life and Health form filings1 within 60 days after receipt of initial filing.2

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Life and Health insurance form filings processed Quality: Percentage of Life and Health insurance form filing processed within 60 days

Objective 1.2 During fiscal year 2005, review for compliance with insurance statutes and regulations, 100 percent of Property and Casualty form filings within 303 working days after receipt of initial filing.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Property and Casualty insurance form filings processed Quality: Percentage of Property and Casualty insurance form filings processed within 30 days

' The Life and Health filings are broken down by lines of insurance starting in FY2004: LifeIAnnuity, Health Maintenance Organization, and Health Insurance. The MIA's Objective in its MFR fiscal year 2004 is consistent with Maryland's Statute that requires initial review of filings within 60 days of the filing (Insurance Article $12-203(c). The 60-day objective is more restrictive than the current statutory requirement, because the statute permits the Commissioner to extend the initial 60 day review period an additional 30 days, making the total possible review period actually 90 days from the initial filing. The MIA did, however, increase the percentage of forms to be reviewed within 60 days from 75% to 100%. Performance Measure numbers for fiscal years 2001, 2002, and 2003 are based on a 60-day review rather than a 30-working day review period for filings, consistent with the MFR for those fiscal years. The Objective has been changed from 60 days to 30 working days for MFR fiscal year 2004, to be consistent with Maryland's Statute, Insurance Article $ 11-206(g)(l). The Objective of 30 working days is actually more restrictive than the Statute, which allows the Commissioner to extend the initial 30-working day review eriod an additional 30 working days. 'Going forward, we are counting each form in a filing package submitted to the Property and Casualty Unit to be consistent with the Life and Health Unit; we counted filing "packages" submitted to the Property and Casualty Unit for fiscal years 2001 and 2002.

I — 329 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS - INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION

Goal 2. Adjudicating consumer complaints in accordance with insurance law and in a prompt and fair manner. Objective 2.1 During fiscal year 2005, resolve all Health medical necessity complaints within the time frames required by law.5 2002 003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Health medical necessity complaints received 976 1104 1050 1050 Quality: Percentage of Health medical necessity complaints processed within statutory time frames 98% 97%Â 98% 98%

Objective 2.2 During fiscal year 2005, complete 75 percent of complaint investigations for Life and Health non-medical necessity complaints within 90 days from receipt of complaint.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance ~easures' Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Life and Health non-medical necessity complaints received 5,636 4059 6,000 6,000 Quality: Percentage of Life and Health non-medical necessity complaints completed within 90 days 94% 95% 92% 92%

Objective 2.3 During fiscal year 2005, complete 60 percent of complaint investigations for Property and Casualty within 90 days from receipt of complaint. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance ~easures' Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Property and Casualty complaints received 11,590 14,490 15,000 15,000 Quality: Percentage of Property and Casualty complaints completed within 90 days 70%" 51% 75% 60%

Objective 2.4 Seventy percent of all complainants are satisfied with the MIA complaints process during fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percentage (actual) of complainants satisfied with the MIA complaints process

The Objective measures the timeliness of the adjudication of the complaints received within a fiscal year, and therefore can only include those complaints which could be both received and adjudicated within the same fiscal year. The average time frame to adjudicate the Health medical necessity complaints referenced in Objective 2.1 is approximately 60 days. As such, the data cannot reflect complaints received after April 30 because those complaints may not be adjudicated prior to June 30, the end of the fiscal year. The remaining 3% would represent these nonmedical necessity cases which the unit occasionally handles i.e. claims issues. ' Objective 2.2 measures the timeliness of the adjudication of the complaints received within a fiscal year, and therefore can only include those complaints which could be both received and adjudicated within the fiscal year. The average time frame to adjudicate the Life and Health non-medical necessity complaints referenced in Objective 2.2 is approximately 90 days. As such, the data cannot reflect complaints received after March 31 because those complaints may not be adjudicated prior to June 30, the end of the fiscal year. Objective 2.3 measures the timeliness of the adjudication of the complaints received within a fiscal year, and therefore can only include those complaints which could be both received and adjudicated within the fiscal year. The average time frame to adjudicate the Property and Casualty complaints referenced in Objective 2.3 is approximately 90 days. As such, the data cannot reflect complaints received after March 31 because those complaints may not be adjudicated prior to June 30, the end of the fiscal year. The percentage in Objective 2.3 was 60 percent for fiscal year 2002, and was raised to 75 percent in fiscal year 2003. It is unlikely that the Unit will meet the 75% measure for FY2004 and as such the estimate for the measure should be returned to 60%.

I — 330 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS - INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION (Continued)

Goal 3. Protecting the public from unfair trade practices and other violations of the Insurance Code. Objective 3.1 During fiscal year 2005, the Life and Health Market Conduct Unit will complete 75 percent of examinations in relation to the number of examinations initiated.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of market conduct examinations of Life and Health companies initiated 28 20 20 20 Quality: Percent of completed examinations in relation to initiated examinations 75 % 75% 75% 75 % Outcomes: (a) Percentage of remediation orderstpenalties issued against Life and Health insurers examined 95 % 95% NtA NtA

Objective 3.2 During fiscal year 2005, the Property and Casualty Market Conduct Unit will complete 75 percent of examinations in relation to the number of examinations initiated.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of market conduct examinations of Property and Casualty companies initiated 28 18 20 20 Efficiency: Percentage of completed examinations in relation to initiated examinations 71% 100% 75% 75% Outcomes: (a) Percentage of remediation orderstpenalties issued against Property and Casualty companies examined 100% NtA NtA NtA

Goal 4. Enforcing solvency standards to ensure that insurers have the financial ability to pay claims when due. Objective 4.1 During fiscal year 2005, complete 90 percent of financial examinations on domestic companies scheduled consistent with statutory time frames, with no more than a 15 percent variance from the time budgeted for that examination.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of examinations completed 23 20 3 1 16 Efficiency: Percentage of examinations completed with no more than a 15 percent variance of budgeted time 91% 95 % 90% 94% Outcome: Percentage of domestic insurers' or health maintenance organizations' financial conditions required the Commissioner to apply for a court- ordered liquidation pursuant to Title 9, Subtitle 2 of the Insurance Article.

I — 331 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D80304 Health Care Regulatory Fund ...... D80305 Insurance Regulation Fund ...... Total ......

I — 332 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funding for major information technology development projects in the Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA). The information technology improvement process at the MIA began in July 1998 with the publishing of the Information Systems Strategic Plan. In fiscal year 2004, the last two major applications in the Enterprise system - Rates & Forms and Compliance & Enforcement - will be completed. The vision of the MIA is to provide a seamless, integrated workplace for better efficiency and workflow between the agency's functional units, and to provide the public and industry with current and correct information.

I — 333 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

D80Z01.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D80305 Insurance Regulation Fund ......

I — 334 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION

D80Z02.01 MARYLAND HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM-HEALTH INSURANCE SAFETY NET PROGRAMS

Program Description The Maryland Health Insurance Plan is an independent unit of State government within the Maryland Insurance Administration. The Plan replaced the SAAC program and is supervised and controlled by a board. The purpose of the Plan is to provide access to affordable, comprehensive health benefits for medically uninsurable residents of the State. The Plan is funded, in part, by a 1% assessment on the gross revenue of each acute care hospital in the State.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D80306 Maryland Health Insurance Plan ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.779 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Research, Demonstrations and Evalu-

I — 335 CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

D90U00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Canal Place Heritage Area is a major heritage tourism development focusing on the historical significance of the C&O Canal and the economic redevelopment of the immediate area. Major ongoing activities include: preserving key historic resources and cultural traditions of the preservation district; improving the Western Maryland Railway Station; expanding the visitor center for the C&O Canal Park; rewatering the C&O Canal and offering interpretive boat excursions; construction a major festival grounds and retail marketplace; developing special events and recreational programming; encouraging private commercial investment; coordinating a local and regional tourism marketing and promotion program; providing adequate and convenient parking for visitors; providing improved vehicular and pedestrian access within Canal Place; and developing a comprehensive operations framework.

MISSION

The Canal Place Preservation and Development Authority's mission is to be the catalyst for the preservation, development, and management of the lands adjacent to the C&O Canal in Cumberland, to be the coordinator of activities and programs partnering with various agencies and organizations to present a variety of events at the Canal Place festival area, and to be the advocate for preservation and development within the Canal Place Preservation District and the greater Cumberland area, for the purpose of enhancing heritage tourism in Western Maryland.

VISION

Looking ten years into the future, the City of Cumberland, Allegany County, and all of the tri-state area will continue to benefit from the development of the Canal Place Heritage Area and the C&O Canal's western terminus as a source of tourism-based economic revitalization and community pride for the City, region and the State of Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Develop and implement educationallinterpretive programs. Objective 1.1 During FY 2005, in cooperation with the National Park Service, conduct regular interpretive tours of the Canal Boat replica, The Cumberland, and develop educationallinterpretive program opportunities with the Allegany County School District.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of Canal Boat visitors 3,181 2,674 3,000 3,500

Objective 1.2 During FY 2005 plan expansion of existing events and design new events for Crescent Lawn Festival Grounds to include Canal Fest, Summer in the City Music Series, as ongoing events and coordinate new programming, such as car shows, Boy Scout events, special music productions, antique and craft shows, and others.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Number of events 22 25 20 25

Goal 2. Rewater the western terminus of the C&O Canal. Objective 2.1 Secure funding from the Federal government to begin construction of the basin area during Fiscal Year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Funding Appropriation ($millions) $0.65 $3.0 $4.0 $10.0

I — 336 CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

D90U00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 3. Facilitate public and private development within the Canal Place Heritage Area. Objective 3.1 Complete Phase 2 Crescent Lawn Festival Grounds and Marketplace during FY 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: New business established 0 9 2 1 New rental space created (square feet) 0 10,700 0 2,000 New jobs created 0 40 4 10

Objective 3.2 Continue private development project to include Footer building site and Cumberland Electric property during FY 2005. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: New hotel rooms created 0 0 0 100 Hotel occupancy 0 0 0 65 % New hotel tax generated 0 0 0 $190,000 New hotel jobs created 0 0 0 65 New restaurants 0 0 0 2 New restaurant jobs created 0 0 0 100 Other new jobs created 0 0 0 6

OTHER MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Other Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Scenic Railroad ridership 35,420 33,037 38,325 42,150 C & 0 Canal Visitors Museum 33,481 30,901 40,500 44,560 Visitor Center 22,557 17,267 38,600 42,750 Allegany County Museum 4,000 3,165 4,000 5,000 Allegheny Highlands Trail 0 0 0 100,000 Gordon Roberts House 10,100 9,874 10,000 12,000 Gilchrist Gallery 0 0 5,000 7,000 Total Visitors to Canal Place 128,739 106,918 152,425 27 1,960 Economic impact (per visitor) $80.41 $84.43 $88.65 $93.08 Economic impact (millions) $10.35 $9.03 $13.51 $25.31

I — 337 CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

SUMMARY OF CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 4.00 4.00 4.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReductiou ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

D90U00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D90302 Rental Income ......

I — 338 CANAL PLACE PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

D90U00.02 CAPITAL APPROPRIATION

Program Description: This program disburses operating funds for capital projects of the Authority

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... 1,075,000 Total Expenditure ...... 1,075,000

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 1,075,000

I — 339 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

D99A11.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Administrative Hearings conducts administrative hearings on behalf of State and other government agencies. As provided by law, persons adversely affected by agency actions or proposed actions are entitled to an administrative hearing. The hearings are conducted by Administrative Law Judges who adjudicate questions of fact and law.

MISSION

To provide flexible due process for any person affected by the action or proposed action of State agencies,

VISION

A State which guarantees every person the right to a fair, timely, and easily accessible administrative adjudicatory process.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To complete the administrative hearing process, from appeal to disposition, in an efficient and timely manner.' Objective 1.1 By July 1,2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 41 days to 35 days for cases from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH).~

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

Objective 1.2 By July 1, 2005, maintain the current average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date at 71days for cases from the Department of Human Resources (DHR).~

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

Objective 1.3 By July 1, 2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 225 days to 210 days for cases from the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (DLLR).'

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

' There are certain case types where the Office of Administrative Hearings does not control the scheduling of the hearing; rather, the agency schedules the hearing and forwards the case to the Office of Administrative Hearings along with the hearing date. These include cases from the Inmate Grievance Office, the Retirement and Pension Systems, Occupational Safety and Health cases from the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and Involuntary Admission cases and medical board cases (e.g. Board of Physician Quality Assurance) from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The objectives measure the period of time beginning when the Office of Administrative Hearings receives the case and ending when the decision is issued and the case is closed. E.g. Medical Assistance and medical boards such as the Board of Physician's Quality Assurance. E.g. Food Stamps, Temporary Cash Assistance, Child Abuse and Neglect, day care and foster care licensing. 4 E.g. Home Improvement Commission, Real Estate Commission, Occupational Safety and Health.

I — 340 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

D99A11.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Objective 1.4 By July 1, 2005, reduce the average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 91 to 80 days for cases from the Inmate Grievance Office of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition 91.3 85.8 8 3 80

Objective 1.5 By July 1, 2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 68 days to 60 days for cases from the Motor Vehicle Administration of the Department of Transportation (MVA).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

Objective 1.6 By July 1, 2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 130 days to 120 days for cases from the Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

Objective 1.7 By July 1,2005, reduce the average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 42 days to 37 days for Special Education and Infant and Toddler Program cases from the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition 41.6 42.3 39 37

Objective 1.8 By July 1, 2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 169 days to 155 days for personnel cases (PERS).~ 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition 143.7 168.9 161 155

Objective 1.9 By July 1, 2005, reduce average number of days from date appeal received to disposition date from 155 days to 135 days for cases from agencies not covered by objectives 1.1 through 1.8 (i.e. Miscellaneous MISC).~

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Average number of days between date appeal received to date of disposition

E.g. State Personnel Management System, Transportation Human Resources System, University of Maryland System. E.g. Retirement and Pension Systems; Department of the Environment; Department of Natural Resources; Central Collection Unit of the Department of Budget and Management; State Police handgun licensing; Department of Transportation dealer, vehicle salesperson and inspection station licensing; Commission on Human Relations; Public Information Act.

I — 341 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

D99A11.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Objective 10. By July 1,2005, increase percentage of non-bench decisions issued timely to 98.50% or better.7

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of non-bench decisions issued 3,469 3,429 3,500 3,600 Quality: Percentage of decisions issued timely 96.8% 96.6% 97.5% 98.5%

Goal 2. To use Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques to resolve cases prior to the contested case hearing. Objective 2.1 By July 1, 2005, increase percentage of cases resolved using Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques (mediation and settlement conferences) from 73.4% to 78.5%.'

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of mediations and settlement conferences held Quality: Percent of cases resolved using Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques

Goal 3. To conduct administrative proceedings in a professional and competent manner. Objective 3.1 By July 1, 2005, 94% of participants to administrative proceedings will rate the preparation for and organization of the proceedings as satisfactory or excellent.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of participants that rate the preparation and organization as satisfactory or excellent 87.8% 92.6% 93% 94%

Objective 3.2 By July 1, 2005, maintain the current percentage of participants to administrative proceedings will rate the fairness of the proceedings as satisfactory or excellent at 94%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of participants that rate the fairness as satisfactory or excellent 87.2% 94.0% 94% 94%

Goal 4. To issue decisions that address and resolve the issues raised by participants to administrative proceedings. Objective 4.1 By July 1, 2005, 90% of participants to administrative proceedings will rate the decision as satisfactory or excellent in addressing and resolving the issues raised during the proceedings.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measure Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of participants that rate the decision as satisfactory or excellent

Federal and State laws set forth specific timeframes for the issuance of decisions. These due dates vary according to case type and are too numerous to identify in this document. This objective is measured by comparing the number of cases settled to the number scheduled for mediation or a settlement conference. It does not include those cases in which the parties settle on their own without assistance from the Office of Administrative Hearings. Note that not all case types are eligible to be scheduled for mediation or settlement, e.g., the State Personnel Management System has instituted its own settlement procedures and specifically requested that the Office of Administrative Hearings discontinue the practice of holding settlement conferences in these matters.

I — 342 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

D99A11.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

CASES DISPOSED BY AGENCY

FY 2003 SOURCE AGENCY Actual Department Of Health And Mental Hygiene 13,013 Department Of Human Resources 10,651 Department Of Labor, Licensing and Regulation 479 Department Of Public Safety and Correctional Services 662 Department Of Transportation - Motor Vehicle Admin. 30,145 Maryland Insurance Administration 848 Maryland State Department Of Education 899 Department of Budget and Management - Personnel 638 Miscellaneous 42 1

TOTAL

OTHER PERFORMANCE MEASURES

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Caseload Data: Cases Brought forward from prior year Cases Received Cases Disposed Cases Carried forward to next year

Hearings Scheduled: OAH's Headquarters - Hunt Valley, MD. Agency's Facilities and Satellite Locations

Decision Data: Hearings with Bench decisions Hearings with Non-Bench decisions

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediations and Settlement Conferences held

I — 343 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

D99A11.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: D99303 Commissions ...... D99304 Photocopier and Tape Fees ...... D99305 Miscellaneous Billings ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: C8 1COO Office of the Attorney General ...... DOSE01 Board of Public Works ...... D27LOO Commission on Human Relations ...... D80Z01 Maryland Insurance Administration ...... F10A01 Department of Budget and Management ...... G20J01 Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems ...... JOOEOO DOT-State Motor Vehicle Administration ...... KOOA01 Department of Natural Resources ...... MOOA01 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene ...... NO0100 DHR-Family Investment Administration ...... POOD01 DLLR-Division of Labor and Industry ...... QOOEOO DPSCS-Inmate Grievance Office ...... ROOA01 State Department of Education-Headquarters ...... R65GOO Higher Education Labor Relations Board ...... UOOA01 Maryland Department of the Environment ...... WOOA01 Maryland State Police ...... Total ......

I — 344 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d05e01 Board of Public Works d05e0101 Administration Office prgm mgr senior i 1.00 81,890 1.00 81,890 1 .OO 83,502 prgm mgr iv 1 .OO 75,148 1 .OO 75,148 1 .OO 75,885 administrator vi 1 .OO 73,107 1 .OO 73,107 1 .OO 73,825 administrator iii 1 .OO 58,783 1.00 58,783 1.00 59,358 administrator i 1 .OO 50,535 1 .OO 50,535 1 .OO 51,027 admin spec iii 2.00 76,290 2.00 76,290 2.00 77,026 ------TOTAL d05e0101* 7.00 415,753 7.00 415,753 7.00 420,623

TOTAL d05e0105* TOTAL d05e01 ** d10a01 Executive Department - Governor d10a0101 General Executive Direction and Control governor state of maryland 1 .OO exec chief of staff 1 .OO lieutenant governor 1 .OO exec aide x .OO exec aide ix 6.00 exec aide viii 1 .OO exec aide vii 2.00 exec aide vi 4.00 exec aide v 5.00 exec aide iv 6.00 prgm mgr senior i .OO administrator vii 1 .OO exec aide iii 2.00 administrator vi 3.00 exec aide ii 1 .OO exec asst iii exec dept 4.00 exec aide i 2.00 exec asst ii exec dept 5.00 administrator iii .OO administrator iii .OO exec asst i exec dept 6.00 administrator iv 3.00 planner v .OO administrator ii 4.00 spec asst iii exec dept 10.00 admin officer iii 2.00

I — 345 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d10a01 Executive Department - Governor d10a0101 General Executive Direction and Control spec asst ii exec dept 7.00 216,463 admin officer i .OO 13,164 spec asst i exec dept 5.00 131,976 assoc judge harness racing .00 2,071 admin aide iii exec dept .OO 16,429 admin aide ii exec dept 1.50 46,975 admin aide i exec dept .OO 20,319 clerk iv exec dept 1 .OO 28,337 ------TOTAL d10a0101* 84.50 5,238,352 TOTAL dIOaOl ** 84.50 5,238,352 d11a04 Office of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing d11a0401 Executive Direction exec aide iv 1 .OO 60,108 1 .OO 74,301 1 .OO 75,759 spec asst iii exec dept 2.00 50,646 1.00 50,535 1.00 51,519 ------TOTAL d11a0401* 3.00 110,754 2.00 124,836 2.00 127,278 TOTAL d11a04 ** 3.00 110,754 2.00 124,836 2.00 127,278 d12a02 Office for Individuals with Disabilities d12a0201 General Administration exec aide v .OO 96,494 exec aide iv 1 .OO 0 prgm mgr iv .OO 86,118 Transfer DHMH administrator vi 1 .OO 73,107 admin v .OO 63,309 New exec asst ii .OO 253,236 New administrator iii 1 .OO 56,555 BPWI exec asst i exec dept 00 110,944 New administrator iv 4.00 241 ,238 administrator ii 2.00 106,940 spec asst iii exec dept 2.00 88,083 admin officer iii 1 .OO 47,779 spec asst ii exec dept .OO 0 admin officer i 1 .OO 151,745 New admin aide ii exec dept 1 .OO 33,441 obs-office assistant ii gen 1 .OO 17,805 ------TOTAL d12a0201* 15.00 TOTAL d12a02 ** 15.00

I — 346 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. d13a13 Maryland Energy Administration d13a1301 General Administration exec aide vi 1.OO prgm mgr senior ii 1.OO administrator vii -00 administrator vi 3.00 administrator v 2.00 administrator iv .OO administrator iii .OO administrator i 2.00 asst attorney general v 1.OO staff atty ii attorney genral .OO administrator ii 2.00 spec asst iii exec dept 1 .OO admin officer iii 1 .OO admin officer ii 1.OO spec asst ii exec dept 1.OO admin officer i .OO admin spec iii 1.OO spec asst i exec dept 1.OO admin spec ii 1.OO admin aide i i exec dept 1.OO

TOTAL d13a1301* TOTAL d13a13 ** d14a14 Office for Children, Youth and Families d14a1401 Office for Children, Youth and Families spec secy families children you 1.OO 95,000 director program monitoring ocy .OO 77,875 exec aide vi 1 .OO 81,626 principal counsel 1 .OO 97,280 asst attorney general viii -00 0 exec aide v 1.OO 0 administrator vii 5.00 200,634 exec aide ii .OO 73,825 administrator vi 1.00 64,448 administrator vi 1.OO 139,400 administrator v 5.00 306,764 exec asst ii exec dept 1.OO 58,593 administrator iv .OO 58,692 Transfer Atty Gen administrator iii 3.00 112,028 administrator i 3.00 49,572 administrator iv 7.00 535,199 computer network spec supr 1.OO 0 administrator ii .OO 51,933 Transfer Atty Gen

I — 347 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d14a14 Office for Children, Youth and Families d14a1401 Office for Children, Youth and Families administrator ii 2.00 fiscal services officer ii 1 .oo fiscal services officer i 1 .oo spec asst ii i exec dept 2.00 admin officer iii 1 .oo admin officer iii .oo admin officer ii 2.00 spec asst ii exec dept 1.00 admin officer i 1 .oo spec asst i exec dept 3.00 admin spec i 1.00 admin aide iii exec dept 1 .oo admin aide ii exec dept .oo admin aide i exec dept 1 .oo ------TOTAL d14a1401* 48.00 TOTAL d14a14 ** 48.00 d15a05 Executive Dept-Boards, Commissions and Offices d15a0503 Office of Minority Affairs exec aide ix .OO 51,820 1 .OO 116,459 1 .OO 116,459 exec aide vii .OO 24,582 1 .OO 92,498 1 .OO 93,409 exec asst ii i exec dept 1 .OO 52,204 .OO 0 .OO 0 spec asst ii i exec dept 2.00 61,767 1 .OO 37,255 1 .OO 38,691 ------TOTAL d15a0503* 3.00 190,373 3.00 246,212 3.00 248,559 d15a0505 Office of Service and Volunteerism exec asst iii exec dept 2.00 exec asst ii exec dept 1.00 administrator iii 2.00 exec asst i exec dept 2.00 spec asst iii exec dept 4.00 admin officer iii 4.00 admin aide iii exec dept 1 .oo secy i exec dept .50 ------TOTAL d15a0505* 16.50 d15a0506 State Ethics Commission exec aide v 1 .OO 94,628 1 .OO 94,628 1 .OO 96,494 exec aide iv .OO 0 1 .OO 85,143 1 .OO 85,981 administrator vii .OO 0 2.00 130,367 2.00 133,258 gen counsel ethics commission 1.00 73,107 -00 0 .OO 0

I — 348 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------"---"------d15a0506 State Ethics Commission administrator v administrator iv spec asst i ii exec dept admin officer iii spec asst i exec dept admin spec i obs-legal assistant ii admin aide ii exec dept admin aide i exec dept

TOTAL d15a0506* 9.00 d15a0507 Health Claims Arbitration Office exec aide iii 1.00 exec asst ii exec dept 1.00 admin officer iii 2.00 admin spec iii 1 .OO spec asst i exec dept 5.50 admin aide iii exec dept 1 .OO admin aide ii exec dept 2.00

TOTAL d15a0507* 13.50 530,031 d15a0516 Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention exec vi i 1.00 102,439 101,000 exec aide vi 1 .OO 7,666 0 exec aide v -00 19,332 92,799 exec aide iv 2.00 130,256 0 administrator vii 2.00 158,802 378,669 BPWI administrator vi 5.00 281 ,384 357,094 exec aide ii 1.00 36,536 60,244 administrator v 1.00 35,920 118,431 BPWI exec aide i 1.00 72,518 73,939 exec asst ii exec dept 1.00 53,890 0 administrator iv 3.00 87,319 59,259 administrator iii 2.00 80,982 290,532 BPW3 exec asst i exec dept 1 .OO 53,371 54,412 administrator i 1 .OO 41,736 43,351 administrator ii 2.00 106,970 339,190 spec asst iii exec dept 2.00 93,603 48,627 admin officer iii 5.00 191,837 197,368 BPWI spec asst ii exec dept 2.00 72,632 42,648 admin officer i 3.00 82,955 38,448 spec asst i exec dept 1 .OO 32, 167 63,812 BPWI ------TOTAL d15a0516* 37.00 1,742,315 2,359,823

I — 349 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------d15a0522 Governor's Grants Office exec aide vii .OO 110,276 administrator vii .OO 75, I48 administrator iv -00 47,088 spec asst iii exec dept .OO 38,691 spec asst i exec dept .OO 29,844 Transferprogram secy i exec dept .OO 0 Transfer Program ------TOTAL d15a0522* 301,047 TOTAL d15a05 ** 4,451,954 d16a06 Secretary of State d16a0601 Office of the Secretary of State secy of state 1 .OO exec aide v 1 .OO administrator vii 3.00 administrator v 3.00 exec asst i exec dept 2.00 administrator iv 2.00 administrator ii 1 .OO spec asst iii exec dept 1 .OO admin officer iii 5.00 spec asst ii exec dept 4.00 admin officer i 6.00 admin spec iii 1 .OO spec asst i exec dept 1 .OO admin spec i 1.60 adrnin aide iii exec dept 2.00 admin aide ii exec dept 3.00 ------TOTAL d16a0601* 37.60 TOTAL d16a06 ** 37.60 d17b01 Historic St. Mary's City Commission d17b0151 Administration administrative positions 32.00 1,701,188 29.00 1,643,703 29.00 1,584,539 staff positions 6.00 208,151 6.00 208,151 6.00 201,966 ------TOTAL d17b0151* 38.00 1,909,339 35.00 1,851,854 35.00 1,786,505 TOTAL d17b01 ** 38.00 1,909,339 35.00 1,851,854 35.00 1,786,505 d20a15 Office for Smart Growth d20a1501 Executive Direction spec secy smart growth 0 Abolish prgm mgr senior iv 0 Transfer Planning prgrn mgr senior i 0

I — 350 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

...... ------am------d20a15 Office for Smart Growth d20a1501 Executive Direction exec asst ii exec dept 0 Abolish administrator iii 0 planner v 0 administrator ii 0 Transfer Planning admin officer ii 0 spec asst ii exec dept 0 Transfer Planning ------TOTAL d20a1501* 0 TOTAL d20a15 ** 0 d25e03 Interagency Committee for School Construction d25e0301 General Administration exec vi i 1 .OO 111,888 prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO 62,862 admin prog mgr ii 1 .OO 67,100 prgm mgr i 1 .OO 47,088 dp staff spec 1 .OO 52,944 administrator i 1 .OO 38,806 financial compliance auditor, I 1 .OO 38,847 agency budget specialist ii 1 .OO 46,419 financial compliance auditor ii .OO 5,893 financial compliance auditor i 1 .OO 26,208 services supervisor i 1 .OO 30,211 fiscal accounts technician i 1 .OO 25,647 admin aide 1 .OO 26,958 admin aide 1 .OO 39,825 office secy iii 2.00 25,640 office secy ii 2.00 62,564 ------TOTAL d25e0301* 17.00 708,900 17.00 753,308 17.00 TOTAL d25e03 ** 17.00 708,900 17.00 753,308 17.00 d26a07 Department of Aging d26a0701 General Administration secy dept aging dep secy dept aging prgm mgr senior ii admin prog mgr ii prgm mgr ii prgm mgr i administrator iii asst attorney general v computer network spec mgr fiscal services administrator i

I — 351 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d26a07 Department of Aging d26a0701 General Administration accountant supervisor ii dp functional analyst supervise fiscal services administrator i administrator ii administrator ii computer network spec ii internal auditor officer personnel administrator i administrator i administrator i dp functional analyst ii hum ser spec v aging nutritionist iii accountant ii hum ser spec iv aging pub affairs officer ii pub affairs officer i admin spec iii admin spec ii fiscal accounts technician ii personnel associate ii fiscal accounts technician i personnel associate i exec assoc iii exec assoc i i management associate admin aide office secy iii office secy ii fiscal accounts clerk i obs-office clerk ii office clerk ii clerical assistant senior citizen aide senior citizen aides --- TOTAL d26a0701* TOTAL d26a07 ** d27lOO Commission on Human Relations d27l0001 General Administration exec dir corn on human relatns 1.00 87,588 1.OO dep dir human relatns 1.OO 79,428 1.00 prgm mgr senior i 1.OO 85,143 1 .OO

I — 352 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d27100 Commission on Human Relations d2710001 General Administration admin prog mgr iv I.OO 79,663 administrator iv 1 .OO 57,011 administrator iii 1 .OO 0 administrator iii 1 .OO 54,942 asst gen counsel iii hum re1 2.00 69,755 computer network spec mgr I.OO 69,755 asst gen counsel ii human re1 "00 50,817 asst gen counsel i hum re1 2.00 58,221 administrator ii 5.00 271 ,808 computer network spec ii 1 .OO 49,493 administrator i .OO 0 equal opportunity officer iii 7.00 354,623 human relations representative .00 51,519 Abolish obs-fiscal specialist iii 1 .OO 51,519 personnel officer iii -50 28,922 equal opportunity officer ii 7.50 119,677 human relations representative 3.00 318,491 emp training spec iv 1 .OO 35,951 equal opportunity officer i 2.00 40,718 human relations representative .OO 31,836 Abolish human relations representative 2.00 60,949 pub affairs specialist ii 1.00 0 admin spec i .00 31,640 equal opportunity officer train 1 .OO 0 publications spec ii -50 0 Abolish hum relations asst 1 .OO 31,692 exec assoc ii 1 .OO 47,779 exec assoc i .OO 0 management associate 1 .OO 41,504 obs-fiscal clerk iii, general 1 .OO 0 office secy i 1.00 0 office services clerk .OO 0 office clerk i 1 .OO 20,347 ------, ------TOTAL d27l0001* 50.50 2,282,466 TOTAL d27100 ** 50.50 2,282,466 d28a03 Maryland Stadium Authority d28a0341 General Administration administrative manager 1.00 54,860 1.00 54,860 1 .OO 54,860 administrative officer 6.80 277,206 6.80 276,746 6.80 276,746 administrative specialist 2.00 61,568 2.00 61,392 2.00 61,392 administrator iv 1.00 70,753 1.00 70,753 1 .OO 70,753 asst attorney general v 1 .OO 75,148 1 .OO 75,148 I.OO 75,148

I — 353 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Posi tions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

. -. ------me-- d28a03 Maryland Stadium Authority d28a0341 General Administration asst project manager deputy director executive director fiscal administrator fiscal director principal counsel project director project manager -.. -. TOTAL d28a0341* d28a0344 Facilities Management administrative clerk administrative specialist asst project manager director of facilities mgmt maintenance general maintenance manager maintenance supervisors maintenance technician manager of technical systems security manager security officers sec. shift supervisor senior maintenance technician stadium engineer tenant service manager

TOTAL d28a0344* d28a0359 Montgomery County Conference Center administrative specialist i .30 10,134 .30 10,134 .30 10,134 fiscal specialist iii .I0 5,880 .I0 5,880 -10 5,880 project manager .30 36,535 -30 36,535 .30 36,535 ------TOTAL d28a0359* .70 52,549 .70 52,549 .70 52,549 TOTAL d28a03 ** 83.50 3,578,586 83.50 3,909,370 83.50 3,909,370 d30n00 Maryland Food Center Authority d30n0041 Administration mfca executive director 1.00 130,000 1 .OO 130,000 1 .OO 130,000 mfca principal counsel 1 .OO 101,154 1.00 101,154 1 .OO 101,154 mfca deputy director 1 .OO 78,000 1 .OO 78,000 1 .OO 78,000 mfca financial administrator 1 .OO 45,000 1 .OO 45,000 1 .OO 45,000

I — 354 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol . -. d30n00 Maryland Food Center Authority d30n0041 Administration mfca market manager 1 .OO mfca project manager .OO mfca projects manager 1 .OO mfca asst to the exec director 1 .OO mfca asst to the deputy dir 1.00 mfca asst to the fin admin 1.00 mfca asst to the market mgr 1 .OO mfca receptionist 1 .OO ------TOTAL d30n0041* 11.00 d30n0042 Maryland Wholesale Produce Market mfca maintenance worker 5.00 145,717 5.00 147,790 5.00 mfca security officer 5.60 150,158 5.60 134,633 5.60

TOTAL d30n0042* 10.60 295,875 10.60 282,423 10.60 d30n0047 Maryland Wholesale Seafood Market mfca maintenance worker mfca security officer

TOTAL d30n0047* TOTAL d30n00 ** d38i01 State Board of Elections d38i0101 General Administration state admin of election laws prgm mgr senior ii admin prog mgr iv admin prog mgr iii administrator vi administrator v dp asst director i election director iii prgm mgr ii election director ii election deputy director iii election director i election deputy director ii election deputy director i budget analyst iv operating data base spec supervisor administrator ii computer network spec ii

I — 355 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------d38i01 State Board of Elections d38i0101 General Administration dp programmer analyst ii administrator i obs-fiscal specialist iii personnel officer ii admin officer ii admin officer i admin spec iii admin spec ii obs-data proc prog ii admin spec trainee management associate admin aide admin aide election supervisor ii obs-election chief clerk election administrative assista election data application spec election supervisor i office secy iii election administrative assista election clerk lead advanced election data application spec office secy ii election clerk iii obs-fiscal clerk iii election clerk ii election clerk i ------TOTAL d38i0101* 29.50 5,536,244 TOTAL d38i01 ** 29.50 5,536,244 d39s00 Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals d39s0001 Contract Appeals Resolution chair bd of contract appeals 1.OO 106,501 obs-chair bd of contract appeal 1 .OO 104,636 mbr bd contract appeals 1.OO 98,678 obs-executive associate iii 1.OO 51,989 exec assoc ii 1.00 44,768 ------TOTAL d39s0001* 5.00 406,572 5.00 TOTAL d39s00 ** 5.00 406,572 5.00

I — 356 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. d40w01 Department of Planning d40w0101 General Administration secy dept planning 116,459 dep dir office planning 0 prgm mgr senior iv 112,454 Transfer prgm mgr senior ii 94,628 Smart Growth dp director iii 81,101 prgm mgr senior i 81,101 prgm mgr iv 75,885 administrator vi 52,704 dp director i 53,710 administrator v 0 dp programmer analyst manager 68,415 administrator iii 58,783 computer network spec mgr 132,963 accountant manager i 62,199 dp programmer analyst supervise 64,029 accountant supervisor ii 55,472 computer network spec lead 49,432 dp programmer analyst lead/adva 0 computer network spec ii 100,523 dp programmer analyst ii 90,795 personnel administrator i 41,302 planner iv 50,941 webinaster ii 49,493 administrator i 51,519 budget analyst ii,capital progr 0 computer network spec i 40,960 dp programmer analyst i 48,627 accountant ii 42,989 visual communications supv 0 admin officer ii 44,744 spec asst ii exec dept 43,060 Transfer admin officer i 41,111 Smart Growth computer info services spec i 39,947 admin spec iii 0 dp programmer 33,689 management associate 81,498 office secy iii 33,814 office secy i 22,260 New ------TOTAL d40w0101* 2,016,607 d40w0102 State Clearinghouse prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii

I — 357 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------d40w0102 State Clearinghouse planner v 172,521 administrator ii 51,437 Transfer planner iv 54,501 Smart Growth dp functional analyst i 40,604 assoc librarian ii 0 office secy iii 32,246 office secy ii 59,078 ------TOTAL d40w0102* 489,283 d40w0103 Planning Data Services prgm mgr senior ii prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii principal planner data base spec supervisor dp programmer analyst lead/adva administrator ii dp functional analyst ii planner iii planner i i obs-data proc prog analyst spec admin spec iii admin aide office secy ii

TOTAL d40w0103* d40w0104 Local Planning Assistance prgm mgr senior i 77,246 prgm mgr iii 73,107 prgm mgr ii 61,501 principal planner 267,872 planner v 229,087 administrator ii 55,564 Transfer DHR planner iv 407,208 planner iv 56,647 planner in 0 admin spec iii 35,345 office secy iii 16,907 office secy ii 44,300 office secy i 24,416 ------TOTAL d40w0104* 27.00 1,278,059 24.00 1,271,896

I — 358 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. d40w0105 Comprehensive Planning dep dir office planning 90,270 prgm mgr senior i 81,101 prgm mgr iv 159,326 prgm mg r ii i 146,243 Abolish principal planner 129,803 prgm mgr i 60,416 planner v 162,812 planner v 0 planner iv 203,308 planner iv 53,460 planner iii 72,500 pub affairs officer ii 45,977 admi n spec i ii 34,039 admin aide 72,512 office secy iii 33,814 office secy i 24,867 , ------TOTAL d40w0105* 1,370,448 d40w0106 Parcel Mapping prgm mgr senior i prgm mgr iv prgm mgr ii administrator iii dp quality assurance spec planner iii planner i i cartographer iv cartographer iii cartographer i - - TOTAL d40w0106* TOTAL d40w01 **

I — 359 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d50h01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance d50h0101 Administrative Headquarters adjutant general prgm mgr senior i admin prog rngr iv admin prog mgr ii prgm mgr ii personnel administrator iii administrator iii administrator iii computer network spec mgr fiscal services chief ii administrator ii personnel officer iii admin officer iii admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer i computer info services spec i pub affairs officer i admin spec iii agency grants specialist traine inventory control specialist pub affairs specialist iii agency buyer ii fiscal accounts technician supv personnel associate iii fiscal accounts technician ii personnel associate ii fiscal accounts technician i personnel associate i personnel clerk obs-executive associate iii fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts clerk i automotive services mechanic

d50h0102 Air Operations and Maintenance asst adjutant general 1 .OO 77,564 1 .OO 92,220 airport firefighter It mil 2.00 101,070 2.00 101,070 maint supv iii 1 .OO 49,572 1 .OO 49,572 engr ii civil-general 1.00 0 .OO 0 acquisition agent ii 1 .OO 38,698 1 .OO 38,448 engr i civil-general .00 31,836 1 .OO 31,836

I — 360 d50h0102 Air Operations and Maintenance envrrnntl spec iii general 2.00 airport firefighter ii mil 16.00 airport firefighter i mil 5.00 police officer suprv military 1.OO airport firefighter trainee mil 1.OO police officer military 12.00 obs-executive associate iii .OO obs-executive associate i 1.OO office secy ii 1.OO supply officer iii 1.OO rnaint chief iii non lie 1.OO electrician high voltage 1.OO carpenter supervisor 1.OO carpenter trim 1.OO electrician 1.OO painter 1.OO maint mechanic senior 4.00 grounds supervisor ii 1.OO building services worker ii 8.00 groundskeeper ii 1.OO building services worker i .00 groundskeeper i .00 ------TOTAL d50h0102* 66.00 d50h0103 Army Operations and Maintenance asst adjutant general 1.OO exec v .OO admin prog mgr iv 1.00 admin prog mgr i 1.OO administrator iii .OO administrator iii .OO engr sr civil general 1.OO maint engineer ii 1.OO administrator i 3.00 administrator i 3.00 admin officer iii 2.00 computer info services spec ii 1.OO computer network spec trainee .OO envrmntl spec iv general 1 .OO rnaint engineer i .OO acquisition agent supervisor 1.OO maint supv i non lic 1.OO architectural tech i 1.OO envrmntl spec ii general 1.OO

I — 361 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------, d50h0103 Army Operations and Maintenance envrmntl spec i general bldg construction insp iii bldg construction insp ii bldg construction insp i building guard ii building guard i building guard trainee exec assoc i office secy iii services specialist office clerk ii supply officer ii office clerk i supply officer i telephone operator ii maint chief iv non lie electrician high voltage maint chief i non lie refrigeration mechanic carpenter trim electrician mason plasterer painter plumber steam fitter maint mechanic senior maint mechanic maint mechanic housekeeping supv i building services worker ii building services worker i

TOTAL d50h0103* d50h0105 State Operations asst adjutant general exec v prgm mgr iv prgm mgr ii prgm mgr i administrator iii administrator iii computer network spec mgr computer info services spec sup juvenile counselor supv ii

I — 362 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------d50h0105 State Operations administrator i juvenile counselor supv i admin officer iii agency budget specialist ii computer info services spec ii juvenile counselor senior admin officer ii admin officer i computer info services spec i admin spec iii inventory control specialist licensed practical nurse iii ad youth supv iii youth supv ii youth supv i exec assoc i admin aide office secy iii military honor guard specialist military honor guard specialist military honor guard specialist military honor guard specialist military honor guard specialist - - TOTAL d50h0105* d50h0106 Maryland Emergency Management Agency prgm mgr iv 1 .OO 70,893 prgm mgr iii 1 .OO 67,645 prgm mgr ii .OO 57,493 principal planner 2.00 62,096 administrator iii 2.00 104,716 computer network spec supr 1.00 57,568 obs-data proc mgr iv 1 .OO 59,932 administrator ii 1 .OO 0 administrator ii .OO 55,027 computer network spec ii 2.00 97,228 planner iv 2.00 100,646 administrator i 1 .OO 0 engr iii civil-general 1 .OO 51,027 admin officer iii 10.00 219,806 New computer info services spec ii 1 .OO 47,779 planner iii 3.00 256,687 admin officer ii 2.00 221,405 admin officer ii .OO 0

I — 363 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------d50h0106 Maryland Emergency Management Agency planner ii 6.00 admin spec iii .00 agency grants specialist traine .00 emergency mgmt operations off m .OO radio tech iv 1 .OO emergency mgmt operations off s .OO emergency mgmt operations off .OO personnel associate iii .OO admin aide 7.00 office supervisor 1 .OO office services clerk 2.00 ------TOTAL d50h0106* 48.00 TOTAL d50h01 ** 343.00 d53t00 Md Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems d53t0001 General Administration ems medical dir prgm mgr senior ii prgm mgr senior i asst attorney general vi prgm mgr iv administrator vi ems nursing pgm consult/admin s prgm mgr iii administrator v nursing program conslt/admin ii prgm mgr ii admin prog mgr i prgm mgr i administrator iii ems regional admin ems assoc regional admin ems exec dir ems aeromedical dir computer network spec lead data base spec ii dp programmer analyst lead/adva fiscal services administrator i administrator ii computer network spec ii administrator i dp functional analyst ii admin officer iii ems training spec iv

I — 364 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d53t00 Md Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems d53t0001 General Administration adrnin officer ii 1 .OO commercial ambulance svc specia 2.00 ems training spec iii 1 .OO adrnin officer i 1 .OO ems training spec ii .OO ems systems tech supv 1 .OO ems systems tech ii 6.00 ems illustrator .OO ems corn oper lead 4.00 ems corn oper ii 13.00 ems photographer 1.00 dp production control spec ii 1 .OO ems corn oper i 2.00 management associate 1 .OO admin aide 4.00 office secy iii 8.00 fiscal accounts clerk ii 1 .OO office secy ii 2.00 ------TOTAL d53t0001* 93.10 TOTAL d53t00 ** 93.10 d55p00 Department of Veterans Affairs d55p0001 Service Program secy dept veterans affairs 1 .OO prgm mgr iv .OO prgm mgr iii 1 .OO administrator v 1 .OO administrator iv .OO fiscal services officer i 1 .OO admin officer ii 1.00 veterans serv prog area supv 3.00 personnel specialist i 1 .OO veterans serv officer iii 3.00 fiscal accounts technician ii .OO admin aide 4.00 admin aide .OO office secy iii 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk ii 1.OO office secy ii 1 .OO office secy i steno -00

I — 365 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d55p0002 Cemetery Program prgm mgr iv 1.00 69,531 .OO 0 .OO prgm mgr i i .OO 0 1 .OO 60,905 1 .OO veterans cemetery supt 6.00 165,179 5.00 172,836 5.00 building guard ii 1 .OO 26,868 1 .OO 26,868 1 .OO admin aide 2.00 67,043 2.00 67,043 2.00 office secy iii 1 .OO 33,493 1.00 33,493 1.00 office secy ii 2.00 35,755 2.00 60,555 2.00 office secy i 1 .OO 29,988 -00 0 .OO automotive services specialist 1 .OO 0 1 .OO 35,740 1 .OO grounds supervisor i 2.00 47,231 2.00 49,409 2.00 motor equipment operator ii 6.00 157,854 6.00 157,853 6.00 building services worker ii 17.00 366,114 17.00 380,575 17.00 building services worker i 2.00 19,224 1 .OO 19,298 1 .OO ------TOTAL d55p0002* 42.00 d55p0003 Memorials and Monuments Program prgm mgr ii .OO admin officer iii 1 .OO admin officer i 1 .OO grounds supervisor i 1 .OO building services worker ii 2.00 ------TOTAL d55p0003* 5.00 d55p0005 Veterans Home Program prgm mgr i i 1 .OO admin spec ii 2.00 business manager i 1 .OO ------TOTAL d55p0005* TOTAL d55p00 ** d60a10 State Archives d60a1001 Archives state archivist prgm mgr senior i dp director i i computer network spec lead administrator iv computer network spec mgr computer network spec supr accountant supervisor ii archivist v archivist v

I — 366 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d60a10 State Archives d60a1001 Archives data base spec ii 101,370 administrator ii 44,559 archivist iv 140,956 Transfer Archives computer network spec i 42,544 archivist iii 287,545 assoc librarian ii 43,060 archivist ii 31,575 photographer iii 63,684 fiscal accounts technician ii 72,512 archival assistant supv 33,814 archival assistant ii 30,275 exec assoc iii 55,027 management associate 36,324 office secy iii 28,271 supply officer ii 28,652 .------TOTAL d60a1001* 2,105,339 d60a1002 Artistic Property archivist iv 43,351 Transfer Archives archivist iv 46,792 . ------TOTAL d60a1002* 90,143 TOTAL d60a10 ** 2,195,482 d70j00 Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund d70j0042 Insured Division administrative aide administrator iv asst atty gen vi bldg & sevices worker ii building guard i building guard ii computer operator ii fiscal accounts clerk i maif associate director maif associate ii maif claims clerk ii maif claims clerk iii maif dep exec dir maif dir maif exec dir maif manager i maif manager ii

I — 367 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------d70j00 Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund d70j0042 Insured Division maif manager iii maif specialist i maif specialist ii maif specialist iii maif specialist iv maif specialist v maif specialist vi maif supervisor i maif supervisor ii maif supervisor in maif supervisor iv maif supervisor v maif technician i maif technician ii maif technician iii maif technician iv maintenance mechanic office clerk i office clerk ii office processing clerk ii office secy i gen office secy ii office secy iii offset machine operator ii services supervisor i stock clerk ii

TOTAL d70j0042* d70j0047 Uninsured Division maif specialist i maif specialist ii maif specialist iii maif specialist iv maif supervisor ii maif supervisor v maif technician ii office clerk i

TOTAL d70j0047* TOTAL d70j00 **

I — 368 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions

d80z01 Insurance Administration and Regulation d80z0101 Administration and Operations state insurance commissioner mia chief actuary exec vii mia deputy ins comm mia executive v mia executive iv principal counsel asst attorney general viii mia executive iii asst attorney general vii mia executive ii asst attorney general vi mia executive i mia administrator v mia administrator iv mia administrator iii mia administrator ii asst attorney general v mia administrator i mia analyst ii obs-actuary iii life and health rnia analyst i obs-insurance examiner v mia officer ii obs-market conduct exam sr prop mia officer i obs-insurance examiner iii obs-market conduct exam prop an mia associate vi mia associate v mia associate iv mia associate iii personnel clerk rnia associate ii mia associate i management assoc admin aide office secy iii office secy ii office services clerk lead office services clerk office processing clerk ii telephone operator ii telephone operator i ------TOTAL d80z0101* 274.00 12,024,812 TOTAL d80z01 ** 274.00 12,024,812 288.00 13,323,740 288.00 13,649,000

I — 369 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

-, d80z02 Health Insurance Safety Net Programs d80z0201 Maryland Health Insurance Program mia executive iv .OO 65,311 1.OO 95,401 97,280 mia executive ii .OO 7,057 1.OO 75,759 76,503 prgm mgr senior i 1.OO 0 00 0 0 prgm mgr i 1.00 0 .OO 0 0 mia administrator ii .OO 0 1.OO 42,453 42,453 BPWI mia administrator i 1 .OO 0 .OO 0 0 mia analyst ii .00 3,888 1.OO 41,736 42,544 mia analyst i .OO 0 1.OO 34,908 34,908 BPWI mia officer ii 1.OO 0 -00 0 0 mia officer i 1.OO 0 .OO 0 0 mia associate v .OO 16,688 1.OO 30,153 31,303 mia associate iv 1.OO 0 .OO 0 0 ------TOTAL d80z0201* 324,991 TOTAL d80z02 ** 324,991 d90u00 Canal Place Preservation and Development Authority d90u0001 General Administration administrator v 1.00 68,415 1.00 admin spec ii 1.OO 35,740 1.00 pub affairs specialist ii 1.OO 29,047 1.OO office clerk i 1 .OO 19,617 1.OO ------TOTAL d90u0001* TOTAL d90u00 ** d99a11 Office of Administrative Hearings d99a1101 General Administration chf admin law judge 1 .OO exec vi 1 .OO prgm mgr senior ii 1.OO dir of quality assurance oah 1.OO administrator iv 1.OO administrator iii 1.OO administrator iii 1.OO admin law judge iii 55.00 admin law judge ii 4.00 admin law judge i 1.OO computer network spec supr 1.OO fiscal services chief ii 1.OO administrator ii 1.OO computer network spec ii 2.00 personnel administrator i 1.OO administrator i 1.OO

I — 370 PERSONNEL DETAIL Executive and Administrative Control

d99a11 Office of Administrative Hearings d99a1101 General Administration admin officer iii 4.00 189,776 dp functional analyst i 1 .OO 29,305 admin officer ii 1.00 44,314 personnel officer i 1 .OO 44,314 admin officer i 1 .OO 41,504 admin spec iii 2.00 76,290 admin spec i 1 .OO 48,521 paralegal ii 2.00 32,167 library assistant iv 1 .OO 5,585 obs-executive associate i 1 .OO 0 management associate 4.00 162,071 docket clerk senior 10.00 342,996 office secy iii 13.00 414,753 docket clerk 6.00 151,887 office services clerk lead 1 .OO 29, 106 office services clerk 8.00 169,715 fiscal accounts clerk i 1 .OO 21,675 office clerk ii .OO 0 office processing clerk ii 1 .OO 6,125 ------TOTAL d99a1101* 133.00 6,668,348 TOTAL d99a11 ** 133.00 6,668,348

I — 371

FINANCIAL AND REVENUE ADMINISTRATION

Comptroller of the Treasury State Treasurer State Department of Assessments and Taxation State Lottery Agency Property Tax Assessment Appeals Boards Registers of Wills

COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

MISSION

The Comptroller of Maryland provides executive leadership for Maryland's financial management services. The Comptroller is accountable for the fair and efficient collection of taxes, regulation of businesses, accurate forecasting and accounting of revenues and expenses, and the provision of technological services to State agencies.

VISION

The Comptroller of Maryland will achieve a favorable national reputation for fiscal management of the State by providing superior tax, regulatory, and technological services that promote the prosperity of the people and businesses of Maryland.

KEY GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Goal 1. Provide public services in ways that achieve the highest level of individual and business customer satisfaction. Objective 1.1 Implement alternative methods for customers to file tax returns and make tax payments. Objective 1.2 Provide customers with enhanced. convenient access to services through the use of Internet applications, the Comptroller's branch offices, improved telecommunications, improved methods for data transfers, and by establishing a formal taxpayer liaison office for problem resolution.

Goal 2. Take advantage of existing and emerging information technology applications to enhance business processes that currently use little or no technology, and improve the infrastructure for efficient implementation of these new technologies. Objective 2.1 Expand andlor implement e-government services through enhanced Internet, Intranet, and Extranet applications. Objective 2.2 Increase use of electronic file transfers, document imaging, and alternative tax payment and return processing methods. Objective 2.3 Enhance infrastructure, including mainframe and related disaster recovery capabilities. Continue to use the latest security protection technology and local area network services.

Goal 3. To be a competitive and desirable employer which develops and retains a diverse and competent workforce providing excellent service to individuals, businesses, and government. Objective 3.1 Maximize the attractiveness of the Comptroller's Office as an employer by promoting career opportunities, expanding direct hire from the marketplace, and offering flexible employee initiatives.

Goal 4. Vigorously enforce tax laws essential to the fair treatment of all taxpayers. Objective 4.1 Implement data warehousing to increase effectiveness of matching and audit selection programs. Objective 4.2 Continue aggressive compliance efforts by Field Enforcement Division of use tax enforcement, cigarette smuggling interdiction, and fuel tax evasion interdiction.

I — 375 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

SUMMARY OF COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 1.125.70 1.103.20 1.120.20 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 20.90 31.40 29.90 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 60.054. 393 59.414. 917 61.871.670 Technical and Special Fees ...... 848.401 969. 383 1.161.262 Operating Expenses ...... 38.697. 676 43.342. 284 41.904. 149 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 68.594. 650 67.054. 692 TransferReduction ...... 376. 000 -1.324. 188 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 68.970. 650 65.730.504 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 5.606. 170 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 63.364.480 65.730. 504 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 12.678. 963 12.665.925 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 23.557. 027 25.330. 155 Total Expenditure ...... 99.600. 470 103.726. 584

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 68.00 66.00 66.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 2.40 2.40 1.40 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 4,192,938 4.044, 399 4,034,314 Technical and Special Fees ...... 226,032 254,761 215, 104 Operating Expenses ...... 3.075. 496 3,947, 162 3.490. 596 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferIReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 376 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOAO1.O1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Comptroller has general supervision over the fiscal affairs of the State. The program coordinates the functions of the various divisions and formulates policies to promote prompt collection of various revenues.

I — 377 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

EOOA01.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 30.50 30.00 30.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00353 Admissions and Amusement Tax ...... E0038 1 Motor Fuel Tax ...... SWF307 Dedicated Purpose Fund ...... Total ......

I — 378 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA01.02 FINANCIAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES - OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Financial and Support Services program administers the finance, procurement, personnel, and other administrative functions for the Comptroller of Maryland. It is also responsible for the accounting records of the Capital Grants and Loans program and records concerning debt service for the State's General Obligation Bonds.

MISSION

The mission of the Financial and Support Services Program is to provide high quality, efficient and timely financial, personnel, and administrative services to support the achievement of the goals and objectives of the Comptroller of Maryland.

VISION

The Financial and Support Services program supports the attainment of the goals and objectives for the Comptroller of Maryland. Performance measures for this program are therefore not presented.

I — 379 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA01.02 FINANCIAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES .OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00353 Admissions and Amusement Tax ...... E00381 Motor Fuel Tax ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: E00901 Receipts from Users of Mailroom. Printshops and Other Supplemental Services ......

I — 380 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA02.01 ACCOUNTING CONTROL AND REPORTING - GENERAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The general objectives of this program are the exercise of financial control, accounting for all State funds received and disbursed, and the preparation of monthly and annual financial reports and such other statistical information as required by law or fiscal policy. MISSION

The Comptroller's General Accounting Division is the State's central accounting office, providing an extensive menu of financial services to assist the State Comptroller in fulfilling his Constitutional responsibilities to provide "general superintendence of the fiscal affairs of the state." Legal and customer requirements and technological innovations dictate the services provided. Services are provided to state agencies, vendors, and those individuals and investors interested in the financial position and results of operations of the State.

VISION

The Comptroller's General Accounting Division is dedicated to providing cost effective services promptly, efficiently, and courteously. The division will continually strive to provide accounting expertise and a wide range of financial services to customers using leading edge technologies and best business practices.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To maintain and improve the State's reputation for excellence and integrity in accounting and financial reporting. Objective 1.1 To produce the State of Maryland Comprehensive Annual Financial Report in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, as promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Unqualified opinion by an independent accounting firm Received Expected Expected Expected be received be received be received

Objective 1.2 To receive the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting Received Expected Expected Expected be received be received be received

Goal 2. To review agency expenditure requests for compliance with State laws and regulations and authorize disbursements from the State Treasury on a timely basis. To respond promptly and courteously to requests from vendors and State agencies. Objective 2.1 Ensure State agencies expenditures are limited to amounts authorized by appropriations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of appropriation accounts over expended in the State's R*STARS accounting system None None None None Expected Expected

I — 381 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA02.01 ACCOUNTING CONTROL AND REPORTING - GENERAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION (Continued)

Objective 2.2 Approve or reject 99% of agency payment requests and submit approved requests to the State Treasurer for disbursement within five working days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of payment requests processed within 5 days 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% Output: Total amount of disbursements (billions) $27.4 $3 1.5 $32 $32

Objective 2.3 Expand use of Corporate Charge Card to at least 50% of total eligible payments.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Corporate Charge Card transactions 652,638 660,299 666,902 673,571 Corporate Charge Card purchases (millions) $184.7 $186 $187 $189.7 Quality: Corporate Charge Card transactions as a percentage of eligible vendor payment transactions 38% 38% 45% 48% Rebate from Program (millions) $1.576 $1.589 $1.605 $1.621

Objective 2.4 Respond to 90% of vendor payment inquiries within 5 minutes

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of vendor payment inquiries completed 10,767 13,746 12,000 10,000 Quality: Percentage of vendor payment inquiries completed within 5 minutes

I — 382 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

GENERAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION

EOOA02.01 ACCOUNTING CONTROL AND REPORTING

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 383 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA03.01 ESTIMATING OF REVENUES - BUREAU OF REVENUE ESTIMATES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Bureau of Revenue Estimates operates in accordance with Section 6-101 of the State Finance and Procurement Article. The Bureau is staff to the Board of Revenue Estimates composed of the Treasurer, Comptroller, and Secretary of Budget and Management. The Board of Revenue Estimates reviews the information and recommendations supplied by the Bureau and submits to the Governor, for submission to the General Assembly, an itemized statement of estimated revenues for the current and succeeding fiscal years. MISSION

The Bureau of Revenue Estimates forecasts Maryland's revenues and determines the fiscal impact of proposals to change Maryland's tax laws. The bureau is accountable to the Board of Revenue Estimates for accurate forecasting of state revenues and the economy.

VISION

The Bureau of Revenue Estimates will be recognized inside and outside Maryland as the primary source of information and analysis regarding all aspects of Maryland taxes and revenues upon which sound public policy decisions can be based.

The Bureau of Revenue Estimates supports the attainment of the goals and objectives for the Comptroller of Maryland and the Board of Revenue Estimates.

I — 384 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

BUREAU OF REVENUE ESTIMATES

EOOA03.01 ESTIMATING OF REVENUES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 385 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

SUMMARY OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 391 .00 382.00 382.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 1.50 2.00 2.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 18.616. 197 18.507. 402 19.223. 857 Technical and Special Fees ...... 49. 786 72.479 83. 156 Operating Expenses ...... 13.016.949 14.636. 861 13.973.245 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 33.808. 659 33.014.823 TransferEeduction ...... -89. 598 -1.308. 081 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 33.719. 061 31.706. 742 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 3.757. 348 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 29.961. 713 3 1.706. 742 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1.699. 171 1.485. 000 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 22. 048 25. 000 Total Expenditure ...... 31.682. 932 33.216. 742

I — 386 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA04.01 REVENUE ADMINISTRATION - REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Revenue Administration Division processes personal, corporation, fiduciary, employer withholding, Maryland estate tax, tire fee, admissions and amusement tax, sales and use tax, alcohol and tobacco tax, and motor fuel tax returns. All remittances received with these returns are deposited through a Centralized Remittance Processing center and a lockbox facility.

In addition, the division is responsible for taxpayer service, taxpayer accounting for return adjustments, tax processing systems application control, revenue accounting, and reporting tax distributions to the subdivisions of Maryland.

MISSION

The Revenue Administration Division is committed to administering the provisions of the Maryland income tax laws effectively and efficiently while maintaining the integrity of the tax system and treating all taxpayers with respect and understanding.

VISION

The Revenue Administration Division will be a national leader in providing taxpayer service by quickly and efficiently processing tax returns and issuing refunds, processing payments promptly and efficiently, and using technological innovations to meet the needs of the people and businesses of Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure that current year personal resident tax returns requesting a refund, both paper and electronic, are processed promptly. Objective 1.1 95% of current year, paper-filed personal resident returns received during the income tax filing season are processed and refunds are issued within 10 business days of the date the returns were received.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of paper returns received 1,817,241 1,651,633 1,575,000 1,464,800 Number of refunds issued on paper returns 1,489,291 1,244,731 1,157,600 1,076,600 Outcome: Average business days for issuance of refunds from current year personal resident paper returns received during filing season. 11.24 11.07 10.00 10.00

Objective 1.2 95% of current year electronically filed returns are processed and refunds are issued within 2 business days of the date the returns were received.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of electronically filed returns 726,548 862,818 1,035,400 1,242,500 Number of refunds from electronic returns 625,089 752,846 903,400 1,084,100 Outcome: Average days for issuance of refunds from electronic returns 1.22 1.12 1.7 1.7

Goal 2. Ensure that all correspondence, both paper and e-mail, is answered promptly. Objective 2.1 95% of paper correspondence is logged and responded to within an average of eight (8) business days or less from the time the correspondence is received.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of letters received 7,149 3,952 3,500 3,000 Outcomes: Average days to respond to paper correspondence 6 6 8 8

I — 387 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA04.01 REVENUE ADMINISTRATION - REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

Objective 2.2 97% of e-mail transmissions are responded to within an average of two business days or less from the time the e-mail transmissions were received.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of e-mails received 15,143 20,485 25,000 28,000 Outcomes: Average days to respond to e-mail correspondence 1 1 2 2

Goal 3. Ensure telephone inquires are answered timely. Objective 3.1 Telephone inquiries are answered within an average of fifty-five (55) seconds or less of the individual being placed in the hold queue.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of telephone calls received 449,638 385,109 329,846 282,513 Outcomes: Average number of seconds taxpayers are in hold queue before call taken 50 5 6 55 55

Note: The hiring freeze will negatively impact the outcome of these Performance Measures as the success of each objective is greatly impacted by personnel staffing.

I — 388 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

EOOA04.01 REVENUE ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 391 .00 382.00 382.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00352 Used Tire Fee ...... 38.738 7. 194 10.000 E00353 Admissions and Amusement Tax ...... 77. 455 100.720 102.457 E0038 1 Motor Fuel Tax ...... 1.485. 658 1.377. 086 1.286.341 Total ...... 1.601.851 1.485.000 1.398. 798

Reimbursable Fund Income: NOOA01 Department of Human Resources ...... 22. 048 25. 000 22. 929

I — 389 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA04.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

This program supported the upgrading of the Comptroller's E-Filing system. These funds were appropriated to be a one-stop Tax Filing portal for submission of personal, business and employer tax payments. These funds were given back to the Major Information Technology Development Fund because of upgrades for the federal tax system.

I — 390 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

REVENUE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

EOOA04.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 97,320 Total Operating Expenses ...... 97,320 Total Expenditure ...... 97,320

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 97,320

Special Fund Income: SWF302 Major Information Technology Development Project Fund ......

I — 391 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA05.01 COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION - COMPLIANCE DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Compliance Division is responsible for the enforcement of all tax laws administered by the Comptroller and for administering the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property. Primary functions include auditing, collections, and various discovery activities. In conjunction with these activities, the division handles the levying of assessments, tax appeals, and legal enforcement.

MISSION

To encourage compliance with tax laws through aggressive, equitable and compassionate enforcement activities. All taxpayers will be treated fairly and will receive prompt courteous service.

VISION

All individuals and businesses will pay their fair share of taxes, allowing Maryland to provide excellent services to its citizens and promoting economic development through uniformly applied tax laws.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Maximize collection of past due taxes. Objective 1.1 Notify 90% of taxpayers of past due amounts within 60 days of case first entering collection system for active collection. Objective 1.2 Establish appropriate payment plans when necessary. Objective 1.3 Use technology along with all available sources of collection information to identify taxpayer assets. Objective 1.4 File liens, garnish salaries, and attach assets when necessary.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of active delinquent inc. tax cases as of 6/30 79,219 8 1,469 80,000 80,000 Number of active delinquent business tax cases as of 6/30 30,379 30,408 30,000 30,000 Outputs: Number of payment agreements entered 29,5 1 1 41,912 47,000 47,000 Number of cases certified to IRS for offset 148,351 65,244 65,000 65,000 Number of Individual Income Tax liens filed 39,525 24,796 25,000 25,000 Number of salary garnishments filed 10,201 14,559 15,000 15,000 Number of bank attachments filed 3,807 3,478 7,500 10,000 Number of Business Tax liens filed 5,776 6,562 7,000 7,000 Outcomes: Dollars collected on delinquent income tax cases 116,712,712 Dollars collected on delinquent business tax cases 155,103,848

Goal 2. Encourage voluntary business tax compliance and identify non-compliant businesses through a highly efficient and effective business tax audit program. Objective 2.1 Develop a cross sectional audit selection program based on the number of accounts, volume of receipts, history of compliance, and results of previous audits for each tax type and business activity. Objective 2.2 Cross train audit staff in multiple taxes to accomplish efficient, complete audit.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Estimated number of Business tax accounts 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Outputs: Number of Business tax audits and investigations 1,561 1,727 1,808 1,953 Dollars assessed for Business Taxes 56,217,397 70,674,420 70,000,000 70,000,000 Percent of auditors (employed for at least 18 months) cross trained 88.2% 83% 86% 90% Quality: Percentage of accounts audited or investigated 6% 7% 7% 8%

I — 392 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA05.01 COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION - COMPLIANCE DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 3. Identify non-compliant taxpayers through various discovery activities. Objective 3.1 Use federal tax data to identify individuals not in compliance with Maryland tax laws, beginning each program within 120 days of the last extension period or 120 days of notification by IRS. Objective 3.2 Develop automated match programs with various sources to identify non-compliant businesses and individuals. Objective 3.3 Develop one new match program each year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of lstnotices sent for Ind. Income Tax 49,556 73,300 65,000 65,000 Number of Business Tax notices sent 5,603 10,145 8,000 8,000 Number of Individual Income Tax assessments 46,564 54,502 55,000 55,000 Dollars assessed for Individual Income Tax 121,285,227 135,852,019 137,000,000 140,000,000 Dollars assessed for Business Tax 4,150,085 5,578,982 4,500,000 4,500,000 Quality: Number of new automated match programs begun 1 0 1 1

Goal 4. Provide all taxpayers with a fair and timely appeal. Objective 4.1 Assign a qualified hearing officer to review each contested assessment. Objective 4.2 Finalize 90% of appeals within 90 days of the hearing unless taxpayer requests additional time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of hearings held 583 67 1 675 675 Number of appeals resolved without a hearing 45 1 490 475 475 Number of appeals finalized 1,212 1266 1,265 1,265 Quality: Percent of appeals finalized within 90 days 96.6% 96.8% 95% 95%

Goal 5. Identify unclaimed property and present it to the rightful owners. Objective 5.1 Identify the holders of unclaimed property and obtain reports listing the properties and their owners. Objective 5.2 Participate in programs to locate owners. Objective 5.3 90% of names will be added to system within 90 days of due date of report by holders.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of Unclaimed Property holder reports received Outputs: Number of notices sent to owners Number of Unclaimed Property claims paid Dollars of Unclaimed Property reported Outcomes: Dollars of Unclaimed Property paid to owners Quality: Percent of names added to system within 90 days

I — 393 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

COMPLIANCE DIVISION

EOOA05.01 COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 328.20 325.20 342.20 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00352 Used Tire Fee ...... E00353 Admissions and Amusement Tax ...... E00354 Unclaimed Property ...... E00355 Income Tax Private Collectors ...... E00358 Boxing and Wrestling Tax ...... E00372 Cigarette Sales Below Cost Act ...... E00381 Motor Fuel Tax ...... Total ......

I — 394 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA06.01 FIELD ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION - FIELD ENFORCEMENT DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Field Enforcement Division is the enforcement arm of the Comptroller of Maryland. It is comprised of four sections - the enforcement agents, the inspectors, the Business License Bureau and the Motor Fuel Lab. The enforcement agents and inspectors are responsible for the detection and enforcement of the revenue laws relating to alcoholic beverages, cigarette taxes, motor fuel and sales and use taxes. The tasks performed to complete this function include conducting investigations, arresting violators and performing compliance inspections for proper licenses. The Business License Bureau is responsible for the issuance of over 85,000 business licenses and coordinating license issues with the clerk of the courts in all counties. The Motor Fuel Lab is responsible for testing motor fuel to ensure proper quality fuel is sold to consumers across the state. They are also responsible for testing alcohol.

MISSION

Pursue all legal and reasonable means to identify and collect all revenue due the Comptroller of Maryland as provided by the Maryland Constitution and statutes as enacted by the General Assembly.

VISION

To secure voluntary compliance to the revenue laws of the State through a program of enforcement and education, maximizing state revenue while fostering fair tax treatment for Maryland businesses and individuals.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To ensure that businesses obtain and renew the proper licenses required by the State of Maryland. Objective 1.1 Through diligent inspections, reduce the number of businesses operating without a valid business license.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: The number of licenses administered 85,389 88,397 90,167 9 1,970 Outputs: The number of delinquent licenses 2,791 3,994 5,711 6,853 Number of citations issued for license violations 1,383 1,718 2,456 2,947 Percent increase in citations issued 48% 24 % 42% 20% Goal 2. To improve voluntary compliance with the use tax laws of the State of Maryland. Objective 2.1 To increase the awareness of the use tax through education. Objective 2.2 To identify violators and thereby increase the amount of use tax collections by 5% over prior year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: The number of delivery vehicles inspected 3 18 259 27 1 285 Outputs: The number of use tax violations identified 658 5 84 613 643 Inputs: The number of delinquent licenses referred for collection 423 790 829 870 Outcome: Amount of use tax collected 467,425 956,394 1,004,213 1,054,424 Percentage increase in collections over prior year +16.46% +104.61% +5.00% +5.00%

Goal 3. Strict enforcement of laws pertaining to untaxed cigarettes to deter illegal cigarettes from coming into the state and to decrease lost revenues. Objective 3.1 Conduct importation and interdiction initiatives to increase seizures of cigarettes by 5% over the prior year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: The number of arrests 74 121 133 148 Outcome: The number of untaxed cigarette packs confiscated 163,695 139,353 146,320 153,636 Percentage increase in cigarette seizures over prior year -23.02% -14.87% +5.00% +5.00%

I — 395 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA06.01 FIELD ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION - FIELD ENFORCEMENT DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 4. Ensure that Maryland's motor fuels meet the highest quality standards. Objective 4.1 Increase inspection and lab analysis of motor fuels available in the State by 5% each year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: The number of motor fuel samples collected 17,281 15,855 16,647 17,480 Outputs: The number of sample violations 177 22 1 265 3 18 Outcome: Percentage increase in sample collections over prior year

Note: NIA - not available

Goal 5. Strict enforcement of Alcoholic Beverage Laws of the State of Maryland. Objective 5.1 Increase inspections to deter violations of Maryland's Alcoholic Beverage Laws

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: The number of alcohol citations * 1,718 1,803 1,894 Outputs: The number of alcohol arrests * 148 155 163 Outcome: Percentage increase of citations per year * * +5.00% +5.00%

Note: * - Data not available

I — 396 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

FIELD ENFORCEMENT DIVISION

EOOA06.01 FIELD ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00372 Cigarette Sales Below Cost Act ...... E00381 Motor Fuel Tax ...... Total ......

I — 397 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA07.01 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX ADMINISTRATION - ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division operates under Article 2B, Title 16 of the Business Regulation Article, Commercial Law, Section 11-501 through Section 11-510, and Tax-General Article, Titles 1, 2, 5, 12, and 13 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. This Division administers laws and regulations pertaining to alcohol beverages and tobacco. It is responsible for regulating the manufacture, storage, transportation, sales, and distribution of alcoholic beverages and cigarettes and collecting the excise tax on beer, wine, distilled spirits, and cigarettes. In fulfillment of its responsibilities, this division issues licenses and permits, maintains alcoholic beverage price filings and credit control lists. and promotes fair trade practices in accordance with the law.

MISSION

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division is dedicated to serving the citizens of Maryland by responsibly managing public resources and carrying out its duties and responsibilities in an equitable, efficient and effective manner. The division is responsible for regulating the manufacture. sale, storage, transportation, distribution, and promotion of alcohol and tobacco products and collecting the alcohol and tobacco excise taxes.

VISION

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division will foster a harmonious relationship among all segments of the alcohol and tobacco industries, while carrying out legislative mandates and executive direction in the best interest of the consumers and taxpayers of Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To administer fair alcohol and tobacco tax and regulatory practices throughout the industry. Objective 1.1 Increase participation in the "Industry Forum" program by 10% per year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of Industry Forum participants 24 32 35 39 Outcomes: Percentage of increase in Industry Forum participation over prior year

Goal 2. To use state of the art technology to provide Maryland businesses with alcohol and tobacco-related information. Objective 2.2 Design in fiscal year 2004 a web-based Direct Debit application that will allow a taxpayer to pay their alcohol and tobacco taxes online. Taxpayer cost and time to generate and sign checks will be eliminated, and the State will have immediate access to the tax money.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of check payments * * 3,240 2,880 Number of Internet payments * * 3 60 720 Outcomes: Percent reduction in check payments from prior year

* New measures for which data is not available.

I — 398 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX DIVISION

EOOA07.01 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement:

Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00372 Cigarette Sales Below Cost Act ...... 37. 840 37.769 85. 151

I — 399 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA08.01 MOTOR FUEL TAX ADMINISTRATION - MOTOR FUEL TAX DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Motor Fuel Tax Division functions under the provisions set forth in Titles 1, 2, 9, and 13 of the Tax General Article and Titles 1 and 10 of the Business Regulation Article. This office administers the motor carrier tax, motor fuel taxes, and the motor fuel and lubricants laws.

MISSION

To provide for the efficient and fair collection of motor fuel and motor carrier taxes while protecting consumers from fraud and deceptive practices.

VISION

The Motor Fuel Tax Division will achieve a national reputation for its leadership in motor fuel tax administration.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To efficiently and effectively collect and distribute motor fuel taxes due the State and fuel use taxes for jurisdictions participating in the International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA). Objective 1.1 To receive 90% of all total motor fuel tax revenue by electronic funds transfer (EFT).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Total revenue received (EFT and Non-EFT) (millions) $720.8 $722.5 $737.0 $75 1.7 Number of tax remittances submitted by EFT 2,132 1,998 2,200 2,300 Efficiency: Percent of total tax revenue received by EFT 95.6% 96.1% 97.5% 97.5% Percentage of EFT transactions of total transactions 16.5% 20.0% 25.0% 25.0%

2002 2003 2004 2005 Other Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Licensed Motor Fuel Accounts 1,020 920 800 800 Special Fuel Exemption Accounts (Law change effective 10103 will no longer require many entities to have exempt. certificates) IFTA Motor Carrier Accounts Motor Fuel Inspection Accounts Petroleum Transporter Accounts Total

Goal 2. To have taxpayers file their quarterly IFTA returns on-line to reduce printing and mailing costs and to increase accuracy. Objective 2.1 By the first reporting quarter of CY 2004 (1/1/04-3/31/04) to have access to the Regional Processing Center on-line filing application so that taxpayers may begin to file their IFTA returns on-line. This will cut down on the cost of printing and mailing the quarterly returns.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of Active IFTA accounts 5,535 5,647 5,700 5,750 Outputs: Number of IFTA registrants filing their quarterly returns on-line NIA Nl A 200 1,000 Efficiency: Expected Savings in printing and postage NIA N/A $154 $770

Objective 2.2 Reduce the number of returns needing review and adjustment due to computation errors. The on-line application will have edit checks to prevent miscalculations.

I — 400 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA08.01 MOTOR FUEL TAX ADMINISTRATION - MOTOR FUEL TAX DIVISION (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of returns processed each quarter 5,535 5,647 5,700 5,750 Outputs: Number of returns not placed in error status due to edit checks within on-line application. NIA NIA 50 250 Efficiency: Reduced number of hours in Internal Audit due to reduction in errors. NIA NIA 25 125

Note: * Data not yet available NIA - not applicable

I — 401 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

MOTOR FUEL TAX DIVISION

EOOA08.01 MOTOR FUEL TAX ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... SO. 288 04 Travel ...... 25. 939 08 Contractual Services ...... 569. 275 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 67. 202 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 8. 488 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 15.089 13 Fixed Charges ...... 100.974 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E00381 Motor Fuel Tax ......

I — 402 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA09.01 PAYROLL MANAGEMENT - CENTRAL PAYROLL BUREAU

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Section 6-401 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article provides for a Central Payroll Bureau. The bureau issues approximately 100,000 payroll checks and direct deposits, on a bi-weekly basis, for 429 payrolls in three separate payroll systems.

MISSION

To provide payroll services to all state agencies, including the issuance of paychecksldeposit advices and wage statements for all permanent and contractual employees of the Legislative, Judicial and Executive branches of State government. Additional services always include friendly and competent guidance to employees, state agencies, and deduction providers regarding State policies and regulations, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, and subsidies.

VISION

Paperless payroll systems whereby employees, state agencies, and business partners submit and receive pay records and deduction data electronically. Archival records are maintained electronically. Payment of wages through direct deposit is maximized. A fully functional and secure electronic information resource is accessible to state agencies and state employees.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Goal 1. Process payroll and issue paychecksldeposit advices and wage statements for all employees Objective 1.1 Process according to pre-established schedules, 100% of authorized and valid pay transactions received.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of checks and deposit advices issued 2,715,829 2,722,866 2,725,000 2,725,000 Percentage of Direct Deposit payments to total salary payments 78.14 82.89 83.00 84.00 Annual income tax statements issued 138,734 141,189 142,000 142,000 Percentage of pay transactions processed according to schedule 100% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 2. Maximize use of electronic and automated transactions for the submission of personnel actions, employee deduction authorizations, and agency payroll certifications. Objective 2.1 Introduce and strive for 100% participation of on-line entry of exception pay data and for the replacement of hard copy transactions to electronic and file generated transactions wherever an appropriate infrastructure for exchange exists and document maintenance requirements permit.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Annual payroll deductions processed 20,500,500 22,944,690 23,000,500 23,000,500 Percent of Deductions established via electronic interface 88.7% 87.0% 89.0% 90.0% Percent of Personnel Actions received via electronic interface 77 % 77% 77% 82% Percent of Regular system payroll certifications via on line entry 73% 99% 100% 100% Percent of Contractual system payroll certifications via on line entry 74% 99% 100% 100%

I — 403 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

CENTRALPAYROLLBUREAU

EOOA09.01 PAYROLL MANAGEMENT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 37.50 37.00 37.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 404 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA1O.O1 TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT AND COMPUTER CENTER OPERATIONS - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Information Technology Division is responsible for the overall management and direction of the agency's information technology efforts. The division provides technology support for the agency's divisions and units, as well as the twenty-four (24) Registers of Wills offices, and serves as the principal information technology advisor to the Comptroller, Deputy Comptroller, executive staff, and division directors. The division also operates the Annapolis Data Center, which provides mainframe computer services for nine (9) primary and fifteen (15) secondary user agencies. The division's operational costs are fully reimbursable from customer agencies via a charge back billing process which produces a monthly invoice for computer usage and services rendered.

MISSION

To provide technology management and support to all divisions and units of the Comptroller's Office and Registers of Wills offices throughout the State, and to operate the Annapolis Data Center providing mainframe computer processing and online connectivity for users in the Comptroller's Office and for twenty-four State agency customers of the Annapolis Data Center.

VISION

Our customers will have instantaneous, around-the-clock access to all tax information and services online. All financial transactions with our customers will be performed online. Our business processes will incorporate technology seamlessly, so that all processes are performed swiftly, efficiently, and with substantial cost savings. Instead of performing manual, repetitive tasks, our employees will spend their time and effort providing services to our customers and looking for new ways to improve the services we provide to our customers.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Continue to provide efficient reliable service to Annapolis Data Center customer agencies while meeting established goals. Objectivel.1 Mainframe computer available for customer processing at least 98% of the time (24 hrs. a day, 7 days a week).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of hours the Mainframe System was available 99.5% 99.7% 98% 98%

Objective 1.2 Online systems available 98% of the time between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of hours the Online System was available 99.7% 99.9% 98% 98%

Objective 1.3 Three (3) second or less internal response time for 98% of all CICS online transactions.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of online transactions 627,153,443 848,807,594 900,000,000 1,000,000,000 Outcome: Percentage of transactions 3 seconds or less 99.5% 99.8% 98% 98%

Objective 1.2 To provide courteous professional assistance with problem resolution for ADC customers.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of problems handled through the help desk 9,856 11,636 12,000 12,000 Outcome: Percentage of surveyed customers "satisfied" with problem resolution 94% 89% 90% 90%

I — 405 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA1O.O1 TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT AND COMPUTER CENTER OPERATIONS - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 2. Enhance and maintain the agency's Information Technology (IT) infrastructure- hardware, software, and processes. Objective 2.1 Enhance reliability, functionality, and security of Comptroller's Website by upgrading the servers, firewalls, software tools, etc. to support additional citizen access and new web applications.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Hits on the Comptroller's Website (in millions) 39.3 56.2 65 75 Tax forms and publications downloaded (in millions) 2.5 3.3 3.5 3.75 Unclaimed Property searches 242,883 683,525 700,000 725,000 Internet tax filings 58,197 75,512 90,000 105,000

Objective 2.2 Implement web enabled applications, services and information to the citizens of Maryland in accordance with House Bill 274.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percentage of services and information Web-enabled 93% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 3. Recruit and retain highly skilled technical staff and develop a knowledge-based workforce to maintain and enhance automated systems to perform the business function for the Comptroller's Office. Objective 3.1 Retain 90% of skilled IT staff.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of skilled IT positions 86 93 90 90 Output: Total number of skilled IT staff retained 83 90 8 1 8 1

I — 406 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

EOOA10.01 TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT AND COMPUTER CENTER OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 157.00 152.00 152.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: B75A01 Department of Legislative Services ...... COOAOO Judiciary ...... C80BOO Office of the Public Defender ...... C81COO Office of the Attorney General ...... C82DOO Office of the State Prosecutor ...... C85EOO Maryland Tax Court ...... C90GOO Public Service Commission ...... C91HOO Office of People's Counsel ...... C94IOO Subsequent Injury Fund ...... C98FOO Workers' Compensation Commission ...... D05E01 Board of Public Works ...... D10A01 Executive Department-Governor ...... D25E03 Interagency Committee for Public School Con- struction ...... D26A07 Department of Aging ...... D27LOO Commission on Human Relations ...... D28A03 Maryland Stadium Authority ...... D30NOO Maryland Food Center Authority ...... D38101 State Board of Elections ...... D39SOO Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals ...... D40W01 Office of Planning ...... D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ...... D53TOO Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems ...... D55POO Department of Veterans Affairs ...... D60A10 State Archives ...... D80Z01 Maryland Insurance Administration ...... D86YOO Governor's Work Force Investment Board ...... D90UOO Canal Place Preservation and Development Authority .. D99A11 Office of Admiusitrative Hearings ......

I — 407 COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND

EOOA1O.O1 TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT AND COMPUTER CENTER OPERATIONS-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

Reimbursable Fund Income: EOOA01 Office of the Comptroller ...... E00902 Misc . Agencies and Adjustments ...... E20B01 Office of the State Treasurer ...... E50COO State Department of Assessments and Taxation ...... E75DOO State Lottery Agency ...... E90GOO Registers of Wills ...... F10A01 Department of Budget and Management ...... F10A02 DBM-Office of Personnel Services and Benefits ...... G20J01 Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems ...... G50LOO Teachers and State Employees Supplemental Retire- ment Plans ...... HOOA01 Department of General Services ...... JOOA01 Department of Transportation ...... KOOA01 Department of Natural Resources ...... LOOA 11 Department of Agriculture ...... MOOA01 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene ...... MOOQ01 DHMH-Medical Care Programs Administration ...... NOOA01 Department of Human Resources ...... POOA01 Department of Labor, Licensing. and Regulation ...... QOOA01 Department of Public Safety and Correctional Ser- vices ...... ROOA01 State Department of Education-Headquarters ...... R13MOO Morgan State University ...... R14DOO St . Mary's College of Maryland ...... R15POO Maryland Public Broadcasting Commission ...... R30B22 USM-College Park Campus ...... R30B23 USM-Bowie State University ...... R30B24 USM-Towson University ...... R30B26 USM-Frostburg State University ...... R30B27 USM-Coppin State College ...... R30B28 USM-University of Baltimore ...... R30B29 USM-Salisbury State University ...... R60HOO College Savings Plans of Maryland ...... R62IOO Maryland Higher Education Commission ...... R95COO Baltimore City Community College ...... R99E01 Maryland School for the Deaf-Frederick Campus ...... SOOA20 Department of Housing and Community Development . TOOAOO Department of Business and Economic Development ... UOOA01 Maryland Department of the Environment ...... U10BOO Maryland Environmental Services ...... VOOD01 Department of Juvenile Services ...... WOOA01 Maryland State Police ...... Total ......

I — 408 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

MISSION

The State Treasurer is responsible for the management and protection of State funds and property. In this capacity, the Treasurer selects and manages the depository facilities for State funds, issues or authorizes agents to issue payments of State funds, invests excess funds, safekeeps all State securities and investments, and provides insurance protection against sudden and unanticipated damage to State property or liability of State employees. The State Treasurer plans, prepares, and advertises State of Maryland General Obligation bond issues and through the Capital Debt Affordability Committee, reviews on a continuing basis the size and condition of State tax-supported debt and other debt of State units, and annually the total amount of State debt that prudently may be authorized for the next fiscal year. VISION

To make Maryland a state that maximizes its personnel and technology as complementary resources to efficiently and effectively manage cash and investments, minimize potential risks and unexpected losses and manage debt in order to confidently plan for the future and maintain the State's AAA bond rating.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Accurately reconcile all Treasury state bank accounts. Objective 1.1 Reconcile the State's Main Depository, Main Disbursement and Income Tax Refund Accounts within thirty days of receipt of the bank statement. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Receipts & disbursements (000,000's) $82,372 $88,160 $94,331 $100,934 Total Receipt & Disbursement Transactions 4,900,000 5,600,000 5,304,000 5,516.000 Number of Accounts to Reconcile 6 6 6 6 Outputs: Avg. Days to Reconcile Accounts >60 >30 <30 <7

Goal 2. Maximize investment earnings for the State's surplus funds in accordance with State law that stipulates investments are limited to secured bank accounts, full faith and credit obligations of the federal government, obligations of certain federal agencies or instrumentalities and repurchase agreements collateralized by those securities mentioned. Objective 2.1 Earn a rate of return on the investment portfolio that exceeds the average 90-Day US Treasury Bill rate by 50 basis points on an annual basis 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Average 90-Day Treasury Bill Rate 2.18% 1.32% 1.15% 1.60% Average Days to Maturity of Portfolio 99 123 110 120 Outputs: Average Return on Investment Portfolio 2.98% 1.94% 1.65% 2.10% Outcome: Portfolio Basis Point (bp) Spread over 90-Day T-Bill Rate 80 62 50 50

Objective 2.2 Increase the 2004 Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) portfolio balance by $126 million from the 2003 balance. Target a rate of return for the portfolio that is at least 12 basis points better than the benchmark, S & P LGIP index. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Fund Investment Balance (in millions - as of 06/30) $1.452 $1,674 $1,800 $2,000 Outputs: Percent increase in LGIP balance 27 % 15.3% 7.5% 11.1% Return on Investment Portfolio 2.53% 1.45% 1.25% 1.75% Outcome: S & P LGIP Index 2.35% 1.31% 1.13% 1.61% Basis point spread over S & P index 18 14 12 14

I — 409 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

Goal 3. Maintain and enhance the information technology capability and infrastructure to meet the diverse needs of the State Treasurer's Office and the agencies it serves. Objective 3.1 Support and implement general Statewide mandates and objectives regarding eGov and Web-enablement initiatives; 50%-65%-80% on schedule by 2004. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of vendors paid electronically 460 820 1500 1500 Quality: Percent of Web-enablement achieved 9% 43% 80% 80% Estimated percent of State employees on Direct Deposit 67 % 77% 80% 80% Percent of transactions paid electronically 51% 60% 65 % 65 %

Goal 4. Process all agency and third party claims submitted to the Insurance Division. Objective 4.1 Promptly and accurately investigate, analyze, and adjust all claims presented under the State Insurance Trust Fund and the Maryland Tort Claim Act. Claims should be adjudicated on a 1:l ratio.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: New claims processed 2,994 3,877 4,150 4,325 Outputs: Claims closed 2,924 3,439 4,150 4.325 Pending open claims 1,040 1,478 1,478 1,478

I — 410 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

SUMMARY OF STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 53.00 52.00 52.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 3.213. 117 3.374. 966 3.596.276 Technical and Special Fees ...... 19.233 26. 000 21. 000 Operating Expenses ...... 27.274. 853 27.967. 526 30.139.656 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 4.035. 820 3.707. 954 TransferJReduction ...... 22. 000 -73. 224 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 4.057. 820 3.634. 730 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 217.543 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 3.840. 277 3.634. 730 3.697. 148 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 759.696 618. 780 621. 653 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 25.907. 230 27.114. 982 29.438. 131 Total Expenditure ...... 30.507. 203 31.368. 492 33.756. 932

I — 411 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

E20B01.01 TREASURY MANAGEMENT - OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Treasury Management Program includes the administrative and operating functions for several principal operating divisions: Banking Services Division, Investments and Information Technology.

Banking Services reconciles the State's principal checking accounts and resolves errors and claims associated with these accounts. The Division also monitors agencies' working fund accounts to ensure the General Fund receives interest on those balances not needed to meet daily expenses. It also provides assistance to State agencies who have banking requirements by assisting and advising them concerning banking matters.

The Investment Division focuses on the short-term investment of State funds, and oversees securities lending operations. The Division determines the disbursement requirements to be funded on a daily basis, and monitors balance levels at the State's main depository and disbursement banks. The Division ensures that portfolio tracking software and cash flow management techniques are utilized to maintain adequate control of all funds.

The Information Technology Division provides the data processing and technology infrastructure needed to operate the State Treasurer's Office. This includes the operation of all internal network and mainframe applications; as well as links to external systems. The Division also provides check printing and electronic payment services for all Vendor payments, State Retirement Agency payments to retirees as well, as printing Child Support checks and the processing of all Payroll Direct Deposits.

MISSION

To provide and maintain the most effective and cost-efficient cash management, investment and banking services for the State. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Treasury Management Program supports the attainment of the goals and objectives for the State Treasurer's Office.

I — 412 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

TREASURY MANAGEMENT

E20B01.01 TREASURY MANAGEMENT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E20303 Investment Fees ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: E20B02 Insurance Protection ...... G20J01 Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems ...... NOOHOO DHR-Child Support Enforcement Administration ...... Total ......

I — 413 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

E20B02.01 INSURANCE MANAGEMENT - INSURANCE PROTECTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Insurance Division determines the insurance requirements to protect State property and personnel, procures commercial insurance and sets State agency premiums for self-insurance. It adjusts claims involving damage to State property and the Maryland Tort Claims Act. The Division also supervises the State's insurance programs.

MISSION

To administer the State Insurance program in a manner that provides the State and its agencies with efficient and cost- effective risk management services; making it possible to plan and manage for the future.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Insurance Management Program supports the attainment of the goals and objectives for the State Treasurer's Office.

I — 414 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

SUMMARY OF INSURANCE PROTECTION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 17.00 17.00 17.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 1,075,146 1,036,65 1 1,091,977 Technical and Special Fees ...... 493 5,000 5,000 Operating Expenses ...... 24,346,210 25,421,766 27,655, 113 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 25,421,849 26,463,417 28,752,090 Total Expenditure ...... 25,421,849 26,463,417 28,752,090

E20B02.01 INSURANCE MANAGEMENT .INSURANCE PROTECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: E20901 Insurance Protection-Various State Agencies ......

I — 415 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

E20B02.02 INSURANCE COVERAGE - INSURANCE PROTECTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Insurance Coverage program provides insurance protection against damage to State property or liability of State employees.

The Insurance Coverage program shares the goals and objectives of the State Treasurer's Office.

I — 416 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

E20B02.02 INSURANCE COVERAGE .INSURANCE PROTECTION

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance MeasuresJPerformance Indicators State Insurance Trust Fund: Combined Beginning Balance ......

Blanket Real and Personal Property: Beginning Balance ...... 7,065,007 4,727,979 -733, 673 -4,592, 438 Transfers and Recoveries ...... 97,695 61,660 100,000 100,000 Agency Premiums ...... 3,540,242 3.221. 043 3,399,495 10,000,000 Excess Policy Coverages...... -1,139, 483 -5,049, 427 -4,608, 260 -4,892, 500 Real Property Losses ...... -4,835, 482 -3,694. 928 -2,750, 000 -2,750, 000 Ending Balance ...... 4,727.979 -733. 673 -4,592, 438 -2,134. 938

Officers and Employees Liability: Beginning Balance ...... 4.105. 695 4.047. 733 1.920.366 820. 366 Agency Premiums ...... 999.972 1,457,909 1,400,000 3,000.000 Liability Losses ...... -1,057, 934 -3,585, 276 -2,500, 000 -2.500, 000 Ending Balance ...... 4,047.733 1,920,366 820,366 1.320.366

Tort Claims Act: Beginning Balance ...... 4.913. 350 7.076. 086 6.281. 063 6.281. 063 Transfers and Recoveries ...... 14.233 100 Agency Premiums ...... ,470,038 2.000,003 4,000,000 4,000, 000 Tort Losses ...... -3,321, 535 -2,795, 126 -4,000, 000 -4.000, 000 Transfer from Auto ...... 4.000, 000 Ending Balance ...... 7,076,086 6,281,063 6.281,063 6,281,063

Motor Vehicle Comprehensive and Liability: Beginning Balance ...... Transfers and Recoveries ...... Agency Premiums ...... Motor Vehicle Losses ...... Insurance Administration ...... Transfer to Tort ...... Transfer to GF ...... Ending Balance ......

Combined Ending Balance ...... 19.884. 563 11.358.444 5.985. 372 9.573. 871

Recommended Actuary Balance ...... 23.827, 000 26.219. 000 26,219.000 26.219, 000

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

13 Fixed Charges ...... 23.917,634 Total Operating Expenses ...... 23,917.634 Total Expenditure ...... 23.917. 634

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 23,917,634

Reimbursable Fund Income: E20901 Insurance Protection-Various State Agencies ...... 23,917,634

I — 417 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

E20B03.01 BOND SALE EXPENSES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Finance Division arranges the sale of general obligation debt and coordinates debt issuance statewide.

MISSION

To provide the State and its agencies with efficient and cost-effective debt issuance services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Bond Sale Expenses program shares the goals and objectives of the State Treasurer's Office.

I — 418 STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE

BOND SALE EXPENSES

E20B03.01 BOND SALE EXPENSES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 280. 000 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E20B03 Bond Sale Expenses ......

I — 419 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

MISSION

To promote fairness in taxation for Maryland property owners by uniformly appraising all taxable property at market value, certifying property values to local governments, and offering programs of property tax relief and business services in a manner that is courteous and convenient. VISION

A State in which the public has confidence that assessments uniformly reflect current market values and that provides convenient access to services through modern technology.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To design and administer property valuation systems which are consistently accurate in describing property ownership, attributes, and values.

Goal 2. To ensure that the Department's programs of property tax relief and business services are run in an efficient and effective manner and that the services are courteous and convenient.

Goal 3. To operate facilities which are convenient for the public, comfortable for employees, and efficient for production.

I — 420 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.01 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program is responsible for providing administrative and related support services to all other programs. It includes Personnel, Assistant Attorney General, Accounting, Procurement, and the Director's staff.

MISSION

A State in which the public has confidence that assessments uniformly reflect current market values and that provides convenient access to services through modern technology.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To provide oversight and management of the Department so as to achieve its goal of promoting fairness in taxation for Maryland property owners.

Goal 2. To ensure that the Department's program of property tax relief and business services are run in an efficient and effective manner and that the services are courteous and convenient.

Goal 3. To ensure public access and convenience to services.

Goal 4. To provide timely financial information and procurement services. Objective 4.1 Maintain or exceed Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) goal of 25%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of procurement transactions 1,301 1,131 1,100 1,250 Outputs: Total procurement dollars $1,698,295 $1,211,735 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 Outcomes: Percent of MBE transactions 24.67% 21.49% 20.45% 25.60% Percent of MBE dollars 26.74% 38.45% 33.33% 32.14%

I — 421 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

SUMMARY OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 735.50 695.50 695.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 2.50 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 37.299. 825 35.610. 053 37.289. 251 Technical and Special Fees ...... 76. 078 5. 500 Operating Expenses ...... 54.081. 370 44.300. 473 53.888. 755 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 96.414. 169 79.147. 276 Transfer/Reduction ...... 324. 000 -2.450. 150 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 96.738. 169 76.697. 126 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 8.234. 694 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 88.503.475 76.697. 126 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 2.953. 798 3. 2 18.900 Total Expenditure ...... 91.457. 273 79.916. 026

E50C00.01 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 422 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.02 REAL PROPERTY VALUATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Real Property Valuation program administers the tax laws covering the assessment of real property. The Department performs assessments on one-third of all Real Property in the State every year and certifies to local taxing authorities the assessment of each property.

MISSION

To promote fairness in taxation for Maryland property owners by uniformly appraising all taxable property at market value, and to provide local governments with a timely and accurate assessable base.

VISION

A State in which the public and local subdivisions have confidence that assessments uniformly reflect current market values.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCES MEASURES

Goal 1. To administer a property valuation system that annually attains recognized standards of uniformity and assessment levels statewide. Objective 1.1 Annually maintain an average level of assessments for taxable properties between 90 to 110% of market value.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Taxable parcels1 1,993,784 2,010,226 2,028,274 2,044,500 Output: Assessable base (millions)' $314.734 $332.968 $359.149 $387.162 Outcome: Residential assessment/sales ratio (median)2 90.0 90.0 93.0 90.0

Objective 1.2 Maintain an average coefficient of dispersion for residential properties of 15.0 or less.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Coefficient of dispersion2 9.30 10.00 10.00 10.00

Objective 1.3 Maintain assessment level of higher and lower valued properties within a range of .98 to 1.03.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Price related differential' 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.01

Goal 2. To maintain public and local government confidence in the administration and accuracy of the assessment process. Objective 2.1 Display updated property ownership records within 7 days of receipt of deed recordation.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of Real Property Transfers 211,137 214,813 217,820 220,651 Outcome: Average number of days 7.0 26.0 20.0 20.0 Quality: Percent improvement in the average number of days over previous year 7.1 % -7 1.2% 30.0% 0.0 %

1 As of July lst. Assessment/Sales ratio, Coefficient of dispersion and Price related differential is calculated at the end of calendar year.

I — 423 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.02 REAL PROPERTY VALUATION (Continued)

Objective 2.2 Increase the number of customer service survey responses by 3%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of surveys returned 1,281 1,321 1,360 1,401 Quality: Percent change in surveys returned -19.2% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% Average rating 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0%

Objective 2.3 Expand public access of real property records on the Internet.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of hits 8,353,463 8,176,533 8,340,063 8.506,864 Percent increase 4.0% -5.9% 2.0% 2.0%

Meanings of Measurement terms use above:

Assessment/Sales Ratio (ASR) - ratio of assessed valuation to sale prices. The closer the ratio is to 1, the more accurate the assessment.

Coefficient of Dispersion (COD) - measures how closely individual assessment/sales ratios are arrayed around the median ratio. This measure is used to evaluate the level of uniformity in the assessment of real property within and among jurisdictions throughout the State. The more uniform the assessments, the lower the COD.

Price related Differential (PRD) - Measures any bias in the assessment/sales ratio of high-dollar compared to low-dollar properties. The closer the PRD is to 1.00, the less bias exists in the assessments.

I — 424 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50C00.02 REAL PROPERTY VALUATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 425 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.04 OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Information Technology (OIT) is responsible for the overall management and direction of the Department's Information Technology efforts. The Program provides technology support for the Department's programs at 25 locations throughout the State. The program also works with and advises local tax collectors in providing assessment certifications and related data.

MISSION

To provide information services that support the Department's programs and meet the needs of local governments, business, and the public for assessment data and other public data. VISION

A State that uses modern technology accurately and efficiently to provide data to program managers, local governments, businesses and the public.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goals 1. To provide timely and accurate assessment and business information to the Department managers, its customers and stakeholders. Objective 1.1 To maintain an inquiry response time of less than .35 seconds.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total CICS transactions million^)^ 239.9 787.9 800.0 810.0 Outcome: Percent of transactions < .35 seconds 99.1% 98.9% 98.0% 94.1% Percent improvement in average response time over previous year 22.5% -0.2% -0.9% -4.0%

Goals 2. To provide continuing information and data processing support to operate, enhance, and maintain existing automated systems by operating automated help desk systems. Objective 2.1 To ensure that all major programming requests have a turnaround of no more than 90 days, 85% of the time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total programming requests (PR) 48 1 285 270 260 Output: Number of PRs completed within 90 days 353 218 216 21 1 Quality: Percent of PRs completed on time 73.4% 76.5% 80.0% 8 1.2% Percent improvement in number of PRs completed on time over previous year

Goals. 3. To move services from "standing in-line" to being "on-line". Objective 3.1 To web enable remaining qualified web capable services.

Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of services qualified for Internet access 28 28 2 8 28 Outcomes: Percent of qualified services on the WEB 85.7% 89.3% 89.3% 92.9%

Due to re-engineering of our Internet Applications from DB2 direct calls to CICS transactions for security and support purpose has greatly increased our CICS transaction counts.

I — 426 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50C00.04 OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 427 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.05 BUSINESS PROPERTY VALUATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Business Property Valuation Program administers the tax laws covering the assessment of personal property, utility companies subject to property tax, utility companies subject to the franchise tax, and property tax incentives for qualifying businesses.

MISSION

To promote fairness in taxation for Maryland's business property owners by uniformly appraising all taxable property at market value and offering property tax incentives for economic development.

VISION

A State in which the public has confidence that assessments uniformly reflect current market values, that local governments have received accurate assessable base information, and the business community has ready access to information about the available government funded property tax incentives.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To uniformly appraise all taxable property on an annual basis and timely certify that information to local taxing authorities. Objective 1.1 Process Personal Property Tax returns accurately and timely.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of personal property returns received 190,367 201,129 21 8,000 224,000 Output: Total number of returns assessed 89,422 92,981 101,000 104,000 Outcomes: Local assessable base (millions) $11,988.0 $1 1,795 $11,805.0 $11,943.0 Estimated local revenue (millions) $319.5 $316.0 $314.0 $318.0 Quality: Percentage of returns assessed by Dec. 1 98.5% 99.1% 98.6% 98.6%

Objective 1.2 To assess all Railroad & Utility operating property in an accurate and timely manner.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of entities 338 315 323 337 Output: Assessable base (millions) $10,643.7 $10,414.9 $9,542.0 $9,149.0 Outcome: Estimated local revenue (millions) $266.1 $260.3 $238.5 $228.7

Objective 1.3 To accurately administer the Franchise Tax laws.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of returns received 368 404 400 400 Outcomes: Revenue from gross receipts tax (millions) $140.9 $129.9 $135.0 $135.0 Total interedpenalties levied $80,466 $254,725 $80,000 $80,000

Goal 2. To increase capital investment and the number of new businesses locating in designated areas of the State through the use of property tax incentives. Objective 2.1 To accurately reimburse local governments for one- half of the Enterprise Zone Tax Credits granted in previous year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Enterprise Zone Participants 394 493 53 1 555 Output: Amount of State Participation $3,008,111 $3,700,093 $4,564,350 $5,272,135 Outcome: Total Capital Investment (millions) $574.2 $665.8 $921.1 $1,006.8

I — 428 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50C00.05 BUSINESS PROPERTY VALUATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 429 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50C00.06 TAX CREDIT PAYMENTS

Program Description: This program contains payments of property tax credits for three programs: the reimbursement of Homeowners' Tax Credits to local governments. the renters' property tax relief. and the reimbursement of property tax credits for urban enterprise zones . Performance measures related to these programs are contained in the programs that administer the credits: the Property Tax Credit Program (EC00.08) for the homeowners and renters credits and Business Property Valuation (EC00.05) for the Enterprise Zone credit .

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators ($ thousands) Homeowners Tax Credits ...... Renter's Credit ...... Urban Enterprise Zone Credits ...... Local Share of Payments* ...... State Appropriation ......

* Laws of Maryland 2003. Chapter 203

FY 2004 FY 2005 Businesses State Tax Businesses State Tax Subdivision Participating Credit Participating Credit

Allegany ...... Baltimore City ...... Baltimore ...... Calvert ...... Cecil ...... Dorchester ...... Garret! ...... Harford ...... Montgomery ...... Prince George's ...... St . Mary's ...... Somerset ...... Washington...... wicomico ...... Worcester ...... Total ......

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... 46,393, 538 Total Expenditure ...... 46,393, 538

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 53,593, 622 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 7,200,084 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 46,393,538

I — 430 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.08 PROPERTY TAX CREDIT PROGRAM

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Under Sections 9-102 and 9-104 Tax-Property Article, the Department reimburses local governments for tax credits against State and local property taxes due on the homeowners' principal residence and reimburses renters directly for tax credits against the property taxes in the yearly rent. The amounts of the two credits are based upon formulas comparing gross household income to the property taxes paid. MISSION

To promote fairness in taxation for Maryland property owners by uniformly appraising all taxable property at market value but having programs of property tax relief for those homeowners and renters who qualify on the basis of income.

VISION

A State in which homeowners and renters who need assistance in paying their property tax liabilities will readily receive it.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To provide property tax relief for low and fixed income renters and homeowners. Objective 1.1 Maintain level participation in both the Homeowners' and Renters' Tax Credit programs.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Homeowners' applications received 79,830 68,736 65.64 1 63,000 Homeowners' applications eligible 59,013 52,629 50,360 48,060 Outcomes: Percent increase in Homeowners' participation +3.4% -13.9% -4.5% -4.0% Total Homeowners' credits (millions) $44.057 $39.874 $39.000 $37.700 Average Homeowners' Credit $747 $758 $774 $784

Inputs: Renters' applications received Renters' applications eligible Outcomes: Percent increase in Renters' participation Total Renters' Credits (millions) Average Renters' Credit

I — 431 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50COO.08 PROPERTY TAX CREDIT PROGRAMS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO303 Administration of Local Tax Credits ......

I — 432 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS & TAXATION

E50C00.10 CHARTER UNIT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This Program is the central repository of all records of business entity formation and filings (charters, limited liability companies, limited partnerships and business trusts). The program provides resident agent information for service of process on these entities and accepts service in certain instances on their behalf. It also records trade names. It is the place of filing for most financing statements under the Uniform Commercial Code. MISSION

To provide courteous and convenient services for business formation and operation in the State.

VISION

A State in which the business community and the general public have access to services performed by the Department in the most efficient and convenient means possible through the use of modern technology.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To facilitate and foster business expansion in the State by providing corporate entity formation, commercial transaction, and document filing systems. Objective 1.1 To provide "regular" service document return within 7 days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of documents 89,265 93,608 96,415 99,300 Quality: Percentage of documents processed within 7 days 67.4% 75.1% 74.0% 74.0% Average number of days to process a document 7.9 7.3 7.5 7.5 Percentage improvements in processing time over previous year 1.3% 7.6% -2.7% 0.0%

Objective 1.2 To provide "expedited" service within 24 hours.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total number of "expedited" requests 66,579 65,713 66,000 66,500 Quality: Percent of documents processed within 24 hours 92.0% 99.0% 99.8% 99.8% Average response time (hours) 24 18 18 18 Percent improvements in processing over previous year 6.0% 25.7% -2.3% 0.0%

I — 433 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

E50C00.10 CHARTER UNIT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 64.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO304 Expedited Service ......

I — 434 MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AGENCY

E75D00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Administration and Operation program of the Lottery Budget encompasses all of the expenses incurred in the operation of Lottery gaming in Maryland. This program does not include the actual expenses of the Lottery games, which are prize expenses and selling expenses (commissions, cashing fees, and agent incentive expenses).

MISSION

The mission of the State Lottery Agency is to provide revenue through the sale of entertaining lottery products to support state programs and services benefiting the citizens of Maryland.

We administer and promote the sale of lottery products in a secure and responsible manner designed to enhance public confidence in the integrity and fairness of the Lottery. This is achieved in partnership with a network of licensed lottery retailers.

VISION

We envision ourselves as an innovative, adaptive and responsible business that will continue to provide a reliable source of revenue for state government well into the future.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Revenue To increase revenue for the operation of State Government. Objective 1.1 The Lottery will increase revenues to $462 million (projected) in fiscal year 2005 to support the State's General Revenue Fund. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: The total revenue generated by the Lottery to support State programs and services ($ millions) 442.5 444.9 440.8 461.9

Goal 2. To increase Lottery ticket sales. Objective 2.1 The Agency will achieve lottery sales of $1,420 million in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Ticket sales generated by the Lottery ($ millions) 1,306.6 1,322.2 1,354.5 1,420.1

Goal 3. Customer Satisfaction To improve the level of customer satisfaction among Lottery players and retailers. Objective 3.1 The Lottery will maintain Player satisfaction at or above 80 percent in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Player Satisfaction Index (weighted composite of player satisfaction ratings on games provided, on the Lottery retail experience, and on the accessibility of Lottery products). 81.0 % 80.0 % 80.0 % 80.0%

I — 435 MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AGENCY

E75D00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS (Continued)

Objective 3.2 The Agency will maintain Retailer Satisfaction at or above 80 percent in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Retailer Satisfaction Index (weighted composite of retailer satisfaction rating on the quality of customer service, on the service relationship with the Lottery, and on service provided by the Lottery Sales Consultant). 79.0 % 80.0 % 81.0 % 80.0%

Goal 4. Player Base To broaden the Lottery's player base. Objective 4.1 The Lottery will maintain its player base at or above 50 percent in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: The percentage of adult Marylanders (18+) who indicate that they have played any Lottery game in past 12 months. 50.0 % 51.0 % 52.0 % 50.0%

Goal 5. Efficiency To improve the efficiency of the Lottery operations. Objective 5.1 The Lottery will achieve a ratio of costs to sales of five percent or less in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: The ratio of operating costs to sales. 3.86 % 3.91% 3.78% 3.82%

I — 436 STATELOTTERYAGENCY

E75D00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS

SUMMARY OF REVENUES (PER BOARD OF REVENUE ESTIMATES-$ MILLIONS)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance MeasuresIPerformance Indicators Lottery Sales: Pick 3 ...... Pick 4 ...... Lotto ...... Cash In Hand and Instant Win ...... Instant Game ...... Keno ...... Match 5 ...... Mega Millions ...... Let It Ride ...... Total Lottery Sales ......

Less: Agent Earnings ...... Operating Budget ...... Prizes ...... Net Lottery Revenue ......

Less: Stadium Authority Revenue ...... Horse Racing Fund Revenue ...... Total General Fund Revenue ......

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: E75301 Lottery Ticket Sales ......

I — 437 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS

E80E00.01 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Property Tax Assessment Appeals Boards, located in each county and Baltimore City, hear appeals on actions of the State Department of Assessments and Taxation on matters relating to the assessment of property or on any other tax matters which may be assigned by the General Assembly. Property assessments made by the State Assessors may be appealed to the local Property Tax Assessment Appeals Boards in the counties and Baltimore City, prior to the Maryland Tax Court and subsequent State court reviews.

MISSION

This agency was established to provide a means for every property owner in the State to appeal the valuation established for tax purposes by the State Department of Assessment and Taxation.

VISION

Every appeal filed would be heard in a timely manner and every decision rendered would be accurate and fair based on the evidence presented at the hearings. Within 30 days, a written decision that states the Boards findings as well as the basis for the findings shall be sent to the petitioner in writing. All of these actions would be accomplished on-line through e-government.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To conduct appeals in a timely and efficient fashion. Objective 1.1. To hear every appeal and render a decision within 30 days of the hearing for every appeal filed during the appeal cycle year.

CY2002 CY2003 CY2004 CY2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Inputs: Appeals filed 8,350 9,957 10,200 10,500 Outputs: Appeals heard 6,637 7,200 7,300 7,500 Appeals clearance rate 79% 72% 7 1% 72% Efficiency: Average length of time from appeal filing to appeal hearing (months): Metro counties/Baltimore City 5 5 5 5 All others 3 3 3 3 Average length of time from hearing to decision (days) 30 30 30 30 Number of appeals pending at end of appeal cycle year 2,907 3,750 3,420 3,150

Goal 2. To render accurate and fair decisions. Objective 2.1. In each year, less than 10% of decisions shall be appealed to the Maryland Tax Court.

CY2002 CY2003 CY2004 CY2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Inputs: Appeals Filed 8,350 9,957 10,200 10,500 Outcome: Number of appeals filed with Maryland Tax Court 557 530 556 584 Percent of appeals filed with Maryland Tax Court 8'3% 7% 8 % 8% Quality: Percent of affirmations by Maryland Tax Court of cases appealed to Tax Court 54% 56% 57% 58%

Note: CY = Calendar Year

I — 438 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS

E80E00.01 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 9.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 439 REGISTERS OF WILLS

OBJECTIVES

Section 2-205 of the Estate and Trusts Article provides that if the fees and receipts of the Registers of Wills are insufficient in any year to pay the authorized salaries and expenses of any Register of Wills, a deficiency shall be paid to the Register of Wills by the Comptroller from funds provided in the State budget for that purpose.

E90G00.01 SUPPLEMENT FOR REGISTERS OF WILLS

Program Description: The supplement for Registers of Wills program provides funds from which deficiencies in the operations of the various Registers of Wills may be paid.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 10,000 75,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 440 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

eOOaOl Office of the Comptroller e00a0101 Executive Direction comptroller state of md chf deputy comptroller exec vii div dir ofc atty general asst state compt iv asst attorney general viii administrator vii asst state compt iii asst state compt ii administrator iv asst state compt i administrator ii accountant, advanced administrator i revenue administrator iv webmaster i pub affairs officer ii pub affairs officer ii revenue administrator iii revenue administrator ii pub affairs officer i pub affairs specialist iii paralegal ii exec assoc ii exec assoc i management assoc admin aide office secy iii office secy ii

TOTAL e00a0101* e00a0102 Financial and Support Services asst state compt iv 1.OO asst state compt iii 1.00 asst state compt ii 1.00 accountant supervisor ii .oo accountant supervisor i 1.oo administrator ii 2.00 personnel administrator i 1.oo accountant, advanced .oo administrator i 1.oo personnel officer iii 1.oo accountant ii 2.00

I — 441 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

e00a0102 Financial and Support Services admin officer iii revenue administrator iii admin officer ii personnel officer i personnel specialist iii personnel specialist ii revenue examiner i services supervisor iii services supervisor ii agency buyer i services supervisor i agency procurement specialist i personnel associate ii personnel associate i management associate fiscal accounts clerk supervise admin aide fiscal accounts clerk ii services specialist fiscal accounts clerk i office processing clerk ii offset machine operator ii fiscal accounts clerk trainee office appliance clerk ii office processing clerk i print shop supv ii print shop supv i building services worker ii stock clerk ii

TOTAL eOOa0102* TOTAL eOOaOl ** e00a02 General Accounting Division e00a0201 Accounting Control and Reporting asst state compt vi 1 .OO prgm mgr senior i 2.00 admin prog mgr ii 1 .OO accountant manager iii 1 .OO accountant manager 1 1 .OO systems control accountant supe .OO accountant supervisor ii 1 .OO systems control accountant lead 1 .OO accountant supervisor i 1 .OO administrator ii .OO

I — 442 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

e00a02 General Accounting Division eOOa0201 Accounting Control and Reporting computer info services spec sup .OO systems control accountant ii c 1 .OO accountant, advanced 4.00 accountant, lead 1 .OO dp functional analyst ii .OO management specialist iv 1 .OO accountant ii 3.00 computer info services spec ii 2.00 dp functional analyst i 1.00 revenue administrator iii 1 .OO management specialist iii 1 .OO fiscal accounts technician supv 1 .OO fiscal accounts technician ii 6.00 fiscal accounts technician i I .OO exec assoc i 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk manager 1 .OO management associate 2.00 fiscal accounts clerk superviso 2.00 fiscal accounts clerk ii 5.00 office secy ii .OO office secy i .OO fiscal accounts clerk i 3.00 fiscal accounts clerk trainee 2.00

TOTAL eOOa0201* TOTAL e00a02 ** e00a03 Bureau of Revenue Estimates e00a0301 Estimating of Revenues asst state compt vi 1 .OO 86,991 administrator vii 1 .OO 70,893 asst state compt iii 1 .OO 71,701 exec assoc i .OO 19,445 office clerk ii .OO 0 ------TOTAL eOOa0301* 3.00 249,030 TOTAL e00a03 ** 3.00 249,030 e00a04 Revenue Administration Division e00a0401 Revenue Administration asst state compt vi 1 .OO 89,440 prgm mgr senior i 2.00 165,392 prgm mgr iv 1 .OO 75,148 asst state compt ii 6.00 407,208

I — 443 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------.

e00a04 Revenue Administration Division e00a0401 Revenue Administration tax consultant ii computer network spec supr dp functional analyst supervise revenue administrator vi accountant supervisor i computer info services spec sup computer network spec ii dp functional analyst lead revenue administrator v dp functional analyst ii obs-data proc prog analyst spec revenue administrator iv accountant ii admin officer iii computer info services spec ii computer network spec trainee dp functional analyst i revenue administrator iii accountant i dp functional analyst trainee obs-data proc prog analyst spec obs-fiscal specialist i revenue administrator ii revenue specialist iii accountant trainee admin officer i computer info services spec i revenue administrator i revenue specialist ii admin spec iii revenue specialist i revenue examiner iii revenue examiner iii revenue examiner ii revenue examiner i dp production control spec supr dp production control spec lead dp production control spec ii police officer ii building guard ii building guard i building guard trainee fiscal accounts technician supv fiscal accounts technician ii

I — 444 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

eOOa04 Revenue Administration Division eOOa0401 Revenue Administration fiscal accounts technician i -00 exec assoc i 1-00 management associate 4.00 fiscal accounts clerk superviso 6.00 admin aide 5.50 office supervisor 2.50 fiscal accounts clerk, Lead 1.00 obs-office supervisor iii 1.00 office secy iii 4.00 fiscal accounts clerk ii 21 -50 office secy ii 2.30 office secy ii -20 office services clerk lead 1.00 obs-office supervisor i 1.00 office services cLerk 16.00 fiscal accounts clerk i 1.00 obs-fiscal clerk ii, general 2.00 office clerk ii 23.00 office processing cLerk ii -00 fiscal accounts clerk trainee 2.00 office clerk i 8.00 office processing clerk i 2.00 office clerk assistant 4.00 office processing assistant 1.00

TOTAL eOOa0401* TOTAL eOOa04 ** eOOa05 Compliance Division eOOa0501 Compliance Administration asst state compt vi asst attorney general viii prgm mgr senior i asst attorney general vi asst state compt iii asst state compt ii asst state compt i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i computer network spec lead financial compliance auditor pr revenue administrator vi computer info services spec sup financial compliance auditor su 3.00 128,288 2.00

I — 445 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions AlLowance Symbol -. eOOa05 CompLiance Division eOOa0501 Compliance Administration revenue administrator v 439,71I computer network spec i 38,691 financial compliance auditor, l 51,519 revenue administrator iv 256,119 revenue field auditor supr 510,783 computer info services spec ii 94,188 financial compliance auditor ii 265,781 revenue administrator iii 287,591 revenue field auditor sr 1,450,910 tax consultant i 34,908 New financial compliance auditor i 39,504 obs-fiscal specialist i 89,488 revenue administrator ii 178,554 revenue field auditor ii 689,127 revenue speciaList iii 224,578 computer info services spec i 31,836 financial compliance auditor tr 91,992 New revenue administrator i 271,402 revenue specialist ii 808,363 obs-accountant-auditor iii 39,630 revenue field auditor i 464,516 New revenue specialist i 2,718,469 revenue examiner iii 623,303 revenue examiner iii 0 revenue examiner ii 57,843 revenue examiner i 574,367 New dp production control spec ii 34,790 fiscal accounts technician supv 41,111 paralegal ii 0 fiscal accounts technician ii 109,640 exec assoc i 45,173 management assoc 41,906 management associate 121,486 fiscal accounts clerk superviso 32,167 admin aide 137,987 admin aide 27,982 office supervisor 34,406 fiscal accounts clerk, lead 32,863 office secy iii 205,144 fiscal accounts clerk ii 296,668 office secy ii 129,802 office processing clerk lead 32,657 office secy i 30,561 office services clerk 34,241

I — 446 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

eOOaO5 Compliance Division eOOa0501 Compliance Administration fiscal accounts clerk i obs-office clerk ii office clerk ii office processing clerk ii offset machine operator ii fiscal accounts clerk trainee stock clerk ii

TOTAL eOOa0501* TOTAL eOOaO5 ** eOOa06 Field Enforcement Division eOOa0601 Field Enforcement Administration exec vi prgm mgr senior i asst state compt ii comp field enforcement agent ch revenue administrator vi administrator ii administrator i revenue administrator iv revenue administrator iii chemist iii revenue administrator ii personnel specialist iii revenue administrator i chemist ii compliance inspector iii comptr octane speciaList compliance inspector ii comptro Lab tech ii comp field enforcement agent su comp fieLd enforcement agent police officer ii exec assoc i management associate admin aide office secy i office clerk ii ------TOTAL eOOa0601* 50.00 2,275,035 49.00 2,266,553 TOTAL eOOaO6 ** 50.00 2,275,035 49.00 2,266,553

I — 447 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

eOOaO7 Alcoho1 and Tobacco Tax Division eOOa0701 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Administration asst state compt iv 1.00 prgm mgr iv 1.00 asst state compt ii I.OO revenue administrator vi I.OO revenue administrator iv 2.00 computer info services spec ii 1-00 revenue administrator iii 1.00 revenue specialist i 3.00 revenue examiner iii 3.00 revenue examiner ii 2.00 revenue examiner i 1-00 exec assoc i 1.00 management associate 1.00 office secy iii 1.00 obs-fiscal clerk iii, general 1.00 ------. TOTAL eOOa0701* 21 -00 TOTAL eOOa07 ** 21 -00 eOOaO8 Motor Fuel Tax Division eOOaO801 Motor Fuel Tax Administration asst state compt iv asst state compt iii revenue administrator vi revenue administrator v revenue administrator iv admin officer iii revenue administrator iii revenue administrator i revenue examiner iii revenue examiner ii revenue examiner i exec assoc i management associate

TOTAL eOOaO801* TOTAL eOOaO8 ** eOOaO9 Central Payroll Bureau eOOa0901 Payroll Management asst state compt v asst state compt iv prgm mgr iv asst state compt ii

I — 448 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

eOOa09 Central Payroll Bureau eOOa0901 PayroLl Management it systems technicat spec super accountant manager i it systems technical spec accountant supervisor i administrator ii accountant ii computer info services spec ii accountant i accountant trainee obs-accountant-auditor iv fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician i central payroll supervisor exec assoc i central payroll clerk leadladv central payroll clerk iii office secy iii central payrolt clerk ii office secy ii central payroll clerk i

TOTAL eOOa0901* TOTAL eOOaO9 **

eOOa10 Information Technology Division eOOalOOl Technology Support and Computer Center Operations exec vi i 1-00 98,878 prgm mgr senior ii I.OO 91,007 dp asst director iii 2.00 154,411 dp asst director ii 4.00 285,841 data base spec manager 1.00 68,415 dp asst director i 1.00 67,737 dp programer analyst manager 3.00 136,830 dp technical support spec manag 2.00 134,837 obs-data proc director i 1-00 68,415 it systems technical spec super 5.00 300,134 computer network spec supr 1.00 64,029 data base spec supervisor 2.00 128,058 dp programer analyst superviso 7.00 419,274 dp technical support spec super 5.00 319,730 fiscal services administrator i 1.00 57,OI I it systems technical spec 9.00 554,066 wehaster supr -00 26, I10 data base spec ii 3.00 163,618

I — 449 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

e00a10 Information Technology Division e00a1001 Technology Support and Computer Center Operations dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp technical support spec ii computer info services spec sup computer network spec ii dp programmer analyst ii dp staff spec webmaster ii accountant, advanced dp functional analyst ii dp technical support spec i webmaster i admin officer iii computer info services spec ii computer network spec trainee dp functional analyst i dp technical support spec train computer info services spec i admin spec ii computer operator mgr i computer operator supr computer operator lead computer operator ii computer operator i computer operator trainee building guard ii obs-fiscal accounts supervisor exec assoc i management associate admin aide data entry operator supr office secy iii data entry operator lead office services clerk data entry operator ii data entry operator i building services worker ii

TOTAL e00a1001* TOTAL e00a10 **

I — 450 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------e20b01 Treasury Management e20b0101 Treasury Management treasurer state of maryland chf deputy treasurer div dir ofc atty general prgm mgr senior iii prgm mgr senior ii prgm mgr senior i dp director i i prgm mgr iii treasury spec vii dp programmer analyst manager treasury spec vi computer network spec lead dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp programmer analyst ii obs-data proc mgr ii obs-fiscal specialist iii treasury spec v treasury spec iv treasury spec iii treasury spec ii obs-data proc supv ii, edp admin aide obs-fiscal clerk iii, general - - - - TOTAL e20b0101* TOTAL e20b01 ** e20b02 Insurance Protection e20b0201 Insurance Management asst attorney general viii 1.OO prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO treasury spec vii 1.00 treasury spec vi 2.00 casualty claims adjuster super 3.00 casualty claims adjuster lead 1 .OO casualty claims adjuster ii 1.00 treasury spec iii 1.00 casualty claims adjuster i 2.00 treasury spec ii 1.OO admin spec iii 1.OO casualty claims adjuster associ 1.OO management assoc 1.OO ------TOTAL e20b0201* 17.00 TOTAL e20b02 ** 17.00

I — 451 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -.

e50c00 State Department of Assessments and Taxation e50c0001 Office of the Director dir dept assessmnts taxation dep dir assmts and tax exec iv principal counsel asst attorney general vii asst attorney general vi prgm mgr ii personnel administrator iii administrator iii fiscal services administrator i accountant supervisor i administrator ii admin officer iii personnel officer ii admin officer ii admin spec iii admin spec ii agency procurement special ist i personnel associate iii personnel associate ii personnel associate i personnel clerk obs-executive associate iii exec assoc i management assoc fiscal accounts clerk superviso admin aide office secy iii fiscal accounts clerk ii

TOTAL e50c0001* e50c0002 Real Property Valuation exec iv prgm mgr senior i prgm mgr iv supv of assessments cnty scale supv of assessments class a administrator v assmnts area supv ii supv of assessments class b administrator iii assmnts area supv i supv of assessments class c

I — 452 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------e50c0002 Real Property Valuation assmnts asst supv class a assmnts asst supv cnty scale assmnts asst supv class b assmnts office manager a supv property maps administrator i assessor adv commercial indus assessor mgr real property assmnts asst supv class c assessor supv i cnty scale assessor ii commercial indust assessor supv real property assmnts office manager assistan assessor advanced real property assessor i commercial industr assmnts office manager b assessor iii real property assmnts office manager c assessor iii cnty scale assessor supv ii cnty scale admin spec iii assmnts office manager assistan assessor ii real property assessor i real property assmnts commercial industrial c cartographer iii cartographer ii assessor assoc real property exec assoc 1 assmnts records supv iii assmnts records supv ii office secy iii assmnts records supv i office secy ii office services clerk lead office secy i office services clerk office clerk ii office processing clerk ii office clerk i assmnts supv cnty scale assmnts clerk cnty scale

TOTAL e50c0002*

I — 453 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

e50c0004 Office of Information Technology prgm mgr senior 111 1 .OO dp director i 1 .OO dp asst director i 1.00 computer network spec mgr 1.00 computer network spec supr 1 .OO data base spec supervisor 1 .OO dp programmer analyst supervise 1 .OO computer network spec lead .00 data base spec ii 1 .OO dp programmer analyst lead/adva 4.00 computer info services spec sup 1.00 computer network spec ii 2.00 dp functional analyst lead -00 dp programmer analyst ii 2.00 webmaster ii 1 .OO administrator i 1 .OO dp programmer analyst i 1 .OO computer info services spec ii 5.00 computer network spec trainee .OO assessor iii real property -00 management associate 1 .OO ------TOTAL e50c0004* 26.00 e50c0005 Business Property Valuation exec iv 1 .OO prgm mgr iii 1.00 prgm mgr ii 1 .OO prgm mgr 1 3.00 administrator i 3.00 admin officer iii 2.00 assessor iv personal property 1 .OO admin officer ii 1 .OO assessor advanced personal prop 5.00 admin officer i 1 .OO assessor iii pers property 13.00 assessor ii pers property 1 .OO assessor i pers property 4.00 admin aide 1 .OO office secy ii 4.50 office services clerk lead .OO office secy i 1 .OO office services clerk 1 .OO office clerk ii 1 .OO office clerk i 2.00 ------TOTAL e50c0005* 47.50

I — 454 prgm mgr ii admin officer iii admin spec iii assmnts records supv iii assmnts records supv i office secy ii office secy i office services clerk office clerk ii office clerk i assmnts clerk cnty scale

TOTAL e50c0008* e50c0010 Charter Unit prgm mgr i i charter specialist iii dp functional analyst lead administrator i admin officer i admin spec iii admin spec ii paralegal ii fiscal accounts technician ii admin aide office supervisor data entry operator supr office secy iii office secy ii office services clerk lead services specialist office services clerk data entry operator ii office clerk ii data entry operator i office clerk i

TOTAL e5OcOOl O* TOTAL e50c00 ** e75d00 State Lottery Agency e75d0001 Administration and Operations dir state lottery 1 .OO 128,994 1 .OO exec vi 1.00 81,437 1 .OO prgm mgr senior iii 1 .OO 91,749 1 .OO

I — 455 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. e75d00 State Lottery Agency e75d0001 Administration and Operations prgm mgr senior ii dep dir state lottery administrator vii asst attorney general vi prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii administrator v dp programmer analyst manager dp quality assurance spec manag obs-lottery sales manager prgm mgr ii administrator iv prgm mgr i computer network spec supr dp programmer analyst supervise accountant supervisor ii data base spec ii management specialist v administrator ii administrator ii computer network spec ii dp staff spec dp staff spec administrator i dp programmer analyst i equal opportunity officer iii internal auditor ii admin officer iii pub affairs officer ii admin officer ii agency buyer v accountant trainee computer info services spec i equal opportunity officer i personnel specialist iii pub affairs officer i research analyst v admin spec iii lottery spec ii admin spec i lottery regional manager lottery representative iii lottery security supervisor lottery spec iii

I — 456 PERSONNEL DETAIL Financial and Revenue Administration

e75d00 State Lottery Agency e75d0001 Administration and Operations computer operator supr lottery representative ii lottery representative i lottery representative i agency buyer iii computer operator ii lottery spec i lottery security specialist fiscal accounts technician supv fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician i obs-executive associate iii fiscal accounts clerk manager admin aide admin aide warehouse supervisor legal secretary office secy iii fiscal accounts clerk ii office secy ii office services clerk lead supply officer iii

TOTAL e75d0001* TOTAL e75d00 **

e80e00 Property Tax Assessment Appeals Boards e80e0001 Property Tax Assessment Appeals Boards admin prop tax assess appeal bd 1.00 mbr assess appeal board -00 exec assoc i 1 .OO office secy iii 5.00 office services clerk 2.00 ------TOTAL e80e0001* 9.00 TOTAL e80e00 ** 9.00

I — 457

GENERAL SERVICES

Department of General Services Office of the Secretary Office of Facilities Security Office of Facilities Operations and Management Office of Procurement and Logistics Office of Real Estate Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

MISSION

The Department of General Services serves Maryland and its citizens by working to ensure that other State agencies are able to achieve their respective missions in an efficient and effective manner.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Operate efficiently and effectively. Objective 1.1 Decrease non-personnel expenses by 3% per year,

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Actual/Estimated Expenditures NIA* NIA* 37,324,683 38,312,208 Decrease in expenditures NIA* NIA* 1,119,740 1,149,366 Percent decrease NIA* NIA* 3% 3%

*Goal of 3% decrease in non-personnel expenses not in effect until FY04.

Goal 2. Manage Departmental Projects efficiently. Objective 2. Complete 80% of capital construction projects within 20 days of schedule by FY2006 (Baseline: FY 1999: 64% completed within 20 days (9 projects out of 14). Project completion is established by the substantial completion date).

Objective 2.2 Annually complete 80% of small contract procurements within 10 days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent of small procurements obtained through e-commerce Percent of small contract procurement completed within 10 days

Objective 2.3 Implement standard operating procedures for 100% of operating systems by FY 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of operating systems 199 199 209 209 Quality: Percent of operating systems with standard operating procedures in place

Goal 3. Provide timely and accurate management information. Objective 3.1 Ensure that 80% of title reports are received within 45 days of receipt of complete request from Land Acquisition Unit. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of title reports received 200 128 135 140 Quality: Percentage of title reports received within 45 days 75 % 70% 80% 80%

I — 541 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

Objective 3.2 Annually, less than 1% of Fixed Asset Equipment Inventory will be lost or missing.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of items in inventory at beginning of fiscal year 9,638 4,858 7,47 1 8,500 Percent of inventory lost or missing 21.01% 10.11% 0.94% 0.90%

Notes: 1. Significant drop in number of assets in FY 2003 can be attributed to deletion of items valued under $100 removed from system. 2. Significant increase in number of assets in FY 2004 can be attributed to DGS' efforts to achieve a 100% physical inventory reconciliation and store all asset records in one central system. Previously, IT and some division asset records were stored in separate systems.

Objective 3.3 All surplus property will be tagged and processed within two days of receipt.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of Items Received 282,816 350,208 315,187 283,668 Quality: Percent of items processed within two days of receipt 45 % 27 % 75 % 90%

Objective 3.4 Beginning in FY 2004, at least 80% of new procurements in DGS supported agencies will be on time and on target to meet identified requirements.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of new procurements on time, on budget, and on target to meet customer needs

Goal 4. Achieve responsible asset management. Objective 4.1 Reduce thefts at DGS facilities by 50% by FY 2005 compared to FY2001 baseline.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of DGS managed facilities 53 54 55 55 Outcome: Number of thefts at DGS managed facilities 129 98 95 9 1 Percent change in thefts at DGS managed facilities -29% -46% -47% -50%

Goal 5. Provide best value for customer agencies and taxpayers. Objective 5.1 Reduce by lo%, the dollar value of change orders resulting from design errors and omissions and litigation costs to resolve claims resulting from disputed change orders on capital improvement projects by FY 2007 while still completing projects on time. (Baseline: FY 2003 = $ 2.6M.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Original contract amounts for projects to be evaluated ($millions) * $ 106 $67 $79 Outputs: Value of approved change orders for errors and omissions * $2.6M $2.5M $2.4M Value of claims and litigation costs * $5,3M $5.1M $4.9M Outcomes: Percent change in dollar value of change orders resulting from errors and omissions on capital improvements projects -3.8% -7.7% Percent change in dollar value of claims and litigation costs on capital improvement projects -3.8% -7.5%

Note: * - Data not available

I — 542 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

Goal 6. Carryout social, economic, and other responsibilities as a State agency. Objective 6.1 Annually improve by 2% the representation by race and gender in EEO Job Categories until the Statewide diversity goals are met or exceeded.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of EEO Job Categories 144 144 144 144 Outputs: Percent EEO Job Categories that meet or exceed statewide goals 46.87% 48.95% 51.75% 54.15%

Objective 6.2 Annually meet or exceed 25% MBE participation in the Department's total procurement dollars.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent MBE participation based on total procurement dollars

I — 543 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 806.50 714.00 706.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 25.95 27.77 27.77 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 39.173. 003 37.360. 281 37.960. 420 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1.094.553 1.035. 336 1.044.210 Operating Expenses ...... 34.861. 263 36.289. 347 39.303. 342 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 54.578. 558 51.667. 187 TransferIReduction ...... -3.494. 158 Total General Fund Appropriation...... 54.578. 558 48.173. 029 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 3.890. 598 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 50,687.960 48,173,029 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1,827,170 1,480,140 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 714,054 755, 031 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 21,899,635 24,276,764 Total Expenditure ...... 75,128,819 74,684,964

I — 544 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 48.00 42.00 38.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 03 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 3.129. 218 2.848. 323 2.629. 568 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1. 189 Operating Expenses ...... 1.544.018 1.373.027 2.022. 206 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 4.660. 200 4.378. 821 TransferReduction ...... 169.431 -157. 471 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 4.829. 631 4.221. 350 Less: General Fund ReversionIReduction ...... 234. 241 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 4.595. 390 4.221. 350 4.651. 774 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 79.035 Total Expenditure ...... 4.674. 425 4.221. 350 4.651. 774

I — 545 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOAO1.O1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the Secretary provides direction and coordination of the functions carried out by the operating units of the Department. It establishes policies, sets priorities, provides support for operating units to achieve success, and communicates on behalf of the Department.

In accordance with State Procurement Regulations, the Board of Public Works delegates authority to the Secretary for the approval and award of the following procurement contracts within the Department's jurisdiction; Capital Construction; Capital Construction-related service; Architectural and Engineering; Maintenance; Capital Equipment; Contract Modifications; Sole Source Procurements; Single bids; invoices necessary for the administration of capital improvement contracts; all commodities and supplies; and Statewide printing contracts.

The Secretary advises the Governor on all matters assigned to the Department.

MISSION

Through centralized administrative and technical expertise, the Office of the Secretary provides executive direction to achieve the Department's goals and objectives. All DGS operations receive the highest quality support services employing best practices to enable them to achieve optimal performance. The Office meets customer needs by providing accurate and timely services.

The Secretary assists and advises the Board of Public Works and other State agencies on all matters of engineering, surveys, plans, specifications, and contracts for public improvements, including the review and approval of any changes.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Operate efficiently and effectively. Objective 1.1 Decrease non-personnel expenses by 3% per year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Actual~EstimatedExpenditures NIA NIA 37,324,683 38,312,208 Output: Decrease in expenditures NIA NIA 1,119,740 1,149,366 Efficiencies: Percent decrease NIA NIA 3% 3%

Goal of 3% decrease in non-personnel expenses not in effect until FY04.

I — 546 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

HOOA01.01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 547 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOA01.02 ADMINISTRATION - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Administration provides support services for the Department of General Services; personnel services, fiscal services and Information Technology support.

The Personnel Division provides management and coordination of all human resources activities including recruitment, hiring, salary and classification determinations, promotion, employment counseling, benefits management, grievance resolution, affirmative action compliance and various training initiatives.

Fiscal Services provides budget management and accounting services for DGS and the Statewide capital construction and DGS maintenance projects.

The Information Technology Group is responsible for automation of DGS processes including vendor and product selection, systems development, systems installation and integration, data center operations, system maintenance and end-user support.

The head of the Division advises the Secretary on all administrative matters within the Department.

MISSION

The Office of Administration provides centralized administrative and technical expertise to the Office of the Secretary. The Office meets customer needs by providing accurate and timely fiscal, personnel or information technology services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide timely and accurate management information. Objective 1.1 Annually, less than 1% of Fixed Asset Equipment Inventory will be lost or missing.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of items in inventory at beginning of fiscal year 9,638 4,858 7,47 1 8,500 Quality: Number of items lost or missing 2,025 49 1 70 80 Percent of inventory lost or missing 21.01% 10.1 1% 0.94% 0.90%

Notes: 1. Significant drop in number of assets in FY 2003 can be attributed to the deletion of items valued under $100 removed from system. 2. Significant increase in number of assets in FY 2004 can be attributed to DGS' efforts to achieve a 100% physical inventory reconciliation and store all asset records in one central system. Previously, IT and some division asset records were stored in separate systems.

Goal 2. Carry out social, economic and other responsibilities as a State agency Objective 2.1 Annually improve by 2% the representation by race and gender in EEO Job Categories until the Statewide diversity goals are met or exceeded.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of EEO Job Categories 144 144 144 144 Outputs: Percent of EEO Job Categories that met or exceeded statewide goals

I — 548 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

HOOA01.02 ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: H00309 ITG Computer Integrated Facilities Management ....

I — 549 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOBO1.O1 FACILITIES SECURITY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division's Police Officers and Security Officers offer around-the-clock security for the Annapolis and Baltimore State Office Centers. The Baltimore DGS Police Detachment provides law enforcement and security for a total of 10 buildings, six State parking lots and four parking garages and has concurrent jurisdiction for traffic enforcement throughout the City of Baltimore. The Annapolis Detachment of DGS Police provides security to 19 buildings, including the Maryland State House, the Revenue Administration and the Goldstein Treasury Buildings, as well as the Lowe House Office Building, the James Senate Office Building and the Miller Senate Office Building. In addition, the detachment covers five parking garages and 11 surface parking lots. The Annapolis DGSP officers also handle both scheduled and unscheduled demonstrations held on State property and coordinate closely with the Annapolis City and Maryland State Police Departments.

MISSION

The mission of the Department of General Services Police is to provide law enforcement and security to certain Maryland State government operations, including buildings and grounds designated by the Secretary of the Department of General Services. The Department of General Services Police will also safeguard the lives of those persons within these designated areas. The Department of General Services Police shall discharge its duties and responsibilities with the dignity and manner which will inspire public confidence and respect.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Achieve responsible asset management. Objective 1.1 Reduce thefts at DGS facilities by 50% by FY 2005 compared to FY 2002 baseline.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of DGS managed facilities 5 3 54 5 5 55 Outcome: Number of thefts at DGS managed facilities 129 9 8 95 9 1 Percent change in thefts at DGS managed facilities -29% -46% -47% -50%

I — 550 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF FACILITIES SECURITY

HOOBO1.O1 FACILITIES SECURITY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF307 Dedicated Purpose Fund ...... 500,000

Federal Fund Income: 93.778 Medical Assistance Program ...... 232. 776

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00905 Security Services ...... 1.061,746 1,094,847 JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ...... 57,643 Total ...... 1.119.389 1.094. 847 3.130. 636

I — 551 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

SUMMARY OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 275.00 234.00 234.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 12.316. 109 11.136.651 11.298.566 Operating Expenses ...... 29,209,782 31.016. 375 32,593,740 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 35,822,567 33,755,694 TransferIReduction ...... -10.507, 573 -12,023, 043 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 25. 3 14.994 21,732,651 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 2,053,021 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 23,261,973 21,732,651 25,479, 131 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 772,650 683,695 703,649 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 714,054 755,03 1 570. 529 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 16,777,214 18,981,649 17,138,997 Total Expenditure ...... 41,525, 891 42,153,026 43,892,306

I — 552 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOCO1.O1 FACILITIES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Facilities Operations and Maintenance provides for the operation, maintenance, and physical safety of buildings and grounds under the jurisdiction of the Department. This also includes management of contract services relating to the operations of the facilities.

MISSION

To provide comprehensive facility management and operations services that meet tenant needs for safe, clean, and functional working environments for employees and the public who use DGS managed facilities. In all our undertakings, responsiveness to customer needs, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness are essential. By consistently providing quality facilities operations and management services, DGS will become the preferred provider of these services for all Maryland State agencies thereby allowing agencies to focus on their goals.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1 Manage Departmental Projects efficiently. Objective 1.1 Implement standardized operating procedures for 100% of the operating systems by FY 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of operating systems 199 199 209 209 Outputs: Number of standardized operating procedures 45 83 121 167 Quality: Percent of operating systems with standard operating procedures in place 23% 42% 58% 80%

I — 553 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

HOOCO1.01 FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: H00302 Rental of Space to Commercial Tenants ...... H003 11 Pay Phone Commissions ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 83.544 Public Assistance Grants ...... 93.778 Medical Assistance Program ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00904 Rental of Space to State Tenants ......

I — 554 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOC01.02 MAINTENANCE OF WOODSTOCK CENTER - OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Program Description: The Office of Facilities Operation and Maintenance maintains the Woodstock Center, which is leased to the United States Department of Labor, Manpower Administration, for use as a Job Corps Center.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 19,331 13 Fixed Charges ...... 1,993 14 Land and Structures ...... 76 Total Operating Expenses ...... 21,400 Total Expenditure ...... 21,400

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 2 1,400

Special Fund Income: H00305 Rental to Federal Government ...... 21,400 2 1,400 21,400

HOOC01.03 WOODSTOCK CENTER - CAPITAL APPROPRIATION - OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Program Description: The Capital Appropriation program provides operating funds for capital projects at the Woodstock Job Corps Center

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... 300,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 300,000 Total Expenditure ...... 300,000

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 300,000

Special Fund Income: H00305 Rental to Federal Government ...... 300,000

I — 555 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOC01.04 SARATOGA STATE CENTER - CAPITAL APPROPRIATION - OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00926 Saratoga State Center-Capita1 Appropriation ......

I — 556 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOC01.05 REIMBURSABLE LEASE MANAGEMENT .OFFICE OF FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 1.514.985 2.743. 941 1,797.184 13 Fixed Charges ...... 2.623. 013 6. 164 2.623. 013 14 Land and Structures ...... 2.464. 300 3.988. 933 2.440. 657 Total Operating Expenses ...... 6.860. 854 Total Expenditure ...... 6.860. 854

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 6,860.854 Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00913 Pass Through of Lease Costs ......

I — 557 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOODO1.O1 PROCUREMENT AND LOGISTICS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Department of General Services' Procurement and Logistics Division provides professional and technical support services to using agencies through generally funded and reimbursable funded programs. Included in the Division are the following programs: Board of Public Works (BPW) and Management Support, Facilities & Construction, Commodity Procurement, Procurement Technology and Support, Visual Communications and Digital Imaging (VCDI), Inventory Standards and Support Services Division (ISSSD), Records Management, and the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Program. The Maryland State Agency for Surplus Property (MSASP) is a self-sustaining agency within the Division which acquires property declared surplus by the State or Federal government. Surplus State property is sold to other agencies, organizations or the public. Surplus Federal property is limited to eligible donee institutions.

MISSION

The Office of Procurement and Logistics assists customers in meeting their missions through fair, equitable, and cost effective processes for the timely delivery of quality products and support services. We meet customer needs and achieve important socioeconomic goals through effective use of resources. Our customers include State agencies, county governments, municipalities, non-profit organizations, and the business community.

Our overall goal is to be the preferred provider by supplying high quality products and services in a timely, and cost efficient manner.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Manage Departmental Projects efficiently. Objective 1.1 Annually complete 80% of small contract procurements within 10 days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Percent of small procurements obtained through e- commerce Quality: Percent of small contract procurement completed within 10 days

Goal 2. Provide best value for customer agencies and taxpayers. Objective 2.1 Beginning in FY 2004, at least 80% of new procurements in DGS supported agencies will be on time and on target to meet identified requirements.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of new procurements on time, on budget, and on target to meet customer needs Efficiency: Percent increase in usage of State blanket purchase order

Goal 3. Provide timely and accurate management information. Objective 3.1 All surplus property will be tagged and processed within two days of receipt.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of Items Received 282,816 350,208 315,187 283,668 Efficiency: Percent of items processed within two days of receipt 45 % 27% 75% 90%

I — 558 DEPARTMENT OF' GENERAL SERVICES

HOODO1.O1 PROCUREMENT AND LOGISTICS (Continued)

Goal 4. Carry out social, economic and other responsibilities as a State agency. Objective 4.1 Annually meet or exceed 25% MBE participation in the Department's total procurement dollars.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent MBE participation based on total procurement dollars

I — 559 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND LOGISTICS

HOODO1.O1 PROCUREMENT AND LOGISTICS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: H00308 Surplus Property Fees ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00909 Visual Communications and Digital Imaging ...... H00910 Records Management ...... H00916 Fuel Management Program ...... H00917 Courier Service ...... H00920 Mail Services ...... H00921 Auction Service Fee ...... H00922 Electric Deregulation ...... Total ......

I — 560 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOEO1.O1 OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

On behalf of State agencies, the Real Estate division acquires and disposes of real property interests serving the specific agency's mission, protecting the legal interests of the State, and ensuring a reasonable value for the State and its citizens. The division consists of three main units, which include Lease Management and Procurement, Land Acquisition and Disposal, and Valuation and Appraisal. Lease Management and Procurement acquires lease space on behalf of State agencies, oversees the construction and modification of leased space, and enforces lease terms. Land Acquisition and Disposal evaluates property to be purchased or sold, coordinates program requirements for capital projects, and negotiates contract terms and conditions. Valuation and Appraisal appraises property for State agencies, provides valuation services for State agencies and organizations that receive state grants and loans, provides value recommendations, and maintains a list of approved appraisers.

MISSION

To use real property expertise in the fields of lease management and procurement, land acquisition and disposal, valuation, and real estate law to acquire or dispose of real property interests in an efficient and cost-effective manner to satisfy the needs of client agencies to help them pursue their missions.

Our overall goal is to achieve the respect of client agencies by performing the mission in a professional and efficient manner and by maintaining an effective technical real estate process in a fully trained and staffed environment, thereby enabling client agencies to meet their respective goals and objectives.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide timely and accurate management information. Objective 1.1 Annually obtain Board of Public Works approval of 75% of procurement mandated newly leased office space within 6 months of receipt of properly completed agency request

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of new agency office procurements submitted to the BPW for approval 20 19 16 16 Outcome: Percentage of new leases approved by BPW within 6 months of properly completed agency request 70% 73% 75% 75 %

I — 561 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE

HOOEO1.O1 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00918 Leasing Assistance ...... H00924 Lease Compliance ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... LOOA11 Department of Agriculture ...... Total ......

I — 562 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

HOOGO1.O1 FACILITIES PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction provides professional management and technical services for State agencies in the planning, budgeting, design, construction, and maintenance of State facilities. The Office assists other State agencies in administering the Community College and Public School Construction Programs. The Office also assists other governmental agencies and non-profit entities by administering the Capital Grants and Loans Program. The Office provides quality assessment and maintenance of State facilities so that buildings and their components maximize their expected life.

MISSION

The Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction ensures the design, construction, and maintenance of safe, secure, functional, cost-effective, aesthetically pleasing facilities that meet governmental and non-profit customer needs. We provide professional project management, technical reviews, and construction management followed by preventive and scheduled critical maintenance services for State agencies.

Our overall goal is to provide the best facilities possible to enable customers to meet their mission. We want State agencies to seek out the assistance of the Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction to design and construct facilities that exceed agency expectations and are completed on time and within budget.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Manage Departmental Projects efficiently Objective 1.1 Complete 80% of capital construction projects within 20 days of schedule by FY2006 (Baseline: FY 1999: 64% completed within 20 days (9 projects out of 14). Project completion is established by the substantial completion date.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of active capital contracts 2 1 26 30 23 Outputs: Number of contracts completed 7 8 8 9 Outcome: Percent of construction projects completed within 20 days of schedule 72% 62.5% 80% 80% Efficiency: DGS Construction Division cost (salaries, operating costs) compared to construction work-in-place cost schedule <1% <1% <1% <1%

Goal 2. Provide best value for customer agencies and taxpayers. Objective 2.1 Reduce by lo%, the dollar value of change orders resulting from design errors and omissions and litigation costs to resolve claims resulting from disputed change orders on capital improvement projects by FY 2007 while still completing projects on time. (Baseline: FY 2003 = $2.6M.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Original contract amounts for projects to be evaluated ($millions) * $106 $67 $79 Outputs: Value of approved change orders for errors and omissions ($millions) * $2.6 $2.5 2.4 Value of claims and litigation costs * $5.3 $5.1 $4.9 Outcomes: Percent change in dollar value of change orders resulting from errors and omissions on capital improvements projects -3.8% -7.7% Percent change in dollar value of claims and litigation costs on capital improvement projects -3.8% -7.5 %

Note: Data not available

I — 563 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

OFFICE OF FACILITIES PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

HOOGO1.O1 FACILITIES PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: H00914 Construction Inspection Services ......

I — 564 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

h00a01 Office of the Secretary h00a0101 Executive Direction secy dept gen services exec vi i div dir ofc atty general prgm mgr senior iii asst attorney general viii asst attorney general vii administrator vi prgm mgr iii administrator iv administrator iv administrator iii administrator iii administrator ii admin spec iii exec assoc ii i exec assoc ii management assoc

TOTAL h00a0101* h00a0102 Administration prgm mgr senior iii 0 prgm mgr senior i 85,143 dp director i 65,072 administrator iv 64,029 administrator iv 0 administrator iii 0 fiscal services administrator i 73,825 computer network spec supr 0 Abolish fiscal services administrator i 64,029 it systems technical spec 65,282 computer network spec lead 55,472 dp programmer analyst lead/adva 0 Abolish agency budget specialist supv 53,975 administrator i 51,027 agency budget specialist lead 51,027 personnel officer iii 0 webmaster i 45,466 Abolish admin officer iii 93,773 agency budget specialist ii 36,250 accountant i 109,991 admin officer ii 44,314 dp functional analyst trainee 0 Abolish personnel officer i 41,839

I — 565 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

-, h00a0102 Administration personnel associate iii fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician i management assoc admin aide fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts clerk i --- TOTAL h00a0102* TOTAL hOOaOl ** h00b01 Office of Facilities Security h00b0101 Facilities Security police chief dgs 1 .OO 67,645 police chief i i 2.00 115,404 police officer manager 4.00 198,874 police communications open ii 6.00 180,076 police communications oper i 3.00 101,847 police officer supervisor 25.00 1,111,934 police officer iii 1.00 0 police officer ii 84.00 2,365,513 police officer trainee .OO 104,972 bui lding guard i i 53.00 1,374,116 54.00 1,372,970 1,370,576 Abolish building guard i 58.00 822,474 52.00 988,608 999,036 Abolish building guard trainee 6.00 60,111 4.00 69,236 71,150 office secy iii 1 .OO 25,776 1 .OO 31,048 31,640 office secy ii 1 .OO 31,097 1 .OO 30,803 31,391 office secy i 1 .OO 21,876 1 .OO 27,291 27,551 ------TOTAL h00b0101* 246.00 6,457,614 221.00 6,696,778 219.00 6,777,609 TOTAL h00b01 ** 246.00 6,457,614 221.00 6,696,778 219.00 6,777,609 hOOcOl Office of Facilities Operation and Maintenance hOOcOIOI Facilities Operation and Maintenance exec vi 1 .OO 85,506 exec v .OO 18,811 prgm mgr senior ii 1 .OO 76,376 prgm mgr iv 1.00 67,681 exec asst iii exec dept 1 .OO 76,806 prgm mgr iii 4.00 234,551 administrator iv 1 .OO 64,029 administrator iv 2.00 116,333 prgm mgr i 3.00 168,244 administrator iii 3.00 174,099 administrator ii .OO 34,306

I — 566 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -.

hOOc0101 Facilities Operation and Maintenance administrator ii maint supv iv government house asst iv administrator i administrator i maint supv iii multi-service center manager admin officer iii admin officer iii maint supv ii lic admin officer ii maint supv i non lic admin officer i admin spec in government house asst iii architectural tech ii electronic tech iv agency buyer ii electronic tech iii agency buyer i electronic tech ii agency hlth and safety spec iv fiscal accounts technician ii management associate admin aide office secy iii office secy ii supply officer iv office secy i office services clerk supply officer iii office clerk ii supply officer ii office clerk i supply clerk maint chief iv lie maint chief iv non lie maint chief iv non-licensed maint chief iii lic maint chief in non lic automotive services specialist electrician high voltage maint chief ii non lie stationary engineer st off comp

I — 567 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. h00c01 Office of Facilities Operation and Maintenance h00c0101 Facilities Operation and Maintenance maint chief i non lic 2.00 66,590 refrigeration mechanic 5.00 126,121 stationary engineer 1st grade 4.00 86,954 carpenter trim 4.00 123,973 electrician 9.00 201 ,065 locksmith 2.00 62,782 painter 7.00 217,172 plumber 5.00 136,475 steam fitter 1 .OO 31,391 maint mechanic senior 18.00 364,469 government house asst ii 1 .OO 29,541 maint mechanic 10.00 210,070 government house asst i 1 .OO 26,575 housekeeping supv iv 1 .OO 37,338 grounds supervisor ii 1 .OO 29,988 housekeeping supv ii 1.00 26,748 grounds supervisor i 1.00 26,868 housekeeping supv i -50 18,780 maint asst 9.00 149,702 building services worker ii 32.00 755,872 service work chief 3.00 52,506 stock clerk ii 1 .OO 24,103 building services worker i 16.50 136,658 ------TOTAL h00c0101* TOTAL h00c01 ** hood01 Office of Procurement and Logistics h00d0101 Procurement and Logistics exec v 1 .OO prgm mgr senior 11 1 .OO prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO administrator vii -00 prgm mgr 111 1 .OO administrator v 1 .OO prgm mgr i i 4.00 admin prog mgr i 1 .OO administrator iv .OO prgm mgr i 1 .OO administrator iii 2.00 administrator iii .OO dgs procurement officer manager 1 .OO dgs procurement officer supervi 8.00 administrator ii 4.00

I — 568 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

hood01 Office of Procurement and Logistics h00d0101 Procurement and Logistics computer info services spec sup 46,287 dgs procurement officer lead 0 administrator i 102,546 dgs procurement officer ii 100,589 equal opportunity officer iii 0 maint supv iii 51,519 admin officer iii 47,779 dgs procurement officer i 258,046 graphic arts specialist 48,238 admin officer ii 120,552 buyer iii pur bureau printing 0 admin officer i 77,639 computer info services spec i 36,324 computer output microfilm supv 0 admin spec iii 37,784 admin spec iii 29,844 inventory control specialist 38,880 admin spec ii 36,084 illustrator ii 55,590 dp production control spec lead 0 Abolish services supervisor ii 36,084 obs-data proc oper tech iii 31,692 dp production control spec trai 25,162 agency procurement specialist s 0 agency procurement specialist I 0 agency procurement specialist i 0 agency procurement specialist i 0 agency procurement specialist t 113,830 obs-contract services asst ii 36,428 agency procurement associate ii 103,394 fiscal accounts technician i 26,243 obs-contract services asst i 0 agency procurement associate i 29,427 exec assoc i 43,472 admin aide 97,012 office supervisor 31,303 warehouse supervisor 107,949 fiscal accounts clerk ii 30,803 warehouse asst supv 28,563 office services clerk 74,550 supv of offset machn operatrs 0 computer output microflm opr ii 0 obs-office clerk ii 49,269 office clerk ii 50,159

I — 569 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

hood01 Office of Procurement and Logistics h00d0101 Procurement and Logistics offset machine operator ii 3.00 48,012 66,681 office appliance clerk ii 4.00 94,659 100,962 offset machine operator i 1 .OO 0 0 Abolish print shop supv iii 1 .OO 38,880 39,630 print shop supv ii 2.00 52,913 107,248 print shop supv i 2.00 69,394 64,290 building services worker ii 1 .OO 13,543 19,106 motor vehicle oper i 1 .OO 0 15,850 ------TOTAL h00d0101* 104.00 3,522,469 3,759,579 TOTAL hOOdOl ** 104.00 3,522,469 3,759,579 h00e01 Office of Real Estate h00e0101 Real Estate Management exec v asst attorney general vi prgm mgr iv prgm mgr ii administrator iii reviewing appraiser iii asst attorney general v real estate reviewing appraiser acquisition specialist senior administrator ii real estate reviewing appraiser acquisition specialist administrator i admin officer ii admin officer ii admin spec iii admin spec ii office secy iii office secy ii - - - TOTAL h00e0101* TOTAL h00e01 ** h00g01 Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction h00g0101 Facilities Planning, Design and Construction exec v 1 .OO 95,587 1.00 95,587 1 .OO 95,587 administrator vii 1 .OO 78, 128 1 .OO 78, 128 1 .OO 79,663 administrator vii .OO 6,534 .OO 0 .OO 0 capital projects asst dir 1 .OO 78, 128 1 .OO 78, 128 1 .OO 79,663 capital projects construction m 1 .OO 78, 128 1 .OO 78,128 1 .OO 78,896

I — 570 PERSONNEL DETAIL General Services

h00g01 Office of Facilities Planning, Design and Construction h00g0101 Facilities Planning, Design and Construction capital projects manager capital projects manager prgm mgr ii administrator iv administrator iv prgm mgr i maint engineering asst mgr capital projects asst mgr capital projects elec eng capital projects eng civil gen capital projects eng civil geot capital projects mech eng dp functional analyst supervise administrator ii architect ii engr sr engr sr electrical maint engineer ii administrator i administrator i bldg construction engineer engr iii mechanical admin officer iii maint engineer i admin officer ii computer info services spec i admin spec iii admin spec i industrial hygienist iii bldg construction insp iii management associate admin aide office secy iii office secy ii office secy i office processing clerk i office processing assistant ------TOTAL h00g0101* 102.50 TOTAL h00g01 ** 102.50

I — 571

JUDICIAL AND LEGAL REVIEW

Judiciary Office of the Public Defender Office of the Attorney General Office of the State Prosecutor Maryland Tax Court Public Service Commission Office of People’s Counsel Subsequent Injury Fund Uninsured Employers’ Fund Workers’ Compensation Commission

JUDICIARY

OBJECTIVES

The Judicial Department of Maryland was established as one of the three co-equal branches of State government by Article IV of the State Constitution. The function of this branch of government is the administration of justice through operation of a system of courts. In effect, this involves the determination of guilt or innocence in criminal matters, the imposition of an appropriate punishment where guilt is found, the resolution of disputes between citizens in civil matters, and the award of appropriate compensation or other remedy where liability is found. Statutory provisions dealing with the judicial department are principally found in the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article and the State Personnel and Pensions Article, Title 27 of the Annotated Code.

SUMMARY OF JUDICIARY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 3,223.75 3,223.75 3,243.75 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 390.00 390.00 371 .OO Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 31 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.O1 COURT OF APPEALS

Program Description: The Court of Appeals is the State's highest court and generally exercises only appellate jurisdiction . The Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals is the administrative head of the judicial system of the State. The Court's appellate jurisdiction is almost fully discretionary with virtually all initial appeals heard by the Court of Special Appeals . In addition to its appellate adjudicatory functions. the Court of Appeals admits to the bar all persons eligible to practice law in the State; disciplines. suspends and disbars lawyers subject to such action; and makes rules and regulations to govern practice. procedure. and judicial administation in all courts of the State.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 32 JUDICIARY

COOA00.02 COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

Program Description The Court of Special Appeals began operations pursuant to constitutional authorization and statutory implementation. It exercises initial appellate jurisdiction in virtually all proceedings. but has no original jurisdiction .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 80.50 80.50 80.50 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 33 JUDICIARY

COOA00.03 CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES

Program Description: The Circuit Courts for the 23 counties and Baltimore City are provided for in Article IV of the Constitution and various provisions of the Courts Article of the Code . These courts are Maryland's trial courts of general jurisdiction . They have original jurisdiction in the more serious criminal matters and the more substantial civil cases . In all counties but Montgomery. they exercise juvenile jurisdiction . These courts handle appeals from the District Court and from certain administrative agencies .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO310 Community Reimbursements of Law Clerk Sala- nes ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.563 Child Support Enforcement ......

I — 34 JUDICIARY

COOA00.04 DISTRICT COURT

Program Description: Article IV. Section 1. of the Maryland Constitution. created the District Court of Maryland as a Court of Record. with a Seal to be used in the authentication of process being issued by the Court . Section 1.601. of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland. established the District Court of Maryland as a court of limited jurisdiction . Sections 4lB.411. of Article IV. of the Maryland Constitution provide for the appointment of a Chief Judge. as well as judicial and non-judicial personnel. necessary to the functioning of the District Court of Maryland . CJ 1.602. divides the State into twelve districts and lists the composition of each district . The District Court of Maryland is centrally administered by a Chief Judge . Assisting the Chief Judge with the daily operation of the Court is a Chief Clerk. four Assistant Chief Clerks. a Chief Internal Auditor and a Coordinator of Commissioner Activity . The Chief Judge also receives assistance from the Administrative Judge. the Administrative Clerk. and the Administrative Commissioner in each district .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 35 COOA00.05 MARYLAND JUDICIAL CONFERENCE

Program Description: Established by Maryland Rule 16-802, the Conference consists of the judges of the Court of Appeals, the Court of Special Appeals, the Circuit Courts of the Counties and of Baltimore City, and the District Court. It meets annually to engage in programs of continuing judicial education and to discuss generally "the improvement of the administration of justice and the judicial system in Maryland".

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 36 JUDICIARY

COOA00.06 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS

Program Description: Section 13-101 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code provides for the establishment of an Administra- tive Office of the Courts its personnel. duties and functions . The office is headed by a State Court Administrator appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals . The Adminisrtative Office provides staff support to the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and assists the Chief Judge in carrying out the duties of administrative head of the judicial system . The Office attempts to aid in improving the business methods of the courts of the State and enhance their efficiency in performing their judicial functions . The Adminis- trative Office is establishing improved methods of gathering and reporting information through automated data processing; expanding programs of education and training for judicial and non-judicial personnel; and formalizing a planning process for the judicial system by identifying potential problem areas. developing feasible solutions for the problems. devising strategies for implementation of those solutions. and then implementing them .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO301 Land Improvement Surcharge ...... COO305 Maryland Legal Services Corporations ...... Total ......

I — 37 JUDICIARY

COOA00.07 COURT RELATED AGENCIES

Program Description: The Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure and staff are appointed by the Court of Appeals pursuant to Maryland Annotated Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Sections 13-301 through 13-303 and Maryland Rule 16-801 in order to aid in the exercise of the rulemaking power of the Court under Article IV, Section 18(a) of the Maryland Constitution in regard to the promulgation of rules of practice, procedure and administration of the courts of the State. The State Reporter is appointed by the judges of the Court of Appeals under Maryland Annotated Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Section 13-201. In accordance with the provisions of Section 13-203 of that Article, it is a duty of the State Reporter to prepare for publication the official reports known as Maryland Reports and Maryland Appellate Reports, of cases decided in the Court of Appeals of Maryland or in the Court of Special Appeals and designated by the respective court to be reported. The program provides for the purchase of copies of each volume of the Maryland Reports and copies of each volume of the Maryland Appellate Reports as specified in the contract. These reports are distributed in accordance with Maryland Annotated Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Section 13-204(c). The Commission on Judicial Disabilities was created by Article IV, Sections 4A and 4B of the Maryland Constitution, with the assistance of staff appointed under Maryland Rule 16-804, to receive complaints, investigate, hold formal hearings if necessary, and file a report and recommendation with the Court of Appeals of Maryland with respect to the censure, retirement or removal of judges. The State Board of Law Examiners operates pursuant to Maryland Annotated Code, Business Occupations and Professions Article, Sections 10-201 through 10-203, and the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Maryland. The Board registers law students, checks their prelegal and legal education, has character investigations made, and administers examinations twice a year to those qualified to take them. It has authority to recommend the admission to the bar of qualified attorneys from other jurisdictions upon proof of good moral character.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 38 JUDICIARY

COOA00.08 STATE LAW LIBRARY

Program Description: The Maryland State Law Library operates under the provisions of Section 13-501 through 13-504 of the Courts and Judicial Pro- ceedings Article . The library consists of three major areas of resource materials; law. State and Federal government documents and a comprehensive collection of Maryland history and genealogy . The State Law Library's primary objective is to serve the legal information needs of the Judiciary and various segments of State government .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversiodReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO302 Xerox Copy Fee ......

I — 39 JUDICIARY

COOA00.09 JUDICIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Program Description: This program is a consolidation of the State supported judicial data processing activities . Service is provided to the District Court case processing system in the areas of traffic adjudication. criminal and civil judgements. juvenile. warrants and office automation projects . Support is given to the Eighth Circuit Court in the court case processing systems of criminal. civil. juvenile and jury selection. Other Circuit Court support includes both statistical reporting and office automation . The Appellate Courts are provided with case management support in addition to statistical reporting and office automation .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 40 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10 CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

Program Description: Article IV. Section 25 of the Maryland Constitution creates a Clerk of the Circuit Court for each County and Baltimore City . The clerk is elected by a plurality of the qualified voters in the respective County or City. and has charge and custody of records and other papers as required by law . The twenty-four offices' duties include issuing writs. recording of land instruments and other documents. issuing various licenses and administering oaths of office. and handling matters related to operation of courts as directed by law . Some Officials also handle jury selection .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO301 Land Improvement Surcharge ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.563 Child Support Enforcement ......

I — 41 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-ALLEGANY COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 42 JUDICIARY

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-BALTIMORE COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 5,739,889 5,064,603 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... -254 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 5,463,161 5,064,349 5,238,913 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 733,105 780,955 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 43,534 49,766 52,121 Total Expenditure ...... 5,506,695 5,847,220 6,071,989

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-CALVERT COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 43 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-CAROLINE COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-CARROLL COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 44 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-CECIL COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-CHARLES COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 45 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-DORCHESTER COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-FREDERICK COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 46 JUDICIARY

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-GARRETT COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 465,290 449,965 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... -127 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 544,901 449,838 581,859 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 34,889 34,889 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 12,478 31,927 20,243 Total Expenditure ...... 557,379 5 16,654 636,991

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-HARFORD COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 47 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-HOWARD COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 38.00 38.00 38.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-KENT COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 48 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 49 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT.ST . MARY'S COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 50 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-SOMERSET COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 12.00 12.00 12.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-TALBOT COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 51 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-WASHINGTON COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-WICOMICO COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 52 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.10

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-WORCESTER COUNTY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-BALTIMORE CITY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 53 JUDICIARY

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-AUTOMATION SUPPORT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ......

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT-COMMON COSTS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 54 JUDICIARY

COOAOO.11 FAMILY LAW DIVISION

Program Description: Consistent with the expressed interest of the General Assembly. in 1998. the Maryland Judiciary established family divisions. as supported by Maryland Rule 16.204. within the State's five largest jurisdictions . These were established in Anne Arundel County. Baltimore City. Baltimore County. Montgomery County. and Prince George's County . The family divisions have jurisdiction over all civil matters related to the family: divorce. custody. child support. visitation. domestic violence. paternity. adoption. guardianship. involuntary commitments. CINNCINS. and juvenile delinquency . Those counties without separate family divisions are provided with a family support coordinator and a budget for services to establish a spectrum of services and to reorient its case management processes to ensure the comprehensive and holistic treatment of families . Funds provided by the General Assembly are used to operate Maryland's family law system. which represents 48% of the circuit court caseload . Funds are provided to local jurisdictions in the form of grants . Additional funds are used to provide special project grants to provide access to the family justice system in both the District and Circuit courts . Family law hotlines. domestic violence legal services. high conflict custody representation projects. and other projects that improve the ability of families and children to participate in the family justice system are also provided .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 9.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 55 JUDICIARY

COOA00.12 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Program Description: This program provides funding for the Judiciary's major information technology projects in concert with the Judiciary Information Technology Master Plan (ITMP) and the Information Technology Project Request (ITPR).

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: COO301 Land Improvement Surcharge ......

I — 56 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

MISSION

The mission of the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) is to provide superior legal representation to indigent defendants in the State of Maryland by safeguarding fundamental individual rights and ensuring access to the guaranteed protections afforded by the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Maryland Constitution and Declaration of Rights, and the laws of Maryland.

VISION

The vision of the OPD is to have an attorney available and present at each critical stage of all criminal proceedings in order to provide superior legal representation for all indigent persons charged with incarcerable crimes.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The OPD will provide superior representation to indigent defendants at all critical stages of representation throughout the State of Maryland. Objective 1.1 The objectives, strategies and measures for this Key Agency Goal are included as District Operations - Goal 1.

Goal 2. The OPD will provide sufficient and balanced resource distribution throughout the Agency. Objective 2.1 The objectives, strategies and measures for this Key Agency Goal are included in General Administration - Goal 1.

Goal 3. The OPD will provide a sufficient information technology infrastructure to efficiently support all Agency operations. Objective 3.1 The objectives, strategies and measures for this Key Agency Goal are included as General Administration - Goal 3.

Goal 4. The OPD will consult and cooperate with the Courts, the State legislature and other public organizations regarding the protection of procedural rights, the due process of law, constitutional safeguards and the administration of criminal justice. Objective 4.1 The objectives, strategies and measures for this Key Agency Goal are included as General Administration - Goal 4.

I — 57 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Administration of the OPD provides coordination of all public defender services including all personnel and fiscal matters. The coordination of budgeting, planning, accounting, data collection, procurement, information technology and continuing legal training is the responsibility of administrative personnel. The administrative staff also review and recommend all legislative proposals for the Public Defender.

MISSION

The mission of General Administration is to obtain and maximize fiscal resources to facilitate the operation of the Agency while providing competent managerial and executive leadership. OPD Administration also seeks to provide competent coordination of support services enabling all Agency personnel to fulfill the Agency's mission. Further, the Administration maintains collaborative relationships with other criminal justice agencies to ensure that the State's criminal justice system safeguards the constitutional rights of those charged with crimes. VISION

The vision of the OPD General Administration is to provide administrative support and professional resources required to ensure superior legal representation to all indigent clients charged with incarcerable crimes.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The OPD will provide sufficient and balanced resource distribution throughout the Agency. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, 90% of full-time attorneys will handle a caseload within 80% to 120% of American Bar Association maximum caseload standards. Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2006, 90% of full-time attorneys will handle a caseload within 90% to 110% of American Bar Association maximum caseload standards. Objective 1.3 By fiscal year 2007, 90% of full-time juvenile court attorneys will handle a caseload of between 95% to 105% of American Bar Association maximum caseload standards.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Total agency number of cases (districts and divisions) 191,180 187,938 191,697 195,531 Total cases paneled 11,732 9,621 9,804 10,000 Output: Average raw caseloads (district operations) Circuit District Juvenile Outcome: Average weighted caseloads (district operations) Circuit District Juvenile Quality: Percent of attorneys meeting ABA standards* Percent of attorneys at MFR goal of 120% ABA Efficiency: Cost - per - case

Note: *ABA standards are: Felony - 150; Misdemeanor - 400; Juvenile - 200.

I — 58 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. The OPD will provide a sufficient information technology infrastructure to efficiently support all Agency operations. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2005, the OPD will have implemented Case Management Phase I to every office statewide.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of offices statewide 0 0 4 8 48 Outputs: Number of offices using Case Management Phase I 0 0 5 48

Goal 3. The OPD will consult and cooperate with the Courts, the State Legislature and other public organizations regarding the protection of procedural rights, the due process of law, constitutional safeguards, and the administration of criminal justice. Objective 3.1 The OPD will continue its participation in 100% of the commissions, task forces and other work groups that have solicited OPD participation to address issues affecting the administration of criminal justice.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of commissions with OPD participation 75 102 105 108

Note: NIA - Not Applicable

Goal 4. Pursuant to Senate Bill 694 (Chap. No. 418, Laws of Maryland, 2001), "Criminal Procedure - DNA Evidence - Post Conviction Review," the OPD will utilize all relevant scientific techniques to identify and exonerate wrongfully convicted inmates. Objective 4.1 By fiscal year 2005, the OPD will refine its protocol to identify cases in which an inmate may have been wrongfully convicted and in which further scientific and factual investigation may lead to exoneration of a wrongfully convicted inmate. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of cases in which inmate has requested assistance with an innocence claim 37 123 100 100 Outputs: Number of cases reviewed 22 112 80 80 Number of cases litigated 4 9 10 10 Outcome: Number of defendants exonerated 0 1 2 2

I — 59 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 812.30 870.50 939.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 53.87 86.60 82.60 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferiReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

C80B00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 37. 019 04 Travel ...... 40. 000 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... SO. 124 08 Contractual Services ...... 747.227 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 155.722 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 2. 980 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 288. 585 13 Fixed Charges ...... 67. 702 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 60 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.02 DISTRICT OPERATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the Public Defender provides legal services to indigent persons through twelve district offices and seven specialized divisions. Each District conforms to the statutory geographic boundaries of the District Courts. Legal representation by the Office of the Public Defender extends to all stages in criminal proceedings including custody, interrogation, preliminary hearing, arraignment, trial and appeal. Representation is provided to qualified indigents in District Courts, Juvenile Courts, Circuit Courts, police custody and related collateral hearings, Children In Need of Assistance (CINA) and termination of parental rights (TPR) cases.

MISSION

The mission of District Operations is to provide superior counseling, negotiation, and trial advocacy services for the clients; to safeguard fundamental individual rights; and to ensure access to the guaranteed protections afforded by the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Maryland Constitution and Declaration of Rights, and the laws of Maryland.

VISION

The vision of District Operations is that all public defender clients will be interviewed promptly after arrest and will have a competent attorney promptly assigned to his or her case to provide superior legal representation from the initial bond hearing through every critical stage and hearing thereafter until the case is completed.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The Public Defender Districts and Divisions will provide competent representation to the clients at all critical stages of criminal, CINA, TPR, and juvenile proceedings. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, 90% of Agency attorneys shall have minimum mandatory contacts with clients to keep the clients informed as to the status of their cases. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of cases (District operations only) 177,306 174,995 178,495 182,065 Quality: Estimated percentage of attorneys meeting minimum contacts 20% 40% 50% 50%

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2005, 90% of OPD attorneys will receive ratings of "exceeds standards" or "outstanding" on their annual PEP evaluations. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of Agency attorneys 42 1 43 1 485 523 Outputs: Number of attorney evaluations 349 335 388 470 Quality: Percentage of attorneys rated "exceeds standards" or "outstanding" 79% 70% 85 % 90%

I — 61 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.02 DISTRICT OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 62 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.02 DISTRICT OPERATIONS

Special Fund Income: C80302 Inmate Services Projects ...... (280303 Anne Amndel County Inmate Services ...... C80304 Criminal Justice Drug Intervention Project AA Co . C80305 Circuit Court Case Management Anne Arundel County ...... C80308 Bail Reconsideration Project ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: QOOC02 DPSCS-Division of Parole and Probation ...... QOOPOO DPSCS-Division of Pretrial Detention and Services ..... VOOD01 Department of Juvenile Services ...... Total ......

I — 63 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.03 APPELLATE AND INMATE SERVICES

APPELLATE SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Appellate Services litigates appeals involving OPD clients. It also provides educational and research support for staff and panel attorneys. The Appellate Division provides representation through use of staff and panel attorneys in appellate cases, reviews and files appropriate petitions for writs of certiorari, conducts continuing education seminars, publishes legal updates and newsletters, and provides quick reference and specialist expertise to staff attorneys statewide.

MISSION

The mission of the Appellate Division is to assume statewide responsibility for all appellate litigation involving public defender clients and to provide educational and research services for Agency staff and panel attorneys throughout the State.

VISION

The vision of the Appellate Division is to be recognized in the legal community and by our clients as one of the best appellate legal systems in the nation, which provides superior appellate legal representation to persons in Maryland who are eligible for public defender services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The OPD will ensure superior, effective appellate representation for its clients. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, each appellate attorney shall handle no more than 120% of the American Bar Association's maximum appellate caseload standard of 25 appeals per attorney per year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of cases 699 73 1 750 750 Input: Number of attorneys 20 21.5 22.5 22.5 Output: Existing average number of cases per attorney 35 3 1 3 2 32 Quality: Percentage of attorneys meeting caseload standards 0% 10% 10% 10%

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2005, the Appellate Division will increase the number of attorneys capable of effectively and competently handling death penalty appeals. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Current number of attorneys competent to handle death penalty appeals 6 8 10 10

I — 64 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.03 APPELLATE AND INMATE SERVICES

INMATE SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Inmate Services, also known as the Collateral Review Division, provides assistance to indigent inmates for post conviction, parole violation, habeas corpus, extradition, and other hearings. This Division operates statewide and provides counsel in collateral criminal proceedings throughout the twelve Districts of the OPD system.

MISSION

The mission of the Inmate Services is to provide superior legal representation, pursuant to Section 7-108 of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland as amended, to clients challenging their criminal convictions based on the denial of constitutional and fundamental rights, and to provide representation to clients at parole revocation hearings.

VISION

The vision of Inmate Services is to be recognized in the legal community, and by our clients, as consistently providing the finest legal representation in post conviction proceedings in the nation.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Inmate Services will provide superior, effective representation for public defender clients. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, the Inmate Services Division will establish maximum caseload goals appropriate for its attorneys. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Post conviction cases handled 94 1 840 1,040 1,200 Quality: Number of attorneys 13 14 16 16 Efficiency: Current caseload per attorney - all cases 160 167 65 75

Inputs: Parole revocation hearings handled Quality: Number of attorneys Efficiency: Current caseload per attorney

Goal 2. Inmate Services will increase the number of clients it represents. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2005, the Inmate Services Division will provide representation, upon request, to those individuals eligible to receive post conviction relief who do not file pro se Petitions for Post Conviction Relief.

Objective 2.2 By fiscal year 2005, the Inmate Services Division will review and provide representation to individuals filing motions to reopen post convictions. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of non-pro se post conviction cases opened 226 302 450 600 Inputs: Number of motions to reopen post conviction cases filed NIA 4 60 95 Outputs: Number of cases in which post conviction relief was granted to our clients 148 182 225 260

Note: NIA - Not Applicable

I — 65 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.03 APPELLATE AND INMATE SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 66 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.04 INVOLUNTARY INSTITUTIONALIZATION SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Involuntary Institutionalization Services Program provides assistance of counsel to every indigent person involuntarily confined pursuant to Title 10, Health General Article, to a facility under the jurisdiction of or licensed by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The services include representation of indigents upon their admission to psychiatric institutions, at their six- month and annual reviews, and when seeking judicial release from psychiatric institutions.

MISSION

The mission of the Involuntary Institutionalization Services Division (Mental Health Division) is to provide superior representation to all indigent persons facing civil commitment to Maryland psychiatric hospitals and individuals seeking release from civil commitment or commitments resulting from a finding of not criminally responsible or not competent to stand trial. It is also the mission to foster and support a comprehensive system for competent representation of accused criminal clients when mental health issues are central to their defense.

VISION

The vision of the Mental Health Division is to provide superior legal representation to ensure that involuntarily or civilly committed individuals are not improperly detained and received proper mental health assistance.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The Mental Health Division will improve consultation and support services to the Districts in criminal cases involving mental health issues. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, the Mental Health Division will increase the number of available and qualified mental health experts by 10% over 2002 actual. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of mental health experts 3 3 38 42 46 Outputs: Number of consultations 264 279 285 290

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2005, the Mental Health Division will increase by 50% the number of trial attorneys attending training on mental health issues. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Percentage attending training 37% 32% 40% 50%

Objective 1.3 By fiscal year 2005, increase by 10% the number of cases in which Mental Health attorneys provide consultation to assistant public defenders in the Districts.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of consultations for current year 264 280 305 335

I — 67 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.04 INVOLUNTARY INSTITUTIONALIZATION SERVICES (Continued)

Goal 2. The OPD will provide competent legal representation to persons in civil commitment hearings and to persons found not criminally responsible or incompetent to stand trial. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2005, have attorney caseload at no more than 120% of the American Bar Association standards for attorneys handling civil commitment hearings and other hearings regarding the release of persons found not criminally responsible or incompetent to stand trial.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Current caseloads per attorney 994 1,000 1,035 1,248 Number of Mental Health attorneys 7 7 7 7 Outputs: ABA standards 200 200 200 200 MFR standards of 120% ABA 240 240 240 240 Outcome: Percentage of mental health attorneys meeting ABA or MFR caseload standards

I — 68 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.04 INVOLUNTARY INSTITUTIONALIZATION SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 1,103, 132 Less: General Fund ReversionIReduction ...... 9,526 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 1.093.606

I — 69 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.05 CAPITAL DEFENSE DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Capital Defense Division (CDD) coordinates the delivery of statewide legal defense services in capital murder cases. The Division consults with the Public Defender and the District Defenders on appointment of counsel, arranges for experts and investigators, supports and advises appointed counsel, gathers data on sentencing in homicide cases. The Division also educates staff and panel attorneys through its publications and training seminars.

MISSION

The mission of the CDD is to provide superior legal representation to indigent persons accused of capital crimes in the State of Maryland. VISION

The vision of the CDD is to be recognized in the legal community and by our clients as a model and a national leader in providing innovative and effective capital defense representation.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES Goal 1. The CDD will provide consultation and support to all public defenders and panel attorneys who are involved in capital litigation at the trial level in the State of Maryland. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005, the CDD will increase the number of Agency attorneys qualified to handle primary and/or secondary responsibility in capital litigation by 10% over 2002.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of Assistant Public Defenders who are currently qualified to handle primary and/or secondary responsibility in capital litigation 6 1 61 6 1 67

Objective 1.2 By fiscal year 2007, the OPD will reduce the actual caseloads of qualified Assistant Public Defenders who are assigned an active death penalty case to 75% of felony attorney caseloads.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Average caseload of an OPD felony attorney 297 250 260 260 Outputs: Estimated reduced caseload for attorneys handling death penalty case 267 225 22 1 22 1

Objective 1.3 By fiscal year 2005, the CDD will increase by 30% the number of panel attorneys and/or pro bono attorneys qualified to accept primary and/or secondary responsibility in capital litigation at the trial level.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of current panel or pro bono attorneys qualified to accept primary and/or secondary responsibility in capital litigation at the trial level 2 1 25 27 28

Note: NIA - Not applicable

I — 70 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.05 CAPITAL DEFENSE DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 2. The CDD will provide services to clients sentenced to death to pursue all further legitimate legal actions. Objective 2.1 By fiscal year 2004, maintain an adequate number of panel attorneys available to handle primary and/or secondary responsibility in post conviction capital litigation and clemency proceedings.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Total number of panel attorneys available qualified to handle primary or secondary responsibility in post conviction matters in capital cases

I — 71 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

C80B00.05 CAPITAL DEFENSE DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 72 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.01 LEGAL COUNSEL AND ADVICE

MISSION

The Office of the Attorney General represents the State in all legal matters. The Attorney General acts as legal counsel to the Governor, General Assembly, Judiciary and State agencies, boards and commissions.

VISION

The Office of the Attorney General provides superior legal representation and promotes public safety by providing the highest quality of legal services from a staff that is dedicated to excellence and professionalism. The Office of the Attorney General demonstrates integrity by being ethical and accountable and making principle decisions. The Office of the Attorney General embraces diversity as well as teamwork.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The Office of the Attorney General will effectively represent the State in all legal matters. Maintain the quality of excellence and successful outcome of matters. Objective 1.1 Handle all legal matters effectively.

Measure See individual Program MeasuresIProgram Indicators.

Goal 2. To continue the Attorney General's commitment to support the citizens of Maryland. Objective 2.1 The Attorney General is committed to citizen outreach. In order to maximize our citizen response efforts, the Attorney General has created a citizen response unit headed by a citizen response coordinator. It is necessary for this citizen response coordinator to be accessible to the public.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Telephone Calls 917 849 850 850 Walk In Traffic 125 233 233 233

Goal 4. To provide timely responses to in-session legislative requests for written advice. Objective 4.1 Answer all in-session legislative requests for written advice on the average of 60 hours after receipt of inquiry.

Measure For the 2003 session, 97 advice letters on specific bills were turned around in an average of 2.96 days.

Goal 5. To complete bill review in a timely manner. Objective 5.1 Complete the Attorney General's review of bills waiting on Governor's signature no later than seven days prior to the last bill signing.

Measure For the 2003 session, there were 629 bills for review, resulting in 13 bills reviewed per day for a period of 48 calendar days.

I — 73 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 247.50 239.50 242.50 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 16.068.279 16.560. 340 17.948.680 Technical and Special Fees ...... 131.982 41. 000 60.000 Operating Expenses ...... 5.334. 898 5.042.021 4.989. 915 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 17.775. 745 17.752. 974 Transfermeduction ...... -663. 119 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 17.775.745 17.089. 855 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 1.139.998 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 16.635.747 17.089. 855 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 1.183.584 601.842 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 1.330.498 1.428. 065 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 2.385. 330 2.523. 599 Total Expenditure ...... 21.535. 159 21.643. 36 1

CSlC00.01 LEGAL COUNSEL AND ADVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... 2.133. 537 2.136. 161 2.080. 064 Total Expenditure ...... 5.169. 145 5.201. 534 5.341. 440

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 5,148,468 5,232,797 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... 150,000 -31, 263 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 5,298,468 5,201,534 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 129,323 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 5,169, 145 5,201,534

I — 74 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.04 SECURITIES DIVISION

MISSION

The primary mission of the Securities Division is to protect Maryland investors from investment fraud and misrepresentation. The Division seeks to accomplish this mission by reviewing and registering offerings for securities, franchises and other investment opportunities prior to their offer and sale to the citizens of Maryland. The Division also licenses and regulates individuals engaged in the sale of securities in Maryland.

VISION

To protect the public by investigating and prosecuting cases that implicate important securities, franchise and business opportunities concerns.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle all Securities Division matters. Objective 1.1 To handle all Securities Division matters effectively.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated BrokerIDealer (Firm) Registration and Renewals 2,381 2,341 2,300 2,350 Registered Agents (Stockbrokers) 141,572 136,287 140,000 140,000 Investment AdviserFinancial Planner (Firm) Registrations and Renewals 492 623 630 650 Federal Covered Adviser Notice Filings 95 8 1,167 1,200 1,250 Investment AdviserIFinancial Planner Representative (Individual) Registration, Renewals and Notice Filings 6,020 5,928 6,100 6,200 Securities Registrations, Renewals, and Exemption and Notice Filings 19,467 19,391 19,000 19,000 Franchise Registration and Renewals 975 1,082 1,100 1,100 Active Cases, Investigations and Inquiries 1,442 1,576 1,500 1,500 Registration Fees $18,733,453 $18,410,428 $17,500,000 $17,750,000 Fines, Restitution and Rescission $2,234,009 $3,340,345 $7,000,000 $500,000

Goal 2. To review all regulatory filings. Objective 2.1 Review all regulatory filings within the statutory deadlines and to review filings and conduct investment adviser audit program with the goal of obtaining a five-year review cycle.

I — 75 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.04 SECURITIES DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 76 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.05 CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION

MISSION

The Mission of the Consumer Protection Division is to protect the citizens of Maryland by: 1)Conciliating consumer complaints through both mediation and arbitration; 2)Registering Health Clubs and Home Builders; 3)Educating the public by developing and disseminating consumer education materials; and 4)Enforcing consumer laws against businesses engaging in unfair or deceptive trade practices.

VISION

A state that provides citizens with a marketplace free of deceptive and unfair practices to further the economic well being of consumers and honest businesses.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle all Consumer Protection Division (CPD) matters, including inquiries, complaints, arbitration, and hearings. Objective 1.1 Handle Consumer Protection matters in a timely manner to achieve beneficial outcome to consumers.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Inquiries 85,665 87,500 90,000 90,000 Complaints 14,294 15,442 14,500 14,750 Output: Arbitrations 138 152 135 140 Cease & Desist Hearings 32 42 25 25 Outcome: Recoveries for Consumers $12,333,6 15 $20,733,258 $5,250,000 $5,250,000

Goal 2. Increase the public's access to mediation and arbitration services. Objective 2.1 Allow consumers to file complaints over the Internet through the OAG web site.

Measure Internet filing feature will be fully implemented in FY 2004.

Objective 2.2 Expand citizen outreach efforts. Program and evaluate methods to increase recruitment so as to meet resource demands of complaint and call volume.

Measure During FY 2003, CPD sent out 1,156 letters-recruiting volunteers to news media, senior centers, libraries, and universities. As a result of this effort, 66 volunteers and student interns started to work with CPD during this FY. All of these new people were given multiple training programs and, in addition, all current volunteers were given appropriate refresher training programs.

Goal 3. Handle consumer complaints in a timely manner. Objective 3.1 Maintain an average time of 110 days between the receipt of consumer complaints and the completion of mediation.

Measure During FY 2003, complaints received by the CPD were opened, mediated, and closed in an average of 73 days.

Goal 4. Provide consumer education materials to Maryland citizens. Objective 4.1 Help Maryland citizens make informed decisions in the marketplace.

Measure During FY 2003, the CPD produced 10 consumer education publications, including newsletters, fact sheets, pamphlets, and booklets. The CPD also issued 44 press releases about enforcement actions or consumer advisories, which also alert the public to consumer education messages.

The CPD mails 950 of its bimonthly newsletter to community organizations, schools, and libraries, which in turn distribute the newsletter to almost 90,000 people. The CPD also distributed 18,300 of its publications directly to people. As required by law, it provided new home builders with 60,000 copies of a booklet on "Buying a New Home" for them to give to all prospective purchasers of new homes. The CPD added 49 consumer education publications, press releases and consumer alerts to the OAG's Web site.

I — 77 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.05 CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C8 1301 Health Spa Fees ...... C8 1302 Homebuilders ...... C8 1303 Consumer Protection Recoveries ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D80Z01 Maryland Insurance Administration ......

I — 78 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

CSlC00.06 ANTITRUST DIVISION MISSION

To protect the citizens of Maryland by enforcing the antitrust laws of the State of Maryland and the United States fairly and consistently; to advise and educate Maryland's agencies, political subdivisions and business enterprises regarding laws protecting competition for the purpose of promoting effective operations and compliance with the antitrust laws; to be responsive to the concerns of the citizens of Maryland regarding threats to the competitive process in the State; to provide high quality legal defense for state agencies and political subdivisions accused of violating state and federal antitrust laws; and to protect the State from individuals and companies that threaten the integrity of state procurement procedures.

VISION

To promote vigorous economic competition within the State of Maryland by fostering a climate in which participants in the marketplace succeed or fail on the strength of their ingenuity, talent, skills and effort, and not by means of their agreements with competitors to circumvent the competitive process of their success in choking off competition for the purpose of securing a monopoly position; to assure that, whenever possible, the market forces of supply and demand are the primary determinants of price, quality, selection and innovation; and to safeguard the integrity of the state's procurement process.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle all antitrust matters. 0bjectivel.lHandle all antitrust matters for beneficial outcome for the State of Maryland and its citizens.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Investigations, Inquiries and Advice 802 67 3 675 675 Enforcement Actions 16 17 17 16 Parens Patriae 4 5 5 4 Other Civil 12 12 12 12 Criminal 0 0 0 0 Antitrust Defense 2 2 1 Amicus Briefs 1 2 1 Debarments 49 49 52 Energy Overcharge Actions 47 47 47 Outcomes: Funds Recovered for State (in thousands) $632 $775 $500 Funds Recovered for Maryland subdivisions (in thousands) Funds Recovered for Consumers (in thousands)

Goal 2. Enhance enforcement capabilities. Objective 2.1 Enhance our enforcement capabilities and investigations to better protect the public.

Measure In FY03, the Antitrust Division participated in 15 multistate cases which were in investigation, litigation, or enforcement phases. Of those 15 cases, we had leadership positions in 6. All of our recoveries for the General Fund and for consumers in FY03 came from 3 of the 6 cases in which we had leadership roles.

I — 79 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.06 ANTITRUST DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 80 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.09 MEDICAID FRAUD CONTROL UNIT

MISSION

The Maryland Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (hereinafter the "MFCU") of the Office of the Attorney General investigates and prosecutes instances of Medicaid provider fraud and the abuse and neglect of vulnerable adults. The MFCU has statewide authority to prosecute such cases and utilizes the grand juries of the various counties to this end. The MFCU serves the people of Maryland through the enforcement actions it undertakes. The MFCU seeks to deter the criminal behavior that comes under its purview by bringing enforcement actions, seeking restitution where appropriate, and by seeking appropriate sentences for those individuals or entities that violate the laws pertaining to fraud and abuse and neglect. The MFCU also advises the Attorney General and his constituents, as well as the Medicaid program, on Medicaid fraud matters and policy issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of vulnerable adults. VISION

The vision of the MFCU is to effectively protect the integrity of the Medicaid program in Maryland and to reduce or eliminate instances of fraud. It is further our vision that all vulnerable adults in Maryland be treated with the dignity and respect they deserve, free from physical abuse. It is further our vision that vulnerable adults in Maryland receive proper and sufficient care and assistance in fulfilling their physical needs.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle all Medicaid Fraud Control Unit matters. Objective 1.1 Handle all MFCU matters to protect the integrity of the Medicaid program and to help protect vulnerable adults. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Cases Pending Beginning of Year 36 52 58 59 New Cases 43 37 36 38 Total 79 89 94 97

Fraud Complaints Patient Abuse Complaints Outputs: Investigations Completed Pending End of Fiscal Year Indictments Civil Settlements Outcomes: Fines, Collections, Restitution and/or overpayments

Goal 2. Help protect vulnerable adults. Objective 2.1 Raise the awareness of the citizens of Maryland regarding the issues of the abuse and neglect of vulnerable adults.

Measure During the past year the Unit received 747 abuse referrals. We also produce a monthly report of cases that are unresolved. These are cases that are under active investigation or which require further review.

I — 81 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.09 MEDICAID FRAUD CONTROL UNIT

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: 93.775 State Medicaid Fraud Control Units ......

I — 82 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.14 CIVIL LITIGATION DIVISION

MISSION

The Civil Division handles all major civil litigation in which the State, its agencies, or officers, is a party. This includes defending the State and State employees in state and federal trial and appellate courts as well as filing suits on behalf of the State. Departmental litigation is handled principally by Assistant Attorneys General assigned to particular agencies. The other principal function of the Civil Division is to oversee litigation handled elsewhere in the Office.

VISION

That the Office of the Attorney General will provide civil litigation services of the highest quality to every State agency, officer and employee that qualifies for representation.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To ensure that its attorneys, and all attorneys in the Office of the Attorney General who litigate provide uniformly high quality litigation services to our clients, Maryland's state agencies, officers and employees. Objective 1.1 Litigating those cases most important to the core functions and governmental policies of the State of Maryland, and to the rights and interests of its citizens, or that are of a complexity and size that require special expertise, resources, or attention.

2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of matters litigated by court jurisdiction: State Courts Federal Courts Miscellaneous Total

I — 83 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.14 CIVIL LITIGATION DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: SWF305 Cigarette Restitution Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D15A05 Executive Department.Boards. Commissions and Offices ......

I — 84 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.15 CRIMINAL APPEALS DIVISION

MISSION

The mission of the Criminal Appeals Division is to faithfully and competently represent the State of Maryland in all criminal matters in the appellate courts of the State and in the federal courts at all levels, including the United States District Court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court. The Division also offers advice, counsel, and training to the 24 local State's Attorney's Offices in the State as well as to other State agencies. It is also the mission of the Division to offer its criminal law expertise in the areas of policy and legislation on behalf of the Office.

VISION

The vision of the Division is one where the citizens of Maryland may live as safe and crime-free as possible, where criminal convictions are upheld and dangerous individuals are isolated from the general public. The Division also would like to see criminal prosecutions be fair and just, to ensure that the guilty are convicted and the innocent are set free.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To competently and efficiently handle all matters assigned to the Division. Objective 1.1 To have all briefs and major pleadings reviewed by a senior member of the Division prior to its filing in court. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Federal Cases Litigated 141 128 135 135 State Cases Litigated 944 837 950 950

Goal 2. To represent the State in criminal appeals. Objective 2.1 To achieve the highest level of affirmances in criminal convictions.

2003 Performance Measures Actual Outcomes: Number of dispositions from State court: Cases handled by the Division Successful cases* Percent successful

Successful cases included those where the defendant's assertions were rejected entirely or only a part of the case was reversed.

I — 85 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.15 CRIMINAL APPEALS DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 86 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.16 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION

MISSION

The mission of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) is to analyze, investigate and prosecute conduct which violates Maryland's criminal statutes, with particular emphasis on fraud within or affecting State government, white collar crime, health care fraud, firearms offenses, and multi-county criminal behavior. Our jurisdiction is statewide and our authority to act is at the specific request of the Governor, in accordance with Article 5, Section 3 of the Maryland Constitution.

The Criminal Investigation Division also advises the Attorney General and his constituents on criminal enforcement matters as well as on policy involving crime, criminal justice and law enforcement.

VISION

To identify correctly and prosecute those persons and entities whose criminal behavior jeopardizes the quality of life, government and commerce in Maryland, in such a way that not only punishes the wrongdoers, but also deters future criminal conduct and educates the public.

To serve as a meaningful partner with local, State and federal prosecutors and law enforcement agencies, so as to coordinate and maximize delivery of appropriate criminal justice services to the population of the State.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle Criminal Investigation Division matters. Objective 1.1 Handle CID matters for most effective investigative and prosecutorial service.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Cases Litigated: Maryland Court of Special Appeals Maryland Trial Courts

Investigations Conducted Investigations Conducted Litigation Pending Investigations Conducted not Resulting in cases in Litigation

Goal Investigation and prosecution of illegal gun suppliers Objective 2.1 Identify prosecutable cases and filings of charges 2002 2003 Performance Measures Actual Actual The Division tracked the following: Referrals 29 300 Opened for Investigation 10 225 Charged 6 30 Case Assessment Time in weeks for each referral <4 <2

I — 87 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.16 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION (Continued)

Goal 3. Enforce procurement fraud related criminal law. Objective 3.1 Identify significant instances of procurement fraud and theft from State programs, with a view towards not only punishing the wrongdoers but also improving the procurement process as well as internal accounting controls.

Measures There were 27 referrals made to the Division, and case assessments were completed in less than four (4) weeks from the date of referral. There were 22 investigation referrals accepted by the Division in which investigation files were opened.

2002 2003 Performance Measures Actual Actual The Division tracked the following: Litigation Pending No Litigation Resulting Charges Filed Convictions

Goal 4. Help protect vulnerable adults from financial exploitations. Objective 4.1 Target financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.

Measures There were 42 referrals made to the Division, and the time between referral and either acceptance or declination of the referral was less than four (4) weeks.

There was one (1) criminal charge filed, with two (2) convictions. One (1) of the convictions was on a charge that was filed prior to FY 02.

2002 2003 Performance Measures Actual Actual The Division tracked the following: Investigations Litigation Pending No Litigation Resulting

I — 88 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.16 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Federal Fund Income: AA.C81 Witness Protection Program Grant ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: C81901 Maryland State Police Gun Grant ...... 87. 109 50. 246 D15A05 Executive Department-Boards, Commissions and Offices...... Total ......

I — 89 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.17 EDUCATIONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION

MISSION

The Educational Affairs Division is the legal advisor to all State higher education institutions (University System of Maryland, Morgan State University, St. Mary's College of Maryland, Baltimore City Community College), as well as the Maryland Higher Education Commission, Maryland Public Television, the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services System, the Historic St. Mary's City Commission, and the Maryland Prepaid College Trust.

VISION

The Division seeks to be a constructive contributor to the successful implementation of our clients' respective missions, and to ensure that such implementation is carried out in a manner that best serves the public interest.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle Educational Affairs Division matters. Objective 1.1 Handle all Educational Affairs Division matters effectively

Goal 2. To help ensure consistent advice to clients. Objective 2.1 To enhance communications between Division attorneys and agency-based attorneys

Goal 3. Continue to implement new collective bargaining legislation, as clients move from election phase to negotiating phase. Objective 3.1 Assure the smoothest possible implementation of new collective bargaining legislation, effective fiscal year 2003. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Federal Cases 32 35 35 35 State Cases 98 90 100 95 Administrative Proceedings 80 70 80 75 Advice Letters 5 10 5 00 515 500 Contracts DraftedIReviewed 500 500 505 500

I — 90 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.17 EDUCATIONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

I — 91 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.18 CORRECTIONAL LITIGATION DIVISION

MISSION

The Mission of the Correctional Litigation Division is to:

Provide legal representation to eligible state correctional institutions, officials and personnel, as mandated by the State Government Article, in defense of civil actions brought by inmates for alleged violations of civil constitutional rights or claims arising out of their incarcerations; Provide advice, information and training to state corrections officials and personnel relating to the avoidance and defense of inmate litigation; Minimize the liability of state corrections officials and personnel in inmate litigation; Reduce the amount of inmate litigation; and Carry out these tasks in compliance with the Canons of Professional Responsibility.

VISION

The vision of the Correctional Litigation Division is to promote a correctional and legal environment in Maryland in which correctional officials and personnel conduct their mission without fear of inmate suits and where those inmate lawsuits that are brought are resolved expeditiously and without improper interference with the work of the State's correctional system.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Handle Correctional Litigation matters. Objective 1.1 Handle Correctional Litigation matters for the most beneficial outcome to the State.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Federal Courts: U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of Appeals U.S. District Court Class Actions State Courts: Maryland Court of Appeals Maryland Court of Special Appeals Circuit Courts of Maryland District Courts of Maryland Health Claims Arbitration Office Administrative Hearings

I — 92 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.18 CORRECTIONAL LITIGATION DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 6.00 6.00 6.00 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 352. 900 409. 326 404. 025 04 Travel ...... 317 800 800 08 Contractual Services ...... 102 800 800 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 500 500 13 Fixed Charges ...... 65. 996 66.396 66,396 Total Operating Expenses ...... 66,415 68,496 68,496 Total Expenditure ...... 419. 315 477. 822 472. 521

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 456.725 477. 822 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 37. 410 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 419,315 477, 822 472,521

I — 93 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.20 CONTRACT LITIGATION DIVISION

MISSION

The Contract Litigation Unit represents the Departments of General Services and Transportation and the University System of Maryland before the Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals and in the courts of the State in litigation arising out of contract formation disputes and contract disputes. The Unit also provides advice upon request regarding a variety of procurement and contract issues, such as structuring procurement solicitations, drafting contract provisions and procurement regulations, administering contracts, and properly formulating State claims and responses to contractor claims.

VISION

Through litigation or settlement, assist our client agencies to resolve contract disputes, at values that are fair to the contractors and the State, in a manner that promotes the letter and spirit of the Procurement Law.

Assessment of the fair value of a monetary contract claim is one of the most difficult aspects of contract litigation. Despite its extreme difficulty, our vision is to be able to reasonably forecast fair value as early as is reasonably possible in the litigation, to the ideal end that the litigation will be resolved for approximately the value that we forecast.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To handle contract disputes. Objective 1.1 To resolve each case for an amount that is within 25 percent of our most recent assessment of case value

2002 2003 2004 2004 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Average variance of actual settlement amounts from most recent case value assessment * 25.5% 25% 25% Average variance of actual fully litigated case amounts from the most recent case value assessment * 17.9% 25 % 25%

Note: Measure was new for the FY 2004 submission; therefore, there is no prior year data.

I — 94 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

C81C00.20 CONTRACT LITIGATION DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: HOOA01 Department of General Services ...... JOOA01 Department of Transportation ...... R30B22 USM-College Park Campus ...... Total ......

I — 95 OFFICE OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR

C82D00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the State Prosecutor (OSP) is an independent agency within the executive branch. The State Prosecutor investigates and, where warranted, prosecutes, criminal offenses affecting the honesty and integrity of our governmental officials and institutions and the electoral process. Specifically, he is authorized to investigate and prosecute criminal offenses under the State election laws and Public Ethics law, as well as the bribery laws and offenses constituting criminal malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance in office. These investigations are conducted either upon the initiative of the OSP or upon the request of the Governor, the Attorney General, the General Assembly, the State Ethics Commission, or a State's Attorney. In addition, upon the request of the Governor, the Attorney General, the General Assembly, the State Ethics Commission, or a State's Attorney, the State Prosecutor may investigate and prosecute any offense, which takes place in more than one county within the State or in more than one State including Maryland.

MISSION

The mission of the OSP is to increase public confidence in, and ensure the honesty and integrity of State government and elections by conducting thorough, independent investigations and when appropriate, prosecutions, of allegations of criminal conduct affecting the integrity of our State and local government institutions, officials, employees and elections.

VISION

The vision of the State Prosecutor is a State in which citizens can have confidence in the honesty and integrity of their government and electoral processes, and are confident that any allegations of corruption will be thoroughly and independently investigated and prosecuted, if necessary.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. For each of the three types of complaints, the Office of the State Prosecutor's investigation shall result in the appropriate legal disposition. Objective 1.1 In Fiscal Year 2005,95% of the investigations shall achieve an appropriate disposition.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of complaints Corruption complaints Election law complaints Other complaints Outputs: Total number of complaints closed Corruption complaints Election law complaints Other complaints Outcome: Percent of investigations that result in an appropriate disposition

Goal 2. For each of the three types of complaints, a timely completion rate has been established to determine whether or not such complaints were processed in a timely manner. Objective 2.1 In Fiscal Year 2005, 95% of corruption complaints shall be closed within the 1-year timely completion rate that has been established.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percentage of corruption complaints that were closed in a timely fashion

' 160 Election Law complaints received from SEE in July '03 added to carryover from FY03.

I — 96 OFFICE OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR

C82D00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Objective 2.2 In Fiscal Year 2005, 95% of election law complaints shall be closed within the 6-month timely completion rate that has been established.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures-Election Law Complaints Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Percentage of election law complaints that were closed in a timely fashion

Objective 2.3 In Fiscal Year 2004, 75% of other complaints shall be closed within the 1-year timely completion rate that has been established. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percentage of other complaints that were closed in a timely fashion 100% 100% 100% 100%

Goal 3. For judicial dispositions, a satisfactory conclusion rate of 75% has been established. Objective 3.1 In Fiscal year 2005,75% of all judicial dispositions shall have a satisfactory conclusion.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of persons charged 17 6 10 10 Outputs: Number of defendants whose cases reached a judicial disposition Outcome: Number of judicial dispositions that attained an appropriate conclusion Efficiency: Percentage of judicial dispositions that attained an appropriate conclusion

3 cases have been appealed to Court of Appeals after P. G. County Circuit Court declared Walk Around Money prohibition unconstitutional

I — 97 OFFICE OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR

C82D00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 98 MARYLAND TAX COURT

CSSE00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND APPEALS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Tax Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the decision, determination or order of any final assessing or taxing authority of the State, or of any agency, department or political subdivision thereof, and to assess anew, abate, modify, change or alter any valuation, assessment, classification, tax or appealed final order. Appeals concerning State and local taxes are heard by a single judge or a panel of judges. Real property tax appeals may be heard in Baltimore City or within the counties where the appeals arise. All decisions of the Court are subject to appeal. MISSION

The Tax Court, an independent unit of State government, provides both the taxpayer and the taxing authority with the ability to appeal and obtain a fair and efficient hearing of a final decision, determination or order from any other unit of State or Local government regarding any tax issue. VISION

A State in which all taxpayers are provided with highest quality tax dispute resolutions system.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. The efficient processing of appeals. Objective 1.1 For the year 2004 and beyond, the average time for an appeal to be opened, heard and closed shall be 8 months (240 days) or less. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of appeals (cases) filed from taxing authorities to the Tax Court in a fiscal year 800 772 850 850 Outputs: Number of appeals (cases) disposed of by the Tax Court 746 790 900 900 Quality: Number of efficiency complaints 30 23 18 15 Citizen Survey Rating Above Above Excellent Excellent Average Average Outcomes: Percentage of appeals (cases) opened and closed within 8 months (Benchmark: 90% wlin 12 months for non-jury civil trial)* 70% 74% 80% 85% Efficiency: Number of appeals (cases) pending at end of fiscal year 709 69 1 64 1 591 Median time(days) between opening and closing of appeals (cases) 203 189 180 180 Clearance Rate (number of cases disposedltotal filed) (Benchmark: 90%)* 93% 102% 106% 106%

* Benchmarks provided by National Center of State Courts Report, Examining the Work ofState Courts, 2001 and by the Joint Report of the American Bar Association, the Conference of State Court Administrators and the Conference of Chief Justices, Trial Court Peformunce Standards & Measurement S~lstem,2001.

I — 99 MARYLAND TAX COURT

C85E00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND APPEALS (Continued)

Goal 2. To provide fair and consistent decisions. Objective 2.1 For the year 2004 and beyond, the Tax Court will further ensure and attempt to measure its consistent application of the law, policy and procedure.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of fairness complaints 7 9 5 5 Citizen Survey Rating Above Above Excellent Excellent Average Average Outcomes: Number of Maryland Tax Court decisions appealed to the Circuit Court Percentage of affirmations by the Appellate Courts

Note: a Due to lag time at appellate level, incomplete data available for prior fiscal year

I — 100 MARYLANDTAXCOURT

C85E00.01 ADMINISTRATION AND APPEALS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 101 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

The Public Service Commission of Maryland was established as an independent unit of the Executive Branch of State government. As such, the Commission must be responsive to the legitimate budgetary oversight responsibilities of the Governor and the General Assembly. The Commission is also charged with quasi-judicial responsibilities. These require the Commission to conduct fair hearings and to make decisions based upon the record.

The goals, objectives and performance measures contained in the document are provided in response to those budgetary oversight responsibilities and will be incorporated into the Commission's performance measurement system. However, decisions in rulemaking and adjudicatory proceedings will continue to be based upon the record in each proceeding, pursuant to the requirements of the Public Utility Companies Article.

MISSION

The mission of the Public Service Commission is to promote adequate, safe, reliable, and economic delivery of services to Maryland consumers by companies subject to the Commission's statutory mandates. We accomplish this by ensuring just and reasonable rates, supervising, monitoring, and regulating all public service companies, educating the public about utility issues, and promoting competition where appropriate.

We conduct proceedings in an open, fair, and nondiscriminatory manner balancing the interests of consumers, utilities, businesses, and other affected parties. In our decisions we consider public safety, the economy of the State, the conservation of natural resources, and the preservation of environmental quality.

We are committed to continuing to build an organization marked by teamwork, accountability, innovation, and diversity. We recruit, develop, and retain quality personnel by providing good working conditions, effective leadership, and the opportunity for personal and professional development.

VISION

Our vision is a State in which all public utility services are safe, reliable, and economic, as well as, a State in which consumers are well informed about those services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of accident reports investigated 4 I I 10 I0 Outcome: Number of accidents attributed to violations of Commission regulations 0 I 0 0 Goal 2. Ensure that public service companies deliver reliable services. Objective 2.1 Annually have no reportable service interruptions due to insufficient jurisdictional plant maintenance or improper plant operations.

I — 102 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of reportable service interruptions 2 1 3 3 Outcome: Number of reportable service interruptions due to insufficient plant maintenance or improper plant operations 0 0 0 0

Goal 3. Conduct open and fair proceedings and render timely decisions in accordance with statutory mandates and applicable law. Objective 3.1 Annually 100% of Commission orders will be upheld on judicial review.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of cases 599 725 600 600 Outputs: Number of decisions rendered 422 586 450 450 Number of final judicial decisions 8 7 6 6 Number of judicial reversals or remands 2 2 0 0 Quality: Percent of orders upheld on judicial review 75% 71% 100% 100%

Objective 3.2 Annually complete 90% of ministerial matters (e.g., letter orders, uncontested filings) and staff comments on utility filings within 30 days1

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of items with 30 day deadline 362 39 1 400 400 Quality: Percent of ministerial material matters & staff comments on utility filings completed within 30 days 46% 48% 85% 90%

Goal 4. Ensure that all Maryland consumers have adequate consumer protection. Objective 4.1 Annually resolve 80% of consumer complaints within 60 days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of complaints 6,209 5,599 7,000 7,000 Outputs: Number of complaints resolved 4,368 4,752 5,600 5,600 Outcome: Percent of consumer complaints resolved within 60 days 89.8% 84.8% 80% 80%

' Section 4-203 Public Utility Companies Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

I — 103 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 138.00 140.00 140.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 5.00 4.00 5.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 8,742,078 9,152,620 9,761,272 Technical and Special Fees ...... 222. 252 164,033 187,405 Operating Expenses ...... 1,859,157 3,368,328 2,755,606 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 10,455,146 12,684,981 12,704,283 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 28.341 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 340,000 Total Expenditure ...... 10,823,487 12,684,981 12.704,283

I — 104 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND HEARINGS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Public Service Commission regulates electric, natural gas, water and sewage, telecommunications companies, electric and natural gas suppliers, and passenger-for-hire services. In addition, the Commission establishes pilotage rates and charges. The Commission hears matters about rate adjustments, applications to exercise franchises, approval of issuance of securities, promulgation of rules and regulations, and quality of utility and common carrier service. It also has the authority to issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to construct new generating stations or transmission lines of a certain capacity. It establishes policies, sets priorities, and provides support for operating units to achieve success, and communicates on behalf of the Commission. Support services include legal, fiscal, and budget, personnel, information technology, communications, consumer assistance, and a variety of special projects. The Commission is a Special Fund agency with revenues equivalent to its operating expenses raised through assessments of the public service companies the Commission regulates.

MISSION

The mission of the Administrative Division is to promote adequate, safe, reliable, and economic delivery of services to Maryland consumers by companies subject to the Commission's statutory mandates. We accomplish this by ensuring just and reasonable rates, by supervising, monitoring, and regulating all public service companies, by educating the public about utility issues and by promoting competition where appropriate. We also provide policy direction, coordinate and oversee the functions of various technical divisions, and furnish support services to the Commission.

We conduct proceedings in an open, fair, and nondiscriminatory manner balancing the interests of consumers, utilities, businesses, and other affected parties. In our decisions, we consider public safety, the economy of the State, the conservation of natural resources, and the preservation of environmental quality.

VISION

Our vision is a State in which all public utility services are just and reasonable, safe, reliable, and economical, as well as, a State in which consumers are well informed about those services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure that rates for public utility services are just and reasonable.

Objective 1.1 Assure adequate and fair rates to utilities and customers by having 100% of Commission rate orders upheld on judicial review.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of rate cases 3 3 3 3 Number of rate cases appealed closed 0 0 0 0 Quality: Percent of cases upheld on judicial review 100% 100% 100% 100%

I — 105 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND HEARINGS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 53.00 59.00 59.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 3.00 3.00 3.00 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 3.719. 100 4.036. 991 4.237. 162 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 210.502 139.748 135.747 03 Communication ...... 164.894 149.009 139.517 04 Travel ...... 50. 832 40. 343 50.800 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 86. 385 90. 613 110.770 08 Contractual Services ...... 304. 187 1.854. 096 1.106. 392 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 54. 143 7 1.300 54. 900 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 78. 881 24. 245 31.535 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 10.674 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 49. 450 50.603 81. 428 13 Fixed Charges ...... 623.568 655.770 728.047 Total Operating Expenses ...... 1.423.014 2.935. 979 2.303. 389 Total Expenditure ...... 5.352. 616 7.112. 718 6.676. 298

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 5.318. 616 7.112. 718 6.676. 298 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 34. 000 Total Expenditure ...... 5.352.616 7.112. 718 6.676.298

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: NOOA01 Department of Human Resources ......

I — 106 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.02 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Telecommunications Division provides information and makes recommendations to the Public Service Commission to assist in the regulation of the telecommunications utilities in Maryland.

MISSION

The mission of the Telecommunications Division is to provide high quality and timely advice to the Commission; to assist in the regulation of telecommunications industries in Maryland for the purpose of providing an affordable, reliable, state-of-the-art, telecommunications network infrastructure for the benefit and use of Maryland consumers.

VISION

Our vision is a state in which the consumers have access to an affordable, feature rich, state-of-the-art, telecommunications network.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure that telecommunications companies provide reliable services. Objective 1.1 Annually the major carriers will meet their service objectives for resolving trouble spots, providing timeliness of repair, meeting appointments for installation, answering inquiries to business offices, and maintaining the operability of pay telephones 95% of the time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Service quality measures submitted by major carriers Outcome: Percent of time that major carriers report meeting their service objectives for resolving trouble spots, providing timeliness of repair, meeting appointments for installation, and answering inquiries to business offices, and maintaining the operability of pay telephones

Goal 2. Ensure that the telecommunications industry in Maryland is open to competition. Objective 2.1 Achieve 5% competitor market share by fiscal year 2004.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent of market share attained by new competitors

Goal 3. Provide high quality and timely advice to the Commission on telecommunication issues. Objective 3.1 Annually reduce the time to process applications.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of new applications 80 82 80 80 Outcome: Average time to process telecommunications company applications (days) 3 6 35 24 18

I — 107 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.02 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

I — 108 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.03 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Engineering Investigations Division is responsible for inspecting the physical facilities and operating records of utilities to determine the adequacy, efficiency, and safety of the services provided; makes recommendations on engineering issues before the Public Service Commission; investigates service problems; monitors the heating value of gas and the voltages on electric systems; tests the accuracy of gas, electric and water meters; reviews utility service tariffs; evaluates construction requests for power plants and high voltage transmission lines; and assures compliance with Federal natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline safety requirements.

MISSION

The mission of the Engineering Division is to ensure that utilities under the Public Service Commission's jurisdiction provide consumers with safe, adequate, and reliable utility services.

VISION

Our vision is a State in which consumers are provided adequate, safe, and reliable utility services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure that gas and electric utility companies operate utility systems safely. Objective 1.1 Annually maintain a zero rate of reportable accidents, from regulated utilities, that are attributable to violations of Commission regulations. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of accidents reported 13 11 10 10 Outputs: Number of accident reports investigated 4 11 10 10 Outcome: Number of accidents attributed to violations of Commission regulations 0 1 0 0

Goal 2. Ensure that public service companies deliver reliable services. Objective 2.1 Annually have no reportable service interruptions due to insufficient jurisdictional plant maintenance or improper plant operations. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of reportable service interruptions due to insufficient plant maintenance or improper plant operations 0 0 0 0

Goal 3. Ensure that utility systems are adequate to meet customer demand. Objective 3.1 Annually have no reportable service interruptions due to insufficient jurisdictional plant capacity.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of reportable service interruptions due to insufficient plant capacity

I — 109 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.03 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.700 Pipeline Safety ......

I — 110 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.04 ACCOUNTING INVESTIGATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Accounting Investigations Division audits and assesses the financial performance of public utilities that provide service to the State of Maryland. The Division provides appropriate guidance on a variety of financial issues including the development of utility revenue requirements, financial performancelearnings levels, recovery of fuel costs, cost allocationslstandards of conduct, and customer billing. The Division also maintains annual reports for most utilities under the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission. MISSION

The mission of the Accounting Investigations Division is to provide expert accounting and ratemaking guidance to the Commission on financial and operational issues that affect public service company stakeholders. This is accomplished by assessing, monitoring, and reporting on public service companies' financial conditions, cost allocations, affiliate transactions, revenue requirements, financial reports, and books of accounts.

VISION

Through appropriate monitoring and educational activities, the Commission will be well informed about accounting and financial issues regarding utility companies that provide services in Maryland. This will enable the Commission to make important decisions from which utility stakeholders receive reasonably priced services from financially healthy utilities.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide timely expert analysis, advice and guidance to the Commission on accounting related matters. Objective 1.1 Annually 95% or more of accounting related bucksheets will be prepared on time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of bucksheets assigned to Accounting Investigations Division 36 36 40 40 Quality: Percent of bucksheets processed on time 100% 100% 100% 100%

Objective 1.2 Annually 95% or more of Earned Return Reports will be analyzed on time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of Earned Return Reports assigned to Accounting Investigations Division 25 25 Quality: Percent of Earned Return Reports analyzed on time 100% 100%

I — 111 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.04 ACCOUNTING INVESTIGATIONS (Continued)

Goal 2. Provide timely audit findings and testimony to the Commission on accounting related matters. Objective 2.1 Annually 95% or more of Fuel cases audits and testimony will be analyzed on time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of fuel cases assigned to Accounting Investigations Division Quality: Percent of fuel cases processed on time

Goal 3. Provide timely completion of rate information to the Commission on accounting related matters. Objective 3.1 Annually 95% or more of fuel adjustment filings will be analyzed on time.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of fuel adjustment filings assigned to Accounting Investigations Division Quality: Percent of fuel adjustment filings processed on time

I — 112 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.04 ACCOUNTING INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 7.00 8.00 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 578. 774 04 Travel ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

I — 113 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.05 COMMON CARRIER INVESTIGATIONS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Common Carrier Investigations Program enforces the Commission's laws concerning the safety, insurance, and services required to be maintained by passenger carriers; taxicab companies in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Cumberland, and Hagerstown; taxicab drivers in Baltimore City, Cumberland, and Hagerstown; and drivers of intrastate for-hire passenger vehicles with a passenger capacity of less than 16.

MISSION

The mission of the Common Carrier Investigations Program is to promote safe and reliable taxicab service in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Cumberland, and Hagerstown and promote safe and reliable passenger carrier service throughout Maryland.

VISION

The vision of the Common Carrier Investigations Program is a taxicab and for-hire passenger carrier industry in Maryland that provides passengers with safe and authorized vehicles and drivers, with a full range of services and at affordable rates whenever customers require service.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure that taxicabs and passenger-for-hire carriers engage in safe practices. Objective 1.1 Annually, maintain a zero fatality rate from accidents attributable to vehicle safety violations by taxicabs and passenger-for-hire vehicles. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of taxicabs regulated 1,476 ,476 1,476 1,476 Number of passenger-for-hire vehicles regulated with a passenger capacity of less than 16 3,492 3,488 3,500 3,500 Number of passenger-for-hire vehicles regulated with a passenger capacity of 16 or more 2,067 2,154 2,200 2,250 Outputs: Number of safety inspections of taxicabs by Commission inspectors 2,236 1,787 1,476 1,476 Number of safety inspections of taxicabs by authorized Maryland inspection stations 1,148 1,357 1,476 1,476 Number of safety inspections of passenger-for-hire Vehicles by Commission inspectors 8,666 7,194 7,900 8,000

Number of safety inspections of passenger-for-hire vehicles by authorized Maryland inspection stations

I — 114 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.05 COMMON CARRIER INVESTIGATIONS (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Quality: Ratio of total number of safety inspections to total number of reported vehicles in service at the end of FY 2003 1.9:1 1.76:1 2: 1 2: 1 Outcome: Number of reported fatalities from accidents attributable to vehicle safety violations by taxicabs and passenger-for hire vehicles 0 0 0 0

Goal 2. Ensure that taxicabs and passenger-for-hire carriers provide reliable service. Objective 2.1 Annually, maintain an out-of-service rate no higher than 3% for taxicabs and passenger-for-hire vehicles that are inspected by Commission inspectors and conduct biannual Safety Reviews on carriers that operate vehicles with a seating capacity of 16 or more.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of taxicabs inspected by Commission inspectors placed out of service for safety violations 5 1 50 50 50 Number of passenger-for-hire vehicles inspected by Commission inspectors placed out of service for safety violations 44 99 100 100 Outcome: Percent of taxicabs inspected by Commission inspectors placed out of service for safety violations 3% 3% 3% 3% Percent of passenger-for-hire vehicles inspected by Commission inspectors placed out of service for safety violations 1% 2% 2% 2%

Objective 2.2 Annually, ensure that all licensed for-hire drivers meet Commission standards for safety and reliability.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of taxicab drivers licensed 2,235 1,144 1,500 2,000 Number of passenger-for-hire drivers licensed 5,474 6,858 4,000 5,000 Outputs: Number of taxicab driver's licenses suspended or revoked Number of passenger-for-hire driver's licenses suspended or revoked Quality: Percent of taxi driver's licenses suspended or revoked Percent of passenger for-hire drivers licenses suspended or revoked

I — 115 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.05 COMMON CARRIER INVESTIGATIONS (Continued)

Goal 3. Ensure that all the Division's actions are completed by established deadlines. Objective 3.1 Annually, resolve or refer to the Hearing Examiner Division 95% of all complaints from customers, other competing companies, and other government agencies within 30 days.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of taxicab complaints received 137 133 130 130 Number of passenger-for-hire complaints received 220 130 130 130 Quality: Percent of passenger-for-hire carrier complaints resolved or referred to the Hearing Examiner Division within 30 days 98% 41% 46% 46% Percent of taxicab complaints resolved or referred to the Hearing Examiner Division within 30 days 89% 14% 15% 15%

I — 116 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.05 COMMON CARRIER INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90301 For-Hire Driving Services Enforcement Fund ...... C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ...... Total ......

I — 117 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.06 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Pursuant to Sections 10-201 through 10-206 of the Transportation Article, Maryland entered into a compact with Virginia and the District of Columbia to create the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission to regulate and improve mass transportation within the Washington metropolitan area. The metropolitan district includes Montgomery and Prince Georges's counties in Maryland, the District of Columbia and the counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia. The expenses of the Transit Commission are borne by the three signatories in proportion to their population within the metropolitan district.

Performance measures are not used for this program.

I — 118 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.06 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions...... 265,324 Total Operating Expenses ...... 265,324 Total Expenditure ...... 265,324

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 265,324

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

I — 119 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.07 RATE RESEARCH AND ECONOMICS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Rate Research and Economics Division participates in all major rate cases filed with the Public Service Commission, as well as, most other case filings. The division conducts ratemaking statistical, economic, and financial studies and makes evidentiary presentations, regarding rate design, class and jurisdictional cost of service allocations, cost of capital, depreciation, economic analysis of market structure and competition, energy choice implementation and other issues in regulatory economics.

MISSION

The mission of the Rate Research and Economics Division is to provide quality and timely support to the Commission and its various divisions on issues related to economics, ratemaking, utility restructuring, and utility finance. We accomplish this by conducting issues analysis, by facilitating settlement and work group processes, by educating consumers, by producing filed comments and evidentiary testimony, and by serving as an expert witness before the Commission.

VISION

The Commission will receive quality support on economic, rate making, utility restructuring, and utility finance issues in Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide quality and timely economic research and restructuring support to the Commission. Objective 1.1 By fiscal year 2005,95% of bucksheets will be sent forward to the Commission without any substantive revisions required by the Office of the Executive Director.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Bucksheet comments sent to the Commission 66 54 65 65 Quality: Percent of bucksheet comments requiring no revisions

Goal 2. Educate consumers and energy professionals about energy regulation and energy service restructuring in Maryland. Objective 2.1 Annually respond to 85% of consumer information requests or complaints directed or referred to the Division within three working days. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Information requests and complaints 369 332 350 350 Quality: Percent of information requests and complaints answered within 3 days 91% 98% 93 % 93%

I — 120 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.07 RATE RESEARCH AND ECONOMICS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Travel ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: NOOA01 Department of Human Resources ......

I — 121 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.08 HEARING EXAMINER DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Hearing Examiner Division (HED) conducts formal administrative, as well as, Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) proceedings on all matters delegated by the Commission. These proceedings include rate cases for natural gas, electric, telephone, water and sewer companies; applications to construct electric generating stations and transmission lines; Commission investigations, complaints, and requests for assessments of civil penalties against common carriers of passengers. Unless appealed to the Commission or the Commission takes action on its own motion, proposed orders issued by hearing examiners become final orders of the Commission within 30 days after their filing.

MISSION

The Hearing Examiner Division's mission is to provide prompt, equitable and cost-effective quasi-judicial and quasi- legislative information-gathering and decision-making services on all matters delegated to it by the Public Service Commission. The Division accomplishes this through a broad array of procedures, including both hearings and Alternative Dispute Resolution processes, in order to maximize the services provided to the public and minimize the expenditures of time and money by all participants.

VISION

The Hearing Examiner Division's vision is to provide comprehensive judicial decisions supported by the facts and consistent with the Public Utility Companies Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Conduct open and fair proceedings in accordance with law and supported by record and recommend rates that are just and reasonable. Objective 1.1 Annually no more than 10% of Hearing Examiner decisions will be reversed or remanded by the Commission upon review. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of cases delegated to HED 588 718 653 653 Output: Number of decisions rendered 418 498 458 45 8 Quality: Percent of decisions remanded by the Commission For further proceedings 0% 1% 5% 5% Percentage of decisions reversed by the Commission 0% 5% 2% 2%

Goal 2. Render timely decisions for utility cases Objective 2.1 Annually 80% of contested cases (not including transportation matters) will be issued within 60 days of close of record. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of non-transportation cases delegated To HED 3 1 5 1 45 45 Quality: Percent of decisions (not including transportation Decisions) issued within 60 days of close of record 81.8% 81.6% 81% 80%

I — 122 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.08 HEARING EXAMINER DIVISION Continued)

Goal 3. Render expeditious decisions in transportation cases Objective 3.1 Annually 90% of taxicab matters will be issued within 30 days of close of the record.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of transportation decisions 344 323 323 323 Number of taxicab decisions 222 136 136 136 Quality: Percent of transportation decisions issued within 30 days of the close of record 77% 47% 47% 47 % Percentage of taxicab decisions filed within 30 days of the closed record 60% 70% 90% 90%

*This measure does not include cases for which extensions have been requested and granted (e.g., waiver by parties).

I — 123 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.08 HEARING EXAMINER DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

I — 124 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.09 STAFF ATTORNEY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Staff Attorney program represents staff witnesses in all proceedings before the Public Service Commission; coordinates the presentation and preparation of testimony; advises staff on legal issues; prepares briefs, memoranda of law, and pleadings.

MISSION

The mission of the Staff Attorney Division is to provide quality and timely legal representation to the technical staff of the Commission. The Division accomplishes this by directing and coordinating preparation of the staff position in all matters pending before the Commission.

VISION

The Staff Attorney Division's vision is that its legal services be complete, comprehensive and supported by current law.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide quality legal representation to the Commission's technical staff. Objective 1.1 Annually 100% of the Division's submissions are adopted by the Executive Director without any need of substantive legal corrections.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of Reviews and Opinions required by Division -Transportation -Integrated Resource Planning -Rate Research and Economics -Staff Counsel -Engineering -Accounting -Telecommunications Number of Cases Outputs: Number of completed reviews Number of items returned by Executive Director for substantive legal correction Quality: Percent of items returned by Executive Director for substantive legal corrections

I — 125 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.09 STAFF ATTORNEY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: NOOA01 Department of Human Resources ......

I — 126 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.10 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING DIVISION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Integrated Resource Planning Division (IRPD) provides analysis of the long-range plans for reliable and economic service of electric companies operating in Maryland. The division reviews applications for the construction of new power plants, the licensing of electric and natural gas suppliers, and other purchased power contracts, Clean Air compliance plans, emissions disclosure related activities, and affiliate relations and corporate restructuring. The Division also works with electric companies to develop cost effective conservation programs; provides testimony in formal proceedings before the Commission; and assists the Staff Attorney Division in performing discovery, conducting cross-examination of witnesses, and preparing legal briefs. A recent responsibility for this Division has been to track electricity issues in national and regional forums such as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and PJM Interconnection (the regional electric grid operator), and provide summary reports to the Commission.

MISSION

The mission of Integrated Resource Planning Division is to provide comprehensive and timely recommendations to the Commission and its various divisions regarding the electric industry, energy markets, and electric service reliability in Maryland. We accomplish this by reviewing electric and natural gas license applications, by monitoring electric and gas suppliers, and by annually developing a Ten-Year Plan and a biennial Electric Supply Adequacy Report.

VISION

The vision of the Integrated Resource Planning Division is to produce comprehensive, accurate, complete and timely reports and recommendations regarding utility regulation in Maryland.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide the Commission with comprehensive and timely statutory reports: the annual Ten-Year Plan of Electric Companies in Maryland that is forwarded to Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the biennial Electric Supply Adequacy Report that is forwarded to the General Assembly. Objective 1.1 Annually, there will be no more than two substantive* revisions required in the draft version of the Ten-Year Plan and the final version will be prepared for timely submission to DNR.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Ten-Year Plan is submitted by Dec. 31 to DNR No Yes Yes Yes Quality: Number of substantive* revisions needed in the draft version of the Ten-Year Plan 2 2 1 1

Objective 1.2 Every two years, there will be no more than two substantive revisions required in the draft version of the Electric Supply Adequacy Report and the final version will be prepared for timely submission to the General Assembly. An update shall be provided in each intervening year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Adequacy Report is submitted on or before January 1 to the General Assembly NIA Yes Yes Yes Quality: Number of substantive* changes needed in the draft version of the Adequacy Report NIA 2 2 1

* Substantive means major changes from the Commission to the drafts provided by IRPD.

I — 127 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

C90G00.10 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING DIVISION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C90303 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: NOOA01 Department of Human Resources

I — 128 OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE'S COUNSEL

C91H00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

As mandated by Section 2-201 through 2-206 of the Public Utility Companies Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Office of People's Counsel (OPC) evaluates all matters pending before the Commission to determine if the interests of residential users of: gas, electricity, telephones, or water and sewage, or of noncommercial users of other regulated services are affected. It appears before the Public Service Commission (PSC), various Federal agencies, and the courts on behalf of those users in all matters or proceedings over which the PSC has original jurisdiction and in other matters in which the Office of People's Counsel deems their interest to be involved. The Office of People's Counsel makes such investigations and requests the PSC to initiate such proceedings as that Office deems necessary to protect the interests of residential and noncommercial users. OPC also monitors the development of competitive markets in gas, electric, and telephone services, and represents consumers who are solicited by or purchase services from unregulated energy and telecommunications companies. MISSION

To represent, as effectively as possible, the interests of residential and non-commercial utility customers in proceedings which might affect their interests before the Public Service Commission, Federal agencies and the courts. In addition, to inform the public of the transition to competition in utility services, to protect their interests in these competitive markets, and to influence legislators and regulators to adopt legislation and regulations which protect the reasonable interests of residential consumers in the competitive market.

VISION

A State in which residential and non-commercial utility customers are knowledgeable about choosing suppliers, receive the highest quality service at the lowest possible cost, are informed about the competitive market for energy and telecommunications services and protected from market abuses, and receive basic and adequate utility services regardless of their ability to pay.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To obtain, preserve and protect fair and equitable prices and high quality and reliable products and services for residential consumers of energy, telecommunications and other regulated utility services. Objective 1.1 Annually to ensure that all residential customers, regardless of location, have reasonable rates and charges for local and long distance telephone service, natural gas and electric service (energy) and other regulated services.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Cases before Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in which OPC has participated 10 Cases before Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in which OPC has participated 15 Telcommunications cases before PSC in which OPC has participated 16 Energy, water and other cases before PSC in which OPC has participated 35 Cases in courts in which OPC has participated 7 Outcomes: Favorable decisions by FCC 1 Favorable decisions by FERC 5 Favorable decisions by PSC 24* Favorable decisions by Courts 4 Favorable decisions by FederaUState policymakers 10

Note: *An OPC "success rate" cannot be calculated by adding PSC telecommunications and energy cases and then dividing that number into the "favorable decisions" number because 1) there are always a substantial number of cases pending before the PSC in which OPC has participated and are resolved in another fiscal year and 2) each case may have multiple parts and multiple decisions.

I — 129 OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE'S COUNSEL

C91H00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. To keep the public informed about changes and new developments in the utility industry. Objective 2.1 Annually to prepare residential electric utility customers to be able to make intelligent choices of energy and telecommunications companies. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Consumer complaints investigated 120 430 600 600 Outcome: Number of complaints resolved successfully 110 299 400 400

Objective 2.2 Annually to produce more and to more widely distribute easily understandable, brief written material regarding making choices of providers, avoiding certain sales and marketing tactics, and understanding consumer rights.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Total number of brochures distributed 12,700 15,440 18,000 18,000 Total number of residential customers reached 19,700 20,000 20,000 20,000

Goal 3. Annually to continue to protect consumers from potential harm caused by the transition from fully regulated services to the competitive market. Objective 3.1 To initiate investigations annually of questionable marketing practices in the energy and telecommunications markets. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of cases initiated 55 133 150 200 Outcomes: Number of cases resolved with favorable results 46 65 70 59

I — 130 OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE'S COUNSEL

C91H00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C91301 Public Utility Regulation Fund ......

I — 131 SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND

C94100.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Subsequent Injury Fund reviews and investigates workers' compensation claims that involve pre-existing health conditions that substantially increase the disability of injured workers. The liability of employers' insurers is limited to compensation for the damages caused by the current injury, and the Subsequent Injury Fund incurs all additional liability from the combined effects of all injuries and/or conditions. The Fund derives its income from assessments of insurance companies on awards of compensation for permanent disability.

MISSION

To provide workers' compensation benefits to disabled workers who have combined effects from a pre-existing disability and an accidental work-related injury.

VISION

A state which has removed the disincentive to hire disabled workers due to employers' concerns of potentially larger workers' compensation claims.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To efficiently defend the Fund's resources against inappropriate use, and to provide monetary benefits to qualified disabled workers injured on the job in accordance with awards passed by the Workers' Compensation Commission. Objective 1.1 All new cases will be promptly reviewed and prepared for legal defense. Objective 1.2 All ordered claimant payments will begin on time, and periodic payments will follow a standard bi-weekly schedule.

Goal 2. To maintain the adequacy and integrity of the Fund balance. Objective 2.1 To ensure that adequate funds are available from which to pay claims, the ratio of total Fund expenditures to total collections will remain less than 1:1. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of benefit payments made 22,067 21,934 22,000 22,100 Number of cases resolved 1,214 928 1,000 1,100

Dollar amount of assessments collected Interest on fund balance Total collections

Benefits paid Agency operating expenditures Total expenditures

Efficiency: Operating budget cost per resolved claim $1,399 $1,872 $1,787 $1,606 Quality: Ratio of total Fund expenditures to total collections 0.821:l 0.759: 1 0.765:1 0.755: 1 Average estimated processing time for authorization of award payments from the Subsequent Injury Fund 3 days 3 days 3 days 3 days

I — 132 SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND

C94100.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C94301 Subsequent Injury Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: C96JOO Uninsured Employers' Fund ......

I — 133 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND

C96J00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Uninsured Employers Fund reviews and investigates claims filed by employees, or in the case of death, by their dependents. If the employer does not pay what is due the claimant, the Fund will directly pay the compensation benefits and medical expenses, and attempt to recover all benefits paid plus certain assessments from the uninsured employer.

The cost of administering the Uninsured Employers Fund and providing benefits to the claimants is derived from assessments placed upon awards of compensation per Labor & Employment Article, Sections 9-1005 through 9-1007.

MISSION

To promptly pay awards ordered by the Workers' Compensation Commission in favor of injured workers against non-insured employers who default on payments, and to maintain an adequate fund balance from which to pay claims through the collection of applicable fines, assessments, and benefit recoveries.

VISION

A state that ensures that all injured workers awarded benefits by the Workers' Compensation Commission are promptly and correctly paid.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To efficiently investigate and defend all designated non-insured cases. Objective 1.1 All new cases will be promptly reviewed, investigated, and prepared for legal defense.

Goal 2. To monitor awards and follow established procedures to ensure prompt payment to claimants and health care providers. Objective 2.1 By the use of active case monitoring, the agency will promptly initiate the appropriate benefit payments for each case following the determination of the Fund's legal obligation. A processing time of any less than 3 working days is not practical in that important considerations may be otherwise overlooked.

Goal 3. To track and collect fines, assessments, and awards benefits paid by the Fund, and to maintain the adequacy and integrity of the Fund balance. Objective 3.1 The agency seeks to maximize its collections from non-insured employers utilizing all legal processes including as a last resort, Central Collections. Objective 3.2 To ensure that adequate funds are available from which to pay claims, the ratio of total Fund expenditures to total collections will remain less than 1:l. (Maryland law permits increasing the 1% permanency award assessment rate if required. Funds from this source are reliable as the payers are primarily insurance companies.)

I — 134 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND

C96J00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: New cases 1,196 1,111 1,200 1,200 Outputs: Investigations 90 1 965 1,000 1,000 Number of cases resolved 875 954 900 950 Number of benefit payments made 2,02 1 2,298 2,300 2,350

Value of compensation and medical payments made $1,850,653 $1,784,455 $1,850,000 $1,900,000 Agency operating expenditures 908,888 912.748 944,823 968.702 Total expenditures $2,759,541 $2,697,203 $2,794,823 $2,868,702

Assessments on permanency awards (1%) Non-certification penalty Fines and penalty assessments for being uninsured Recovery of benefits Interest on fund balance CCU Collections Total collections Efficiency: Operating budget cost per number of resolved cases Quality: Ratio of total Fund expenditures to total collections for the year. Average estimated processing time for UEF authorization of award payments 3 days 3 days 3 days 3 days

I — 135 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND

C96J00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C96301 Uninsured Employer's Fund ......

I — 136 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

SUMMARY OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 132.50 128.50 128.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 8.94 12.75 17.75 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 8.138. 017 8.264. 576 8.224. 063 Technical and Special Fees ...... 452.491 685.664 728. 764 Operating Expenses ...... 3.884.321 3.851. 726 3.838.480 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 12.414. 527 12.773. 269 12.761. 153 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 60. 302 28. 697 30. 154 Total Expenditure ...... 12.474. 829 12.801.966 12.791.307

I — 137 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

C98F00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Workers' Compensation Commission receives, processes, adjudicates claims for injured employees, and refers those claimants who need rehabilitation to the appropriate vocational rehabilitation service providers. Pursuant to a shared agreement, the Commission provides data processing support to the Subsequent Injury Fund and the Uninsured Employers' Fund. All expenditures of the Workers' Compensation Commission and the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation's Occupational Health and Safety Program are recovered from insurance companies and self-insurers through an annual maintenance assessment.

MISSION

The Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission seeks to secure the equitable and timely administration of the provisions of the Maryland Workers' Compensation Law on behalf of its customers, the injured workers and their employers, by providing an efficient and effective forum for the resolution of individual claims. VISION

The Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission envisions a state wherein injured workers and employers are empowered to create an equitable partnership to facilitate prompt and fair resolution of workers' compensation matters.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To improve the effectiveness and timely delivery of services provided by the Workers' Compensation Commission to its customers. Objective 1.1 In FY2005 to set 90% or more of all non-permanency hearings within 60 days of the date when issues are filed.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of non-permanency hearings set 15,055 15,448 15,767 16,557 Quality: Percent of non-permanency hearings set within 60 days 92% 89% 90% 90%

Objective 1.2 In FY2005 to maintain a conformance rate of at least 95% for the issuance of Commission Orders within 30 days after the conclusion of a hearing. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of Commission Orders issued 13,829 14,004 14,400 15,100 Quality: Percent issued within 30 days 98% 92% 95 % 95 %

Objective 1.3 In FY2005 to ensure 95% or more of all disputed claims performed by insurance companies and self-insured employers are processed within 15 days of issues being filed. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of newly contested issues 19,448 18,432 20,950 20,950 Quality: Percent of compliance 95% 95 % 95% 95 %

I — 138 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

C98F00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

OTHER PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Employee claims filed 27,407 27,205 28,565 29,995 Employer's First Report of Injury filed 134,194 130,757 130,000 130,000 Number of cases referred for support services 4,321 4,643 4,700 4,850 For vocational rehabilitation services 1,363 1,456 1,500 1,550 For medical case management 2,958 3,187 3,200 3,300 Outputs: Hearings set during period 39,803 40,816 4 1,500 43,670 Outcomes: Compromise agreements approved 9,157 8,423 9,000 9,200 Cases appealed to courts 2,229 2,201 2,300 2,400 Injured workers returning to employment following rehabilitation 1,976 2,114 2,115 2,200

I — 139 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

C98F00.01 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

TOTAL PAYROLLS AND ASSESSMENT RATES

Assessment Estimated Per One Estimated Cost of Thousand Fiscal Total Total Safety Dollars Year Payroll Expenses Inspection Of Payroll

$16.777. 366 $6.683. 406 0.266 $16.215. 597 $7.184. 201 0.249 $19.615. 072 $7.528. 517 0.304 $19.012. 054 $8.002. 65 1 0.257 $19.829. 559 $7.660. 628 0.248

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C98330 Self-Insurer Assessment ...... C98331 Sale of Publications and Photocopies ...... C98332 Registration Fees-Vocational Rehabilitation Practi- tioners ...... C98333 Maintenance Assessment ...... C98334 Interest Earnings ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: C94IOO Subsequent Injury Fund ...... C96JOO Uninsured Employers' Fund ...... Total ......

I — 140 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

C98F00.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program identifies defined, current major information technology projects in the Workers' Compensation Commission.

I — 141 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

C9SF00.02 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: C98333 Maintenance Assessment ......

I — 142 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

cOOaOO Judiciary cOOaOOOl Court of Appeals chf judge court of appeals judge court of appeals judiciary employee exempt law clerks judiciary employee non-exempt judiciary employee hourly

TOTAL cOOaOOOl* cOOaOOO2 Court of Special Appeals chf judge ct of spec appeals judge court of special appeals judiciary employee exempt law clerks judiciary employee non-exempt

TOTAL c00a0002* c00a0003 Circuit Court Judges judge circuit ct judiciary employee exempt law clerk judiciary employee hourly

TOTAL c00a0003* c00a0004 District Court chf judge dist court of md 123,800 judge district court 11,930,500 maif attorney iv 0 judiciary employee exempt 12,577,327 Transfer Judiciary judiciary employee non-exempt 29,380,469 Transfer Judiciary ------and New13 TOTAL c00a0004* 54,012,096 c00a0006 Administrative Office of the Courts administrator v 1 .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO judiciary employee exempt 40.00 judiciary employee non-exempt 49.50 judiciary employee hourly .OO

TOTAL c00a0006* 91.50

I — 143 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c00a0007 Court Related Agencies judiciary employee exempt 707,994 New judiciary employee non-exempt 291,020 state reporter judiciary 21,733 judiciary employee hourly 0 , ------TOTAL cOOa0007* 1,020,747 c00a0008 State Law Library judiciary employee exempt judiciary employee non-exempt judiciary employee hourly

TOTAL cOOaOOO8* c00a0009 Judicial Information Systems judiciary employee exempt 68.00 4,371,377 67.00 4,472,423 judiciary employee non-exempt 43.50 1,686,226 46.50 1,818,873 New judiciary employee hourly .OO 0 .oo 0 ------"---"------TOTAL cOOa0009* 111.50 6,057,603 113.50 6,291,296 cOOaOOlO Clerks of the Circuit Court judiciary clerk of court a 5.00 425,000 judiciary clerk of court b 3.00 249,750 judiciary clerk of court c 9.00 738,900 judiciary clerk of court d 7.00 553,700 judiciary employee exempt 76.00 4,031,173 judiciary clerk iii .OO 27,936 judiciary employee non-exempt 1,116.50 36,521,701 New obs-cir ct emp intermittent .00 0 judiciary employee hourly .OO 0 . ------TOTAL c00a0010* 1,216.50 42,548,160 cOOaOO11 Family Law Division judiciary employee exempt judiciary employee non-exempt judiciary employee hourly

TOTAL cOOa0011* c00a0012 Major Information Technology Development Projects judiciary employee exempt 4.00 294,840 3.00 294,840 3.00 301,568 ------TOTAL c00a0012* 4.00 294,840 3.00 294,840 3.00 301,568 TOTAL cOOaOO ** 3,223.75 133,186,838 3,223.75 139,952,074 3,243.75 142,885,989

I — 144 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c80b00 Office of the Public Defender c80b0001 General Administration pub defender dep public defender exec vi asst pub defender v prgm mgr senior i administrator iv asst pub defender hq supv asst pub defender hq lead asst pub defender supervisor fiscal services administrator i asst pub defender iii computer network spec mgr computer network spec supr fiscal services administrator i personnel administrator ii administrator ii computer network spec ii administrator i computer network spec i accountant ii admin officer iii personnel officer ii admin officer ii personnel officer i computer info services spec i agency buyer i fiscal accounts technician supv paralegal ii personnel associate iii fiscal accounts technician ii personnel associate ii fiscal accounts technician i personnel associate i management associate admin aide office secy iii office services clerk fiscal accounts clerk i

TOTAL c80b0001* c80b0002 District Operations exec vi .OO prgm mgr senior iii 1.OO

I — 145 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. c80b0002 District Operations prgm mgr senior ii 82,558 prgm mgr senior i 253,788 dist pub def metropolitan 555,501 dist pub defender 438,649 asst dist pub defender 873,992 asst pub defender hq supv 552,050 asst pub defender hq lead 0 asst pub defender supervisor 3,684,506 New asst pub defender iii 9,798,432 New computer network spec mgr 0 asst pub defender ii 6,677,470 New computer network spec supr 0 social work manager, criminal j 115,692 asst pub defender i 4,598,629 BPW1;New computer network spec ii 0 social worker adv, criminal jus 50,941 computer network spec i 38,691 social worker ii, criminal just 0 social worker ii, criminal just 548,814 New admin officer iii 0 social worker i, criminal justi 213,710 admin officer ii 88,637 social worker prov, criminal ju 107,728 BPW3 admin officer i 700,475 computer info services spec i 0 admin spec iii 105,441 pub defender intake supervisor 630,137 admin spec ii 71,831 pub defender invest ii 415,552 New pub defender invest iii 967,754 pub defender invest i 28,040 paralegal ii 474,085 obs-legal assistant ii 55,964 paralegal i 317,242 pub defender intake spec ii 1,324,440 pub defender intake spec i 113,716 BPW2 admin aide 704,925 office supervisor 34,406 legal secretary 136,219 office secy iii 1,542,932 office secy ii 527,217 New office services clerk lead 32,298 office secy i 124,537 office services clerk 218,263 data entry operator ii 0

I — 146 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------c80b0002 District Operations obs-office clerk ii 21,675 office clerk ii 1,032,362 New obs-office clerk i 0 office clerk i 50,428 ------TOTAL c80b0002* 685.50 38,410,881 c80b0003 Appellate and Inmate Services chf appellate service pub def 1 .OO chf inmate services pub def 1 .OO asst pub defender hq supv 2.00 asst pub defender supervisor 4.00 asst pub defender iii 14.30 asst pub defender ii 9.00 asst pub defender i 5.00 admin officer i 2.00 pub defender invest iii 1.00 paralegal ii 1.00 paralegal i 1 .OO admin aide 1 .OO legal secretary 2.00 office secy iii 3.00 office secy ii 2.00 office secy i .OO office services clerk 1 .OO office clerk i 2.00 ------TOTAL c80b0003* 52.30 2,632,527 c80b0004 Involuntary Institutionalization Services chf involntary inst ser pub def 1.00 asst pub defender hq supv 1.00 asst pub defender iii 1 .OO asst pub defender ii 1.50 asst pub defender i 1 .OO admin officer i 1 .OO pub defender intake supervisor 1 .OO pub defender invest ii .OO pub defender invest iii 3.00 pub defender invest i 1 .OO paralegal ii 2.00 admin aide -00 office secy iii 4.00 ------TOTAL c80b0004* 17.50 735,935 17.50

I — 147 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c80b0005 Capital Defense Division chf capital defense division 1.OO asst dist pub defender 1.OO asst pub defender iii 1 .OO admin officer i 1.00 ------TOTAL c80b0005* 4.00 TOTAL c80b00 ** 812.30 c81c00 Office of the Attorney General ~81~0001Legal Counsel and Advice attorney general dep attorney general senior exec assoc attorney gene div dir ofc atty general asst attorney general viii prgm mgr senior ii asst attorney general vii asst attorney general vi data base spec manager dp asst director i administrator iv administrator iii dp technical support spec ii dp programmer analyst ii administrator i admin officer iii computer info services spec ii admin officer ii assoc librarian ii admin officer i computer info services spec i fiscal accounts technician i exec assoc iii exec assoc ii exec assoc i management assoc office manager admin aide legal secretary fiscal accounts clerk ii office services clerk lead office services clerk office clerk ii

I — 148 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

~81~0004Securities Division div dir ofc atty general 96,179 asst attorney general viii 91,007 asst attorney general vii 167,019 asst attorney general vi 288,926 New administrator iii 58,783 asst attorney general v 63,823 staff atty ii attorney genral 100,651 computer network spec ii 55,027 administrator i 152,097 admin officer ii 44,744 fraud investigator law departme 135,471 New admin spec iii 154,419 admin aide 36,084 legal secretary 133,669 ------TOTAL c81c0004* 1,577,899

~81~0005Consumer Protection Division div dir ofc atty general I.OO asst attorney general viii 1.OO asst attorney general vii 1.OO asst attorney general vi 9.00 prgm mgr iii 1.OO administrator v 1.OO prgm mgr i 1.OO administrator iii 1.OO asst attorney general v 3.00 administrator ii 2.00 computer network spec ii 1.OO administrator i 1.OO admin officer iii 13.00 admin officer i 1.OO fraud investigator law departme 4.00 consmr affairs supervisor 2.00 admin spec ii 1.00 visual communications supv .50 computer operator ii 1 .OO management assoc 2.00 admin aide 2.00 legal secretary 10.00 office secy ii 1.OO ------TOTAL c81c0005* 60.50

I — 149 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------

~81~0006Antitrust Division div dir ofc atty general 110,276 asst attorney general viii 91,007 asst attorney general vi i 84,323 asst attorney general vi 242,325 admin officer i 40,333 fraud investigator law departme I.OO 38,145 38,880 management assoc 1.OO 40,718 41,504 ------.------TOTAL c81c0006* 9.00 638,498 648,648

~81~0009Medicaid Fraud Control Unit div din ofc atty general 1 .OO 108,140 asst attorney general viii 1.OO 85,009 asst attorney general vi i 1.OO 85,143 asst attorney general vi 2.00 192,255 New administrator iii 2.00 119,290 administrator ii 2.00 111,664 administrator i 1.OO 47,247 computer info services spec ii 1.OO 47,779 admin officer ii 3.00 132,185 admin officer i 1 .OO 41,504 fraud investigator law departme 4.00 189,043 New fraud investigator law departme 1.OO 37,784 obs-legal assistant ii .OO 0 admin aide 1.00 35,740 ------TOTAL c81c0009* 21 .OO 1,001,005 21.00 1,127,681 23.00 1,232,783 c81c0014 Civil Litigation Division senior exec assoc attorney gene 105,935 principal counsel 92,653 asst attorney general viii 179,395 prgm mgr senior ii 72,105 asst attorney general vii 84,323 asst attorney general vi 409,574 administrator iv 0 Transfer OCYF administrator iii 52,862 asst attorney general v 67,645 staff atty ii attorney genral 54,412 administrator ii 0 Transfer OCYF staff atty i attorney general 0 paralegal ii 37,784 management assoc 86,750 - - -. ------TOTAL c81c0014* 1,243,438

I — 150 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c81c0015 Criminal Appeals Division div dir ofc atty general principal counsel asst attorney general viii asst attorney general vii asst attorney general vi asst attorney general v staff atty i attorney general paralegal ii management assoc legal secretary - - - TOTAL c81c0015* 20.00 c81c0016 Criminal Investigation Division div dir ofc atty general 1.OO asst attorney general viii 2.00 asst attorney general vii 1.OO asst attorney general vi 2.00 administrator iii 1.OO asst attorney general v 2.00 administrator ii 3.00 administrator i 2.00 admin officer iii 1.00 admin officer i -00 fraud investigator law departure 1.OO paralegal ii .OO ------TOTAL c81c0016* 16.00 c81c0017 Educational Affairs Division div dir ofc atty general 1.00 asst attorney general vi 3.00 admin officer i 1.OO management assoc 1.OO admin aide 1.OO legal secretary 2.00

c81c0018 Correctional Litigation Division asst attorney general vii 1.OO 83,502 1.OO 83,502 1 .OO 84,323 asst attorney general vi 2.00 86,576 2.00 110,438 2.00 114,746 paralegal ii 1.OO 37,999 1.OO 38,145 1.OO 38,880 asst librarian 1.00 33,493 1.OO 33,493 1.OO 34,135 management assoc 1.OO 40,718 1.OO 40,718 1.OO 41,504 ------TOTAL c81c0018* 6.00 282,288 6.00 306,296 6.00 313,588

I — 151 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

~81~0020Contract Litigation Division div dir ofc atty general asst attorney general viii asst attorney general vi asst attorney general v admin officer i paralegal ii paralegal ii management assoc legal secretary ----- TOTAL c81c0020* TOTAL ~81~00**

c82d00 Office of the State Prosecutor c82d0001 General Administration state prosecutor 1.OO senior asst state prosecutor 2.00 administrator iii 1.OO administrator ii 2.00 personnel officer iii 1.OO paralegal ii 1.00 admin aide 1 .OO ------TOTAL c82d0001* TOTAL c82d00 **

c85e00 Maryland Tax Court c85e0001 Administration and Appeals administrator iv chf judge tax court judge tax court clerk tax court management assoc office secy i

TOTAL c85e0001* TOTAL c85e00 ** c90g00 Public Service Commission c90g0001 General Administration and Hearings chair pub service commission 1.OO commissioner pub service 4.00 gen counsel public service 1.OO prgm mgr senior iii 1.OO exec secy public service corn 1.OO

I — 152 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c90g00 Public Service Connnission c90g0001 General Administration and Hearings prgm mgr senior ii .OO prgm mgr iv 3.00 admin prog mgr iii 1 .OO dp director i 1 .OO dp asst director i 1 .OO prgm mgr ii .OO administrator iv 1 .OO administrator iv 1 .OO prgm mgr i .OO administrator iii 1 .OO asst gen counsel iii pub ser co 4.00 asst gen counsel i pub ser corn .OO fiscal services administrator i 1 .OO computer network spec ii 2.00 personnel administrator i 1.00 accountant, advanced 1 .OO computer network spec i 1.00 dp programmer analyst i 2.00 psc regulatory economist .OO admin officer iii 1 .OO admin officer ii 4.00 personnel officer i 1 .OO admin officer i 1 .OO admin spec iii 3.00 admin spec ii 2.00 admin spec i 1 .OO fiscal accounts technician i 1 .OO fiscal accounts clerk manager -00 management associate 6.00 admin aide 2.00 office secy iii 2.00 office secy i .OO ------TOTAL c90g0001* 53.00 c90g0002 Telecommunications Division prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii psc regulatory economist iii pub serv engr iii regulatory economist iii psc regulatory economist regulatory economist i office secy iii ----. TOTAL c90g0002*

I — 153 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

...... ------em------ma------

c90g0003 Engineering Investigations chf engineer pub service comm asst chf engineer pub ser comm pub serv engr iii pub serv engr ii pub serv engr i office secy iii

TOTAL c90g0003*

c90g0004 Accounting Investigations prgm mgr TV 1 .OO 84,456 1 .OO administrator iv 1 .OO 64,604 1 .OO pub utility auditor senior 2.00 121,361 3.00 pub utility auditor 2.00 67,966 2.00 office secy iii 1 .OO 33,493 1 .OO

TOTAL c90g0004* 7.00 c90g0005 Common Carrier Investigations prgm mgr iii 1 .OO administrator iii 2.00 admin officer ii .OO admin officer i 1 .OO admin spec iii 1 .OO admin spec ii 4.00 admin spec i 7.00 common carrier insp iii 6.00 office secy iii 1 .OO office secy ii 1 .OO

TOTAL c90g0005* c90g0007 Rate Research and Economics prgm mgr iv 1 .OO prgm mgr 1 1 .OO psc regulatory economist iii .OO regulatory economist iii 3.00 psc regulatory economist ii 1 .OO regulatory ecomonist ii 1 .OO psc regulatory economist .OO office secy iii 1 .OO

------a------TOTAL c90g0007* 8.00 464,371 9.00 504,554 9.00 512,574

I — 154 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

c90g0008 Hearing Examiner Division prgm mgr senior iii prgm mgr senior ii prgm mgr iv hearing exam sr pub ser corn hearing exam ii pub ser corn taxicab license hearing officer management associate office secy iii

TOTAL c90g0008* c90g0009 Staff Attorney prgm mgr senior ii chf staff atty pub ser corn prgm mgr i i staff atty iii pub ser corn staff atty ii pub ser corn staff atty i pub ser corn office secy iii

c90g0010 Integrated Resource Planning Division prgm mgr iii 1 .OO prgm mgr i 1 .OO regulatory economist iii 1 .OO regulatory ecomonist ii 1 .OO psc regulatory economist 2.00 office secy iii 1 .OO ------TOTAL c90g0010* TOTAL c90g00 ** c91h00 Office of the People's Counsel c91h0001 General Administration peoples counsel 1 .OO dep peoples counsel 1.00 asst peoples counsel iv 4.00 asst peoples counsel iii 1.00 asst peoples counsel ii 2.00 consumer liaison peoples couns 1.00 administrator ii 1 .OO administrator i 1 .OO admin officer ii 1 .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO

I — 155 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------

c91h00 Office of the People's Counsel c91h0001 General Administration management associate 1 .OO admin aide 2.00 office secy i 1.00 ------TOTAL c91h0001* TOTAL c91h00 **

c94i00 Subsequent Injury Fund c94i0001 General Administration exec dir subsequest injury fund prgm mgr senior i asst attorney general vi mbr subsequent injury fnd bd fiscal services administrator i administrator ii admin spec iii admin spec i fiscal accounts technician supv fiscal accounts technician i admin aide legal secretary office secy i ---- TOTAL c94i0001* TOTAL c94i00 **

c96j00 Uninsured Employers1 Fund c96j0001 General Administration exec dir uninsured employer fun prgm mgr senior 1 asst attorney general vi mbr uninsured employers fund admin officer ii claims investigator iv fiscal accounts technician ii legal secretary office secy iii fiscal accounts clerk ii office secy i ------TOTAL c96j0001* 13.00 617,169 13.00 642,652 TOTAL c96j00 ** 13.00 617,169 13.00 642,652

I — 156 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

c98f00 Workers' Compensation Commission c98f0001 General Administration chair workers comp commission commissioner workers comp principal counsel dir admin workers comp dp director i i i asst attorney general vi dp asst director i administrator iii data base spec supervisor dp programmer analyst supervise) dp technical support spec super dp programmer analyst lead/adva fiscal services administrator i administrator ii computer network spec ii dp programmer analyst ii hearing reporter supervisor obs-fiscal administrator i webmaster ii administrator i computer network spec i dp programmer analyst i hearing reporter lead personnel officer iii accountant ii agency budget specialist ii financial compliance auditor ii hearing reporter ii asst to the comm ii workers corn personnel officer i admin officer i agency budget specialist i workers comp rehab spec admin spec iii admin spec ii asst to the corn i workers corn computer operator lead computer operator ii dp programmer trainee services supervisor i obs-data proc oper tech ii, gen agency procurement specialist I asst to the corn lead workers c obs-fiscal accounts supervisor

I — 157 PERSONNEL DETAIL Judiciary

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol , -.

c98f0001 General Administration admin aide claims reviewer supervisor office supervisor asst to the corn trnee workers data entry operator supr office secy iii claims reviewer ii fiscal accounts clerk ii obs-office supervisor ii office secy ii services specialist office services clerk office clerk i

TOTAL c98f0001* TOTAL c98f00 **

I — 158 LEGISLATIVE

General Assembly of Maryland Department of Legislative Services

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND

OBJECTIVES

The General Assembly of Maryland is created by Article I11 of the State Constitution and is composed of two branches: the Senate and the House of Delegates . Its purpose is to: formulate and enact the public policy of the State by the passage of legislation; enact annual appropriation bills for the operating and capital budget; provide revenue for the State by passage of legislation; oversee the operation of the State and the needs for legislation by conducting inquiries and investigations; and meet annually on the second Wednesday of January for 90 days and in special session as required .

SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 730.00 730.00 730.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 42,683,614 45,435,073 46,389,942 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1,251,455 1,181,430 1,161,429 Operating Expenses ...... 13.426,302 13,243,390 13,187,810 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 59,045,939 59,859,893 Less: General Fund ReversiodReduction ...... 1,684,568 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 57,361,371 59.859.893 60,739, 18 1

SUMMARY OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 366.00 366.00 366.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferiReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 17 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND

B75A01.01 SENATE

Program Description: The Senate is composed of 47 Senators. The Senate initiates legislation. holds legislative hearings. confirms designated appointments of the Governor and tries impeachment cases . Funds are provided for the compensation of the President of the Senate. Senators and for staff. for reimbursement of expenses relating to the session and meetings in the interim and for each Senator's district office accounts .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

B75A01.02 HOUSE OF DELEGATES

Program Description: The House of Delegates is composed of 141 Delegates . The House initiates legislation. holds legislative hearings. conducts inquiries into complaints. grievances and offenses as the Grand Inquest of the State and has sole power of impeachment . Funds are provided for the compensation of the Speaker of the House of Delegates. Delegates and for staff. for reimbursement of expenses relating to the session and meetings in the interim and for each Delegates' district office accounts .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 18 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND

B75A01.03 GENERAL LEGISLATIVE EXPENSES

Program Description: Certain services for the General Assembly are administered on a joint basis including supplies. equipment and furniture. maintenance and out-of-state travel .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 19 DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

OBJECTIVES

The Department of Legislative Services is the Maryland General Assembly's non-partisan staff. The operations of the department are subject to the policy and directions of the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Delegates, and the Legislative Policy Committee. The department has four offices: Office of the Executive Director, Office of Legislative Audits, Office of Legislative Informa- tion Systems, and Office of Policy Analysis. Primary duties of the Department are to provide: (1) budget and fiscal analysis; (2) legislative drafting, statutory revision, and legal research; (3) fiscal-compliance/opinion audits of state agencies; (4) legislative research and library and public information services; (5) legislative information systems maintenance, development, and support; and (6) administrative support services for the operation of the legislature.

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 364.00 364.00 364.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 20 DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

B75A01.04 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Program Description: The primary duties of the Office of the Executive Director are to: 1 Oversee the activities of the Department to ensure that its functions are performed correctly, efficiently, and timely, in a non-partisan manner. 2 Manage all financial activities of the Department and the General Assembly, consistent with the State budget and the policies of the President and the Speaker, the Management Subcommittee, and the Legislative Policy Committee. 3. Manage all personnel functions for the Department, and those personnel functions of the General Assembly as assigned by the Presi- dent and the Speaker. 4. Manage all document preparation, printing, and publication for the Department. 5. Supervise all other support services, where appropriate, to the General Assembly relating to telecommunications, distribution, copying, supplies, housekeeping, and maintenance.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 21 DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

B75A01.05 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS

Program Description: The primary duties of the Office of Legislative Audits are to: 1. Conduct fiscal/compliance audits of all agencies of the Executive and Judicial Branches of state government at least once every three years . 2 . Conduct financial statement audits. performance audits. and special reviews of selected agencies as requested or as required by laws 3 . Review the audit reports of local government units in the State

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 106.00 106.00 106.00 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 22 DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

B75A01.06 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Program Description: The primary duties of the Office of Legislative Information Systems are to: 1. Develop. coordinate. support. and maintain the computers services. data processing. and information systems for the Department and the General Assembly . 2 . Provide training related to information systems for employees of the Department and the General Assembly . 3 . Plan for the future information systems need of the Department and the General Assembly .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 23 DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES

B75A01.07 OFFICE OF POLICY ANALYSIS

Program Description: The primary duties of the Office of Policy Analysis are to: 1. Analyze and make recommendations on fiscal matters that relate to the State budget and on policy issues . 2 . Analyze and prepare legislation for members of the General Assembly . 3 . Analyze proposed and emergency regulations of Executive branch agencies .

4 . Prepare recommendations for the revision of the statutory law for the General Assembly .

5 . Provide professional staffing services for any committee or subcommittee of General Assembly . 6 . Provide library and information services to the General Assembly and the public . 7 . Index and preserve information relating to the preparation of legislation, regulatory review, and statutory revision .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 24 PERSONNEL DETAIL Legislative

b75a01 General Assembly of Maryland/Department of Legislative Services b75a0101 Senate budget and taxation committee desk officers education, health, and environm finance committee judicial proceedings committee office of the majority leader office of the minority leader office of the president office of the secretary of the president of the senate regular senate staff senators session support personnel

TOTAL b75a0101* b75a0102 House of Delegates appropriations committee delegates delegation staff desk officers economic matters committee environmental matters committee health and government operation judiciary committee office of the chief clerk office of the majority leader office of the minority leader office of the speaker regular house staff session support personnel speaker ways and means committee

TOTAL b75a0102* b75a0103 General Legislative Expenses legislative security .OO 0 1.00 21,351 protocol committee .OO 0 1 .OO 21,415 ------TOTAL b75a0103* .OO 0 2.00 42,766

I — 25 PERSONNEL DETAIL Legislative

b75a0104 Office of the Executive Director executive director .oo is senior analyst/engineer i .oo legislative administrator .oo legislative administrator .oo legislative administrator .oo legislative aide .oo legislative aide -00 legislative aide -00 legislative assistant i .00 legislative assistant i .oo legislative assistant i .oo legislative assistant i .oo legislative assistant ii .oo legislative assistant ii .oo legislative assistant ii .00 legislative associate i .oo legislative associate i .oo legislative associate i -00 legislative associate i .00 legislative associate i .00 legislative associate ii -00 legislative associate ii .oo legislative associate ii .oo legislative associate ii .oo legislative manager .oo legislative manager .oo legislative manager .oo legislative manager .oo legislative policy analyst i -00 legislative specialist i .00 legislative specialist i -00 legislative specialist i .oo legislative specialist i .00 legislative specialist i .00 senior administrator -00 senior administrator i -00 senior administrator ii -00 senior administrator ii .oo senior manager .oo senior manager .oo ------. TOTAL b75aOl O4* .oo

I — 26 PERSONNEL DETAIL Legislative

b75a0105 Office of Legislative Audits deputy office director .OO 0 1.OO 109,246 1.OO is technical analyst/enginee .OO 0 2.00 100,000 2.00 legislative administrator .OO 0 1.OO 35,000 1.OO legislative assistant i .OO 0 3.00 86,488 3.00 legislative associate i .OO 0 1-00 38,064 1.OO legislative associate ii .OO 0 1.OO 44,200 1.OO legislative manager .OO 0 12.00 1,035,297 12.00 off ice director .OO 0 1.OO 119,128 1.00 senior auditor i .OO 0 21.00 1,088,088 21.00 senior auditor ii .OO 0 12.00 757,728 12.00 senior auditor iii .OO 0 8.00 623,168 8.00 senior manager .OO 0 6.00 585,966 6.00 staff auditor i .OO 0 32.00 1,248,084 32.00 staff auditor ii .OO 0 5.00 227,968 5.00 ------TOTAL b75a0105* -00 0 b75a0106 Office of Legislative Information Systems deputy office director is analyst/engineer ii is analyst/engineer iii is principal analyst/enginee is senior analyst/engineer i is senior analyst/engineer i is technical analyst/enginee is technical analyst/enginee legislative administrator legislative assistant i office director senior manager ------TOTAL b75a0106* b75a0107 Office of Policy Analysis deputy office director legislative aide legislative assistant i legislative assistant i legislative assistant ii legislative assistant ii legislative associate i legislative associate i legislative associate ii legislative librarian i legislative manager

I — 27 PERSONNEL DETAIL Legislative

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------b75a0107 Office of Policy Analysis legislative policy analyst i legislative policy analyst i legislative policy analyst i legislative specialist i legislative specialist ii legislative specialist ii office director principal policy analyst i principal policy analyst ii principal policy analyst iii senior librarian i senior librarian ii senior manager senior manager senior policy analyst i senior policy analyst ii senior policy analyst iii ------TOTAL b75a0107* -00 0 140.00 8,278,556 140.00 8,278,556 TOTAL b75a01 ** .OO 0 730.00 34,515,525 730.00 35,201,266

I — 28 NATURAL RESOURCES AND RECREATION

Department of Natural Resources Office of the Secretary Forestry Service Wildlife and Heritage Service State Forest and Park Service Capital Grants and Loan Administration Licensing and Registration Service Natural Resources Police Resource Planning Engineering and Construction Chesapeake Bay Critical Areas Commission Resource Assessment Service Maryland Environmental Trust Watershed Services Fisheries Service

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

MISSION

The Department of Natural Resources preserves, protects, enhances and restores Maryland's natural resources for the wise use and enjoyment of all citizens.

VISION

To inspire people to enjoy and live in harmony with their environment.

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Annually meet the Department's commitments to the Chesapeake Bay Program to restore health to the Bay and its living resources.'

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total DNR commitments to the Bay Program 57 58 58 5 8 Outputs: Cumulative DNR living resources commitments met 1 2 9 10 Cumulative DNR habitat commitments met 1 4 8 8 Cumulative DNR water quality commitments met 3 5 5 Cumulative DNR land use commitments met 1 3 4 7 Cumulative DNR stewardship commitments met 4 9 10 13 Outcome: Acres of SAV ' nla 5 1,232 nla nla Oyster biomass index (1994 base) 1 2 3 3 Nitrogen loading to Bay from Maryland (in million pounds) 5 6 5 6 5 6 55 Wetland acres restored 142 160 100 100 Cumulative number of marine pump-outs 394 41 1 426 44 1

Cumulative DNR commitments met nla 2 1 36 43

Objective 1.2 By 2009, implement 100% of the phase I & I1 actions assigned to DNR in the Coastal Bays Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP).~

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total CCMP actions required* 25 25 25 25 Outputs: Cumulative fish and wildlife-related actions completed 3 8 10 13 Cumulative Community and Economic Development-related actions completed 6 7 7 8 Outcome: Documented improvements to Bays' nutrient and sediment conditions 6 6 6 6

1 Some105 commitments are included in the Chesapeake Bay Agreement signed by the Governor in June 2000, of which DNR has lead responsibility for 58. All Units in the Department participate in meeting these commitments. *~ctualacreage of SAV in Maryland is unpredictable; the Chesapeake Bay Program has set an interim goal of 61,646 acres in Maryland by 2005. Calculated from Phase 4.3 Watershed Model, Chesapeake Bay Program. Numbers are extrapolated from 2000 Progress and 2010 Projected scenarios. There are some 134 actions assigned to DNR in the Coastal Bays Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan, prepared under the National Estuary Program. These actions fall under four broad themes. Meeting these commitments cuts across multiple DNR Units. Descriptions and details of the required actions may be found in the CCMP.

*These numbers were incorrect in previous publications of DNR's MFR submission

I — 685 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Goal 2. Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 2.1 By 2010, complete 50 comprehensive watershed management plans and initial implementation actions in collaboration with local, state, federal and NGO partners.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Chesapeake 2000 commitments 21 2 1 2 1 2 1 Outputs: Plans completed 5 5 5 5 Participating local agencies and other partners 36 23 25 25 Stream corridor assessment miles completed 400 500 500 500 Watershed characterizations prepared 5 5 5 5 Outcome: Cumulative number of watersheds covered by plans 5 10 15 20 Percent of state land area covered by watershed management plans 14 27 32 36

Objective 2.2 By 2006, complete at least 3 regional landscape level conservation strategies, which deploy an interdisciplinary approach and science-based targeting methods to protect and restore key ecosystems and adjacent lands.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Statewide Green Infrastructure acres (in millions) 2 2 2 2 Outputs: Acres of restoration of Green Infrastructure gaps 4,733 1,580 2,200 1,500 Number of regional landscape level conservation strategies completed 2 Outcome: Cumulative acres protected by easement 110,000 Acres protected by acquisition 25,283

Objective 2.3 By 2005, develop and begin implementation of an aquatic and terrestrial management and control program to address critical invasive species threats.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of invasive species policy and guidance developed 0 3 0 1 Number of management plans monitored 0 3 3 2

Objective 2.4 By 2006, establish a comprehensive ecosystem based program to protect fish and their essential habitats.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Fish passage projects completed 1 23 4 3 Stream restoration projects implemented 0 1 1.5 3 Outcome: Cumulative miles of streams reopened to anadromous fish (Fisheries) Cumulative miles of riparian forest re-established Cumulative miles of streams restored

Goal 3. Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 3.1 By 2005, establish a comprehensive watershed protection strategy to restore or protect urbanizing watersheds and target pilot projects to measurably improve water quality

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Annual number of pilot project completed n/a 2 2 2 Cumulative number of watersheds inventoried n/a 1 3 4

I — 686 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Goal 4. A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 4.1 By 2005, implement a coordinated DNR-wide approach to prioritizing and acting on key land protection opportunities through annual funding and stewardship programs.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Funding appropriated for land preservation $60,527,542 $38,788,941 $20,984,000 $30,269,658 Outputs: Percent of targeted dollars protecting the most valuable and threatened land nla 85% 95 % 100% Outcome: Number of acres acquired through coordination efforts 25,283 38,086 9,877 13,725

Objective 4.2 By 2006, implement a comprehensive program to track and monitor compliance of all natural resource related easements associated with DNR.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percent easements monitored and under compliance with easement conditions

Objective 4.3 By 2006, annually achieve integrated resource management covering 25,000 acres of non-industrial private lands to guide 700 landowners in natural resource management that meets their objectives and provides multiple ecosystem benefits.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of Integrated ForestNildlife Stewardship Plans completed 458 683 700 700 Number of seedlings planted (in millions) Acres of management practices implemented Outcome: Acres of restored forest land (reforestation) Acres of restored agricultural land

Objective 4.4 By 2006, enroll 50,000 acres of sensitive agricultural lands in the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Acres of eligible riparian agricultural land 117,344 104,344 9 1,344 69,430 Outcome: Acres of riparian buffers established 13,940 15,925 10,000 8,000 Acres of wetlands restored 833 465 1,000 400 Acres of highly erodible land stablized 2,794 2,296 3,000 3,000 Miles of forest riparian buffers established 300 48 1 300 300 Acres of restored agricultural land (including riparian buffers)

I — 687 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Goal 5. Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 5.1 Annually manage the natural, cultural, historical and recreational resources to provide the best use for the benefit of people.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of boating safety certificates issued 6,760 7,014 6,500 6,500 Number of hunters checked 16,869 17,162 17,250 17,250 Number of hunter education classes 227 226 225 225 Number of hunter safety certificates issued 7,211 7,207 7,200 7,200 Number of boating inspections 48,141 46,415 45,500 45,500 Number of Maryland Basic Boating classes 385 386 385 385 Outcome: Number of boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (209 accidents) Number of people injured in boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (105 injured) Number of people killed in boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (10 killed) Number of people injured in hunting accidents above or below base year 1999 (28 injured) Number of people killed in hunting accidents above or below base year 1999 (1 killed) Number of boat inspections per officer

Goal 6. Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 6.1 By July 1, 2004 and thereafter, 25% of all new hires will be minorities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of applicants 1,292 500 800 1000 Outputs: Number of applicants hired** 77 15 25 30 Number of minority applicants hired* 32 8 10 Outcome: Percent of minorities hired 42 33 32 33

*of those applicants who choose to voluntarily disclose **does not include contractual conversions

Objective 6.2 Ensure effective and comprehensive fiscal management through internal audits, eliminating repeat audit findings, maximizing federal income, and maintaining adequate invoice controls.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures* Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Federal Grant dollars earned $23,820,106 $26,068,401 $28,031,461 $31,088,281 Outputs: Number of legislative audit findings corrected 16 4 11 nla Number of internal compliance audit reports 97 89 95 95 Quality: Number of legislative and federal audit report findings ** Number of repeat legislative audit findings corrected Percent compliance with legislative and Federal audit report findings Percent of internal audit recommendations implemented

* Federal and Legislative Audits occur every 3 years. ** Department anticipates correcting all legislative and federal audit report findings in FY 2004. nla - Data not available

I — 688 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 1.490.00 1.454.00 1.446.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 377.50 480.00 438.50 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 99.321. 608 94.610. 804 95.288. 727 Technical and Special Fees ...... 7.660.123 8.435. 128 9.226. 455 Operating Expenses ...... 113.591.382 76.571. 473 138.888. 109 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 82.257. 345 74.794. 736 TransferReduction ...... 732.645 -3.968. 005 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 82.989. 990 70.826. 73 1 Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... 3.532. 598 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 78.791. 727 70.826. 731 68.615. 704 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 109.865.237 75.287. 311 143.331.697 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 24. 7 15.255 27.199.312 25.868. 608 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 7.200. 894 6.304. 051 5.587. 282 Total Expenditure ...... 220.573. 113 179.617.405 243.403. 291

SUMMARY OF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer/Reduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 689 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOAO1.O1 SECRETARIAT - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Secretariat program provides overall direction and supervision of the Department.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Note: The Office of the Secretary shares the key goals, objectives, and performance measures of the Department.

I — 690 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOAO1.O1 SECRETARIAT .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 24.00 25.00 24.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 10 2.20 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0306 Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0308 Deer Stamp Account ...... KO03 10 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO031 1 Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0315 Fort Washington Marina Account ...... KO0319 Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... KO0320 Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... KO0321 Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... KO0325 Offroad Vehicle Account ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0329 Reforestation Fund ...... KO0333 Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... KO0334 Somers Cove Marina Account ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0337 Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... KO0345 Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... KO0346 Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... KO0356 Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... KO0360 Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total Special Funds ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ......

I — 691 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.02 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of the Attorney General program provides all legal representation, advice and counsel required by the Secretary and the Department.

I — 692 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.02 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 30 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 693 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.03 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Finance and Administrative Service program handles all financial transactions and provides centralized support services for the Department including procurement, fleet management, mail services and facilities support.

MISSION

To provide the Department with financial, procurement, fleet management, mail services and facilities support.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 Ensure effective and comprehensive fiscal management through internal audits, eliminating repeat audit findings, maximizing federal income, and maintaining adequate invoice controls.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures* Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Number of legislative and federal audit report findings** Number of legislative audit findings corrected Number of repeat legislative audit findings corrected

* Federal and Legislative Audits occur every 3 years. ** Department anticipates correcting all legislative and federal audit report findings in FY 2004. n/a - Not applicable

I — 694 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.03 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 695 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.03 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Special Fund Income: KO0306 Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... Deer Stamp Account ...... Environmental Trust Fund ...... Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... Fort Washington Marina Account ...... Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... Offroad Vehicle Account ...... POS Administrative Fee ...... Reforestation Fund ...... Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... Somers Cove Marina Account ...... State Boat Act ...... Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total Special Funds ......

Federal Fund Income: Cooperative Forestry Assistance ...... Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 ...... Chesapeake Bay Studies ...... Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Manage- ment Act ...... Sport Fish Restoration ...... Wildlife Restoration ...... Endangered Species Conservation ...... State Wildlife Grants ...... Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants ...... Chesapeake Bay Program ...... Environmental Protection --Consolidated Research Total ......

I — 696 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.04 HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICE- OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The staff of Human Resource Service provides the best support services possible to both employees and managers in DNR.

MISSION

To provide internal training and staff development in the areas of ADA, FMLA, employee discipline, supervisory training, diversity initiatives and performance evaluations.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 By July 1, 2006, train 100% of eligible DNR employees in HR requiredlmandatory training initiatives.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of employees eligible for training 1,462 1,468 1,470 1470 Outputs: Number of employees who attended required internal training 1,355 1,360 1,400 1400 Percent of eligible employees trained 92.7% 92.6% 95.2% 95%

I — 697 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.04 HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICE .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0306 Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0308 Deer Stamp Account ...... KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO03 11 Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0315 Fort Washington Marina Account ...... KO0319 Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... KO0320 Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... KO0321 Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... KO0325 Offroad Vehicle Account ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0329 Reforestation Fund ...... KO0333 Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... KO0334 Somers Cove Marina Account ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0337 Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... KO0345 Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... KO0346 Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... KO0356 Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... KO0360 Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total Special Funds ......

I — 698 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.05 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE- OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MISSION

To provide programming, analysis and technical support services and to operate central computer facilities for the Department. ITS coordinates all aspects of information technology with other agencies of the State, which regulate or provide information technology activities or services.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 By June 30,2006, 100% of remote DNR locations needing direct access will have access to the Wide Area Network (WAN), implemented consistent with the Network Maryland Strategy, from their work locations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of remote DNR locations needing access to the network 105 105 105 105 Outcome: Percent of locations with dial-in capability 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of locations with high speed connection 42% 42% 50% 100%

Objective 1.2 Annually, maintain a level of network reliability of at least 99%.*

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of hours network is available per month 720 720 720 720 Number of hours network not available per month 5 7 7 7 Outcome: Percentage of time network is available to users 99% 99% 99% 99%

*The percentage of network availability is determined by using a formula that measures the total time available divided into the total acceptable availability time. Therefore it is possible to obtain and maintain 100%. The formula is documented in the Department of Natural Resources Policy- Network Design and Operations, Policy: 02:01

I — 699 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.05 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... Deer Stamp Account ...... Environmental Trust Fund ...... Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... Fort Washington Marina Account ...... Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... Offroad Vehicle Account ...... POS Administrative Fee ...... Reforestation Fund ...... Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... Somers Cove Marina Account ...... State Boat Act ...... Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total Special Funds ......

I — 700 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.06 OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING- OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MISSION

To provide information to the public and media regarding overall policies and activities of the Department of Natural Resources through public appearances, sponsorship of public events, news conferences, news releases, exhibits and publications, coordination of volunteer activities, and radio and television programming.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 On an annual basis, support internal and external communication of department programs and services in a timely manner by: producing and distributing 100% of scheduled DNR-wide publications (Bay Game, The Natural Resource, Annual Report, et al.); participating in five major events; and completing 95% of customer service jobs -- graphics, writinglediting, certificateslproclamations, etc. -- within the requested deadline.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Percent of major events participated in 7% 6% 6% Quality: Percent of jobs completed on deadline 97 98% 99% 98% Outcome: Number of publication copies distributed 425,000 356,000 397,000 356,000 Number of people attending events 500,000 400,000 400,000 425,000 Percent of survey respondents increasing stewardship behavior

Objective 1.2 On an annual basis, maintain 100% internal and external media customer satisfaction by: maintaining 24 hour on-call emergency availability to media and staff; responding to 100% of media inquiries within 24 hours; and responding to 95% of unitlprogram requests for staff assistance, press releases, events etc. within the requested deadline.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Percent of calls responded to within 24 hours 100% 100% 100% 100% Number of press releases issued 276 300 300 350 Number of print articles covering DNR 1,055 1,100 1,100 1,200 Number of proactive stories placed highlighting DNR's mission & staff efforts

I — 701 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA01.06 OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING .OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0306 Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0308 Deer Stamp Account ...... KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO03 1 1 Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0315 Fort Washington Marina Account ...... KO0319 Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... KO0320 Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... KO0321 Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... KO0325 Offroad Vehicle Account ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0329 Reforestation Fund ...... KO0333 Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... KO0334 Somers Cove Marina Account ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0337 Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... KO0345 Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... KO0346 Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... KO0356 Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... KO0360 Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total Special Funds ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration

I — 702 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA02.09 FORESTRY SERVICE - FORESTRY SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The DNR Forest Service provides technical advice and assistance to individuals and communities regarding the proper management, care and protection of the forest resource for the purpose of maintaining the current forest land base of the State. This program also works with the educational community and a variety of other volunteer groups and organizations to bring bout a better understanding, appreciation of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries through proactive stream buffer restoration projects.

MISSION

To restore, manage and protect Maryland's trees, forests, and forested ecosystems to sustain our natural resources and connect people to the land.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 2) Increase Maryland's 1996 Chesapeake Bay Program goal of 600 miles of buffer restoration to 2000 miles of riparian forest buffer (RFB) restoration by 2010. Objective 1.1 Double 1996 goal and restore 1,200 miles of riparian forest buffers (RFB) by 2010.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Acres of RFBs established 5,072 3,196 4,500 4,500 Linear feet of RFBs established 1,584,680 907,708 1,584,000 1,584,000 Miles of RFBs restored 273 172 300 300 Cumulative miles since 1996 779 1,051 1,300 1,550

Objective 1.2 Annually achieve integrated resource management on 15,000 acres.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of acres of Management Plans prepared 15,628 11,435 15,000 15,000 Outcome: Number of wildfires suppressed 1,019 600 600 600

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 4) A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 2.1 Annually protect 5,000 acres of forestland via Forest Conservation Act (FCA) long-term protection agreements.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Acres of FCA long-term protection secured, 4,100 5,996 4,000 5,000

Objective 2.2 Increase the number of local governments and communities participating in conserving urban forest and tree resources. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of Roadside Tree permits issued 1,420 1,400 1,375 1,300 Acres of FCA mitigated reforestation 750 835 500 500 Municipal Watershed Plan practices implemented 15 15 15 15 Number of local governments and communities participating in conserving urban forest and tree resources 120 120 120 120

I — 703 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

FORESTRY SERVICE

KOOA02.09 FORESTRY SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0329 Reforestation Fund ...... KO0346 Woodlands Incentive Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: BB.KOO Forestry Federal Contracts ...... 10.663 Forest Land Enhancement Program ...... 10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance ...... 10.672 Rural Development, Forestry and Communities ...... 66.461 Wetlands Protection-State Development Grants ...... 66.505 Water Pollution Control-Research. Development, and Demonstration ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: KOOA12 DNR-Resource Assessment Service ...... KOOA 14 DNR-Watershed Services ...... Total ......

I — 704 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA03.01 WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE - WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Wildlife and Heritage Service is responsible for ensuring the long term conservation of the full array of native ecosystems, natural communities and species that comprise the biological integrity of Maryland; and for striking the necessary balance between the ecological needs of wildlife resources, and societal needs and desires.

MISSION

To conserve Maryland's diverse native wildlife, plants, and the natural communities that support them, using scientific expertise and informed public input.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Scientifically supported sustainable harvest strategies for game species populations by a variety of survey methods. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of implemented research surveys 5 12 11 11 Number of implemented population monitoring surveys 15 16 21 16 Number of implemented harvestihunter participation surveys 3 3 3 3 Outcome: Number of individuals participating in deer hunting 80,400 114,000 83,000 120,000 Number of individuals participating in waterfowl hunting 35,600 47,000 40,600 5 1,000 Number of individuals participating in other game bird hunting 34,100 34,000 34,200 34,000 Number of individuals participating in small game hunting 3 1,400 3 1,000 3 1,000 29,000 Number of individuals participating in furbearer hunting 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,300 Number of deer harvested 85,000 94,100 90,000 100,000 Number of waterfowl harvested 250,000 300,000 300,000 330,000 Number of other game birds harvested 209,600 204,000 204,800 200,000 Number of small game mammals harvested 213,000 200,000 2 10,000 190,000 Number of dollars generated for the management of game species $4,650,221 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $6,000,000

Objective 1.2 Annually protect rare, threatened and endangered species habitat at 100 sites public and private sites throughout Maryland.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of project proposals reviewed 2,000 2,416 2,500 2,500 Number of technical assists provided 200 200 200 200 Number of protection strategies developed and implemented 100 103 100 100 Outcome: Number of acres of rare, threatened or endangered species' habitat protected each year 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

I — 705 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA03.01 WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE - WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE (Continued)

Objective 1.3 By 2005, recover five populations of rare, threatened or endangered species.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of rare, threatened and endangered species 990 1,018 1,025 1,025 Outcome: Number of populations recovered per year 1 1 2 1

Objective 1.4 Restore 1,000 acres of critical plant and wildlife habitat by June 30, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of critical habitat sites in need of restoration 50 50 50 50 Outputs: Number of restoration plans completed 10 10 15 15 Number of restoration plans implemented 4 6 7 10 Outcome: Number of acres restored each year 200 350 500 500

Goal 2. Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 2.1 By 2005, develop and begin implementation of an aquatic and terrestrial management and control program to address critical invasive species threats.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of management plans completed 0 4 5 3 Number of management plans implemented 0 3 2 2

Goal 3. Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 3.1 Provide wildlife-related information and education programs to a diverse audience to achieve DNR resource management objectives.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of workshops and events conducted 166 175 175 200 Number of volunteers utilized 32 38 40 40 Number of people receiving wildlife based education programs (est.)

Goal 4. A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 4.1 By 2006, enroll 50,000 acres of sensitive agricultural lands in the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Governor's Bonus Payment 1,300,000 1,300,000 0 0 Acres of eligible riparian agricultural land 117,344 104,344 9 1,344 69,430 Outcome: Acres of riparian buffers established 13,940 15,925 10,000 8,000 Acres of wetlands restored 833 465 1,000 400 Acres of highly erodible land stabilized 2,794 2,296 3,000 3,000 Miles of forest riparian buffers established 300 48 1 300 300 Acres of restored agricultural (including riparian buffers) land

I — 706 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA03.01 WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE - WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE (Continued)

Objective 4.2 Manage the Wildlife Management Area (WMA) system for wildlife conservation consistent with Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration guidelines and goals.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Acres of WMAs 104,769 105,543 105,500 106,000 Outcome: Number of WMAs with sustained wildlife populations

Goal 5. Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 5.1 Annually provide diverse recreational opportunities on the network of agency-managed lands.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of WMAs with recreational use 37 40 37 40 Outcome: Number of user days of WMA system 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

I — 707 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA03.01 WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE .WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 708 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA03.01 WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE .WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE

Special Fund Income: KO0308 Deer Stamp Account ...... KO0320 Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... KO0337 Chesapeake Bay Endangered Species Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0345 Wildlife Habitat Improvement Fund ...... KO0360 Upland Wildlife Habitat Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: AA.KO0 Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Annual Payments ...... 10.604 National Park Service ...... 10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance ...... 15.611 Wildlife Restoration ...... 15.612 Endangered Species Conservation ...... 15.625 Wildlife Conservation and Restoration ...... 15.633 Landowner Incentive ...... 15.634 State Wildlife Grants ...... 66.461 Wetlands Protection-State Development Grants ...... 66.505 Water Pollution Control-Research, Development, and Demonstration ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: UOOA04 MDE-Water Management Administration ......

I — 709 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 331.50 313.50 311.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 290.30 347.40 322.10 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 23.931. 122 23.028. 624 21.273. 175 Technical and Special Fees ...... 5,000,415 4,671. 424 5,621, 199 Operating Expenses ...... 13,505,476 12,059,550 12,251,570 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionRednction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 710 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA04.01 STATE-WIDE OPERATION- STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Forest and Park Service manages and operates Maryland's forests, parks, scenic preserves, historic monuments, natural environment areas and recreation areas.

MISSION

To manage the natural, cultural, historical, and recreational resources to provide the best use for the benefit of people.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 3) Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 1.1 Promote stewardship ethics to 25,000 state forest and park visitors to ensure the responsible use of public lands; and monitor recreational impacts to protect these state lands, as set forth in the environmental ethics goals of the Department of Natural Resources.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Miles of boundaries 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Outputs: Additional miles of boundaries marked 75 50 50 50 Miles of boundaries marked 300 350 400 450

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 5) Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 2.1 Support the operation of the State Forest and Park Service by generating $15,506,401 of revenue by the end of Fiscal Year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of day use sites 93 94 93 94 Number of overnight sites 30 30 30 30 Outcome: Number of day use visitors 9,537,814 9,446,652 9,923,141 10,121,603 Number of overnight visitors 791,927 772,533 823,921 840,399

Revenue collected - Day Use Revenue collected - Overnight use Total revenue generated

Objective 2.2 Provide outdoor recreational experiences for 10,205,000 visitors by June 30, 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of land units available to the public 93 94 93 94 Number of acres available to the public 266,136 268,316 266,136 268,316 Outcome: Number of visitors using forests and parks 10,329,741 10,219,185 10,400,500 10,500,000

I — 711 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA04.01 STATE-WIDE OPERATION .STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Food ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0301 POS Transfer Tax ...... KO0306 Deep Creek Lake Management and Protection Fund ...... KO031 1 Fair Hill Improvement Fund ...... KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0315 Fort Washington Marina Account ...... KO0321 Natural Resources Property Maintenance Fund ...... KO0325 Offroad Vehicle Account ...... KO0334 Somers Cove Marina Account ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... KO0356 Forest and Park Concession Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: AA.KO0 Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Annual Payments ...... 94.006 AmeriCorps ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ......

I — 712 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA04.06 REVENUE OPERATIONS - STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Revenue Operations program includes camp stores, snack bars, beach concessions, boat rental areas, gift shops, windsurfing areas and marinas.

MISSION

To manage the natural, cultural, historical, and recreational resources to provide the best use for the benefit of people.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The key goals and objectives are the same as program KA04.01, Statewide Operations.

I — 713 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA04.06 REVENUE OPERATIONS .STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Food ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... SO. I67 Fixed Charges ...... 1.079 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0356 Forest and Park Concession Fund ......

I — 714 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 37.00 37.00 37.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer/Reduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 715 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.05 OPERATIONS - CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Capital Grants and Loans Administration administers State and Federal Grants to facilitate land conservation and recreational facility development through Program Open Space; to acquire easements and fee interest in designated Rural Legacy Areas throughout the State to protect the best of Maryland's natural, agriculture, and cultural resource lands; to develop new boating access areas and improve existing boat facilities for the general boating public through the Waterway Improvement Program; and to protect eroding shorelines and stream banks through the Shore Erosion Control Program.

MISSION

To protect the best of Maryland's open space lands, shorelines and natural resources while providing outdoor recreation opportunities in cooperation with Federal and local governments.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 2) Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 1.1 Annually establish 10,000 linear feet of protected and restored tidal shoreline and fresh water stream habitat areas.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of technical assistance actions 160 239 200 225 Number of grantslloanslcontracts awarded 29 13 12 15 Outcome: Feet of shorelinelstream bank stabilized 1 O,O6 1 8,276 3,209 8,300 Square feet of marsh createdlprotected 83.235 1 15.680 3 1.388 105,500 Pounds of Nitrogen prevented from entering Maryland waterways annually Pounds of Phosphorus prevented from entering Maryland waterways annually Tons of sediment input reduction to sensitive aquatic habitat

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 4) A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 2.1 Annually, conserve land in accordance with conservation initiatives, priorities and incentives.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of POS acquisition acres approved by the Board of Public Works 4,371 2,608 1,500 1,500 Number of Rural Legacy easement and fee simple acres acquired 14,498 10,376 1,994 14,000 Number of Green Print acres acquired 4,733 23,266 800 20,000 Number of acres preserved from development 27,458 36,094 7,255 25,000

Objective 2.2 Each year, fully utilize the State and Local plans for land and water conservation and recreation

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of local POS projects 226 203 150 150 Number of Waterway projects 144 99 5 3 150 Number of Community Park Projects 4 1 69 70 70 Outcome: Percentage of local land preservation and recreation plans emphasizing resource conservation in conjunction with recreation NIA 100% 100% 100%

NIA-Not Available

I — 716 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.05 OPERATIONS .CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... 1 ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0333 Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services......

I — 717 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.10 OUTDOOR RECREATION LAND LOAN - CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

This program shares the program description, mission, goals, objectives, and performance measures of Program KOOA05.05 Capital Grants And Loans.

I — 718 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.10 OUTDOOR RECREATION LAND LOAN - CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 18,354,846 14 Land and Structures ...... 20,352,161 Total Operating Expenses ...... 38,707,007 Total Expenditure ...... 38,707,007

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 37,259,292 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 1,447,7 15 Total Expenditure ...... 38,707,007

Special Fund Income: KO0301 POS Transfer Tax ...... 37.259.292 7.937.888 61.999.242

Federal Fund Income: 15.916 Outdoor Recreation-Acquisition, Development and Planning ...... 1,447,715 2,000,000 2,000,000

Provided that of the Special Fund Allowance, $33,531,276 represents that share of Programs Open Space revenues available for State projects and $28,467,966 represents that share of Program Open Space revenues available for local programs. Contingent upon the enactment of legislation altering the amount of transfer tax revenues to be distributed to Open Space programs, the share of Program Open Space revenues available for State projects will be reduced by $28,668,276 and the share of Program Open Space Revenues available for local projects will be reduced by 528,467,966. These amounts may be used for any State projects or local share authorized in Chapter 403, Laws of Maryland, 1969 as amended, or in Chapter 81, Laws of Maryland 1984; Chapter 106, Laws of Maryland 1985; Chapter 109, Laws of Maryland, 1986; Chapter 121, Laws of Maryland, 1987; Chapter 10, Laws of Maryland, 1988; Chapter 14, Laws of Maryland, 1989; Chapter 409, Laws of Maryland, 1990; Chapter 3, Laws of Maryland, 1991; Chapter 4, 1st Special Session, Laws of Maryland, 1992; Chapter 204, Laws of Maryland, 1993; Chapter 8, Laws of Maryland, 1994; Chapter 7, Laws of Maryland, 1995; Chapter 13, Laws of Maryland, 1996; Chapter 3, Laws of Maryland, 1997; Chapter 109, Laws of Maryland, 1998; Chapter 118, Laws of Maryland, 1999; Chapter 204, Laws of Maryland, 2000; Chapter 102, Laws of Maryland, 2001; Chapter 290, Laws of Maryland, 2002; or Chapter 204, Laws of Maryland, 2003; and for any State land acquistion projects as provided in the Capital Budget volume of the state budget books.

I — 719 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.11 WATERWAY SERVICE PROJECTS .CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The Waterway Capital Projects Program provided grants and loans for capital projects financed through the Waterway Improvement Fund pursuant to the State Boat Act .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ...... 15.622 Sportfishing and Boating Safety Act ...... 15.916 Outdoor Recreation.Acquisition, Development and Planning ...... Total ......

I — 720 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.14 SHORE EROSION CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS - CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN

This program shares the program description, mission, goals, objectives, and performance measures of Program KOOA05.05 Capital Grants And Loans.

I — 721 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA05.14 SHORE EROSION CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS - CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOAN ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0333 Shore Erosion Control Revolving Loan Fund

I — 722 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA06.01 GENERAL DIRECTION- LICENSING & REGISTRATION SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Licensing and Registration Service is responsible for the collection of special funds from the sale of recreational hunting and fishing licenses, the issuance of commercial fishing licenses, the titling and registration of boats, the issuance of documented vessel decals, the sale of off-road vehicle permits, and the collection of vessel excise tax.

MISSION

The Licensing and Registration Service will maximize customer service within its budgetary and staffing constraints as it provides for the implementation of the State Boat Act and the issuance of commercial and recreational licenses.

VISION

The Licensing and Registration Service will offer increased customer convenience by implementing on-line services and otherwise streamlining its operations so that maximum customer service can be provided in a fiscally prudent manner.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 Make 100% of sport licenses available for purchase on-line by 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percentage of sport licenses available for purchase on-line 0 0 50% 70%

Objective 1.2 Reduce average paperwork completion cycle to 4 days by 2006.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of Commercial Licenses Issued 7,313 7,313 7,450 7,530 Number of fishing licenses issued 588,472 606,000 618,200 636,300 Number of vessels registered 98,200 102,100 104,200 106,300 Number of hunting licenses issued 247,902 260,300 265,500 273,500 Outcome: Average paperwork completion cycle*

Note: *New measure, no data available

I — 723 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LICENSING AND REGISTRATION SERVICE

KOOA06.01 GENERAL DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 45.00 46.00 46.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0308 Deer Stamp Account ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0320 Migratory Wild Waterfowl Stamp ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

I — 724 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 285.00 296.00 296.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 13.30 14.60 13.70 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 22,840, 372 22,020. 214 23.882. 098 Technical and Special Fees ...... 506.547 478. 290 556. 144 Operating Expenses ...... 4.502. 024 4.299. 433 4.236. 251 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 18.420. 915 18.352.940 TransferIReduction ...... 236.452 -400. 000 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 18.657. 367 17.952.940 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 614. 089 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 18.043.278 17.952.940 18.241.547 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 7.380. 718 6.596. 992 8.090. 628 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 2.424. 947 2.248. 005 2.342. 318 Total Expenditure ...... 27.848. 943 26.797. 937 28.674. 493

I — 725 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.01 GENERAL DIRECTION- NATURAL RESOURCE POLICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Direction program consists of the Office of the Superintendent, the DNR Communication Center, and two bureaus - Management Services and Administrative Services. The Office of the Superintendent is responsible for the overall direction, supervision and coordination of the Natural Resources Police Unit. The Management Services Bureau provides agency support in the areas of personnel management, data processing, fleet management, fiscal services and procurement and coordinates the removal of abandoned boats from Maryland's waterways. The Administrative Services Bureau includes the Safety Education Division which is responsible for statewide boating and hunting safety education training and the Training Division which is responsible for the entrance level training of recruit officers and in-service training for all law enforcement personnel.

MISSION

The Natural Resources Police are responsible for enforcing all natural resources laws of the State, including all rules and regulations adopted pursuant to the Natural Resources Article. We assist in the protection of life and property and serve as the primary search and rescue agency on the waters and in the rural areas of the State. We preserve the peace, assist in the prevention of crime, detect and apprehend violators, safeguard individual rights and perform miscellaneous functions as requested by the citizenry.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 1) Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Protect existing stocks of living resources throughout the State, including marine resources in the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays and tributaries.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of officers patrolling SAV beds 136 130 126 126 Number of acres of delineated SAV beds being protected Outputs: Number of conservation inspections conducted Number of conservation markings placedlmaintained Efficiency: Number of conservation inspections per officer Number of conservation markings per hydrographic employee Outcome: Number of incidents contributing to degradation of SAV beds

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 5) Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 2.1 Improve safety and enjoyment for people participating in outdoor recreation activities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of calls taken on the fish health hotline 676 447 650 650 Outputs: Number of boating safety certificates issued 6,760 7,014 6,500 6,500 Number of hunters checked 6,869 17,162 17,250 17,250 Number of hunter education classes 227 226 225 225 Number of hunter safety certificates issued 7,211 7,207 7,200 7,200 Number of "fish kill" incidents to which officers respond 5 5 5 5 Number of boating inspections 48,141 46,415 45,500 45,500 Number of boating markings placedlmaintained 1,650 1,730 1,750 1,750 Number of Maryland Basic Boating classes 385 386 385 385

I — 726 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.01 GENERAL DIRECTION - NATURAL RESOURCE POLICE (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (209 accidents) 10 -59 10 10 Number of people injured in boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (105 injured) 5 -7 5 5 Number of people killed in boating accidents above or below base year 1999 (10 killed) 6 -3 1 1 Number of people injured in hunting accidents above or below base year 1999 (28 injured) 0 -1 -5 -5 Number of people killed in hunting accidents above or below base year 1999 (1 killed) 1 1 0 1 Number of areas closed due to outbreaks of harmful aquatic organisms 1 1 1 1 Number of people reported ill as a result of harmful aquatic organisms 4 1 5 5 Number of abandoned boats removed by the Program 105 3 3 90 90 Outputs: Dollar amount collected by Tax Unit $2,398,785 $1,750,381 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Efficiency: Number of boating markings/buoys per hydrographic person 118 123 125 125 Number of vessel safety checks per certified inspector 14 15 15 15 Number of boat inspections per officer 245 243 24 1 24 1 Average cost per boat removed by Abandoned Boat Program $2,131 $7,468 $2,000 $2,000

I — 727 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.01 GENERAL DIRECTION .NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.611 Wildlife Restoration ...... 20.005 Boating Safety Financial Assistance ...... Total ......

I — 728 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.04 FIELD OPERATIONS- NATURAL RESOURCE POLICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Field Operations Program comprises the Field Force Division and the Special Operations Division. The Field Force includes the uniformed patrol officers, patrol supervisors and administrative officers and communications support staff. The Special Operations Division includes the criminal investigators, undercover operations unit and the officers assigned to the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Task Force.

MISSION

The Field Operations program is responsible for the field enforcement activities of the Natural Resources Police. These activities include the enforcement of the State's conservation laws and regulations as they apply to fish, fisheries, game and non-game animals, and birds; the State Boat Act; and various other criminal law violations arising out of its primary enforcement effort.

Note: The Field Operations program shares the same objectives and performance measures found in KOOA07.01 - General Direction-Natural Resources Police.

I — 729 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.04 FIELD OPERATIONS .NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 206.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0339 Wildlife Management and Protection Fund ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.005 Boating Safety Financial Assistance ......

I — 730 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.05 WATERWAY MANAGEMENT SERVICES - NATURAL RESOURCE POLICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Waterway Management Services Program consists of two divisions: Hydrographic Operations and the Regulations Division.

MISSION

Hydrographic Operations is responsible for the placement of signs and buoys that mark areas with boating or fishing related restrictions. Some examples are areas with speed limits, restrictions on setting crab pots, prohibitions on clamming, etc. The Unit also sets and maintains aids to navigation, provides icebreaking services and performs hydrographic surveys. The Regulations division is responsible for the establishment of regulations pertaining to marine activities including the establishment of speed limits on waterways and the development of boating regulations statewide.

Note: The Waterway Management Services program shares the same objectives and performance measures found in KOOA07.01 General Direction- Natural Resources Police.

I — 731 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA07.05 WATERWAY MANAGEMENT SERVICES - NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.61 1 Wildlife Restoration ...... 20.005 Boating Safety Financial Assistance ...... Total ......

I — 732 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA08.01 RESOURCE PLANNING ADMINISTRATION - RESOURCE PLANNING

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Direction Program provides for the overall coordination and management of administrative, fiscal and operational activities for the Resource Planning unit of Public Lands.

MISSION

To support the effective, efficient and environmentally responsible management of the public lands estate by guiding the development and implementation of a strategic plan for conservation and recreation by providing technical assistance to land managers in property acquisition, development and management, formulating land unit plans and project site designs, conducting computer-based mapping and graphic analysis and directing an interdisciplinary review of projects of potential impact to natural resources or operations.

VISION

To inspire people to enjoy and live in harmony with their environment.

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 3) Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 1.1 By June 30 annually provide for the effective protection of public lands by researching and plotting ownership records in order to create new project boundary maps and to physically geo-reference the information to identify and maintain 250 miles of property boundaries.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total number of DNR land units 144 148 150 230* Outputs: Number Miles surveyed and recovered upon request 25 50 30 30 Number of miles of property boundaries mapped. 160 200 250 250

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 4) A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 2.1 By June 30, 2004 produce and complete 32 plans, strategies and studies (e.g. map-based unit plans; site plans; recreational plans; Chesapeake Bay-access plans; and community planning partnerships and strategies) to serve as a framework for the effective revitalization of public lands.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of completed planning strategies, studies and plans 24 25 28 25

Objective 2.2 By June 30, 2004 provide for the effective revitalization of public lands by reviewing, analyzing, and addressing 300-325 project proposals for the use of public lands.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of projects completed 175 192 225 227

*Note: The number of land units has increased for FY 2005 due to changes in how the units are identified for management, database, and mapping purposes.

I — 733 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

RESOURCE PLANNING

KOOA08.01 RESOURCE PLANNING ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 44. 788 04 Travel ...... 1 1. 999 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 23. 73 1 08 Contractual Services ...... 70. 217 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 145.009 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 34.083 11 Equipment-Additional ...... SO. 109 13 Fixed Charges ...... 5. 077 Total Operating Expenses ...... 385. 013 Total Expenditure ...... 1.651. 952

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 1.123. 209 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

I — 734 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 54.00 52.00 52.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 6.60 5.30 5.30 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversioniReductiou ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 735 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA09.01 GENERAL DIRECTION - ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Direction Program is responsible for operational, administrative, project management, and engineeringltechnical support for all capital development and critical maintenance projects located on lands owned by DNR. In addition, the Program also provides technical support to local jurisdictions as deemed necessary by the Department.

MISSION

To provide professional quality engineering, project management, and in-house construction services for the Department of Natural Resources in a cost effective and timely manner in support of Departmental goals and objectives for the benefit of Maryland's natural resources and the general public.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 5) Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 1.1 Annually provide administrative, engineering, project management, and in-house construction support for DNR with primary emphasis on the maintenance, limited development, and safe use of the Department's state owned facilities and infrastructure including the Ocean City Beach Project, as well as support the overall goals and objectives of the Department.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Annual number of new Critical Maintenance (CM) capital projects on DNR lands Annual total number of new major capital development projects on DNR lands (not including Critical Maintenance projects) Outputs: Annual number of surveys, engineering, and technical designs/assessments initiated and/or completed Number of projects initiated or completed on DNR lands Outcome: Percent of annual Critical Maintenance Projects initiated or completed on DNR lands Percent of annual major capital development

I — 736 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA09.01 GENERAL DIRECTION .ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionlReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0336 State Boat Act ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOA01 Department of Transportation ......

I — 737 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA09.06 OCEAN CITY MAINTENANCE - ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

Program Description: The Ocean Beach Maintenance Fund was established to provide funds for the maintenance of the beach at Ocean City, Maryland.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0324 Ocean Beach Replenishment Account ......

I — 738 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA1O.O1 CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL AREA COMMISSION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The purpose of the Commission is to foster more sensitive development activity on the Chesapeake Bay shoreline area and to minimize damage to water quality and the natural habitat. The law establishing the Commission provides for the implementation of a resource protection program on a cooperative basis between the State and affected local governments, with local governments establishing and administering their programs in a consistent and uniform manner, subject to State criteria and oversight. The primary activities of the Commission are: 1) review of local development proposals; 2) provision of technical planning assistance to local governments; 3) promoting water quality and habitat protection; 4) approval of amendments to local programs; and 5) provision of $750,000 to 54 local governments for implementation of their local Critical Area Programs.

MISSION

To foster more sensitive development activity on the Chesapeake Bay shoreline area and to minimize damage to water quality and the natural habitat.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Review development proposals along the Critical Area shorelines of the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays to assess impacts to water quality and fish, plant and wildlife habitats.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Project reviews with recommendations for improvements in site design, stormwater management, forest conservation, buffer enhancement, cluster development, and direction regarding compliance with the Critical Area law and Criteria 79 1 830 87 1 958 Outcome: Percent of projects exceeding minimum requirements for habitat and water quality protection due to technical assistance and staff involvement 8 % 8% 8% 15%

Objective 1.2 Complete comprehensive reviews of local Critical Area Programs to assure consistency with law and regulations. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of local Critical Area Programs 61 63 63 63 Outputs: Comprehensive reviews completed 5 2 2 2 Outcome: Number of Critical Area Programs that have been comprehensively reviewed and are fully consistent with Critical Area regulations 36 3 8 40 42

I — 739 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL AREA COMMISSION

KOOA1O.O1 CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL AREA COMMISSION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services ......

I — 740 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 111.00 112.00 112.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 12.90 20.80 12.30 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 6,705,312 6,682.407 6,675,453 Technical and Special Fees ...... 303,968 495,271 341,714 Operating Expenses ...... 10,071,572 10,757,294 11,073,189 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferIReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 741 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.01 SUPPORT SERVICES - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

MISSION The Program is responsible for the overall direction, supervision and coordination of administrative and programmatic activities of the Unit.

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 6) Diverse Workforce and Efficient Operations. Objective 1.1 Annually, recoup total funding allocated by grant awards, to include federal and reimbursable fund grants.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Total grant dollars awarded (Includes carry forward from prior years) $4,375,409 $2,602,798 $3,915,839 $3,555,291 Outcome: Total receipt of grants funds $4,223,044 $2,305,339 $3,915,839 $3,555,291

I — 742 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.01 SUPPORT SERVICES .RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Appropriation Statement:

. . Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ......

I — 743 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.04 MONITORING AND NON TIDAL - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment Division (MANTA) conducts water monitoring and technical assessments in Maryland's streams, rivers, the Chesapeake Bay, and Coastal Bays. These programs describe the ecological /water quality status of these ecosystems, contribute to the development of habitat protectionlrestoration approaches, and measure changes in waterlhabitat qualitylbiota resulting from the implementation of watershed management plans. MANTA'S aquatic resource assessments are used to track progress by the Tributary Strategies teams; to reduce the adverse impacts of acid deposition on Maryland water bodies; to understand the cumulative effects of population growth and development changes on streams and rivers; and provide information about the ecological health of the State's streams, rivers, and bays, including new assessment/management tools, to scientists, governmental agencies, citizen monitoring groups, legislators, environmental educators, and the general public.

MISSION

Provide the citizens of Maryland and this Department with water quality data and technical assessments that describe the ecological/water quality status of Maryland's streams, rivers, the Chesapeake Bay, and Coastal Bays. These assessments will contribute to the development of habitat protection and restoration approaches and will allow measurement of changes in water quality, habitat or biota resulting from the implementation of watershed management plans.

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Annually collect samples and contribute to the assessment of water quality status and trends in the mainstem Chesapeake Bay, its tidal tributaries and Maryland's Coastal Bays.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of mainstem Chesapeake Bay sampling events completed (a, b) 3 20 295 320 320 Number of tributary and Coastal Bays sampling events completed (c, d, e) 1,492 1,153 1,100 1,100 Number of algal samples collected and identified (f, g, h) 1,131 1,043 950 950 Number of tidal tributaries with assessments 0 8 16 16

Note: a.) Mainstem Chesapeake Bay network.(Inputs: FY 2002-2005)

b.) Weather conditions prevented collection of some samples. (Outputs: FY 2002 and 2003)

c.) Networks sampled: Bay Tributary, Enhanced Tributary, Tributary Comprehensive Runs. Numbers of Tributary Comprehensive Runs were reduced in 2002 because of a funding shortage. A few critical areas were added to the Bay Tributary network in 2003. (Inputs: FY 2002-2003)

d.) Funding shortfalls have required reductions in sampling effort to match available funds. (Inputs: 2002-2003; Outputs: 2002-2004)

e.) Weather conditions prevented collection of some scheduled samples. (Outputs: FY 2002-2003)

f.) Algal community monitoring includes a routine tidal network that relies on species composition to track ecosystem conditions. Additional algal samples are collected and processed upon request whenever harmful algal species appear.

g.) Number of algal samples requested reflects collections from the routine network. Final number of samples delivered and identified reflects additional efforts focused on harmful algal investigations.

h.) New federal funds for harmful algal monitoring allowed DNR to deploy continuously recording devices that measure key water quality parameters 24 hours a day. This monitoring program began with four Chesapeake Bay sites in 2002. The program expanded in 2003 to eight sights.

I — 744 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.04 MONITORING AND NON TIDAL - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE (Continued)

Objective 1.2 By 2009, implement 100% of the phase I and I1 actions assigned to DNR in the Coastal Bays Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of sampling events completed (a, b) 508 469 504 504 Number of weeks of data collected 12 64 60 60

Note: a.) Weather conditions prevented the collection of some samples. (Outputs: FY 2002 and 2003)

b.) Funding shortfall caused a decrease in sampling effort to match available funding. (Inputs: 2003-2004)

Goal 2. Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 2.1 By 2006, establish a comprehensive ecosystem-based program to increase critical fisheries reproduction and habitat elements.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of sampling events completed 260 274 260 270 Number of volunteers recruited 76 114 250 100 Number of biologicalhabitat indicator data sets provided 3 3 3 3 Number of stream sites assessed with DNR staff data 260 274 257 235 Number of stream sites assessed with volunteer data 295 396 400 400

I — 745 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.04 MONITORING AND NON-TIDAL ASSESSMENT .RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... 25. 672 Travel ...... 19.020 Fuel and Utilities ...... 12.542 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 128. I68 Contractual Services ...... 355. 988 Supplies and Materials ...... 68. 857 Equipment-Replacement ...... SO. 840 Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... 191. 1.52 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: VC.KO0 Various Federal Contracts ...... 11.426 Financial Assistance for Ocean Resources Conser- vation and Assessment Program ...... 11.478 Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research-Coastal Ocean Program ...... 66.460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants ...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... 66.500 Environmental Protection -Consolidated Research Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: KOOA02 DNR-Forestry Service ...... KOOA03 DNR-Wildlife and Heritage Service ...... KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services...... R30B34 USM-Center for Environmental Science ...... UOOA04 MDE-Water Management Administration ...... U10BOO Maryland Environmental Services ...... Total ......

I — 746 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.05 POWER PLANT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Power Plant Assessment Program functions to ensure that Maryland meets its electricity demands at reasonable costs while protecting the State's valuable natural resources. It provides a continuing program for evaluating electric generation issues and recommending responsible long-term solutions.

MISSION

To assist in assuring that the State is provided adequate electricity at reasonable costs and minimal impact to Maryland's environment by preparing conclusions and recommendations for management and regulatory actions based on scientific data collection and analysis.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 2) Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 1.1 Every year, complete assessment and prepare and issue prior to all formal hearings consolidated recommendations to minimize social, economic and physical impacts of new energy facilities.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of applications and pre-applications for new power plant and transmission line projects under review 23 25 23 15 Outputs: Number of hearings to which recommendations were submitted 2 1 23 23 13 Outcome: Percent of assessments and recommendations completed prior to hearing commencement 100% 100% 100% 100%

Objective 1.2 On an annual basis identify major environmental and public health issues resulting from electricity generation and implement at least 35 projects and investigations to improve the quality of air, land, and water resources.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Major Power Plant Issues 13 13 12 11 Outputs: Research Publications and active projects 59 45 56 5 1 Outcome: Number of projects initiated 59 45 5 6 5 1

Objective 1.3 Perform biennially a cumulative environmental impact assessment of Maryland's existing power plants on Maryland's natural resources.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of existing power plant assets 5 1 5 3 52 49 Biennial Cumulative Environmental Impact assessments completed

I — 747 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.05 POWER PLANT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM .RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ......

I — 748 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.06 TIDEWATER ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Division provides required guidance for the restoration, protection, and management of Maryland's tidal water ecosystems, including the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays and their tributaries, through mandated reporting and other technical assessments of ecological health, evaluation of progress toward management objectives, and identification of causes and solutions for environmental degradation. The Division coordinates Maryland's involvement in many of the technical aspects of the regional Chesapeake Bay Program and the Coastal Bays Program, and is the lead for the State's interagency investigations of harmful algal blooms (HAB). The Division also manages the State's long-term data bases for water quality and living resources. Assessment results are provided frequently to meet reporting requirements and information needs of state, local and federal government resource managers, elected officials, citizens, students, scientists and businesses through interpretive reports, briefings, Internet-based information and raw data.

MISSION

To guide the restoration, protection, management, and safe use of Maryland's tidewater ecosystems, including the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays and their tributaries, through technical assessments of ecosystem health, evaluation of causes and solutions for environmental degradation, tracking progress of management objectives, and involvement of stakeholders in restoration efforts. A major part of the Division's mission is to objectively evaluate whether the numerous management programs are yielding the desired, bottom-line results (e.g. improved water quality, habitat and living resources) in the State's tidal waters.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Annually produce technical assessments of water quality, habitat and biological resources necessary to support the development and modification of the State's Tributary Strategies and other restoration and management programs for the Chesapeake Bay, tidal tributaries and Coastal Bays Programs.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Assessments of 50 major Chesapeake Bay and Tributary segments New or revised water quality criteria adopted for Maryland tidal waters Assessments of major Chesapeake Bay and tributary designated uses for water quality and habitat criteria (D.O., water clarity and chlorophyll) State-wide water quality assessment report mandated by federal Clean Water Act State-wide monitoring strategies Number of Tributary Strategies revised to achieve and maintain the assigned Chesapeake Bay Program loading goals Assessments of key fisheries habitats

I — 749 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.06 TIDEWATER ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT- RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Objective 1.2 Annually meet the Department's commitments to the Chesapeake Bay Program and Coastal Bay Program to assess and restore the health of SAV and other living resources and report on progress.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of SAV datasets collected per year 7.400 7.400 7.400 7,400 Outputs: Number of SAV status and trends reports, presentations, web pages Number of SAV invasive species assessments conducted and control efforts implemented Number of citizens involved in SAV restoration projects Number of schools involved in SAV restoration projects Number of tributary-specific or event-specific (HAB impacts) fish community health assessments conducted Number of large-scale SAV seed collection and propagation projects underway Number of fish community health assessments incorporated into Fishery Management Plans, used in habitat restoration projects, and used in Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) impacts assessments Number of segment-specific assessments of SAV abundance, habitat quality, restoration targeting and criteria for planting and human disturbance Outcome: Amount of exotic SAV species removed (pounds) Amount of SAV planted / transplanted (square meters)

Objective 1.3 Annually produce technical assessments on HAB distribution and prevalence for the Chesapeake Bay, tidal tributaries and Coastal Bays Programs extending our understanding of HAB interactions with living resources, development of new management strategies and providing timely information to the public.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of water, habitat and living resources samples received Number of fish health or human health events reported and responded to Number of HAB issues and events coordinated annually Outputs: Number of tributaries assessed for HABs Annual number of technical reports, web reports and presentations Management strategies developed to reduce prevalence of harmful algal blooms and related economic losses

I — 750 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.06 TIDEWATER ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT .RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO03 10 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: DD.KO0 US Army Corps of Engineers ...... 11.419 Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards 1 1.426 Financial Assistance for Ocean Resources Conser- vation and Assessment Program ...... 11.457 Chesapeake Bay Studies ...... 11.463 Habitat Conservation ...... 11.478 Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research-Coastal Ocean Program ...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... 66.500 Environmental Protection -Consolidated Research 66.606 Surveys, Studies, Investigations and Special Purpose Grants ...... 66.951 Environmental Education Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services ...... R30B34 USM-Center for Environmental Science ...... UOOA04 MDE-Water Management Administration ...... Total ......

I — 751 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.07 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Geological Survey is an applied scientific research organization that gathers and interprets geologic and hydrologic data and information. The Survey provides resource assessments and the information base about water resources, mineral resources, geologic framework and Chesapeake Bay geology that is a fundamental component for policy development and decision making in the Department of Natural Resources, other State departments, county and municipal agencies.

MISSION

To gather information, analyze and report on the State's geology, water and mineral resources (pursuant to Title 2 of the Natural Resources Code) and apply this knowledge to practical problems related to environmental and natural resource issues and communicate earth science information to government agencies and the general public.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Investigate shoreline conditions, sediment physical and chemical characteristics, and sediment transport processes to determine sediments effects on the ecosystem and living resources distribution in the Chesapeake Bay and Coastal Bays. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Reports on open-water dredged sediment placement site 1 1 1 1 Reports on remaining capacity estimates for open-water placement site for future planning 1 1 2 1 Reports on chemical effects at confined placement sites 2 2 2 2 Reports and presentations on habitat and substrate characteristics at proposed sites 5 3 2 2 Reports on sediment volumes and nutrient qualities 0 0 0 1 Report on restoration potential on oyster bars 0 0 13 12

Goal 2. Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers. Objective 2.1 Study the water resources of Maryland in order to determine the quality and rate of replenishment of its aquifers and surface waters by exploration, evaluation and monitoring and report results to the public, government agencies, and private organizations.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Networks operated 6 6 5 5 Outputs: Annual reports 6 6 5 5 Quarterly reports (final report in FY 05) 4 4 3 3 Study report issued NIA 1 1 1

Note: NIA - Not applicable

I — 752 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA12.07 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure .....

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO0319 Maryland Geological Survey Account ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 15.808 U.S.. . Geological Survey-Research and Data Acqui- sition ...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... 66.606 Surveys, Studies, Investigations and Special Purpose Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ...... JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... KOOA06 DNR-Licensing and Registration Service ...... KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services ...... LOOA 15 DAGR-Office of Resource Conservation ...... UOOA04 MDE-Water Management Administration ...... U 1OBOO Maryland Environmental Services ...... Total ......

I — 753 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA13.01 GENERAL DIRECTION - MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Environmental Trust promotes conservation of open space, primarily by accepting conservation easements on properties of environmental, scenic, historic, or cultural significance. The Trust's principal programs are the Conservation Easement Program, Local Land Trust Assistance Program, Rural Historic Village Protection Program and Keep Maryland Beautiful Program

MISSION

To promote conservation of open space, primarily by accepting conservation easements over properties of environmental, scenic, historic, or cultural significance.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 4) A Conserved and Managed Statewide Network of Ecologically Valuable Private and Public Lands. Objective 1.1 By 2009, protect an additional 18,000 acres of land, via conservation easement, to sustain and protect ecologically significant lands.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of acres protected 89,000 97,500 100,000 106,000 Efficiency: Preservation cost per acre for donated easements $180 $180 $180 $180 Preservation cost per acre for purchased easements $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500

I — 754 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

KOOA13.01 GENERAL DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0347 Local Land Trust ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOA01 Department of Transportation ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services ...... Total ......

I — 755 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF WATERSHED SERVICES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 92.50 90.50 90.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Q qn 9 50 9.30 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Original General Fund Appropriation ...... TransferReduction ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 756 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.01 GENERAL DIRECTION- WATERSHED SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Watershed Services Unit is the lead unit within the Department of Natural Resources for coordinating statewide efforts to restore and protect the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays. The Watershed Services Unit provides financial and technical resources to local governments, state government agencies and private landowners to strategically protect, conserve and restore water quality and living resources habitats in the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays watersheds.

MISSION

To promote the conservation and restoration of Maryland's ecosystems through the development, implementation and utilization of resource assessment and prioritization tools and information.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Annually, provide assistance and leadership to Maryland's Tributary Teams to complete 40 projects that help meet the Chesapeake Bay Agreement water quality and habitat goals.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of policy or program changes 2 5 8 8 Number of people reached 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Number of stewardship projects completed 40 40 40 40

Objective 1.2 By 2004, develop new Tributary Strategies for each of Maryland's 10 Tributary basins in accordance with the Chesapeake Bay 2000 Agreement.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Percent revised Tributary Strategies completed 25 % 75% 100% nla Outcome: New Tributary Strategies for each of Maryland's 10 Tributary basins* n/a nla 10 nla

(* - This is a 10-year strategy and will be reevaluated in 2006 and updated if needed)

Objective 1.3 Annually, track policy development for the Chesapeake 2000 Bay Agreement and fulfill the commitments for Stewardship and Sound Land Use.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of commitments tracked and reported for State Agencies 6 7 1 6

I — 757 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.01 GENERAL DIRECTION- WATERSHED SERVICES (Continued)

Goal 2. Healthy Maryland Watershed Lands, Streams and Non-Tidal Rivers.

Objective 2.1 Annually assess 128 watersheds, 450,000 acres of natural resources areas and 500 miles of streams to direct and support the conservation and restoration of Maryland's natural resources.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Number of watersheds assessed for nutrient load contributions 128 128 128 128 Watersheds assessed for wetland condition nla 5 5 5 Number of watershed characterizations prepared 5 5 5 5 Outcome: Percentage of State lands protected 18% 19% 19% 20%

Objective 2.2 Annually provide direct and indirect technical, financial or administrative support for at least 50 on-the- ground projects that conserve or restore Maryland's natural resources.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Annual number of stream restoration projects nla 1 15 2 Annual number of wetland restoration projects 7 13 5 5 Pumpout grants awarded 122 153 160 165 Clean Marinas certified 14 19 15 15 Outcome: Cumulative miles of streams restored nla 0.2 3.4 4.4 Cumulative wetland acres enhanced or restored 142 301 401 501 Cumulative number of Pumpouts in State 41 1 426 44 1 456 Cumulative number of Clean Marinas in State 53 72 87 102

Goal 3. Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 3.1 Provide a combination of funding, workshops and training opportunities for 500 educators per calendar year through Project WET, Healthy Water--Healthy People, Aquatic Resources Education (ARE) conferences and CBNERR workshops.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of workshops conducted 25 27 25 25 Number of educators trained 1,039 937 1,000 1,000

Objective 3.2 Annually provide Hooked on Fishing, Not on Drugs programs to 3,200 youth across Maryland to instill a stewardship ethic.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of organizations trained 1 2 5 6 Number of organizations conducting fishing programs as a result of training 1 2 5 6 Number of fishing programs that used loaner equipment 17 43 45 48 Total number of youth participating 2,028 3,105 3,200 3,300

I — 758 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.01 GENERAL DIRECTION .WATERSHED SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 11 .00 10.00 10.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Food ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... 25. 453 45. 325 101.092

Federal Fund Income: 11.419 Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards 208. 42 1 145.887 20.082 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... 361. 422 Total ...... 208. 421 145.887 381.504

I — 759 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.02 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS - WATERSHED SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Program Development and Operations Program consists of four divisions. The overall responsibility of the Chesapeake Bay Program Division is to ensure broad public and local government involvement in and understanding of the issues, roles and actions needed to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.

The Landscape and Watershed Analysis Division conducts computer-based landscape and watershed assessments to support comprehensive resource conservation and water quality protection and restoration initiatives by state and local agencies

The Watershed Information Services Division oversees the production, management and distribution of spatial data, including computerized maps and other geographic information. This Division also serves DNR units to provide information, coordination and consistency in matters related to environmental review.

The Technical and Planning Services Division provides a variety of services to public and private landowners and businesses as well as local governments and non-profit organizations including: water trail planning and mapping; coordination and funding of Watershed Restoration Action Strategies; stream corridor assessments; identification and implementation of targeted wetland and stream restoration projects; funding and technical assistance to public and private marinas for boat sewage disposal and pollution reduction, and preparation of mandated statewide planning documents and associated public surveys.

I — 760 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.02 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION .WATERSHED SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 05 Food ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants . Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionIReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 761 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.02 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION .WATERSHED SERVICES

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0314 Forest and Park Reserve Fund ...... KO0327 POS Administrative Fee ...... KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ...... KO0347 Local Land Trust ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: VC.KO0 Various Federal Contracts ...... 10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance ...... 11.419 Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards 11.473 Coastal Services Center ...... 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ...... 15.616 Clean Vessel Act ...... 66.460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants ...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOOB01 DOT-State Highway Administration ...... J00100 DOT-State Aviation Administration ...... KOOA02 DNR-Forestry Service ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... KOOA14 DNR-Watershed Services ...... UOOA05 MDE-Technical and Regulatory Services Admin- . . istration ...... Total ......

I — 762 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.05 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT - WATERSHED SERVICES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Coastal Zone Management Program coordinates multi-year, multi-agency initiatives that provide a framework for statewide and watershed-specific water quality and habitat restoration efforts. These efforts help to ensure an effective and coordinated approach toward water quality and habitat conservation among federal, state and local governments. They also provide mechanisms for involvement by the public and local governments in decision-making. The Division manages four separate grant programs: Coastal Zone Management Program, Section 319 Coastal Nonpoint Source Program, Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve in Maryland, and the Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grant. The Coastal Zone Management Program strives to achieve a balance between development and protection of resources in the coastal zone. The nonpoint source program works with state and local governments to plan and implement nonpoint source pollution controls. The Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve manages protected estuarine areas as natural field laboratories and develops a coordinated program of research and education. The Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grant strives to achieve the goals under the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement.

I — 763 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA14.05 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT .WATERSHED SERVICES

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 05 Food ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0342 Waterway Improvement Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 11.419 Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards 11.420 Coastal Zone Management Estuarine Research Reserves ...... 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ...... 66.460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants ...... 66.461 Wetlands Protection-State Development Grants ...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... Total ......

I — 764 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SUMMARY OF FISHERIES SERVICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 148.50 127.50 127.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 21.30 32.10 26.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 8.650. 950 8.249. 941 7.338. 824 Technical and Special Fees ...... 570.784 942.557 757. 870 Operating Expenses ...... 7.486. 345 7.113. 797 7.794. 980 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 6.306. 763 4.296. 830 TransferlReduction ...... -699. 004 -229. 7 16 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 5.607. 759 4.067. 114 Less: General Fund ReversionlReduction ...... 462. 507 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 5.145. 252 4.067. 114 3.276. 212 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 6.653. 454 7.271.054 7.339. 263 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 2.919. 258 3.287. 797 3.601. 043 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 1.990. 115 1.680. 330 1.675. 156 Total Expenditure ...... 16.708.079 16.306.295 15.891.674

I — 765 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.01 GENERAL DIRECTION, POLICY, AND OXFORD - FISHERIES SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program is responsible for the three primary functional areas: Administrative Services, Policy and Development and The Sarbanes Cooperative Oxford Lab. The goals and objectives of Administrative Services and Policy and Development are accomplished through programs 006, 008 and 01 1. Administrative Services- supports all administrative functions.

Policy and Development- includes three projects: Fisheries Management Plans, Regulatory Programs and Commercial and Recreational Services. Fisheries Management Plans compiles and assesses data, and prepares and coordinates fisheries management plans (FMP) to maintain sustainable fisheries in Maryland and the region. Regulatory Programs develops, and administers legislative and regulatory actions, conducts public meetings and hearings; holds administrative hearings for license revocations; allocates fish resources through the regulatory and public notice process; and serves as voting participants on regional fisheries management councils and commissions. Commercial and Recreational Services manages the operations of limited entry quota-based fisheries, operates programs to support recreational fisheries and produces the Fisheries Homepage for the DNR Website.

The Sarbanes Cooperative Oxford Laboratory- operates under the terms of a cooperative agreement between the state and federal agencies. Scientists investigate health problems of fish, shellfish and wildlife in Maryland and maintain worldwide collaborations to improve understanding of aquatic animal health and to prevent and mitigate diseases. The Laboratory participates in the National Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Stranding Network, investigating strandings of these threatened and endangered animals in Maryland. We are working with scientists in other countries to expand a manual of shellfish diseases that will assist scientists in developing nations identify diseases of commercial shellfish.

MISSION

Administrative Services - To provide direction and administrative support to programs in this administration.

Policy and Development - To manage fisheries resources in balance with the ecosystem

Sarbanes Cooperative Oxford Laboratory - Improve the health and survival of Maryland's fish, shellfish and wildlife by providing high quality information and services to managers of natural resources, the research community and the public.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Improve the understanding of fish health and threats to fish health, provide timely and objective detection associated with disease and improved management advice to respond to fish health concerns.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of softshell clam samples received 550 557 5 60 560 Number of sea turtles samples submitted 10 16 25 30 Number of histological samples received from nine State and Federal projects Number of oyster tissue samples received Outputs: Number of softshell clam samples analyzed for both clam dermo disease and disseminated neoplasia disease Number of detailed reports of tests for immumo or ISH Number of detailed reports of tests for dermo disease Number of samples analyzed (pathology) Number of oyster samples analyzed for dermo disease Number of fish, shellfish and wildlife field samples Number of histological samples processed Number of samples analyzed (microbiology)

I — 766 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.01 GENERAL DIRECTION. POLICY AND OXFORD - FISHERIES SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 05 Food ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund ReversionReduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: EE.KOO National Fish and Wildlife Federation Section 6 Grants ...... Cooperative Fishery Statistics ...... Marine Mammal Data Program ...... Unallied Management Projects ...... Chesapeake Bay Studies ...... Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Manage- ment Act ...... Sport Fish Restoration ...... State Wildlife Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOODOO DOT-Maryland Port Administration ...... KOOA05 DNR-Capital Grants and Loan Administration ...... R30B34 USM-Center for Environmental Science ...... Total ......

I — 767 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.06 RESTORATION & ENHANCEMENT HATCHERIES - FISHERIES SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Restoration and Enhancement Program's long term goal is to revitalize the freshwater fisheries resources of Maryland. The primary objective of the program is to protect, enhance, restore, and conserve the quality and richness of the State's diverse fisheries resources and to provide sound scientific management of those resources.

MISSION

To provide high quality, diverse, accessible fishing opportunities, consistent with sound fisheries management practices

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 3) Natural Resources Stewardship Opportunities for Maryland's Urban and Rural Citizens. Objective 1.1 Prioritize threats to fish and shellfish populations and their habitat and initiate restoration activities to restore populations 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of dollars for hatchery production $1,585,283 $1,632,265 $1,590,320 $1,590,320 Outputs: Estimated number of fish produced of 4 species (American shad, hickory shad, yellow perch and striped bass) for restoration of specific drainages with decreased environmental impacts 7,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000

Goal 2. (Departmental Goal 5) Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 2.1 Sustain fishing opportunities and communities: Provide for the sustainable participation of fishing communities and anglers in high quality, diverse, accessible recreational and commercial fishing pportunities

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of fish at various sizes: 500,000 trout, 600,000 freshwater fish of 11 species, 6 million fry and fingerlings of 3 anadromous species 7,100,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000

I — 768 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.06 RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT-HATCHERIES. FISHERIES SERVICE

Appropriation Statement:

Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Food ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO03 12 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... KO0338 Fisheries Management and Protection Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 11.457 Chesapeake Bay Studies ...... 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ...... 15.634 State Wildlife Grants ...... Total ......

I — 769 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.08 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT - FISHERIES SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Resource Management Program provides the biological, technical and socio-economic information needed to scientifically manage Maryland's commercial, recreational and ecologically important fish and shellfish resources.

MISSION

The mission of the Resource Management Program is to monitor and assess the status, trends and socio-economic importance of Maryland's fisheries resources and in cooperation with other agencies for which the Department shares stewardship responsibility, develop a comprehensive management framework for the conservation and equitable use of these resources.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Build and manage sustainable fisheries in Maryland's aquatic ecosystems through regulation of fishing activity (biomass levels at or above target; fishing mortality levels at or below target)

Note: This objective encompasses work to be completed by other Fisheries Service programs

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of species managed using biological reference points Blue crab harvest projections in millions of pounds Number of Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) revised to include ecosystem effects Striped Bass fishing quota (in millions of pounds) Number of yellow perch strategy objectives achieved Number of FMPs with a multispecies management Component Outcome: Number of sustainable fisheries managed (fisheries operating below targets with biomass above thresholds)

Dredge survey index of recruitment (actual count of crabs per dredge tow) Fishing mortality rate of blue crabs (percentage) Dredge survey index of stock size (actual number of crabs per dredge tow)

Striped bass spawning stock biomass Juvenile index (abundance of striped bass young) Striped bass fishing mortality rate (percentage)

I — 770 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.08 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT .FISHERIES SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 1.95 1.740 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 201. 504 03 Communication ...... SO. 493 04 Travel ...... 9. 856 05 Food ...... 2 1 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 11. 066 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 77. 928 08 Contractual Services ...... 645. 615 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 99. 165 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 10.281 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 9. 674 13 Fixed Charges ...... 46. 033 Total Operating Expenses ...... 960. 132 Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0310 Environmental Trust Fund ...... KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund ...... Total ......

Federal Fund Income: 11.407 Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 ...... 11.434 Cooperative Fishery Statistics ...... 11.457 Chesapeake Bay Studies...... 11.474 Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Manage- ment Act ...... 15.605 Sport Fish Restoration ...... 15.634 State Wildlife Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: R30B34 USM-Center for Environmental Science ......

I — 771 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.09 FISHERIES CAPITAL BUDGET - FISHERIES SERVICE

MISSION

To develop an abundant and sustainable oyster population that will significantly improve the ecological and economic benefits that oysters provide to the Chesapeake Bay region.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Sustainable Populations of Living Resources and Aquatic Habitat in the Mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay, Tidal Tributaries and Coastal Bays. Objective 1.1 Assess Maryland's aquatic ecosystems to identify essential fish habitat and inform and direct fish habitat protection.

Note: This objective encompasses the work of several other Fisheries Service programs. In all Fisheries Service objectives, the term "fish" could refer to fish or shellfish.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of hatchery oysters planted 13,000,000 30,000,000 100,000,000 250,000,000 Number of fish passage/blockage removal projects 1 23 4 3 Outcome: Acres of oyster habitat rehabilitated through planting of shell or non-shell habitat* 85 92 200 200 Number of stream miles reopened 364 391 432 446

*This Unit has changed the way this number is calculated to better reflect our activities

I — 772 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.09 FISHERIES CAPITAL BUDGET- FISHERIES SERVICE

Program Description: The Fisheries Capital Program for fisheries management and restoration

Appropriation Statement: 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 1,571,683 Total Operating Expenses ...... 1,571,683 Total Expenditure ...... 1,571,683

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 1,575,000 Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... 3,317 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 1,571,683

I — 773 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.11 SHELLFISH RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT - FISHERIES SERVICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Shellfish Division's primary task is to restore oyster populations and oyster habitat in the Chesapeake Bay. The major techniques for oyster restoration are: shell planting, oyster bar cleaning, seed oyster planting, establishing sanctuaries and reserves to conserve broodstock and enhance ecological benefits of oysters, and regulating harvest to protect oyster stocks. The three main projects in the Division are: 1) the Oyster Repletion Project which plants large volumes of shell and seed oysters to increase harvests and build sanctuary populations, 2) the Oyster Restoration Project which plants shell and seed, cleans habitat, produces hatchery oysters, establishes sanctuaries and reserves to enhance oyster populations for ecological benefits, and 3) the Stock Assessment Project which monitors stocks and evaluates restoration methods. The Shellfish Division works in partnership with other governmental agencies, environmental groups, the University system, industry, the private sector, county oyster committees and other management committees. The Shellfish Division also works with clam and scallop stocks.

MISSION

To plan and implement restoration strategies to increase oyster stocks and habitat, as well as other shellfish species.

Goal 1. (Departmental Goal 5) Diverse Outdoor Recreation Opportunities for Maryland Citizens and Visitors. Objective 1.1 Sustain fishing opportunities and communities: Provide for the sustainable participation of fishing communities and anglers in high quality, diverse, accessible recreational and commercial fishing

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of bushels of oysters harvested 148,155 52,923 50,000 25,000

I — 774 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

KOOA17.11 SHELLFISH RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT .FISHERIES SERVICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Total General Fund Appropriation ...... Less: General Fund Reversion/Reduction ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: KO0312 Fisheries Research and Development Fund

Federal Fund Income: 11.457 Chesapeake Bay Studies...... 66.466 Chesapeake Bay Program ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: JOODOO DOT-Maryland Pofl Administration ......

I — 775 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

kOOa01 Office of the Secretary kOOaOlOl Secretariat secy dept naturak resources 125,514 dep secy dept natural resources lOO,3O4 exec vi 294,067 exec v 9O,OOO prgm mgr senior iv 0 prgm mgr senior iii 182,790 prgm mgr senior i 81,890 prgm mgr iv 86,118 administrator vi 73,825 administrator vi 61,421 prgm mgr iii 80,570 administrator iv 65,282 internal auditor prog super 0 Abolish administrator ii 52,439 internal auditor lead 55,027 internal auditor ii 97,755 admin officer iii 40,604 admin officer ii 74,888 exec assoc iii 103,286 exec assoc i 39,504 admi n aide 0 - - TOTAL kOOa01 01* 1,705,284 kOOa0102 Office of the Attorney General principal counsel 1.00 95,401 asst attorney general viii 1.00 76,463 asst attorney general vii 1-00 83, 163 asst attorney general vi 6.00 405,081 admin officer ii I.OO 42,648 management assoc 1.00 40,778 legal secretary 1.00 33,493

TOTAL kOOa0102* 12.00 kOOa0103 Finance and Administrative Service administrator iv 1.00 administrator iii 1.00 fiscal services administrator v 2.00 accountant manager i 1.00 obs-fiscal administrator iii 1-00 accountant supervisor ii 1.00 obs-fiscaL administrator ii I-00 accountant, lead specialized 2.00

I — 776 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

kOOa0103 Finance and Administrative Service agency budget specialist supv 55,027 accountant, advanced 150,857 administrator i 50,535 administrator i 57,291 accountant i 0 Abolish admin officer ii 44,744 admin officer i 41,906 admin spec iii 0 admin spec ii 36,084 agency procurement specialist l 46,792 agency procurement specialist t 37,784 fiscal accounts technician ii 213,534 agency procurement associate ii 34,790 fiscal accounts technician i 0 fiscal accounts clerk manager 132,161 adrnin aide 31,303 fiscal accounts clerk ii 219,657 services specialist 63,083 fiscal accounts clerk i 21,285 office clerk ii 49,131 fiscal accounts clerk trainee 20,347 ------TOTAL kOOa0103* 1,953,913

kOOa0104 Human Resource Service dir personnel services prgm mgr i obs-equal opportunity admin ii personnel administrator ii personnel administrator i equal opportunity officer iii management development spec equal opportunity officer ii equal opportunity officer ii personnel officer ii admin officer ii personnel officer i admin officer i admin officer i personnel associate iii personnel clerk office secy ii

7------TOTAL kOOa0104* 21 -00

I — 777 PERSONNEL DETAIL NaturaL Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 CLassification TitLe Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions ALLowance SymboL ...... ------

kOOa0105 Information Technology Service dp director ii 1.00 dp asst director ii 1-00 dp programmer anaLyst manager 1-00 computer network spec supr 1-00 webmaster supr 1-00 computer network spec Lead 2.00 dp programmer anaLyst leadladva 4.00 computer network spec ii 2-00 dp programmer analyst ii 1-00 webmaster ii 2.00 computer info services spec ii 4.00 management associate 1-00 admin aide 1.00 ------TOTAL kOOa0105* 22.00

kOOa0106 Office of Comunications and Marketing prgm mgr senior iii 1.00 admin prog mgr iv 1.00 administrator ii 1-00 prgm admin ii 1-00 administrator i 2-00 admin officer iii 1-00 pub affairs officer ii 2.00 pub affairs officer ii -00 admin officer i 1-00 admin officer i 1.00 iLLustrator iii 1-00 management associate 1.00 ------TOTAL kOOa0106* 13.00 TOTAL kOOa01 ** 137.00

kOOaO2 Forestry Service kOOa0209 Forestry Service prgm mgr senior i prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii administrator v prgm mgr ii prgm mgr i forestry manager iv administrator ii dp programmer anaLyst ii forestry manager iii

I — 778 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------kOOaO2 Forestry Service kOOa0209 Forestry Service nat res planner iv administrator i forestry manager ii admin officer iii admin officer iii forestry manager i obs-parks program manager i pub affairs officer ii admin officer ii admin officer i forester trainee iii admin spec ii nat res tech vi nat res tech v nat res tech iv nat res tech iii management associate admin aide office secy iii - - TOTAL kOOa0209* TOTAL kOOaO2 ** kOOa03 Wildlife and Heritage Service kOOa0301 Wildlife and Heritage Service prgm mgr senior i 1-00 75,759 prgm mgr iv 1.00 0 Abolish prgm mgr iii 4.00 290,554 administrator iv 2.00 65,282 administrator iv -00 52,794 prgm mgr i 8.00 538,994 administrator iii 1.00 44,096 nat res planner v 1-00 59,932 envrmntl spec v 1-00 56, I00 nat res biol vi 9.00 372,375 nat res planner iv 3.00 167,228 nat res biol v 5.00 249,930 nat res manager iii 1.00 51,027 obs-parks program manager ii 1-00 97,866 nat res biol iv 12.00 545,839 admin officer ii 1-00 45,173 admin officer i 1-00 41,906 admin spec iii 2.00 150,422 nat res biol ii 2.00 93,656

I — 779 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------k00a03 Wildlife and Heritage Service k00a0301 Wildlife and Heritage Service admin spec ii 5.00 nat res biol i 1.00 nat res tech vi 10.00 nat res tech v 6.00 nat res tech iii 7.00 nat res tech ii 5.00 exec assoc i 1 .OO admin aide 2.00 office secy ii .OO obs-typist clerk iv 1 .OO park technician ii 2.00 ------TOTAL kOOa0301* 96.00 TOTAL k00a03 ** 96.00 k00a04 State Forest and Park Service k00a0401 State-Wide Operation park administrator 3.00 247,540 prgm mgr senior ii 1 .OO 96,494 park regional admin 4.00 382,951 administrator vi 1 .OO 73,825 administrator iv 2.00 129,938 prgm mgr i 1.00 63,415 administrator iii 1 .OO 59,358 exec asst i exec dept 1 .OO 59,358 park ranger manager iii 10.00 700,794 park ranger manager ii 14.00 968,451 park ranger manager i 12.00 763,130 administrator ii 1.00 110,065 administrator ii 1.00 0 nat res planner iv 1 .OO 55,564 administrator i 3.00 51,519 administrator i .OO 54,066 forestry manager ii 3.00 154,065 park services associate supervi 1 .OO 51,027 admin officer iii 2.00 44,246 admin officer iii 1 .OO 101,238 forestry manager i 2.00 48,238 landscape architect ii 1 .OO 48,238 nat res biol iv 1 .OO 47,779 obs-parks program manager i 4.00 95,558 park services associate Lead 1 .OO 36,250 Abolish pub affairs officer ii 2.00 94,657 admin officer ii 3.00 124,315

I — 780 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

k00a04 State Forest and Park Service k00a0401 State-Wide Operation admin officer ii 38,037 forester supervisor 38,771 maint supv i non tic 126,850 admin officer i 41,504 park services associate ii 796,195 park services associate ii 31,250 admin spec iii 72,919 park services associate i 93,820 admin spec ii 869,307 Abolish radio tech supv general 96,476 nat res tech vi 78,781 nat res tech v 38,145 nat res tech iv 36,084 conservation assoc iv 0 park ranger supervisor 1,449,497 park services supervisor 129,125 park services specialist 180,336 ranger ii 4,505,148 ranger i 0 exec assoc i 41,044 admin aide 30,728 office secy iii 94,211 office secy ii 152,033 office secy i 23,096 office services clerk 23,096 maint chief iv non lie 374,075 automotive services supv ii 79,260 automotive services specialist 104,414 maint chief ii non lic 310,272 park technician iv 625,060 park technician iii 28,832 park technician ii 53,075 park technician i 77,719 maint asst 0 conservation aide i 58,569 ------TOTAL k00a0401* 15,359,808 k00a0406 Revenue Operations office secy iii

TOTAL k00a0406* TOTAL k00a04 ** 331.50 15,634,796 313.50 15,204,429 311.50 15,394,271

I — 781 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. k00a05 Capital Grants & Loan Administration k00a0505 Operations prgm mgr iii 1 .OO administrator v 1 .OO prgm mgr ii 4.00 administrator iv 1 .OO administrator iii 5.00 landscape architect v 1 .OO engr sr civil general 1 .OO water res engr iii hydrology 1 .OO engr iii civil-general 1 .OO admin officer iii 4.00 admin officer iii .OO nat res planner iii 7.00 admin officer ii 4.00 admin spec iii .OO waterways improvement tech iii .OO waterways improvement tech i 1 .OO exec assoc iii 1 .OO exec assoc i 1 .OO admin aide 3.00 ------TOTAL k00a0505* 37.00 TOTAL k00a05 ** 37.00 k00a06 Licensing and Registration Service k00a0601 General Direction prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO administrator v 1 .OO administrator v -00 computer info services spec sup .00 administrator i 1 .OO computer info services spec ii 3.00 admin officer ii 1 .OO admin spec iii 3.00 admin spec iii .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO admin spec i 1 .OO licensing registration center 8.00 licensing registration spec 6.00 admin aide 1 .OO licensing registration tech i 6.00 licensing registration tech i 9.00 licensing registration tech i 2.00 licensing registration tech i 1 .OO

I — 782 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

k00a07 Natural Resources Police k00a0701 General Direction nat res police superintendent nat res police chief nat res police major nat res police major administrator v prgm mgr ii administrator iv nat res police captain nat res police lieut nat res planner iv administrator i admin officer iii agency grants specialist ii admin officer ii recreation specialist ii admin spec iii admin spec ii nat res police sergeant radio tech supv general communicatns supv law enforcrnnt radio tech ii agency buyer ii police communications open ii police communications oper i nat res police corporal nat res police off i/c nat res police off management associate admin aide office secy i office services clerk automotive services supv ii marine engine technician ii maint chief i non lie painter

TOTAL kOOa0701* k00a0704 Field Operations nat res police chief nat res police major nat res police major nat res police captain nat res police lieut

I — 783 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------k00a0704 Field Operations nat res police chief pilot nat res police sergeant police communications open police communications oper nat res police corporal nat res police off i/c nat res police off admin aide aviation mechanic helicopter 1.00 39,850 1 .OO 39,095 1 .OO 39,850 ------TOTAL k00a0704* 207.00 10,605,635 206.00 11,069,483 206.00 11,312,711 k00a0705 Waterway Management Services nat res police captain 2.00 nat res police lieut 1 .OO dp programmer analyst ii 1 .OO hydrographer iv 1 .OO nat res manager ii 1 .OO master ii nat res vessel 3.00 admin spec iii 1.OO chf marine engineer 3.00 hydrographic engr assoc iv 1 .OO hydrographic engr assoc iii 1.OO hydrographic engr assoc ii 3.00 admin aide 1 .OO services specialist 1 .OO marine engine technician ii 1 .OO painter .OO mate nat res vessel 4.00 sailor iii 1.00 ---- TOTAL k00a0705* 26.00 TOTAL k00a07 ** 285.00 k00a08 Resource Planning k00a0801 Resource Planning Administration prgm mgr iv 1 .OO prgm mgr ii 1 .OO prgm mgr i 1 .OO dp programmer analyst supervise 1 .OO nat res planner v 3.00 administrator ii 1.OO dp programmer analyst ii 1 .OO nat res planner iv 1 .OO computer info services spec ii 1.OO

I — 784 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------k00a08 Resource Planning k00a0801 Resource Planning Administration envrmntl spec iv general .OO nat res planner i i i 1.00 admin officer ii 1.00 nat res planner i i 2.00 nat res planner i 1 .OO cartographer iii 1 .OO cartographer ii 1 .OO admin aide 1 .OO services specialist 1 .OO

TOTAL k00a0801* 20.00 TOTAL k00a08 ** 20.00 k00a09 Engineering and Construction k00a0901 General Direction prgm mgr ii administrator iii water res engr v environmental water res engr v hydrology water res engr iv hydrology administrator ii water res engr in hydrology administrator i bldg construction engineer engr iii civil-general admin officer ii master ii nat res vessel bldg construction insp iii waterways improvement tech iii hydrographic engr assoc iii waterways improvement tech i waterways improvement tech ii park services specialist agency procurement specialist i admin aide office secy iii carpenter trim carpenter

TOTAL k00a0901* TOTAL k00a09 **

I — 785 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------kOOalO Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission kOOalOOl Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission chair ches crit area comm 1.00 administrator v -00 prgm mgr i .oo administrator iii 1 .oo nat res planner v 2.00 administrator ii 1 .oo nat res planner iv 4.00 planner iv 1 .oo nat res planner iii 1 .oo management associate 1 .oo admin aide 1 .oo office secy iii 1 .oo ------TOTAL k00a1001* 14.00 TOTAL k00a10 ** 14.00 k00a12 Resource Assessment Service k00a1201 Support Services dir resource assessment serv 1 .OO dp programmer analyst supervise 1 .OO administrator ii 1 .OO computer info services spec ii 1 .OO admin officer ii 1 .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO ------TOTAL kOOa1201* 6.00 318,329 6.00 305,951 6.00 311,836 k00a1204 Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment dir power plant siting prgm 1 .oo obs-energy resources admin iii .oo prgm mgr i i 1 .oo envrrnntl prgm mgr i water mgt 1 .oo obs-energy resources admin i 1.00 nat res biol vi 1.00 nat res biol v 3.00 nat res biol iv 7.00 admi n officer i i 1 .oo nat res biol iii 6.00 master ii nat res vessel 1 .oo pub affairs officer i 1 .oo nat res biol ii 5.00 nat res biol i 2.00 hydrographic engr assoc ii 1 .oo admin aide 1 .oo

I — 786 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

k00a1204 Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment office secy iii 2.00 65,629 2.00 66,986 2.00 67,949 ------TOTAL k00a1204* 35.00 1,454,032 35.00 1,505,264 35.00 1,531,348 k00a1205 Power Plant Assessment Program dir power plant siting prgm 1 .OO obs-energy resources admin iii -00 prgm mgr ii 1 .OO prgrn mgr i 1 .OO administrator iii 1 .OO obs-energy resources admin i 3.00 admin officer iii 1 .OO admin aide 1 .OO office secy ii 1.00 ------TOTAL kOOa1205* 10.00 k00a1206 Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment prgm mgr senior i 1 .OO prgm mgr ii 1 .OO administrator iv 1 .OO dp programmer analyst lead/adva 1 .OO dp programmer analyst ii 4.00 envrmntl spec v 1 .OO nat res biol vi 3.00 nat res planner iv 2.00 dp programmer analyst i 1.00 nat res biol v 1-00 research statistician vi 2.00 admin officer iii 1 .OO nat res biol iv 2.00 research statistician v 4.00 admin officer ii 2.00 nat res biol iii 2.00 admin spec iii 1 .OO admin spec ii 1 .OO dp programmer -00 admin aide 1 .OO office services clerk 1 .OO ------TOTAL kOOa1206* 33.00 k00a1207 Maryland Geological Survey prgm mgr iv 1 .OO 77,789 1 .OO 78,128 1 .OO 78,896 principal geologist 4.00 259,203 4.00 250,211 4.00 253,912

I — 787 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol . -. .------k00a1207 Maryland Geological Survey geol iv general geol iv geohydrology geol iv sedmntlgy strtgrphy water res engr iii enviromental geol iii geohydrology admin officer ii envrmntl spec iii general obs-park naturalist geol i agency procurement associate ii admin aide office secy iii ------TOTAL k00a1207* 27.00 TOTAL k00a12 ** 111.00 k00a13 Maryland Environmental Trust k00a1301 General Direction administrator v 1 .OO nat res planner iv 2.00 administrator i 1 .OO admin officer iii 1 .OO nat res planner iii 3.00 office secy iii 2.00

TOTAL k00a1301* TOTAL k00a13 ** k00a14 Watershed Services k00a1401 General Direction prgm mgr senior i administrator vii prgm mgr iii administrator ii admin officer iii computer info services spec ii admin spec ii nat res biol i exec assoc i office secy ii - - - TOTAL kOOa1401*

I — 788 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------k00a1402 Program Development and Operation prgm mgr iv prgm mgr iii administrator v prgm mgr i i principal planner prgm mgr i administrator iii administrator iii dp programmer analyst superviso water res engr v hydrology dp programmer analyst lead/adva nat res planner v water res engr iv hydrology administrator ii computer info services spec sup dp programmer analyst ii geol iv geomorphology nat res biol vi nat res planner iv water res engr iii hydrology dp programmer analyst i admin officer iii nat res manager ii nat res planner iii admin officer ii nat res biol iii park services associate ii admin spec iii agency grants specialist traine envrmntl spec ii general nat res biol i i nat res planner i illustrator ii admin aide office secy iii

TOTAL kOOa1402* k00a1405 Coastal Zone Management prgm mgr iii administrator v nat res planner v administrator ii nat res planner iv administrator i

I — 789 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------k00a1405 Coastal Zone Management admin officer iii agency grants specialist ii computer info services spec ii nat res biol iv nat res planner iii obs-parks program manager i obs-park naturalist office secy ii

TOTAL kOOa1405* 21 .oo TOTAL k00a14 ** 92.50 k00a17 Fisheries Service k00a1701 General Direction, Policy and Oxford prgm mgr senior i 1 .oo prgm mgr iv 1 .oo prgm mgr iii 1 .oo prgm mgr ii 1.00 prgm mgr i 2.00 administrator iii 2.00 veterinarian iv agric 1.00 obs-data proc mgr iv 1 .oo administrator ii 4.00 dp programmer analyst ii 2.00 nat res planner iv 3.00 research statistician vii 1 .oo administrator i 1 .oo engr iii civil-general 1 .oo admin officer iii 2.00 computer info services spec ii 2.00 nat res biol iv 4.00 nat res manager ii 1 .oo admin officer ii 3.00 nat res biol iii .oo envrmntl spec iii general 1 .oo master ii nat res vessel 1 .oo admin spec iii 1 .oo nat res biol ii 8.50 pub affairs specialist iii 1 .oo admin spec ii 1 .oo conservation assoc v 1 .oo admin aide 2.00 office secy ii 1 .oo maint mechanic senior 1 .oo

------a------TOTAL kOOa1701* 52.50 2,326,992 36.50 1,654,531 36.50 1,682,853

I — 790 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------k00a1706 Restoration and Enhancement-Hatcheries prgm mgr iii 1 .OO prgm mgr i i 1 .OO prgm mgr 1 1.OO administrator iii 1.OO administrator ii .OO nat res biol vi 5.00 nat res biol v 4.00 nat res biol iv 5.00 nat res planner iii 1.OO nat res biol iii 11.00 nat res biol ii .OO nat res tech vi .OO hydrographic engr assoc iii 1 .OO nat res tech v 7.00 nat res tech iv 4.00 nat res tech iii 3.00 nat res tech ii 1.00 office secy ii 1.OO conservation aide iv 1.OO ------TOTAL kOOa1706* 48.00 k00a1708 Resource Management prgm mgr iii prgm mgr i nat res biol vi research statistician vii nat res biol v obs-data proc prog analyst spec research statistician vi nat res biol iv nat res biol iii nat res biol ii obs-data proc prog trainee nat res tech v office services clerk - - - TOTAL kOOa1708* k00a1711 Shellfish Restoration and Management prgm mgr 11 1.OO 60,905 1.OO 60,905 1.OO 62,096 administrator iv 1.OO 61,597 1.OO 61,597 1.OO 62,801 prgm mgr i 1.OO 59,259 1.OO 59,259 1.OO 60,416 nat res biol vi 1.OO 55,027 1.OO 55,027 1.OO 56,100 nat res biol iv 1.OO 47,319 1 .OO 47,319 1.OO 48,238

I — 791 PERSONNEL DETAIL Natural Resources and Recreation

k00a1711 Shellfish Restoration and Management nat res biol iii 4.00 nat res biol ii 1 .OO nat res tech v 2.00 nat res tech iv 2.00

TOTAL k00a171 I* 14.00 TOTAL k00a17 ** 148.50

I — 792 PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Operating Expenses ...... 150,262,166 136,682,755 128,490,311 Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 149,900,588 141,096,364 TransferEeduction ...... 414,769 -4,413, 609 Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 150,315,357 136,682,755 Less: General Fund ReversionIReduction ...... 53, 191 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 150,262,166 136,682,755 128,490,311

I — 9 PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

A15000.01 DISPARITY GRANTS

Program Description: Section 9 of Article 24 authorizes disparity grants to address the differences in the capacities of Baltimore City and certain counties to raise revenue from the local income tax. Beginning in fiscal year 1992, disparity grants were provided to Baltimore City and counties whose per capita piggyback income tax revenue are less than 70 percent of the State average. In fiscal year 1998, the percent was increased to 75. The fiscal year 2004 appropriation includes the statutory grant of $96,655,528 and an additional grant of $9,175,892. The fiscal year 2005 allowance includes an additional grant of $500,000 to Garrett County to assure that each subdivision receives an increase in direct State funding in conjuction with other legislative proposals.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance MeasuresIPerformance Indicators

Allegany ., .. , . . , . . , . , , . , , . ., , ,, , .. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ... ,.. ., , ,, .. .. ,. , . , , . , , ,.. ,.. ,. , . , , , . , . , , . , , . , , . , Baltimore City ...... Caroline...... , ...... , . . , , . , Dorchester ...... , . , ...... ,.. ,.. ,., , .. ,.. ,.. ,.. , ,, . , , . .. ,.. .. ,. , , ,.. ,.. ,. , , . , , .. ,. , . , , . , , . , Garrett ...... , Prince George's ...... Somerset ...... , .. ,. , . . , . , ...... ,...... ,.. ., Washington ...... ,...... ,.. ,, . , , ,, , . , , . , , . , , . , , ,. , , . , . , , . , . , ...... , , . , , . , , ,... .,, .. ,.. ,.. ,. Wicomico ......

Total ...... ,... ., ., . . , , . , , . , , . ., ......

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Net General Fund Expenditure ......

I — 10 PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

A18R00.01 SECURITY INTEREST FILING FEES

Program Description: Section 13-208 of the Transportation Article provides a general fund grant to Baltimore City, beginning with fiscal year 1998, equal to $5 of each security interest filing fee collected by the Motor Vehicle Administration.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators Baltimore City ...... $2,797,685 $3,164,769 $3,025,000 $3,196,000

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 3,164,769 Total Operating Expenses ...... 3,164,769 Total Expenditure ...... 3,164,769

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 2,750,000 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... 414,769 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 3,164,769

I — 11 PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

A19S00.01 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION-CERTAIN LOCAL EMPLOYEES

Program Description: The state provides retirement benefits for certain local employees. primarily in the offices of local sheriffs and state's attorneys . Section 32 of Chapter 109. Acts of 1998. requires direct funding of the annual employer contributions to the retirement systems for the retirement costs of these employees.

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators:

2002 2003 2004 2005 Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation

Allegany ...... 6. 527 7. 475 Anne Arundel ...... 5. 188 30. 134 Baltimore City ...... 1.033.251 1.051. 570 Baltimore County ...... 6. 835 7. 722 Calvert ...... 2. 986 29. 207 Caroline ...... 4. 917 6.529 Can-oil ...... 4. 49 1 6. 047 Cecil ...... 6. 441 8. 417 Dorchester ...... 7. 707 8. 710 Garrett ...... 269 380 Howard ...... 14.789 41. 134 Kent ...... 2. 110 2. 384 Montgomery ...... 4. 344 5. 174 Prince George's ...... 29. 459 68. 182 Queen Anne's ...... 4. 625 8. 258 Washington ...... 4. 061 5. 090 Wicomico ...... 7. 358 9. 149 Worcester ...... 4.852 5. 729 Unallocated ...... 1.021 Total ...... Allowance

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 1.302.312 Total Operating Expenses ...... 1.302.312 Total Expenditure ...... 1.302.312

Total General Fund Appropriation ...... 1.355. 503 Less: General Fund ReversionlReduction ...... 53. 191 Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 1.302. 312

I — 12 PAYMENTS TO CIVIL DIVISIONS OF THE STATE

A20T00.01 ELECTRICITY GENERATING EQUIPMENT PROPERTY TAX GRANT

Program Description: Article 24. Section 9-1 102. provides for a grant to specific subdivisions to offset the cost of the property tax exemption for personal property that is machinery or equipment used to generate electricity for sale . Beginning in fiscal 2001. the grant was phased in over a two-year period to correspond to the phase-in of the exemption . The fiscal year 2004 appropriation reflects a 14.4% reduction approved by the Board of Public Works on July 30. 2003 .

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Performance Measures/Performance Indicators Anne Arundel ...... Baltimore City ...... Baltimore County ...... Calvert ...... Charles ...... Dorchester ...... Garrett ...... Harford ...... Montgomery ...... Prince George's ...... Washington ...... Reduction contingent upon legislation ...... Total ......

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 30.615. 201 Total Operating Expenses ...... 30,615. 201 Total Expenditure ...... 30.615. 201

Original General Fund Appropriation ...... 30.615. 201 Transfer of General Fund Appropriation ...... Net General Fund Expenditure ...... 30,615, 201

I — 13

RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION

Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems Teachers and State Employees Supplemental Retirement Plans Injured Workers’ Insurance Fund

MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS

G20J01.01 STATE RETIREMENT AGENCY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program implements the objectives of the State Retirement and Pension System. The Executive Director's Office is responsible for the executive direction of the System including administrative and investment policy, legislation and legal liaison, and financial affairs. The Administrative Division is responsible for the payment of benefits, administration of employee contributions, and individual and group membership counseling. The Finance Division is responsible for accounting and financial reporting, budget administration, and procurement. The Investment Division is responsible for the management, control and investment of the System's Retirement Accumulation and Annuity Savings Funds. The Internal Audit Division ensures Agency compliance with State laws, rules and regulations, as well as ensuring employer compliance with Agency reporting policies. The Information Services Division is responsible for the design and implementation of new automated management information systems and for maintenance and enhancements of existing systems. MISSION

To administer the survivor, disability, and retirement benefits of the System's participants, and to ensure that sufficient assets are available to fund the benefits when due. VISION

A state that provides a fully-funded retirement system that is affordable to all participating employees and provides guaranteed adequate disability, survivor, and retirement benefits.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To invest prudently System assets in a well-diversified manner to optimize long-term returns, while controlling risk through excellence in execution of the investment objectives and strategies of the System. Objective 1.1 By the end of each fiscal year, meet the Board of Trustees' absolute return objective of achieving a real rate of return of at least 3.0%.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Difference between the actual rate of return for the composite portfolio and the 10-year rolling average of the annual national inflation rate

Objective 1.2 By the end of each fiscal year, meet the Board of Trustees' absolute return objective of achieving a nominal rate of return that equals or exceeds the actuarial return assumption set by the Board of Trustees.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Difference between the actual rate of return for the composite portfolio and the actuarial return assumption set by the Board of Trustees over a 10-year rolling average

Objective 1.3 Over the long term (5-year rolling periods), meet or exceed median peer performance, where peers are defined as other public pension funds with assets in excess of $1 billion.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Difference between the nominal rate of return for the composite portfolio and the nominal median peer return over a 5-year rolling period (1.92)% (1.82%) NIA NIA MSRPS nominal rate of return over a 5-year rolling period 3.21% 89% NIA NIA

Note: NIA - Estimate not available.

I — 527 MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS

G20J01.01 STATE RETIREMENT AGENCY (Continued)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated

Outcomes: Nominal peer return over a 5-year rolling period 5.13% 2.71% NIA N/A Fair value of investment portfolio at fiscal year end ($000~) $26,5 12,600 $26,622,400 NIA NIA Net investment income earned during the fiscal year ($000~) ($2,159,700) $756,700 NIA NIA

Goal 2. To effectively communicate with all retirement plan participants to inform them about the benefits provided by the System and to educate them about planning and preparing for all aspects of their defined benefit system.

Objective 2.1 By the end of fiscal year 2004, 90% of new retirees and active plan participants should feel that they received adequate information to make informed decisions regarding their defined benefit retirement options.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: The percentage of new retirees and active plan participants who respond favorably to a customer survey regarding the adequacy of information disseminated through individual counseling and through telephone inquiry

Objective 2.2 On an ongoing basis, no more than 5.0 percent of incoming telephone calls will be abandoned by the phone system and waiting time for calls to be answered will be less than 1:45 minutes.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Percentage of incoming telephone calls abandoned by the automated telephone system 5.4% 4.5% 5.0% 5.0% Average telephone waiting time in minutes: seconds 1:20 1:05 1:45 1:45

Goal 3. To accurately and timely pay all retirement allowances provided by State pension law to the System's retirees and their beneficiaries.

Objective 3.1 On an ongoing basis, 98% of retirement allowances will be processed timely.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of new retirees during fiscal year 5,031 5,321 5,000 5,000 Dollar value of retirement benefits paid ($000~) $1,372,300 $1,474,300 $1,575,000 $1,700,000 Quality: Percentage of retirement applications processed within the stated time frame 99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 99.0%

Objective 3.2 On an ongoing basis, 100% of retirement allowances paid will be accurately computed in accordance with the State Pension Law. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percentage of retirement benefit payments accurately computed 99.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0%

Note: NIA Estimate not available. Dollars expressed in thousands.

I — 528 MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS

G20J01.01 STATE RETIREMENT AGENCY

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: G20301 Investment Income ...... 19.751. 555 20.258. 051 21,239,978

I — 529 TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS

G50L00.01 MARYLAND SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN BOARD AND STAFF

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Title 35 of the State Personnel and Pension Article establishes the Teachers and State Employees Supplemental Retirement Plans and a Board of Trustees to administer them. Operating expenses are provided from an assessment against the managed assets of participants.

As a reform component for the State Employees' Pension System, an optional defined contribution system was established effective July 1, 1999. That system, under Title 32 of the State Personnel and Pension Article, authorizes employer matching contributions for State Employees' Pension System members who elect to contribute to the supplemental retirement plans. The Match Plan receives dollar-for-dollar matching contributions in eligible participant accounts up to a maximum amount per fiscal year as provided in the State Budget. To conserve spending, the Match Plan statutory maximum amount of $600 was reduced to $500 in fiscal year 2003 and suspended in fiscal year 2004.

MISSION

To enable State employees and teachers to participate in voluntary tax sheltered income deferral, tax deferred annuity, and profit sharing and salary reduction savings plans that offer members tax advantages as provided in the Internal Revenue Code.

VISION

A State that sponsors productive voluntary retirement savings programs for all its employees to secure economic stability for themselves and their families in later years.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To provide clear and complete information about the plans to employees and cultivate their informed decisions about participation. Objective 1.1 To encourage 85% of eligible employees to participate in the plans.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Deferred Compensation (457) Plan members 28,574 28,453 28,500 29,100 Tax Deferred Annuity (403b) Plan members 1,365 1,279 1,280 1,300 Savings & Investment (401k) Plan members 37,175 37,086 37,100 37,800 Outcomes: All Plans members 67,114 66,818 66,880 68,200 Plan members as percent of eligible employees 83% 83% 84% 85% All Plans contributing members 45,571 45,581 45,700 46,600 Contributors as percent of eligible employees 56% 57% 57% 58%

I — 530 TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS

G50L00.01 MARYLAND SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN BOARD AND STAFF (Continued)

Goal 2. To provide effective, long-term investment opportunities for participants. Objective 2.1 To maintain plan asset growth illustrative of market performance and prudent participant selections.

Annual Rates of Return as of June 30,2003

lYear 3 Years 5Years 10 Years Outcomes: Average Returns for all Investment Options 2.2% -6.1% 1.9% 9.4% Average of all Investment Indices 0.9% -7.3% 0.4% 8.0%

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: All plans Net total assets* (millions) Invested assets (millions) Outcomes: Change over previous fiscal year

Notes: * Net Total Assets for the 457 Plan includes assets such as the cash value of life insurance and annuity reserves in addition to Invested Assets.

I — 531 TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS

G50L00.01 MARYLAND SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN BOARD AND STAFF

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: G50301 Participant Charges ......

I — 532 INJURED WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Injured Worker's Insurance Fund (IWIF) is a non-budgeted, independent entity. IWIF is governed by a Board of nine directors (appointed by the Governor to 5-year terms), which approves the operating and capital budgets. By law, IWIF's calendar year 2003 budget is submitted to the General Assembly for informational purposes only. The primary purpose of IWIF is to provide workers compensation insurance to Maryland-based businesses. IWIF provides workers compensation insurance to employers who do not wish, or are not allowed, to self-insure. The goal of IWIF is to provide insurance coverage and to pay benefits promptly to injured workers and dependents. Financing for IWIF is derived solely from its premium and investment income.

MISSION

The mission of the Injured Workers' Insurance Fund is to provide high-quality workers' compensation services at a fair market price for the benefit of all Marylanders. In providing this service, IWIF adds to the economic vitality of the state and supports the financial stability of Maryland businesses. VISION

To be the workers' compensation insurer of choice for Maryland.

KEY GOALS

To intensify our commitment to being customer-driven so as to provide superior internal and external service.

To create an internal organization structure that will help spur profitable growth.

To maximize operating efficiencies, enhance management of financial and human assets, and lead in the marketplace by leveraging technology.

To create and maintain a high-performance culture that motivates, challenges and rewards employees.

To brand IWIF with workplace safety. Create and respond to market opportunities.

I — 533 INJURED WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND

SUMMARY OF INJURED WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND

2003 2004 2005 Estimated Estimated Estimated Number of Authorized Positions ...... 406.00 398.00 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 27.935. 000 29.125. 000 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 604.000 572. 000 03 Communication ...... 1.037.000 998.000 04 Travel ...... 219. 000 210. 000 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 30.000 43. 000 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 34. 000 37. 000 08 Contractual Services ...... 2.901. 000 3.287. 000 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 556. 000 683.000 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 222. 000 223.000 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 20. 000 8.000 13 Fixed Charges ...... 735.000 574.000 14 Land and Structures ...... 872. 000 1.102.000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 6.626. 000 7.165. 000 Total Expenditure ...... 35.165. 000 36.862. 000

Non-Budgeted Funds ...... 35.165. 000 36.862. 000

Non-budgeted Fund Income: G99701 Premium and Investment Income ......

I — 534 PERSONNEL DETAIL Retirement and Pension Systems Administration

g20j01 Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems g20j0101 State Retirement Agency exec dir for investments ret exec dir state retirement agenc exec vi prgm mgr senior iv principal counsel asst attorney general viii prgm mgr senior ii prgm mgr senior i administrator vii administrator vii asst attorney general vi dp asst director i i i prgm mgr iv administrator vi dp asst director ii prgm mgr iii admin prog mgr ii administrator v administrator v admin prog mgr i administrator iv personnel administrator iii personnel administrator iii prgm mgr i administrator iii accountant manager iii asst attorney general v fiscal services administrator i accountant manager ii computer network spec mgr computer network spec supr dp programmer analyst supervise dp technical support spec super accountant supervisor ii computer network spec lead dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp quality assurance spec dp technical support spec ii dp technical support spec ii internal auditor super investment operations manager accountant supervisor i accountant, lead specialized

I — 535 PERSONNEL DETAIL Retirement and Pension Systems Administration

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------, g20j01 Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems g20j0101 State Retirement Agency administrator ii administrator ii computer network spec ii computer network spec ii dp programmer analyst ii dp staff spec internal auditor lead obs-data proc staff specialist personnel administrator i webmaster ii accountant, advanced administrator i dp functional analyst ii dp functional analyst ii personnel officer iii accountant ii admin officer iii computer info services spec ii ret benefits counselor iv accountant i admin officer ii internal auditor i personnel officer i ret benefits counselor iii ret services specialist iv admin officer i admin officer i ret benefits counselor ii admin spec iii ret services specialist ii admin spec ii ret services specialist i dp production control spec supr computer operator ii computer operator i dp production control spec ii dp production control spec i fiscal accounts technician supv ret benefits counselor i fiscal accounts technician ii exec assoc iii exec assoc ii obs-executive associate i admin aide

I — 536 PERSONNEL DETAIL Retirement and Pension Systems Administration

g20jOl Maryland State Retirement and Pension Systems g20jOlOl State Retirement Agency services specialist 3.00 42,396 -00 0 -00 0 office services clerk 1.00 26,785 1-00 29,988 1.00 30,275 ------TOTAL g20jOIOl* 168.00 8,183,051 164.00 8,364,670 164.00 8,511,354 TOTAL g20jOI ** 168.00 8,183,051 164.00 8,364,670 164.00 8,511,354 g50lOO Teachers and State Employees Supplemental Retirement Plans g50lOOOl Maryland Supplemental Retirement Plan Board and Staff exec vi i 1-00 111,008 1-00 administrator vii I-00 76,622 1-00 administrator vi 1-00 71,701 1-00 administrator iii 2.00 104,015 2.00 obs-fiscal administrator iii 1-00 62,801 1-00 obs-fiscal specialist iii 1.00 50,535 1-00 admin officer iii 1-00 42,989 1-00 admin officer ii 4.00 167,496 4.00 obs-accountant-auditor iv 1-00 41,504 I.OO obs-accountant-auditor iii 1.00 35,345 1.00 office secy iii 1.50 50,240 I-50 office secy i 1-00 23,096 I.OO ------TOTAL g5010001* 16.50 837,352 16.50 TOTAL g50lOO ** 16.50 837,352 16.50

I — 537

TRANSPORTATION

Department of Transportation Secretary’s Office Debt Service Requirements State Highway Administration Maryland Port Administration State Motor Vehicle Administration Maryland Transit Administration State Aviation Administration Maryland Transportation Authority

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MISSION

The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) will facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods across all transportation modes.

VISION

To provide a transportation system that works for people.

KEY GOALS

Goal 1. Efficiency - Maximize the Effectiveness of Existing Systems - Extend the useful life of existing facilities and equipment - Maximize the operational performance and capacity of the existing systems

Goal 2. Mobility - Provide Critical New Systems Additions - Relieve congestion by adding key system links - Support varied modal needs with cost-effective options

Goal 3. Safety - Increase Systems Safety and Security - Reduce injuries, fatalities and risks - Improve security of the public

Goal 4. Productivity and Quality - Improve Program and Project Delivery - Reduce project implementation time through process improvements - Incorporate environmental stewardship into all projects and activities - Contain costs and leverage resources with business-like organization and innovative approaches to finance and service delivery

I — 575 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 9,318.50 9,095.50 9,134.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 121.86 175.85 171.85 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 579,845,464 569,668,624 584,625,207 Technical and Special Fees ...... 165,885,088 176,721,426 147,010,134 Operating Expenses ...... 2,386,337,965 2,592,921,772 2,499,000,242 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 2,418,603,477 2,501,000,956 2,494,332,693 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 710,993,967 837,659,446 736,302,890 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 2,471,073 651,420 Total Expenditure ...... 3,132,068,517 3,339,311,822 3,230,635,583

TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Source of Funds: Taxes and Fees ...... Operating Revenues ...... Investment Income ...... Other ...... Federal Funds-Operations ...... Federal Funds-Capital ...... Capital Reimbursements ...... Bond Proceeds ...... Premium on Sale of Bonds ...... MdTA Transfer ...... Reversion-Encumbrances ...... Total Department ......

County and Municipality Funds ...... Total Source of Funds ...... Less: Projected Expenditures ...... Contingent Reduction ...... Revised Expenditures ......

Increase/Decrease(-) ...... Transfer to the General Fund ...... Capital Program Adjustment ...... Fund Balance at July 01 ...... Fund Balance at June 30 ......

I — 576 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND REVENUES

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Taxes and Fees: Highway User Revenue ...... 1.052.619. 732 1.093.269. 829 1.130.957. 311 Gasoline and Motor Vehicle Revenue Account Deductions Retained by DOT ...... 140.386. 285 148.027.000 153.091.000 Miscellaneous MVA Revenue ...... 129.779. 797 133.727.700 135.625. 200 General Fund Share of Fees ...... -160.000. 000 -154.913. 000 Total Taxes and Fees ...... 1.162.785. 814 1.220.111. 529

Operating Revenues: Maryland Port Administration ...... 91.901. 161 89.301. 000 Mass Transit Administration ...... 98.236. 527 106.156.000 Maryland Aviation Administration ...... 8.106. 655 121.608.000 Maryland Aviation Administration PFCs ...... 11.598.909 41,857.000 Total Operating Revenues ...... 299.843. 252 358.922. 000

Other: The Secretary's Office ...... 20.629.000 State Highway Administration ...... 8.000. 000 Hauling Fees-State Highway Administration ...... 8.000. 000 Investment Income ...... 2.500. 000 Reimbursements ...... 398. 841 Total Other Revenue ...... 39.527. 841

Federal Funds-Operations: The Secretary's Office ...... 7.817. 714 State Highway Administration .Maintenance ...... 6.966. 474 State Highway Administration - Safety ...... 12.935.274 Motor Vehicle Administration ...... 387. 764 Mass Transit Administration ...... 5 1.606. 220 Maryland Aviation Administration ...... 199.000 Total Federal FundsÃ‘Operation ......

I — 577 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND REVENUES .(CONTINUED)

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Federal Funds-Capital: The Secretary's Office ...... Washington Metro Area Transit ...... State Highway Administration ...... Maryland Port Administration ...... Mass Transit Administration ...... Maryland Aviation Administration ...... Total Federal Funds-Capital ......

Capital Reimbursements: State Highway Administration ...... Bond Proceeds ...... Premium on Sale of Bonds ...... MdTA Transfer ...... Reversion-Encumbrances ...... Total-Department of Transportation ......

County and Municipality Funds ...... Baltimore City ...... General Fund ...... Federal Funds ...... Total County and Municipality ...... Total Source of Funds ......

I — 578 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

REVENUES AND DISTRIBUTION

GASOLINE AND MOTOR VEHICLE REVENUE ACCOUNT

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Revenue: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax and Fees ...... 7 16.084. 746 735.100. 000 754.200. 000 Motor Vehicle Titling Tax ...... 669.252. 824 704.000. 000 728.000. 000 Sales Tax ...... 22. 5 18.259 23.800. 000 24.800. 000 Motor Vehicle Registration Fees ...... 188.024.449 192.100.000 195.900.000 Corporation Income Tax ...... 91.033. 901 100.400.000 112.800.000 Total Gross Revenues ...... 1.686.914. 179 1.755.400.000 1.815.700. 000

Less Deductions: Fuel Tax: Gas Tax Division ...... 7.135. 304 Natural Resources ...... 3.262. I83 General Fund-Chesapeake Bay ...... 12.505.037 Distribution to the Trust Fund: Aviation Fuel Tax ...... 1.063. 943 SHA-Highway Safety ...... 968. 126 Motor Vehicle Titling Tax ...... 133.850. 565 Sales Tax ...... 4.503. 652 Distribution to Other Special Funds: Maryland Department of the Environment ...... 423. 008 State Police-Auto Safety ...... 4.225. 118 State Police-Commercial Vehicle ...... 15.234.769 Adjustment for Revenue Estimates ...... Total Deductions...... Net Highway Revenues ......

Distribution: Department of Transportation 70% ...... Counties and Municipalities ...... Baltimore City ...... Transfer to the General Fund ...... Transfer to the General Fund - Contingent on Legislation ...... Total Distribution ......

I — 579 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MISCELLANEOUS MOTOR VEHICLE REVENUE

REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated

Motor Vehicle Revenue: Licenses ...... Other MVA Revenue ...... MEDEVAC Surcharge ...... Vehicle Emmissions Inspections ...... Security Interest Filing Fees ...... Special License Tags ...... Total Motor Vehicle Fees ......

Less Deductions: Distribution to the General Fund Special License Tags ...... Security Interest Filing Fees ...... Distribution to Other Special Funds: Security Interest Assurance Fund ...... EMS Operations Fund (MEDEVAC) ...... Scholarship Fund ...... Total Deductions ...... Net Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Revenue ......

I — 580 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOAO1.O1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION - THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Secretary's Office (TSO) provides overall policy direction, management, and support services for the Department.

MISSION

To lead the Department in achieving Maryland's Transportation Vision by setting policy, allocating resources, monitoring performance, and empowering our employees to strive for excellence.

VISION

TSO shares the Department's Vision which is to provide a world class transportation system by managing its resources prudently and effectively.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Ensure stable funding for transportation Objective 1.1 Provide resources for transportation services through a fiscally prudent program that maintains a bond coverage ratio where net revenues are at least 2.5 times the maximum annual debt service in every year of a six-year program.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Bond coverage ratio of net revenues to maximum annual debt service 4.6 4.3 2.6 2.8

Goal 2. Preserve and Enhance the Transportation System Objective 2.1 Adequately fund system preservation needs in the Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP) at $450 million in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimate Estimated Estimated Output: System Preservation Funding Levels in CTP ($ millions) 634 44 1 489 472

Goal 3. Strengthen the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) certification processes thereby enabling qualified firms to have access to business opportunities. Objective 3.1 Complete 100 MBE recertification reassessment case reviews per year by June 30, 2003 and maintain it.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of MBE recertification reassessments completed annually

I — 581 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 332.00 329.00 329.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

JOOAO1.O1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ...... HOOA01 Department of General Services ...... Total ......

I — 582 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.02 OPERATING GRANTS-IN-AID - THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Operating Grants-In-Aid program provides funds for the Department to make grants to various entities for transportation related purposes.

This program shares the same mission, vision, and key goals and objectives as program JOOAO.O1 Executive Direction - Secretary's Office in the Department of Transportation.

I — 583 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.02 OPERATING GRANTS-IN-AID .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ...... 20.505 Federal Transit Technical Studies Grants ...... Total ......

I — 584 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.03 FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Program Description: The Facilities and Capital Equipment program provides funds for the capital program in the Secretary's Office .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Travel ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 10.565 Commodity Supplemental Food Program ...... 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ...... Total ......

I — 585 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.02 OPERATING GRANTS-IN-AID .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

JOOA01.03 FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Summary of Operating and Capital Grants: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Special Funds Commmercial Vehicle Program-University of Maryland ...... 26. 284 65. 000 Maryland Department of Planning .operating ...... 258. 230 258.230 258. 230 Department of the Environment (Diesel) ...... 43. 65 1 43. 651 43.65 1 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)-Baltimore City ...... 703.464 1.529.472 1.529. 472 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)-Anne Arundel ...... 75. 000 75. 000 75. 000 DBED Office of International Business ...... 35.000 35. 000 35. 000 Baltimore City Marine Fire Suppression ...... 1.399.940 1.399.940 1.399. 940 Rail Freight Oversight-Washington Council ...... 50. 000 Appalachian Regional Commission ...... 49. 976 53. 583 54. 731 Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland ...... 50. 000 55. 000 55. 000 Allegany County Department of Community Services ...... 10.378 7. 912 8. 189 HagerstownIEastem Panhandle Metropolitan Planning Org...... 15.844 12.708 13. 153 Salisbury Area Planning Council ...... 8.445 8.741 Baltimore Metropolitan Council ...... 407. 242 401. 348 415. 395 Wilmington Area Planning Council ...... 10.437 6. 336 6. 558 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments ...... 286. 382 315.901 326. 958 Gateway Community Dev . Corp ...... 25. 000 Air Passenger Study-Washington Council of Governments ...... 81. 515 125.000 Sheperds Mill Road-Carroll County ...... 375.643 3.042. 000 MEDCO ...... 5.388. 000 Downtown Partnership ...... 29.867 Key Highway Road Extension-Baltimore City ...... 5.000. 000 Susquehanna Bridge Pier Inspection ...... 18.000 Rocky Gap Amphitheater Access-Allegany County ...... 1.100.000 Ripken Stadium ...... 400. 000 Pathways to School-Various ...... 30. 215 176.000 Bloomsbury Square-DGSlAnnapolis ...... 246.000 Beaver Dam Creek Trash Boom-Prince George's County ...... 100.000 Airport Citizens Committee ...... 108.241 324. 000 305. 000 Anacostia River Trail ...... 33. 353 127.000 104.000 LaPlata Improvements ...... 726.962 1.573. 000 Employer OutreachIGuaranteed Ride Home ...... 1.093.496 1.182. 000 1.182. 000 Commuter Connections Operations Center ...... 136.066 169.000 169.000 Employer Outreach for Bicycles ...... 8. 675 6.000 6. 000 Clean Air Partners ...... 250. 000 250. 000 250. 000 Clean FuellATV~TaxiProgram ...... 690. 046 591. 000 31 1.000 Congestion Outreach Program ...... 400. 000 400. 000 Commuter Choice Outreach ...... 100.000 100.000 Commuter Choice Marketing ...... 250. 000 250.000 Mass Marketing ...... 1.704 400. 000 425.000 Telework Partnership with Employers (TPE) ...... 52. 830 350.000 136.000 Transportation Related Air Pollution Projects ...... 1.132. 151 820.000 Montgomery County PAC I1 ...... 144.933 5.000 Telework Resource Center ...... 51. 070 60. 000 60. 000 Telework Expansion ...... 30. 000 30. 000 Maryland Department of Planning - capital ...... 1 18.000 Montgomery County Buses (Air Quality Conformity) ...... 796. 000 678.000 Bike and Pedestrian Southern Maryland ...... 50. 000 Air Quality Conformity ...... 2.979. 000 1.383. 000 Renovation of Center Plaza ...... 400. 000 Pride of Baltimore ...... 200. 000 MD 5Mattawoman Beantown ...... -420. 000 LaPlata Park and Ride ...... -200. 000 Total Special Funds ......

I — 586 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.02 OPERATING GRANTS-IN-AID .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

JOOA01.03 FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Summary of Operating and Capital Grants: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Federal Funds Downtown Partnership ...... 1.153. 015 1.143. 393 1.165.073 Allegany County Department of Community Services...... 83. 295 63. 309 65. 525 HagerstownIEastern Panhandle Metropolitan Planning Org ...... 127. 169 101.666 105.224 Salisbury Area Planning Council ...... 67. 561 69. 926 Baltimore Metropolitan Council ...... 3.293. 755 3.863. 886 3.999. 122 Wilmington Area Planning Council ...... 83.772 SO. 693 52. 467 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments ...... 2.295. I86 2.527. 206 2.615. 658 Federal ITS-Local Connections to CHART ...... 120.379 Downtown Partnership ...... 119.470 Montgomery County Buses (Air Quality Conformity) ...... 3.181. 000 2. 700014. Commuter Choice Marketing ...... 1.000.000 1.000.000 Telework Expansion ...... 120.000 120.000 Anacostia River Trail ...... 528.000 528.000 Air Quality Conformity ...... 11.916.000 5.533. 000 MD S/Mattawornan Beantown ...... -1.680. 000 LaPlata Park and Ride ...... -800. 000 Total Federal Funds ......

Total Grants ......

I — 587 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.04 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT-OPERATING-THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Operating program provides grants to operate the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's Metrobus and Metrorail Systems. The Department's payments represent Maryland's share of the operating deficits for Metrobus and Metrorail.

Performance Measures

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Annual ridership (000s) - Metrorail - Metrobus ADA trips completed Total

Outputs: Revenue miles (000s) - Metrorail - Metrobus Total

Outputs: Passengers per revenue mile - Metrorail - Metrobus

Efficiency: Operating cost per revenue mile - Metrorail - Metrobus

Efficiency: Operating cost per trip - Metrorail - Metrobus - ADA

* Data not yet available.

I — 588 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

.IOOA01.04 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT- OPERATING-THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Program Description: The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Operating program provides grants to operate the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's Metrobus and Metrorail Systems, and operating assistance for local bus services in Montgomery and Prince George's counties. The Department's payments represent Maryland's share of the opening deficits for Metrobus, Metrorail and eligible local bus services in Montgomery and Prince George's counties.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 129,030,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 129,030,000 Total Expenditure ...... 129,030,000

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 129,030,000

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ...... 129,030,000 146,415,000 149,998,000

I — 589 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.05 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT- CAPITAL-THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Program Description: This Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Capital program provides grants for the design, construction and rehabilitation of transit systems and related structures in the Washington metropolitan area. Although this program is primarily capital grants for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's Metrobus and Metrorail Systems, funding is also provided for other transit-related projects in Montogomery and Prince George's Counties.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ......

I — 590 I — 591 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.07 OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES-THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 114.50 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

I — 592 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS- THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funds for development of major information technology projects to support the Secretary's Office's business requirements. It provides an independent method for identifying appropriations and expenditures related to development costs for major information technology projects.

I — 593 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOA01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSÃ‘TH SECRETARY'S OFFICE

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ......

I — 594 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

JOOA04.01 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Program Description: This program provides for all the debt service fund requirements of the Department of Transportation as required by law.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Consolidated Transportation Bonds Total Refunding 1993 Series 1996 Refunding 1998 Series 1999 Series 2002 Series 2003 Refunding Series 2003 Series 2003(2nd) Series 2003(3rd) Series 2004 Series 2004(2nd) Total Consolidated Transportation Bonds

County Transportation Bonds-First Issue: Fourteenth Series Total Debt Service Fund Requirement

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

I — 595 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 3.353.00 3.282.00 3.282.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 7.77 24.00 22.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

I — 596 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

JOOBO1.O1 STATE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT

Program Description: The State System Construction and Equipment program provides funds for the capital program of the State Highway Administration . Financing is available from current revenues. Federal Aid and bond proceeds for construction and reconstruction projects on the State Highway System. program-related planning and research. aquisitions of major capital equipment and all other capital expenditures .

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated Source of Funds: Special Funds and Bond Proceeds ...... Federal Funds: Interstate Maintenance ...... National Highway System ...... Surface Transportation Program ...... High Priority Projects ...... Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement ...... Congestion MitigationJAir Quality ...... Statewide Planning Research ...... Woodrow Wilson Bridge ...... Appalachia ...... Minimum Guarantee ...... Other ...... Sub-Total ...... Total ......

Application of Funds: Major Projects: Primary ...... Secondary.,...... Interstate ...... Woodrow Wilson Bridge ...... Total ......

System Preservation Projects: Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation ...... Safety and Spot Improvements ...... Resurfacing and Rehabilitation ...... Traffic Management ...... Commuter Action Improvements ...... Environmental Projects ...... Noise Barriers ...... Transportation Enhancements ...... Statewide Planning and Research ...... Urban Street Reconstruction ...... Neighborhood Conservation ...... Sidewalk Projects ...... Emergency ...... Drainage Improvements ...... Truck Weight ...... CHART ...... Intersection Capacity ...... Rest Areas ...... Bicycle Retrofit ...... Pilot Program ...... Guard Rail Treatment ...... Quick Response ...... Sub-Total ......

Facilities and Equipment ...... Reimbursable Expenditures ...... Work Performed for Other Modal Administration ...... Total ......

I — 597 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOBO1.O1 STATE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT-STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ...... 20.600 State and Community Highway Safety ...... 23.003 Appalachian Development Highway System ...... 23.008 Appalachian Local Access Roads ...... Total ......

I — 598 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.02 STATE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The State System Maintenance program provides funds for the maintenance of roads and bridges, traffic services, sign permit administration, and landscaping.

MISSION

Efficiently provide mobility for our customers through a safe, well-maintained and attractive highway system that enhances Maryland's communities, economy and environment.

VISION

Providing our customers a world class highway system

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Safety: A safe highway system for all users. Objective 1.1 Reduce the annual number of traffic fatalities on all Maryland roads from 662 in CY01 to fewer than 600 by 12/31/06 and reduce the annual number of people injured on all Maryland roads from 60,000 in CY01 to fewer than 55,000 by 1213 1/06.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: Number of vehicle miles driven (billions) (calendar year) 52 53.8 56.5 57.9 Outcome: Annual number of traffic fatalities on all Maryland roads (calendar year measure) Annual number of personal injuries on all Maryland roads (calendar year measure) Percent reduction in fatal accident rates on state highways compared to 1998 rates (calendar year)* Percent reduction in injury accident rates on state highways compared to 1998 rates (calendar year)* Reduction in large truck fatal and injury accidents on state highways compared to 1999 numbers (calendar year)*

Note: In the current submission we have chosen to measure our safety performance in actual number of fatalities and injuries because this is a measure that the public can easily identify with.

"These measures have been provided for purposes of comparing with the other state agencies.

Objective 1.2 Reduce the annual number of pedestrian fatalities on all Maryland roads from 99 in CY01 to fewer than 90 by 12/31/06 and reduce the annual number of pedestrians injured on all Maryland roads from 2,700 in 2001 to fewer than 2,400 by 1213 1/06.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Number of pedestrian fatalities on all Maryland roads (calendar year measure) Number of pedestrian injuries on all Maryland roads (calendar year measure)

I — 599 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.02 STATE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. Mobility / Congestion Relief: Enhance, maintain, and operate the highway system to improve mobility for our customers. Objective 2.1 Reduce congestion delay and associated costs caused by incidents by 4%, from FY02 levels, by June 30, 2006. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Average minutes of delay (calendar year) 28.8 27.7 27.4 27.1 Outcomes: Percent reduction in incident congestion delay (calendar year) 12.7% 4% 1% 1% Reduction in user costs due to incidents ($ million) (calendar year) 402.75 467.97 472.64 477.38

Objective 2.2 Reduce delays caused by congestion along state highways that have scheduled improvement projects intended to improve traffic flow by an average of 10% each year.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Average percent of reduction in delay due to improvements (calendar year)

Goal 3. System Preservation and Maintenance: To maintain a quality highway system. Objective 3.1 Maintain annually at least 83% (CY02 pavement conditions) of the MD SHA pavements in acceptable riding quality condition1. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Miles of mainline pavement2 (calendar year) 10,116 10,340 10,340 10,355 Outcome: Percent of roadway mileage with acceptable ride quality (calendar year) 83% 83% 83% 83%

Note: '~idequality is represented by the International Roughness Index (IRI) which is a based on the longitudinal profile of the roadway surface. Interstate roadways exhibiting IRI values less than 120 incheslmile and Non-Interstate roadways exhibiting IRI values less than 170 incheslmile are considered acceptable.

Directional miles including both directions of roadway for both divided and undivided highways.

Objective 3.2 Maintain annually 100% of the bridges on MD SHA portion of the National Highway System (NHS) so that all legally loaded vehicles can safely traverse*.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Number of bridges on MD SHA portion of the NHS (calendar year) 1,337 1,340 1,342 1,354 Outcome: Percent of bridges on MD SHA portion of the NHS that are not weight posted (calendar year) 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of MD SHA bridges on NHS that are structurally deficient. (calendar year measure) 3.8% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

Note: *In the current business plan we have chosen to measure the success our bridge maintenance on the desired outcome of maintaining mobility for legally loaded vehicles

I — 600 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.02 STATE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 4. Efficiency in Government: Improve efficiencies in our business processes. Objective 4.1 Maintain the cost per lane mile, at or below FY02 levels (dollars adjusted for inflation), of providing non- winter maintenance services while maintaining the integrity of the highway system.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number of lane miles maintained 16,602 16,657 16,707 16,757 Maintenance expenditures in FY02 dollars 134,768,670 124,207,701 * * * * Outcome: Expenditures per lane mile in FY02 dollars 8,118 7,457 * * * *

Note: FY 2002 dollars if we reduce expenditures by 0.75% by 2006 8,271 8,250 8,230 Those same amounts inflated at 2.1 % per year 8,423 8,579

Note: ** Data not currently available

Goal 5. Environmental Stewardship: Develop and maintain Maryland state highways in an environmentally responsible manner. Objective 5.1 Create or restore 200 acres of wetlands and 5 miles of stream by 6130106 to benefit watershed water quality.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Acres wetlands restored 56.3 15 64.9 100 Miles of streams restored * * 2.5 5.0

Goal 6. Customer Satisfaction: To provide services to our customers that meets or exceeds their expectations. Objective 6.1 Attain at least 80% overall external customer satisfaction rating of "Aor "B" biennially.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of external overall customer satisfaction rating of "A" or "B". * * * * 80% 80%

Notes: * New objectives, data not currently available. ** Survey will occur in 2003.

I — 601 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.02 STATE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The State System Maintenance program provides funds for the maintenance of roads and bridges. traffic services. sign permit administration and landscaping .

2003 2004 2005 Actual Estimated Estimated Maintenance of Highways and Bridges: Districts (Including Winter Maintenance): District No . 1 Dorchester. Somerset. Wicomico. Worcester ...... 10.875.909 9.767. 899 9.772. 568 District No . 2 Caroline. Cecil. Kent. Queen Anne's. Talbot ...... 16.422.787 13.418.573 13.452. 066 District No . 3 Montgomery. Prince George's ...... 34.607. 222 22.833.210 22.831. 513 District No . 4 Baltimore. Harford ...... 26.106,292 16.815. 780 16.834.951 District No . 5 Anne Arundel. Calvert. Charles. St . Mary's ...... 23.526. 269 16.991. 562 17.004.354 District No . 6 Allegany. Garrett. Washington ...... 26.011. 603 14.778. 174 14.820.412 District No . 7 Can-011. Frederick. Howard ...... 22.135. 958 15,994.516 15.998.425 Total District Maintenance ...... 159.686.040 110.714.289 State-Wide Miscellaneous Projects: Bridges ...... 8.857. 199 Enviromental Design ...... 3.120. 081 Maintenance of Traffic Signal Systems ...... 6.907. 802 CHART ...... 7.095. 092 Office of Maintenance ...... 20.963.592 Total State-Wide Miscellaneous Projects ...... Headquarter's Support ...... Total ......

I — 602 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.02 STATE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ......

I — 603 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.03 COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY CAPITAL FUNDS .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: Under Title 8. Section 507. the State Highway Administration may allocate funds to a "County Highway Construction Fund" from the Transportation Trust Fund . The allocation is determined by the amount of Federal Secondary Highway Funds and Urban Funds may be allocated to the counties and that may be subsequently released by them to the State Highway Administration for use on the State Highway System . The County Highway Construction Fund is apportioned to the counties and matching construction funds are required of each participating county .

STATE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT

STATE AID IN LIEU OF FEDERAL AID

The allocation of Transportation Trust Funds to the County Highway Construction Program for Fiscal Year 2004. which represents 50 percent of Maryland's estimated apportionment of Federal Aid Secondary and Urban Systems Funds. is $4.500.000 . Estimated amounts eamable on a road mileage basis are as follows:

APPORTIONMENTS OF FEDERAL AID SECONDARY AND URBAN SYSTEMS FUNDS

FISCAL YEAR 2005

Estimated Allocation

Urban Secondary Systems

Allegany ...... Anne Arundel ...... Baltimore ...... Calvert ...... Caroline ...... Carroll ...... Cecil ...... Charles ...... Dorchester ...... Frederick ...... Garrett ...... Harford ...... Howard ...... Kent ...... Montgomery ...... Prince George's ...... Queen Anne's ...... St . Mary's ...... Somerset ...... Talbot ...... Washington ...... Wicomico ...... Worcester ...... Total ......

I — 604 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.03 COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY CAPITAL FUNDS .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Counties and Baltimore Municipalities City Total

Special Funds in Lieu of Federal Secondary and Urban Apportion- ments ...... Federal Aid: Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation ...... National Highway Systems ...... State Flexibility ...... STP Urban pop Over ...... STP Optional Safety ...... Hi-Priority TEA-21 ...... Congestion MitigationIAir Quality ...... Interstate Maintenance ......

Total ...... $14,500,000 $17,600,000 $32,100,000

Expenditures: Services provided to Counties in Lieu of Cash Payments ...... $1,600,000 $1,600,000 State Aid in Lieu of Federal Funds ...... 2,900,000 2,900, 000 Payments of Federal Highway Funds Earned ...... 10,000,000 17,600,000 27,600,000

Total ...... $14.500. 000 $17.600. 000 $32.100. 000

Notes: 1. Title 8. Section 507 of the Transportation Article permits the transfer of these Federal funds to the SHA and a like amount of special funds to the counties in lieu of Federal funds released bv the counties . The 2005 request is based on the assumption that this action will be taken in every applicable instance .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund

Federal Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ......

I — 605 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.04 HIGHWAY SAFETY OPERATING PROGRAM - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Highway Safety Operating program provides funds to maintain truck weighing stations, approach roads and equipment used to enforce motor vehicle weight and age limits; administers State Highway Safety and Motor Carrier Programs; and issues hauling permits under Sections 24-1 11.2 and 113 of the Transportation Article.

Highway Safety Operating Program in the State Highway Administration shares the same mission, vision, key goals and objective and performance measureslperformance indicators as the State System Maintenance Program (JB01.02).

I — 606 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.04 HIGHWAY SAFETY OPERATING PROGRAM .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.218 Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program ...... 20.600 State and Community Highway Safety ...... Total ......

I — 607 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.05 COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY FUNDS .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

APPORTIONMENTS OF ESTIMATED HIGHWAY USER REVENUES .FISCAL YEAR 2005

Available to to Munici- Less: Bond Counties. Munici- palities Sinking Fund palities and and Balti- County Total Requirement Baltimore City Counties more City

Allegany ...... $1.712. 282 Anne Arundel ...... 1.292. 307 Baltimore ...... Calvert ...... 379. 182 Caroline ...... 581. 599 Carroll ...... 1.655. 296 Cecil ...... 139. 137 981. 281 Charles ...... 410. 883 Dorchester ...... 839. 942 Frederick ...... 3.233. 783 Garrett ...... 640. 157 Harford ...... 1.320.972 Howard ...... Kent ...... 354. 840 Montgomery ...... 4.523. 274 Prince George's ...... 6.190. 036 Queen Anne's ...... 285. 805 St . Mary's ...... 83.480 Somerset ...... 292. 302 Talbot ...... 813. 398 Washington ...... 214. 056 2. 07 1.993 Wicomico ...... 1.266. 593 Worcester ...... 1.161.464 Total Counties ...... $353.193 $30.090. 869 Baltimore City $170.000. 000 Total ...... $200,090.869 Reduction ...... Total ......

I — 608 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.05 COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY FUNDS - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: Section 8-403 of the Transportation Article allocates Highway User Revenues to the 23 counties, Baltimore City and municipalities; to construct and maintain roads and streets.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 43 1,450,129 Total Operating Expenses ...... 43 1,450,129 Total Expenditure ...... 431,450,129

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 431,450,129

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

I — 609 DEPARTMENT OF' TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS - STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funds for development of major information technology projects to support the State Highway Administration's business requirements. It provides an independent method for identifying appropriations and expenditures related to development costs for major information technology projects.

I — 610 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOB01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS .STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction ......

I — 611 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOODOO.O1 PORT OPERATIONS - MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Maryland Port Administration functions under Title 6 of the Transportation Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland. Through its efforts to increase waterborne commerce, the Maryland Port Administration (MPA) promotes the economic well being of the State of Maryland and manages the State owned facilities (roughly half of the Port's terminals). Activities include developing, marketing, maintaining and stewardship of the State's port facilities, improving access channels, developing and promoting international and domestic trade by promoting cargoes and economic expansion in the State, and coordinating the delivery of services to the maritime community, such as dredging and navigational aids.

MISSION

The mission of the Maryland Port Administration is to stimulate the flow of waterborne commerce through the State of Maryland in a manner that provides economic benefit to the citizens of the State.

VISION

To remain a major catalyst in the growth of international trade, competitive or dominant in all international cargo flows through East Coast ports, sustained by strong public and private sectors, while being good stewards of Maryland's natural environment.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. To maximize the economic benefit generated by the Port of Baltimore to the State in a cost effective manner. Objective 1.1 Maintain Roll-on, Roll-off (RoRo) tonnage at fiscal year 2002 levels (365) through fiscal year 2005, and maintain our position as the largest RoRo port on the U.S. East Coast.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual* Estimated Estimated Outcomes: RoRo tonnage, (thousands) (a) 365 369 365 365 RoRo ranking 1st 1st 1st 1st RoRo market share (a) 46% 44% 46% 48%

Objective 1.2 Increase automobile volumes 3.2% annually through fiscal year 2005, (2002 is the base year at 683,000 tons)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual* Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Auto tonnage, (thousands) (b) 683 1,079 1,100 1,125 Auto market share (b) 20% 26% 26% 27 %

Objective 1.3 Maintain forest products tonnage volumes above one million tonslyear through fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual* Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Forest products, tonnage, (thousands) (c) 1,222 1,436 1,440 1,440 Forest products market share (c) 34% 35% 35% 35 %

Objective 1.4 Maintain or increase container cargo volumes through fiscal year 2005

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual* Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Container TEUs, (thousands) (d) 37 1 418 419 420 Efficiency: Number of crane moveslhour at SMT on MIT accounts (d) 35 34 37 37 Average truck turn-around time at SMT (singleldouble moves) (d) 34.2152.6 36.9156.9 30160 30160

I — 612 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOODOO.O1 PORT OPERATIONS - MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. Operate the MPA to ensure revenues exceed operating expenses. Objective 2.1 In fiscal years 2004 and 2005 manage discretionary spending to maximize revenues and effectively manage expenditures. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: MPA net income, ($thousands) (e) $1,430 $5,401 $2,769 1,517

Objective 2.2 Manage the World Trade Center's occupancy rate at 95% or above and obtain $3.9M in revenue from such occupancy through fiscal year 2004. (This assumes the WTC will be sold at the end of FY04.)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: World Trade Center revenue, ($millions) (f) $3.8 $3.7 $3.2 $3.5 Efficiency: WTC occupancy (f) 93% 93% 85% 89%

Goal 3. Preserve and enhance the port's infrastructure to maintain cargo capacities, while ensuring adequate security. Objective 3.1 Maintain and improve terminal infrastructure (cranes, berths, cargo storage areas) to preserve and enhance capacity through the year 2010.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: MPA total general cargo tonnage, (thousands) (g) 6,288 7,055 7,100 7,135

Goal 4. Safety and mobility - maintain and improve the shipping channels for safe, unimpeded access to the Port. Objective 4.1 Through fiscal year 2005, manage an effective dredging program to maintain and improve the shipping channels for safe, unimpeded access to the Port by ensuring adequate placement capacity is available to meet dredging demand, removing access channel restrictions and improving the navigation system.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Inputs: State's share of Channel Improvements funding, ($Millions) $7.3 $0 $1.0 $2.3 Outcomes: Years of Dredged Material Capacity remaining 7 6 5 4 Annual maintenance dredging to keep channels clear (million cubic yds) n/a 2.07 2.3 3.1

FY2003 Cargo data is full year proiection based on % year data; actual FY2003 data should be available 0ct.Nov. 2003.

NOTES:

(a) POB remains the strongest Roll-on/Roll-off (RoRo) port on the East Coast. RoRo includes trucks, tractors, agriculture machinery, construction equipment, trailers, boats, planes, and railroad equipment. The Port's Roll-on/Roll-off performance is measured quarterly using U.S. MARAD data, (which is available three months after the end of the quarter). Cargo is measured in short tons (2,000 lbs.). Our RoRo tonnage is compared to other East Coast ports (Miami to Maine) to determine market share.

(b) The Port's automobile cargoes include passenger automobiles and light trucks (less than five tons). The Port's automobile performance is measured quarterly using U.S. MARAD data, (which is available three months after the end of the quarter). Cargo is measured in short tons (2,000 lbs.). Our automobiles tonnage is compared to other East Coast ports (Miami to Maine) to determine market share. (Although military privately owned vehicles move through the port, they are included in these figures; they account for about another 10% of the auto tonnage and provide additional economic benefit to the region).

(c) The Port's forest product commodities consist of pulp, paper, lumber and logs. The Port's forest product performance is measured quarterly using U.S. MARAD data, (which is available three months after the end of the quarter). Cargo is measured in short tons (2,000 lbs.). Our forest product's tonnage is compared to other U.S. North Atlantic ports (north of and including Norfolk) to determine market share.

I — 613 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOODOO.O1 PORT OPERATIONS - MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

NOTES: (Continued)

(d) The Port's container performance is measured quarterly using Journal of Commerce (JOC) data for foreign import and export containers, (which are available two months after the end of the quarter). Cargo is measured in TEUs (twenty- foot equivalent units). The number of domestic containers arriving by barge is added to this figure to give total Port TEUs. Note, this is not a measure of tonnage, and empty containers are not included. Efficiency measure goal is to maintain annual vessel production of 37 moves (net) per hour at SMT on Maryland International Terminal (MIT) controlled accounts, and average truck turn times of 30 minutes per single move and 60 minutes on double moves at SMT on MIT controlled accounts.

(e) Actual and projected revenues are based on "billable tonnage," which differs from cargo tonnage, because billable tonnage includes tare weight and empty containers. Future tonnage projections for revenue purposes are conservative for fiscal reasons compared to cargo projections used for planning and terminal operations.

(f) The WTC occupancy performance is measured semi-annually as a percentage of the total available floor space, (95% is considered "full"). WTC revenue includes monthly and daily tenant commitments. The events of 911 1/01 coupled with new office space coming on line in downtown Baltimore could have an adverse effect on both occupancy and revenue targets.

(g) The MPA's total general cargo goal performance is measured monthly using MPA Accounting data of MPA terminal activity. The annual total tonnage moving across MPA's terminals is a gross outcome measure of the attractiveness of MPA's infrastructure and facilities. (Although there is a correlation between facilities and cargo volumes, caution must be used, because there are many factors outside MPA's influence that impact the movement of freight, i.e. national and world economic trends, labor costs (here and at competing ports), value of the US dollar, rail and highway service and rates, prolonged weather phenomena, changes in vessel sizes, etc.)

I — 614 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 314.00 306.00 310.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 90 1.70 1.70 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

JOODOO.01 PORT OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 268.00 261 .00 265.00 Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ......

I — 615 REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2005

Estimated Incomc(Thousands)

21103 2004 2005 Estimate

I — 616 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOD00.02 PORT FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The Port Facilities and Capital Equipment program provides funds for the capital programs of the Maryland Port Administration to develop and modernize port facilities. improve access channels in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers through dredging activities and provides project financing to promote new cargo and economic expansion in the State .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.801 Development and Promotion of Ports and Inter- modal Transportation ......

I — 617 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOEOO.O1 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS - STATE MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Motor Vehicle Administration is responsible for supplying motor vehicle services to the citizens of Maryland. These services include licensing all passenger and commercial drivers, registering and titling vehicles, issuing tags and permits for persons with a disability, issuing photo identification cards for non-driver residents, regulating motor vehicle dealers and sales, administering the compulsory insurance compliance program, managing the vehicle emission inspections program, and running driver safety programs. The Administration serves its customers through a network of customer service offices, electronic services (kiosks, Internet, telephone), a telephone customer service center, and Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program stations.

MISSION

As employees and agents of the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA), we are committed to providing excellent customer service, promoting a safe driving environment, and protecting consumer interests.

VISION

The Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) will serve as a national model for safety and service.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. DRIVER SAFETY - Improve driver safety by assisting drivers to make responsible decisions when operating and owning a motor vehicle and sharing timely, accurate conviction data on unsafe drivers with enforcement, judiciary and other states. Objective 1.1 Achieve a 3-5% reduction in youthful novice driver (16 year old) crashes (over the pre-GLS system) by fiscal year 2005. Objective 1.2 Comply with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 concerning the posting of conviction data within 30 days by 2005 and 10 days by 2008.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outputs: Number enrolled in Motorcycle Safety courses 5,436 6.748 7,000 7,000 Outcome: Percent reduction in 16 year old driver disabling and fatal crashes under the Graduated Licensing system 44% Percent of motorcycle fatalities compared to total fatalities 8.0% Percent of alcohol fatalities (BAC level greater than or equal to 0.08) compared to total fatalities 36.2% Average percent of registered vehicles insured 95 % Quality: Percent of conviction data received and posted within 30 days 69% Goal 2. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND SERVICE - Provide customer-friendly service and protect consumer interests. Objective 2.1 Achieve 89% of customers rating service as Good or Very Good by fiscal year 2005. Objective 2.2 Reduce average customer visit time to 35 minutes by fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Performance Measures Outputs: Number of transactions (millions) 14.2 14.4 Number of walk-in transactions (millions) 7.9 8.8 Outcome: Average Branch office Customer Visit Time (minutes) 39 46 Percent of incoming calls answered at the Customer Service Center 84% 86% Percent of dealer complaint cases issued and closed within 90 days 53% 60% Average Wait Time at VEIP Station (minutes) < 5 < 5

I — 618 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOEOO.O1 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS - STATE MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Quality: Percent of branch office customers rating service as Good or Very Good 89% 85% 85% 89% Percent of Call Center customers rating service as Good or Very Good 89% 86% 88% 90% Percent of branch office customers rating facility appearance as Good or Very Good 95 % 94% 96% 96% Percent of branch office customers rating employee helpfulness as Good or Very Good 92% 91% 92% 93%

Goal 3. OPERATING EFFICIENCY - Increase service delivery access points through a flexible, functional, and cost-effective Information Technology environment. Objective 3.1 Provide over 80% of information and services available to the public over the Internet by fiscal year 2005. Objective 3.2 Increase use of alternative service delivery options to 42% of major transactions by fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Performance Measures Outputs: Number of transactions (millions) Number of alternative service delivery transactions (millions) Outcome: Percent of registration renewals by alternative service delivery Percent of new titles issued electronically Alternative service delivery transactions as percent of total transactions Percent of information and services available to the public over the Internet

I — 619 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 1.647.00 1.606.50 1.606.50 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 68 49 101 15 101.15 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Operating Expenses ...... Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ...... 139.053.689 149.847.467 144.000.483

JOOEOO.O1 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund

Federal Fund Income: 20.217 Motor Carrier Safety ...... 25, 311 20.218 Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program ...... 12 1,955 350,520 15,000 20.600 State and Community Highway Safety ...... 29. 001 11,933 Total ...... 150,956 387.764 15,000

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance ...... 42. 000

I — 620 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOE00.03 FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The Facilities and Capital Equipment Program provides funds for new capital facilities. major renovations to existing facilities. and capital equipment needs for the Motor Vehicle Administration .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

I — 621 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOE00.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS - MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funds for development of major information technology projects to support the Motor Vihicles Administration's business requirements. It provides an independent method for identifying appropriations and expenditures related to development costs for major information technology projects.

I — 622 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOE00.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... 11,045,359 17,158,000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 11,045,359 17,158,000 Total Expenditure ...... 11,045,359 17,158,000

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 11,045,359 17,158,000

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ...... 11,045,359 17,158,000

I — 623 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOHO1.O1 TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Transit Administration program provides executive direction and support services for the agency including finance, human resources, legal affairs, customer services, media and public relations and administration.

MISSION

The Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) provides a network of transit services to our customers throughout Maryland in a safe, reliable and efficient manner that supports the economy and the environment.

VISION

The MTA will support communities, the economy and the environment by providing excellent service and proactively addressing transit and rail freight needs statewide.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Provide outstanding service to our customers. Objective 1.1 Provide high on time performance, with on time goals in fiscal year 2005 of: * 87.5% for Bus; 98.0% for Metro; 92.0% for MARC; 3.5 customer satisfaction survey score for on-time service at origin and destination

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Percent of service provided on time Bus Metro Light Rail MARC Customer service rating from customer satisfaction survey (Scale: 5=Excellent, I= Poor): On-time pickup at origin On-time discharge at destination

*Note: Light Rail reporting will be suspended starting fiscal year 2004 due to variable service disruptions during double track construction that will continue through end of fiscal year 2006.

Objective 1.2 Provide clean facilities and vehicles, resulting in a customer satisfaction survey score of 3.4 for cleanliness of vehicles in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Quality: Customer service rating from customer satisfaction survey (Scale: 5=Excellent, I= Poor): Cleanliness of vehicle 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.4

I — 624 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOHO1.O1 TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Goal 2. Encourage transit ridership in Maryland Objective 2.1 Achieve 95.8 million boardings on MTA in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Boardings (in thousands) Bus Metro Light Rail Mobility MARC Contracted Commuter Bus Total

* Boarding counts anticipate ridership loss due to fare increase at start of fiscal year 2004.

Goal 3. Use MTA resources efficiently and effectively and be accountable to the public, our customers and our employees, with performance measured against prior years and transit industry peers. Objective 3.1 Achieve a passengers per vehicle mile ratio of 2.75 during fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Passengers per vehicle revenue mile Bus Metro Light Rail Paratransit MARC Contracted Commuter Bus Total

Objective 3.2 Achieve an operating cost per vehicle mile of $9.01 during fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Operating cost per vehicle mile Bus Metro Light Rail Paratransit MARC Contracted Commuter Bus Total

I — 625 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOHO1.O1 TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

Objective 3.3 Achieve farebox recovery ratios by mode during fiscal year 2005 of: 44.0% for Bus; 3 1.9% for Metro; 22.4% for Light Rail and 62.8% for MARC.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Efficiency: Farebox recovery ratio Bus Metro Light Rail MARC

Goal 4. Provide a safe, crime free environment for our customers and employees Objective 4.1 Improve safety and security measures in transit vehicles and facilities, resulting in customer satisfaction survey scores in fiscal year 2005 of: 4.5 for feeling safe while riding, 3.4 for feeling safe at stops and stations and 3.3 for vehicle safety at MTA parking lots.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Customer service rating from customer satisfaction survey (Scale 5=Excellent, l=Poor): Feeling safe while riding Feeling safe at stops and stations Vehicle safety at MTA parking lots

Objective 4.2 Improve employee safety and reduce the number of Workers' Compensation claims to 560 in fiscal year 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Workers' Compensation claims 602 609 590 5 60

Objective 4.3 Substantially reduce the 480 open items identified in the APTA Safety Findings and Recommendations Report of 2003 by the end of fiscal year 2005 to 244, or a 49% reduction over base. (base 480 items as of May 2003)

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: Open items Percent reduction over base (480 items)

I — 626 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 3.103.00 3.030.00 3. 051 .00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 33.00 33.00 33.00 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 218.761. 603 21 1.865.761 220.008. 948 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1.250.654 1.543.977 1.390. 054 Operating Expenses ...... 412.590. 555 486.961. 123 488.438. 993 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 460.350. 615 470.432. 641 524.158. 764 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 172.207. 397 229.908. 220 185.679. 231 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 44. 800 30. 000 Total Expenditure ...... 632.602. 812 700.370. 861 709.837. 995

JOOHO1.O1 TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication...... 04 Travel ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

I — 627 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.02 BUS OPERATIONS - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Bus Operations program provides fixed route bus services in the Baltimore metropolitan area and surrounding counties and includes contracted bus service for certain suburban routes. The Maryland Transit Administration also operates or contracts for specially equipped small vans (known as mobility) for disabled individuals who cannot use regular bus services.

All programs in the Maryland Transit Administration share the mission, vision, key goals, objectives presented for program JOOHO1.O1 Transit Administration. Although some performance measures\performance indicators are specific to goals or objectives, all are applicable to Maryland Transit Administration programs.

I — 628 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.02 BUS OPERATIONS .MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... Technical and Special Fees ...... Communication ...... Travel ...... Fuel and Utilities ...... Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... Contractual Services ...... Supplies and Materials ...... Equipment-Replacement ...... Equipment-Additional ...... Fixed Charges ...... Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ......

I — 629 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.04 RAIL OPERATIONS - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Rail Operations program includes the Baltimore Metro heavy rail transit system, the Central Light Rail line as well as MARC commuter rail service operated under contract by CSX Transportation and Amtrak in the Baltimore and Washington metropolitan areas.

I — 630 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.04 RAIL OPERATIONS .MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 200s Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants. Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.500 Federal Transit Capital Improvement Grants ...... 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ...... Total ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: D50H01 Military Department Operations and Maintenance

I — 631 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.05 FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The Facilities and Capital Equipment program includes the following organizational units and functions: 1) Planning and Programming- Regional and State planning. capital programming and monitoring. statewide grants management (grants in program 06). WMATA and legislative liaison; 2)Engineering-Facilities and Systems Engineering. construction management. and contracting; 3) Real Estate- Right-of-way acquisition. commercial development. and property management; and 4) Freight Services-Management of freight rail road service . These organizational units are responsible for construction and rehabilitation of facilities. procurement of transit vehicles. and implementation of various transit capital projects across the State.

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.312 High Speed Ground Transportation Next Gener- ation High Speed Rail Program ...... 3.017. 000 2.137. 000 20.500 Federal Transit Capital Improvement Grants ...... 65.782. 000 8 1.570.000 103.622.000 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ...... 48.002. 957 83.962. 000 19.882. 000 20.509 Public Transportation for Nonurbanized Areas ...... 1.028.000 1.672. 000 1.697.000 20.513 Capital Assistance Program for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities ...... 1.168.000 1.764.000 1.766.000 Total ...... 118.997.957 171.105.000 126.967.000

I — 632 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.06 STATEWIDE PROGRAMS OPERATIONS - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Statewide Programs - Operations provides technical assistance, operating grants and federal grants-in-aid for local jurisdictions with primary emphasis on small urban and rural areas and elderly and disabled individuals. The program also includes the Statewide Commuter Bus program in which private bus companies under contract to the Maryland Transit Administration to provide service along corridors into the Washington, D.C. area. Finally, a freight operating agreement supports maintenance of State-owned rail lines operated by the Maryland and Delaware Railroad in Caroline, Dorchester, Kent and Queen Anne's Counties.

All programs in the Maryland Transit Administration share the mission, vision, key goals, objectives presented for JOOHO1.O1 Transit Administration. Although some performance measures\performance indicators are specific to goals or objectives, all are applicable to Maryland Transit Administration programs.

I — 633 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.06 STATEWIDE PROGRAMS OPERATIONS .MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

03 Communication ...... 1.067 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 1.272 08 Contractual Services ...... 12.432.605 14.007.041 16.868.999 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 2. 957 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 52.505. 066 56.567. 408 56.764. 414 13 Fixed Charges ...... 136.875 199.997 233. 997 Total Operating Expenses ...... 65.079. 842 70,774.446 73,867.410 Total Expenditure ...... 65.079. 842

Special Fund Expenditure ...... 56.891. 939 Federal Fund Expenditure...... 8.187. 903 Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.505 Federal Transit Technical Studies Grants ...... 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ...... 20.509 Public Transportation for Nonurbanized Areas ...... 20.5 16 Job Access-Reverse Commute ...... Total ......

I — 634 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funds for development of major information technology projects to support the Maryland Transit Administration's business requirements. It provides an independent method for identifying appropriations and expenditures related to development costs for major information technology projects.

I — 635 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOH01.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS .MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 14.458. 004 26.156. 000 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 264. 802 1.119. 000 Total Operating Expenses ...... 14.722.806 Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.500 Federal Transit Capital Improvement Grants ...... 20.507 Federal Transit Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants ...... Total ......

I — 636 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOO100.02 AIRPORT OPERATIONS - MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides for the operation, maintenance, protection, and development of Baltimore/Washington International Airport (BWI) as a major center of commercial air carrier service in the State, and Martin State Airport (MTN) as a general aviation reliever facility and as a support facility for the Maryland Air National Guard and Maryland State Police. Further purposes of the program are to foster, develop, and regulate aviation within the State.

VISION

The Maryland aviation system will be the "Easy Come, Easy Go" gateway to the world.

MISSION

The Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA) fosters the vitality of aviation Statewide and promotes safe and efficient operations, economic viability, and environmental stewardship. Responsible for the operation of BWI and MTN, the MAA provides friendly, convenient facilities and customer services while developing enhanced domestic and international passenger and cargo opportunities through intermodalism and state-of-the-art technology.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Keep BWI passengers, tenants, and facilities safe. Objective 1.1 Annually maintain the reported crime rate at BWI at or below 5.0 crimes per 100,000 parked vehicles. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcome: Crime Rate ~ro~ert~/~ersons' 991.02 5.010.3 5.010.3 5.010.3

Objective 1.2 Annually reduce the number of passenger and employee injury claims. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcome: Total Injury Claims 64 5 8 56 56

Objective 1.3 Annually pass TSA regulatory assessment for security certification. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcome: Compliance with TSA regulatory assessment for N/A Pass Pass Pass security certification

Objective 1.4 Annually pass FAA Part 139 regulatory assessment for safety certification. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Outcome: Compliance with annual FAA Part 139 safety Pass Pass Pass Pass certification (PassIFail)

Goal 2. Provide exceptional service. Objective 2.1 Annually improve customer rating of BWI airport services and facilities as Excellent or Good. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Output: Total Passengers 19,012,529 19,482,000 20,464,000 22,5 18,000 Outcome: Percent of excellent/good passenger rating NIA 80% 85% 88%

I — 637 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOO100.02 AIRPORT OPERATIONS - MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Goal 3. Operate BWI efficiently and effectively. Objective 3.1 Achieve or exceed the airport revenue per enplaned (RPE) passenger at BWI at or above comparable airports2. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Comparable Airports RPE median amount3 $15.94 $17.80 TBD TBD Outcome: BWI revenue per enplaned passenger $15.94 $16.97 $20.36 $18.50

Objective 3.2 Total fiscal revenue will exceed fiscal operating expenses. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: Percent revenue over operating expenses 18.4% 4.76% 9.35% 4.23%

Goal 4. Attract, maintain, and expand air service. Objective 4.1 Passenger and cargo growth at BWI should meet or exceed the annual national rates. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measuresc Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Input: National Passenger growth rate -2.6% 2.3% 4.4% 4.4% Outcome: BWI Passenger growth rate -6.7% 2.5% 5.0% 10.0% Input: National Cargo growth rate 6% 4.6% 4.7% 4.5% Outcome: BWI Cargo growth rate 11.7% 4.1 % 4.8% 4.5%

Objective 4.2 Maintain an annual airline cost per enplaned passenger (CPE) at BWI below comparable airports2. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Input: Comparable Airports CPE median amount3 $5.56 $6.02 TBD TED Outcome: Cost per enplaned passenger $4.25 $4.34 $4.39 $4.94

Note: Calendar year measure

1. A "crime against a person" is defined as any crime where a victim is present and aware of the criminal action. 2. Comparable airports are defined as those seven airports both above and below BWI in number of enplanements. 3. Information used to calculate median amounts compares the most recent FAA reported revenue data (cy-2002 and 2001) to BWI fiscal years 2003 and 2002 respectively.

I — 638 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF STATE AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 569.50 542.00 556.00 Total Number of Contractual Positions ...... 4.00 4.00 4.00 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 33.830. 824 33.058. 933 34.875. 978 Technical and Special Fees ...... 1.957. 329 2.283. 939 2.083. 939 Operating Expenses ...... 173.964.083 178.577.657 180.382.067 Special Fund Expenditure ...... 191.658.926 185.752. 629 192.105. 484 Federal Fund Expenditure ...... 16.010. 710 28.052. 000 25.236. 500 Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... 2.082. 600 1 15. 900 Total Expenditure ...... 209.752. 236 213.920. 529 217.341. 984

JOO100.02 AIRPORT OPERATIONS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... Number of Contractual Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 11 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Reimbursable Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.106 Airport Improvement Program ......

Reimbursable Fund Income: DOSE01 Board of Public Works ......

I — 639 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOO100.03 AIRPORT FACILITIES AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .STATE AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Program Description: The Airport Facilities and Capital Equipment program provides funds to develop and maintain the facilities at BaltimoreIWashington International and Martin State Airports . The capital Program for BWI will improve airport facilities to meet the commercial and general aviation needs for both passengers and cargo activities . Development of Martin State Airport requires facilities improvements to support the Maryland Air National Guard. Aviation Division of the Maryland State Police and general aviation . The program also includes development grants for public-use airports located throughout the State . Eligible projects may be financed with State grants which are matched with Federal and local funds . Certain projects ineligible for Federal funds are financed entirely by State and local funding or a combination of State grants and loans . The Maryland Aviation Administraion is authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to collect passengers facility charges (PFC) for capital projects in accordance with Federal Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990. Projects funded partially or entirely with PFC revenue must preserve or enhance safety. security or capacity of the national air transportation system. reduce noise or mitigate noise impact resulting from an airport or furnish opportunities for enhanced competition among carriers .

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 4.045. 236 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 275. 373 03 Communication ...... SO. 739 04 Travel ...... 37. 424 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 46. 817 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 2.032. 483 08 Contractual Services ...... 287. 511 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 29. 870 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 2. 528 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 15.310 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 1.432.7 18 13 Fixed Charges ...... 552.389 14 Land and Structures ...... 87.963. 226 Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.106 Airport Improvement Program ......

I — 640 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOO100.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS - MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides funds for development of major information technology projects to support the Maryland Aviation Administration's business requirements. It provides an independent method for identifying appropriations and expenditures related to development costs for major information technology projects.

I — 641 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOO100.08 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - STATE AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

08 Contractual Services ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Expenditure ...... Federal Fund Expenditure...... Total Expenditure ......

Special Fund Income: J00301 Transportation Trust Fund ......

Federal Fund Income: 20.106 Airport Improvement Program ......

I — 642 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance Total Number of Authorized Positions ...... 1,518.50 1,534.50 Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 88,158,346 94,784,539 Technical and Special Fees ...... 15,155,505 20,509,755 Operating Expenses ...... 183,738,697 221,915,781 Non-Budgeted Funds ...... 287,052,548 337,210,075

I — 643 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOJ00.41 OPERATING PROGRAM (INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE) - NON-BUDGETED FUNDS - MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

All powers, authority, obligations, functions, duties, and discretion relating to the financing, construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of Maryland's toll facilities and any other revenue project authorized and provided for under Title 4 of the Transportation Article, have been vested exclusively in the Maryland Transportation Authority. The Authority, consisting of six members and the Secretary of Transportation serving as Chairman, meets regularly to discuss business related to, and establish policy for, projects and facilities under its jurisdiction. Facilities under jurisdiction of the Authority include: the Susquehanna River Bridge (Thomas J. Hatem Memorial Bridge); the Potomac River Bridge (Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge); the Chesapeake Bay Bridge (William Preston Lane, Jr. Memorial Bridge); the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel, including the Harbor Tunnel Approach connecting 1-95; the Baltimore Harbor Outer Crossing (Francis Scott Key Bridge); the John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway; the Fort McHenry Tunnel; and, the Seagirt Marine Terminal. The Authority also issues transportation facility revenue bonds to finance projects on behalf of the Maryland Department of Transportation, including projects at the Port of Baltimore and Baltimore Washington International Airport. MISSION The Maryland Transportation Authority assists the State in achieving its transportation goals by advancing the safe, secure, and convenient movement of people and goods for the benefit of the citizens of Maryland. Tolls, other revenues, and bonding capacity are used to develop, operate, provide law enforcement for, and maintain the Authority's highways, bridges, and tunnels, which serve as vital links in the State's transportation network. Acting on behalf of the Department of Transportation, the Authority also finances and constructs capital projects to improve Maryland's transportation system, including terminal facilities at the Port of Baltimore and the Baltimore-Washington International Airport. The Authority provides law enforcement at the port and airport facilities. The Authority is committed to sound management practices, fiscal responsibility, and prompt, courteous assistance to the traveling public. We are dedicated to teamwork, a diverse workforce, and employee development. VISION Customers will move conveniently and safely through our facilities, as the Authority meets the demands of travel and commerce in the 21st century. The Authority will seek new ways to improve transportation in Maryland and the region through partnerships with the Maryland Department of Transportation and others. Innovative engineering, state-of-the-art technology, professional law enforcement, and results-oriented management will be used to reach this vision. The Authority will continuously strive to foster confidence and citizen pride in Maryland government.

KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Goal 1. Convenience. Move people and goods conveniently. Objective 1.1 Increase average peak hour throughput at the Baltimore Harbor crossings toll plazas (Francis Scott Key Bridge, Baltimore Harbor Tunnel, and Fort McHenry Tunnel) to 17,780 vehicles per hour in 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: The average annual peak hour throughput at the Baltimore Harbor crossings 16,973 16,872 17,432 17,780

I — 644 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOJ00.41 OPERATING PROGRAM (INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE) - NON-BUDGETED FUNDS - MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (Continued)

Objective 1.2 Increase the number of disabled vehicles assisted by the courtesy patrol program to 20,358 in 2005 (100% increase, with 2000, 10,179, as the base). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: The number of vehicles assisted by the courtesy patrol program 15,897 17,918 19,138 20,358

Goal 2. Convenience. Preserve and improve Authority facilities. Objective 2.1 Ensure no Authority bridges or overpasses are categorized as structurally deficient, according to federal functional standards. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: The percent (and number) of bridges and overpasses 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% categorized as structurally deficient by Federal standards (0) (0) (0) (0)

Objective 2.2 Maintain the percentage of Authority bridges and overpasses out of compliance with federal functional standards at 5% or less in 2001 and thereafter. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: The percent (and number) of bridges and overpasses 4.8% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% categorized as functionally obsolete by Federal standards (12) (11) (1 1) (1 1)

Note: Functionally obsolete refers to the bridge's deck geometry, horizontal or vertical clearance, or approach roadway alignment which no longer meets the criteria for the system in which it is an integral part. Structurally deficient refers to a bridge that is restricted to light vehicular traffic, is closed, or requires immediate rehabilitation to remain open.]

Objective 2.3 Respond to all critical deficiencies identified in the annual inspection report within one year of identification.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcomes: The percent of critical items (as identified by the annual inspection report) that were corrected within 1 year of identification 100% 100% 100% 100%

Note: Critical deficiencies include both emergency and non-emergency items. Emergency items are addressed immediately. An appropriate response to a critical deficiency is to achieve a resolution, or to begin necessary repairs, within one year of identification.

I — 645 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOJ00.41 OPERATING PROGRAM (INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE) - NON-BUDGETED FUNDS - MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (Continued)

Goal 3. Safety. Reduce the fatal and injury vehicle collision rate. Objective 3.1 During calendar year 2004, reduce the annual fatal and injury vehicle collision rate to less than 15 collisions per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (an annual reduction of at least 3% per year, based on the calendar year 1999 rate of 17.3). 2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Input: Vehicle miles traveled on Authority facilities (calendar year; in millions of vehicle miles) 3,390 3,4571 3,526 3,597 Outcome: The number of fatal vehicle collisions at Authority facilities (calendar year; 11 in 2000, 16 in 2001) 15 8t 12 12 The number of vehicle collisions involving injuries at Authority facilities (calendar year; 535 in 2000, 570 in 2001) 579 5601 550 540 The annual fatal and injury vehicle collision rate (per 100 million vehicle miles) at Authority facilities (calendar year, 16.8 in 2000, 17.5 in 200 1) 17.5 16.41 15.9 15.3

Objective 3.2 Increase the number of serious commercial vehicle safety violations (e.g., brakes, steering, secured load) detected during inspections to 9,007 in calendar year 2004.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Input: The number of commercial vehicles inspected (calendar year; 20,662 in 2001) 13,134 15,958+ nla nla Outputs: The number of overweight vehicles detected (calendar year; 4,777 in 2001) 5,106 3,7441 nla da Outcome: The number of commercial vehicles and drivers taken out-of-service by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Unit (calendar year; 7,011 in 2001) 4,37 1 4,8841 nla da The number of serious commercial vehicle safety violations detected during inspections (calendar year; 6,370 in 2001) 3,627 6,104f 9,007 9,188

Goal 4. Safety. Reduce workplace accidents. Objective 4.1 Reduce the number of employee lost-time work injuries to 31 in 2005 (a 30% reduction, with 45 injuries in 2000 as the base).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Outcome: The number of work-related injuries involving lost-time

1Calendar year 2003 projection based on data from the first 6 months of the year. da- Values not estimated

I — 646 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOJ00.41 OPERATING PROGRAM (INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE) - NON-BUDGETED FUNDS - MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (Continued)

Goal 5. Security. Protect people and property from unlawful activity. Objective 5.1 Crimes against employees committed at Authority facilities will remain at zero through 2005.

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Output: Reported crimes against employees committed at Authority facilities 0 0 0 0

Objective 5.2 Increase the number of commercial vehicle cargo inspections to 179,000 in calendar year 2005 (a 26% increase, with calendar year 2002 as the base).

2002 2003 2004 2005 Performance Measures Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Output: The total commercial vehicle cargo inspections (calendar year; 143,556 in 2001)

Calendar year 2003 projection based on data from the first 6 months of the year.

I — 647 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

JOOJ00.41 OPERATING PROGRAM (INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE)-NON-BUDGETED

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 03 Communication ...... 04 Travel ...... 06 Fuel and Utilities ...... 07 Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance ...... 08 Contractual Services ...... 09 Supplies and Materials ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: J00701 Toll Revenues and Bond Proceeds ......

I — 648 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

JOOJ00.42 CAPITAL PROGRAM-NON-BUDGETED FUNDS

Appropriation Statement: 2003 2004 2005 Actual Appropriation Allowance

Number of Authorized Positions ...... 01 Salaries. Wages and Fringe Benefits ...... 02 Technical and Special Fees ...... 10 Equipment-Replacement ...... 1 1 Equipment-Additional ...... 12 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions ...... 13 Fixed Charges ...... 14 Land and Structures ...... Total Operating Expenses ...... Total Expenditure ......

Non-budgeted Fund Income: J00701 Toll Revenues and Bond Proceeds ......

I — 649 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Ended Ending Ending June 30,2003 June 30,2004 June 30,2005 Revenues Actual Estimated Estimated

Tolls:

Susquehanna River Toll Bridge $4,430,000 $4,910,000 Potomac River Toll Bridge 9,440,000 9,680,000 Chesapeake Bay Toll Bridge 33,800,000 34,820,000 Francis Scott Key Bridge 18,150,000 22,940,000 Baltimore Harbor Tunnel 34,580,000 43,760,000 Fort McHenry Tunnel 78,110,000 97,540,000 John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway 90,010,000 96,730,000 Concessions-Kennedy Memorial Highway 7,890,000 8,060,000 Seagirt Marine Terminal 7,200,000 7,400,000 Seagirt Marine Terminal Berth IV 305,100 297,500 Commissions, Rental, and Miscellaneous 1,700,000 1,700,000 Investment Income 9,580,000 8,680,000 Baltimore City 1-95 Agreement Participation in Maintenance DOT Participation-BWI Airport Police(includes Equipment cost) 14,387,000 14,370,000 DOT Participation-Port Admin. Police(inc1udes Equipment cost) 4,880,000 5,197,000 Masonville Revenue 1,670,000 1,670,000 In Lieu of Federal Funds 6,000,000 Total

Expenditures: Operating Program: Susquehanna River Toll Bridge Potomac River Toll Bridge Chesapeake Bay Toll Bridge Francis Scott Key Bridge Baltimore Harbor Tunnel Fort McHenry Tunnel John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway Police Headquarters and Traffic Management BWI Airport Police Port Police Administrative and General Sub-Total

Debt Service: Interest on Bonds- 199 1 Series Interest on Bonds-1992 Series Interest on Bonds-1998 Series Payment on Serial Bonds-1991 Series Payment on Serial Bonds-1992 Series Payment on Serial Bonds-1998 Series Debt Service Payment

Total Operating (including Debt Service) Capital Program Total Expenditures

Excess of Revenues over Expenditures Reserves at Beginning of Fiscal Year Total Reserves at End of Fiscal Year

I — 650 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportat ion

FY 2003 FY 2004 Classification Title Expenditure Positions ...... ------j00a01 The Secretary's Office j00a0101 Executive Direction accountant advanced accountant lead specialized admin assistant ii - sg admin assistant iii admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer iii admin officer iii admin spec ii admin spec ii admin spec iii admin spec iii administrator i administrator i administrator ii administrator ii administrator iii administrator iii administrator iv administrator v administrator vi administrator vii asst atty gen iv asst atty gen vi automotive services mechanic building services worker ii conversion class xvi data base specialist ii deputy secy dept of trans div dir ofc atty general dot executive iii dot executive iv dot executive v dot executive vi dp functional analyst ii dp functional analyst supv dp programmer analyst ii dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp quality assurance specialist equal opportunity officer iii executive associate i executive associate ii executive associate iii facility maint supv ii

I — 651 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

jOOaOl The Secretary's Office j00a0101 Executive Direction financial compliance auditor ii fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator v fiscal services administrator v internal auditor lead maint supv i non lic minority business enterprise ag minority business enterprise ag minority business enterprise ag minority business enterprise su obs-admin aide gen obs-management associate office clerk ii personnel administrator i personnel administrator ii personnel administrator ii personnel administrator iii personnel administrator iii personnel administrator iv personnel associate iii personnel associate iv personnel officer ii personnel officer iii personnel technician i personnel technician iv principal counsel procurement administrator vi program manager sr iv pub affairs officer i secy of transportation services specialist services supervisor ii --. TOTAL jOOa0101* j00a0103 Facilities and Capital Equipment admin assistant iii 1 .OO 37, 128 1.OO 37, 128 1.OO 37,844 administrator i 1.OO 37,255 .OO 0 .OO 0 administrator iii 1.OO 61,103 1.OO 61,103 1.OO 62,295 administrator iv 2.00 120,925 2.00 120,925 2.00 123,289 administrator v 1.OO 65,811 1.OO 65,811 1.00 66,455

I — 652 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

j00a0103 Facilities and Capital Equipment administrator vi i 4.00 244,141 4.00 304,141 4.00 308,691 dot executive vi 1 .OO 105,183 1 .OO 105,183 1 .OO 105,183 planner iii 1.00 37,645 1 .OO 37,645 1.00 39,093 program manager sr iv 2.00 59,207 2.00 143,904 2.00 149,552 ------TOTAL j00a0103* 14.00 768,398 13.00 875,840 13.00 892,402 j00a0107 Office of Transportation Technology Services admin assistant ii - sg 2.00 59,106 admin assistant iii 2.00 72,249 admin program manager ii 1 .OO 67,100 admi n spec ii i 1 .OO 38,145 administrator ii i 2.00 116,441 administrator ii i 1 .OO 53,371 administrator iv 1.00 57,011 administrator vi 1 .OO 70,322 administrator vi 2.00 135,524 administrator vi i 1 .OO 72,284 computer info services spec i 1.00 33,055 computer info services spec ii 1.00 47,319 computer network spec i 1 .OO 45,029 computer network spec ii 10.00 524,342 computer network spec manager 1 .OO 68,415 computer network spec supv 4.00 250,000 computer operator i 1 .OO 28,271 computer operator ii 10.00 366,825 computer operator lead 6.00 244,308 computer operator manager i 2.00 114,213 computer operator supervisor 3.00 116,686 data base specialist manager 1 .OO 67,100 data base specialist supv 3.00 184,954 data entry operator i i 6.50 185,704 data entry operator lead 6.00 186,858 data entry operator manager i 1 .OO 38,145 data entry operator manager i i 1 .OO 40,718 dot executive v 1.00 79,407 dp functional analyst ii 3.00 142,283 dp functional analyst supv 1 .OO 52,353 dp production control specialis 2.00 59,438 dp production control specialis 3.00 95,823 dp production control specialis 1 .OO 38,880 dp production control special is 1.00 35,638 dp programmer analyst ii 5.00 247,009 dp programmer analyst lead/adva 2.00 110,137 dp programmer analyst manager 1 .OO 68,415

I — 653 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------j00a0107 Office of Transportation Technology Services dp programmer analyst supervise dp tech support specialist i dp tech support specialist ii dp tech support specialist mana dp tech support specialist supv fiscal accounts clerk supervise it systems technical specialist office clerk ii program manager sr iv --. -. TOTAL j00a0107* TOTAL jOOaOl ** jOObOl State Highway Administration

accountant advanced accountant ii accountant lead specialized accountant manager i accountant manager ii accountant manager iii accountant supervisor i accountant supervisor ii admin assistant i - sg admin assistant ii - sg admin assistant iii admin assistant, exec admin officer i admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer iii admin officer iii admin program manager iv admin spec i admin spec ii adrnin spec iii administrator i administrator i administrator ii administrator ii administrator iii administrator iii administrator iv administrator iv

I — 654 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. j00b01 State Highway Administration

administrator v administrator v administrator vi administrator vi administrator vii administrator vii agency buyer i agency grants specialist ii agency procurement specialist i agency procurement specialist i agency procurement specialist I architect ii asst atty gen iv asst atty gen vi asst atty gen vii asst atty gen viii automotive body repair spec building guard ii building services worker ii capital projects architect cartographer iii coimnssion mbr src computer info services spec i computer info services spec ii computer info services spec sup computer network spec ii computer network spec lead computer network spec manager computer network spec supv computer operator ii computer operator supervisor computer user support specialis contract services asst i contract services asst ii data base specialist ii data base specialist supv dot executive iv dot executive v dot executive vi dp assistant director i dp director ii dp director iii dp functional analyst ii dp functional analyst lead

I — 655 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------. jOObOl State Highway Administration

dp functional analyst supv dp functional analyst trainee dp programmer analyst ii dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp programmer analyst manager dp programmer analyst supervise dp programmer analyst trainee dp quality assurance specialist dp staff specialist drawbridge operator emergency response tech emergency response tech sr engr senior registered civil engr senior registered mechanic environmental analyst i environmental analyst iii environmental analyst iv environmental manager i environmental manager ii equal opportunity officer ii equal opportunity officer iii equal opportunity officer train executive associate i executive associate ii facility maint supv i facility maint supv ii facility maint tech i facility maint tech ii facility maint tech iii facility maint tech iv fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician supe fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator v fiscal services administrator v graphic arts specialist heavy equip maint supv i heavy equip maint supv ii heavy equip maint tech i heavy equip maint tech ii heavy equip maint tech iii heavy equipment body repair /pa

I — 656 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions -. jOObOl State Highway Administration

heavy equipment body repair /pa heavy equipment body repair /pa highway maint chief highway maintenance worker ii highway operations tech ii highway operations tech iii highway operations tech iv illustrator iii internal auditor i internal auditor ii internal auditor lead internal auditor prog supv internal auditor supv it systems technical specialist landscape architect iii landscape architect iv landscape architect v maint chief iv non lic maint supv i lic mdot printer metals inspector iii motor equipment operator ii obs-admin aide gen obs-office secy ii gen office clerk assistant office clerk i office clerk i office clerk ii office clerk ii office services clerk paralegal ii personnel administrator ii personnel associate i personnel associate ii personnel officer ii personnel officer iii photographer iii physician program staff planner i planner iii planner v principal counsel procurement administrator ii procurement administrator iv

I — 657 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------

j00b01 State Highway Administration

procurement associate 111 program manager i program manager ii program manager iii program manager iv pub affairs officer i pub affairs officer ii pub affairs officer ii radio tech ii radio tech ii i radio tech iv real property manager real property review appraiser real property review appraiser real property review appraiser real property specialist i real property specialist ii real property specialist iii real property specialist iv real property supervisor safety management consultant safety management rep i safety management rep ii safety management rep iii services specialist services supervisor ii services supervisor iii sha chief engineer maintenance sha deputy administrator sha deputy chief engr bridge de sha deputy chief engr matis r sha deputy chief engr traffic sha deputy chief eng. construct sha director environmental desi sha director of administration sha director of finance sha director of real estate shop administrative technician shop administrative technician shop administrative technician sign operations manager sign operations supervisor sign technician ii sign technician iii

I — 658 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions ...... ------j00b01 State Highway Administration

sign technician iv state highway administrator stock clerk ii supply officer ii supply officer iv traffic control technician i traffic control technician ii traffic control technician iii traffic control technician supe trans engineer i trans engineer ii trans engineer iii trans engineer iv trans engineer v trans engineering manager i trans engineering manager ii trans engineering technician i trans engineering technician iv trans engineering technician v trans facilities maint supv iii trans facilities maint worker i trans facilities maint worker i transportation engineering tech transportation engineering tech webmaster supervisor ------TOTAL jOObOIOO* 3,353.00 136,680,384 3,282.00 TOTAL j00b01 ** 3,353.00 136,680,384 3,282.00

I — 659 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions ------

jOOdOO Maryland Port Administration j00d0001 Port Operations accountant advanced 46,790 accountant ii 44,669 admin assistant i - sg 59,190 admin assistant ii - sg 133,421 admin assistant in 362,I78 admin officer i 201,820 admin officer iii 48,239 admin officer iii 48,239 administrator i 96,401 administrator ii 55,027 administrator iii 115,403 administrator iv 178,697 administrator v 138,170 administrator vi 55,806 asst atty gen vi 78,896 asst atty gen vii 85,142 budget manager 79,664 chf boat maintenance 43,123 chf exec staffing programs 0 chf financial officer treasur 105,000 compensation mgr 62,801 comptroller 85,142 computer network spec lead 57,107 computer network spec manager 67,099 computer user support specialis 35,685 conversion class xv 42,990 crane electrical spec 367,906 New crane electrician 1,032,402 New crane mechanic 1,006,918 New crane mechanical spec 151,964 New data base specialist ii 112,070 deputy dir marketing 93,000 deputy exec dir-marketing ope 115,000 director marketing lO5,OOO director-operations 95,000 dot executive assoc iii 39,632 dot executive asst i 158,973 dot executive asst ii 107,260 dot executive asst iii 242,686 dot executive asst v 287,699 dot executive asst vi 79,664 dot executive officer iii 103,038 dot executive v 89,250 dot executive vi 72,719

I — 660 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

jOOdOO Maryland Port Administration j00d0001 Port Operations dp assistant director ii dp functional analyst ii dp programmer analyst supervise dp staff specialist supv dp tech support specialist ii equal opportunity officer iii executive assistant executive associate i executive associate ii executive director facility maint supv i facility maint supv ii facility maint tech i facility maint tech iii fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts clerk manager fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician supe fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i foreman crane elect foreman crane mech foreman supply gen mgr crane maintenance gen mgr facility maintenance gen mgr information services gen mgr intlL sales gen mgr sales graphic arts specialist heavy equip maint tech iii heavy equip management officer internal auditor ii maint craftsman spec maint high voltage crane electr maint hvac spec maint mechanic marine plaza clerk market analyst asst master port endeavor mdot printer mgr human resources mgr international sales mgr market analyst mgr market planning

I — 661 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 Classification Title Positions ...... ------jOOdOO Maryland Port Administration j00d0001 Port Operations mgr ro/ro cargo development mgr south amer latin amer sal mgr south amer latin amer tr mgr traffic/intermodal motor boat operator obs-asst mgr operations obs-boat maintenance spec obs-fleet mech spec obs-foreman maintenance obs-interagency rel mgr obs-legal secretary obs-marketing regional sales mg obs-mgr distribution services obs-mgr quality customer serv obs-mgr risk management obs-procurement associate iii - obs-project/administrative mana obs-safety specialist obs-stationary engineer office services clerk personnel administrator i personnel associate ii personnel officer ii personnel specialist iii principal counsel, port admin procurement administrator i procurement administrator ii procurement administrator v procurement associate iii pub affairs officer pub affairs officer ii real estate administrator sai lor services specialist skilled trade specialist ii stock clerk i stock clerk ii supply specialist/technician supv crane elect supv crane mech supv terminal maint wtc building manager wtc maint svcs mgr

I — 662 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------j00d0002 Port Facilities and Capital Equipment admin assistant ii - sg 1 .OO 33,493 admin assistant iii 2.00 54,256 administrator ii 1 .OO 55,027 administrator ii 1 .OO 57,194 administrator iii 1 .OO 0 administrator iv 1 .OO 64,029 administrator v 1 .OO 72,518 administrator vi 3.00 178,501 computer info services spec ii 2.00 47,319 crane mechanic 1 .OO 47,701 deputy dir-harbor development 1.00 87,000 deputy exec dir-planning fina 1.00 123,571 design engineering associate ii 1.00 57,658 director-engineering 1 .OO 102,644 dot executive v 2.00 180,325 equal opportunity officer ii 1 .OO 34,908 executive associate i 1 .OO 44,314 fiscal services administrator i 1.00 68,415 obs-cadd administrator 1 .OO 58,783 obs-mgr design engineering 1 .OO 73,107 obs-project design engineer 1.00 58,783 planner i 1 .OO 24,578 planner iv 1 .OO 55,027 planner v 2.00 90,101 procurement administrator i 1 .OO 53,975 procurement administrator ii 1 .OO 62,296 program manager iii 1 .OO 62,598 program manager sr ii 1 .OO 87,526 project construct insp eng asso 5.00 257,777 trans engineer iii 2.00 37,215 trans engineer iv 2.00 107,041 trans engineer v 2.00 107,783 trans engineering technician iv 1 .OO 0 ------TOTAL j00d0002* 46.00 2,445,463 TOTAL jOOdOO ** 314.00 15,304,715 jOOeOO Motor Vehicle Administration j00e0001 Motor Vehicle Operations accountant advanced 11.00 505,375 11.00 accountant manager ii 1 .OO 62,096 1.00 accountant supervisor ii 1 .OO 52,353 1 .OO admin assistant i - sg 5.00 106,424 4.00 admin assistant ii - sg 15.00 448,064 14.00 admin assistant iii 30.00 959,046 29.00

I — 663 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. jOOeOO Motor Vehicle Administration jOOeOOOl Motor Vehicle Operations admin assistant, exec admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer iii admin officer iii admin spec i admin spec ii admin spec iii administrator i administrator ii administrator iii administrator iii administrator iv administrator v administrator v administrator vi administrator vii agency budget spec ii agency procurement specialist i agency procurement specialist i agency procurement specialist I asst atty gen v asst atty gen vi asst atty gen viii asst mva branch manager i asst mva branch manager ii automotive services specialist building guard ii building services worker ii chf facility maint officer clerical assistant comunicatns supv motor veh adm computer info services spec i computer info services spec ii computer info services spec sup computer network spec ii computer network spec lead computer network spec manager computer network spec supv consmr serv investgtr iii customer agent i customer agent ii customer agent iii

I — 664 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------jOOeOO Motor Vehicle Administration jOOeOOOl Motor Vehicle Operations customer agent iv dot executive assoc i dot executive assoc ii dot executive assoc iii dot executive assoc iv dot executive asst ii dot executive asst iii dot executive asst vi dot executive iv dot executive officer i dot executive officer iii dot executive v dp assistant director iii dp functional analyst ii dp programmer analyst i dp programmer analyst ii dp programmer analyst lead/adva dp programmer analyst manager dp programmer analyst supervise dp programmer analyst trainee dp quality assurance manager dp quality assurance specialist dp staff specialist driver license agent i driver license agent ii driver license agent iii electronic tech iii emp training spec iv equal opportunity officer ii executive associate i executive associate ii facility maint supv ii facility maint tech iii field agent ii mva fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal accounts technician supe fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator i fiscal services administrator v heavy equip maint supv i internal auditor ii internal auditor lead

I — 665 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. jOOeOO Motor Vehicle Administration jOOeOOOl Motor Vehicle Operations internal auditor supv it systems technical specialist it systems technical specialist maint chief i non lie maint mechanic mdot printer motor vehicle administrator mva branch manager i mva branch manager ii mva deputy administrator mva section manager central pro mva section manager investigati mva section manager vehicle ins mva veip regional supervisor mva veip representative nurse case reviewer obs-fiscal associate i obs-fiscal associate ii obs-management associate obs-office secy ii gen office clerk assistant office clerk ii office services clerk office services clerk lead personnel administrator i personnel administrator ii personnel administrator iii personnel administrator iv personnel associate iii personnel officer i personnel officer ii personnel officer iii physician program manager i police officer ii police officer iii police officer supervisor principal counsel print shop supv ii print shop supv iii procurement administrator i procurement administrator iii procurement administrator v program manager ii publications specialist ii

I — 666 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

jOOeOO Motor Vehicle Administration jOOeOOO1 Motor Vehicle Operations safety management consultant 1.OO safety management rep ii 1.OO skilled trade specialist i 7.00 skilled trade specialist ii 5.00 skilled trade specialist iii 1 .OO skilled trade specialist supv 2.00 supply officer i 4.00 supply officer iii 1.OO supply officer iv 1.OO teletypewriter operator 1.OO trans facilities maint worker i 4.00 webmaster ii 1.OO ------TOTAL jOOe0001* 1,637.00 j00e0003 Facilities and Capital Equipment admin assistant iii administrator ii administrator iv administrator v administrator v dot executive asst vi dot executive ii trans engineer v trans engineering manager ii

TOTAL j00e0003* TOTAL jOOeOO **

I — 667 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

jOOhOI Maryland Transit Administration jOOhOIO1 Transit Administration accountant accountant advanced accountant i accountant ii accountant lead accountant manager i accountant manager ii accountant supervisor ii accounting clerk admin assistant i - sg admin assistant ii - sg admin assistant iii admin assistant, exec admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer iii admin officer iii admin spec ii admin spec ii administrator i administrator i administrator ii administrator ii administrator iii administrator iii administrator iv administrator iv administrator v administrator v administrator vi administrator vii administrator, mta administrator, mta acting asst atty gen vi asst supv rev control chf counsel, mta claims representative i claims representative ii claims representative iii claims spec clerk-fiscal management computer info services spec ii computer info services spec ma computer info services spec su

I — 668 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions -. j00h01 Maryland Transit Administration j00h0101 Transit Administration computer network spec i computer network spec supv computer network spec trainee cost price clerk data entry clerk ii director office of administrat director office of finance dot executive iv dot executive v dot executive vi dp director i i dp programmer analyst lead/adv dp programmer analyst manager dp programmer analyst supervis dp programmer analyst supervis employee selection spec i equal opportunity officer ii equal opportunity officer iii executive associate i executive associate ii fiscal accounts clerk ii fiscal accounts technician ii fiscal services administrator fiscal services administrator fiscal services administrator fiscal services administrator graphic arts specialist guard-money truck i Ilustrator i i i Ilustrator ii i information service clerk internal auditor ii internal auditor Lead keypunch operator marketing specialist mgr media/public re1 money counter mta exec dir of safety risk obs-fiscal administrator ii obs-fiscal specialist iii office clerk personnel administrator i personnel administrator ii personnel administrator ii

I — 669 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. j00h01 Maryland Transit Administration jOOhOIOI Transit Administration personnel administrator iii personnel associate i personnel associate ii personnel associate iii personnel officer ii personnel officer ii personnel technician iii photographer - lith tech printer procurement administrator i procurement administrator v program manager sr iv pub affairs officer ii safety officer shipping clerk storeroom attendant supt - bus maint division supv bus mat/stores supv rail mat/stores supv rev control supv transportation

TOTAL jOOhOIOI* jOOh0102 Bus Operations admin assistant i - sg 50,675 admin assistant ii - sg 31,225 admin assistant ii - sg 0 admin assistant iii 26,856 admin officer ii 44,575 administrator iii 229,738 administrator iv 126,350 administrator v 384,031 administrator vi 73,545 administrator vi 144,288 asst supt transportation 0 asst supt transportation 538,567 New chf program control 73,545 chf scheduling 50,834 chf supv transportation 220,357 cleaner a 1,523,634 New2 cleaner b 544,155 deputy admin, mta 105,644 dispatcher 803,024

I — 670 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

j00h0102 Bus Operations div secretary 189,284 dot executive iv 81,580 dot executive vi 95,039 executive associate ii 42,826 gen supt quality assurance 63,175 instr - bus operations 340,520 instr - bus veh maint 197,142 jani tor-bus 217,662 maint control clerk 371,650 maint engineer - rail 59,133 mgr fleet 52,155 mgr ops plan sched 72,129 obs-admin aide gen 36,639 obs-fiscal administrator iii 64,412 obs-supt - quality assurance 59,133 operator 50,943,375 porter 192,455 program manager iv 78,597 quality assur spec 101,668 repairman a 14,627,649 repairman b 872,120 repairman c 1,744,240 resv clerk 225,102 schedule clerk 313,110 senior transit analyst 50,834 starter 425,079 supt transportation 338,118 New supt - bus maint division 394,824 supt - fac maint 58,000 supt - ops planning 59,133 supt - ops scheduling 54,734 supt - radio maint 59,133 supv facilities rnaint bus 135,930 supv maint bus 1,572,514 supv maint bus 96,886 supv passenger coord 50,834 supv systems maint 198,093 supv transportation 3,754,289 New15 supv transportation 46,615 technician 684,684 training specialist, mta 50,833 transit analyst 97,625 vault puller 387,171 ------TOTAL jOOh0102* 84,527,167

I — 671 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------j00h0104 Rail Operations admin assistant i - sg admin assistant ii - sg admin assistant iii admin assistant, exec admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer iii admin spec i admin spec iii administrator iii administrator v administrator vi administrator vii asst supt transportation chf program scheduling chf supv transportation cleaner comunicatns supv law enforcmn corporal mta police dispatcher div secretary dot executive iv facility maint supv ii facility maint tech iv instr - rail elec instr - rail ops instr - rail veh maint janitor maint control clerk maint engineer - rail mgr systems/equip engr mta police chief mta police lieutenant mta police major mta police officer mta police sergeant obs-supt - field electronics operator police radio corn i police radio corn ii repairman a repairman b repairman c senior drafter

I — 672 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------j00h0104 Rail Operations station attendant supt - fac maint supt - maint of way supt - rail elec maint supt - rail heavy repair supt - transportation supv catenary supv facilities maint rail supv maint of way supv rail car maint supv rail heavy repair supv service insp supv service insp supv service insp supv systems maint supv transportation trainmaster

TOTAL jOOh0104* j00h0105 Facilities and Capital Equipment admin assistant ii - sg 4.00 admin assistant iii 3.00 admin officer i 2.00 admin spec ii 1.OO admin spec iii 1.OO administrator i 1.OO administrator i 3.00 administrator ii 3.00 administrator ii 5.00 administrator iii 1.OO administrator iv 2.00 administrator iv 10.00 administrator v 3.00 administrator vi 2.00 administrator vi 2.00 administrator vii 3.00 agency procurement specialist 1.OO architect i 1.OO chf engr, change order 1.OO chf equipment engr 2.00 chf intergovt re1 1.OO chf program control 1.OO director office of engineering 1.00 director office of plan/prog 1.OO

I — 673 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

j00h0105 Facilities and Capital Equipment dot executive iv dot executive v dp functional analyst i e t iv planning engr senior electrical executive associate i mgr contract admin mgr systems engineering mgr systems/equip engr obs-admin aide gen obs-plan/prog analyst obs-right of way agent iv planner iii planner iv planner iv planner v planner v principal eng - rolling stock principal project engr principal systems engr procurement administrator i procurement administrator ii procurement associate iii program manager iii program manager sr i real property specialist iii real property supervisor schedule cost engr senior drafter trans engineer iv trans engineer v trans engineering manager i trans engineering manager ii

TOTAL j00h0105* TOTAL j00h01 **

jOOiOO Maryland Aviation Administration j00i0002 Airport Operations accountant advanced 1.OO accountant i 1.OO accountant ii 2.00 accountant lead specialized 1.OO admin assistant i - sg 3.00 admin assistant ii - sg 10.00

I — 674 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

jOOiOO Maryland Aviation Administr j00i0002 Airport Operations admin assistant iii admin assistant, exec admin officer i admin officer ii admin officer ii admin officer iii admin spec ii admin spec iii administrator i administrator i administrator ii administrator iii administrator iii administrator iv administrator v administrator vi administrator vii agency budget spec ii agency buyer i agency buyer ii agency buyer iii air traffic control specialist air traffic control supervisor air traffic manager aircraft service worker airport div fire chief, fire op airport div fire chief, fire tr airport fire captain airport fire lieutenant airport firefighter i airport firefighter ii airport firefighter trainee airport maintenance technician airport maintenance technician airport management assistant airport management officer i airport management officer ii airport management officer iii airport management specialist i airport management specialist i airport paramedic airport paramedic firefighter airport paramedic lieutenant asst atty gen v

I — 675 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol

jOOiOO Maryland Aviation Administration j00i0002 Airport Operations asst atty gen vi 79,664 building services worker ii 25,201 chf facility maint officer 58,782 commercial management officer i 146,637 commercial management officer i 96,865 computer info services spec ii 47,319 computer network spec ii 168,006 computer network spec supv 111,744 computer user support specialis 113,051 data base specialist ii 51,854 dot executive iii 71,589 dot executive iv 284,240 dot executive v 701,942 dp assistant director ii 73,109 dp tech support specialist ii 63,512 emp training spec iv 99,001 employee selection spec ii 52,945 engr senior registered mechanic 59,931 environmental analyst iii 51,027 environmental manager i 64,655 equal opportunity officer iii 38,691 executive associate i 45,174 executive associate ii 45,977 facilities maint sup i 627,547 New facility maint supv ii 201,721 facility maint tech i 187,296 facility maint tech iii 1,152,906 facility maint tech iv 300,601 facility maintenance technician 320,633 New fiscal accounts clerk ii 119,748 fiscal accounts clerk supervise 70,409 fiscal accounts technician ii IZ9.071 fiscal accounts technician supe 31,836 fiscal services administrator i 58,782 fiscal services administrator i 186,172 fiscal services administrator i 67,758 fiscal services administrator i 62,596 fiscal services administrator v 141,829 fiscal services administrator v 61,292 heavy equip maint supv i 44,744 heavy equip maint supv ii 84,031 heavy equip maint tech i 26,329 heavy equip maint tech ii 101,674 heavy equip maint tech iii 118,519

I — 676 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. jOOiOO Maryland Aviation Administration jOOiOOO2 Airport Operations housekeeping supv IV 215,132 New internal auditor i 0 internal auditor ii 155,580 internal auditor lead 55,027 maa deputy administrator 187,230 obs-mpa stationary engineer 39,632 office clerk ii 32,093 office services clerk 91,468 office supervisor 35,738 paralegal ii 38,881 personnel administrator i 55,027 personnel administrator ii 59,357 personnel administrator iii 112,370 personnel administrator iv 69,755 personnel associate iii 77,762 personnel technician iii 38,881 principal counsel 97,281 procurement administrator i 55,027 procurement administrator ii 58,782 procurement associate ii - sg 70,346 program manager i 62,199 program manager iii 70,322 program manager iv 161,691 pub affairs officer ii 141,057 public information assistant i 75,166 public information assistant ii 539,931 public information assistant ii 69, I62 public information supervisor 39,569 research statistician iv 45,680 safety management consultant 57,659 safety management rep ii 41,111 safety management rep iii 49,654 skilled trade specialist iii 325,945 skilled trade specialist supv 177,704 skilled trade specialist I1 1,221,738 New state aviation administrator 185,000 warehouse assistant supervisor 55,560 warehouse supervisor 33,441 ------21,234,830 j00i0003 Airport Facilities and Capital Equipment accountant advanced 1 .OO 0 .OO accountant ii 1 .OO 43,893 1 .OO

I — 677 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol -. j00i0003 Airport Facilities and Capital Equipment admin assistant i - sg admin assistant ii - sg admin assistant iii admin officer i admin officer iii admin program manager iv administrator i administrator ii administrator iii administrator iv administrator v administrator vi agency budget spec i agency procurement specialist i airport management officer ii architect ii asst atty gen vi capital projects architect computer network spec ii dot executive iv e t vi const environmental analyst ii equal opportunity officer iii housing rehabilitation speciali maa director, facilities develo maa director, facilities planni planner ii planner iii planner iv procurement administrator i procurement administrator v program manager i program manager iii program manager iv real property specialist iii safety management rep iii trans engineer iii trans engineer iv trans engineer v trans engineering manager ii trans engineering technician iv transportation engineering tech

TOTAL jOOi0003* TOTAL jOOiOO **

I — 678 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

JOOjOO Maryland Transportation Authority

accountant advanced 98,765 accountant ii 45,103 accountant supervisor ii 59,932 admin assistant i - sg 104,875 admin assistant ii - sg 571,127 New admin assistant iii 634,736 admin assistant, exec 313,524 admin officer i 79,909 admin officer iii 86,720 admin spec ii 31,303 admin spec iii 38,880 administrator ii 157,466 administrator ii 48,550 administrator iii 54,942 administrator v 69,755 administrator vi 73,825 agency budget spec i 36,323 agency procurement speci 44,245 architect ii 54,502 asst atty gen v 71,011 asst atty gen vi 157,792 building guard ii 204,344 New comnunications clerk ii 28,385 computer info services s 47,779 computer network spec i 50,535 computer network spec ii 46,287 computer network spec ma 69,755 computer network spec su 61,006 data base specialist i 75,948 data base specialist ii 156,969 dot executive iv 422,581 dot executive vi 100,176 equal opportunity office 51,028 executive associate i 40,656 executive associate ii 48,238 facility maint supv i 775,203 facility maint supv ii 358,669 facility maint tech i 362,961 facility maint tech ii 171,992 facility maint tech iii 4,066,392 facility maint tech iv 1,486,629 financial compliance aud 59,932 fiscal services administ 54,412 fiscal services administ 84,323

I — 679 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ...... ------jOOjOO Maryland Transportation Authority

heavy equip maint supv i 178,982 heavy equip maint supv i 48,238 heavy equip maint tech i 21,285 heavy equip maint tech i 221,421 heavy equip maint tech i 584,123 heavy equip management o 41,302 highway operations tech 234,147 New highway operations tech 38,572 highway operations tech 70,237 highway operations tech 45,173 dot printer 57,844 mdta administrative offi 130,928 mdta administrative offi 80,920 mdta administrative spec 36,428 mdta administrator i 139,309 New mdta administrator ii 207,993 mdta administrator iii 250,181 mdta administrator iv 214,192 New mdta administrator v 115,467 mdta administrator vi 220,756 mdta administrator vii 472,637 mdta asst executive seer 101,982 mdta communications equi 29,296 mdta communications equi 41,504 mdta communications equi 43,472 mdta counsel 84,868 mdta dep director strate 57,373 mdta director of adminis 84,181 mdta director of enginee 89,977 mdta director of facilit 89,977 mdta director of finance 94,628 mdta director strategic 88,387 mdta electronic equipen 220,996 mdta electronic equipen 123,885 mdta electronic equipen 51,519 mdta executive secretary 0 mdta fund analyst iii 85,185 mdta housekeeper i 37,871 mdta housekeeper ii 333,466 mdta human resources adm 69,086 mdta motor carrier inspe 368,586 New mdta motor carrier inspe 749,203 mdta police cadet 342,510 mdta police captain 792,131

I — 680 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

FY 2003 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2005 Classification Title Positions Expenditure Positions Appropriation Positions Allowance Symbol ------jOOjOO Maryland Transportation Authority

mdta police chief 290,956 mdta police corporal 3,737,288 mdta police lieutenant 968,646 mdta police major 363,620 mdta police officer i 2,300,055 mdta police officer ii 13,056,240 New mdta police sergeant 1,948,737 mdta police sergeant 67,863 mdta regional admin, cen 85,837 mdta regional admin, nor 84,181 mdta shop clerk 58,204 mdta stock clerk ii 189,688 mdta supervising engines 55,564 mdta telecomunicator i 111,969 mdta telecomunicator ii 1,350,274 New mdta telecomunicator su 382,859 mdta toll collection sup 266,844 mdta toll collection sup 307,641 mdta toll collector i 1,520,298 mdta toll collector ii 832,159 mdta toll collector iii 4,550,470 mdta toll revenue clerk 93,309 mdta toll revenue clerk 180,984 mdta toll revenue clerk 245,350 mdta toll revenue clerk 114,109 mdta toll revenue clerk 708,465 mdta toll revenue clerk 68,270 mdta toll revenue clerk 35,740 mdta toll sergeant 2,165,575 mdta vehicle recovery te 409,301 New mdta vehicle recovery te 858,054 New mdta vehicle recovery te 301,312 obs-admin aide gen 221,718 obs-admin assistant i 21,675 office clerk ii 29,197 office clerk ii 29,755 office services clerk 147,107 personnel administrator 349,978 personnel administrator 54,502 personnel associate i 26,243 personnel associate ii 38,572 personnel associate ii 36,084 personnel associate iii 38,512 personnel clerk 26,028

I — 681 PERSONNEL DETAIL Transportation

JOOjOO Maryland Transportation Authority

personnel officer i personnel officer ii personnel specialist ii personnel technician iii planner iv print shop supv iii procurement associate ii program manager sr ii program manager sr iv pub affairs officer i public information assis public information super safety management consul safety management rep ii services specialist shop administrative tech skilled trade specialist skilled trade specialist skilled trade specialist trans engineer iii trans engineer iv trans engineer v trans engineering manage trans engineering techni trans engineering techni trans engineering techni trans engineering techni trans engineering techni trans facilities maint w trans facilities maint w

TOTAL jOOjOOOO* TOTAL jOOjOO **

I — 682